Influence of Sowing Time on Yield and Yield Components of Spring Rapeseed in Lithuania
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. General Experimental Conditions
2.2. Experimental Design
2.3. Agrotechnologies of the Experiment
2.4. Meteorological Conditions
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Soil Temperature and Moisture during the Sowing
3.2. Germination Energy and Germination of Spring Rapeseed Sown at Different Times
3.3. Number of Pods on the Plant
3.4. Number of Seeds in One Pod
3.5. 1000-Seed Weight
3.6. Spring Rapeseed Yield
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- UFOP. Report on Global Market Supply 2017/2018; Union Zur Forderung Von Oel-Und Proteinpflanzen e. V.: Berlin, Germany, 2016; p. 29. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, S.; Bishoni, U.R.; Cebert, E. Imapct of Rotation on Yield and Economic Performance of Summer Crops—Winter Canola Cropping Systems. Am.-Eurasian J. Sustain. Agric. 2007, 1, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, W.; Shah, F.; Duncan, R.W.; Ma, B.L. Grain yield, root growth habit and lodging of eight oilseed rape genotypes in response to a short period of heat stress during flowering. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2020, 287, 107954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agahi, K.; Ahmadi, J.; Oghan, H.A.; Fotokian, M.H.; Orang, S.F. Analysis of genotype × environment interaction for seed yield in spring oilseed rape using the AMMI model. Crop Breed. Appl. Biot. 2020, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marjanović Jeromela, A.; Nagl, N.; Gvozdanovi–Varga, J.; Hristov, N.; Kondi-Špika, A.; Marinkovi, M. Genotype by environment interaction for seed yield per plant in rapeseed using AMMI model. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2011, 46, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zali, H.; Sofalian, O.; Hasanloo, T.; Asghari, A. AMMI and GGE Biplot Analysis of Yield Stability and Drought Tolerance in Brassica napus L. Agric. Commun. 2016, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Nowosad, K.; Liersch, A.; Popławska, W.; Bocianowski, J. Genotype by environment interaction for seed yield in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model. Euphytica 2016, 208, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šiaudinis, G.; Lazauskas, S. Azoto ir sieros trąšų įtaka vasarinių rapsų augimui ir derliui. Zemdirbyste 2009, 96, 71–81. [Google Scholar]
- Robertson, M.J.; Holland, J.F.; Bambach, R. Response of canola and Indian mustard to sowing date in the grain belt of north-eastern Australia. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2004, 44, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hocking, P.J.; Stapper, M. Effect of sowing time and nitrogen fertilizer on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertilizer on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield, and yield components. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2001, 52, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chapagain, T.; Good, A. Yield and production gaps in rainfed wheat, barley, and canola in Alberta. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Madani, H.; Reza, M.; Javanmard, H.R.; Rezaea, A. Effect of sowing date and application time of nitrogen fertilizer on agronomical traits of spring rapeseed in Iran cold regions. In Proceedings of the 13th International Rapeseed Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 5–9 June 2011; Volume 2, pp. 814–817. [Google Scholar]
- Khayat, M. Measuring yield and its components of canola genotypes in different planting date. JLS 2015, 5, 48–55. [Google Scholar]
- Velička, R. Rapsai; Lututė: Kaunas, Lithuania, 2002; pp. 26–86. [Google Scholar]
- Takashima, N.E.; Rondanini, D.; Puhl, L.; Miralles, D. Environmental factors affecting yield variability in spring and winter rapseed genotypes cultivated in the southeastern Argentine Pampas. Eur. J. Agron. 2013, 48, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Booth, E.J.; Gunstone, F.D. Rapeseeds and rapeseed oil: Agronomy, production, and trade. In Rapeseed and Canola Oil Production, Processing, Properties and Uses; Gunstone, F.D., Ed.; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Barczak, B.; Skinder, Z.; Piotrowsk, R. Sulphur as a factor that affects nitrogen effectiveness in spring rapeseed agrotechnicspart ii. Yield of seeds and protein. Acta Sci. Pol. Agric. 2016, 15, 3–14. [Google Scholar]
- Morrison, M.J.; Gutknecht, A.; Chan, J.; Miller, S. Characterising canola pollen germination across a temperature gradient. Crop Pasture Sci. 2016, 67, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, B.L.; Biswas, D.K.; Herath, A.W.; Whalen, J.K.; Ruan, S.Q.; Caldwell, C.; Earl, H.; Vanasse, A.; Scott, P.; Smith, D.L. Growth, yield and yield components of canola as affected by nitrogen, sulphur and boron fertilization. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2015, 178, 658–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, A.; Tripathi, D.K.; Chauhan, D.K.; Kumar, N.; Singh, G.S. Paradigms of climate change impacts on some major food sources of the world: A review on current knowledge and future prospects. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 216, 356–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, B.L.; Zhao, H.; Zheng, Z.M.; Caldwell, C.; Mills, A.; Earl, H.; Vanasse, A.; Scott, P.; Smith, D.L. Optimizing seeding dates and rates for canola production in the humid eastern Canadian agroecosystems. Agron. J. 2016, 108, 1869–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, B.L.; Herath, A. Timing and rates of nitrogen fertilizer application on seed yield, quality and nitrogen–use efficiency of canola. Crop Pasture Sci. 2016, 67, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.; Ma, B.L.; Whalen, J.K. Enhancing rapeseed tolerance to heat and drought stresses in a changing climate: Potential of root system architecture to mitigate abiotic stressors. Adv. Agron. 2018, 151, 87–159. [Google Scholar]
- Sadowski, C.; Dakowska, S.; Lukanowski, A.; Jedryczka, M. Occurrence of fungal diseases on spring rape in Poland. Integr. Control Oilseed Crop. IOBC/Wprs Bull. 2002, 25, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Hall, A.J.; Richards, R.A. Prognosis for genetic improvement of yield potential and water-limited yield of major grain crops. Field Crop. Res. 2013, 143, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Villalobos, F.J.; Orgaz, F.; Fereres, E. Sowing and planting. In Principles of Agronomy for Sustainable Agriculture; Villalobos, F.J., Fereres, E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin, Germany, 2016; pp. 217–227. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Berger, J.D.; Milroy, S.P. Genotype×environment interaction studies highlight the role of phenology in specific adaptation of canola (Brassica napus L.) to contrasting Mediterranean climates. Field Crops Res. 2013, 144, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozer, H. Sowing date and nitrogen rate effects on growth, yield and yield components of two summer rapeseed cultivars. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 19, 453–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer, T.; Edmeades, G.O. Breeding and cereal yield progress. Crop Sci. 2010, 50, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Velička, R.; Marcinkevičienė, A.; Pupalienė, R.; Butkevičienė, L.M.; Kosteckas, R.; Čekanauskas, S.; Kriaučiūnienė, Z. Winter oilseed rape and weed competition in organic farming using non-chemical weed control. Zemdirbyste 2016, 103, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Universal Lithuanian Encyclopedia. Science and Encyclopedia Publishing Center, Vilnius, Lithuania. Available online: https://www.vle.lt/straipsnis/dirvos-branda/ (accessed on 7 October 2021).
- Dirsė, A.; Taparauskienė, L. Fluctuations in plant vegetation periods and a comparison of its assessment methods. Agric. Sci. 2010, 17, 9–17. [Google Scholar]
- Raudonius, S. Application of statistics in plant and crop research: Important issues. Zemdirbyste 2017, 104, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tarakanovas, P.; Raudonius, S. Statistical Analysis of Agronomic Research Data Using Computer Programs ANOVA, STAT, SPLIT-PLOT from the Package SELEKCIJA and IRRISTAT; Academy Press: Kaunas, Lithuania, 2003; p. 58. [Google Scholar]
- Keogh, B.; Mcgrath, T.; Grant, J. The effect of sowing date and nitrogen on the dry-matter yield and nitrogen content of forage rape (Brassica napus L.) and stubble turnips (Brassica rapa L.) in Ireland. Grass Forage Sci. 2011, 67, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valiukas, D. Sausrų ir Sausų Laikotarpių Lietuvoje Analizė. Ph.D. Thesis, Vilniaus Universitetas, Vilnius, Lithuania, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Alizadeh, M.R.; Allameh, A. Soil properties and crop yield under different tillage methods for rapeseed cultivation in paddy fields. J. Agric. Sci. Belgrade 2015, 60, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kirkegaard, J.A.; Lilley, J.M.; Brill, R.D.; Ware, A.H.; Walela, C.K. The critical period for yield and quality determination in canola (Brassica napus L.). Field Crop. Res. 2018, 222, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labra, M.H.; Struik, P.C.; Evers, J.B.; Calderini, D.F. Plasticity of seed weight compensates reductions in seed number of oilseed rape in response to shading at flowering. Eur. J. Agron. 2017, 84, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weymann, W.; Böttcher, U.; Sieling, K.; Kage, H. Effects of weather conditions during different growth phases on yield formation of winter oilseed rape. Field Crop. Res. 2015, 173, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khairunniza-Bejo, S.; Mustaffha, S.; Ishak, W.; Ismail, W. Application of artificial neural network in predicting crop yield. A review. J. Food Eng. 2014, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Niedbała, G. Simple model based on artificial neural network for early prediction and simulation winter rapeseed yield. J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mckenzie, R.H.; Bremer, E.; Middleton, A.B.; Pfiffner, P.G.; Woods, S.A. Optimum seeding date and rate for irrigated cereal and oilseed crops in southern Alberta. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2011, 91, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuai, J.; Yang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, G.; Zuo, Q.; Wu, J.; Ling, X. Paclobutrazol increases canola seed yield by enhancing lodging andpod shatter resistance in Brassica napus L. Field Crop. Res. 2015, 180, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Ghatty, S.; Satyanarayana, J.; Guha, A.; Chaitanya, B.; Reddy, A.R. Paclobutrazol treatment as a potential strategy for higher seed and oil yield in field-grown Ccamelina sativa L. Crantz. BMC Res. 2012, 5, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kirkegaard, J.A.; Lilley, J.M.; Brill, R.D.; Sprague, S.J.; Fettell, N.A.; Pengilley, G.C. Re-evaluating sowing time of spring canola (Brassica napus L.) in south-eastern Australia—How early is too early? Crop Pasture Sci. 2016, 67, 381–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Treatment | Date | |
---|---|---|
2018 | 2019 | |
1 | 20 April | 5 April |
2 | 27 April | 12 April |
3 | 4 May | 19 April |
4 | 11 May | 26 April |
5 | 18 May | 3 May |
6 | 25 May | 10 May |
7 | 1 June | 17 May |
8 | 8 June | 24 May |
9 | 31 May | |
10 | 7 June |
Sowing Time | Soil Moisture during Sowing (%) | Soil T during Sowing (°C) | Mean Soil T in the 3 D before Sowing * (°C) | Mean Air T in the 3 D before Sowing * (°C) | Cumulative Precipitation in the 3 Days before and 3 D after Sowing * (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | |||||
20 April | 23.7abc | 17.8f | 12.5 | 11.4 | 5.8 |
27 April | 24.5abc | 12.7g | 10.6 | 10.0 | 11 |
4 May | 26.1a | 25.3cd | 21.5 | 16.6 | 1.5 |
11 May | 22.5bc | 23.6e | 23.5 | 18.6 | 0 |
18 May | 22.8bc | 24.8d | 19.6 | 16.0 | 14.3 |
25 May | 21.2d | 28.9a | 21.9 | 16.5 | 0.7 |
1 June | 22.0cd | 26.2bc | 29.9 | 22.0 | 25.1 |
8 June | 19.7d | 26.8b | 18.0 | 12.8 | 0.4 |
2019 | |||||
5 April | 20.9abc | 10.7g | 6.3 | 5.6 | 0.6 |
12 April | 20.0cd | 7.9h | 3.0 | 2.5 | 0 |
19 April | 22.4ab | 15.7e | 10.7 | 9.7 | 0 |
26 April | 21.4abc | 19.7c | 14.0 | 14.0 | 0 |
3 May | 19.9cd | 14.1e | 12.7 | 11.2 | 1.7 |
10 May | 16.5e | 25.2b | 11.0 | 8.9 | 4.5 |
17 May | 19.4cd | 17.7d | 12.3 | 11.5 | 0.5 |
24 May | 19.8cd | 24.8b | 23.0 | 20.0 | 0.6 |
31 May | 23.8a | 17.3d | 15.3 | 14.3 | 18.7 |
7 June | 18.5de | 26.7a | 24.3 | 21.6 | 0 |
Field Emergence of Spring Rapeseed Crop after 3 Days | |
---|---|
2018 | |
Average air temperature (during 3 days before sowing), °C | r = 0.95; y = −99.6 + 8.11x − 0.09x2; p < 0.01 |
Average soil temperature (during 3 days before sowing), °C | r = 0.98; y = −42.9 + 4.69x − 0.04x2; p < 0.01 |
Amount of precipitation (during 3 days before and after sowing), mm | r = 0.96; y = −72.77 + 7.95x − 0.73x2 + 0.02x3; p < 0.01 |
2019 | |
Soil temperature during sowing, °C | r = 0.98; y = −72.77 + 7.95x − 0.73x2 + 0.02x3; p < 0.05 |
Sowing Time | Rapeseed Biometric Characteristics | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Pods | Number of Seeds in One Pod | 1000-Seed Weight (g) | ||||
First-Row Branches | Second-Row Branches | Third-Row Branches | On Average on the Whole Plant | |||
2018 | ||||||
20 April | 33.1bc | 0.6d | - | 61.8b | 22.8a | 3.89b |
27 April | 21.2bc | 1.0d | - | 39.8c | 24.0a | 3.95b |
4 May | 18.0c | 1.1d | - | 35.5c | 20.8a | 3.87b |
11 May | 16.9c | 3.18d | - | 34.6c | 21.5a | 3.98b |
18 May | 36.5b | 11.3bc | - | 60.9b | 21.5a | 3.97b |
25 May | 35.7b | 10.2bcd | - | 61.1b | 21.3a | 4.29a |
1 June | 78.0a | 39.4a | - | 136.7a | 22.1a | 3.64b |
8 June | 35.4b | 4.10cd | - | 56.6bc | 21.0a | 3.14c |
2019 | ||||||
5 April | 23.6bc | 20.0a | 8.71a | 57.1b | 17.0cd | 4.58a |
12 April | 26.5b | 22.2a | 4.99b | 59.0b | 18.4bc | 4.08b |
19 April | 24.0bc | 17.5ab | 1.96bc | 49.2bc | 21.4a | 4.11b |
26 April | 33.8b | 11.9b | 0.75c | 59.7b | 20.1ab | 4.31ab |
3 May | 21.6bc | 2.4d | 0.25c | 32.7c | 19.1b | 4.31ab |
10 May | 29.7b | 22.5a | 3.08c | 60.6b | 15.4d | 4.13b |
17 May | 16.1c | 9.3b | 0.01c | 30.9c | 16.0d | 3.95bc |
24 May | 20.2bc | 5.3cd | 0.13c | 34.9c | 16.3d | 3.59cd |
31 May | 32.0b | 7.4cd | 0.17c | 54.1bc | 16.2d | 3.45d |
7 June | 53.8a | 12.7b | 0.92c | 83.4a | 20.2ab | 2.49e |
1000-Seed Weight | |
---|---|
2018 | |
Average number of pods per plant, units | r = 0.98; y = 0.3 + 0.078x; p < 0.01 |
Crop density, seedlings m−2 | r = −0.77; y = 14.17y − 0.12x; p < 0.05 |
2019 | |
Average number of pods per plant, units | r = 0.79; y = 1.304 + 0.123x − 0.001x2; p < 0.05 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Butkevičienė, L.M.; Kriaučiūnienė, Z.; Pupalienė, R.; Velička, R.; Kosteckienė, S.; Kosteckas, R.; Klimas, E. Influence of Sowing Time on Yield and Yield Components of Spring Rapeseed in Lithuania. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2170. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112170
Butkevičienė LM, Kriaučiūnienė Z, Pupalienė R, Velička R, Kosteckienė S, Kosteckas R, Klimas E. Influence of Sowing Time on Yield and Yield Components of Spring Rapeseed in Lithuania. Agronomy. 2021; 11(11):2170. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112170
Chicago/Turabian StyleButkevičienė, Lina Marija, Zita Kriaučiūnienė, Rita Pupalienė, Rimantas Velička, Silvija Kosteckienė, Robertas Kosteckas, and Evaldas Klimas. 2021. "Influence of Sowing Time on Yield and Yield Components of Spring Rapeseed in Lithuania" Agronomy 11, no. 11: 2170. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112170