Next Article in Journal
Comparative Evaluation of Pyrus Species to Identify Possible Resources of Interest in Pear Breeding
Next Article in Special Issue
Plot Layout Method of Field Experiment for Wheat with Border Irrigation Based on Soil Water Content Heterogeneity
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Applying an Organic Amendment on the Persistence of Tebuconazole and Fluopyram in Vineyard Soils
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-Objective Optimization Water–Nitrogen Coupling Zones of Maize under Mulched Drip Irrigation: A Case Study of West Liaohe Plain, China
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Accurate and Rapid Measurement of Soil Dry Depth Using Ultrasonic Reflection Waves

Agronomy 2023, 13(5), 1276; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051276
by Zhongwei Liang 1,2, Chunhui Zhao 1,2, Yupeng Zhang 3, Sheng Long 1,2, Jinrui Xiao 2,* and Zhuan Zhao 4,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Agronomy 2023, 13(5), 1276; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051276
Submission received: 6 April 2023 / Revised: 27 April 2023 / Accepted: 27 April 2023 / Published: 28 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water-Saving in Agriculture: From Soil to Plant)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments are attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

A point-by-point response has been added in the attached PDF file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript needs to go through some minor revision before publishing. The points to be cleared or adjusted are listed below:

1. Introduction:

The last sentece sounds like to be in the abstract. Here should sound like the objetive of the research.

Surprisingly, the results obtained from ultrasonic measurements were  in great agreement with those manually measured dry depth values. Although some errors were observed in measuring the dry depth of certain types of soil, the overall accuracy  was acceptable. These findings show that the proposed method could be an efficient and  cost-effective approach to measuring the dry depth of soil.

2.   Materials and Methods:   

Eq.3 - Define what is Õ¡, t and x;

Eq.4 - Define what is v;

Line 207: what type of soil moisture sensor was used?;

Line 245 and 246: unit correction: µs not us;

Fig.9: unit correction for reflection time in all figures; Fig. Caption: The relationship between reflection time (UNIT?) and dry depth (UNIT?) for (a) clay, (b) sandy loam, (c) silty loam, and  (d) sand, respectively;

Fig. 10. I Expected to see a linear regression comparison  as Fig.9, between measured manually (x-axis) and with the instrument (y-axis) for each soil type

Author Response

a point-by-point response has been added in the attached PDF file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop