Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals That Upregulated Expression of Aux/IAA Genes Is Associated with Defective Leaf Growth of the slf Mutant in Eggplant
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Mycorrhizal Fungi from Different Rhizospheric Soils on Fungal Colonization, Growth, and Chlorophyll Contents of Cenchrus ciliaris
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tradescantia pallida (Commelinaceae) Promotes Reductions in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) Populations

by
Aline do Nascimento Rocha
1,
Silvana Aparecida de Souza
1,
Claudemir Antonio Garcia Fioratti
1,
Juliana Rosa Carrijo Mauad
2,
Munir Mauad
3 and
Rosilda Mara Mussury
1,*
1
Laboratory of Insect-Plant Interaction, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Highway Dourados-Itahum, km 12, Dourados 79804-970, Brazil
2
Agribusiness Program, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Highway Dourados-Itahum, km 12, Dourados 79804-970, Brazil
3
Agricultural Production Program, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Highway Dourados-Itahum, km 12, Dourados 79804-970, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(11), 2646; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112646
Submission received: 2 September 2022 / Revised: 24 October 2022 / Accepted: 25 October 2022 / Published: 27 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exploring Plant-Herbivore Interactions Based on Chemical Ecology)

Abstract

:
The feeding activity of Plutella xylostella in brassica crops can lead to large losses; thus, pesticides that prevent feeding during the larval stage or prevent the metamorphosis of this insect can be used for its control. In this study, the effects of two types of aqueous extracts of Tradescantia pallida on the different life stage of P. xylostella cycle were tested; neither of the two aqueous extracts, which were obtained by infusion and maceration, had been tested against P. xylostella. The biological variables evaluated were larval and pupal duration and viability, pupal weight, sex ratio, longevity of females, fecundity, fertility and oviposition period. There was no significant difference in the duration of the larval phase of P. xylostella between the bioassay treatments; however, larval viability was lower when the individuals were exposed to both types of T. pallida extracts. Reduced pupal viability was observed among the individuals treated with the application of the extracts. Treatment with the aqueous extract obtained by infusion caused the lowest pupal weight, fecundity, and fertility and longevity among females. The results obtained in this study allow us to propose the bioextract as an alternative for pest management, emphasizing the technique for small producers and/or organic.

1. Introduction

Members of the Brassicaceae family have several nutritional and bioenergetic properties [1] and are widely cultivated in Brazil and worldwide; representative species of this family include cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata), cauliflower (B. oleracea var. botrytis), kale (B. oleracea var. acephala), broccoli (B. oleracea var. italica) and mustard (B. juncea) [2]. However, despite the vegetables of the genus Brassica being easily cultivated, the damage caused by Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus 1758) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), popularly known as the crucifer moth, affects crop productivity and generates large economic impacts by increasing management and control costs [3].
Pest control in brassica crops is usually achieved by the application of agricultural defence products, since they are practical, fast and efficient in controlling insect pests [4]. However, pesticides pose toxicological risks to the environment and to humans in addition to resulting in the evolution of insect resistance after continuous and incorrect applications [5,6]. In organic farming, the use of synthetic pesticides is not permissible, requiring the use of alternative control methods that allow the final product to be classified as organic. Therefore, due to the economic impacts caused by P. xylostella on brassica crops and problems related to control measures, alternative and selective control methods that rely on the techniques used in integrated pest management (IPM) have become necessary [7,8,9].
One of the alternatives for population reduction of this pest with less environmental impact is the application of botanical extracts. Promising plants, such as those in the families Meliaceae, Rutaceae, Asteraceae, Annonaceae, Labiatae and Canellaceae, have chemical compounds with repellent or insecticidal potential, as reported by Jacobson [10]. Studies involving plant extracts with insecticidal properties indicate changes in the biological characteristics of insects, such as mortality [11,12,13] changes in food [14,15] or oviposition [15,16] preferences, deformities, and morphological and physiological transformations of P. xylostella [11,17,18,19,20].
We hypothesized that Tradescantia pallida var. Hunt. (Commelinaceae) exhibits insecticidal properties, considering that in a recent study, this species was included in annual environmental monitoring and no herbivory was observed at any point in the evaluated area [21]. Thus, we believe that the plant species contains some lethal or repellent compound that can be used in the population control of P. xylostella.
In this study, we evaluated the action of T. pallida aqueous extract at a concentration of 10% (w/v) from two different extraction methods on the life cycle of P. xylostella in a plastic tunnel.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cultivation of Plutella xylostella

The individual used in the study design were sourced from the insect rearing facilities of Laboratory of Insect-Plant Interaction of the School of Biological and Environmental Sciences at the Federal University of Grande Dourados (Universidade Federal de Grande Dourados-UFGD) in Dourados, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. The individuals were kept under controlled conditions of temperature (25 ± 2 °C), relative humidity (70 ± 5%) and photoperiod (12 h). The larvae were fed with organic leaves of Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala DC. until they reached the pupa stage. Adults were fed a 10% diluted honey solution [22].

2.2. Collection of Botanical Material and Preparation of Aqueous Extracts

The collection of botanical material was authorized by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—CNPq) and the Council for the Management of Genetic Heritage (CGEN/MMA) under the number A1501D0.
Fully expanded leaves of T. pallida were collected from a garden in the Federal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados, MS (22°11′42.8″ S 54°56′06.7″ W), between 7:00 am and 9:00 am during May 2019. The leaves were dried in a forced air oven for four days at a maximum temperature of 45 °C (±1 °C). After this period, they were ground in a knife mill (Model 7Lab Micro 910) until a fine powder was obtained.

2.2.1. Maceration

An aqueous extract with a concentration (weight/volume) of 10%, conventional concentration, was obtained through the maceration technique and the addition of 10 g of the powdered plant material to 100 mL of distilled water by [11,19,23]. After manual stirring, the solution remained at rest for 24 h in a refrigerated environment (10 °C). At the end of this period, the liquid was strained with filter paper and the filtrate was used in the tests.

2.2.2. Infusion

To obtain an extraction by infusion, 100 mL of distilled water was heated to 100 °C, and when this temperature was reached, 10 g of the powdered plant material was added. The solution remained at room temperature under light protection for 2 h; after this period, the solution was filtered through filter paper and the filtrate was used in the tests.

2.3. Bioassay in a Plastic Tunnel

The experiment was conducted in a plastic tunnel measuring 21 m in length by 7 m in width and 3 m in height located in the nursery area of the School of Agricultural Sciences of the Federal University of Grande Dourados, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Seedlings of cabbage (B. oleracea var. acephala) in the second phenological stage were planted in pots with a volume of 5 L filled with a dystrophic red latosol soil with a very clayey texture [24]. The properties of the 0.0–0.20 m layer were as follows: OM = 26.0 g dm−3; pH (CaCl2) = 5.4; P (resin) = 25 mg dm−3; K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ = 8.7, 36.0 and 22.0 mmolc dm−3, respectively; and S−SO42− = 5.6 mg dm−3. The granulometric analysis revealed 644, 203 and 152 g kg−1 of clay, silt and sand, respectively. The seedlings were acclimated in a plastic tunnel until they bore six to eight true leaves, characterizing the third phenological stage [25].
Ten plants were established for each treatment, namely, the control (distilled water), the aqueous extract of T. pallida obtained by maceration (ETPM) and the extract of T. pallida obtained by infusion (ETPI). Each plant represented one replicate, and each leaf represented a subsample, totalling 5 subsamples per replicate. A third-instar P. xylostella larva was placed on each kale leaf (subsample), and after 48 h, the treatments were applied. To prevent the escape of individuals, an iron frame with voile fabric was installed surrounding the entire vessel (Figure 1). The temperature and relative humidity were evaluated daily using an Underbody digital thermo-hygrometer. The plants were irrigated daily with 200 mL of water.
A sprayer with a flow rate of 0.6 mL was used for each application of the extracts. Two applications of 0.6 mL per leaf (subsample) were necessary, totalling approximately 60 mL of extract per treatment.
The evaluation of the biological parameters, including the duration (days) and survival (%) of the larval and pupal stages and pupal weight (Bel Mark Analytical Balance (0.001 g)), was performed by daily monitoring inside the plastic tunnel, starting 24 h after the first application.
After adult emergence, the sexing process was performed, and the sex ratio [RS = female/(female + male)] was evaluated. Then, all the possible pairs for each treatment were formed, with 10 replicates for the control and extract obtained by maceration and 8 replicates for the extract obtained by infusion; the pairs were placed separately in plastic cages (measuring 24 cm in length, 19 cm in width, 10 cm height) to evaluate the reproductive stages of the insects. At the base of the cage, a disc of cabbage leaf (8 cm in diameter) was used as an oviposition substrate and replaced daily for egg counting. A 10% (w/v) honey solution was offered for feeding. The fecundity (number of eggs deposited on the leaf disc), fertility (number of newly emerged larvae), oviposition period [(days) = the period between the first and last laying] and female longevity were evaluated daily.
Larval, pupal and egg survival data were transformed to √x/100 arcsene and data on larval and pupal duration, sex ratio, female longevity, fecundity (number of eggs) and fertility (number of newly emerged larvae) were analyzed. The oviposition period was transformed to √x + 0.5. The results were submitted to variance analysis and the means were compared by the Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05) using R program.

3. Results

There was no significant difference in the duration of the larval stage of P. xylostella between the treatments (F = 3.80; DF = 2; p = 0.03); however, larval survival was significantly lower (F = 7.22; DF = 2; p = 0.03) when the individuals were exposed to T. pallida extracts (Table 1). We observed that ETMP caused approximately 48% mortality in P. xylostella larvae, while ETPI caused mortality in 56% of the individuals (Table 1).
In pupal duration, treatments did not differ significantly from control (F = 1.16; DF = 2; p = 0.32) (Table 2). Regarding pupal survival, there was no significant difference between ETPM e ETPI treatments, but both treatments differed significantly from the control; (F = 4.08; DF = 2; p = 0.02). However, we noticed that the extracts had reduced the number of individuals that reached the adult stage, and the ETPM caused approximately 24% of incomplete pupae development and, consequently, did not emerge, and the ETPI had affected the pupae emergence of approximately 28% (Table 2). For pupal biomass, we observed that only ETPI differed from the control treatment, reducing the pupae weight by an average of 1.40 mg (F = 4.03; DF = 2; p = 0.02) (Table 2).
As can be seen in Table 3, ETPI affected all parameters of the cruciferous moth reproductive phase, significantly differing from the control, while ETPM did not significantly differ from the control. Based on the results, it was verified that the females longevity from larvae fed with ETPI was affected when compared to the females control (F = 4.71; DF = 2; p = 0.01), in addition to the fecundity (F = 7.56; DF = 2; p = 0.003) and fertility (F = 6.03; GL = 2; p = 0.007). For fecundity, ETPI promoted an average laying of 81 eggs, and for fertility, only 21 larvae hatched, which represents a reduction of 73% and 76% when compared to the control, respectively.
A way of showing P. xylostella damage and the effect of ETPI and ETPM is represented in Figure 2 and Figure 3. Figure 2A shows healthy cabbage seedlings without P. xylostella larvae infestation and the Figure 2B shows the cruciferous moth larvae damage in the control treatment. However, throughout the experiment, we noticed that ETPM (Figure 2C) and ETPI (Figure 2D) reduced the cabbage leaves perforations caused by P. xylostella. Figure 3 shows the effect of the ex-treatment on the insect. Figure 3A,A’ shows a healthy, greenish-greenish cruciferous moth larva from the control treatment. While in Figure 3B,B’, the larva of P. xylostella can be seen dead after exposure to the T. pallida extract, with changes of the insect morphology and color.

4. Discussion

The present study is, to our knowledge, the first to evaluate the insecticidal potential of T. pallida aqueous extract on P. xylostella in organic crops using two extraction methods: infusion and maceration. We found that a 10% concentration of plant extract affected the biology and development of the diamondback moth through lethal and sublethal effects, ranging from larvicidal effects to reduction in pupal weight and reproduction at the adult stage.
In this study, with both extraction methods, T. pallida caused significant lethal effects on larval and pupal stages. The T. pallida extract by infusion (ETPI) method affected pupal weight and was also reflected in the adult stage because females showed significant reduction in fecundity and fertility. Thus, ETPI showed better performance than the ETPM.
The chemical composition evaluation of the extract performed by Rocha et al. [26], indicated the presence of phenolic compounds and flavonoids, such as rutin, luteolin, and apigenin, in addition to anthocyanins and tannins. Of these, rutin is a flavonoid known to have an important role in plant protection against lepidopterans, demonstrating lethal and/or antinutritional effects during the larval stage [27,28]. In our study, the change in larval and pupal survival caused by both extracts, primarily by ETPI, may probably be owing to the presence of flavonoids, especially rutin. Some studies with Alibertia spp. in the control of P. xylostella showed a reduction in pupal survival, especially by A. sessilis [11]. Moreover, as highlighted by Tavares et al. [29], rutin contributes to the protection of plants through its antifeeding action against Lepidoptera. This flavonoid reduces growth and larval and pupal weights [27], in addition to decreasing survival [30]. The negative effect of rutin on the growth of Anticarsia gemmatalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [28] and biology of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [30] has been reported.
Luteolin is a flavonoid that prevents insect oviposition on leaves [31,32], and this characteristic corroborates the results obtained in the present study of significantly reduced fecundity and fertility because of ETPI. In Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris (Homoptera: Aphididae), changes in fecundity were observed with different doses of luteolin [33]. Thus, these flavonoids may be directly related to changes in fecundity and fertility of P. xylostella, especially in the case of ETPI, reinforcing the hypothesis of a synergy between compounds. In contrast, as observed by Rocha et al. [26] tannins function as a phagodeterrent, causing insect death or several sublethal effects throughout the insect life cycle [13,19,34].
In our study, we observed a significant reduction in pupal weight, especially with the use of ETPI, which is directly related to insect performance in the larval stage [35] and clearly associated to the feeding activity performed at this stage. The presence of compounds with toxicity to the insect may lead to a reduction in pupal biomass, owing to the activation of the cytochrome P-450 mechanism. This activation is an important tool used by insects for defensive detoxification [36], in which the insects need to degrade possible allelochemicals of the extract and end up diverting resources that would be used to gain weight in the larval stage, i.e., there is greater energy expenditure to degrade the toxic compounds and lower conversion of ingested nutrients [37].
In general, in the present study, the aqueous extract of T. pallida obtained by the infusion method (ETPI) affected larval and pupal survival, pupal weight, female longevity, fecundity and fertility. This result may have been due to the role of temperature in the extraction of compounds present in the leaves of T. pallida, because, there may be an increase in the extraction of certain compounds and a reduction in the extraction of other secondary compounds, and the synergistic action between compounds may potentiate the insecticidal effect of an extract.
The choice of which method to use depends exclusively on the time and plant resource available to the farmer. We encourage the use of solvents and extraction methods for the development of affordable botanical insecticides, especially for the smallholder. In our study, both extracts were easy to manage, had low cost, could be prepared quickly, and were highly accessible, showing that simple extraction methods are applicable. Considering the results of the present study, we recommend the use of ETPI.

5. Conclusions

In our research, we observed that the Tradescantia pallida aqueous extract by the infusion method (ETPI) had the best results, affecting all insect development stages, especially the adult stage, reducing the individuals number in the next generation, and, consequently reduction of damages in the diverse cultures of Brassicaceae in organic cultivation. The T. pallida aqueous extract by the maceration method (ETPM) should not be discarded if it is impossible to prepare and use ETPI. We emphasize that our research is unprecedented in the use of T. Pallida as a botanical insecticide and of easy and viable use by small producers and family farmers in field conditions, specially in developing countries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.d.N.R. and R.M.M.; methodology, A.d.N.R., R.M.M. and M.M.; formal analysis, A.d.N.R., S.A.d.S., C.A.G.F., M.M. and R.M.M.; investigation, A.d.N.R. and R.M.M.; resources, R.M.M.; data curation, A.d.N.R. and R.M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.d.N.R., S.A.d.S., C.A.G.F., J.R.C.M., M.M. and R.M.M.; writing—review and editing, A.d.N.R., S.A.d.S., C.A.G.F., J.R.C.M., M.M. and R.M.M.; visualization, A.d.N.R. and R.M.M.; supervision, R.M.M.; project administration, A.d.N.R. and R.M.M.; funding acquisition, R.M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Foundation for the support and Development of Education, Science and Technology (FUNDECT) of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, No. 71/711.130/2018. The APC was funded by Federal University of Grande Dourados.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the National Council for the Improvement of Higher Education, Brazil (CAPES) for providing a scholarship to the first author. This study was supported by the Federal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados, MS, and for the financial support Foundation for the Support and Development of Education, Science, and Technology (FUNDECT) of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, No. 71/711.130/2018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Soengas, M.P.F.; Pérez, T.S.; Pazos, P.V.; González, M.E.C. Antioxidant properties of Brassica vegetables. Funct. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 5, 43–55. [Google Scholar]
  2. Filgueira, F.A.R. Novo Manual de Olericultura: Agrotecnologia Moderna na produção e Comercialização de Hortaliças, 1st ed.; UFV Editora: Viçosa, Brazil, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zalucki, M.P.; Shabbir, A.; Silva, R.; Adamson, D.; Shu-Sheng, L.; Furlong, M.J. Estimating the economic cost of one of the world’s major insect pests, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): Just how long is a piece of string? J. Econ. Entomol. 2012, 105, 1115–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Talekar, N.S.; Shelton, A.M. Biology, ecology, and management of the diamondback moth. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1993, 38, 275–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tsaboula, A.; Papadakis, E.N.; Vryzas, Z.; Kotopoulou, A.; Kintzikoglou, K.; Papadopoulou-Mourkidou, E. Environmental and human risk hierarchy of pesticides: A prioritization method, based on monitoring, hazard assessment and environmental fate. Environ. Int. 2016, 91, 78–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Troczka, B.J.; Williamson, M.S.; Field, L.M.; Davies, T.E. Rapid selection for resistance to diamide insecticides in Plutella xylostella via specific amino acid polymorphisms in the ryanodine receptor. Neurotoxicology 2017, 60, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Campos, W.G.; Schoereder, J.H.; Souza, O.F. Seasonality in neotropical populations of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera): Resource availability and migration. Popul. Ecol. 2006, 48, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marchioro, C.A.; Foerster, L.A. Biotic factors are more important than abiotic factors in regulating the abundance of Plutella xylostella L., in Southern Brazil. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2016, 60, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Fidelis, E.G.; Farias, E.S.; Lopes, M.C.; Sousa, F.F.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Picanço, M.C. Contributions of climate, plant phenology and natural enemies to the seasonal variation of aphids on cabbage. J. Appl. Entomol. 2019, 143, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jacobson, M. Botanical pesticides: Past, present and future. In Insecticide of Plant Origin, 387th ed.; Arnason, J.T., Philogène, B.J.R., Morand, P., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1989; pp. 69–77. [Google Scholar]
  11. Peres, L.L.S.; Sobreiro, A.I.; Couto, I.F.S.; Silva, R.M.; Pereira, F.F.; Vieira, S.C.H.; Mussury, R.M. Chemical compounds and bioactivity of aqueous extracts of Alibertia ssp. in the control of Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Insects 2017, 8, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. da Silva, R.M.; Fioratti, C.A.G.; Silva, G.B.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; Miranda, L.O.; Mauad, M.; Mussury, R.M. Antibiose do extrato foliar de Duguetia furfuracea sobre Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). In Temas atuais em ecologia Comportamental e interações. Anais do II BecInt—Behavioral ecology and Interactions Symposium, 1st ed.; Calixto, E.S., Toreza-Silingardi, H.M., Eds.; Editora Composer: Uberlândia, Brazil, 2017; Volume 1, pp. 52–69. ISBN 978-85-8324-057-0. (In Portuguese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Souza, S.A.; Couto, I.F.S.; Silva, M.P.; Cardoso, C.A.; Scalon, S.P.Q.; Ferreira, F.F.; Mussury, R.M. Aqueous extracts of species of the genus Campomanesia (Myrtaceae) affect biological characteristics of Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus, 1758) Lepidoptera: Plutellidae. J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 11, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Chandrashekharaiah, M.; Kandakoor, S.B.; Gowda, G.B.; Kammar, V.; Chakravarthy, A.K. Nanomaterials: A review of their action and application in pest management and evaluation of DNA-tagged particles. In New Horizons in Insect Science: Towards Sustainable Pest Management, 1st ed.; Chakracarthy, A.K., Ed.; Springer: Nova Deli, India, 2015; pp. 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Couto, I.F.S.; Verza, S.; Valente, F.I.; Senna, B.; Souza, S.A.; Mauad, M.; Mussury, R.M. Botanical extracts of the Brazilian savannah affect feeding and oviposition of Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 11, 322–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Souza, S.A.; Padial, I.M.P.M.; da Silva, M.M.M.; Ferreira, E.A.; Domingues, A.; Emerson, M.C.; Mauad, M.; Mussury, R.M. Extratos aquosos de espécies do gênero Campomanesia (Myrtaceae) afeta a oviposição de Plutella xylostella (L., 1758) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). In Ciências Biológicas: Gênese na formação Multidisciplinar, 3rd ed.; Freitas, D.R.J., Ed.; Atena Editora: Ponta Grossa, Brazil, 2021; pp. 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pan, L.; Ren, L.; Chen, F.; Feng, Y.; Luo, Y. Antifeedant activity of Ginkgo Biloba secondary metabolites against Hyphantria cunea larvae: Mechanisms and applications. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, 155682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Hikal, W.M.; Baeshen, R.S.; Said-Al Ahl, H.A.H. Botanical insecticide as simple extractives for pest control. Cogent Biol. 2017, 3, 1404274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ferreira, E.A.; de Souza, S.A.; Domingues, A.; da Silva, M.M.M.; Padial, I.M.P.M.; Carvalho, E.M.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; Silva, S.V.; Mussury, R.M. Phytochemical screening and bioactivity of Ludwigia spp. in the control of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Insects 2020, 11, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. da Silva, R.M.; dos Santos, L.P.; Silva, G.B.; Miranda, L.O.; Fioratti, C.A.G.; Scalon, S.P.Q.; Mauad, M.; Mussury, R.M. Alibertia spp. (Rubiaceae) extracts interfere with the development and reproduction of Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Gesunde Pflanz. 2020, 72, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rocha, A.N.; Candido, L.S.; Pereira, J.G.; Silva, C.A.M.; da Silva, S.V.; Mussury, R.M. Evaluation of vehicular pollution using the TRAD-MCN mutagenic bioassay with Tradescantia pallida (Commelinaceae). Environ. Pollut. 2018, 240, 440–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Barros, R.; Thuler, R.T.; Pereira, F.F. Técnica de criação de Plutella xylostella (L., 1758) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). In Técnicas de criação de pragas de Importância agrícola, em dietas Naturais., 1st ed.; Pratissoli, D., Ed.; Edufes: Vitória, Brazil, 2012; pp. 65–84. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ferreira, E.A.; Faca, E.C.; de Souza, S.A.; Fioratti, C.A.G.; Mauad, J.R.C.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; Mauad, M.; Mussury, R.M. Antifeeding and oviposition deterrent effect of Ludwigia spp. (Onagraceae) against Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Plants 2022, 11, 2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Santos, H.G. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação dos Solos, 3rd ed.; Revista e Ampliada: Brasília, Brazil, 2013; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cassol, S.P.; Lenhardt, E.R.; Gabriel, V.J. Caracterização dos estádios fenológicos e a exigência de adubação do repolho. Cien. Agrovet. Alimen. 2017, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rocha, A.N.; Carvalho, E.M.; Mauad, J.R.C.; Mussury, R.M. Tradescantia pallida L. (Commelinaceae) influences the activity of oviposition and feeding of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Res., Soc. Develop. 2021, 10, e57610817583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stamp, N.E.; Skrobola, C.M. Failure to avoid rutin diets results in altered food utilization and reduced growth rate of Manduca sexta larvae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1993, 68, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hoffmann-Campo, C.B.; Ramos Neto, J.A.; Oliveira, M.C.N.; Oliveira, L.J. Detrimental effect of rutina on Anticarsia gemmatalis. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 2006, 41, 1453–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Tavares, W.S.; Pereira, A.I.A.; Freitas, S.S.; Serrão, J.E.; Zanuncio, J.C. The chemical exploration of Dimorphandra mollis (Fabaceae) in Brazil, with emphasis on insecticidal response: A review. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2014, 73, 465–468. [Google Scholar]
  30. Silva, T.R.F.B.; Almeida, A.C.S.; Moura, T.L.; Silva, A.R.; Freitas, S.S.; Jesus, F.G. Effect of the flavonoid rutin on the biology of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Acta Sci. Agron. 2016, 38, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Andreo, D.; Jorge, N. Antioxidantes naturais: Técnicas de extração. Bol. Do Cent. De Pesqui. De Process. De Aliment. 2006, 24, 319–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Leal, P.F.; Braga, M.E.; Sato, D.N.; Carvalho, J.E. Functional properties of spices extracts obtained via supercritical fluid extraction. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 2520–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Goławska, S.; Łukasik, I. Antifeedant activity of luteolin and genistein against the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. J. Pest Sci. 2012, 85, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Lago, J.H.G.; Brochini, C.B.; Roque, N.F. Terpenoids from Guarea guidonia. Phytochemistry 2002, 60, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Maroneze, D.M.; Gallegos, D.M.N. Efeito de extrato aquoso de Melia azedarach no desenvolvimento das fases imatura e reprodutiva de Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Semina: Cienc. Agrar. 2009, 30, 537–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Breuer, M.; Hoste, B.; de Loof, A.; Naqvi, S.N.H. Effect of Melia azedarach extract on the activity of NADPH-cytochrome c reductase and cholinesterase in insects. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2003, 76, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tanzubil, P.B.; Mccaffery, A.R. Effects of azadirachtin and aqueous neem seed extracts on survival, growth and development of the African armyworm, Spodoptera exempta. Crop Prot. 1990, 9, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A). Sketch of the experimental unit of the bioassay. (B). Execution of the bioassay in a semi-field situation.
Figure 1. (A). Sketch of the experimental unit of the bioassay. (B). Execution of the bioassay in a semi-field situation.
Agronomy 12 02646 g001
Figure 2. Overview of cabbages from different treatments. (A). Control sample unit and without Plutella xylostella infestation. (B). Sample unit, control infested. (C). Sampling unit with ETPM. (D). Sampling unit with ETPI.
Figure 2. Overview of cabbages from different treatments. (A). Control sample unit and without Plutella xylostella infestation. (B). Sample unit, control infested. (C). Sampling unit with ETPM. (D). Sampling unit with ETPI.
Agronomy 12 02646 g002
Figure 3. Development of the experiment. (A). Control: in evidence, larval stage of Plutella xylostella. (A’). Detail of the healthy larva. (B). In evidence, dead P. xylostella larvae after contact with the aqueous extract of T. pallida. (B’). Dead larvae detail.
Figure 3. Development of the experiment. (A). Control: in evidence, larval stage of Plutella xylostella. (A’). Detail of the healthy larva. (B). In evidence, dead P. xylostella larvae after contact with the aqueous extract of T. pallida. (B’). Dead larvae detail.
Agronomy 12 02646 g003
Table 1. Duration and larval survival (±standard error) of Plutella xylostella in plastic tunnels exposed to different treatments consisting of 10% Tradescantia pallida aqueous extract (Temp: 23 ± 8 °C, RH: 53 ± 10%, photophase: 13 h ± 36 min).
Table 1. Duration and larval survival (±standard error) of Plutella xylostella in plastic tunnels exposed to different treatments consisting of 10% Tradescantia pallida aqueous extract (Temp: 23 ± 8 °C, RH: 53 ± 10%, photophase: 13 h ± 36 min).
TreatmentsLarval Phase
Larval Duration (Days)Larval Survival (%)
Control7.28 ± 0.4 a
n = 50
92.57 ± 4.9 a
n = 47
ETPM6.10 ± 0.3 a
n = 50
52.01 ± 8.6 b
n = 26
ETPI6.04 ± 0.3 a
n = 50
43.99 ± 8.7 b
n = 21
C.V. (%)7.9838.50
Means followed by the same letter in a column do not differ according to Tukey’s test at the 5% probability level (p < 0.05). ETPM = T. pallida extract obtained by maceration. ETPI = T. pallida extract obtained by infusion.
Table 2. Duration, survival and pupal weight (±standard error) of Plutella xylostella exposed in plastic tunnels to different treatments with 10% Tradescantia pallida aqueous extract (Temp: 23 ± 8 °C, RH: 53 ± 10%, photophase: 13 h ± 36 min).
Table 2. Duration, survival and pupal weight (±standard error) of Plutella xylostella exposed in plastic tunnels to different treatments with 10% Tradescantia pallida aqueous extract (Temp: 23 ± 8 °C, RH: 53 ± 10%, photophase: 13 h ± 36 min).
TreatmentsPupal Phase
Pupal Duration (Days)Pupal Survival (%)Pupal Weight (mg)
Control6.59 ± 0.26 a
n = 47
100 ± 0.00 a
n = 47
5.70 ± 0.16 a
n = 47
ETPM4.67 ± 0.34 a
n = 26
76.37 ± 9.95 b
n = 19
5.50 ± 0.5 a
n = 19
ETPI4.83 ± 0.58 a
n = 21
72.69 ± 12.35 b
n = 14
4.30 ± 0.33 b
n = 14
C.V. (%)26.1339.2923.25
Means followed by the same letter in a column do not differ according to Tukey’s test at the 5% probability level (p < 0.05). ETPM = T. pallida extract obtained by maceration. ETPI = T. pallida extract obtained by infusion.
Table 3. Longevity of females, and fecundity and fertility of adult Plutella xylostella in plastic tunnels exposed to different treatments with 10% Tradescantia pallida aqueous extract. (Temp: 23 ± 8 °C, RH: 53 ± 10%, photophase: 13 h ± 36 min.).
Table 3. Longevity of females, and fecundity and fertility of adult Plutella xylostella in plastic tunnels exposed to different treatments with 10% Tradescantia pallida aqueous extract. (Temp: 23 ± 8 °C, RH: 53 ± 10%, photophase: 13 h ± 36 min.).
TreatmentsAdult Phase
Longevity of Females (Days)Fecundity
(Number of Eggs)
Fertility
(Number of Hatched Larvae)
Control17.55 ± 1.13 a
(n = 10)
111.51 ± 12.9 a
(n = 10)
83.64 ± 13.9 a
(n = 10)
ETPM20.60 ± 1.61 a
(n = 10)
65.31 ± 8.75 ab
(n = 10)
41.00 ± 10.16 ab
(n = 10)
ETPI14.18 ± 1.18 b
(n = 8)
30.05 ± 10.9 b
(n = 8)
20.13 ± 9.2 b
(n = 8)
C.V. (%)26.1339.2923.25
Means followed by the same letter in a column do not differ according to Tukey’s test at the 5% probability level (p < 0.05) (±standard error). ETPM = T. pallida extract by maceration. ETPI = T. pallida extract by infusion.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rocha, A.d.N.; Souza, S.A.d.; Fioratti, C.A.G.; Mauad, J.R.C.; Mauad, M.; Mussury, R.M. Tradescantia pallida (Commelinaceae) Promotes Reductions in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) Populations. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112646

AMA Style

Rocha AdN, Souza SAd, Fioratti CAG, Mauad JRC, Mauad M, Mussury RM. Tradescantia pallida (Commelinaceae) Promotes Reductions in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) Populations. Agronomy. 2022; 12(11):2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112646

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rocha, Aline do Nascimento, Silvana Aparecida de Souza, Claudemir Antonio Garcia Fioratti, Juliana Rosa Carrijo Mauad, Munir Mauad, and Rosilda Mara Mussury. 2022. "Tradescantia pallida (Commelinaceae) Promotes Reductions in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) Populations" Agronomy 12, no. 11: 2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112646

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop