Next Article in Journal
Hyaluronic Acid—Extraction Methods, Sources and Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Laboratory Studies about Microplastic Aging and Its Effects on the Adsorption of Chlorpyrifos
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Preparation and Characterization of Activated Carbon/Polymer Composites: A Review

by
Yoon-Ji Yim
1 and
Byung-Joo Kim
2,*
1
Busan Textile Materials Research Center, Korea Dyeing and Finishing Technology Institute, Busan 46744, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Nano & Advanced Materials Engineering, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(16), 3472; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15163472
Submission received: 15 April 2022 / Revised: 19 June 2023 / Accepted: 30 June 2023 / Published: 19 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites)

Abstract

:
Activated carbon (AC) and activated carbon fibers (ACFs) are materials with a large specific surface area and excellent physical adsorption properties due to their rich porous structure, and they are used as electrode materials to improve the performance of adsorbents or capacitors. Recently, multiple studies have confirmed the applicability of AC/polymer compo-sites in various fields by exploiting the unique physical and chemical properties of AC. As the excellent mechanical properties, stability, antistatic and electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding functions of activated carbon/polymer composite materials were confirmed in recent studies, it is expected that activated carbon can be utilized as an ideal reinforcing material for low-cost polymer composite materials. Therefore, in this review, we would like to describe the fabrication, characterization and applicability of AC/polymer composites.

1. Introduction

Activated carbon (AC) and activated carbon fibers (ACFs) have rich porous structures, large specific surface areas, and excellent physical adsorption properties. Such AC and ACFs can be synthesized using various raw materials such as coal [1], petroleum [2], biomass [3], and the like, and activated carbon having various properties can be manufactured according to activation methods such as gas activation [4] and chemical activation [5]. Usually, owing to its excellent adsorption performance, AC is widely used in all industries as an adsorbent for decolorization, deodorization, solvent recovery, and water and wastewater treatment; furthermore, it has been used as an electrode material to improve the performance of capacitors [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29].
As it is applied to various fields, the demand in the market has increased widely. In addition, recently, research on using AC and ACFs as a filler for the development of high-functional polymer composite materials [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49] has been steadily progressing just like carbon materials such as carbon fibers [50,51,52,53,54], carbon nanotubes [55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68], and graphene. However, AC and ACFs have great potential to replace other carbon materials, but their potential use in polymer composite materials as reinforcing fillers has not been fully explored.
Recently, multiple studies have confirmed the applicability of AC/polymer composites in various fields by exploiting the unique physical and chemical properties of AC. For example, due to the porous structure, the molten polymer enters the pores of the activated carbon to form a three-dimensional network to improve the tensile properties of the composite material, or to improve the electrical properties or electromagnetic wave shielding properties of the polymer composite material due to its electrical conductivity. Owing to its low cost, excellent stability, and antistatic and electromagnetic interference shielding functions, AC/polymer composite material can be used in various applications, such as automobile parts and shielding materials [69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98].
This work aimed to investigate the current status of related research fields by summarizing the manufacturing, characterization, and applicability of AC/polymer composite materials reported in the literature. Herein, the applicability and properties of AC/polymer composite materials, such as adsorption, mechanical, electromagnetic interference shielding (EMI SE), and other properties, according to various manufacturing conditions are detailed.

2. Adsorption Properties of Activated Carbon/Polymer Composites

Various studies have been conducted on the evaluation of the absorption properties of AC/polymer composites; the results of some studies are summarized in Table 1. Akter et al. [69] investigated the removal properties of Pb(II) using chitosan-activated carbon-polyvinyl alcohol (CS-AC-PVA) composite beads and reported that the amount of Pb adsorption was 0.2801 mg/g. Bekhoukh et al. [70] used an activated carbon/polyaniline composite as an adsorbent to confirm the properties of anionic methyl orange removal. Ramadoss et al. [71] used an activated carbon/PVP composite to fabricate a biodegradable membrane for brackish water treatment; the results indicated that the dye adsorption efficiency was 100% for methyl orange and up to 57% for rhodamine B within 3 h (Figure 1).
Lelifajri et al. [72] prepared an immobilized activated carbon/polyvinyl alcohol composite material for the adsorption removal of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. The results indicated that the prepared adsorbent exhibited adequate reuse performance and that it was an effective and promising adsorbent for removing herbicides. Industrial wastewater with heavy metals is a major environmental problem, and research on the development of adsorbents that can remove these heavy metals is ongoing. Aswini and Jaisankar [73] investigated the adsorption of heavy metals, such as copper, cadmium, and lead, using sugarcane-based AC and polymer composites. The results confirmed that the prepared AC and composite material can be used as an adsorbent for the removal of heavy metal in wastewater. Khalili et al. [74] synthesized a pine cone-based activated carbon/polyaniline composite for capturing CO2 via oxidative polymerization and analyzed the CO2 adsorption capacity of the prepared composite. The results indicated that the CO2 adsorption capacity significantly increased from 1.91 mmol/g for AC to 2.69 mmol/g for AC-PANI-F and 3.16 mmol/g for AC-PANI-S at 25 °C and 1 bar. This indicates that activated carbon/PANI composites can be used as effective adsorbents to capture CO2 from flue gases. Hwang et al. [75] studied the properties and filtration efficiency of activated carbon/polymer composites for humic acid removal. The results indicated that AC addition significantly affected the membrane morphology, pore size distribution, porosity, and chemical properties. Activated carbon/polyurethane foam composites were prepared by adding AC during PU foam synthesis. The prepared composite material exhibited the maximum adsorption capacities of MB and phenol of 100 and 66.5 mg/g, respectively. The manufactured AC/PU composite material can be molded into a desired shape depending on the mold used, confirming its applicability in various fields [76].

3. Mechanical Properties of Activated Carbon/Polymer Composites

Many studies have been conducted on the evaluation of the mechanical properties of AC/polymer composites; the results of some studies are summarized in Table 2. Wang et al. [77] reported the manufacturing method and analyzed the mechanical properties of biomass-activated carbon (BAC)/ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) composites using physical mixing and the twin-screw extrusion process. The results indicated that when 65% of BAC was added, the tensile strength increased by approximately 325.86%, from 22.93 to 97.65 MPa. The uniformly distributed BAC in the composites improved the mechanical properties. They explained that the molten UHMWPE entered the pores of the BAC powder and formed a three-dimensional network through pore bonding (Figure 2a,b), effectively bearing the load and improving the tensile properties of the composites.
It was confirmed through the SEM images that the molten UHMWPE was embedded in the pores of the BAC like a rivet structure. Nisar et al. [78,79] prepared a polyethylene (PE) nanocomposite reinforced with magnetic (Ni, Co, Fe)-AC using the melt mixing method and investigated the mechanical properties of the composites. The results confirmed that the AC-Ni/PE composites showed the highest improvement in mechanical properties, and the modulus of the composites was 1202 MPa, which was approximately 53% higher than that of HDPE. They explained that the elongation at break decreases by strongly limiting the strength of the polymer chain as the fillers are dispersed in the polymer matrix, and they also showed the improvement of mechanical properties through various factors such as the dispersion of the filler and the crystal structure of the polymers.
Minugu et al. [80] investigated the effect of AC content on the mechanical strength of composite materials using Arhar fiber biomass as a precursor and a reinforcing material for synthesized AC epoxy composites. Minugu’s research team prepared AC with many micropores and mesopores, and they confirmed that the strength of the composites increases as the polymer resin penetrates the porous structure of AC and forms a strong bond. The results indicated that the tensile and flexural strengths of the composite material with 2% AC were 56 and 95 MPa, respectively (Figure 3a,b).
Makara et al. [81] developed a technique for converting dead leaf biomass into AC and studied the mechanical properties of the composites using it as a reinforcing material for natural rubber. For comparison with carbon black (CB), which is generally used as a reinforcing material for rubber, the mechanical properties of CB/rubber and AC/rubber composite were comparatively analyzed. Both types of carbon fillers improved the mechanical strength of the rubber, which was explained by the network formation caused by the interaction between the filler and rubber. The tensile strength and modulus of the composite with 15 PHR of dead leaf-AC increased by ~8% and 40%, respectively. The CB/rubber composites had better mechanical properties than the AC/rubber composites. However, in the case of the studied dead leaf-AC, it was confirmed that it is a promising material that can improve the mechanical properties of rubber at a lower price than CB. Mustafa et al. [82] investigated the tensile strength of an epoxy composite material according to the AC content. The AC content of each composite was 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 wt.%, and the composite with AC of 15 wt.% had the best tensile strength. The results indicated that the tensile strength of the composite material with 15 wt.% of AC was 36.34 MPa, which is an improvement of approximately 19%. They also demonstrated through FT-IR, SEM, DSC analysis, etc. that there is a strong interaction between the epoxy matrix and AC powder. Nawras et al. [83] investigated the effect of the addition of AC on the mechanical properties of jute fiber/polyester composites. The AC content of each composite was 1,3,5, and 10 wt.%, and the mechanical properties also improved as the AC content increased. The composites with 3 wt.% AC had the best impact strength, and when 3 wt.% AC was added, the impact strength increased by approximately 51% to 6.4 kJ/m2. Mahmud et al. [84] investigated the effects of contact pressure and sliding speed on the friction coefficient and wear of activated carbon/epoxy composites. Hilmi et al. [85] investigated the frictional properties of activated carbon/epoxy composites. Wang and Su [86] investigated the effect of AC surface treatment on the mechanical properties of epoxy composite materials and confirmed that the fracture toughness of the composite material improved by approximately 234%. They explained that the reinforcing mechanism of mechanical properties is due to the physical properties of AC due to the large specific surface area and porous structure and the chemical bond formed by the reaction of the functional group of AC with the epoxy group of matrix. Khalil et al. [87] investigated the fracture toughness of an activated carbon/epoxy composite material with an addition of 5% AC and reported that the fracture toughness of the composite material improved by approximately 17%. Song et al. [88] confirmed the compressive strength of a specimen by manufacturing AC/phenolic foam. The AC/phenol was foamed using microwaves. They explained that AC strengthens the foam structure by trapping gases such as H2O generated during the curing reaction. The compressive strength of the specimen with AC was approximately 9.7% higher than that of the specimen without. These showed that the addition of AC and AC surface treatment are effective at improving the mechanical properties of composite materials. Most of the research results showed that the mechanical properties of the AC/polymer composites were improved as the polymer penetrates the pores of the AC and the bonding force between the two materials increases. These research results confirmed the improvement of the mechanical properties of the composites by adding AC, suggesting the possibility of application in various fields such as automobiles and aviation parts.

4. Electrical and EMI Shielding Properties of Activated Carbon/Polymer Composites

Some research results on the Electrical and EMI shielding properties of AC/polymer composites are summarized in Table 3. Singsang et al. [89] mixed AC synthesized from waste coffee grounds with poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) in a batch-type internal mixer and confirmed the influence of AC content on physical properties. They prepared the AC/PBS composites by adjusting the concentration of AC to 0, 1, 1.5, 2 and 5 wt.%, and they investigated their mechanical, electrical, and morphological properties. The electrical properties of the composites were confirmed through electrical conductivity measurement, and it was confirmed that the electrical conductivity of the composites increased rapidly when 1.5 wt.% of AC was added. The electrical properties of the AC (5 wt.%)/PBS composites were the best. They explained that it was due to the high electrical conductivity of AC. The electrical conductivity of the composite material with 5% activated carbon was 4.32 × 10−5 (Ω m)−1, which was approximately 229% higher than that of PBS, confirming that AC could be used as a reinforcement in the PBS matrix. Abdullah et al. [90] prepared the Fe-AC powders by chemically bonding Fe to AC, and they confirmed that a stable bond was formed through analysis such as FT-IR. In addition, adjusting the content of the Fe-AC powders to 10, 20, and 25% to prepare Fe-AC/PVA composites confirmed the electromagnetic properties. In particular, they confirmed the electromagnetic wave absorption properties of the Fe-Ac/PVA composites; the results indicated that this composite material exhibits excellent electromagnetic wave absorption properties in the frequency range of 4–6 GHz and that the composite material with 20% AC has a return loss value of −32.5 dB at a frequency of 4.65 GHz. Naeem et al. [91] reported research results for the development of multifunctional PLA composites by synthesizing AC from acrylic fiber waste (Figure 4). Acrylic fibrous waste–AC particles were added to PLA at 1, 5, and 10 wt.% to prepare AC/PLA composite films by solvent casting, and their electrical conductivity, EMI shielding, thermomechanical and thermal stability properties were investigated. The electrical conductivity of the acrylic fibrous waste–AC/PLA composite films was observed by measuring the surface resistance, and as a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that the resistance decreased rapidly after adding 10 wt.% to the acrylic fibrous waste–AC. They explained that this was due to the tunneling effect. In addition, the analysis of the EMI shielding properties of the activated carbon/PLA composite revealed a shielding effect of approximately 16 dB, confirming its potential as a packaging material for electronic devices.
Xia et al. [92] manufactured an activated carbon/kenaf fiber/polyester composite using the VARTM process and investigated the electromagnetic wave shielding properties of the composite material. The AC content of the composite material was added as 0, 10, 20, and 30%, and the EMI shielding properties of the composite material were confirmed according to the AC content. With increasing AC content, the EMI shielding effectiveness increased to 93.0%. The incorporation of AC into the composite was very effective at shielding electromagnetic waves. They explained that the addition of AC is particularly effective in enhancing the electromagnetic wave absorption of the composite, which reduces secondary electromagnetic pollution. Shaaban et al. [93] manufactured an AC (8 wt.%)/PU composite material using the chemical blowing method and investigated its microwave absorption characteristics. They synthesized a novel AC using rubber wood sawdust as a raw material, and the prepared AC had a BET surface area of 1301 m2/g. As the AC content increased, the electromagnetic wave shielding properties increased, and the AC (8 wt.%)/PU composites showed the best shielding properties. The results of EMI shielding of AC (8 wt.%)/PU indicated that it has a value of approximately 10 dB (Figure 5). Khan et al. [94] prepared an AC/acrylic resin (AR) composite material according to the AC content using the solution processing method. The AC/AR composites were prepared with AC content of 0, 1, 5, 10, 20, and 30%, and the composites were characterized through FT-IR, XRD, TGA, and SEM analysis. In addition, electrical properties were measured to confirm the applicability of the AC/AR composite material as an electromagnetic wave shielding material. The electrical properties of the AC/AR composites were confirmed by measuring the surface resistance. With increasing AC content, the electrical resistivity of the composite material decreased. As the AC content increased, the electrical resistance of the composite material decreased. The composite material with 30% of AC had a considerably lower resistivity (104 ohm/sq) compared to that of the pure acrylic resin. These results suggest that activated carbon/acrylic composites are suitable materials for electromagnetic wave shielding coatings.
Junhua and Chung [95] confirmed the electromagnetic wave shielding properties of AC fiber/carbon fiber/polymer composite materials; the electromagnetic wave shielding effect of these materials was 38 dB, which was approximately 30% higher than that of the carbon fiber/epoxy composite material. Khan et al. [96] prepared a composite by dispersing AC (1~30 wt.%) in an acrylic resin (AR) matrix and confirmed the electromagnetic shielding properties of the composites. In addition, they analyzed the structural and morphological properties of AC/AR composites through XRD, Raman, and SEM analysis, and they confirmed that AC was effectively dispersed inside the AR matrix. It was confirmed that the electromagnetic wave shielding effect value of the AC (30 wt.%)/AR composite material was −36 dB, and this value corresponds to about 1400% of the AR shielding value (−2.4 dB). As a result of the study, the AC/AR composites had a shielding efficiency of 99.9% or more, confirming that it is a suitable material as an EMI shielding material. Yew et al. [97] prepared a composite by dispersing a hybrid filler containing AC in an epoxy resin matrix. Three types of fillers were used: coconut shell (CS), CS-AC, and beta-silicon carbide (β-SiC). The elemental composition, surface morphologies and structural properties of epoxy composites according to hybrid fillers were investigated, and it confirmed that CS and CS-AC fillers had a positive effect on the electromagnetic properties of composite materials from the results of dielectric properties and electrical conductivity analysis.

5. Other Properties of Activated Carbon/Polymer Composites

Table 4 shows the research results on other properties of AC/Polymer composites. Yun et al. [98] prepared a composite hydrogel by adding AC to poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and poly(acrylic acid) (PAAc) polymers by free-radical polymerization. The PVA/PAAc composite hydrogels containing two different types of AC, coconut-based AC and coal-based AC, were prepared. The drug was efficiently loaded due to the abundant pore structure of AC in the fabricated composite hydrogel system. The hydrogel matrix used a swelled well in basal conditions to release the drug loaded into the AC. The drug-release behavior of AC/PVA/PAAc composite materials was studied, and it was confirmed that the composite hydrogel containing AC by changing the type and pH of AC is a material that can easily control drug release.
Gong et al. [99] prepared AC/Ni2O3/polypropylene composites through melt mixing and investigated the thermal stability and flame retardancy of the composites. They confirmed that AC was effectively dispersed in the PP matrix through XRD, SEM, and TEM analysis, and they studied thermal stability through thermogravimetric analysis and flame retardancy through cone calorimeter testing. The addition of AC/Ni2O3 significantly improved the thermal stability of the PP composites and significantly reduced the heat release rate. As a result of the study, it was confirmed that the thermal stability and flame retardancy of the composite material were improved by forming a network structure of AC and Ni2O3 particles in the matrix. They explained that the formation of a denser protective layer due to the formation of a network of AC/Ni2O3 particles in the PP matrix improved the flame retardancy of the PP composites (Figure 6).
Alston et al. [100] characterized the hygroscopic behavior of ACFs/phenolic resin composites, and as a result of the study, it was confirmed that activated carbon fibers act as sinks or water sources by absorbing water due to pores. The observed water absorption and diffusion behavior of the ACFs/phenolic resin composites was very complex due to the combination of water adsorbed and absorbed by the fibers and water in the resin due to curing. They have successfully developed a “source-sink” model to simulate the absorption and diffusion behavior of the composites. In addition, the porosity of the ACFs confirmed that a high level of accuracy could be achieved using the proposed “source sink” extension model. Zhang et al. [101] prepared polyvinyl chloride (PVC) composites containing AC and molybdenum oxide (MoO3), and they investigated the effect of the addition of AC and MoO3 on improving the flame retardancy of the composite. As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that as AC and MoO3 were added, the heat dissipation property of the composite material was greatly reduced, and the smoke suppression property was greatly improved. When the total content of AC and MoO3 was 10 PHR, the flame retardancy of the composite material was the best, and the heat release rate and smoke generation rate values were the lowest at 173.80 kW/m2 and 0.1472 m2/s, respectively. This is a result of 47.3% and 59.9% reduction, respectively, when compared with the value of PVC. Oh et al. [102] prepared a composite material by adding AC to a mixture of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) polymers, and the drug release properties of AC/PCL/PEO composites were investigated. As a result of the analysis, the drug release properties of the AC/PCL/PEO composites were significantly improved due to the microporous structure of AC and the swelling and selective dissolution properties of the PCL/PEO polymers. In addition, the prepared composites were effective in controlling both drug loading and drug release. The study results of the drug release properties, thermal stability, flame retardancy, and hygroscopicity were summarized as other properties of the AC/polymer composites. Through this, it was possible to confirm the application potential of the AC/polymer composite material for drug delivery as well as flame-retardant and moisture-absorbent materials, and the possibility of application in various other fields can also be expected.

6. Conclusions

Through this work, the current status of related research fields is investigated in order to confirm the preparation, characterization, and applicability of AC/polymer composites reported in the literature. This review summarizes the results of studies on the effects of AC and ACFs as reinforcing materials in polymer composites on the mechanical properties, adsorption properties, and electrical properties of the composite materials. AC and ACFs are materials with a rich porous structure, a large specific surface area, and excellent physical adsorption properties. Using the unique physical and chemical properties of AC, it is possible to develop AC/polymer composites for application in various fields. As the polymer matrix penetrates the pores of AC, the mechanical properties of AC/polymer composites are significantly improved. The dispersion properties and surface properties of AC are also important factors in determining the mechanical properties of composites. Due to the excellent adsorption properties of AC, AC/polymer composites can be used as adsorbents for dyes and heavy metals. In addition, AC presents the possibility of application as an electromagnetic wave shielding material and an antistatic material by giving electrical properties to the polymers. The application potential of the AC/polymer composite material for drug delivery, flame retardant, and moisture absorption was also confirmed. The research results summarized in this review show positive effects of AC and ACFs added to polymer composites, confirming their potential use in various industrial applications such as aerospace, EMI shielding, automotive, and sporting goods. In addition, activated carbon is a very inexpensive material compared to nano-carbon materials such as CNTs and graphene, suggesting the possibility of developing a low-cost, high-functional composite material through various types of activated carbon and various surface treatment technologies. Through various research results, the possibility of application in other various fields of AC/polymer composite can also be expected.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-J.Y. and B.-J.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-J.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.-J.Y.; visualization, Y.-J.Y.; supervision, B.-J.K.; project administration, Y.-J.Y.; funding acquisition, Y.-J.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Nano-Material Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2019M3A7B9071501).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This article is a review article, so there is no data to share.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chingombe, P.; Saha, B.; Wakeman, R.J. Surface modification and characterisation of a coal-based activated carbon. Carbon 2005, 43, 3132–3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jiang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, K.; Chen, S. Effects of chemical modification of petroleum cokes on the properties of the resulting activated carbon. Fuel 2008, 87, 1844–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jain, A.; Balasubramanian, R.; Srinivasan, M.P. Hydrothermal conversion of biomass waste to activated carbon with high porosity: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 283, 789–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Foster, K.L.; Fuerman, R.G.; Economy, J.; Larson, S.M.; Rood, M.J. Adsorption characteristics of trace volatile organic compounds in gas streams onto activated carbon fibers. Chem. Mater. 1992, 4, 1068–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Maciá-Agulló, J.A.; Moore, B.C.; Cazorla-Amorós, D.; Linares-Solano, A. Activation of coal tar pitch carbon fibres: Physical activation vs. chemical activation. Carbon 2004, 42, 1367–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.J.; He, P.Y.; Li, C.J.; Liu, L.C. Facile synthesis of cost-effective iron enhanced hetero-structure activated carbon/geopolymer composite catalyst for NH3-SCR: Insight into the role of iron species. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2020, 605, 117804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mines, P.D.; Uthuppu, B.; Thirion, D.; Jakobsen, M.H.; Yavuz, C.T.; Andersen, H.R.; Hwang, Y. Granular activated carbon with grafted nanoporous polymer enhances nanoscale zero-valent iron impregnation and water contaminant removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 339, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Supriya, S.; Palanisamy, P.N. Adsorptive removal of acid orange 7 from industrial effluents using activated carbon and conducting polymer composite–A comparative study. Indian J. Chem. Technol. 2016, 23, 506–512. [Google Scholar]
  9. Oladipo, A.A.; Gazi, M. Microwaves initiated synthesis of activated carbon-based composite hydrogel for simultaneous removal of copper (II) ions and direct red 80 dye: A multi-component adsorption system. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2015, 47, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. El-Bindary, A.A.; Diab, M.A.; Hussien, M.A.; El-Sonbati, A.Z.; Eessa, A.M. Adsorption of Acid Red 57 from aqueous solutions onto polyacrylonitrile/activated carbon composite. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 124, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, S.; Huang, H.; Tao, M.; Liu, X.; Cheng, T. Frontal polymerization preparation of poly (acrylamide-co-acrylic acid)/activated carbon composite hydrogels for dye removal. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 129, 3737–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baseri, J.R.; Palanisamy, P.N.; Sivakumar, P. Comparative studies of the adsorption of direct dye on activated carbon and conducting polymer composite. J. Chem. 2013, 9, 1122–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Park, S.J.; Kim, K.D. Influence of activation temperature on adsorption characteristics of activated carbon fiber composites. Carbon 2001, 39, 1741–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yellappa, M.; Modestra, J.A.; Reddy, Y.R.; Mohan, S.V. Functionalized conductive activated carbon-polyaniline composite anode for augmented energy recovery in microbial fuel cells. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 320, 124340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chonat, A.; Palatty, S. Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of a Hybrid Supercapacitive Material Based on Ternary Doped Polyaniline/Activated Carbon Composite. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 10148–10159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Matsushima, J.T.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Marcuzzo, J.S.; Cuna, A.; Baldan, M.R. 3D-interconnected framework binary composite based on polypyrrole/textile polyacrylonitrile-derived activated carbon fiber felt as supercapacitor electrode. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 10225–10233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lebedeva, M.V.; Ayupov, A.B.; Yeletsky, P.M.; Parmon, V.N. Rice husk derived activated carbon/polyaniline composites as active materials for supercapacitors. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2018, 13, 3674–3690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Du, W.; Wang, X.; Sun, X.; Zhan, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, X. Nitrogen-doped hierarchical porous carbon using biomass-derived activated carbon/carbonized polyaniline composites for supercapacitor electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 827, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Selvakumar, M. Multilayered electrode materials based on polyaniline/activated carbon composites for supercapacitor applications. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2018, 43, 4067–4080. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ling, J.; Zou, H.; Yang, W.; Chen, W.; Lei, K.; Chen, S. Facile fabrication of polyaniline/molybdenum trioxide/activated carbon cloth composite for supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 2018, 20, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vighnesha, K.M.; Sangeetha, D.N.; Selvakumar, M. Synthesis and characterization of activated carbon/conducting polymer composite electrode for supercapacitor applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 914–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Põldsalu, I.; Harjo, M.; Tamm, T.; Uibu, M.; Peikolainen, A.L.; Kiefer, R. Inkjet-printed hybrid conducting polymer-activated carbon aerogel linear actuators driven in an organic electrolyte. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 250, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alluri, N.R.; Chandrasekhar, A.; Jeong, J.H.; Kim, S.J. Enhanced electroactive β-phase of the sonication-process-derived PVDF-activated carbon composite film for efficient energy conversion and a battery-free acceleration sensor. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 4833–4844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guo, Z.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Xia, Y. Aqueous lithium-ion batteries using polyimide-activated carbon composites anode and spinel LiMn2O4 cathode. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1503–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Na, R.; Zhang, X.; Huo, P.; Du, Y.; Huo, G.; Zhu, K.; Wang, G. High performance disulfonated poly (arylene ether sulfone)/poly (ethylene oxide) composite membrane used as a novel separator for supercapacitor with neutral electrolyte and activated carbon electrodes. High Perform. Polym. 2017, 29, 984–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mohan, V.M.; Murakami, K.; Kono, A.; Shimomura, M. Poly (acrylonitrile)/activated carbon composite polymer gel electrolyte for high efficiency dye sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 7399–7407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Patil, D.S.; Pawar, S.A.; Devan, R.S.; Ma, Y.R.; Bae, W.R.; Kim, J.H.; Patil, P.S. Improved electrochemical performance of activated carbon/polyaniline composite electrode. Mater. Lett. 2014, 117, 248–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bello, A.; Barzegar, F.; Momodu, D.; Dangbegnon, J.; Taghizadeh, F.; Fabiane, M.; Manyala, N. Asymmetric supercapacitor based on nanostructured graphene foam/polyvinyl alcohol/formaldehyde and activated carbon electrodes. J. Power Sources 2015, 273, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, X.; Chen, Q.; Wang, A.; Xu, J.; Wu, S.; Shen, J. Bamboo-like composites of V2O5/polyindole and activated carbon cloth as electrodes for all-solid-state flexible asymmetric supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 3776–3783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thostenson, E.T.; Ren, Z.; Chou, T.W. Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: A review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61, 1899–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Forintos, N.; Czigany, T. Multifunctional application of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites: Electrical properties of the reinforcing carbon fibers–A short review. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 162, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, J.; Mubarak, S.; Li, K.; Huang, X.; Huang, W.; Zhuo, D.; Wang, J. The Micro–Macro Interlaminar Properties of Continuous Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polyphenylene Sulfide Laminates Made by Thermocompression to Simulate the Consolidation Process in FDM. Polymers 2022, 14, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Motaghi, A.; Hrymak, A.; Motlagh, G.H. Electrical conductivity and percolation threshold of hybrid carbon/polymer composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 41744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mousavi, S.M.; Hashemi, S.A.; Kalashgrani, M.Y.; Omidifar, N.; Bahrani, S.; Vijayakameswara Rao, N.; Chiang, W.H. Bioactive Graphene Quantum Dots Based Polymer Composite for Biomedical Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Allahkarami, E.; Dehghan Monfared, A.; Silva, L.F.O.; Dotto, G.L. Toward a mechanistic understanding of adsorption behavior of phenol onto a novel activated carbon composite. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cruz-Cruz, I.; Ramírez-Herrera, C.A.; Martínez-Romero, O.; Castillo-Márquez, S.A.; Jiménez-Cedeño, I.H.; Olvera-Trejo, D.; Elías-Zúñiga, A. Influence of Epoxy Resin Curing Kinetics on the Mechanical Properties of Carbon Fiber Composites. Polymers 2022, 14, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Araby, S.; Philips, B.; Meng, Q.; Ma, J.; Laoui, T.; Wang, C.H. Recent advances in carbon-based nanomaterials for flame retardant polymers and composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2021, 212, 108675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Badakhsh, A.; Lee, Y.M.; Rhee, K.Y.; Park, C.W.; An, K.H.; Kim, B.J. Improvement of thermal, electrical and mechanical properties of composites using a synergistic network of length controlled-CNTs and graphene nanoplatelets. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 175, 107075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, X.; Huang, C.; Wang, L.; Liang, L.; Cheng, Y.; Fei, W.; Li, Y. Recent progress in graphene/polymer nanocomposites. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2001105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Panahi-Sarmad, M.; Noroozi, M.; Abrisham, M.; Eghbalinia, S.; Teimoury, F.; Bahramian, A.R.; Goodarzi, V. A comprehensive review on carbon-based polymer nanocomposite foams as electromagnetic interference shields and piezoresistive sensors. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2020, 2, 2318–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheng, X.; Yokozeki, T.; Wu, L.; Koyanagi, J.; Wang, H.; Sun, Q. The enhancement effect of carbon-based nano-fillers/polyaniline hybrids on the through-thickness electric conductivity of carbon fiber reinforced polymer. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 105, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Brigandi, P.J.; Cogen, J.M.; Pearson, R.A. Electrically conductive multiphase polymer blend carbon-based composites. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2014, 54, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Babu, K.; Rendén, G.; Afriyie Mensah, R.; Kim, N.K.; Jiang, L.; Xu, Q.; Das, O. A review on the flammability properties of carbon-based polymeric composites: State-of-the-art and future trends. Polymers 2020, 12, 1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kumar, R.; Sahoo, S.; Joanni, E.; Singh, R.K.; Tan, W.K.; Kar, K.K.; Matsuda, A. Recent progress on carbon-based composite materials for microwave electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 2021, 177, 304–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Duan, Y. Investigating the Effect of Low-Temperature Drilling Process on the Mechanical Behavior of CFRP. Polymers 2022, 14, 1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Jen, Y.M.; Ni, W.L. Effect of Dispersing Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Nanoplatelets Hybrids in the Matrix on the Flexural Fatigue Properties of Carbon/Epoxy Composites. Polymers 2022, 14, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Jang, D.; Park, J.E.; Kim, Y.K. Evaluation of (CNT@ CIP)-embedded magneto-resistive sensor based on carbon nanotube and carbonyl iron powder polymer composites. Polymers 2022, 14, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cravanzola, S.; Haznedar, G.; Scarano, D.; Zecchina, A.; Cesano, F. Carbon-based piezoresistive polymer composites: Structure and electrical properties. Carbon 2013, 62, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Park, D.W.; Shim, S.E. A review on thermal conductivity of polymer composites using carbon-based fillers: Carbon nanotubes and carbon fibers. Carbon Lett. 2010, 11, 347–356. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jeong, J.S.; Kim, K.W.; An, K.H.; Kim, B.J. Fast recovery process of carbon fibers from waste carbon fibers-reinforced thermoset plastics. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 247, 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhou, J.; Li, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Xu, E.; Li, S.; Sui, S. Microwave heating and curing of metal-like CFRP laminates through ultrathin and flexible resonance structures. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022, 218, 109200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yim, Y.J.; Lee, J.J.; Tugirumubano, A.; Go, S.H.; Kim, H.G.; Kwac, L.K. Electromagnetic interference shielding behavior of magnetic carbon fibers prepared by electroless FeCoNi-plating. Materials 2021, 14, 3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jang, D.; Choi, B.H.; Yoon, H.N.; Yang, B.; Lee, H.K. Improved electromagnetic wave shielding capability of carbonyl iron powder-embedded lightweight CFRP composites. Compos. Struct. 2022, 286, 115326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yim, Y.J.; Rhee, K.Y.; Park, S.J. Influence of electroless nickel-plating on fracture toughness of pitch-based carbon fibre reinforced composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 76, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Feng, C.; Jiang, L. Micromechanics modeling of the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube (CNT)–polymer nanocomposites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2013, 47, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kumanek, B.; Janas, D. Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube networks: A review. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 7397–7427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yim, Y.J.; Rhee, K.Y.; Park, S.J. Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of nickel-plated MWCNTs/high-density polyethylene composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 98, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sun, X.; Sun, H.; Li, H.; Peng, H. Developing polymer composite materials: Carbon nanotubes or graphene. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 5153–5176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yim, Y.J.; Chung, D.C.; Park, S.J. EMI shielding effectiveness and mechanical properties of MWCNTs-reinforced biodegradable epoxy matrix composites. Carbon Lett. 2017, 22, 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  60. Esawi, A.M.; Morsi, K.; Sayed, A.; Taher, M.; Lanka, S.J.C.S. Effect of carbon nanotube (CNT) content on the mechanical properties of CNT-reinforced aluminium composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70, 2237–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ma, P.C.; Tang, B.Z.; Kim, J.K. Effect of CNT decoration with silver nanoparticles on electrical conductivity of CNT-polymer composites. Carbon 2008, 46, 1497–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Huang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Fan, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H. Graphene-based electrodes. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 5979–6004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cataldi, P.; Athanassiou, A.; Bayer, I.S. Graphene nanoplatelets-based advanced materials and recent progress in sustainable applications. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kim, S.; Ku, S.H.; Lim, S.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Park, C.B. Graphene–biomineral hybrid materials. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2009–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Xie, L.; Liang, Y.; Hong, G.; Dai, H. MoS2 nanoparticles grown on graphene: An advanced catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7296–7299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lee, D.H.; Choi, Y.H.; Rhee, K.Y.; Yang, K.S.; Kim, B.J. Facile preparation and characterization of carbon fibers with core-shell structure from graphene-dispersed isotropic pitch compounds. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Zhu, Y.; Murali, S.; Cai, W.; Li, X.; Suk, J.W.; Potts, J.R.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene and graphene oxide: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3906–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yim, Y.J.; Park, S.J. Influence of MWCNTs on Fracture Toughness of MWCNTs/Nickel-Pitch Fiber/Epoxy Composites. Compos. Res. 2015, 28, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Akter, M.; Hirase, N.; Sikder, M.; Rahman, M.; Hosokawa, T.; Saito, T.; Kurasaki, M. Pb (II) Remediation from Aqueous Environment Using Chitosan-Activated Carbon-Polyvinyl Alcohol Composite Beads. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2021, 232, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bekhoukh, A.; Moulefera, I.; Zeggai, F.Z.; Benyoucef, A.; Bachari, K. Anionic methyl orange removal from aqueous solutions by activated carbon reinforced conducting polyaniline as adsorbent: Synthesis, characterization, adsorption behavior, regeneration and kinetics study. J. Polym. Environ. 2022, 30, 886–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ramadoss, P.; Regi, T.; Rahman, M.I.; Arivuoli, D. Low-cost and biodegradable cellulose/PVP/activated carbon composite membrane for brackish water treatment. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nawi, M.A.; Sabar, S.; Nawawi, W.I. Preparation of immobilized activated carbon-polyvinyl alcohol composite for the adsorptive removal of 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. J. Water Process. Eng. 2018, 25, 269–277. [Google Scholar]
  73. Aswini, K.; Jaisankar, V. A Study on the Environmental Applications of Activated Carbon and Its Polymer Composite from Agro Waste Materials. Int. J. Res. Advent Technol. 2018, 6, 3557–3566. [Google Scholar]
  74. Khalili, S.; Khoshandam, B.; Jahanshahi, M. Synthesis of activated carbon/polyaniline nanocomposites for enhanced CO2 adsorption. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 35692–35704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hwang, L.L.; Chen, J.C.; Wey, M.Y. The properties and filtration efficiency of activated carbon polymer composite membranes for the removal of humic acid. Desalination 2013, 313, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, W.; Liu, S. Preparation and characterization of polyurethane foam/activated carbon composite adsorbents. J. Porous Mater. 2021, 19, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, R.; Meng, T.; Zhang, B.; Chen, C.; Li, D. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon/ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene composites. Polym. Compos. 2021, 42, 2728–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Thue, T.S.; Lima, E.C.; Sieliechi, J.M.; Saucier, C.; Dias, S.L.P.; Vaghetti, J.C.P.; Rodembusch, F.S.; Pavan, F.A. Effects of first-row transition metals and impregnation ratios on the physicochemical properties of microwave-assisted activated carbons from wood biomass. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 486, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Nisar, M.; Thue, P.S.; Maghous, M.B.; Geshev, J.; Lima, E.C.; Einloft, S. Metal activated carbon as an efficient filler for high-density polyethylene nanocomposites. Polym. Compos. 2020, 41, 3184–3193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Prakash, M.O.; Gujjala, R.; Panchal, M.; Ojha, S. Mechanical characterization of arhar biomass based porous nano activated carbon polymer composites. Polym. Compos. 2020, 41, 3113–3123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lay, M.; Rusli, A.; Abdullah, M.K.; Hamid, Z.A.A.; Shuib, R.K. Converting dead leaf biomass into activated carbon as a potential replacement for carbon black filler in rubber composites. Compos. Part B 2020, 201, 108366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hunain, M.B.; Alnomani, S.N.; Razzaq, Q. An Investigation of Tensile and Thermal Properties of Epoxy Polymer Modified by Activated Carbon Particle. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1094, 012164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mostafa, N.H.; Hunain, M.B.; Jassim, A. Mechanical properties of the Jute fibers-activated carbon filled reinforced polyester composites. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 12, 125104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mahmud, D.N.F.; Abdollah, M.F.B.; Masripan, N.A.B.; Tamaldin, N.; Amiruddin, H. Influence of contact pressure and sliding speed dependence on the tribological characteristics of an activated carbon-epoxy composite derived from palm kernel under dry sliding conditions. Friction 2018, 7, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chua, K.W.; Bin Abdollah, M.F.; Tahir, N.A.M.; Amiruddin, H. Frictional properties of palm kernel activated carbon-epoxy composites under various normal loads. J. Teknol. 2015, 76, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  86. Wang, Q.; Su, D.S. Reinforcing epoxy resin with activated carbon: A way of high rate of quality and price. Compos. Commun. 2018, 9, 54–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Khalil, H.P.S.A.; Jawaid, M.; Firoozian, P.; Alothman, O.Y.; Paridah, M.T.; Zainudin, E.S. Flexural properties of activated carbon filled epoxy nanocomposites. Malays. J. Anal. Sci. 2014, 18, 391–397. [Google Scholar]
  88. Song, S.A.; Oh, H.J.; Kim, B.G.; Kim, S.S. Novel foaming methods to fabricate activated carbon reinforced microcellular phenolic foams. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 76, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Singsang, W.; Suetrong, J.; Choedsanthia, T.; Srakaew, N.L.O.; Jantrasee, S.; Prasoetsopha, N. Properties of biodegradable poly (butylene succinate) filled with activated carbon synthesized from waste coffee grounds. J. Mater. Sci. Appl. Energy 2021, 10, 87–95. [Google Scholar]
  90. Abdullah, B.; Ilyas, S.; Tahir, D. Nanocomposites Fe/activated carbon/PVA for microwave absorber: Synthesis and characterization. J. Nanomater. 2018, 2018, 9823263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Naeem, S.; Baheti, V.; Militky, J.; Ali, A. Multifunctional polylactic acid composites filled with activated carbon particles obtained from acrylic fibrous wastes. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 578–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xia, C.; Zhang, S.; Ren, H.; Shi, S.Q.; Zhang, H.; Cai, L.; Li, J. Scalable fabrication of natural-fiber reinforced composites with electromagnetic interference shielding properties by incorporating powdered activated carbon. Materials 2015, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Shaaban, A.; Se, S.M.; Ibrahim, I.M.; Ahsan, Q. Preparation of rubber wood sawdust-based activated carbon and its use as a filler of polyurethane matrix composites for microwave absorption. New Carbon Mater. 2015, 30, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Arora, M.; Puri, C.; Wahab, M.A.; Saini, P. Synthesis and characterization of acrylic resin/activated carbon composites. Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 2014, 52, 251–254. [Google Scholar]
  95. Wu, J.; Chung, D.D.L. Increasing the electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon fiber polymer–matrix composite by using activated carbon fibers. Carbon 2002, 40, 445–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Arora, M.; Wahab, M.A.; Saini, P. Permittivity and electromagnetic interference shielding investigations of activated charcoal loaded acrylic coating compositions. J. Polym. 2014, 2014, 193058. [Google Scholar]
  97. Yew, B.S.; Muhamad, M.; Mohamed, S.B.; Wee, F.H. Coconut shell, coconut shell activated carbon and beta-silicon carbide reinforced polymer composite: An alternative dielectric material for wireless communication application. Bull. Electr. Eng. Inform. 2020, 9, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yun, J.M.; Im, J.S.; Oh, A.R.; Lee, Y.S.; Kim, H.I. Controlled release behavior of ph-responsive composite hydrogel containing activated carbon. Carbon Lett. 2009, 10, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gong, J.; Tian, N.; Liu, J.; Yao, K.; Jiang, Z.; Chen, X.; Tang, T. Synergistic effect of activated carbon and Ni2O3 in promoting the thermal stability and flame retardancy of polypropylene. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2014, 99, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Alston, S.; Arnold, C.; Swan, M.; Stone, C. A source-sink model for water diffusion in an activated carbon fiber/phenolic composite. Polym. Compos. 2021, 42, 3550–3561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, M.; Wu, W.; He, S.; Wang, X.; Jiao, Y.; Qu, H.; Xu, J. Synergistic flame retardant effects of activated carbon and molybdenum oxide in poly (vinyl chloride). Polym. Int. 2018, 67, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Oh, A.; Yun, J.; Kim, H.I. Controlled release behavior of PCL/PEO/activated carbon composite microcapsule. J. Polym. Res. 2011, 18, 2441–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dye adsorption efficiency of (a) RhB cationic dye and (b) methyl orange anionic dye [71]. “Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [71]. 2020, John Wiley and Sons”.
Figure 1. Dye adsorption efficiency of (a) RhB cationic dye and (b) methyl orange anionic dye [71]. “Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [71]. 2020, John Wiley and Sons”.
Polymers 15 03472 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the internal bonding model of AC/polymer composites (a) SEM image of the tensile section of AC/UHMWPE composite material (4000×), (b) Schematic diagram of the internal bonding model of AC/UHMWPE composite material [77]. “Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [77]. 2021, John Wiley and Sons”.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the internal bonding model of AC/polymer composites (a) SEM image of the tensile section of AC/UHMWPE composite material (4000×), (b) Schematic diagram of the internal bonding model of AC/UHMWPE composite material [77]. “Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [77]. 2021, John Wiley and Sons”.
Polymers 15 03472 g002
Figure 3. (a) Tensile strength of AC/epoxy composites as a function of filler loading, (b) Flexural strength of AC/epoxy composites as a function of filler loading [80]. “Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [80]. 2020, John Wiley and Sons”.
Figure 3. (a) Tensile strength of AC/epoxy composites as a function of filler loading, (b) Flexural strength of AC/epoxy composites as a function of filler loading [80]. “Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [80]. 2020, John Wiley and Sons”.
Polymers 15 03472 g003
Figure 4. (a) Preparation of activated carbon from acrylic fibrous waste and (b) EMI shielding effectiveness of AC/PLA composites [91]. “Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [91]. 2019, John Wiley and Sons”.
Figure 4. (a) Preparation of activated carbon from acrylic fibrous waste and (b) EMI shielding effectiveness of AC/PLA composites [91]. “Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [91]. 2019, John Wiley and Sons”.
Polymers 15 03472 g004
Figure 5. (a) Return loss spectrum of different thicknesses of 8% R1.5 loaded PU foam at the frequency range of 1 to 3 GHz and (b) EMI shielding efficiency spectra of different thicknesses of 8% R1.5-loaded PU foam at the frequency range of 1 to 2.5 GHz [93]. “Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [93]. 2015, Elsevier”.
Figure 5. (a) Return loss spectrum of different thicknesses of 8% R1.5 loaded PU foam at the frequency range of 1 to 3 GHz and (b) EMI shielding efficiency spectra of different thicknesses of 8% R1.5-loaded PU foam at the frequency range of 1 to 2.5 GHz [93]. “Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [93]. 2015, Elsevier”.
Polymers 15 03472 g005
Figure 6. (a) Photographs of the residual chars after the cone calorimeter tests from neat PP (a), PP/7.5AC composite (b), PP/7.5Ni2O3 composite (c) and PP/7.5ACe7.5 Ni2O3 composite (d) and (b) Schematic drawing for the mechanism of the synergistic effect between AC and Ni2O3 in improving the flame retardancy of PP [99]. “Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [99]. 2014, Elsevier”.
Figure 6. (a) Photographs of the residual chars after the cone calorimeter tests from neat PP (a), PP/7.5AC composite (b), PP/7.5Ni2O3 composite (c) and PP/7.5ACe7.5 Ni2O3 composite (d) and (b) Schematic drawing for the mechanism of the synergistic effect between AC and Ni2O3 in improving the flame retardancy of PP [99]. “Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [99]. 2014, Elsevier”.
Polymers 15 03472 g006
Table 1. Adsorption characteristics of AC/polymer composites according to the preparation condition.
Table 1. Adsorption characteristics of AC/polymer composites according to the preparation condition.
Preparation ConditionAdsorption CharacteristicsEnhancement
Chitosan (3 g)-AC (1 g)/PVA (4 g) composites by mixing and heating [69]Adsorbed amount of Pb
(0.2801 mg/g)
Adsorbed amount of Pb: 115.95% (compared with CS)
AC/PANI composites via in situ polymerization [70]MO removal capacity (192.52 mg g−1 at 298 K and pH 6.0)311.19% (compared with PANI)
AC/NaCMC/PVP (1:3:2) composites
using the solution casting method [71]
Adsorption of two toxic dyes, Rhodamine B (57%) and methyl orange (100%)-
AC/polyvinyl alcohol composites using the solution method [72]Adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (55.9 mg/g)-
Sugarcane bagasse–AC/PVP composites [73]Adsorption capacity of Pb (96.39%), Cu (98.38%), and Cd (79.43%)4.63%, 3.15%, and 2.75% (compared with AC)
AC/polyaniline composites via in situ polymerization [74]CO2 adsorption capacity
(3.16 mmol/g)
65.44%
(compared with AC)
AC/PPSU/PEI/PEG (0.25/35/5/6 wt.%) composites using the wet phase inversion technique [75]Humic acid removal efficiency (80%)-
AC/polyurethane foam (PU) composites [76]Adsorption capacity of MB
(100 mg/g)
-
Table 2. Mechanical characteristics of AC/polymer composites according to the preparation condition.
Table 2. Mechanical characteristics of AC/polymer composites according to the preparation condition.
Preparation ConditionMechanical CharacteristicsEnhancement
BAC (65%)/UHMWPE (35%) composites
using the twin-screw extrusion process [77]
Tensile strength
(97.65 ± 5.23 MPa)
Tensile strength: 325.86%
(compared with UHMWPE)
AC–Ni/PE composites (2 wt.%) composites
using the melt mixing technique [78,79]
Tensile modulus
(1202 MPa)
Tensile modulus: 53.51%
(compared with HDPE)
AC (2%)/epoxy composites
using mechanical stirring methods [80]
Tensile and flexural strengths
(56 and 95.2 MPa, respectively)
Tensile strength: 329%
Flexural strength: 226%
(compared with epoxy)
Dead leaf-AC (15 PHR)/rubber (SMR) composites using the mixing and compounding process [81]Tensile strength and
modulus elongation
-
AC (15 wt.%)/epoxy composites
using a laboratory shear mixture [82]
Tensile strength
(26.34 MPa)
Tensile strength: 19.16%
AC (3%)/jute fiber (21%)/polyester composites
using the hand lay-up process [83]
Impact strength
(6.4 kJ/m2)
Impact strength: 51%
AC (60%)/epoxy (40%) composites
using a hot-press machine [84]
Coefficient of friction and wear-
PKAC (70 mass%)/epoxy (30 mass%) composites using a hot-press machine [85] Friction coefficient-
0.3% NAC (ammonia-treated)/epoxy composites using mill technology [86]Fracture toughness
(KIC: 3.88 ± 0.06 MPa m1/2)
KIC: 234.48%
AC (5%)/epoxy composites by mixing [87]Fracture toughness (0.92 J)Fracture toughness: 17.94%
phenolic resin (90)/acid (10)/AC (1) composite foams by microwave foaming [88] Compressive strength (2170 kPa)Compressive strength: 9.7%
Table 3. EMI shielding characteristics of AC/polymer composites according to the preparation condition.
Table 3. EMI shielding characteristics of AC/polymer composites according to the preparation condition.
Preparation ConditionElectrical and EMI Shielding PropertiesEnhancement
Coffee-AC (5 wt.%)/PBS composites using the melting process [89]Electrical conductivity
(4.32 × 10−5 (Ω·m)−1)
229.77% (compared with PBS)
Fe-AC (20%)/PVA composites using the solution method [90]Microwave absorption (−32.5 dB)-
Acrylic fibrous waste–AC (10 wt.%)/PLA composites via solvent casting [91] EMI shielding properties (16 dB)
and electrical conductivity (10,000 Ω·cm)
EMI shielding properties: 220% (compared with AC 1 wt.%)
Electrical conductivity: 5 × 1015 Ω·cm (Pure PLA)
AC (28.9%)/polyester composites using the VARTM process [92]EMI shielding properties (93%)124.63% (compared with AC 0%)
AC (8 wt.%)/PU composites using the chemical blowing method [93]Microwave absorption (10 dB)-
AC (30 wt.%)/acrylic resin(AR) composites using the solution process [94]Electrical resistivity (104 Ω/sq)Pure AR (1011 Ω/sq)
ACF/epoxy composites using filament winding machine [95]EMI shielding properties (38 dB)31% (compared with CF/epoxy)
AC (30 wt.%)/acrylic resin(AR) composites using the solution process [96]EMI shielding effectiveness (−36 dB)1400% (compared with AR)
Coconut shells(CS)/CS-AC/beta-silicon carbide (β-SiC)/epoxy resin composites using the solution process [97]Dielectric properties and Electrical conductivity-
Table 4. Other characteristics of AC/polymer composites according to the preparation condition.
Table 4. Other characteristics of AC/polymer composites according to the preparation condition.
Preparation ConditionOther PropertiesEnhancement
AC/PVA/PAAc composite hydrogel by free-radical polymerization [98]Drug release behavior-
AC/Ni2O3/polypropylene composites using the melt mixing process [99] Thermal stability and flame retardancy-
ACFs/phenolic resin composites composites via solvent casting [100] Hygroscopic behavior-
AC/MoO3/PVC composites using the solution process [101] Heat release rate (173.80 kW/m2) and smoke generation rate (0.1472 m2/s)47.3% and 59.9% reduction
(compared with PVC)
AC/PCL/PEO composites using the oil-in-water emulsion solvent evaporation method [102]Drug release behavior -
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yim, Y.-J.; Kim, B.-J. Preparation and Characterization of Activated Carbon/Polymer Composites: A Review. Polymers 2023, 15, 3472. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15163472

AMA Style

Yim Y-J, Kim B-J. Preparation and Characterization of Activated Carbon/Polymer Composites: A Review. Polymers. 2023; 15(16):3472. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15163472

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yim, Yoon-Ji, and Byung-Joo Kim. 2023. "Preparation and Characterization of Activated Carbon/Polymer Composites: A Review" Polymers 15, no. 16: 3472. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15163472

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop