Next Article in Journal
Towards a Kinetic Modeling of the Changes in the Electrical Properties of Cable Insulation during Radio-Thermal Ageing in Nuclear Power Plants. Application to Silane-Crosslinked Polyethylene
Next Article in Special Issue
Dynamic and Ballistic Performance of Uni- and Bidirectional Pineapple Leaf Fibers (PALF)-Reinforced Epoxy Composites Functionalized with Graphene Oxide
Previous Article in Journal
Biocompatible Hydrogel for Intra-Articular Implantation Comprising Cationic and Anionic Polymers of Natural Origin: In Vivo Evaluation in a Rabbit Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development and Characterization of Environmentally Friendly Wood Plastic Composites from Biobased Polyethylene and Short Natural Fibers Processed by Injection Moulding
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 24
10.3390/polym13244425
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review on the Thermal Characterisation of Natural and Hybrid Fiber Composites

by
Jorge S. S. Neto
,
Henrique F. M. de Queiroz
,
Ricardo A. A. Aguiar
and
Mariana D. Banea
*
Federal Centre of Technological Education in Rio de Janeiro (CEFET/RJ), Rio de Janeiro 20271-110, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(24), 4425; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244425
Submission received: 14 November 2021 / Revised: 6 December 2021 / Accepted: 8 December 2021 / Published: 16 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Fibre Composites and Their Mechanical Behavior)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The thermal stability of natural fiber composites is a relevant aspect to be considered since the processing temperature plays a critical role in the manufacturing process of composites. At higher temperatures, the natural fiber components (cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin) start to degrade and their major properties (mechanical and thermal) change. Different methods are used in the literature to determine the thermal properties of natural fiber composites as well as to help to understand and determine their suitability for a certain applications (e.g., Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and differential mechanical thermal analysis (DMA)). Weight loss percentage, the degradation temperature, glass transition temperature (Tg), and viscoelastic properties (storage modulus, loss modulus, and the damping factor) are the most common thermal properties determined by these methods. This paper provides an overview of the recent advances made regarding the thermal properties of natural and hybrid fiber composites in thermoset and thermoplastic polymeric matrices. First, the main factors that affect the thermal properties of natural and hybrid fiber composites (fiber and matrix type, the presence of fillers, fiber content and orientation, the treatment of the fibers, and manufacturing process) are briefly presented. Further, the methods used to determine the thermal properties of natural and hybrid composites are discussed. It is concluded that thermal analysis can provide useful information for the development of new materials and the optimization of the selection process of these materials for new applications. It is crucial to ensure that the natural fibers used in the composites can withstand the heat required during the fabrication process and retain their characteristics in service.

1. Introduction

The application of composites has continuously increased across many industries, in particular in the automotive and aerospace industries where lower weight and high resistance are key factors. The most commonly used fibers that attend these requirements are carbon and glass fibers [1,2,3]. However, nowadays, the industry is seeking new desirable characteristics of composite materials, such as renewability, eco-friendliness, and low cost. Consequently, there has been great interest in research and innovation in natural fiber composites owing to the advantages of these materials compared to their synthetic fiber counterparts (i.e., lower environmental impact and lower cost), supporting their potential across a wide range of applications in several industrial sectors [4,5,6,7,8,9]. The natural fiber-reinforced composites (NFRCs) are used mainly in non-structural car body parts, such as door panels, package trays, hat racks, instrument panels, internal engine covers, sun visors, boot liners, oil air filters, and even progressing to more structurally demanding parts, such as seat backs and exterior underfloor paneling [10,11]. Nowadays, most of the automotive makers, such as Audi, Volkswagen, Toyota, Daimler-Benz, Volvo, Ford, etc., use NFRCs to produce components. The continually growing demands for lightweight and fuel-efficient vehicles will further push the growth of NFRCs in the automotive market. There are other exciting market trends going forward in many different industries. For example, tri-dimensional hybrid natural fiber reinforcement preforms have been used recently by sports car manufacturers, such as Porsche and even McLaren in Formula 1 [12]. Other applications of NFRCs include sport equipment, musical instruments, aerospace, construction industry [12,13,14], and ballistic armour [15,16].
Several types of natural fibers are currently used in industry, such as jute, sisal, oil palm, kenaf, and flax, which are well established in the global market with a well-defined production line. However, new promising natural fibers are being discovered and used on a smaller scale or are still being used only for research. This is the case of the buriti and curauá fibers, for example, that still need some improvements in their production line to be more commercially affordable and reach widespread use [17,18]. They are used as reinforcement fibers in thermoset or thermoplastic polymeric matrix in a variety of applications [19]. Depending upon the matrix type, NFRCs are categorized into completely biodegradable or partially biodegradable composites.
The growing importance of natural fiber reinforced composites is reflected by the increasing number of publications (e.g., reviews, patents, book chapters, and books) during the recent years [4,5,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Therefore, it is important to study their thermal and mechanical behaviour in order to utilize their full potential. The thermal stability of natural fiber composites is a relevant aspect to be considered as the processing temperature plays a crucial role in the fabrication process of the composites. At higher temperatures, the natural fiber components (i.e., cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin), start to degrade and the major properties (mechanical and thermal) of the composite change. Intense research efforts are continuously made and some of the shortcomings of NFRCs were addressed by recent advancements in fiber treatment and modification, exploration of new natural fibers, and hybridization. The fiber modification techniques provide improved fiber–matrix interfacial adhesion, improved fiber roughness, and wettability and depend on the particular fiber/matrix used and the composite application, while the hybridization methods provide flexibility in fiber selection for the material properties according to the end-use application requirements.
Even though there are many recent review articles concerning the use of natural fibers in the production of natural hybrid composites [10,23,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34], one topic that was not covered in any significant detail relates to the thermal characterisation of NFRCs. This paper provides an overview of the recent advances in the thermal properties of natural and hybrid natural fiber composites in thermoset and thermoplastic polymeric matrices. First, the main factors that affect the thermal properties of natural and hybrid fiber composite materials (fiber and matrix type, the presence of additive fillers, fiber content and orientation, the treatment of the fibers, manufacturing process, and type of loading) are briefly presented. Further, the methods used to determine the thermal properties of natural and hybrid composites are discussed. Finally, some conclusions and critical challenges and future perspectives and research activities are summarized.

2. Factors That Affect the Thermal Properties of Natural and Hybrid Composites

The main factors that affect the thermal properties of natural and hybrid fiber compo-site materials are: fiber and matrix type, the presence of additive fillers, fiber content and orientation, the treatment of the fibers, manufacturing process, and type of loading. In this section, these factors are briefly discussed.

2.1. Type of Fiber

The natural fibers are promising renewable alternatives to the traditional human-made fibers (i.e., glass and carbon fibers) in composite materials. Their consumption is increasing in different industrial sectors, such as aeronautical, automotive, civil, and naval, with an average annual growth of 7.5% and an expected global market demand around 35 million tons by 2022 [10]. The natural fibers can be divided into three main groups regarding their origin: mineral, animal, and cellulose/lignocellulose (see Figure 1). Mineral-based fibers were widely used in composite materials. However, their use presented many human health issues (carcinogenic parts that can be inhaled or ingested), nowadays being forbidden in many countries worldwide. The animal fibers present lower mechanical properties compared to the cellulose fibers, except for the silk fiber that presents high tensile strength [10]. However, the silk fibers are quite expensive and are more used in the textile industries [10]. The cellulose/lignocellulose fibers are the most used natural fibers due to their relatively low price and higher mechanical properties compared to other natural fibers and are the focus in the present review. They can also be subdivided into different categories corresponding to the plant part that originated them, as can be seen in Figure 1. Depending on the length, orientation, and type of natural fiber, randomly oriented (short), unidirectional, and woven fabrics are usually used as reinforcements in thermoset and thermoplastic matrices [35].
The thermal stability of any natural fiber is the maximum temperature at which a fiber decomposes [36]. It is known that various constituents of the natural fiber (i.e., hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin) decompose at different temperatures which leads to the complete decomposition of the fiber as a whole [37]. It was reported that, lignin starts degrading at a temperature around 200 °C, while hemicelluloses and cellulosic constituents degraded at higher temperatures [38]. Usually, the thermal degradation of lignin and cellulose occurs in the temperature range of 300–450 °C [39]. The thermal stability of the natural fiber can be enhanced by removing a certain proportion of hemicelluloses and lignin constituents. However, fibers with lower lignin content are susceptible to thermal damage and often tend to damage secondary cell walls [40]. Other volatile or partially stable constituents (i.e., pectin, waxes, and water-soluble substances), may also be found in cellulose fibers. Thus, the thermal properties of the natural fiber leads to critical issues for the processing of natural fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composite products. For instance, the automotive interior part made of natural fiber reinforced composites can be affected by the high temperature inside the vehicle during the hot season. In addition, the thermal stability of these composites is a critical issue because of the poor heat resistance during a fire. If the natural fibers are exposed to temperatures higher than 250 °C, they have a very high probability of burning, thus compromising the structural integrity of the component [41].
To summarize, the thermal stability of natural fiber composites is a relevant aspect to be considered as the processing temperature plays a crucial role in the fabrication process of the composites. Intense research efforts are continuously made and some of the shortcomings of NFRCs were addressed by recent advancements in fiber treatment and modification, by the exploration of new natural fibers and hybridization.

2.2. Surface Treatment of Natural Fibers

The surface treatment of natural fibers is usually performed to enhance their mechanical and thermal properties, before using them to manufacture a composite material. Fiber surface modification can improve the fiber–matrix interfacial bonding, roughness, and wettability and decrease the moisture absorption of the fibers [5,42,43]. As a result, better mechanical and thermal properties of the resulting composites can be achieved. The main surface modification methods used for natural fibers are: physical and chemical treatments.
The main physical treatments used to modify the surface of natural fibers are as follows: plasma, corona, ultraviolet (UV), heat treatments, electron radiation, and fiber beating. These treatments improve the adhesion between the fiber and matrix by changing the surface properties of the fibers without changing their structural composition [44,45].
The chemical treatments are a common way of increasing the interface adhesion between the fiber–matrix by chemical bonding or mechanical interlocking at the interface and decreases the water absorption of the fibers. This is achieved by using compounds that promote adhesion by chemically coupling the fibers to the matrix, such as: sodium hydroxide [46], silane [47], acetic acid [48], Benzoyl Chloride [49], maleated coupling agents [44], isocyanates [5], peroxide [50], and stearic acid [51].
Numerous researchers have investigated the effect of the fiber treatments on the thermal properties of NFRCs [36,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74]. In general, fiber pre-treatments increased the thermal stability of the resulting NFRCs, mainly due to the removal of the waxy layers and other impurities from the fiber surface, as well as increasing the crystallinity [75,76,77]. However, some researchers found that surface treatments of natural fibers led to a decrease in degradation temperatures, signifying weakened thermal stability of the composites [78,79]. In addition, in some cases, the gain in thermal stability negatively affected the mechanical properties of composites. It was stated that the balance in improvements in thermal properties depends on fiber treatment type and time. It was also shown that the combination of treatments (mixed treatments) promoted increased thermal stability [80]. Table 1 summarizes the results from several recent studies on the effect of fiber treatments on the thermal properties of natural fiber composites.
To summarize, using natural fibers with low lignin content leads to better thermal performance of composites. The thermal stability of fibers can be enhanced by removing a certain proportion of hemicelluloses and lignin constituents by different chemical treatments. The fiber modification techniques provide improved fiber–matrix interfacial adhesion, improved fiber roughness, and wettability and depend on the particular fiber/matrix used and the composite application. The thermal degradation of natural fibers is an important issue in the development of natural fiber reinforced composites in both manufacturing and for the use of these materials in service. In general, it was stated that in order to avoid the thermal degradation of developed NFRCs, the processing temperature must be kept below 250 °C.

2.3. Type of Matrix

In natural fiber reinforced polymer composites, both thermoplastic and thermoset polymers are used as matrices. There are several types of thermoplastics such as polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), nylon, polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polylactic acid (PLA), and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), which can be used as matrix with natural fiber composites. When heated, thermoplastics soften and can be remoulded without significant degradation into a variety of products. Thus, their most important characteristic is the recyclability. They present other benefits, such as being lightweight, durable materials and they are reasonably priced [41,95]. The processing of natural fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites usually involves extrusion of materials at melt temperatures followed by shaping operations (i.e., injection molding and thermoforming). However, due to some degree of incompatibility of nonpolar hydrophobic PP and PE with polar and hydrophilic natural cellulose fibers, these types of resins are typically not used as matrices for NFRCs.
PLA is one of the most used thermoplastic polymers as a matrix in natural fiber composites. PLA is a widely used commercial biodegradable polymer, which belongs to one of the thermoplastic aliphatic polyesters produced from natural resources like corn, rice, and sugar beets [96]. PLA presents good stiffness, high strength, and low elongation at break, which make it an ecologically friendly material for composite applications [97]. However, the mechanical and thermal properties of PLA are strongly related to crystallinity. The wide application of PLA is limited by its low crystallization degree/rate, high brittleness and low thermal resistance (its thermal resistance is limited by its low glass transition (60 °C) [98]). The thermal properties of natural fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites were studied by numerous researchers [41,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106].
On the other hand, the thermoset matrices (epoxy, urethane, vinyl ester, phenolic, polyester, polyimide, polyurethane (PU)) can hardly be recycled or change the shape once the polymerization (curing) is concluded. The main thermoset resins used for natural fiber composites are epoxy and unsaturated polyesters [107]. Finally, biodegradable polymer matrices (elastomers, thermosets, and thermoplastics) are also used in the manufacture of NFRCs and combining these matrices with natural fibers produces “green composites” or “bio-composites”. Biodegradable thermosets have gathered more interest in producing green composites in comparison to thermoplastics [108].
There is an intense effort in the scientific community to increase the performance of the thermoplastic biopolymers (mainly based on PLA matrices). Some examples of studies about the thermal properties of natural fiber reinforced green composites will be discussed in the next sections [109]. Some researchers performed comparative studies on the mechanical properties of epoxy and polyester composites reinforced with hemp fiber or sisal, jute, and curauá [19], in order to discover which of these thermoset matrices is more adequate for novel NFRCs to be used in technological applications. In general, the epoxy based NFRCs revealed superior mechanical and thermal properties to those of polyester NFRCs. In another study, the thermal properties of different NFRCs based on thermoplastic matrices (Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), high impact polystyrene (HIPS), and high density polyethylene (HDPE)) reinforced with banana fiber were compared [110]. However, all these matrices have different chemical structures and undergo different reactions with the surface of natural fibers in composites. The thermal stability of composites is directly related to the crystallinity of the matrix and fiber reinforcements (high crystallinity improve the heat resistance).

2.4. Incorporation of Fillers, Fiber Content and Orientation

It was shown in the literature that the presence of fillers, fiber content and orientation, and the manufacturing process of the composites also affects the thermal properties of composite materials [105,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132].
The nature of fillers can be organic, inorganic metallic, and ceramic and they can be in macro, micro, or nano scale [133]. In general, superior thermal properties can be achieved with fillers at nano-scale, at low reinforcement concentration (usually <10 wt%). For instance, Ramesh et al. [114] investigated the effect of MMT clay filler in the thermal properties of Kenaf fiber-reinforced PLA composite. The kenaf fibers were treated with 6% of NaOH solution for 3 h, and the amount of MMT used was 1%, 2%, and 3%. It was found that the presence of MMT clay improved the thermal stability. The MMT clay acts as a barrier, preventing the PLA polymer matrix from volatilizing. The segmental mobility of the polymer networks between the clay layers is limited, resulting in better thermal stability properties. Arulmurugan et al. [128] studied the effect of barium sulfate (BaSO4) on the thermal properties of an aloevera/flax hybrid composite. The fibers were subjected to chemical pre-treatment (sodium hydroxide and potassium permanganate) with 10% and 5% for 1 h, respectively. Then, they were treated with sodium laurel sulphate with 2% for 30 min. The authors report that the increase in BaSO4 in the pure and hybrid composite increased the thermal resistance of hybrid natural reinforced polymeric. Moreover, the maximum peak for the treated composites shows an increment with the addition of BaSO4 in its structure. In a different study, Bhoopathi et al. [134], investigated the influence of eggshell nanoparticles on the thermal properties of hemp reinforced composites. The natural fibers were treated by mercerization (5% of NaOH for 5 h at room temperature). The studied cases were: Hemp without eggshell (0%ESP), hemp + 7% eggshell (7%ESP), hemp + 14% eggshell (14%ESP), hemp + 21% eggshell (21%ESP). The authors report that increasing the nanoparticle percentage increased the degradation temperature of the composites when compared to the unmodified composite samples. The best case found was the 14%ESP, where the maximum exothermic peak value of degradation temperature onset was 411.6 °C while for the unfilled case it was 326.2 °C. Gouda et al. [135] studied hybrid composites with bamboo and GNP filler and found that the hybrid composites exhibited improved thermal conductivity. DMA results showed that the Tg of the hybrid composite materials lay in the range of 90–95 °C.
Sumesh et al. [116] investigated the thermal properties of cellulose micro filler (CMF) filled pineapple (PA)/flax (FL) hybrid composites and showed that the endothermic enthalpy and the endothermic peak increased due to the addition of CMF to the PA/FL composite. The improvement in the endothermic peak was from 92.99° to 114.94° for the 2% CMF and 30% PA/FL specimens, while the endothermic energy increased from 492.34 Jg−1 to 499.39 Jg−1. The 3% CMF with 35% PA/FL specimens presented an increase in the endothermic peak from 92.56 °C to 120.39 °C, while the enthalpy increased from 495.86 Jg−1 to 504.21 Jg−1. The untreated 30 wt% PA/FL with 2% CMF presented lower enthalpy and endothermic peak due to the poor bonding capacity of untreated cellulose fibers.
Souza et al. [136] studied the effect of the percentage of fiber on the thermal characteristics of natural composites reinforced with caranan fiber. The studied variation of fiber/matrix percentage was from 0% to 30%. The authors show that the increase of the caranan fiber increases the Tg of the composites. The fiber contents with 20% and 30% had a Tg value of 96 °C and 113 °C, respectively. Devireddy et al. [137] studied the thermal properties of banana/jute epoxy hybrid composites. The transverse and longitudinal thermal conductivities of the hybrid composites decreased by 44.35% and 34.98%, respectively, for 30 wt% jute and 10 wt% of banana fibers specimens. The thermal diffusivity and specific heat capacity of jute/banana hybrid composite decreased with increasing the fiber content. The combination of jute (30 wt%) and banana (10 wt%) presented the highest thermal stability at a higher temperature range.

3. Methods Used to Determine the Thermal Properties of Natural and Hybrid Composites

Different methods are used to determine the thermal properties of natural and hybrid fiber composites and to help understand and determine the suitability of different fiber-reinforced composites for a certain application. The methods used in the literature for thermal analysis of composites are as follows: Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). Figure 2 presents a summary of the main methods used to determine the thermal properties of composite materials with the main thermal properties of the composites provided by these techniques. This section presents an overview of the main techniques used for the thermal characterization of natural and hybrid fiber composites.

3.1. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

TGA analysis consists of measuring the weight of a material sample as a function of temperature and/or time, in a specific controlled atmosphere (e.g., nitrogen, helium, air, or other gases) [74,138,139]. Different temperatures and measurement times are applied in accordance with the matrix type of the natural fiber composite sample [39]. Typical thermogravimetric parameters consist of moisture, volatile substances, loss on ignition, or ash. The thermal data obtained from TGA analysis are dependent on several parameters, such as the sample’s mass and form, atmosphere, flow rate, heating rate, and the treatment applied [39]. For example, sample mass and form affect the profile of the TG curve. A big sample will possibly present thermal gradients in the sample, which will determine a temperature deviation from the set temperature due to endo- or exothermal reactions as well as a delay in mass loss.
As discussed in the previous section, the thermal behaviour of natural fiber composites depends on the principal constituents (natural fibers and matrix type) of the composite. For example, similar natural fibers, such as wood, jute, and sisal, present similar TG/DTG curves and thermal decomposition patterns. In general, the derivative thermogravimetric test (DTG) curve of natural fibers shows elimination of water and the thermal decomposition of cellulose components of the fibers. The DTG curve shows the maximum rate of peak thermal decomposition, and fiber constituents are indicated by peaks in each degradation range. For instance, the lignocellulose fibers (i.e., jute, flax, wood, sisal, ramie, curauá etc.) present three stages of degradation. The first stage is related to water loss by natural fiber (60–100 °C). The second stage is related to the loss of the main constituents of the fibers: hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin (200–500 °C). Finally, the last stage of degradation is the formation of active coal as a form of residue [48,140,141,142,143].
Table 2 summarizes several studies which present the stages of decomposition of different natural fiber reinforced composites.
Several authors used the thermogravimetric analysis to determine the thermal properties of natural fiber composites [52,53,84,85,104,107,128,150,151,152]. For example, Boopalan et al. [153] studied the thermal properties of jute (J)/banana (B) reinforced epoxy composites. The TGA analysis showed that the combinations of J (50%)/B (50%), J (75%)/B (25%), and J (25%)/B (75%) presented initial weight loss at 200 °C due to solvent removal in the epoxy matrix and major weight loss occurs at 380 °C (75.64%), 377.72 °C (82.14%), and 376.51 °C (79.01%), respectively. However, the J/Epoxy and B/Epoxy presented the initial weight loss at 190 °C because of solvent removal from the matrix and major weight loss at 376.51 °C (79.01%) and 377.72 °C (74.43%), mainly due to epoxy and fiber volatilization and degradation. Therefore, the 50% jute and 50% banana fiber epoxy hybrid composite showed better thermal properties than other combinations.
Hidalgo–Salazar et al. [145], studied the thermal properties of fique fiber reinforced natural composites. Two types of resins (linear low-density polyethylene (LLDP) and epoxy resin (EP)) were used. Figure 3 presents an example of representative TG (Figure 3a) and DTG (Figure 3b) curves of the Fique fiber, which show that degradation occurred at 296 °C, while the neat EP starts its decomposition at 96 °C. Therefore, the EP/Fique samples degraded after the neat resin in both degradation steps. This has been previously reported in the available literature regarding EP/Phormium tenax leaf fiber composites and was explained to be due to an enhanced fiber/matrix interface [154]. The residual char after final degradation was 6.1% for neat epoxy resin and 11.1% for epoxy-Fique natural fiber composite. The authors state that this increase in the residual char of the composite was due to the Fique fiber incorporation in the epoxy resin.
Figure 4 presents an example of representative TG and DTG curves of LLDPE, LLDPE/Fique, while Figure 5 shows the thermal curves for EP and EP/Fique natural composites, respectively. For the neat LLDPE sample a single step degradation was observed with To (onset) at 439 °C and Tmax and 478 °C, respectively (see Figure 4a). The char residue at the end of the degradation was 4.1%. For the PE/Fique case, a two-step degradation process was observed. The authors state that the first degradation step is linked to the fiber constituent degradation (To at 266 °C) presenting a mass loss of 21%. A minor decrease on the thermal stability of the polymeric matrix was observed, which can be linked to the degradation of fibers on the LLDPE during the thermocompression process at 170 °C. Moreover, the residual weight of LLDPE-Fique increased to 5.6%, due to the Fique fiber addition. In Figure 4b, it can be seen that the DTG curve presented two Tmax peaks at 293 °C and 358 °C, which can be linked to hemicellulose and α-cellulose degradation. The second degradation step is related to LLDPE matrix decomposition. The process starts at 437 °C and presented a Tmax of 470 °C. On the other hand, a two-stage weight loss process was reported for both EP and EP/Fique composites, indicating similar thermal degradation behaviour (see Figure 5). The first degradation step (90 °C to 200 °C) is related to small molecular decomposition of EP. For this stage, the reported To were 96 °C and 114 °C, while Tmax were 167 °C and 165 °C for EP and EP/Fique, respectively. In addition, the second degradation step (250–500 °C) illustrates the decomposition of the main polymeric chain. In this step, the observed To was 344 °C and 352 °C while Tmax was 365 °C and 373 °C for EP and EP-Fique, respectively.
Neher et al. [155], investigated the thermal properties of the palm fiber reinforced composite of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). The composites were manufactured using an injection moulding machine in different weight fractions: 5, 10, and 20 wt%. They found that thermal degradation occurs only in one stage for ABS (100%), while the ABS composite with 10% of fiber presented higher Tonset when compared to other reinforced cases. In a recent study, Komal et al. [156] investigated the thermal properties of short banana fiber/PLA fabricated by different processing techniques (injection molding (DIM), extrusion injection molding (EIM), and extrusion compression molding (ECM)). In Figure 6a, it can be seen that all the composites exhibited a similar trend of thermal decomposition. Figure 6b shows that all the composites lost 5%, 25%, 50%, and 75% of their weight in the temperature range of 275–285 °C, 315–320 °C, 350–355 °C, and 620–625 °C, respectively. Similar to the other studies discussed above (see Table 1), the loss of weight of the composites studied can be divided into three stages: 1. The loss of weight at around 80–160 °C attributed to the evaporation of moisture present in the banana fiber; 2. The weight reduction in the temperature range of 250–350 °C due to the decomposition of hemicellulose, cellulose, and some portion of the lignin of the banana fiber and pyrolysis of the PLA; 3. The weight loss at the temperature range of 350–450 °C due to the pyrolysis of remaining lignin and pyrolysis of the residue of lignin and PLA. DTG curves (Figure 6c) show the precise peak position of the degradation temperature (maximum reduction in weight between 250 °C and 350 °C), which represents the pyrolysis of the hemicellulose and cellulose of the fiber and PLA.
Table 3 summarizes the results from several recent studies on the thermal properties of natural fiber composites.

3.2. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

The DSC determines the material transitions as a function of temperature and time. The endothermic (heat absorption) and exothermic (heat released) peaks and magnitudes indicate the thermal phase transformation of the composites [162,163]. The principal thermal data extracted from this analysis are the glass-transition temperature (Tg), degree of crystallization (Xc), crystallization temperature (Tc), and fusion temperature (Tm). The enthalpy variation and heat capacity of the composite can also be determined.
The Tg is an important material property when considering the natural composites for a particular end-use application. Tg is the temperature band in which a thermoset polymer shifts from a stiff to a more flexible or rubbery state. It is well known that the “normal” state of most thermoset polymers at room temperature is rigid (amorphous solid). Below the Tg, the molecular chains of the thermoset resins do not present enough energy to let them move around (the molecules are frozen in place as a rigid structure because of the short chain length, molecular groups separating off the chain, and interlocking with each other). Moreover, when the polymer resin is heated, the molecules of the polymer resin gain energy and they can start to move around. The amorphous rigid structure of the thermoset polymer resin is transformed to a flexible structure (rubbery state) when a certain heat energy level is attained, and the polymer molecules are allowed to move freely around each other. This transition point is termed the glass transition temperature. To conclude, the service temperature of polymer resins should be always below the Tg. If the composites are used above their Tg, they will quickly lose their mechanical properties (strength and stiffness), and they will continue to maintain some mechanical properties until the temperature reaches Tm. The crystallization temperature (Tc) is associated with the point where polymer chain alignment modification is possible. Upon reaching the Tc, ordered crystalline chain regions appear, called lamellae. However, amorphous regions still remain in the structure. It should be noted that the crystallization is an exothermic peak in a DSC curve. Tc temperature is higher than Tg but still lower than that of the melting temperature, (Tm). Finally, the melting temperature (Tm) is the point where the polymeric chains lose their bonds and turn into a liquid. This process is called endothermic transition. In general, Tm for a thermoset polymer is higher than its Tg. At temperatures above Tg but below Tm, the polymer resin is in the rubbery state and the material can exhibit large deformations under a relatively low load.
There are several factors that can affect the data collected by the DSC analysis, such as sample size and shape, heat ramp, and type of atmosphere. Several authors used the DSC technique to investigate the thermal stability of natural fiber and hybrid composites [66,86,107,116,134,136,159,164,165,166]. For instance, Gupta et al. [164], used the DSC technique to investigate the effect of hybridization on the thermal properties of jute/sisal fibers in epoxy-based composites. The studied cases were: jute (J1), sisal (S1), 50% of jute + 50% of sisal (H1), 25% of jute + 75% of sisal (H2) and 75% of jute + 25% of sisal (H3). The composites were manufactured using the hand-lay-up technique and total fiber loading of 30%wt. They found that hybridization positively affected the Tg of the composites. The values of Tg found for H1 samples was 73.86 °C, for the H2 case was 72.86 °C, while for H3 the Tg value found was 68.36 °C when compared with the Tg of the matrix (65.16 °C). Moreover, the exothermic temperature (Td) for hybrid composites and natural fibers presented higher values than the pure matrix.
Pereira et al. [107] used DSC to investigate the influence of the hybridization on the thermal properties of pure sisal and epoxy hybrid composites. Figure 7 shows the DSC curves for the composites studied. It can be seen that two events predominate, endothermic and exothermic around 100 °C and 375 °C, respectively. Sisal + curauá was the sample that absorbed the greatest heat in the endothermic event and the one that least released heat in the exothermic event.
Table 4 summarizes the results from several recent studies on the thermal properties of natural fiber composites obtained from DSC analysis.

3.3. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA)

DMA determines the following thermal data: storage modulus (E′), loss modulus (E″), damping factor (tan δ = E″/E′) and glass transition temperature (Tg) [173]. The storage modulus (E′) is associated with the energy storage of the elastic characteristics of the material [66,111,174,175]. It decreases with increasing the temperature and is associated with “stiffness” of the composites sample [111,174]. The loss modulus (E”) is linked to the energy dissipation promoted by the viscous part of the composite sample. This dissipation is related to the internal molecular friction of the molecular chains due to the following factors: morphological transformation and relaxation, morphology, and system heterogeneity [39,111]. The damping factor is defined by dividing the storage and loss modulus (tan δ= E″/E′) and is associated with the internal mobility of the polymeric molecular chains, showing the influence of the fiber/matrix interactions [65,111,175,176]. A high tan δ value indicates that the system is dissipating more energy than it is storing due to the fiber–matrix interaction quality, while a low tan δ value suggests that the polymeric chain has lower mobility showing a good fiber/matrix interfacial interaction. Determining Tg using DMA measurements of the complex modulus is usually performed as temperature increases with a constant heating rate.
In the DMA analysis, several different test method configurations are available (i.e., dual cantilever, single cantilever, three-point bending, torsion, shear, tension, and compression). However, the most common test method for composite materials is the three-point bending mode, as it removes the combined loading present in single or double cantilever modes and yields measurable strains in relatively rigid materials. Depending on the methodology used, significant variation of the glass transition temperature for a given material may be reported via the DMA analysis (up to 25 °C). The calculation method may also be more or less conservative, taking the Tg via first inflection point/modulus drop onset or the tan δ peak, respectively [177].
The thermal properties of the natural fiber composites collected via DMA depends on the physical or structural arrangement of phases (interface), morphology and the nature of natural composite constituents. It was shown in the literature that the presence of fillers, fiber content and orientation, and the chemical treatment of the fibers affect the dynamic mechanical properties of a composite material [110,111]. The mode of testing also has an influence on the DMA tests results.
The DMA analysis was used by several researchers to determine the thermal properties of natural fiber composites [52,65,71,82,164,166,178]. For example, Chee et al. [179] used the thermomechanical analysis (TMA) and DMA analysis to investigate the effect of the hybridization of bamboo (B) and Kenaf (K) fibers on the thermal properties of various configurations in epoxy resin-based hybrid composites. The authors reported that the composite with 100% Bamboo obtained a value of storage modulus (E’) of 979 MPa, while the epoxy resin and 100% Kenaf had a value of 449 and 775 MPa, respectively.
Komal et al. [156] used DMA to study the thermal properties of short banana fiber (20 wt%) and PLA matrix fabricated using different processing techniques (direct injection molding (DIM), extrusion injection molding (EIM), and extrusion compression molding (ECM)). They found that the dynamic mechanical properties (storage modulus, loss modulus, and tan delta) and crystallinity of the composites fabricated by EIM presented a significant improvement compared to the other fabrication techniques, as can be seen in Figure 8.
Table 5 summarizes the results from several recent studies on the thermal properties of natural fiber and hybrid composites obtained through DMA analysis.

4. Conclusions

Thermal analysis can provide useful information for the development of new materials and optimization of the selection process of these materials for new applications. The most common thermal properties studied in the literature are: the percentage of weight loss, the degradation temperature, Tg, and viscoelastic properties (storage modulus, loss modulus, and the damping factor). Different factors affect the thermal properties of natural fiber composites (i.e., fiber and matrix type, the presence of fillers, fiber content, and fiber orientation, the chemical treatment of the fibers, manufacturing process, and type of loading). It is crucial to ensure that the natural fibers used in the composites can withstand the heat required during the fabrication process and retain their characteristics after exposure to heat. Different approaches were used in the literature for the enhancement of thermal properties of natural fiber-based composite materials. For example, using natural fibers with low lignin content leads to a better thermal performance of composites. Another approach involves the removal of lignin through fiber treatment. Finally, the incorporation of synthetic fillers or synthetic fibers in natural fiber reinforced composites increase their thermal stability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, J.S.S.N. and M.D.B.; methodology, J.S.S.N. and H.F.M.d.Q.; supervision, M.D.B.; validation, R.A.A.A. and M.D.B.; writing—review & editing, M.D.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the Brazilian Research Agencies: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)-Grant number 311079/2020-2, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)- Finance Code 001, and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)- Grant number E-26/211.072/2019 and E-26/202.728/2019.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Brazilian Research Agencies: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. Guo, R.; Xian, G.; Li, C.; Huang, X.; Xin, M. Effect of fiber hybridization types on the mechanical properties of carbon/glass fiber reinforced polymer composite rod. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, C.; Xian, G.; Li, H. Tension-tension fatigue performance of a large-diameter pultruded carbon/glass hybrid rod. Int. J. Fatigue 2019, 120, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lal, H.M.; Uthaman, A.; Li, C.; Xian, G.; Thomas, S. Combined effects of cyclic/sustained bending loading and water immersion on the interface shear strength of carbon/glass fiber reinforced polymer hybrid rods for bridge cable. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 314, 125587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Budhe, S.; de Barros, S.; Banea, M.D. Theoretical assessment of the elastic modulus of natural fiber-based intra-ply hybrid composites. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2019, 41, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Banea, M.D.; Neto, J.S.S.; Cavalcanti, D.K.K. Recent Trends in Surface Modification of Natural Fibres for Their Use in Green Composites. In Green Composites; Thomas, S., Balakrishnan, P., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 329–350. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wambua, P.; Ivens, J.; Verpoest, I. Natural fibres: Can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics? Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 1259–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. De Queiroz, H.F.M.; Banea, M.D.; Cavalcanti, D.K.K. Adhesively bonded joints of jute, glass and hybrid jute/glass fibre-reinforced polymer composites for automotive industry. Appl. Adhes. Sci. 2021, 9, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De Queiroz, H.F.M.; Banea, M.D.; Cavalcanti, D.K.K. Experimental analysis of adhesively bonded joints in synthetic- and natural fibre-reinforced polymer composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2020, 54, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Queiroz, H.F.M.; Banea, M.D.; Cavalcanti, D.K.K.; de Souza e Silva Neto, J. The effect of multiscale hybridization on the mechanical properties of natural fiber-reinforced composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 51213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pickering, K.L.; Efendy, M.A.; Le, T.M. A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 83, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Marichelvam, M.K.; Manimaran, P.; Verma, A.; Sanjay, M.R.; Siengchin, S.; Kandakodeeswaran, K.; Geetha, M. A novel palm sheath and sugarcane bagasse fiber based hybrid composites for automotive applications: An experimental approach. Polym. Compos. 2021, 42, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Akampumuza, O.; Wambua, P.M.; Ahmed, A.; Li, W.; Qin, X.-H. Review of the applications of biocomposites in the automotive industry. Polym. Compos. 2017, 38, 2553–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fitzgerald, A.; Proud, W.; Kandemir, A.; Murphy, R.J.; Jesson, D.A.; Trask, R.S.; Hamerton, I.; Longana, M.L. A Life Cycle Engineering Perspective on Biocomposites as a Solution for a Sustainable Recovery. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Islam, M.S.; Ahmed, S.J.U. Influence of jute fiber on concrete properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 189, 768–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Benzait, Z.; Trabzon, L. A review of recent research on materials used in polymer–matrix composites for body armor application. J. Compos. Mater. 2018, 52, 3241–3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Braga, F.D.O.; Bolzan, L.T.; da Luz, F.S.; Lopes, P.H.L.M.; Lima, É.P., Jr.; Monteiro, S.N. High energy ballistic and fracture comparison between multilayered armor systems using non-woven curaua fabric composites and aramid laminates. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2017, 6, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sanjay, M.; Siengchin, S.; Parameswaranpillai, J.; Jawaid, M.; Pruncu, C.I.; Khan, A. A comprehensive review of techniques for natural fibers as reinforcement in composites: Preparation, processing and characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 108–121. [Google Scholar]
  18. Silva, R.V.; Aquino, E.M.F. Curaua Fiber: A New Alternative to Polymeric Composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2008, 27, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cavalcanti, D.K.K.; Banea, M.D.; Neto, J.S.S.; Lima, R.A.A. Comparative analysis of the mechanical and thermal properties of polyester and epoxy natural fibre-reinforced hybrid composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2021, 55, 1683–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chaudhary, V.; Bajpai, P.K.; Maheshwari, S. Effect of moisture absorption on the mechanical performance of natural fiber reinforced woven hybrid bio-composites. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 17, 84–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maslinda, A.B.; Abdul Majid, M.S.; Ridzuan, M.J.M.; Afendi, M.; Gibson, A.G. Effect of water absorption on the mechanical properties of hybrid interwoven cellulosic-cellulosic fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Compos. Struct. 2017, 167, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Choudhury, M.R.; Debnath, K. Green Composites: Introductory Overview. In Green Composites; Thomas, S., Balakrishnan, P., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  23. El Messiry, M. Green Composite as an Adequate Material for Automotive Applications. In Green Composites; Thomas, S., Balakrishnan, P., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 151–208. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mahmud, S.; Hasan, K.M.F.; Jahid, M.A.; Mohiuddin, K.; Zhang, R.; Zhu, J. Comprehensive review on plant fiber-reinforced polymeric biocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 7231–7264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Do Nascimento, H.M.; dos Santos, A.; Duarte, V.A.; Bittencourt, P.R.S.; Radovanovic, E.; Fávaro, S.L. Characterization of natural cellulosic fibers from Yucca aloifolia L. leaf as potential reinforcement of polymer composites. Cellulose 2021, 28, 5477–5492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gurunathan, T.; Mohanty, S.; Nayak, S.K. A review of the recent developments in biocomposites based on natural fibres and their application perspectives. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 77, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mehdikhani, M.; Gorbatikh, L.; Verpoest, I.; Lomov, S.V. Voids in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A review on their formation, characteristics, and effects on mechanical performance. J. Compos. Mater. 2018, 53, 1579–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sanjay, M.R.; Madhu, P.; Jawaid, M.; Senthamaraikannan, P.; Senthil, S.; Pradeep, S. Characterization and properties of natural fiber polymer composites: A comprehensive review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 566–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Siakeng, R.; Jawaid, M.; Ariffin, H.; Sapuan, S.M.; Asim, M.; Saba, N. Natural fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites: A review. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 446–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thyavihalli Girijappa, Y.G.; Mavinkere Rangappa, S.; Parameswaranpillai, J.; Siengchin, S. Natural Fibers as Sustainable and Renewable Resource for Development of Eco-Friendly Composites: A Comprehensive Review. Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sivaranjana, P.; Arumugaprabu, V. A brief review on mechanical and thermal properties of banana fiber based hybrid composites. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Swolfs, Y.; Gorbatikh, L.; Verpoest, I. Fibre hybridisation in polymer composites: A review. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2014, 67, 181–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mahmoud Zaghloul, M.Y.; Yousry Zaghloul, M.M.; Yousry Zaghloul, M.M. Developments in polyester composite materials–An in-depth review on natural fibres and nano fillers. Compos. Struct. 2021, 278, 114698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Odesanya, K.O.; Ahmad, R.; Jawaid, M.; Bingol, S.; Adebayo, G.O.; Wong, Y.H. Natural Fibre-Reinforced Composite for Ballistic Applications: A Review. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 3795–3812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Neto, J.; Queiroz, H.; Aguiar, R.; Lima, R.; Cavalcanti, D.; Banea, M.-D. A Review of Recent Advances in Hybrid Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. J. Renew. Mater. 2022, 10, 561–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Joseph, S.; Sreekala, M.S.; Thomas, S. Effect of chemical modifications on the thermal stability and degradation of banana fiber and banana fiber-reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 110, 2305–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Azwa, Z.N.; Yousif, B.F.; Manalo, A.C.; Karunasena, W. A review on the degradability of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Mater. Des. 2013, 47, 424–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Joseph, P.V.; Joseph, K.; Thomas, S.; Pillai, C.K.S.; Prasad, V.S.; Groeninckx, G.; Sarkissova, M. The thermal and crystallisation studies of short sisal fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2003, 34, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Asim, M.; Paridah, M.T.; Chandrasekar, M.; Shahroze, R.M.; Jawaid, M.; Nasir, M.; Siakeng, R. Thermal stability of natural fibers and their polymer composites. Iran. Polym. J. 2020, 29, 625–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fan, M.; Naughton, A. Mechanisms of thermal decomposition of natural fibre composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 88, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Grigore, M.E. Methods of Recycling, Properties and Applications of Recycled Thermoplastic Polymers. Recycling 2017, 2, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zhou, Y.; Fan, M.; Chen, L. Interface and bonding mechanisms of plant fibre composites: An overview. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 101, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Beg, M.D.H.; Pickering, K.L. Mechanical performance of Kraft fibre reinforced polypropylene composites: Influence of fibre length, fibre beating and hygrothermal ageing. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2008, 39, 1748–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gholampour, A.; Ozbakkaloglu, T. A review of natural fiber composites: Properties, modification and processing techniques, characterization, applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 829–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Latif, R.; Wakeel, S.; Khan, N.Z.; Siddiquee, A.N.; Lal Verma, S.; Khan, Z.A. Surface treatments of plant fibers and their effects on mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composites: A review. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2018, 38, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. De Araujo Alves Lima, R.; Cavalcanti, D.K.; de Souza e Silva Neto, J.; da Costa, H.M.; Banea, M.D. Effect of surface treatments on interfacial properties of natural intralaminar hybrid composites. Polym. Compos. 2020, 41, 314–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rout, J.; Misra, M.; Tripathy, S.S.; Nayak, S.K.; Mohanty, A.K. The influence of fibre treatment on the performance of coir-polyester composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61, 1303–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. El Boustani, M.; Lebrun, G.; Brouillette, F.; Belfkira, A. Effect of a solvent-free acetylation treatment on reinforcements permeability and tensile behaviour of flax/epoxy and flax/wood fibre/epoxy composites. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 95, 1082–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Safri, S.N.A.; Sultan, M.T.H.; Saba, N.; Jawaid, M. Effect of benzoyl treatment on flexural and compressive properties of sugar palm/glass fibres/epoxy hybrid composites. Polym. Test. 2018, 71, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vinayagamoorthy, R. Influence of fiber surface modifications on the mechanical behavior of Vetiveria zizanioides reinforced polymer composites. J. Nat. Fibers 2019, 16, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zafeiropoulos, N.E.; Williams, D.R.; Baillie, C.A.; Matthews, F.L. Engineering and characterisation of the interface in flax fibre/polypropylene composite materials. Part I. Development and investigation of surface treatments. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2002, 33, 1083–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Asim, M.; Paridah, M.T.; Saba, N.; Jawaid, M.; Alothman, O.Y.; Nasir, M.; Almutairi, Z. Thermal, physical properties and flammability of silane treated kenaf/pineapple leaf fibres phenolic hybrid composites. Compos. Struct. 2018, 202, 1330–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rashid, B.; Leman, Z.; Jawaid, M.; Ghazali, M.J.; Ishak, M.R. Influence of Treatments on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Sugar Palm Fibre Reinforced Phenolic Composites. BioResources 2017, 12, 16. [Google Scholar]
  54. Ouajai, S.; Shanks, R.A. Composition, structure and thermal degradation of hemp cellulose after chemical treatments. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 89, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Georgiopoulos, P.; Christopoulos, A.; Koutsoumpis, S.; Kontou, E. The effect of surface treatment on the performance of flax/biodegradable composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 106, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kabir, M.M.; Wang, H.; Lau, K.T.; Cardona, F. Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: An overview. Compos. Part B Eng. 2012, 43, 2883–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jandas, P.J.; Mohanty, S.; Nayak, S.K.; Srivastava, H. Effect of surface treatments of banana fiber on mechanical, thermal, and biodegradability properties of PLA/banana fiber biocomposites. Polym. Compos. 2011, 32, 1689–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dixit, S.; Joshi, B.; Kumar, P.; Yadav, V.L. Novel Hybrid Structural Biocomposites from Alkali Treated-Date Palm and Coir Fibers: Morphology, Thermal and Mechanical Properties. J. Polym. Environ. 2020, 28, 2386–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Do Carmo, F.F.; do Nascimento, J.P.C.; de Morais, J.E.V.; Martins, V.C.; Sales, J.C.; Silva, M.A.S.; Silva, R.S.; Sombra, A.S.B. High thermal stability of the YNbO4 − CaYTiNbO7 composites for radio frequency and microwave applications. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 271, 124956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ferreira, D.P.; Cruz, J.; Fangueiro, R. Surface modification of natural fibers in polymer composites. In Green Composites for Automotive Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 3–41. [Google Scholar]
  61. Izwan, S.M.; Sapuan, S.M.; Zuhri, M.Y.M.; Mohamed, A.R. Thermal stability and dynamic mechanical analysis of benzoylation treated sugar palm/kenaf fiber reinforced polypropylene hybrid composites. Polymers 2021, 13, 2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kumar, S.; Saha, A.; Bhowmik, S. Accelerated weathering effects on mechanical, thermal and viscoelastic properties of kenaf/pineapple biocomposite laminates for load bearing structural applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 139, 51465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Siakeng, R.; Jawaid, M.; Asim, M.; Saba, N.; Sanjay, M.; Siengchin, S.; Fouad, H. Alkali treated coir/pineapple leaf fibres reinforced PLA hybrid composites: Evaluation of mechanical, morphological, thermal and physical properties. Express Polym. Lett. 2020, 14, 717–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, F.; Zhou, S.; Li, L.; Zhang, X. Changes in the morphological–mechanical properties and thermal stability of bamboo fibers during the processing of alkaline treatment. Polym. Compos. 2018, 39, E1421–E1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Neto, J.; Lima, R.; Cavalcanti, D.; Souza, J.; Aguiar, R.; Banea, M. Effect of chemical treatment on the thermal properties of hybrid natural fiber-reinforced composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, K.; Zhang, X.; Takagi, H.; Yang, Z.; Wang, D. Effect of chemical treatments on transverse thermal conductivity of unidirectional abaca fiber/epoxy composite. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2014, 66, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liew, F.K.; Hamdan, S.; Rahman, M.R.; Rusop, M.; Khan, A. Thermo-mechanical properties of jute/bamboo/polyethylene hybrid composites: The combined effects of silane coupling agent and copolymer. Polym. Compos. 2020, 41, 4830–4841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Asim, M.; Jawaid, M.; Fouad, H.; Alothman, O.Y. Effect of surface modified date palm fibre loading on mechanical, thermal properties of date palm reinforced phenolic composites. Compos. Struct. 2021, 267, 113913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jawaid, M.; Awad, S.; Fouad, H.; Asim, M.; Saba, N.; Dhakal, H.N. Improvements in the thermal behaviour of date palm/bamboo fibres reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. Compos. Struct. 2021, 277, 114644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Maou, S.; Meghezzi, A.; Grohens, Y.; Meftah, Y.; Kervoelen, A.; Magueresse, A. Effect of various chemical modifications of date palm fibers (DPFs) on the thermo-physical properties of polyvinyl chloride (PVC)–high-density polyethylene (HDPE) composites. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 171, 113974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ramakrishnan, S.; Krishnamurthy, K.; Rajeshkumar, G.; Asim, M. Dynamic Mechanical Properties and Free Vibration Characteristics of Surface Modified Jute Fiber/Nano-Clay Reinforced Epoxy Composites. J. Polym. Environ. 2020, 29, 1076–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Premalatha, N.; Saravanakumar, S.S.; Sanjay, M.R.; Siengchin, S.; Khan, A. Structural and Thermal Properties of Chemically Modified Luffa Cylindrica Fibers. J. Nat. Fibers 2021, 18, 1038–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Węgrzyn, M.; Rudnik, E.; Kamocka-Bronisz, R.; Kukfisz, B. Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Biocomposites Based on Polyethylene from Renewable Resources Modified with Ionic Liquids. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 1808–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hu, G.; Cai, S.Y.; Zhou, Y.H.; Zhang, N.W.; Ren, J. Enhanced mechanical and thermal properties of poly (lactic acid)/bamboo fiber composites via surface modification. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2018, 37, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, K.Q.; Lin, J.Y.; Hao, C.Y.; Hong, G.H.; Chen, Z.H.; Chen, Z.J.; Zhang, S.B.; Song, W. Effect of Nano-hydroxyapatite Modification of Bamboo Fiber on the Properties of Bamboo Fiber/Polylactic Acid Composites. BioResources 2019, 14, 1694–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Oza, S.; Ning, H.B.; Ferguson, I.; Lu, N. Effect of surface treatment on thermal stability of the hemp-PLA composites: Correlation of activation energy with thermal degradation. Compos. Part B Eng. 2014, 67, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sheng, K.C.; Zhang, S.; Qian, S.P.; Lopez, C.A.F. High-toughness PLA/Bamboo cellulose nanowhiskers bionanocomposite, strengthened with silylated ultrafine bamboo-char. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 165, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Masirek, R.; Kulinski, Z.; Chionna, D.; Piorkowska, E.; Pracella, M. Composites of poly(L-lactide) with hemp fibers: Morphology and thermal and mechanical properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 105, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bodur, M.S.; Bakkal, M.; Sonmez, H.E. The effects of different chemical treatment methods on the mechanical and thermal properties of textile fiber reinforced polymer composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2016, 50, 3817–3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Fiore, V.; Scalici, T.; Valenza, A. Effect of sodium bicarbonate treatment on mechanical properties of flax-reinforced epoxy composite materials. J. Compos. Mater. 2018, 52, 1061–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Shanmugasundaram, N.; Rajendran, I.; Ramkumar, T. Static, dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of untreated and alkali treated mulberry fiber reinforced polyester composites. Polym. Compos. 2018, 39, E1908–E1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gupta, M. Investigations on jute fibre-reinforced polyester composites: Effect of alkali treatment and poly (lactic acid) coating. J. Ind. Text. 2020, 49, 923–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lavoratti, A.; Romanzini, D.; Amico, S.C.; Zattera, A.J. Influence of Fibre Treatment on the Characteristics of Buriti and Ramie Polyester Composites. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2017, 25, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Chin, S.C.; Tee, K.F.; Tong, F.S.; Ong, H.R.; Gimbun, J. Thermal and mechanical properties of bamboo fiber reinforced composites. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 23, 100876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Teixeira, L.A.; Junior, L.V.D.; Luz, S.M. Chemical treatment of curaua fibres and its effect on the mechanical performance of fibre/polyester composites. Plast. Rubber Compos. 2020, 50, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chung, T.-J.; Park, J.-W.; Lee, H.-J.; Kwon, H.-J.; Kim, H.-J.; Lee, Y.-K.; Tze, W.T.Y. The improvement of mechanical properties, thermal stability, and water absorption resistance of an eco-friendly PLA/kenaf biocomposite using acetylation. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Zaman, H.U.; Khan, R.A. Acetylation used for natural fiber/polymer composites. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2019, 34, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Goriparthi, B.K.; Suman, K.N.S.; Mohan Rao, N. Effect of fiber surface treatments on mechanical and abrasive wear performance of polylactide/jute composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2012, 43, 1800–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Datta, J.; Kopczyńska, P. Effect of kenaf fibre modification on morphology and mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane materials. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 74, 566–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Asaithambi, B.; Ganesan, G.S.; Kumar, S.A. Banana/sisal fibers reinforced poly (lactic acid) hybrid biocomposites; influence of chemical modification of BSF towards thermal properties. Polym. Compos. 2017, 38, 1053–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jabbar, A.; Militký, J.; Wiener, J.; Karahan, M. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of novel treated jute/green epoxy composites. Text. Res. J. 2016, 86, 960–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Costa, I.L.M.; Pereira, P.H.F.; Claro, A.M.; Amaral, N.C.D.; Barud, H.D.S.; Ribeiro, R.B.; Mulinari, D.R. 3D-printing pen from valorization of pine cone residues as reinforcement in acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS): Microstructure and thermal properties. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2021, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yu, T.; Jiang, N.; Li, Y. Study on short ramie fiber/poly(lactic acid) composites compatibilized by maleic anhydride. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2014, 64, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yiga, V.A.; Lubwama, M.; Pagel, S.; Benz, J.; Olupot, P.W.; Bonten, C. Flame retardancy and thermal stability of agricultural residue fiber-reinforced polylactic acid: A Review. Polym. Compos. 2021, 42, 15–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Nam, T.H.; Ogihara, S.; Kobayashi, S. Interfacial, mechanical and thermal properties of coir fiber-reinforced poly(lactic acid) biodegradable composites. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2012, 21, 103–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mukherjee, T.; Kao, N. PLA Based Biopolymer Reinforced with Natural Fibre: A Review. J. Polym. Environ. 2011, 19, 714–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rajeshkumar, G.; Arvindh Seshadri, S.; Devnani, G.L.; Sanjay, M.R.; Siengchin, S.; Prakash Maran, J.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Karuppiah, P.; Mariadhas, V.A.; Sivarajasekar, N.; et al. Environment friendly, renewable and sustainable poly lactic acid (PLA) based natural fiber reinforced composites—A comprehensive review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 310, 127483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mallick, P.K. 5-Thermoplastics and thermoplastic–Matrix composites for lightweight automotive structures. In Materials, Design and Manufacturing for Lightweight Vehicles; Mallick, P.K., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2010; pp. 174–207. [Google Scholar]
  99. Chilali, A.; Assarar, M.; Zouari, W.; Kebir, H.; Ayad, R. Effect of geometric dimensions and fibre orientation on 3D moisture diffusion in flax fibre reinforced thermoplastic and thermosetting composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 95, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Atiqah, A.; Jawaid, M.; Sapuan, S.; Ishak, M.; Alothman, O.Y. Thermal properties of sugar palm/glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane hybrid composites. Compos. Struct. 2018, 202, 954–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Enciso, B.; Abenojar, J.; Paz, E.; Martínez, M. Influence of low pressure plasma treatment on the durability of thermoplastic composites LDPE-flax/coconut under thermal and humidity conditions. Fibers Polym. 2018, 19, 1327–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Atiqah, A.; Jawaid, M.; Sapuan, S.; Ishak, M. Dynamic mechanical properties of sugar palm/glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane hybrid composites. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 1329–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Radzi, A.M.; Sapuan, S.M.; Jawaid, M.; Mansor, M.R. Water absorption, thickness swelling and thermal properties of roselle/sugar palm fibre reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane hybrid composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 3988–3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Nair, S.T.; Vijayan, P.P.; George, S.C.; Kalarikkal, N.; Thomas, S. Enhanced mechanical and thermal performance of multiwalled carbon nanotubes-filled polypropylene/natural rubber thermoplastic elastomers. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 4963–4976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wong, J.F.; Chan, J.X.; Hassan, A.; Mohamad, Z.; Othman, N. Thermal and flammability properties of wollastonite-filled thermoplastic composites: A review. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 8911–8950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Pereira, A.L.; Banea, M.D.; Neto, J.S.; Cavalcanti, D.K. Mechanical and Thermal Characterization of Natural Intralaminar Hybrid Composites Based on Sisal. Polymers 2020, 12, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. George, A.; Sanjay, M.R.; Srisuk, R.; Parameswaranpillai, J.; Siengchin, S. A comprehensive review on chemical properties and applications of biopolymers and their composites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Yorseng, K.; Rangappa, S.M.; Parameswaranpillai, J.; Siengchin, S. Influence of Accelerated Weathering on the Mechanical, Fracture Morphology, Thermal Stability, Contact Angle, and Water Absorption Properties of Natural Fiber Fabric-Based Epoxy Hybrid Composites. Polymers 2020, 12, 2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kusić, D.; Božič, U.; Monzón, M.; Paz, R.; Bordón, P. Thermal and Mechanical Characterization of Banana Fiber Reinforced Composites for Its Application in Injection Molding. Materials 2020, 13, 3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Saba, N.; Jawaid, M.; Alothman, O.Y.; Paridah, M. A review on dynamic mechanical properties of natural fibre reinforced polymer composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 106, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ashok, R.; Srinivasa, C.; Basavaraju, B. Dynamic mechanical properties of natural fiber composites—A review. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2019, 2, 586–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Biswas, B.; Chabri, S.; Sawai, P.; Mitra, B.C.; Das, K.; Sinha, A. Effect of copper incorporation on the mechanical and thermal behavior of jute fiber reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. Polym. Compos. 2018, 39, E1315–E1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ramesh, P.; Prasad, B.D.; Narayana, K.L. Influence of Montmorillonite Clay Content on Thermal, Mechanical, Water Absorption and Biodegradability Properties of Treated Kenaf Fiber/PLA-Hybrid Biocomposites. Silicon 2021, 13, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Soatthiyanon, N.; Aumnate, C.; Srikulkit, K. Rheological, tensile, and thermal properties of poly(butylene succinate) composites filled with two types of cellulose (kenaf cellulose fiber and commercial cellulose). Polym. Compos. 2020, 41, 2777–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Sumesh, K.R.; Kanthavel, K.; Kavimani, V. Peanut oil cake-derived cellulose fiber: Extraction, application of mechanical and thermal properties in pineapple/flax natural fiber composites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 150, 775–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Babu, N.B.K.; Muthukumaran, S.; Ramesh, T.; Arokiasamy, S. Effect of Agro-waste Microcoir Pith and Nano-alumina Reinforcement on Thermal Degradation and Dynamic Mechanical Behavior of Polyester Composites. J. Nat. Fibers 2021, 18, 581–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ojha, A.R.; Biswal, S.K. Thermo physico-mechanical behavior of palm stalk fiber reinforced epoxy composites filled with granite powder. Compos. Commun. 2019, 16, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Prasob, P.A.; Sasikumar, M. Static and dynamic behavior of jute/epoxy composites with ZnO and TiO2 fillers at different temperature conditions. Polym. Test. 2018, 69, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ramakrishnan, S.; Krishnamurthy, K.; Rajasekar, R.; Rajeshkumar, G. An experimental study on the effect of nano-clay addition on mechanical and water absorption behaviour of jute fibre reinforced epoxy composites. J. Ind. Text. 2019, 49, 597–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Reddy, K.M.; Vardhan, D.H.; Reddy, Y.S.K.; Raghavendra, G.; Rudrapati, R. Experimental Study of Thermal and Mechanical Behaviour of Graphite-Filled UJF Composite. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 2021, 3739573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sajith, T.A.; Praveen, K.M.; Thomas, S.; Ahmad, Z.; Kalarikkal, N.; Dhanani, C.; Maria, H.J. Effect of HAF carbon black on curing, mechanical, thermal and neutron shielding properties of natural rubber–Low-density polyethylene composites. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2021, 141, 103940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Sumesh, K.R.; Kanthavel, K. Effect of TiO2 nano-filler in mechanical and free vibration damping behavior of hybrid natural fiber composites. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2020, 42, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Sumesh, K.R.; Kanthavel, K.; Ajithram, A.; Nandhini, P. Bioalumina Nano Powder Extraction and its Applications for Sisal, Coir and Banana Hybrid Fiber Composites: Mechanical and Thermal Properties. J. Polym. Environ. 2019, 27, 2068–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Vivek, S.; Kanthavel, K. Effect of bagasse ash filled epoxy composites reinforced with hybrid plant fibres for mechanical and thermal properties. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 160, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wu, H.; Xu, D.; Zhou, Y.; Guo, J.; He, W.; He, Y.; Yi, Y.; Qin, S. The Improved Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Hemp Fibers Reinforced Polypropylene Composites with Dodecyl Bromide Modification. Fibers Polym. 2021, 22, 2869–2877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Xu, S.; Sun, L.; He, J.; Han, H.; Wang, H.; Fang, Y.; Wang, Q. Effects of LiCl on crystallization, thermal, and mechanical properties of polyamide 6/wood fiber composites. Polym. Compos. 2018, 39, E1574–E1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Arulmurugan, M.; Selvakumar, A.S.; Prabu, K.; Rajamurugan, G. Effect of barium sulphate on mechanical, DMA and thermal behaviour of woven aloevera/flax hybrid composites. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2020, 43, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Neto, J.S.S.; Banea, M.D.; Cavalcanti, D.K.K.; Queiroz, H.F.M.; Aguiar, R.A.A. Analysis of mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy multiwalled carbon nanocomposites. J. Compos. Mater. 2020, 54, 4831–4840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Mohit, H.; Srisuk, R.; Sanjay, M.R.; Siengchin, S.; Khan, A.; Marwani, H.M.; Dzudzevic-Cancar, H.; Asiri, A.M. Nanoparticles Addition in Coir-Basalt-Innegra Fibers Reinforced Bio-synthetic Epoxy Composites. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 3561–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Mohit, H.; Sanjay, M.R.; Siengchin, S.; Khan, A.; Marwani, H.M.; Dzudzevic-Cancar, H.; Asiri, A.M. Effect of TiC Nanoparticles Reinforcement in Coir Fiber Based Bio/Synthetic Epoxy Hybrid Composites: Mechanical and Thermal Characteristics. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 2609–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Neves, R.M.; Zattera, A.J.; Amico, S.C. Enhancing thermal and dynamic-mechanical properties of epoxy reinforced by amino-functionalized microcrystalline cellulose. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 51329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Barbosa, A.Q.; Da Silva, L.F.M.; Banea, M.D.; Öchsner, A. Methods to increase the toughness of structural adhesives with micro particles: An overview with focus on cork particles. Mater. Werkst. 2016, 47, 307–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Bhoopathi, R.; Ramesh, M. Influence of eggshell nanoparticles and effect of alkalization on characterization of industrial hemp fibre reinforced epoxy composites. J. Polym. Environ. 2020, 28, 2178–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Gouda, K.; Bhowmik, S.; Das, B. Synergetic Effect of Micro-bamboo Filler and Graphene Nanoplatelets on Thermomechanical Properties of Epoxy-Based Hybrid Composite. JOM 2020, 72, 4466–4476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Souza, A.T.; Junio, R.F.P.; Neuba, L.D.M.; Candido, V.S.; da Silva, A.C.R.; de Azevedo, A.R.G.; Monteiro, S.N.; Nascimento, L.F.C. Caranan Fiber from Mauritiella armata Palm Tree as Novel Reinforcement for Epoxy Composites. Polymers 2020, 12, 2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Devireddy, S.B.R.; Biswas, S. Physical and thermal properties of unidirectional banana–jute hybrid fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2016, 35, 1157–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Asim, M.; Jawaid, M.; Paridah, M.T.; Saba, N.; Nasir, M.; Shahroze, R.M. Dynamic and thermo-mechanical properties of hybridized kenaf/PALF reinforced phenolic composites. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 3814–3822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Krishnasamy, S.; Thiagamani, S.M.K.; Kumar, C.M.; Nagarajan, R.; Shahroze, R.; Siengchin, S.; Ismail, S.O.; M.P, I.D. Recent advances in thermal properties of hybrid cellulosic fiber reinforced polymer composites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 141, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Monteiro, S.N.; Calado, V.; Rodriguez, R.J.S.; Margem, F.M. Thermogravimetric behavior of natural fibers reinforced polymer composites—An overview. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 557, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Guo, Y.; Zhu, S.; Chen, Y.; Li, D. Thermal properties of wood-plastic composites with different compositions. Materials 2019, 12, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Jawaid, M.; Khalil, H.A.; Bakar, A.A.; Hassan, A.; Dungani, R. Effect of jute fibre loading on the mechanical and thermal properties of oil palm–epoxy composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2013, 47, 1633–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Junior, V.D.L.; Leão, R.M.; Steier, V.F.; da Luz, S.M. Influence of cure agent, treatment and fibre content on the thermal behaviour of a curaua/epoxy prepreg. Plast. Rubber Compos. 2020, 49, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Li, C.; Yin, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Xian, G. Mechanical property evolution and service life prediction of pultruded carbon/glass hybrid rod exposed in harsh oil-well condition. Compos. Struct. 2020, 246, 112418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Bessa, W.; Trache, D.; Derradji, M.; Ambar, H.; Benziane, M.; Guedouar, B. Effect of different chemical treatments and loadings of Arundo donax L. fibers on the dynamic mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of bisphenol A aniline based polybenzoxazine composites. Polym. Compos. 2021, 42, 5199–5208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Hidalgo-Salazar, M.A.; Correa, J.P. Mechanical and thermal properties of biocomposites from nonwoven industrial Fique fiber mats with Epoxy Resin and Linear Low Density Polyethylene. Results Phys. 2018, 8, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Dong, Y.; Ghataura, A.; Takagi, H.; Haroosh, H.J.; Nakagaito, A.N.; Lau, K.-T. Polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposites reinforced with coir fibres: Evaluation of mechanical performance and multifunctional properties. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2014, 63, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Yussuf, A.A.; Massoumi, I.; Hassan, A. Comparison of Polylactic Acid/Kenaf and Polylactic Acid/Rise Husk Composites: The Influence of the Natural Fibers on the Mechanical, Thermal and Biodegradability Properties. J. Polym. Environ. 2010, 18, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Głowińska, E.; Datta, J.; Parcheta, P. Effect of sisal fiber filler on thermal properties of bio-based polyurethane composites. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 130, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Atagur, M.; Seki, Y.; Pasaoglu, Y.; Sever, K.; Seki, Y.; Sarikanat, M.; Altay, L. Mechanical and thermal properties of Carpinas betulus fiber filled polypropylene composites. Polym. Compos. 2020, 41, 1925–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Nimanpure, S.; Hashmi, S.A.R.; Kumar, R.; Bhargaw, H.N.; Kumar, R.; Nair, P.; Naik, A. Mechanical, electrical, and thermal analysis of sisal fibril/kenaf fiber hybrid polyester composites. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 664–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Eselini, N.; Tirkes, S.; Akar, A.O.; Tayfun, U. Production and characterization of poly (lactic acid)-based biocomposites filled with basalt fiber and flax fiber hybrid. J. Elastomers Plast. 2020, 52, 701–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Fang, C.-C.; Zhang, Y.; Qi, S.-Y.; Liao, Y.-C.; Li, Y.-Y.; Wang, P. Influence of structural design on mechanical and thermal properties of jute reinforced polylactic acid (PLA) laminated composites. Cellulose 2020, 27, 9397–9407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Boopalan, M.; Niranjanaa, M.; Umapathy, M.J. Study on the mechanical properties and thermal properties of jute and banana fiber reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2013, 51, 54–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. De Rosa, I.M.; Santulli, C.; Sarasini, F. Mechanical and thermal characterization of epoxy composites reinforced with random and quasi-unidirectional untreated Phormium tenax leaf fibers. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 2397–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Neher, B.; Bhuiyan, M.M.R.; Kabir, H.; Gafur, M.A.; Qadir, M.R.; Ahmed, F. Thermal properties of palm fiber and palm fiber-reinforced ABS composite. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2016, 124, 1281–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Komal, U.K.; Lila, M.K.; Singh, I. PLA/banana fiber based sustainable biocomposites: A manufacturing perspective. Compos. Part B Eng. 2020, 180, 107535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Gheith, M.H.; Aziz, M.A.; Ghori, W.; Saba, N.; Asim, M.; Jawaid, M.; Alothman, O.Y. Flexural, thermal and dynamic mechanical properties of date palm fibres reinforced epoxy composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 853–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Kumar, A.A.J.; Prakash, M. Thermal properties of basalt/Cissus quadrangularis hybrid fiber reinforced polylactic acid biomedical composites. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2020, 141, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Wang, W.; Liu, L.; Ding, N.; Zhang, R.; Yu, J. Mechanical and thermal behavior analysis of wood–polypropylene composites. Text. Res. J. 2021, 91, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Margoto, O.H.; Prado, K.D.S.D.; Mergulhão, R.C.; Moris, V.A.D.S.; de Paiva, J.M.F. Mechanical and Thermal Characterization of Jute Fabric-Reinforced Polypropylene Composites: Effect of Maleic Anhydride. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Kamarudin, S.H.; Abdullah, L.C.; Aung, M.M.; Ratnam, C.T. Thermal and Structural Analysis of Epoxidized Jatropha Oil and Alkaline Treated Kenaf Fiber Reinforced Poly(Lactic Acid) Biocomposites. Polymers 2020, 12, 2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Jesuarockiam, N.; Jawaid, M.; Zainudin, E.S.; Sultan, M.T.H.; Yahaya, R. Enhanced Thermal and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Synthetic/Natural Hybrid Composites with Graphene Nanoplateletes. Polymers 2019, 11, 1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Veerasimman, A.; Shanmugam, V.; Rajendran, S.; Johnson, D.J.; Subbiah, A.; Koilpichai, J.; Marimuthu, U. Thermal Properties of Natural Fiber Sisal Based Hybrid Composites—A Brief Review. J. Nat. Fibers 2021, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Gupta, M.K. Thermal and dynamic mechanical analysis of hybrid jute/sisal fibre reinforced epoxy composite. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl. 2016, 232, 743–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Biswas, B.; Sawai, P.; Santra, A.; Gain, A.; Saha, P.; Mitra, B.C.; Bandyopadhyay, N.R.; Sinha, A. Thermal stability, swelling and degradation behaviour of natural fibre based hybrid polymer composites. Cellulose 2019, 26, 4445–4461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Yorseng, K.; Rangappa, S.M.; Pulikkalparambil, H.; Siengchin, S.; Parameswaranpillai, J. Accelerated weathering studies of kenaf/sisal fiber fabric reinforced fully biobased hybrid bioepoxy composites for semi-structural applications: Morphology, thermo-mechanical, water absorption behavior and surface hydrophobicity. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 235, 117464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Saw, S.K.; Sarkhel, G.; Choudhury, A. Preparation and characterization of chemically modified Jute–Coir hybrid fiber reinforced epoxy novolac composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 125, 3038–3049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Prasad, V.; Joseph, M.A.; Sekar, K. Investigation of mechanical, thermal and water absorption properties of flax fibre reinforced epoxy composite with nano TiO2 addition. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 115, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Guo, J.; Cao, M.; Ren, W.; Wang, H.; Yu, Y. Mechanical, dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of TiO2 nanoparticles treatment bamboo fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 12643–12659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Wang, F.; Zhou, S.; Yang, M.; Chen, Z.; Ran, S. Thermo-Mechanical Performance of Polylactide Composites Reinforced with Alkali-Treated Bamboo Fibers. Polymers 2018, 10, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  171. Tawakkal, I.S.M.A.; Cran, M.J.; Bigger, S.W. Effect of kenaf fibre loading and thymol concentration on the mechanical and thermal properties of PLA/kenaf/thymol composites. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 61, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Zhang, L.; Sun, Z.H.; Liang, D.P.; Lin, J.; Xiao, W. Preparation and Performance Evaluation of PLA/Coir Fibre Biocomposites. BioResources 2017, 12, 7349–7362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Chandrasekar, M.; Ishak, M.; Sapuan, S.; Leman, Z.; Jawaid, M. A review on the characterisation of natural fibres and their composites after alkali treatment and water absorption. Plast. Rubber Compos. 2017, 46, 119–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Lu, N.; Oza, S. A comparative study of the mechanical properties of hemp fiber with virgin and recycled high density polyethylene matrix. Compos. Part B Eng. 2013, 45, 1651–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Jawaid, M.; Khalil, H.A.; Hassan, A.; Dungani, R.; Hadiyane, A. Effect of jute fibre loading on tensile and dynamic mechanical properties of oil palm epoxy composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2013, 45, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Wang, Z.; Xian, G.; Zhao, X.-L. Effects of hydrothermal aging on carbon fibre/epoxy composites with different interfacial bonding strength. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 161, 634–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Akay, M. Aspects of dynamic mechanical analysis in polymeric composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1993, 47, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Kumar, A.M.; Parameshwaran, R.; Rajasekar, R. Effect of abaca reinforced polymer composite on dynamic mechanical analysis. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2021, 299, 1657–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Chee, S.S.; Jawaid, M.; Sultan, M.T.H.; Alothman, O.Y.; Abdullah, L.C. Thermomechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of bamboo/woven kenaf mat reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 163, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Arulmurugan, M.; Prabu, K.; Rajamurugan, G.; Selvakumar, A.S. Viscoelastic behavior of aloevera/hemp/flax sandwich laminate composite reinforced with BaSO4: Dynamic mechanical analysis. J. Ind. Text. 2019, 50, 1040–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Khan, A.; Asiri, A.M.; Jawaid, M.; Saba, N.; Inamuddin. Effect of cellulose nano fibers and nano clays on the mechanical, morphological, thermal and dynamic mechanical performance of kenaf/epoxy composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 239, 116248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Chee, S.S.; Jawaid, M.; Alothman, O.Y.; Fouad, H. Effects of Nanoclay on Mechanical and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Bamboo/Kenaf Reinforced Epoxy Hybrid Composites. Polymers 2021, 13, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Demosthenes, L.C.D.C.; Nascimento, L.F.C.; Monteiro, S.N.; Costa, U.O.; Filho, F.D.C.G.; da Luz, F.S.; Oliveira, M.S.; Ramos, F.J.H.T.V.; Pereira, A.C.; Braga, F.O. Thermal and structural characterization of buriti fibers and their relevance in fabric reinforced composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Samouh, Z.; Molnar, K.; Boussu, F.; Cherkaoui, O.; El Moznine, R. Mechanical and thermal characterization of sisal fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2019, 30, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  185. Zhang, Q.; Shi, L.; Nie, J.; Wang, H.; Yang, D. Study on poly(lactic acid)/natural fibers composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 125, E526–E533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Yu, T.; Ren, J.; Li, S.; Yuan, H.; Li, Y. Effect of fiber surface-treatments on the properties of poly(lactic acid)/ramie composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010, 41, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Siakeng, R.; Jawaid, M.; Ariffin, H.; Sapuan, S.M. Mechanical, dynamic, and thermomechanical properties of coir/pineapple leaf fiber reinforced polylactic acid hybrid biocomposites. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 2000–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Manral, A.; Bajpai, P.K. Static and dynamic mechanical analysis of geometrically different kenaf/PLA green composite laminates. Polym. Compos. 2020, 41, 691–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Han, L.; Ma, F.; Chen, S.; Pu, Y. Effect of short basalt fibers on durability, mechanical properties, and thermal properties of polylactic acid composites. Polym. Renew. Resour. 2019, 10, 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 13 04425 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic of natural fibers classification.
Figure 1. Schematic of natural fibers classification.
Polymers 13 04425 g001
Polymers 13 04425 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic of the principal methods used to determine the thermal properties of composites. Reproduced with permission from [35].
Figure 2. Schematic of the principal methods used to determine the thermal properties of composites. Reproduced with permission from [35].
Polymers 13 04425 g002
Polymers 13 04425 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) TG and (b) DTG curves of Fique fibers at heating rates of 10 °C/min. Reproduced with permission from [145].
Figure 3. (a) TG and (b) DTG curves of Fique fibers at heating rates of 10 °C/min. Reproduced with permission from [145].
Polymers 13 04425 g003
Polymers 13 04425 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) TG curve of neat Linear Low-Density Polyethylene (LLDPE) and (b) DTG curve of Linear Low-Density Polyethylene nonwoven Fique Fiber natural composite (LLDPE/FF). Reproduced with permission from [145].
Figure 4. (a) TG curve of neat Linear Low-Density Polyethylene (LLDPE) and (b) DTG curve of Linear Low-Density Polyethylene nonwoven Fique Fiber natural composite (LLDPE/FF). Reproduced with permission from [145].
Polymers 13 04425 g004
Polymers 13 04425 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) TG and (b) DTG curves of neat Epoxy resin (EP) and Fique biocomposite based Epoxy (EP/FF). Reproduced with permission from [145].
Figure 5. (a) TG and (b) DTG curves of neat Epoxy resin (EP) and Fique biocomposite based Epoxy (EP/FF). Reproduced with permission from [145].
Polymers 13 04425 g005
Polymers 13 04425 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) TGA (b) mass reduction and (c) DTG curves of banana/PLA based composites fabricated using three processing techniques (DIM, EIM and ECM). Reproduced with permission from [156].
Figure 6. (a) TGA (b) mass reduction and (c) DTG curves of banana/PLA based composites fabricated using three processing techniques (DIM, EIM and ECM). Reproduced with permission from [156].
Polymers 13 04425 g006
Polymers 13 04425 g007 550
Figure 7. DSC curves of epoxy sisal based composites as a function of hybridization (S-Sisal; S + R-Sisal + ramie; S + C-Sisal + curauá and S + G-sisal + glass fiber), Reproduced with permission from Pereira et al. [107].
Figure 7. DSC curves of epoxy sisal based composites as a function of hybridization (S-Sisal; S + R-Sisal + ramie; S + C-Sisal + curauá and S + G-sisal + glass fiber), Reproduced with permission from Pereira et al. [107].
Polymers 13 04425 g007
Polymers 13 04425 g008a 550Polymers 13 04425 g008b 550
Figure 8. DMA test results of banana fiber/PLA composites (a) Storage modulus (E′) and (b) Loss modulus (E″), (c) Tan delta vs. temperature. Reproduced with permission from [156].
Figure 8. DMA test results of banana fiber/PLA composites (a) Storage modulus (E′) and (b) Loss modulus (E″), (c) Tan delta vs. temperature. Reproduced with permission from [156].
Polymers 13 04425 g008aPolymers 13 04425 g008b
Table
Table 1. Effect of treatments on the thermal properties of natural fiber-reinforced composites.
Table 1. Effect of treatments on the thermal properties of natural fiber-reinforced composites.
FiberMatrixTreatmentThermal PropertiesRef.
FlaxEpoxy5% and 10% of sodium bicarbonateBy increasing the concentration of sodium bicarbonate, negligible changes in the Tg and reductions in the tan δ peak heights were found.[81]
Mulberry (MF)PolyesterAlkalization (5% ATMFC, 10% ATMFC and 15% ATMFC)10% ATMFC samples presented higher values of storage modulus and loss modulus compared to the other cases studied.[82]
JutePolyester5% of alkali treatment, poly (lactic acid)-coated and mixed treatmentThe mixed and alkaline treatment improved the Tg.[83]
Buriti and ramiePolyesterNaOH (2.5 and 10%)The buriti fiber starts to degrade at 217 °C, while the ramie fiber at 247 °C. The alkalization treatment of these fibers negatively affected their properties when compared to the in natura and washed cases.[84]
BambooEpoxy, polyester, and Vinyl esterChemical (10% NaOH) and physical (milling method)The alkaline treatment enhanced the thermal stability of the composites.[85]
CurauáPolyester10% of barium hydroxide Ba(OH)2 for 48 h at 25 °C, 14% of calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)2 for 4 h at 70 °C, 10% of potassium hydroxide (KOH) for 1 h at 25 °C, 5% of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for 2 h at 70 °C and 5% of silane (Trimethoxy(propyl) for 4 h at 25 °CThe chemical treatment increased the Tg of the treated composite. The Ca (OH)2 treatment provided a Tg of 141.2 °C, compared to the 133.69 °C of the untreated composite.[86]
KenafPLAAcetylation (0.5, 1, 2 and 3 h)The thermal stability was improved as treatment time was increased.[87]
BananaPPUntreated, alkaline and acetylated treatmentThe acetylation treatment improved the thermal stability and raised up the crystallization temperature.[88]
JutePLA6% benzoyl peroxide acetone solution for about 30 min after alkali pre-treatmentHigher storage modulus and lower tan δ compared to untreated composite.[89]
KenafPUAcetylation, blocked isocyanate, maleic anhydride and permanganate treatmentThe acetylated treatment provided better values for storage modulus (E’) when compared to all other treatments.[90]
Banana + sisalPLAUntreated and benzoyl peroxide treatmentThe peroxide treatment improved the thermal stability by delaying the thermal degradation. No significant changes in the Tg and melting temperature (Tm).[91]
Jute + curauáEpoxyUntreated, alkali, silane and mixed treatmentThe chemical treatment improved both Tg and thermal stability of the composites. tan δ value decreased.[65]
BambooEpoxy, polyester and vinyl esterAlkali (0 h-0%, 24 h-10 %, 48 h-5, 10, 15% and 72 h-10%)The bamboo-epoxy composite treated with the 10% of NaOH for 48 h presented the highest thermal stability.[85]
CottonLDPEAlkaline, silane, mixed treatment, maleic anhydride, and alkali–maleic anhydrideThe mixed treated composite presented higher Tg.[80]
JuteEpoxyEnzyme treatment, ozone treatment and laser treatmentThe laser treated composites presented higher Tg values in relation to the other treatments.[92]
Pine coneABSAlkaline and bleaching (alkaline + H2O2)The NaOH treatment increased the Tg of ABS/FT2% and ABS/FT5% composite when compared to the pure ABS composite. The untreated and ABS/FB2% composites showed no significant change in Tg.[93]
RamiePLAMaleic anhydride (MA)The thermal stability increased but the Tg decreased[94]
Table
Table 2. Stages of thermal degradation of natural fiber reinforced composites.
Table 2. Stages of thermal degradation of natural fiber reinforced composites.
Fiber TypeMatrixStage 1Stage 2Stage 3Ref.
Sisal, Sisal + Ramie,
Sisal + Curauá		Epoxy30–150 °C: evaporation of humidity retained in the fibers240–420 °C: pyrolysis process.-[107]
BambooEpoxy, polyester, vinyl ester30–155 °C: evaporation of moisture.199–399 °C: the decomposition of cellulosic components (cellulose and hemicellulose).364–499 °C: the decomposition of lignin.[85]
Sugar PalmPhenolic30–200 °C: corresponds to vaporization of water molecules200–300 °C: the thermal degradation of the hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin.300–400 °C: the loss of small groups and water bonds in the chains of the chemical structures.[53]
Ramie and BuritiPolyester61 °C (Ramie)–69 °C (Buriti): is attributed to the water evaporating.289 °C (Ramie)–292 °C (Buriti): The decomposition of amorphous constituents, such as hemicellulose.368 °C (Ramie)–341 °C (Buriti): Thermal decomposition of cellulose.[84]
Arundo donax L.Benzoxazine resin-200–300 °C: The decomposition of hemicellulose and cellulose.350–500 °C: The decomposition of lignin.[144]
FiqueLinear Low-Density Polyethylene (LLDPE) and Epoxy60–100 °C: The evaporation of superficial water.250–350 °C: The decomposition of hemicellulose.350–600 °C: The decomposition of α-cellulose.[145]
Coir fiberPLA25–150 °C: attributed to the evaporation of water.190 °C and 290 °C: corresponds to the hemicellulose degradation.290 °C and 360 °C: the thermal degradation of cellulose. The degradation of lignin occurred between 280 °C and 500 °C[146]
Kenaf and Rice huskPLA30–150 °C: The evaporation of the moisture absorbed in fibers.230–350 °C: The degradation of the cellulosic substances of hemicelluloses, cellulose and lignin.-[147]
Sisal fillerPolyurethane (PU)-297 °C: the hemicellulose degradation.365 °C: corresponded to cellulose degradation[148]
Carpinus betulus L.Polypropylene (PP)-223–290 °C: the hemicellulose degradation.290–380 °C:
the cellulose and lignin degradation		[149]
Table
Table 3. Thermal properties of natural fiber composites obtained from TGA analysis.
Table 3. Thermal properties of natural fiber composites obtained from TGA analysis.
FiberMatrixThermal PropertiesRef.
Thermoset matrices
BambooEpoxy, Polyester and Vinyl esterThe incorporation of bamboo fiber did not present a substantial improvement in the initial onset degradation temperature (Tonset) of the composites.[85]
FiqueLinear Low-Density Polyethylene (LLDP) and Epoxy resin (EP)The incorporation of the fique fiber in LLDP matrix decreased the Tonset and Tmax when compared to pure LLDP composite. For the EP, the fiber incorporation increased in Tonset and Tmax compared to the pure epoxy case.[145]
Buriti and ramiePolyesterThe maximum peak of degradation temperature (Td) for the ramie fiber reinforced composite was 372 °C, while for the buriti composite it was 346 °C.[84]
Sisal, sisal +
curauá and sisal + ramie		EpoxyThe hybridization increased the thermal stability of the composites when compared to the pure sisal composites.[107]
Banana, jute
Banana + jute		EpoxyThe thermal diffusivity and specific heat capacity of jute/banana hybrid composite decreased with increasing the fiber content.[137]
Sugar PalmPhenolicThe chemical treatment negatively affected the thermal stability of the composite.[53]
Sisal and kenafPolyesterThe thermal stability of hybrid composites was superior when compared to the neat fiber case[150]
Sugar palm fiber (SPF) and roselle fiber (RF)PolyurethaneThe sugar palm fiber (SP) improved thermal stability of hybrid composite. The roselle (25 wt%) + sugar palm (75 wt%) composite showed higher thermal stability when compared to RFT composite.[104]
Jute, jute + sisal and jute + curauáEpoxy and PolyesterTonset was higher for the jute, jute + curauá epoxy composites compared to polyester composites. For jute + sisal there was no significant change in Tonset for both matrices.[19]
Kenaf +
pineapple		PhenolicThe treatment increased the maximum degradation temperature (Td).[52]
CurauáPolyesterThe addition of the fiber and chemical treatment of fibers with NaOH improved the thermal stability of the composites.[86]
MulberryPolyesterThe thermal stability of the composites increased by increasing the NaOH concentration.[82]
Jute +
Oil palm		EpoxyThe hybridization of the composites increased the maximum degradation temperature when compared to the pure Oil palm composite.[141]
Date palm fibers (DPF)EpoxyDPF improves the thermal stability of the composite. E′ and E″ increased (50% DPF presented higher improvement compared to 40% and 60% DPF content). [157]
Thermoplastic matrices
BananaABS, high impact polystyrene (HIPS) and HDPEThe addition of natural fiber to the thermoplastic matrix showed an increased thermal stability when compared to the pure resin.[110]
Date palmPVC and HDPE The chemical treatment improved the Tonset and Tmax of the date palm reinforced composites when compared to the untreated composite and the pure matrix.[70]
Basalt + Cissus quadrangularisPLAThe addition of basalt fiber increased the thermal stability of the composite.[158]
JutePLAThe configuration 2J5P-2 (2 layers of jute and 5 layers of PLA) of composite showed an increase in Tonset and Tmax when compared to the other cases.[152]
Wood powderPolypropylene (PP)The incorporation of wood powder presented maximum temperature (482.3 °C) for 45 wt% when compared to pure PP composite (475.3 °C).[159]
Flax + BasaltPLAThe hybridization of the composite showed an increase in Tonset when compared to the flax + PLA composite. The increment of basalt fiber increased the thermal stability of the composite.[151]
Banana PLAThe presence of banana fibers in PLA matrix led to a reduction in degradation temperature as compared to neat PLA, which was attributed to the low thermal stability of banana fibers that possibly enhanced deformation of the crystalline structure of PLA at higher temperatures.[57]
Jute + Maleic anhydride (MAPP)Polypropylene (PP)The incorporation of MAPP did not have significant influence on the thermal stability of the composites.[160]
Kenaf + epoxidized jatropha oil (EJO)PLAThe incorporation of EJO (5 wt%) slightly increased the thermal stability (Tonset and Tend) of composites when compared to EJO (1 wt%).[161]
SisalPolyurethane (PU)The chemical treatment improved the thermal stability when compared with untreated composite.[148]
Carpinus betulus L.Polypropylene (PP)The addition of fiber lowered the thermal stability when compared with pure PP matrix.[149]
Table
Table 4. Thermal properties of natural and hybrid composites obtained from DSC analysis.
Table 4. Thermal properties of natural and hybrid composites obtained from DSC analysis.
FiberMatrixThermal PropertiesRef.
Thermoset Matrices
CurauáPolyesterThe chemical treatments used increased the Tg of the composites. The best treatment was Ca (OH)2 with a Tg value of 141.92 °C.[86]
Jute + ZrO2PolyesterThe presence of the nanofiller increased the Tg of the composite.[165]
Jute+ ramieEpoxyAlkalization and mixed (alkalization + silane) treatment increased the thermal properties.[65]
CarananEpoxyThe endothermic peak shows a large amount of water retained in the fiber.[136]
Jute + sisalEpoxyThe addition of natural fiber produced an increase of thermal properties (Tg and Tc).[164]
Hemp+ eggshellEpoxyThe incorporation of filler reduced the exothermic peak of the composite.[134]
Flax + Pineapple + Micro Cellulose (CMF)EpoxyThe addition of CMF improved the endothermic peak and enthalpy when compared to the unmodified composite.[116]
Kenaf + SisalBio-EpoxyUV aging increased the Tg of hybrid composites and pure fibers.[166]
Jute + coirEpoxyThe endothermic peak showed water loss between 60–120 °C.[167]
Flax + TiO2EpoxyThe addition of 0.7% of nanofiller increased the Tg by 5 °C when compared to the unfilled composite.[168]
Thermoplastic matrices
Cotton Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) The mixed (alkali–silane) treated composite presented higher values for Tg when compared with other chemical treatments.[80]
BambooPolypropylene (PP)The incorporation of natural fiber and nanofiller (TiO2) improved the crystallization temperature (Tc) when compared to pure PP composite.[169]
Pine cone (Pinus elliottii)ABSThe chemical treatment (NaOH) increased the Tg of the composite when compared to pure ABS composite.[93]
Wood powderPolypropylene (PP)The addition of wood powder (15 wt% and 30 wt%) showed no significant change for the melting temperature (Tm). However, the composite with 45 wt% presented a decrease of 2 °C in Tm.[159]
BambooPLAThe alkalinization treatment of bamboo fiber increases thermal stability (Tg and Tc) when compared to untreated composites.[170]
Date palmPVC and HDPEThe chemical treatment (H2O2+ HNO3) increased the Tg of the date palm reinforced composite when compared to the other treatments and the pure matrix.[70]
Kenaf fiber;
up to 10% (w/w) of thymol		PLANo change in Tg with an increase in kenaf fiber content unless when plasticizer is used. A decrease in all of the key thermal transitions with the addition of 5% and 10% (w/w) thymol into the neat PLA and PLA/kenaf composites was found.[171]
Coir fibersPLAAddition of coir fibers increased the Tg and degree of crystallinity while the crystallization temperature decreased.[172]
Coir fibersPLAAddition of coir fibers in PLA matrix does not affect the Tg and melting temperatures of the coir fiber-reinforced PLA. However, the cold crystallization temperatures decreased with increasing fiber content[146]
Basalt + Cissus quadrangularisPLAThe PBC2 (PLA + 12 wt% of basalt + 0.5 wt% of Cissus quadrangularis) composite showed maximum Tg = 58.72 °C and Xc = 24.43%.[158]
Table
Table 5. Thermal properties of natural composites obtained from DMA analysis.
Table 5. Thermal properties of natural composites obtained from DMA analysis.
FiberMatrixThermal PropertiesRef.
Thermoset Matrices
Jute + sisalEpoxyThe hybridization increased the storage modulus (E′) of composites. Tg of the hybrid composites was lower compared to pure jute composite.[164]
KenafPolyurethane (PU)The acetylated treatment presented better values for storage modulus (E′) when compared with all other treatments.[90]
Pineapple + kenafPhenolicThe treated pineapple fiber increased the Tg of the composites.[52]
MulberryPolyester10% of NaOH treatment increased the storage modulus (E′) of the composite. The fibers decreased the Tg (values of 69 °C was found for the neat resin and 63 °C was found for the untreated composites).[82]
Aloevera /Hemp/FlaxEpoxyThe hybridization and chemical treatment (BaSO4) increased the storage modulus (E′) and Tg of composites.[180]
Kenaf + Nanofiller
CNFs		EpoxyThe incorporation of nanofiller improved the Tg of the composites and improved thermal stability and residual char of kenaf/epoxy composites. [181]
Kenaf (KKK), Sisal (SSS) and Kenaf + Sisal (KSK and SKS)Bio-EpoxyThe incorporation of fibers (sisal and kenaf) did not affect the Tg of the composites. The hybridization increased the values of storage modulus (E′) when compared to pure resin.[166]
Jute + NanoclayEpoxyThe nanoclay modified jute composites presented higher E′, E″ and tan δ values. The composites modified with 5 wt% of nanoclay had improved viscoelastic properties. 5% treated jute fiber composites presented the highest E′ and E″ values but the lowest tan δ value. 5% NaOH + 5 wt% nanoclay specimens presented higher storage modulus and Tg.[71]
Bamboo +
Kenaf +
Nanoclay		EpoxyThe addition of the nanofiller improved the storage modulus, loss modulus and tan δ when compared to the other hybrid composite.[182]
Ramie + BuritiPolyesterThe ramie reinforced composite treated with 2% de NaOH presented higher storage modulus and loss modulus compared to the other treated cases.[84]
Jute +
Oil palm		EpoxyHigh oil palm to jute fiber ratio lowered the storage modulus. Loss modulus presented an increasing trend as a function of increasing jute fiber content.[141]
Bamboo + KenafEpoxyThe complex and storage modulus of bamboo composite are higher compared to kenaf composite. Hybrid composites value lie between bamboo and kenaf composites.[179]
Date palm + BambooEpoxyThe hybridization of the composite presents an increase of storage modulus (E′) when compared with single fiber composites.[69]
BuritiEpoxyThe addition of buriti fiber improved the storage modulus (E′) and Tg when compared with pure epoxy.[183]
Thermoplastic matrices
Flax + BasaltPLAThe addition of natural fiber increased the storage modulus (E′) of the composites when compared to pure PLA composite.[151]
Date palmPVC and HDPEThe chemical treatments increased the properties of Tg and storage modulus (E′) when compared to untreated composites and pure matrix.[70]
SisalPLAThe sisal fiber with 15% weight fraction increased the thermal properties with maximum storage (E′ = 3430 MPa) and maximum loss moduli (E″ = 245 MPa). [184]
Bamboo, wood and coconutPLAThe addition of natural fibers increased the crystalline degree of PLA matrix. Also, increased the storage modulus (E′) when compared with pure PLA.[185]
sugar palm fiber (SPF)- and kenaf fiber (KF)-Polypropylene (PP)The hybrid composite with the best ratio (PP/SPF/KF), T-SP5K5, showed a loss modulus (E″) of 86.2 MPa and a damping factor of 0.058. [61]
RamiePLAThe chemical treatments (NaOH and Silane) showed maximum storage modulus (E′) when compared to untreated composite.[186]
Coir + pineapple leafPLAThe hybridization of the composite showed an increase of storage modulus (E′) and loss modulus (E″) when compared to pure PLA.[187]
Carpinus betulus L.PPThe incorporation of nanofiller increased the storage modulus (E′) and Tg when compared with pure PP. [149]
KenafPLAThe randomly oriented (ROFRPC) composite showed highest storage modulus (E′) when compared with unidirectional (UDFRPC) and bidirectional (BDFRPC) kenaf composites. The incorporation of different kenaf mats with PLA improved the Tg of the composites as compared to neat PLA. ROFRPC showed the highest value of Tg.[188]
Basalt (BF)PLAThe addition of BF improved the storage modulus (E′) when compared with pure PLA. Increasing the fiber content decreased tan δ (the presence of BF prevents the chain mobility of the pure PLA).The addition of BF had little influence on the Tg and Tm of the PLA composites.[189]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Neto, J.S.S.; de Queiroz, H.F.M.; Aguiar, R.A.A.; Banea, M.D. A Review on the Thermal Characterisation of Natural and Hybrid Fiber Composites. Polymers 2021, 13, 4425. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244425

AMA Style

Neto JSS, de Queiroz HFM, Aguiar RAA, Banea MD. A Review on the Thermal Characterisation of Natural and Hybrid Fiber Composites. Polymers. 2021; 13(24):4425. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244425

Chicago/Turabian Style

Neto, Jorge S. S., Henrique F. M. de Queiroz, Ricardo A. A. Aguiar, and Mariana D. Banea. 2021. "A Review on the Thermal Characterisation of Natural and Hybrid Fiber Composites" Polymers 13, no. 24: 4425. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244425

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop