Next Article in Journal
Effects of Pulsed Electric Field on the Physicochemical and Structural Properties of Micellar Casein
Next Article in Special Issue
Preparation of Polyimide/Ionic Liquid Hybrid Membrane for CO2/CH4 Separation
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Optimization of a Coextrusion Die with a Complex Geometry Using the Coupling Inverse Design Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Emerging Trends in Porogens toward Material Fabrication: Recent Progresses and Challenges
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nanofiltration Performance of Poly(p-xylylene) Nanofilms with Imidazole Side Chains

1
Department of Chemistry and Materials, Faculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Ueda 386-8567, Japan
2
Research Initiative for Supra-Materials (RISM), Interdisciplinary Cluster for Cutting Edge Research (ICCER), Shinshu University, Ueda 386-8567, Japan
3
Global Aqua Innovation Center, Shinshu University, Nagano 380-8553, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(15), 3309; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15153309
Submission received: 29 June 2023 / Revised: 31 July 2023 / Accepted: 2 August 2023 / Published: 4 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Polymer Membranes for Adsorption and Separation Applications)

Abstract

:
Herein, we report the nanofiltration performance of poly(p-xylylene) thin films with imidazole side chains that were deposited onto commercial polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes using a chemical vapor deposition process. The resulting thin films with a few tens of nanometers exhibited water permeation under a pressure difference of 0.5 MPa and selectively rejected water-soluble organic dyes based on their molecular sizes. Additionally, thin flaky ZIF-L crystals (Zn(mim)2·(Hmim)1/2·(H2O)3/2) (Hmim = 2-methylimidazole) formed on the surface of imidazole-containing poly(p-xylylene) films, and the composite films demonstrated the ability to adsorb methylene blue molecules within the cavities of ZIF-L.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Membrane processes have shown great promise in separation due to their high performance and low energy consumption [1,2,3]. Membranes have been developed using materials including polymers [4,5], amphiphiles [6,7], metal–organic frameworks [8,9], and carbons [10,11,12] to enable breakthroughs in molecular separation processes. Polymer-based membranes, in particular, rely on the surface characteristics and the inner free volume of the polymers to achieve optimal performance. Technological advancements have been made to control attributes of polymer-based membranes, such as high permeability, good selectivity, and membrane fouling [13,14]. However, achieving precise structural control of large-area and defect-free membranes remains challenging. In our previous work, we reported the nanofiltration properties of ultrathin films based on crosslinked poly(xylylene)s (PPXs) with polar substituents deposited using the chemical vapor deposition process (CVD) [15]. By tuning surface structure and internal free volume in PPX films, we can create desired permeable pathways within the condensed polymer chains formed through bottom-up polymerization of functionalized [2.2]paracyclophane on the surface of target substrates.
Since the mid-1960s, PPXs have been prepared through surface polymerization of p-quinodimethanes generated via vacuum vapor pyrolysis of [2.2]paracyclophane derivatives (known as the Gorham process) [16,17]. PPXs have been widely utilized as coating layers due to their excellent conformity, uniform thickness, and impressive thermal/chemical stabilities [18]. During the CVD process, a [2.2]paracyclophane monomer undergoes cleavage into reactive p-quinodimethane precursors above 550 °C under vacuum. The generated precursors then polymerize to semi-crystalline PPXs on target surfaces, resulting in defect-free and uniform coating layers. This coating method enables the adsorption of gaseous monomers onto the target surfaces. The PPX coating films offer flexible layers that serve as barriers for gases and liquids, corrosion control agents, and lubricants on various surfaces [19,20]. Additionally, PPX films have become integral components in realizing stretchable electronics and bioactive surfaces [21]. Someya et al. successfully fabricated stretchable organic-based electronic devices, such as light-emitting diodes, photodetectors, transistors, and photovoltaics, on PPX thin films [22,23,24,25]. Lahann et al. reported the creation of patterned bioactive surfaces using biotin through click reactions with acetylene units at the surface of PPX films [26,27,28]. These papers highlight the defect-free nature of PPX films, which provide functionalized surfaces and excellent dielectric properties for developing these devices. While structurally modified PPX films have been prepared from various [2.2]paracyclophane derivatives using the Gorham process [29,30], the control of the molecular permeabilities of PPX thin films has not been explored, except in our previous study [15]. The surface polymerization of PPXs can provide a deposition approach for clean and defect-free nanometer thickness films with an effective nanofiltration performance, and the molecular separation property can be tuned to achieve free-volume sizes and specific interactions between their substituents and target solutes in PPXs. In this study, we also report the growth of metal–organic frameworks on imidazole-modified PPX nanofilms and investigate the resulting changes in the molecular permeabilities of composite membranes.

2. Materials and Methods

General: NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE 400 FT NMR spectrometer at 399.65 MHz and 100.62 MHz for 1H and 13C in CDCl3 solution. Chemical shifts are reported relative to internal tetramethylsilane. Mass spectra with electrospray ionization were obtained on a Bruker Daltonics micrOTOF II (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Single-crystal structural analysis of 4-imidazole-[2,2]paracyclophane 1 was carried out using a Rigaku XtaLAB mini II (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan), and the single crystal of 1 was prepared via recrystallization from toluene with slow evaporation of n-hexane. Surface morphologies of nanofilms were characterized using atomic force microscopy (AFM) images in non-contact mode with a JEOL JSPM-5400 system (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) images recorded in a Hitachi S-5000 FE-SEM (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with Pt sputter coating. The XRD patterns of PPX film 2 were analyzed using wide-angle X-ray diffraction (Rigaku XRD-DSC (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan)) with Cu Kα radiation. The chemical compositions of films were determined using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Kratos Analytical Axis Ultra (Shimazu, Kyoto, Japan)). Surface zeta potentials were determined via electrophoretic light scattering (Malvern Zetasizer Nano (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) using Al2O3 nanoparticles in various pHs. The thicknesses of 2 deposited on Si wafers were analyzed with a thin-film measurement system (Filmetrics F20-UV (Filmetrics, San Diego, CA, USA).
All chemicals were purchased from commercial supplies and used without further purification.
Synthesis of 1 [31]: The mixture of 4-amino-[2,2]paracycrophane (500 mg, 2.24 mmol), NH4Cl (300 mg, 5.60 mmol), and paraformaldehyde (168 mg) in a mixed solvent of 1,4-dioxane (9.0 mL) and water (3.0 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 15 min. Glyoxal (0.64 mL, 5.60 mmol) and one drop of H3PO4 were added to the reaction mixture, and the mixture was heated at 80 °C with stirring for 18 h. After cooling, 3.0 M NaOH aqueous solution (15.0 mL) was added, and the mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was dried with MgSO4 and filtrated. After the evaporation of organic solvents, the crude product was purified via activated alumina column chromatography (eluent: CH2Cl2 to CH2Cl2: ethyl acetate = 1:1 v/v) and sublimated under vacuum to give a white solid. Yield 0.38 g (62%). 1H-NMR (400.52 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.75 (s, 1H), 7.25 (s, 1H), 7.20 (t, J = 1.1 Hz, 1H), 6.56–6.70 (m, 5H), 6.52 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.41–6.44 (m, 1H), 2.87–3.28 (m, 7H), 2.66–2.74 (m, 1H).13C-NMR (100.13 MHz, CDCl3) δ 142.10, 139.60, 139.53, 136.98, 136.87, 136.67, 133.58, 133.12, 133.02, 132.83, 132.02, 130.05, 129.44, 127.16, 119.71, 35.46, 35.05, 34.78, 32.66. FT-IR: 3045, 3022,1556 cm−1 (imidazole). ESI-TOF HRMS (APCI): m/z 275.1538 (calcd. m/z 275.1543 for C19H18N2 [M]+).
Coating process of PPX films 2: The coatings of 2 on Si wafers and UF membranes (Biomax polyethersulfone (normal molecular weight limit: 50 kDa, diameter: 25 mm)) were carried out via a CVD polymerization process starting from 1 using an SCS Labcoter 2 parylene deposition system (Specialty Coating Systems). The monomer 1 was first sublimated at 175 °C, and the sublimated species were then introduced into the pyrolysis zone, which was heated at 650 °C. The p-quinodimethane derivatives generated during the pyrolysis process were polymerized onto target substrates, which were placed on a rotating holder at room temperature. The pressure inside the chamber was maintained at 4.0 Pa throughout the CVD process. The thicknesses of the resulting coatings of 2 on the target substrates were determined by analyzing the light reflection from Si wafer samples coated with 2 using F20-UV.
Preparation of 2/ZIF-8 nanocomposite membrane: 2/ZIF-L composite films were prepared via sequential permeation of UF membranes coated with 2 in aqueous solutions of Zn(NO3)2∙6H2O (25 mM, 10 mL) and 2mIM (170 mM, 10 mL) at a pressure difference of 0.4 MPa with two intermediate washings with DI water (10 mL) using a dead-end filtration system.
Nanofiltration: Nanofiltration experiments were performed in five repeats in a dead-end stirred cell (Merck Millipore, Model 8010 (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) at 20 °C and 0–0.5 MPa. Data on water permeance and dye rejection performance were the average value using five membranes coated with 2 or 2/ZIF-L, fabricated using five independent processes under the same conditions. The measurements were performed after the initial compaction phase until permeance reached a steady state. The effective membrane area was 4.1 cm2, and the stirring speed was 500 r.p.m. Permeate samples for solvent permeance measurements were collected at intervals of 10 min, and samples for rejection evaluations were taken after 2 h. The solvent permeance J (L m−2 h−1 MPa−1) was determined using the equation J = V/(A × t × p), where V is the permeate volume, A is the effective membrane area, t is the unit time, and p is the applied pressure. The molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of the membrane was tested by filtrating a series of polyethylene glycols (PEGs) with an average molecular weight of 330, 601, 1490, 3060, 6550, 12,200, 25,800, and 41,300 Da with a concentration of 150 ppm at 0.4 MPa. The MWCO of the membrane was defined as the molecular weight of a PEG, which has 90% rejection rate, and rejection rates were determined from the average values for three samples.

3. Results and Discussion

Imidazoles are important conjugated heterocyclic components in functional molecules and have been used in various applications, including drugs and ionic liquids [32,33]. In this study, an imidazole-substituted derivative 1 was synthesized from racemic 4-amino[2.2]paracyclophane, which serves as a monomer for PPX film 2 (Scheme 1) [31,34]. Compound 1 was purified via column chromatography and vacuum sublimation. A single-crystal X-ray structure of 1 (CCDC2109296) revealed a distortion of the [2.2]paracyclophane skeleton (Scheme 1 and Figure S1). Due to the steric repulsion, the carbon–carbon distance for the methylene bridge near the imidazole unit was longer than the other bridge. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis of 1 exhibited a single endothermic peak at 156 °C, corresponding to the melting point from a crystal to a liquid state (Figure S2). The melting point of 1 was lower than that of [2.2]paracyclophane without a substituent (melting point: 286 °C), indicating that the introduction of imidazole and the distortion of the cyclic skeleton reduce intermolecular interaction among 1 in the crystal. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of 1 under a N2 atmosphere revealed that a 10% weight loss occurred at 242 °C (Figure S3). These thermal properties of 1 were utilized to determine CVD deposition conditions, with the sublimation of 1 performed at 175 °C under vacuum conditions.
A p-Quinodimethane derivative formed through pyrolytic cleavage of vapored 1 under vacuum spontaneously polymerized into 2 at the surface of a Si wafer within the chamber (Scheme 1). Figure 1a,b show images of field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) of 2 on a Si wafer. Polymer 2 is insoluble in all common solvents. The FE-SEM image of the cross-section sample indicates the deposition of polymer film 2 with a 1.0 mm thickness on a Si wafer. The AFM image of 2 revealed a smooth and uniform surface composed of nanometer-sized particle assemblies (Figure S4), and its height variations were less than 1.0 nm. The film thickness of 2 can be controlled within 10.0 nm to 1.0 mm by changing the initial amount of 1 for the CVD process. The film thicknesses of 2 of less than 100 nm were determined from the AFM image analysis of damaged samples via ultrasonication in water (Figure 1c). Circular domains appeared after ultrasonication, and the film thicknesses of 2 were determined from the average differences between the two levels in the AFM images. The thicknesses from the AFM analyses agreed with the values from the optical measurement.
We investigated the chemical composition of the 2 films via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The XPS survey spectra revealed that 2 films contained 86.5 at. % carbon, 6.4 at. % nitrogen, and 7.1 at. % oxygen (Figure S5). The carbon/nitrogen ratio in the XPS of 2 almost agreed with the theoretical ratio (nominal values; 89.1 at. % carbon and 10.9 at. % nitrogen), and the presence of oxygen can be ascribed to the adsorption of oxygen at the surface of 2 after the deposition process. The C 1s were deconvoluted into two peaks positioned at 284.5 and 285.8 eV, which can be assigned to aliphatic and aromatic carbons (C=C/C-C) and carbon atoms bonded to N (C-N), respectively (Figure 2a) [35]. For N 1s, two characteristic peaks at 396.6 and 398.7 eV can be attributed to amine and imine nitrogen in imidazole units in 2 [36]. Consequently, the XPS spectra agree with the expected chemical structure of 2.
The polymerized film 2 showed a melting point of 284 °C as determined via DSC (Figures S6 and S7). The melting point of 2 was compatible with the reported value for Parylene C (290 °C). The wide-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of 1.0 mm thick film 2 peeled off from the substrate showed two sharp peaks at 2q = 17.6 and 22.5° (Figure 2b) [37]. Out-of-plane XRD of an 11.1 nm thick film 2 on the Si wafer also displayed two peaks at 2q = 16.8 and 21.1°, indicating that the crystalline structure of 2 was not altered by reducing the film thickness (Figure S8). The film 2 deposited under the standard CVD condition was a semi-crystalline material and contained two α and β phases corresponding to monoclinic and hexagonal orientations of polymer backbones [38,39].
The hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity property of surfaces was analyzed considering the contact angle of a water droplet. The water droplet contact angle for 2 deposited on a Si wafer (76.2 ± 1.2°) was lower than that of PPX lacking any substituents (84.8 ± 1.3°) [40], suggesting that the introduction of polar imidazole side chains into PPX backbones slightly improved surface hydrophilicity. Figure 2c shows the surface zeta potential versus pH for 2 at room temperature. The surface of 2 exhibited positive and negative charges at low and high pH with an isoelectronic point around pH 7.0, indicating amphoteric characteristics of imidazole units in 2 due to the formation of the imidazolium cation and imidazoline anion at low and high pH ranges [41,42,43,44]. After the 2-coated Si wafer was immersed into 0.1 mol/L HCl aqueous solution for 8 h., the AFM topological image after the treatment with HCl showed no changes for the as-deposited 2 films (Figure S9).
The 2 films were deposited onto ultrafiltration (UF) membranes (molecular cut-off of 50 kDa) via the CVD of 1. The cross-cut SEM image of the UF membrane coated with 2 displays a uniform covering of the supporting membrane surface (Figure S10). The UF membranes coated with 2 (28.7 ± 1.2 nm thick) exhibited a water permeation flux of 9.4 ± 0.35 L m−2 h−1 at a pressure difference of 0.5 MPa (Table 1). The water flux of 2-coated membranes increased linearly with an increasing pressure difference in the 0.1–0.5 MPa range and was inversely proportional to the film thickness (Figure S11). The MWCO of 2 was 7.0 kDa, as determined through a solute filtration experiment with neutral PEGs with various molecular weights (Figure S12) [45].
The nanofiltration performance of 2 was evaluated by rejecting four types of water-soluble dyes with different molecular sizes, molecular weights, and charges (Table 1). The concentration of feed dye solutions was 10 mM, and the concentrations of residual dye in filtrates were determined by the changes in the absorbance in the visible absorption spectra. When a colored aqueous solution containing negatively charged Rose Bengal (RB) (Mw 1017.64 g/mol, Figure S13) was filtered in dead-end mode using the 2-coated membranes, 2 could altogether reject RB with a molecular width of 1.2 nm, and the filtrate was a colorless liquid. This observation suggests the CVD-deposited 2 on the supported UF membranes had no defects. Dye rejection rates for methyl orange (MO) (Mw 327.33 g/mol), Rhodamine 6G (RH) (Mw 479.02 g/mol), and methylene blue (MB) (Mw 319.85 g/mol) were also examined at pH7.0, and they were 75 ± 3%, 60 ± 5%, and 26 ± 3%, respectively. Despite a slight difference in molecular sizes between MO and MB, 2 should not hinder the permeation of positively charged MB at pH 7.0. In contrast, the rejection of MB increased to 44 ± 2% at pH 5.0. Thus, 2 films can change the diffusivity of negatively charged dyes in response to the protonation degree of imidazole units [41,42,43,44].
Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) have been constructed by connecting tetrahedrally coordinated metal ions with imidazolate linkers [46,47,48]. ZIFs, composed of Zn2+ ions and 2-methyl imidazole (2mIM), have been widely investigated as durable porous materials in membranes for molecular separation processes [49,50,51]. In this study, we expected an improvement in the filtration performance of 2/ZIF nanocomposite membranes due to the direct growth of ZIF crystals on the surface of 2 thin films. First, the 2-coated Si wafer was immersed into an aqueous solution of Zn(NO3)2∙6H2O for 5 min, and the treated substrates were washed with water two times (Figure S14). As shown in Figure 3a, the XPS spectrum of Zn 2p revealed the binding energies of Zn 2p3/2 at 1020.2 eV and Zn 2p1/2 at 1043.2 eV, confirming the presence of Zn2+ in 2 (Figure S15) [52]. Moreover, the peaks of N 1s shifted to higher binding energies due to coordination with Zn2+ with imidazole units in 2. XPS analyses revealed that Zn2+ ions could accumulate in 2 films by forming coordination bonds with imidazole units.
Metal–organic frameworks were grown on the surface of 2 by alternately immersing two aqueous solutions of 2mIM and Zn2+ with a washing step [53]. The height of domains in the AFM images increased when the number of process cycles was increased (Figure 3b and Figure S16). The XRD peak positions of the composite film are almost consistent with the reported values of ZIF-L (Figure S17) [54]. ZIF-L is composed of two-dimensional layers with a cushion-shaped cavity of 9.4 × 7.0 × 5.3 Å (Figure 3c). This layered structure is stabilized by the intertwining layers of the monodentate Hmim and free Hmim molecule through hydrogen bonding. The water droplet contact angle of 2 modified with ZIF-L crystals (121.2 ± 4.2°) was higher than that of 2 due to the formation of hydrophobic ZIF-L crystals on the surface of 2 and the increase in surface roughness [55].
The ZIF-L crystals were formed on the surface of 2 (21.2 ± 1.5 nm thick) on UF membranes through alternative permeation of Zn2+ and 2mIM aqueous solutions at a pressure difference of 0.4 MPa (Figure 3d). The FE-SEM image of the 2/ZIF-L nanocomposite membrane shows a thin flaky crystal on the surface of 2 (Figure 3e). The composite membrane performed better in rejecting charged dyes than 2 alone (Table 1). The rejection of MB molecules (17.0 × 7.6 × 3.3 nm) was significantly improved from 26% to 52% due to the adsorption into the internal cavity of ZIF-L. The rejection of MB gradually decreased when the passing volume of an aqueous solution of MB was increased, maintaining the water flux (Figure S18).

4. Conclusions

To summarize, we have demonstrated the nanofiltration performance of PPX 2 thin films possessing imidazole side chains prepared on the surface of commercial UF membranes using a dry CVD process. The uniform and stable 2 PPX films with a few tens of nanometers were formed via the surface polymerization of imidazole-substituted monomers generated by the gas-phase pyrolysis of [2.2]paracyclophane derivatives without the use of solvents and catalysts. The resulting 2 films showed an increase in rejection rates for the cationic dyes RH and MB due to the protonation of imidazole units in 2 below pH 7. Furthermore, the imidazole units in 2 could accumulate Zn2+ ions through the coordination bond, and ZIF-L architectures were constructed on 2. The 2/ZIF-L nanocomposite membranes displayed improved dye rejection rates for water-soluble organic dyes with increasing water flux compared to 2. The clean and robust PPX films presented here provide a platform for molecular separations through tuning free-volume sizes and specific interactions between their substituents and target solutes in PPXs. Further studies are underway to establish the potential for various applications, such as an effective separation of biomolecules in biomedical devices and ultrathin ion-exchange membranes of energy storage devices.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym15153309/s1. Figure S1. Angle difference of two ethylene bridges in 1; Figure S2. DSC profile of 1 during the heating process. Figure S3. TGA profile of 1 under N2 atmosphere. Figure S4. AFM image (2 × 2 mm) of 2 on a Si wafer. Figure S5. XPS wide-scan spectrum of 2 deposited onto a Si wafer. Figure S6. DSC profile of 2 during the heating process. Figure S7. TGA profile of 2 under N2 atmosphere. Figure S8. Out-of-plane XRD of 11.1 nm thick film 2 on the Si wafer. Figure S9. AFM image of 2 after treatment with 0.1 mol/L HCl. Figure S10. Cross-cut FE-SEM image of 2-coated UF membrane; (a) cross-cut image of 2-coated polyethersulfone layer in UF membrane and (b) magnified image of the surface of the 2-coated membrane. Figure S11. Dependences of water flux of 2 on pressure (a) and film thickness (b) when using a dead-end membrane filtration system at room temperature. Figure S12. Determination of MWCO for 2 from the rejection curve of PEGs. Figure S13. Chemical structures of water-soluble dyes. Figure S14. AFM image of 2 film after treatment with an aqueous solution of Zn(NO3)2∙6H2O. Figure S15. XPS wide-scan spectrum of 2 with an aqueous solution of Zn(NO3)2∙6H2O. Figure S16. Height change with an increasing number of cycles for the growth of ZIF-L on 2. Figure S17. XRD patterns of 2/ZIF-L composite film on a Si wafer and reference patterns of ZIF-8 and ZIF-L. Figure S18. Change in rejection ratio of 2/ZIF-L composite membrane during continuous feeding of an aqueous solution of MB.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.; Methodology, M.K., E.H.O. and Y.H.; Validation, M.K., Y.K. and E.H.O.; Formal Analysis, M.L.K.; Investigation, S.Y. and T.S.; Data Curation, S.Y.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, M.K.; Writing—Review and Editing, M.K.; Visualization, M.K. and E.H.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Center of Innovation Program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (No. H25C3312) and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (No. 18H04056) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) of Japan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Elimelech, M.; Phillip, W.A. The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment. Science 2011, 333, 712–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Marchetti, P.; Jimenez Solomon, M.F.; Szekely, G.; Livingston, A.G. Molecular separation with organic solvent nanofiltration: A critical review. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 10735–10806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yadav, D.; Karki, S.; Ingole, P.G. Current advances and opportunities in the development of nanofiltration (NF) membranes in the area of wastewater treatment, water desalination, biotechnological and pharmaceutical applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, G.; Li, N.; Miller, S.J.; Kim, D.; Yi, S.; Labreche, Y.; Koros, W.J. Molecularly Designed Stabilized Asymmetric Hollow Fiber Membranes for Aggressive Natural Gas Separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng. 2016, 55, 13754–13758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jimenez-Solomon, M.F.; Song, Q.; Jelfs, K.E.; Munoz-Ibanez, M.; Livingston, A.G. Polymer nanofilms with enhanced microporosity by interfacial polymerisation. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 760–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Karan, S.; Wang, Q.; Samitsu, S.; Fujii, Y.; Ichinose, I. Ultrathin free-standing membranes from metal hydroxide nanostrands. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 448, 270–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Henmi, M.; Nakatsuji, K.; Ichikawa, T.; Tomioka, H.; Sakamoto, T.; Yoshio, M.; Kato, T. Self-organized liquid-crystalline nanostructured membranes for water treatment: Selective permeation of ions. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2238–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qian, Q.; Asinger, P.A.; Lee, M.J.; Han, G.; Mizrahi Rodriguez, K.; Lin, S.; Benedetti, F.M.; Wu, A.X.; Chi, W.S.; Smith, Z.P. MOF-Based Membranes for Gas Separations. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 8161–8266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fan, H.; Peng, M.; Strauss, I.; Mundstock, A.; Meng, H.; Caro, J. MOF-in-COF molecular sieving membrane for selective hydrogen separation. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Karan, S.; Samitsu, S.; Peng, X.; Kurashima, K.; Ichinose, I. Ultrafast Viscous Permeation of Organic Solvents Through Diamond-Like Carbon Nanosheets. Science 2012, 335, 444–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Joshi, R.K.; Carbone, P.; Wang, F.C.; Kravets, V.G.; Su, Y.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Wu, H.A.; Geim, A.K.; Nair, R.R. Precise and Ultrafast Molecular Sieving Through Graphene Oxide Membranes. Science 2014, 343, 752–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Morelos-Gomez, A.; Cruz-Silva, R.; Muramatsu, H.; Ortiz-Medina, J.; Araki, T.; Fukuyo, T.; Tejima, S.; Takeuchi, K.; Hayashi, T.; Terrones, M.; et al. Effective NaCl and dye rejection of hybrid graphene oxide/graphene layered membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 1083–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Baran, M.J.; Carrington, M.E.; Sahu, S.; Baskin, A.; Song, J.; Baird, M.A.; Han, K.S.; Mueller, K.T.; Teat, S.J.; Meckler, S.M.; et al. Diversity-oriented synthesis of polymer membranes with ion solvation cages. Nature 2021, 592, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tomczak, W. Fouling of the Nanofiltration Membrane NF270 Used for Separation of Fermentation Broths: Impact of Feed Pretreatment Process. Processes 2023, 11, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shii, T.; Hatori, M.; Yokota, K.; Hattori, Y.; Kimura, M. Selective Blocking Property of Microporous Polymer Membranes Fabricated by Chemical Vapor Deposition. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Gorham, W.F. A New, General Synthetic Method for the Preparation of Linear Poly-p-xylylenes. Polym. Chem. 1966, 4, 3027–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yeh, Y.L.; Gorham, W.F. Preparation and Reactions of Some [2.2]Paracyclophane Derivatives. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 2366–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hopf, H. [2.2]Paracyclophanes in polymer chemistry and materials science. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2008, 47, 9808–9812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nguyen, B.K.; Matsumoto, K.; Shimoyama, I. Tensile film stress of parylene deposited on liquid. Langmuir 2010, 26, 18771–18775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Charmet, J.; Banakh, O.; Laux, E.; Graf, B.; Dias, F.; Dunand, A.; Keppner, H.; Gorodyska, G.; Textor, M.; Noell, W.; et al. Solid on liquid deposition. Thin Solid Films 2010, 518, 5061–5065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guan, Z.Y.; Wu, C.Y.; Li, Y.J.; Chen, H.Y. Switching the Biointerface of Displaceable Poly-p-xylylene Coatings. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 14431–14438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kaltenbrunner, M.; White, M.S.; Glowacki, E.D.; Sekitani, T.; Someya, T.; Sariciftci, N.S.; Bauer, S. Ultrathin and lightweight organic solar cells with high flexibility. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kuribara, K.; Wang, H.; Uchiyama, N.; Fukuda, K.; Yokota, T.; Zschieschang, U.; Jaye, C.; Fischer, D.; Klauk, H.; Yamamoto, T.; et al. Organic transistors with high thermal stability for medical applications. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kaltenbrunner, M.; Sekitani, T.; Reeder, J.; Yokota, T.; Kuribara, K.; Tokuhara, T.; Drack, M.; Schwodiauer, R.; Graz, I.; Bauer-Gogonea, S.; et al. An ultra-lightweight design for imperceptible plastic electronics. Nature 2013, 499, 458–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, B.; Huang, W.; Lee, S.; Huang, L.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Z.; Feng, L.-W.; Wang, G.; Yokota, T.; et al. Foundry-compatible high-resolution patterning of vertically phase-separated semiconducting films for ultraflexible organic electronics. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chen, H.-Y.; Lai, J.H.; Jiang, X.; Lahann, J. Substrate-Selective Chemical Vapor Deposition of Reactive Polymer Coatings. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 3474–3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Nandivada, H.; Chen, H.Y.; Bondarenko, L.; Lahann, J. Reactive polymer coatings that “Click”. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2006, 45, 3360–3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Chen, H.Y.; Lahann, J. Designable biointerfaces using vapor-based reactive polymers. Langmuir 2011, 27, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Greiner, A.; Schaifer, O.; Simon, P. Poly(P-xyly1ene)s: Synthesis, polymer analogous reactions, and perspectives on structure-property relationships. Acta Polym. 1997, 48, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hassan, Z.; Spuling, E.; Knoll, D.M.; Brase, S. Regioselective Functionalization of [2.2]Paracyclophanes: Recent Synthetic Progress and Perspectives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 2156–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Seacome, R.J.; Coles, M.P.; Glover, J.E.; Hitchcock, P.B.; Rowlands, G.J. Planar-chiral imidazole-based phosphine ligands derived from [2,2]paracyclophane. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 3687–3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hallett, J.P.; Welton, T. Room-temperature ionic liquids: Solvents for synthesis and catalysis. 2. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3508–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shabalin, D.A.; Camp, J.E. Recent advances in the synthesis of imidazoles. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 3950–3964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cipiciani, A.; Fringuelli, F.; Mancini, V.; Piermatti, O.; Pizzo, F.; Ruzziconi, R. Synthesis of Chiral (R)-4-Hydroxy- and (R)-4-Halogeno[2.2]paracyclophanes and Group Polarizability. Optical Rotation Relationship. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3744–3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Titantah, J.T.; Lamoen, D. Carbon and nitrogen 1s energy levels in amorphous carbon nitride systems: XPS interpretation using first-principles. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2007, 16, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Finsgar, M. Surface analysis of 2-mercapto-1-methylimidazole adsorbed on copper by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 190, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jackson, N.; Stam, F.; O’Brien, J.; Kailas, L.; Mathewson, A.; O’Murchu, C. Crystallinity and mechanical effects from annealing Parylene thin films. Thin Solid Films 2016, 603, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Murthy, N.S.; Kim, H.-G. Molecular packing in alkylated and chlorinated poly-p-xylylenes. Polymer 1984, 25, 1093–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Miller, K.J.; Hollinger, H.B. On the Conformations of Poly(p-xylylene) and Its Mesophase Transitions. Macromolecules 1990, 23, 3855–3859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Boduroglu, S.; Cetinkaya, M.; Dressick, W.J.; Singh, A.; Demire, M.C. Controlling the Wettability and Adhesion of Nanostructured Poly-(p-xylylene) Films. Langmuir 2007, 23, 11391–11395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheng, L.; Zhang, M.; Fang, C.; Feng, W.; Zhu, L.; Xu, Y. Positively charged poly(N-vinyl imidazole)gel-filled loose nanofiltration membranes: Perfromances and molelling analysis. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 625, 118975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hu, J.; Hardian, R.; Gede, M.; Holtzl, T.; Szekely, G. Reversible crosslinking of polybenzimidazole-based organic solvent nanofiltration membranes using difunctional organic acids: Toward sustainable crosslinking approaches. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 648, 120383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bai, Y.; Gao, P.; Fang, R.; Gai, J.; Zhang, L.-D.; Zhou, Z.-H.; Sun, S.-P.; Gao, X.-L. Constructing positively charged acid-resistant nanofiltration membranes via surface postgrafting for efficient removal of metak ions from electroplating rinse wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 297, 121500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Setiawan, O.; Huang, Y.-H.; Abdi, Z.G.; Hung, W.-S.; Chung, T.-S. pH-tunable and pH-responsive polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration membranes for Li+/Mg2+ separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2023, 668, 121269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, C.; Mao, H.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, S. In situ surface crosslinked tight ultrafiltration membrane prepared by one-step chemical reaction-involved phase inversion process between activated PAEK-COOH and PEI. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 538, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Park, K.S.; Ni, Z.; Cote, A.P.; Choi, J.Y.; Huang, R.; Uribe-Romo, F.J.; Chae, H.K.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 10186–10191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Phan, A.; Doonan, C.J.; Uribe-Romo, F.J.; KnoblerR, C.B.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Synthesis, Structure, and Carbon Dioxide Capture Properties of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhang, J.P.; Zhang, Y.B.; Lin, J.B.; Chen, X.M. Metal azolate frameworks: From crystal engineering to functional materials. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1001–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ordoñez, M.J.C.; Balkus, K.J.; Ferraris, J.P.; Musselman, I.H. Molecular sieving realized with ZIF-8/Matrimid® mixed-matrix membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 361, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, J.R.; Sculley, J.; Zhou, H.C. Metal-organic frameworks for separations. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 869–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Cseri, L.; Hardian, R.; Anan, S.; Vovusha, H.; Schwingenschlögl, U.; Budd, P.M.; Sada, K.; Kondo, K.; Szekely, G. Bridging the interfacial gap in mixed-matrix membranes by nature-inspired design: Precise molecular sieving with polymer-grafted metal-organic frameworks. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 23793–23801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Thanh, M.T.; Thien, T.V.; Du, P.D.; Hung, N.P.; Khieu, D.Q. Iron doped zeolitic imidazolate framework (Fe-ZIF-8): Synthesis and photocatalytic degradation of RDB dye in Fe-ZIF-8. J. Porous Mater. 2017, 25, 857–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, L.; Fang, M.; Liu, J.; He, J.; Li, J.; Lei, J. Layer-by-Layer Fabrication of High-Performance Polyamide/ZIF-8 Nanocomposite Membrane for Nanofiltration Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 24082–24093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Deacon, A.; Briquet, L.; Malankowska, M.; Massingberd-Mundy, F.; Rudić, S.; Hyde, T.L.; Cavaye, H.; Coronas, J.; Poulston, S.; Johnson, T. Understanding the ZIF-L to ZIF-8 transformation from fundamentals to fully costed kilogram-scale production. Commun. Chem. 2022, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, M.-Y.; Wang, X.-P.; Lin, R.; Liu, Y.; Chen, F.-S.; Cui, L.-S.; Meng, X.-M.; Hou, J. Improving the hydrostability of ZIF-8 membrane by biomolecule towards enhanced nanofiltration performance for dye removal. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 618, 118630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Polymerization of 4-imidazole-[2,2]paracyclophane 1 via the CVD process and single-crystal X-ray structures of 1 (displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level and hydrogen atoms omitted).
Scheme 1. Polymerization of 4-imidazole-[2,2]paracyclophane 1 via the CVD process and single-crystal X-ray structures of 1 (displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level and hydrogen atoms omitted).
Polymers 15 03309 sch001
Figure 1. (a) FE-SEM image and (b) AFM image (Ra = 0.97 nm) of 2 films (thickness: 1.0 mm) deposited onto a Si wafer. (c) AFM image of 2 film damaged by 5 min of sonication in water. (d) Line scan of height change at the arrow shown in (c).
Figure 1. (a) FE-SEM image and (b) AFM image (Ra = 0.97 nm) of 2 films (thickness: 1.0 mm) deposited onto a Si wafer. (c) AFM image of 2 film damaged by 5 min of sonication in water. (d) Line scan of height change at the arrow shown in (c).
Polymers 15 03309 g001
Figure 2. (a) C 1s and N 1s XPS spectra (dotted line: deconvolution for general chemical species identification) of 2 deposited on a Si wafer. (b) XRD pattern and (c) effect of pH on surface zeta potentials of 2 films.
Figure 2. (a) C 1s and N 1s XPS spectra (dotted line: deconvolution for general chemical species identification) of 2 deposited on a Si wafer. (b) XRD pattern and (c) effect of pH on surface zeta potentials of 2 films.
Polymers 15 03309 g002
Figure 3. (a) Zn 2p and N 1s XPS spectra of 2 film after treatment with an aqueous solution of Zn(NO3)2∙6H2O for 5 min. (b) AFM image of the surface of a Si wafer coated with 2 after alternative immersing of two aqueous solutions of 2mIM and Zn2+. (c) The structure of ZIF-L (blue: nitrogen, black: carbon). (d) Growth process of ZIF-L on 2 deposited onto UF membrane (x: washing process with water). (e) FE-SEM image of ZIF-L crystal grown on 2 deposited onto UF membrane.
Figure 3. (a) Zn 2p and N 1s XPS spectra of 2 film after treatment with an aqueous solution of Zn(NO3)2∙6H2O for 5 min. (b) AFM image of the surface of a Si wafer coated with 2 after alternative immersing of two aqueous solutions of 2mIM and Zn2+. (c) The structure of ZIF-L (blue: nitrogen, black: carbon). (d) Growth process of ZIF-L on 2 deposited onto UF membrane (x: washing process with water). (e) FE-SEM image of ZIF-L crystal grown on 2 deposited onto UF membrane.
Polymers 15 03309 g003
Table 1. Water fluxes and dye rejection ratios of 2 and 2/ZIF-L composite membranes.
Table 1. Water fluxes and dye rejection ratios of 2 and 2/ZIF-L composite membranes.
Water FluxDye Rejection a (%)
(L m−2 h−1 MPa−1)RB bMO cRH dMB e
219.8 ± 0.795 ± 275 ± 360 ± 526 ± 3
2/ZIF-L19.2 ± 1.098 ± 290 ± 675 ± 352 ± 2
a (Dye) = 10 mM, b RB: Rose Bengal, c MO: methyl orange, d RH: Rhodamine 6G, e MB: methylene blue.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yoshida, S.; Shii, T.; Kitazawa, Y.; Kim, M.L.; Otal, E.H.; Hattori, Y.; Kimura, M. Nanofiltration Performance of Poly(p-xylylene) Nanofilms with Imidazole Side Chains. Polymers 2023, 15, 3309. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15153309

AMA Style

Yoshida S, Shii T, Kitazawa Y, Kim ML, Otal EH, Hattori Y, Kimura M. Nanofiltration Performance of Poly(p-xylylene) Nanofilms with Imidazole Side Chains. Polymers. 2023; 15(15):3309. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15153309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yoshida, Satsuki, Takeshi Shii, Yu Kitazawa, Manuela L. Kim, Eugenio H. Otal, Yoshiyuki Hattori, and Mutsumi Kimura. 2023. "Nanofiltration Performance of Poly(p-xylylene) Nanofilms with Imidazole Side Chains" Polymers 15, no. 15: 3309. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15153309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop