Next Article in Journal
Mast Cells and Skin and Breast Cancers: A Complicated and Microenvironment-Dependent Role
Next Article in Special Issue
Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveals Core Regulatory Programs That Determine the Heterogeneity of Circulating and Tissue-Resident Memory CD8+ T Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Targeting Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Cells by Ingenol Mebutate (PEP005) Correlates with PKCδ Activation, ROS Induction as Well as Downregulation of XIAP and c-FLIP
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tissue–Resident Memory T Cells in Chronic Inflammation—Local Cells with Systemic Effects?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/cells10050989
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

TGF-β: Many Paths to CD103+ CD8 T Cell Residency

by
Zhijuan Qiu
,
Timothy H. Chu
and
Brian S. Sheridan
*
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Infectious Diseases, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2021, 10(5), 989; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10050989
Submission received: 19 March 2021 / Revised: 19 April 2021 / Accepted: 21 April 2021 / Published: 23 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
CD8 tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells primarily reside in nonlymphoid tissues without recirculating and provide front-line protective immunity against infections and cancers. CD8 TRM cells can be generally divided into CD69+ CD103− TRM cells (referred to as CD103− TRM cells) and CD69+ CD103+ TRM cells (referred to as CD103+ TRM cells). TGF-β plays a critical role in the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of tissue-specific activation of TGF-β mediated by integrins and how it contributes to CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development and maintenance. Furthermore, we discuss the underlying mechanisms utilized by TGF-β to regulate the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells. Overall, this review highlights the importance of TGF-β in regulating this unique subset of memory CD8 T cells that may shed light on improving vaccine design to target this population.

1. Introduction

Immunological memory is a hallmark of adaptive immunity and the basis of vaccination. Memory CD8 T cells, as an important component of immunological memory, play a critical role in mediating long-term protective immunity against intracellular pathogens and cancers. Based on their migratory patterns, memory CD8 T cells can be divided into circulating effector memory T (TEM) and central memory T (TCM) cells and noncirculating tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. TEM cells recirculate between blood, nonlymphoid tissues, and secondary lymphoid organs. TCM cells recirculate between blood and secondary lymphoid organs. TRM cells reside within a particular tissue and do not recirculate during homeostasis. Circulating memory T cells and TRM cells differ in their protective nature and timing for immunologic impact. Upon re-exposure to pathogens, while circulating memory T cells need to be recruited to infected tissues to exert their protective function, TRM cells are prepositioned in the tissue to respond immediately, representing a first-line defense against invading pathogens. TGF-β is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays an important role in regulating many cellular processes such as fibrogenesis and carcinogenesis [8,9,10,11]. It is produced and sensed by a variety of immune cells and regulates many aspects of an immune response [11,12,13]. While the role of TGF-β in the formation of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells appears absolute and is the focus of this review, TGF-β signaling is also important in numerous other immunologic processes associated with CD8 T cells, such as the formation and maintenance of circulating memory CD8 T cells [14]. TGF-β signals provided during the effector phase favors memory precursor effector cells and promotes the formation of circulating memory CD8 T cells [14,15,16], while TGF-β signaling provided during memory homeostasis controls the maintenance of circulating memory CD8 T cells by preserving their phenotypic and functional identity [14]. This review focuses on the diverse role of TGF-β in the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells by skewing the population towards a memory precursor effector cell (MPEC) phenotype and by regulating Itgae (which encodes CD103) and Klf2 expression.

2. CD8 TRM Cells and Their Protective Functions

CD8 TRM cells primarily reside in nonlymphoid tissues and are phenotypically, functionally, transcriptionally, and metabolically distinct from circulating memory T cell subsets [1,2,3,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Phenotypically, CD8 TRM cells predominately express CD69, an albeit imperfect marker that is commonly used to distinguish CD8 TRM cells from their circulating counterparts, and the majority of those CD8 TRM cells that reside within epithelium also express the αE integrin, CD103 [2,27,28]. CD69 interacts with sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor S1PR1 and promotes early CD8 T cell retention in nonlymphoid tissues by inhibiting S1PR1-mediated tissue egress [18,29,30,31,32,33]. CD103 binds to E-cadherin expressed in adherens junctions of epithelial cells and plays an important role in the accumulation and retention of CD8 TRM cells in barrier tissues [18,27,31,34,35]. CD8 TRM cells functionally differ from circulating memory T cells; however, the difference varies among tissues and subjects of studies. For example, CD8 TRM cells in the small intestine epithelium express more granzyme B but less cytokines IFNγ, TNFα, and IL-2 than circulating memory T cells [17,27]. While CD8 TRM cells in the mouse liver express more granzyme B, IFNγ, and TNFα than circulating memory T cells [36], those in the human liver display lower granzyme B, higher perforin, IFNγ, and IL-2 than circulating memory T cells [37]. CD8 TRM cells in the skin express higher CD49a than their circulating counterparts, a marker that is associated with the expression of cytotoxic effector proteins such as granzyme B and perforin [2,38], suggesting that skin CD8 TRM cells may be more cytotoxic than circulating memory T cells. CD8 TRM cells exhibit a unique transcriptional profile that is fundamentally distinct from circulating memory T cells [18,19,20,21,22,23]. A core gene signature comprising both upregulated and downregulated genes shared by CD8 TRM cells at different anatomic locations, including the skin, lung, and small intestine, has been defined [18]. Among upregulated genes are various adhesion molecules like Itga1 (encodes CD49a), Itgae (encodes CD103), and Cdh1 (encodes E-cadherin) that are known or likely to be associated with tissue retention, while the most prominent downregulated gene is S1pr1 that is required for tissue egress, all of which presumably contribute to the establishment and maintenance of tissue residency. Finally, CD8 TRM cells are metabolically distinct from circulating memory T cells. CD8 TRM cells, but not their circulating memory counterparts, upregulate fatty-acid-binding protein (FABP) 4 and 5 expression, allowing them to use exogenous free fatty acid and oxidative metabolism for survival and long-term maintenance in the tissue [26]. A recent study showed that tumor cells also upregulate FABP4 and FABP5 expression and outcompete tumor reactive CD8 TRM cells for lipid uptake leading to TRM cell death [39]. Interestingly, PD-L1 blockade decreases FABP4 and FABP5 expression in tumor cells while upregulating expression of these molecules in TRM cells, promoting TRM cell survival and their antitumor response [39].
CD8 TRM cells play a critical role in protective immunity against infections and cancers [2,7,25,34,36,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. They are prepositioned in the tissue to respond immediately to pathogen re-encounter and mediate protective immunity through multiple mechanisms. CD8 TRM cells express high levels of cytotoxic granules such as granzyme B and can rapidly and directly lyse infected cells [17,27,36,38]. Upon reactivation by local antigen, CD8 TRM cells rapidly release cytokines including IFNγ, TNFα, and IL-2. IFNγ in turn triggers tissue-wide expression of diverse antimicrobial genes [47], and induces expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) on local endothelial cells, which mediates the recruitment of circulating memory T and B cells [48,49]. TNFα is essential for the maturation of dendritic cells by promoting the lymph node homing receptor CCR7 and costimulatory molecule CD86 expression, while IL-2 is critical for NK cell activation by inducing granzyme B expression [49]. Upon antigenic rechallenge, CD8 TRM cells undergo profound in situ proliferation, contributing to the local recall response and secondary TRM cell populations [50,51]. Finally, antigenic reactivation can lead to the lymphatic exit of CD8 TRM cells from their tissue of residence to rejoin the circulation [52,53,54]. These former CD8 TRM cells have the plasticity to give rise to circulating memory T cells, preferably circulating effector memory T cells, at different anatomical locations, as well as TRM cells in the secondary lymphoid organs [52,53,54]. They also maintain the propensity to return to their tissue of origin and redifferentiate into TRM cells [53,54]. Of note, a recent study showed that aged mice exhibit excessive accumulation of CD8 TRM cells in the lung after a viral infection as a result of elevated TGF-β in the infected aged lung [55]. These CD8 TRM cells display diminished effector functions and consequently fail to provide protective immunity against secondary infection. Instead, they cause chronic lung inflammation and fibrosis. Therefore, CD8 TRM cells that provide protective immunity in young individuals may be detrimental in aged individuals.

3. The Role of TGF-β in CD8 TRM Cell Development and Maintenance

Studies in the past decade have demonstrated that TGF-β signaling is required for the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells, but not CD103− CD8 TRM cells, in many tissues including the lung, small intestine, skin, salivary glands, and brain [18,27,31,34,35,56,57,58,59,60]. Of note, TGF-β signaling promotes the accumulation of CD103− CD8 TRM cells in the extravascular compartment of the kidney by promoting effector T cell extravasation [61]. TGF-β signaling does not seem to affect the overall accumulation of effector CD8 T cells in the tissue at the peak of the T cell response [18,34,57]. However, in the absence of TGF-β signaling, tissue-infiltrating CD8 T cells are not able to upregulate CD103 expression and fail to differentiate into CD103+ CD8 TRM cells [18,27,31,34,35,57]. Moreover, tissue-infiltrating cells that fail to receive TGF-β signals are not maintained long term in the tissue [18,34,57]. Interestingly, during chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection, although CD8 T cells that lack TGF-β signaling are not able to differentiate into CD103+ CD8 TRM cells, they are maintained efficiently in the tissue due to the continuous replenishment of effector CD8 T cells from the circulation [57]. In this model, CD8 T cells that lack TGF-β signaling have increased gut-homing receptor α4β7 expression and an enhanced ability to migrate to the tissue in the presence of continued antigen and/or inflammation [57], though this was not observed in a model of a rapidly controlled bacterial infection [34].

4. Integrin-Mediated Activation of TGF-β in the Development and Maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM Cells

TGF-β is synthesized as a precursor, consisting of the N-terminal latency-associated peptide (LAP) and the C-terminal mature cytokine [11,12,13,62]. The LAP is cleaved from the mature TGF-β cytokine in the Golgi by protease furin but remains noncovalently associated with the cytokine, preventing the access of the cytokine to its receptor. The LAP-TGF-β complex (also referred to as the small latent complex, SLC) can further associate with latent TGF-β binding protein (LTBP) through interactions with LAP to form the large latent complex (LLC). The LTBP can bind to proteins of the extracellular matrix (ECM) such as fibronectin and fibrillin and facilitate the deposition and storage of the LLC into the ECM after secretion. The activation of TGF-β requires the release of active TGF-β from the latent complex (Figure 1). The most effective and understood mechanism to activate TGF-β is through the integrins αvβ6 and αvβ8, which bind to the arginine–glycine–aspartic acid (RGD) motif in the LAP causing the release of TGF-β from the latent complex though physical force [11,12,13,62].
Integrin-mediated TGF-β activation plays an important role in multiple steps of CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development and their long-term maintenance. During homeostasis, αv-expressing migratory dendritic cells (DC) activate TGF-β and present it to naïve CD8 T cells in lymph nodes through noncognate but MHC I-dependent interaction to precondition these naïve CD8 T cells for effective differentiation into epidermal CD103+ CD8 TRM cells in the skin upon immune activation [63]. While resident DC expressing αv integrins in the epidermis do not seem to play a role in the development of epidermal CD103+ CD8 TRM cells, keratinocytes expressing αvβ6 and αvβ8 are required for the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells in the epidermis [63,64,65]. Several cell types in the epidermis, including Langerhans cells, keratinocytes, dendritic epidermal T cells (DETC), and CD8 TRM cells, can express TGF-β and provide a source to support CD103+ CD8 TRM cell residence [66]. Nevertheless, continued exposure to TGF-β derived from CD8 TRM cells, but not Langerhans cells, keratinocytes, or DETC, is required for the long-term persistence of epidermal CD103+ CD8 TRM cells [64,67,68]. Interestingly, while the presence of antigen in the flank skin is not required for the development of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells, it renders antigen-specific TRM cells more resistant to the impact of limited amounts of TGF-β than recruited bystander TRM cells [68,69]. Therefore, TGF-β provides a competitive pressure that promotes the persistence of antigen-specific CD8 TRM cells in the skin epidermis. However, how integrin-mediated TGF-β activation regulates CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development and maintenance in the dermis is unclear.
In the small intestine, intestinal epithelial cells express αvβ6 but not αvβ8, and αvβ6 is required for the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells in the intestinal epithelium but not lamina propria (LP) [64]. However, the source of TGF-β that supports CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development and maintenance in the epithelium is unclear. Interestingly, in the LP, T-bet expressing type 1 regulatory cells are recruited to the LP through chemokine receptor CXCR3 and promote CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development in the LP by producing TGF-β and activating it through the expression of αvβ8 [70]. Therefore, the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells in the intestinal epithelium and LP require different αv integrins and integrin-expressing cells.
In the lung, DC, in particular CD103+ DC, express αvβ8 and are proficient at producing biologically active TGF-β to efficiently drive CD103 expression on CD8 T cells [58]. Studies using humanized mice demonstrated that human lung CD1c+ DC (which corresponds closely to murine cDC2) promote CD8 T cell accumulation in lung epithelia and present membrane-bound TGF-β to drive CD103+ TRM cell differentiation [71]. Both studies identified the ability of DC to present TGF-β to induce CD103 expression and the differentiation of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells, although the responsible DC subset differs between studies. However, whether TGF-β derived from other sources such as lung epithelial cells and other integrin-expressing cells play a role in CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development in the lung needs further investigation.

5. Mechanisms by Which TGF-β Regulates the Development and Maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM Cells

Integrin-activating TGF-β is required for the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells in several tissues. Although it is incompletely understood, TGF-β can regulate CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development and maintenance through multiple mechanisms (Figure 2).

5.1. By Skewing towards an MPEC Phenotype

TGF-β, whose production is increased after acute infection [15,72], selectively promotes the apoptosis of short-lived effector T cells (SLEC, CD127− KLRG-1+) during clonal expansion and contraction by dampening antiapoptotic molecule B-cell lymphoma (Bcl)-2 expression and indirectly promoting the establishment of a predominately memory precursor effector T cells (MPEC, CD127+ KLRG-1−) population in lymphoid tissues over time [15]. TGF-β has also been shown to directly downregulate KLRG-1 expression [73], possibly further contributing to a decreased SLEC population. Indeed, in the absence of TGF-β signaling, a higher percentage of SLEC, and a lower percentage of MPEC were observed [15,34]. Previous studies have demonstrated that early effector cells and MPEC, but not SLEC, can form CD103+ CD8 TRM cells [18,34]. Therefore, TGF-β can support CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development by promoting SLEC apoptosis and skewing the population towards an MPEC phenotype.
MPEC and SLEC in lymphoid tissues express similar gut-homing receptor α4β7 expression and can both initially seed the small intestine [34]. However, MPEC rapidly accumulate in the small intestine in association with a rapid loss of SLEC that is primarily due to the accelerated apoptosis of SLEC [34]. This rapid shift to MPEC in the intestine occurs while the corresponding antigenic-specific splenic cells are largely SLEC, suggesting the differentiation pattern can be greatly influenced by the tissue-specific environment [34,74]. SLEC do not express CD127, and their survival is predominantly provided by IL-15, while MPEC express CD127 and their survival can be promoted by both IL-7 and IL-15 [75]. Both IL-7 and IL-15 can induce the antiapoptotic molecule Bcl-2 expression and thus promote cell survival. MPEC express higher Bcl-2 than SLEC, possibly due to their ability to respond to both IL-7 and IL-15 [15]. However, IL-7 but not IL-15 seems to be able to overcome the apoptotic effect induced by TGF-β [15]. TGF-β is constitutively expressed in the small intestine [76]. Therefore, after seeding the small intestine, SLEC undergo accelerated apoptosis in response to TGF-β in the tissue due to their inability to overcome TGF-β-mediated apoptosis, leading to the rapid accumulation of MPEC [34]. On the other hand, MPEC receive signals through TGF-β but do not appear to undergo enhanced apoptosis [34].
Naive T cells express high levels of TGF-β receptors, and the expression is transiently downregulated during T cell activation [15,77]. Activated T cells then regain the expression of TGF-β receptors and sensitivity to TGF-β. Extracellular ATP sensing through the purinergic receptor P2RX7 on CD8 T cells is required for the re-expression of TGF-β receptor II (TGF-βRII) [16]. The re-expression of TGF-βRII through P2RX7 potentiates the ability of CD8 T cells to respond to TGF-β, which promotes the MPEC population and is crucial for the generation of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells [16].

5.2. Through Regulating CD103 Expression

It has long been known that TGF-β induces CD103 expression upon T cell activation in vitro [27,78,79]. Studies from the last decade demonstrated that TGF-β is absolutely required for CD103 upregulation and CD103+ CD8 TRM cell differentiation in vivo [18,34,35,57,58]. CD103 plays a clear and critical role in CD103+ CD8 TRM cell residence within the tissue. However, some studies suggest that CD103 is important for the long-term retention of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells in the tissue [18,27,31,80], while others suggest that it promotes initial accumulation of effector CD8 T cells in the tissue [34,35]. CD103 can bind to E-cadherin expressed on epithelial cells and mediate heterotypic adhesive interaction between CD8 T cells and epithelial cells [81], likely contributing to the accumulation and retention of CD8 T cells in the tissue. However, concrete evidence demonstrating the contribution of CD103-E-cadherin interaction to effector CD8 T cell accumulation and CD103+ CD8 TRM cell retention in the tissue is so far lacking. Recent studies demonstrated that CD103-deficient CD8 TRM cells have increased motility [82,83], indirectly supporting that CD103 on CD103+ CD8 TRM cells may interact with E-cadherin on epithelial cells to restrain the motility of TRM cells and therefore enhance their retention. Furthermore, CD103+ CD8 TRM cells have been shown in several studies to have higher expression of antiapoptotic molecule Bcl-2 than CD103− CD8 TRM cells [18,35,80], suggesting that CD103+ CD8 TRM cells have a survival advantage over CD103- CD8 TRM cells. However, whether CD103 is involved in Bcl-2 expression or simply marks a subset of effector cells receiving IL-15 and/or IL-7 signals needs further clarification.
TGF-β binds to TGF-βRII, which then recruits and phosphorylates TGF-βRI, resulting in the activation of TGF-βRI [10,12]. Active TGF-βRI recruits and phosphorylates receptor-activated Smad (R-Smad) proteins Smad2 and Smad3, which can subsequently bind to the co-Smad protein Smad4 [10,12]. The Smad2/3/4 complex translocates to the nucleus, where it binds to Smad-binding elements in target genes and initiates their transcription [10,12]. TGF-β in the absence of T cell receptor (TCR) signaling activates downstream Smad2/3 but fails to induce CD103 expression. Similarly, TCR engagement in the absence of TGF-β signaling activates nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) but does not induce CD103 expression [84]. TGF-β together with TCR engagement are needed to induce CD103 expression [84]. Smad3 activated by TGF-β and NFAT activated by TCR engagement bind to their respective responsive elements in the promoter and enhancer regions of Itgae gene (the gene that encodes CD103), together driving the expression of CD103 [84].
T-bet can directly bind to Itgae gene locus in virus-specific CD8 T cells to suppress CD103 expression and CD103+ CD8 TRM cell formation, presumably through interfering with the binding of Smad3 to the Itgae gene locus [72]. Indeed, overexpression of T-bet in activated CD8 T cells inhibits CD103 expression and CD103+ CD8 TRM cell formation [72,85]. Moreover, T-bet can depress TGF-βRII expression on activated CD8 T cells, which likely negatively regulates CD8 T cell responsiveness to TGF-β and the induction of CD103 [85]. Interestingly, TGF-β signaling through TGF-βRII can downregulate T-bet expression, which in turn mitigates the suppression effect of T-bet on CD103 expression [85]. Similar reciprocal regulation was also observed between TGF-β and another T-box transcription factor Eomesodermin (Eomes) [85]. T cell factor 1 (TCF1) can also directly bind to Itgae gene locus to suppress CD103 expression and CD103+ CD8 TRM cell formation [86]. Interestingly, TGF-β can inhibit TCF1 protein expression and reduce the recruitment of TCF1 to the Itgae gene locus, which represses the negative regulation of TCF1 on CD103 expression [86]. TCF1 is critical for TCM cell differentiation and longevity [87,88]. A recent study identified heterogenous populations of CD8 TRM cells in the intestine that included a Blimp-1hi Id3lo cell population that decreases over time and a Blimp-1lo Id3hi cell population that increases over time [89]. Blimp-1lo Id3hi TRM cells express higher TCF1, suggesting that TCF1 may promote their longevity. Paradoxically, Blimp-1lo Id3hi TRM cells express higher CD103, contradictory to the known role of TCF1 in suppressing CD103 expression. During the effector phase, Blimp-1lo Id3hi cells resemble MPEC, while Blimp-1hi Id3lo cells resemble SLEC. As MPEC express higher TGF-βRII and lower T-bet than SLEC [15,90]; this suggests that Blimp-1lo Id3hi cells may have higher TGF-βRII and lower T-bet expression. Higher TGF-βRII expression may enhance CD103 expression, while lower T-bet expression may result in reduced suppression of CD103 expression. However, how TGF-β signaling, T-bet, and TCF1 regulate CD103 expression in these TRM cell populations require further evaluation.
Overall, TGF-β regulates CD103 expression and CD103+ CD8 TRM cell differentiation by directly driving CD103 expression on activated CD8 T cells through Smad3 and indirectly promoting CD103 expression through antagonizing T-bet, Eomes and TCF1-mediated suppression of CD103 expression.
Both SLEC and MPEC express TGF-βRII and can respond to TGF-β [15]. However, while MPEC quickly upregulate CD103 expression in response to TGF-β in the small intestine, SLEC fail to do so [34]. Previous studies demonstrated that SLEC express lower TGF-βRII and three- to four-fold more T-bet than MPEC [90]. As TGF-β signaling through TGF-βRII induces CD103 expression and T-bet can inhibit TGF-β-Smad3-mediated induction of CD103 expression [72], the lower TGF-βRII expression and higher T-bet expression in SLEC likely leads to a failure to upregulate CD103 expression. Therefore, SLEC cannot form CD103+ CD8 TRM cells due to an inability to upregulate CD103 expression and an inability to survive in response to TGF-β.
While TGF-β and CD103 are intimately linked, CD103-deficient CD8 T cells do not mirror TGF-βRII-deficient CD8 T cells. For example, TGF-βRII deficiency leads to a severe defect (20- to 50-fold reduction) in the development and maintenance of CD8 TRM cells in the intestinal epithelium, while CD103 deficiency only resulted in a mild defect (two- to three-fold reduction) [27,34,57]. Thus, TGF-β utilizes other pathways to promote CD8 TRM cell development and maintenance in addition to regulating the expression of the prototypical marker of epithelial residency CD103.

5.3. Through Regulating KLF2 Expression

TGF-β alone or in combination with IL-33 and/or TNF can downregulate the zinc-finger transcription factor Kruppel-like factor 2 (KLF2) through a PI3K/Akt dependent pathway [32]. As KLF2 directly binds to the promoter of the gene encoding S1PR1 to induce S1PR1 expression, TGF-β signals lead to loss of S1PR1 expression [91,92]. S1PR1 mediates the egress of CD8 T cells from tissues by binding to its ligand S1P found at very high concentrations in the afferent lymphatics draining peripheral tissues. KLF2 and S1PR1 are critical in the induction of TRM cells, as forced expression of KLF2 or S1PR1 prevents the establishment of CD8 TRM cells [32]. Downregulation of S1PR1 expression at the gene expression level through the downregulation of KLF2 or at the surface protein expression level through the interaction with CD69 is essential for preventing tissue egress of CD8 T cells and the establishment of CD8 TRM cells [32,33]. Therefore, TGF-β can further promote CD8 TRM cell formation by downregulating KLF2 and S1PR1 expression to facilitate T cell retention in peripheral nonlymphoid tissues.

6. Conclusions and Implications

CD8 TRM cells provide front-line protective immunity against infections and cancers. TGF-β plays a crucial role in regulating the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells through multiple mechanisms. TGF-β is secreted as a latent form that needs to be activated to exert its function. The activation of TGF-β is mediated by different αv integrins and integrin-expressing cells at different tissues, highlighting tissue-specific regulation of TGF-β activation and CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development and maintenance. TGF-β can induce the apoptosis of SLEC and promote the accumulation of MPEC that favors the development of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells. TGF-β can directly induce CD103 expression or indirectly promote CD103 expression by counteracting mechanisms that suppress CD103 expression and thus support CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development and maintenance through CD103-mediated tissue accumulation and retention. Furthermore, TGF-β can downregulate KLF2 expression, which in turn downregulates S1PR1 expression and prevents S1PR1-mediated tissue egress of CD8 T cells, thus promoting the development of CD8 TRM cells in the tissue. However, whether there are additional TGF-β mediated mechanisms that promote the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells needs further investigation. Understanding exactly how TGF-β regulates the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells can help us better target this memory population for protection against infections and malignancies. For example, MPEC but not SLEC can overcome TGF-β-induced apoptosis and form CD103+ CD8 TRM cells in response to TGF-β. Approaches that favor MPEC generation such as using the TLR4 ligand LPS as an adjuvant for DC vaccination may promote CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development [93]. CD8 TRM cells have also been implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, such as psoriasis [6]. Blocking TGF-β activation in the skin may provide a therapeutic approach to eliminate skin CD103+ CD8 TRM cells with minimal impact on other immune compartments. Finally, a better understanding of the role of TGF-β in CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development and maintenance may lead to improved antitumor immunotherapies. It is becoming increasingly evident that CD8 TRM cells provide superior protection against tumors. However, it is well known that TGF-β is a critical factor that promotes tumor development and metastasis. Thus, understanding these pathways more comprehensively could lead to targeted therapies to promote antitumor CD8 TRM cells.

Author Contributions

Z.Q. wrote the original draft. T.H.C. and Z.Q. generated the figures. B.S.S. and T.H.C. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors were supported by NIH awards K12GM102778 (Z.Q.), T32 AI007539 (T.H.C.), R01AI076457 (B.S.S.), R21AI137929 (B.S.S.), and funds provided by Stony Brook University (B.S.S.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sallusto, F.; Lenig, D.; Förster, R.; Lipp, M.; Lanzavecchia, A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999, 401, 708–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gebhardt, T.; Wakim, L.M.; Eidsmo, L.; Reading, P.C.; Heath, W.R.; Carbone, F.R. Memory T cells in nonlymphoid tissue that provide enhanced local immunity during infection with herpes simplex virus. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 524–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Masopust, D.; Choo, D.; Vezys, V.; Wherry, E.J.; Duraiswamy, J.; Akondy, R.; Wang, J.; Casey, K.A.; Barber, D.L.; Kawamura, K.S.; et al. Dynamic T cell migration program provides resident memory within intestinal epithelium. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Sheridan, B.S.; Lefrançois, L. Regional and mucosal memory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schenkel, J.M.; Masopust, D. Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells. Immunity 2014, 41, 886–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Park, C.O.; Kupper, T.S. The emerging role of resident memory T cells in protective immunity and inflammatory disease. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 688–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Mueller, S.N.; Mackay, L.K. Tissue-resident memory T cells: Local specialists in immune defence. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lodyga, M.; Hinz, B. TGF-β1—A truly transforming growth factor in fibrosis and immunity. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 101, 123–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Meng, X.-M.; Nikolic-Paterson, D.J.; Lan, H.Y. TGF-β: The master regulator of fibrosis. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2016, 12, 325–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Smith, A.L.; Robin, T.P.; Ford, H.L. Molecular Pathways: Targeting the TGF-β Pathway for Cancer Therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 4514–4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Batlle, E.; Massagué, J. Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling in Immunity and Cancer. Immunity 2019, 50, 924–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Travis, M.A.; Sheppard, D. TGF-β Activation and Function in Immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 32, 51–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Nolte, M.; Margadant, C. Controlling Immunity and Inflammation through Integrin-Dependent Regulation of TGF-β. Trends Cell Biol. 2020, 30, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ma, C.; Zhang, N. Transforming growth factor-β signaling is constantly shaping memory T-cell population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 11013–11017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Sanjabi, S.; Mosaheb, M.M.; Flavell, R.A. Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells. Immunity 2009, 31, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Da Silva, H.B.; Peng, C.; Wang, H.; Wanhainen, K.M.; Ma, C.; Lopez, S.; Khoruts, A.; Zhang, N.; Jameson, S.C. Sensing of ATP via the Purinergic Receptor P2RX7 Promotes CD8+ Trm Cell Generation by Enhancing Their Sensitivity to the Cytokine TGF-β. Immunity 2020, 53, 158–171.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Masopust, D.; Vezys, V.; Wherry, E.J.; Barber, D.L.; Ahmed, R. Cutting Edge: Gut Microenvironment Promotes Differentiation of a Unique Memory CD8 T Cell Population. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 2079–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Mackay, L.K.; Rahimpour, A.; Ma, J.Z.; Collins, N.C.; Stock, A.T.; Hafon, M.-L.; Vega-Ramos, J.; Lauzurica, P.; Mueller, S.N.; Stefanovic, T.; et al. The developmental pathway for CD103+CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cells of skin. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 14, 1294–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wakim, L.M.; Woodward-Davis, A.; Liu, R.; Hu, Y.; Villadangos, J.; Smyth, G.; Bevan, M.J. The Molecular Signature of Tissue Resident Memory CD8 T Cells Isolated from the Brain. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 3462–3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mackay, L.K.; Minnich, M.; Kragten, N.A.M.; Liao, Y.; Nota, B.; Seillet, C.; Zaid, A.; Man, K.; Preston, S.; Freestone, D.; et al. Hobit and Blimp1 instruct a universal transcriptional program of tissue residency in lymphocytes. Science 2016, 352, 459–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hombrink, P.; Helbig, C.; Backer, R.A.; Piet, B.; Oja, A.E.; Stark, R.; Brasser, G.; Jongejan, A.; Jonkers, R.E.; Nota, B.; et al. Programs for the persistence, vigilance and control of human CD8+ lung-resident memory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2016, 17, 1467–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kumar, B.V.; Ma, W.; Miron, M.; Granot, T.; Guyer, R.S.; Carpenter, D.J.; Senda, T.; Sun, X.; Ho, S.-H.; Lerner, H.; et al. Human Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells Are Defined by Core Transcriptional and Functional Signatures in Lymphoid and Mucosal Sites. Cell Rep. 2017, 20, 2921–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Milner, J.J.; Toma, C.; Yu, B.; Zhang, K.; Omilusik, K.; Phan, A.T.; Wang, D.; Getzler, A.J.; Nguyen, T.; Crotty, S.; et al. Runx3 programs CD8+ T cell residency in non-lymphoid tissues and tumours. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017, 552, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mackay, L.K.; Kallies, A. Transcriptional Regulation of Tissue-Resident Lymphocytes. Trends Immunol. 2017, 38, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Behr, F.M.; Chuwonpad, A.; Stark, R.; Van Gisbergen, K.P.J.M. Armed and Ready: Transcriptional Regulation of Tissue-Resident Memory CD8 T Cells. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Pan, Y.; Tian, T.; Park, C.O.; Lofftus, S.Y.; Mei, S.; Liu, X.; Luo, C.; O’Malley, J.T.; Gehad, A.; Teague, J.E.; et al. Survival of tissue-resident memory T cells requires exogenous lipid uptake and metabolism. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017, 543, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Casey, K.A.; Fraser, K.A.; Schenkel, J.M.; Moran, A.; Abt, M.C.; Beura, L.K.; Lucas, P.J.; Artis, D.; Wherry, E.J.; Hogquist, K.; et al. Antigen-Independent Differentiation and Maintenance of Effector-like Resident Memory T Cells in Tissues. J. Immunol. 2012, 188, 4866–4875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Steinert, E.M.; Schenkel, J.M.; Fraser, K.A.; Beura, L.K.; Manlove, L.S.; Igyártó, B.Z.; Southern, P.J.; Masopust, D. Quantifying Memory CD8 T Cells Reveals Regionalization of Immunosurveillance. Cell 2015, 161, 737–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Shiow, L.R.; Rosen, D.B.; Brdičková, N.; Xu, Y.; An, J.; Lanier, L.L.; Cyster, J.G.; Matloubian, M. CD69 acts downstream of interferon-α/β to inhibit S1P1 and lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 440, 540–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bankovich, A.J.; Shiow, L.R.; Cyster, J.G. CD69 Suppresses Sphingosine 1-Phosophate Receptor-1 (S1P1) Function through Interaction with Membrane Helix 4. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 22328–22337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lee, Y.-T.; Suarez-Ramirez, J.E.; Wu, T.; Redman, J.M.; Bouchard, K.; Hadley, G.A.; Cauley, L.S. Environmental and Antigen Receptor-Derived Signals Support Sustained Surveillance of the Lungs by Pathogen-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 4085–4094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Skon, C.N.; Lee, J.-Y.; Anderson, K.G.; Masopust, D.; Hogquist, K.A.; Jameson, S.C. Transcriptional downregulation of S1pr1 is required for the establishment of resident memory CD8+ T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 14, 1285–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Mackay, L.K.; Braun, A.; MacLeod, B.L.; Collins, N.; Tebartz, C.; Bedoui, S.; Carbone, F.R.; Gebhardt, T. Cutting Edge: CD69 Interference with Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Function Regulates Peripheral T Cell Retention. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 2059–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Sheridan, B.S.; Pham, Q.-M.; Lee, Y.-T.; Cauley, L.S.; Puddington, L.; Lefrançois, L. Oral Infection Drives a Distinct Population of Intestinal Resident Memory CD8+ T Cells with Enhanced Protective Function. Immunity 2014, 40, 747–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Thom, J.T.; Weber, T.C.; Walton, S.M.; Torti, N.; Oxenius, A. The Salivary Gland Acts as a Sink for Tissue-Resident Memory CD8+ T Cells, Facilitating Protection from Local Cytomegalovirus Infection. Cell Rep. 2015, 13, 1125–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Fernandez-Ruiz, D.; Ng, W.Y.; Holz, L.E.; Ma, J.Z.; Zaid, A.; Wong, Y.C.; Lau, L.S.; Mollard, V.; Cozijnsen, A.; Collins, N.; et al. Liver-Resident Memory CD8+ T Cells Form a Front-Line Defense against Malaria Liver-Stage Infection. Immunity 2016, 45, 889–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Pallett, L.J.; Davies, J.; Colbeck, E.J.; Robertson, F.; Hansi, N.; Easom, N.J.; Burton, A.R.; Stegmann, K.A.; Schurich, A.; Swadling, L.; et al. IL-2high tissue-resident T cells in the human liver: Sentinels for hepatotropic infection. J. Exp. Med. 2017, 214, 1567–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cheuk, S.; Schlums, H.; Sérézal, I.G.; Martini, E.; Chiang, S.C.; Marquardt, N.; Gibbs, A.; Detlofsson, E.; Introini, A.; Forkel, M.; et al. CD49a Expression Defines Tissue-Resident CD8+ T Cells Poised for Cytotoxic Function in Human Skin. Immunity 2017, 46, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lin, R.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, Y.; He, Q.; Zhou, J.; Li, S.; Sun, Y.; Li, D.Y.; Qiu, H.-B.; Wang, W.; et al. Fatty acid oxidation controls CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cell survival in gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2020, 8, 479–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Jiang, X.; Clark, R.A.; Liu, L.; Wagers, A.J.; Fuhlbrigge, R.C.; Kupper, T.S. Skin infection generates non-migratory memory CD8+ TRM cells providing global skin immunity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 483, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wu, T.; Hu, Y.; Lee, Y.-T.; Bouchard, K.R.; Benechet, A.; Khanna, K.; Cauley, L.S. Lung-resident memory CD8 T cells (TRM) are indispensable for optimal cross-protection against pulmonary virus infection. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2013, 95, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Shin, H.; Iwasaki, A. A vaccine strategy that protects against genital herpes by establishing local memory T cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 491, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ganesan, A.-P.; Clarke, J.; Wood, O.; Garrido-Martin, E.M.; Chee, S.J.; Mellows, T.; Samaniego-Castruita, D.; Singh, D.; Seumois, G.; Alzetani, A.; et al. Tissue-resident memory features are linked to the magnitude of cytotoxic T cell responses in human lung cancer. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 940–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Malik, B.T.; Byrne, K.T.; Vella, J.L.; Zhang, P.; Shabaneh, T.B.; Steinberg, S.M.; Molodtsov, A.K.; Bowers, J.S.; Angeles, C.V.; Paulos, C.M.; et al. Resident memory T cells in the skin mediate durable immunity to melanoma. Sci. Immunol. 2017, 2, eaam6346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Nizard, M.; Roussel, H.; Diniz, M.O.; Karaki, S.; Tran, T.; Voron, T.; Dransart, E.; Sandoval, F.; Riquet, M.; Rance, B.; et al. Induction of resident memory T cells enhances the efficacy of cancer vaccine. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Steinbach, K.; Vincenti, I.; Kreutzfeldt, M.; Page, N.; Muschaweckh, A.; Wagner, I.; Drexler, I.; Pinschewer, D.; Korn, T.; Merkler, D. Brain-resident memory T cells represent an autonomous cytotoxic barrier to viral infection. J. Exp. Med. 2016, 213, 1571–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ariotti, S.; Hogenbirk, M.A.; Dijkgraaf, F.E.; Visser, L.L.; Hoekstra, M.E.; Song, J.-Y.; Jacobs, H.; Haanen, J.B.; Schumacher, T.N. Skin-resident memory CD8+ T cells trigger a state of tissue-wide pathogen alert. Science 2014, 346, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schenkel, J.M.; Fraser, K.A.; Vezys, V.; Masopust, D. Sensing and alarm function of resident memory CD8+ T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 14, 509–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Schenkel, J.M.; Fraser, K.A.; Beura, L.K.; Pauken, K.E.; Vezys, V.; Masopust, D. Resident memory CD8 T cells trigger protective innate and adaptive immune responses. Science 2014, 346, 98–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Beura, L.K.; Mitchell, J.S.; Thompson, E.A.; Schenkel, J.M.; Mohammed, J.; Wijeyesinghe, S.; Fonseca, R.; Burbach, B.J.; Hickman, H.D.; Vezys, V.; et al. Intravital mucosal imaging of CD8+ resident memory T cells shows tissue-autonomous recall responses that amplify secondary memory. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Park, S.L.; Zaid, A.; Hor, J.L.; Christo, S.N.; Prier, J.E.; Davies, B.; Alexandre, Y.O.; Gregory, J.L.; Russell, T.A.; Gebhardt, T.; et al. Local proliferation maintains a stable pool of tissue-resident memory T cells after antiviral recall responses. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Beura, L.K.; Wijeyesinghe, S.; Thompson, E.A.; Macchietto, M.G.; Rosato, P.C.; Pierson, M.J.; Schenkel, J.M.; Mitchell, J.S.; Vezys, V.; Fife, B.T.; et al. T Cells in Nonlymphoid Tissues Give Rise to Lymph-Node-Resident Memory T Cells. Immunity 2018, 48, 327–338.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Fonseca, R.; Beura, L.K.; Quarnstrom, C.F.; Ghoneim, H.E.; Fan, Y.; Zebley, C.C.; Scott, M.C.; Fares-Frederickson, N.J.; Wijeyesinghe, S.; Thompson, E.A.; et al. Developmental plasticity allows outside-in immune responses by resident memory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2020, 21, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Behr, F.M.; Parga-Vidal, L.; Kragten, N.A.M.; Van Dam, T.J.P.; Wesselink, T.H.; Sheridan, B.S.; Arens, R.; Van Lier, R.A.W.; Stark, R.; Van Gisbergen, K.P.J.M. Tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells shape local and systemic secondary T cell responses. Nat. Immunol. 2020, 21, 1070–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Goplen, N.P.; Wu, Y.; Son, Y.M.; Li, C.; Wang, Z.; Cheon, I.S.; Jiang, L.; Zhu, B.; Ayasoufi, K.; Chini, E.N.; et al. Tissue-resident CD8+T cells drive age-associated chronic lung sequelae after viral pneumonia. Sci. Immunol. 2020, 5, eabc4557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. El-Asady, R.; Yuan, R.; Liu, K.; Wang, D.; Gress, R.E.; Lucas, P.J.; Drachenberg, C.B.; Hadley, G.A. TGF-β–dependent CD103 expression by CD8+ T cells promotes selective destruction of the host intestinal epithelium during graft-versus-host disease. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 201, 1647–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Zhang, N.; Bevan, M.J. Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Controls the Formation and Maintenance of Gut-Resident Memory T Cells by Regulating Migration and Retention. Immunity 2013, 39, 687–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Wakim, L.M.; Smith, J.Z.; Caminschi, I.; Lahoud, M.H.; Villadangos, J.A. Antibody-targeted vaccination to lung dendritic cells generates tissue-resident memory CD8 T cells that are highly protective against influenza virus infection. Mucosal Immunol. 2015, 8, 1060–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Bergsbaken, T.; Bevan, M.J. Proinflammatory microenvironments within the intestine regulate the differentiation of tissue-resident CD8+ T cells responding to infection. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Graham, J.B.; Da Costa, A.; Lund, J.M. Regulatory T cells shape the resident memory T cell response to virus infection in the tissues. J. Immunol. 2013, 192, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ma, C.; Mishra, S.; Demel, E.L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, N. TGF-β Controls the Formation of Kidney-Resident T Cells via Promoting Effector T Cell Extravasation. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Robertson, I.B.; Horiguchi, M.; Zilberberg, L.; Dabovic, B.; Hadjiolova, K.; Rifkin, D.B. Latent TGF-β-binding proteins. Matrix Biol. 2015, 47, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mani, V.; Bromley, S.K.; Äijö, T.; Mora-Buch, R.; Carrizosa, E.; Warner, R.D.; Hamze, M.; Sen, D.R.; Chasse, A.Y.; Lorant, A.; et al. Migratory DCs activate TGF-β to precondition naïve CD8+ T cells for tissue-resident memory fate. Science 2019, 366, eaav5728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mohammed, J.; Beura, L.K.; Bobr, A.; Astry, B.; Chicoine, B.; Kashem, S.W.; Welty, N.E.; Igyártó, B.Z.; Wijeyesinghe, S.; A Thompson, E.; et al. Stromal cells control the epithelial residence of DCs and memory T cells by regulated activation of TGF-β. Nat. Immunol. 2016, 17, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hirai, T.; Zenke, Y.; Yang, Y.; Bartholin, L.; Beura, L.K.; Masopust, D.; Kaplan, D.H. Keratinocyte-Mediated Activation of the Cytokine TGF-β Maintains Skin Recirculating Memory CD8+ T Cells. Immunity 2019, 50, 1249–1261.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yang, Y.; Zenke, Y.; Hirai, T.; Kaplan, D.H.; Yan, Y. Keratinocyte-derived TGFβ is not required to maintain skin immune homeostasis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2019, 94, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Zaid, A.; Mackay, L.K.; Rahimpour, A.; Braun, A.; Veldhoen, M.; Carbone, F.R.; Manton, J.H.; Heath, W.R.; Mueller, S.N. Persistence of skin-resident memory T cells within an epidermal niche. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 5307–5312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Hirai, T.; Yang, Y.; Zenke, Y.; Li, H.; Chaudhri, V.K.; Diaz, J.S.D.L.C.; Zhou, P.Y.; Nguyen, B.A.-T.; Bartholin, L.; Workman, C.J.; et al. Competition for Active TGFβ Cytokine Allows for Selective Retention of Antigen-Specific Tissue- Resident Memory T Cells in the Epidermal Niche. Immunity 2021, 54, 84–98.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Mackay, L.K.; Stock, A.T.; Ma, J.Z.; Jones, C.M.; Kent, S.J.; Mueller, S.N.; Heath, W.R.; Carbone, F.R.; Gebhardt, T. Long-lived epithelial immunity by tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells in the absence of persisting local antigen presentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 7037–7042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Ferreira, C.; Barros, L.; Baptista, M.; Blankenhaus, B.; Barros, A.; Figueiredo-Campos, P.; Konjar, Š.; Lainé, A.; Kamenjarin, N.; Stojanovic, A.; et al. Type 1 Treg cells promote the generation of CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2020, 21, 766–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yu, C.I.; Becker, C.; Wang, Y.; Marches, F.; Helft, J.; Leboeuf, M.; Anguiano, E.; Pourpe, S.; Goller, K.; Pascual, V.; et al. Human CD1c+ Dendritic Cells Drive the Differentiation of CD103+ CD8+ Mucosal Effector T Cells via the Cytokine TGF-β. Immunity 2013, 38, 818–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Laidlaw, B.J.; Zhang, N.; Marshall, H.D.; Staron, M.M.; Guan, T.; Hu, Y.; Cauley, L.S.; Craft, J.; Kaech, S.M. CD4+ T Cell Help Guides Formation of CD103+ Lung-Resident Memory CD8+ T Cells during Influenza Viral Infection. Immunity 2014, 41, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Schwartzkopff, S.; Woyciechowski, S.; Aichele, U.; Flecken, T.; Zhang, N.; Thimme, R.; Pircher, H. TGF-β downregulates KLRG1 expression in mouse and human CD8+T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015, 45, 2212–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Plumlee, C.R.; Sheridan, B.S.; Cicek, B.B.; Lefrançois, L. Environmental Cues Dictate the Fate of Individual CD8+ T Cells Responding to Infection. Immunity 2013, 39, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Qiu, Z.; Khairallah, C.; Sheridan, B.S. Listeria Monocytogenes: A Model Pathogen Continues to Refine Our Knowledge of the CD8 T Cell Response. Pathogens 2018, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Koyama, S.Y.; Podolsky, D.K. Differential expression of transforming growth factors alpha and beta in rat intestinal epithelial cells. J. Clin. Investig. 1989, 83, 1768–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Tu, E.; Chia, C.P.; Chen, W.; Zhang, D.; Park, S.A.; Jin, W.; Wang, D.; Alegre, M.-L.; Zhang, Y.E.; Sun, L.; et al. T Cell Receptor-Regulated TGF-β Type I Receptor Expression Determines T Cell Quiescence and Activation. Immunity 2018, 48, 745–759.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Kilshaw, P.J.; Murant, S.J. A new surface antigen on intraepithelial lymphocytes in the intestine. Eur. J. Immunol. 1990, 20, 2201–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kilshaw, P.J.; Murant, S.J. Expression and regulation of β7(βp) integrins on mouse lymphocytes: Relevance to the mucosal immune system. Eur. J. Immunol. 1991, 21, 2591–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wakim, L.M.; Woodward-Davis, A.; Bevan, M.J. Memory T cells persisting within the brain after local infection show functional adaptations to their tissue of residence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 17872–17879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Cepek, K.L.; Shaw, S.K.; Parker, C.M.; Russell, G.J.; Morrow, J.S.; Rimm, D.L.; Brenner, M.B. Adhesion between epithelial cells and T lymphocytes mediated by E-cadherin and the αEβ7 integrin. Nat. Cell Biol. 1994, 372, 190–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zaid, A.; Hor, J.L.; Christo, S.N.; Groom, J.R.; Heath, W.R.; Mackay, L.K.; Mueller, S.N. Chemokine Receptor–Dependent Control of Skin Tissue–Resident Memory T Cell Formation. J. Immunol. 2017, 199, 2451–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Reilly, E.C.; Emo, K.L.; Buckley, P.M.; Reilly, N.S.; Smith, I.; Chaves, F.A.; Yang, H.; Oakes, P.W.; Topham, D.J. TRMintegrins CD103 and CD49a differentially support adherence and motility after resolution of influenza virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 12306–12314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Mokrani, M.; Klibi, J.; Bluteau, D.; Bismuth, G.; Mami-Chouaib, F. Smad and NFAT Pathways Cooperate To Induce CD103 Expression in Human CD8 T Lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 2471–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Mackay, L.K.; Wynne-Jones, E.; Freestone, D.; Pellicci, D.G.; Mielke, L.A.; Newman, D.M.; Braun, A.; Masson, F.; Kallies, A.; Belz, G.T.; et al. T-box Transcription Factors Combine with the Cytokines TGF-β and IL-15 to Control Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Fate. Immunity 2015, 43, 1101–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Wu, J.; Madi, A.; Mieg, A.; Hotz-Wagenblatt, A.; Weisshaar, N.; Ma, S.; Mohr, K.; Schlimbach, T.; Hering, M.; Borgers, H.; et al. T Cell Factor 1 Suppresses CD103+ Lung Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Development. Cell Rep. 2020, 31, 107484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhou, X.; Yu, S.; Zhao, D.-M.; Harty, J.T.; Badovinac, V.P.; Xue, H.-H. Differentiation and Persistence of Memory CD8+ T Cells Depend on T Cell Factor 1. Immunity 2010, 33, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Jeannet, G.; Boudousquié, C.; Gardiol, N.; Kang, J.; Huelsken, J.; Held, W. Essential role of the Wnt pathway effector Tcf-1 for the establishment of functional CD8 T cell memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 9777–9782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Milner, J.J.; Toma, C.; He, Z.; Kurd, N.S.; Nguyen, Q.P.; McDonald, B.; Quezada, L.; Widjaja, C.E.; Witherden, D.A.; Crowl, J.T.; et al. Heterogenous Populations of Tissue-Resident CD8+ T Cells Are Generated in Response to Infection and Malignancy. Immunity 2020, 52, 808–824.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Joshi, N.S.; Cui, W.; Chandele, A.; Lee, H.K.; Urso, D.R.; Hagman, J.; Gapin, L.; Kaech, S.M. Inflammation Directs Memory Precursor and Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cell Fates via the Graded Expression of T-bet Transcription Factor. Immunity 2007, 27, 281–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Carlson, C.M.; Endrizzi, B.T.; Wu, J.; Ding, X.; Weinreich, M.A.; Walsh, E.R.; Wani, M.A.; Lingrel, J.B.; Hogquist, K.A.; Jameson, S.C. Kruppel-like factor 2 regulates thymocyte and T-cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 442, 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Bai, A.; Hu, H.; Yeung, M.; Chen, J. Krüppel-Like Factor 2 Controls T Cell Trafficking by Activating L-Selectin (CD62L) and Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor 1 Transcription. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 7632–7639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Cui, W.; Joshi, N.S.; Liu, Y.; Meng, H.; Kleinstein, S.H.; Kaech, S.M. TLR4 ligands lipopolysaccharide and monophosphoryl lipid a differentially regulate effector and memory CD8+ T Cell differentiation. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 4221–4232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Cells 10 00989 g001 550
Figure 1. Integrin-mediated activation of TGF-β in the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells. TGF-β is secreted as LAP-TGF-β latent complex, which binds to the latent TGF-β binding protein (LTBP) to form the large latent complex. The large latent complex can bind to extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins such as fibronectin and fibrillin to facilitate the deposit and storage of TGF-β into the ECM. Alternatively, LAP-TGF-β latent complex can also be deposited and stored on the surface of cell membranes. The activation of TGF-β requires the release of TGF-β from the LAP-TGF-β latent complex. The best understood mechanism is through integrin αvβ8 and αvβ6. During homeostasis in the lymph nodes, αvβ8 expressed by migratory dendritic cells (DC) activates and presents TGF-β to precondition native CD8 T cells for epidermal CD103+ CD8 TRM cell residency. In the skin epidermis, αvβ8 and αvβ6 expressed by different keratinocytes activate CD8 TRM cell-derived TGF-β that is critical for the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells. In the small intestine lamina propria, type 1 regulatory cells promote CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development by producing TGF-β and activating it through the expression of αvβ8. In the small intestine epithelium, intestinal epithelial cells express αvβ6, which is required for the activation of TGF-β and CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development and maintenance. In the lung, DC membrane bound TGF-β and DC expressing αvβ8 efficiently drive CD103+ CD8 TRM cell differentiation.
Figure 1. Integrin-mediated activation of TGF-β in the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells. TGF-β is secreted as LAP-TGF-β latent complex, which binds to the latent TGF-β binding protein (LTBP) to form the large latent complex. The large latent complex can bind to extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins such as fibronectin and fibrillin to facilitate the deposit and storage of TGF-β into the ECM. Alternatively, LAP-TGF-β latent complex can also be deposited and stored on the surface of cell membranes. The activation of TGF-β requires the release of TGF-β from the LAP-TGF-β latent complex. The best understood mechanism is through integrin αvβ8 and αvβ6. During homeostasis in the lymph nodes, αvβ8 expressed by migratory dendritic cells (DC) activates and presents TGF-β to precondition native CD8 T cells for epidermal CD103+ CD8 TRM cell residency. In the skin epidermis, αvβ8 and αvβ6 expressed by different keratinocytes activate CD8 TRM cell-derived TGF-β that is critical for the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells. In the small intestine lamina propria, type 1 regulatory cells promote CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development by producing TGF-β and activating it through the expression of αvβ8. In the small intestine epithelium, intestinal epithelial cells express αvβ6, which is required for the activation of TGF-β and CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development and maintenance. In the lung, DC membrane bound TGF-β and DC expressing αvβ8 efficiently drive CD103+ CD8 TRM cell differentiation.
Cells 10 00989 g001
Cells 10 00989 g002 550
Figure 2. TGF-β regulates the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells through multiple mechanisms. (1) By skewing towards an MPEC phenotype—MPEC, but not SLEC, can form CD103+ CD8 TRM cells. The survival of SLEC depends on IL-15, which cannot overcome TGF-β-mediated apoptosis. MPEC can respond to both IL-15 and IL-7, and IL-7 is able overcome the apoptotic effect induced by TGF-β. As a result, TGF-β selectively promotes the apoptosis of SLEC, leading to the accumulation of MPEC that favors the development of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells. (2) Through regulating CD103 expression—TGF-β can directly induce CD103 expression through Smad3 or indirectly promote CD103 expression by counteracting T-bet, Eomes, and TCF1-mediated suppression of CD103 expression, thus supporting CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development and maintenance through CD103-mediated tissue accumulation and retention. Although both SLEC and MPEC can respond to TGF-β, SLEC do not appear to express CD103 likely due to their lower TGF-βRII expression and the enhanced suppression of Itgae (the gene encoding CD103) expression by their heightened T-bet expression. (3) Through regulating KLF2 expression—TGF-β can downregulate KLF2 expression, which in turn downregulates S1PR1 expression and prevents S1PR1-mediated tissue egress of CD8 T cells, thus promoting the development of CD8 TRM cells in the tissue.
Figure 2. TGF-β regulates the development and maintenance of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells through multiple mechanisms. (1) By skewing towards an MPEC phenotype—MPEC, but not SLEC, can form CD103+ CD8 TRM cells. The survival of SLEC depends on IL-15, which cannot overcome TGF-β-mediated apoptosis. MPEC can respond to both IL-15 and IL-7, and IL-7 is able overcome the apoptotic effect induced by TGF-β. As a result, TGF-β selectively promotes the apoptosis of SLEC, leading to the accumulation of MPEC that favors the development of CD103+ CD8 TRM cells. (2) Through regulating CD103 expression—TGF-β can directly induce CD103 expression through Smad3 or indirectly promote CD103 expression by counteracting T-bet, Eomes, and TCF1-mediated suppression of CD103 expression, thus supporting CD103+ CD8 TRM cell development and maintenance through CD103-mediated tissue accumulation and retention. Although both SLEC and MPEC can respond to TGF-β, SLEC do not appear to express CD103 likely due to their lower TGF-βRII expression and the enhanced suppression of Itgae (the gene encoding CD103) expression by their heightened T-bet expression. (3) Through regulating KLF2 expression—TGF-β can downregulate KLF2 expression, which in turn downregulates S1PR1 expression and prevents S1PR1-mediated tissue egress of CD8 T cells, thus promoting the development of CD8 TRM cells in the tissue.
Cells 10 00989 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiu, Z.; Chu, T.H.; Sheridan, B.S. TGF-β: Many Paths to CD103+ CD8 T Cell Residency. Cells 2021, 10, 989. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10050989

AMA Style

Qiu Z, Chu TH, Sheridan BS. TGF-β: Many Paths to CD103+ CD8 T Cell Residency. Cells. 2021; 10(5):989. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10050989

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiu, Zhijuan, Timothy H. Chu, and Brian S. Sheridan. 2021. "TGF-β: Many Paths to CD103+ CD8 T Cell Residency" Cells 10, no. 5: 989. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10050989

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop