Next Article in Journal
Rice Biofortification: High Iron, Zinc, and Vitamin-A to Fight against “Hidden Hunger”
Next Article in Special Issue
Performance of Medicago sativa Grown in Clay Soil Favored by Compost or Farmyard Manure to Mitigate Salt Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Fatty Acid Composition of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Seeds in Relation to Yield and Soil Chemical Properties on Continuously Monocropped Upland Fields Converted from Paddy Fields
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Commercial Humic Substances and Other Organic Amendments for the Immobilization of Copper Through 13C CPMAS NMR, FT-IR, and DSC Analyses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Agro-Environmental Benefit and Risk of Manure- and Bone Meal-Derived Pyrogenic Carbonaceous Materials as Soil Amendments: Availability of PAHs, PTEs, and P

by
Vladimír Frišták
1,*,
Martin Pipíška
1,
Gerhard Soja
2,
Alena Klokočíková Packová
3,
Michal Hubeňák
4 and
Magdaléna Kadlečíková
5
1
Department of Chemistry, Trnava University in Trnava, 91843 Trnava, Slovak
2
Energy Department, Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, 3430 Tulln, Austria
3
Department of Chemistry, Matej Bel University, 97401 Banská Bystrica, Slovak
4
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Comenius University in Bratislava, 81219 Bratislava, Slovak
5
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 81219 Bratislava, Slovak
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2019, 9(12), 802; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120802
Submission received: 29 October 2019 / Revised: 15 November 2019 / Accepted: 22 November 2019 / Published: 24 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remediation of Contaminated Soil for Food Security)

Abstract

:
The worldwide boom of biochar and pyrogenic carbonaceous material application as a potential soil additive has brought about not only agricultural benefits such as enhanced crop yield, nutrients supply (P), and soil organic carbon increase, but also, on the other hand, environmental risk of organic (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)) and potentially toxic element (PTE) penetration into arable soils. Therefore, our study assessed pyrogenic carbonaceous materials (PCM) produced from the P-rich feedstocks—chicken manure (CM) and bone meal (BM)—as promising and safe alternatives for inorganic P fertilizers. Pyrogenic materials produced in the process of slow pyrolysis at residence time 2 h, 400 and 500 °C, were characterized by determination of pH, electrical conductivity (EC), elemental analysis of total C, H, N, S scanning electron microscopy (SEM), total content of P, selected potentially toxic elements (PTEs), and available forms of PTEs and P by diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) and calcium-acetate-lactate (CAL) extractions. CMPCM4, CMPCM5, BMPCM4, and BMPCM5 were characterized by determination of total 16 US-EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) PAHs by toluene extraction protocol and available concentrations by Tenax resin approach. Additionally, CMPCM4, CMPCM4, BMPCM4, and BMPCM5 were tested in earthworm avoidance test with Eisenia foetita and short-term rye-seedling germination test. Obtained results showed decreasing of total carbon in the order of BM > BMPCM4 > BMPCM5 and increasing in the order of CM < CMPCM4 < CMPCM5. Total phosphorus content increased from 56.8 ± 1.7 g kg−1 (BM) to 85.2 ± 4.2 g kg−1 (BMPCM4) to 110.5 ± 7.0 g kg−1 (BMPCM5). In the case of chicken manure-derived pyrogenic materials, total phosphorus content increased in the order of CM (22.9 ± 2.0 g kg−1) < CMPCM4 (37.0 ± 4.5 g kg−1) < CMPCM5 (40.0 ± 3.4 g kg−1). Availability of selected PTEs and P decreased in pyrogenic materials compared to feedstock. Total concentration of ∑16-US-EPA PAHs in BMPCM4 and BMPCM5 was 3.92 mg kg−1; CMPCM4, 7.33 mg kg−1; and CMPCM, 6.69 mg kg−1. The Tenax-available ∑16-PAHs showed concentrations of 0.53 mg kg−1 for BMPCM4, 0.26 mg kg−1 for BMPCM5, 1.13 mg kg−1 for CMPCM4, and 0.35 mg kg−1 for CMPCM5. Total P concentrations determined in rye aboveground tissues showed the highest accumulation ability in the case of CMPCM5 compared to other samples. Pyrogenic carbonaceous materials produced from chicken manure and bone meal at 400 and 500 °C have the potential to be P slow release fertilizers and may be ecologically safe.

1. Introduction

Agricultural soils globally are at risk of losing organic carbon by intensive soil tillage and ineffective cropping practices. About 45% of all European mineral soils have low to very low organic carbon contents (0–2%) [1]. Low soil content increases the vulnerability of soils to biodiversity decline, compaction, erosion, reduced fertility, and low water holding capacity. The importance of soil organic carbon is based on its role as a primary constituent of soil organic matter that has a stable fraction known as humus. Additionally, sustained soil fertility is not achievable without the appropriate supply of nutrients for vegetation. Among the essential elements necessary for plant growth, phosphorus is one of the most critical macronutrients [2]. Phosphorus is mined from rock phosphate, which is characterized by extremely uneven geographical distribution, and constitutes a limited resource that is at risk of exhaustion in the course of this century or the next [3]. As a result, fertilizer products that consider the demand of crops for both nutrient and soil organic carbon can be efficient soil amendments with properties not easily simulated by conventional mineral or organic fertilizers. Development of such innovative products requires feedstock-specific carbonization steps that will modify the labile carbon of wastes and residues into stable organic carbon compounds with mean soil residence times of decades to centuries [4].
The application of modern processing technologies such as pyrolysis and carbonization using biogenic waste materials has the potential to develop combined solutions for organic carbon and phosphorus problems of present and future agriculture and food production. Pyrolysis is a carbonization technology that converts biomass or other organic materials thermochemically into predominantly stable, recalcitrant organic carbon compounds. The process requires an inert atmosphere with low to no oxygen, a temperature range of 300–1000 °C, and residence time from seconds to several hours [5,6,7,8]. Produced pyrogenic carbonaceous materials contain concentrated (two to three times) content of total carbon and other elements (phosphorus, calcium, potassium) in comparison to the feedstock [9], however, with the possible amplification of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) such as cadmium, zinc, lead, and copper. Additionally, incomplete combustion and the method of feedstock pyrolysis are often responsible for significant levels of coproduced polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in pyrogenic carbonaceous products [10]. Processes of dehydrogenation, dealkylation, cyclization, and aromatization of polymers are responsible for PAH structure and formation during pyrolysis at lower temperatures [11]. Additionally, the pyrogenic carbonaceous materials can often be contaminated by the re-condensation of PAHs from gases and vapours released during thermochemical conversion [12]. Pyrogenic materials used as soil fertilizers, therefore, may act as a source of PAH. Our previous studies [6] confirmed the impact of thermochemical treatment on extractable concentrations of aromatic compounds from sewage sludge-derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials. Wang et al. [13] highlighted the importance of PAH monitoring in biochar-based soil amendments concerning plant contamination and human cancer risk. Authors have indicated that the total concentrations of 16 US-EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) PAH structures ranged from 638 to 12,347 μg kg−1 depending on production parameter, and that biochar application increased PAH accumulation in vegetable due to root exudates that enhanced aromatic release from biochars [13].
Conventional feedstocks such as wood waste or plant residues are thermochemically converted to high carbon concentrated products with very limited content of nutrients [14]. Therefore production of pyrogenic materials as potential soil fertilizers requires the use of reachable and, on nutrients, rich feedstock such as manures or animal residues [15]. Applied materials have to be closely monitored for potential ecotoxicity on the basis of organic and inorganic pollutant availability and mobility. The use of bone and meat meal in animal feeds was prohibited after the bovine spongiform encephalopathy crisis throughout the EU countries [16]. The utilization of low-risk and safe material from healthy animals is allowed as soil fertilizer or pet feed, and thus the enormous amount of bone meal produced by the food processing industry each year represents a promising input material. Furthermore, the bone meal material is conveniently rendered safe through the thermal treatment, which destroys pathogens and converts material into added-value product [17]. Biochar derived from animal bone meal is a high-calcium and phosphorus-rich material with low carbon content but with high agronomic efficiency such as crop yield increase [18]. Additionally, this kind of biochar has shown remediation potential for cadmium immobilization in contaminated soils [19]. Intensification of animal husbandry production can lead to a large concentration of animals in small areas, excessive amounts of manure, and subsequent environmental problems such as nutrient leaching into water bodies, methane emissions, and odour pollution [20]. Therefore, thermochemical stabilization of these materials could reduce the amount of nitrogen and phosphorus entering streams, ponds, or lakes, and convert carbon fractions into more stable forms. Nevertheless, more research is needed to critically evaluate the effect of the pyrolysis treatment on carbon content, nutrient availability, and potential contaminant mobility in manure- and bone meal-derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials.
The aims of the present research were to characterize (i) agricultural and environmental benefits, including phosphorus availability, carbon fixation, and enhanced plant yield production of bone meal and chicken manure-derived biochars; and (ii) evaluate the concentrations of organic (PAHs) and inorganic (PTEs) and their mobility and penetration from pyrogenic material-based fertilizers and into the soil environment as a potential risk.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Biochar Production and Physicochemical Characterization

Commercially available feedstock bone meal (BM) based on livestock residues (AIT, Austria) was oven dried at 60 °C for 72 h. Fresh chicken manure (CM) obtained from a local poultry farm (Tulln, Austria) was lyophilised in a lab-scale freeze-drying system using conditions of 0.2–0.4 mbar of pressure, condenser temperature of −45 °C, chamber temperature from −15 °C to −5 °C, and residence time of 14 days. Both feedstock materials were thermochemically converted using slow pyrolysis process at temperatures of 400 °C and 500 °C (heating rate 30 °C min) for 2 h of residence time in a modified lab-scale pyrolysis reactor under N2 atmosphere (2L min−1) to ensure strict anoxic conditions. Uniform conditions of each batch were ensured by thermochemical sensors and technological process control unit. The resulting pyrogenic carbonaceous materials BMPCM4, CMPCM4, BMPCM5, and CMPCM5 with production yields 30%–40% were ground, sieved to achieve uniform fractions (<200 μm and <2 mm), and stored in polypropylene boxes under dry and cool (4 °C) conditions. Prior to each analysis, BMPCM4, CMPCM4, BMPCM5, and CMPCM5 samples were thoroughly mixed in a lab-shaker. The total contents of C, H, and N within the samples were determined using Elemental Analyzer (CHNS-O EA 1108, Carlo Erba Instruments, Milan, Italy). The active pH values of samples were measured after mixing samples with deionized water (ratio 1:15 m:v) for 1 h, and 1 h of stabilization. Electrical conductivities (EC) of samples were measured in deionized water (1:10 m:v) after 24 h of mixing. The characterization experiments were conducted for each material using three replicates. The morphological structures of BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5 were captured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using an electron microscope JEOL JSM7500F (Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a field emission electron source using a 10 kV accelerating voltage and a beam current of 20 μA. Images were captured in a combined secondary and back scattered electron regimes with a sample-to-detector distance of 10–15 mm.

2.2. Total and Available Pool of PAH Determination

Prior each extraction, BMPCM4, CMPCM4, BMPCM5, and CMPCM5 samples were thoroughly mixed in a lab-shaker. The quartering technique to gain an analytically representative sample was applied. The total concentration of 16 structures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons according to the EPA priority pollutant list [21] (naphthalene, acenaphtene, acenaphthylene, phenanthrene, fluorene, anthracene, benz[a]anthracene, chrysene, pyrene, fluoranthene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, benzo[ghi]perylene, dibenz[ah]anthracene) within BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5 were determined by toluene extraction in Soxhlet extraction unit (solid/liquid: 1/15, 36 h, 110 °C) [11]. Extracts were cleaned according to Bücheli [22] described in the following steps: 1 mL of isooctane as keeper was added to extracts, and mixtures were concentrated (rotary vacuum concentrator) and cleaned by DMS/Milli-Q water (9:1, v:v) liquid−liquid partitioning and over 10% water-deactivated silica gel. A total of 16 EPA PAH concentrations were determined in purified extracts by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). For estimation of physically available forms of 16 EPA PAH desorption, methodology with polymeric adsorbent Tenax TA (Alltech) according Richardson and Aitken [23] was applied. Prior to use, Tenax resin in bead form was cleaned in a Soxhlet extractor by an acetone/hexane mixture (v:v 50:50) for 12 h. Tenax resin was then rinsed with methanol and oven-dried for 24 h at 40 °C. For the availability test, briefly, 3 g of BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5 was placed into 50 mL centrifuge vials with 30 mL of deionized water (<0.04 μS cm−1), 0.2 mL of 2 mol L−1 NaN3, and 0.2 mL 0.1 mol L−1 HgCl2 to inhibit biological activity with 0.5 g of Tenax beads. Vials were covered with foil to reduce light exposure and placed on a laboratory shaker at 22 °C, 60 rpm, with 14 days of continuous shaking. The samples were centrifuged (4000 rpm, 20 min) and stabilized for 2 h to separate the Tenax resin and particles of BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5, respectively. The resin was obtained by raising the suspension surface with deionized water, transferred into tube with deionized water, and vortexed to remove the residues of BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5. The Tenax resins were extracted with methanol (analytical grade) for 24 h, and the obtained filtered extracts (0.4 mm pore nylon filter) were analysed by GC-MS and HPLC to determine 16 EPA PAHs. For HPLC analysis, the chromatographic apparatus consisted of an Agilent 1100er series model; degasser G1379A; quaternary pump G1311A; column GRACE/Vydac C18 polymeric reversed-phase, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm; and GRACE/Vydac C18 guard column, 4.6 × 7.5 mm, 5 μm was used. The mobile phase, composed of a mixture of ultra-pure water and acetonitrile, varied during time of analysis. The detection was performed with diode array detector DAD (λ = 310 nm) and fluorescence detector FLD (Ex = 260 nm, Em = 350 nm, 420 nm, 440 nm, 500 nm) detectors. Analytic procedure of 16 PAH determination by HPLC has been described in detail in our previous work [6]. The control analysis of 16 EPA PAH in extracts was conducted by GC-MS, as described in our previous study [24]. The apparatus consisted of an Agilent GC 6890N model, Rtx-5Sil MS capillary column (30 m, 0.25 mm internal diameter (i.d.), 0.25 μm film thickness) from Restek (Bellefonte, PA, USA), and 2 m Siltek guard column (0.53 mm i.d.). Helium was used as a carrier gas at a constant flow of 1 mL min−1. GC oven temperature was initially kept at 100 °C for 1 min, raised at a rate of 5 °C min−1 to 300 °C, and kept for 15 min. Split less injection volume was 1 μL. Detection was performed with an Agilent MS 5973i in the electron impact mode with 70 eV ionization energy and single ion monitoring. The mixed 16 EPA PAH toluene standard solution (MERCK, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to prepare internal standard solutions of known concentrations.

2.3. Total and Chemically Extractable Pool of PTE Determination

Prior to each extraction, BMPCM4, CMPCM4, BMPCM5, and CMPCM5 samples were thoroughly mixed in a lab-shaker. Total Cd, Cu, Fe, and Zn concentrations of BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5 were determined using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry ICP-MS (Perkin Elmer, Elan DRCe 9000, Shelton, CT, USA) after wet digestion with HNO3 and H2O2 (Enders and Lehmann, 2012). Mobile fractions of Cd, Cu, Fe, and Zn in BMPCM400, BMPCM500, CMPCM400, and CMPCM500 were determined by diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) extraction protocol according Lindsay and Norvell [25], followed by ICP-MS analysis. Briefly, 10 g of pyrogenic materialwith 20 mL of DTPA extracting solution (0.005 mol L−1 diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, 0.01 mol L−1 CaCl2 and 0.1 mol L−1 triethanolamine, with a pH of 7.3) was shaken for 2 h at 180 rpm. The experiments were conducted for each material using three replicates.

2.4. Earthworm Avoidance Test

The earthworm avoidance test was conducted under modified laboratory conditions (dark room, 15 °C) using universal soil substrate (Einheitserde ED63, pH 6.8) [26,27]. Prior to use, soil substrate was oven-dried at 50 °C for 5 days, passed through a 2 mm standardized test sieve (RETSCH, Haan, Germany), homogenized, and moistened to 30% dry matter (DM) moisture content. As an experimental unit, polyvinylchloride (PVC) vessels with a diameter of 15 cm and height of 20 cm were used. Units were divided into two equal sections by a vertically introduced PVC divider. One half of each vessel was filled with non-amended (control) substrate, whereas the other half was filled with 1% and 3% (w:w) BMPCM-, BMPCM5-, CMPCM4-, and CMPCM5-amended substrate. Particle size of <2 mm of pyrogenic materials was used for the amendments. The divider was subsequently removed and 10 red worms Eisenia foetida (worm farm) were randomly placed. This species was chosen as it commonly occurs in organic rich soils [28]. Experimental units were covered by perforated plastic wrap in order to prevent escape. During the 14 day incubation period, the position and orientation of vessels were randomly changed and soil moisture was checked by weighing the units and replenishing the weight loss with deionized water. The experiment was conducted for each material and amendment ratio using five replicates. The experiment was concluded by inserting the divider into its original position, emptying out the different parts of vessels, and counting the earthworms found in respective compartments. Earthworms damaged by the divider were not considered. The percentage of avoidance was calculated according to the following equation:
X a v o i d a n c e = 100 ( n c n t ) / N
where Xavoidance is the avoidance in percent, nc is the number of earthworms in the nonamended (control) soil (mean of five replicates), nt is the number of earthworms in the amended soil (mean of five replicates), and N is the total number of earthworms in experimental unit.

2.5. Phosphorus Content, Mobility, and Availability

The total phosphorus content in BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5 was determined by ICP-MS (Perkin Elmer, Elan DRCe 9000, USA) after wet digestion with HNO3 and H2O2 [29]. For determination of labile phosphorus forms, the calcium-acetate-lactate (CAL) extraction protocol was used [30], followed by P-determination in extracts by ICP-MS. Briefly, 1 g of BMPCM400, BMPCM500, CMPCM400, and CMPCM500 was shaken with 20 mL of CAL extractant (0.05 mol L−1 calcium lactate + 0.05 mol L−1 calcium acetate + 0.3 mol L−1 acetic acid) for 90 min at 180 rpm. The plant available pool of phosphorus in the studied materials was characterized by rye seedlings test [31]. The ryegrass (100 seeds) was grown in experimental 1 L pots filled with the homogenous mixtures of fine quartz sand and BMPCM400, BMPCM500, CMPCM400, CMPCM500, and commercial inorganic phosphorus fertilizer (IF, 42% P2O5, Glatz, Wien, Austria) with particle size <200 μm, in ratios of 1% and 3% (w:w) under greenhouse conditions (light period 12 h light/12 h dark, constant air humidity, 25 °C). As a control sample, non-amended quartz sand was used. All amendments were tested using five replicates. The purity of sand was achieved by rinsing with 0.01 mol L−1 HCl and deionized water (electrical conductivity EC < 0.04 μS cm−1). The content of extractable P from purified sand was under limit of detection (LOD) of analytical method. The pots were irrigated using P-free Hoagland solution including all others nutrients to keep the water capacity at constant value during the 17 day experimental period. The position of sample replicates within each experimental block was randomized. At the end of experiment, aboveground (leaf tissues) and underground (roots) of ryegrass were harvested, washed with deionized water, separated from sand and biochar particles, and dried at 60 °C for 14 days. Plant materials were characterized for total P, Cd, Cu, Fe, and Zn contents by ICP-MS after previous wet digestion with HNO3 and HClO4.

3. Results

3.1. Pyrogenic Material Characterization

Feedstock mass loss during pyrolysis corresponded to an increase in process temperature with production yields of 46% for BMPCM4, 35% for BMPCM5, 47% for CMPCM4, and 40% for CMPCM5.
The carbon and nitrogen residing within the volatile chemical components of bone meal-derived pyrogenic materials were preferentially lost compared to the less volatile elements that concentrated under pyrolysis conditions (Table 1). Chicken manure-derived pyrogenic material produced at 500 °C showed decreased total nitrogen content and a slight increase in total content of carbon compared to CMPCM4 and thus lower volatilization of carbon-based components. Studied pyrogenic materials had stronger alkalinity character.
The morphology and surface structure of BMPCM and CMPCM obtained by SEM revealed preferentially amorphous particles of BMPCM (Figure 1a,b). The structural characteristics of finely and coarsely ground animal bones reflected the final structure of derived bone meal-derived pyrogenic material. SEM images of CMPCM (Figure 1c,d) showed heterogeneous morphology. The mixture of organic matter with minor straw-based litter resulted in the formation of broken fibres, largely amorphous and granular particles. Cellulose fibres are effective carriers and provide surfaces for mineral composite formation during the pyrolysis process.
Comparison of feedstocks and pyrogenic carbonaceous materials produced at 400 and 500 °C showed differences in chemical composition (Table 2). Total concentrations of Cd in all tested materials were lower than the detection limit of the applied analytical method. Total content of Cu, Fe, K, Mg, and P increased 1.4- to 1.9-fold for both feedstock materials. The difference between materials produced at 400 and 500 °C was negligible. Total Zn content in BMPCM4 and CMPCM4 doubled compared to input feedstocks. Pyrogenic materials produced at 500 °C contained three times the Zn content than raw bone meal and chicken manure.
The DTPA-available concentrations provided important information to estimate bioavailability of metal and mettaloids in soil and soil amendments (Table 3). Comparison of DTPA-extractable amounts of Cd, Cu, Fe, and Zn from feedstocks and pyrogenic carbonaceous materials produced at 400 and 500 °C showed a significant decrease in mobile metal forms. In bone meal-derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials BMPCM4 and BMPCM5, the DTPA-extractable Cd was lower than the detection limit of the analytical method (<0.05 mg kg−1). Extractable Cu decreased about 6%–34%, Fe 67%–80%, and Zn 18%–33%. In the case of chicken manure-derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials, a decreased availability of Cu of about 40%–56%, Fe 54%–72%, and Zn 25%–35% was observed. Phosphorus available forms in BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5 tested by CAL-extraction protocol showed a comparable trend for both feedstocks in reduction of extractable phosphorus and revealed the option to mitigate diffuse P-losses in soil.
Our results suggest substantial differences between pyrogenic carbonaceous materials produced at 400 and 500 °C in extractable concentrations of 16 US-EPA PAHs using toluene extraction in Soxhlet extractor (Table 4). Total concentrations of naphthalene represent >75% for BMPCM4, >68% for BMPCM5, >88% for CMPCM4, and >87% for CMPCM5 of total ∑16 US-EPA PAHs. Determination of available forms of PAHs (Table 4) by tenax extraction test revealed the different behaviours of BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5. Depending on the sample, the content of ∑16 PAHs quantified by Tenax adsorbent beads ranged between 5% and 16% of total aromate content defined by toluene extraction protocol (labelled as total). The extraction showed decreased concentrations of ∑16 USEPA PAHs for BMPCM5 (5.2%) compared to BMPCM4 (15.4%). For the chicken manure-derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials, the same trend was confirmed. Available concentrations of ∑16 USEPA PAHs were quantified as 13.6% for CMPCM4 and 5.8% for CMPCM5.

3.2. Avoidance Test

In the avoidance test, Eisenia foetida actively burrowed in both pyrogenic carbonaceous material-treated and control parts of the vessels, and after 14 days of the tested period, all experimental animals were recovered. After 2 weeks of incubation time, there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the distribution of the worms between the 1% and 3% amendment of BMPCM4 and BMPCM5, respectively (Figure 2). At 1% amendment, the earthworms tended to avoid applications of BMPCM4 and BMPCM5. The 3% treatment showed significant preference for BMPCM4 and BMPCM5 by earthworms. On the other hand, differences between 1% and 3% amendment of CMPCM4 were not statistically significant. Both treatments showed preference of earthworms for chicken manure-derived pyrogenic material. The difference between 1% and 3% CMPCM5 treatments was statistically significant (p < 0.05) with the most intensive preference of 3% CMPCM5 by experimental earthworms.

3.3. Pot Experiment

The assessment of BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5 as potential P fertilizers and soil amendments was carried out using a rye seedlings test. After 16 days cultivation, the yield of dry mass increased in the following order: control < P-inorganic fertilizer (IF) < BMPCM5 < CMPCM4 = BMPCM4 = CMPCM5 at 1% application rate of amendments (Figure 3). On the other hand, after 3% application rate, the order of increase was P-inorganic fertilizer (IF) < control = BMPCM5 < CMPCM5 < BMPCM4 = CMPCM4 (Figure 3). The higher application rate of P-inorganic fertilizer caused significant reduction in biomass production and inhibition of rye seed germination in comparison with the 1% amendment. The contents of total P in produced biomass showed a significant increase of phosphorus concentrations in all treatments compared to non-amended control (Figure 4A). At 1% application rate, the total phosphorus content in rye biomass increased in the order of control < CMPCM4 < BMPCM4 = BMPCM5 < P-inorganic fertilizer = CMPCM5. The highest concentration of P quantified in rye biomass obtained from 1% CMPCM5 was 7.1 mg kg−1 (dry weight) The 3% application showed P increasing in the order of control < CMPCM4 < P-inorganic fertilizer = BMPCM4 = BMPCM5 < CMPCM5. The 3% amendment of CMPCM5 resulted in 2-3 times higher accumulation of phosphorus in rye tissues compared to non-amended control sample.
Additionally, the application of BMPCM4, BMPCM4, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5 at both application rates showed significant reduction in Cu uptake and transfer into aboveground parts of rye compared to the non-amended control (Figure 4B). Total Cu concentrations in plant tissues obtained from amended samples decreased about 5%–43% compared to control. P-inorganic fertilizer did not show any significant differences to control. Conversely, uptake and accumulation of Fe in aboveground parts of rye were supported by 1% and 3% BMPCM4 amendments with a concentration >100 mg kg−1 (Figure 4C). BMPCM4, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5 did not significantly increase total Fe content in rye tissues compared to control sample. Determination of total Zn content in rye showed increase in zinc uptake and accumulation of CMPCM4 and CMPCM5 at 3% application rate compared to control—concentrations increased from 40 ± 1.2 mg kg−1 to 47.5 ± 1.2 mg kg−1. Amendments of BMPCM4 and BMPCM5 resulted mainly in the decrease of Zn concentrations in rye tissues of about 12%–16% compared to non-amended control.

4. Discussion

4.1. Pyrogenic Carbonaceous Materials Properties

The assessment of pyrogenic carbonaceous materials as soil amendments and fertilizers represents important issue in current agronomical approaches. Agronomic properties of pyrolysis products can be affected by various parameters such conversion temperature, residence time, heating rate, and feedstock composition [32].
Results of the characterization experiments indicated increased pH of PCM with pyrolysis peak temperature that was attributed to the processes of volatilization and partitioning of organic acids, decomposition of oxygen-containing functional groups (carboxylic, lactonic, carbonyl, phenolic), dihydroxylation of organic matter, formation of heteroatom groups, and formation of ash residue with high content of alkali and alkaline earth metal carbonates and oxides [14,33]. Alkalic character and pH values >10 of chicken manure-derived biochar produced at 350 and 700 °C were demonstrated by Hass et al. [14]. The authors discussed the strong influence of feedstock elemental composition on ash mineral composition. The feedstock with initially high ash content results in pyrogenic material of high pH and liming capacity. Additionally, process temperature affects ash composition of pyrolysis products [6]. Accordingly, European Biochar Certificate EBC [34] pyrogenic carbonaceous materials are characterized by total carbon content <50%. Elemental analysis showed decrease in total C, H, and N contents of bone meal-derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials with increasing pyrolysis temperature. The losses were attributed to the devolatilization of organic compounds and the cleavage of weaker bonds such as –NH, –OH, and –CH3 [17]. These findings agree with our previous studies of sewage sludge [24] and animal residues [15]. Cantrell et al. [34] highlighted reduction of total C with increased temperature by animal manure-derived chars. Increased carbon content in CMPCM5 may be attributed to minor content of straw-based litter in feedstock. Cellulose-based biomaterials during thermochemical conversion increases total carbon content [2]. The higher ash content at CMPCM5 and BMPCM5 was responsible for higher values of BMPCM5 and CMPCM5 EC compared to analogues produced at lower temperatures (Table 1).
Pyrolysis process of bone meal and chicken manure at 500 °C slightly influenced total 16 USEPA PAHs in comparison with materials produced at 400 °C. All materials, BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5, were under limit of EBC [35] concerning the content of 16 USEPA PAHs (<12 mg kg−1 for basic grade biochar). The effect of pyrolysis treatment confirmed stability and ability of two ring-aromatic structure formations in bone meal and chicken manure during thermochemical conversion, as well as in and temperature dependence. Dai et al. [36] and Bűcheli et al. [37] described in detail the main mechanism of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon formation during pyrolysis treatment of different biomass. The authors showed pyrosynthesis as a process of gaseous hydrocarbon radical generation by organic matter cracking under 500 °C. Afterwards, these radicals are able to form larger aromatic structures. Lower treatment temperatures can lead to the formation of aromatic structures as a result of biomass conversion by condensation, aromatization, and carbonization [24]. Zielinska and Oleszczuk [38] discussed the main effect of feedstock composition and individual structure contribution to total PAH content in pyrogenic carbonaceous materials. Consideration of the PAH-available pool provides important knowledge in the assessment of pyrogenic material toxicity. Bioavailability of PAHs can be assessed by various methodologies and procedures [10]. The combination of suitable sorption sink and conducting media represents an effective tool in the quantification of freely dissolved and accessible structures of PAHs. According to Oleszczuk [39], the Tenax extraction test can be used as a predictor for free available content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Our previous study [24] showed suitability of Tenax resin application in PAH labile pool determination in sludge-derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials.
The total concentrations of PTEs determined in BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5 increased 1.4- to 2-fold compared to input feedstock. According to EBC [34], basic grade biochar is characterized by threshold concentrations of Cd < 1.5 mg kg−1, Cu < 100 mg kg−1, and Zn < 0.4 g kg−1. Tested samples of BMPCM4 and BMPCM5 were in accordance with limits. On the other hand, CMPCM4 and CMPCM5 exceeded total concentration of Zn in terms of the EBC guidelines. DTPA extractable concentrations of PTEs provide important information to estimate the bioavailability of metals and metalloids in soils, sediments, biosolids, and soil amendments [40]. The comparison of DTPA-extractable amounts of Cd, Cu, Fe, and Zn from pyrogenic materials and feedstocks showed a significant decrease in mobile metal forms. Lu et al. [41] revealed similar trends in the mobility of metals from sludge and sludge-derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials. Reduced mobility of PTEs is attributed to formation on new ligands for metal bindings, and formation of organo-metallic complexes and precipitates. Liu et al. [42] discussed decreased mobility of Cd, Cu, and Zn in pyrogenic materials via formation of new chemical forms of metal sulphides and oxides. CAL extraction confirmed a similar trend in the reduction of extractable and mobile phosphorus forms and thus revealed the option to mitigate the P losses in soil matrix. Similar results were confirmed for sewage sludge-derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials in Frišták et al. [6].

4.2. Pyrogenic Carbonaceous Materials as Soil Fertilizers

According to Karayildirim et al. [43], lower pyrolysis temperatures are related to properties more suitable in agricultural applications. The effect of BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5 at 1% and 3% application rates on the habitat choice of Eisenia fetida may be attributable to increased water holding capacity and thus higher humidity of amended soil. Busch et al. [44] reported Eisenia spp. preference toward additions of 10 and 30 t ha−1 of activated peanut hull biochar in loamy sand. Li et al. [45] reported no significant effect of 10 g kg−1 of biochar on Eisenia fetida in an avoidance test. Our study confirmed the difference between BMPCM and CMPCM, caused probably by higher water holding capacity of chicken manure-derived materials with minor portion of cellulose material. The relevance of desiccation factor in earthworms’ avoidance was highlighted by several authors [27,45,46]. Additionally, earthworms are sensitive to the changes in the matrix potential of the soil [27]. Our study showed BMPCM material as a product with higher content of removable ash compared to CMPCM product. The addition of small-sized PCM particles into soil can slightly increase the soil porosity or, on the other hand, fill macroscopic soil pores. This can alter particle contacts and degree of water saturation in soil.
Application of 1% and 3% BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5 in pot experiments with rye seedlings showed differences in plant biomass production and thus in total P concentrations accumulated in rye aboveground tissues. Pyrogenic materials can be utilized as slow-releasing fertilizers with mitigation of P losses compared to original feedstock application. Our results showed decreased lower or statistically non-significant differences between control and amended samples for Cd and Cu accumulation. Fe showed a similar trend. Total concentrations of Zn in rye tissues were higher at CMPCM4 and CMPCM5 amendments compared to control. This can be attributed to higher concentrations of Zn in chicken manure-derived pyrogenic materials compared to bone meal-derived pyrogenic materials. The reducing availability of PTEs by rye roots can be discussed as a liming effect of pyrogenic materials. Given the known effect of pH on solubility and thus mobility of several elements [25], the effect of pyrogenic material application on soil pH has a stronger significance than these elements’ original concentrations in amendments. A similar trend was confirmed by Hass et al. [14] for chicken manure-derived biochar and availability of several PTEs. Our previous study [6] showed a decrease in availability of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Pb for alfalfa in soil-amended 1% and 5% sludge-derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials. Additionally, bioaccumulation of Zn by alfalfa showed an opposite trend to other PTEs.

5. Conclusions

The results showed that pyrogenic carbonaceous materials produced from chicken manure and bone meal can be applied as potential alternative P fertilizers and soil organic C stabilization tools. The pyrolysis products produced at 500 °C contained lower concentrations of mobile forms of PAHs in comparison with materials produced at 400 °C. Total carbon content decreased in the order of BM > BMPCM4 > BMPCM5 and increased in the order of CM < CMPCM4 < CMPCM5. We observed enhanced total P content in pyrogenic materials compared to input feedstocks. Available forms of P and PTEs decreased with the increase of pyrolysis temperature. Rye seedling test showed comparable or enhanced accumulation of phosphorus from pyrogenic materials compared to inorganic fertilizers. Comparison of chicken manure-derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials and bone meal-derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials applied in 1% and 3% amendments showed better preference of Eisenia foetita for a higher application rate. Obtained results of short-term experiments require a comparison with long-term field experiments to assess pyrogenic material application as commercial fertilizers. However, production of pyrogenic carbonaceous materials by thermochemical conversion of bone meal and chicken manure shows a promising tool in assessment of heterogeneous feedstocks as valuable soil amendments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.F. and M.P.; methodology, V.F. and G.S.; validation, V.F. and G.S., formal analysis, V.F.; investigation, V.F., A.K.P., M.H., and M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, V.F.; writing—review and editing, V.F. and A.K.P.; visualization, V.F.; supervision, V.F. and G.S.; project administration, V.F., M.P., and G.S.; funding acquisition, V.F., M.P., and G.S.

Funding

This research was funded by Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG, project number 844744; Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic, project number VEGA1/0110/19; and Trnava University in Trnava, project number 2/TU/2019.

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to M.Sc. Marion Graser and Christian Mayer for technical support and M.Sc. David Erwin Berthold for language proofs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Jones, A.; Panagos, P.; Barcelo, S.; Bouraoui, F.; Bosco, C.; Dewitte, O.; Gardi, C.; Erhard, M.; Hervás, J.; Hiederer, R.; et al. The State of Soil in Europe. In Reference Report by the Joint Research Centre; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  2. Micháleková-Richveisová, B.; Frišták, V.; Pipíška, M.; Ďuriška, L.; Moreno-Jiménez, E.; Soja, G. Iron-impregnated biochars as effective phosphate sorption materials. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 24, 463–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cordell, D.; White, S. Peak phosphorus: Clarifying the key issues of a vigorous debate about long-term phosphorus security. Sustainability 2011, 3, 2027–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lehmann, J.; Rillig, M.C.; Thies, J.; Masiello, C.A.; Hockaday, W.C.; Crowley, D. Biochar effects on soil biota—A review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 1812–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kloss, S.; Zehetner, F.; Wimmer, B.; Buecker, J.; Rempt, F.; Soja, G. Biochar application to temperate soils: Effects on soil fertility and crop growth under greenhouse conditions. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2014, 177, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Frišták, V.; Pipíška, M.; Soja, G. Pyrolysis treatment of sewage sludge: A promising way to produce phosphorus fertilizer. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 1772–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dieguez-Alonso, A.; Anca-Couce, A.; Frišták, V.; Moreno-Jiménez, E.; Bacher, M.; Bücheli, T.D.; Cimò, G.; Conte, P.; Hagemann, N.; Haller, A.; et al. Designing biochar properties through the blending of biomass feedstock with metals: Impact on oxyanions adsorption behavior. Chemosphere 2019, 214, 743–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aceña-Heras, D.; Novak, J.; Luz Cayuela, M.; Peñalosa, J.M.; Moreno-Jiménez, E. Influence of pyrolyzed grape-seeds/sewage sludge blends on the availability of P, Fe, Cu, As and Cd to maize. Agronomy 2019, 9, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Víglašová, E.; Galamboš, M.; Danková, Z.; Krivosudský, L.; Lengauer, L.C.; Hood-Nowotny, R.; Soja, G.; Rompel, A.; Matík, M.; Briančin, J. Production, characterization and adsorption studies of bamboo-based biochar/montmorillonite composite for nitrate removal. Waste Manag. 2018, 79, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mayer, P.; Hilber, I.; Gouliarmou, V.; Hale, S.E.; Cornelissen, G.; Bucheli, T.D. How to determine the environmental exposure of PAHs originating from biochar. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 1941–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hilber, I.; Blum, F.; Leifeld, J.; Schmidt, H.P.; Bücheli, T.D. Quantitative determination of PAHs in biochar:a prerequisite to ensure its quality and safe application. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 3042–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Buss, W.; Mašek, O. Mobile organic compounds in biochar—A potential source of contamination—Phytotoxic effects on cress seed (Lepidum sativum) germination. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 137, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, J.; Xia, K.; Waigi, M.G.; Gao, Y.; Odinga, E.S.; Ling, W.; Liu, J. Application of biochar to soils may result in plant contamination and human cancer risk due to exposure of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ. Int. 2018, 121, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hass, A.; Gonzalez, J.M.; Lima, I.M.; Godwin, H.W.; Halvorson, J.J.; Boyer, D.G. Chicken manure biochar as liming and nutrient source for acid Appalachian soil. J. Environ. Qual. 2012, 41, 1096–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Frišták, V.; Graser, M.; Pipíška, M.; Micháleková-Richveisová, B.; Soja, G. Pyrolysis products as soil fertilizers: Screening of potentially hazardous aromatic compounds. Nova Biotechnol. Chim. 2016, 15, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hazardous Wastes EWC Codes 1001 and 1901, CWC Codes 1001 and 1901, Council decision 22/12/94 (94/904/EC). In European Community Council Directive 91/96/WC; European Union: Brussel, Belgium, 1994.
  17. Vamvuka, D.; Dermitzakis, S.; Pentari, D.; Sfakiotakis, S. Valorization of meat and bone meal through pyrolysis for soil amendment or lead adsorption from wastewaters. Food Bioprod. Process. 2018, 109, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Someus, E.; Pugliese, M. Concentrated phosphorus recovery from food grade animal bones. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Siebers, N.; Leinweber, P. Bone Char: A clean and renewable phosphorus fertilizer with cadmium immobilization capacity. J. Environ. Qual. 2013, 42, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cely, P.; Gascó, G.; Paz-Ferreiro, J.; Méndez, A. Agronomic properties of biochars from different manure wastes. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2015, 111, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. EPIWIN; Version 3.10; US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) and SRC (Environmental Science Center): Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
  22. Bűcheli, T.; Blum, F.; Desaules, A.; Gustafsson, O. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, black carbon, and molecular markers in soil of Switzerland. Chemosphere 2004, 56, 1061–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Richardson, S.D.; Aitken, M.D. Desorption and bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in contaminated soil subjected to long-term in situ biostimulation. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011, 30, 2674–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Frišták, V.; Laughinghouse, H.D.; Packová, A.; Graser, M.; Soja, G. Monitoring of methylated naphthalenes in sludge-derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials. Chemosphere 2019, 217, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lindsay, W.L.; Norvell, W.A. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1978, 42, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hund-Rinke, K.; Wiechering, H. Earthworms avoidance test for soil assessments: An alternative for acute and reproduction tests. J. Soils Sediments 2001, 1, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tammeorg, P.; Parviainen, T.; Nuutinen, V.; Simojoki, A.; Vaara, E.; Helenius, J. Effects of biochar on earthworms in arable soil: Avoidance test and field trial in boreal loamy sand. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 191, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Test No. 207: Earthworm Acute Toxicity Test. In OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, Section 2; OECD: Paris, France, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  29. Enders, A.; Lehmann, J. Comparison of wet-digestion and dry-ashing methodsfor total elemental analysis of biochar. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2012, 43, 1042–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schüller, H. Die CAL-Methode, eine neude Methode zur Bestimmung des pflanzen verfügbaren Phosphates in Böden. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 1969, 123, 48–63. [Google Scholar]
  31. Neubauer, H.; Schneider, W. The nutrient uptake of seedlings and its application for the estimation of the nutrient content in soils. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Düng. Bodenk. 1923, A2, 329–362. [Google Scholar]
  32. Agrafioti, E.; Bouras, G.; Kalderis, D.; Diamadopoulos, E. Biochar production by sewage sludge pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2013, 101, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Amonette, J.; Joseph, S. Characteristics of Biochar: Micro Chemical Properties. In Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology; Lehmann, J., Joseph, S., Eds.; Earthscan: London, UK, 2009; pp. 33–52. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cantrell, K.B.; Hunt, P.G.; Uchimiya, M.; Novak, J.M.; Ro, K.S. Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 107, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. EBC. European Biochar Certificate, Guidelines for a Sustainable Production of Biochar; European Biochar Foundation: Arbaz, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dai, Q.; Jiang, X.; Jiang, Y.; Jin, Y.; Wang, F.; Chi, Y.; Yan, J.; Xu, A. Temperature influence and distribution in three phases of PAHs in wet sewage sludge pyrolysis using conventional and microwave heating. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 3317–3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bűcheli, T.; Hilber, I.; Schmidt, H.P. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated aromatic compounds in biochar. In Biochar for Environmental Management. Science and Technology and Implementation; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2015; pp. 595–624. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zielińska, A.; Oleszczuk, P. The conversion of sewage sludge into biochar educes polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon content and ecotoxicity but increases trace metal content. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 75, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Oleszczuk, P. The tenax fraction of PAHs relates to effects in sewage sludges. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2009, 72, 1320–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Karer, J.; Wawra, A.; Zehetner, F.; Dunst, G.; Wagner, M.; Pavel, P.B.; Puschenreiter, M.; Friesl-Hanl, W.; Soja, G. Effects of biochar and compost mixtures and inorganic additives on immobilisation of heavy metals in contaminated soils. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015, 226, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lu, H.; Zhang, W.; Wang, S.; Zhuang, L.; Yang, Y.; Qiu, R. Characterization of sewage sludge-derived biochars from different feedstocks and pyrolysis temperatures. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2013, 102, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, T.; Liu, B.; Zhang, W. Nutrients and heavy metals in biochar produced by sewage sludge pyrolysis: Ist application in soil amendment. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2014, 23, 271–275. [Google Scholar]
  43. Karayildirim, T.; Yanik, J.; Yuksel, M.; Bock-Horn, H. Characterization of products from pyrolysis of waste sludges. Fuel 2006, 85, 1498–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Busch, D.; Kammann, C.; Grünhage, L.; Muller, C. Simple biotoxicity tests for evaluation of carbonaceous soil additives: Establishment and reproducibility of four test procedures. J. Environ. Qual. 2011, 40, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, D.; Hockaday, W.C.; Masiello, C.A.; Alvarez, P.I.J. Earthworms avoidance of biochar can be mitigated by wetting. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 1732–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chan, K.Z.; Barchia, I. Soil compaction controls the abundance, biomass and distribution of eartworms in a single dairz farm in south-eastern Australia. Soil Tillage Res. 2007, 94, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscophic (SEM) images of BMPCM at magnifications of 250× (a) and 1500× (b), and CMPCM at magnifications of 250× (c) and 2500× (d).
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscophic (SEM) images of BMPCM at magnifications of 250× (a) and 1500× (b), and CMPCM at magnifications of 250× (c) and 2500× (d).
Agronomy 09 00802 g001
Figure 2. Preference/avoidance (Xavoid) of Eisenia foetida in 1% (solid fill) and 3% (hatched fill) BMPCM4-, BMPCM5-, CMPCM4-, and CMPCM5-amended soil after 2 weeks incubation. Stars indicate a significant difference between application ratio of pyrogenic carbonaceous materials treatments at p < 0.05 level.
Figure 2. Preference/avoidance (Xavoid) of Eisenia foetida in 1% (solid fill) and 3% (hatched fill) BMPCM4-, BMPCM5-, CMPCM4-, and CMPCM5-amended soil after 2 weeks incubation. Stars indicate a significant difference between application ratio of pyrogenic carbonaceous materials treatments at p < 0.05 level.
Agronomy 09 00802 g002
Figure 3. Biomassproduction of ryegrass (dry weight) in pots amended by 1% (solid fill) and 3% (hatched fill) BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, CMPCM5, inorganic phosphorus fertilizer (IF), and non-amended soil. Different letters mean statistical significant difference (p < 0.05) between studied amendments.
Figure 3. Biomassproduction of ryegrass (dry weight) in pots amended by 1% (solid fill) and 3% (hatched fill) BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, CMPCM5, inorganic phosphorus fertilizer (IF), and non-amended soil. Different letters mean statistical significant difference (p < 0.05) between studied amendments.
Agronomy 09 00802 g003
Figure 4. Total concentrations of P (A), Cu (B), Fe (C) and Zn (D) concentrations (mean ± SD) measured in rye grass tissues obtained from pots with 1% (solid fill) and 3% (hatched fill) amendment of BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, CMPCM5, and IF after total digestion (method HNO3 + HClO4, in digestion block—temperature program 80 °C/60 min, 120 °C/40 min, 160 °C/40 min, 180 °C/60min, 210 °C/60 min) diluted in 61%–62% HNO3 and quantified by ICP-MS. Different letters mean statistical significant difference (p < 0.05) between studied amendments.
Figure 4. Total concentrations of P (A), Cu (B), Fe (C) and Zn (D) concentrations (mean ± SD) measured in rye grass tissues obtained from pots with 1% (solid fill) and 3% (hatched fill) amendment of BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, CMPCM5, and IF after total digestion (method HNO3 + HClO4, in digestion block—temperature program 80 °C/60 min, 120 °C/40 min, 160 °C/40 min, 180 °C/60min, 210 °C/60 min) diluted in 61%–62% HNO3 and quantified by ICP-MS. Different letters mean statistical significant difference (p < 0.05) between studied amendments.
Agronomy 09 00802 g004
Table 1. Physicochemical characteristics of bone meal (BM), chicken manure (CM), and derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials produced at 400 °C (BMPCM4, CMPCM4) and 500 °C (BMPCM5, CMPCM5). All measurements were conducted in triplicate (mean ± SD).
Table 1. Physicochemical characteristics of bone meal (BM), chicken manure (CM), and derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials produced at 400 °C (BMPCM4, CMPCM4) and 500 °C (BMPCM5, CMPCM5). All measurements were conducted in triplicate (mean ± SD).
SamplepHEC (mS cm−1)Ctot (%)Htot (%)Ntot (%)Stot (%)
BM6.5 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.139.8 ± 0.76.1 ± 0.47.7 ± 0.40.5 ± 0.1
BMPCM49.8 ± 0.14.7 ± 0.133.9 ± 0.22.5 ± 0.15.2 ± 0.30.2 ± 0.1
BMPCM510.1 ± 0.15.0 ± 0.130.3 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.05.0 ± 0.30.2 ± 0.1
CM7.6 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.137.1 ± 0.25.3 ± 0.23.8 ± 0.20.8 ± 0.1
CMPCM49.7 ± 0.14.1 ± 0.144.8 ± 0.12.6 ± 0.14.4 ± 0.30.9 ± 0.1
CMPCM510.1 ± 0.25.0 ± 0.346.3 ± 0.11.6 ± 0.14.1 ± 0.30.8 ± 0.1
Table 2. Total concentrations of Cd, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, P, Zn, and calcium-acetate-lactate (CAL) extractable concentrations of P in bone meal (BM), chicken manure (CM), and derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials produced at 400 °C (BMPCM4, CMPCM4) and 500 °C (BMPCM5, CMPCM5) (mean ± SD).
Table 2. Total concentrations of Cd, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, P, Zn, and calcium-acetate-lactate (CAL) extractable concentrations of P in bone meal (BM), chicken manure (CM), and derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials produced at 400 °C (BMPCM4, CMPCM4) and 500 °C (BMPCM5, CMPCM5) (mean ± SD).
SampleCd (mg kg−1)Cu (mg kg−1)Fe (g kg−1)K (g kg−1)Mg (g kg−1)P (g kg−1)Zn (g kg−1)
BM<0.0512.4 ± 0.40.6 ± 0.48.2 ± 0.42.8 ± 0.256.8 ± 1.70.1 ± 0.0
BMPCM4<0.0519.2 ± 0.70.9 ± 0.111.4 ± 0.24.7 ± 0.385.2 ± 4.20.2 ± 0.0
BMPCM5<0.0521.7 ± 0.91.0 ± 0.013.4 ± 0.35.5 ± 0.3110.5 ± 7.00.3 ± 0.0
CM<0.0567.1 ± 3.21.4 ± 0.130.2 ± 0.612.8 ± 0.122.9 ± 2.00.6 ± 0.1
CMPCM4<0.0598.8 ± 7.12.0 ± 0.144.2 ± 0.517.0 ± 0.437.0 ± 4.5 1.1 ± 0.1
CMPCM5<0.05109.2 ± 9.72.2 ± 0.144.7 ± 0.418.0 ± 1.240.0 ± 3.41.2 ± 0.2
Table 3. DTPA extractable concentrations of Cd, Cu, Fe, P, Zn, and CAL extractable concentrations of P in bone meal (BM), chicken manure (CM), and derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials produced at 400 °C (BMPCM4, CMPCM4) and 500 °C (BMPCM5, CMPCM5) (mean ± SD).
Table 3. DTPA extractable concentrations of Cd, Cu, Fe, P, Zn, and CAL extractable concentrations of P in bone meal (BM), chicken manure (CM), and derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials produced at 400 °C (BMPCM4, CMPCM4) and 500 °C (BMPCM5, CMPCM5) (mean ± SD).
SampleCdDTPA (mg kg−1)CuDTPA (mg kg−1)FeDTPA (mg kg−1)PCAL (mg kg−1)ZnDTPA (mg kg−1)
BM<0.051.8 ± 0.163.8 ± 3.5815.6 ± 29.554.7 ± 2.6
BMPCM4<0.051.7 ± 0.121.4 ± 1.5654.8 ± 22.544.7 ± 2.1
BMPCM5<0.051.2 ± 0.111.5 ± 0.8379.7 ± 16.937.1 ± 2.4
CM<0.057.4 ± 0.284.4 ± 5.5709.4 ± 29.774.7 ± 7.5
CMPCM4<0.054.4 ± 0.139.0 ± 2.9604.4 ± 33.955.9 ± 3.4
CMPCM5<0.053.3 ± 0.222.9 ± 2.1368.7 ± 21.148.5 ± 2.4
Table 4. Total concentrations of naphthalene, acenaphtene, acenaphthylene, phenanthrene, fluorene, anthracene, benz[a]anthracene, chrysene, pyrene, fluoranthene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, benzo[ghi]perylene, and dibenz[ah]anthracene in BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5 determined by toluene extraction in Soxhlet extraction unit (solid/liquid: 1/15, 36 h, 110 °C) and their available concentrations determined by Tenax resin approach (mean ± SD). ND = non-detected.
Table 4. Total concentrations of naphthalene, acenaphtene, acenaphthylene, phenanthrene, fluorene, anthracene, benz[a]anthracene, chrysene, pyrene, fluoranthene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, benzo[ghi]perylene, and dibenz[ah]anthracene in BMPCM4, BMPCM5, CMPCM4, and CMPCM5 determined by toluene extraction in Soxhlet extraction unit (solid/liquid: 1/15, 36 h, 110 °C) and their available concentrations determined by Tenax resin approach (mean ± SD). ND = non-detected.
SampleBMPCM4BMPCM5CMPCM4CMPCM5
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH)Total (μg kg−1)Available (μg kg−1)Total (μg kg−1)Available (μg kg−1)Total (μg kg−1)Available (μg kg−1)Total (μg kg−1)Available (μg kg−1)
naphthalene5566 ± 24896 ± 55534 ± 65248 ± 213491 ± 98478 ± 213427 ± 65142 ± 5
acenaphtene9 ± 1ND5 ± 0ND5 ± 0ND33 ± 2ND
acenaphthylene533 ± 2173 ± 3253 ± 1024 ± 1195 ± 629 ± 1104 ± 2451 ± 3
phenanthrene222 ± 930 ± 2255 ± 824 ± 118 ± 1ND24 ± 1ND
fluorene444 ± 1664 ± 3295 ± 1425 ± 10113 ± 818 ± 184 ± 310 ± 1
anthracene131 ± 517 ± 188 ± 39 ± 028 ± 19 ± 086 ± 48 ± 0
benz[a]anthracene61 ± 29 ± 036 ± 23 ± 013 ± 1ND28 ± 1ND
chrysene110 ± 415 ± 174 ± 29 ± 021 ± 1ND61 ± 28 ± 0
pyrene56 ± 39 ± 023 ± 1ND6 ± 0ND17 ± 1ND
fluoranthene111 ± 515 ± 173 ± 28 ± 020 ± 1ND60 ± 27 ± 0
benzo[b]fluoranthene17 ± 1ND7 ± 0ND2 ± 0ND3 ± 0ND
benzo[k]fluoranthene14 ± 1ND7 ± 0ND2 ± 0ND4 ± 0ND
benzo[a]pyrene30 ± 2ND18 ± 0ND4 ± 0ND8 ± 0ND
indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene10 ± 0ND4 ± 0ND2 ± 0ND6 ± 0ND
benzo[ghi]perylene3 ± 0NDNDNDNDNDNDND
dibenz[ah]anthracene13 ± 0ND17 ± 1ND3 ± 0ND3 ± 0ND
∑16 PAHs73301128668935039235343928226

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Frišták, V.; Pipíška, M.; Soja, G.; Klokočíková Packová, A.; Hubeňák, M.; Kadlečíková, M. Agro-Environmental Benefit and Risk of Manure- and Bone Meal-Derived Pyrogenic Carbonaceous Materials as Soil Amendments: Availability of PAHs, PTEs, and P. Agronomy 2019, 9, 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120802

AMA Style

Frišták V, Pipíška M, Soja G, Klokočíková Packová A, Hubeňák M, Kadlečíková M. Agro-Environmental Benefit and Risk of Manure- and Bone Meal-Derived Pyrogenic Carbonaceous Materials as Soil Amendments: Availability of PAHs, PTEs, and P. Agronomy. 2019; 9(12):802. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120802

Chicago/Turabian Style

Frišták, Vladimír, Martin Pipíška, Gerhard Soja, Alena Klokočíková Packová, Michal Hubeňák, and Magdaléna Kadlečíková. 2019. "Agro-Environmental Benefit and Risk of Manure- and Bone Meal-Derived Pyrogenic Carbonaceous Materials as Soil Amendments: Availability of PAHs, PTEs, and P" Agronomy 9, no. 12: 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120802

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop