Next Article in Journal
Arabidopsis Mitochondrial Transcription Termination Factor mTERF2 Promotes Splicing of Group IIB Introns
Next Article in Special Issue
Aggregated Tau-PHF6 (VQIVYK) Potentiates NLRP3 Inflammasome Expression and Autophagy in Human Microglial Cells
Previous Article in Journal
MARTs and MARylation in the Cytosol: Biological Functions, Mechanisms of Action, and Therapeutic Potential
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

NLRP3 Inflammasome at the Interface of Inflammation, Endothelial Dysfunction, and Type 2 Diabetes

Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, Ks. Trojdena 4, 02-109 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2021, 10(2), 314; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020314
Submission received: 22 December 2020 / Revised: 24 January 2021 / Accepted: 30 January 2021 / Published: 3 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection The Role of NLRP3 in Health and Disease)

Abstract

:
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), accounting for 90–95% cases of diabetes, is characterized by chronic inflammation. The mechanisms that control inflammation activation in T2DM are largely unexplored. Inflammasomes represent significant sensors mediating innate immune responses. The aim of this work is to present a review of links between the NLRP3 inflammasome, endothelial dysfunction, and T2DM. The NLRP3 inflammasome activates caspase-1, which leads to the maturation of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin 1β and interleukin 18. In this review, we characterize the structure and functions of NLRP3 inflammasome as well as the most important mechanisms and molecules engaged in its activation. We present evidence of the importance of the endothelial dysfunction as the first key step to activating the inflammasome, which suggests that suppressing the NLRP3 inflammasome could be a new approach in depletion hyperglycemic toxicity and in averting the onset of vascular complications in T2DM. We also demonstrate reports showing that the expression of a few microRNAs that are also known to be involved in either NLRP3 inflammasome activation or endothelial dysfunction is deregulated in T2DM. Collectively, this evidence suggests that T2DM is an inflammatory disease stimulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines. Finally, studies revealing the role of glucose concentration in the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome are analyzed. The more that is known about inflammasomes, the higher the chances to create new, effective therapies for patients suffering from inflammatory diseases. This may offer potential novel therapeutic perspectives in T2DM prevention and treatment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In 2019, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimated that 463 million people aged 20 to 79 years had diabetes. This represents 9.3% of the world’s population in this age group. It is projected that this number will reach 578 million by 2030 and 700 million by 2045 [1]. According to the IDF estimates, the number of deaths that were attributed to diabetes and complications of diabetes in 2019 was 4.2 million. The annual global health expenditure on diabetes is estimated to be 760 billion US dollars, and this number is projected to reach 845 billion US dollars by 2045. The above data prove that diabetes is one of the most common diseases and major public health burdens worldwide [2,3,4,5].
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) accounts for 90% to 95% of all diabetes in the world, which makes it the most common type of diabetes, with a prevalence reaching 8.3% in 2014 [2]. The T2DM is characterized by insulin resistance, which leads to hyperglycemia and, consequently, to hyperinsulinemia in order to lower the rise in blood glucose levels. Gradually, a relative inadequate production of insulin may develop as a result of pancreatic islet β-cell dysfunction. It is more common for T2DM to be detected in older adults, although the prevalence of the disease in children and adolescents is continuously rising due to the growing levels of obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and poor dietary habits, including excessive consumption of red meat, processed food, and sweet beverages.
A number of studies have clearly demonstrated that chronic tissue inflammation is a key contributing factor to T2DM [6,7]. It has been shown that elevated levels of inflammatory proteins such as interleukins (IL) 1β and 6, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1), and C-reactive protein (CRP) are predictive of T2DM [8]. Inflammation is the first response of the immune system to infection or tissue injury and is a significant component in the pathogenesis of many vascular disorders such as atherosclerosis and diabetic angiopathy [9,10].
Pivotal research into the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors (NOD), leucine-rich repeats (LRR), and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome complex suggests that it acts as a trigger initiating inflammatory responses, playing a crucial role in the dysfunction of endothelial cells. The NLRP3 inflammasome also makes a significant contribution during the development of diabetes and its complications [11].
The aim of this work is to present a review of the links between the NLRP3 inflammasome, endothelial dysfunction, and type 2 diabetes.

2. The NLRP3 Inflammasome and Inflammatory Regulators

2.1. NLRP3 Inflammasome

Inflammasomes are large intracellular multi-protein complexes with a molecular mass of at least 700 kDa, containing caspase-1, cysteine-aspartic proteases 1 apoptosis-associated speck-like protein (ASC), and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor with a pyrin domain (NLRP). This complex is present in the cytosol of stimulated immune cells such as monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells [12,13,14,15].
Two types of inflammasomes have been recognized so far: Nod-like receptor (NLR) inflammasomes, and Pyrin and HIN domain-containing protein (PYHIN) inflammasomes. The NLRs are intracellular receptors of the immune system, and a subset of them including NLRP1, NLRP2, NLRP3, NLRC4, NLRP6, NLRP7, and NLRP12 acts as a component of inflammasome complexes with sensory roles. The PYHIN inflammasomes act as sensory parts and can interact with viral or bacterial double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) [16,17]. The inflammasome plays an important role in the pathogenesis of various human inflammatory diseases [18,19]. The concept of inflammasome was proposed for the first time by the Tschopp research group in 2002 [20].
The NLRP3 inflammasome has been the most fully characterized so far. The NLRP3 contains three domains: C-terminal leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), a central nucleotide domain termed as the NACHT domain, and an N-terminal effector domain, i.e., pyrin domain (PYD). The ASC contains an N-terminal PYD and a C-terminal caspase recruitment domain (CARD). Caspase-1 contains CARD and catalytic domains [21,22,23,24]. The NLRP3 inflammasome is expressed in the cytosol of various cell types, including granulocytes, monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, T and B cells, epithelial cells, osteoblasts, fibroblasts, and melanoma cells [25,26].
The NLRP3 Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) are able to recognize molecules identifying pathogens—the so-called Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs), or molecules released by damaged cells, i.e., the Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs). The PRRs are divided into the following families: the toll-like receptors (TLRs), the nucleotide binding and oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs), the retinoic acid inducible gene-I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs), the absentin-melanoma (AIM)-like receptors (ALRs), and the C-type lectins (CTLs) [27,28].

2.2. Caspase-1

Caspases are cysteine proteases. Their primary role is to regulate apoptosis. However, there is evidence available that the primary activity of some of caspases controls inflammation [29,30]. Pro-inflammatory caspases are known as group I caspases. Thirteen caspases have been identified in mammals. Four of them, i.e., caspase-1, -4, -5, and -12, play a role of pro-inflammatory caspases in humans, whereas in mice, there are three such caspases, i.e., -1, -11, and -12. Out of all the pro-inflammatory caspases, caspase-1 has been studies and characterized in the most detail [31,32].
The crucial role of caspase-1, known as interleukin-1β-converting enzyme (ICE), in inflammation is to catalyze the intracellular conversion of the pro-inflammatory cytokines pro-IL-1β (31 kDa) and pro-IL-18 (24 kDa) into their mature and biologically active forms IL-1β (17.5 kDa) and IL-18 (18 kDa), respectively [33,34]. This step is a prerequisite to releasing cytokines from the cytosol into the extracellular space, which in turn allows them to exert their pro-inflammatory impact on the receptors of surrounding cells in a paracrine manner [35]. Proteases such as elastase, cathepsin G, and proteinase 3 are able to activate IL-1β independently of caspase-1 [36]. Caspases are synthesized as zymogens. One of the important functions of inflammasomes is to mediate the cleavage of the caspases, which activates them [37].

2.3. Interleukin 1β

IL-1 is a master regulatory cytokine. This inflammatory/immune mediator plays an important role at a few levels of the immune responses, e.g., it activates cells to produce other inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [38].
The IL-1β is a potent pro-inflammatory cytokine. IL-1β induces endothelial cells to express cell membrane adhesion molecules and pro-coagulant activity. Hence, trapping leukocytes from the bloodstream is possible [39]. When PRR proteins of the NLRP3 inflammasome recognize molecules identifying PAMPs or DAMPs, then IL-1β is transcriptionally regulated [40,41,42].
Two signals are required for the production of IL-1β. The first signal is the synthesis of intracellular pro-IL-1β, which occurs after the stimulation of PRRs, such as TLRs situated in endosomes or on the cell surface and NLRs located in the cytoplasm, i.e., the ligation of PRR with its respected ligand. The second signal is the recruitment and activation of pro-caspase-1 and subsequent processing (proteolytic cleavage) of pro-IL-1β by caspase-1 to its mature form, i.e., IL-1β [43,44]. In most cases, the recruitment of pro-caspase-1 is facilitated by ASC.
The IL-1β is not only secreted by immune cells such as monocytes or macrophages, neutrophils, lymphocytes B, dendritic cells, and NK cells but also by nonimmune cells such as keratinocytes [45]. The potent pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β is known to contribute to the inflammatory response in various metabolic diseases including diabetes [46,47]. However, the mechanism by which IL-1β is induced in a distinctive metabolic dysfunction has only recently come to light and seems to be connected with inflammasome platform activation [48,49].
In 2011, Menu and Vince recapitulated the role of abnormal activation of NLRP3 inflammasome and the overexpression of IL-1β in the development of diabetes and in its complications [50]. Clinical studies suggest that IL-1β is linked to adipocyte inflammation and insulin resistance and that the factors controlling bioactive IL-1β secretion have therapeutic implications [51,52]. IL-1β decreases tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) and its gene expression. This inhibits the downstream pathway of insulin signaling, which is required to control glycemia, thereby inducing insulin resistance [53]. Moreover, IL-1β contributes to the expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), which also promotes insulin resistance. The insulin sensitivity may be reduced even further because of the overaccumulation of lymphocytes in adipose tissues, which is mediated by IL-1β and IL-18 [54]. In mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD), the lack of IL-1β was protective in terms of adipose tissue inflammation and insulin resistance [55,56].
IL-1β cytokine works in two planes. On the one hand, IL-1β interferes with insulin signaling in hepatocytes and adipocytes, inhibits insulin-induced glucose uptake, suppresses lipogenesis, and decreases the release of adiponectin [57]. On the other hand, IL-1β has been reported to contribute to β-cell failure. High levels of IL-1β, induced by high levels of glucose or free fatty acids, contribute to decreased insulin secretion, impaired β-cell replication, and increased β-cell apoptosis, whereas low levels of IL-1β have the opposite effects in pancreatic islets [58]. Based on clinical observations, IL-1β has been shown to reduce the insulin secretion and a number of β cells [59]. IL-1β influences the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) and the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), which in turn control the expression of the encoding genes in the process of β-cell death [60]. Presumably, in the pre-T2DM stage, insulin resistance reduces glucose uptake, causing transient postprandial hyperglycemia. However, glucose-induced IL-1β production and NF-κB activation are unlikely to be the main mediators of β-cell glucotoxicity, and transient hyperglycemia is unlikely to be sufficient to trigger the transition from obesity to diabetes [61]. Lipotoxicity also plays an important role in β-cell destruction mediated by IL-1β production and secretion together with elevated glucose levels in cultured T2DM islets [62]. The neutralization of pro-inflammatory cytokines, especially IL-1β, may extinguish the inflammatory process of the pancreatic islets and thus normalize blood glucose levels and reduce insulin resistance [63]. High amounts of IL-1β may be the reason for insulin insensitivity in obese individuals. In the adipose tissue of such individuals, the expression of the NLRP3 inflammasome components, the activity of caspase-1, and the level of IL-1β are increased, all of which are directly correlated with insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and the severity of T2DM [64]. An important observation, however, is that not all obese subjects or patients prior to T2DM exhibit dyslipidemia. Overall, it must be underlined that IL-1β is only one of a few factors influencing the development of T2DM [65,66].

2.4. Interleukin 18

IL-18, which is also known as an interferon-gamma inducing factor, plays an important pro-inflammatory role, and it is involved in the induction of inflammatory agents as well as regulation of the cytotoxic activity of NK cells and T cells [67,68,69,70]. Moreover, IL-18 was found to assist the differentiation and activation of different T helper (Th) cells depending on the cytokine profile. Apart from its place in immune defense against infective pathogens, IL-18 participates in the pathogenesis of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases [71].
The same two signals that are required for the production of IL-1β are also necessary to produce IL-18. The first signal is the synthesis of intracellular pro-interleukin, which occurs after stimulation of PRRs, such as TLRs situated in endosomes or on the cell surface and NLRs located in the cytoplasm, i.e., the ligation of PRR with its respected ligand [49]. In the case of IL-18, pro-IL-18, an inactive precursor of IL-18, is cleaved and converted by caspase-1 into the biologically active cytokine IL-18. After being processed, IL-18 is released into the extracellular space [72]. In 2012, Bellora et al. exposed that IL-18 is expressed not only as a secreted form but also as a membrane-bound form [73]. The inactive form has been observed in various cells, including dendritic cells, keratinocytes, macrophages, Kupffer cells, microglia, intestinal epithelial cells, astrocytes and osteoblasts. Summing up, many types of hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells have the potential to produce IL-18 [74,75].
The NLRP3 inflammasome is probably activated by a high glucose concentration or abnormal lipid metabolites, which accompany metabolic disorders. Subsequently, IL-18 and IL-1β are secreted, which can elicit inflammatory responses. IL-18 induces the production of TNFα, which in turn promotes the synthesis and release of IL-6 and CRP [76,77]. Since the discovery of IL-18 in 1995 by Okamura et al. [78], elevated levels of this cytokine have been associated with many health disorders and diseases, including obesity, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, diabetes, and atherosclerosis [79].
Krogh-Madsen et al. reported that TNF-induced insulin resistance is associated with an increased IL18 gene expression in muscle tissue, suggesting that both TNF and IL-18 may play salient roles in pathogenesis of insulin resistance [80]. Lindegaard et al. identified in mice experiments that IL-18 can activate the adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling pathway, which enhances fat oxidation in skeletal muscles and sequentially reduces insulin resistance induced by HFD [81]. In this study, IL-18 receptor/ mice exhibited inflammation, weight gain, lipid deposition, and attenuated AMPK signaling in skeletal muscles, which indicated that IL-18 was involved in metabolic homeostasis, inflammation, and insulin resistance [81]. Esposito et al. reported that fasting IL-18 levels were higher in people with newly diagnosed T2DM than in matched healthy subjects. Moreover, a single high-fat meal was enough to significantly increase the levels of circulating IL-18 in subjects with and without T2DM [82]. Thorand et al. showed in a human population-based cohort study that the elevated serum levels of IL-18 were associated with a significantly increased risk of T2DM and that this association was independent of CRP and IL-6 [83]. Overall, these findings suggest that IL-18 induces inflammatory responses that may lead to insulin resistance and T2DM development. Recently, Zhuang et al. applied a Mendelian randomization method to study the causal relationship between IL-18 plasma levels and T2DM [84]. The authors concluded that the IL-18-associated T2DM risk is predominantly due to the role of pro-inflammatory cytokines in β-cell dysfunction.

3. Mechanism of Inflammasome NLRP3 Activation

Immune cells such as monocytes and macrophages activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in two-step process. The initial step clusters a process in which PAMPs, DAMPs, or environmental stress are recognized by TLRs or cytokines such as TNFα, leading to the activation of NF-κB, which evokes the expression and activation of NLRP3, pro-IL-1β, and pro-IL-18, and transcriptional protein modifications such as ASC phosphorylation, and NLRP3 de-ubiquitination. A secondary stimulus causes activation of the inflammasome by oligomerizing inactive NLRP3 [22,79,85]. Summing up, upon activation, NLRP3 undergoes a conformational change that exposes its nucleotide-binding domain (NBD) and N-terminal pyrin domain to allow for the formation of an oligomeric complex and facilitates the recruitment and activation of pro-caspase-1 [86].
Activation of the inflammasome has been explained using three different models favored in the literature: potassium ion (K+) efflux as induced by extracellular ATP (K+ channel model), the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) via PAMPs and DAMPs (ROS model), and crystalline structures causing lysosomal rupture-induced cathepsin B release (lysosomal damage model) [87,88]. The molecular mechanism by which these models activate the inflammasome remains unclear and has been the subject of much discussion by researchers [89].
The first model indicates that ion fluxes, especially K+ efflux, act as signals for NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Inhibition of K+ efflux by a high concentration of K+ in the cell culture can suppress NLRP3 inflammasome activation in response to most inflammasome activators [89,90]. This model is a crucial factor for the assembly and upregulation of NLRP3 complexes induced by the agonist ATP. The K+ efflux occurs through a pyrogenic P2X7-ATP-dependent pore that recruits a pannexin-1 hemichannel. This action permits extracellular NLRP3 agonists to enter the cytosol and to engage the NLRP3 protein complex, and triggers IL-1β secretion by the inflammasome [91]. In accord with this pattern, several studies have shown that an elevated concentration of extracellular potassium averts NLRP3 complex activation whereas a reduced cytoplasmic potassium concentration initiates the NLRP3 inflammasome activation [24]. Nevertheless, the molecular pathway between diminished levels of cytosolic potassium and NLRP3 activation requires further explanation [92].
The second model shows that the generation of ROS plays an essential role in the inflammasome activation. Almost all NLRP3 activators, including particulate matter, increase intracellular ROS production [93]. Furthermore, the inhibition of ROS with specific scavengers suppresses inflammasome activation in response to a range of NLRP3 activators [93]. Another research has revealed that thioredoxin-interacting protein can bind to NLRP3 in a ROS-dependent manner, additionally indicating the crucial role of ROS in inflammasome activation [94].
The third model revealed that cytosolic release of lysosomal cathepsin B consists in triggering inflammasome activation. In this type, phagocytosis of environmental molecules appears to activate the NLRP3 complex that shapes aggregates when absorbed by phagocytes. These crystalline structures trigger lysosomal effluent and release the essence into the cytosol through a mechanism mediated by lysosomal cysteine protease, cathepsin B, boosting the NLRP3 complex activation [85,95].
Furthermore, recent studies have suggested that posttranslational modifications of NLRP3 may be important in regulating its activation. NLRP3 is inactivated as a result of specific modifications, such as ubiquitination and phosphorylation, and it is activated after de-ubiquitination and de-phosphorylation [96,97].

4. Endothelial Dysfunction as the First Key Step to Activating the Inflammasome

Endothelial cells cover the inner surface of blood vessels in a single layer and perform several functions. They are responsible for the transport of nutrients (among them glucose), hormones, and macromolecules from the blood to the surrounding tissue, enabling its growth and proper metabolism [98]. Endothelial cells affect cell adhesion, the integrity of the vessel wall, vascular permeability, thrombus formation, and fibrinolysis; regulate blood flow; and maintain blood fluidity, leukocyte trafficking, angiogenesis and immunity [99,100]. They secrete mediators that regulate vascular tone—vasoconstrictors, i.e., endothelin-1 (ET-1) and thromboxane A2, and vasodilators, i.e., nitric oxide (NO), prostacycline, and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor [101]. Endothelial cells ensure a barrier between the blood and tissues and therefore play a key role in the inflammatory response [102].
These cells constitute a line of defense against endogenous molecules or microbes causing infections or inflammation [103,104]. Many PAMPs and DAMPs can be detected by endothelial cells thanks to their innate immune system receptors [105,106]. Features of a damaged endothelium include phenotypic changes, inflammation, and impaired permeability, among others [103,107].
Impaired vasodilation, augmented pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory properties, and increased redox state all characterize endothelial dysfunction. In diabetes, endothelial dysfunction is defined as the early stage of different hyperglycemia-associated vascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis, that trigger vascular inflammation and ultimately atherosclerotic lesions. Endothelial dysfunction is developed at a very early stage of T2DM with a complex mechanism including altered cell signaling, increased oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory activation, and mitochondrial dysfunction [108,109]. This pathological condition in diabetes has been associated with high glucose and high fat levels in the blood, insulin resistance, and hypertension [110,111,112]. The expansion of hyperglycemia-induced vascular endothelium inflammation leads to endothelial barrier dysfunction, which eventually results in diabetes-associated vasculopathy [113]. Consequently, vascular complications consist of the primary cause of death and disability in patients with diabetes [114]. It has been noted that, in T2DM, insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction occur before the development of overt hyperglycemia and that insulin resistance usually precedes hyperglycemia and diabetes by many years [100,115,116]. Many studies show that diabetes has been stipulated to have a close relationship with cardiovascular disease and that maintaining normoglycemia is key to preventing cardiovascular disorders [117,118,119].
Glucose transport to endothelial cells is insulin-independent and is mediated by glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) in contrast to striated muscle cells, where it is mediated by the glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4). Therefore, the level of glucose in endothelial cells is the same as in the blood regardless of insulin sensitivity [120]. However, the insulin level in the blood affects the production of NO and ET-1 by the endothelium via two independent insulin-signaling pathways. Insulin resistance influences the production of NO but not the production of ET-1 [121]. Insulin-stimulated NO and ET-1 release are regulated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent and by MAPK-dependent signaling, respectively. Increased insulin signaling enhances the production of ET-1 [122,123,124,125]. Insulin resistance causes an imbalance between the production of NO and the secretion of ET-1. Selective impairment of PI3K activation and compensatory hyperinsulinemia has a direct effect on endothelial dysfunction through the pro-hypertensive, atherosclerotic, thrombogenic, and pro-coagulant effects of insulin [126].
Hyperglycemia causes oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction by the overproduction of ROS that causes cellular damage leading to diabetic complications through several biochemical pathways (Figure 1) [127,128].
The most important source of ROS is excessive activation of the mitochondrial electron transport chain, which is a major site of ATP production in mitochondria and glucose-induced activation of NAD(P)H-dependent oxidase [129,130,131,132]. The overproduction of ROS causes DNA damage. Poly (ADP ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) is activated, and then, the glycolytic enzyme glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH) is inhibited. This results in the accumulation of upstream glycolytic metabolites, which affect the polyol pathway, hexosamine pathway, and diacylglycerol (DAG) and protein kinase C (PKC) pathway, and in the generation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) [133]. Increased polyol activity results in an accumulation of sorbitol and fructose and finally leads to the overproduction of H2O2 and ROS in general, an enhancement of oxidative stress, and the formation of methylglyoxal (precursor of AGEs) and DAG, which activate PKC [132,134,135]. PKC influences insulin receptor substrates 1 and 2, causing inactivation of the PI3K pathway and endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), and NO production in endothelial cells. Subsequently, the activity of NF-κB and the pro-oxidant enzyme NOX are increased [132,136]. Activation of NF-κB increases the production of vascular adhesion molecules, cytokines, and chemo-attractants and, consequently, the activation of inflammatory cells in the vascular wall [100]. AGEs are formed as a result of nonenzymatic glycation of proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids [137,138,139]. AGEs start to perform their functions as a result of binding to their receptors. Finally, AGEs induce inflammation characterized by the presence of pro-inflammatory cytokines and inflammatory molecules such as TNFα, IL-6, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1), and MCP-1 (Figure 1) [140,141,142]. Activation of the hexosamine pathway leads to the dysregulation of O-linked glycosylation, which decreases PI3K/AKT signaling, which in turn reduces the phosphorylation of eNOS by serine/threonine protein kinase B (AKT). Eventually, the production of NO is decreased [143,144,145,146].
In insulin resistance states, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is activated and contributes to insulin resistance [147,148,149,150]. ER is the largest organelle in the cell and constitutes a dynamic structure that fulfills several functions including calcium storage, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, protein synthesis, maturation, folding, and transport [151,152,153]. Excessive disrupted protein synthesis and accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER space results in ER stress, which leads to activation of a complex signaling network known as the unfolded protein response (UPR) [154]. The UPR is a pro-survival mechanism, of which the main role is to increase the protein folding capacity [150]. ER stress, similar to hyperglycemia, induces oxidative stress, causing excessive production of ROS and pathological effects [155,156]. Since there is a high demand for protein synthesis in diabetes, an overwhelming formation of nonnative disulfide bonds leads to overconsumption of glutathione (GSH). This is to scavenge ROS The depletion of stocks of reduced GSH in the cell leads to an increase in oxidative stress [157]. The misfolded proteins buildup inside the ER lumen, and large amounts of Ca2+ leak into the mitochondria, which enhances the production of ROS. Excessive Ca2+ inside the mitochondria leads to ROS production. Then, homeostasis of Ca2+ in the ER is lost, which stimulates ER stress and oxidative stress, causing endothelial dysfunction [132,158]. The contribution of ER stress to insulin resistance is through the UPR branch, protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) pathway [159].
The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a kinase that is a component of two different complexes: mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) [160,161]. The mTORC1 regulates cell growth and metabolism. Activation of mTORC1 affects protein and nucleotide synthesis, lipogenesis, and glycolysis; inhibits autophagy; and controls mitochondrial biogenesis and functions. In contrast, mTORC2 activation regulates cell survival and cytoskeletal organization and phosphorylates AGC kinases such as serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase 1 (SGK1) and AKT. Both mTORC1 and mTORC2 are not active simultaneously—activation of mTORC1 deactivates mTORC2, and vice versa. The level of mTORC1 is increased in diabetes and metabolic stress conditions [162]. Chronic mTORC1 activation increases insulin resistance by regulating negative feedback through the phosphorylation of IRS-1 [163]. Previous studies have indicated an increase in mTORC1 activity in endothelial cells in response to glucose, insulin, oxidative stress, and angiotensin II. This demonstrates that mTORC1 may be an important mediator in several signaling pathways [164]. Nevertheless, the exact effect of mTORC1 on these pathways and, hence, on vascular function has not yet been characterized. The data reported by Decker and Pumiglia indicated that mTORC1 may be the critical determinant of eNOS phosphorylation. This finding provides new insight into eNOS uncoupling, endothelial dysfunction, and vascular disease accompanying diabetes [165]. Recently, Reho et al. demonstrated that mTORC1 signaling plays a key role in the regulation of vascular endothelial function by modulating ROS signaling [164]. Increased activity of mTORC1 causes elevated expression of pro-oxidative genes and the production of ROS, which may contribute to further dysfunction of endothelial cells. A blockade of the inhibitor of NF-κB subunit β activity with an anti-inflammatory, cell-permeable quinoxaline compound, BMS-345541, blocked the production of ROS due to increased mTORC1 activity. However, there is a little research into the role of mTOR signaling in the generation of endothelial dysfunction, which is responsible for inflammasome activation, and further studies are necessary.
Taking into consideration the role of NLRP3 inflammasome in the human body, suppressing the NLRP3 inflammasome could be a new approach to depleting hyperglycemic toxicity and to averting the onset of vascular complication [166].
Mice with Kawasaki disease, an inflammatory disease model, show impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation associated with increased caspase-1, IL-1β, and VCAM-1 expression [167]. Furthermore, NLRP3 deficiency protects endothelial function in hypercholesterolemic mice by depletion of vascular superoxide anion generation and increasing eNOS activity. In vitro experiments also indicate a modulatory role of NLRP3 on endothelial function since the silencing of the NLRP3 gene prevents caspase-1 and IL-1β activation in endothelial cells stimulated with cell wall fragments of Lactobacillus casei [168]. Additionally, the expression of NLRP3 inflammasome constituents is increased in brain areas that control blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats and is linked to extension vascular damage and high blood pressure. Chen et al. deliberated the role of the inflammasome activation mediating tight junction disruption, a critical event of endothelial impairment that leads to endothelial hyperpermeability in diabetes. The scientists observed that NLRP3 ablation prevented mice from tight junction impairment in the coronary arterial endothelium. Similarly, NLRP3 gene silencing avoided high glucose-induced downregulation of tight junction proteins of mouse vascular endothelial cells in vitro [167]. They concluded that the ROS-dependent activation of endothelial NLRP3 inflammasome by hyperglycemia might be essential to initiate the mechanism provoking endothelial dysfunction and endothelial injury in diabetes [169].

5. Role of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Diabetes and Activation Inflammasome by Metabolic Signals

The NLRP3 inflammasome seems to act as a sensor for metabolic danger signals (endogenous DAMPs and PAMPs) that accumulate during obesity, including saturated free fatty acids (FFAs), ceramides, high levels of glucose, uric acid, and Islet Amyloid Polipeptyde (IAAP) [27]. The NLRP3 inflammasome activation and successive IL-1β production have been first shown in pancreatic β-cells and islet-infiltrating macrophages [170]. This process results in IL-1β production, and numerous cytokines and chemokines are induced (Figure 2) [27].
Inflammation from nutrient overload and obesity is increasingly recognized in obesity-related diseases, including T2DM. Research confirms that caloric restriction and intermittent fasting reverse nutrient overload states in parallel with reducing inflammation [171]. Obesity-associated inflammation includes the activation of both the innate and adaptive immune systems. Moreover, obesity results in the activation of inflammatory cells in various lipid-accumulating organs, which in turn leads to the production of cytokines and acute-phase proteins [172]. The triggers for the pro-inflammatory pathways comprise the excess nutrient intermediates, including saturated fatty acids, ceramides, and excess glucose levels that function through pattern recognition receptors on leukocyte or adipocyte cell membranes [173]. The best studied organs/tissues for nutrient overload-related pathways activating immune response include the liver, pancreas, muscles, and adipocytes [174]. Collectively, human studies indicate that insulin resistance and obesity are strongly associated with increased NLRP3 expression in adipose tissue. Studies in obese mice corroborate this finding. Moreover, HFD increases NLRP3 expression in murine adipose tissue while calorie-restricted diet reduces its expression. Hence, NLRP3 blockade in mice protects against HFD-induced obesity and insulin resistance [175]. A variety of immune cells, including pro-inflammatory macrophages, affect adipose tissue homeostasis by increasing the production of cytokines such as TNF, IL-1β, and IL-6 [176]. NLRP3 inflammasome activation seems to be a key regulator of adipocyte differentiation and drives adipocytes towards more insulin resistance. Consistently, caloric restriction and exercise-mediated weight loss in obese subjects with T2DM reduce NLRP3 (also known as CIAS1) and IL1B gene expressions in abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue, improving insulin sensitivity [177]. Esser et al. demonstrated an increased expression of NLRP3 and IL1B in visceral adipose tissue from metabolically unhealthy obese patients compared with metabolically healthy obese patients. These authors also reported that NLRP3 expression positively correlated with insulin resistance [178]. Yin et al. found that NLRP3 expression was increased in subcutaneous adipose tissue from mice fed for 3 months with a HFD compared with control mice [179]. Wang et al. showed that NLRP3 and Caspase-1 expressions were increased in epididymal fat from db/db mice compared with wild-type mice [180]. Finucane et al. demonstrated that NLRP3, Caspase-1, and IL1B expressions in adipose tissue were higher in mice treated for 6 months with a saturated fatty acid HFD in comparison with mice fed with a monounsaturated fatty acid HFD [181]. In the same study, it was demonstrated in vitro that the latter diet can reduce adipose IL-1β secretion and insulin resistance. The authors further showed that the effect of the monounsaturated fatty acid is related to the ability to block ATP-induced processing of IL-1β in an AMPK-dependent manner.
The NLRP3 inflammasome is extensively studied in inflammation prognosis and progression of T2DM. Liu et al. reviewed the crucial role of NLRP3 in the pathogenesis of T2DM. It has been demonstrated that IL-1β is elevated in T2DM patients, suggesting that IL-1β may be linked with the development of T2DM [182]. Excessive IL-1β production in T2DM has a few consequences: (1) it induces the expression of other inflammatory mediators (IL-18, IL-33) using IL-1 receptor signaling that amplifies inflammatory reaction [183]; (2) it evokes oxidative stress as well as ER stress, which are both closely linked to T2DM [184,185]; and (3) it activates c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs), inducing serine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) and attenuating the activity of the insulin-PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in insulin-sensitive tissues [186]. Bitto et al. exposed that NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, IL-18, and IL-1β are upregulated during wound healing in animal models of T2DM in comparison with healthy animals [187]. Kim et al. demonstrated that NLRP3 can be suppressed by γ-tocotrienol, delaying the progression of T2DM [188]. Coll et al. reported that MCC950, which inhibits the NLRP3 inflammasome, can be applied as a potential anti-inflammatory therapy in T2DM [189]. More evidence for a pathogenic role of NLRP3 inflammasome in T2DM comes from a study reporting that glyburide suppresses inflammasome-mediated IL-1β release in monocytes [190]. Metformin was also reported to decrease IL-1β levels, which was attributed to activating AMPK [191]. Henriksbo et al. revealed that Fluvastatin provokes inflammation and insulin resistance in adipose tissue via the upregulation of NLRP3, which is consistent with the increased expression of NLRP3 in inflamed adipose tissues of T2DM patients [192]. These observations confirm that the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome is related to insulin resistance. Furthermore, wound healing is disrupted in T2DM patients [193]. The above data clearly show that much research was conducted to explain the association of NLRP3 inflammasome and T2DM. Nevertheless, the mechanism of NLRP3 inflammasome activation in T2DM is not fully understood and requires further studies [194].
The role of NLRP3 inflammasome in metabolic syndrome and T2DM can be split into two subcategories. The first subcategory contains mediated roles by sensing endogenous inflammasome activators, whereas the second contains indirect roles related to inflammasome-associated alteration, leading to manipulation of the gut microbiota. It is worth stressing that T2DM has been the first metabolic disease shown to involve NLRP3 [195,196].
Elevated plasma FFAs, mainly a result of increased high fat diet consumption, contributes to the development of T2DM [197]. Recent studies revealed an association between NLRP3 inflammasomes and metabolic disease-related lipid species, such as saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and ceramides (Figure 2) [198]. An analysis from the Ting laboratory demonstrated that the fatty acid palmitate in human plasma can activate the NLRP3 inflammasome [199]. Kien et al. uncovered that lowering the dietary palmitate to anoleate ratio diminishes cytokines in leukocytes and reduces redox-sensitive gene expression in muscles [200]. Palmitic acid is one abundant FFA that activates the NLRP3 inflammasome via mitochondrial ROS production and lysosomal destabilization, thus promoting insulin resistance. Like palmitate, the unsaturated fatty acid oleate, is likewise highly abundant in plasma; however, in contrast to palmitate, oleate was shown not to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome [199,201]. Interestingly, whereas saturated fatty acid activates the NLRP3 inflammasome in mice and contributes to insulin resistance, unsaturated fatty acid attenuates IL-1β-mediated insulin resistance by preserving AMPK activity [202]. Several studies highlight that dietary fatty acid composition is sensed by the NLRP3 inflammasome that modulates its response depending on fat type. Different cell types respond to FFAs and assemble inflammasome components, inducing IL-1β release [181].
Palmitate-induced NLRP3 inflammasome complex formation disrupts endothelial tight junctions, leading to the onset of endothelial injury during obesity. Intestinal epithelial cells react to a high-cholesterol diet by activating caspase-1 after the IL-1β-dependent accumulation of myeloid cells in the intestine. In monocytes, palmitate activates caspase-4/5 and prompts the release of IL-1β and IL-18 [203,204,205].
Increased levels of SFAs promote the synthesis of ceramides. This lipid species production is associated with an inflammatory response during obesity-induced diabetes. Ceramide has been shown to evoke NLRP3 inflammasome activation in cultured macrophages and in adipose tissue explants of diet-induced obese mice, which, upon exposure to this lipid, stimulate NLRP3-dependent caspase-1 activation [177,206].
Hyperglycemia is one of the hallmarks of T2DM [207]. It has been known for almost two decades that the NLRP3 inflammasome is activated in response to high levels of glucose (Figure 2) [182,208]. Some reports show that β cells in pancreatic islets produce IL-1β in response to high glucose, which contributes to glucotoxicity and results in functional impairment and apoptosis of β cells [58]. Aside from β cells, hyperglycemia is also reported to increase IL-1β generation in adipose tissue and a cardiomyocyte cell lines [209]. Recent evidence has suggested that high glucose levels promote IL1B mRNA transcription [210]. Glucose has been shown to activate the protein kinase C alpha (PKCα), and via phosphorylation of p38, MAPK and extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) lead to NF-κB activation and subsequent IL1B transcription in monocytes, hence priming cells for inflammasome activation [211]. High glucose concentration may supply the priming signal for transcription of IL1B by activation of thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP), which afterwards facilitates boosted IL-1β expression levels. Additionally, high levels of glucose promote the production of ROS, and that is sufficient as the second signal that promotes inflammasome activation of caspase-1 and processing of IL-1β in pancreatic islets [212,213]. TXNIP, also known as thioredoxin-binding protein 2, is a protein that interacts and negatively regulates the expression and function of thioredoxin (TXN). TXNIP acts as a crucial regulator of lipid and glucose metabolism through pleiotropic actions including regulation of β cell function, peripheral glucose uptake, adipogenesis, hepatic glucose production, and substrate utilization. The upregulation of TXNIP in animal models has been shown to induce apoptosis of pancreatic β cells and to reduce insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues like skeletal muscles and adipose tissue. On the contrary, TXNIP-deficient animals are protected from diet-induced insulin resistance and T2DM [213,214]. Alhawiti et al. indicated that TXNIP levels are elevated in people with T2DM and that its expression is strongly induced by glucose [215]. It seems to be interesting that, upon activation, TXNIP is able to directly interact with NLRP3 in a ROS-dependent manner, leading to the activation of caspase-1 and the processing of IL-1β in pancreatic islets. However, these observations could not be reproduced in bone-marrow-derived macrophages lacking TXNIP and exhibited in high glucose levels [216].
Obesity is accompanied by an increased level of uric acid. Uric acid can form crystals as NLRP3 activators [217]. Uric acid is a product of purine catabolism released from ischemic tissues and dying cells. After crystallization, uric acid activates the immune system by reducing NO availability, increasing ROS production, stimulating chemotaxis, and activating the NF-κB and MAPK pathways [218]. Uric acid crystals also induce the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, secreted during inflammasome formation [219].
In 2010, Masters et al. demonstrated that amylin, known also as islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP), which is secreted by pancreatic β cells besides insulin, can be converted from a soluble to amyloid form and can activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in mouse macrophages (Figure 2) [220]. Human IAPP peptides have the tendency to misfold and to form insoluble aggregates [221]. IAPP production is chronically stimulated in obese individuals due to high blood glucose levels, and amyloid IAPP accumulates in the pancreas. Similar to many other particulate substances, IAPP aggregates are potent NLRP3 activators [222]. In a recent study, the stimulation of macrophages with human IAPP was shown to induce the cleavage of caspase-1 and the production of IL-1β in an NLRP3-dependent manner [223].
Intestinal microflora are involved in metabolic, immunological, and protective functions [224]. A change in the composition of the intestinal microbiota, i.e., a process called dysbiosis, has been reported to play a key role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases such as T2DM [225]. Inflammasomes play an important role in regulating the composition of the gut microflora, as highlighted by recent studies in mouse models [226]. In this study, a susceptibility to colitis and tumorigenesis was indicated as the result of the absence of components of the inflammasome associated with dysbiosis [226]. Accumulating evidence strongly suggests that the inflammasome structure is responsible for the epithelium intestinal integrity and protection against pathogenic attack [166]. The mechanisms and factors involved in activation of the inflammasome by intestinal microbiota are unknown. However, it has been reported that some species of pathogenic bacteria such as Citrobacterrodentium, Listeria monocytogenes, Clostridium difficile, and Salmonella typhimurium growing in the intestine appear to be associated with the deficiency of IL-1β, IL-18, and caspase-1 [227,228].

6. Epigenetic Regulation of NLRP3 Inflammasome by microRNA

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, endogenous noncoding RNAs that are 19–24 nucleotides (nt) in length and exert regulatory functions through complementary base pairing to the 39 untranslated regions (39 UTRs) of protein-coding messenger RNAs (mRNAs). The discovery of miRNAs disclosed a new dimension in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. Humans have more than 2500 miRNAs that participate in most cellular processes [229,230,231]. The expression of miRNA is deregulated during diseases such as cancer, influenza, leukemia, and T2DM [232,233]. There have been a few dozens of miRNAs reported to be involved in either regulating the NLRP3 inflammasome or developing inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, or T2DM [234,235,236]. A review of all these miRNAs is beyond the scope of this manuscript. However, below, we present those miRNAs that are altered in T2DM and are also known to be involved in either NLRP3 inflammasome activation or endothelial dysfunction. We start with miRNA-223, which is a key regulator of NLRP3 activity. The role of miRNAs in controlling innate immune responses has primarily been aimed at TLR signal-transduction pathways. Respective miRNAs were identified to be induced upon TLR activation targeting mRNAs encoding elements of the TLR-signaling system itself. These regulatory systems have evolved to allow a strong initial immune response that is gradually dampened down after secondary induction of the regulating miRNAs [237,238].
miRNA-223 is a highly conserved miRNA. The gene encoding miRNA-223 is located within the q12 locus of the X chromosome [239,240]. It is specifically expressed in myeloid lineage and triggers myeloid differentiation of progenitor cells to maintain granulocyte function [241]. These molecular particles are involved in the regulation of hematopoiesis, immune response, and different types of inflammation disorders. A few studies have indicated that miRNA-223 is deregulated in T2DM [242,243]. This suggests that T2DM is an inflammatory disease with pathogenesis driven at least in part by pro-inflammatory cytokines. Quantitative miRNA expression analyses revealed that these particles were consistently upregulated in hearts of the insulin-resistant patients with T2DM. This effect was connected with the miRNA-223 role in GLUT4 regulation and glucose metabolism. In vitro, the overexpression of miRNA-223 in cardiomyocytes increased the total GLUT4 level and induced GLUT4 translocation from the cytoplasmic compartment to the cell membrane. In vivo, the inhibition of miRNA-223 in the heart resulted in a significant decrease in GLUT4 expression [244]. In individuals with T2DM, the increased miRNA-223 and GLUT4-dependent glucose uptake may be insignificant in the periphery, but in the heart, this may have a marked effect and may increase metabolic processes that could be detrimental. This possibility is suggested by the fact that myocardial infarction is the primary cause of mortality in people with T2DM [245,246].
The miRNA-223 is a crucial regulator of NLRP3 inflammasome activity. Tight transcriptional regulation trough miRNA-223 controls inflammasome activation by manipulating mRNA levels of NLRP3 [247]. The inhibition of NLRP3 expression by miRNA-223 occurs through a conserved binding site within the 3′UTR of NLRP3, leading to limited NLRP3 inflammasome activity. Haneklaus et al. proved that miRNA-223 targets the 3′UTR of NLRP3 and that miRNA-223 expression decreases as monocytes differentiate into macrophages and NLRP3 protein levels increase [246]. The overexpression of miRNA-223 averts the accumulation of NLRP3 protein and inhibits IL-1β generation by the inflammasome [243]. Further investigations are needed to elucidate the functional role and therapeutic potential of miRNA-223 in metabolic disorders. This may provide new insights into the epigenetic regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome [248,249].
Up until now, there were four miRNAs reported to play regulatory roles in T2DM as well as endothelial dysfunction and NLRP3 inflammasome, i.e., miRNA-9, miRNA-21, miRNA-133, and miRNA-146a [234,235,236].
The gene encoding miRNA-9 is located on human chromosome 1 (1q22) and is highly expressed in the brain area. miRNA-9 is linked to the secretion of insulin [250,251]. The relation between β-cell function and miRNA-9 was found through in vitro and in vivo experiments. Ramachandran et al. reported that miRNA-9 targets and regulates Sirt1 expression in insulin-secreting cells. This targeting is relevant in pancreatic islets, where decreasing Sirt1 protein levels are accompanied by high miRNA-9 expression during glucose-dependent insulin secretion. This functional interplay between insulin secretion, miRNA-9, and Sirt1 expression could be relevant in diabetes [252]. In 2006, Plaisance et al. demonstrated that insulin secretion can also be affected by the overexpression of miRNA-9, which targets the transcription factor Onecut-2 by reducing its amount, leading to the increased expression of Granuphilin/Slp4, a negative regulator of insulin secretion [253].
The MIR21 gene encoding miRNA-21 is located on human chromosome 17 (17q23.1) [254]. These molecules are highly expressed in endothelial cells, cardiomyocytes, and cardiac fibroblasts, acting on a variety of targets related to apoptosis and inflammation. Both in vitro and in vivo studies showed that miRNA-21 was upregulated in T2DM and obesity, suggesting a potential role in common aspects of the disease pathogenesis [255]. miRNA-21 is involved in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling pathways and has been shown to be a target for weight reduction in vivo [256].
Diabetic condition in vivo as well as the persistent exposure to high insulin and glucose in vitro seem to contribute to the upregulation of miRNA-21 in adipocytes. This miRNA was reported to be upregulated in the kidneys of diabetic mice and in mesangial cell lines grown in high-glucose conditions [257]. At the molecular level, in diabetic conditions, miRNA-21 was reported to increase the downstream AKT/target of rapamycin complex 1 (AKT/TORC1) activity and to increase NF-κB signaling pathways [258]. Ling et al. demonstrated that miRNA-21 reversed high-glucose and high insulin-induced insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Overexpressing miRNA-21 extensively improved the insulin-induced phosphorylation in AKT, glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3β), and GLUT4 in insulin-resistive adipocytes [259]. Zhang et al. showed that miRNA-21 deficiency increased the production of ROS and induced endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial miRNA-21 may play a critical role in vascular remodeling by regulating transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) signaling [260].
miRNA-133, which is coded by three genes (MIR133A1, MIR133A2, and MIR133B located on chromosomes 18, 20, and 6, respectively), is mainly expressed in the muscles and controls the pathogenesis of insulin resistance [261]. Bandyopadhyay et al. reported that overexpression of miRNA-133a-1-enhanced secretion of IL-1β and the activation of caspase-1 resulting from upregulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome [262]. Contrary to miRNA-133a-1, miRNA-133b inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome. It binds to the 3′UTR of NLRP3 and downregulates its activation, which leads to the decreased expression of caspase-1, ASC, IL-18, and IL-1 [263].
miRNA-133, miRNA-223, as well as miRNA-1 are expressed in a diabetic heart and take part in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy. miRNA-133 promotes the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy by inhibiting the expression of GLUT4 or Kruppel-Like Factor 15, which reduce glucose uptake and metabolism in cardiomyocytes [264].
A few studies support the notion that miRNA-146a, that is coded by MIR146A located on human chromosome 5 (5q33.3), has anti-inflammatory effects, and miRNA-146a deficiency enhances inflammatory responses, promoting increased activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and the secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 [234,265]. miRNA-146a directly downregulates the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by targeting tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) and IL-1 receptor associated kinase (IRAK1) [266,267]. In mice with miRNA-146a deficiency, the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNFα is increased, and the genes of NRLP3, ASC, and caspase-1 are remarkably overexpressed [268]. Cowan et al. reported that prolonged exposure of saturated fatty acids to the β-cell line MIN6 cells and pancreatic islets increased the expression of miRNA-146 [269].
Other miRNAs with potential roles in the regulation of the inflammasome complex and associated with the development of diabetes include miRNA-7, miRNA-132, and miRNA-148 [234,235].
The gene encoding miRNA-7 is located on human chromosome 9 (9q21.32) and directly regulated by the transcription factor HoxD10 [270]. miRNA-7 is associated with insulin secretion, β-cell development, and glucose homeostasis. The molecules are highly expressed in islet cells and regulate components necessary for insulin exocytosis [271]. Recent studies pointed out the higher expression level of miRNA-7 in human pancreatic fetal and adult endocrine cells. These studies revealed that the inhibition of miRNA-7 during the embryonic stage results in general downregulation of insulin production, in a decrease in β-cell count, and in glucose intolerance in the postnatal period [272,273].
Upregulation of miRNA-132 may be associated with prolonged hyperglycemia. It was observed in vitro in islets exposed to high-glucose concentrations and in vivo in rat islets in a non-obesity T2DM model [274]. Bijirk et al. reported the in vivo effect of cholesterol-conjugated antagomirs targeting miRNA-132 on islet function in mice [275]. They verified that miRNA-132 expression was decreased in pancreatic islets and that treatment resulted in increased insulin secretion and a reduction in blood glucose levels [275]. Nesca et al. investigated that the expression of miRNA-132 increased as a result of incubation with palmitate while the expression of other miRNAs decreased after the same treatment [276].
miRNA-148 was found to be overexpressed in adipose tissue of high fat-fed mice and obese human subjects, promoting adipogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells by targeting proto-oncogene protein Wnt1. miRNA-148 downregulates insulin promoter activity and insulin mRNA levels [277].
Several other miRNAs are involved in the development and progression of endothelial dysfunction and T2DM. They are miRNA-29b, miRNA-122, miRNA-126, and miRNA-143 [235,236].
miRNA-29b is encoded by a gene located on human chromosome 7 (7q32.3). Studies have shown that miRNA-29b expression is increased in the liver, muscle, and fat of diabetic rats, and a relationship with insulin resistance has been shown in cellular experiments [278]. miRNA-29b mainly mediates the insulin pathway by inhibiting proteins that enhance insulin signaling. In addition, it can prevent insulin secretion by inhibiting monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) [279]. miRNA-29b has also been shown to increase blood pressure and endothelial inflammation [280].
The gene encoding miRNA-122, located on human chromosome 18 (18q21.31) miRNA-122 is mainly expressed in the liver, and it regulates the expression of various genes associated with cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism. In a population-based study, it was shown that circulating levels of miRNA-122 were elevated in people with metabolic syndrome or T2DM. Moreover, they were also associated with the risk of new-onset metabolic syndrome and T2DM in the general population [281]. miRNA-122 levels have been higher in the sera from hyperglycemic patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to sera from normoglycemic patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome [282]. Young et al. demonstrated that miRNA-122 contributed to the endothelial dysfunction in hypertension by reducing L-arginine and NO metabolism [283]. Recently, Wu et al. reported that the inhibition of miRNA-122 reduced atherosclerotic lesion formation in ApoE¯/¯ mice by regulating neuronal Per-Arnt-Sim domain protein 3 (NPAS3)-mediated endothelial to mesenchymal transition [284].
The MIR126 gene is located on human chromosome 9 (9q34.3). In 2010, Zampetaki et al. reported for the first time that endothelial miRNA-126 levels were deregulated in people with T2DM, which suggested a potential role of this miRNA as a novel biomarker for a newly diagnosed T2DM [243]. This was then confirmed by other authors [285]. Moreover, in an in vitro study, it was revealed that hyperglycemia reduced the miRNA-126 content of endothelial apoptotic bodies and affected miRNA-126 release from endothelial cells, suggesting that this miRNA can be a potential soluble biomarker for endothelial dysfunction or atherosclerosis [243]. miRNA-126 is considered the main regulator of endothelial homeostasis and vascular integrity [286]. Harris et al. stated the involvement of miRNAs in endothelial cells activation and dysfunction [287]. They demonstrated that VCAM-1 is a potential target of miRNA-126. Endogenous miRNA-126 decreases VCAM-1 expression, thereby suppressing leukocyte interactions with endothelial cells. The above data suggest that miRNA-126 can regulate vascular inflammation [287]. miRNA-126 can promote insulin resistance by inhibiting IRS1 [288].
Xu et al. documented a correlation between upregulated miRNA-143, located on human chromosome 5 (5q32); endothelial dysfunction; and atherosclerotic plaque formation. Low miRNA-143 levels were accompanied by the elevated glycolysis rate in endothelial cells. Contrarily, the overexpression of miR-143 suppressed glycolysis through direct targeting of hexokinase 2 [289]. Interestingly, miRNA-143 was upregulated in atherosclerotic plaque samples in comparison with normal arteries. Jordan et al. used two obesity mouse models, i.e., db/db mice and diet-induced obesity mice, to demonstrate increased hepatic miRNA-143 expression. According to this study, the overexpression of miRNA-143 may reduce insulin sensitivity by downregulating oxysterol-binding-protein-related protein 8 (ORP8) and by impairing insulin-induced AKT activation and glucose homeostasis [290].

7. Conclusions

This review summarizes the links between the NLRP3 inflammasome, endothelial dysfunction, and type 2 diabetes. The role of NLRP3 as an indicator of metabolic disturbance has been clearly demonstrated. Inflammasome activity is crucial for host responses to microbial pathogens and cytokine production by the innate immune system shaping the adaptive immune response. Understanding the balance between favorable and noxious inflammasome activation is necessary in order to shape this activation for the benefit of the patient. Endothelial cells become active participants and regulators of the inflammatory response in the event of inflammation or infection as they are among the first cells to come into contact with endogenous particles or microbes Taking into consideration the role of NLRP3 inflammasome in the human body, suppressing the NLRP3 inflammasome could be a new approach in depletion of hyperglycemic toxicity and averting the onset of vascular complication in people with T2DM.
We revealed that the advancement of research increased the understanding of potential mechanisms that affect endothelial function through the NLRP3 inflammasome activation pathway. A better understanding of the interactions between endothelial dysfunction and the NLRP3 inflammasome-regulated pathways may open up a new avenue for effective treatment of cardiovascular complications in metabolic diseases including T2DM.
In this review, we also summarized previous studies on the molecular mechanisms of inflammasome activation. Discoveries in fundamental and preclinical research in recent years have demonstrated great potential for miRNA in the treatment of diseases linked to NLRP3 dysfunction. A few miRNAs are deregulated in T2DM, which is compatible with an emerging body of evidence suggesting that this is an inflammatory disease with pathogenesis driven at least in part by pro-inflammatory cytokines. Thanks to the increase in molecular information about inflammasomes, new therapeutic options are expected for patients with inflammatory diseases. This may offer potential novel therapeutic perspectives in T2DM prevention and treatment.
Finally, it must be stressed that inflammasomes other than NLRP3, such as AIM2, NLRP1, NLRC4, and NLRP6, have not been thoroughly investigated so far in the context of the development of endothelial dysfunction and the impact on pathogenesis and progression of T2DM.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.M.G. and P.L.; methodology, I.M.G.; validation, A.C. and P.L.; investigation, I.M.G. and A.C.; resources, P.L.; data curation, I.M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, I.M.G.; writing—review and editing, I.M.G., A.C. and P.L.; visualization, I.M.G.; supervision, P.L.; project administration, P.L.; funding acquisition, P.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially founded by National Science Centre Poland, grant number 2017/27/B/ST7/00269.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jerzy Kawiak for valuable comments during the preparation of this review.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

3′UTR3′untranslated region
39 UTRs39 untranslated regions
AGEsadvanced glycation end products
AKTserine/threonine protein kinase B
AIMabsentin-melanoma
ALRsabsentin-melanoma-like receptors
AMPKadenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase
ASCapoptosis-associated speck-like protein
CARDC-terminal caspase recruitment domain
CRPC-reactice protein
CTLsC-type lectins
DAGdiacylglycerol
DAMPsdamage-associated molecular patterns
dsDNAbacterial double-stranded DNA
ET-1endothelin-1
ERendoplasmic reticulum
ERK1/2extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2
eNOSendothelial NO synthase
FFAssaturated free fatty acids
G3PDHglyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
GSHglutathione
GSK3βglycogen synthase kinase 3 beta
GLUT1glucose transporter 1
GLUT4glucose transporter 4
HFDhigh-fat diet
IAAPislet amyloid polipeptyde
ICAM-1intercellular adhesion molecule 1
ICEinterleukin-1β-converting enzyme
IDFInternational Diabetes Federation
ILinterleukins
IRAK1IL-1 receptor-associated kinase
IRS-1insulin receptor substrate-1
JNKsc-Jun N-terminal kinases
LRRleucine-rich repeats
MAPKmitogen-activated protein kinases
MCP1monocyte chemoattractant protein 1
MCT1monocarboxylate transporter 1
miRNAsmicroRNAs
mRNAsmessenger RNAs
mTORmechanistic target of rapamycin
mTORCmechanistic target of rapamycin complex
NBDnucleotide-binding domain
NF-κBnuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
NLRPnucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor with a pyrin domain
NLRP3protein 3 inflammasome complex
NLRNod-like receptor
NOnitric oxide
NODnucleotide-binding oligomerization domain
NODnucleotide oligomerization domain
NPAS3neuronal Per-Arnt-Sim domain protein 3
NTnucleotides
ORP8oxysterol-binding-protein-related protein 8
PAMPspathogen-associated molecular patterns
PARP-1poly (ADP ribose) polymerase 1
PERKprotein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase
PI3Kphosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
PKCprotein kinase C
PKCαprotein kinase C alpha
PRRspattern recognition receptor
PYDpyrin domain
RIG-Iretinoic acid inducible gene-I
RLRsRIG-I-like receptors
ROSreactive oxygen species
SFAssaturated fatty acids
SGK1serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase 1
T2DMtype 2 diabetes mellitus
TGF-βtransforming growth factor beta
ThT helper
TLRstoll-like receptors
TNFαtumor necrosis factor alpha
TNFRtumor necrosis factor receptor
TORC1target of rapamycin complex 1
TRAF6TNFR-associated factor 6
TXNthioredoxin
TXNIPthioredoxin-interacting protein
UPRunfolded protein response
VCAM-1vascular cell adhesion molecule
VEGFvascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 9th ed.; International Diabetes Federation: Brussels, Belgium, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Guariguata, L.; Whiting, D.R.; Hambleton, I.; Beagley, J.; Linnenkamp, U.; Shaw, J.E. Global Estimates of Diabetes Prevalence for 2013 and Projections For 2035. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pr. 2014, 103, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Leon, B.M.; Maddox, T.M. Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Epidemiology, Biological Mechanisms, Treatment Recommendations and Future Research. World J. Diabetes 2015, 6, 1246–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Unnikrishnan, R.; Pradeepa, R.; Joshi, S.R.; Mohan, V. Type 2 Diabetes: Demystifying the Global Epidemic. Diabetes 2017, 66, 1432–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Al-Lawati, J.A. Diabetes Mellitus: A Local and Global Public Health Emergency! Oman Med. J. 2017, 32, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hameed, I.; Masoodi, S.R.; Mir, S.A.; Nabi, M.; Ghazanfar, K.; Ganai, B.A. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: From a Metabolic Disorder to an Inflammatory Condition. World J. Diabetes 2015, 6, 598–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nordmann, T.M.; Dror, E.; Schulze, F.; Traub, S.; Berishvili, E.; Barbieux, C.; Böni-Schnetzler, M.; Donath, M.Y. The Role of Inflammation in β-cell Dedifferentiation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sproston, N.R.; Ashworth, J.J. Role of C-Reactive Protein at Sites of Inflammation and Infection. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, L.; Deng, H.; Cui, H.; Fang, J.; Zuo, Z.; Deng, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, L. Inflammatory Responses and Inflammation-Associated Diseases in Organs. Oncotarget 2017, 9, 7204–7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Frostegård, J. Immune Mechanisms in Atherosclerosis, Especially in Diabetes Type 2. Front. Endocrinol. 2013, 4, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dixit, V.D. Nlrp3 Inflammasome Activation in Type 2 Diabetes: Is It Clinically Relevant? Diabetes 2013, 62, 22–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Stutz, A.; Golenbock, D.T.; Latz, E. Inflammasomes: Too Big to Miss. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 3502–3511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Groslambert, M.; Py, B.F. Spotlight on the NLRP3 Inflammasome Pathway. J. Inflamm. Res. 2018, 11, 359–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Latz, E.; Duewell, P. NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation in Inflammaging. Semin. Immunol. 2018, 40, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shao, B.Z.; Cao, Q.; Liu, C. Targeting NLRP3 Inflammasome in the Treatment of CNS Diseases. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2018, 11, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Benetti, E.; Chiazza, F.; Patel, N.S.; Collino, M. The NLRP3 Inflammasome as a Novel Player of the Intercellular Crosstalk in Metabolic Disorders. Mediat. Inflamm. 2013, 2013, 678627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yin, Y.; Pastrana, J.L.; Li, X.; Huang, X.; Mallilankaraman, K.; Choi, E.T.; Madesh, M.; Wang, H.; Yang, X.F. Inflammasomes: Sensors of Metabolic Stresses for Vascular Inflammation. Front. Biosci. 2013, 18, 638–649. [Google Scholar]
  18. Man, S.M.; Karki, R.; Kanneganti, T.D. Molecular Mechanisms and Functions of Pyroptosis, Inflammatory Caspases and Inflammasomes in Infectious Diseases. Immunol. Rev. 2017, 277, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Conley, S.M.; Abais, J.M.; Boini, K.M.; Li, P.L. Inflammasome Activation in Chronic Glomerular Diseases. Curr. Drug Targets 2017, 18, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Martinon, F.; Burns, K.; Tschopp, J. The Inflammasome: A Molecular Platform Triggering Activation of Inflammatory Caspases and Processing of proIL-beta. Mol. Cell 2002, 10, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jha, S.; Ting, J.P. Inflammasome-Associated NucleotiDe-binding Domain, Leucine-Rich Repeat Proteins and Inflammatory Diseases. J. Immunol. 2009, 12, 7623–7629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yang, Q.; Liu, R.; Yu, Q.; Bi, Y.; Liu, G. Metabolic Regulation of Inflammasomes in Inflammation. Immunology 2019, 2, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ahechu, P.; Zozaya, G.; Martí, P.; Hernández-Lizoáin, J.L.; Baixauli, J.; Unamuno, X.; Frühbeck, G.; Catalán, V. NLRP3 Inflammasome: A Possible Link Between Obesity-Associated Low-Grade Chronic Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer Development. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, W.; Chen, C.; Chen, Z.; Liu, L.; Jiang, J.; Wu, Z.; Zhao, M.; Chen, Y. NLRP3: A Novel Mediator in Cardiovascular Disease. J. Immunol. Res. 2018, 2018, 5702103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Conforti-Andreoni, C.; Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P.; Mortellaro, A. The Inflammasomes in Health and Disease: From Genetics to Molecular Mechanisms of Autoinflammation and Beyond. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2011, 2, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Fernandez, M.V.; Miller, E.A.; Bhardwaj, N. Activation and Measurement of NLRP3 Inflammasome Activity Using IL-1β in Human Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells. J. Vis. Exp. 2014, 87, e51284. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiang, D.; Chen, S.; Sun, R.; Zhang, X.; Wang, D. The NLRP3 Inflammasome: Role in Metabolic Disorders and Regulation by Metabolic Pathways. Cancer Lett. 2018, 419, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Volpe, C.M.; Anjos, P.M.; Nogueira-Machado, J.A. Inflammasome as a New Therapeutic Target for Diabetic Complications. Recent Pat. Endocr. Metab. Immune Drug Discov. 2016, 10, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Parrish, A.B.; Freel, C.D.; Kornbluth, S. Cellular Mechanisms Controlling Caspase Activation and Function. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5, a008672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kuranaga, E. Beyond Apoptosis: Caspase Regulatory Mechanisms and Functions in Vivo. Genes Cells 2012, 2, 83–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. McIlwain, D.R.; Berger, T.; Mak, T.W. Caspase Functions in Cell Death and Disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7, a008656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Martin, S.J.; Henry, C.M.; Cullen, S.P. A Perspective on Mammalian Caspases as Positive and Negative Regulators of Inflammation. Mol. Cell 2012, 4, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ramirez, M.L.G.; Poreba, M.; Snipas, S.J.; Groborz, K.; Drag, M.; Salvesen, G.S. Extensivepeptide and Natural Protein Substrate Screens Reveal That Mouse Caspase-11 Has Much Narrower Substrate Specificity Than Caspase-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 18, 7058–7067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Xi, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Yang, W.Y.; Jiang, X.; Sha, X.; Cheng, X.; Wang, J.; Qin, X.; Yu, Y.; et al. Caspase-1 Inflammasome Activation Mediates Homocysteine-Induced Pyrop-Apoptosis in Endothelial Cells. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 1525–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Junger, W.G. Immune Cell Regulation by Autocrine Purinergic Signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 3, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Fettelschoss, A.; Kistowska, M.; LeibundGut-Landmann, S.; Beer, H.D.; Johansen, P.; Senti, G.; Contassot, E.; Bachmann, M.F.; French, L.E.; Oxenius, A.; et al. Inflammasome Activation and IL-1β Target IL-1α for Secretion as Opposed to Surface expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 18055–18060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Platnich, J.M.; Muruve, D.A. NOD-Like Receptors and Inflammasomes: A Review of Their Canonical and Non-canonical Signaling Pathways. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2019, 18, 30994–30999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Turner, M.D.; Nedjai, B.; Hurst, T.; Pennington, D.J. Cytokines and Chemokines: At the Crossroads of Cell Signalling and Inflammatory Disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 11, 2563–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Di Paolo, N.C.; Shayakhmetov, D.M. Interleukin 1α and the Inflammatory Process. Nat. Immunol. 2016, 8, 906–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Crișan, T.O.; Netea, M.G.; Joosten, L.A. Innate Immune Memory: Implications for Host Responses to Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns. Eur. J. Immunol. 2016, 4, 817–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Krakauer, T. Inflammasomes, Autophagy, and Cell Death: The Trinity of Innate Host Defense against Intracellular Bacteria. Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 2019, 2471215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Boutari, C.; Mantzoros, C.S. Inflammation: A Key Player Linking Obesity with Malignancies. Metabolism 2018, 81, A3–A6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Assmann, T.S.; Brondani, L.D.A.; Bouças, A.P.; Canani, L.H.; Crispim, D. Toll-Like Receptor 3 (TLR3) and the Development of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Arch. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 1, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kumar, H.; Kawai, T.; Akira, S. Pathogen Recognition by the Innate Immune System. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 1, 16–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. MacLeod, A.S.; Mansbridge, J.N. The Innate Immune System in Acute and Chronic Wounds. Adv. Wound. Care. 2016, 2, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Martín-Sánchez, F.; Diamond, C.; Zeitler, M.; Gomez, A.I.; Baroja-Mazo, A.; Bagnall, J.; Spiller, D.; White, M.; Daniels, M.; Mortellaro, A.; et al. Inflammasome-Dependent IL-1β Release Depends Upon Membrane Permeabilisation. Cell Death Differ. 2016, 23, 1219–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. England, H.; Summersgill, H.R.; Edye, M.E.; Rothwell, N.J.; Brough, D. Release of Interleukin-1α or Interleukin-1β Depends on Mechanism of Cell Death. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 23, 15942–15950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Robbins, G.R.; Wen, H.; Ting, J.P. Inflammasomes and Metabolic Disorders: Old Genes in Modern Diseases. Mol. Cell 2014, 54, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Dinarello, C.A. Overview of the IL-1 Family in Innate Inflammation and Acquired Immunity. Immunol. Rev. 2018, 1, 8–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Menu, P.; Vince, J.E. The NLRP3 Inflammasome in Health and Disease: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2011, 1, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Speaker, K.J.; Fleshner, M. Interleukin-1 Beta: A Potential Link between Stress and the Development of Visceral Obesity. BMC Physiol. 2012, 12, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Grant, R.W.; Dixit, V.D. Mechanisms of Disease: Inflammasome Activation and the Development of Type 2 Diabetes. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Boucher, J.; Kleinridders, A.; Kahn, C.R. Insulin Receptor Signaling in Normal and Insulin-Resistant States. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014, 6, a009191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Kwon, H.; Pessin, J.E. Adipokines Mediate Inflammation and Insulin Resistance. Front. Endocrinol. 2013, 4, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. McGillicuddy, F.C.; Harford, K.A.; Reynolds, C.M.; Oliver, E.; Claessens, M.; Mills, K.H.; Roche, H.M. Lack of Interleukin-1 Receptor I (Il-1ri) Protects Mice from High-Fat Diet-Induced Adipose Tissue Inflammation Coincident with Improved Glucose Homeostasis. Diabetes 2011, 6, 1688–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Peiró, C.; Lorenzo, Ó.; Carraro, R.; Sánchez-Ferrer, C.F. IL-1β Inhibition in Cardiovascular Complications Associated to Diabetes Mellitus. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Jiang, N.; Li, Y.; Shu, T.; Wang, J. Cytokines and Inflammation in a Dipogenesis: An Updated Review. Front. Med. 2019, 13, 314–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Maedler, K.; Sergeev, P.; Ris, F.; Oberholzer, J.; Joller-Jemelka, H.I.; Spinas, G.A.; Kaiser, N.; Halban, P.A.; Donath, M.Y. Glucose-Induced β Cell Production of IL-1β Contributes to Glucotoxicity in Human Pancreatic Islets. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Eizirik, D.L.; Pasquali, L.; Cnop, M. Pancreatic β-Cells in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Different Pathways to Failure. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020, 16, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cnop, M.; Welsh, N.; Jonas, J.C.; Jörns, A.; Lenzen, S.; Eizirik, D.L. Mechanisms of Pancreatic Beta-Cell Death in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: Many Differences, Few Similarities. Diabetes 2005, 54, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Baker, R.G.; Hayden, M.S.; Ghosh, S. NF-κB, Inflammation, and Metabolic Disease. Cell Metab. 2011, 13, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Imai, Y.; Dobrian, A.D.; Morris, M.A.; Nadler, J.L. Islet Inflammation: A Unifying Target for Diabetes Treatment? Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 24, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Cieślak, M.; Wojtczak, A.; Cieślak, M. Role of Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines of Pancreatic Islets and Prospects of Elaboration of New Methods for the Diabetes Treatment. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2015, 62, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Ding, S.; Xu, S.; Ma, Y.; Liu, G.; Jang, H.; Fang, J. Modulatory Mechanisms of the NLRP3 Inflammasomes in Diabetes. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Erion, D.M.; Park, H.J.; Lee, H.Y. The Role of Lipids in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes and Associated Co-morbidities. BMB Rep. 2016, 49, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Eckel, R.H.; Grundy, S.M.; Zimmet, P.Z. The Metabolic Syndrome. Lancet 2005, 365, 1415–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yasuda, K.; Nakanishi, K.; Tsutsui, H. Interleukin-18 in Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Pradeep, A.R.; Hadge, P.; Chowdhry, S.; Patel, S.; Happy, D. Exploring the Role of Th1 Cytokines: Interleukin-17 and Interleukin-18 in Periodontal Health and Disease. J. Oral. Sci. 2009, 51, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Tone, M.; Thompson, S.A.; Tone, Y.; Fairchild, P.J.; Waldmann, H. Regulation of IL-18 (IFN-Gamma-Inducing Factor) Gene Expression. J. Immunol. 1997, 159, 6156–6163. [Google Scholar]
  70. Ververs, F.A.; Kalkhoven, E.; Van’t Land, B.; Boes, M.; Schipper, H.S. Immunometabolic Activation of Invariant Natural Killer T Cells. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Lee, J.H.; Cho, D.H.; Park, H.J. IL-18 and Cutaneous Inflammatory Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 12, 29357–29369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Dinarello, C.A. Novel Targets for Interleukin 18 Binding Protein. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2001, 60, 18–24. [Google Scholar]
  73. Bellora, F.; Castriconi, R.; Doni, A.; Cantoni, C.; Moretta, L.; Mantovani, A.; Moretta, A.; Bottino, C. M-CSF Induces the Expression of a Membrane-Bound Form of IL-18 in a Subset of Human Monocytes Differentiating in Vitro toward Macrophages. Eur. J. Immunol. 2012, 42, 1618–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Do, D.V.; Ong, C.T.; Khoo, Y.T.; Carbone, A.; Lim, C.P.; Wang, S.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Cao, X.; Cho, D.H.; Wei, X.Q.; et al. Interleukin-18 System Plays an Importantrole in Keloid Pathogenesis via Epithelial-Mesenchymal Interactions. Br. J. Dermatol. 2012, 166, 1275–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yamaoka-Tojo, M.; Tojo, T.; Wakaume, K.; Kameda, R.; Nemoto, S.; Takahira, N.; Masuda, T.; Izumi, T. Circulating Interleukin-18: A Specific Biomarker for Atherosclerosis-Prone Patients with Metabolic Syndrome. Nutr. Metab. 2011, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Akira, S. The Role of IL-18 in Innate Immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2000, 1, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Slaats, J.; Ten Oever, J.; van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Netea, M.G. IL-1β/IL-6/CRP and IL-18/ferritin: Distinct Inflammatory Programs in Infections. PLoS Pathogens 2016, 12, e1005973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Okamura, H.; Tsutsui, H.; Komatsu, T.; Yutsudo, M.; Hakura, A.; Tanimoto, T.; Torigoe, K.; Okura, T.; Nukada, Y.; Hattori, K.; et al. Cloning of a New Cytokine That Induces IFN-γ Production by T Cells. Nature 1995, 378, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wedell-Neergaard, A.S.; Krogh-Madsen, R.; Petersen, G.L.; Hansen, Å.M.; Pedersen, B.K.; Lund, R.; Bruunsgaard, H. Cardiorespiratory Fitness and the Metabolic Syndrome: Roles of Inflammation and Abdominal Obesity. PLoS ONE. 2018, 13, e0194991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Krogh-Madsen, R.; Plomgaard, P.; Møller, K.; Mittendorfer, B.; Pedersen, B.K. Influence of TNF-Alpha and IL-6 Infusions on Insulin Sensitivity and Expression of IL-18 in Humans. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 291, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lindegaard, B.; Matthews, V.B.; Brandt, C.; Hojman, P.; Allen, T.L.; Estevez, E.; Watt, M.J.; Bruce, C.R.; Mortensen, O.H.; Syberg, S.; et al. Interleukin-18 Activates Skeletal Muscle AMPK and Reduces Weight Gain and Insulin Resistance in Mice. Diabetes 2013, 62, 3064–3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Esposito, K.; Nappo, F.; Giugliano, F.; Di Palo, C.; Ciotola, M.; Barbieri, M.; Paolisso, G.; Giugliano, D. Meal Modulation of Circulating Interleukin 18 and Adiponectin Concentrations in Healthy Subjects and in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 78, 1135–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Thorand, B.; Kolb, H.; Baumert, J.; Koenig, W.; Chambless, L.; Meisinger, C.; Illig, T.; Martin, S.; Herder, C. Elevated Levels of Interleukin-18 Predict the Development of Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg Study, 1984–2002. Diabetes 2005, 54, 2932–2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhuang, H.; Han, J.; Cheng, L.; Liu, S.-L. A Positive Causal Influence of IL-18 Levels on the Risk of t2dm: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Campden, R.I.; Zhang, Y. The Role of Lysosomal Cysteine Cathepsins in NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2019, 670, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yang, Y.; Wang, H.; Kouadir, M.; Song, H.; Shi, F. Recent Advances in the Mechanisms of NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation and Its Inhibitors. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Yabal, M.; Calleja, D.J.; Simpson, D.S.; Lawlor, K.E. Stressing Out the Mitochondria: Mechanistic Insights into NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019, 105, 377–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Latz, E.; Xiao, T.S.; Stutz, A. Activation and Regulation of the Inflammasomes. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lee, S.; Suh, G.Y.; Ryter, S.W.; Choi, A.M. Regulation and Function of the Nucleotide Binding Domain Leucine-Rich Repeat-Containing Receptor, Pyrin Domain-Containing-3 Inflammasome in Lung Disease. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2016, 54, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Próchnicki, T.; Mangan, M.S.; Latz, E. Recent Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms of the NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. F1000Research 2016, 4692016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Hu, Z.; Chai, J. Structural Mechanisms in NLR Inflammasome Assembly and Signaling. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2016, 397, 23–42. [Google Scholar]
  92. Chen, Y.; Wang, L.; Pitzer, A.L.; Li, X.; Li, P.L.; Zhang, Y. Contribution of Redox-Dependent Activation of Endothelial NLRP3 Inflammasomes to Hyperglycemia-Induced Endothelial Dysfunction. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 94, 1335–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. He, Y.; Hara, H.; Núñez, G. Mechanism and Regulation of NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. Trends. Biochem. Sci. 2016, 41, 1012–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Abais, J.M.; Xia, M.; Zhang, Y.; Boini, K.M.; Li, P.L. Redox Regulation of NLRP3 Inflammasomes: ROS as Trigger or Effector? Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2015, 22, 1111–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Weber, K.; Schilling, J.D. Lysosomes Integrate Metabolic-Inflammatory Cross-Talk in Primary Macrophage Inflammasome Activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 9158–9171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Shim, D.W.; Lee, K.H. Posttranslational Regulation of the NLR Family Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Inflammasome. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Ren, G.; Zhang, X.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Ma, W.; Wang, X.; Song, P.; Lai, L.; Chen, H.; et al. ABRO1 Promotes NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation through Regulation of NLRP3 Deubiquitination. EMBO J. 2019, 38, e100376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cersosimo, E.; DeFronzo, R.A. Insulin Resistance and Endothelial Dysfunction: The Road Map to Cardiovascular Diseases. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2006, 22, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Murakami, M.; Simons, M. Regulation of Vascular Integrity. J. Mol. Med. 2009, 87, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Kaur, R.; Kaur, M.; Singh, J. Endothelial Dysfunction and Platelet Hyperactivity in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Molecular Insights and Therapeutic Strategies. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2018, 17, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Avogaro, A.; Albiero, M.; Menegazzo, L.; de Kreutzenberg, S.; Fadini, G.P. Endothelial Dysfunction in Diabetes: The Role of Reparatory Mechanisms. Diabetes Care 2011, 34, S285–S290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Rajendran, P.; Rengarajan, T.; Thangavel, J.; Nishigaki, Y.; Sakthisekaran, D.; Sethi, G.; Nishigaki, I. The Vascular Endothelium and Human Diseases. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 9, 1057–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Gimbrone, M.A., Jr.; García-Cardeña, G. Endothelial Cell Dysfunction and the Pathobiology of Atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 620–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Rock, K.L.; Latz, E.; Ontiveros, F.; Kono, H. The Sterile Inflammatory Response. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 28, 321–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Land, W.G. The Role of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns in Human Diseases: Part I—Promoting Inflammation and Immunity. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J. 2015, 15, e9–e21. [Google Scholar]
  106. Land, W.G. The Role of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs) in Human Diseases: Part II: DAMPs as Diagnostics, Prognostics and Therapeutics in Clinical Medicine. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J. 2015, 15, e157–e170. [Google Scholar]
  107. Meza, C.A.; La Favor, J.D.; Kim, D.H.; Hickner, R.C. Endothelial Dysfunction: Is There a Hyperglycemia-Induced Imbalance of NOX and NOS? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Smolders, V.F.; Zodda, E.; Quax, P.H.A.; Carini, M.; Barberà, J.A.; Thomson, T.M.; Tura-Ceide, O.; Cascante, M. Metabolic Alterations in Cardiopulmonary Vascular Dysfunction. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2019, 5, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Park, K.H.; Park, W.J. Endothelial Dysfunction: Clinical Implications in Cardiovascular Disease and Therapeutic Approaches. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2015, 30, 1213–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Fernández-Sánchez, A.; Madrigal-Santillán., E.; Bautista., M.; Esquivel-Soto, J.; Morales-González, A.; Esquivel-Chirino, C.; Durante-Montiel, I.; Sánchez-Rivera, G.; Valadez-Vega, C.; Morales-González, J.A. Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Obesity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 3117–3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Francisqueti, F.V.; Chiaverini, L.C.; Santos, K.C.; Minatel, I.O.; Ronchi, C.B.; Ferron, A.J.; Ferreira, A.L.; Corrêa, C.R. The Role of Oxidative Stress on the Pathophysiology of Metabolic Syndrome. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2017, 63, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Sasaki, N.; Ozono, R.; Higashi, Y.; Maeda, R.; Kihara, Y. Association of Insulin Resistance, Plasma Glucose Level, and Derum Insulin Level with Hypertension in a Population with Different Stages of Impaired Glucose Metabolism. J. Am. Heart. Assoc. 2020, 9, e015546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wang, F.; Guo, X.; Shen, X.; Kream, R.M.; Mantione, K.J.; Stefano, G.B. Vascular Dysfunction Associated with Type 2 Diabetes and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Potential Etiological Linkage. Med. Sci. Monit. Basic Res. 2014, 20, 118–129. [Google Scholar]
  114. Adams, V.; Linke, A. Impact of Exercise Training on Cardiovascular Disease and Risk. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2019, 1865, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hadi, H.A.; Suwaidi, J.A. Endothelial Dysfunction in Diabetes Mellitus. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2007, 3, 853–876. [Google Scholar]
  116. Kaludercic, N.; Di Lisa, F. Mitochondrial ROS Formation in the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 7, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Forouhi, N.G.; Misra, A.; Mohan, V.; Taylor, R.; Yancy, W. Dietary and Nutritional Approaches for Prevention and Management of Type 2 Diabetes. BMJ 2018, 361, k2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Paneni, F.; Beckman, J.A.; Creager, M.A.; Cosentino, F. Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Pathophysiology, Clinical Consequences, and Medical Therapy: Part I. Heart J. 2013, 34, 2436–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Henning, R.J. Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease. Future Cardiol. 2018, 14, 491–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bakker, W.; Eringa, E.C.; Sipkema, P.; van Hinsbergh, V.W.M. Endothelial Dysfunction and Diabetes: Roles of Hyperglycemia, Impaired Insulin Signaling and Obesity. Cell Tissue Res. 2009, 335, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Lteif, A.; Vaishnava, P.; Baron, A.D.; Mather, K.J. Endothelin Limits Insulin Action in Obese/Insulin-Resistant Humans. Diabetes 2007, 56, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Mather, K.; Anderson, T.J.; Verma, S. Insulin Action in the Vasculature: Physiology and Pathophysiology. J. Vasc. Res. 2001, 38, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Vincent, M.A.; Montagnani, M.; Quon, M.J. Molecular and Physiologic Actions of Insulin Related to Production of Nitric Oxide in Vascular Endothelium. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2003, 3, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Muniyappa, R.; Montagnani, M.; Koh, K.K.; Quon, M.J. Cardiovascular Actions of Insulin. Endocr. Rev. 2007, 28, 463–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Janus, A.; Szahidewicz-Krupska, E.; Mazur, G.; Doroszko, A. Insulin Resistance and Endothelial Dysfunction Constitute a Common Therapeutic Target in Cardiometabolic Disorders. Mediat. Inflamm. 2016, 2016, 3634948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Muniyappa, R.; Sowers, J.R. Role of Insulin Resistance in Endothelial Dysfunction. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2013, 14, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Siegelaar, S.E.; Holleman, F.; Hoekstra, J.B.; DeVries, J.H. Glucose Variability; Does It Matter? Endocr. Rev. 2010, 31, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Son, S.M. Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Pathogenesis of Vascular Complications of Diabetes. Diabetes Metab. J. 2012, 36, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Takeda, Y.; Matoba, K.; Sekiguchi, K.; Nagai, Y.; Yokota, T.; Utsunomiya, K.; Nishimura, R. Endothelial Dysfunction in Diabetes. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kaneto, H.; Katakami, N.; Matsuhisa, M.; Matsuoka, T.A. Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in the Progression of Type 2 Diabetes and Atherosclerosis. Mediat. Inflamm. 2010, 2010, 453892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Widlansky, M.E.; Gutterman, D.D. Regulation of Endothelial Function by Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 15, 1517–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Maamoun, H.; Benameur, T.; Pintus, G.; Munusamy, S.; Agouni, A. Crosstalk between Oxidative Stress and Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress in Endothelial Dysfunction and Aberrant Angiogenesis Associated with Diabetes: A Focus on the Protective Roles of Heme Oxygenase (HO)-1. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Brownlee, M. The Pathobiology of Diabetic Complications: A Unifying Mechanism. Diabetes 2005, 54, 1615–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Allaman, I.; Bélanger, M.; Magistretti, P.J. Methylglyoxal, The Dark Side of Glycolysis. Front. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Maessen, D.E.; Stehouwer, C.D.; Schalkwijk, C.G. The Role of Methylglyoxal and the Glyoxalase System in Diabetes and Other Age-Related Diseases. Clin. Sci. 2015, 128, 839–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Zhang, Y.; Ren, J. New Insights of µ-Calpain in the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Vascular Injury. Diabetes 2015, 64, 693–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Booth, A.A.; Khalifah, R.G.; Todd, P.; Hudson, B.G. In Vitro Kinetic Studies of Formation of Antigenic Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs) Novel Inhibition of Post-Amadori Glycation Pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 5430–5437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Brownlee, M.; Vlassara, H.; Cerami, A. Nonenzymatic Glycosylation and the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Complications. Ann. Intern. Med. 1984, 101, 527–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Forbes, J.M.; Thallas, V.; Thomas, M.C.; Founds, H.W.; Burns, W.C.; Jerums, G.; Cooper, M.E. The Breakdown of Preexisting Advanced Glycation End Products Is Associated with Reduced Renal Fibrosis in Experimental Diabetes. FASEB J. 2003, 17, 1762–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Litwinoff, E.; Hurtado Del Pozo, C.; Ramasamy, R.; Schmidt, A.M. Emerging Targets for Therapeutic Development in Diabetes and Its Complications: The RAGE Signaling Pathway. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015, 98, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Bierhaus, A.; Schiekofer, S.; Schwaninger, M.; Andrassy, M.; Humpert, P.M.; Chen, J.; Hong, M.; Luther, T.; Henle, T.; Klöting, I.; et al. Diabetes-Associated Sustained Activation of the Transcription Factor Nuclear Factor-kappaB. Diabetes 2001, 50, 2792–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Younce, C.W.; Wang, K.; Kolattukudy, P.E. Hyperglycaemia-Induced Cardiomyocyte Death Is Mediated via MCP-1 Production and Induction of a Novel Zinc-Finger Protein MCPIP. Cardiovasc. Res. 2010, 87, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Primer, K.R.; Psaltis, P.J.; Tan, J.T.M.; Bursill, C.A. The Role of High-Density Lipoproteins in Endothelial Cell Metabolism and Diabetes-Impaired Angiogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Beleznai, T.; Bagi, Z. Activation of Hexosamine Pathway Impairs Nitric Oxide (NO)-Dependent Arteriolar Dilations by Increased Protein O-GlcNAcylation. Vascul. Pharmacol. 2012, 56, 115–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Beyer, A.M.; Weihrauch, D. Hexosamine Pathway Activation and O-Linked-N-Acetylglucosamine: Novel Mediators of Endothelial Dysfunction in Hyper-Glycemia and Diabetes. Vascul. Pharmacol. 2012, 56, 113–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Giacco, F.; Brownlee, M. Oxidative Stress and Diabetic Complications. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 1058–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Hummasti, S.; Hotamisligil, G.S. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Inflammation in Obesity and Diabetes. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Özcan, U.; Cao, Q.; Yilmaz, E.; Lee, A.H.; Iwakoshi, N.N.; Özdelen, E.; Tuncman, G.; Görgün, C.; Glimcher, L.H.; Hotamisligil, G.S. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Links Obesity, Insulin Action, and Type 2 Diabetes. Science 2004, 306, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Özcan, U.; Yilmaz, E.; Özcan, L.; Furuhashi, M.; Vaillancourt, E.; Smith, R.O.; Görgün, C.Z.; Hotamisligil, G.S. Chemical Chaperones Reduce ER Stress and Restore Glucose Homeostasis in a Mouse Model of Type 2 Diabetes. Science 2006, 313, 1137–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Flamment, M.; Hajduch, E.; Ferré, P.; Foufelle, F. New Insights into ER Stress-Induced Insulin Resistance. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 23, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Schwarz, D.S.; Blower, M.D. The Endoplasmic Reticulum: Structure, Function and Response to Cellular Signaling. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Marciniak, S.J.; Ron, D. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Signaling in Disease. Physiol. Rev. 2006, 86, 1133–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Schroder, M.; Kaufman, R.J. The Mammalian Unfolded Protein Response. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2005, 74, 739–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Ron, D.; Walter, P. Signal Integration in the Endoplasmic Reticulum Unfolded Protein Response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Basha, B.; Samuel, S.M.; Triggle, C.R.; Ding, H. Endothelial Dysfunction in Diabetes Mellitus: Possible Involvement of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress? Exp. Diabetes Res. 2012, 2012, 481840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. Mooradian, A.D.; Haas, M.J. Glucose-Induced Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Is Independent of Oxidative Stress: A Mechanistic Explanation for the Failure of Antioxidant Therapy in Diabetes. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 50, 1140–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Maamoun, H.; Abdelsalam, S.S.; Zeidan, A.; Korashy, H.M.; Agouni, A. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress: A Critical Molecular Driver of Endothelial Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disturbances Associated with Diabetes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Dong, Y.; Fernandes, C.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wu, H.; Brophy, M.L.; Deng, L.; Song, K.; Wen, A.; Wong, S.; et al. Role of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Signalling in Diabetic Endothelial Dysfunction and Atherosclerosis. Diabetes Vasc. Dis. Res. 2017, 14, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Villalobos-Labra, R.; Subiabre, M.; Toledo, F.; Pardo, F.; Sobrevia, L. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Development of Insulin Resistance in Adipose, Skeletal, Liver, and Foetoplacental Tissue in Diabesity. Mol. Asp. Med. 2019, 66, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Contreras, A.G.; Dormond, O.; Edelbauer, M.; Calzadilla, K.; Hoerning, A.; Pal, S.; Briscoe, D.M. mTOR-Understanding the Clinical Effects. Transplant. Proc. 2008, 40, S9–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Morita, M.; Gravel, S.P.; Hulea, L.; Larsson, O.; Pollak, M.; St-Pierre, J.; Topisirovic, I. mTOR Coordinates Protein Synthesis, Mitochondrial Activity and Proliferation. Cell Cycle. 2015, 14, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Mao, Z.; Zhang, W. Role of mTOR in Glucose and Lipid Metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  163. Yoon, M.S. The Role of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) in Insulin Signaling. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Reho, J.J.; Guo, D.F.; Rahmouni, K. Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 Signaling Modulates Vascular Endothelial Function through Reactive Oxygen Species. J. Am. Heart. Assoc. 2019, 8, e010662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Decker, B.; Pumiglia, K. mTORc1 Activity Is Necessary and Sufficient for Phosphorylation of eNOSS1177. Physiol. Rep. 2018, 6, e13733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Lei-Leston, A.C.; Murphy, A.G.; Maloy, K.J. Epithelial Cell Inflammasomes in Intestinal Immunity and Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Boini, K.M.; Pitzer, A.L.; Gulbins, E.; Zhang, Y.; Li, P.L. Endothelial NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation Associated with Lysosomal Destabilization during Coronary Arteritis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1853, 396–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Wang, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Gulbins, E.; Zhang, Y. Enhancement of Endothelial Permeability by Free Fatty Acid through Lysosomal Cathepsin B-Mediated NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 73229–73241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  169. Wan, Z.; Fan, Y.; Liu, X.; Xue, J.; Han, Z.; Zhu, C.; Wang, X. NLRP3 Inflammasome Promotes Diabetes-Induced Endothelial Inflammation and Atherosclerosis. Diabetes, Metab. Syndr. Obesity Targets Ther. 2019, 12, 1931–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Sokolova, M.; Sahraoui, A.; Høyem, M.; Øgaard, J.; Lien, E.; Aukrust, P.; Yndestad, A.; Ranheim, T.; Scholz, H. NLRP3 Inflammasome Mediates Oxidative Stress-Induced Pancreatic Islet Dysfunction. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 315, E912–E923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Esser, N.; Legrand-Poels, S.; Piette, J.; Scheen, A.J.; Paquot, N. Inflammation as a Link between Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome and Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2014, 105, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Lumeng, C.N. Innate Immune Activation in Obesity. Mol. Aspects Med. 2013, 34, 12–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  173. Tanti, J.F.; Ceppo, F.; Jager, J.; Berthou, F. Implication of Inflammatory Signalingpathways in Obesity-Induced Insulin Resistance. Front. Endocrinol. 2013, 3, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Burhans, M.S.; Hagman, D.K.; Kuzma, J.N.; Schmidt, K.A.; Kratz, M. Contribution of Adipose Tissue Inflammation to the Development of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Compr. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1–58. [Google Scholar]
  175. Ringling, R.E.; Gastecki, M.L.; Woodford, M.L.; Lum-Naihe, K.J.; Grant, R.W.; Pulakat, L.; Vieira-Potter, V.J.; Padilla, J. Loss of Nlrp3 Does Not Protect Mice from Western Diet-Induced Adipose Tissue Inflammation and Glucose Intolerance. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Makki, K.; Froguel, P.; Wolowczuk, I. Adipose Tissue in Obesity-Related Inflammation and Insulin Resistance: Cells, Cytokines, and Chemokines. ISRN Inflamm. 2013, 2013, 139239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Vandanmagsar, B.; Youm, Y.H.; Ravussin, A.; Galgani, J.E.; Stadler, K.; Mynatt, R.L.; Ravussin, E.; Stephens, J.M.; Dixit, V.D. The NLRP3 Inflammasome Instigates Obesity-Induced Inflammation and Insulin Resistance. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Esser, N.; L’homme, L.; De Roover, A.; Kohnen, L.; Scheen, A.J.; Moutschen, M.; Piette, J.; Legrand-Poels, S.; Paquot, N. Obesity Phenotype Is Related to nlrp3 Inflammasome Activity and Immunological Profile of Visceral Adipose Tissue. Diabetologia 2013, 56, 2487–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Yin, Z.; Deng, T.; Peterson, L.E.; Yu, R.; Lin, J.; Hamilton, D.J.; Reardon, P.R.; Sherman, V.; Winnier, G.E.; Zhan, M.; et al. Transcriptome Analysis of Human Adipocytes Implicates the NOD-Like Receptor Pathway in Obesity-Induced Adipose Inflam-Mation. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2014, 394, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Wang, X.; He, G.; Peng, Y.; Zhong, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, B. Sodium Butyrate Alleviatesadipocyte Inflammation by Inhibiting NLRP3 Pathway. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Finucane, O.M.; Lyons, C.L.; Murphy, A.M.; Reynolds, C.M.; Klinger, R.; Healy, N.P.; Cooke, A.A.; Coll, R.C.; McAllan, L.; Nilaweera, K.N.; et al. Monounsaturated Fatty Acid-Enriched High-Fat Diets Impede Adipose NLRP3 Inflammasome-Mediated IL-1β Secretion and Insulin Resistance despite Obesity. Diabetes 2015, 64, 2116–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Liu, Y.; Li, C.; Yin, H.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y. NLRP3 Inflammasome: A Potential Alternative Therapy Target for Atherosclerosis. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2020, 15, 0718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Arend, W.P.; Palmer, G.; Gabay, C. IL-1, IL-18, and IL-33 Families of Cytokines. Immunol. Rev. 2008, 223, 20–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Cardozo, A.K.; Ortis, F.; Storling, J.; Feng, Y.M.; Rasschaert, J.; Tonnesen, M.; Van Eylen, F.; Mandrup-Poulsen, T.; Herchuelz, A.; Eizirik, D.L. Cytokines Downregulate the Sarcoendoplasmic Reticulum Pump Ca2+ Atpase 2b and Deplete Endoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+, Leading to Induction of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Pancreatic Beta-Cells. Diabetes 2005, 54, 452–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  185. Verma, G.; Datta, M. IL-1beta Induces ER Stress in a JNK Dependent Manner that Determines Cell Death in Human Pancreatic Epithelial MIA PaCa-2 Cells. Apoptosis 2010, 15, 864–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Banerjee, M.; Saxena, M. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) Family of Cytokines: Role in Type 2 Diabetes. Clin. Chim. Acta 2012, 413, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Bitto, A.; Altavilla, D.; Pizzino, G.; Irrera, N.; Pallio, G.; Colonna, M.R.; Squadrito, F. Inhibition of Inflammasome Activation Improves the Impaired Pattern of Healing in Genetically Diabetic Mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 2300–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Kim, Y.; Wang, W.; Okla, M.; Kang, I.; Moreau, R.; Chung, S. Suppression of NLRP3 Inflammasome by γ-Tocotrienol Ameliorates Type 2 Diabetes. J. Lipid. Res. 2016, 57, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. Coll, R.C.; Hill, J.R.; Day, C.J.; Zamoshnikova, A.; Boucher, D.; Massey, N.L.; Chitty, J.L.; Fraser, J.A.; Jennings, M.P.; Robertson, A.A.B.; et al. MCC950 Directly Targets the NLRP3 ATP-Hydrolysis Motif for Inflammasome Inhibition. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2019, 15, 556–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Lamkanfi, M.; Mueller, J.L.; Vitari, A.C.; Misaghi, S.; Fedorova, A.; Deshayes, K.; Lee, W.P.; Hoffman, H.M.; Dixit, V.M. Glyburide Inhibits the Cryopyrin/NALP3 Inflammasome. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Lee, H.M.; Kim, J.J.; Kim, H.J.; Shong, M.; Ku, B.J.; Jo, E.K. Upregulated NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes 2013, 62, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  192. Henriksbo, B.D.; Lau, T.C.; Cavallari, J.F.; Denou, E.; Chi, W.; Lally, J.S.; Crane, J.D.; Duggan, B.M.; Foley, K.P.; Fullerton, M.D.; et al. Fluvastatin Causes NLRP3 Inflammasome-Mediated Adipose Insulin Resistance. Diabetes 2014, 63, 3742–3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  193. Dangwal, S.; Stratmann, B.; Bang, C.; Lorenzen, J.M.; Kumarswamy, R.; Fiedler, J.; Falk, C.S.; Scholz, C.S.; Thum, T.; Tschoepe, D. Impairment of Wound Healing in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Influences Circulating MicroRNA Patterns via in-Flammatory Cytokines. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2015, 35, 1480–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Fusco, R.; Siracusa, R.; Genovese, T.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Di Paola, R. Focus on the Role of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Sepehri, Z.; Kiani, Z.; Afshari, M.; Kohan, F.; Dalvand, A.; Ghavami, S. Inflammasomes and Type 2 Diabetes: An Updated Systematic Review. Immunol. Lett. 2017, 24, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Abderrazak, A.; Syrovets, T.; Couchie, D.; El Hadri, K.; Friguet, B.; Simmet, T.; Rouis, M. NLRP3 Inflammasome: From a Danger Signal Sensor to a Regulatory Node of Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Diseases. Redox Biol. 2015, 4, 296–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Boden, G. Obesity, Insulin Resistance and Free Fatty Acids. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2011, 18, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  198. Engin, A. Fat Cell and Fatty Acid Turnover in Obesity. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 960, 135–160. [Google Scholar]
  199. Wen, H.; Gris, D.; Lei, Y.; Jha, S.; Zhang, L.; Huang, M.T.; Brickey, W.J.; Ting, J.P. Fatty Acid-Induced NLRP3-ASC Inflammasome Activation Interferes with Insulin Signaling. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  200. Kien, C.L.; Bunn, J.Y.; Fukagawa, N.K.; Anathy, V.; Matthews, D.E.; Crain, K.I.; Ebenstein, D.B.; Tarleton, E.K.; Pratley, R.E.; Poynter, M.E. Lipidomic Evidence That Lowering the Typical Dietary Palmitate to Oleate Ratio in Humans Decreases the Leukocyte Production of Proinflammatory Cytokines and Muscle Expression of Redox-Sensitive Genes. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2015, 26, 1599–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. L’homme, L.; Esser, N.; Riva, L.; Scheen, A.; Paquot, N.; Piette, J.; Legrand-Poels, S. Unsaturated Fatty Acids Prevent Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Human Monocytes/Macrophages. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 2998–3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Wu, K.K.; Cheung, S.W.; Cheng, K.K. NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation in Adipose Tissues and Its Implications on Metabolic Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 11, 4184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Mundi, S.; Massaro, M.; Scoditti, E.; Carluccio, M.A.; van Hinsbergh, V.W.M.; Iruela- Arispe, M.L.; De Caterina, R. Endothelial Permeability, LDL Deposition, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors-A Review. Cardiovasc. Res. 2018, 114, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Man, S.M. Inflammasomes in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Infection, Cancer and Gut Microbiota Homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 12, 721–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Pillon, N.J.; Chan, K.L.; Zhang, S.; Mejdani, M.; Jacobson, M.R.; Ducos, A.; Bilan, P.J.; Niu, W.; Klip, A. Saturated Fatty Acids Activate Caspase-4/5 in Human Monocytes, Triggering IL-1β and IL-18 Release. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 311, E825–E835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  206. Sokolowska, E.; Blachnio-Zabielska, A. The Role of Ceramides in Insulin Resistance. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  207. Pandey, A.; Chawla, S.; Guchhait, P. Type-2 Diabetes: Current Understanding and Future Perspectives. IUBMB Life 2015, 67, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Swanson, K.V.; Deng, M.; Ting, J.P. The NLRP3 Inflammasome: Molecular Activation and Regulation to Therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 19, 477–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Donath, M.Y.; Dalmas, É.; Sauter, N.S.; Böni-Schnetzler, M. Inflammation in Obesity and Diabetes: Islet Dysfunction and Therapeutic Opportunity. Cell Metab. 2013, 17, 860–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Koenen, T.B.; Stienstra, R.; van Tits, L.J.; de Graaf, J.; Stalenhoef, A.F.; Joosten, L.A.; Tack, C.J.; Netea, M.G. Hyperglycemia Activates Caspase-1 and TXNIP-Mediated IL-1beta Transcription in Human Adipose Tissue. Diabetes 2011, 60, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  211. Li, X.; Yang, B.; Chen, M.; Klein, J.D.; Sands, J.M.; Chen, G. Activation of Protein Kinase C-α and Src Kinase Increases Urea Transporter a1 α-2, 6 Sialylation. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015, 26, 926–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  212. Feng, H.; Gu, J.; Gou, F.; Huang, W.; Gao, C.; Chen, G.; Long, Y.; Zhou, X.; Yang, M.; Liu, S.; et al. High Glucose and Lipopolysaccharide Prime NLRP3 Inflammasome via ROS/TXNIP Pathway in Mesangial Cells. J. Diabetes Res. 2016, 2016, 6973175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  213. Hong, X.; Lu, A.L.; Yao, X.M.; Hua, Q.; Li, X.Y.; Qin, L.; Zhang, H.M.; Meng, G.X.; Su, Q. Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome by Advanced Glycation End Products Promotes Pancreatic Islet Damage. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 2017, 9692546. [Google Scholar]
  214. Chutkow, W.A.; Birkenfeld, A.L.; Brown, J.D.; Lee, H.Y.; Frederick, D.W.; Yoshioka, J.; Patwari, P.; Kursawe, R.; Cushman, S.W.; Plutzky, J.; et al. Deletion of the Alpha-Arrestin Protein Txnip in Mice Promotes Adiposity and Adipogenesis While Preserving Insulin Sensitivity. Diabetes 2010, 59, 1424–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  215. Alhawiti, N.M.; Al Mahri, S.; Aziz, M.A.; Malik, S.S.; Mohammad, S. TXNIP in Metabolic Regulation: Physiological Role and Therapeutic Outlook. Curr. Drug. Targets 2017, 18, 1095–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  216. Lane, T.; Flam, B.; Lockey, R.; Kolliputi, N. TXNIP Shuttling: Missing Link between Oxidative Stress and Inflammasome Activation. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4, 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Braga, T.T.; Forni, M.F.; Correa-Costa, M.; Ramos, R.N.; Barbuto, J.A.; Branco, P.; Castoldi, A.; Hiyane, M.I.; Davanso, M.R.; Latz, E.; et al. Soluble Uric Acid Activates the NLRP3 Inflammasome. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 39884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Ghaemi-Oskouie, F.; Shi, Y. The Role of Uric Acid as an Endogenous Danger Signal in Immunity and Inflammation. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2011, 13, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. Eleftheriadis, T.; Pissas, G.; Antoniadi, G.; Makri, P.; Liakopoulos, V.; Stefanidis, I. Urate Crystals Induce NLRP3 Inflammasome-Dependent IL-1β Secretion and Proliferation in Isolated Primary Human T-Cells. Hippokratia 2015, 19, 41–46. [Google Scholar]
  220. Masters, S.L.; Dunne, A.; Subramanian, S.L.; Hull, R.L.; Tannahill, G.M.; Sharp, F.A.; Becker, C.; Franchi, L.; Yoshihara, E.; Chen, Z.; et al. Activation of the NLRP3 Inflammasome by Islet Amyloid Polypeptide Provides a Mechanism for Enhanced IL-1b in Type 2 Diabetes. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Costes, S. Targeting Protein Misfolding to Protect Pancreatic Beta-Cells in Type 2 Diabetes. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2018, 43, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Mukherjee, A.; Morales-Scheihing, D.; Salvadores, N.; Moreno-Gonzalez, I.; Gonzalez, C.; Taylor-Presse, K.; Mendez, N.; Shahnawaz, M.; Gaber, A.O.; Sabek, O.M.; et al. Induction of IAPP Amyloid Deposition and Associated Diabetic Abnormalities by a Prion-like Mechanism. J. Exp. Med. 2017, 214, 2591–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Zheng, D.; Liwinski, T.; Elinav, E. Inflammasome Activation and Regulation: Toward a Better Understanding of Complex Mechanisms. Cell Discov. 2020, 6, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Li, Q.; Chang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Chen, H.; Tao, S.; Zhang, Z. Implication of the Gut Microbiome Composition of Type 2 Diabetic Patients from Northern China. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Singh, R.K.; Chang, H.W.; Yan, D.; Lee, K.M.; Ucmak, D.; Wong, K.; Abrouk, M.; Farahnik, B.; Nakamura, M.; Zhu, T.H.; et al. Influence of Diet on the Gut Microbiome and Implications for Human Health. J. Transl. Med. 2017, 15, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  226. Yu, A.I.; Zhao, L.; Eaton, K.A.; Ho, S.; Chen, J.; Poe, S.; Becker, J.; Gonzalez, A.; McKinstry, D.; Hasso, M.; et al. Gut Microbiota Modulate CD8 T Cell Responses to Influence Colitis- Associated Tumorigenesis. Cell Rep. 2020, 31, 107471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Cervantes, J.; Nagata, T.; Uchijima, M.; Shibata, K.; Koide, Y. Intracytosolic Listeria Monocytogenes Induces Cell Death through Caspase-1 Activation in Murine Macrophages. Cell Microbiol. 2008, 10, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Ng, J.; Hirota, S.A.; Gross, O.; Li, Y.; Ulke-Lemee, A.; Potentier, M.S.; Schenck, L.P.; Vilaysane, A.; Seamone, M.E.; Feng, H.; et al. Clostridium Difficile Toxin-Induced Inflammation and Intestinal Injury Are Mediated by the Inflammasome. Gastroenterology 2010, 2, 542–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Boxberger, N.; Hecker, M.; Zettl, U.K. Dysregulation of Inflammasome Priming and Activation by MicroRNAs in Human Immune-Mediated Diseases. J. Immunol. 2019, 202, 2177–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  230. Dehaini, H.; Awada, H.; El-Yazbi, A.; Zouein, F.A.; Issa, K.; Eid, A.A.; Ibrahim, M.; Badran, A.; Baydoun, E.; Pintus, G.; et al. MicroRNAs as Potential Pharmaco-Targets in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Compounded by Diabetes. Cells 2019, 8, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  231. Huang, Y.; Yan, Y.; Xv, W.; Qian, G.; Li, C.; Zou, H.; Li, Y. A New Insight into the Roles of MiRNAs in Metabolic Syndrome. Biomed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  232. Zhang, B.H.; Shen, C.A.; Zhu, B.W.; An, H.Y.; Zheng, B.; Xu, S.B.; Sun, J.C.; Sun, P.C.; Zhang, W.; Wang, J.; et al. Insight into miRNAs Related with Glucometabolic Disorder. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 111, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Lorente-Cebrián, S.; González-Muniesa, P.; Milagro, F.I.; Martínez, J.A. MicroRNAs And Other Non-coding RNAs in Adipose Tissue and Obesity: Emerging Roles as Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets. Clin. Sci. 2019, 133, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Zamani, P.; Oskuee, R.K.; Atkin, S.L.; Navashenaq, J.G.; Sahebkar, A. MicroRNAs as Important Regulators of the NLRP3 Inflammasome. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2020, 150, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Deng, J.; Guo, F. MicroRNAs and Type 2 Diabetes. ExRNA 2019, 36, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  236. Nemecz, M.; Alexandru, N.; Tanko, G.; Georgescu, A. Role of MicroRNA in Endothelial Dysfunction and Hypertension. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2016, 18, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Olivieri, F.; Rippo, M.R.; Prattichizzo, F.; Babini, L.; Graciotti, L.; Recchioni, R.; Procopio, A.D. Toll Like Receptor Signaling in “inflammaging”: MicroRNA as New Players. Immun. Ageing 2013, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  238. He, X.; Jing, Z.; Cheng, G. MicroRNAs: New Regulators of Toll-like Receptor Signalling Pathways. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 945169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  239. Haneklaus, M.; Gerlic, M.; O’Neill, L.A.; Masters, S.L. miR-223: Infection, Inflammation and Cancer. J. Intern. Med. 2013, 274, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Kim, D.; Song, J.; Ahn, C.; Kang, Y.; Chun, C.H.; Jin, E.J. Peroxisomal Dysfunction Is Associated with Up-Regulation of Apoptotic Cell Death via miR-223 Induction in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Bone 2014, 64, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Chuang, T.Y.; Wu, H.L.; Chen, C.C.; Gamboa, G.M.; Layman, L.C.; Diamond, M.P.; Azziz, R.; Chen, Y.H. MicroRNA-223 Expression is Upregulated in Insulin Resistant Human Adipose Tissue. J. Diabetes Res. 2015, 94, 3659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  242. Wen, D.; Qiao, P.; Wang, L. Circulating MicroRNA-223 as a Potential Biomarker for Obesity. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 2015, 9, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Zampetaki, A.; Kiechl, S.; Drozdov, I.; Willeit, P.; Mayr, U.; Prokopi, M.; Mayr, A.; Weger, S.; Oberhollenzer, F.; Bonora, E.; et al. Plasma MicroRNA Profiling Reveals Loss of Endothelial miR-126 and Other MicroRNAs in Type 2 Diabetes. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 810–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Mirra, P.; Nigro, C.; Prevenzano, I.; Leone, A.; Raciti, G.A.; Formisano, P.; Beguinot, F.; Miele, C. The Destiny of Glucose from a MicroRNA Perspective. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Lu, H.; Buchan, R.J.; Cook, S.A. MicroRNA-223 Regulates Glut4 Expression and Cardiomyocyte Glucose Metabolism. Cardiovasc. Res. 2010, 86, 410–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Haneklaus, M.; Gerlic, M.; Kurowska-Stolarska, M.; Rainey, A.A.; Pich, D.; McInnes, I.B.; Hammerschmidt, W.; O’Neill, L.A.; Masters, S.L. Cutting Edge: miR-223 and EBV miR-BART15 Regulate the NLRP3 Inflammasome and IL-1β Production. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 3795–3799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  247. Zhuang, G.; Meng, C.; Guo, X.; Cheruku, P.S.; Shi, L.; Xu, H.; Li, H.; Wang, G.; Evans, A.R.; Safe, S.; et al. A Novel Regulator of Macrophage Activation: Mir-223 in Obesity-Associated Adipose Tissue Inflammation. Circulation 2012, 125, 2892–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  248. Shukla, G.C.; Singh, J.; Barik, S. MicroRNAs: Processing, Maturation, Target Recognition and Regulatory Functions. Mol. Cell Pharmacol. 2011, 3, 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  249. Bauernfeind, F.; Rieger, A.; Schildberg, F.A.; Knolle, P.A.; Schmid-Burgk, J.L.; Hornung, V. NLRP3 Inflammasome Activity Is Negatively Controlled by miR-223. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 4175–4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  250. LaPierre, M.P.; Stoffel, M. MicroRNAs as Stress Regulators in Pancreatic Beta Cells and Diabetes. Mol. Metab. 2017, 6, 1010–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Xu, H.; Guo, S.; Li, W.; Yu, P. The Circular RNA Cdr1as, via miR-7 and Its Targets, Regulates Insulin Transcription and Secretion in Islet Cells. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Ramachandran, D.; Roy, U.; Garg, S.; Ghosh, S.; Pathak, S.; Kolthur-Seetharam, U. Sirt1 and mir-9 Expression Is Regulated during Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion in Pancreatic β-Islets. FEBS J. 2011, 278, 1167–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Plaisance, V.; Abderrahmani, A.; Perret-Menoud, V.; Jacquemin, P.; Lemaigre, F.; Regazzi, R. MicroRNA-9 Controls the Expression of Granuphilin/slp4 and the Secretory Response of Insulin-Producing Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 26932–26942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  254. Kumarswamy, R.; Volkmann, I.; Thum, T. Regulation and Function of miRNA-21 in Health and Disease. RNA Biol. 2011, 8, 706–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  255. Kim, Y.J.; Hwang, S.J.; Bae, Y.C.; Jung, J.S. MiR-21 Regulates Adipogenic Differentiation through the Modulation of TGF-Beta Signaling in Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Human Adipose Tissue. Stem Cells 2009, 27, 3093–3102. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  256. Loboda, A.; Sobczak, M.; Jozkowicz, A.; Dulak, J. TGF-β1/Smads and miR-21 in Renal Fibrosis and Inflammation. Mediat. Inflamm. 2016, 2016, 8319283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  257. La Sala, L.; Mrakic-Sposta, S.; Micheloni, S.; Prattichizzo, F.; Ceriello, A. Glucose-Sensing microRNA-21 Disrupts ROS Homeostasis and Impairs Antioxidant Responses in Cellular Glucose Variability. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2018, 17, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  258. Zhang, Y.; Huang, B.; Wang, H.Y.; Chang, A.; Zheng, X.F.S. Emerging Role of MicroRNAs in mTOR Signaling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 2613–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Ling, H.Y.; Hu, B.; Hu, X.B.; Zhong, J.; Feng, S.D.; Qin, L.; Liu, G.; Wen, G.B.; Liao, D.F. MiRNA-21 Reverses High Glucose and High Insulin Induced Insulin Resistance in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes through Targeting Phosphatase and Tensin Homologue. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2012, 120, 553–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  260. Zhang, X.Y.; Shen, B.R.; Zhang, Y.C.; Wan, X.J.; Yao, Q.P.; Wu, G.L.; Wang, J.Y.; Chen, S.G.; Yan, Z.Q.; Jiang, Z.L. Induction of Thoracic Aortic Remodeling by Endothelial-Specific Deletion of MicroRNA-21 in Mice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59002. [Google Scholar]
  261. Esteves, J.V.; Enguita, F.J.; Machado, U.F. MicroRNAs-Mediated Regulation of Skeletal Muscle GLUT4 Expression and Translocation in Insulin Resistance. J. Diabetes Res. 2017, 2017, 7267910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Bandyopadhyay, S.; Lane, T.; Venugopal, R.; Parthasarathy, P.T.; Cho, Y.; Galam, L.; Lockey, R.; Kolliputi, N. MicroRNA-133a-1 Regulates Inflammasome Activation through Uncoupling Protein-2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 439, 407e412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  263. Xiao, L.; Jiang, L.; Hu, Q.; Li, Y. MicroRNA-133b Ameliorates Allergic Inflammation and Symptom in Murine Model of Allergic Rhinitis by Targeting Nlrp3. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 42, 901–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  264. Song, Z.; Gao, R.; Yan, B. Potential roles of MicroRNA-1 and MicroRNA-133 in Cardiovascular Disease. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 21, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  265. Bhatt, K.; Lanting, L.L.; Jia, Y.; Yadav, S.; Reddy, M.A.; Magilnick, N.; Boldin, M.; Natarajan, N. Anti-inflammatory Role of MicroRNA-146a in the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016, 27, 2277–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  266. Li, S.; Yue, Y.; Xu, W.; Xiong, S. MicroRNA-146a Represses Mycobacteriainduced Inflammatory Response and Facilitates Bacterial Replication via Targeting IRAK-1 and TRAF-6. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81438. [Google Scholar]
  267. Park, H.; Huang, X.; Lu, C.; Cairo, M.S.; Zhou, X. MicroRNA-146a and MicroRNA-146b Regulate Human Dendritic Cell Apoptosis and Cytokine Production by Targeting TRAF6 and IRAK1 Proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 2831–2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  268. Zhang, Q.B.; Qing, Y.F.; Yin, C.C.; Zhou, L.; Liu, X.S.; Mi, Q.S.; Zhou, J.G. Mice with MiR-146a Deficiency Develop Severe Gouty Arthritis via Dysregulation of TRAF 6, IRAK 1 and NALP3 Inflammasome. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2018, 20, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  269. Cowan, C.; Muraleedharan, C.K.; O’Donnell, J.J. 3rd.; Singh, P.K.; Lum, H.; Kumar, A.; Xu, S. MicroRNA-146 Inhibits Thrombin-Induced NF-κB Activation and Subsequent Inflammatory Responses in Human Retinal Endothelial Cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 4944–4951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  270. Reddy, S.D.; Ohshiro, K.; Rayala, S.K.; Kumar, R. MicroRNA-7, A Homeobox D10 Target, Inhibits p21-Activated Kinase 1 and Regulates its Functions. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 8195–8200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  271. Latreille, M.; Hausser, J.; Stützer, I.; Zhang, Q.; Hastoy, B.; Gargani, S.; Kerr-Conte, J.; Pattou, F.; Zavolan, M.; Esguerra, J.L.; et al. MicroRNA-7a Regulates Pancreatic β Cell Function. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 2722–2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  272. Guay, C.; Regazzi, R. Role of Islet MicroRNAs in Diabetes: Which Model for Which Question? Diabetologia 2015, 58, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  273. Eliasson, L.; Regazzi, R. Micro (RNA) Management and Mismanagement of the Islet. J. Mol. Biol. 2020, 432, 1419–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Zhao, E.; Keller, M.P.; Rabaglia, M.E.; Oler, A.T.; Stapleton, D.S.; Schueler, K.L.; Neto, E.C.; Moon, J.Y.; Wang, P.; Wang, I.M.; et al. Obesity and Genetics Regulate MicroRNAs in Islets, Liver, and Adipose of Diabetic Mice. Mamm. Genome 2009, 20, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  275. Bijkerk, R.; Esguerra, J.L.S.; Ellenbroek, J.H.; Au, Y.W.; Hanegraaf, M.A.J.; de Koning, E.J.; Eliasson, L.; van Zonneveld, A.J. In Vivo Silencing of MicroRNA-132 Reduces Blood Glucose and Improves Insulin Decretion. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2019, 29, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Nesca, V.; Guay, C.; Jacovetti, C.; Menoud, V.; Peyot, M.L.; Laybutt, D.R.; Prentki, M.; Regazzi, R. Identification of Particular Groups of MicroRNAs That Positively or Negatively Impact on Beta Cell Function in Obese Models of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetologia 2013, 56, 2203–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  277. Shi, C.; Zhang, M.; Tong, M.; Yang, L.; Pang, L.; Chen, L.; Xu, G.; Chi, X.; Hong, Q.; Ni, Y.; et al. miR-148a is Associated With Obesity and Modulates Adipocyte Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells through Wnt Signaling. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  278. Massart, J.; Sjögren, R.J.O.; Lundell, L.S.; Mudry, J.M.; Franck, N.; O’Gorman, D.J.; Egan, B.; Zierath, J.R.; Krook, A. Altered miR-29 Expression in Type 2 Diabetes Influences Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Dkeletal Muscle. Diabetes 2017, 66, 1807–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  279. Pullen, T.J.; da Silva Xavier, G.; Kelsey, G.; Rutter, G.A. miR-29a and miR-29b Contribute to Pancreatic Beta-Cell-Specific Silencing of Monocarboxylate Transporter 1 (Mct1). Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 31, 3182–3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  280. Chamorro-Jorganes, A.; Araldi, E.; Suárez, Y. MicroRNAs as Pharmacological Targets in Endothelial Cell Function and Dysfunction. Pharmacol. Res. 2013, 75, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  281. Willeit, P.; Skroblin, P.; Moschen, A.R.; Yin, X.; Kaudewitz, D.; Zampetaki, A.; Barwari, T.; Whitehead, M.; Ramírez, C.M.; Goedeke, L.; et al. Circulating MicroRNA-122 is Associated with the Risk of New-Onset Metabolic Syndrome and Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes 2017, 66, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  282. Simionescu, N.; Niculescu, L.S.; Carnuta, M.G.; Sanda, G.M.; Stancu, C.S.; Popescu, A.C.; Popescu, M.R.; Vlad, A.; Dimulescu, D.R.; Simionescu, M.; et al. Hyperglycemia Determines Increased Specific MicroRNAs Levels in Sera and HDL of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients and Stimulates MicroRNAs Production in Human Macrophages. PLoS ONE. 2016, 11, e0161201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Yang, Z.; Kaye, D.M. Mechanistic Insights into the Link Between a Polymorphism of the 3′UTR of the SLC7A1 Gene and Hypertension. Hum. Mutat. 2009, 30, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  284. Wu, X.; Du, X.; Yang, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, N.; Li, Y.; Jiang, X.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, Z. Inhibition of mir-122 Reduced Atherosclerotic Lesion Formation by Regulating npas3-Mediated Endothelial to Mesenchymal Transition. Life Sci. 2021, 265, 118816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Liu, Y.; Gao, G.; Yang, C.; Zhou, K.; Shen, B.; Liang, H.; Jiang, X. The Role of Circulating Microrna-126 (mir-126): A Novel Biomarker for Screening Prediabetes and Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 10567–10577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  286. Potus, F.; Ruffenach, G.; Dahou, A.; Thebault, C.; Breuils-Bonnet, S.; Tremblay, È.; Nadeau, V.; Paradis, R.; Graydon, C.; Wong, R.; et al. Downregulation of MicroRNA-126 Contributes to the Failing Right Ventricle in Pulmonary Srterial Hypertension. Circulation 2015, 132, 932–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  287. Harris, T.A.; Yamakuchi, M.; Ferlito, M.; Mendell, J.T.; Lowenstein, C.J. MicroRNA-126 Regulates Endothelial Expression of Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 1516–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  288. Harris, T.A.; Yamakuchi, M.; Kondo, M.; Oettgen, P.; Lowenstein, C.J. Ets-1 and Ets-2 Regulate the Expression of MicroRNA-126 in Endothelial Cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010, 30, 1990–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Xu, R.H.; Liu, B.; Wu, J.D.; Yan, Y.Y.; Wang, J.N. MiR-143 is involved In Endothelial Cell Dysfunction through Suppression of Glycolysis and Correlated with Atherosclerotic Plaques Formation. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2016, 20, 4063–4071. [Google Scholar]
  290. Deng, L.; Blanco, F.J.; Stevens, H.; Lu, R.; Caudrillier, A.; McBride, M.; McClure, J.D.; Grant, J.; Thomas, M.; Frid, M.; et al. MicroRNA-143 Activation Regulates Smooth Muscle and Endothelial Cell Crosstalk in Pulmonary Srterial Hypertension. Circ. Res. 2015, 117, 870–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Links between NLRP3, endothelial dysfunction, and type 2 diabetes.
Figure 1. Links between NLRP3, endothelial dysfunction, and type 2 diabetes.
Cells 10 00314 g001
Figure 2. NLRP3 activation model.
Figure 2. NLRP3 activation model.
Cells 10 00314 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gora, I.M.; Ciechanowska, A.; Ladyzynski, P. NLRP3 Inflammasome at the Interface of Inflammation, Endothelial Dysfunction, and Type 2 Diabetes. Cells 2021, 10, 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020314

AMA Style

Gora IM, Ciechanowska A, Ladyzynski P. NLRP3 Inflammasome at the Interface of Inflammation, Endothelial Dysfunction, and Type 2 Diabetes. Cells. 2021; 10(2):314. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020314

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gora, Ilona M., Anna Ciechanowska, and Piotr Ladyzynski. 2021. "NLRP3 Inflammasome at the Interface of Inflammation, Endothelial Dysfunction, and Type 2 Diabetes" Cells 10, no. 2: 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020314

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop