Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Suitability of a Combine Harvester Equipped with the Sunflower Header to Harvest Cardoon Seeds: A Case Study in Central Italy
Next Article in Special Issue
Physical Crop Postharvest Storage and Protection Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Growth and Ginsenosides Content of Ginseng Sprouts According to LED-Based Light Quality Changes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antifungal Effects of Rhizospheric Bacillus Species Against Bayberry Twig Blight Pathogen Pestalotiopsis versicolor
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/agronomy10121982
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Shelf-Life of Bunched Carrots as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization and Leaf Presence

by
Anita Ierna
1,
Rosario Paolo Mauro
2,*,
Cherubino Leonardi
2 and
Francesco Giuffrida
2
1
Institute of BioEconomy, National Research Council (CNR-IBE), Via P. Gaifami 18, 95126 Catania, Italy
2
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Di3A), University of Catania, Via Valdisavoia 5, 95123 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2020, 10(12), 1982; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121982
Submission received: 16 November 2020 / Revised: 10 December 2020 / Accepted: 13 December 2020 / Published: 16 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Technologies for Conservation, Protection, and Quality of Vegetables and Fruits in a Postharvest Period)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nitrogen (N) fertilization is essential for adequate earliness and the commercial attractiveness of carrots, but its excess could generate fast decay during postharvest, mostly in bunched carrots exhibiting their highly perishable leaves. A field experiment was conducted over the 2016–2017 growing season to address the effects of two N fertilization rates (120 and 240 kg N ha−1, hereafter N120 and N240, respectively) and leaf presence/absence (leaf+ and leaf−) on physicochemical and compositional traits of carrots cv. ‘Dordogne’, after storage at 4.0 ± 0.5 °C, 95–96% relative humidity (RH) for 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 days (hereafter S0–S24). Before storage, carrots were arranged in bunches and packaged in common low-density polyethylene (LDPE) pouches (thickness 95 μm), 54 × 24 cm size, with 16 holes of 5 mm size. N240 carrots compared to N120 showed higher cumulative weight loss (CWL) and firmness reduction, with differences at S24 equal to 108 vs. 41 g kg−1 fresh weight (FW) and 13.3 vs. 14.5 N, respectively. N240 compared to N120 increased also the color deviation (ΔE*ab, +126%) and nitrates content (+93%) of carrots and slowed down their temporal increase of total polyphenols and antioxidant activity. Leaf+ carrots compared to leaf boosted CWL and firmness reduction, with differences at S24 equal to 90 vs. 58 g kg−1 FW and 12 vs. 17 N, respectively. In addition, leaf presence increased reducing sugars (+17%) and decreased nitrates (−24%) contents. This research has shown the possibility of improving the desirable quality and shelf-life of carrots by halving the N dose commonly supplied by growers and marketing bunched carrots within 12 days from the start of storage.

1. Introduction

Carrot (Daucus carota L.) is a biennial herbaceous crop belonging to the Apiaceae family, playing a role of primary importance among the root vegetables cultivated worldwide [1]. From a nutraceutical viewpoint, the species represents a valuable source of bioactive constituents, such as carotenoids, flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acid derivates, so being able to exert multiple beneficial effects on human health [2]. In Italy, the global production of carrot accounts for almost 547 ktons of roots obtained from about 14 kha of land [3], with a product intended both to fresh consumption or industrial processing. Under Mediterranean growth conditions, similarly to other horticultural crops [4], its cultivation usually takes place in sandy soils, which are characterized by low organic matter and, consequently, by low N reserves and mineralization potential. Consequently, N fertilization is perceived as essential to reach adequate earliness and yield levels, due to the pivotal role of N in ensuring an adequate crop growth rate, so allowing growers to adjust the harvest dates to meet factory and marketing schedules [5]. This leads often to unjustifiable N overdressing in the attempt to enhance as much as possible the product’s earliness and commercial attractiveness. Excessive N applications generate environmental problems such as groundwater contamination, greenhouse gases emission, and the eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems, thus playing a significant role in ecosystems deterioration [6]. When food safety is concerned, the impact of N overdressing in favoring the accumulation of harmful nitrates for human health, as well as in increasing the incidence of storage disorders and potential for faster postharvest decay, has been demonstrated in a multitude of vegetables [7]. When consumed as an unprocessed vegetable, carrot is present on the market all year round in form of fresh or cold-stored product, a condition deriving from both the wide environmental adaptability of the crop and the good storability of the roots [8]. Indeed, when deprived from leaves (topped carrots), they represent a suitable product for long-term storage under appropriated conditions (≈0 °C at 95–98% RH), being able to be kept up to 8 months before packaging and retail [9]. In Southern areas of Italy, characterized by mild winters (Mediterranean climate), carrot is grown during the autumn–spring period (plantings from September to November and harvesting from February to May), generating an off-season product, mainly destined to fresh consumption. These carrots are usually more appreciated by consumers than cold-stored ones, thanks to their higher freshness and superior organoleptic properties, and in consequence of this are marketed also in several EU countries, when long cold-stored stocks show both quantitative and qualitative issues. The product is often offered in bunches, with plants still exhibiting their leaves (bunched carrots), in order to emphasize their commercial attractiveness and freshness. As a result of their high metabolic activity, leaves are notoriously highly perishable organs during postharvest life [10]. Indeed, the leaves of carrot bunches restricts the options for commercial refrigerated stores, thus potentially accelerating the postharvest decay and product spoilage. Unfortunately, up to now, there is no information about the consequences of leaves presence on the postharvest physiology of this popular vegetable, just as there is no knowledge on the effects that N fertilization could have on the postharvest shelf-life in bunched carrots. While, on the one hand, N fertilization is an essential means to ensure a good development and a longer duration of carrot leaves in the field, on the other, N concentration in leaf tissues is tightly linked to their level of metabolic activity [11], so potentially altering the physiological balance among interrelated organs during postharvest life. Considering the lack of specific literature regarding carrot, the aim of the present research was to evaluate the effects N fertilization rate and leaf presence on postharvest shelf-life of fresh, off-season carrot roots.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Field, Plant Material, and Crop Management

A field trial was carried out during the 2016–2017 growing season at a commercial farm located at Ispica plain, (Southeastern Sicily: 36°47′ N 14°54′ E, 42 m a.s.l.), which is one of the most typical areas for early carrot cultivation in Southern Italy. The climate is semi-arid Mediterranean, with mild winters, often rainless springs, and hot and dry summers. Frost occurrence is virtually unknown (only two events in 30 years), and this permits growing carrot in a winter–spring cycle (from November–December to May). The mean 30-year 1977–2006 monthly maximum and minimum temperatures ranges between 15.3 and 7.6 °C in February and 32.9 and 23.0 °C in August, respectively. Yearly rainfall is 480 mm, more than 50% of which concentrated from November to January [12]. During the experiment, meteorological data were obtained daily from SIAS (Servizio Informativo Agrometeorologico Siciliano). The soil is a moderately deep, calcic brown on the basis of the USDA Soil Taxonomy Classification [13], with sandy loam texture, which, at the beginning of the experiment, comprised low N content (0.8 g kg−1) and low organic matter (12.2 g kg−1), P2O5 available (57 mg kg−1), K2O exchangeable (302 mg kg−1), pH 7.7. Soil analyses were carried out according to the procedures approved by the Italian Society of Soil Science [14]. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications, including two nitrogen rates (120 and 240 kg ha−1 of N, hereafter referred as N120 and N240, respectively). N120 was formulated on the basis of the N uptake by carrot crop with marketable yields of 40 t ha−1 [15] and the available soil mineral N for the crop cycle at planting equal to about 60 kg ha−1 determined according to the methodology reported in a previous paper [16]. N240 represents the conventional N fertilization rate commonly adopted by Mediterranean producers for enhancing yields. The cultivar ‘Dordogne’ was utilized, a hybrid of the Nantes-type, which is well-adapted to Mediterranean growing conditions, and it is usually adopted for the production of “early”, bunched carrots. ‘Dordogne’ is characterized by a homogeneous and intense orange color and smooth roots, bright green leaves with an elegant and tidy posture, and excellent root/leaf balance. On November 5, 2016, seeds were sown at a ≈1 cm depth, through a precision seeder operating in twin rows (0.20 × 0.30 m) on an 0.80 m wide ridges; soon after seeding, the ridges were rolled uniformly. Actual density was 170 plants m−2. Plot size was 3.6 m × 3.6 m, and consisted of 3 ridges, 3.6 m long. Tillage consisted in a preparatory work deep ploughing (~40 cm) and ridges setting with a bed-maker for the formation of raised ridges, ≈2 weeks before sowing. One week before sowing, 70 kg ha−1 of P2O5 (as mineral superphosphate) and 300 kg ha−1 of K2O (as K sulfate) were applied. At sowing was also supplied 25% of N (as ammonium nitrate), 25% at the stage of 5–6 leaves (71 days after sowing, DAS), 25% at the beginning of roots enlargement (114 DAS) and the remaining 25% at the stage of advanced root enlargement (156 DAS). Crop water requirements were completely satisfied by drip irrigation, supplying 100% of crop maximum evapotranspiration, when the accumulated daily evaporation, estimated through the Penman–Monteith equation, reached 30 mm. Over the crop cycle, 170 mm of irrigation water were applied. Weeds and pests’ control were performed by applying metribuzin and pirimicarb when needed.

2.2. Plant Harvest, Post-Harvest Handling and Sampling

Plants harvest was carried out by hand on 17 May (193 DAS), on 13 m2 wide plots (3.6 m × 3.6 m) per each fertilization level and replicate, taking care to avoid any damage to leaves. Within each experimental unit, harvested carrots were selected for uniform size and absence of defects, then arranged by hand in 20 bunches each containing 10 roots. Within 3 h from the harvest, all bunched carrots were brought to the laboratory, where they were washed through demineralized water to remove soil particles, and then, they were dried with paper towels. The storage trial was realized on 30 bunches per each N level, 15 of which were topped (by removing leaves with a knife at the collar level, hereafter leaf−) and leaving the remaining carrots with the leaves (leaf+). Then, all bunches (either topped or not) were packaged in low-density polyethylene (LDPE) pouches (thickness 95 μm) of 54 × 24 cm size, each with 16 holes of 5 mm sizes. This film was selected since it is commonly used by local commercial carrot packagers. All pouches were closed through a heat sealer MVS41X (Minipack-Torre, Dalmine, Italy), stored at 4.0 ± 0.5 °C, 95–96% RH, and sampled for analyses at the harvest date (unpackaged carrots, hereafter S0) and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 (hereafter S3, S6, S12, and S24) days after storage. Overall, 60 bags were used, deriving from the factorial combination of 2 N fertilization rates, 2 carrot typologies (leaf+ vs. leaf−), and 5 sampling dates (0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 days after storage).

2.3. Determinations and Calculations

2.3.1. Physicochemical Traits

At each storage time, physicochemical traits were determined considering three packages as a single experimental unit. Carrot fresh weight was determined through a digital precision balance (±0.01 g) (Gibertini Europe, Novate Milanese, Italy); then, the cumulative weight loss (CWL) within the S3–S24 interval was calculated and expressed as g kg−1 fresh weight (FW). Soon after, external chromatic coordinates were determined on five carrots within each package, according to McGuire [17], through a tristimulus Chroma Meter mod. CR-200 (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan), on 2 points per root ≈1 cm below the plant collar. The obtained CIELab* coordinates, namely lightness (L*), green–red axis (a*), and blue–yellow axis (b*), were used to calculate the total color difference [ΔE*ab = (ΔL*2 + Δa*2 + Δb*2)1/2], this last describing the color deviation recorded during postharvest storage (S3–S24 interval). Firmness was evaluated in the middle part of five roots per package, through a Digital Texture Analyser mod. TA-XT2 (Stable Micro Systems, Godalming, UK) by using a cylindrical tip (Ø 2.0 mm), and defined as the force (N) needed to impress a 2 mm fruit deformation along the equatorial axis, at a speed of 10 mm s−1. Dry matter (DM) content was determined through the gravimetric method on three taproots cut into slices (5 mm thick), after drying them at 105 °C in a thermo-ventilated oven (Binder, Tuttlingen, Germany) until constant weight was reached. In the same way, leaf DM was determined in leaf+ samples. Total solids content was also determined on three taproots sliced into slices of 5 mm, after drying at 65 °C in a thermo-ventilated oven (Binder, Tuttlingen, Germany) until constant weight to obtain dry material for determining the content of reducing sugars and nitrates.

2.3.2. Compositional Traits

At each storage time, 5 roots per package were cut into discs with a thickness of 5 mm, frozen with liquid N, and placed at −80 °C until subsequent determination of the antioxidant activity and the total polyphenol content (TPC). Antioxidant activity was estimated by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay [18], measuring the absorbance at 517 nm (spectrophotometer Lamba 11, Perkin Elmer, San Jose, CA, USA), according to the method reported by Singh et al. [19]. Results were expressed as mg Trolox kg−1 FW. TPC was quantified through the Folin–Ciocalteau assay [20] measuring the absorbance of the carrot extracts at 710 nm. Determinations were made on the basis of a standard calibration curve generated with known amounts of gallic acid and expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE) kg−1 FW. Reducing sugars were quantified on the dry material and pressed through a 1 mm stainless steel sieve using the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method [21] and expressed as mg kg−1 FW. Nitric N concentration in carrots was determined through ionic chromatography. To each dry and ground 0.5 g sample, 50 mL of ultrapure water was added, and the mixture was stirred for 30 min at 180 rpm. After filtering the extract and carrying out the appropriate dilution, reading was conducted with an ion-chromatograph (Dionex IC 25, 40 EG Eluent Generator, IonPacAS11-HC; Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Results were expressed as mg kg−1 FW.

2.4. Statistical Procedure

Collected and calculated data were firstly subjected to Shapiro–Wilk’s and Levene’s test, in order to check for normal distribution and homoscedasticity, respectively. Then, data were subjected to a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), based on a factorial combination ‘nitrogen rate × leaf presence × storage time’, according to the layout adopted during the experiment (Table 1). The DM content of leaves was subjected to a two-way ANOVA (‘nitrogen rate × storage time’) (data not shown).

2.5. Meteorological Conditions during the Experiment

During the experiment, the meteorological data were in line with the long-term average, as total rainfall was 290 mm, mostly concentrated from November to March (overall 259 mm), with December being the rainiest month (71 mm). The mean maximum temperature gradually decreased from November (19.8 °C) to January (14.7 °C) and then increased up to 22.1 °C in May. Similarly, the mean minimum temperature passed from 14.1 °C in November to 8.8 °C in January and then reached the highest value (15.2 °C) during May.
Percentage data were Bliss’ transformed before the ANOVA (untransformed data are reported and discussed), whereas multiple mean comparisons were performed through Fisher’s protected least significant difference (LSD) test (at least for p ≤ 0.05). All calculations were performed using Microsoft Excel® version 2016 and Minitab version 16.1.1 (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physicochemical Traits

The nitrogen rate significantly influenced almost all the studied variables (Table 1). It is known that the increase in N fertilization may affect both nutritional and health-related traits of fresh carrots, either in a positive [22] or negative way [23,24]. Regardless of leaf presence and storage time, at N240, we found a greater CWL of roots than at N120 (66.5 vs. 23.0 g kg−1 FW, +89%) (Table 2).
Excessive soil N can cause increased weight loss during storage in some vegetables [25], which is a common feature, whose extent depends on pre-harvest practices (including N fertilization) and varietal traits, as well as on the length and conditions of storage [26,27]. The significance of the “nitrogen rate × leaf presence” (Table 1) interaction indicates that the presence of leaves accentuated the effects of the N fertilization. Indeed, passing from N120 to N240, there was a higher CWL increase in leaf+ (from 26.1 to 87.6 g kg−1 FW, +236%) than in leaf− carrots (from 20.0 to 45.3 g kg−1 FW, +126%) (Figure 1). It is likely to presume that leaves promoted the CWL of roots through the transpiration-driven water flow, functionally connecting roots and stomata. Moreover, during postharvest storage, the CWL in N120 roots was quite constant up to S12; then, it significantly increased between S12 and S24 (from 22.2 to 41.1 g kg−1 FW, +85%), whereas the N240 supply boosted the CWL, most of all between S6 and S12 (from 41.8 to 99.2 g kg−1 FW, +137%), so that within the S3–S24 period, the CWL increase was equal to 552% and 200%, in N240 and N120, respectively (Figure 2A).
In both leaf+ and leaf− carrots, average CWL values equal to 15.1 g kg−1 FW were found at S3, which are reputedly within the norm of storage carrots. It was found that short-term storage (2 days) at very high air humidity did not excessively stress the bunched carrots [28]. After this storage time, leaf+ carrots displayed a more abrupt increase in weight loss, most of all between S6 and S12 (from 30.0 to 87.9 g kg−1 FW, 193%), as compared to the leaf− ones (from 26.9 to 33.5 g kg−1 FW, 24%), so that at the end of postharvest storage, it was recorded a 48% higher CWL in leaf+ than in leaf− carrots (89.2 vs. 60.1 g kg−1 FW, respectively) (Figure 3A).
The weight loss values of almost 9% we found at S12 in leaf+ carrots is considered as a threshold for acceptable marketable quality [29], while leaf− carrots had, at the same storage time, a CWL of about 3%, which is in line with weight loss values usually found in carrots stored in bags for a short time [30]. The loss of water in leaf+ carrots from leaves was certainly favored by the use of macro-perforated film pouches, which by their nature provide very high mass exchange rates and usefully allow oxygen ingress and carbon dioxide exit. Similar weight loss values are reported for macro-perforated films in “cime di rapa” (Brassica rapa L. subsp. sylvestris L.) [31] and minimally processed carrots [32]. Water losses also led to a reduction in leaves hydration degree throughout the storage period. A similar DM content of leaves in N120 and N240 up to S12, but at S24, the N240 carrots proved a greater increase of their leaf DM content (up to 19.8%) than the N120 ones (16.5%) (Figure 4).
This seems to suggest that the N240 leaves had a higher transpiration rate, which is a feature that is consistent with the known effects of N in accelerating leaf metabolism and transpiration rate [33]. A higher average root DM content was recorded in N240 (12.2%) than in N120 carrots (11.7%) (Table 2), and, with the increasing storage time from S3 to S24, a significant root DM rise in leaf+ (from 11.8 to 13.2%) unlike the leaf− roots (in which DM content remained constant between the 11.6–11.7% range) (Figure 3B). Dry matter content values of about 12% are in accordance with the values for conventional carrots found in the literature [34]. The greater DM content in N240 carrots, compared to the N120 ones, was at the base of their greater firmness (20.2 vs. 19.3 N, respectively) (Table 2). However, their faster CWL resulted in their more marked loss of firmness, since the N240 carrots showed the highest firmness reduction along the postharvest period, especially between S6 and S24 (from 21.4 to 13.3 N, −38%), compared to the N120 roots (from 20.0 to 14.5 N, −27%) (Figure 2B). Moreover, our results showed that leaf+ carrots had higher firmness reduction within the S3-S24 period (from 23.1 to 10.9 N, −53%) than the leaf− ones (from 23.7 to 17.0 N, −22%) (Figure 3C), so confirming that CWL was essentially a transpiration-driven process, resulting in a lower hydration status of the leaf+ roots. However, it should be noted that in leaf+ carrots the firmness reduction at S12 was quite low (−22%), showing how bunched carrots for at least half of the postharvest period can keep a good firm texture thanks to the storage conditions used (cold and high humidity). This does not happen realistically during retail sale when they are normally exposed to nearly free convection in ambient air of rather low humidity. However, 12 days is a long enough time that can also allow a long journey to export the product, as long as the storage conditions are maintained until the time of retail sale. Moreover, at S12, no differences in the visual appearance of both taproots and leaves were found nor symptoms of infection resulting from bacteria and molds (data not reported). Certainly, it would have been important to test the satisfaction of the product, also verifying the taste, aroma, flavor, and microbial counts that we intend to do in a subsequent research. Among the main factors, ΔE*ab of carrot proved to be responsive to N fertilization, as it was significantly higher in N240 (0.86) than in N120 fertilized roots (0.38) (Table 2), meaning that N240 carrots showed a more vivid and shiny color. This seems in accordance with the finding that the biosynthesis of carotene is an N-demanding process [35]. ΔE*ab progressively increased during storage with a similar trend among the two N rates (Table 2). However, ΔE*ab values greater than 1, which is the threshold above which two colors can be optically distinguished [36], were not recorded throughout the entire storage period, which is consistent with high qualitative status in terms of roots fresh weight and turgor.

3.2. Compositional Traits

Regardless of the other factors, the highest N rate promoted the nitrate content of carrots, almost by doubling it (105.9 mg kg−1 FW) in comparison to the N120 roots (54.9 mg kg−1 FW) (Table 3).
This finding is coherent with previous studies claiming excess N fertilization responsible for high N accumulation in carrots [37,38]. Nitrates are naturally occurring compounds in vegetables, since their presence in plants is connected with the N transformations to amino acids and proteins [39]. Usually, the concentration of nitrate is relatively low in carrots [40]; however, supra optimal N supply has been shown to cause undesirable high nitrate levels in carrots, whether supplied as mineral fertilizer [41] or by the mineralization of residues of previous crops [19,37,42]. In this research, the nitrate content does not represented a safety problem, because even the maximum nitrate concentration found (about 106 mg kg−1 FW in the N240 carrots) was far below the safety threshold value for children food (250 mg NO3 kg−1 FW) [42]. Interestingly, the leaf presence proved a significant reduction of nitrates content (from 91.6 to 69.2 mg kg−1 FW, −24%) (Table 3). This is probably due to the fact that leaves induce a more dynamic metabolism by consuming nitrates at a faster rate than leaf− carrots, making bunched carrots healthier than topped taproots. Furthermore, during postharvest storage from S0 to S24, nitrates content significantly decreased (from 91.8 to 65.9 mg kg−1 FW, −28%), which is in agreement with what was previously found [43].
Regarding reducing sugars content, no differences were found in relation to the N supply, and this outcome was consistent with other authors, that found small [44] or no influence [37] of the N supply on glucose, fructose, or sucrose concentration. Differently, the leaf presence acted to significantly increase the reducing sugars concentration (Table 3). Such differences in response to leaf presence proved to be time-dependent, as they were more marked beyond S6, reaching the maximum values at S24 (26.3 and 20.0 g kg−1 FW, in leaf+ and leaf−, respectively) (Figure 3D). This outcome can likely be attributed to the leaf–driven stimulation of the enzyme sucrose synthase, which catalyzes the decomposition of sucrose (the reserve carbohydrate in carrots) to uridine diphosphate glucose in the storage tissue [45]. On the other hand, we cannot exclude that the highest reducing sugars content in leaf+ carrots was also a result of their higher concentration effect, following the greater root water loss in response to leaf presence. In this sense, there was a clear analogy among the temporal trends of root DM and reducing sugars contents, overall indicating that transpiration largely prevailed on respiration in influencing this compositional trait of carrots. In other words, there was a negligible consumption of simple sugars through respiration activity, which is likely due to the relatively short-term storage and optimal storage conditions, particularly low temperatures. This result is consistent with most experiments recording only minor changes in the glucose content in root vegetables during cold storage [46].
On the average of the other factors, the N240 promoted a 20% decrease in TPC of carrots as compared to N120 (512 vs. 440 mg GAE kg−1 FW) (Table 3). Such a result directly supports the carbon nutrient balance (CNB) hypothesis that predicts a higher level of carbon-based secondary metabolites, such as polyphenols, under limited N availability [47]. Similarly, some studies on the pot cultivation of carrot plants fertilized with Ca (NO3)2 showed a decrease in the content of phenolic compounds in roots when compared to control without N fertilization [48]. The total content of phenolic compounds in carrot is a cultivar characteristic [49], but it is known that it is greatly modified by the rate of N and the method of N fertilization [27], foliar nutrition [50], and N form [48,51]. When considered over the S0–S24 storage period, the N240 carrots proved a steeper TPC rise over time (from 336 to 572 mg GAE kg−1 FW, +70%) than the N120 ones (from 454 to 628 mg GAE kg−1 FW, +38%) (Table 3). In globe artichoke [52], the TPC significantly increased during cold storage for both samples receiving 200 (N200) or 400 (N400) kg N ha−1, while it decreased in N unfertilized samples. The authors stated that the behavior of N200 and N400 samples may be related to their higher proneness to degenerative phenomena following postharvest conditions of storage, which may have stimulated the phenylpropanoid metabolism and, therefore, the increase of TPC in their tissues [53]. The antioxidant activity during storage followed a trend similar to TPC, and this is attributable to antioxidant activity of total phenolic compounds [54].

4. Conclusions

The research highlighted that the N fertilization rate and leaf presence had an important effect on the postharvest shelf-life of fresh carrot roots. Supplying 240 kg ha−1 of N, compared to 120 kg ha−1, resulted in greater weight loss, color variations, and roots nitrates content as well as in a reduction of phenols and antioxidant activity. Consequently, the rate of 120 kg N ha−1, which corresponds to the crop N uptake, has been shown to improve the quality and shelf-life of carrots, as well as making savings for the farmer and ensuring a more environmentally friendly crop management. The presence of the leaves led to dramatic changes in root appearance, mostly in terms of loss of weight and firmness, which are the most important parameters of quality and shelf-life in carrot. These differences were highly evident from the 12th day of storage, which therefore represents a deadline for their shelf-life when stored at 4 °C. However, bunched carrots compared to topped ones showed higher reducing sugars content and lower nitrates content, the former traits being appreciated by the consumer from a sensorial viewpoint, together with the attractive presence and freshness given by leaves. Overall, these preliminary results have shown the possibility of improving the desirable quality and shelf-life of bunched carrots halving the dose of nitrogen that is usually supplied, maintaining optimal storage conditions, and marketing carrots within 12 days from the start of storage.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.L., A.I. and F.G.; methodology, A.I., F.G.; investigation, A.I., F.G.; resources, F.G.; data curation, R.P.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.I., R.P.M.; writing—review and editing, A.I.; visualization, F.G.; supervision, C.L.; funding acquisition, C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fondi di Ateneo 2020–2022, University of Catania.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Irene Longo for her technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funder had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Que, F.; Hou, X.L.; Wang, G.L.; Xu, Z.S.; Tan, G.F.; Li, T.; Wang, Y.H.; Khadr, A.; Xiong, A.S. Advances in research on the carrot, an important root vegetable in the Apiaceae family. Hortic. Res. 2019, 6, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Leja, M.; Kamińska, I.; Kramer, M.; Maksylewicz-Kaul, A.; Kammerer, D.; Carle, R.; Baranski, R. The Content of Phenolic Compounds and Radical Scavenging Activity Varies with Carrot Origin and Root Color. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2013, 68, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Istat.it. Available online: http://dati.istat.it/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=DCSP_COLTIVAZIONI (accessed on 5 November 2020).
  4. Giuffrida, F.; Cassaniti, C.; Scuderi, D.; Caturano, E.; Leonardi, C. Tomato yield, nitrogen uptake and use efficiency in relation to nitrogen fertilization levels. Acta Hortic. 2012, 927, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reid, J.B.; Hunt, A.G.; Johnstone, P.R.; Searle, B.P.; Jesson, L.K. On the responses of carrots (Daucus carota L.) to nitrogen supply. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2018, 46, 298–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ierna, A.; Mauro, R.P.; Mauromicale, G. Improved yield and nutrient efficiency in two globe artichoke genotypes by balancing nitrogen and phosphorus supply. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32, 773–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Prusky, D. Reduction of the incidence of postharvest quality losses, and future prospects. Food Secur. 2011, 3, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Suojala-Ahlfors, T.; Laamanen, T.L. Effect of calcium amendment on the calcium content and storage quality of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2014, 79, 278–282. [Google Scholar]
  9. Larsen, H.; Wold, A.B. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on sensory quality, chemical parameters and shelf life of carrot roots (Daucus carota L.) stored at chilled and abusive temperatures. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 114, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al Ubeed, H.M.S.; Wills, R.B.H.; Bowyer, M.C.; Golding, J.B. Inhibition of postharvest senescence of green leafy vegetables by exogenous D-cysteine and L-cysteine as precursors of hydrogen sulphide. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 94, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mauro, R.P.; Occhipinti, A.; Longo, A.M.G.; Mauromicale, G. Effects of shading on chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis of subterranean clover. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2011, 197, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Osservatorio Delle Acque. Available online: www.osservatorioacque.it (accessed on 26 July 2020).
  13. USDA United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Conservation Service. Soil Taxonomy—A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys, 2nd ed.; Handbook, 436; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; p. 886.
  14. Violante, P. Metodi di Analisi Chimica del Suolo; Franco Angeli: Milano, Italy, 2000; p. 536. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tesi, R.; Lenzi, A. Nutrizione azotata per un’orticoltura sostenibile. Italus Hortus 2005, 12, 57–73. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ierna, A.; Mauromicale, G. Sustainable and profitable nitrogen fertilization management of potato. Agronomy 2019, 9, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. McGuire, R.G. Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience 1992, 27, 1254–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Singh, G.; Kawatra, A.; Sehgal, S. Nutritional composition of selected green leafy vegetables, herbs and carrots. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2001, 56, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Slinkard, K.; Singleton, V. Total phenol analysis: Automation and comparison with manual methods. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1977, 28, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gusakov, A.V.; Kondratyeva, E.G.; Sinitsyn, A.P. Comparison of two methods for assaying reducing sugars in the determination of carbohydrase activities. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2011, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kaack, K.; Nielsen, M.; Christensen, L.P.; Thorup-Kristensen, K. Nutritionally important chemical constituents and yield of carrot (Daucus carota L.) roots grown organically using ten levels of green manure. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2001, 51, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rembiałkowska, E. Quality of plant products from organic agriculture. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2007, 87, 2757–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Grinder-Pedersen, L.; Rasmussen, S.E.; Bügel, S.; Jørgensen, L.V.; Dragsted, L.O.; Gundersen, V.; Sandström, B. Effect of diets based on foods from conventional versus organic production on intake and excretion of flavonoids and markers of antioxidative defense in humans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 5671–5676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rajasree, G.; Pillai, G.R. Effect of nitrogen nutrition on fruit quality and shelf life of cucurbitaceous vegetable bitter gourd. J. Plant Nutr. 2012, 35, 1139–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gajewski, M.; Szymczak, P.; Danilcenko, H. Changes of physical and chemical traits of roots of different carrot cultivars under cold store conditions. Veg. Crop. Res. Bull. 2010, 72, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rozek, S.; Leja, M.; Wojciechowska, R. Effect of differentiated nitrogen fertilization on changes of certain compounds in stored carrot roots. Folia Hortic. 2000, 12, 21–34. [Google Scholar]
  28. Herppich, W.B.; Mempel, H.; Geyer, M. Effects of postharvest mechanical and climatic stress on carrot tissue water relations. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 1999, 16, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Robinson, J.E.; Browne, K.M.; Burton, W.G. Storage characteristics of some vegetables and soft fruits. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1975, 81, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Larsen, H.; Liland, K.H. Determination of O2 and CO2 transmission rate of whole packages and single perforations in micro-perforated packages for fruit and vegetables. J. Food Eng. 2013, 119, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Conte, A.; Scrocco, C.; Brescia, I.; Mastromatteo, M.; Del Nobile, M.A. Shelf life of fresh-cut Cime di rapa (Brassica rapa L.) as affected by packaging. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 1218–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dawange, S.P.; Dash, S.K.; Bal, L.M.; Panda, M.K. Quality of minimally processed carrots in perforation-mediated modified-atmosphere packaging (PM-MAP). J. Food Meas. Charact. 2016, 10, 746–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Matimati, I.; Verboom, G.A.; Cramer, M.D. Nitrogen regulation of transpiration controls mass-flow acquisition of nutrients. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Seljåsen, R.; Kristensen, H.L.; Lauridsen, C.; Wyss, G.S.; Kretzschmar, U.; Birlouez-Aragone, I.; Kahl, J. Quality of carrots as affected by pre- and postharvest factors and processing. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 2611–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Seljåsen, R.; Lea, P.; Torp, T.; Riley, H.; Berentsen, E.; Thomsen, M.; Bengtsson, G.B. Effects of genotype, soil type, year and fertilisation on sensory and morphological attributes of carrots (Daucus carota L.). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 1786–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dattner, M.; Bohn, D. Characterization of print quality in terms of colorimetric aspects. In Printing on Polymers: Fundamentals and Applications; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Nederland, 2015; pp. 329–345. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sorensen, J.N. Nitrogen effects on vegetable crop production and chemical composition. Acta Hortic. 1999, 506, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Smoleń, S.; Sady, W.; Ledwozyw-Smoleń, I.; Strzetelski, P.; Liszka-Skoczylas, M.; Rozek, S. Quality of fresh and stored carrots depending on iodine and nitrogen fertilization. Food Chem. 2014, 159, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ierna, A. Influence of harvest date on nitrate contents of three potato varieties for off-season production. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2009, 22, 551–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sharma, K.D.; Karki, S.; Thakur, N.S.; Attri, S. Chemical composition, functional properties and processing of carrot-A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 49, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Schaller, R.G.; Schnitzler, W.H. Nitrogen nutrition and flavour compounds of carrots (Daucus carota L.) cultivated in Mitscherlich pots. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gutezeit, B. Yield and nitrate content of carrots (Daucus carota L.) as affected by nitrogen supply. Acta Hortic. 1999, 506, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ilić, Z.S.; Šunić, L. Nitrate content of root vegetables during different storage conditions. Acta Hortic. 2015, 1079, 659–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cserni, I.; Prohaszka, K.; Patocs, I. The effect of different N-doses on changes in the nitrate-sugar and carotene contents of carrot. Acta Agron. Hung. 1989, 38, 341–348. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tang, G.Q.; Sturm, A. Antisense repression of sucrose synthase in carrot (Daucus carota L.) affects growth rather than sucrose partitioning. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999, 41, 465–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ilić, Z.S.; Šunić, L.; Milenković, L.; Pestorić, M.; Belović, M.; Kevrešan, Ž.; Mastilović, J. Nutrients content and texture changes as affected of harvest time, postharvest treatments and storage condition of carrot. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2017, 16, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bryant, J.P.; Stuart Chapin, F.; Klein, D.R. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 1983, 40, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Smoleń, S.; Sady, W. The effect of various nitrogen fertilization and foliar nutrition regimes on the concentrations of sugars, carotenoids and phenolic compounds in carrot (Daucus carota L.). Sci. Hortic. 2009, 120, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nicolle, C.; Simon, G.; Rock, E.; Amouroux, P.; Rémésy, C. Genetic variability influences carotenoid, vitamin, phenolic, and mineral content in white, yellow, purple, orange, and dark-orange carrot cultivars. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2004, 129, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Mareczek, A.; Wyzgolik, G.; Leja, M. Antioxidative ability of carrot as related to urea foliar application. Hort. Veg. Grow. 2004, 23, 329–335. [Google Scholar]
  51. Leja, M.; Rożek, S.; Mareczek, A. Effect of fertilization with reduced nitrogen forms on phenolic metabolism in carrot roots. Umbelliferae Improv. Newsl. 1998, 8, 20–22. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lombardo, S.; Restuccia, C.; Muratore, G.; Barbagallo, R.N.; Licciardello, F.; Pandino, G.; Scifò, G.O.; Mazzaglia, A.; Ragonese, F.; Mauromicale, G. Effect of nitrogen fertilisation on the overall quality of minimally processed globe artichoke heads. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 650–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Salveit, M.E. Physical and physiological changes in minimally processed fruits and vegetable. In Phytochemistry of Fruit and Vegetables; Tomás-Barberán, A., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 205–220. [Google Scholar]
  54. Ismail, A.; Zamaliah, M.M.; Chin, W.F. Total antioxidant activity and phenolic content in selected vegetables. Food Chem. 2004, 87, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agronomy 10 01982 g001 550
Figure 1. Cumulative weight loss (CWL) in carrots as affected by “nitrogen fertilization × leaf presence”. Red histograms: leaf−; blue histograms: leaf+. Vertical bars indicate the standard error (n = 12).
Figure 1. Cumulative weight loss (CWL) in carrots as affected by “nitrogen fertilization × leaf presence”. Red histograms: leaf−; blue histograms: leaf+. Vertical bars indicate the standard error (n = 12).
Agronomy 10 01982 g001
Agronomy 10 01982 g002 550
Figure 2. Cumulative weight loss (A), firmness (B), total polyphenols content (C), and antioxidant activity (D) in carrots as affected by “nitrogen fertilization × storage time” interaction. Each time point represents means ± standard error (n = 6). Red line: N120; blue line: N240.
Figure 2. Cumulative weight loss (A), firmness (B), total polyphenols content (C), and antioxidant activity (D) in carrots as affected by “nitrogen fertilization × storage time” interaction. Each time point represents means ± standard error (n = 6). Red line: N120; blue line: N240.
Agronomy 10 01982 g002
Agronomy 10 01982 g003a 550Agronomy 10 01982 g003b 550
Figure 3. Cumulative weight loss (A), root dry matter content (B), firmness (C), and reducing sugars content (D) in carrots as affected by “leaf presence × storage time” interaction. Each time point represent means ± standard error (n = 6). Red line: leaf−; blue line: leaf+.
Figure 3. Cumulative weight loss (A), root dry matter content (B), firmness (C), and reducing sugars content (D) in carrots as affected by “leaf presence × storage time” interaction. Each time point represent means ± standard error (n = 6). Red line: leaf−; blue line: leaf+.
Agronomy 10 01982 g003aAgronomy 10 01982 g003b
Agronomy 10 01982 g004 550
Figure 4. Leaf dry matter of carrots as affected by “nitrogen fertilization × storage time” interaction. Each time point represents means ± standard error (n = 6). Red line: N120; blue line: N240.
Figure 4. Leaf dry matter of carrots as affected by “nitrogen fertilization × storage time” interaction. Each time point represents means ± standard error (n = 6). Red line: N120; blue line: N240.
Agronomy 10 01982 g004
Table
Table 1. F values resulting from analysis of variance for all studied variables.
Table 1. F values resulting from analysis of variance for all studied variables.
DfCWL
(g kg−1 FW)		Root DM Content (%)Firmness (N)ΔE*abNitrate Content
(mg kg−1 FW)		RSc Content
(g kg−1 FW)		TPC (mg GAE kg−1 FW)TEAC (mg Trolox kg−1 FW)
Nitrogen rate (N)1162.2 ***8.8 ***5.0 *323.8 ***103.3 ***NS51.4 ***5.3 *
Leaf presence (L)150.4 ***NS62.2 ***NS20.0 ***13.8 ***NSNS
Storage time (S)465.6 ***NS66.9 ***52.7 ***3.5 *26.1 ***49.1 ***105.6 ***
N × L128.1 ***NSNSNSNSNSNSNS
N × S425.8 ***NS6.7 ***NSNSNS3.1 *19.6 ***
L × S411.3 ***4.9 ***5.1 **NSNS4.4 **NSNS
N × L × S4NSNSNSNSNSNSNSNS
Df: degrees of freedom; CWL: cumulative weight loss; DM: dry matter; RSc: reducing sugars; TPC: total polyphenols content; TEAC: Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity; NS: not significant; *, **, ***: significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.
Table
Table 2. Physicochemical traits of carrots as affected by the main factors.
Table 2. Physicochemical traits of carrots as affected by the main factors.
CWL
(g kg−1 FW)		Leaf DM Content (%)Root DM Content (%)Firmness
(N)		ΔE*ab
N fertilizationN12023.0 b15.6 b11.7 b19.3 b0.38 b
N24066.5 a16.4 a12.2 a20.2 a0.86 a
Leaf presenceleaf–32.6 b-11.8 a21.3 a0.63 a
leaf+56.9 a-12.4 a18.2 b0.62 a
Storage timeS0-14.9 d11.7 a21.7 b-
S315.1 d15.1 cd11.9 a23.4 a0.38 d
S628.5 c15.9 bc11.8 a20.7 b0.55 c
S1260.7 b16.1 b12.1 a19.0 c0.74 b
S2474.7 a18.2 a12.7 a13.9 d0.81 a
CWL: cumulative weight loss; DM: dry matter. Different letters among factor means indicate significance at Fisher’s protected LSD test (p ≤ 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Compositional traits of carrot roots as affected by the main factors.
Table 3. Compositional traits of carrot roots as affected by the main factors.
Nitrate Content
(mg kg−1 FW)		RSc Content
(g kg−1 FW)		TPC
(mg GAE kg−1 FW)		TEAC
(mg Trolox kg−1 FW)
N fertilizationN12054.9 b17.4 a512 a194 a
N240105.9 a17.3 a440 b181 b
Leaf presenceleaf−91.6 a16.0 b485 a199 a
leaf+69.2 b18.7 a467 a176 a
Storage timeS091.8 a13.0 e395 e93 d
S389.7 a14.5 d424 d175 c
S678.1 b16.5 c472 c181 c
S1276.5 b19.6 b490 b214 b
S2465.9 c23.2 a600 a272 a
RSc: reducing sugars; TPC: total polyphenols content; TEAC: trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity. Different letters among factor means indicate significance at Fisher’s protected LSD test (p ≤ 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ierna, A.; Mauro, R.P.; Leonardi, C.; Giuffrida, F. Shelf-Life of Bunched Carrots as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization and Leaf Presence. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121982

AMA Style

Ierna A, Mauro RP, Leonardi C, Giuffrida F. Shelf-Life of Bunched Carrots as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization and Leaf Presence. Agronomy. 2020; 10(12):1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121982

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ierna, Anita, Rosario Paolo Mauro, Cherubino Leonardi, and Francesco Giuffrida. 2020. "Shelf-Life of Bunched Carrots as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization and Leaf Presence" Agronomy 10, no. 12: 1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121982

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop