Next Article in Journal
Setting Irrigation Thresholds for Building a Platform Aimed at the Improved Management of Citrus Orchards in Coastal Syria
Next Article in Special Issue
Alleviatory Effects of Silicon and 24-Epibrassinolide in Modulation of Growth, Osmolytes, Metabolites, Antioxidant Defense System, and Gene Expression in Lead-Exposed Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Cross-Platform Wheat Ear Counting Model Using Deep Learning for UAV and Ground Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Breeding Drought-Tolerant Maize (Zea mays) Using Molecular Breeding Tools: Recent Advancements and Future Prospective
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Systematic Review on the Improvement of Cd Stress Tolerance in Ramie Crop, Limitations and Future Prospective

1
College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
2
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 62400, Pakistan
3
Department of Biology, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
4
Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences and Arts, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
5
Research Center on Ecological Sciences, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
6
Gansu Provincial Key Lab of Arid Land Crop Science, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(7), 1793; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071793
Submission received: 23 May 2023 / Revised: 25 June 2023 / Accepted: 25 June 2023 / Published: 4 July 2023

Abstract

:
Cadmium (Cd) is a non-essential, highly phytotoxic metal and damages ramie plant growth and development even at low concentrations. Ramie is one of the most significant crops in China, with excellent fiber quality and immense industrial importance. Planting Cd-tolerant ramie cultivars can prevent yield loss on contaminated soil. Previously, significant efforts have been made to develop Cd tolerance in ramie. However, the Cd tolerance mechanism is still not fully understood; hence, breeding industrial crops is critical to tackling the ongoing challenges. Cd tolerance is a complex genetic mechanism requiring high-level molecular studies to clarify the genes network. Genetic studies have identified several Cd-tolerant genes in ramie, which led to the development of several ramie cultivars suitable to grow on toxic soils; however, due to the continuous rise in Cd toxicity, potent molecular tools are critical in modern-day breeding programs. Genetic engineering, and transcriptome analysis have been used to develop abiotic stress tolerance in ramie, but QTL mapping and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) are rarely studied. However, studies are still limited in addressing this issue. This review critically elaborated on using QTL mapping, transcriptomes, transcription factors, CRISPR/Cas9, and genetic engineering to enhance Cd tolerance in ramie. These genes/QTL should be transferred or edited into sensitive cultivars using genetic engineering or CRISPR/Cas9. CRISPR/Cas9 is highly recommended because it provides targeted gene editing in ramie, its use is limited and can address the research gaps, and it would revolutionize the field of agriculture. Limitations, gaps, and future potential are briefly discussed. This review paper presents new clues to help future researchers comprehensively understand Cd tolerance in ramie and develop tolerant cultivars for industrial purposes.

1. Introduction

The significant rise in levels of heavy metal ions such as Cd, arsenic (As), and lead (Pb) in soils poses a constant threat to human and plant life [1,2,3,4]. These metals are naturally present in our environment in low concentrations [5,6]. Human-caused activities are a significant cause of the rising concentration of heavy metals in soil [7,8,9,10]. Cd stress is the most devastating abiotic stress that has led to the huge loss of crop growth and yields in large areas. Cd enters the food chain and causes an imbalance in food security [11,12]. Cd toxicity is a significant threat to crops. It is toxic even at low concentrations [13] and has no biological role in crop growth and development [14]. Anthropogenic activities include the atmospheric deposition of combustion emissions, mining, sewage sludge, and Cd-containing fertilizers [15]. Cd is ranked seventh in the top twenty toxic heavy metals list and is classified as a group 1 carcinogen [16]. Cd2+ is a divalent form of Cd in soils at concentrations typically ranging from 0.1–1.0 mg kg−1 [17]. Cd stress interferes with crops’ morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits. Cd stress mainly inhibits seed germination, reducing total plant weight, the number of leaves, and root length, ultimately leading to total plant death [18]. It encourages osmotic stress in plants by reducing leaf-relative water content, transpiration, and stomatal conductance [19,20]. Cd stress reduces the uptake of essential nutrients and leads to inappropriate plant growth [21,22]. Ramie is called China grass, and it is considered the most critical fiber crop next to cotton and is characterized by its rapid growth, shoot biomass, and excellent root system [23]. Ramie can be harvested three times a year. Ramie is mainly cultivated in China, India, and Pacific Rim countries. Ramie cultivation dates back to 5000 years ago in Southern China, with a high fiber yield next to cotton [23]. Toxic levels of Cd have led to a reduction in root length, shoot length, fiber yield, and enzymatic activities [12,24]. Meanwhile, it also reduces the chlorophyll contents, plant water relation, nutrients uptake, biomass, quality, protein contents, and damage to DNA [25]. Cd pollution is more terrible in the Hunan Province of China than in most parts of China [26]. China has small arable land per capita, but the food demand is too high and requires the effective and safe utilization of heavy metals-contaminated arable land to sustain food security. In recent years, numerous studies have focused on safe utilization, including soil improvement, selection, breeding varieties with low capacity for the absorption of heavy metals, and agronomic management [27].
Previous studies have revealed that ramie crop has robust tolerance to Cd stress and can accumulate Cd ions from soil; hence, the use of ramie to prevent the Cd contamination of agricultural soils is of practical significance [27,28,29]. More significantly, ramie can accumulate a comparatively large number of heavy metals in its above-ground portion [30]. Ramie is a relatively tolerant crop against heavy metals stress, especially Cd stress, as it absorbs Cd from heavy metals-contaminated soils [27,30,31]. An earlier study showed that ramie has a certain degree of tolerance to soil Cd stress at a concentration of ≤20 mg/kg [32]. Ma et al. [33] treated the two ramie cultivars (Dazhuhuangbaima and Zhongzhu 1) with different Cd levels of 0, 25, and 75 mg kg−1 for 30 days and concluded that Zhongzhu 1 had a higher degree of tolerance to Cd stress, as indicated by Cd enrichment in all organs and Cd content was mainly observed in the cell wall of both varieties. In this regard, breeders have employed conventional breeding techniques to enhance the Cd tolerance in ramie [34]. Still, the complex genetic mechanism of Cd tolerance hindered the expansion of these techniques. On the other hand, hormonal applications significantly mediated ramie growth under Cd stress [35]. Previous research studies have shown that ramie has a potential tolerance against Cd stress, which can be exploited to develop Cd-tolerant cultivars; however, there is still limited information about the complete genetic mechanism of ramie.
Considering these issues, it is essential to tackle the ongoing issue of Cd stress by using potential molecular tools. In this regard, the QTL mapping analysis method is one of the most promising ways of improving tolerance in ramie [36]. Still, this technique has limited applications in ramie, and this gap should be covered in future studies. On the other hand, TFs analysis revealed several genes involved in Cd tolerance [30,37] and can be used to develop tolerant cultivars using genetic engineering or editing using the CRISPR/Cas9 tool. All TFs belong to different families, which have still not been identified because of the diverse nature of the gene network. Several gene families must be explored for their possible role in Cd tolerance in ramie [37,38]. CRISPR/Cas9 is a novel gene editing tool that offers targeted editing of the desired gene in crops [39]. Still, this tool is not used for Cd tolerance in ramie, which presents an excellent opportunity to target Cd-sensitive genes to generate Cd-tolerant mutants in future studies. As one of the most significant fiber crops, ramie growth and yield are continuously threatened by rising toxic levels of Cd stress. Until now, many studies have been conducted to unpin the molecular mechanism of Cd tolerance in ramie; however, a detailed review on this aspect has not been published to motivate breeders to carry out additional studies. This is the first comprehensive review paper on Cd tolerance in ramie, which will serve as a valuable source of information to execute future research studies. The bioremediation of Cd-polluted sites is considered effective and reliable because ramie is a super accumulator of Cd.

2. Effects of Cd Stress and Genetic Mechanisms

In plants, Cd toxicity causes leaf chlorosis, reduced growth rates, respiration and photosynthesis, enhanced oxidative damage, and decreased nutrient uptake capability [40,41]. Ramie’s growth and development are badly affected by Cd stress. In previous studies, different ramie genotypes were evaluated to assess the effects of Cd stress. Cd stress affected the plant height, shoot dry weight, and root dry weight [35,42]. Ramie seedlings were subjected to Cd stress (3 and 7 mg1−1) for 10 days to investigate its effects on lipid membrane and chlorophyll synthesis. Cd stress-induced lipid peroxidation, as indicated by an enhanced malondialdehyde content (MDA) in leaves and roots. The prolonged exposure of ramie to Cd stress decreased antioxidant enzyme activity [24]. Zhu et al. [43] studied the effects of Cd stress on the growth parameters of different ramie cultivars. They concluded that Cd stress negatively affects the above-ground raw tissues and fiber yield [43]. Another ramie cultivar, Chuanzhu, was treated with Cd stress at a concentration of 50 mg/L, and it was noticed that plant height (PH), root length (RL), and biomass were reduced [44]. Higher Cd concentration reduces photosynthesis (Figure 1) and affects the reproductive stage in ramie [45]. Cd stress caused sugar degradation, the inactivation of antioxidant enzyme activity, protein oxidation, and growth inhibition in ramie [46]. Increasing Cd concentration affected the stem, leaves, and internal cell organs in ramie [47]. As mentioned earlier, Cd is highly toxic to ramie even at low concentrations. Some of the micro-regional studies showed that the ramie cultivar is significantly affected by Cd stress at 25 mg kg−1 concentration. Cd retained in stems and leaves greatly reduced the plant biomass [48]. Although several studies have indicated the toxic effects of Cd stress on ramie crops, there is still a need to expose the plant to extreme Cd stress to investigate the effects on biochemical and molecular functions. These studies would help us to adopt a better protective mechanism to counter the adverse effects of Cd stress through the screening and training of genotypes [49].
In the last decade, numerous studies have focused on the Cd tolerance mechanisms at the physiological, biochemical, and molecular levels [50,51]. Transcriptome and proteomics approaches have been adopted to understand the molecular factors involved in Cd tolerance [52,53]. Tolerance to Cd stress in ramie is a complex genetic mechanism controlled by many genes [49]. The Cd tolerance in ramie varies among the genotypes and germplasm. Ying et al. [54] evaluated the 269 ramie germplasm resources under the Cd stress condition. The results indicated a significant difference among the ramie germplasm regarding Cd accumulation and transport. The data showed the different genetic factors involved in ramie tolerance to Cd stress, which can be analyzed using molecular breeding tools rather than conventional tools [54]. Plants also have varied and complex defensive systems for resisting Cd stress [55].
Moreover, antioxidant enzymes, ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT) are critical for scavenging ROS [56,57,58]. The complex genetic mechanism of Cd tolerance cannot be unfolded using conventional breeding methods because of their time-consuming and costly nature [59,60,61]. Despite all these efforts, the Cd-tolerant nature of ramie has not been thoroughly studied. The effects of Cd stress on fiber quality and genetic material should be further investigated to avoid potential loss. Hence, it would be better to make a complete genome sequence of ramie germplasm to characterize all possible genes and proteins involved in Cd tolerance in ramie and use them in Cd stress breeding programs. In addition to this, germplasm with Cd-tolerant ability can be fully exploited for Cd-tolerant genotype development. The activation of systematic resistance plays a crucial role in countering Cd stress in ramie and can be enhanced using Cd stress conditions. Investigations of the morphological, physiological, and biochemical mechanisms of Cd tolerance are not fully understood and need further studies to identify the potential traits involved in Cd tolerance in ramie.

3. Agronomic Approaches to Enhance Cd Tolerance in Ramie

Plant hormones or growth regulators play a crucial role in defense response against heavy metals (HMs) stress, especially Cd stress [62,63] (Figure 2). Each hormone’s mechanism of action may differ for each crop [64]. It has been determined that multiple hormones may regulate a single process, and simultaneously, different processes are controlled by a single hormone [65]. Plant hormones such as auxin, abscisic acid (ABA), cytokinin (CK), ethylene (ET), and jasmonic acid (JA) are essential plant hormones that are vital for plant growth and development, and are also involved in crosstalk with other hormones [66,67,68]. Hormones in very low concentrations control cell membrane permeability, secondary metabolites, and growth, as well as the reproduction of plants [69,70]. Cd stress retards plant growth and accumulates in below- and above-ground parts of the plant. Cd stress causes a delay in seed germination, and seeds may vary in their response [71]. Plants react to heavy Cd stress depending on the concentration of Cd stress. The role of these hormones has been investigated in many crops, including ramie, which has the ability of Cd phytoextraction [72].
ABA is a powerful hormone controlling plant tolerance to Cd stress in ramie. Chen et al. [73] conducted a study to investigate the effect of ABA on ramie under Cd stress. Directly adding ABA to the cultural solution promoted ramie growth and development under Cd stress, increased Cd enrichment, and indicated its regulatory role in enhancement or stress tolerance and as a potential agronomic agent [73]. Similarly, another research team led by He et al. [74] studied the effect of different growth regulators on the Cd content in ramie. The results showed that a foliar spray of hormones reduced the Cd content in underground parts of ramie, which showed the potential role of these growth regulators in increasing Cd tolerance [74].
Auxin is well known for its signaling function and plays a crucial role in life developments such as cell division, embryogenesis, meristem, and organ development [75,76]. Auxin plays a significant role in stress response, organ formation, and vascular development [77]. A recent study showed that Cd at a concentration of 500 mM had variable effects on hormonal function. The content of JA reduces, and ABA increases after exposure to Cd stress. Meanwhile, indole acetic acid (IAA) content decreases after increased Cd content in Koelreuteria paniculata [78]. Similarly, ABA content increases in soybean after exposure to Cd stress for 24 h and decreases after 140 h [79]. Chaca et al. [79] revealed that plants mainly produce JA and ABA hormones under Cd stress. Usually, phytohormones enhance plant tolerance to Cd due to their participation as signaling molecules and encourage plant growth by expressing different metabolites, genes, and pigments [80,81]. Earlier work has demonstrated that plant hormones regulate Cd tolerance in many crops, including rice [82], wheat [83], and Arabidopsis [84]. These crops respond to Cd stress by hormonal action. The priming of barley seed with GB3 reduces the toxic effects of Cd stress on coleoptile growth [85]. Gibberellin improves ramie growth, development, and metabolic processes [86,87]. The study indicated that brassinosteroids (BR) and gibberellin (GA) have different effects on the enrichment and transport of Cd in ramie. The results indicated that GA-1 enhanced the Cd content of the aboveground ramie to three times more than that of the control and decreased the Cd content of the underground ramie by 54.76%. This research study offers an effective technique to advance the capability of ramie to adsorb heavy metals [74].
Furthermore, the pretreatment of seeds of maize with SA and IAA enhances the growth of coleoptiles under Cd stress [88]. In another study, SA at a concentration of 500 mM increased the antioxidant defense system [89] and mitigation of the influences of Cd stress on plant growth and development in maize [90]. It has also been shown that SA use reduces the Cd stress in roots [91]. In barley plants, SA curbs the consequences of Cd stress on organic reserves, inhibits the impairment of plant growth due to Cd, and triggers Cd tolerance mechanisms [92]. Kalai et al. [92] described that SA at concentration of 600 mM enhanced growth and development in barley seedlings and decreased Cd stress. These reports showed very little information about using hormones to mitigate Cd stress in crops. It is strongly recommended to conduct more studies to investigate the regulatory role of plant growth regulators in alleviating Cd toxicity in ramie to develop a suitable approach for Cd-contaminated soils, which are the primary habitat of ramie.
Spermidine is a polyamine compound situated in ribosomes and living tissues and has numerous metabolic roles within plants [93,94,95]. Spermidine has been a significant polyamine in mitigating Cd stress in many crops [96]. Ramie was used to investigate the Cd tolerance mechanism with various treatment durations and the effect of the up-regulation of antioxidant capability by spermidine treatment. The outcomes exhibited that short-term (0–7 days) Cd stress caused the enrichment of pigment content, soluble sugars, and the activation of antioxidants, temporarily reducing the level of MDA, the primary oxidative stress marker. Spd treatment noticeably improved the soluble sugar content and condensed glutathione (GSH) in ramie leaves after short-duration Cd stress, while it showed no beneficial effects on other antioxidants. Long-term (0–15 days) Cd stress may lead to growth retardation related to Cd increment, protein sugar degradation, a rise in MDA, and the inactivation of antioxidants. Spd treatment reduced long-term Cd toxicity by reducing Cd content, stabilizing cellular macromolecules such as protein and sugar, and preventing the inactivation of catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD). These findings showed that Spd uses could be dynamic in the Cd tolerance’s rise by regulating different traits [46].
Another study used the combined exogenous application of Spd and calcium (Ca) to study the effects on Cd stress in ramie. The results exhibited that using 5 mM Ca meaningfully reduced Cd toxicity in ramie by reducing Cd content, discouraging H2O2 and MDA content, enhancing plants’ dry weight and chlorophyll contents, and changing the actions of total superoxide dismutase (SOD). Additionally, ramie accumulated Cd and was affected by more toxic effects of Cd stress by applying 1 mM Ca or Cd. Severe Cd toxicity could be reduced by adding exogenous Spd via a surge of plant growth and the decrease of the Cd-induced oxidative stress. Generally, the effects of 1 mM Ca and Spd seemed greater than other treatments in the ramie plants under Cd stress, with a more excellent Cd accumulation capability. They assessed Cd stress tolerance in ramie [97]. Sun et al. [34] studied the effects and mechanisms of IAA and Spd on Cd accumulation in ramie to broaden the understanding of Cd tolerance. The results showed that the application of Spd and IAA increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes (Table 1). IAA and Spd application could meaningfully reduce the oxidative stress encouraged by Cd in ramie crop. Hence, the application of Spd, IAA, and GA can be combined to increase the Cd tolerance in ramie crops [34].
Selenium (Se) is one of the most potent metalloids widely used to enhance crop tolerance to Cd stress. Se has also been used in ramie to mitigate the toxic effects of Cd stress. Ramie plants were grown in hydroponic conditions and were separately or instantaneously treated with Se spray, 1.2 μmol/L, and Cd stress 6 and 9 mg/L. At low Se levels, the activity of SOD was improved by 35.34% under 6 or 9 mg/L Cd stress, POD was improved by 12.45%, and the level of DNA methylation was reduced by 10.70%, correspondingly. The results established that low Se-level spray on ramie leaves could improve the action of POD and SOD, and control DNA methylation in ramie leaves. Hence, future studies must explore the effects of this hormone on functions of other antioxidants such as CAT and APX to improve the Cd tolerance in ramie [25]. In an earlier study, ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid (EDDS) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) were added to potted soil containing ramie plants. The chelants were found to decrease Cd content in roots by 15% and 12% in EDTA- and EDDS-treated plants. Hence, chelate-induced phytoremediation is an effective technique for the remediation of Cd-contaminated soils [98]. Similarly, in another study, the Cd accumulation and translocation mechanism in ramie was studied by adding ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA). The results demonstrated that EDTA and NTA could increase Cd Phyto-availability in soil, transport Cd from the roots to the aboveground tissues, and increase leaf Cd accumulation. This study highlights the control of Cd accumulation in ramie [99]. The above results indicate that more studies should be conducted to investigate the role of GA, CK, and ET in regulating Cd tolerance by enhancing the growth of ramie plants. These hormones can enhance the antioxidant defense system and prevent ramie growth under severe Cd stress conditions. Moreover, the hormonal application should be studied at different growth stages of ramie under Cd stress conditions.

4. Genetic Diversity for Cd Tolerance in Ramie

The breeding of genotypes tolerant to adverse growing environments is critical for ramie existence [100]. Hence, genetic diversity has been the foundation of plant breeding since the initial days of agriculture [101,102]. It helps plant breeders to develop new genotypes that can address grower requirements, acclimatize to climate variation, and meet the growing global food demand [103]. Researchers rely on dissimilarity in crop genetics, breeding methods, and approaches to integrate genetic assortment into cultivated genotypes [104]. Crop breeders exploit genetic diversity to breed new cultivars with improved traits such as resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses and to advance the nutritional value of foods for the world population [105,106]. Plant breeders have achieved the vital task of the planned incorporation of a new genetic assortment while protecting critical economic characteristics of crops [103]. Genetic diversity can be explained as a range of genetic traits in crop species. Genetic diversity can be measured by investigating changes in the DNA nucleotide sequences in a progeny of individuals [107,108,109]. Genetic diversity in crops gives rise to a population’s phenotypic differences and observable traits [110]. Crop genomes are naturally different, which causes more genetic and epigenetic variations in plants that help as the sources of a large volume of genetic and phenotypic diversity, even among the cultivars of the same species [111,112]. More considerable genetic diversity in crops gives plants an outstanding capability to acclimatize to sudden abiotic stresses [113,114].
The achievement of the crop improvement target depends on capably recognizing and integrating genetic diversity from numerous plant genetic sources comprising currently grown varieties [115], newly established varieties, wild and landraces of crops, and the collection of germplasm with elite plants [116]. Numerous genomic tools and breeding approaches have enhanced the competence and accuracy of integrating genetic diversity into cultivated crop varieties. However, plant breeding still remains a time- and resource-intensive procedure [117,118]. Ramie, a significant fiber crop [119], has genetic diversity, crucial in developing tolerant cultivars [120]. Genetic diversity is indispensable for breeding programs. Ramie has excellent potential for tolerance to Cd toxicity [54]. To assess genetic diversity for Cd tolerance, 269 ramie germplasm accessions were studied under Cd-contaminated soils and significant genetic diversity was observed among the studied germplasm [54]. Ramie has been best known for its phytoremediation capability for decades. The phytoremediation capability of ramie shows that it has considerable genetic diversity for Cd-tolerant genes, which can be exploited in breeding programs. Zhu et al. [121] showed that ramie could tolerate higher Cd concentrations (100 mg/kg), prevent significant economic loss, and safeguard crop security. Results showed that an extended period would be required to improve the soils affected by Cd toxicity. Other assortments and cultivations of Cd hyperaccumulator ramie are indispensable [121]. The first report on constitutional heavy metals tolerance was presented by Yang et al. [23]. They evaluated ramie in contaminated fields with various metals, including Cd, and revealed that ramie germplasm and genotypes performed better under contaminated conditions. These results determined that ramie holds a certain degree of constitutional Cd tolerance. This germplasm can be useful for increasing diversity and transforming tolerant genes to develop Cd-tolerant ramie cultivars [23].
The results presented significant variations in Cd tolerance; these germplasm resources can be exploited for other breeding programs [23]. Later, another hydroponic and field experiment was conducted to compare ramie’s superior genotypes and Cd tolerance indices. In the hydroponic culture experiment, considerable variances, and noteworthy genotypic differences in plant height (PH), leaf number per plant (LNP), shoot dry weight (SDW), and root dry weight (RDW) were observed under Cd treatments. The SDW was well associated with PH and RDW. The SDW was well associated with PH and bark thickness. This proposes that these features could be used as Cd tolerance indices in future studies [122]. She et al. [123] showed that Cd-tolerant ramie will be a great source of phytoremediation in Cd-contaminated soils. Cd contents in ramie were two to ten times higher compared to other plant species, as shown by the data collected from mining areas where the soil was heavily polluted with Cd and other metals. These ramie genotypes provide a more significant source of genetic diversity for Cd tolerance [123]. Zhu et al. [43] observed significant differences among the ramie varieties for Cd tolerance and accumulation. Results indicated that raw fiber yield and biological tissues of variety (Zhongzhu1) were higher than the other six varieties [43]. Several traits of ramie have been tested for Cd tolerance and accumulation. The significant difference in yield among the ramie cultivars showed more considerable genetic diversity and potential candidate genes for genetic engineering. The results obtained from a study indicated that the cultivar Zhongzhu No. 3 showed a high yield in Cd-contaminated soils. All varieties showed more than a 90% Cd removal ratio during the uncovering process of fibers [124]. The varieties such as Zhongzhu1 and Zhongzhu No. 3 should be used to develop new high-tolerant varieties for the phytoremediation of Cd-contaminated soils. The screening of all available germplasms of ramie to identify the potential Cd tolerant plant material for further breeding programs is critical.
Therefore, it is proposed that the screening of Cd-tolerant ramie genotypes would lead to the identification of tolerant genes for Cd-tolerant breeding programs. The screening ramie genotypes can be enhanced via breeding tools such as introduction, mass selection, and hybridization (Figure 3) to enhance Cd tolerance in the future when the crop faces more deadly threats of Cd toxicity. Molecular breeding tools are, however, more potent, and reliable in protecting the diversity and integrating the Cd-tolerant genes into elite cultivars. We recommend collecting the ramie germplasm from different locations and screening it for its tolerance against Cd stress.

5. QTL Mapping for Cd Tolerance in Ramie

The highly toxic, metal-like Cd and its uptake by crops are significant constraints for modern-day agriculture [125]. To dissect the genetic mechanism and regulation of Cd tolerance in crops, QTL mapping is one of the most productive approaches. QTL mapping is frequently used to recognize candidate genes related to phenotypic characters [125]. Current development in genetic and genomic resources, including genome sequencing, diversity analysis, transcriptome characterization, the construction of genetic maps, and the development of transgenic cultivars, provide new prospects to improve the genetic makeup of the ramie cultivars for better output and higher resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. These parameters have been significantly reviewed in ramie [31]. Unfortunately, the information on QTL mapping in ramie is negligible, which needs urgent studies to screen the population for Cd tolerance and identify the QTL to be used in the QTL pyramiding program [36,126]. Researchers have identified QTL in ramie, which were mainly related to fiber yield-related traits, lignin biosynthesis, and flowering time [126,127,128,129]. Choosing an ideal mapping population is critical in identifying dominant regions controlling Cd tolerance [125]. It is believed that the evaluation of ramie populations under different levels of Cd stress will lead to the identification of several Cd-tolerant QTL, which can be integrated into elite cultivars using QTL pyramiding. QTL mapping studies must be expanded to develop the Cd-tolerant ramie cultivars. The above results show that there are minimal studies on QTL mapping for Cd tolerance in ramie. Hence, it is essential to develop the mapping populations of ramie to detect the genomic regions regulating Cd tolerance to accelerate plant breeding.

6. Genetically Engineered Ramie for Cd Tolerance

Developing tolerance to Cd stress is one of the main objectives of crop breeding to sustain the crops growth and development on Cd-contaminated soils (Figure 4) [130,131]. Genetic studies have been conducted to develop tolerant cultivars in many crops using the genes for specific stress-related pathways [132,133]. Despite the significant progress in this field, the use of this technique in ramie is still minimal because of the availability of little knowledge regarding the complete genetic mechanism of Cd tolerance [134]. These hindrances limit the ramie’s capability to perform better on contaminated soils [134]. Using genetic engineering, ramie’s capabilities to mitigate the toxic effects of Cd stress may have considerably increased [134]. Genetic engineering can potentially transfer the tolerant gene to develop Cd-tolerant plants [130,135]. The growth of genetically engineered ramie is a suitable approach to sustain growth in Cd-affected soil.
Although gene expression and regulation caused by Cd stress are not fully understood, She et al. [134] established the ramie root gene expression database grown as either in control or under Cd stress (100 uM). A total of 3887 genes were detected with different expression patterns. The expression pattern shows that 2883 were up-regulated and 1004 genes were downregulated. The biological function of these genes was determined by gene ontology analysis. In total, 15 genes with differential expression patterns were selected, and 12 showed consistent expression patterns. These genes could be used to develop new transgenic ramie plants via genetic engineering [134]. These genes can be potential candidates for the genetic engineering of Cd tolerance in ramie [134]. GE is a dominant method that may accelerate the development of new plant lines with traits mandatory in phytoremediation [136]. Transgenic plants with various genes from diverse sources have been developed to increase heavy metal tolerance, enabling durable heavy metal tolerance [137,138].
Genetic engineering has been a potent tool for gene modification for decades [139,140]. This technique has led to several Cd-tolerant crops showing tolerance to heavy metals as well as higher yield and quality [51,141]. Arabidopsis is a model plant that has shown greater tolerance to Cd stress. The development of genetically engineered Arabidopsis provides clues about using GE in ramie to enhance Cd tolerance in future research studies [134,141]. Applications of genetic engineering have been witnessed in many crops such as rice [51], wheat [142], Arabidopsis [141], and sorghum [143] (Table 2), which showed a considerable enhancement in Cd tolerance and gave solid clues for the use of this technique in ramie crops. Recent studies have shown that transcription factors (TFs), transcriptome, and many other genes are potential targets for genetic engineering to enhance Cd tolerance in crops [143,144]. The success of GE depends on the selection of Agrobacterium vectors, which play a central role in the transformation and expression of the transgene in our desired crop [145]. The exposure of crops to various levels of Cd stress leads to the expression of different TFs, and genes which serve as an ideal target for GE [146]. Due to the development of specific advanced gene editing methods such as CRISPR/Cas9 [147], the use of GE is decreasing and has several deficiencies [148,149], which must be addressed to solve the Cd stress issues threatening the growth and production of economically important crops. Applications of genetic engineering are very limited in ramie. We strongly emphasize screening the ramie germplasm under Cd stress environments and identifying the potential genes to be transformed using genetic engineering. These research gaps must be filled to develop transgenic ramie cultivars that grow under Cd-contaminated soils. The wild relatives, landraces, and untapped germplasm will serve as a potential source of genetic diversity and identify novel Cd-tolerant genes in the future. However, the future of crop genome editing is bright and can meet challenges regarding food security issues and environmental hazards.

7. Transcription Factors (TFs) Analysis for Cd Tolerance in Ramie

Cd contamination is a significant issue in China and threatens agricultural stability [153,154]. Ramie, a fiber crop, has often been projected for use as a phytoremediation of polluted soils. Still, extreme Cd stress can critically impede ramie stem growth, decreasing its economic value [59]. To eliminate this threat, breeders must use molecular factors involved in Cd tolerance in crops and use them in molecular breeding programs [155]. TFs are essential elements that regulate gene expression and play a key role in heavy metals tolerance in plants. Plenty of TFs have been identified in response to heavy metals stress in crops; many TFs showed improved resistance, especially against Cd. The bZIP TFs family plays a critical role in heavy metals tolerance by controlling physiological processes and adaptive responses. Huang et al. [38] conducted TFs analysis and cloned a novel bZIP gene, indicated as BnbZIP3, from ramie plants. BnbZIP3 transcripts were found in different tissues in ramie. BnbZIP3 expression was induced by drought and ABA. Expression analysis showed that BnbZIP3 might positively regulate the Cd tolerance in ramie and identified it as a potential candidate gene for future breeding programs. This study suggested that this TF, BnbZIP3, can be exploited in Cd-tolerant breeding in ramie in future research studies to enhance heavy metal tolerance [38]. In the same way, another significant bZIP TF, BnbZIP2, was identified by TFs analysis and then cloned from ramie, and it was localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm. BnbZIP2 transcripts were higher in male and female flowers, and its expression was induced by drought and ABA treatment. Plants with overexpression of BnbZIP2 showed high sensitivity to Cd stress, especially at the seed germination stage. Further analysis of this TF can provide significant results for Cd stress tolerance in ramie. Hence, this paper recommends further research and analysis of this TF in future studies [156].
MYB transcription factors (TFs) play a key role in plants and are accountable for numerous biological procedures such as growth, metabolism, and response to metals stress. The MYB TFs have been widely investigated in numerous plant species. Nevertheless, complete data on MYB TFs in ramie remains a mystery [30]. In another TFs analysis, 105 BnGR2R3-MYB genes were recognized from the ramie genome and classified into 35 subfamilies based on phylogeny discrepancy and sequences resemblance. Remarkably, the expression of BnGMYB10/12/41 in stems, roots, and leaves of ramie roots enhanced more than 10-fold after Cd stress, and they may cooperate with critical genes controlling the biosynthesis of flavonoids. Thus, protein communication network investigation recognized a possible connection between responsiveness to Cd stress and flavonoid biosynthesis. In theory, the studies enhanced the understanding of the valuable roles of MYBs and provided a basis for studying the genes in ramie crops. Hence, more studies are required to investigate the role of potential TF, BnGMYB10/12/41, regarding its interaction with other genes, especially genes regulating flavonoid biosynthesis to regulate Cd tolerance in ramie. In this way, researchers can generate more genetic material for further studies regarding the MYB TFs family and its role in Cd tolerance [30]. MYB TFs have been studied for their crucial role in Cd tolerance in many crops, especially ramie and Arabidopsis. An MYB gene called BnMYB2 was cloned from ramie, enhancing Cd tolerance in Arabidopsis [37]. Thus, these TFs may regulate Cd stress and can be used to develop tolerant ramie varieties or other industrial crops for higher yields. Further analysis indicated that this TF has a close phylogenetic association with other 1R-MYB TFs which play a role against diverse environmental stresses. Hence, further characterization of this TF is missing and demands further study to accelerate Cd tolerance breeding [37].
The bnMYB3 gene cloned from the ramie genome by amplifying cDNA ends (RACE) showed significant tolerance to Cd stress. The results of real-time quantitative PCR examination demonstrated that the BnMYB3 gene was a constituent. Still, its expression levels in leaves and stems were more significant than in roots. Furthermore, BnMYB3 expression was seemingly stimulated by Cd, and the relative expression level of the BnMYB3 gene intensely improved with the continuation of Cd stress time and the increased concentration of Cd2+. Further characterization of this gene can lead to identifying different roles against Cd stress. Hence, it is recommended to conduct more studies to identify the pathways regulated by the BnMYB3 gene in ramie [157]. Recently, another MYB TF, BnMYB1, was isolated from the ramie plant by rapidly amplifying cDNA ends based on the expression profiling of Cd-tolerant genes. Additionally, the BnMYB1 gene was up-regulated after Cd stress, and the expression pattern of BnMYB1 altered along with the Cd concentration and stress time. Collectively, our data proposed that BnMYB1 (Table 3) is a cadmium-responsive factor and may show possible roles in plant’s adjustment to Cd stress. This is a possible candidate for Cd-tolerant breeding, and further studies can authenticate its role against Cd stress and other heavy metals. Its expression level can be enhanced in various plant parts, including the leaves, roots, and stems [158].
Pathway enrichment analysis exposed that the DEGs enhanced the cutin and wax biosynthesis pathway in ramie. Detecting these Cd-tolerant genes and pathways will be supportive in developing Cd-tolerant ramie cultivars. Further genetic analysis is critical to identify the pathways controlled by these identified genes. Cutin and way biosynthesis genes should be used in molecular breeding programs in future studies [59]. NAC is one of the significant TFs families, but the number of identified and cloned genes is minimal. In an experiment, 32 full-length BnNAC genes and 47 known NAC proteins were identified in other species. Alongside these, 32 proteins were used for phylogenetic analysis. The results showed that seventy-nine NAC family proteins could be classified into eight groups. Additionally, the expression of BnNAC genes was controlled by Cd stress, respectively. The documentation of these 32 full-length BnNAC genes and the description of their expression outline offer a prospect for the future explanation of their roles in ramie growth and development. These genes could be used for Cd tolerance in ramie to perform better in contaminated soils. The possible gaps in this study suggested that further studies are required to clarify the functions of these genes in ramie growth and development. Furthermore, NAC is not a highly studied TFs family, and future researchers should complete the functional characterization of this family regarding its role in Cd tolerance in ramie [159]. After a comprehensive analysis of available data on TFs for Cd tolerance in ramie, it can be concluded that this information is insufficient to adopt a reliable breeding tool to counter the threat of Cd stress on ramie growth and development. Different TFs families such as DREB and WRKY have not been profoundly investigated in ramie regarding Cd tolerance. The identification of TFs genes, their cloning, and transformation will increase Cd tolerance and lead to the development of tolerant ramie cultivars. It is important to expose the ramie to different levels of Cd stress at different growth stages and identify the potential TFs regulating Cd tolerance. This comprehensive review compiled all available data on the role of TFs in Cd tolerance in ramie, highlighted research gaps, and recommended further studies.

8. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing for Cd Tolerance

The CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing system is discovered in the immune system of bacteria and archaea [160]. It comprises short RNA sequences and endonucleases that cleave the genome of foreign invaders at targeted points [161]. CRISPR/Cas9 comprises sgRNA and Cas proteins, which act as biological scissors [162]. CRISPR/Cas9 systems have been divided into two major groups: class 1, which has an extensive multiple Cas protein network for alignment and cleavage. The second group is class 2, which employs a single protein for editing [163]. The class 2 CRISPR program has been widely used in biological research because of the advantages offered by a single protein in the group. The class 2 CRISPR system has been further divided into three types, II, V, and VI, in which the nucleases are Cas9, 12a, and 13 [164]. Most Cas9 and Cas12 variants work in RNA-dependent DNA slicing that can encourage double-stranded breaks (DSBs), although Cas13 types have an RNA-dependent RNA cleavage action [165,166]. Newly emerged gene editing systems, such as base editing (BE) and prime editing (PE), can be used to edit large DNA parts [167]. These systems have further expanded the scope and boundary of the CRISPR/Cas9 system, but their use is not limited. It is strongly believed that use of BE and PE systems will increase with time [167,168].
The CRISPR/Ca9 technique has been practiced to enhance heavy metal tolerance in crops [169]. CRISPR/Ca9 has emerged as a promising tool for the targeted gene editing of desirable traits [170]. The CRISPR/Cas9 system is capable of developing environmentally resilient crop cultivars [171]. CRISPR/CCas9 has been successfully used in crops, animals, and bacteria for precise gene editing [172,173,174]. To avoid the off-target effects during gene editing, several web tools have been developed to design single-guided RNA (sgRNA) [175,176]. A web tool, CRISPR-P, has been established for sgRNA in 20 plant species [177]. Several studies have employed a detailed protocol for a targeted mutation in crops using CRISPR/Cas9 [178,179], and a toolkit and some vectors have been developed for CRISPR/Cas9 [180,181]. These studies have offered the use of CRISPR-Cas9 for many purposes, including genetic screening, editing, and transcriptional modulation to unfold the molecular mechanism of abiotic stress tolerance and to breed stress-tolerant crops [182].
Although CRISPR/Cas9 has generated several successful stories about its use in targeted gene editing in many crops [183,184], there is no evidence of CRISPR/Cas9 for Cd tolerance in ramie. CRISPR/Cas9 has been employed in many crops for the development of Cd tolerance. A successful example was presented by Liu et al. [185], in which they edited the Sl1 gene in tomatoes using CRISPR/Cas9, which enhanced Cd tolerance by increasing the efficiency of antioxidant enzymes and increased photosynthesis. Gene expression analysis showed that Sl1 regulated the transcript levels of heavy metals transporter genes to prevent Cd accumulation [185]. Many heavy metal transporters have been knocked out using CRISPR/Cas9 to enhance abiotic tolerance in many crops. A heavy metal transporter, OsABCG36, is responsible for rice’s Cd tolerance. The CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of OsABCG36 increased Cd tolerance in rice plants by transporting Cd from root cells in rice [186]. There has been no report of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing for Cd tolerance in ramie. Many potential genetic resources offer an excellent opportunity for successfully using CRISPR/Cas9 to use targeted gene editing in ramie for Cd tolerance. The CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted gene editing of metal transport and other genes from wild types and landraces can be helpful to develop Cd-tolerant ramie cultivars to sustain growth and development in Cd-polluted soils. It is important to screen the ramie germplasms for the identification of stress responsive genes, the extraction of the genome, the construction of the gene library, and the use of potential molecular tools for successful genetic modification in the desired gene for desired traits. CRISPR/Cas9 can also be used to enhance the genetic diversity in ramie through the creation of mutations by artificial means in available germplasm.

9. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Agriculture plays a crucial role in providing the dietary needs of all human beings. Plant breeding aims to increase the yield of crops to maintain balance in food security. However, different types of biotic and abiotic stresses have significantly affected the growth and yield of many crops, leading to increased hunger in many parts of the world. Cd is a non-essential heavy metal that has no biological role in plants, damaging ramie growth and production even at low concentrations. Cd toxicity effects can be seen at the whole-plant, cellular, and molecular levels, reducing photosynthesis, protein synthesis, introducing retardation of growth, nutritional disorder, and an imbalance in the plant water relation. Ramie is China’s most significant fiber crop, and has been badly affected by Cd toxicity and requires special attention from researchers. Plants use several defense mechanisms to counter the toxic effect of Cd, such as the activation of the antioxidant defense system, as well as the synthesis of genes, proteins, and other stress-signaling pathways. The Cd tolerance mechanism is complex and governed by many genes and their regulatory networks. Plant breeders have been trying to develop Cd tolerance in ramie by conventional breeding methods; however, the large-scale use of these methods is limited. QTL mapping using diverse populations should be enhanced to identify potent regions involved in Cd tolerance and their transformation using QTL pyramiding. Previous genetic engineering studies have led to the development of many Cd-tolerant genotypes in many crops; however, the use of this tool in ramie is negligible.
TFs technique has been widely used in ramie to identify the genes overexpressed under Cd stress, and they have been classified based on their families. We strongly suggest using the identified TFs and QTL in molecular breeding programs. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing is a novel tool that broke biological barriers and has successfully edited the many abiotic tolerance genes in the crops. Unfortunately, the application of CRISPR/Cas9 based gene editing for Cd tolerance in ramie has not been reported, which offers an excellent opportunity to apply this tool for developing Cd-tolerant ramie cultivars. Agronomic techniques such as using different growth-promoting hormones, such as GA, CK, ET, JA, and ABA, are mandatory to counterbalance the toxic effect of Cd stress in ramie. The enhancement of the antioxidant defense mechanism is critical to naturalize ROS and MDA production under Cd stress. Ramie breeders should conserve the genetic diversity of ramie to increase the efficiency of Cd-tolerant breeding in future studies.
We strongly recommend the following steps to develop Cd-tolerant ramie cultivars
  • The screening of ramie germplasm will lead to the identification of several tolerant genotypes, which can serve as a source of Cd-tolerant genes for developing Cd-tolerant ramie.
  • Investigation of physiological- and biochemical-based Cd tolerance mechanisms.
  • Selection of wild relatives of ramie and their screening for Cd-tolerant genes.
  • Exposure of ramie cultivars to Cd stress levels and increase the expression of TFs families and the selection of potential targets for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing to develop Cd-tolerant mutants.
  • Conservation of the genetic diversity of ramie for future breeding programs.
  • Increase the Cd accumulation in ramie to increase its phytoremediation capability.

Author Contributions

A.R. prepared the manuscript, H.J., Y.M., P.H., H.X. and X.L. helped in review and editing. M.U.H., S.F.A.G., B.A., R.O.E., M.U.H. and S.A. reviewed the manuscript. Y.J. supervised the study and provided funding. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071940), China National Key R&D Program (2019YFD1002205-3 and 2017FY100604-02), and Foundation for the Construction of Innovative Hunan (2020NK2028).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University for supporting this work through the research groups program under grant number R.G.P. 2/75/44.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References and Notes

  1. Liu, J.; Gai, L.; Zong, H. Foliage application of chitosan alleviates the adverse effects of cadmium stress in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 164, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Guedes, F.R.C.M.; Maia, C.F.; da Silva, B.R.S.; Batista, B.L.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P.; da Silva Lobato, A.K. Exogenous 24-Epibrassinolide stimulates root protection, and leaf antioxidant enzymes in lead stressed rice plants: Central roles to minimize Pb content and oxidative stress. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 280, 116992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Neidhardt, H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate negative effects of arsenic-induced stress on crop plants: A meta-analysis. Plants People Planet 2021, 3, 523–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhao, Y.; Wang, J.; Huang, W.; Zhang, D.; Wu, J.; Li, B.; Li, M.; Liu, L.; Yan, M. Abscisic-Acid-Regulated Responses to Alleviate Cadmium Toxicity in Plants. Plants 2023, 12, 1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Griffith, A.; Wise, P.; Gill, R.; Paukett, M.; Donofrio, N.; Seyfferth, A.L. Combined effects of arsenic and Magnaporthe oryzae on rice and alleviation by silicon. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 750, 142209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bhat, J.A.; Faizan, M.; Bhat, M.A.; Huang, F.; Yu, D.; Ahmad, A.; Bajguz, A.; Ahmad, P. Defense interplay of the zinc-oxide nanoparticles and melatonin in alleviating the arsenic stress in soybean (Glycine max L.). Chemosphere 2022, 288, 132471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Antoniadis, V.; Levizou, E.; Shaheen, S.M.; Ok, Y.S.; Sebastian, A.; Baum, C.; Prasad, M.N.; Wenzel, W.W.; Rinklebe, J. Trace elements in the soil-plant interface: Phytoavailability, translocation, and phytoremediation—A review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2017, 171, 621–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Geng, N.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Tsang, D.C.; Rinklebe, J.; Xia, Y.; Lu, D.; Zhu, L.; Palansooriya, K.N.; Kim, K.-H. Bioaccumulation of potentially toxic elements by submerged plants and biofilms: A critical review. Environ. Int. 2019, 131, 105015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Palansooriya, K.N.; Shaheen, S.M.; Chen, S.S.; Tsang, D.C.; Hashimoto, Y.; Hou, D.; Bolan, N.S.; Rinklebe, J.; Ok, Y.S. Soil amendments for immobilization of potentially toxic elements in contaminated soils: A critical review. Environ. Int. 2020, 134, 105046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kučerová, D.; Vivodová, Z.; Kollárová, K. Silicon alleviates the negative effects of arsenic in poplar callus in relation to its nutrient concentrations. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2021, 145, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. El Rasafi, T.; Oukarroum, A.; Haddioui, A.; Song, H.; Kwon, E.E.; Bolan, N.; Tack, F.M.; Sebastian, A.; Prasad, M.; Rinklebe, J. Cadmium stress in plants: A critical review of the effects, mechanisms, and tolerance strategies. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 52, 675–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhao, H.; Guan, J.; Liang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Hu, H.; Zhang, J. Effects of cadmium stress on growth and physiological characteristics of sassafras seedlings. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, Z.; Wu, X.; Hou, L.; Ji, S.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, W.; Li, T.; Zhang, L.; Liu, P.; Yang, L. Effects of cadmium on transcription, physiology, and ultrastructure of two tobacco cultivars. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 869, 161751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Manzoor, M.; Gul, I.; Kallerhoff, J.; Arshad, M. Fungi-assisted phytoextraction of lead: Tolerance, plant growth–promoting activities and phytoavailability. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 23788–23797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kubier, A.; Wilkin, R.T.; Pichler, T. Cadmium in soils and groundwater: A review. App. Geochem. 2019, 108, 104388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zulfiqar, U.; Ayub, A.; Hussain, S.; Waraich, E.A.; El-Esawi, M.A.; Ishfaq, M.; Ahmad, M.; Ali, N.; Maqsood, M.F. Cadmium toxicity in plants: Recent progress on morpho-physiological effects and remediation strategies. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutrit. 2021, 22, 212–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Smolders, E.; Brans, K.; Földi, A.; Merckx, R. Cadmium fixation in soils measured by isotopic dilution. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 1999, 63, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Astolfi, S.; Ortolani, M.R.; Catarcione, G.; Paolacci, A.R.; Cesco, S.; Pinton, R.; Ciaffi, M. Cadmium exposure affects iron acquisition in barley (Hordeum vulgare) seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 2014, 152, 646–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Abbas, T.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Hannan, F.; Keller, C.; Al-Wabel, M.I.; Ok, Y.S. Cadmium minimization in wheat: A critical review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 130, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hussain, B.; Ashraf, M.N.; Abbas, A.; Li, J.; Farooq, M. Cadmium stress in paddy fields: Effects of soil conditions and remediation strategies. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, Q.; Lu, X.; Guo, X.; Pan, Y.; Yu, B.; Tang, Z.; Guo, Q. Differential responses to Cd stress induced by exogenous application of Cu, Zn or Ca in the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 157, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, J.; Liang, J.; Li, K.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, B.; Lu, X.; Yang, J.; Zhu, Q. Correlations between cadmium and mineral nutrients in absorption and accumulation in various genotypes of rice under cadmium stress. Chemosphere 2003, 52, 1467–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yang, B.; Zhou, M.; Shu, W.; Lan, C.; Ye, Z.; Qiu, R.; Jie, Y.; Cui, G.; Wong, M.H. Constitutional tolerance to heavy metals of a fiber crop, ramie (Boehmeria nivea), and its potential usage. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zeng, G.; Qu, D.; Gu, J.; Zhou, M.; Chai, L. Cadmium-induced oxidative stress and response of the ascorbate–glutathione cycle in Bechmeria nivea (L.) Gaud. Chemosphere 2007, 69, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, C.-L.; Liu, Y.-G.; Zeng, G.-M.; Hu, X.-J.; Ying, Y.-C.; Xi, H.; Lu, Z.; Wang, Y.-Q.; Li, H.-Y. Mechanism of exogenous selenium alleviates cadmium induced toxicity in Bechmeria nivea (L.) Gaud (Ramie). Transact. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2014, 24, 3964–3970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Du, Y.; Hu, X.F.; Wu, X.H.; Shu, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Yan, X.J. Affects of mining activities on Cd pollution to the paddy soils and rice grain in Hunan province, Central South China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185, 9843–9856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. An, X.; Wei, J.; Liu, Q.; Ying, J.; Zhou, H.; Luo, X.; Li, W.; Liu, T.; Zou, L.; Zhu, G. Progress in the Study of the absorption, accumulation, and tolerance of ramie to the heavy metal cadmium. Mol. Plant Breed. 2023, 14, 3. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lei, M.; Yue, Q.; Chen, T.; Huang, Z.; Liao, X.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, G.; Chang, Q. Heavy metal concentrations in soils and plants around Shizhuyuan mining area of Hunan Province. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2005, 25, 1146–1151. [Google Scholar]
  29. She, W.; Jie, Y.-C.; Xing, H.-C.; Lu, Y.-W.; Kang, W.-L.; Wang, D. Heavy metal concentrations and bioaccumulation of ramie (Boehmeria nivea) growing on 3 mining areas in Shimen, Lengshuijiang and Liuyang of Hunan Province. Shengtai Xuebao/Acta Ecol. Sin. 2010, 31, 874–881. [Google Scholar]
  30. Feng, X.; Abubakar, A.; Chen, K.; Yu, C.; Zhu, A.; Chen, J.; Gao, G.; Wang, X.; Mou, P.; Chen, P. Genome-wide analysis of R2R3-MYB transcription factors in Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaudich revealed potential cadmium tolerance and anthocyanin biosynthesis genes. Front. Genet. 2023, 14, 1080909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Satya, P.; Mitra, S.; Ray, D.P. Ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud) genetic improvement. In Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Industrial and Food Crops; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 115–150. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhu, Q.; Huang, D.; Liu, S.; Luo, Z.; Rao, Z.; Cao, X.; Ren, X. Accumulation and subcellular distribution of cadmium in ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud.) planted on elevated soil cadmium contents. Plant Soil Environ. 2013, 59, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ma, Y.; Jie, H.; Tang, Y.; Xing, H.; Jie, Y. The Role of hemicellulose in cadmium tolerance in ramie (Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaud.). Plants 2022, 11, 1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sun, Z.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zeng, G.; Wang, Y.; Hu, X.; Zhou, L. Effects of indole-3-acetic, kinetin and spermidine assisted with EDDS on metal accumulation and tolerance mechanisms in ramie (Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaud.). Ecol. Engin. 2014, 71, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tang, H.; Liu, Y.; Gong, X.; Zeng, G.; Zheng, B.; Wang, D.; Sun, Z.; Zhou, L.; Zeng, X. Effects of selenium and silicon on enhancing antioxidative capacity in ramie (Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaud.) under cadmium stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 9999–10008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zeng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Yang, X.; Wang, H.; Li, F.; Liu, T. Linkage mapping of quantitative trait loci for fiber yield and its related traits in the population derived from cultivated ramie and wild B. nivea var. tenacissima. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhu, S.; Shi, W.; Jie, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Song, C. A MYB transcription factor, BnMYB2, cloned from ramie (Boehmeria nivea) is involved in cadmium tolerance and accumulation. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0233375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Huang, C.; Zhou, J.; Jie, Y.; Xing, H.; Zhong, Y.; She, W.; Wei, G.; Yu, W.; Ma, Y. A ramie (Boehmeria nivea) bZIP transcription factor BnbZIP3 positively regulates drought, salinity and heavy metal tolerance. Mol. Breed. 2016, 36, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gillani, S.F.; Rasheed, A.; Yuhong, G.; Wei, J.; Tariq, H.; Ilyas, M.; Yunling, P. Assessment of cold stress tolerance in maize through quantitative trait locus, genome-wide association study and transcriptome analysis. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Nap. 2021, 49, 12525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shanying, H.; Xiaoe, Y.; Zhenli, H.; Baligar, V.C. Morphological and physiological responses of plants to cadmium toxicity: A review. Pedosphere 2017, 27, 421–438. [Google Scholar]
  41. Baliardini, C.; Meyer, C.-L.; Salis, P.; Saumitou-Laprade, P.; Verbruggen, N. CATION EXCHANGER1 cosegregates with cadmium tolerance in the metal hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri and plays a role in limiting oxidative stress in Arabidopsis spp. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. She, W.; Jie, Y.-C.; Xing, H.-C.; Lu, Y.-W.; Huang, M.; Kang, W.-L.; Wang, D. Tolerance to cadmium in ramie (Boehmeria nivea) genotypes and its evaluation indicators. Acta Agron. Sinica 2011, 37, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhu, S.; Shi, W.; Zhang, J. Effect of different ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud) cultivars on the adsorption of heavy metal ions cadmium and lead in the remediation of contaminated farmland soils. Open Chem. 2022, 20, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Quan, R.; Chen, J.; Zhang, L.; Xu, M.; Yang, R.; She, W.; Cui, G. Responses of ramie to antioxidant enzymes and plant chelating peptides to Cd stress. Chin. J. Trop. Crops 2022, 43, 1023. [Google Scholar]
  45. She, W.; Cui, G.; Li, X.; Su, X.; Jie, Y.; Yang, R. Characterization of cadmium concentration and translocation among ramie cultivars as affected by zinc and iron deficiency. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018, 40, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhou, L.; Liu, Y.; Hu, X.; Zeng, G.; Wang, Y.; Hu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Tan, X.; Jiang, L.; Zeng, X. Time-dependent antioxidative responses of ramie (Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaudich) to moderate cadmium stress and its up-regulation mechanism by spermidine antioxidant. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 76141–76149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, G.; Chai, L.; Song, X.; Min, Z.; Xiao, X. Subcellular distribution and chemical forms of cadmium in Bechmeria nivea (L.) Gaud. Environ. Expe. Bot. 2008, 62, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. She, W.; Jie, Y.-C.; Xing, H.-C.; Luo, Z.-Q.; Kang, W.-L.; Huang, M.; Zhu, S.-J. Absorption and accumulation of cadmium by ramie (Boehmeria nivea) cultivars: A field study. Acta Agricul. Scand. Section B-Soil Plant Sci. 2011, 61, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, X.; Luan, M.; Qiu, C.; Guo, Y.; Long, S.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, H. Analysis of the potential of 165 ramie germplasms to be used for cadmium-contamination remediation. Indust. Crops Prod. 2021, 171, 113841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Djemal, R.; Khoudi, H. The ethylene-responsive transcription factor of durum wheat, TdSHN1, confers cadmium, copper, and zinc tolerance to yeast and transgenic tobacco plants. Protoplasma 2022, 259, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rono, J.K.; Le Wang, L.; Wu, X.C.; Cao, H.W.; Zhao, Y.N.; Khan, I.U.; Yang, Z.M. Identification of a new function of metallothionein-like gene OsMT1e for cadmium detoxification and potential phytoremediation. Chemosphere 2021, 265, 129136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sterckeman, T.; Thomine, S. Mechanisms of cadmium accumulation in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2020, 39, 322–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zulfiqar, U.; Jiang, W.; Xiukang, W.; Hussain, S.; Ahmad, M.; Maqsood, M.F.; Ali, N.; Ishfaq, M.; Kaleem, M.; Haider, F.U. Cadmium phytotoxicity, tolerance, and advanced remediation approaches in agricultural soils; a comprehensive review. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 773815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ying, Z.; Yushen, M.; Yamei, W.; Zehang, L.; Yuejun, X.; Hucheng, X.; Yucheng, J. Genotype differences in cadmium accumulation ability of ramie on cadmium-polluted Field. J. Agricul. Sci. Tech. 2021, 23, 54. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hasan, M.K.; Ahammed, G.J.; Sun, S.; Li, M.; Yin, H.; Zhou, J. Melatonin inhibits cadmium translocation and enhances plant tolerance by regulating sulfur uptake and assimilation in Solanum lycopersicum L. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 10563–10576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ahammed, G.J.; Xu, W.; Liu, A.; Chen, S. Endogenous melatonin deficiency aggravates high temperature-induced oxidative stress in Solanum lycopersicum L. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 161, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rehman, S.; Chattha, M.U.; Khan, I.; Mahmood, A.; Hassan, M.U.; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Salem, M.Z.; Ali, H.M.; Hano, C.; El-Esawi, M.A. Exogenously applied trehalose augments cadmium stress tolerance and yield of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) grown in soil and hydroponic systems through reducing cd uptake and enhancing photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant defense systems. Plants 2022, 11, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yeboah, A.; Lu, J.; Gu, S.; Liu, H.; Shi, Y.; Amoanimaa-Dede, H.; Agyenim-Boateng, K.G.; Payne, J.; Yin, X. Evaluation of two wild castor (Ricinus communis L.) accessions for cadmium tolerance in relation to antioxidant systems and lipid peroxidation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 55634–55642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, T.; Zhu, S.; Tang, Q.; Tang, S. Genome-wide transcriptomic profiling of ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud) in response to cadmium stress. Gene 2015, 558, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yeboah, A.; Lu, J.; Ting, Y.; Karikari, B.; Gu, S.; Xie, Y.; Liu, H.; Yin, X. Genome-wide association study identifies loci, beneficial alleles, and candidate genes for cadmium tolerance in castor (Ricinus communis L.). Indust. Crops Prod. 2021, 171, 113842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hou, F.; Zhou, X.; Liu, P.; Yuan, G.; Zou, C.; Lübberstedt, T.; Pan, G.; Ma, L.; Shen, Y. Genetic dissection of maize seedling traits in an IBM Syn10 DH population under the combined stress of lead and cadmium. Mol. Genet. Gen. 2021, 296, 1057–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sytar, O.; Kumari, P.; Yadav, S.; Brestic, M.; Rastogi, A. Phytohormone priming: Regulator for heavy metal stress in plants. J. Plant Growth Reg. 2019, 38, 739–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Kapoor, D.; Bhardwaj, S.; Gautam, S.; Rattan, A.; Bhardwaj, R.; Sharma, A. Brassinosteroids in plant nutrition and heavy metal tolerance. In Brassinosteroids in Plant Developmental Biology and Stress Tolerance; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 217–235. [Google Scholar]
  64. Rehman, R.S.; Ali, M.; Zafar, S.A.; Hussain, M.; Pasha, A.; Naveed, M.S.; Ahmad, M.; Waseem, M. Abscisic Acid Mediated Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Asian J. Res. Crop. Sci. 2022, 7, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gray, W.M. Hormonal regulation of plant growth and development. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2, e311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Bücker-Neto, L.; Paiva, A.L.S.; Machado, R.D.; Arenhart, R.A.; Margis-Pinheiro, M. Interactions between plant hormones and heavy metals responses. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2017, 40, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Xu, Y.-X.; Mao, J.; Chen, W.; Qian, T.-T.; Liu, S.-C.; Hao, W.-J.; Li, C.-F.; Chen, L. Identification and expression profiling of the auxin response factors (ARFs) in the tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) under various abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 98, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yaashikaa, P.; Kumar, P.S.; Jeevanantham, S.; Saravanan, R. A review on bioremediation approach for heavy metal detoxification and accumulation in plants. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 301, 119035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wani, S.H.; Kumar, V.; Shriram, V.; Sah, S.K. Phytohormones and their metabolic engineering for abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Crop. J. 2016, 4, 162–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Shaukat, K.; Zahra, N.; Hafeez, M.B.; Naseer, R.; Batool, A.; Batool, H.; Raza, A.; Wahid, A. Role of salicylic acid–induced abiotic stress tolerance and underlying mechanisms in plants. In Emerging Plant Growth Regulators in Agriculture; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 73–98. [Google Scholar]
  71. Wang, H.; Zhong, G.; Shi, G.; Pan, F. Toxicity of Cu, Pb, and Zn on seed germination and young seedlings of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture, Nanchang, China, 22–25 October 2010; pp. 231–240. [Google Scholar]
  72. Bulak, P.; Walkiewicz, A.; Brzezińska, M. Plant growth regulators-assisted phytoextraction. Biol. Plant. 2014, 58, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chen, K.; Chen, P.; Qiu, X.; Chen, J.; Gao, G.; Wang, X.; Zhu, A.; Yu, C. Regulating role of abscisic acid on cadmium enrichment in ramie (Boehmeria nivea L.). Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. He, Y.; He, S.; Luo, J.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Huo, Y.; Jie, Y.; Xing, H. Exogenous Plant growth Regulator and Foliar Fertilizers for Phytoextraction of Cadmium with Boehmeria nivea [L.] Gaudich from Contaminated Field Soil. 2022. Available online: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1197456/latest.pdf (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  75. Mroue, S.; Simeunovic, A.; Robert, H.S. Auxin production as an integrator of environmental cues for developmental growth regulation. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Woodward, A.W.; Bartel, B. Auxin: Regulation, action, and interaction. Ann. Bot. 2005, 95, 707–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Cao, X.; Yang, H.; Shang, C.; Ma, S.; Liu, L.; Cheng, J. The roles of auxin biosynthesis YUCCA gene family in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Yang, L.P.; Zhu, J.; Wang, P.; Zeng, J.; Tan, R.; Yang, Y.Z.; Liu, Z.M. Effect of Cd on growth, physiological response, Cd subcellular distribution and chemical forms of Koelreuteria paniculata. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 160, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Chaca, P.; Vigliocco, A.; Reinoso, H.; Molina, A.; Abdala, G.; Zirulnik, F.; Pedranzani, H. Effects of cadmium stress on growth, anatomy and hormone contents in Glycine max (L.) Merr. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2014, 36, 2815–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ahmad, P.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Alam, P.; Ahanger, M.A.; Alamri, S.A. Jasmonic acid alleviates negative impacts of cadmium stress by modifying osmolytes and antioxidants in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2017, 63, 1889–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Shahid, M.; Javed, M.T.; Mushtaq, A.; Akram, M.S.; Mahmood, F.; Ahmed, T.; Noman, M.; Azeem, M. Microbe-mediated mitigation of cadmium toxicity in plants. In Cadmium Toxicity and Tolerance in Plants; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 427–449. [Google Scholar]
  82. Rahman, A.; Nahar, K.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Fujita, M. Manganese-induced cadmium stress tolerance in rice seedlings: Coordinated action of antioxidant defense, glyoxalase system and nutrient homeostasis. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2016, 339, 462–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Erguuml, N. Effects of some heavy metals and heavy metal hormone interactions on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Gun 91) seedlings. Afri. J. Agricul. Res. 2012, 7, 1518–1523. [Google Scholar]
  84. Villiers, F.; Jourdain, A.; Bastien, O.; Leonhardt, N.; Fujioka, S.; Tichtincky, G.; Parcy, F.; Bourguignon, J.; Hugouvieux, V. Evidence for functional interaction between brassinosteroids and cadmium response in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1185–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Munzuroglu, O.; Zengin, F.K. Effect of cadmium on germination, coleoptile and root growth of barley seeds in the presence of gibberellic acid and kinetin. J. Environ. Biol. 2006, 27, 671–677. [Google Scholar]
  86. Jie, H.; Zhao, L.; Ma, Y.; Rasheed, A.; Jie, Y. Integrated transcriptome and metabolome analysis reveal that exogenous gibberellin application regulates lignin synthesis in ramie. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jie, H.; Ma, Y.; Xie, D.-Y.; Jie, Y. Transcriptional and metabolic characterization of feeding ramie growth enhanced by a combined application of gibberellin and ethrel. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Karcz, W.; Kurtyka, R. Effect of cadmium on growth, proton extrusion and membrane potential in maize coleoptile segments. Biol. Plant. 2007, 51, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Krantev, A.; Yordanova, R.; Popova, L. Salicylic acid decreases Cd toxicity in maize plants. Gen. App. Plant Physiol. 2006, 3, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  90. Krantev, A.; Yordanova, R.; Janda, T.; Szalai, G.; Popova, L. Treatment with salicylic acid decreases the effect of cadmium on photosynthesis in maize plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 920–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gondor, O.K.; Pál, M.; Darkó, É.; Janda, T.; Szalai, G. Salicylic acid and sodium salicylate alleviate cadmium toxicity to different extents in maize (Zea mays L.). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Kalai, T.; Bouthour, D.; Manai, J.; Kaab, L.B.B.; Gouia, H. Salicylic acid alleviates the toxicity of cadmium on seedling growth, amylases and phosphatases activity in germinating barley seeds. Arc. Agro. Soil Sci. 2016, 62, 892–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Tang, C.; Zhang, R.; Hu, X.; Song, J.; Li, B.; Ou, D.; Hu, X.; Zhao, Y. Exogenous spermidine elevating cadmium tolerance in Salix matsudana involves cadmium detoxification and antioxidant defense. Int. J. Phytoremed. 2019, 21, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Nahar, K.; Rahman, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Alam, M.; Rahman, A.; Suzuki, T.; Fujita, M. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of spermine-induced cadmium stress tolerance in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) seedlings. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 21206–21218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Yang, H.; Shi, G.; Li, W.; Wu, W. Exogenous spermidine enhances Hydrocharis dubia cadmium tolerance. Russian J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 60, 770–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Rady, M.M.; Hemida, K.A. Modulation of cadmium toxicity and enhancing cadmium-tolerance in wheat seedlings by exogenous application of polyamines. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 119, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gong, X.; Liu, Y.; Huang, D.; Zeng, G.; Liu, S.; Tang, H.; Zhou, L.; Hu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Tan, X. Effects of exogenous calcium and spermidine on cadmium stress moderation and metal accumulation in Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaudich. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 8699–8708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. She, W.; Cui, G.-X.; Jie, Y.-C.; Bai, Y.-C.; Cao, Y.; Xiao, C.-X. Comparative effects of chelants on plant growth, cadmium uptake and accumulation in nine cultivars of Ramie (Boehmeria nivea). Acta Agricul. Scand. Sect. B-Soil Plant Sci. 2014, 64, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yin, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, G.; Hu, X.; Hu, X.; Zhou, L.; Guo, Y.; Li, J. Cadmium accumulation and apoplastic and symplastic transport in Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaudich on cadmium-contaminated soil with the addition of EDTA or NTA. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 47584–47591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wu, S.; Xue, S.; Iqbal, Y.; Xing, H.; Jie, Y. Seasonal nutrient cycling and enrichment of nutrient-related soil microbes aid in the adaptation of ramie (Boehmeria nivea L.) to nutrient-deficient conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 644904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Zheng, J.; Liu, T.; Zheng, Q.; Li, J.; Qian, Y.; Li, J.; Zhan, Q. Identification of cold tolerance and analysis of genetic diversity for major wheat varieties in Jianghuai region of China. Pak. J. Bot. 2019, 52, 839–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Das, S.; Pandit, E.; Guru, M.; Nayak, D.; Tasleem, S.; Barik, S.; Mohanty, D.; Mohanty, S.; Patra, B.; Pradhan, S. Genetic diversity, population structure, marker validation and kinship analysis for seedling stage cold tolerance in indica rice. ORYZA-An Int. J. Rice 2018, 55, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Swarup, S.; Cargill, E.J.; Crosby, K.; Flagel, L.; Kniskern, J.; Glenn, K.C. Genetic diversity is indispensable for plant breeding to improve crops. Crop. Sci. 2021, 61, 839–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Negisho, K.; Shibru, S.; Pillen, K.; Ordon, F.; Wehner, G. Genetic diversity of Ethiopian durum wheat landraces. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Govindaraj, M.; Vetriventhan, M.; Srinivasan, M. Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: An overview of its analytical perspectives. Genet. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Esquinas-Alcázar, J. Protecting crop genetic diversity for food security: Political, ethical and technical challenges. Nat. Rev. Gen. 2005, 6, 946–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Choudhury, B.I.; Khan, M.L.; Dayanandan, S. Patterns of nucleotide diversity and phenotypes of two domestication related genes (OsC1 and Wx) in indigenous rice varieties in Northeast India. BMC Genet. 2014, 15, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Haun, W.J.; Hyten, D.L.; Xu, W.W.; Gerhardt, D.J.; Albert, T.J.; Richmond, T.; Jeddeloh, J.A.; Jia, G.; Springer, N.M.; Vance, C.P. The composition and origins of genomic variation among individuals of the soybean reference cultivar Williams 82. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Van de Wouw, M.; van Hintum, T.; Kik, C.; van Treuren, R.; Visser, B. Genetic diversity trends in twentieth century crop cultivars: A meta analysis. Theoret. App. Genet. 2010, 120, 1241–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Fukuoka, S.; Suu, T.D.; Ebana, K.; Trinh, L.N.; Nagamine, T.; Okuno, K. Diversity in phenotypic profiles in landrace populations of Vietnamese rice: A case study of agronomic characters for conserving crop genetic diversity on farm. Genet. Res. Crop Evolut. 2006, 53, 753–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wendel, J.F.; Greilhuber, J.; Dolezel, J.; Leitch, I.J. Plant Genome Diversity Volume 1: Plant Genomes, Their Residents, and Their Evolutionary Dynamics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  112. Murat, F.; Peer, Y.V.D.; Salse, J. Decoding plant and animal genome plasticity from differential paleo-evolutionary patterns and processes. Gen. Biol. Evol. 2012, 4, 917–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Raza, A.; Razzaq, A.; Mehmood, S.S.; Zou, X.; Zhang, X.; Lv, Y.; Xu, J. Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: A review. Plants 2019, 8, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Wu, X.; Cai, K.; Zhang, G.; Zeng, F. Metabolite profiling of barley grains subjected to water stress: To explain the genotypic difference in drought-induced impacts on malting quality. Fronti. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Belete, Y.; Shimelis, H.; Laing, M.; Mathew, I. Genetic diversity and population structure of bread wheat genotypes determined via phenotypic and SSR marker analyses under drought-stress conditions. J. Crop Imp. 2021, 35, 303–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Pandey, J.; Scheuring, D.C.; Koym, J.W.; Coombs, J.; Novy, R.G.; Thompson, A.L.; Holm, D.G.; Douches, D.S.; Miller, J.C.; Vales, M.I. Genetic diversity and population structure of advanced clones selected over forty years by a potato breeding program in the USA. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Vaughan, D.; Balazs, E.; Heslop-Harrison, J. From crop domestication to super-domestication. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100, 893–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Andersen, J.R.; Lübberstedt, T. Functional markers in plants. Trend. Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Ren, Y.; Wei, Q.; Lin, L.; Shi, L.; Cui, Z.; Li, Y.; Huang, C.; Wei, C. Physicochemical properties of a new starch from ramie (Boehmeria nivea) root. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 174, 392–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Glaszmann, J.-C.; Kilian, B.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Varshney, R.K. Accessing genetic diversity for crop improvement. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Zhu, G.; Huang, D.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, S.; Liu, G.; Jia, L. Tolerance and phytoremediation potential of ramie for cadmium contaminated soil. Res. Agricul. Modern. 2009, 30, 752–755. [Google Scholar]
  122. She, W.; Jie, Y.; Xing, H.; Lu, Y.; Huang, M.; Kang, W.; Wang, D. Comparison and screening indicators for ramie (Boehmeria nivea) genotypes tolerant to cadmium. Acta Agro. Sin. 2011, 37, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. She, W.; Jie, Y.; Xing, H.; Huang, M.; Kang, W.; Lu, Y.; Wang, D. Uptake and accumulation of heavy metal by ramie growing on antimony mining area in Lengshuijiang City of Hunan Province. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2010, 29, 91–96. [Google Scholar]
  124. Wu, Z.; Tang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, C.; Long, S.; Zhao, X.; Hu, Z.; Guo, Y. Ramie (Boehmeria nivea) as Phytoremediation Crop for heavy metal-contaminated paddy soil in Southern China: Variety comparison, cd accumulation, and assessment of fiber recycling. J. Nat. Fib. 2021, 19, 11078–11091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Derakhshani, B.; Jafary, H.; Zanjani, B.M.; Hasanpur, K.; Mishina, K.; Tanaka, T.; Kawahara, Y.; Oono, Y. Combined QTL mapping and RNA-Seq profiling reveals candidate genes associated with cadmium tolerance in barley. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Liu, T.; Tang, S.; Zhu, S.; Tang, Q. QTL mapping for fiber yield-related traits by constructing the first genetic linkage map in ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud). Mol. Breed. 2014, 34, 883–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Chen, J.; Rao, J.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, Z.; Liu, F.; Tang, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, C.; Liu, T. Integration of quantitative trait loci mapping and expression profiling analysis to identify genes potentially involved in ramie fiber lignin biosynthesis. Genes 2019, 10, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Zhu, S.; Zheng, X.; Dai, Q.; Tang, S.; Liu, T. Identification of quantitative trait loci for flowering time traits in ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud). Euphytica 2016, 210, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Shi, Y.; Huang, K.; Niu, J.; Zhong, Y.; Sun, Z.; Luan, M.; Chen, J. Association analysis and validation of simple sequence repeat markers for fiber fineness in ramie (Boehmeria Nivea L. Gaudich). J. Nat. Fib. 2020, 19, 3615–3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ranjbar, S.; Malcata, F.X. Is Genetic Engineering a Route to Enhance Microalgae-Mediated Bioremediation of Heavy Metal-Containing Effluents? Molecules 2022, 27, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Bansal, M.; Wani, S.H. Recent advancement in plant genetic engineering for efficient phytoremediation. In Phytoremediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 195–202. [Google Scholar]
  132. Raza, A.; Habib, M.; Charagh, S.; Kakavand, S.N. Genetic engineering of plants to tolerate toxic metals and metalloids. In Handbook of Bioremediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 411–436. [Google Scholar]
  133. Sonawane, H.; Arya, S.; Bedi, A.; Jaiswar, A. Targeted genetic modification technologies: Potential benefits of their future use in Phytoremediation. In Phytoremediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 203–226. [Google Scholar]
  134. She, W.; Zhu, S.; Jie, Y.; Xing, H.; Cui, G. Expression profiling of cadmium response genes in ramie (Boehmeria nivea L.) root. Bullet. Environ. Contaminat. Toxicol. 2015, 94, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Thakur, A.K.; Kumar, P.; Parmar, N.; Shandil, R.K.; Aggarwal, G.; Gaur, A.; Srivastava, D.K. Achievements and prospects of genetic engineering in poplar: A review. New For. 2021, 52, 889–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Cai, X.; Wang, M.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, C.; Ow, D.W. Overexpression of OsABCG48 lowers cadmium in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agronomy 2021, 11, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Mehta, V.; Kansara, R.; Srivashtav, V.; Savaliya, P. A novel insight into phytoremediation of heavy metals through genetic engineering and phytohor-mones. J. Nanosci. Nanomed. Nanobiol. 2021, 4, 10. [Google Scholar]
  138. Yue, E.; Rong, F.; Liu, Z.; Ruan, S.; Qian, H. A Great Potential genetic editing target, the non-Coding RNA Microrna535, knockout through CRISPR/Cas9 technology to reduce the accumulation of cadmium in rice. Knockout through Crispr/cas9 Technology to Reduce the Accumulation of Cadmium in Rice.
  139. Wojas, S.; Hennig, J.; Plaza, S.; Geisler, M.; Siemianowski, O.; Skłodowska, A.; Ruszczyńska, A.; Bulska, E.; Antosiewicz, D.M. Ectopic expression of Arabidopsis ABC transporter MRP7 modifies cadmium root-to-shoot transport and accumulation. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 2781–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zhang, Y.; Sa, G.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, S.; Wu, X.; Zhao, N.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, S.; Deng, C.; Deng, J. Populus euphratica annexin1 facilitates cadmium enrichment in transgenic Arabidopsis. J. Hazard. Mat. 2021, 405, 124063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. He, L.; Ma, X.; Li, Z.; Jiao, Z.; Li, Y.; Ow, D.W. Maize OXIDATIVE STRESS2 homologs enhance cadmium tolerance in Arabidopsis through activation of a putative SAM-dependent methyltransferase gene. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 1675–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Wu, L.; Yu, Y.; Hu, H.; Tao, Y.; Song, P.; Li, D.; Guan, Y.; Gao, H.; Sui, X.; Volodymyr, T. New SFT2-like Vesicle Transport Protein (SFT2L) enhances cadmium tolerance and reduces cadmium accumulation in common wheat grains. J. Agricul. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 5526–5540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Ye, P.; Wang, M.; Zhang, T.; Liu, X.; Jiang, H.; Sun, Y.; Cheng, X.; Yan, Q. Enhanced cadmium accumulation and tolerance in transgenic hairy roots of Solanum nigrum L. Expressing Iron-Regulated Transporter Gene IRT1. Life 2020, 10, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Sahoo, K.K.; Tripathi, A.K.; Pareek, A.; Singla-Pareek, S.L. Taming drought stress in rice through genetic engineering of transcription factors and protein kinases. Plant Stress 2013, 7, 60–72. [Google Scholar]
  145. Nester, E.W. Agrobacterium: Nature’s genetic engineer. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 5, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Tang, W.; Charles, T.M.; Newton, R.J. Overexpression of the pepper transcription factor CaPF1 in transgenic Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana Mill.) confers multiple stress tolerance and enhances organ growth. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 59, 603–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Jaganathan, D.; Ramasamy, K.; Sellamuthu, G.; Jayabalan, S.; Venkataraman, G. CRISPR for crop improvement: An update review. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Shabbir, R.; Javed, T.; Afzal, I.; Sabagh, A.E.; Ali, A.; Vicente, O.; Chen, P. Modern biotechnologies: Innovative and sustainable approaches for the improvement of sugarcane tolerance to environmental stresses. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Sandler, R. The ethics of genetic engineering and gene drives in conservation. Conservat. Biol. 2020, 34, 378–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zhu, B.; Gan, C.; Gu, L.; Du, X.; Wang, H. Identification of NRAMP4 from Arabis paniculata enhance cadmium tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. J. Genet. 2021, 100, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Huo, J.; Du, B.; Sun, S.; He, S.; Zhao, N.; Liu, Q.; Zhai, H. A novel aldo-keto reductase gene, IbAKR, from sweet potato confers higher tolerance to cadmium stress in tobacco. Front. Agricul. Sci. Engi. 2018, 5, 206–213. [Google Scholar]
  152. Bhuiyan, M.S.U.; Min, S.R.; Jeong, W.J.; Sultana, S.; Choi, K.S.; Song, W.Y.; Lee, Y.; Lim, Y.P.; Liu, J.R. Overexpression of a yeast cadmium factor 1 (YCF1) enhances heavy metal tolerance and accumulation in Brassica juncea. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2011, 105, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Shi, J.; Du, P.; Luo, H.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Wu, M.; Xu, G.; Gao, H. Soil contamination with cadmium and potential risk around various mines in China during 2000–2020. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 310, 114509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Yang, Y.; Wang, T.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.; Chen, W.; Dai, Y. Mitigating cadmium contamination of rice soils supporting tobacco–rice rotation in southern China: Win–win or lose–lose? J. Hazard. Mat. 2022, 425, 128052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Liptáková, Ľ.; Demecsová, L.; Valentovičová, K.; Zelinová, V.; Tamás, L. Early gene expression response of barley root tip to toxic concentrations of cadmium. Plant Mol. Biol. 2022, 108, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Huang, C.; Zhou, J.; Jie, Y.; Xing, H.; Zhong, Y.; Yu, W.; She, W.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y. A ramie bZIP transcription factor BnbZIP2 is involved in drought, salt, and heavy metal stress response. DNA Cell Biol. 2016, 35, 776–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Zhu, S.; Shi, W. Cloning and expression pattern analysis of BnMYB3 transcription factor gene in ramie. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2019, 39, 422–429. [Google Scholar]
  158. Zhu, S.; Shi, W.; Jie, Y.; Zhou, Q. Cloning and expression analysis of cadmium-responsive transcription factor gene BnMYB1 from ramie (Boehmeria nivea). J. Agricul. Biotech. 2018, 26, 774–783. [Google Scholar]
  159. Liu, T.; Zhu, S.; Tang, Q.; Tang, S. Identification of 32 full-length NAC transcription factors in ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud) and characterization of the expression pattern of these genes. Mol. Genet. Gen. 2014, 289, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Sternberg, S.H.; Richter, H.; Charpentier, E.; Qimron, U. Adaptation in CRISPR-Cas systems. Mol. Cell 2016, 61, 797–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Amitai, G.; Sorek, R. CRISPR–Cas adaptation: Insights into the mechanism of action. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Ahmad, S.; Wei, X.; Sheng, Z.; Hu, P.; Tang, S. CRISPR/Cas9 for development of disease resistance in plants: Recent progress, limitations and future prospects. Brief. Funct. Gen. 2020, 19, 26–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Makarova, K.S.; Wolf, Y.I.; Iranzo, J.; Shmakov, S.A.; Alkhnbashi, O.S.; Brouns, S.J.; Charpentier, E.; Cheng, D.; Haft, D.H.; Horvath, P. Evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems: A burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Tang, Y.; Fu, Y. Class 2 CRISPR/Cas: An expanding biotechnology toolbox for and beyond genome editing. Cell Biosci. 2018, 8, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Chen, J.S.; Ma, E.; Harrington, L.B.; Da Costa, M.; Tian, X.; Palefsky, J.M.; Doudna, J.A. CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity. Science 2018, 360, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Gootenberg, J.S.; Abudayyeh, O.O.; Lee, J.W.; Essletzbichler, P.; Dy, A.J.; Joung, J.; Verdine, V.; Donghia, N.; Daringer, N.M.; Freije, C.A. Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science 2017, 356, 438–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Kantor, A.; McClements, M.E.; MacLaren, R.E. CRISPR-Cas9 DNA base-editing and prime-editing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Li, Y.; Li, W.; Li, J. The CRISPR/Cas9 revolution continues: From base editing to prime editing in plant science. J. Genet. Gen. 2021, 48, 661–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Huang, C.-J.; Wu, T.-L.; Zheng, P.-X.; Ou, J.-Y.; Ni, H.-F.; Lin, Y.-C. Comparative genomic analysis uncovered evolution of pathogenicity factors, horizontal gene transfer events, and heavy metal resistance traits in citrus canker Bacterium Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Kesari, N. Role of CRISPR-Cas9 and amiRNA in conferring abiotic and biotic stress tolerance to plants. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  171. Ahmed, T.; Noman, M.; Shahid, M.; Muhammad, S.; Tahir ul Qamar, M.; Ali, M.A.; Maqsood, A.; Hafeez, R.; Ogunyemi, S.O.; Li, B. Potential application of CRISPR/Cas9 system to engineer abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Protein Pept. Lett. 2021, 28, 861–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Feng, Z.; Zhang, B.; Ding, W.; Liu, X.; Yang, D.-L.; Wei, P.; Cao, F.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, F.; Mao, Y. Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res. 2013, 23, 1229–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Shan, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, K.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, K.; Liu, J.; Xi, J.J.; Qiu, J.-L. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotech. 2013, 31, 686–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Nekrasov, V.; Staskawicz, B.; Weigel, D.; Jones, J.D.; Kamoun, S. Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat. Biotech. 2013, 31, 691–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Hsu, P.D.; Scott, D.A.; Weinstein, J.A.; Ran, F.A.; Konermann, S.; Agarwala, V.; Li, Y.; Fine, E.J.; Wu, X.; Shalem, O. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotech. 2013, 31, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Montague, T.G.; Cruz, J.M.; Gagnon, J.A.; Church, G.M.; Valen, E. CHOPCHOP: A CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN web tool for genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, W401–W407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Lei, Y.; Lu, L.; Liu, H.Y.; Li, S.; Xing, F.; Chen, L.L. CRISPR-P: A web tool for synthetic single-guide RNA design of CRISPR-system in plants. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1494–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Belhaj, K.; Chaparro-Garcia, A.; Kamoun, S.; Nekrasov, V. Plant genome editing made easy: Targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods 2013, 9, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  179. Shan, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Gao, C. Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system. Nat. Prot. 2014, 9, 2395–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Xing, H.-L.; Dong, L.; Wang, Z.-P.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Han, C.-Y.; Liu, B.; Wang, X.-C.; Chen, Q.-J. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Kumar, V.; Jain, M. The CRISPR–Cas system for plant genome editing: Advances and opportunities. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Jain, M. Function genomics of abiotic stress tolerance in plants: A CRISPR approach. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Sarma, H.; Islam, N.; Prasad, R.; Prasad, M.; Ma, L.Q.; Rinklebe, J. Enhancing phytoremediation of hazardous metal (loid) s using genome engineering CRISPR–Cas9 technology. J. Hazard. Mat. 2021, 414, 125493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Ahmad, S.; Sheng, Z.; Jalal, R.S.; Tabassum, J.; Ahmed, F.K.; Hu, S.; Shao, G.; Wei, X.; Abd-Elsalam, K.A.; Hu, P. CRISPR–Cas technology towards improvement of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. In CRISPR and RNAi Systems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 755–772. [Google Scholar]
  185. Liu, C.-X.; Yang, T.; Zhou, H.; Ahammed, G.J.; Qi, Z.-Y.; Zhou, J. The E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Sl1 Is critical for cadmium tolerance in Solanum lycopersicum L. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Fu, S.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yang, G.; Chao, D.; Wang, Z.; Shi, M.; Chen, J.; Chao, D.-Y.; Li, R. The ABC transporter ABCG36 is required for cadmium tolerance in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 5909–5918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Effects of Cd toxicity on ramie growth and development. Cd toxicity leads to a reduction in seed germination, seedling growth, biomass, and photosynthesis. Cd toxicity reduces the uptake of nutrients and water. In the same way, Cd toxicity induces the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reduces the activity of antioxidant enzymes. Cd toxicity causes damage to membranes and biomolecules. Cd toxicity reduces yield and causes plant death. This Figure is created with Biorender.com.
Figure 1. Effects of Cd toxicity on ramie growth and development. Cd toxicity leads to a reduction in seed germination, seedling growth, biomass, and photosynthesis. Cd toxicity reduces the uptake of nutrients and water. In the same way, Cd toxicity induces the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reduces the activity of antioxidant enzymes. Cd toxicity causes damage to membranes and biomolecules. Cd toxicity reduces yield and causes plant death. This Figure is created with Biorender.com.
Agronomy 13 01793 g001
Figure 2. The ways to prevent Cd stress in ramie. The plant mainly prevents Cd stress by detoxification and chelation. The ramie plant also uses antioxidant defense mechanisms to avoid Cd stress. This Figure is created with Biorender.com.
Figure 2. The ways to prevent Cd stress in ramie. The plant mainly prevents Cd stress by detoxification and chelation. The ramie plant also uses antioxidant defense mechanisms to avoid Cd stress. This Figure is created with Biorender.com.
Agronomy 13 01793 g002
Figure 3. Developing Cd-tolerant ramie cultivar using conventional breeding methods such as introduction, mass selection, hybridization, and backcrossing. These breeding methods have great potential to develop Cd tolerance suitable for growth in Cd-contaminated soils. This Figure is created with Biorender.com.
Figure 3. Developing Cd-tolerant ramie cultivar using conventional breeding methods such as introduction, mass selection, hybridization, and backcrossing. These breeding methods have great potential to develop Cd tolerance suitable for growth in Cd-contaminated soils. This Figure is created with Biorender.com.
Agronomy 13 01793 g003
Figure 4. An overview of genetic engineering applications for Cd tolerance in ramie cultivars. Transgenic plants with transgene overexpression show better growth and development under Cd stress conditions. This Figure is created with Biorender.com.
Figure 4. An overview of genetic engineering applications for Cd tolerance in ramie cultivars. Transgenic plants with transgene overexpression show better growth and development under Cd stress conditions. This Figure is created with Biorender.com.
Agronomy 13 01793 g004
Table 1. Role of different hormones, polyamines, nutrients, and metalloids to enhance Cd tolerance in ramie.
Table 1. Role of different hormones, polyamines, nutrients, and metalloids to enhance Cd tolerance in ramie.
Cd StressHormones, Polyamines, Metalloids, and NutrientsEffectsReferences
30 mg kg−1Spd and IAA 100 μmIncreased the activity of antioxidant enzymes [34]
6 and 9 mg/LSe, 1.2 μmol/LImprove the action of POD and SOD and control methylation of DNA in ramie leaves[25]
1 mMCa 5-mM, and Spd 1 mM Reduced MDA contents, enhancing plants’ dry weight, and chlorophyll contents[97]
Cd 30 μM Spd 0.1 mM Decreased Cd content, stabilized cellular macromolecules like protein and sugar[46]
Table 2. The exploitation of genetic engineering for Cd tolerance in significant crops.
Table 2. The exploitation of genetic engineering for Cd tolerance in significant crops.
Crops/PlantsGeneRoleReferences
Wheat TaSFT2LEnhanced root and shoot growth, chlorophyll contents, and root and shoot dry weight[142]
RiceOsMT1eEnhanced shoot and dry root weight and chlorophyll contents[51]
ArabidopsisApNRAMP4Reduced Cd contents[150]
TobaccoIbAKRIncreased ability for scavenging MDA, and enhanced proline contents[151]
ArabidopsisZmOXS2b and ZmO2L1Enhanced Cd tolerance by activating the targeted gene[141]
Brassica YCF1Increased plant fresh weight and biomass[152]
Table 3. Potential TFs genes for enhancing Cd tolerance in ramie.
Table 3. Potential TFs genes for enhancing Cd tolerance in ramie.
TFs Families/GenesGeneFunctionReference
MYBBnGMYB10/12/41Interact with genes regulating the biosynthesis of flavonoids and enhanced Cd tolerance[30]
MYBBnMYB2Enhanced Cd tolerance in Arabidopsis[37]
MYBBnMYB3Higher expression levels with an increase in stress time and intensity [157]
MYBBnMYB1Up-regulated and higher expression in leaves[158]
bZIPBnbZIP3Enhanced Cd tolerance[38]
bZIPBnbZIP2Enhanced sensitivity to Cd stress[156]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rasheed, A.; Jie, H.; He, P.; Lv, X.; Ali, B.; Ma, Y.; Xing, H.; Almari, S.; Elnour, R.O.; Hassan, M.U.; et al. A Systematic Review on the Improvement of Cd Stress Tolerance in Ramie Crop, Limitations and Future Prospective. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1793. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071793

AMA Style

Rasheed A, Jie H, He P, Lv X, Ali B, Ma Y, Xing H, Almari S, Elnour RO, Hassan MU, et al. A Systematic Review on the Improvement of Cd Stress Tolerance in Ramie Crop, Limitations and Future Prospective. Agronomy. 2023; 13(7):1793. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071793

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rasheed, Adnan, Hongdong Jie, Pengliang He, Xueying Lv, Basharat Ali, Yushen Ma, Hucheng Xing, Saad Almari, Rehab O. Elnour, Muhammad Umair Hassan, and et al. 2023. "A Systematic Review on the Improvement of Cd Stress Tolerance in Ramie Crop, Limitations and Future Prospective" Agronomy 13, no. 7: 1793. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071793

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop