Next Article in Journal
Exploring Two Streptomyces Species to Control Rhizoctonia solani in Tomato
Previous Article in Journal
Integrated Design and Evaluation of a Soil-Covering and Film-Mulching Device for Sugarcane Transverse Planters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Calcium Application Methods on Delaying Plant Wilting under Water Deficit in Bedding Plants

Division of Plant and Soil Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Agronomy 2021, 11(7), 1383; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071383
Submission received: 6 June 2021 / Revised: 28 June 2021 / Accepted: 1 July 2021 / Published: 8 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Horticultural and Floricultural Crops)

Abstract

:
Floriculture crops can lose their aesthetic quality due to water deficit during postproduction. Calcium is a secondary messenger in plant stress signaling, and the treatment of calcium has been proposed to alleviate damage by various abiotic stresses. The objective of this research was to evaluate application methods of calcium to delay plant wilting under water deficiency in three species of bedding plants: viola (Viola cornuta), impatiens (Impatiens walleriana), and petunia (Petunia grandiflora). Three application methods were compared including spray, drench, and pre-drench. Calcium was applied as CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2 at three concentrations ranging from 50 to 300 mM. The effect of calcium on shelf life was species-dependent, increasing shelf life in viola and impatiens, but not in petunia. Viola showed increased shelf life up to 154% and 400% in drench and pre-drench applications, respectively, compared to the control. In impatiens, spray and pre-drench applications delayed wilting symptoms by 53% and 200%, respectively. Comparing calcium sources, CaCl2 was the most effective as a drench, while Ca(NO3)2 pre-drench application effectively delayed wilting. There was no difference between CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2 in spray application. These results provided the optimum application methods to delay plant witling and the potential of calcium application on enhancing water deficit tolerance in floriculture crops.

1. Introduction

Recently, the frequency and severity of extreme climate events have increased significantly, becoming the most significant problem and challenge globally. Climate change is expected to lead to more extreme weather environments, including severe drought, which poses a high risk for the agricultural industry [1]. Severe water deficiency causes a reduction in crop productivity by adversely affecting plant growth and reproduction. According to Earth system models, the decline in global vegetation growth and food production due to drought is estimated to be nearly tripled by the end of the 21st century relative to the 20th century [2]. Such a dramatic reduction in global crop yield will ultimately cause food insecurity worldwide.
Floriculture crops are produced to a high quality in greenhouses, but their quality can be compromised during shipping and retailing. In fact, the postproduction periods are considered suboptimal environmental conditions for plants [3]. During retailing, floriculture crops are often placed on display shelves and roadside stands under suboptimal temperatures and irrigations. Consequently, the substrate dries rapidly, causing plant wilting. Sometimes extreme weather, such as high temperature and prolonged exposure to direct sunlight, exacerbates water deficit stress and diminishes the ornamental quality of plants quickly [4]. Crop losses due to these adverse conditions are estimated to be up to 20% of unsalable crops [5]. Therefore, it is highly desirable to enhance water deficit stress tolerance in floriculture crops to maintain their high quality and longevity during the postproduction period.
The potential use of antitranspirants has been proposed to ameliorate water deficit stress impacts in crop production [6,7]. Antitranspirants are chemical compounds that are applied to leaves or substrates to reduce transpirational water loss and improve plant water stress tolerance [8,9]. Various antitranspirants were evaluated in floriculture crops, and some of them were effective in delaying plant wilting [9]. There are two types of antitranspirants. One type of antitranspirants blocks stomata by forming a film on the leaf, and the other type causes the stomata to close by inducing a stress response. Film-forming antitranspirants are sprayed on the plant canopy to block stomata with a physical barrier [7]. This type of antitranspirants effectively reduced transpirational water loss in bedding plants that had a low density of leaf trichomes [9]. The phytohormone, abscisic acid (ABA), is one of the prominent antitranspirants which induces stomatal closure in plants [7]. Application of ABA reduced stomatal conductance quickly and enhanced water deficit tolerance in a wide range of plant species [8,9,10,11]. However, side effects of such antitranspirants were documented as well. A film-forming antitranspirant (β-pinene polymer) application caused flower damage in various bedding plants [9]. Foliar chlorosis and leaf abscission have been frequently documented as side effects of ABA treatments [12,13,14]. Therefore, it is strongly desired to develop a new antitranspirant to enhance water deficit tolerance in floriculture crops.
Exogenous calcium application has been suggested as a candidate antitranspirant with fewer side effects on floriculture crops. Calcium is a secondary messenger involved in various physiological and biochemical processes in a plant’s stress response [15]. Many experiments have reported that the exogenous application of calcium mitigated the adverse effects of abiotic stresses by regulating osmotic adjustment, photosynthetic efficiency, and antioxidant activities [16,17,18]. In the aspect of stomatal movements, an increased level of cytosolic calcium induces ion efflux from guard cells and reduces the guard cell volume, closing stomata when plants are exposed to water deficit [19]. Park et al. [20] suggested that exogenous treatment of CaCl2 enhanced water deficit tolerance by promoting stomatal closure and maintaining high relative water content in Viola cornuta without any side effects.
Based on the positive effects of calcium treatment, finding a practical and optimum application method of calcium for floriculture crops is required to reduce crop loss due to water deficit during the postproduction period. The objectives of this research were to (1) evaluate the effect of calcium treatment on three species of annual bedding plants, (2) compare two calcium sources (CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2), and (3) identify the effective application methods (spray, drench, and pre-drench) of calcium for each species under water deficit stress.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Three species of popular bedding plants (Viola cornuta ‘Sorbet® XP Yellow’, Impatiens walleriana ‘Xtreme™ White’, and Petunia grandiflora ‘Tritunia™ Red’) were selected in this study to investigate the effect of calcium application to enhance water deficit tolerance. Viola and impatiens are sensitive, and petunia is moderately sensitive to water deficit stress [21]. Seeds of bedding plants were sown in a 288-plug tray, and 4-week-old seedlings were transplanted into 11 cm pots with soilless media (Sunshine Mix #1, Sun Gro Horticulture, Agawam, MA, USA). Plants were grown in a greenhouse (Morgantown, WV, USA) under natural irradiance with supplemental lighting of high-pressure sodium lamps (600 W HS200 deep reflector; Hortilux, Pijnacker, The Netherlands). The supplemental lights were turned on when natural radiance fell below 50 W·m−2. Plants were fertigated with 20N-1.3P-15.8K (Peter Professional Petunia Special; Everris NA, Marysville, OH, USA), except for impatiens (15N-2.2P-12.5K, Peter® Excel Cal-Mag; Everris NA). The fertilizer rate was 200 mg·L−1 nitrogen (N), and it was reduced to 100 mg·L−1 N one week before treatment. All bedding plants were subjected to calcium application when they reached a marketable stage of at least one open flower per pot. Plants were irrigated with deionized (DI) water to container capacity 12 h before application. Calcium sources were CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2, and calcium solutions were applied between 0900 to 1000HR. Three methods of calcium treatment were evaluated independently.

2.2. Spray Application

Plants were grown in the greenhouse with the following environmental conditions. The average daily photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) was 180 μmol·m−2·s−1 from 0600 to 2000HR. Mean greenhouse temperatures were 22.9 ± 1.8/18.3 ± 1.7 °C day/night (mean ± SD) with a mean relative humidity of 33%. Calcium was sprayed at 50, 100, and 200 mM with the addition of 0.5% surfactant (TWEEN™ 20; Fisher BioReagnets™, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) on the top and the underside of the plant canopy (about 35 mL per plant) using a handheld pump sprayer. Deionized water with 0.5% surfactant was sprayed as a control treatment. Water was withheld immediately after spray application.

2.3. Drench Application

The growing conditions were PPFD of 230 μmol·m−2·s−1 from 0600 to 2000HR, 22.6 ± 1.7/18.6 ± 1.4 °C day/night with a mean relative humidity of 41%. Calcium solutions were drenched at 100, 200, and 300 mM in substrates, and control was drenched with DI water (60 mL per pot). Water was withheld immediately after drench application.

2.4. Pre-Drench Application

The growing conditions were PPFD of 287 μmol·m−2·s−1 from 0600 to 2000HR, 21.8 ± 2.9/17.4 ± 2.1 °C day/night with a mean relative humidity of 72%. Deionized water was drenched as control and calcium solutions were drenched at 100, 200, and 300 mM in substrates (60 mL per pot). Treated plants were fertigated at 100 mg·L−1 N for the next three days and subsequently they were exposed to water deficit.

2.5. Water Deficit Treatment and Measurements

Treated plants were placed in the greenhouse during water deficit stress by withholding irrigation, and visual wilting status was documented daily. The shelf life was determined by the number of days from the first day of water being withheld until plants showed wilting symptoms. Shelf life data were normalized as shelf life extension (%), which was calculated with the following equation:
S h e l f   l i f e   e x t e n s i o n   ( % ) = s h e l f   l i f e   o f   C a - t r e a t e d   p l a n t s h e l f   l i f e   o f   c o n t r o l s h e l f   l i f e   o f   c o n t r o l × 100

2.6. Statistical Analyses

All experiments were laid in a 3 × 2 × 3 factorial arrangement (species × calcium source × concentration) in a randomized complete block design with four replications (n = 4) except for petunia in drench application with three replications (n = 3). Each plant was analyzed as one replication. Statistical analyses were carried out using the General Linear Model Procedure (PROC GLM) of SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Shelf life extension was analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with three main factors: species, calcium source, and concentration. Orthogonal contrasts were used for the pre-planned comparisons among three species (sensitive vs. moderately sensitive species and viola vs. impatiens). Regression analysis was conducted with shelf life and shelf life extension to test significant (p ≤ 0.05) linear or quadratic effects of calcium concentration.

3. Results

3.1. Spray Application

The main effect of species was significant in shelf life extension when spray application was used (p < 0.0001) (Table 1). Orthogonal contrasts showed that sensitive species, viola and impatiens, had higher shelf life extension than moderately sensitive species, petunia (p = 0.0007) (Table 1 and Figure 1). Increased shelf life extension was observed in impatiens comparing to viola (p = 0.0001) (Table 1 and Figure 1). Calcium spray application in impatiens had 25–46% of shelf life extension, which was 1.1 to 2.1 days extension compared to control (Figure 1). The other two main effects (calcium source and concentration) and interaction effects showed no difference (Table 1). Shelf life extension was not changed with increasing Ca concentration (50–200 mM) in all three species with spray application (Figure 1), confirming no significant main effect of concentration.
Shelf life of impatiens increased linearly as the concentration of CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2 increased (Figure 2). One hundred millimolar increase of CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2 extended impatiens shelf life by 0.6 and 0.9 day, respectively (p = 0.0052 and 0.0439, R2 = 0.4382 and 0.2594, respectively). The effect of CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2 concentrations on shelf life did not fit any tested regression models in viola and petunia (Figure 2).

3.2. Drench Application

The main effect of species was significant in shelf life extension in drench application (p < 0.0001) (Table 2). However, there was no difference between sensitive and moderately sensitive species (p = 0.6817). Within sensitive species, drench application was more effective in viola compared to impatiens (p < 0.0001) (Table 2 and Figure 3). The interaction effect (species × concentration) was significant in drench application (p = 0.0188) (Table 2). Viola showed a linear shelf life extension response to Ca concentration (p = 0.0067 and R2 = 0.2896) (Figure 3). According to the linear regression model, viola shelf life extension was increased up to 142% (3.3 days of extension) at 300 mM calcium drench application (Figure 3). However, Ca drench treatment did not increase the shelf life extension of impatiens and petunia (p = 0.5585 and 0.1806, respectively). There was no significance in other main and interaction effects (Table 2).
In viola, Ca drench treatment was effective on increasing shelf life (Figure 4). Shelf life increased linearly with increasing CaCl2 concentration by up to 5.5 days (p < 0.0001 and R2 = 0.8232). The regression model showed an increase of 100 mM CaCl2 extended shelf life by 1.1 days. With Ca(NO3)2, the concentration effect on shelf life extension fit a quadratic rather than the linear model. Shelf life was gradually increased by 4.8 days between 0 and 200 mM until plateaued at 300 mM Ca(NO3)2 (p < 0.0001 and R2 = 0.8991). Drench application of Ca(NO3)2 at 200 and 300 mM extended shelf life by 2.5 days compared to the control. Impatiens and petunia were not affected by the concentration of CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2 treatments (Figure 4).

3.3. Pre-Drench Application

The factorial ANOVA table showed that species and concentration effects were significant (p < 0.0001) in shelf life extension of pre-drench application (Table 3). Sensitive species (viola and impatiens) had higher shelf life extension than petunia (p < 0.0001) and viola had a higher shelf life extension than impatiens (p < 0.0001) (Table 3 and Figure 5). The main effect of concentration and the interaction effect between species and concentration were significant (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0001, respectively) (Table 3). Shelf life extension was increased as calcium concentration increased in viola (p < 0.0001 and R2 = 0.5765), but increasing calcium concentration did not prolong shelf life in impatiens and petunia (p = 0.1795 and 0.2334, and R2 = 0.0804 and 0.0639, respectively) (Figure 5). The regression model showed an increase of 100 mM calcium extended shelf life by 106% or a 1.1 day extension in viola. The effects of calcium source and other interactions were not significant (Table 3).
In pre-drench application, shelf life was linearly increased in response to both CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2 concentration in viola (p < 0.0001, and R2 = 0.8577 and 0.7685, respectively) (Figure 6). Viola showed the longest shelf life of 5.0 and 4.5 days at 300 mM of CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2, respectively. Shelf life was extended by 1.3 and 1.1 days with 100 mM increases of CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2 respectively. Impatiens responded linearly to CaCl2 concentration (p = 0.0005 and R2 = 0.5904), increasing shelf life by 0.8 day per 100 mM of CaCl2. Pre-drench application of Ca(NO3)2 showed a quadratic response in impatiens (p < 0.0001 and R2 = 0.8556). Shelf life of impatiens treated with Ca(NO3)2 was increased by 6.0 days at 200 mM, followed by a decrease at 300 mM (Figure 6). Impatiens had the highest shelf life treated with Ca(NO3)2 at 200 mM. Similar to spray and drench applications, shelf life was not affected by pre-drench application in petunia.

4. Discussion

The efficacy of Ca treatment methods on enhancing water deficit stress tolerance appeared to be species-dependent. Plant wilting was delayed in viola with drench and pre-drench applications, while spray and pre-drench applications were effective for impatiens. However, none of methods was effective in petunia.
Differences in response to the application methods might be associated with the mode of action of treatment methods. Drench application with a high concentration of chemical solutions reduces the soil water potential and induces osmotic stress to plants [20]. Osmotic stress activates similar mechanisms and physiological changes of water deficit stress [22,23,24]. CaCl2-induced osmotic stress has been shown to rapidly trigger stomatal closure within 4 hrs after treatment [20]. The early osmotic stress event could help plants reduce transpirational water loss and delay wilting during the subsequent water deficit stress. Pre-drench also causes osmotic stress to plants, but the following irrigation might alleviate its impact. Inhibited leaf gas exchange parameters, such as photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance, by salt/osmotic stresses, recovered after the normal irrigation in Spinacia oleracea [25], V. cornuta [20], and Abelmoschus esculentus [26]. Especially in CaCl2-treated V. cornuta, the subsequent irrigation increased stomatal conductance gradually and fully restored it within four days after osmotic treatment [20]. The resumed transpiration might attribute to calcium uptake and distribution, leading to high Ca contents in plants. Therefore, the positive impacts of pre-drench application on enhancing water deficit stress may result from chemical solution-induced osmotic stress and/or increased Ca uptake in plants.
The spray application was effective only on impatiens. Plants can absorb mineral nutrients sprayed on their leaves, and in some cases, this method has advantages over the nutrient application to the soil [27]. It is possible to speculate that increased Ca uptake by spray or pre-drench applications may enhance water deficit tolerance in impatiens. In this study, the pre-drench application showed 75–200% extension of shelf life, while the spray application had 18–53% extension of shelf life. Pre-drench applications may have higher Ca uptake than spray due to a higher calcium solution concentration and/or the three-day watering period between application and water deficit. During this period, plants might absorb a higher amount of calcium and distribute it within the whole plant, resulting in delayed wilting symptoms in impatiens. In addition, Murillo-Amador et al. [28] addressed that Ca spray application increased chlorophyll fluorescence, but it did not alleviate the adverse effects of salt stress in Vigna unguiculata. Thus, pre-drench would be the most effective method for Ca uptake to increase water stress tolerance in impatiens.
Regression analysis indicated that shelf life showed a linear or quadratic response to the concentration of CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2, respectively. In viola treated with drench application, 300 mM CaCl2 had higher shelf life than 300 mM Ca(NO3)2. Chloride was suggested to induce stomatal closure by activating an ABA-dependent pathway in Vicia faba under salt stress [29]. In this study, Cl from CaCl2 might play an important role as an osmotic stress inducer to stimulate stress mechanisms, extending the shelf life in viola. In contrast, pre-drench application of Ca(NO3)2 was effective with the highest shelf life of 6 days at 200 mM compared to CaCl2 in impatiens. Previous studies suggested that nitrate is the most dominant counter anion to stimulate Ca uptake and movement by plants [30,31,32]. In pre-drench application, nitrate from Ca(NO3)2 appeared to increase Ca uptake and translocation, leading to higher shelf life in impatiens under water deficiency. This result supports that increased Ca uptake by pre-drench application would be more effective in enhancing water stress tolerance than drench-induced osmotic stress in impatiens.
The species-dependent responses to Ca application methods might be related to the level of water deficit tested species. Calcium treatments delayed plant wilting and extended shelf life in the extremely sensitive species (viola and impatiens), while none of the methods was influential in the moderately tolerant species (petunia). Ca-induced osmotic stress or increased Ca uptake would not be efficient to enhance water deficit tolerance in species with high tolerance traits to water stress. According to Villarino et al. [33], Viola tricolor, I. walleriana, and Petunia ×hybrida have been characterized as extremely sensitive, moderately sensitive, and highly tolerant species to the high saline substrate, respectively. The different levels of salt stress tolerance might result in different responses to drench application. The higher efficacy of drench application was shown in the most sensitive species, viola compared to impatiens and petunia, to enhance water stress tolerance.

5. Conclusions

The efficacy of three calcium application methods was evaluated on enhancing temporary water deficit stress tolerance in three species of annual bedding plants. Plant wilting of viola was delayed by drench and pre-drench applications, while spray and pre-drench applications were effective in impatiens. Floriculture crops treated with Ca could maintain the aesthetic quality during the postproduction period because of shelf life extension resulted from increased temporary water deficit stress tolerance. However, the tested plants responded to the Ca treatment methods in a species-dependent manner, probably due to the different salt/osmotic stress tolerance levels. Drench application effectively delayed wilting in the susceptible species (viola), while pre-drench application delayed wilting in the susceptible and moderately sensitive species (viola and impatiens). The most tolerant species did not show enhanced water deficit stress tolerance by any Ca applications. Our results suggested that CaCl2 played a role as an osmotic stress inducer in the drench application and Ca(NO3)2 as a Ca uptake helper in the pre-drench application. Floriculture growers should survey the salt stress sensitivity of their crops before choosing an appropriate application method to maximize the efficacy of Ca application. Additionally, for susceptible species, it would be necessary to compare Ca drench and pre-drench applications under the same environmental conditions to find out the better method since the evaluation of Ca application methods was performed independently in this experiment. In this study, a high concentration of pure Ca was used. Finding alternative and cheaper Ca sources may help make this application more economical and practical.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.P. and N.L.W.; methodology, S.P. and N.L.W.; software, S.P.; validation, S.P.; formal analysis, S.P.; investigation, S.P.; resources, N.L.W.; data curation, S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P.; writing—review and editing, S.P. and N.L.W.; visualization, S.P.; supervision, N.L.W.; project administration, N.L.W.; funding acquisition, N.L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Salaries and research support were provided in part by state and federal funds appropriated to the West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, West Virginia University. Scientific Article, No. 3406 of the West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Morgantown, WV.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank PanAmerican Seed and Syngenta Flowers for their donation of plant material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Farooq, M.; Wahid, A.; Kobayashi, N.; Fujita, D.; Basra, S. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2009, 29, 153–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Xu, C.; McDowell, N.G.; Fisher, R.A.; Wei, L.; Sevanto, S.; Christoffersen, B.O.; Weng, E.; Middleton, R.S. Increasing impacts of extreme droughts on vegetation productivity under climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2019, 9, 948–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Ferrante, A.; Trivellini, A.; Scuderi, D.; Romano, D.; Vernieri, P. Post-production physiology and handling of ornamental potted plants. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 100, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Raudales, R.; Pundt, L. Maintaining High-Quality Plants in Retail Settings. e-GRO Alert 2016, 5, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Healy, W. Piles of money. Grow. Mag. 2009, 72, 42–46. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pandey, P.; Sharma, R.; Neelkanthe, S. Climate change: Combating drought with antitranspirants and super absorbent. Plant Arch. 2017, 17, 1146–1156. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mphande, W.; Kettlewell, P.S.; Grove, I.G.; Farrell, A.D. The potential of antitranspirants in drought management of arable crops: A review. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 236, 106143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Waterland, N.L.; Finer, J.J.; Jones, M.L. Abscisic acid applications decrease stomatal conductance and delay wilting in drought-stressed chrysanthemums. HortTechnology 2010, 20, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Park, S.; Mills, S.A.; Moon, Y.; Waterland, N.L. Evaluation of antitranspirants for enhancing temporary water stress tolerance in bedding plants. HortTechnology 2016, 26, 444–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Franks, P.J.; Farquhar, G.D. The effect of exogenous abscisic acid on stomatal development, stomatal mechanics, and leaf gas exchange in Tradescantia virginiana. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kim, J.; van Iersel, M.W. Abscisic acid drenches can reduce water use and extend shelf life of Salvia splendens. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 127, 420–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Agehara, S.; Leskovar, D.I. Characterizing concentration effects of exogenous abscisic acid on gas exchange, water relations, and growth of muskmelon seedlings during water stress and rehydration. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2012, 137, 400–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Astacio, M.G.; van Iersel, M.W. Determining the effects of abscisic acid drenches on evapotranspiration and leaf gas exchange of tomato. HortScience 2011, 46, 1512–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Waterland, N.L.; Finer, J.J.; Jones, M.L. Benzyladenine and gibberellic acid application prevents abscisic acid-induced leaf chlorosis in pansy and viola. HortScience 2010, 45, 925–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ranty, B.; Aldon, D.; Cotelle, V.; Galaud, J.-P.; Thuleau, P.; Mazars, C. Calcium sensors as key hubs in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Shoresh, M.; Spivak, M.; Bernstein, N. Involvement of calcium-mediated effects on ROS metabolism in the regulation of growth improvement under salinity. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 51, 1221–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tan, W.; wei Meng, Q.; Brestic, M.; Olsovska, K.; Yang, X. Photosynthesis is improved by exogenous calcium in heat-stressed tobacco plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 2063–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Upadhyaya, H.; Panda, S.K.; Dutta, B.K. CaCl2 improves post-drought recovery potential in Camellia sinensis (L) O. Kuntze. Plant Cell Rpt. 2011, 30, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Roelfsema, M.R.G.; Hedrich, R.; Geiger, D. Anion channels: Master switches of stress responses. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Park, S.; Moon, Y.; Waterland, N.L. Treatment with Calcium Chloride Enhances Water Deficit Stress Tolerance in Viola (Viola cornuta). HortScience 2020, 55, 882–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Selection and Use of Stress-Tolerant Bedding Plants for the Landscape. Available online: https://content.ces.ncsu.edu/selection-and-use-of-stress-tolerant-bedding-plants-for-the-landscape (accessed on 9 May 2021).
  22. Bartels, D.; Sunkar, R. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2005, 24, 23–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, W.; Vinocur, B.; Altman, A. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 2003, 218, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, J.; Jia, W.; Yang, J.; Ismail, A.M. Role of ABA in integrating plant responses to drought and salt stresses. Field Crop. Res. 2006, 97, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Delfine, S.; Alvino, A.; Villani, M.C.; Loreto, F. Restrictions to carbon dioxide conductance and photosynthesis in spinach leaves recovering from salt stress. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119, 1101–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Azeem, A.; Wu, Y.; Xing, D.; Javed, Q.; Ullah, I. Photosynthetic response of two okra cultivars under salt stress and re-watering. J. Plant Interact. 2017, 12, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E. Plant Physiology, 5th ed.; Sinauer: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2010; pp. 118–119. [Google Scholar]
  28. Murillo-Amador, B.; Jones, H.G.; Kaya, C.; Aguilar, R.L.; García-Hernández, J.L.; Troyo-Diéguez, E.; Ávila-Serrano, N.Y.; Rueda-Puente, E. Effects of foliar application of calcium nitrate on growth and physiological attributes of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) grown under salt stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2006, 58, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Geilfus, C.M.; Mithöfer, A.; Ludwig-Müller, J.; Zörb, C.; Muehling, K.H. Chloride-inducible transient apoplastic alkalinizations induce stomata closure by controlling abscisic acid distribution between leaf apoplast and guard cells in salt-stressed Vicia faba. New Phytol. 2015, 208, 803–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kirkby, E. Maximizing calcium uptake by plants. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1979, 10, 89–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wallace, A.; Mueller, R. Calcium uptake and distribution in plants. J. Plant Nutr. 1980, 2, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hanger, B. The movement of calcium in plants. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1979, 10, 171–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Villarino, G.H.; Mattson, N.S. Assessing tolerance to sodium chloride salinity in fourteen floriculture species. HortTechnology 2011, 21, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Influence of calcium concentration on shelf life extension of V. cornuta (viola), I. walleriana (impatiens), and P. grandiflora (petunia) in spray application. Each data point represents the mean of shelf life extension from CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2, but the analysis was performed with all data (n = 8). Bars represent standard error. NS, nonsignificant.
Figure 1. Influence of calcium concentration on shelf life extension of V. cornuta (viola), I. walleriana (impatiens), and P. grandiflora (petunia) in spray application. Each data point represents the mean of shelf life extension from CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2, but the analysis was performed with all data (n = 8). Bars represent standard error. NS, nonsignificant.
Agronomy 11 01383 g001
Figure 2. Influence of concentrations of CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2 on shelf life of V. cornuta (viola), I. walleriana (impatiens), and P. grandiflora (petunia) in spray application. Each data point represents the mean of shelf life, but the analysis was performed with all data (n = 4). Bars represent standard error. NS, nonsignificant; *, significant at p ≤ 0.05; **, significant at p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 2. Influence of concentrations of CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2 on shelf life of V. cornuta (viola), I. walleriana (impatiens), and P. grandiflora (petunia) in spray application. Each data point represents the mean of shelf life, but the analysis was performed with all data (n = 4). Bars represent standard error. NS, nonsignificant; *, significant at p ≤ 0.05; **, significant at p ≤ 0.01.
Agronomy 11 01383 g002
Figure 3. Influence of calcium concentration on shelf life extension of V. cornuta (viola), I. walleriana (impatiens), and P. grandiflora (petunia) in drench application. Each data point represents the mean of shelf life extension from CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2, but the analysis was performed with all data (n = 8 for viola and impatiens and n = 6 for petunia). Bars represent standard error. NS, nonsignificant; **, significant at p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 3. Influence of calcium concentration on shelf life extension of V. cornuta (viola), I. walleriana (impatiens), and P. grandiflora (petunia) in drench application. Each data point represents the mean of shelf life extension from CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2, but the analysis was performed with all data (n = 8 for viola and impatiens and n = 6 for petunia). Bars represent standard error. NS, nonsignificant; **, significant at p ≤ 0.01.
Agronomy 11 01383 g003
Figure 4. Influence of concentrations of CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2 on shelf life of V. cornuta (viola), I. walleriana (impatiens), and P. grandiflora (petunia) in drench application. Each data point represents the mean of shelf life, but the analysis was performed with all data (n = 4 for viola and impatiens and n = 3 for petunia). Bars represent standard error. NS, nonsignificant; ***, significant at p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 4. Influence of concentrations of CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2 on shelf life of V. cornuta (viola), I. walleriana (impatiens), and P. grandiflora (petunia) in drench application. Each data point represents the mean of shelf life, but the analysis was performed with all data (n = 4 for viola and impatiens and n = 3 for petunia). Bars represent standard error. NS, nonsignificant; ***, significant at p ≤ 0.001.
Agronomy 11 01383 g004
Figure 5. Influence of calcium concentration on shelf life extension of V. cornuta (viola), I. walleriana (impatiens), and P. grandiflora (petunia) in pre-drench application. Each data point represents the mean of shelf life extension from CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2, but the analysis was performed with all data (n = 8). Bars represent standard error. NS, nonsignificant; ***, significant at p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 5. Influence of calcium concentration on shelf life extension of V. cornuta (viola), I. walleriana (impatiens), and P. grandiflora (petunia) in pre-drench application. Each data point represents the mean of shelf life extension from CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2, but the analysis was performed with all data (n = 8). Bars represent standard error. NS, nonsignificant; ***, significant at p ≤ 0.001.
Agronomy 11 01383 g005
Figure 6. Influence of concentrations of CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2 on shelf life of V. cornuta (viola), I. walleriana (impatiens), and P. grandiflora (petunia) in pre-drench application. Each data point represents the mean of shelf life, but the analysis was performed with all data (n = 4). Bars represent standard error. NS, nonsignificant; ***, significant at p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 6. Influence of concentrations of CaCl2 and Ca(NO3)2 on shelf life of V. cornuta (viola), I. walleriana (impatiens), and P. grandiflora (petunia) in pre-drench application. Each data point represents the mean of shelf life, but the analysis was performed with all data (n = 4). Bars represent standard error. NS, nonsignificant; ***, significant at p ≤ 0.001.
Agronomy 11 01383 g006
Table 1. Factorial ANOVA on shelf life extension in spray application.
Table 1. Factorial ANOVA on shelf life extension in spray application.
Source of VariancedfMSF-Valuep-Value
Replication31766.71.70.1732
Species (A)215,334.715.0<0.0001
 Sensitive (Viola and Impatiens) vs.
 Moderate (Petunia)
113,417.413.10.0007
 Viola vs. Impatiens117,252.116.90.0001
Calcium source (B)167.50.10.7984
Concentration (C)2911.70.90.4166
A*B21125.81.10.3406
A*C4554.90.50.7053
B*C2139.70.10.8727
A*B*C4345.60.30.8512
Error511023.3
Table 2. Factorial ANOVA on shelf life extension in drench application.
Table 2. Factorial ANOVA on shelf life extension in drench application.
Source of VariancedfMSF-Valuep-Value
Replication33862.12.60.0668
Species (A)246,798.231.0<0.0001
 Sensitive (Viola and Impatiens) vs.
 Moderate (Petunia)
1257.20.20.6817
 Viola vs. Impatiens193,339.161.8<0.0001
Calcium source (B)19.60.00.9366
Concentration (C)24796.33.20.0512
A*B2381.80.30.7776
A*C44974.73.30.0188
B*C23492.32.30.1106
A*B*C42615.01.70.1595
Error451509.5
Table 3. Factorial ANOVA on shelf life extension in pre-drench application.
Table 3. Factorial ANOVA on shelf life extension in pre-drench application.
Source of VariancedfMSF-Valuep-Value
Replication31774.70.60.6432
Species (A)2431,589.5136.4<0.0001
 Sensitive (Viola and Impatiens) vs.
 Moderate (Petunia)
1622,345.7196.7<0.0001
 Viola vs. Impatiens1240,833.376.1<0.0001
Calcium source (B)17469.12.40.1306
Concentration (C)248,962.215.5<0.0001
A*B22330.20.70.4838
A*C423,059.47.30.0001
B*C26670.52.10.1319
A*B*C47052.52.20.0788
Error513163.6
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, S.; Waterland, N.L. Evaluation of Calcium Application Methods on Delaying Plant Wilting under Water Deficit in Bedding Plants. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1383. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071383

AMA Style

Park S, Waterland NL. Evaluation of Calcium Application Methods on Delaying Plant Wilting under Water Deficit in Bedding Plants. Agronomy. 2021; 11(7):1383. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071383

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Suejin, and Nicole L. Waterland. 2021. "Evaluation of Calcium Application Methods on Delaying Plant Wilting under Water Deficit in Bedding Plants" Agronomy 11, no. 7: 1383. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071383

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop