Next Article in Journal
Drying Process of Waterborne Paint Film on Bamboo Laminated Lumber for Furniture
Previous Article in Journal
Microscopic Mechanism of Electrical Aging of PVDF Cable Insulation Material
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Severely Deformed Polypropylene in ECAE (Equal Channel Angular Extrusion) via Routes A and C
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of rGO Content and Drying Method on the Textural, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties of rGO/Polymer Composites

by
Jelena D. Jovanovic
1,*,
Stevan N. Blagojevic
1 and
Borivoj K. Adnadjevic
2
1
Institute of General and Physical Chemistry, Studentski Trg 12-16/V, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Faculty of Physical Chemistry, University of Belgrade, Studentski Trg 12-16, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(5), 1287; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15051287
Submission received: 1 February 2023 / Revised: 24 February 2023 / Accepted: 25 February 2023 / Published: 3 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structure-Property Relationship of Polymer Materials)

Abstract

:
Composite hydrogels samples consisting of poly(methyl methacrylate/butyl acrylate/2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) (poly-OH) and up to 60% reduced graphene oxide (rGO) containing rGO were synthesized. The method of coupled thermally induced self-assembly of graphene oxide (GO) platelets within a polymer matrix and in situ chemical reduction of GO was applied. The synthesized hydrogels were dried using the ambient pressure drying (APD) and freeze-drying (FD) methods. The effects of the weight fraction of rGO in the composites and the drying method on the textural, morphological, thermal, and rheological properties were examined for the dried samples. The obtained results indicate that APD leads to the formation of non-porous xerogels (X) of high bulk density (D), while FD results in the formation of highly porous aerogels (A) with low D. An increase in the weight fraction of rGO in the composite xerogels leads to an increase in D, specific surface area (SA), pore volume (Vp), average pore diameter (dp), and porosity (P). With an increase in the weight fraction of rGO in A-composites, the D values increase while the values of SP, Vp, dp, and P decrease. Thermo-degradation (TD) of both X and A composites takes place through three distinct steps: dehydration, decomposition of residual oxygen functional group, and polymer chain degradation. The thermal stabilities (TS) of the X-composites and X-rGO are higher than those of the A-composites and A-rGO. The values of the storage modulus (E’) and the loss modulus (E”) of the A-composites increase with the increase in their weight fraction of rGO.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Aerogels are three-dimensional (3D) porous materials that are the lightest solid materials known, presenting a novel class of materials. Aerogels exhibit some unique properties such as low bulk density (D = 3 kg/m3), high porosity (P = 90–99%), large specific surface areas (SA), low thermal conductivity (k = 0.014 W/mK at room temperature), low refractive index, and low dielectric constants [1]. The most important class of carbon aerogels are graphene-based aerogels (GAs), which are characterized by low D = 9–96 mg/cm3, and high pore volume (Vp = 1.5–2.9 cm3/g), SA = 130–1800 m2/g, specific capacitance, and cyclic stability. GAs are promising materials that attract significant attention and have a number of possible applications such as electrodes materials [2,3], supercapacitors [4], gas storage and separation [5], sensors [6] catalyst supports [7,8], photonic band gap materials [9], separation membranes [10], phase- changing materials [11], etc.
In the literature, numerous methods have been described for producing GAs that can be classified into several categories: hydrothermal reduction [12], chemical reduction [13], cross-linking [14], template-mediated assembly [15,16], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [17], 3D printing [18], and 3D printing-freeze drying [1]. Comprehensive literature overviews in the field of polymer-graphene-based composites, in regard to their, preparation, characterization, and applications are given in the papers of M. Zhang et al. [19], A. Arzac et al. [20], W. C. Hu et al. [21], C. N. Nwosu et al., [22], Y. Fadil et al. [23].
Methods of reactive emulsion mixing have been described for the synthesis of poly(methyl methacrylate/butyl acrylate/2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate)/rGO composite (PMMA/BA/HEMA-/rGO) [24] and in situ synthesis by semicontinuous emulsion polymerization in the presence of polyurethane (PU) [25]. Composite hydrogel supports by self-assembly of GO nanoplatelets in a polymer latex matrix with the addition of ascorbic acid (AAs) as a GO reducing agent have been synthesized by using methyl methacrylate (MMA) and butyl acrylate (BA) copolymer latexes, functionalized by Br and OH. [26]. Poly (methyl methacrylate-co- butyl acrylate-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PMMA/BA/HEMA) filled with graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) reinforced nanocomposites have been synthesized and their sensing properties investigated [27].
Zhang et al. synthesized composites of polyacrylates with different functional groups: carboxyl P(MMA/BA/AA), hydroxyl P(MMA/BA/HEA), and acylamino groups P(MMA/BA/AM) and amino-functionalized GO via emulsion polymerization [28]. Advancements in the synthesis of graphene-based polymeric nanocomposites have been presented [29]. M. D. Prasad et al., presented synthesis methods for graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) reinforced polymer nanocomposites along with rheological and thermal properties [30]. A simple method for obtaining colloidally stable graphene-based polymer nanocomposite has been developed [31].
The drying method for GA preparation is an important factor that limits their large-scale production. In the literature, numerous drying methods have been described for the preparation of 3D porous GA: supercritical drying (SC), [32], freeze-drying [33], vacuum drying [34], ambient pressure drying [35], and a combination of freeze-thawing and APD [36]. APD is found to be more suitable for the large-scale production of GA. However, during APD drying, strong capillary forces act in the initial structure of the partially dried hydrogel in the small pores, which leads to the collapse of the porous structure and prevents the formation of an aerogel [35]. For that reason, the most frequently applied drying methods used to obtain GA are mainly the two drying methods: SC and FD. Advances in 3D-GA preparation by different drying methods have been reviewed [37]. Zhang et al. investigated the effects of SC and FD methods on the GAs properties. [38].
GAs with enhanced mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties have been prepared by supercritical ethanol drying and high-temperature reduction [39]. X. Jing et al. synthesized GAs samples by the sol-gel method, which have been dried by SD and FD methods. The drying method notably influenced GA microstructure and mechanical compression [40]. Wang et al. investigated the effect of drying conditions on structure and electrochemical performance using N-doped graphene as a model material. When the graphene hydrogel was directly freeze-dried, an interconnected porous structure can be obtained, whereas, heat-dried and pre-frozen samples had layered structures [41]. A novel method based on APD for the preparation of GA with superelasticity and multifunctionality has been presented. The method was based on recasting the partially reduced GO hydrogel with the ice-template method [36].
To the best of our knowledge, literature data concerning the effects of weight fraction of rGO and method of drying on the textural, morphological, thermal, and rheological properties of composite hydrogels (CHG) are very sparse. The aim of this work was to investigate the effects of weight fraction of rGO and method of drying (APD and FD) on texture properties: (specific surface area (SA), pores volume (Vp), average pore diameter (dp), porosity (P) and bulk density (D)), along with their morphology, thermal stability, and rheological properties (storage modulus (E’) and loss modulus (E”)) of aerogels (A) and xerogels (X), obtained by the method of coupled thermally induced self-assembly of graphene oxide (GO) platelets within a polymer matrix and in situ chemical reduction of GO.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Technical grade methyl methacrylate (MMA), and butyl acrylate (BA), Quimidroga, Barcelona, Spain, 2-hydroxy ethyl methacrylate (HEMA), Sigma-Aldrich Chemie, Gmbh, Steinheim, Germany, were used as monomers. Potassium persulfate (p.a.) (KPS), and 4,4-azobis(4-cyanovaleric acid) (V-501) (p.a.), Sigma-Aldrich Chemie, Gmbh, Steinheim, Germany were used as initiators. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (p.a.), Sigma-Aldrich, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie, Gmbh, Steinheim, Germany and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) (puriss) with an average weight molar weight Mw = 10,000, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie, Gmbh, Steinheim, Germany, were used as surfactants. Graphene oxide (GO) aqueous dispersion (concentration 4 g/L GO, >95% monolayer content), Graphenea, San Sebastian, Spian, and ascorbic acid (AsA) (p.a.), Acros, Gell, Belgioum. All the chemicals were used without further purification. Oxygen-free-grade nitrogen and double-deionized water were used throughout the experimentation.

2.2. Synthesis of Composite Hydrogels and rGO Hydrogel

The synthesis of composite hydrogel (CHG) was performed by the method of coupled thermally induced self-assembly of GO platelets within a polymer matrix and in situ chemical reduction of GO. An aqueous dispersion of OH functionalized polymer based on MMA/BA/HEMA in weight fractions of 49.5/49.5/1, was prepared by the method of seeded semicontinuous emulsion polymerization of poly-OH. Details about the synthesis and characterization are given elsewhere [26]. The synthesis of CHG was performed by the method of coupled thermally induced self-assembly of graphene oxide (GO) platelets within a polymer matrix and in situ chemical reduction of GO. Briefly, GO dispersion (50 g) was mixed in different weight fractions rGO with poly-OH (1.25/1; 0.63/1, and 0.42/1) for 3 h. The mixtures were afterward heated to 70 °C and AsA reducing agent (AsA/GO weight fraction of 1) was added and left to react for 3 h. In order to remove residual reactants, hydrogels were dialyzed for one week in ultrapure water controlling the conductivity until it remained constant. To that end, a Spectral/Por dialysis membrane (Spectrumlabs) with a molecular cut-off of 12,000–14,000 Da was used. The rGO hydrogel was synthesized by the same procedure as GH without the presence of poly-OH.
Synthesized poly-OH, CHG, and rGO-HG were dried by two methods: freeze drying (FD) of hydrogels, which was carried out under vacuum in a lyophilizer (Telstar LyoQuest-85), and ambient pressure drying (APD) which was carried out at laboratory oven at 70 °C during 24 h, until a constant weight of the dried products was achieved. Samples obtained by FD are denoted: A-poly-OH, A-30, A-39, A-56, A-rGO, and by APD: X-poly-OH, X-30, X-39, X-56, X-rGO, where 30, 39 and 56 represent rGO’s percentage content in the composites.

2.3. Characterization

2.3.1. Textural Properties

Textural properties: the specific surface area (SA), pores volume (Vp), average pore diameter (dp), porosity (P), and bulk density (D) were determined.
Determination of SA of the examined samples was performed by the BET method. Low-temperature adsorption-desorption isotherms of N2 (−196 °C) were measured on a Micrometrics ASAP 2010, Nocross, GA, USA.
Determination of Vp was performed on the basis of the measured volume of adsorbed N2 at a relative pressure p/po = 0.99.
The average pore diameter was calculated using Equation (1):
d p = 4   V p SA
The porosity of the investigated samples was calculated based on Equation (2):
P =   V p D × 100
The bulk densities of the samples of aerogels and xerogels were calculated as a ratio of their weight and volume. The samples were cut into a parallelogram cube shape with dimensions 10 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm, whereas the xerogels samples had dimensions 4 mm × 4 mm × 1 mm and their weights were determined.

2.3.2. Morphology

The morphology of the investigated samples was examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi S-4800, Hitacchi, Tokyo, Japan), at 15 kV accelerating voltage, after coating the samples with a thin layer of gold under reduced pressure. The samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and afterward broken up to investigate the cross-section area, which was scanned at a desired magnification in a range of 2000×–50,000×.

2.3.3. Thermal Degradation and Stability

Thermogravimetric curves (TG) and differential thermogravimetric curves (DTG) of the investigated samples were recorded using a Thermo gravimetric Analyser model Q500 (TA Instruments, Newtown, PA, USA). The samples (~3 mg) were heated from 25 °C to 800 °C in open pans with a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere with a flow rate of 100 mL/min.

2.3.4. Mechanical Properties

The dependencies of storage modulus (E’) and the loss modulus (E”) of the A-samples on frequency were recorded on an AR-G2 rheometer (TA Instruments) with 40 mm diameter parallel steel plate geometry at 25 °C. Frequency experiments were performed in the range of 0.01 to 100 Hz at a fixed oscillatory strain of 0.2% applied to the samples cut into a parallelogram cube shape with dimensions 10 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm in compression mode. The X-samples lost their structure during the measurements, forming a kind of composite powder material, and therefore their mechanical properties were not further investigated.

3. Results and Discussion

Samples of poly(methylmethacrylate/butylacrylate/hydroxy-ethylmethacrylate) (poly-OH) composite hydrogels (CHG) with different rGO content, were synthesized by the described procedure and dried by the FD and APD methods. Figure 1 shows images of a representative sample of hydrogel CHG-56 and its derived composites A-56 and X-56.
As can be seen from Figure 1, FD drying leads to the formation of A-composite samples that almost fully retain their volume with respect to the starting hydrogel sample, whereas APD drying causes a substantial decrease in the volume of obtained X-composite sample. The textural properties of the synthesized samples were investigated. The basic textural properties: D, SA, Vp, dp, and P, of the samples dried by APD are given in Table 1.
The X-composite samples and X-rGO shows moderate D = 450–930 mg/dm3 and low P = 31–96%. The increase in the weight fraction of rGO in the composite leads to an increase in the values of D, SA, Vp, dp, and P. The D value of X-rGO is lower than those of the X-composites, while the values of SA, Vp, dp, and P are higher than the corresponding values of the X-composites. The determined textural properties of X-rGO and the X-composite samples with different weight fractions of rGO indicate that APD leads to structural changes in the hydrogel, which are demonstrated by the collapse of the hydrogel network due to the action of capillary forces [42]. The increase in D and P in the X-composites with the increase in weight fraction of rGO can be attributed to the number of contacts between fragments that were created due to the collapse of the network structure under the action of capillary forces. The increase in SA, Vp, dp, and P with the increase in the weight fraction of rGO indicates an increase in the relative number of fragments containing rGO sheets in relation to the samples that contain rGO sheets with bonded polymer particles. As a consequence, SA, Vp, dp, and P increase [43,44,45].
The textural properties of samples dried by FD are shown in Table 2.
Conversely, FD of hydrogels of both rGO and composites with different weight fractions of rGO leads to the formation of samples with high P = 2000–8800% and low D = 25–53 mg/cm3 (aerogels). The high porosity and low D of A-rGO and A-composite samples indicate that there is no distortion and shrinking of the network structure, as well as that there is no change in the volume and structure of the porous system when they were dried by FD. The increase in the weight fraction of rGO in the CHG leads to an increase in the value of D and P, and a decrease in the value of SA, Vp, and dp, of the A-composite samples. The values of SA and Vp, dp, and P of A-rGO are higher than the corresponding values of the A-composites, while, on the contrary, the D value of A-rGO is lower than the D of all A-composite samples. The values of SA of A-rGO composites are much lower than SA of single graphene sheet (SA = 2640 m2/g) [39], most probably due to the layering or partial overlapping of flexible graphene sheets created during the self-assembly process to form a 3D network with higher density.
As in the case of APD, there is an increase in D of the A-composites with an increase in rGO, indicating: (a) the existence of covalent interactions between polymer particles and rGO-sheets and the formation of rGO-sheets with a bound polymer; (b) mutual cross-linking between chains of rGO sheets and chains of rGO-sheets with bonded polymer particles; and (c) partial overlapping between the sheets, which leads to the formation of a 3D spatial network. Since GO is a multifunctional crosslinker, its connection with chains in the system depends on the relative contribution of GO and rGO in the reaction mixture. Therefore, with a change in the weight fraction of rGO in the composite its spatial structure changes. As the weight fraction of GO in the composite increases, the degree of cross-linking of the chains increases, which results in SA, Vp, dp, and P decreasing, whereas D increases.
With the aim of determining the effects of the weight fraction of rGO and the drying method on the morphological properties of the synthesized composites and rGO samples, their SEM images were taken. In Figure 2, as an example, SEM images of X -rGO, and X-56 under different magnifications obtained by APD are shown.
The presence of polymer particles, the chains of rGO sheets, and formed pores are not observed in the SEM images. The X-rGO and X-composite samples show a compact and non-porous appearance with twisted fibrous morphology. The complex, twisted fibrous morphology of the X- samples is most likely created by the mutual connection and twisting of fragments that have been formed by the collapse of the network of partially dried hydrogels. In Figure 3, as an example, SEM images of: (a) A-rGO and (b) A-56 under different magnifications are shown.
Figure 3a,b clearly show that samples A-56 and A-rGO are highly porous. The porosity of the composite and A-rGO is most likely created by interconnection by partial overlapping of flexible rGO sheets with flexible rGO sheets with covalently bonded polymer. The formed pores are hexagonal in shape and thin-walled, with macro-porous dimensions (12–50 microns).
In order to determine the effects of the rGO weight fraction in the X- and A-composites and the applied method of drying on their thermal stability (TS) of the obtained samples, the non-isothermal TG and DTG curves of the synthesized samples were recorded and analyzed. The TG and DTG curves of the investigated X-samples are shown in Figure 4.
The TG curves of X-composites have a complex shape. On the DTG curves of those samples, three well-separated peaks are clearly visible, indicating the existence of three stages of thermal degradation (TD) of the X-composite. The values of characteristic TD temperatures—initial temperature (Ti), temperature of the peak’s maximum (Tm), and final temperature (Tf)—and the weight loss (Δm) for each TD stage of the X-samples are given in Table 3.
The first TD stage of the X-composite, which begins at T1,i = 50 °C and ends at T1,f = 137 °C is followed by Δm1 = 5–8%. In the temperature interval of T2,i = 343–374 °C to T2,f = 490–520 °C, the second TD stage of the X-composite takes place with a characteristic Δm2 = 20–26%. The third TD stage of the X-composite starts at T3,i = 580–520 °C and ends at T3,f = 680–665 °C with Δm3 = 26–31%.
An increase in the weight fraction of rGO in the X-composite does not lead to the change in the T1,i and T1,f, values, whereas the values of other characteristic temperatures and weight losses decrease. The decrease in the characteristic temperatures of the second TD stage and third TD stage along with Δm2 and Δm3 indicates that the thermostability (TS) of the X-composites increases with an increase in the weight fraction of rGO in the composite.
On the TG curve of X-poly-OH (Figure 4a), with increasing temperature, a unique sigmoidal change in the weight of the sample and, accordingly, a corresponding sharp peak on the DTG curve can be observed. The determined shape of the TG and DTG curves indicates that TD of poly-OH is performed in a single stage. The TD of poly-OH begins at T2,i = 220 °C and ends at T2,f = 410 °C, followed by Δm2 = 97.2%.
In regard to the temperature interval at which the TD of the X-poly-OH takes place, it can be assumed that the second TD stage of the X-composite is most likely connected to the TD of the bound polymer for rGO. The values of the characteristic temperatures of the second TD stage of the TD-X composite are significantly higher than the corresponding values of the X-polymer, and the weight losses are lower, which designates a significant increase in the TS of the X-composite compared to poly-OH. Two well-separated peaks are noticeable on the DTG curve of X-rGO (Figure 4b), indicating the existence of two TD stages for X-rGO. The first TD stage of X-rGO takes place in the temperature interval from T1,l = 50 °C to T1,f = 131 °C and is followed by Δmi = 8% and the second TD stage from T3,i = 405 °C to T3,f = 665 °C with Δm3 = 88%. In accordance with literature data, the first TD stage of X-rGO is most likely associated with the thermodesorption of adsorbed water on X-rGO, and the second stage with the decomposition of residual oxygen-containing functional groups on rGO (C=O; C-O) [45,46,47]. The determined values of the characteristic temperatures of TD of X rGO indicate that the first stage of the TD of X-composite is connected with the thermodesorption of water and the third with the decomposition of residual oxygen-containing functional groups on rGO. The values of T1,i and T1,f of the X-composite are identical to the corresponding ones of x-rGO, while the Δm of the composite is lower than that of X-rGO. On the contrary, the T3,i and T3,f values of X-composites are higher than those of X-rGO with a significantly lower weight loss, which indicates a higher TS of X-composite compared to X-rGO.
The TG and DTG curves of the A- samples are shown in Figure 5a,b.
The values of the characteristic temperatures: Ti, Tm, and Tf, and Δm for each TD stage of the A-samples are presented in Table 4.
As in the case of the X-composite, the TG curves of the A composites have a complex shape. Three distinct peaks are observed on the DTG curves, which indicate the existence of three TD stages of the A-composite. The first TD stage of the A-composite begins at T1,i ~104 °C and ends at T1,f ~235 °C. This level of TD of the composite is followed with Δmi = 5–16% and most likely, as in the case of X-composite, is associated with thermodesorption and adsorbed water on the samples.
In the temperature interval from T2,i = 250293 °C to T2,f = 360–388 °C, the second stage of TD of the A-composite takes place with a weight loss of Δm2 = 15–27%. The second stage of the TD of the A-composite is most likely connected to the TD of polymer particles bonded to the rGO sheets. The third TD stage of the composite begins at T3,i = 430–478 °C and ends at T3,f = 555–570 °C with Δm3 = 40–66%. As in the case of the X-composite, the third TD stage of the A-composite is most likely related to the decomposition of residual oxygen-containing functional groups on rGO. Increasing the weight fraction of rGO in the composite: (a) does not lead to changes in the values of the characteristic temperatures of the thermodesorption stage; (b) causes a decrease in the value of the characteristic temperatures of TD, bound polymer, and residual oxygen groups; and (c) leads to a decrease in the value of Δm from 27% to 15%, that is, from 68% to 40%.
The determined decrease in the characteristic temperatures and weight losses of the second TD stage and third TD stage of the A-composite with an increase in the weight fraction of rGO in the composite indicates the increased thermal stability of the composites.
Thermal degradation of A-poly-OH begins at T2i = 246 °C and ends at T2f = 446 °C with sample weight loss Δm2 = 98%. The characteristic temperatures of the TD of the A-composite of the bound polymer for rGO are higher than the corresponding values for the A-polymer, which indicates the significantly higher thermal stability of the A-composite compared to the A-poly-OH. On the DTG curve of A-rGO samples, as well as in the case of X-rGO samples, two peaks are observed that indicate that two stages of thermal degradation of A-rGO happened. The first TD stage of A-rGO occurs in the temperature interval from T1,i = 125 °C to T1,f = 230 °C with Δm1 = 16%. The second TD stage of A-rGO, which is associated with the decomposition of residual oxygen groups containing in rGO, takes place at temperatures between T3,i = 420 °C and T3,f = 564 °C with a sample weight loss of Δm3 = 70%.
The characteristic temperatures and weight loss of the thermodesorption stage of TD A-composite are lower than the corresponding values for A-rGO. In contrast, the characteristic temperatures of T3,i and T3,f of the third stage of thermal degradation of the composite samples are higher than the analogous values for the A-rGO sample. The weight losses of the A-composites are significantly lower (66–44%) than those of the A-rGO samples (70%), which indicates that the A-composite samples are more thermally stable than the A-rGO samples.
Based on a comparative analysis of the established effects of the applied APD and FD on the values of the characteristic temperatures of particular TD stages of investigated samples and their weight losses during them the following can be stated. The values of the characteristic temperatures of all TD stages of the X-composites are higher than the analogous ones for the A-composite samples, whereas the values of weight losses are lower. The increase in the value of the characteristic temperatures and the decrease in the weight loss of the X-samples indicates that they are more thermostable than the A-samples. The increase in the thermal stability of the X-composites in relation to the A-composites is a consequence of their compact and non-porous nature. If the values of characteristic temperatures and weight losses of X-poly-OH and A-poly-OH are compared, it can be concluded that APD drying leads to an increase in the TS of X-poly-OH compared to A-poly-OH. The characteristic temperatures of the thermosorption TD stage of A-rG0 are higher than the characteristic temperatures of the A-composites, whereas the characteristic temperatures of the decomposition stage of residual oxygen groups of the A-composites are higher than the corresponding ones of A-rGO. This also indicates an increase in the thermal stability of rGO dried by APD.
The effect of the rGO weight fraction on the mechanical properties of A-poly-OH, A-composites, and A-rGO was examined by the DMA method. Figure 6 shows the dependence of the storage modulus (E’) and the loss modulus (E”) on frequency.
Based on the results shown in Figure 6, the following can be concluded. The values of E’ and E” of the investigated A-samples are almost independent of frequency and the dependencies of E’ and E” on frequency are parallel. The values of E’ are significantly higher than the E” for all A-composite samples. The values of E’ and E” at each frequency for A-rGO are higher than the corresponding values for each of the examined A-composites. The values of E’ and E” of the A-composites increase with the increase in the weight fraction of rGO. The independence of E’ and E” of the frequency and their mutual parallelism confirms the existence of the aerogel structure of the A-composite samples and A-rGO. The significantly higher value of E’ than E” both in the case of composites and pure rGO, at all applied frequencies, indicates the dominant influence of elastic forces on the mechanical properties of the composites and A-rGO. The increase in the E’ with an increase in the weight fraction of rGO in the A-composite leads to an increase in the mechanical strength of the composite.
With the aim of finding an explanation for the increase in the E’ and the mechanical strength of the composite samples with an increase in the rGO weight fraction, the values of the density of crosslinking (qc) and the distance between two points of crosslinking (dc) were calculated based on the dependence of E’ on frequency [48]:
q c = E p R T
where E p is storage modulus on the threshold of rubber-like behavior; R is universal gas constant; and T is temperature.
q c = 1 q c N 1 / 3
where N is Avogadro’s number.
The effect of the weight fraction of rGO on qc and dc is shown in Table 5.
The values of qc increase with the increase in the concentration of rGO in the A-composite from 35 mol/m3 to 222 mol/m3, whereas the dc decreases from 3.62 nm to 1.93 m. The value of qc of rGO is higher than the qc value for any of the A-composites, whereas the dc value is lower than the values for investigated A-composites.
By analyzing the effect of the weight fraction of rGO on the value of qc and dc of the composites, it can be concluded that the values of both qc and dc change linearly with the increasing weight fraction of rGO according to the equations:
q c = 5.42   w r G O 8.17   R 2 = 0.999
d c = 3.50 0.026 w r G O   R 2 = 0.985
where w r G O is the weight fraction of rGO.
The linear dependence of qc and dc on the weight fraction of GO clearly implies that the cross-linking of the A-rGO aerogel is achieved by the mutual connection of graphene sheets in rGO, while in the case of A-composites, there is a connection of the rGO sheet with bounded polymers particles. Due to this connection, the qc increases and the dc decrease with the increasing weight fraction of rGO in the composite.

4. Conclusions

Samples of composite hydrogels with different weight fractions of rGO (0–60%) were synthesized by the method of coupled thermally induced self-assembly of GO platelets within a polymer matrix and in situ chemical reduction of GO. The effect of the weight fraction of rGO in combination with the drying method on textural properties (D, SA, Vp, dp, and P), morphological characteristics, thermal stability, and rheological properties (E’ and E’’) was determined. Based on the obtained results, it is possible to draw the following conclusions. Drying composite hydrogels using the APD method leads to the formation of non-porous powders—xerogels with: (a) Moderate D = 540–930 mg/cm3; (b) low SA (22–42 m2/g), Vp (0.017–0.042 cm3/g), and P (31–45%); (c) characteristic twisted fibrous structure; (d) significant TS. Increasing the weight fraction of rGO in xerogels causes an increase in the D, SA, Vp, dp, P, and TS of the xerogels. Drying of composite hydrogels by the FD method results in the formation of highly porous aerogel samples with high SA (660–920 m3/g), Vp (1.05–2.10 cm3/g), P (2000–7500%), and D (28–53 mg/cm3). Increasing the weight fraction of rGO in the A-composites leads to an increase in D and qc and a decrease in SA, Vp, P, and dc. The compact non-porous xerogels are a consequence of the collapse of the hydrogel network under the action of capillary forces during the drying of the CHG. Thermal degradation of the poly-OH occurs through a single stage, of A-rGO and X-rGO through two TD stages, whereas in the case of the A- and X-composites, three TD stages are observed (dehydration, decomposition of residual oxygen functional group, and polymer chain degradation). The thermal stabilities of the X-composites and X-rGO are higher than those of A-composites and A-rGO. The increase in D and TS, E’ and E’’, that is, the decrease in the values of SA, Vp, P, and dc of the aerogels with an increase in the weight fraction of rGO is a consequence of the increase in qc.

Author Contributions

J.D.J.: Data curation, Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing; B.K.A.: Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Supervision; S.N.B.: Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Resources. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The present investigations were supported by The Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, under Contracts No: 451-03-68/2022-14/200051, 451-03-68/2022-14/200146, 451-03-47/2023-01/200051, COST Action CA15107, The authors are especially acknowledged to dr Radmila Tomovska, research professor, Polymath, Spain, for all her support, enabling mutual collaboration through COST Action CA15107 and kindly providing all necessary materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gorgolis, G.; Galiotis, C. Graphene aerogels: A review. 2D Mater. 2017, 4, 032001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, Y.; Liang, J.; Chen, Y. An overview of the applications of graphene-based materials in supercapacitors. Small 2012, 8, 1805–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, Y.; Fu, Z.-Y.; Su, B.-L. Hierarchically Structured Porous Materials for Energy Conversion and Storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 4634–4667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Qiu, B.; Xing, M.; Zhang, J. Mesoporous TiO2 nanocrystals grown in situ on graphene aerogels for high photocatalysis and lithium-ion batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5852–5855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chang, Z.; Zhang, D.-S.; Chen, Q.; Bu, X.-H. Microporous organic polymers for gas storage and separation applications. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. PCCP 2013, 15, 5430–5442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schedin, F.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Hill, E.W.; Blake, P.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Novoselov, K.S. Detection of individual gas molecules adsorbed on graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 652–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhou, X.; Li, Y.; Peng, T.; Xie, W.; Zhao, X. Synthesis, characterization and its visible-light-induced photocatalytic property of carbon doped ZnO. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 1747–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Parlett, C.M.A.; Wilson, K.; Lee, A.F. Hierarchical porous materials: Catalytic applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 4, 23876–23893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, J.; Tao, C.-A.; An, Q.; Zhang, W.; Wu, Y.; Li, X.; Shen, D.; Li, G. 3D-ordered macroporous poly(ionic liquid) films as multifunctional materials. Chem. Comm. 2010, 46, 967–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, X.; Husson, S.M.; Qian, X.; Wickramasinghe, S.R. Inverse colloidal crystal microfiltration membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2010, 365, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhong, Y.; Zhou, M.; Huang, F.; Lin, T.; Wan, D. Effect of graphene aerogel on thermal behavior of phase change materials for thermal management, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2013, 113, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, Y.; Sheng, K.; Li, C.; Shi, G. Self-assembled graphene hydrogel via a one step hydrothermal process. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4324–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sun, H.; Xu, Z.; Gao, C. Multifunctional, ultra-flyweight, synergistically assembled carbon aerogels. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2554–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ma, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Ji, Q.; Xia, Y. Temperature-sensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)/graphene oxide nanocomposite hydrogels by in situ polymerization with improved swelling capability and mechanical behavior. Eur. Polym. J. 2013, 49, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, C.-M.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, C.-H.; Zhao, X.-C.; Zhang, B.-S.; Kong, Q.-Q.; Wang, M.-Z.; Yang, Y.-G.; Caia, R.; Su, D.S. Macroporous ‘bubble’ graphene film via template-directed ordered-assembly for high rate supercapacitors. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 7149–7151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Huang, L.; Li, C.; Hong, J.-D.; Shi, G. Highly Compressible Macroporous Graphene Monoliths via an Improved Hydrothermal Process. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4789–4793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bi, H.; Chen, I.-W.; Lin, T.; Huang, F. A New Tubular Graphene Form of a Tetrahedrally Connected Cellular Structure. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 5943–5949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, C.; Han TY, J.; Duoss, E.B.; Golobic, A.M.; Kuntz, J.D.; Spadaccini, C.M.; Worsley, M.A. Highly Compressible 3D Periodic Graphene Aerogel Microlattices. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, M.; Li, Y.; Su, Z.; Wei, G. Recent advances in the synthesis and applications of graphene–polymer nanocomposites. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 6107–6124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arzac, A.; Leal, G.P.; Carlos de la Cal, J.; Tomovska, R. Water-Borne Polymer/Graphene Nanocomposites. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2017, 302, 1600315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, W.C.; Li, W.D.; Dai, S.C.Z. A critical review on the development and performance of polymer/graphene nanocomposites. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2018, 25, 1059–1073. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nwosu, C.N.; Iliut, M.; Vijayaraghavan, A. Graphene and water-based elastomer nanocomposites—A review. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 9505–9540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fadil, Y.; Thickett, S.C.; Agarwal, V.; Zetterlund, P.B. Synthesis of graphene-based polymeric nanocomposites using emulsion techniques. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2022, 125, 101476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Spasevska, D.; Danilovska, V.; Leal, G.P.; Blazevska- Giliev, J.; Tomovska, R. Reactive emulsion mixing as a novel pathway toward water borne reduced graphene oxide/polymer composites. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 24477–24483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Spasevska, D.; Leal, G.P.; Fernández, M.; Blazevska Gilev, J.; Paulis, M.; Tomovska, R. Crosslinked reduced graphene oxide/polymer composites via in situ synthesis by semicontinuous emulsion polymerization. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 16414–16421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ormategui, N.; Veloso, A.; Leal, G.P.; Rodriguez-Couto, S.; Tomovska, R. Design of Stable and Powerful Nanobiocatalysts, Based on Enzyme Laccase Immobilized on Self-Assembled 3D Graphene/Polymer Composite Hydrogels. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 14104–14112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Trajcheva, A.; Politakos, N.; Perez, B.T.; Joseph, Y.; Gilev, J.B.; Tomovska, R. QCM nanocomposite gas sensors–Expanding the application of waterborne polymer composites based on graphene nanoribbon. Polymer 2021, 213, 123335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, W.; Li, S.; Ma, J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, C.; Yan, H. pH-Induced Electrostatic Interaction between Polyacrylates and Amino-Functionalized Graphene Oxide on Stability and Coating Performances. Polymers 2021, 13, 3406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Díez-Pascual, A.M. Development of Graphene-Based Polymeric Nanocomposites: A Brief Overview. Polymers 2021, 13, 2978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Prasad, M.D.; Sharma, A.; Tambe, P. Graphene Nanoribbons Reinforced Polymer Nanocomposites and its Applications: A Review. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2022, 2225, 012004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fadil, Y.; Agarwal, V.; Jasinski, F.; Thickett, S.C.; Minami, H.; Zetterlund, P.B. Electrically conductive polymer/rGO nanocomposite films at ambient temperature via miniemulsion polymerization using GO as surfactant. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 6566–6570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, Z.; Scherer, G.W. Supercritical Drying of Cementitious Materials. Cement Concrete Res. 2017, 99, 137–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Lei, Q.; Fang, X.; Xie, H.; Yu, W. Tightly-packed fluorinated graphene aerogel/polydimethylsiloxane composite with excellent thermal management properties. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022, 220, 109302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, C.; Qiu, L.; Zhang, B.; Li, D.; Liu, C.-Y. Robust Vacuum-/air-Dried Graphene Aerogels and Fast Recoverable Shape-Memory Hybrid Foams. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1510–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chabot, V.; Higgins, D.; Yu, A.P.; Xiao, X.C.; Chen, Z.W.; Zhang, J.J. A review of graphene and graphene oxide sponge materials and applications to energy and the environment. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1564–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, H.; Zhang, T.; Jiang, M.; Duana, Y.; Zhang, J. Ambient pressure dried graphene aerogels with superelasticity and multifunctionality. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 19268–19272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ding, M.; Li, C. Recent Advances in Simple Preparation of 3D Graphene Aerogels Based on 2D Graphene Materials. Front Chem. 2022, 10, 815463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, X.; Sui, Z.; Xu, B.; Yue, S.; Luo, Y.; Zhan, W.; Liu, B. Mechanically strong and highly conductive graphene aerogel and its use as electrodes for electrochemical power sources. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 6494–6497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cheng, Y.; Zhou, S.; Hu, P.; Zhao, G.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Han, W. Enhanced mechanical, thermal, and electric properties of graphene aerogels via supercritical ethanol drying and high-temperature thermal reduction. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Xie, J.; Niu, L.; Qiao, Y.; Lei, Y.; Li, G.; Zhang, X.; Chen, P. The influence of the drying method on the microstructure and the compression behavior of graphene aerogel. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2022, 121, 108772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Z.; Tang, Z.; Han, Z.; Shen, S.; Zhao, B.; Yang, J. Effect of drying conditions on the structure of three-dimensional N-doped graphene and its electrochemical performance. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 19838–19843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, R.; Xu, C. Preparation and properties of graphene nano sheets-polystyrene nanocomposites via in situ emulsion polymerization. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2010, 484, 247–253. [Google Scholar]
  43. Tan, Y.; Fang, L.; Xiao, J.; Song, Y.; Zheng, Q. Grafting of copolymers onto graphene by miniemulsion polymerization for conductive polymer composites: Improved electrical conductivity and compatibility induced by interfacial distribution of graphene. Polym Chem. 2013, 4, 2939–2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Adhikari, B.; Biswas, A.; Banerajee, A. Graphen- oxide -based hydrogels to make metal nanoparticle containing reduced graphene oxide—Based functionalized hybrid hydrogels. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 5472–5482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Acik, M.; Lee, G.; Mattevi, C.; Pirkle, A.; Naklace, R.; Chowala, M.; Cho, K.; Chabel, Y. The role of oxygen during thermal reduction of graphene oxide studied by infrared absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 115, 19761–19781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nguyen, S.; Nguyen, H.; Rinaldy, A.; Nguyen, N.; Fan, Z.; Duong, H. Morphology control and thermal stability of binderless- graphene aerogels from graphite for energy storage applications. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2012, 444, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, P.B. One-pot synthesis and characterization of reduced graphene oxide—Gelatin nanocomposite hydrogels. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 6171–6181. [Google Scholar]
  48. Goodwin, J.W.; Huges, R.W. Rheology for Chemists; The Royal Society for Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Images of the hydrogel H-56, A-56, and X-56.
Figure 1. Images of the hydrogel H-56, A-56, and X-56.
Polymers 15 01287 g001
Figure 2. SEM images under different magnifications: (a) and (b) X-rGO; (c) and (d) X-56.
Figure 2. SEM images under different magnifications: (a) and (b) X-rGO; (c) and (d) X-56.
Polymers 15 01287 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of: (a) A-rGO; (bd)A-56 under different magnifications.
Figure 3. SEM images of: (a) A-rGO; (bd)A-56 under different magnifications.
Polymers 15 01287 g003
Figure 4. TG (a) and DTG (b) curves of the X- samples: (_) X-poly(OH); (_) X-rGO; (_)X-56; (_)X-39; (_)X-30.
Figure 4. TG (a) and DTG (b) curves of the X- samples: (_) X-poly(OH); (_) X-rGO; (_)X-56; (_)X-39; (_)X-30.
Polymers 15 01287 g004
Figure 5. TG (a) and DTG (b) curves of the A- samples: (_) A-poly(OH); (_) A-rGO; (_)A-56; (_)A-39; (_)A-30.
Figure 5. TG (a) and DTG (b) curves of the A- samples: (_) A-poly(OH); (_) A-rGO; (_)A-56; (_)A-39; (_)A-30.
Polymers 15 01287 g005
Figure 6. Dependence of E’ and E” on frequency for A-samples: A-rGO: (__)E’ and (- -)E′; A-56: (__)E’ and (- -)E′; A-39: (__)E’ and (- -)E′; A-30: (__)E’ and (- -)E′.
Figure 6. Dependence of E’ and E” on frequency for A-samples: A-rGO: (__)E’ and (- -)E′; A-56: (__)E’ and (- -)E′; A-39: (__)E’ and (- -)E′; A-30: (__)E’ and (- -)E′.
Polymers 15 01287 g006
Table 1. Textural properties: D, SA, Vp, dp, and P, of samples dried by APD.
Table 1. Textural properties: D, SA, Vp, dp, and P, of samples dried by APD.
SampleD
(mg/cm3)
SA
(m2/g)
Vp
(cm3/g)
dp
(nm)
P
(%)
X-30540220.0173.131
X-39820230.0203.524
X-56930440.0423.745
X-rGO450520.0503.896
Table 2. Textural properties: D, SA, Vp, dp, and P, of samples dried by FD.
Table 2. Textural properties: D, SA, Vp, dp, and P, of samples dried by FD.
SampleD
(mg/cm3)
SA
(m2/g)
Vp
(cm3/g)
dp
(nm)
P
(%)
A-30289602.108.87500
A-39358801.808.15100
A-56536601.056.32000
A-RGO2510002.28.98800
Table 3. Characteristic temperatures and weight losses for each TD stage for X-samples.
Table 3. Characteristic temperatures and weight losses for each TD stage for X-samples.
X-poly-OHX-30X-39X-56X-rGO
T1,i (°C)-50505050
T1,m (°C)-198969595
T1,f (°C)-137136135131
Δm1 (%)-5558
T2,i (°C)220374359343-
T2,m (°C)350440420400-
T2,f (°C)410520500490-
Δm2 (%)97.2202620-
T3,i (°C)-580540520405
T3,m (°C)-640610568606
T3,f (°C)-680675670665
Δm3 (%)-31292688
Ti,j is temperature of a particular stage of TD where: i = 1, 2, 3 refer to TD stage and j = i, m, f refer to initial, peak’s maximum, and final T, and Δmi is weight loss of particular stage of TD (i = 1, 2, 3).
Table 4. Characteristic temperatures and weight losses for each TD stage for A-samples.
Table 4. Characteristic temperatures and weight losses for each TD stage for A-samples.
A-poly-OHA-30A-39A-56A-rGO
T1,i (°C)-104105104125
T1,m (°C)-168166168177
T1,f (°C)-232236235230
Δm1 (%)-76516
T2,i (°C)246293280250-
T2,m (°C)357350340295-
T2,f (°C)446388380360-
Δm2 (%)98271815-
T3,i (°C)-478450433420
T3,m (°C)-570
T3,f (°C)-628609590564
Δm3 (%)-66604070
Ti,j is temperature of a particular stage of TD where: I = 1, 2, 3 refer to TD stage and j = i, m, f refer to initial, peak’s maximum, and final T, and Δmi is weight loss of particular stage of TD (i = 1, 2, 3).
Table 5. Effect of weight fraction of rGO on qc and dc.
Table 5. Effect of weight fraction of rGO on qc and dc.
SampleE’,
(kPa)
qc,
(mol/m3)
dc,
(nm)
Poly-OH86.735.03.62
A-3020080.82.74
A-39323130.52.33
A-56550222.11.95
A-rGO567228.81.93
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jovanovic, J.D.; Blagojevic, S.N.; Adnadjevic, B.K. The Effects of rGO Content and Drying Method on the Textural, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties of rGO/Polymer Composites. Polymers 2023, 15, 1287. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15051287

AMA Style

Jovanovic JD, Blagojevic SN, Adnadjevic BK. The Effects of rGO Content and Drying Method on the Textural, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties of rGO/Polymer Composites. Polymers. 2023; 15(5):1287. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15051287

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jovanovic, Jelena D., Stevan N. Blagojevic, and Borivoj K. Adnadjevic. 2023. "The Effects of rGO Content and Drying Method on the Textural, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties of rGO/Polymer Composites" Polymers 15, no. 5: 1287. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15051287

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop