Next Article in Journal
Marketing Farmers’ Varieties in Europe: Encouraging Pathways with Missing Links for the Recognition and Support of Farmer Seed Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Response of Crops to Conservation Tillage and Nitrogen Fertilization under Different Agroecological Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Application of High Pressures in the Postharvest Conservation of Broccoli

by
Emmanuel M. Pereira
1,2,3,
Anderson S. Formiga
3,
José S. Pinzetta Junior
3,
Isabela N. F. Cordeiro
3,4,
Karollayne T. E. F. Oliveira
3,
Mônica Tejo Cavalcanti
1,5 and
Ben-Hur Mattiuz
6,*
1
National Semiarid Institute, Campina Grande 10067-000, Brazil
2
Center for Human, Social and Agrarian Sciences, Department of Agriculture, Federal University of Paraíba, Bananeiras 58220-000, Brazil
3
School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Department of Technology, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14884-900, Brazil
4
Federal Institute of Maranhão, Campus Codó, Codó 65400-000, Brazil
5
Center for Agro-Food Science and Technology, Federal University of Campina Grande, R. Jairo Vieira Feitosa, 1770, Pombal 58840-000, Brazil
6
Institute of Biosciences, Department of General and Applied Biology, São Paulo State University, Av. 24A 1515, Rio Claro 13506-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(11), 2157; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112157
Submission received: 14 September 2021 / Revised: 24 October 2021 / Accepted: 25 October 2021 / Published: 27 October 2021

Abstract

:
Broccoli is a vegetable of high nutritional value, rich in bioactive compounds, but has a fast degradation after harvest. This work assesses the effect of hyperbaric pressure, at room temperature, on postharvest conservation of broccoli. The broccoli samples were subjected to the five hyperbaric pressures (100 control, 200, 400, 600, and 800 kPa) during three different times (1, 2, and 3 days), at 22 °C and 95% RH. The pressures of 400, 600, and 800 kPa provided the best conservation of broccoli quality. Respiratory rate, ethylene production, soluble solids content, and lipid peroxidation decreased at the highest-pressure treatments. Moreover, the highest pressures maintained fresh mass, green color, ascorbic acid content, and receptacle firmness. The hyperbaric treatments of 600 and 800 kPa increased catalase enzymatic activity and reduced peroxidase activity as a result of the reduction of oxidative stress, delaying the senescence of broccoli.

1. Introduction

Vegetable production increases by around 5 million tonnes per year [1]. The population’s search for a healthy life may be the leading cause of this growth. Among these vegetables, broccoli has stood out because of its high nutritional value and nutraceutical properties, such as high levels of beta-carotene, vitamin C, selenium, fiber, lutein, zeaxanthin, vitamin K, folic acid, and minerals such as calcium, potassium, phosphorus [2,3,4].
Broccoli has high perishability, with a shelf life of only two days at room temperature [5]. This rapid senescence is due to the high production of ethylene and respiratory rates, requiring refrigeration to prolong the shelf life of this vegetable, making the production process more expensive.
Recent studies have shown the benefits of using hyperbaric pressures to retard the physiological mechanisms of maturation and senescence in vegetables. Hyperbaric pressure delayed maturation in tomatoes, as evidenced by the reduction in respiratory rate and maintenance of color and firmness [6,7,8]. Tomatoes submitted to pressures of 600 and 800 kPa at room temperature showed biochemical changes, such as the increased catalase activity and decrease in peroxidase [9].
The application of pressure treatment at room temperature can induce positive effects on the physiological activity of the vegetables in a similar way to refrigerated storage [7,8,10,11]. Since pressurizing uses only 3% of the energy required in the refrigeration, this technique allows for energy savings. The economy that occurs due to the pressurizing does not have to be instantaneous, and it takes little energy to maintain the pressure throughout the storage [8].
In this sense, this work aims to evaluate the effect of the application of hyperbaric pressures at room temperature on the postharvest quality of broccoli ‘Legacy’.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Vegetable Material

The broccoli ‘Legacy’ were obtained in commercial crops of Taiúva county (21°7′24.87″ S, 48°27′8.83″ W, 634 m altitude), São Paulo, Brazil.
The inflorescences were harvested at commercial maturation stage (about 80 days after sowing, in the winter of 2018) and transported to the laboratory in 30 min. The sampling was homogenized by choosing inflorescences with similar shape and color, mean weight of 630 ± 60 g, and absence of diseases. All inflorescences were sanitized in a solution of Sodium Dichloro-s-triazinetrione Dihydrate (Sumaveg®, Diversey, Socorro, SP, Brazil) at 200 mg L−1 for five minutes and allowed to dry in a cold room at 22 °C for 2–4 h at the place where the treatments were applied.

2.2. Hyperbaric System

The experiments were performed in a hyperbaric system as described by Inestroza-Lizardo [9].
The system comprised five steel chambers with 10.75 L each, interconnected to a closed circuit through which a constant flow of compressed air circulated, keeping constant the partial pressures of oxygen (21 kPa) and nitrogen (78 kPa). The previous passage of air adsorbed the CO2 into a chamber containing calcium oxide.
The treatment chambers are equipped with a pressure regulator at the input and needle valve at the output of each vessel to regulate air pressure and airflow, respectively, in addition to a safety valve. The system was connected to a 250 L air compressor (Schulz, model MSV 20 MAX, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil) that supplied compressed air. The air flow was measured using a flowmeter in a range of 5–2000 mL min−1 (Bronkhorst™, Ruurlo, The Netherlands). The CO2 concentration was measured in an infrared gas analyzer (Guardian® Plus, Edinburgh Sensor’s, Livingston, UK). The flowmeter and CO2 analyzer were connected to the acquisition and control card (PersonnelDAQ 3000, Cleveland, OH, USA) and a computer. Pressure, airflow rate, and CO2 level were recorded using DasyLab® software (Measurement Computing Corporation, Norton, MA, USA).

2.3. Experimental Procedure

Each replicate of the experiment comprised twelve inflorescences, two of which were used to characterize the initial quality (day 0) (Table 1) and ten were distributed in the five chambers of the system (two inflorescences per chamber). Then, the chambers were closed and pressurized at 100 (control), 200, 400, 600, and 800 kPa for periods of 1, 2, and 3 days. Data loggers (HOBO Prov2 U-23-001, Onset Corporation, Bourne, MA, USA) monitored temperature (22 ± 1 °C) and relative air humidity (95 ± 2.0%) within the chambers every 30 min. At the end of each treatment period, the chambers were automatically depressurized for two hours. The inflorescences were removed from the chambers and evaluated.

2.4. Physical, Metabolic, and Chemical Analyses

The weight loss was calculated by the difference between initial and final inflorescence weight divided by the initial weight. The samples were weighed on an electronic scale with a measuring range of 50–6000 g ± 2 g (BP6, Filizola, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). We expressed the result as a g kg−1.
The color index (CI) included the luminosity parameters L*, a*, and b* (Minolta CR-400 colorimeter, Konica Minolta, New Jersey, NJ, USA) [12]. Readings were taken in five points on each inflorescence, and the CI was calculated using Equation (1):
CI = (100 × a*)/(L* × b*)
The firmness was measured using a digital penetrometer with 8 mm tip (5–200 N ± 1 N, Impac, IP-90DI, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) and evaluated at the base of the receptacle (receptacle firmness). The results were expressed in Newton (N).
The respiratory rate (RR), CO2 concentration, was measured using an infrared gas analyzer (Guardian®Plus, Edinburgh Sensors, Livingston, UK) connected to a data acquisition and control card (Personnel DAQ 3000, Cleveland, OH, USA) and a laptop computer. CO2 levels were recorded using DasyLab®software (Measurement Computing Corporation, Norton, MA, USA) throughout the experiment and calculated automatically in real time during the whole trial, according to Equation (2) [13]:
RR = (ΔCO2 × Q)/W
where ΔCO2 is the difference between the concentration of CO2 at the inlet and outlet of chambers, Q is the air flow rate, and W is the mass of broccoli. The results were expressed in mg CO2 kg−1 h−1.
The inflorescences were stored in 5 L sealed containers to estimate ethylene production. After one hour, 200 μL of the gas inside containers (headspace) was collected by a silicone septum with the aid of a gas chromatography syringe (SGE, Analytical Science, Ringwood, VIC, Australia). The samples were injected in a gas chromatograph (Trace GC Ultra, Thermo Scientific, Whaltham, MA, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID), and a Porapack N capillary column (2 m in length) and set at 80 °C, with hydrogen as carrier gas (35 mL min−1). The operating temperatures were 110 °C in the column, 250 °C in the detector, and 200 °C in the injector. Ethylene production was measured after removal of inflorescence from the chambers and was expressed in μg kg−1 s−1.
Soluble solids (SS), titratable acidity (TA), and ascorbic acid (AA) were determined according to AOC methodology [14]. The results were expressed as the percentage of SS, percentage of citric acid, and mg of ascorbic acid mg kg−1.
Peroxidation of lipids was measured according to Heath and Packer [15]. Samples were frozen in liquid N2, macerated, combined with 4 mL of TCA buffer (1% w/v), homogenized, and centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000× g at 4 °C (Biofuge Stratos model, Heraeus, Hanau, Germany). A 1 mL aliquot was pipetted from the supernatant and transferred to a test tube, adding 3 mL of thiobarbituric acid at 0.5% (w/v), TCA at 20% (w/v), and incubating in a water bath at 95 °C for 60 min. Subsequently, the tubes were held for 10 min in an ice bath to interrupt the reaction. The samples were then centrifuged again for 10 min at 10,000 × g. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured using a UV VIS spectrophotometer (Femto 700 plus, São Paulo-SP, Brazil) at 535 nm and 600 nm. We expressed the results as the malondialdehyde content (MDA) per mmol kg−1.
The total antioxidant activity was estimated by the DPPH method according to Brand-Williams et al. [16]. The results were expressed in mmol kg−1.
Catalase activity (CAT) (EC 1.11.1.6) was determined by the method of Kar and Mishra [17] with adaptations. We obtained the reaction combining 150 μL of sample in a potassium phosphate buffer + EDTA + DTT + PVPP at 100 mmol L−1 (pH 7.5). A total of 1950 μL of potassium phosphate buffer at 100 mmol L−1(pH 7.5) was used as the determination buffer, 150 μL of potassium phosphate buffer + EDTA + DTT + PVPP at 100 mmol L−1 (pH 7.5) as the extraction buffer, and 750 μl of hydrogen peroxide solution at 50 mM as the enzymatic substrate. The readings were performed in a UV VIS spectrophotometer (Femto, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) at 240 nm absorbance. We expressed the specific activity of CAT as U kg−1 protein.
The activity of peroxidases (POD) (EC 1.11.1.7) was measured according to Lima et al. [18]. The reaction system comprised 1 mL of enzyme extract with 0.5 mL of 30% hydrogen peroxide in potassium phosphate buffer at 0.2 M (pH 6.7) and 0.5 mL of phenol and aminoantipyrine solution. The solution was immersed in a water bath at 30 °C for 5 min. Absolute ethyl alcohol (2 mL) was added to stop the reaction, and we assessed the absorbance in a UV VIS spectrophotometer at 505 nm. We express the specific activity of POD as U kg−1 protein.
For the calculation of the specific activity of CAT and POD, the total soluble protein content was measured using the Bradford method [19].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

We applied a randomized block design in a factorial scheme (5 pressures × 3 exposure times). The data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey tests, with 99% probability (p < 0.01), using AgroEstat software version 2014 [20]. When significant differences were found, we performed regression analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Physicochemical Analyzes

Weight Loss, Firmness, Color Index (CI), Soluble Solids (SS), Titratable Acidity (TA), Ascorbic Acid Content (AA)

The alteration in atmospheric pressure around the vegetable reduced the weight loss (WL) of broccoli ‘Legacy’ effectively. The higher the pressure, the lower the weight loss at all exposure times (1, 2, and 3 days) (Figure 1A). The inflorescences subjected to 100 kPa had the highest WL, and the longer the exposure time, the larger the WL. After three days of treatment, broccoli at 100 kPa lost 3% mass, while those under 800 kPa lost only 1.2%.
The increase in pressure promoted the maintenance of firmness (Figure 1B). The pressure of 800 kPa for one day maintained the firmness of the broccoli in 12.2 N, very close to the initial value of 13.3 N (Table 1) and higher than the control (9.5 N). Control broccoli had an average reduction of 11.4% in firmness compared to the initial values, but firmness values increased over the three days of storage. The high mass loss suffered by the broccoli that remained for three days in the chambers may have increased elasticity and resistance of tissues against the tip of the penetrometer.
In general, the color index (CI) increased with time of exposure to pressure, turning the broccoli yellowish (Figure 1C), which may be attributed to at least three factors: (1) the degradation of chlorophylls by the enzyme chlorophyllase; (2) change in pH, following the change in titratable acidity (TA) and oxidation; and (3) ethylene production (Figure 1C).
The SS content decreased with increasing pressures, with the mean of the control being 20% higher than the inflorescences submitted to 800 kPa pressure (Figure 1D). The SS reduction was also observed in tomatoes subjected to 800 kPa pressure for six days [6]. On the other hand, the SS content in ‘Italy’ broccoli stored in different types of packages increases during the storage period [21]. Thus, the application of pressure probably improved the conservation of the vegetables, indicating a delay in senescence.
The TA contents ranged from 0.14 to 0.26 g kg−1 (Figure 1E). The hyperbaric pressure improved organic acids preservation in broccoli compared to control inflorescences. The pressure of 800 kPa at three days of storage provided the highest levels of TA. The effect of hyperbaric atmospheres on the increase in TA also occurs in fruits, as in mangoes, for example [22].
TA values of plants also depend on genetic, agronomic, climatic, and postharvest factors. For example, broccoli ‘Italia’ has higher TA values than those found in this study, reaching 0.53 to 0.77 g kg−1 of pulp [21]. This divergence may be attributed to cropping conditions [23].
The AA content of control broccoli was reduced by 27% compared to the initial value (99.6 mg kg−1, Figure 1F, Table 1). The 800 kPa treatment maintained the highest AA levels (94 mg kg−1) regardless of the pressure time.

3.2. Physiological Phenomena

Production of Ethylene and Respiratory Rate

The increase in atmospheric pressure around broccoli effectively reduced the respiratory rate of broccoli ‘Legacy’ (Figure 2A). Broccoli submitted to hyperbaric pressures for three days had an average respiratory rate of 11 mg CO2 kg−1 h−1, while broccoli at 100 kPa presented respiratory rates of 13.5 mg CO2 kg−1 h−1 (Figure 3).
The production of ethylene in broccoli increased as a function of time of exposure to pressures, showing a quadratic relation. Increased pressure maintained ethylene production at low levels (Figure 2B). Broccoli submitted to pressures of 600 and 800 kPa for one day presented ethylene production about 16% lower than the control and very close to the initial values (5.2 mg kg−1 s−1). After three days, control broccoli produced even more ethylene, and the difference for the best treatment (800 kPa) increased to 33.6% (Figure 1C).

3.3. Biochemical Analyses

Lipid Peroxidation, Total Antioxidant Activity (TAA), Activity of the CAT, and Activity of the POD

The maintenance of the AA contents under high pressures agrees with the increase in lipid peroxidation (Figure 3A), since the control presented the highest values of MDA regardless of the pressure period, with an average increment of 28% compared to the pressure of 800 kPa (12.5 mmol kg−1).
The content of TAA increased with the applied pressure, regardless of the period of exposure (Figure 3B). TAA values ranged from 0.30 to 0.38 μmol TEAC 100 g−1 FW on one day of exposure to pressure, 0.37 to 0.43 on two days, and from 0.25 to 0.32 on three days (Figure 3B).
The hyperbaric pressure significantly influenced the activity of the CAT and POD enzymes of broccoli (p < 0.01; Figure 3C,D).

4. Discussion

4.1. Physicochemical Analyses

Weight Loss, Firmness, Color Index (CI), Soluble Solids (SS), Titratable Acidity (TA), Ascorbic Acid Content (AA)

The alteration of atmospheric pressure is a leading factor influencing the vapor pressure in the environment [6]. The difference between the vapor pressure of water in intercellular spaces of plant tissue and the surrounding air controls the rate of water loss in fresh vegetables. Thus, decreasing the difference in vapor pressure between vegetable and ambient air reduces water loss from plant tissue [24]. Such a process explains the higher mass losses in the broccoli under control treatment (100 kPa). This effect also occurs in other fruits and vegetables when submitted to high pressures [6,9,25,26].
The maintenance of firmness in fruits and vegetables depends on factors such as tissue turgor and cell wall degradation [27], which influence the weight loss in vegetables. Our data suggest that the difference in the firmness of broccoli relates to the weight loss because the broccoli with greater firmness presented a smaller loss of mass (Figure 1A). This correlation also occurs in several other vegetables, for example, the ‘Debora’ tomato [6] and lettuces [26].
Broccoli with firmness around 13.8 N are suitable for commercialization, as they maintain the visual characteristic of turgidity [21]. Thus, we can conclude that the broccoli stored under the pressures of 400, 600, and 800 kPa presented adequate firmness for commercialization until the third day of storage at 22 °C (Figure 1B).
The pressures of 400, 600, and 800 kPa preserved the green color of inflorescences, showing a lower color index than the inflorescences submitted to the pressures of 100 and 200 kPa (Figure 1C). The relationship between CI and TA was inversely proportional to third day of pressure, that is, as CI decreased, TA increased (Figure 1C,E). This correlation can be attributed to chlorophyll degradation due to enzymatic activity, causing the yellowing of inflorescences and the release of organic acids in the cellular environment, which increases the TA values.
The highest values of ethylene production and SS content occurred in the control inflorescences, indicating their advanced senescence when compared to the broccoli submitted to 800 kPa (Figure 1D). The increase of SS in control broccoli can be attributed to the high activity of enzymes involved in cell wall degradation [28] with consequent reduction of firmness (Figure 1B) and increased respiratory rate (Figure 2A).
Reduction of acidity during postharvest relates to ripening or senescence due to increased consumption of organic acids in the respiratory process or conversion of acids to sugars in glycogenesis. In the control broccoli, in addition to lower acidity (Figure 1E), they had a higher respiratory rate (Figure 2A), higher ethylene production (Figure 2B), and higher soluble solids (SS) content (Figure 1D), suggesting a greater metabolic activity than the other treatments.
Ascorbic acid content tends to decrease with maturation and storage time [29]. Possibly, the AA was consumed in metabolic reactions in the senescence process of control broccoli, whereas high-pressure application precluded such metabolic reactions (Figure 1E).
Tomatoes submitted to high pressures also present higher AA values when compared to fruits under control pressure [9].
Ascorbic acid is an antioxidant compound that plays a vital role in free radical suppression [30,31], with the ability to donate electrons to a wide range of enzymatic and non-enzymatic reactions [32]. The metabolism of AA acts on the defense to oxidative stress [33], that is, the higher the stress occurring in the vegetable, the lower the concentration of this compound. In this case, the stress was generated by the natural senescence of broccoli, which triggered reactions of degradation and oxidation, reducing postharvest life. The high pressures exerted on the vegetable acted in the metabolism as a whole, slowing the senescence and keeping the levels of AA elevated.

4.2. Physiological Phenomena

Production of Ethylene and Respiratory Rate

The increase in atmospheric pressure around broccoli effectively reduced the respiratory rate of broccoli ‘Legacy’. Broccoli submitted to hyperbaric pressures for three days had an average respiratory rate of 11 mg CO2 kg−1 h−1, while broccoli at 100 kPa presented respiratory rates of 13.5 mg CO2 kg−1 h−1 (Figure 2A). The broccoli respiratory rate at 800 kPa pressure was 18.5% lower than the control. The reduction in respiratory rate due to the increase in atmospheric pressure also occurs in several fruits and vegetables, such as the fruits of Prunus mume [34], lettuce [26], and tomatoes [9].
The lower respiratory rates achieved by the treatments with high pressures may be due to the solubilization of CO2 within the broccoli and its posterior dilution in the recipients as a result of the increase in the partial pressures of the air gases inside the hyperbaric chambers [25]. The CO2 generated by the broccoli respiration was probably solubilized in the internal tissues until it reached the partial pressure of the CO2 of the surrounding air. Subsequently, CO2 was diluted inside the hyperbaric chamber, causing an increase in the CO2 partial pressure of the air surrounding the vegetable with the rise in CO2 concentration inside the chamber. This process of dilution and solubilization is continuous and stabilizes only when the amount of CO2 exiting the chamber into the gas analyzer becomes equal to that generated by the respiratory rate of the plants [26]. However, the strength of the effect of hyperbaric pressures on the respiratory rates of plants depends on the type of material studied, exposure time, pressure intensity, and temperature.
Ethylene production should be controlled and kept low because it induces chlorophyll degradation with consequent yellowing of broccoli [35]. This effect was observed in the control inflorescences when compared to those submitted to 800 kPa, with the lowest ethylene production (Figure 2B) and the highest color index (Figure 1C), impairing appearance and decreasing shelf life [34,36].
Regardless of the pressure time, the ethylene values observed in broccoli subjected to pressures of 600 and 800 kPa were similar, indicating that the range between 600–800 kPa can be used to control ethylene biosynthesis in broccoli.
The inhibition of ACC oxidase (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate) activity, the enzyme responsible for converting ACC into ethylene, caused by the high pressure, may have kept low ethylene production. Prunus mume fruits submitted to 5 MPa pressure showed a 75% reduction in ACC oxidase activity compared to the control (100 kPa), while substrate levels (ACC) remained unchanged [37].

4.3. Biochemical Analyses

Lipid Peroxidation, Total Antioxidant Activity (TAA), Activity of the CAT and Activity of the POD

Oxidative stress comprises a central factor in biotic and abiotic stress phenomena, occurring during an imbalance between the reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and antioxidant defense in any compartment of a plant cell [38]. Oxidative stress can be measured by lipid peroxidation, which begins with the reaction of a free radical and unsaturated fatty acid, propagating by peroxyl radicals, and resulting in the lipid hydroperoxides and aldehydes formation, such as malondialdehyde, 4-hydroxynonenal, and isoprostanes [39]. This process may occur in all living organisms and can trigger lesions in cells [30], altering membranes and leading to permeability disorders and cell death.
The lower levels of MDA in broccoli submitted to high pressures indicate the efficiency of this treatment in oxidative stress reduction. However, the influence of hyperbaric pressures on MDA is still unclear, with scarce reports in the literature. The three-day pressure treatment showed the lowest MDA values (Figure 3A). The MDA reduction was also observed in tomatoes preserved under high pressure [9,40].
The increase in TAA content as a function of pressure was also observed in ‘Debora’ tomatoes [9] and in mangoes [22]. This behavior may be attributed to a hormesis effect promoted by increased hyperbaric pressure.
Broccoli that remained at 800 kPa for 1 and 2 days had CAT activity 2.5 times higher than control broccoli (Figure 3C). CAT plays a crucial role in maintaining hydrogen peroxide homeostasis in plant cells. The enzyme disproportionates the H2O2 generated in peroxisomes by oxidases involved in β-oxidation of fatty acids, photorespiration, and purine catabolism [30,41]. Therefore, maintaining high CAT activity is a defense mechanism against stress factors [42]. In this sense, the hyperbaric treatments were efficient due to the storage under high pressure activating the CAT, which is directly related to the process of detoxification of H2O2 and indirectly to the protection of cells.
After two days of treatment, the control broccoli presented the POD activity 2.7 times higher than broccoli submitted to 800 kPa (Figure 3D). However, inflorescences treated with three days of pressure showed opposite behavior, since the highest values of POD activity were observed in inflorescences treated with 800 kPa (Figure 3D).
The higher pressures increased CAT activity and reduced POD activity (Figure 3C,D). Since the main function of CAT in plant metabolism is to rapidly convert hydrogen peroxide (toxic) into other compounds less harmful to the plant, and peroxide is the main substrate of POD, it was expected that the lower availability of peroxide in the intracellular medium would hinder POD activity.
The senescence may have induced the high POD levels of control inflorescences after two days of storage since high levels of POD are associated with the oxidative deterioration of fruits at an advanced stage of maturity [29]. In this aspect, the pressures of 600 and 800 kPa were efficient in keeping low enzymatic activity and propitiating the better conservation of the broccoli when compared to the control inflorescences (Figure 3D).

5. Conclusions

The hyperbaric treatments exerted efficient conservation on the postharvest of broccoli ‘Legacy’, mainly in the highest pressures. The pressures of 400, 600, and 800 kPa reduced the respiratory rate of the vegetables and the production of ethylene and maintained the fresh weight, firmness, and green color, which are essential characteristics for commercialization. The pressures of 600 and 800 kPa influenced antioxidant activity, leading to a reduction in lipid peroxidation and peroxidase enzyme, which preserved tissue integrity and delayed the senescence of broccoli.

Author Contributions

This study was conducted by E.M.P., who was responsible for conducting the study; carrying out the analyses; tabulating the data; and assembling the texts, figures, and tables. J.S.P.J., A.S.F., M.T.C., K.T.E.F.O. and I.N.F.C. assisted with experiment set-up, execution of the analyses, and the literature review necessary for writing this article. B.-H.M. was responsible for providing the resources for carrying out the experiment, including the necessary equipment and reagents. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel—Brazil (CAPES)—Financing Code 001 and the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for financial support (Case No. 2017/17024-0).

Acknowledgments

We thank the support of the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel—Brazil (CAPES)—Financing Code 001 and the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for financial support (Case No. 2017/17024-0).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Faostat Database Results. 2018. Available online: http://www.fao.org/home/en/ (accessed on 28 October 2019).
  2. Kristal, A.R.; Lampe, J.W. Brassica Vegetables and Prostate Cancer Risk: A Review of the Epidemiological Evidence. Nutr. Cancer 2002, 42, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. De Carvalho, P.G.B.; Machado, C.M.M.; Moretti, C.L.; Fonseca, M.E.D.N. Hortaliças como alimentos funcionais. Hortic. Bras. 2006, 24, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ning, X.; Lee, J.; Han, C. Drying characteristics and quality of red ginseng using far-infrared rays. J. Ginseng Res. 2015, 39, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Gioppo, M. Postharvest of Cotton, Red Cabbage and Surface in Different Environments and Regulators. Master’s Thesis, UEPG, Ponta Grossa, Brazil, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  6. Inestroza-Lizardo, C.; Mattiuz, B.H.; da Silva, J.P.; Galati, V.C.; Voigt, V. Hyperbaric pressure at room temperature increases post-harvest preservation of the tomato cultivar ‘Débora’. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 228, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Liplap, P.; Vigneault, C.; Toivonen, P.; Charles, M.T.; Raghavan, G.V. Effect of hyperbaric pressure and temperature on respiration rates and quality attributes of tomato. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2013, 86, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vigneault, C.; Leblanc, D.I.; Goyette, B.; Jenni, S. Invited review: Engineering aspects of physical treatments to increase fruit and vegetable phytochemical content. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 2012, 92, 373–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Inestroza-Lizardo, C.; Mattiuz, B.-H.; da Silva, J.P.; Voigt, V.; Muniz, A.C.; Pinsetta, J.S. Effect of hyperbaric pressure on the activity of antioxidant enzymes and bioactive compounds of cv. ‘Débora’ tomatoes. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 249, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baba, T.; Ikeda, F. Use of high pressure treatment to prolong the postharvest life of mume fruit (Prunus mume). Acta Hortic. 2003, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goyette, B. Hyperbaric Treatment to Enhance Quality Attributes of Fresh Horticultural Produce. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Bioresource Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  12. Paula, J.T. Postharvest Conservation Methods of Cashew Stalk. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  13. Goyette, B.; Vigneault, C.; Wang, N.; Raghavan, V. Conceptualization, design and evaluation of a hyperbaric respirometer. J. Food Eng. 2011, 105, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, 16th ed.; Cunniff, P., Ed.; AOAC: Washington, DC, USA, 1997; Chaper 37; p. 2. [Google Scholar]
  15. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kar, M.; Mishra, D. Catalase, Peroxidase and Polyphenoloxidase Activities during Rice Leaf Senescence. Plant. Physiol. 1976, 57, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lima, G.P.P.; Brasil, O.G.; De Oliveira, A.M. Poliaminas e atividade da peroxidase em feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivado sob estresse salino. Sci. Agricola 1999, 56, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kader, A.A. Postharvest biology and technology: An Overview. In Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops; Kader, A.A., Ed.; University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources: Davis, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  21. Barbosa, J.C.; Maldonado, W., Jr. AgroEstat–Sistema para Análises Estatísticas de Ensaios Agronômicos; Version 1.1. 0.711; Jaboticabal: São Paulo, Brazil, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  22. Silva, J.P.D. Effect of Hyperbaric Atmospheres on Postharvest of Mango Palmer. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  23. Beckles, D. Factors affecting the postharvest soluble solids and sugar content of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2012, 63, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Padula, M.L.; Carciofi, B.A.M.; Dannenhauer, C.E.; Stringari, G.B.; Monteiro, A.R. Influence of different types of packaging on the physicochemical characteristics and gaseous composition of minimally processed organic Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var Itálica) and stored under refrigeration. Braz. J. Food Nutr. 2009, 17, 259–268. [Google Scholar]
  25. Goyette, B.; Charles, M.T.; Vigneault, C.; Raghavan, V. Effect of Hyperbaric Treatment on Quality Attributes of Tomato Fruits. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 1, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liplap, P.; Boutin, J.; Leblanc, D.I.; Vigneault, C.; Raghavan, G.S.V. Effect of hyperbaric pressure and temperature on respiration rates and quality attributes of Boston lettuce. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 49, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fagundes, C.; Moraes, K.; Pérez-Gago, M.; Palou, L.; Maraschin, M.; Monteiro, A. Effect of active modified atmosphere and cold storage on the postharvest quality of cherry tomatoes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 109, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maftoonazad, N.; Ramaswamy, H.S.; Marcotte, M. Shelf-life extension of peaches through sodium alginate and methyl cellulose edible coatings. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 43, 951–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chitarra, M.I.F.; Chitarra, A.B. Pós-Colheita de Frutas e Hortaliças: Fisiologia e Manuseio, 2nd ed.; UFLA: Lavras, Brazil, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gill, S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kaur, C.; Walia, S.; Nagal, S.; Walia, S.; Singh, J.; Singh, B.B.; Saha, S.; Singh, B.; Kalia, P.; Jaggi, S.; et al. Functional quality and antioxidant composition of selected tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) cultivars grown in Northern India. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 50, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Das, K.; Roychoudhury, A. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Front. Environ. Sci. 2014, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Tsaniklidis, G.; Delis, C.; Nikoloudakis, N.; Katinakis, P.; Aivalakis, G. Low temperature storage affects the ascorbic acid metabolism of cherry tomato fruits. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 84, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jones, R.B.; Faragher, J.D.; Winkler, S. A review of the influence of postharvest treatments on quality and glucosinolate content in broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) heads. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2006, 41, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yamauchi, N.; Funamoto, Y.; Kanetsune, Y. Involvement of Chlorophyll Degrading Enzymes with Chlorophyll Degradation in Stored Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.) Florets. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 1999, 5, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Moreno-Fernández, D.; Carvajal, M.; López-Berenguer, C.; García-Viguera, C. Chemical and biological characterisation of nutraceutical compounds of broccoli. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2006, 41, 1508–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Baba, T.; Como, G.; Ohtsubo, T.; Ikeda, F.; Lizada, M. Effects of High-pressure Treatment on Mume Fruit (Prunus mume). J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1999, 124, 399–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Foyer, C.H.; Noctor, G. Oxygen processing in photosynthesis: Regulation and signalling. New Phytol. 2000, 146, 359–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lima, E.S.; Abdalla, D.S. Lipid peroxidation: Mechanisms and evaluation in biological samples. J. Pharm. Sci. 2001, 37, 293–303. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kou, X.; Wu, J.Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Xue, Z.; Bai, Y.; Zhou, F. Effects of Hypobaric Treatments on the Quality, Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Tomato. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, H1816–H1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Igamberdiev, A.U.; Lea, P.J. The role of peroxisomes in the integration of metabolism and evolutionary diversity of photosynthetic organisms. Phytochemistry 2002, 60, 651–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Boonkorn, P. Impact of hot water soaking on antioxidant enzyme activities and some qualities of storage tomato fruits. Int. Food Res. J. 2016, 23, 934–938. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Weight loss (A), firmness (B), color index (C), soluble solids (D), titratable acidity (E), and ascorbic acid (F) in broccoli ‘Legacy’ submitted to hyperbaric treatments during 1, 2, and 3 days at 22 °C and 95% RH. Color index: 0 = yellow; −2.0 = green. The error bar identifies the standard deviation of 5% of the mean.
Figure 1. Weight loss (A), firmness (B), color index (C), soluble solids (D), titratable acidity (E), and ascorbic acid (F) in broccoli ‘Legacy’ submitted to hyperbaric treatments during 1, 2, and 3 days at 22 °C and 95% RH. Color index: 0 = yellow; −2.0 = green. The error bar identifies the standard deviation of 5% of the mean.
Agronomy 11 02157 g001
Figure 2. Relationship between respiration rate (A) and ethylene production (B) in broccoli ‘Legacy’ with pressures applied at times 1, 2, and 3 days at 22 °C and 95% RH. The error bar identifies the standard deviation of 5% of the mean.
Figure 2. Relationship between respiration rate (A) and ethylene production (B) in broccoli ‘Legacy’ with pressures applied at times 1, 2, and 3 days at 22 °C and 95% RH. The error bar identifies the standard deviation of 5% of the mean.
Agronomy 11 02157 g002
Figure 3. Lipid peroxidation (A), antioxidant activity (B), catalase activity (C), peroxidase activity (D) in broccoli ‘Legacy’ submitted to hyperbaric treatments during 1, 2, and 3 days at 22 °C and 95% RH. The error bar identifies the standard deviation of 5% of the mean.
Figure 3. Lipid peroxidation (A), antioxidant activity (B), catalase activity (C), peroxidase activity (D) in broccoli ‘Legacy’ submitted to hyperbaric treatments during 1, 2, and 3 days at 22 °C and 95% RH. The error bar identifies the standard deviation of 5% of the mean.
Agronomy 11 02157 g003
Table 1. Initial characterization of broccoli ‘Legacy’.
Table 1. Initial characterization of broccoli ‘Legacy’.
VariablesValues
Mass (g)630 ± 60
Epidermis color index1.04 ± 0.10
Receptacle firmness (N)13.3 ± 1.02
Ethylene production (mL C2H4 kg−1 h−1)5.2 ± 1.2
Soluble solids (%)6.17 ± 0.05
Titratable acidity (g kg−1)0.14 ± 0.07
Ascorbic acid (mg kg−1)99.6 ± 2.40
Antioxidant activity (mmol kg−1)0.23 ± 0.20
Lipid peroxidation (mmol kg−1)19.22 ± 1.6
Catalese activity (U kg−1 pt)1.12 × 10−10 ± 0.1
Peroxidase activity (U kg−1 pt)0.03 ± 0.01
Values represent the mean ± standard deviation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pereira, E.M.; Formiga, A.S.; Pinzetta Junior, J.S.; Cordeiro, I.N.F.; Oliveira, K.T.E.F.; Cavalcanti, M.T.; Mattiuz, B.-H. Application of High Pressures in the Postharvest Conservation of Broccoli. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2157. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112157

AMA Style

Pereira EM, Formiga AS, Pinzetta Junior JS, Cordeiro INF, Oliveira KTEF, Cavalcanti MT, Mattiuz B-H. Application of High Pressures in the Postharvest Conservation of Broccoli. Agronomy. 2021; 11(11):2157. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112157

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pereira, Emmanuel M., Anderson S. Formiga, José S. Pinzetta Junior, Isabela N. F. Cordeiro, Karollayne T. E. F. Oliveira, Mônica Tejo Cavalcanti, and Ben-Hur Mattiuz. 2021. "Application of High Pressures in the Postharvest Conservation of Broccoli" Agronomy 11, no. 11: 2157. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112157

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop