Next Article in Journal
Advances and Sustainable Practices for the Rapidly Changing Field of Agronomy
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Long-Term Effect of Tillage Systems and Pre-Crop on Physicochemical Properties and Chemical Composition of Soil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Agronomic Improvements, Not Climate, Underpin Recent Rice Yield Gains in Changing Environments

1
Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(9), 2071; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092071
Submission received: 29 July 2022 / Revised: 22 August 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 30 August 2022

Abstract

:
Food security depends not only on the extent of climate change but also on the compensatory potentials of agronomic improvements. However, the separate contribution of these agronomic factors to rice yield remains largely unknown. Here we distinguished the impacts and relative contributions on rice yield based on statistical models and machine learning by using an observation database collected from 52 agro-meteorological stations in China from 1981 to 2018. Agronomic improvements are responsible for more than 40% of the observed rice yield change, ranging from 42.9% to 96.5% in different cropping types, and the effect increased with the latitude. Among the management considered, sowing date adjustment contributes most to late and early rice yield. Response of rice yield to nighttime temperature was stronger than that to daytime temperature, and wind speed is the main climatic contributing factor to early rice yield. The effects of wind speed on rice yield should be considered for the adaptation measures. This observation-based evidence may help guide agricultural priorities in mitigating the impact of climate change on rice yield.

1. Introduction

Ensuring food security, especially in food production systems, against the negative impacts of climate change is a fundamental priority of the Paris Agreement [1]. Rice is one of the world’s most widely grown crops, feeding nearly half the world’s population [2]. China is one of the largest rice-growing regions, accounting for 18.5% of the world’s total rice planting area and 23% of China’s arable land [3]. Changes in rice yield may affect food security as population growth and trade changes have led to rigid growth in food demand. Climate warming beyond the optimum temperature for rice growth has been reported as the main driving factor for yield reduction [4,5]. An assessment of food security by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) suggests that climate change could lead to a 10–12% reduction in irrigated rice yields by 2050, excluding CO2 fertilization [6]. Therefore, quantifying the impacts of climate change and agronomic improvements on rice yields may help to guide adaptation efforts and agricultural priorities.
Climate change directly results in the change of agricultural resources such as heat, water, and light for crop growth. Rice growth is sensitive to climate change, and the extent and direction of responses are complex and vary among regions. Studies based on statistical models or crop models have demonstrated the potential negative impact of climate change on rice yield [7,8]. Increasing temperature accelerates crop development rate and shortens the growing season, leading to earlier anthesis and maturity, which reduces dry matter accumulation, seed weight, and crop yields [9]. Climate warming from 1981 to 2012 shortened rice growth duration by 4.2, 1.8, and 3.9 days for single, early, and late rice [10]. Long-term field experiments showed that a 1 °C increase in nighttime temperature resulted in a 10% reduction in rice yield [11]. Wind speed also affected the growth of rice. Under humid and low wind speed conditions, rice panicle temperature was 4 °C higher than air temperature [12]. Still, the impact of climate change on food production is two-sided. Crop yield potential was increased in high latitudes where the background temperature was low [13]. In northeast China, for example, warming temperature would increase production by extending the growing season and reducing frost damage [14].
Continuous adjustment of agronomic practices sustains productivity under changing climates, such as earlier sowing, harvest date, and genetic improvement (heat-resistant and drought-resistant varieties) [15,16]. Improving crop performance under climate change by changing cultivars and adjusting sowing dates has been widely reported [17,18]. For example, droughts increase the sensitivity of crop yields to temperature [19], while proper irrigation alleviates the negative effects of drought damage [20]. Liu and Dai [21] studied changes in crop varieties and management practices in China over the past 20 years that offset the negative effects of climate change on crop growth and increased crop yields. Masud et al. [22] proposed that varieties with high-temperature resistance and high thermal requirements should be developed to better adapt to climate change and achieve yield increase. However, the adaptation effect also varies with geographical and climatic conditions.
Although previous studies have provided a comprehensive understanding of the impact of climate change on yield, the impact of agronomic improvements remains largely unknown. Therefore, quantifying the yield gain caused by agronomic improvements is needed to adopt appropriate climate change mitigation strategies [23]. Some studies have applied crop models to quantify the impact of climate change and agricultural practices on crops. However, most of the process-based crop models are based on a single point, while the food security issues are mainly manifested at regional or even larger spatial scales. When crop models are transformed from plot scale to regional scale, some assumptions have to be made, increasing the uncertainty of the results [24]. Statistical models have an empirical advantage and are widely used in global change-related research [25,26]. Therefore, based on the observed rice yield data collected from 52 agrometeorological stations in major rice-producing areas in China during 1981–2018, we used improved first-order difference, and random forest models to (1) identify the key climatic factors determining rice yield; (2) distinguish the separate contributions of climate change and agronomic improvements to rice yield changes; (3) quantify the relative effects of cultivar shift, fertilization, and sowing date adjustment on rice yield.

2. Materials and Methods

For this study, 52 agro-meteorological stations with continuous records were selected (Figure 1). Rice yield data from 1981 to 2018 were obtained from local agro-meteorological stations maintained by the China Meteorological Administration and the provincial Meteorological Bureau. Additionally, management data such as cultivar shift, fertilization, and sowing date were also observed and recorded by well-trained agricultural technicians, Chinese agro-meteorological system checked these data. Daily meteorological data from 1981 to 2018 (average temperature (tem), maximum temperature (tmax), minimum temperature (tmin), precipitation (pre), sunshine duration (ssd), and wind speed (win)) were obtained from the China Meteorological Administration China website (http://data.cma.cn/en) (accessed on 28 July 2022).

2.1. Trend Analysis

We combined Sen slope estimation with the Mann-Kendall (MK) statistical test to calculate the trends and mutation points of key climatic factors (mean temperature, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, precipitation, sunshine duration, photoperiod, and wind speed) during the growth period. For the MK test, positive values of Z represent upward trends and negative values of Z represent downward trends [27]. |Z| > 1.96 and |Z| > 2.576 represent significant upward/downward trends at the 0.05 and 0.01 significance levels, respectively [28]. For the MK mutation test, the UF and UB were calculated respectively. If the two curves of UF and UB have intersection points, the intersection point is the mutation point which indicates a significant change around the point. The MK test was calculated using Matlab 2016a (Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA). However, the MK test cannot obtain the slope of the time series. Sen slope estimation is robust and widely used in meteorology and hydrology-related studies [29,30]. Therefore, the combination of the MK test and Sen slope estimation can effectively estimate the trend of yield and climate factors [31].

2.2. Sensitivity Analysis

Meteorological factors occurred simultaneously, as did the agrotechnical measures. Therefore, to separate the impact of climate change from the observed data, first-order differential was applied to processing the time series of yield and climate data. The first-order difference model has proven able to remove the influence of long-term trends (such as technological progress) on the premise that the technology level is consistent across years [25,32,33].
For selected climatic factors, correlations exist, which might entail uncertainties in estimating the sensitivity of rice yield to changing climatic variables. Therefore, we used ridge regression to exclude the effect of climate covariability on rice yield. Ridge regression can remove the influence of other control factors to effectively derive the effect of a single factor, which can deal with collinearity problems [34]. Because of the interaction of selected climatic factors, it was appropriate to use ridge regression to quantify the response of rice yield to each factor. Regression coefficients were used to quantify the climate sensitivity of rice yield. We standardized yield sensitivity to each climatic factor with the extremal normalization based on previous studies to assess the relative importance of each factor [35].

2.3. Quantify the Effect of the Agronomic Improvement

Based on the sensitivity of yield to climatic factors, the separate impact of climate change on yield is calculated according to the following formula:
Y c l i = S t e m × T t e m + S t m a x × T t m a x + S t m i n × T t m i n + S p r e × T p r e + S s s d × T s s d + S D L × T D L + S w i n × T w i n
where Y c l i represents the changing trend of rice yield affected by main climatic factors (kg ha−1 a−1); T t e m , T t m a x ,   T t m i n ,   T p r e ,     T s s d ,     T D L , and T w i n represent the trends of mean temperature, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, precipitation, sunshine duration, photoperiod, and wind speed during the growth period of rice, respectively, which are calculated by Sen slope. S t e m ,     S t m a x ,     S t m i n ,     S p r e , S s sd ,   S D L , and S w i n represent the sensitivity of mean temperature, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, precipitation, sunshine duration, photoperiod, and wind speed for rice yield. The observed yield trend is the result of a combination of climate change and agronomic improvements. Thus, the individual impact of agronomic improvements on rice yield is calculated indirectly according to the following calculation:
Y m a n = Y a l l Y c l i
where Y m a n represents the changing trend of rice yield under the influence of agronomic improvements alone. Y a l l represents the observed trend of rice yield change (kg ha−1 a−1).

2.4. Distinguish the Relative Contribution of Climate Change and Agronomic Improvements to Yield

For each site, the contribution of climate change relative to agronomic improvements ( R C c l i ) is shown in Equation (3):
R C c l i = Y c l i | Y c l i | + | Y m a n | × 100 %
Similarly, the contribution of agronomic improvements ( R C m a n ) to rice yield at each site was calculated using this formula. The average relative contribution of climate change ( R C ¯ c l i ) is shown in Equation (4):
R C ¯ c l i = i = 1 n R C c l i , i | i = 1 n R C c l i , i | + | i = 1 n R C m a n , i | × 100 %
where n represents the number of sites included in the planting type. R C ¯ c l i is the contribution of climate change on rice yield for specific cropping types. R C c l i , i and R C m a n , i denote the relative contribution of climate change and agronomic improvements at the ith site, respectively. Similarly, the average relative contribution of agronomic improvements to different rice cropping types can be calculated according to this formula, expressed as R C ¯ m a n .
Random forest is an ensemble learning method for classification, regression, and other tasks that operates by constructing a multitude of decision trees at training time and outputting the class that is the mode of the classes (classification) or mean/average prediction (regression) of the individual trees [36]. The random forest method can explain the nonlinear response of yield to management and separate the effects of each variable [37]. Therefore, random forests were used to rank and quantify the importance of each agriculture practice (sowing date adjustment, nitrogen fertilizer, variety replacement) to rice yield. The random forest was calculated using Matlab 2016a (Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Climate Change during the Growing Season and Yield Trend

The changes in climatic factors in the growing seasons and yield trends are shown in Figure 2. In the past 40 years, rice yield showed an increasing trend, and the trend of single/early/late rice yield was 165.41/179.22/200.63 kg ha−1 per decade, respectively. The mutation points of the yield changes generally occurred after 2010, accounting for 63.6%, 66.7% and 80.0% of stations of single, early, and late rice (Table 1).
The average temperature in the rice-growing season increased by 0.19 °C per decade, and the magnitude of the minimum temperature increase was larger than that of the maximum temperature. In the growing season of single and late rice, the climate was dry and hot, and the decreasing precipitation trend was 0.74 and 0.41 mm per decade, respectively. The median variation trend of sunshine duration at all stations was −23.61 h per decade. Sunshine duration in the growing season of late rice decreased with the latitude. Wind speeds change the microclimate by affecting evapotranspiration and soil moisture [38]. We found that wind speed decreased during the growing season of single rice but increased in early rice and late rice, with a trend of 0.05 and 0.08 (m s−1) per decade, respectively.

3.2. Response of Rice Yield to Climate Change

The sensitivity of rice yield to climate variables obtained by the ridge regression model is shown in Figure 3. The positive and negative signs indicate the response direction of the yield change. The yield of early rice was more sensitive to climatic factors compared with the single and late rice. The single, early, and late rice yields changed −29.99, 49.98 and −43.44 kg ha−1 per degree of temperature increase, respectively. The increase in mean temperature, daytime temperature, and nighttime temperature negatively affected yield. Meanwhile, a rise in temperature in the early growing season was beneficial to increasing yield. Increased precipitation resulted in 91.87 kg ha−1 and 21.68 kg ha−1 yield reduction in single and late rice, respectively. The increase of sunshine duration by 100 h resulted in 1.57, 1.18 and 0.20 kg ha−1 yield reduction of single, early, and late rice, respectively. The wind speed increased by 1m/s, and the yield of single rice and early rice increased by 222.15 and 290.56 kg ha−1, respectively, while that of late rice decreased by 72.51 kg ha−1. The dominant climatic factors of yield change of different types of rice are different. The yield of single rice was mainly controlled by nighttime temperature, wind speed, and sunshine duration. The relative importance of wind speed and photoperiod to early rice yield was 0.79 and 0.64, respectively. The relative importance of sunshine duration, precipitation, mean temperature, and daytime temperature to late rice yield was more than 0.5. In general, the temperature had a dominant effect on rice yield, while the effect of precipitation was relatively weak.

3.3. Impact of Agronomic Improvements on Rice Yield

The trend of rice yield under the influence of climate change and agronomic improvements is shown in Figure 4. Agronomic improvements mitigate or even reverse the adverse effects of climate change, resulting in yield increases at each site. The average effect of climate change and agronomic improvements on rice yield was 2.85 and 23.39 kg ha−1 per year, respectively. In terms of rice types, climate change generally harmed late rice and promoted the yield increase of single and early rice. As for the spatial distribution, the negative climate impact on rice yield was higher in the main grain-producing areas (Heilongjiang and Hunan) than in non-agricultural provinces (Guizhou and Hainan). Agronomic improvements harmed yield at some stations located in low latitude, indicating that adaptation measures are not always effective in a changing environment. Under the isolated impact of climate change, the trends of single, early, and late rice yield were 4.32, 5.40 and −1.18 kg ha−1 per year, respectively. The effects of agronomic improvements were 29.93, 16.03 and 24.20 kg ha−1 per year. The effects of agronomic improvements on crop yield were spatiotemporal and gradually increased with the latitude.

3.4. The Relative Contribution of Climate Change and Agronomic Improvements to Yield

The relative contribution of climate change and agronomic improvements to rice yield is shown in Figure 5. The positive and negative contribution indicates the response direction of rice yield. We found that the relative contribution of agronomic improvements to rice yield is much larger than that of climate change and plays a leading role in the yield change. The contribution of agronomic improvements to single/early/late rice yield was 73.0%, 42.9% and 96.5%, respectively. The proportion of stations with a positive relative contribution of single/early/late rice was more than 50.0%. The contribution of climate change to single/early/late rice yield was 27.0%, 57.1%, and −3.5%, respectively. Farmers will take multiple targeted measures to adapt to climate change in the changing climate, such as fertilization, sowing date adjustment, and variety replacement. Crop management records (Table 2) show that rice cultivars shift frequently. Varieties of single/early/late rice have changed more than 20 times during the last 40 years. The results confirm that cultivar shift is an essential adaptation measure, and the number of cultivar shifts is similar to the number of varieties, indicating less use of duplicated varieties. The sowing date of single rice and late rice was delayed by 0.53 and 2.22 days per decade, while the sowing date of early rice was advanced by 0.19 days.

4. Discussion

Rice yield was sustained at a certain level in China before 2010, and the yield inflection point appeared in 2010. We separated the relative contributions of climate change and agronomic improvements. Agronomic improvements were sufficient to alleviate the negative effect of changing climate on yield potential. Without adaptation to climate change, the potential yields of rice in China by 2050 are projected to be 4.3–12.4% lower than those in 1961–1990, respectively, which is more sensitive than the global average [39,40].
Strong negative effects of climate change have been reported as affecting important processes such as biomass growth rate, growing season length, and grain formation [41,42,43,44]. Among the climatic factors considered, warmer average temperatures contributed to the yield loss of single and late rice, partially due to the increasing temperature, shortened growth periods, and hampered rice yield [45]. Compared with average temperature, the negative effect of warmer nighttime temperature on single rice yield was relatively larger. Some scholars have reduced the uncertainty by combining field experiments with crop models, while also showing the negative impacts of warmer nighttime temperatures on yield [11,46]. Yield losses reached 10–20% with nighttime temperatures rising above 28 °C [47]. Rice pollen viability was reduced by warmer night temperatures [48]. Furthermore, warmer night temperatures resulted in enhanced nocturnal respiration after anthesis and reduced soil water availability, thus affecting the duration of the reproductive growth stage [47]. Therefore, the impact of nighttime temperature on rice yield deserves attention. On the contrary, mean temperature has a positive effect on early rice yield, which is contrary to single and late rice. Early rice was sown in the cool season of the year when the air and soil temperatures are usually lower than the optimal temperature for rice growth, which may contribute to the divergent effect of warmer temperatures. Previous studies have shown that climate warming can increase the effective accumulated temperature of the rice-growing season in northeast China and reduce the effects of frost damage [49]. There is observational evidence that warmer producing areas are more likely to suffer production risk compared with cooler regions [50].
Rice yields have been limited by insufficient photothermal resources, especially in southern China in the past years [51]. Besides temperature, the impact of sunshine duration and photoperiod were also detected in this study. Contrary to the previous studies, which gave much greater weight to temperature, we found that wind speed and photoperiod had comparable contributions to that of temperature. Wind speed changes the microclimate of crop growth by affecting evapotranspiration and soil moisture. For example, reduced wind speed can reduce crop leaf surface dryness and reduce plant leaf shedding [52]. We found that the effect of photoperiod on rice yield is non-negligible. Some studies have reported that the variation in the length of the vegetative growth period may be the result of the interaction of temperature and photoperiod [51,53]. Photoperiod affects photosynthetic efficiency and other biological characteristics of crops. Previous studies indicated that chilling and photoperiod affect vegetation growth [54]. Similarly, photoperiod alters phenological responses to climatic factors by influencing the accumulated temperature requirements of crops [55]; this study confirmed this conclusion. Rice is a short-day crop, and its latitude adaptability is mainly related to photoperiod [53]. We found that precipitation has a negative effect on rice yield, which may be due to the different water requirements at different growth stages, and flooding is not conducive to rice growth, especially before the three leaves stages.
Our results confirm that agronomic improvements were sufficient to maintain rice yield at steady levels in changing climates. The number of cultivars is close to the number of cultivar shifts from 1981 to 2018, suggesting that breeding cycle advancement facilitates climate change adaptation by increasing genetic yield potential [18]. Ahmad et al. [45] compared observed with simulated yield changes and concluded that rice varieties with higher thermal requirements stabilized the duration of critical growth stages. We found that the application of fertilizer was the main management driver affecting the single rice yield. Indeed, fertilization management has significantly boosted crop production in China [56]. Fertilization plays an important role in yield when soil nutrient supply is low. However, skyrocketing fertilizers in China raise non-negligible environmental concerns, such as soil acidification and water pollution [57,58,59]. Planting date adjustment determines the yield-limiting conditions related to the climate. The regional observation-based evidence has highlighted the advantage of a suitable sowing date [60]. By changing the planting date (moving the growing season to the cooler season) and slowing the development rate of crops, more time for dry matter accumulation is beneficial to yield increase [61]. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of timely sowing to avoid yield loss caused by heat stress [62,63]. There is also a view that one or two weeks of sowing changes will have little effect on crop growth under suitable soil moisture conditions [64]. We found that planting dates for single and late rice have been delayed by about 2–8 days over the past decades. The adjustment of the sowing date is the key management measure affecting early and late rice yield, even moreso than the contribution of variety replacement. Recently, a study also revealed that sowing date has an important impact on yield, surpassing all other crop management, soil, and variety factors [65], which strongly supports our results. Therefore, improving climate resilience and productivity by time management should be highlighted in future adaptation measures.
Based on statistical models and machine learning, this study isolated and quantified the impacts and separated contributions of climatic factors and agronomic improvements on rice yield. Although the statistical method can eliminate the influence of slow trends and has an empirical advantage, there are still large uncertainties due to the inherent errors in the historical data set input. At the same time, although sunshine duration, wind speed, photoperiod, and other previously neglected climatic factors were considered in this paper, CO2 concentration, extreme climate, and other factors also had important effects on rice yield [66,67]. The effects of these factors on rice yield need to be further assessed in future studies. In addition, although statistical models reflect the relationship between climatic factors and rice yield, there is still a lack of mechanical explanation. Comprehensive analysis combining statistical and process mechanism models can be advocated in future studies.

5. Conclusions

From 1981 to 2018, the average temperature, daytime temperature, and nighttime temperature in the rice-growing season increased, while sunshine duration and photoperiod decreased, precipitation decreased in the single and late rice-growing seasons, and wind speed increased in the early and late rice-growing seasons. Under the combined influence of climate change and agronomic improvements, 27.3%, 33.3%, and 40.0% of the sites of single/early/late rice showed an increased yield, respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed that the sensitivity of single and late rice yields to daytime and nighttime temperatures were negative, and the effect of nighttime temperature on rice yield was greater. Appropriate warming was beneficial to the early rice yield increase. The increase in wind speed benefited the single and early rice yield and was one of the leading climatic factors for single and early rice yield. Therefore, it is necessary to incorporate the influence of this factor into the process model to reduce the uncertainty of simulation. Contribution results showed that agronomic improvements played a dominant role in yield gain. Among the agricultural practices considered, nitrogen fertilizer had a relatively large effect on single rice, while sowing date adjustment had a relatively large effect on late rice and early rice. Duplicate varieties were rarely used, indicating breeding cycle advancement over the past 40 years. Thus, genetic yield potential is essential to achieving yield increase. Authors should discuss the results and how they can be interpreted from the perspective of previous studies and of the working hypotheses. The findings and their implications should be discussed in the broadest context possible. Future research directions may also be highlighted.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Z. and Y.L.; methodology, J.Z. and Y.L.; software, J.Z.; validation, Y.L.; formal analysis, J.Z.; investigation, J.Z.; resources, Y.L.; data curation, Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Z. and Y.L.; writing—review and editing, J.Z. and Y.L.; visualization, J.Z.; supervision, Y.L.; project administration, Y.L.; funding acquisition, Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, grant number XDA28060200, the National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars, grant number 42122003, and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences, grant number Y202016.

Data Availability Statement

All data that support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Acknowledgments

We also thank the China Meteorological Administration for providing data support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. UNFCCC. Adoption of the Paris Agreement; UNFCCC: Paris, France, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. He, L.; Cleverly, J.; Wang, B.; Jin, N.; Mi, C.; Liu, D.L.; Yu, Q. Multi-model ensemble projections of future extreme heat stress on rice across southern China. Theor. Appl. Clim. 2018, 133, 1107–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shi, P.; Tang, L.; Lin, C.; Liu, L.; Wang, H.; Cao, W.; Zhu, Y. Modeling the effects of post-anthesis heat stress on rice phenology. Field Crops Res. 2015, 177, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhao, C.; Piao, S.; Huang, Y.; Wang, X.; Ciais, P.; Huang, M.; Zeng, Z.; Peng, S. Field warming experiments shed light on the wheat yield response to temperature in China. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Qin, Y. How global warming alters future maize yield and water use efficiency in China. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 160, 120229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nelson, G.C.; Rosegrant, M.W.; Palazzo, A.; Gray, I.; Ingersoll, C.; Robertson, R.; Tokgoz, S.; Zhu, T.; Sulser, T.B.; Ringler, C. Food Security, Farming, and Climate Change to 2050: Scenarios, Results, Policy Options; International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; Volume 172. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, T.; Zhu, J.; Wassmann, R. Responses of rice yields to recent climate change in China: An empirical assessment based on long-term observations at different spatial scales (1981–2005). Agric. For. Meteorol. 2010, 150, 1128–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sun, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Liu, B.; Tang, L.; Liu, L.; Cao, W.; Zhu, Y. Current rice models underestimate yield losses from short-term heat stresses. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021, 27, 402–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, C.; van Groenigen, K.J.; Yang, H.; Hungate, B.A.; Yang, B.; Tian, Y.; Chen, J.; Dong, W.; Huang, S.; Deng, A.; et al. Global warming and shifts in cropping systems together reduce China’s rice production. Glob. Food Secur. Agric. Policy Econ. Environ. 2020, 24, 100359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hu, X.; Huang, Y.; Sun, W.; Yu, L. Shifts in cultivar and planting date have regulated rice growth duration under climate warming in China since the early 1980s. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2017, 247, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peng, S.B.; Huang, J.L.; Sheehy, J.E.; Laza, R.C.; Visperas, R.M.; Zhong, X.H.; Centeno, G.S.; Khush, G.S.; Cassman, K.G. Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 9971–9975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tian, X.; Matsui, T.; Li, S.; Yoshimoto, M.; Kobayasi, K.; Hasegawa, T. Heat-Induced Floret Sterility of Hybrid Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars under Humid and Low Wind Conditions in the Field of Jianghan Basin, China. Plant Prod. Sci. 2010, 13, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Peng, X.L.; Yang, Y.M.; Yu, C.L.; Chen, L.N.; Zhang, M.C.; Liu, Z.L.; Sun, Y.K.; Luo, S.U.; Liu, Y.Y. Crop Management for Increasing Rice Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Northeast China. Agron. J. 2015, 107, 1682–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chu, Z.; Guo, J.; Zhao, J. Impacts of future climate change on agroclimatic resources in Northeast China. J. Geogr. Sci. 2017, 27, 1044–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ladha, J.K.; Radanielson, A.M.; Rutkoski, J.E.; Buresh, R.J.; Dobermann, A.; Angeles, O.; Pabuayon, I.L.B.; Santos-Medellin, C.; Fritsche-Neto, R.; Chivenge, P.; et al. Steady agronomic and genetic interventions are essential for sustaining productivity in intensive rice cropping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2110807118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sandhu, N.; Kumar, A. Bridging the Rice Yield Gaps under Drought: QTLs, Genes, and Their Use in Breeding Programs. Agronomy 2017, 7, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Deng, F.; Zhang, C.; He, L.; Liao, S.; Li, Q.; Li, B.; Zhu, S.; Gao, Y.; Tao, Y.; Zhou, W.; et al. Delayed sowing date improves the quality of mechanically transplanted rice by optimizing temperature conditions during growth season. Field Crops Res. 2022, 281, 108493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zabel, F.; Muller, C.; Elliott, J.; Minoli, S.; Jagermeyr, J.; Schneider, J.M.; Franke, J.A.; Moyer, E.; Dury, M.; Francois, L.; et al. Large potential for crop production adaptation depends on available future varieties. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021, 27, 3870–3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lobell, D.B.; Deines, J.M.; Di Tommaso, S. Changes in the drought sensitivity of US maize yields. Nat. Food 2020, 1, 729–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, J.; Carbone, G.J.; Huang, X.; Lackstrom, K.; Gao, P. Mapping the sensitivity of agriculture to drought and estimating the effect of irrigation in the United States, 1950–2016. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2020, 292, 108124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Y.; Dai, L. Modelling the impacts of climate change and crop management measures on soybean phenology in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 121271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Masud, M.M.; Azam, M.N.; Mohiuddin, M.; Banna, H.; Akhtar, R.; Alam, A.F.; Begum, H. Adaptation barriers and strategies towards climate change: Challenges in the agricultural sector. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 156, 698–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Anwar, M.R.; Liu, D.L.; Farquharson, R.; Macadam, I.; Abadi, A.; Finlayson, J.; Wang, B.; Ramilan, T. Climate change impacts on phenology and yields of five broadacre crops at four climatologically distinct locations in Australia. Agric. Syst. 2015, 132, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wallach, D.; Nissanka, S.P.; Karunaratne, A.S.; Weerakoon, W.M.W.; Thorburn, P.J.; Boote, K.J.; Jones, J.W. Accounting for both parameter and model structure uncertainty in crop model predictions of phenology: A case study on rice. Eur. J. Agron. 2017, 88, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, Y.; Chen, Q.; Ge, Q.; Dai, J.; Qin, Y.; Dai, L.; Zou, X.; Chen, J. Modelling the impacts of climate change and crop management on phenological trends of spring and winter wheat in China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2018, 248, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guo, Y.M.; Xiang, H.T.; Li, Z.W.; Ma, F.; Du, C.W. Prediction of Rice Yield in East China Based on Climate and Agronomic Traits Data Using Artificial Neural Networks and Partial Least Squares Regression. Agronomy 2021, 11, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hisdal, H.; Stahl, K.; Tallaksen, L.M.; Demuth, S. Have streamflow droughts in Europe become more severe or frequent? Int. J. Climatol. 2001, 21, 317–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zarch, M.A.A.; Sivakumar, B.; Sharma, A. Droughts in a warming climate: A global assessment of Standardized precipitation index (SPI) and Reconnaissance drought index (RDI). J. Hydrol. 2015, 526, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mumo, L.; Yu, J.; Fang, K. Assessing Impacts of Seasonal Climate Variability on Maize Yield in Kenya; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; Volume 12, pp. 297–307. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Ren, G.; Yang, G.; Feng, Y. Analysis of the spatiotemporal variability of droughts and the effects of drought on potato production in northern China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2019, 264, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gocic, M.; Trajkovic, S. Analysis of changes in meteorological variables using Mann-Kendall and Sen’s slope estimator statistical tests in Serbia. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2013, 100, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lobell, D.B.; Asner, G.P. Climate and management contributions to recent trends in US agricultural yields. Science 2003, 299, 1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Pan, T.; Ge, Q. Assessing the adaptability of maize phenology to climate change: The role of an-thropogenic-management practices. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 293, 112874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hoerl, A.E.; Kennard, R.W. Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 1970, 12, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fu, Y.H.; Zhang, X.; Piao, S.; Hao, F.; Geng, X.; Vitasse, Y.; Zohner, C.; Peñuelas, J.; Janssens, I.A. Daylength helps temperate deciduous trees to leaf-out at the optimal time. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2019, 25, 2410–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Altmann, A.; Toloşi, L.; Sander, O.; Lengauer, T. Permutation importance: A corrected feature importance measure. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 1340–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, J.; Liu, Y. Decoupling of impact factors reveals the response of cash crops phenology to climate change and adaptive management practice. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2022, 322, 109010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gardiner, B.; Berry, P.; Moulia, B. Wind impacts on plant growth, mechanics and damage. Plant Sci. 2016, 245, 94–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, C.; Piao, S.; Wang, X.; Huang, Y.; Ciais, P.; Elliott, J.; Huang, M.; Janssens, I.A.; Li, T.; Lian, X.; et al. Plausible rice yield losses under future climate warming. Nat. Plants 2016, 3, 16202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ju, H.; van der Velde, M.; Lin, E.; Xiong, W.; Li, Y. The impacts of climate change on agricultural production systems in China. Clim. Chang. 2013, 120, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhu, P.; Zhuang, Q.; Archontoulis, S.V.; Bernacchi, C.; Mueller, C. Dissecting the nonlinear response of maize yield to high temperature stress with model-data integration. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2019, 25, 2470–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Asseng, S.; Ewert, F.; Martre, P.; Roetter, R.P.; Lobell, D.B.; Cammarano, D.; Kimball, B.A.; Ottman, M.J.; Wall, G.W.; White, J.W.; et al. Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ray, D.K.; Ramankutty, N.; Mueller, N.D.; West, P.C.; Foley, J.A. Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Liu, B.; Asseng, S.; Muller, C.; Ewert, F.; Elliott, J.; Lobell, D.B.; Martre, P.; Ruane, A.C.; Wallach, D.; Jones, J.; et al. Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2016, 6, 1130–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ahmad, S.; Abbas, G.; Ahmed, M.; Fatima, Z.; Anjum, M.A.; Rasul, G.; Khan, M.A.; Hoogenboom, G. Climate warming and management impact on the change of phenology of the rice-wheat cropping system in Punjab, Pakistan. Field Crops Res. 2019, 230, 46–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sakai, H.; Cheng, W.; Chen, C.P.; Hasegawa, T. Short-term high nighttime temperatures pose an emerging risk to rice grain failure. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2022, 314, 108779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bahuguna, R.N.; Solis, C.A.; Shi, W.; Jagadish, K.S.V. Post-flowering night respiration and altered sink activity account for high night temperature-induced grain yield and quality loss in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiol. Plant 2017, 159, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhang, C.; Li, G.; Chen, T.; Feng, B.; Fu, W.; Yan, J.; Islam, M.R.; Jin, Q.; Tao, L.; Fu, G. Heat stress induces spikelet sterility in rice at anthesis through inhibition of pollen tube elongation interfering with auxin homeostasis in pollinated pistils. Rice 2018, 11, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Z.; Liu, X.; Wang, P.; Shuai, J.; Chen, Y.; Song, X.; Tao, F. The heat deficit index depicts the responses of rice yield to climate change in the northeastern three provinces of China. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2014, 14, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rosenzweig, C.; Elliott, J.; Deryng, D.; Ruane, A.C.; Muller, C.; Arneth, A.; Boote, K.J.; Folberth, C.; Glotter, M.; Khabarov, N.; et al. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 3268–3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, T.Y.; Huang, Y.; Yang, X.G. Climate warming over the past three decades has shortened rice growth duration in China and cultivar shifts have further accelerated the process for late rice. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wu, C.; Wang, J.; Ciais, P.; Peñuelas, J.; Zhang, X.; Sonnentag, O.; Tian, F.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Liu, R. Widespread decline in winds delayed autumn foliar senescence over high latitudes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2015821118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yin, X.Y.; Kropff, M.J. The effect of photoperiod on interval between panicle initiation and flowering in rice. Field Crops Res. 1998, 57, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fu, Y.H.; Zhao, H.; Piao, S.; Peaucelle, M.; Peng, S.; Zhou, G.; Ciais, P.; Huang, M.; Menzel, A.; Peñuelas, J. Declining global warming effects on the phenology of spring leaf unfolding. Nature 2015, 526, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tao, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y. Climate warming outweighed agricultural managements in affecting wheat phenology across China during 1981–2018. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2022, 316, 108865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, X.; Ma, L.; Ma, W.; Wu, Z.; Cui, Z.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, F. What has caused the use of fertilizers to skyrocket in China? Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2018, 110, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qi, X.; Dang, H. Addressing the dual challenges of food security and environmental sustainability during rural livelihood transitions in China. Land Use Policy 2018, 77, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dalin, C.; Qiu, H.; Hanasaki, N.; Mauzerall, D.L.; Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. Balancing water resource conservation and food security in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 4588–4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhu, Q.; Liu, X.; Hao, T.; Zeng, M.; Shen, J.; Zhang, F.; de Vries, W. Cropland acidification increases risk of yield losses and food insecurity in China. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 256, 113145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ahmad, S.; Abbas, Q.; Abbas, G.; Fatima, Z.; Atique Ur, R.; Naz, S.; Younis, H.; Khan, R.J.; Nasim, W.; Habib Ur Rehman, M.; et al. Quantification of Climate Warming and Crop Management Impacts on Cotton Phenology. Plants 2017, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rose, G.; Osborne, T.; Greatrex, H.; Wheeler, T. Impact of progressive global warming on the global-scale yield of maize and soybean. Clim. Chang. 2016, 134, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hunt, J.R.; Lilley, J.M.; Trevaskis, B.; Flohr, B.M.; Peake, A.; Fletcher, A.; Zwart, A.B.; Gobbett, D.; Kirkegaard, J.A. Early sowing systems can boost Australian wheat yields despite recent climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2019, 9, 244–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dhillon, S.; Fischer, R. Date of sowing effects on grain yield and yield components of irrigated spring wheat cultivars and relationships with radiation and temperature in Ludhiana, India. Field Crops Res. 1994, 37, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gao, Z.; Feng, H.; Liang, X.; Lin, S.; Zhao, X.; Shen, S.; Du, X.; Cui, Y.; Zhou, S. Adjusting the sowing date of spring maize did not mitigate against heat stress in the North China Plain. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2021, 298, 108274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. McDonald, A.J.; Keil, A.; Srivastava, A.; Craufurd, P.; Kishore, A.; Kumar, V.; Paudel, G.; Singh, S.; Singh, A.; Sohane, R. Time management governs climate resilience and productivity in the coupled rice–wheat cropping systems of eastern India. Nat. Food 2022, 3, 542–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, Y.; Chen, J. Future global socioeconomic risk to droughts based on estimates of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability in a changing climate. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 751, 142159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Jin, Z.; Zhuang, Q.; Wang, J.; Archontoulis, S.V.; Zobel, Z.; Kotamarthi, V.R. The combined and separate impacts of climate extremes on the current and future US rainfed maize and soybean production under elevated CO2. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2017, 23, 2687–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of rice stations and planting ratio. (ac) Early rice, single rice, and late rice, respectively. The shading in (a) indicates the planting areas of early and late rice.
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of rice stations and planting ratio. (ac) Early rice, single rice, and late rice, respectively. The shading in (a) indicates the planting areas of early and late rice.
Agronomy 12 02071 g001
Figure 2. Trends of yield (a) and climatic factors (bh) in rice-growing season from 1981 to 2018. Purple fonts indicate the percentage of sites that have significantly increased, and black fonts indicate the percentage of sites that have significantly decreased. (bh) The trend of mean temperature, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, precipitation, sunshine duration, photoperiod, and wind speed, respectively.
Figure 2. Trends of yield (a) and climatic factors (bh) in rice-growing season from 1981 to 2018. Purple fonts indicate the percentage of sites that have significantly increased, and black fonts indicate the percentage of sites that have significantly decreased. (bh) The trend of mean temperature, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, precipitation, sunshine duration, photoperiod, and wind speed, respectively.
Agronomy 12 02071 g002
Figure 3. Sensitivity of rice yield to climatic factors (ag) and relative importance (h). (ag) Sensitivity of rice yield to mean temperature, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, precipitation, sunshine duration, photoperiod, and wind speed, respectively.
Figure 3. Sensitivity of rice yield to climatic factors (ag) and relative importance (h). (ag) Sensitivity of rice yield to mean temperature, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, precipitation, sunshine duration, photoperiod, and wind speed, respectively.
Agronomy 12 02071 g003
Figure 4. Effects of climate change and agronomic improvements on rice yield at different stations. (ac) Single rice, early rice, and late rice, respectively.
Figure 4. Effects of climate change and agronomic improvements on rice yield at different stations. (ac) Single rice, early rice, and late rice, respectively.
Agronomy 12 02071 g004
Figure 5. The relative effects of climate change and agronomic improvements on rice yield. (a) is the relative contribution of climate change and agronomic improvements. (b) is the relative contribution of each measure.
Figure 5. The relative effects of climate change and agronomic improvements on rice yield. (a) is the relative contribution of climate change and agronomic improvements. (b) is the relative contribution of each measure.
Agronomy 12 02071 g005
Table 1. Mutation points of rice yield at each station from 1981 to 2018 based on MK test.
Table 1. Mutation points of rice yield at each station from 1981 to 2018 based on MK test.
Single SitesMutation YearEarly SitesMutation YearLate SitesMutation Year
Wu Chang2009Jing Dong1990Xiao Gan2011
Ning An2018Yu Xi1989Nan Xian2010
Xin Bin2006Xiao Gan2010Chang De2014
Zhao Tong2012Nan Xian2014Zhang Sha2018
Bao Shan2010Chang De2013Wu Gang2013
Da Li2012Zhang Sha2012Heng Yang2011
Kun Ming1995Wu Gang2014Lian Xian2018
Lu Liang2018Heng Yang2015Mei Xian2014
Pu An2015Lian Xian2011Gao Yao2013
Geng Ma2017Mei Xian2018Chao Zhou1984
Jiang Cheng2018Gao Yao2014Zhong Shan2018
Meng Zi2018Chao Zhou1987Hua Zhou1987
Fang Xian2018Hua Zhou1985Yang Jiang2018
Zhong Xiang2016Yang Jiang2016Qiong Shan2018
Sang Zhi2013Qiong Shan2014Qiong Zhong2013
Zun Yi2009
Yu Qing2018
Jiang Kou2010
Pu Ding1982
Li Ping2012
Gui Dong2018
Hui Shui2010
Table 2. Summary of adaptation measures for rice agriculture from 1981 to 2018.
Table 2. Summary of adaptation measures for rice agriculture from 1981 to 2018.
TypeNitrogen (kg/ha)Trend of Sowing Date (Days/Decade)No. of VarietiesNo. of Cultivar Shifts
Single rice148.200.531923
Early rice179.00−0.191928
Late rice151.462.221729
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Liu, Y. Agronomic Improvements, Not Climate, Underpin Recent Rice Yield Gains in Changing Environments. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092071

AMA Style

Zhang J, Liu Y. Agronomic Improvements, Not Climate, Underpin Recent Rice Yield Gains in Changing Environments. Agronomy. 2022; 12(9):2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092071

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jie, and Yujie Liu. 2022. "Agronomic Improvements, Not Climate, Underpin Recent Rice Yield Gains in Changing Environments" Agronomy 12, no. 9: 2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092071

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop