Next Article in Journal
Comparison of the Properties of a Random Copolymer and a Molten Blend PA6/PA6.9
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrical Properties of Polyetherimide-Based Nanocomposites Filled with Reduced Graphene Oxide and Graphene Oxide-Barium Titanate-Based Hybrid Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanism of Multi-Stage Degradation in Hot Bitumen of Micronized Powder Elastomeric Modifiers from Worn-Out Tire’s Rubber
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advancement of the Power-Law Model and Its Percolation Exponent for the Electrical Conductivity of a Graphene-Containing System as a Component in the Biosensing of Breast Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetic Field Influence on the Microwave Characteristics of Composite Samples Based on Polycrystalline Y-Type Hexaferrite

1
Institute of Electronics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 72 Tsarigradsko Chaussee, 1784 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Neofit Rilski South-Western University, 66 Ivan Mihailov Str., 2700 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
3
Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. Georgi Bonchev Str., bld. 11, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
4
Greenmat, Chemistry Department, University of Liege, 11 Allée du 6 Août, 4000 Liège, Belgium
5
Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Ul. Okólna 2, 50-422 Wroclaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(19), 4114; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194114
Submission received: 5 August 2022 / Revised: 31 August 2022 / Accepted: 28 September 2022 / Published: 30 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Horizons in Nanofillers Based Polymer Composites II)

Abstract

:
Here, we report results on the magnetic and microwave properties of polycrystalline Y-type hexaferrite synthesized by sol-gel auto-combustion and acting as a filler in a composite microwave-absorbing material. The reflection losses in the 1–20 GHz range of the Y-type hexaferrite powder dispersed homogeneously in a polymer matrix of silicon rubber were investigated in the absence and in the presence of a magnetic field. A permanent magnet was used with a strength of 1.4 T, with the magnetic force lines oriented perpendicularly to the direction of the electromagnetic wave propagation. In the case of using an external magnetic field, an extraordinary result was observed. The microwave reflection losses reached a maximum value of 35.4 dB at 5.6 GHz in the Ku-band without a magnetic field and a maximum value of 21.4 dB at 8.2 GHz with the external magnetic field applied. The sensitivity of the microwave properties of the composite material to the external magnetic field was manifested by the decrease of the reflected wave attenuation. At a fixed thickness, tm, of the composite, the attenuation peak frequency can be adjusted to a certain value either by changing the filling density or by applying an external magnetic field.

1. Introduction

The continuing development of microwave (MW) technologies and the extensive use of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation, not only in various industries but also in medicine and everyday life, such as designing “smart” cities, could lead to a massive increase in electromagnetic interference that could damage sensitive electronic devices and affect human health in ways that are yet to be fully understood. During the past decade, the necessity for the large-scale use of the gigahertz range has resulted in the development of novel functional materials with qualitatively novel properties. Serious efforts have been directed towards producing materials that attenuate (absorb and screen) microwave radiation with high efficiency in order to alleviate problems related to electromagnetic interference and to control its biological impact [1,2,3]. With the continuous innovations in information technologies, higher expectations have been put forward for portable, implantable and wearable electronic devices. The new trends in developing electromagnetic (EM) devices are focused on miniaturization, integration and multifunctionality. However, all of this has led to increased EM radiation pollution, which interferes with the regular operation of precision electronic components; these problems are becoming very serious [4,5].
On the other hand, EM radiation may also heat human cells or interfere with the intrinsic EM field of the human body; thus, harming human health [6,7,8].
These are the main reasons driving the development of various advanced materials for EM wave absorption. The parameters indicating the quality of EM wave absorbers are high reflection losses (RL), small thickness, wide bandwidth and low density [9,10,11,12,13].
Recently, the attention of researchers in this field has been attracted by a large variety of nanomaterials (e.g., magnetic materials and magnetic composites), mainly due to the possibility of controlling their EM wave absorption properties by varying the shape and size of nanoparticles or the structure and composition of nanocomposites [14,15,16,17,18,19].
In view of responding to the growing requirements of the materials intended for such applications, researchers have increasingly focused their attention on developing magnetic composites based on M-, Y-, Z- and U-hexaferrites [20,21]. Hexagonal ferrites are ferrimagnetic materials that are widely investigated for microwave absorption in the GHz frequency band. These materials exhibit strong magnetocrystalline anisotropy, very good high-frequency magnetic properties, large resistivity, good chemical stability and low cost [22,23,24]. In general, a pure hexagonal ferrite exhibits low microwave absorption efficiency and a rather narrow absorbing bandwidth. This is due to their relatively weak EM attenuation ability and a large inequality in magnetic and dielectric losses. To solve these problems and to prepare hexagonal ferrite materials with very good absorbing properties, efforts have been directed towards reducing the materials’ dimension and particle size [25,26], doping with rare earth or transition metal ions [27,28] and combining hexagonal ferrites with other absorbing materials to form composites [29].
Thus, it has been clearly demonstrated that some multiferroic materials, such as the Y-type hexagonal ferrites, could have practical applications with very good reflection losses and absorption bandwidth [30].
This is why the last decade saw strong research efforts geared towards studying the structural and magnetic properties of, and particularly, the magnetic phase transitions in Y-type hexaferrites. This is explained by the magnetoelectric effect at room temperature observed in some of them and the consequent potential practical applications of these compounds as multiferroics.
In this paper, the effects of substituting magnetic Ni2+ cations with non-magnetic Zn2+ cations in Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2−xNixFe12O22-based composites on their room temperature microwave behavior, together with the influence of applying an external magnetic field, were studied. The results are presented and discussed concerning the following two Y-type hexaferrite compositions: Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn0.5Ni1.5Fe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5ZnNiFe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn1.2Ni0.8Fe12O22 and Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Fe12O22.

2. Materials and Methods

Powder samples of Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn0.5Ni1.5Fe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5ZnNiFe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn1.2Ni0.8Fe12O22 and Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Fe12O22 were prepared by a modified citric acid sol-gel auto-combustion technique using stoichiometric amounts of the precursors. The synthesis procedure is described in detail in [31], and further information on the phase content analysis is given in [32]. In brief, the corresponding metal nitrates were used as starting materials; a citric acid solution was slowly added to the mixed nitrates as a chelator to form stable complexes with the metal cations. The solution was then slowly evaporated to form a gel; thus, it turned into a fluffy mass and burned in a self-propagating combustion manner. The obtained auto-combusted powders were homogenized and thermally treated at 800 °C for three hours. Finally, the Y-type hexaferrite powders were produced as follows: The powders were pressed into bulk pellets with a diameter of 16 mm. The pellets were annealed at 1170 °C in air for 10 h. After cooling down to room temperature, the pellets were ground to obtain the powder materials for the magnetic measurement. For the microwave measurements, the powders were homogenized and used as a filler for composite preparations.
The composite samples were prepared by dispersing the magnetic Y-type hexaferrite (Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn0.5Ni1.5Fe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5ZnNiFe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn1.2Ni0.8Fe12O22 and Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Fe12O22) powders (fillers) in commercial silicon rubber (Mastersil, ASP, Sofia, Bulgaria) as a polymer matrix. Two types of composite samples were prepared as follows: A is a series of samples with amounts of magnetic filler of 1.5 g per 1 cm3 of silicon rubber (Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn0.5Ni1.5Fe12O22, P1A; Ba0.5Sr1.5ZnNiFe12O22, P2A; Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn1.2Ni0.8Fe12O22, P3A; Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Fe12O22, P4A) and B is a series of samples with amounts of magnetic filler of 1.8 g per 1 cm3 of silicon rubber (Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn0.5Ni1.5Fe12O22, P1B; Ba0.5Sr1.5ZnNiFe12O22, P2B; Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn1.2Ni0.8Fe12O22, P3B; Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Fe12O22, P4B). The samples were molded into a toroidal shape with an outside diameter of 7 mm, an inner diameter of 3 mm and a thickness of 4 mm. A referent sample of identical dimensions (denoted as R) made of silicon rubber was only used to study the polymer matrix behavior in the respective microwave range.
The microwave (MW) measurements were conducted using a Hewlett-Packard 8756A microwave scalar network analyzer in a frequency range of 1–20 GHz. To determine the MW characteristics of the composites, a technique was employed whereby the electromagnetic wave (TEM) impinges normally on a single-layer absorber backed by a perfect conductor [33]. The toroidal samples were tightly fitted into a 50-Ω coaxial measurement cell (APC 7) backed by a perfect conductor (short-circuit measurement). During part of the measurements, an external magnetic field was applied using a permanent magnet, providing a flux density of 1.4 T. The magnetic force lines were perpendicular to the direction of the electromagnetic wave propagation. The magnetic flux density in the air gap in the coaxial line was 0.3 T, as measured by a Model 475 Gaussmeter with an HMNT-4E04-VR Hall sensor. The hysteresis measurements were conducted at 300 K by a physical property measurement system (PPMS, Quantum Design Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM TESCAN LYRA I, with an EDX detector, Bruker Quantax, TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) was used to determine the samples’ morphology and the particles’ distribution in the silicon rubber.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 and Figure 2 illustrate the microstructure of the cut P1A and P4B samples. They have different filler densities and different ferrite compositions, but they appear very similar. The SEM images show that the particles are of a hexagonal shape, typical for hexaferrites, and are well agglomerated to form clusters of different sizes and shapes. These clusters are randomly distributed in the volume of the toroidal samples. Our previous investigations have shown that the average particle size is around 600 nm, with the size being within the 200–1000-nm range [34]. Since the same synthesis technique was used for all of the samples, it was only natural to assume that all of them would have a broad particle size distribution. Therefore, they are in a mixed mono- and poly-domain state, since the critical size for a mono-domain state for these types of materials is around 500 nm. Thus, it seemed speculative to discuss the size effect in this case where the size distribution was so broad. This was the main reason why our attention was focused on the Zn:Ni substitution in the samples and its influence on the magnetic and microwave properties rather than on the particle size effect.
Figure 3 presents the hysteresis curves of the Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn0.5Ni1.5Fe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5ZnNiFe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn1.2Ni0.8Fe12O22 and Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Fe12O22 powders. The curves are very narrow, with a coercivity of about a few oersteds. The magnetization values at a magnetic field of 50 kOe (here referred to as saturation magnetization) as a function of the Zn:Ni cation ratio of the samples are presented in Table 1.
It is noteworthy that the sample with the highest content of nickel ions, which bear magnetic moments, has the lowest value of magnetization (50 kOe). This should be related to the known preference of the non-magnetic Zn2+ cations to occupy tetrahedral positions, whereas the magnetic Ni2+ cations prefer octahedral positions [35]. This entails the migration of iron cations between crystallographic sites with octahedral and tetrahedral oxygen configurations and is accompanied by a corresponding change in the magnetic structure. We also found a similar behavior at low temperatures in our earlier study [31]. One can also see that as the content of the non-magnetic Zn2+ cation is increased, the process of saturation is shifted to the higher values of the external magnetic field.
Our investigations were mainly aimed at measuring the microwave characteristics of the composite samples, in which the prepared powder material was dispersed in a polymer matrix (silicon rubber). Figure 4 presents the changes in the reflection losses (RL) in the sweeping frequency range of 20 GHz for the composite A series samples with amounts of magnetic filler of 1.5 g per 1 cm3 of silicon rubber (P1A, P2A, P3A and P4A) and the control polymer sample of the same thickness (4 mm) without a filler (R). Figure 5 presents the changes in the reflection losses (RL) in the sweeping frequency range of 20 GHz for the composite B series samples with amounts of magnetic filler of 1.8 g per 1 cm3 of silicon rubber (P1B, P2B, P3B and P4B) and the control polymer sample of the same thickness (4 mm) without a filler (R). Our previous experience has shown that the silicon rubber is transparent to electromagnetic waves in this microwave region [36,37], as it is confirmed in Figure 2 for the control (R). Consequently, in the case of a hexaferrite/silicon rubber composite, the microwave properties are due to the hexaferrite only. The curves representing RL were obtained under the conditions of an electromagnetic wave incident perpendicularly to the surface of toroidal samples backed by a perfect conductor. According to the transmission line theory for such a case, the value of RL as a function of the normalized input impedance is given by [38,39,40] and is as follows:
R L d B = 20 l o g Z i n Z 0 Z i n + Z 0 ,
where
Z i n = Z 0 μ r ε r t a n h j 2 π c μ r ε r f d
where Zin is the input impedance of the absorber; Z0 is the impedance of free space; c is the speed of light in free space; f is the electromagnetic wave frequency; d is the absorber thickness; μ r and ε r are the complex permeability and permittivity, respectively.
An RL value of −10 dB corresponds to a 90% attenuation of the electromagnetic wave. In general, materials with RL values below −10 dB could be considered suitable microwave absorbers for practical applications [41].
At certain thicknesses and frequencies, minima are observed in the reflected wave. This takes place when the thickness of the absorber layer satisfies the quarter-wave thickness criterion, described by the quarter-wave theory [42,43] as follows:
t m = n c 4 f m ε r μ r n = 1 , 3 , 5 ,
f m = n c 4 t m ε r μ r n = 1 , 3 , 5 ,
where tm and fm are the matching thickness and the peak frequency [44].
To assess the EM wave attenuation, the intrinsic properties of the samples have to be accounted for. The incident microwave energy can generate heat in the material during the interaction of the electromagnetic field with the molecular and electronic structure of the material; the incident microwave energy can generate heat in the material. In this way, this process can convert the incident EM waves into thermal energy, and, finally, the energy will be dissipated.
In a sample, multiple scattering on inhomogeneities can take place [45]. Thus, by varying the material structure, in our case, the density of the hexaferrite particles, one could extend the EM wave propagation path within the sample and improve the absorption capacity of the EM wave absorber [46]. One can conclude that changing the electromagnetic parameters can also enhance the intrinsic EM absorption capabilities.
In the case reported, we measured the MW characteristics of two types of composite samples—with different powder compositions and with different weight ratios. We also added an external magnetic field perpendicular to the propagation of the electromagnetic wave to observe changes in the wave attenuation.
For both the A and B series of samples, two types of measurements were made—with and without an external magnetic field. The magnetic force lines of this field were perpendicular to the direction of the electromagnetic wave propagation; one would expect that the wave attenuation would be higher due to the orientation of the spins’ magnetic moments. The results from the microwave measurements are opposite. In both cases, for the A and B series, the reflection losses decreased as a consequence of applying an external magnetic field. For the A series (Figure 4) without a magnetic field, the minimal reflection was observed at 8.2 GHz with an RL = −31.7 dB. In the case with a magnetic field, the best value for the reflection losses was observed at 8.1 GHz with an RL = −17 dB. An analogous behavior was identified for the B series (Figure 5), but the value of the reflection losses was higher and shifted to the lower frequencies due to the higher hexaferrite content in the composite samples. The minimal reflection without a magnetic field was observed at 4.6 GHz with an RL = −35.5 dB, and it was observed with a magnetic field at 8.1 GHz with an RL = −21.4 dB.
Following the main conclusion of the influence of the magnetic field on the reflection losses, the influence of the Zn:Ni ratio on them was discussed in Figure 6. For the A series samples, the main peak with the best value was observed for the Zn:Ni ratio of 1.2:0.8 (Zn1.2Ni0.8) at 8.3 GHz with an RL = −31.9 dB without an external magnetic field. With the magnetic field applied, the sample with the best attenuation was of the same ratio of Zn1.2Ni0.8 at 8.1 GHz with an RL = −17.2 dB.
A comparative view of the peaks for the A series of samples depending on the Zn:Ni ratio with and without a magnetic field is shown in Figure 7a. It is clear that applying the external magnetic field deteriorates the absorbing characteristics; namely, the attenuation decreases. Figure 7b shows the averaged results of ten measurements, with the standard deviation being 5%.
For the B series of samples, shown in Figure 8, two main peaks were observed with the same value of reflection losses as follows: for the ratio of Zn:Ni=1:1 at 4.7 GHz and for the ratio of Zn1.2Ni0.8 at 5.6 GHz with an RL = −35.4 dB without an external magnetic field. When the magnetic field was applied, the sample with the best attenuation was that with the same ratio of Zn1.2Ni0.8 at 8.2 GHz with an RL = −21.4 dB. Compared to the A series, the attenuation characteristics are improved, but, again, the external magnetic field plays a negative role and decreases the attenuation.
A comparative view of the peaks is shown in Figure 9a for the B series of samples depending on the Zn:Ni ratio with and without a magnetic field. A similar behavior was observed when the external magnetic field was applied; the absorbing characteristics deteriorated. Figure 9b shows the results of ten repeated measurements. Here, again, the average value is obtained with a standard deviation of 5%. The most likely explanation for this error is the measurement setup since the samples were fixed mechanically without glue, so that minor differences might have arisen in their positioning.
One can, therefore, conclude that the material’s saturation magnetization was raised by decreasing the degree of substitution with Ni, which, in turn, raised its reflection losses. Additionally, an optimal Zn:Ni ratio, namely, i.e., Zn1.2Ni0.8, existed there.
These results are opposite to the results observed by us for a Z-type hexaferrite (Sr3Co2Fe24O41) under the same experimental conditions [20]; applying a magnetic field resulted in an increased attenuation. In the reported case, for all of the investigated samples, the values of the reflection losses decreased when a magnetic field was applied. Thus, one might speculate that the external magnetic field changes the samples’ permeability to negative or positive [47], depending on whether the material’s resonance frequency is above or below the frequency range of the measurement. Additionally, for all of the samples, a magnetic phase transition from a helicoidal to a ferrimagnetic spin order occurs around room temperature, which was demonstrated in our earlier study [31,34]. This could play an important role in determining the microwave characteristics under an external magnetic field. Accordingly, applying a magnetic field most probably makes the sample more transparent, depending on the intrinsic properties of the Y-type hexaferrite.

4. Conclusions

Y-type hexaferrite materials were studied with different Ni substitutions, namely, Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2Fe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn1.2Ni0.8Fe12O22, Ba0.5Sr1.5ZnNiFe12O22 and Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn0.5Ni1.5Fe12O22. The magnetic measurements at room temperature showed that the samples with an increased Ni substitution exhibited a decreased saturation magnetization. This effect impacted the results of the measurements of the composite samples’ microwave characteristics when a Y-type hexaferrite was used as a filler material dispersed in a polymer matrix. It was estimated that composite samples with a higher hexaferrite content had better microwave properties, with the optimal Zn:Ni ratio for the best results being 1.2:0.8. The highest value of the reflection losses, RL = −35.4 dB, was measured at 5.6 GHz without applying an external magnetic field. When a perpendicular external magnetic field was applied, the absorbing properties of both types of samples changed dramatically; namely, all main peaks were shifted to higher frequencies and the reflection losses decreased. The maximum value of 21.4 dB was found at 8.2 GHz with the external magnetic field applied. Thus, one might assume that the magnetic field makes the composite samples more transparent to the electromagnetic waves in this specific frequency range. This behavior should be related to the intrinsic properties of Y-type hexaferrite materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.K., S.K. and K.K.; formal analysis, T.K., S.K., K.K., B.G., D.K., B.V., R.C., L.M.T., M.B. and A.J.Z.; funding acquisition, T.K., B.V. and A.J.Z.; investigation, T.K., S.K., K.K., D.K., B.V., R.C., L.M.T., M.B. and A.J.Z.; methodology, T.K. and B.G.; project administration, T.K., S.K. and K.K.; resources, T.K., S.K., B.G., D.K., C.G., B.V., R.C., L.M.T., M.B. and A.J.Z.; supervision, T.K. and S.K.; validation, T.K., S.K., K.K., B.G., D.K., B.V., R.C., L.M.T., M.B. and A.J.Z.; visualization, T.K. and S.K.; writing—original draft, T.K., S.K., K.K. and C.G.; writing—review and editing, C.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Bulgarian National Science Fund (grant number KP-06-N48/5).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a joint research project between the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and WBI, Belgium and by a joint research project between the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research, Polish Academy of Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dankov, P. Material characterization in the microwave range, when the materials become composite, reinforced, 3d-printed, artificially mixed, nanomaterials and metamaterials, Nanomaterials and Metamaterials. Forum Electromagn. Res. Methods Appl. Technol. (FERMAT J.) 2020, 41, 1–37. Available online: https://www.e-fermat.org/articles.php (accessed on 20 December 2020).
  2. Miszczyk, A. Protective and suppressing electromagnetic interference properties of epoxy coatings containing nano-sized NiZn ferrites. Front. Mater. 2020, 7, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bera, S.C. Microwave Active Devices and Circuits for Communication, 1st ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Houbi, A.; Aldashevich, Z.A.; Atassi, Y.; Bagasharova Telmanovna, Z.; Saule, M.; Kubanych, K. Microwave absorbing properties of ferrites and their composites: A review. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2021, 529, 167839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zeng, X.J.; Cheng, X.Y.; Yu, R.H.; Stucky, G.D. Electromagnetic microwave absorption theory and recent achievements in microwave absorbers. Carbon 2020, 168, 606–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cao, M.S.; Wang, X.X.; Zhang, M.; Cao, W.Q.; Fang, X.Y.; Yuan, J. Variable-temperature electron transport and dipole polarization turning flexible multifunctional microsensor beyond electrical and optical energy. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1907156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lee, S.; Jo, I.; Kang, S.; Jang, B.; Moon, J.; Park, J.B.; Lee, S.; Rho, S.; Kim, Y.; Hong, B.H. Smart contact lenses with graphene coating for electromagnetic interference shielding and dehydration protection. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 5318–5324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Z.; Mao, B.Y.; Wang, Q.L.; Yu, J.; Dai, J.X.; Song, R.G.; Pu, Z.H.; He, D.P.; Wu, Z.; Mu, S.C. Ultrahigh conductive copper/large flake size graphene heterostructure thin-film with remarkable electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness. Small 2018, 14, 1704332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meng, F.B.; Wang, H.G.; Huang, F.; Guo, Y.F.; Wang, Z.Y.; Hui, D.; Zhou, Z.W. Graphene-based microwave absorbing composites: A review and prospective. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 137, 260–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, F.Y.; Sun, Y.Q.; Li, D.R.; Zhong, B.; Wu, Z.G.; Zuo, S.Y.; Yan, D.; Zhuo, R.F.; Feng, J.J.; Yan, P.X. Core-shell FeCo@carbon nanoparticles encapsulated in polydopamine-derived carbon nanocages for efficient microwave absorption. Carbon 2018, 134, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, L.N.; Jia, X.L.; Li, Y.F.; Yang, F.; Zhang, L.Q.; Liu, L.P.; Ren, X.; Yang, H.T. Synthesis and microwave absorption property of flexible magnetic film based on graphene oxide/carbon nanotubes and Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 14940–14946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, W.; Wei, J.; Wang, W.; Hu, D.; Li, Y.; Guan, J. Ferrite-based metamaterial microwave absorber with absorption frequency magnetically tunable in a wide range. Mater. Des. 2016, 110, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pang, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Yan, M.; Qu, S.; Xia, S.; Xu, Z. Electromagnetic reflection reduction of carbon composite materials mediated by collaborative mechanisms. Carbon 2019, 147, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, B.; Zhao, W.Y.; Shao, G.; Fan, B.B.; Zhang, R. Morphology-control synthesis of a core–shell structured NiCu alloy with tunable electromagnetic-wave absorption capabilities. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 12951–12960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, H.; Cao, Z.M.; Lin, J.Y.; Zhao, H.; Jiang, Q.R.; Jiang, Z.Y.; Liao, H.G.; Kuang, Q.; Xie, Z.X. Synthesis of u-channelled spherical Fex(CoyNi1-y)100-xJanus colloidal particles with excellent electromagnetic wave absorption performance. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 1930–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, C.H.; Ding, Y.J.; Yuan, Y.; He, X.D.; Wu, S.T.; Hu, S.; Zou, M.C.; Zhao, W.Q.; Yang, L.S.; Cao, A.Y.; et al. Graphene aerogel composites derived from recycled cigarette filters for electromagnetic wave absorption. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 11893–11901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, X.F.; Jia, Z.R.; Feng, A.L.; Wang, X.X.; Liu, J.J.; Zhang, M.; Cao, H.J.; Wu, G.L. Synthesis of fish skin-derived 3D carbon foams with broadened bandwidth and excellent electromagnetic wave absorption performance. Carbon 2019, 152, 827–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xiang, J.; Li, J.L.; Zhang, X.H.; Ye, Q.; Xu, J.H.; Sheng, X.Q. Magnetic carbon nanofibers containing uniformly dispersed Fe/Co/Ni nanoparticles as stable and highperformance electromagnetic wave absorbers. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 16905–16914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, X.A.; Du, D.X.; Wang, C.S.; Wang, H.Y.; Xu, Z.P. In situ synthesis of hierarchical rose-like porous Fe@C with enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 558–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kolev, S.; Peneva, P.; Krezhov, K.; Malakova, T.; Ghelev, C.; Koutzarova, T.; Kovacheva, D.; Vertruyen, B.; Closset, R.; Tran, L.-M.; et al. Structural, magnetic and microwave characterization of polycrystalline Z-type Sr3Co2Fe24O41 hexaferrite. Materials 2020, 13, 2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Almessiere, M.; Genc, F.; Sozeri, H.; Baykal, A.; Trukhanov, S.V.; Trukhanov, A.V. Influence of charge disproportionation on microwave characteristics of Zn–Nd substituted Sr-hexaferrites. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 6776–6785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kong, L.B.; Li, Z.W.; Liu, L.; Huang, R.; Abshinova, M.; Yang, Z.H.; Tang, C.B.; Tan, P.K.; Deng, C.R.; Matitsine, S. Recent progress in some composite materials and structures for specific electromagnetic applications. Int. Mater. Rev. 2013, 58, 203–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pullar, R.C. Hexagonal Ferrite Fibres and Nanofibres. Solid State Phenom. 2016, 241, 1–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kong, L.B.; Liu, L.; Yang, Z.; Li, S.; Zhang, T.; Wang, C. Ferrite-based composites for microwave absorbing applications. In Metal Oxides, Magnetic, Ferroelectric, and Multiferroic Metal Oxides; Stojanovic, B.D., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 361–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bahadur, A.; Saeed, A.; Iqbal, S.; Shoaib, M.; Ahmad, I.; ur Rahman, M.S.; Bashir, M.I.; Yaseen, M.; Hussain, W. Morphological and magnetic properties of BaFe12O19 nanoferrite: A promising microwave absorbing material. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 7346–7350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wei, S.C.; Liu, Y.; Tian, H.L.; Tong, H.; Liu, Y.X.; Xu, B.S. Microwave absorption property of plasma spray W-type hexagonal ferrite coating. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 377, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kumar, S.; Meena, R.S.; Chatterjee, R. Microwave absorption studies of Cr-doped Co–U type hexaferrites over 2–18 GHz frequency range. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016, 418, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Singh, J.; Singh, C.; Kaur, D.; Narang, S.B.; Jotania, R.; Joshi, R. Investigation on structural and microwave absorption property of Co2+ and Y3+ substituted M-type Ba-Sr hexagonal ferrites prepared by a ceramic method. J. Alloy. Comp. 2017, 695, 792–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tang, X.T.; Wei, G.T.; Zhu, T.X.; Sheng, L.M.; An, K.; Yu, L.M.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, X.L. Microwave absorption performance enhanced by high-crystalline graphene and BaFe12O19 nanocomposites. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 119, 204301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stergiou, C.A.; Litsardakis, G. Y-type hexagonal ferrites for microwave absorber and antenna applications. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016, 405, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Koutzarova, T.; Kolev, S.; Krezhov, K.; Georgieva, B.; Ghelev, C.; Kovacheva, D.; Vertruyen, B.; Closset, R.; Tran, L.-M.; Babij, M.; et al. Ni-substitution effect on the properties of Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2−xNixFe12O22 powders. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2020, 505, 166725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Koutzarova, T.; Kolev, S.; Krezhov, K.; Georgieva, B.; Ghelev, C.; Kovacheva, D.; Vertruyen, B.; Closset, R.; Tran, L.-M.; Babij, M.; et al. Data supporting the results of the characterization of the phases and structures appearing during the synthesis process of Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2-xNixFe12O22 by auto-combustion. Data Brief 2020, 31, 105803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, S.; Jo, S.; Gueon, K.; Choi, K.; Kim, J.; Churn, K. Complex permeability and permittivity and microwave absorption of ferrite-rubber composite at X-band frequencies. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1991, 27, 5462–5464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Georgieva, B.; Kolev, S.; Krezhov, K.; Ghelev, C.; Kovacheva, D.; Vertruyen, B.; Closset, R.; Tran, L.-M.; Babij, M.; Zaleski, A.J.; et al. Structural and magnetic characterization of Y-type hexaferrite powders prepared by sol-gel auto-combustion and sonochemistry. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 477, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. El Hiti, M.; Abo El Ata, A. Semiconductivity in Ba2Ni2−xZnxFe12O22 Y-type hexaferrites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1999, 195, 667–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kolev, S.; Yanev, A.; Nedkov, I. Microwave absorption of ferrite powders in a polymer matrix. Phys. Stat. Sol. 2006, 3, 1308–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kolev, S.; Koutzarova, T. Nanosized ferrite materials for absorption and protection from microwave radiation. In Advanced Nanotechnologies for Detection and Defence against CBRN Agents NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics; Petkov, P., Tsiulyanu, D., Popov, C., Kulisch, W., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Naito, Y.; Suetake, K. Application of ferrite to electromagnetic wave absorber and its characteristics. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 1971, 19, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, W.; Liu, L.; Yang, Z.; Xu, J.; Hou, Y.; Ji, G. A versatile route toward the electromagnetic functionalization of metal–organic framework-derived three-dimensional nanoporous carbon composites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 8965–8975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Quan, B.; Shi, W.H.; Ong, S.J.H.; Lu, X.C.; Wang, P.L.Y.; Ji, G.B.; Guo, Y.F.; Zheng, L.R.; Xu, Z.C.J. Defect engineering in two common types of dielectric materials for electromagnetic absorption applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1901236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, G.Z.; Gao, Z.; Tang, S.W.; Chen, C.Q.; Duan, F.F.; Zhao, S.C.; Lin, S.W.; Feng, Y.H.; Zhou, L.; Qin, Y. Microwave absorption properties of carbon nanocoils coated with highly controlled magnetic materials by atomic layer deposition. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 11009–11017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Qiao, L.; Wang, T.; Mei, Z.L.; Li, X.L.; Sui, W.B.; Tang, L.Y.; Li, F.S. Analyzing bandwidth on the microwave absorber by the interface reflection model. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2016, 33, 027502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, H.; Xu, S.Y.; Tang, D.M.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, B.S. Thin magnetic coating for low-frequency broadband microwave absorption. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 243911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kong, I.; Ahmad, S.H.; Abdullah, M.H.; Hui, D.; Yusoff, A.N.; Puryanti, D. Magnetic and microwave absorbing properties of magnetite thermoplastic natural rubber nanocomposites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2010, 322, 3401–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cao, M.S.; Song, W.L.; Hou, Z.L.; Wen, B.; Yuan, J. The effects of temperature and frequency on the dielectric properties, electromagnetic interference shielding and microwave-absorption of short carbon fiber/silica composites. Carbon 2010, 48, 788–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhu, L.Y.; Zeng, X.J.; Li, X.P.; Yang, B.; Yu, R.H. Hydrothermal synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4/graphene composites with good electromagnetic microwave absorbing performances. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 426, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Smit, J.; Wijn, H.P.J. Ferrites: Physical Properties of Ferrimagnetic Oxides in Relation to Their Technical Applications; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1959. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. SEM images of (a) sample P1A and (b) zoomed area of a cluster.
Figure 1. SEM images of (a) sample P1A and (b) zoomed area of a cluster.
Polymers 14 04114 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) sample P4B and (b) zoomed area of a cluster.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) sample P4B and (b) zoomed area of a cluster.
Polymers 14 04114 g002
Figure 3. Hysteresis curves of Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2−xNixFe12O22 (x = 0, 0.8, 1.2, 1.5) at room temperature.
Figure 3. Hysteresis curves of Ba0.5Sr1.5Zn2−xNixFe12O22 (x = 0, 0.8, 1.2, 1.5) at room temperature.
Polymers 14 04114 g003
Figure 4. Reflection losses of the A series of samples with a filler ratio of 1.5 g per 1 cm3 (a) with a magnetic field and (b) without an external magnetic field applied.
Figure 4. Reflection losses of the A series of samples with a filler ratio of 1.5 g per 1 cm3 (a) with a magnetic field and (b) without an external magnetic field applied.
Polymers 14 04114 g004
Figure 5. Reflection losses of the B series of samples with a filler ratio of 1.8 g per 1 cm3 (a) with a magnetic field and (b) without an external magnetic field applied.
Figure 5. Reflection losses of the B series of samples with a filler ratio of 1.8 g per 1 cm3 (a) with a magnetic field and (b) without an external magnetic field applied.
Polymers 14 04114 g005
Figure 6. The main reflection loss peaks for the A series of samples depending on the Zn:Ni ratio (a) without a magnetic field and (b) with an external magnetic field applied.
Figure 6. The main reflection loss peaks for the A series of samples depending on the Zn:Ni ratio (a) without a magnetic field and (b) with an external magnetic field applied.
Polymers 14 04114 g006
Figure 7. The main reflection loss peaks for the A series of samples depending on the Zn:Ni ratio. (a) Comparative view with and without a magnetic field and (b) an RL with a standard deviation.
Figure 7. The main reflection loss peaks for the A series of samples depending on the Zn:Ni ratio. (a) Comparative view with and without a magnetic field and (b) an RL with a standard deviation.
Polymers 14 04114 g007
Figure 8. The main reflection loss peaks for the B series of samples depending on the Zn:Ni ratio (a) without a magnetic field and (b) with an external magnetic field applied.
Figure 8. The main reflection loss peaks for the B series of samples depending on the Zn:Ni ratio (a) without a magnetic field and (b) with an external magnetic field applied.
Polymers 14 04114 g008
Figure 9. The main reflection loss peaks for the A series of samples depending on the Zn:Ni ratio (a) without a magnetic field and (b) with an external magnetic field applied.
Figure 9. The main reflection loss peaks for the A series of samples depending on the Zn:Ni ratio (a) without a magnetic field and (b) with an external magnetic field applied.
Polymers 14 04114 g009
Table 1. Magnetization values at a magnetic field of 50 kOe for the samples depending on the Zn:Ni cation ratio.
Table 1. Magnetization values at a magnetic field of 50 kOe for the samples depending on the Zn:Ni cation ratio.
300 KZn0.5Ni1.5ZnNiZn1.2Ni0.8Zn2Ni0
saturation magnetization, emu/g32.8237.0737.2538.56
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kolev, S.; Georgieva, B.; Koutzarova, T.; Krezhov, K.; Ghelev, C.; Kovacheva, D.; Vertruyen, B.; Closset, R.; Tran, L.M.; Babij, M.; et al. Magnetic Field Influence on the Microwave Characteristics of Composite Samples Based on Polycrystalline Y-Type Hexaferrite. Polymers 2022, 14, 4114. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194114

AMA Style

Kolev S, Georgieva B, Koutzarova T, Krezhov K, Ghelev C, Kovacheva D, Vertruyen B, Closset R, Tran LM, Babij M, et al. Magnetic Field Influence on the Microwave Characteristics of Composite Samples Based on Polycrystalline Y-Type Hexaferrite. Polymers. 2022; 14(19):4114. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194114

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kolev, Svetoslav, Borislava Georgieva, Tatyana Koutzarova, Kiril Krezhov, Chavdar Ghelev, Daniela Kovacheva, Benedicte Vertruyen, Raphael Closset, Lan Maria Tran, Michal Babij, and et al. 2022. "Magnetic Field Influence on the Microwave Characteristics of Composite Samples Based on Polycrystalline Y-Type Hexaferrite" Polymers 14, no. 19: 4114. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194114

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop