Next Article in Journal
Pilot-Scale Melt Electrospinning of Polybutylene Succinate Fiber Mats for a Biobased and Biodegradable Face Mask
Previous Article in Journal
Polymeric Materials Selection for Flexible Pulsating Heat Pipe Manufacturing Using a Comparative Hybrid MCDM Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Starch Modification with Molecular Transformation, Physicochemical Characteristics, and Industrial Usability: A State-of-the-Art Review

1
School of Food Engineering, Anhui Science and Technology University, 9 Donghua Road, Fengyang 233100, China
2
Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety of the Ministry of Education of China, Institutes of Agricultural Science and Technology Development, Yangzhou University, 48 Wenhui East Road, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Polymers 2023, 15(13), 2935; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15132935
Submission received: 10 May 2023 / Revised: 23 June 2023 / Accepted: 29 June 2023 / Published: 3 July 2023

Abstract

:
Starch is a readily available and abundant source of biological raw materials and is widely used in the food, medical, and textile industries. However, native starch with insufficient functionality limits its utilization in the above applications; therefore, it is modified through various physical, chemical, enzymatic, genetic and multiple modifications. This review summarized the relationship between structural changes and functional properties of starch subjected to different modified methods, including hydrothermal treatment, microwave, pre-gelatinization, ball milling, ultrasonication, radiation, high hydrostatic pressure, supercritical CO2, oxidation, etherification, esterification, acid hydrolysis, enzymatic modification, genetic modification, and their combined modifications. A better understanding of these features has the potential to lead to starch-based products with targeted structures and optimized properties for specific applications.

1. Introduction

Starch is primarily derived from plant carbohydrates and is a renewable biopolymer that is found in various plant tissues [1,2], such as the endosperm of cereals, thin-walled tissues of tubers, cotyledons of legume seeds [3], and the pulp of immature fruits [4]. Starch can be spherical, elliptical, polygonal, flattened, elongated, or kidney-shaped [5]. Natural starch consists of amylose and amylopectin [6], and it presents a complex semi-crystalline structure with a starch granule density of 1.5 g/mL. The density of the starch granules is higher than the density of fibers (density range: 1.2–1.4 g/mL) [7]. The molecular weight of amylopectin is significantly higher than that of amylose, with most samples containing between 15% and 30% of amylose [8].
Starch is a readily available and abundant source of biological raw materials and is widely used in the food, medical, and textile industries. However, as the application prospects of starch continue to improve, the limitations of using natural starch become more prominent. For instance, natural starch is insoluble in sluoat room temperature, is prone to retrogradation, and is susceptible to viscosity loss under low pH and high-temperature conditions. These properties significantly hinder the application prospects of starch [9]. Researchers have been focusing on methods to modify starch to improve the physicochemical characteristics of natural starch derived from different sources. Physical, chemical, biological, and combined modification methods can be used to address the problems associated with the use of natural starch. These modification methods have been reviewed in this paper.

2. Physical Modification

Physical modification technology is an economical and eco-friendly technology that can be used to modify starch properties. Physical modifications can usually be divided into thermal and non-thermal treatments [10]. Heat treatment and non-heat treatment refer to the functional properties of starch that can be tuned by controlling the temperature and moisture levels in the absence of foreign substances [11]. Currently, the physical-modification method has emerged as an important starch-modification method.

2.1. Thermal Treatment

2.1.1. Hydrothermal Treatment

Hydrothermal treatment is a physical modification method that preserves the surface characteristics of starch granules and that maintains the starch structure better than other physical modification methods. The common methods include annealing (ANN), heat moisture treatment (HMT), and superheated steam (SS). ANN and HMT are executed above the glass transition temperature and below the gelation temperature of starch [12,13]. The execution of the SS method results in an increase in the temperature of starch above its saturation point as steam is released at a given pressure during the process. This method was superior to conventional hydrothermal modification methods, and the use of SS can save 50–80% of energy [14,15,16]. This can be attributed to the high-heat-transfer coefficient of superheated steam. The high-heat-transfer coefficient results in an increase in the mobility of starch molecules, promoting the process of modification. Additionally, the SS method was safer than the HMT method [17,18]. Adebowale et al. investigated the effect of ANN and HMT on the properties of millet starch and found that the modified starch contained <1% of broken granules [19]. The solubility tended to increase with increasing humidity, and the swelling capacity of the materials subjected to these conditions was lower than that of natural finger millet starch. The pasting temperature of the starch samples subjected to ANN and HMT increased while the pasting viscosity decreased. Dutta et al. and Shi et al. found contrary results, who reported that the swelling capacity and solubility of potato starch subjected to ANN and HMT methods were lower than those of natural potato starch [13,20]. This may be attributed to the depolymerization and damage of starch granules. The strong interactions between amylose and amylopectin molecules prevented their leaching from the granules [16,21,22]. The results reported by Xiang et al. confirmed the results reported by Dutta et al. and Shi et al. [13,20,23]. They pointed out that the ANN-based modification of starch, realized at the hydrothermal treatment temperature, promoted the rearrangement of starch molecular chains, resulting in the formation of a perfect crystal structure.
The results reported by Ma et al. agreed well with the results reported by Dutta et al., Shi et al. and Xiang et al. [13,20,22,23]. They reported that the swelling power, solubility, leached amylose content, viscosity, and ΔH (enthalpy change) of starch subjected to conditions of hot steam treatment were lower than those of natural starch. Liu et al. demonstrated that starch from different sources exhibited different gel states after SS treatment [16]. This variability could be attributed to the nature of starch, the heating method used, and the processing conditions. Therefore, modified starch samples can be selected based on specific requirements, and those with similar properties can be used interchangeably [24]. In conclusion, the SS method can reduce the swelling ability and improve the starch gel stability. Due to its high efficiency and low loss characteristics, this method will be a promising method for starch modification and can be widely applied in the future.

2.1.2. Microwave

Microwave treatment involves the use of electromagnetic radiation at frequencies between 300 MHz and 300 GHz [25]. These radiations affect daily life, and the microwave treatment method is an efficient and green method that can be used to modify starch. The electric field of microwave radiation vibrates at high frequency, leading to the continuous orientation of polar and ionizable molecules. The altered molecules rub together and collapse with surrounding molecules through electromagnetic induction and then generate heat [26]. Li et al. studied the physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility of sorghum starch under conditions of microwave treatment [27]. The results revealed that the surface of the three sorghum starch granules was rough, and the pasting temperature and pasting time increased post microwave treatment. The slowly digestible starch and resistant starch contents increased significantly when the samples were subjected to conditions of microwave treatment, and the process did not alter the chemical functional groups of the starch samples. Wang et al. compared the effects exerted by ultrasonic and microwave treatment methods on the structural and thermal properties of common corn and potato starch samples [28]. They found that microwaves and ultrasound helped to reduce the total amylose starch content in starch. This may be due to the disruption of the surface of starch granules and the double helix of starch. The effect of modification was influenced by the source of starch. The ease of operation, “green” with nature, and sustainability of microwave technology make it a promising starch-modification technology. In addition, microwave technology can increase the resistant starch content of native starch, providing a new method for the development of low GI products.

2.1.3. Pregelatinization

Pregelatinized starch has a special structure, such as hydrogen bond breaking porosity, where the crystal zone in the pregelatinized starch particles is completely or partially destroyed and has properties such as cold-water solubility and high viscosity compared to natural starch. It can reduce the processing time and heat loss in later applications, thus shortening and simplifying the process. For instance, pregelatinization is used for thickeners in many instant food products. These kinds of products require only the addition of hot water with stirring before serving, such as baby food, instant soups and instant deserts. Pregelatinized starch is a kind of starch modified by physical modification. It can significantly change the viscosity, water-binding ability, gel structure, and other properties of starch. Adding pregelatinized starch to natural starch, or the direct replacement of natural starch with pregelatinized starch, can shorten and simplify the production process while improving the quality of the final product [29]. The concept of “convenience living” has attracted the attention of consumers, and this has resulted in an increase in the production of instant food items that can be consumed by heating. Therefore, methods of processing starch-based pregelatinized foods are being extensively studied. Pregelatinized starch can be oven dried, spray dried, drum dried, extruded dried, and freeze dried. Among these methods, oven drying is the oldest known drying method. The uniformity of oven drying temperature is difficult to control. The disadvantages of using this method have hindered the application prospects of the method, and the use of this drying method is being gradually restricted.

2.1.4. Spray Drying

Spray drying is a method of modified starch that combines several drying steps into one, resulting in reduced drying time. This method can be efficiently used to realize the mass production of samples. Tay et al. introduced a low-temperature spray-drying process that yielded glutinous rice starch in high yields [30]. The product was characterized by low moisture content and uniform particle size. The crystallinity and pasting properties of the spray-dried glutinous rice starch were retained during the treatment process. In addition, in the spray-drying method, different pretreatment conditions have different effects on the physicochemical properties of starch. Santos et al. pasted and spray-dried natural cassava starch at different preheating temperatures [29]. They showed that spray-dried tapioca starch (starch concentration of 25%, preheating temperature of 52 °C, processing heating time of 10 min) shows a low change in gelation enthalpy and a high gelatinization temperature and gelatinization degree, which make it suitable for industrial use as a partially gelatinized starch. They also varied the starch concentrations and heating times to understand the effects of different physical conditions on the properties of starch and reported that the preheating temperature and heating time had a significant effect on cold viscosity. These results can help in the production of fast-brewing powders and gels that can be used to develop convenience foods. These authors have published several papers on the process followed for the modification of starch. They reported that the spray-drying method affected the physicochemical properties (solubility, swelling, and pasting properties) of starch. Starch solubility was not significantly affected, and the effect of the treatment conditions on the viscosity of starch was low [29,31,32,33]. In spray drying, the preheating temperature and starch concentration affected the solubility, swelling, crystallinity and pasting temperature of the starch. Although the spray-drying method has conventionally been used for the production of pregelatinized starch, the high cost of the production process, complex influence factors and difficulties of achieving consistent quality limit the application of this method.

2.1.5. Drum Drying

Drum drying involves two stages (pasting and drying) and can be accomplished using single-drum or double-drum dryers [34]. This method was considered more convenient and cost-effective than spray drying and extrusion drying. Chittrakorn et al. investigated the process of preparation of pregelatinized sweet potato starch at different temperatures (110, 120, and 130 °C) following the process of drum drying [35]. The results indicated that an increase in the pregelatinization temperature significantly increased the water absorption index of pregelatinized starch. Furthermore, the water solubility index of this sample was lower than that of natural sweet potato flour. The addition of an appropriate amount of pregelatinized sweet potato flour to wheat flour resulted in an improvement in cake quality. In another report, Obadi et al. examined the influence of pregelatinized starch (treated under different conditions) on dough characteristics and soba noodle quality and found that the dough tensile strength reached its maximum with the addition of blast-dried tapioca starch [36]. As a whole, the viscosity and water absorption index of drum-dried starch was higher than those of the spray-dried and extruded starch samples. Further research should focus on expending the application prospects of drum-dried modified starch.

2.1.6. Extrusion

Starch extrusion technology is a thermo-mechanical process that breaks the bonds in starch, resulting in the pasting, melting, and degradation of starch. This technology involves the execution of several unit operational steps, such as mixing, cooking, kneading, shearing, shaping, and forming [37]. Extrusion is a cost-effective modification method that can be used to achieve high productivity. Various combinations of parameters can be chosen to execute this versatile method to obtain the desired end product [38,39]. The final products are characterized by low density and high expansion ratio [40].
Gandhi et al. investigated the effect of twin-screw extrusion on the properties and quality attributes of corn and potato starch [39]. The water absorption index, water solubility index, degree of starch pasting achieved, and in vitro digestibility of the extruded starch samples were significantly higher than those of the untreated starch samples. The polysaccharide chain molecules and intermolecular hydrogen bonds in starch molecules break during extrusion. This results in the transformation of the samples from their native state to the crushed and pasted states [41]. This facilitates the water absorption of starch molecules and promotes the swelling and increase in the water absorption index. The water solubility index increase can be explained by the increase in the extrusion temperature, the decrease in molecular weight due to high mechanical shear [42], and gelatinization [43].
The results differ depending on the raw material used, extrusion parameters, and extrusion conditions. Qi et al. studied the extrusion process of pea starch (moisture content: 25–55%) using a twin-screw extruder (aspect ratio: 26) [44]. The lowest relative content of resistant starch was observed when the moisture content was 40%, the screw speed was kept at 180 r/min and the shear temperature was 70 °C. When the moisture content was 25%, screw speed kept at 140 r/min and shear temperature at 70 °C, the relative content of slowly digested starch was the lowest. Li et al. extracted starch from pineapple honey seeds and used a double-screw extruder to modify the precipitated powder by controlling the extrusion operation parameters [45]. The results were in agreement with Qi et al. that the fine structure of pineapple honey seed starch was significantly influenced by the extrusion operation parameters. Ali et al. found that the high temperature and shear force caused a disruption in the hydrogen bonds and molecular structure of potato starch, resulting in reduced stability and lower molecular weight [46]. The high temperature and shear force also led to an increased gelatinization degree and tighter arrangement of starch molecules [47]. Therefore, the setting of the parameters during the extrusion process determined the properties of the starch.
Improved extrusion cooking technology (IECT) improves the performance of the extrudate. A low amount of energy is consumed during the process, and IECT is a promising and improved method that can be used to treat and process starch. Cheng et al. followed the IECT process for the extrusion of buckwheat flour, and the results revealed that the IECT-treated buckwheat flour samples retained favorable functional components and physical properties [47]. However, the extrusion process has much room for development, and its application prospects can be improved by conducting in-depth studies on the physicochemical properties of the samples.
In conclusion, the parameters of the pregelatinization method are universal, and pregelatinized starch has excellent pasting properties, which can be used in a wide range of applications. Each pregelatinization treatment has advantages and disadvantages, therefore, it is necessary to further optimize the pregelatinization method to meet the needs of different food industries.

2.2. Non-Thermal Treatment

2.2.1. Ultrasonication

Ultrasonic modification is a processing technique that results in the physical depolymerization of starch. Ultrasound helps to improve the physicochemical properties of starch. The advantages of the process lie in the use of small amounts of chemicals and the consumption of less amount of time [48]. Satmalawati et al. varied the amplitudes and treatment durations and used eight combinations of amplitudes and treatment times to treat starch [49]. They reported that ultrasound treatment degraded starch polymers, while resulting in the generation of amorphous starch. Thus, modified starch had a higher content of amylose, low viscosity, and increased solubility of the samples. The results agree well with the results reported by Mohammad Amini et al. and Rahaman et al. [48,50]. Ultrasonic modification is an ideal modification method because it is a green method, and the modification parameters can be adjusted without restrictions. This method can be used to obtain modified starch with the desired properties. However, the effect of ultrasonic modification was unstable, and the experimental results were difficult to reproduce. In the future, we need to explore the principle of ultrasonic modification in depth to obtain the target properties of starch. The changes in the properties of starch after ultrasonic modification are shown in Figure 1.

2.2.2. Radiation

Radiation technology can be potentially used to improve the solubility and enzymatic digestibility of starch, and thus, it can be widely used in the food industry [52]. Radiation-based modification techniques are safe and effective tools that can be used to modify starch. The effect of radiation on starch is shown in Figure 2. Irradiation significantly increases the water solubility of irradiated starch and significantly reduces the viscosity of the samples [52,53]. Liang et al. treated starch under conditions of varying irradiation doses (6, 12, and 24 kGy) [54]. They also varied the frequencies (1, 2, 4, and 8 times) of the electron beam used for irradiation. The results revealed that an increase in dose resulted in an increase in the extent of starch degradation, a decrease in molecular weight and viscosity, and an increase in starch solubility and swelling capacity of the samples. The use of multiple low-dose irradiations helped improve starch properties and reduce energy consumption. The physicochemical properties of starch recorded under conditions of irradiation can complement some of the existing properties of starch, thereby improving the application prospects of starch.

2.2.3. Ball Milling

Ball milling modification involves the exploitation of friction, impact, shear, or other mechanical forces to modify the structure and properties of starch granules (Figure 3) [56]. Ball milling modification can be categorized into dry ball milling and wet ball milling methods. Wet ball milling is an energy-efficient method that can dissipate heat effectively and produce samples with small particles. This method was more efficient than the dry ball milling method [57]. The effect of ball milling treatment primarily depends on the starch source and grinding conditions (density of the grinding material, ball size, grinding speed, grinding time, ball-to-powder ratio, etc.). Huang et al. investigated the effect of ball milling on the physicochemical properties of cassava starch and corn starch and reported that the ball milling process destroyed the crystal structure of starch [58]. It was observed that the pasting temperature of starch decreased with an increase in the grinding time, the cold-water solubility increased with the breakage of hydrogen bonds, and the cold-water solubility of cassava starch was higher than that of corn starch. Ahmad et al. used a planetary ball mill (600 rpm, 5 h, 5 zirconium balls with a diameter of 8 cm) to grind water caltrop and horseshoe starch [59]. The results indicated that the water absorption capacity and thermal stability of the modified starch were better than those of natural starch, and this result was consistent with the results reported by Huang et al. and Juarez-Arellano et al. [58,60]. Han et al. investigated the effect of treatment times (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min) on the granule structure and physicochemical properties of different starch samples (wheat starch, type A and type B starch) [61]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) technique was used for sample analysis, and the results revealed that the degree of starch granule fragmentation realized increased with an increase in the ball milling time. In contrast, partial re-agglomeration of wheat starch granules and type B starch was realized when the samples were ball milled for a prolonged time (30, 40, or 60 min). The re-agglomeration properties of starch significantly affected the digestibility of the samples. Soe et al. investigated the effect of milling time on the properties of glutinous rice starch [56]. The results revealed that the solubility of starch significantly increased with an increase in the ball milling time, and the starch swelling capacity reached its maximum at 15 min. Moreover, the longer the ball milling time, the lower the swelling capacity, and this can be attributed to the formation of different gelling fragments and soluble substances during the process of ball milling. Ball milling and grinding are simple processes that are environmentally friendly, and the resulting product is characterized by high solubility and good dispersibility. Thus, it can be inferred that the ball milling method is a promising physical modification method.

2.2.4. High Hydrostatic Pressure (HHP)

The HHP-based treatment method is a new, non-thermal, and environmentally friendly treatment technique that is easy to control [63]. This method can be used for physical modification. The mechanism of HHP action on starch is shown in Figure 4. Rahman et al. studied the effect of different parameters of HHP (HHP100, 300 and 500 MPa, 15 and 30 min at 52 °C) on the physicochemical, thermal, and structural properties of different varieties of starch samples [64]. The results revealed that the amylose and damaged starch contents of the starch samples increased following HHP treatment. However, the solubility and swelling capacity of the samples decreased, and significant differences in thermal properties between the different varieties of starch samples were observed. This can be potentially attributed to the different degrees of HHP-induced pasting [65]. However, the high hydrostatic pressure ensures that the forces acting on the product are uniform and that it is energy efficient and retains the product’s nutrients well. During food processing, starch physically interacts with fatty acids, proteins, polyphenols and other substances to form starch complexes. These complexes are useful in food technology, as they influence the texture, physicochemical properties and quality of foods. For example, the incorporation of a high amylose starch, fatty acid complex into surimi resulted in a more compact network structure of surimi gel, which improved the quality of surimi products [66]. Guo et al. prepared lotus seed starch, fatty acid complexes using high hydrostatic pressure, analyzed their physicochemical properties and found that the complexes presented a compact structure, higher crystallinity and higher thermal stability. In addition, it was demonstrated that the crystalline properties of the complexes were related to pressure and fatty acid chain length [67]. The application of HHP technology in preparation of starch–fatty acids complexes further expands the range of applications of this modification method.

2.2.5. Supercritical CO2

A supercritical fluid is a compound that is formed above critical pressure and temperature and is a green solvent that is inexpensive, safe, non-toxic, and environmentally friendly [69]. CO2, as a solvent in supercritical fluids, has an easy-to-control critical value, is convenient to use, and is characterized by a much lower critical temperature than other commonly used solvents. This fluid exhibits both gas and liquid properties, such as low viscosity, high diffusion coefficient, and good dissolution properties [70]. Villegas et al. studied the morphology and size-distribution properties of starch granules [71]. The results were recorded before and after contact with supercritical CO2. They also studied the solubility and volume expansion properties of the starch samples in supercritical CO2. Analysis of the SEM images revealed that the average diameter of the treated starch granules was higher than the average diameter of untreated starch granules when the samples were treated with supercritical CO2. This resulted in swelling of the starch granules. This may be due to the absorption of CO2 by starch. However, the extent of swelling realized in this case was negligible compared to the extent of swelling realized following other modification methods. The authors pointed out that the introduction of different functional groups exerted varying degrees of effects on the physicochemical properties of modified starch. Moreover, the supercritical fluid-modification approach can be combined with physical, chemical, and biological methods to obtain starch samples with the target properties. Figure 5 shows the schematic diagram of the supercritical CO2 unit. Table 1 summarizes the physical modification methods for the various starch sources that have been reported above.

3. Chemical Modification

Chemical modification involves the introduction of new functional groups into the polymer molecules. This results in significant changes in the physicochemical properties of starch molecules [73,74]. Starch contains α-1,4 glycosidic and α-1,6 glycosidic bonds, and the skeletal structure contains a reduced aldehyde end. Therefore, starch was prone to aldehyde- and base-induced depolymerization and glycosidic rearrangement [75]. Chemical modification methods can be divided into four categories: oxidation, esterification, etherification, and acid hydrolysis. Suitable treatment methods can be chosen based on the desired properties [76]. Food-grade and chemically modified starch must comply with relevant regulations, and the disposal of chemical waste generated during the treatment process poses a significant challenge. However, there is still a lack of research on the potential long-term effects of consuming chemically modified starch on human health.

3.1. Oxidation

The oxidation of modified starch results in the conversion of hydroxyl groups to carbonyl and carboxyl groups, resulting in the depolymerization of amylose and amylopectin [77]. The chemical reagents widely used for starch oxidation are hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorite, periodate, dichromate, and ozone [78]. Oxidation modification results in improved gel texture, stability, and film adhesion [79]. However, chemical waste generated during starch modification needs to be treated appropriately after disposal. Additional concerns include low yields of modified starch, consumption of large amounts of wastewater and time, and the uncertainty about the safety of chemically modified starch.
Tung et al. studied the oxidation of starch extracted from pineapple honey seed [80]. They used hydrogen peroxide for oxidation and analyzed the starch samples using SEM, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) techniques. The results revealed that starch underwent oxidation in the amorphous region, and rough and microporous granules were formed post oxidation. However, the safety of using this oxidized starch in the food industry was not reported.
The electrolysis technique can potentially address most of the problems associated with chemical modification. Food-grade chemicals are used in small amounts during electrolysis. Thus, these can be easily removed from the final products. Castanha et al. used tapioca starch as the raw material [81]. They oxidized the raw material in an electrolytic cell using sodium chloride as the electrolyte. The results revealed that the number of carbonyl and carboxyl groups in oxidized starch increased rapidly with an increase in the NaCl content, and the pores on the surface of the modified starch granules (observed using the SEM technique) increased in size under these conditions. The solubility of this sample was higher than the solubility of natural starch. This can be attributed to starch being primarily oxidized in the amorphous region. The starch molecules break down into smaller molecules, forming a network that readily absorbs water. This increases the solubility of the molecules [82]. This result agrees with the results reported by Tung et al [80].
Ozone is a robust and environmentally friendly oxidant. It is a stronger oxidizing agent than sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide [83]. Ozone can be readily degraded to form oxygen and is not harmful to the environment. Moreover, it does not leave any residue in the final product [79]. The mechanism of action of ozone in the starch molecule is shown in Figure 6. Castanha et al. studied ozone-oxidized potato starch and reported that, unlike natural starch, the ozone-oxidized starch sample could be fully pasted at low temperatures [81]. It was also observed that the ozone-oxidized sample dissolved faster than the other samples, and the amount of water retained by the pasted samples was higher than that retained by native starch. This resulted in an increase in the apparent viscosity and gel strength of the samples. The results reveal that ozone treatment was better than other chemical treatment methods, as it is a safe and green method that can be used to produce starch with the desired properties. Hu et al. further confirmed the feasibility of producing ozone-modified starch and discussed the role of time in the field of ozone treatment of buckwheat starch [84]. The results revealed that aldehyde groups generated during oxidation during the preparation of starch paste in boiling water, at the ozone treatment times of 2.5 and 7.5 min, cross-linked with the hydroxyl groups of starch in the amorphous region. The amorphous layer of starch was further oxidized and degraded at ozone treatment times of 15 and 20 min. The ozone treatment method can be used to modify the structure and physicochemical properties of natural buckwheat starch. Thus, it can be potentially used as an ingredient in conventional products such as instant soup and meal replacement shakes. It can also be used in the field of 3D printing of food [85].
Ozone treatment is an efficient and widely used technology. A correlation analysis was conducted by Castanha et al. for the ozone treatment of cassava, corn, and potato starch samples [86]. The ozone-treated starch results in a product with high industrial relevance and low consistency, with higher strength after cooling and storage.
Figure 6. Mechanism of ozone action in starch molecules [87].
Figure 6. Mechanism of ozone action in starch molecules [87].
Polymers 15 02935 g006

3.2. Etherification

Etherification is a modified method that, by introducing the lipophilic functional groups, is used to improve the water resistance of starch [88]. The mechanism of the etherification reaction is shown in Figure 7. Hydroxypropylation, hydroxyethylation, and carboxymethylation are the three etherification methods used to prepare starch-based ethers. Four types of modified products are usually obtained post etherification: nonionic, cationic, anionic, and amphoteric. Hydroxypropyl starch is the most common type of etherified starch, and it is produced using propylene oxide [89]. This paper focuses on reviewing low-substitution modified starch samples as the production of highly substituted starch samples involves the use of hazardous solvents.
Wang et al. used 3–9% propylene oxide to hydroxypropylate normal wheat starch, glutinous wheat starch [90], and glutinous corn starch and established the relationship between molar substitution and the degree of aging. Their results revealed that hydroxypropylation significantly affected the thermal properties of normal wheat starch, glutinous wheat starch, and glutinous corn starch. They reported that (1) the pasting and peak temperatures decreased with an increase in the hydroxypropyl content, (2) three hydroxypropylated starch samples were characterized by different degrees of swelling, and (3) the hydroxypropylated starch samples were difficult to age and degrade. Hydroxypropylated starch is commonly found in corn [91], amaranth [92], beans [89], rice [93], cassava [94,95], canna [96], etc. Although etherified starches can improve the sensory quality and overall properties of the final product, they are less frequently used in food products because it is difficult to guarantee the safety of etherifying agents added during the modification process. However, because of the high stability of etherified starches with low substitution, they can also be used as thickeners and stabilizers in food industries.
Figure 7. Mechanism of starch modified by etherification reaction [97].
Figure 7. Mechanism of starch modified by etherification reaction [97].
Polymers 15 02935 g007

3.3. Esterification

Esterification reactions can be conducted to effectively modify the structure of starch granules to improve the application prospects of starch. The skeletal structure of starch bears a large number of hydroxyl groups. Hence, starch can be esterified with acids and their derivatives [98]. Starch esters can be divided into inorganic and organic acid esters depending on the type of acid used for esterification [99]. According to the United States’ official regulations, esterified starch can be used in food products. The safety guidelines state that food items should not contain more than 3.0% octenyl succinic anhydrate (OSA)-modified starch [100,101,102]. OSA-modified starch is prepared by reacting starch with OSA, and it is one of the most important amphiphilic derivatives [100]. The reaction involves the introduction of a hydrophobic anhydride group into the starch chain to enhance the amphiphilic nature of the starch [103]. The method followed for OSA modification is the most widely used method of starch esterification because it does not require the use of toxic or hazardous organic solvents. Moreover, the desired results can be obtained under easily controllable experimental conditions [104]. The mechanism of OSA modification is shown in Figure 8. Zhang et al. investigated the effect of different degrees of substitution on the physicochemical properties of starch [105]. They used amylose as the raw material and esterified the samples with OSA at room temperature at a pH of 8.5. The results revealed that the form of the starch samples and the particle size did not change significantly post OSA modification. However, the relative crystallinity and pasting temperature of starch decreased, and the pasting viscosity, swelling capacity, and emulsion stability of the sample increased under these conditions. This result was consistent with the results reported by Zainal Abiddin et al. [106]. It was also observed that the physicochemical properties of OSA-modified starch varied based on the degree of substitution [107]. The disadvantage of OSA is its low solubility in water [107], but the improvement in swelling capacity, pasting viscosity, emulsion stability and shear resistance after OSA modification greatly expanded the application of OSA-modified starches in emulsions.

3.4. Acid Hydrolysis

A concentrated slurry is treated with acid at a temperature below the starch pasting temperature during acid hydrolysis. The method is also referred to as acid dilution [109]. Usually, starch is treated with inorganic acids (hydrochloric or sulfuric acid) during the process of acid hydrolysis [110,111]. The acid solution is neutralized with an alkali when the desired degree of hydrolysis is attained. Following this, the solution is washed [112]. Acid hydrolysis can significantly alter the structural and functional properties of starch. The process of starch acid hydrolysis is shown in Figure 9. In 1874, Nägeli produced the first hot-water-soluble starch following the process of sulfuric acid treatment. Lintner was the first to hydrolyze potato starch at room temperature using 7.5% (w/v) hydrochloric acid [113]. The modified starch was soluble in hot water, and the solution appeared colorless.
Abdorreza et al. studied the effect of acid hydrolysis on the physicochemical and rheological properties of sago starch [114]. It was observed that the solubility increased significantly after 12 h of acid treatment, and it was noted that more than 10 g of sago starch could be dissolved per 100 g of water. Mendez-Montealvo et al. used 7.5% hydrochloric acid for the hydrolysis of non-traditional plantain starch [115]. Hydrolysis was carried out over a period of 3–15 days. Acid hydrolysis resulted in damage of the amorphous as well as crystalline regions of sago starch. It was also observed that the solubility of the starch sample was significantly high on days 9 and 15, and this could be potentially attributed to the acid degradation of the samples at the level of the double helix structure.
Acid hydrolysis can impart specific properties to starch if the pH, hydrolysis time, and molecular weight of starches are controlled [116]. Although this is a simple and inexpensive modification method, few studies have been conducted to address the issues associated with low yields and the formation of undesirable byproducts. Table 2 summarizes the above reported chemical modification methods for various starch sources.
Figure 9. Acid hydrolysis process of granular potato starch [117].
Figure 9. Acid hydrolysis process of granular potato starch [117].
Polymers 15 02935 g009

4. Enzymatic Modification

Enzyme modification technology can be used to effectively control the specific properties of starch. The use of biological modification methods helps to reduce the yields of byproducts. High specificity for hydrolysis products and high yields of target products can be achieved using these techniques [118,119]. Table 3 summarizes the enzyme modification methods for the various starch sources described in the text. Enzymatic modification is a green method that is closely related to the concept of world development. The enzymes usually used are α-1,4-glucanases and α-1,6-glucanases. It has been observed that a single enzyme does not significantly affect the properties of starch. Hence, a combination of multiple enzymes has been used by researchers to obtain the desired results. The biological enzyme modification method can be used to produce porous starch, slow-digesting starch, and resistant starch [120]. Enzymes can erode the entire granule surface or its parts (external erosion) or digest channels from selected points on the granule surface toward the center of the granule (internal erosion) [121]. The enzyme type, enzyme concentration, reaction time, and starch source play an important role in the physicochemical properties of the starch-based final product. Lopez-Ochoa et al. analyzed the paste properties and thermal properties of tapioca starch using pullulanase and amyloglucosidase [122], and their results revealed that the viscosity of the drinks prepared from pullulanase-modified starch was higher than that of the amyloglucosidase-modified starch. Compared with pullulanase-modified starch, a higher degree of long-term retrogradation was recorded for amyloglucosidase-modified starch [123]. Han et al. revealed that the desired final product could be prepared by controlling the type of enzyme, enzyme activity, and enzyme concentration [124]. Cornejo et al. investigated the effect of the degree of enzyme hydrolysis (0%, 30%, and 50%) on the properties of different varieties of cassava starch [125]. Structural analysis revealed that a progressive increase in the degree of enzyme hydrolysis resulted in progressive structural damage to cassava starch. Enzyme hydrolysis increased the water-holding capacity and water-binding capacity of the starch. Analysis of the rheological properties of starch revealed that the response of starch varieties to enzymatic hydrolysis was influenced by the degree of enzyme hydrolysis. However, the time-consuming nature of the enzyme-based treatment method hinders its application prospects, and researchers have conducted relevant studies to address this problem. Wang et al. introduced the use of ultrasound-based treatment methods in the glycolytic enzyme pretreatment, starch pretreatment, and mixed reaction system-based treatment methods to improve the enzyme hydrolysis efficiency of starch [126]. The enzymatic reaction conducted following ultrasonic pretreatment improved the degree of starch enzymatic hydrolysis (effective temperature: <65 °C), and the degree of enzymolysis hydrolysis varied with the experimental steps associated with ultrasonic treatment. In conclusion, the enzyme modification method is a promising and attractive method for starch modification.

5. Genetic Modification

Genetic modification of starch not only helps in understanding the mechanisms associated with the biosynthesis of starch but also presents a platform to expand the application prospects of starch. Biogenetic mutations impart starch with unique physicochemical properties. Wang et al. performed targeted mutagenesis with IbGBSSI and IbSBEII (genes associated with biosynthetic pathways in sweet potatoes) using CRISPR/Cas9 technology and found that amylose content in modified starch was higher than that in natural sweet potatoes [127]. Luo et al. successfully produced high amylose tapioca starch by CRISPR/cas9-mediated starch branching enzyme 2 (SBE2) mutation. It was found that the resistant starch and amylose starch content of genetically modified cassava starch increased significantly, and the starch viscosity changed with increasing pasting temperature and peak time [128]. Products with high amylose starch content contained higher levels of resistant starch, which was beneficial for human health [129]. Sun et al. successfully produced high amylose rice by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of SBEIIb and found that high amylose starch cereal products could provide new options for people with chronic diseases such as diabetes and obesity [130]. Fu et al. successfully obtained four waxy rice starches by CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology and found that the above four mutants had different physicochemical properties, which provided a reference for obtaining rice with target properties in the future [131]. Waxy starch was known as low-amylose starch or amylose-free starch and offers special advantages in starch-based food processing. For instance, waxy rice was suitable for sauces, gravies and baby food, as it had higher viscosity and was easier to digest [132]. The development of the field of genetic engineering can contribute to the development of novel starch samples that can contribute to the future of food and agriculture. Table 4 summarizes the genetic modification methods for the various starch sources described in the text.

6. Dual Modifications

The dual modification method is widely used for starch modification, as it can address the shortcomings of the single modification method. The dual modification method is developed using a combination of two modification methods. It can be broadly classified into six categories: physical–physical modifications, physical–chemical modifications, physical–biological modifications, chemical–chemical modifications, chemical–biological modifications, and biological modifications. There is a significant correlation between the physicochemical properties of dual-modified starch samples [133]. The dual modification methods have the potential to make starch widely available and, therefore, to expand the starch market.

6.1. Physical–Physical Modifications

Dual physical modification was more effective than single physical modification. Zhou et al. compared the physicochemical properties of corn starch and potato starch modified by ultrasonic and microwave alone and by dual treatment [134]. The results showed that dual modification significantly affected the solubility, dehydration rate, and in vitro digestibility of potato starch. Colussi et al. investigated the relationship between humid HMT and HHP and evaluated their effects on thermal, pasting, swelling power, solubility, morphological and crystallization properties and in vitro digestibility of potato starch [135]. The results showed that when HHP was applied to HMT starch, the peak viscosity, retracted viscosity, and final viscosity were greatly increased compared to the samples treated with HMT alone. Dual modification increased the transition temperature and swelling force and changed the relative crystallinity. In addition, the dual-modified starch could be used as a substitute for low glycemic index foods. The results of this study are in agreement with Zhou et al. [134].

6.2. Physical–Chemical Modifications

The combined physical and chemical modification facilitates the further acquisition of starch with target properties. Li et al. compared the granular, physicochemical, and thermal properties of single-modified and corresponding freeze–thaw-assisted acid hydrolysis starches [136]. The study showed that after freeze–thaw and acid hydrolysis treatments, the starches exhibited the characteristic combination presented by both treatments alone. In addition, the oil adsorption capacity and solubility of the starches were significantly increased. The reasons may be the freeze–thawing exposes starch to more enzyme attachment sites, thus enhancing starch hydrolysis [137]. FITR and SEM showed that the chemical groups of the starches were not changed after the combined treatment, but Khurshida et al. revealed that the dual modification of cassava starch using ultrasound and acetic acid acetylation showed that the dual-modified starch had the lowest viscosity, and they pointed out that the type of dual modification and the order of modification had a significant effect on the physicochemical properties of the starch, and the solubility of the starch treated with ultrasound first was significantly lower than that of the starch treated with acetic acid acetylation first. Acetylation of starch was performed first [138]. Thus, the combination of physical and chemical modifications can help us to obtain starches with significantly different properties.

6.3. Physical–Enzyme Modifications

Physical modification methods are currently the preferred method for starch modification due to their green, efficient, and easy-to-operate nature, while enzymatic hydrolysis is used as a green modification method. Davoudi et al. investigated the effect of low-temperature plasma treatment and enzymatic hydrolysis on the physicochemical properties and microstructure of porous corn starch, and SEM images showed that deeper grooves appeared on the surface of the combined starch, and the combined starch showed the highest solubility, swelling capacity, and total pore volume [139]. Lin et al. investigated the structure and physicochemical properties of lotus seed starch nanoparticles prepared by ultrasound-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis, and the results showed that ultrasound further degraded the lotus seed starch nanoparticles [140]. However, when the ultrasound power and time were too large, some fine particles would adhere to the large particles so that the pullulanase could not fully function. At present, few studies have been reported for the control of the parameters of the dual modification method on the physicochemical properties of the modified starch; therefore, further studies are needed to better obtain products with the target properties.

6.4. Chemical–Chemical Modifications

Dual-chemical modification makes full use of the advantages of single-chemical modification, and therefore, its modification effect is more obvious. Javadian et al. investigated the effect of dual-chemical modifications on the functional, microstructural, and thermal properties of cassava starch by acid hydrolysis and then by hydroxypropylation of cassava starch [141]. The results showed that the solubility of the dual-modified starch was significantly higher than that of natural starch, that the pasting degree and pasting parameters of the dual-modified starch were lower, and that the dual modifications reduced the energy required to change the properties of the starch compared to single modifications. Sriprablom et al. compared the effects of cross-linking and octenyl succinylation mono- and bi-modification on the physicochemical, in vitro digestibility, and emulsification properties of cassava starch and showed the results in terms of physicochemical and emulsification properties [142]. This was mainly due to the effect of the functional groups introduced in the second modification, while in vitro digestibility seemed to be affected by the two functional groups introduced in the first and second modifications. This finding will help in the future acquisition of the target properties of starch.

6.5. Enzyme–Enzyme Modifications

The inherent advantages of the biomodification approach are: “green” and efficient. Dual biomodification further consolidates this advantage and effectively enhances that of single biomodification. Jeong et al. investigated the effect of α-amylase in combination with α-amylase and cellulase on the physicochemical properties of oat flakes and starch and showed that enzyme modification resulted in a significant increase in starch solubility and swelling and that the combined enzymes caused more intense depolymerization of starch molecules than single enzymes [143]. Guo et al. modified potato starch granules with branching enzymes and transglucosidase [144]. It was shown that during the enzymatic digestion of potato starch, the two enzymes exhibited synergistic effects, attacking the external and internal parts of the starch synergistically, and the complex enzyme modification increased the α-1,6-glycosidic bond ratio and the number of short chains of the starch compared to the single enzyme modification, resulting in a significant decrease in crystallinity, viscosity, pasting temperature and enthalpy, and in a significant increase in solubility. Table 5 summarizes the dual modification methods that have been reported for various starch sources.

7. Conclusions

Studies have shown that modified starch presents better physicochemical properties than native starch, and starch modification significantly expands the market for starch byproducts. Currently, people are placing great emphasis on eating well and healthily. With the rise in the concept of homology of medicine and food, the starch industry has been further boosted. For instance, Pueraria lobata starch high in isoflavones can be used as food and in the medicinal industry. As a result, it is a healthy and nutritious choice. Pueraria lobata starch is an underexplored native starch, and it will have great application in functional food ingredients if it is modified. Additionally, as the global population continues to grow, the development of modified starch with improved functionality and sustainability will become increasingly important to meet the demand for food and other industrial applications. Research on modified starch is expected to focus on developing more efficient and eco-friendly modification methods as well as on exploring novel starch sources and their potential uses in the future.

Author Contributions

R.H.: writing—original draft preparation. S.L.: writing—original draft preparation. L.Y.: writing—review and editing, project and funding acquisition. G.Z., L.Z. and P.Q.: organizing and collecting literature. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2108085QC141), the Universities Scientific Research Project of Anhui Province (KJ2021A0886), the Anhui Xiaogang National Agricultural Science and Technology Park Science and Technology Project (YQ202207) and the instant Pueraria lobata powder (S202210879248).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All basic data supporting the results of this study are available from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all study participants for their contributions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zeeman, S.C.; Kossmann, J.; Smith, A.M. Starch: Its Metabolism, Evolution, and Biotechnological Modification in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 209–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Copeland, L. History of Starch Research. In Starch Structure, Functionality and Application in Foods; Wang, S., Ed.; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2020; pp. 1–7. ISBN 9789811506215. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, S.; Guo, P. Botanical Sources of Starch. In Starch Structure, Functionality and Application in Foods; Wang, S., Ed.; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2020; pp. 9–27. ISBN 9789811506215. [Google Scholar]
  4. Agama-Acevedo, E.; Flores-Silva, P.C.; Bello-Perez, L.A. Cereal Starch Production for Food Applications. In Starches for Food Application; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 71–102. ISBN 978-0-12-809440-2. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pérez, S.; Bertoft, E. The Molecular Structures of Starch Components and Their Contribution to the Architecture of Starch Granules: A Comprehensive Review. Starch-Stärke 2010, 62, 389–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cornejo-Ramírez, Y.I.; Martínez-Cruz, O.; Del Toro-Sánchez, C.L.; Wong-Corral, F.J.; Borboa-Flores, J.; Cinco-Moroyoqui, F.J. The Structural Characteristics of Starches and Their Functional Properties. CyTA-J. Food 2018, 16, 1003–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, W.; Lickfield, G.C.; Yang, C.Q. Molecular Modeling of Cellulose in Amorphous State. Part I: Model Building and Plastic Deformation Study. Polymer 2004, 45, 1063–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bertoft, E. Understanding Starch Structure: Recent Progress. Agronomy 2017, 7, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kaur, M.; Bhullar, G.K. Partial Characterization of Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) Kernel Starch Oxidized at Different Levels of Sodium Hypochlorite. Int. J. Food Prop. 2016, 19, 605–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Raghunathan, R.; Pandiselvam, R.; Kothakota, A.; Mousavi Khaneghah, A. The Application of Emerging Non-Thermal Technologies for the Modification of Cereal Starches. LWT 2021, 138, 110795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Deka, D.; Sit, N. Dual Modification of Taro Starch by Microwave and Other Heat Moisture Treatments. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 92, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dias, A.R.G.; da Rosa Zavareze, E.; Spier, F.; de Castro, L.A.S.; Gutkoski, L.C. Effects of Annealing on the Physicochemical Properties and Enzymatic Susceptibility of Rice Starches with Different Amylose Contents. Food Chem. 2010, 123, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dutta, D.; Sit, N. Comparison of Properties of Films Prepared from Potato Starch Modified by Annealing and Heat–Moisture Treatment. Starch-Stärke 2022, 74, 2200110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Alfy, A.; Kiran, B.V.; Jeevitha, G.C.; Hebbar, H.U. Recent Developments in Superheated Steam Processing of Foods—A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 2191–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hu, X.; Guo, B.; Liu, C.; Yan, X.; Chen, J.; Luo, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Yang, R.; Zhong, Y.; et al. Modification of Potato Starch by Using Superheated Steam. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 198, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, C.; Yan, X.; Xu, X.; Guo, B.; Yang, R.; Chen, J.; Zhong, Y.; Luo, S.; Xu, J.; Wu, J. Changes in Granular Swelling and Rheological Properties of Food Crop Starches Modified by Superheated Steam. Starch-Stärke 2019, 71, 1800132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Van Deventer, H.C.; Heijmans, R.M.H. Drying with Superheated Steam. Dry. Technol. 2001, 19, 2033–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pronyk, C.; Cenkowski, S.; Muir, W.E. Drying Foodstuffs with Superheated Steam. Dry. Technol. 2004, 22, 899–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Adebowale, K.O.; Afolabi, T.A.; Olu-Owolabi, B.I. Hydrothermal Treatments of Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana) Starch. Food Hydrocoll. 2005, 19, 974–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shi, X.; Ding, Y.; Wan, J.; Liu, C.; Prakash, S.; Xia, X. Effect of Annealing on Structural, Physicochemical, and In Vitro Digestive Properties of Starch from Castanopsis sclerophylla. Starch-Stärke 2021, 73, 2100005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, Y.; Xu, D.; Sang, S.; Jin, Y.; Xu, X.; Cui, B. Effect of Superheated Steam Treatment on the Structural and Digestible Properties of Wheat Flour. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 112, 106362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ma, Y.; Zhang, W.; Pan, Y.; Ali, B.; Xu, D.; Xu, X. Physicochemical, Crystalline Characterization and Digestibility of Wheat Starch under Superheated Steam Treatment. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 118, 106720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xiang, G.; Li, J.; Han, W.; Yang, Y.; Lin, Q.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Guo, X.; Pan, Q.; Huang, Z.; et al. The Influence of Temperature Changes on the Rice Starch Structure and Digestive Characteristics: One and Two-Step Annealing. Foods 2022, 11, 3641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gomes, A.M.M.; Mendes da Silva, C.E.; Ricardo, N.M.P.S. Effects of Annealing on the Physicochemical Properties of Fermented Cassava Starch (Polvilho azedo). Carbohydr. Polym. 2005, 60, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Salazar-González, C.; San Martín-González, M.F.; López-Malo, A.; Sosa-Morales, M.E. Recent Studies Related to Microwave Processing of Fluid Foods. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cui, R.; Yeon Yoo, M.J.; Zhu, F. Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Heating on Physicochemical Properties and Phenolic Profiles of Purple Sweetpotato and Wheat Flours. Food Biosci. 2022, 46, 101602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, R.; Dai, L.; Peng, H.; Jiang, P.; Liu, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, C.; Li, Z. Effects of Microwave Treatment on Sorghum Grains: Effects on the Physicochemical Properties and in Vitro Digestibility of Starch. J. Food Process Eng. 2021, 44, e13804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, L.; Wang, M.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, Y.; Ouyang, J. Influence of Ultrasound and Microwave Treatments on the Structural and Thermal Properties of Normal Maize Starch and Potato Starch: A Comparative Study. Food Chem. 2022, 377, 131990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. dos Santos, T.P.R.; Franco, C.M.L.; Mischan, M.M.; Leonel, M. Improvement in Spray-Drying Technology for Preparation of Pregelatinized Cassava Starch. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 39, 939–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Tay, J.B.J.; Chua, X.; Ang, C.; Goh, K.K.T.; Subramanian, G.S.; Tan, S.Y.; Lin, E.M.J.; Wu, W.-Y.; Lim, K. Continuous Low-Temperature Spray Drying Approach for Efficient Production of High Quality Native Rice Starch. Dry. Technol. 2022, 40, 1758–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. dos Santos, T.P.R.; Franco, C.M.L.; Mischan, M.M.; Leonel, M. Behavior of Sweet Potato Starch After Spray-Drying Under Different Pretreatment Conditions. Starch-Stärke 2019, 71, 1800245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. dos Santos, T.P.R.; Franco, C.M.L.; do Carmo, E.L.; Jane, J.; Leonel, M. Effect of Spray-Drying and Extrusion on Physicochemical Characteristics of Sweet Potato Starch. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. dos Santos, T.P.R.; Franco, C.M.L.; Leonel, M. Gelatinized Sweet Potato Starches Obtained at Different Preheating Temperatures in a Spray Dryer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 149, 1339–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chieregato Maniglia, B.; Carregari Polachini, T.; Norwood, E.-A.; Le-Bail, P.; Le-Bail, A. Thermal Technologies to Enhance Starch Performance and Starchy Products. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 40, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chittrakorn, S.; Bora, G.C. Production of Pregelatinized Sweet Potato Flour and Its Effect on Batter and Cake Properties. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e16019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Obadi, M.; Chen, Y.; Qi, Y.; Liu, S.; Xu, B. Effects of Different Pre-Gelatinized Starch on the Processing Quality of High Value-Added Tartary Buckwheat Noodles. Food Meas. 2020, 14, 3462–3472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stojceska, V.; Ainsworth, P.; Plunkett, A.; İbanoğlu, Ş. The Effect of Extrusion Cooking Using Different Water Feed Rates on the Quality of Ready-to-Eat Snacks Made from Food by-Products. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Faraj, A.; Vasanthan, T.; Hoover, R. The Effect of Extrusion Cooking on Resistant Starch Formation in Waxy and Regular Barley Flours. Food Res. Int. 2004, 37, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gandhi, N.; Singh, B.; Singh, P.; Sharma, S. Functional, Rheological, Morphological, and Micro-Structural Properties of Extrusion-Processed Corn and Potato Starches. Starch-Stärke 2021, 73, 2000140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Baidoo, E.A.; Murphy, K.; Ganjyal, G.M. Hulled Varieties of Barley Showed Better Expansion Characteristics Compared to Hull-Less Varieties during Twin-Screw Extrusion. Cereal Chem. 2019, 96, 391–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ye, J.; Hu, X.; Luo, S.; Liu, W.; Chen, J.; Zeng, Z.; Liu, C. Properties of Starch after Extrusion: A Review. Starch-Stärke 2018, 70, 1700110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rangira, I.; Gu, B.; Ek, P.; Ganjyal, G.M. Pea Starch Exhibits Good Expansion Characteristics under Relatively Lower Temperatures during Extrusion Cooking. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 3333–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ding, Q.-B.; Ainsworth, P.; Tucker, G.; Marson, H. The Effect of Extrusion Conditions on the Physicochemical Properties and Sensory Characteristics of Rice-Based Expanded Snacks. J. Food Eng. 2005, 66, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Qi, M.; Ren, Z.; Zhang, G.; He, Z.; Wang, C.; Zhang, D.; Ma, C. Effect of Extrusion Treatment on Rheological Properties and in Vitro Digestibility of Pea Starch. Food Sci. 2021, 42, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, B.; Tan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X. Effect of Extrusion Modification on Fine Structure of Artocarpus heterophyllus Seed Starch. China Condiment 2019, 44, 130–134+139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ali, S.; Singh, B.; Sharma, S. Effect of Processing Temperature on Morphology, Crystallinity, Functional Properties, and in Vitro Digestibility of Extruded Corn and Potato Starches. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cheng, W.; Gao, L.; Wu, D.; Gao, C.; Meng, L.; Feng, X.; Tang, X. Effect of Improved Extrusion Cooking Technology on Structure, Physiochemical and Nutritional Characteristics of Physically Modified Buckwheat Flour: Its Potential Use as Food Ingredients. LWT 2020, 133, 109872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mohammad Amini, A.; Razavi, S.M.A.; Mortazavi, S.A. Morphological, Physicochemical, and Viscoelastic Properties of Sonicated Corn Starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 122, 282–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Satmalawati, E.M.; Pranoto, Y.; Marseno, D.W.; Marsono, Y. The Physicochemical Characteristics of Cassava Starch Modified by Ultrasonication. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 980, 012030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rahaman, A.; Kumari, A.; Zeng, X.-A.; Adil Farooq, M.; Siddique, R.; Khalifa, I.; Siddeeg, A.; Ali, M.; Faisal Manzoor, M. Ultrasound Based Modification and Structural-Functional Analysis of Corn and Cassava Starch. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 80, 105795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, H.; Xu, K.; Ma, Y.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, L. Impact of Ultrasonication on the Aggregation Structure and Physicochemical Characteristics of Sweet Potato Starch. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020, 63, 104868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tran, M.Q.; Nguyen, V.B.; Tran, X.A. Gamma Radiation Modification of Cassava Starch and Its Characterization. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2022, 62, 1197–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Punia, S.; Dhull, S.B.; Kunner, P.; Rohilla, S. Effect of γ-Radiation on Physico-Chemical, Morphological and Thermal Characteristics of Lotus Seed (Nelumbo nucifera) Starch. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 157, 584–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liang, W.; Zhao, W.; Liu, X.; Zheng, J.; Sun, Z.; Ge, X.; Shen, H.; Ospankulova, G.; Muratkhan, M.; Li, W. Understanding How Electron Beam Irradiation Doses and Frequencies Modify the Multiscale Structure, Physicochemical Properties, and in Vitro Digestibility of Potato Starch. Food Res. Int. 2022, 162, 111947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nontamas, P.; Phatthanakun, R.; Chio-Srichan, S.; Soontaranon, S.; Sorndech, W.; Tongta, S. Physico-Chemical Properties and Digestibility of Native and Citrate Starches Change in Different Ways by Synchrotron Radiation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 207, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Soe, M.T.; Chitropas, P.; Pongjanyakul, T.; Limpongsa, E.; Jaipakdee, N. Thai Glutinous Rice Starch Modified by Ball Milling and Its Application as a Mucoadhesive Polymer. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 232, 115812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, B.; Yuan, Z.; Qiao, D.; Zhao, S.; Lin, Q.; Xie, F. Wet Ball Milling of Indica Rice Starch Effectively Modifies Its Multilevel Structures and Pasting Behavior. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 1, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Huang, Z.-Q.; Xie, X.; Chen, Y.; Lu, J.; Tong, Z.-F. Ball-Milling Treatment Effect on Physicochemical Properties and Features for Cassava and Maize Starches. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2008, 11, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ahmad, M.; Gani, A.; Masoodi, F.A.; Rizvi, S.H. Influence of Ball Milling on the Production of Starch Nanoparticles and Its Effect on Structural, Thermal and Functional Properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 151, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Juarez-Arellano, E.A.; Urzua-Valenzuela, M.; Peña-Rico, M.A.; Aparicio-Saguilan, A.; Valera-Zaragoza, M.; Huerta-Heredia, A.A.; Navarro-Mtz, A.K. Planetary Ball-Mill as a Versatile Tool to Controlled Potato Starch Modification to Broaden Its Industrial Applications. Food Res. Int. 2021, 140, 109870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Han, N.; Fan, J.-L.; Chen, N.; Chen, H.-Q. Effect of Ball Milling Treatment on the Structural, Physicochemical and Digestive Properties of Wheat Starch, A- and B-Type Starch Granules. J. Cereal Sci. 2022, 104, 103439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bangar, S.P.; Singh, A.; Ashogbon, A.O.; Bobade, H. Ball-Milling: A Sustainable and Green Approach for Starch Modification. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 237, 124069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, D.; Mu, T.; Sun, H.; He, J. Effects of Different High Hydrostatic Pressure-Treated Potato Starch on the Processing Performance of Dough-like Model Systems. Food Res. Int. 2019, 120, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rahman, H.; Mu, T.; Zhang, M.; Ma, M.; Sun, H. Comparative Study of the Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure on Physicochemical, Thermal, and Structural Properties of Maize, Potato, and Sweet Potato Starches. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, Z.; Wang, C.; Liao, X.; Shen, Q. Measurement and Comparison of Multi-Scale Structure in Heat and Pressure Treated Corn Starch Granule under the Same Degree of Gelatinization. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 108, 106081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mi, H.; Su, Q.; Chen, J.; Yi, S.; Li, X.; Li, J. Starch-Fatty Acid Complexes Improve the Gel Properties and Enhance the Fatty Acid Content of Nemipterus Virgatus Surimi under High-Temperature Treatment. Food Chem. 2021, 362, 130253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Guo, Z.; Jia, X.; Lin, X.; Chen, B.; Sun, S.; Zheng, B. Insight into the Formation, Structure and Digestibility of Lotus Seed Amylose-Fatty Acid Complexes Prepared by High Hydrostatic Pressure. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 128, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rostamabadi, H.; Can Karaca, A.; Nowacka, M.; Mulla, M.Z.; Al-attar, H.; Rathnakumar, K.; Gultekin Subasi, B.; Sehrawat, R.; Kheto, A.; Falsafi, S.R. How High Hydrostatic Pressure Treatment Modifies the Physicochemical and Nutritional Attributes of Polysaccharides? Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 137, 108375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Blanchard, L.A.; Brennecke, J.F. Recovery of Organic Products from Ionic Liquids Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fan, Y.; Picchioni, F. Modification of Starch: A Review on the Application of “Green” Solvents and Controlled Functionalization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 241, 116350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Villegas, M.E.; Aredo, V.; Asevedo, K.J.E.; Lourenço, R.V.; Bazito, R.C.; Oliveira, A.L. Commercial Starch Behavior When Impregnated with Food Additives by Moderate Temperature Supercritical CO2 Processing. Starch-Stärke 2020, 72, 1900231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lee, S.-C.; Surendhiran, D.; Chun, B.-S. Extraction and Encapsulation of Squalene-Rich Cod Liver Oil Using Supercritical CO2 Process for Enhanced Oxidative Stability. J. CO2 Util. 2022, 62, 102104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Haq, F.; Yu, H.; Wang, L.; Teng, L.; Haroon, M.; Khan, R.U.; Mehmood, S.; Amin, B.U.; Ullah, R.S.; Khan, A.; et al. Advances in Chemical Modifications of Starches and Their Applications. Carbohydr. Res. 2019, 476, 12–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zia-ud-Din; Xiong, H.; Fei, P. Physical and Chemical Modification of Starches: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 2691–2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Radeloff, M.A.; Beck, R.H.F. Principles of Industrial Scale Chemical Starch Modification. Sugar Ind. 2012, 148, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, Z.; Mhaske, P.; Farahnaky, A.; Kasapis, S.; Majzoobi, M. Cassava Starch: Chemical Modification and Its Impact on Functional Properties and Digestibility, a Review. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 129, 107542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Trinh, K.S.; Dang, T.B. Structural, Physicochemical, and Functional Properties of Electrolyzed Cassava Starch. Int. J. Food Sci. 2019, 2019, 9290627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Pandiselvam, R.; Manikantan, M.R.; Divya, V.; Ashokkumar, C.; Kaavya, R.; Kothakota, A.; Ramesh, S.V. Ozone: An Advanced Oxidation Technology for Starch Modification. Ozone Sci. Eng. 2019, 41, 491–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Çatal, H.; İbanoğlu, Ş. Effect of Aqueous Ozonation on the Pasting, Flow and Gelatinization Properties of Wheat Starch. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 59, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tung, N.T.; Thuy, L.T.H.; Luong, N.T.; Van Khoi, N.; Ha, P.T.T.; Thang, N.H. The Molecular Structural Transformation of Jackfruit Seed Starch in Hydrogen Peroxide Oxidation Condition. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2021, 98, 100192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Castanha, N.; Santos, D.N.; Cunha, R.L.; Augusto, P.E.D. Properties and Possible Applications of Ozone-Modified Potato Starch. Food Res. Int. 2019, 116, 1192–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhou, F.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Q.; Kong, B. Potato Starch Oxidation Induced by Sodium Hypochlorite and Its Effect on Functional Properties and Digestibility. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 84, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Satmalawati, E.M.; Pranoto, Y.; Marseno, D.W.; Marsono, Y. Physicochemical Properties of Ozone-Oxidized Cassava Starch under Different Slurry Concentration. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 443, 012007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hu, J.; Li, X.; Cheng, Z.; Fan, X.; Ma, Z.; Hu, X.; Wu, G.; Xing, Y. Modified Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.) Starch by Gaseous Ozone: Structural, Physicochemical and in Vitro Digestible Properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 125, 107365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Maniglia, B.C.; Lima, D.C.; Matta Junior, M.D.; Le-Bail, P.; Le-Bail, A.; Augusto, P.E.D. Hydrogels Based on Ozonated Cassava Starch: Effect of Ozone Processing and Gelatinization Conditions on Enhancing 3D-Printing Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 138, 1087–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Castanha, N.; Miano, A.C.; Jones, O.G.; Reuhs, B.L.; Campanella, O.H.; Augusto, P.E.D. Starch Modification by Ozone: Correlating Molecular Structure and Gel Properties in Different Starch Sources. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 108, 106027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Castanha, N.; Matta Junior, M.D.D.; Augusto, P.E.D. Potato Starch Modification Using the Ozone Technology. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 66, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Watcharakitti, J.; Win, E.E.; Nimnuan, J.; Smith, S.M. Modified Starch-Based Adhesives: A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Oladebeye, A.O.; Oshodi, A.A.; Amoo, I.A.; Karim, A.A. Hydroxypropyl Derivatives of Legume Starches: Functional, Rheological and Thermal Properties. Starch-Stärke 2013, 65, 762–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, W.; Shi, Y.-C. Gelatinization, Pasting and Retrogradation Properties of Hydroxypropylated Normal Wheat, Waxy Wheat, and Waxy Maize Starches. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 106, 105910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kim, H.; Lamsal, B.; Jane, J.; Grewell, D. Sheet-extruded Films from Blends of Hydroxypropylated and Native Corn Starches, and Their Characterization. J. Food Process Eng. 2020, 43, e13216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Pal, J.; Singhal, R.S.; Kulkarni, P.R. Physicochemical Properties of Hydroxypropyl Derivative from Corn and Amaranth Starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 2002, 48, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Shen, Y.; Zhang, N.; Xu, Y.; Huang, J.; Yuan, M.; Wu, D.; Shu, X. Physicochemical Properties of Hydroxypropylated and Cross-Linked Rice Starches Differential in Amylose Content. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 128, 775–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Liu, J.; Lai, R.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y. Preparation and Characterization of Composites of Hydroxypropyl Tapioca Starch and Zein. Starch-Stärke 2020, 72, 1900204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Charoenthai, N.; Sanga-ngam, T.; Kasemwong, K.; Sungthongjeen, S.; Puttipipatkhachorn, S. Characterization of Hydroxypropyl Tapioca Starch and Its Pregelatinized Starch as Tablet Disintegrants. Starch-Stärke 2022, 74, 2100263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chuenkamol, B.; Puttanlek, C.; Rungsardthong, V.; Uttapap, D. Characterization of Low-Substituted Hydroxypropylated Canna Starch. Food Hydrocoll. 2007, 21, 1123–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Clasen, S.H.; Müller, C.M.O.; Parize, A.L.; Pires, A.T.N. Synthesis and Characterization of Cassava Starch with Maleic Acid Derivatives by Etherification Reaction. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 180, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Haroon, M.; Wang, L.; Yu, H.; Abbasi, N.M.; Zain-ul-Abdin, Z.-A.; Saleem, M.; Khan, R.U.; Ullah, R.S.; Chen, Q.; Wu, J. Chemical Modification of Starch and Its Application as an Adsorbent Material. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 78264–78285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ačkar, Đ.; Babić, J.; Jozinović, A.; Miličević, B.; Jokić, S.; Miličević, R.; Rajič, M.; Šubarić, D. Starch Modification by Organic Acids and Their Derivatives: A Review. Molecules 2015, 20, 19554–19570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Bai, Y.; Shi, Y.-C. Structure and Preparation of Octenyl Succinic Esters of Granular Starch, Microporous Starch and Soluble Maltodextrin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 83, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bajaj, R.; Singh, N.; Kaur, A. Properties of Octenyl Succinic Anhydride (OSA) Modified Starches and Their Application in Low Fat Mayonnaise. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 131, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jiranuntakul, W.; Puncha-arnon, S.; Uttapap, D. Enhancement of Octenyl Succinylation of Cassava Starch by Prior Modification with Heat-Moisture Treatment. Starch-Stärke 2014, 66, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cheng, F.; Ai, Y.; Ghosh, S. Utilization of Octenyl Succinic Anhydride-Modified Pea and Corn Starches for Stabilizing Oil-in-Water Emulsions. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 118, 106773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Dewi, A.M.P.; Santoso, U.; Pranoto, Y.; Marseno, D.W. Dual Modification of Sago Starch via Heat Moisture Treatment and Octenyl Succinylation to Improve Starch Hydrophobicity. Polymers 2022, 14, 1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Zhang, W.; Cheng, B.; Li, J.; Shu, Z.; Wang, P.; Zeng, X. Structure and Properties of Octenyl Succinic Anhydride-Modified High-Amylose Japonica Rice Starches. Polymers 2021, 13, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Zainal Abiddin, N.F.; Yusoff, A.; Ahmad, N. Effect of Octenylsuccinylation on Physicochemical, Thermal, Morphological and Stability of Octenyl Succinic Anhydride (OSA) Modified Sago Starch. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 75, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Perea-Flores, M.D.J.; Martínez-Luna, K.L.; Núñez-Bretón, L.C.; Sarria-Guzmán, Y.; Jiménez-Guzmán, J.; Alamilla-Beltrán, L.; Vivar-Vera, G.; González-Jiménez, F.E. Modification by Lipophilic Substitution of Mexican Oxalis Tuberosa Starch and Its Effect on Functional and Microstructural Properties. Food Meas. 2022, 16, 1062–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sweedman, M.C.; Tizzotti, M.J.; Schäfer, C.; Gilbert, R.G. Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Octenyl Succinic Anhydride Modified Starches: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 905–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Xia, L.; Wenyuan, G.; Juan, W.; Qianqian, J.; Luqi, H. Comparison of the Morphological, Crystalline, and Thermal Properties of Different Crystalline Types of Starches after Acid Hydrolysis. Starch-Stärke 2010, 62, 686–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jiang, M.; Hong, Y.; Gu, Z.; Cheng, L.; Li, Z.; Li, C. Effects of Acid Hydrolysis Intensity on the Properties of Starch/Xanthan Mixtures. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 106, 320–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kim, H.-Y.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.-Y.; Lim, W.-J.; Lim, S.-T. Characterization of Nanoparticles Prepared by Acid Hydrolysis of Various Starches. Starch-Stärke 2012, 64, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wang, S.; Copeland, L. Effect of Acid Hydrolysis on Starch Structure and Functionality: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 55, 1081–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Lintner, C.J. Studien über Diastase. J. Prakt. Chem. 1886, 34, 378–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Abdorreza, M.N.; Robal, M.; Cheng, L.H.; Tajul, A.Y.; Karim, A.A. Physicochemical, Thermal, and Rheological Properties of Acid-Hydrolyzed Sago (Metroxylon sagu) Starch. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Mendez-Montealvo, G.; Velazquez, G.; Fonseca-Florido, H.A.; Morales-Sanchez, E.; Soler, A. Insights on the Acid Hydrolysis of Achira (Canna edulis) Starch: Crystalline and Double-Helical Structure Changes Impacting Functionality. LWT 2022, 153, 112509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhang, H.; Hou, H.; Liu, P.; Wang, W.; Dong, H. Effects of Acid Hydrolysis on the Physicochemical Properties of Pea Starch and Its Film Forming Capacity. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 87, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Li, D.; Yang, N.; Zhou, X.; Jin, Y.; Guo, L.; Xie, Z.; Jin, Z.; Xu, X. Characterization of Acid Hydrolysis of Granular Potato Starch under Induced Electric Field. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 71, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Dura, A.; Błaszczak, W.; Rosell, C.M. Functionality of Porous Starch Obtained by Amylase or Amyloglucosidase Treatments. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 837–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Jiang, K.; Wang, W.; Ma, Q.; Wang, J.; Sun, J. Microwave-Assisted Enzymatic Hydrolysis as a Novel Efficient Way to Prepare Porous Starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 301, 120306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Punia Bangar, S.; Ashogbon, A.O.; Singh, A.; Chaudhary, V.; Whiteside, W.S. Enzymatic Modification of Starch: A Green Approach for Starch Applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 287, 119265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Chen, G.; Zhang, B. Hydrolysis of Granular Corn Starch with Controlled Pore Size. J. Cereal Sci. 2012, 56, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lopez-Ochoa, J.D.; Cadena-Chamorro, E.; Ciro-Velasquez, H.; Rodríguez-Sandoval, E. Enzymatically Modified Cassava Starch as a Stabilizer for Fermented Dairy Beverages. Starch-Stärke 2022, 74, 2100242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Benavent-Gil, Y.; Rosell, C.M. Comparison of Porous Starches Obtained from Different Enzyme Types and Levels. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Han, X.; Wen, H.; Luo, Y.; Yang, J.; Xiao, W.; Ji, X.; Xie, J. Effects of α-Amylase and Glucoamylase on the Characterization and Function of Maize Porous Starches. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 116, 106661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Cornejo, F.; Maldonado-Alvarado, P.; Palacios-Ponce, S.; Hugo, D.; Rosell, C.M. Impact of Cassava Starch Varieties on the Physiochemical Change during Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Molecules 2022, 27, 6098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wang, D.; Hou, F.; Ma, X.; Chen, W.; Yan, L.; Ding, T.; Ye, X.; Liu, D. Study on the Mechanism of Ultrasound-Accelerated Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Starch: Analysis of Ultrasound Effect on Different Objects. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 148, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wang, H.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Fan, W.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, S.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, P. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Mutagenesis of Starch Biosynthetic Genes in Sweet Potato (Ipomoea Batatas) for the Improvement of Starch Quality. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Luo, S.; Ma, Q.; Zhong, Y.; Jing, J.; Wei, Z.; Zhou, W.; Lu, X.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, P. Editing of the Starch Branching Enzyme Gene SBE2 Generates High-Amylose Storage Roots in Cassava. Plant Mol. Biol. 2022, 108, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Regina, A.; Bird, A.; Topping, D.; Bowden, S.; Freeman, J.; Barsby, T.; Kosar-Hashemi, B.; Li, Z.; Rahman, S.; Morell, M. High-Amylose Wheat Generated by RNA Interference Improves Indices of Large-Bowel Health in Rats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 3546–3551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Sun, Y.; Jiao, G.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Guo, X.; Du, W.; Du, J.; Francis, F.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Generation of High-Amylose Rice through CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Targeted Mutagenesis of Starch Branching Enzymes. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  131. Fu, Y.; Hua, Y.; Luo, T.; Liu, C.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Tao, Y.; Zhu, Z.; et al. Generating Waxy Rice Starch with Target Type of Amylopectin Fine Structure and Gelatinization Temperature by Waxy Gene Editing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 306, 120595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Kaur, B.; Ariffin, F.; Bhat, R.; Karim, A.A. Progress in Starch Modification in the Last Decade. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 26, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Mehfooz, T.; Ali, T.M.; Hasnain, A. Effect of Cross-Linking on Characteristics of Succinylated and Oxidized Barley Starch. Food Meas. 2019, 13, 1058–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zhou, Y.; Wang, M.; Wang, L.; Liu, L.; Wu, Y.; Ouyang, J. Comparison of the Effect of Ultrasound and Microwave on the Functional Properties and in Vitro Digestibility of Normal Maize Starch and Potato Starch. J. Food Process Eng. 2023, 46, e14222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Colussi, R.; Kringel, D.; Kaur, L.; da Rosa Zavareze, E.; Dias, A.R.G.; Singh, J. Dual Modification of Potato Starch: Effects of Heat-Moisture and High Pressure Treatments on Starch Structure and Functionalities. Food Chem. 2020, 318, 126475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Li, J.; Deng, Y.; Feng, H.; Yuan, H.; Fang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Hunag, G. Freeze-Thawing Assisted Preparation of Acid-Hydrolyzed Starch: Microstructure and Physicochemical Properties. Starch-Stärke 2022, 74, 2200095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Tu, D.; Ou, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, B.; Zeng, H. Effects of Freeze-Thaw Treatment and Pullulanase Debranching on the Structural Properties and Digestibility of Lotus Seed Starch-Glycerin Monostearin Complexes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 177, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Khurshida, S.; Das, M.J.; Deka, S.C.; Sit, N. Effect of Dual Modification Sequence on Physicochemical, Pasting, Rheological and Digestibility Properties of Cassava Starch Modified by Acetic Acid and Ultrasound. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 188, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Davoudi, Z.; Azizi, M.H.; Barzegar, M. Porous Corn Starch Obtained from Combined Cold Plasma and Enzymatic Hydrolysis: Microstructure and Physicochemical Properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 223, 790–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Lin, X.; Sun, S.; Wang, B.; Zheng, B.; Guo, Z. Structural and Physicochemical Properties of Lotus Seed Starch Nanoparticles Prepared Using Ultrasonic-Assisted Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020, 68, 105199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Javadian, N.; Mohammadi Nafchi, A.; Bolandi, M. The Effects of Dual Modification on Functional, Microstructural, and Thermal Properties of Tapioca Starch. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 5467–5476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sriprablom, J.; Tatikunakorn, P.; Lerdpriyanun, P.; Suphantharika, M.; Wongsagonsup, R. Effect of Single and Dual Modifications with Cross-Linking and Octenylsuccinylation on Physicochemical, in-Vitro Digestibility, and Emulsifying Properties of Cassava Starch. Food Res. Int. 2023, 163, 112304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Jeong, J.H.; Hong, S.Y.; Cho, J.; Cho, D.; Park, E.Y. Impact of Enzyme Modification on Physicochemical Properties of Oat Flake and Starch. Starch-Stärke 2022, 74, 2100292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Guo, L.; Deng, Y.; Lu, L.; Zou, F.; Cui, B. Synergistic Effects of Branching Enzyme and Transglucosidase on the Modification of Potato Starch Granules. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 130, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of starch modification with ultrasound [51].
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of starch modification with ultrasound [51].
Polymers 15 02935 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the effect of radiation on starch [55].
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the effect of radiation on starch [55].
Polymers 15 02935 g002
Figure 3. The interaction mechanism of ball milling [62].
Figure 3. The interaction mechanism of ball milling [62].
Polymers 15 02935 g003
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the action of HHP processing [68].
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the action of HHP processing [68].
Polymers 15 02935 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of supercritical CO2 unit [72].
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of supercritical CO2 unit [72].
Polymers 15 02935 g005
Figure 8. Mechanism of OSA-modified starch [108].
Figure 8. Mechanism of OSA-modified starch [108].
Polymers 15 02935 g008
Table 1. Summary of methods used for physical modifications of starch.
Table 1. Summary of methods used for physical modifications of starch.
TypeTechniqueStarch SourceAdvantagesInfluence on Structures and PropertiesReferences
Thermal treatmentHydrothermal treatmentPotato starch
Wheat starch
Improve starch properties at low cost using a simple
Environmentally friendly process
ANN and HMT: Both modifications increased tensile strength, elongation at break (%), reduced solubility and water vapor permeability.
SS: The treated samples showed lower swelling power, solubility and viscosity, but had higher pasting temperature.
[13,22]
MicrowaveSorghum starchEfficient and green
Easy to obtain equipment
Rough surface of starch granules.
Increase in pasting temperature and pasting time.
Chemical groups remain unchanged.
[27]
Spray dryingCassava starchResulting in retention of particle integrity
Easy access to equipment
High cold viscosity.
Low decomposition.
[31]
Drum dryingTapioca starch
Maize starch
Economical
Convenient
Increased tensile strength of bitter wheat flour flakes.
Increased viscosity and water absorption index.
[36]
ExtrusionCorn starch
Potato starch
Versatile, efficient
Economical production
Increased water absorption index, water solubility index, starch pasting.
Decreased stability.
Improved in vitro digestibility.
[39,46]
Non-thermal treatmentBall millingWheat starch
A-and B-type starch
Cost-effective
Environmentally friendly
With increased solubility.
Starch granule surface was disrupted.
Increased amount of rapidly digestible starch.
[61]
UltrasonicationCassava starchEnvironmentally friendlyDegradation of starch polymer.
Increased solubility.
[49]
RadiationPotato starchFast, efficient, non-toxic, chemical residue free
Low heat production
Reduce molecular weight and viscosity.
Improves starch solubility and swelling capacity.
[54]
High hydrostatic pressureMaize starches
Potato starches
Sweet potato starches
lotus seed starch-fatty acid complexes
Easy to control
Environmentally friendly
Increased content of amylose starch and damaged starch.
Decreased solubility and swelling capacity.
Improved crystallinity and stability.
[64,67]
Supercritical CO2Corn starchesEasy to operate
Safe and non-toxic
Low price
The introduction of different functional group substituents has different effects on their physicochemical properties.[71]
Table 2. Summary of methods used for chemical modifications of starch.
Table 2. Summary of methods used for chemical modifications of starch.
TypeTechniqueStarch SourceAdvantagesInfluence on Structures and PropertiesReferences
OxidationOxidationJackfruit seed starchNo harmful byproducts.
Very environmentally friendly.
High recovery rate.
Starch granules are rough, not smooth, with dents and cracks on the surface.
Oxidation in the amorphous region of starch.
[80]
ElectrolyzedCassava starchSafe and green.
Effective in changing starch properties.
Rough surface of starch granules with large holes.
Increased transparency.
Increased solubility.
[77]
Ozone-modifiedPotato starch
Buckwheat starch
Simple and environmentally friendly.Higher enzyme sensitivity.
Fully glued at lower temperature, easier to dissolve.
Retains more water than natural starches.
[81,84,86]
EtherificationHydroxypropylationWheat starch
Waxy wheat starch
Waxy maize starch
Inhibits the arrangement of starch chains.
Significantly changes the properties of starch.
Decrease in pasting temperature and peak temperature.
Increased hot and cold viscosity.
Different degrees of starch swelling.
[90]
EsterificationOctenyl
succinic anhydride
Japonica Rice StarchesRetains starch morphology and particle size, but starch properties change.Reduced relative crystallinity and pasting temperature of starch.
Improved pasting viscosity, swelling capacity, emulsification stability.
[105]
Acid hydrolysisAcid hydrolysisAchira starchCan significantly change the structural and functional properties of starch without destroying the morphology of the starch granules.Significant increase in solubility and water-holding capacity.
Degradation of the amorphous and crystalline regions.
[115]
Table 3. Summary of methods used for enzymatic modifications of starch.
Table 3. Summary of methods used for enzymatic modifications of starch.
TypeTechniqueStarch SourceAdvantagesInfluence on Structures and PropertiesReferences
Enzymatic modificationPullulanase
and amyloglucosidase
Cassava starchGreen and Safe.
Higher viscosity of pullulanase modified starch.
Improves the shelf life of yogurt-based drinks.
Alters the water activity of yogurt-based beverages.
Reduces lactic acid buildup over time.
Higher viscosity of beverages with enzyme modified starch.
[122]
α-amylase and glucoamylaseCassava StarchEasy access to target products.
Green and safe.
Different enzymatic hydrolysis reactions for different sources of starch.
Increase in apparent amylose content.
Increased water binding capacity and water holding capacity.
[125]
Glucoamylase and Ultrasound AssistPotato starchAccelerated enzyme hydrolysis.Hydrogen bonds and starch chains are broken.
Molecular weight reduction.
[126]
Table 4. Summary of methods used for genetic modifications of starch.
Table 4. Summary of methods used for genetic modifications of starch.
TypeTechniqueStarch SourceAdvantagesInfluence on Structures and PropertiesReferences
Genetic modificationCRISPR/Cas9Sweet potato starchImprove the quality of sweet potato starch.
An effective tool for breeding polyploid tubers in crops.
High mutagenesis rate.
In the allopolyploid sweet potato, the IbGBSSI-knockout reduced, while the IbSBEII-knockout increased, the amylose percentage.[127]
Tapioca starch Efficient editing and wide versatility.Increased content of resistant starch and amylose starch.
Viscosity increases with pasting temperature and peak time.
[128]
Rice starchProduction of high straight-chain starch. Significant increase in resistant starch content.[130]
Rice starchProduced four types of waxy rice starch with different physicochemical propertiesWater solubility decreased with an increase in amylose content in waxy mutant starches.
Decreased crystallinity.
Different waxy mutant starches have different gel properties.
[131]
Table 5. Summary of methods used for dual modifications of starch.
Table 5. Summary of methods used for dual modifications of starch.
TypeTechniqueStarch SourceAdvantagesInfluence on Structures and PropertiesReferences
Physical–physical modificationsUltrasonic microwaveCorn starch, Potato starchDual modification is more effective than single modification.Increased solubility of starch.
Improved water and oil absorption capacity.
Improved freeze-thaw stability.
[134]
HMT-HHPPotato starchCan be used as a substitute for low glycemic index foods.Increase in peak viscosity, retraction and final viscosity.
Slower glucose release rate.
[135]
Physical–chemical modificationsFreeze–thaw
acid hydrolysis
Corn starchFreeze–thawing exposes starch to more enzyme attachment sites, thus enhancing starch hydrolysis [137].Reduced amylose starch content.
Increased solubility.
Increased water and oil adsorption capacity.
Decreased swelling capacity.
[136]
Ultrasound
acetylation
Tapioca starchModification order affects starch affects starch properties.Decrease in swelling degree.
Decrease in paste viscosity.
Increase in resistant starch and slow-digesting starch content.
[138]
Physical–enzyme modificationsUltrasound enzyme hydrolysisLotus Seed StarchUltrasound facilitates the rearrangement of starch amylose molecules.Affected the starch size.
Promoted molecular rearrangement during enzymatic hydrolysis.
[140]
Physical–enzyme modificationsCold plasma enzymatic hydrolysisCorn starchCold plasma promotes enzyme performance.
Higher starch absorption capacity.
Increased swelling capacity and solubility.
Decrease in the orderly arrangement of starch molecules.
Delayed starch pasting.
[139]
Chemical–chemical modificationsAcid hydrolysis-
etherification
Cassava starchReduces the force and energy required to modify starch.Increase in solubility.
Paste parameter and paste degree decrease.
[141]
Cross-linking acetylationCassava starchExpanding the range of applications.Emulsification stability is improved.
Thermal stability improvement.
[142]
Enzyme modifications α-amylase enzyme cellulaseOat StarchIncreased water absorption capacity of starch.
Improved sensory evaluation of starch.
Swelling power, increased solubility.
Degradation of polysaccharide chains.
[143]
Branching enzyme transglucosidasePotato starchIdeal physical and chemical properties of potato starch can be obtained.Crystallinity, viscosity and pasting temperature decrease.
Increase in solubility.
[144]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, R.; Li, S.; Zhao, G.; Zhai, L.; Qin, P.; Yang, L. Starch Modification with Molecular Transformation, Physicochemical Characteristics, and Industrial Usability: A State-of-the-Art Review. Polymers 2023, 15, 2935. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15132935

AMA Style

He R, Li S, Zhao G, Zhai L, Qin P, Yang L. Starch Modification with Molecular Transformation, Physicochemical Characteristics, and Industrial Usability: A State-of-the-Art Review. Polymers. 2023; 15(13):2935. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15132935

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Ruidi, Songnan Li, Gongqi Zhao, Ligong Zhai, Peng Qin, and Liping Yang. 2023. "Starch Modification with Molecular Transformation, Physicochemical Characteristics, and Industrial Usability: A State-of-the-Art Review" Polymers 15, no. 13: 2935. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15132935

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop