Next Article in Journal
Marker-Assisted Evaluation of Two Powdery Mildew Resistance Candidate Genes in Korean Cucumber Inbred Lines
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Subsurface Application of Compound Mineral Fertilizer on Soil Enzymatic Activity under Reduced Tillage
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of El Niño on Oil Palm Yield in Malaysia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Labile Soil Organic Matter Pools Are Influenced by 45 Years of Applied Farmyard Manure and Mineral Nitrogen in the Wheat—Pearl Millet Cropping System in the Sub-Tropical Condition

1
Department of Soil Science, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa 848125, India
2
IRRI-IRRAS Project, Patna 800001, India
3
Department of Agronomy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa 848125, India
4
Department of Statistics, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa 848125, India
5
Department of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, The Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
7
Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(11), 2190; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112190
Submission received: 8 October 2021 / Revised: 26 October 2021 / Accepted: 27 October 2021 / Published: 29 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Tillage, Cover Crop and Crop Rotation on Soil)

Abstract

:
Labile soil organic matter pools (LSOMp) are believed to be the most sensitive indicator of soil quality when it is changed rapidly with varied management practices. In sub-tropical climates, the turnover period of labile pools is quicker than in temperate climates. Organic amendments are of importance in improve the LSOMp for a temperate climate and may be helpful in sub-tropical climates as well. Hence, the status of LSOMp was studied in long term farmyard manure (FYM) amended soils under wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) cropping systems in sub-tropical arid conditions. At the same time, we also attempt to determine the impact of mineral nitrogen (N) application in these pools. In this study, dissolved organic matter (DOM), microbial biomass (MB), and light fraction (LF) were isolated in the management practices involving different modes and rates of FYM applications along with the application of nitrogenous fertilizer. C and N contents of the labile pools were analyzed in the soil samples at different periods after FYM applications. Among the different pools, microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were changed significantly with different rates and modes of FYM application and mineral N application. Application of FYM at 15 Mg ha−1 in both the seasons + 120 kg ha−1 mineral N resulted in significantly higher MBC and DOC as compared to all of the other treatments. This treatment also resulted in 13.75% and 5.8% more MBC and DOC, respectively, as compared to the amount of MBC and DOC content in the control plot where FYM and mineral N were not applied. Comparing the labile organic matter pools of 45 years of FYM amendment with initial values, it was found that the dissolved organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, and light fraction carbon were increased up to the maximum extent of about 600, 1200, and 700 times, respectively. The maximum amount of DOM (562 mg kg−1 of DOC and 70.1 mg kg−1 of DON), MB (999 mg kg−1 of MBC and 158.4 mg kg−1 of MBN), LF (2.61 g kg−1 of LFC and 154.6 g kg−1 of LFN) were found in case of both season applied FYM as compared to either summer or winter applied FYM. Concerning the different rates of FYM application, 15 Mg ha−1 FYM also resulted in a significantly higher amount of DOM, MB, and LF as compared to other FYM rates (i.e., 5 Mg ha−1 and 10 Mg ha−1). Amongst different pools, MB was found to be the most sensitive to management practices in this study. From this study, it was found that the long-term FYM amendment in sub-tropical soil along with mineral N application can improve the LSOMp of the soil. Thus, it can be recommended that the application of FYM at 15 Mg ha−1 in summer and winter with +120 kg ha−1 mineral N can improve SOC and its labile pools in subtropical arid soils. Future studies on LSOMp can be carried out by considering different cropping systems of subtropical climate.

1. Introduction

Soil organic matter (SOM) mainly consists of ‘labile’ pools with smaller sizes and rapid turnover and ‘recalcitrant’ pools of larger sizes with slow turnover [1]. Total soil organic matter content has an immense importance on soil structure, permeability, bulk density, and various chemical as well as biological properties. Hence, it is considered one of the most important attributes of soil quality [2]. However, there are no such rapid changes in organic carbon (C) content and total nitrogen (N) due to short term changes in management practices. Labile organic matter pools are highly sensitive to the changes in soil management practices and could be considered as an excellent soil quality indicator for controlling soil function in specific ways [3]. They include soil organic matter, light fraction, non-humic substances, soil micro, and macrofauna [4]. Different management practices, soil, and climate strongly influence the amount of these active fractions [5]. In temperate soils, these active fractions consist of almost 25–33% of the soil organic matter (SOM). However, they are possibly little in the case of tropical soils [6]. The soil nutrient dynamics is highly altered with active fractions. Precise and consistent measurement of turnover times, as well as the size of different SOM pools, must be present to comprehend the impact of varied soil management practices on the SOM dynamics [1]. Hence, it is important to understand SOM changes under tropical weather with the manipulation of management practices. Perhaps the most mobile form of SOC is dissolved organic matter (DOM) which is controlled and replenished by the addition of C through plant leaves, root exudates, and soil microbes [7]. It is reported that the majority of released DOM (up to 40%) is potentially biodegradable in solution within a period of days to a few months [8]. This form of DOM may be utilized by a crop during its growth period which can be a major pathway in element cycling and hence can be considered an important factor in plant nutrition point of view. The DOM is considered as an important substrate for microbial activity, a key resource of mineralizable N, S, and P, and its leaching greatly controls the SOM as well as nutrient content and the chemical state of ground-water [3]. In agricultural soils, fertilization with SOM has been shown to enhance the water-extractable organic carbon by a factor of 2.7 to 3.2 [9,10]. It is important to know the effect of mineral N-fertilizer on the concentration of DOM in cultivated soils. Most of the studies on DOM have been conducted in a temperate climate [11]. Thus, the research gap regarding the study of the status of soil DOM in tropical and sub-tropical climatic condition and cultivated soil per se is quite large. The light fraction of SOM is one of the most important indicators of soil quality as it is the primary fraction for soil C formation [12]. It is significant in controlling the activity of heterotrophic organisms as it provides energy to them, and it is also the reservoir of plant nutrients and relatively labile C. Hence, the determination of soil structure vis-à-vis ecosystem is largely dependent on the light fraction of SOM [13]. The labile character of the light fraction is significant owing to having a considerable impact on the plant-available N pool [14]. Balota and Auler [15] stated that soil microbial biomass mediates both immobilization and mineralization of nutrients and it is a storehouse of considerable amounts of readily mineralizable N than the N in most of the organic matter. Although accounting for only a little portion of soil organic matter, 1–3% of soil organic C [16], measurement of biomass may be helpful for the early assessment of changes in soil quality through varied soil managements long before such changes can be found in total soil organic N or C content. It is essential to study the changes in this fraction of soil organic matter due to the changes in soil management practices [17].
Organic amendments have a huge role in the improvement of the labile SOM pools. Organics may contribute to the passive pools of the soil. Majumder et al. [18] reported that most of the pools were significantly correlated with each other under organic amendment for the rice-wheat cropping system. In this study, different rates and modes of FYM amendments were considered believing that it might improve the labile SOM pools and that, by comparing the different rates and modes of application, the suitable FYM application schedule may come out from this study. Similarly, N application was considered to supplement the N nutrient to the crop and to find out whether there is any role of this fertilization in labile SOM pools or not. N is one of the vital factors that may influence SOC content by increasing inputs of plant residues to the soil [19]. The wheat–pearl millet cropping system is very much popular in the sub-tropical arid climatic condition of India, particularly in the western and north-western part of the country where there is a low amount of rainfall received in a year which does not allow the farmers to go for water-loving crops such as rice.
The major research gap lies in the limited information about the status of labile SOM pools in sub-tropical soils, especially in the cultivated soils where the rate of SOM decomposition is fast in comparison to temperate soil. Due to such a rapid turnover of labile SOM pools, it is very important to study the status of these pools in long term organic amendment of sub-tropical soils where SOM levels per unit of C input are lower. The research findings on the status of mineral N fertilization on these pools under organically amended soil of sub-tropical climate are also scarce. Considering all of his information, a long-term experiment having different rates of FYM applied at different times in a pearl millet–wheat cropping system was conducted with the hypothesis that long-term FYM and mineral N application would improve the labile SOM pools of the sub-tropical soils. The focal objectives of the study were to assess the status of labile soil organic matter pools and soil organic carbon as well as nitrogen build-up through the long-term application of FYM and mineral N in the sub-tropical climate. The novelty of the study is to generate the status of labile SOM pools of the sub-tropical soils with long-term different FYM application schedules along with mineral N.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site

A long-term field experiment was initiated in October 1967 on a coarse loamy soil and classified as Typic Ustochrepts at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India (29.16° N, 75.75° E, 215 m above mean sea level).

2.2. Weather and Experimental Soils

During the experimental period of 2012–2013, the site experienced rainfall of 770 mm annum−1, of which 80 to 85% was received during August to October; the minimum and the maximum temperatures of 5 °C and 43 °C during December and May, respectively; variation in relative humidity from 81% in the morning hours to 45% in the evening hours; and total pan evaporation of 545 mm. Thus, the experimental site experienced a climate that was characterized by dryness, extremes of temperature, and scanty rainfall and thus the area was very hot in summers and cool in winters. The surface soil (0–15 cm) was sandy loam and well-drained. Initial surface soil (0–15 cm) before starting of the study was saline (pH 8.2); low in organic carbon (4.2 g kg−1), medium in available P (0.5 M NaHCO3–extractable, 13.0 kg ha−1) and available K (N NH4OAc extractable, 249 kg ha−1); and low in available Zn (DTPA extractable, 0.68 mg kg−1). The initial labile soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools are listed in Table 1.

2.3. Treatments and Experimental Design

The treatments consisted of three rates of FYM (15, 30 and 45 Mg ha−1 till 2007–2008 and 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1 after 2008–2009) applied in three modes of application viz., in summer to pearl millet during May; in winter to wheat during November; and in both the summer and winter. The FYM applications were reduced to lower rates so as to make it realistic according to the availability to the farmers. The absolute control plot (no FYM) was applied in all of the seasons. The main plots were composed of nine combinations of FYM application (3 rates × 3 modes) and one absolute control. Each main plot was again divided into two sub-plots. Application of N at 0 and 120 kg ha−1 for both the crops through urea was put into these two sub-plots. The statistical design used to analyze the data obtained from this experiment was a split-split plot design with four replications. The area of each sub-plot was 60 m2 (10 m × 6 m). FYM was applied to the experimental field about 20–25 days before sowing of the crops and it was incorporated into the top-soil layer (above 15–20 cm). N was applied in two equal splits at sowing and 25–30 days after sowing for both the crops. The nutrient content of FYM applied in 2012 is represented in Table 2.
No chemical fertilizers except urea were applied to the experimental site since the beginning of this experiment. The land was prepared conventionally for sowing the crops. Harvesting of both the crops was carried out at 2–5 cm above the ground level and the leftover stubble and roots of the crops were incorporated. No extra residues of any crops were added to the soil. Manual harvesting of the crops was carried out at their maturity stages.

2.4. Collection of Soil Samples and Analysis

Soil samples were taken in November 2013 before application of treatments to wheat from 0–15 cm depth using a 5 cm diameter augur. Each sample was a composite of three places in a plot. Each sample was mixed thoroughly, sieved through 2 mm sieve and stored in plastic bags below 4 °C until analysis for different soil properties. Thus, soil samples represent winter and summer applications of FYM which allowed 12- and 6-month mineralization periods, respectively, and also the combination of the two applications. Organic carbon in the surface soils was determined by Walkley and Black method [20] and total nitrogen as per the method suggested by Bremner [21].

2.5. Dissolved Organic Matter

50 mL of deionized water was added to 12 g of dry soil and this was subjected to shaking for 1 h on a horizontal shaker followed by centrifuging for 30 min at 8000 rpm. The solution was filtered through 0.45 μm polysulfone filter membrane and the filtrate was collected and stored in a freezer until laboratory analysis. Determination of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was carried out with the dichromate acid oxidation method [22], while dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) was determined by Kjeldahl distillation after oxidizing the DOM by 1% potassium persulphate reagent [23].

2.6. Microbial Biomass

Moist soil samples of 25 g (oven-dry basis) were fumigated with ethanol-free CHCl3 and extracted with 0.5 M K2SO4 [24]. Another set of unfumigated samples was similarly extracted. The extract was digested with K2Cr2O7 followed by back titration with ferrous ammonium sulphate. Subsequently, biomass carbon was estimated using the following equation: Biomass C = 2.64 Ec, where Ec denotes the difference between organic carbon extracted by 0.5 M K2SO4 from fumigated and non-fumigated soils. The extra N released by CHCl3 was calculated as the difference between N extracted by 0.5 M K2SO4 from the fumigated and non-fumigated soils [25].

2.7. Light Fraction

Light fraction SOM was isolated in the surface soil by dispersing the representative soil sample in NaI solution (specific gravity 1.70) and by removing the suspended material by vacuum suction. The light fraction was washed, dried, ground and analyzed for total C and N by CHN analyzer (Perkin Elmer Model 2400 series II).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Effect of FYM application during both the seasons (summer and winter) with three doses in each mode of application and also with or without mineral N and their interactions on the three labile pools C and N were analyzed [26], where the F-test indicated a significant (p = 0.05) effect. Means were separated according to LSD (p = 0.05) using appropriate error mean squares.

3. Results

The effects of different treatment combinations on soil quality indicators viz., soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrogen (DON), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) as well as nitrogen (MBN), light fraction carbon (LFC) and nitrogen (LFN) were statistically studied with the help analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique. Table 3 represents the F values obtained for the main effects as well as interaction impacts of all treatments along with their statistical significance.

3.1. FYM Modes and Rates Interaction

3.1.1. Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen Build-Up

The ANOVA yielded a significant interaction between different modes and rates of FYM application concerning SOC and TN as depicted in Table 3. However, for mineral Nitrogen, the only main effects were significant. The interaction between modes and rates of FYM application suggested that the effect of different rates of FYM depended on its time of application (Figure 1a–h).
A post hoc analysis using the least significant difference (LSD) further revealed that SOC were significantly higher when FYM was applied for both seasons. It was also found that FYM applied during summer only resulted in significant improvement of SOC over the winter applied FYM at all the rates of application. Almost 8 to 34% higher SOC build-up in the soil was observed in both season FYM applications at the three rates than the summer applications. Similar trends were also observed in TN build-up through the FYM application and about 16 to 25% higher build-up was recorded in both season FYM applications at the three rates than summer applications. Figure 2 depicts the increase in soil organic C (SOC) from the initiation of the study to 45 years of FYM application at different rates and modes. SOC was increased up to 19.1 g kg−1 from the initial 4.2 g kg−1 with the application of 15 Mg ha−1 FYM both in summer and winter. The application of FYM at 5 Mg ha−1 in the winter season only resulted in about 120% increment in SOC content from the initial soil status.

3.1.2. Labile Soil Organic Matter Pools

Significant main and interaction effects of FYM modes and rates were observed on the carbon and nitrogen fractions of all the three LSOMp (Table 3). All of the carbon and nitrogen fractions had significantly higher concentrations when FYM was applied in summer as compared to winter in each FYM rate (Figure 1a–h). Higher concentrations were observed in summer of DOC and DON by 15–22% and 15–33%; MBC and MBN by 14–30% and 21–24%; and LFC and LFN by 14–23% and 12–14%, respectively, as compared to the winter application. Significantly higher concentrations were also observed in both season FYM applications as compared to summer and winter applications in each FYM rate due to the cumulative effect. Figure 3 represents the changes in the labile soil organic matter pools after 45 years of FYM amendments. Figure 3 clearly depicts that the dissolved organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, and light fraction carbon increased to the tune of about 600, 1200, and 700 times, respectively, from their respective initial values.

3.2. Mineral N Interaction with FYM Modes and Rates

The application of mineral N at 120 kg ha−1 significantly increased DON in all the three FYM modes (Table 4). The increase varied from 43 to 58% among the three modes. Interaction between mineral N and FYM modes was also significant with MBC and MBN. MBC and MBN increased due to mineral N application by 30 to 32% and 51 to 83%, respectively, among the three modes.
Nitrogen application also increased carbon and nitrogen contents of both dissolved organic matter and microbial biomass at the three rates of FYM (Table 5). The increase in DOC and DON concentrations were 12 to 21% and 33 to 61%, respectively, while MBC and MBN were 20 to 30% and 36 to 76%, respectively, at the three FYM rates. The mineral N did not have any significant effect on the light fraction of soil organic matter at the different rates or modes of FYM.

3.3. Modes and Rates of FYM and Mineral N Interaction

3.3.1. Soil Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen

Table 6 and Table 7 represent the treatment effects of mineral N and different modes and rates of FYM on SOC and TN build-up in soil, respectively. The variations in SOC and TN concentrations among the different treatments were between 4.6 to 19.5 g kg−1 and 402 to 1032 mg kg−1, respectively. TN increased significantly with increasing FYM rates at each mode and mineral N. TN was found to be higher in summer applications FYM as compared to winter applications at 5 and 10 Mg ha−1 in N control plots. At 120 kg ha−1 N, it was significantly higher only in summer FYM application of 5 Mg ha−1 as compared to winter application. It was interesting to understand that TN was significantly higher when FYM was applied at 5 Mg ha−1 during summer as well as winter than the one-time application of 10 Mg ha−1 during either summer or winter. The percent increase in SOC build-ups by mineral N at 120 kg ha−1 in the different FYM applications were between 2–16% in winter; 12–18% in summer and 4–13% and in both seasons. The corresponding increases in TN build-up were 4–15% in summer; 3–9% in winter; and 13–14% in both season FYM applications.

3.3.2. Dissolved Organic Matter

The variations in DOC and DON concentrations were from 85 to 578 mg kg−1 and from 6.9 to 87.7 mg kg−1, respectively. It was observed that DOC and DON were 1.38 to 2.96% and 1.71 to 5.06% of SOC and TN, respectively. There was a significant decrease in DOC in winter as compared to summer application at each FYM and mineral N rate. Mineral N was found to increase DOC concentrations in all the FYM treatments (Table 6).
Thus, the role of fertilizer nitrogen may be seen as a catalyst in increasing the concentration of DOM in FYM amended soils. In summer, the maximum increase in DOC concentration was about 30% observed in 10 Mg ha−1 FYM applied plot, while in winter it was about 25% in the 15 Mg ha−1 FYM applied plot. Thus, an increase in the concentration of DOC due to mineral N application depends on both the rate as well as the time of FYM application. When FYM was applied during both seasons the percent increase in DOC with the application of mineral N decreased from 21 to 6% with increasing dose of FYM from 5 to 15 Mg ha−1 year−1. A maximum increase in DON concentration with mineral N application was observed at 15 Mg ha−1 FYM rate in all three modes. In summer FYM application the maximum increase was 62% while in winter it was 41%. DON concentration increased up to 67% when 15 Mg ha−1 FYM was applied in both seasons.

3.3.3. Microbial Biomass

MBC varied from 85 mg kg−1 in the control plot to 1169 mg kg−1 in the plot at the highest FYM application rate per annum (30 Mg ha−1 year−1) and mineral N at 120 kg ha−1 (Table 6). MBN varied between 12.14 and 208.75 mg kg−1 in the corresponding treatments (Table 7). Thus, MBC and MBN increased up to 13.75 and 17.21 times due to the various management practices of FYM and mineral N. MBC varied between 1.85 and 5.72% of soil organic carbon while MBN between 3.01 and 12.05% of total nitrogen. A significant decrease in MBC was observed in winter as compared to summer application at each FYM rate and mineral N. Thus, mineral N increased microbial activity at each rate of FYM in each mode.

3.3.4. Light Fraction

LFC and LFN varied from 370 to 2763 mg kg−1 and 49 to 160 mg kg−1, respectively, in the plots with different management practices (Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8). LFC constituted 7.21 to 14.17% of organic carbon while LFN constituted 5.52 to 9.23% of total N. It was observed that the different FYM and mineral N treatments did not have any significant influence on these contents of the light fraction.

4. Discussion

4.1. SOC and TN Build-Up

Long term application of organic amendment such as FYM, root biomass, and crop residues to the soil were ultimately reflected through the increase in SOC [27]. Improved soil physicochemical properties and the biological environment through the addition of root biomass C was observed, as they are beneficial for crop growth and these resulted in higher C-sequestration [28]. Significant loss of SOC and TN was found in the winter FYM applied plot as compared to summer applied plots. The winter application was about five months earlier than the summer application. Application of organic manures increases C-sequestration as they contain most of the C in recalcitrant form and these organic manures have already gone through some decomposition before their application in the agricultural fields [29]. Still, under subtropical climate, SOC and TN of winter applied FYM plots were lower by 11% to 16% and 6% to 8%, respectively, as compared to summer applied plots. Recycling of soil C into the atmosphere might be controlled by FYM application as its application to the soil helped in the formation of chemically resistant humic substances [30]. These humic substances are accumulated in the soil, and so they are supposed not to be decomposed by the soil microbes. However, their relative inherent recalcitrance may depend upon the climatic condition and microbial mineralization rates of humic and fulvic acid fractions [30]. Such recalcitrance refers to molecular level characteristics such as functional groups, elemental composition, and molecular conformation that control the natural biodegradability [31]. Similarly, the N status of soil is altered significantly due to changes in organic matter sowing to their composition, varying stages of decomposition and ecological factors [32]. Thus, the increase in SOC and TN depends upon the addition of organic matter in soil and their recalcitrance.

4.2. Dissolve Organic Matter

In this study, DOC content was increased with the FYM application. This might be discussed as the application of FYM in the soil helps in the direct addition of water-soluble C. Antil and Singh [33] also reported that there is a linear relationship between organic manure application and the buildup of water-soluble C in the soil. Soil DOC content has increased to the tune of almost 2.7–3.2 times through the application of both organic manures and chemical fertilizers into the soil [34]. There was a significant increase in DOC and DON concentrations in soil by N application. The increase in DOC might be due to the application of fertilizer N which improved crop biomass and returned more crop remains into the soil. DOM, being highly mobile in soils can have an influence on acidity, microbial activity, nutrient availability and mobility [5].

4.3. Microbial Biomass Carbon

The abundance of microbial activity owing to the application of mineral N was also previously reported by Francioli [35]. SOC buildup was higher with the application of FYM and this might be the reason behind such enhancement of MBC in the present study. Metabolic activity of the soil microbes might be increased by utilizing root exudation under FYM treated plots where soil C was higher [36]. Singh et al. [37] also reported that the increase in MBC through organic manure amendment was much higher than that of mineral fertilizer application. Moreover, binding agents such as exocellular mucilaginous polysaccharides, major food and energy for soil fauna, is formed due to the abundance of the varied microbial community associated with the decomposing particulate organic matter which is considered as one of the key attributes of soil quality [38]. Hence, soil microbial biomass measurements are considered as one of the fundamental tools to assess the changes in SOM under varied soil management in different climatic conditions.

4.4. Light Fraction of SOM

LFC and LFN varied from 370 to 2763 mg kg−1 and from 49 to 160 mg kg−1, respectively, in the plots with different management practices which constituted 6.30–14.15% of organic carbon, and 5.72–9.73% total N. The light fraction comprises a small portion of soil mass. However, owing to having high C and N content, it could explain a substantial portion of total carbon and nitrogen pools in the soil [39]. Janzen et al. [40] reported that the light fraction accounts for 2–18% of the soil carbon and 1–12% of the total N. LFC is highly labile and mainly composed of partially decomposed plant residues [41]. In this study, a higher amount of LFC was found through the FYM application. This finding confirms that the light fractions can be changed rapidly in responses to management. The gap of six months between the two modes of FYM application might have led to more decomposition of soil organic matter, and reduced the LFC in winter applied plots.

5. Conclusions

Thus, in cultivated soils under wheat–pearl millet cropping sequence, proper management of FYM and mineral N will have to be carried out for improvement in labile SOM pools, SOC, and TN. The application of 15 Mg ha−1 FYM in both seasons significantly improved all the labile soil organic matter pools. Application of N at 120 kg ha−1 also showed significant improvement in the microbial biomass and dissolve organic N in the soil. It was also comprehended that the microbial biomass was the most sensitive among all the different LSOMp to the changes in FYM amendment as it had the most variation in its carbon and nitrogen content. On the other hand, light fraction showed persistence in the soil during the year, as there was no significant change in its concentration due to the different modes or rates of FYM application along with mineral N. Thus, from this study it can be recommended that the FYM application at 15 Mg ha−1 in both summer and winter + 120 kg ha−1 mineral N can improve the labile soil organic matter pools and build-up soil organic carbon under wheat–pearl millet system in sub-tropical soil. This finding will help the researchers those who are working on the different soil organic matter properties as influenced by varied management practices in the sub-tropical climatic condition. The fate of the LSOMp should further be explored in different cropping systems under sub-tropical and tropical climates where the turnover is rapid.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.L., B.H.K. and S.K.S.; methodology, R.L. and B.H.K.; software, R.L., B.P. and A.H.; validation, R.L., B.H.K. and S.K.S.; formal analysis, R.L., B.P., N. and A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, R.L., B.H.K., S.K.S., B.P. and N.; writing—review and editing, A.H., A.G. and M.A.; supervision, B.H.K.; project administration, B.H.K.; funding acquisition, A.H., M.A. and A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The current work was funded by the Department of Soil Science, CCS Hisar Agricultural University, Hisar-Haryana, India. Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/257), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia also supported this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in this article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

All of the authors are thankful to the Department of Soil Science, CCS Hisar Agricultural University, Hisar-Haryana, India for providing necessary support in laboratory and fieldwork in the long term field experiment. The authors also extend their appreciation to Taif University for funding current work by Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/257), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

DOCDissolved organic carbon
DOMDissolved organic matter
DONDissolved organic nitrogen
FYMFarmyard manure
LFLight fraction
LFCLight fraction carbon
LFNLight fraction nitrogen
LSDLeast significant difference
LSOMpLabile soil organic matter pool
MBMicrobial biomass
MBCMicrobial biomass carbon
MBNMicrobial biomass nitrogen
SOCSoil organic carbon
SOMSoil organic matter
TNTotal nitrogen

References

  1. McLauchlan, K.K.; Hobbie, S.E. Comparison of labile soil organic matter fractionation techniques. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2004, 68, 1616–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bünemanna, E.K.; Bongiornoa, G.; Bai, Z.; Creamer, R.E.; Deyn, G.D.; Goede, R.; Fleskens, L.; Geissen, V.; Kuyper, T.W.; Mäder, P.; et al. Soil quality—A critical review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 120, 105–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Haynes, R. Labile organic matter fractions as central components of the quality of agricultural soils: An overview. Adv. Agron. 2005, 85, 221–268. [Google Scholar]
  4. Strosser, E. Methods for determination of labile soil organic matter: An overview. J. Agrobiol. 2010, 27, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gmach, M.R.; Cherubin, M.R.; Kaiser, K.; Cerri, C.E.P. Processes that influence dissolved organic matter in the soil: A review. Sci. Agric. 2020, 77, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nath, A.J.; Brahma, B.; Sileshi, G.W.; Dash, A.K. Impact of land use changes on storage of soil organic carbon in active and recalcitrant pools in a humid tropical region of India. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 624, 908–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kalbitz, K.; Solinger, S.; Park, J.M.; Michalzik, H.B.; Matzner, E. Controls on the dynamics of dissolved organic matter in soils: A review. Soil Sci. 2000, 164, 277–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, J.; Dai, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhai, B. Effects of fallow or planting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and fertilizing P or fertilizing P and N practices on soil carbon and nitrogen in a low-organic-matter soil. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2016, 62, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gregorich, E.G.; Rochette, P.; McGuire, S.; Liang, B.C.; Lessard, R. Soluble organic carbon and carbon dioxide fluxes in maize fields receiving spring applied manure. J. Environ. Qual. 1998, 27, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rochette, P.; Gregorich, E.G. Dynamics of microbial biomass C, soluble organic C and CO2 evolution after three years of manure application. Canadian. J. Soil Sci. 1998, 78, 283–290. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kalbitz, K.; Meyer, A.; Yang, R.; Gerstberger, P. Response of dissolved organic matter in the forest floor to long-term manipulation of litter and through fall inputs. Biogeochemistry 2007, 86, 301–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gregorich, E.G.; Carter, M.R.; Angers, D.A.; Monreal, C.M.; Ellert, B.H. Towards a minimum data set to assess soil organic matter quality. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1994, 74, 367–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Malhi, S.S.; Brandt, S.; Gill, K.S. Cultivation and grass type effects on light fraction and total organic C and N in a Dark Brown Chernozemic soil. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2003, 83, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. de Souza, G.P.; de Figueiredo, C.C.; de Sousa, D.M.G. Relationships between labile soil organic carbon fractions under different soil management systems. Sci. Agric. 2016, 73, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Balota, E.L.; Auler, P.A.M. Soil microbial biomass under different management and tillage systems of permanent intercropped cover species in an orange orchard. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo. 2011, 35, 1873–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Jenkinson, D.S.; Ladd, J.N. Microbial biomass in soil: Measurement and turnover. In Soil Biochemistry; Paul, A.E., Ladd, J.N., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 415–471. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kar, S.; Pramanick, B.; Brahmachari, K.; Saha, G.; Mahapatra, B.S.; Saha, A.; Kumar, A. Exploring the best tillage option in rice based diversified cropping systems in alluvial soil of eastern India. Soil Till. Res. 2021, 205, 104761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Majumder, B.; Mandal, B.; Bandyopadhyay, P.K.; Gangopadhyay, A.; Mani, P.K.; Kundu, A.L.; Mazumdar, D. Organic amendments influence soil organic carbon pools and rice–wheat productivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2008, 72, 775–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brown, K.H. Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Soil Organic Carbon Storage and Aggregation Mechanisms within Continuous Corn Cropping Systems. Master’s Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, 2013. Available online: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/13413 (accessed on 12 January 2020).
  20. Nelson, E.W.; Sommers, L.E. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3—Chemical Methods; Sparks, D.L., Ed.; Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bremner, J.M. Nitrogen total. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3—Chemical Methods; Sparks, D.L., Ed.; Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 1996; pp. 1085–1122. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ciavatta, C.; Vittori, A.L.; Sequi, P. Determination of organic C in soils and fertilizers. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1989, 20, 759–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, Z.S.; Northup, R.R.; Dahlgren, R.A. Determination of dissolved organic nitrogen using persulphate oxidation and conductimetric quantification of nitrate nitrogen. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1994, 25, 3161–3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vance, E.D.; Brookes, P.C.; Jenkinson, D.S. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1987, 19, 703–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Brookes, P.C.; Kragt, J.F.; Powlson, D.S.; Jenkinson, D.S. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: The effects of fumigation time and temperature. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1985, 17, 831–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gomez, K.A.; Gomez, A.A. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research; John Wiley & Sons: New Delhi, India, 1984; pp. 200–356. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kaur, T.; Brar, B.S.; Dhillon, N. Soil organic matter dynamics as affected by long-term use of organic and inorganic fertilizers under maize–wheat cropping system. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2008, 81, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Paustian, K.; Larson, E.; Kent, J.; Marx, E.; Swan, A. Soil C Sequestration as a biological negative emission strategy. Front. Clim. 2019, 1, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miles, R.J.; Brown, J.R. The Sanborn field experiment: Implications for long-term soil organic carbon levels. Agron. J. 2011, 103, 268–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Qualls, R.G. Biodegradability of humic substances and other fractions of decomposing leaf litter. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2004, 68, 1705–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kleber, M. What is recalcitrant soil organic matter? Environ. Chem. 2010, 7, 320–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, J.J.; Liu, Y.; Bowden, R.D.; Lajtha, K.; Simpson, A.J.; Huang, W.L.; Simpson, M.J. Long-term nitrogen addition alters the composition of soil-derived dissolved organic matter. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2020, 4, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Antil, R.J.; Singh, M. Effects of organic manures and fertilizers on organic matter and nutrients status of the soil. Arch. Agron. Soil. Sci. 2007, 53, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rochette, P.; Angers, D.A.; Cote, D. Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics following application of pig slurry. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2000, 64, 1389–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Francioli, D.; Schulz, E.; Lentendu, G.; Wubet, T.; Buscot, F.; Reitz, T. Mineral vs. organic amendments: Microbial community structure, activity and abundance of agriculturally relevant microbes are driven by long-term fertilization strategies. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Börjesson, G.; Menichetti, L.; Thornton, B.; Campbell, C.D.; Kätterer, T. Seasonal dynamics of the soil microbial community: Assimilation of old and young carbon sources in a long-term field experiment as revealed by natural 13C abundance. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2016, 67, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Singh, J.P.; Kaur, J.; Mehta, D.S.; Narwal, R.P. Long-term effects of nutrient management on soil health and crop productivity under rice—wheat cropping system. Ind. J. Fertil. 2012, 8, 28–48. [Google Scholar]
  38. Manna, M.C.; Sahu, A.; Rao, A.S. Impact of long-term fertilizers and manure application on carbon sequestration efficiency under different cropping systems. Ind. J. Soil Conser. 2012, 40, 70–77. [Google Scholar]
  39. Conrad, K.A.; Dalal, R.C.; Allen, D.E.; Fujinuma, R.; Menzies, N.W. Free light fraction carbon and nitrogen, a physically uncomplexed soil organic matter distribution within subtropical grass and leucaena—grass pastures. Soil Res. 2018, 56, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Janzen, H.H.; Campblel, C.A.; Brandt, S.A.; Lanfond, G.P.; Townley-Smith, L. Light-fraction organic matter in soils from long-term crop rotations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1992, 56, 1799–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Saljnikov, E.; Cakmak, D.; Rahimgalieva, S. Soil organic matter stability as affected by land management in steppe ecosystems. In Soil Processes and Current Trends in Quality Assessment; Maria, C.H.S., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2013; pp. 269–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Effect of FYM modes and rates interaction on (a) soil organic C (SOC); (b) Dissolved organic C (DOC); (c) microbial biomass C (MBC); (d) light fraction C (LFC); (e) total N (TN); (f) dissolved organic N (DON); (g) microbial biomass N (MBN); and (h) light fraction N (LFN). Bars with different letters in lowercase are significantly different at p = 0.05 according to LSD. Lines above the bars denote standard deviation (n = 3). S5, S10, and S15 denote summer applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1, respectively; W5, W10, and W15 denote winter applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1, respectively; S5W5, S10W10, and S15W15 denote both seasons applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1 in each season, respectively.
Figure 1. Effect of FYM modes and rates interaction on (a) soil organic C (SOC); (b) Dissolved organic C (DOC); (c) microbial biomass C (MBC); (d) light fraction C (LFC); (e) total N (TN); (f) dissolved organic N (DON); (g) microbial biomass N (MBN); and (h) light fraction N (LFN). Bars with different letters in lowercase are significantly different at p = 0.05 according to LSD. Lines above the bars denote standard deviation (n = 3). S5, S10, and S15 denote summer applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1, respectively; W5, W10, and W15 denote winter applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1, respectively; S5W5, S10W10, and S15W15 denote both seasons applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1 in each season, respectively.
Agronomy 11 02190 g001
Figure 2. Relative increase (%) in soil organic carbon (SOC) status from initial to 45 years of study. Initial SOC value was 4.2 g kg−1; S5, S10, and S15 denote summer applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1, respectively; W5, W10, and W15 denote winter applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1, respectively; S5W5, S10W10, and S15W15 denote both seasons applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1 in each season, respectively.
Figure 2. Relative increase (%) in soil organic carbon (SOC) status from initial to 45 years of study. Initial SOC value was 4.2 g kg−1; S5, S10, and S15 denote summer applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1, respectively; W5, W10, and W15 denote winter applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1, respectively; S5W5, S10W10, and S15W15 denote both seasons applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1 in each season, respectively.
Agronomy 11 02190 g002
Figure 3. Relative increase (%) in soil organic matter pools from initial to 45 years of study. S5, S10, and S15 denote summer applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1, respectively; W5, W10, and W15 denote winter applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1, respectively; S5W5, S10W10, and S15W15 denote both seasons applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1 in each season, respectively.
Figure 3. Relative increase (%) in soil organic matter pools from initial to 45 years of study. S5, S10, and S15 denote summer applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1, respectively; W5, W10, and W15 denote winter applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1, respectively; S5W5, S10W10, and S15W15 denote both seasons applied FYM at 5, 10, and 15 Mg ha−1 in each season, respectively.
Agronomy 11 02190 g003
Table 1. Initial soil organic carbon, labile soil organic carbon pools, total nitrogen and soil organic nitrogen pools during 1967.
Table 1. Initial soil organic carbon, labile soil organic carbon pools, total nitrogen and soil organic nitrogen pools during 1967.
AttributesValues
Soil organic carbon (g kg−1)4.2
Dissolved organic carbon (mg kg−1)75.5
Microbial biomass carbon (mg kg−1)76.3
Light fraction carbon (mg kg−1)328
Total nitrogen (mg kg−1)359
Dissolved organic nitrogen (mg kg−1)6.23
Microbial biomass nitrogen (mg kg−1)10.9
Light fraction nitrogen (mg kg−1)42.9
Table 2. Nutrient composition of farmyard manure applied during 2012.
Table 2. Nutrient composition of farmyard manure applied during 2012.
NutrientContent (%)NutrientContent (mg kg−1)
C39.53Zn57
N1.21Mn28
P0.58Cu239
K0.426Fe2214
S0.16
Table 3. Analysis of variance (F values) on soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), light fraction carbon (LFC), and light fraction nitrogen (LFN).
Table 3. Analysis of variance (F values) on soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), light fraction carbon (LFC), and light fraction nitrogen (LFN).
Source of VariationdfSOCTNDOCDONMBCMBNLFCLFN
Mode (M)261.96 *137.3 *414.3 *482.8 *147.7 *241.4 *224.9 *36.12 *
Rate (R)272.55 *141.6 *437.1 *465.2 *99.13 *99.45 *228.4 *44.25 *
M × R46.34 *6.95 *87.17 *63.90 *7.42 *11.73 *28.60 *4.82 *
Inorganic N (N)126.12 *34.27 *191.8 *156.7 *403.8 *210.8 *34.58 *60.49 *
M × N20.722.501.5711.40 *22.81 *23.77 *0.651.78
R × N20.250.027.68 *14.98 *9.28 *5.89 *0.202.68
M × R × N40.541.64 *3.70 *1.6412.10 *2.271.080.83
* Significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 4. Interaction effects of different FYM modes and rate of application on organic carbon, total nitrogen, and carbon and nitrogen contents of labile soil organic matter pools.
Table 4. Interaction effects of different FYM modes and rate of application on organic carbon, total nitrogen, and carbon and nitrogen contents of labile soil organic matter pools.
FYM ModesFarmyard Manure Application Rate (Mg ha−1)
051015051015
OC a (g kg−1)TN b (mg kg−1)
Summer10.812.114.2105211881309
Winter9.310.812.696711211208
Both seasons11.714.619.1119413661632
LSD (p ≤ 0.05)1.466
DOC c (mg kg−1)DON d (mg kg−1)
Summer15121326824.431.544.4
Winter12917423421.326.033.5
Both seasons18833356228.954.170.1
LSD (p ≤ 0.05)24.142.9
MBC c (mg kg−1)MBN d (mg kg−1)
Summer37247559856.171.286.0
Winter28638252446.257.471.9
Both seasons53471099988.8113.3158.4
LSD (p ≤ 0.05)77.2910.6
LFC c (g kg−1)LFN d (g kg−1)
Summer0.901.091.5269.584.1102.6
Winter0.730.961.2361.074.891.3
Both seasons1.181.602.6183.8106.1154.6
LSD (p ≤ 0.05)0.1516.8
a SOC, soil organic carbon; b TN, total N; c Carbon contents of labile soil organic matter pools viz. DOC (Dissolved organic carbon), MBC (Microbial biomass carbon) and LFC (Light fraction carbon); d Nitrogen contents of labile soil organic matter pools viz. DON (Dissolved organic nitrogen), MBN (Microbial biomass nitrogen) and LFN (Light fraction nitrogen).
Table 5. Interaction effects of different farmyard manure modes of application and inorganic N on carbon and nitrogen contents of labile soil organic matter pools.
Table 5. Interaction effects of different farmyard manure modes of application and inorganic N on carbon and nitrogen contents of labile soil organic matter pools.
FYM ModesInorganic N (kg ha−1)
01200120
DOC a (mg kg−1)DON b (mg kg−1)
Summer19222927.039.8
Winter16419422.231.7
Both seasons34038139.562.6
LSD (p ≤ 0.05)Ns4.30
MBC a (mg kg−1)MBN b (mg kg−1)
Summer41654756.685.6
Winter34544944.872.1
Both seasons64585084.8155.5
LSD (p = 0.05)25.110.39
LFC a (g kg−1)LFN b (g kg−1)
Summer1033131372.796.2
Winter887106067.384.0
Both seasons16851911108.5121.1
LSD (p ≤ 0.05)NsNs
a Labile soil organic matter pools viz. DOC (dissolved organic carbon), MBC (microbial biomass carbon) and LFC (light fraction carbon); b Nitrogen contents of labile soil organic matter pools viz. DON (dissolved organic nitrogen), MBN (microbial biomass nitrogen) and LFN (light fraction nitrogen); Ns: not significant at p = 0.05.
Table 6. Interaction effects of farmyard manure application rates and inorganic N on carbon and nitrogen contents of labile soil organic matter pools.
Table 6. Interaction effects of farmyard manure application rates and inorganic N on carbon and nitrogen contents of labile soil organic matter pools.
FYM DosesInorganic N (kg ha−1)
01200120
DOC a (mg kg−1)DON b (mg kg−1)
0514516721.328.3
1021726329.644.8
1533537537.760.9
LSD (p ≤ 0.05)9.04.3
MBC a (mg kg−1)MBN b (mg kg−1)
0537745246.181.2
1045558962.998.3
1560879198.4133.8
LSD (p ≤ 0.05)2510.4
LFC a (g kg−1)LFN b (g kg−1)
05806106759.983.0
101117132579.495.2
1516831893109.3123.0
LSD (p ≤ 0.05)NsNs
a Labile soil organic matter pools viz. DOC (dissolved organic carbon), MBC (microbial biomass carbon) and LFC (light fraction carbon); b Nitrogen contents of labile soil organic matter pools viz. DON (dissolved organic nitrogen), MBN (microbial biomass nitrogen) and LFN (light fraction nitrogen); Ns: not significant at p = 0.05.
Table 7. Soil organic carbon and labile soil organic carbon pools as influenced by varied FYM modes, rates of application, and inorganic nitrogen after 42 years of experimentation.
Table 7. Soil organic carbon and labile soil organic carbon pools as influenced by varied FYM modes, rates of application, and inorganic nitrogen after 42 years of experimentation.
FYM ApplicationOC (g kg−1)DOC (mg kg−1)MBC (mg kg−1)LFC (mg kg−1)
ModesRates (Mg ha−1)N0N120N0N120N0N120N0N120
S059.9 Aa11.7 Aa140 Gb162 Ha300 Fb442 Fa714 Aa1082 Aa
1011.4 Aa12.8 Aa185.0 Eb240 Ea411 Eb538 Ea1003 Aa1195 Aa
1513.2 Aa15.1 Aa250.0 Cb285 Ca534 Cb662 Ca1382 Aa1664 Aa
W059.2 Aa9.4 Aa124 Hb133 Ia243 Gb328 Ga584 Aa872 Aa
1010.2 Aa11.3 Aa160.0 Fb188 Ga330 Fb433 Fa875 Aa1055 Aa
1511.6 Aa13.5 Aa208.0 Db260 Da462 Db542 Da1202 Aa1253 Aa
B0511.0 Aa12.4 Aa170.0 Fb205 Fa482 Db585 Da1120 Aa1246 Aa
1014.1 Aa15.1 Aa305.0 Bb360 Ba624 Bb795 Ba1473 Aa1724 Aa
1518.7 Aa19.5 Aa546.0 Ab578 Aa829 Ab1116 Aa2464 Aa2763 Aa
Control4.66.18510585134370370
S, summer; W, winter; B, both seasons; N0, no inorganic N; N120, 120 kg N ha−1; OC, organic carbon; DOC (dissolved organic carbon), MBC (microbial biomass carbon), LFC (light fraction carbon); means in columns within each N rate with the same upper case letters are not significantly different according to least-square means for FYM rates and modes and inorganic N interactions adjusted for multiple comparisons at p = 0.05; means in rows with each FYM modes and rates with the same lower case letters are not significantly different according to least-square means for FYM doses and modes and inorganic N interactions adjusted for multiple comparisons at p = 0.05.
Table 8. Soil organic nitrogen and soil organic nitrogen pools as influenced by FYM modes, doses, and inorganic nitrogen after 35 years of application.
Table 8. Soil organic nitrogen and soil organic nitrogen pools as influenced by FYM modes, doses, and inorganic nitrogen after 35 years of application.
FYM ApplicationTN (mg kg−1)DON (mg kg−1)MBN (mg kg−1)LFN (mg kg−1)
ModesRates (Mg ha−1)N0N120N0N120N0N120N0N120
S05979 Eb1124 Ea22.0 Aa26.7 Aa43.1 Aa69.1 Aa54.0 Aa84.8 Aa
101143 Da1233 Da25.1 Aa37.9 Aa59.6 Aa82.8 Aa71.5 Aa90.7 Aa
151283 Ba1334 Ca33.8 Aa54.9 Aa67.0 Aa105.1 Aa92.5 Aa113.0 Aa
W05923 Fa1010 Fa18.1 Aa24.5 Aa31.0 Aa61.3 Aa48.1 Aa73.9 Aa
101102 Eb1140 Da21.6 Aa30.3 Aa47.1 Aa67.7 Aa67.3 Aa82.2 Aa
151192 Ba1224 Ca26.8 Aa40.2 Aa56.3 Aa87.4 Aa86.6 Aa96.0 Aa
B051162 Ca1194 Da23.9 Aa33.8 Aa64.3 Aa113.3 Aa77.2 Aa90.4 Aa
101279 Bb1453 Ba42.0 Aa66.2 Aa82.1 Aa144.6 Aa99.3 Aa112.8 Aa
151532 Ab1732 Aa52.5 Aa87.7 Aa108.1 Aa208.8 Aa149.1 Aa160.0 Aa
Control 4026856.914.612.125.34968
S, summer; W, winter; B, both seasons; N0, no inorganic N; N120, 120 kg N ha−1; TN, total N; DON (dissolved organic nitrogen); MBN (microbial biomass nitrogen); LFN (light fraction nitrogen); means in columns within each N rate with the same uppercase letters are not significantly different according to least-square means for FYM rates and modes and inorganic N interactions adjusted for multiple comparisons at p ≤ 0.05; means in rows with each FYM modes and rates with the same lower case letters are not significantly different according to least-square means for FYM doses and modes and inorganic N interactions adjusted for multiple comparisons at p ≤ 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Laik, R.; Kumara, B.H.; Pramanick, B.; Singh, S.K.; Nidhi; Alhomrani, M.; Gaber, A.; Hossain, A. Labile Soil Organic Matter Pools Are Influenced by 45 Years of Applied Farmyard Manure and Mineral Nitrogen in the Wheat—Pearl Millet Cropping System in the Sub-Tropical Condition. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2190. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112190

AMA Style

Laik R, Kumara BH, Pramanick B, Singh SK, Nidhi, Alhomrani M, Gaber A, Hossain A. Labile Soil Organic Matter Pools Are Influenced by 45 Years of Applied Farmyard Manure and Mineral Nitrogen in the Wheat—Pearl Millet Cropping System in the Sub-Tropical Condition. Agronomy. 2021; 11(11):2190. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Laik, Ranjan, B. H. Kumara, Biswajit Pramanick, Santosh Kumar Singh, Nidhi, Majid Alhomrani, Ahmed Gaber, and Akbar Hossain. 2021. "Labile Soil Organic Matter Pools Are Influenced by 45 Years of Applied Farmyard Manure and Mineral Nitrogen in the Wheat—Pearl Millet Cropping System in the Sub-Tropical Condition" Agronomy 11, no. 11: 2190. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop