Next Article in Journal
Effect of Finish Line Design on the Fit Accuracy of CAD/CAM Monolithic Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic-Network Fixed Dental Prostheses: An In Vitro Study
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Characterization of Super-Absorbing Gel Formulated from κ-Carrageenan–Potato Peel Starch Blended Polymers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 24
10.3390/polym13244309
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Selenium-Functionalized Corn Starch as a Biodegradable GPx Mimic with High Catalytic Performance

by
Shufei Jiao
1,
Zijie Liu
1,
Min Liu
1,
Yongxian Liu
2,
Shuming Zhong
1,
Feng Wang
1,* and
Yanzhen Yin
1,*
1
School Petroleum and Chemical Engineering, Beibu Gulf University, Qinzhou 535011, China
2
Agricultural Resource and Environment Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 535007, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(24), 4309; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244309
Submission received: 9 November 2021 / Revised: 28 November 2021 / Accepted: 3 December 2021 / Published: 9 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Multiple Application for Novel and Advanced Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Selenium-functionalized starch (Se-starch80) is one of the main functional foods used for selenium supplementation. In traditional agriculture, Se-starch has some deficiencies such as long growth cycle and unstable selenium content that prevent its antioxidant performance. In this study, Se-starch was prepared by the nucleophilic addition between NaSeH and carbon-carbon double bond of octenyl succinic anhydride waxy corn starch ester (OSA starch). Some techniques such as 1HNMR, XPS, SEM-EDS, XRD and FT-IR were used to characterize the relevant samples and the results showed that the modification did not destroy the starch framework significantly and the catalytic center (negative divalent selenium) was anchored on the starch framework. The intensive distribution of catalytic center on the starch surface and the hydrophobic microenvironments derived from the OSA chains furnished the Se-starch80 with a high GPx-like catalytic activity (initial reaction rate = 3.64 μM/min). This value was about 1.5 × 105 times higher than that of a typical small-molecule GPx mimic (PhSeSePh). In addition, the Se-starch80, without any cytotoxicity, showed a saturated kinetic catalytic behavior that is similar to a typical enzyme. This work exemplifies a biodegradable selenium-functionalized polymer platform for the high-performing GPx mimic.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Selenium (Se) is an important trace element that participates in the synthesis of 25 Se-containing proteins in the human body. Glutathione peroxidase (GPx), with the –SeH catalytic center, is a particularly important antioxidant enzyme that scavenges the excess free radicals in human body. GPx and therefore protects human against oxidative damage [1], inflammation [2], cancer [3], and Keshan disease [4,5]. As the continuous increase in health awareness and healthcare, it is widely concerned to obtain selenium-functionalized supplementation for maintaining the health [6,7,8]. In the traditional cultivation, Se-functionalized nutrients are mainly in the form of selenide protein deriving from wheat [9,10,11], rice [12,13,14], potato [15,16], etc. Due to the low protein content in these crops and the complex and long growth period of plant, the selenium content is unstable in targeted products. To solve this problem, in the past decade, many GPx mimics such as small molecules [17,18], block copolymers [19,20], supramolecular materials [21], and nanomaterials [22] with stable selenium component have been designed and evaluated the antioxidant efficacy. However, most of these GPx mimics is limited in the application of food and drugs since their biotoxicity and poor biodegradability. Therefore, it is still a challenge to obtain biodegradable Se-functionalized supplements with stable selenium content.
Starch, one of the most important foods for human diet, is expected to be an ideal food source of selenium supplements. However, due to the limited metabolic process, the selenium-containing starch from natural plants is rarely found so far. Compared with protein, starch reveals a more stable structure in the chemical modifications. Sun et al. [23] synthesized a novel biodegradable starch-based hydrogel by using starch and Se-containing cross-linker. Such hydrogel revealed multi stimuli responsiveness property like enzyme hydrolysis and redox responsive cleavage, making it a promising biomedical candidate of controlled drug delivery. Kazemi et al. [24] prepared colloidal selenium nanoparticles in a starch matrix and showed its nontoxicity in colorectal cancer SW480 cell via the MTT assay. Moreover, the selenium nanoparticles encapsulated in a starch matrix (NC Se/St), as an effective and environmentally safe agent, revealed a targeted low-dose delivery to bacterial phytopathogens [25]. These studies indicated that the starch combined with selenium is biodegradable and safe in the medical application. Unfortunately, the Se-containing starch with GPx-like catalytic activity has not been synthesized and studied.
It is well-known that the octenyl succinic anhydride starch ester (OSA starch) is a typical modified starch with wide applications in foods and medicines [26,27]. In the OSA starch skeleton, the olefinic bond, as a reactive group, could react with sodium hydrogen selenide (NaSeH) via the nucleophilic addition and generate the –SeH. While the –SeH is the typical catalytic center of GPx [28]. Inspired by these, in this work, the OSA starch was firstly employed as the raw material to produce a biodegradable starch-based GPx mimic (Se-starch) via the reaction with NaSeH (Scheme 1). Simultaneously, the synthesis conditions, such as reaction time, reaction temperature, and the component of reactants were optimized to obtain the Se-starch with high catalytic activity. The structural characterizations of the samples were conducted in 1H NMR, XPS, SEM-EDS, etc. The catalytic mechanism of Se-starch as a GPx mimic was also studied in vitro. In addition, a MTT assay was used to investigate the cytotoxicity of Se-starch. This study may provide a new method for preparing the Se-functionalized starch with high GPx-like catalytic activity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Octenyl succinic anhydride waxy corn starch ester (OSA Starch, food grade) with a degree of substitution (DS) of 2.2%, was purchased from Guangxi State Farms Mingyang Starch Development Co., Ltd., Nanning, China. Chemicals including cumene hydrogen peroxide (CUOOH), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), selenium powder, sodium borohydride (NaBH), and 4-nitrothiophenol (NBT) were purchased from J&K Scientific, Ltd., San Jose, CA, USA. Ethanoland sodium hydroxidewere of analytical grade and purchased from Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd., Shantou, China. 3-Carboxy-4 nitrothiophenol (TNB) was synthesized according to the previously reported method [29]. Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HepG2 was obtained from Cell Bank of the Type Culture Collection Committee of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

2.2. Preparation of Selenium-Functionalized Waxy Corn Starch

To obtain a NaSeH stock solution, equimolar amounts of Se powder and NaBH4 were added to a 100 mL flask, and then an appropriate amount of a mixed solvent of ethanol and H2O was slowly added into this flask under N2 atmosphere. This flask was held for 2 h at room temperature to get the NaSeH solution. OSA starch (10.0 g) and the mixture of ethanol and H2O (100 mL) (the volume ratio of ethanol was 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90%, respectively) were placed in a 250 mL flask and vigorously stirred for 30 min. Then, a certain amount of NaSeH solution (the mole ratio of NaSeH to −HC=CH− was 1:1, 1.2:1, 1.5:1, 1.8:1, and 2.2:1, respectively) was slowly added to the above solution in an ice bath, and the pH of the solution was adjusted to the range of 8–10 using NaOH solution (0.1 M). Next, the flask was transferred to a water bath with different temperatures (30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 °C, respectively) for the reaction. After holding for the preset time (between 1 and 8 h), the reaction was terminated by adjusting the solution pH to be about 3 using 0.1% HCl solution. Then, ethanol (about 500 mL) was added into the system over 20 min to precipitate the Se-starch. The starch precipitate was collected by a vacuum filter, and washed successively using 75% ethanol and anhydrous ethanol. Finally, the product was vacuum-dried at 50 °C for 24 h.

2.3. Characterizations of Se-Starch

A Bruker Advance III HD 500 MHz NMR spectrometer was used to record the 1HNMR spectra of the related samples that were dissolved in D2O. Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were collected using a Frontier FT-IR spectrometer (Perkin Elmer) with the attenuated total reflection mode. The scan range of wavenumber was 500–4000 cm−1. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM, 6700F, JEOL) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) for the Se-starch samples were performed on a 6700F microscope (JEOL). A D8 ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer (Cu-Kα radiation, λ = 0.154 nm; Bruker) was employed to collect the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples over a 2θ range from 5 to 40°, with a tube voltage of 40 kV and a tube current of 40 mA. A Thermo fisher Scientific K-Alpha XPS spectrometer (Mono Al Kα (hv = 1486.6 eV), X-ray source of 72 W, wide-scan and high resolution spectra of 100.0 eV and 40 eV, set the C 1s peak to 284.6 eV) was employed to analyze elemental compositions and the selenium form. The Se content of Se-starch was determined using an atomic fluorescence spectrometer (AFS-9530, Beijing Haiguang). The fluorescence spectra of the pyrene-containing samples were recorded on a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Agilent Cary Eclipse) with the excitation wavelength of 335 nm.

2.4. Determination of the Catalytic Activity of Se-Starch

The catalytic activity of sample was determined according to the method reported by Wu and Hilvert [30], using NBT or TNB as an alternative of glutathione (GSH). In a typical test, 700 µL of phosphate buffer (PBS, pH = 7.0), 100 µL of Se-starch dispersion, and 100 µL of NBT or TNB solution (1.5 mM) were added into a quartz cuvette. The mixture in the quartz cuvette was uniformly pre-incubated for 2 min at room temperature. Then, the enzymatic reaction was initiated by adding 100 µL of CUOOH or H2O2 (2.5 mM) as the substrates. The decrease in the absorption at 410 nm was monitored by an UV spectrophotometer (UV2600, Shimadzu). The catalytic activity (namely the antioxidant performance) of Se-starch was expressed by the initial reaction rate (v0, μM/min) of the enzymatic reaction, which was calculated by the following equation,
v 0 = Δ A ε × L × Δ t
where Δt is the time of the enzymatic reaction from initiation to termination; ΔA is the change of the absorbance during the enzymatic reaction within Δt; ε is the molar extinction coefficient of NBT or TNB (ε(NBT) = 14,600 1/M∙cm, ε(TNB) = 13,600 1/M∙cm, pH = 7.0); L is the optical path length of the quartz cuvette (L = 1 cm). Triplicates experiments were conducted to get the average v0.
v 0 = v 0 [ S ] [ S ] + K m
1 v 0 = ( K m v m a x ) 1 [ S ] + 1 v m a x
According to the Michaelis and Menten equation (Equation (2)) and double reciprocal plot (Equation (3)), the Michaelis constant (Km, µM) and the maximum reaction rate (vmax, µM/min) are determined using the Linear-regression curve by plotting 1/v0 against 1/[S], in which the intercept is 1/vmax and the intercept is the absolute value of 1/Km. The [S] is the concentration of substrate [31].
K cat = v max / [ E ]
The reaction constant (Kcat, 1/min) was calculated using Equation (4), where the [E] is the concentration of enzyme.

2.5. Cell Viability Assays

MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay was used to measure the cytotoxicity of Se-starch80 toward HepG2 cells according to the previously reported literature [32]. The density of cell was 2 × 105 cells per well. The concentration of the Se-starch80 for incubating the cell varied from 10 to 1000 µg/mL. The optical density was measured using a microplate reader (PerkinElmer Victor X5) at 490 nm. The relative cell viability was depicted as the percentage relative to the optical density derived from the control test.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Preparation and Structural Characterization of Se-Starch 80

In this work, as shown in Scheme 1, thecatalytic center (−SeH) was directly introduced into the OSA starch via the nucleophilic addition between NaSeH and the −HC=CH− in OSA starch. According to the optimization of preparation process for the selenium-functionalized starch (presented later in this work), the Se-starch (Se-starch80) that was produced under the conditions of volume ratio of ethanol 80%, temperature 30 °C, n(NaSeH):n(alkene) = 1.5:1 and reaction time 6 h revealed the highest catalytic activity. Such Se-starch with the Se content of 0.033 mg/kg was selected for the characterizations.
In order to determine the selenization reaction mechanism, the 1H NMR spectroscopy was used to characterize the changes of OSA starch during the reaction. As shown in Figure 1, for the OSA starch, the 1H NMR spectrum showed a proton signal peak at 5.25 ppm, which was ascribed the proton of −HC=CH− in the OSA chains [33]. This peak almost disappeared in the 1H NMR spectrum of Se-starch80, suggesting the −HC=CH− participated in the reaction. In this reaction system, NaSeH is a strong nucleophile that can undergo a reaction similar to the −SH and −HC=CH− groups [34]. While the −HC=CH− is the group with the maximum reactivity in the OSA starch toward NaSeH. Therefore, it could be concluded that the nucleophilic addition reaction occurred between NaSeH and −HC=CH−, resulting in the disappearance of the proton signal of −HC=CH−. The selenium in the Se-starch80 was confirmed using XPS, as shown in Figure 2A. The peaks located at 531, 497, 285 and 54 eV were assigned to oxygen, sodium, carbon, and selenium signal, respectively. In the locally magnified image, the Se(3d3/2, 5/2) signal peak appeared at about 54 eV, indicating the negative bivalent selenium (Se2−) in the Se-starch [35]. Generally, NaSeH can be easily oxidized by O2 to form the red nano Se0. However, the Se-starch was white, which further proved that the −SeH was covalently bonded to the starch skeleton, rather than being presented as elemental selenium, which is usually gray or red [36]. Furthermore, the EDS results for Se-starch80 showed that the Se was evenly distributed on the surface of the starch particles with a content of 3 wt% (Figure 2B). This content is significantly greater than that of the value determined by AFS (0.033 mg/kg, 3.3 × 10−6 wt%). These results suggested that the anchored −SeH was mainly distributed on the surface of starch, which would profit the exposure of the active center for catalytic reaction.
The OSA starch granule showed a smooth surface (Figure 2C), while a rough surface with grooves was observed in the Se-starch80 (Figure 2D). This morphology change of the starch during the modificationmight be due to the NaSeH, a strong alkali would gelatinize or destruct the starch [37]. The FT-IR spectrum of Se-starch80 presented the characteristic peaks at 3440 cm−1 (O−H stretching), 2930 cm−1 (C−H stretching) [38,39], 1652 cm−1 (C=O stretching), 1021 cm−1 (C−O stretching) [40]. These peaks were almost identical to that of OSA starch (Figure 3A). However, the intensity of the O−H stretching (partially relevant to the bound water) for Se-starch80 was lower than that of the OSA starch. One probable explanation is that the outer portion of starch was gelatinized by the NaSeH solution, resulting in a decrease of bound water on the starch surface [41]. In addition, the dehydration of starch by reaction medium with high ethanol content might be the other cause of the decrease of O−H stretching. The structure change for starch during the modification was further studied by XRD (Figure 3B). The XRD pattern for Se-starch80 with a diffraction peak at about 19.4° was similar to that of OSA starch, indicating that the Se-functionalized reaction mainly arose on the surface of starch and did not dramatically damage the internal skeleton of starch [41].

3.2. Optimization of the Preparation Process of Se-Starch

Similar to natural enzymes, the catalytic activity of GPx mimic may be greatly affected by structural changes in their skeleton, catalytic center, and peripheral recognition [12,24]. For the Se-starch, the starch provided a degradable framework with −SeH as the catalytic center, and formed a coarse surface with grooves, which was similar to the natural GPx. In addition, the OSA molecular chains offered the Se-starch surface with hydrophobic microenvironment, which could also influence the catalytic activity. These factors would be affected by the reaction condition. Therefore, the effect of the reaction conditions including reaction time, reaction temperature, n(NaSeH):n(-HC=CH-), and volume ratio of ethanol (V%) on the Se content and catalytic activity (υ0, μM/min) were investigated. The NBT and CUOOH were used as the substrates to test the υ0. Figure 4A shows the effect of reaction time on the Se content and υ0 under the conditions of reaction temperature 40 °C, n(NaSeH):n(−HC=CH−) = 1:1 and volume ratio of ethanol 30%. The υ0, similar to the Se content, increased with the prolongation of reaction time in the initial stage of 6 h. Due to the equilibrium of reaction, the further increase of reaction time did not promote the υ0 and the Se content significantly. Therefore, the reaction time of 6 h was selected for preparing Se-starch.
The effect of reaction temperature on the Se content and υ0 under the conditions of reaction time 6 h, n(NaSeH):n(−HC=CH−) = 1:1, and volume ratio of ethanol 30% was conducted by altering the temperature from 30 to 70 °C (Figure 4B). The Se content almost did not changed at the temperature range from 30 to 60 °C, while dropped remarkably at 70 °C. A possible explanation is that the reverse reaction of the nucleophilic addition reaction was dominant at high temperature. For the υ0, it decreased slightly as the temperature increased from 30 to 60 °C and declined significantly at 70 °C. The reduction of υ0 would attribute to the decrease of Se. The partial gelatinization of the starch at high temperature would cover the Se active center, which might be the other reason for the decrease of υ0. Therefore, the nucleophilic addition reaction between NaSeH and OSA starch was performed at 30 °C. The influence of the NaSeH content on the reaction was studied by changing the n(NaSeH):n(−HC=CH−) from 1.0 to 2.2 at the conditions of reaction time 6 h, reaction temperature 30 °C, and volume ratio of ethanol 30%. As shown in Figure 4C, the Se content increased with the increase of the molar ratio of NaSeH and −HC=CH−, whereas the υ0 did not change significantly as the molar ratio of NaSeH and −HC=CH− increased. This result might be ascribed to the partial gelatinization of starch by alkaline NaSeH, which coated the Se active center and hindered its catalysis. Although the high content of NaSeH could promote the Se content of Se-starch, the excessive NaSeH resulted in a troublesome purification of the product. Therefore, the molar ratio of NaSeH and −HC=CH− was set to be 1.5 for the further experiments.
Figure 4D reveals the effect of volume ratio of ethanol (V%) on the Se content and υ0 under the conditions of reaction time 6 h, reaction temperature 30 °C, and n(NaSeH):n(−HC=CH−) = 1.5:1. At the low volume ratio of ethanol (such as V% = 0, 10, and 20%), the OSA starch was completely emulsified and dispersed in the solution, resulting in a difficulty for separating the products from the solution (Figure 4E). The increase of the V% from 30% to 60% caused the aggregation of the soluble OSA starch, forming a bulk precipitation with high adhesion. This cohesive precipitation with limited reactive site to be exposed would restrict the nucleophilic addition reaction, resulting in a low Se content and catalytic activity. As the further increase of the V%, the OSA starch particles could be dispersed freely in the reaction system, which benefited the heterogeneous reaction between NaSeH and OSA starch and consequently caused the increase of the Se content as well as the υ0. The decline of the υ0 at V% = 90% might be due to the dehydration of starch by ethanol, which could compact the starch to decrease the exposure of catalytic center. In addition, the change of the surface property of starch by dehydration might be the other reason of the decline of the υ0 at V% = 90%. Therefore, the optimized volume ratio of ethanol for the reaction system was 80%. Taken together, the optimized reaction conditions for preparing Se-starch were as follow: reaction time 6 h, temperature 30 °C, molar ratio of NaSeH to −HC=CH− 1.5 and volume ratio of ethanol 80%, in which the targeted Se-starch (Se-starch80) revealed a high catalytic activity (υ0 = 3.64 μM/min). This value is 1.5 × 105 times higher than the catalytic activity of a typical small-molecule GPx mimic (PhSeSePh) at the reaction system of NBT and CUOOH.

3.3. Catalytic Mechanism and Catalytic behavior of Se-Starch80

In general, the combinations with different substrates were used to analyze the effect of the hydrophobic interaction and the substrate recognition sites between substrates and the catalyst [42,43]. As the typical substrate, 4-nitrothiophenol (NBT, a hydrophobic substrate) and 3-carboxy-4-nitrothiophenol (TNB, a hydrophilic substrate) were used as the reductive thiophenol substrates, while H2O2 and CUOOH were used as the hydroperoxide substrates. H2O2 is more hydrophilic than the CUOOH for the absence of the p-cumyl group in H2O2. These substrate combinations were employed to test the catalytic activity of Se-starch80 (Scheme 2), in which the concentrations of thiophenol substrate and hydroperoxide substrate were 150 µM and 250 µM, respectively. As shown in Table 1, Se-starch80 revealed different υ0 at the reaction systems with various substrates. In the system containing both hydrophobic substrates (NBT + CUOOH), Se-starch80 exhibited the highestυ0, while it showed the minimumυ0 in the system of TNB and H2O2, two hydrophilic substrates. These results suggested that the hydrophobic interaction played an important role in the catalysis. The hydrophobic microenvironments in the Se-starch80 were testified by the pyrene fluorescence probe experiment [44] (Figure 5). The pyrene solution (C = 1.0 × 10−6 M) revealed a fluorescence intensity ratio (I1/I3, the indicator of hydrophobicity) of 1.81 at peak 1 (372 nm) and peak 3 (383 nm). However, the solution containing pyrene (concentration = 1.0 × 10−6 M) and Se-starch80 with a lower I1/I3 of 1.66, indicating the formation of hydrophobic microenvironments in the Se-starch80 for gathering pyrene molecule [45]. The OSA starch, without −SeH, did not present any catalytic activity in the system of NBT + CUOOH, suggesting the key function of Se in the catalysis. In the system of TNB + CUOOH, the υ0 of Se-starch80 was comparable to that of Micellar Catalyst (Table 1), a previously reported GPx mimic with high catalytic activity [46].
The catalytic behavior of Se-starch80 was further investigated by changing the concentration of hydroperoxide substrates at the system containing the thiophenol substrates (0.15 mM). As shown in Figure 6, for all substrate combinations, the catalytic activity of Se-starch80 increased with the rise of the concentration of hydroperoxide substrates and then arrived at the equilibrium, suggesting a saturation kinetic catalytic behavior. This catalytic behavior was similar to a typical catalytic behavior of enzyme. Based on the profiles of υ0 versus the concentrations of hydroperoxide substrates, some catalytic kinetic parameters such as the maximum reaction rate (vmax, µM/min), the reaction constant (Kcat, 1/min), Michaelis‒Menten constant (Km, µM), and the catalytic efficiency (Kcat/Km, 1/M∙min) were calculated and listed in Table 2. The Km, an index of the affinity between catalyst and substrates, designates the concentration of substrate at v = 0.5 vmax, where v is the reaction rate. A lower Km indicates a stronger affinity between catalyst and substrates. Taking the reaction system of CUOOH + TNB and the system of CUOOH + NBT as the comparison, the Km of Se-starch80 at the system of CUOOH + TNB is inferior to the Km derived from the system of CUOOH + NBT, indicating that Se-starch80 revealed a higher affinity to NBT than TNB. The higher affinity for TNB could be due to the bearing of –COOH, which could interact with the hydroxyl of starch via hydrogen bond. However, the catalytic activity (υ0) and the catalytic kinetic parameters including υmax, Kcat, and Kcat/Km of Se-starch80 in the system of CUOOH + TNB were smaller than that in the system of CUOOH + NBT. A possible explanation was that the strong affinity of Se-starch80 toward TNB resulted in a poor dissociation of the substrate from catalyst after catalytic reaction. The active centers in the catalyst were occupied by the bonded substrates, which hindered the subsequent reaction and consequently decreased the catalytic activity of Se-starch80.

3.4. Cytotoxicity of Se-Starch80

The exposure of Se-starch80 to the proliferation of HepG2 cancer cells was conducted to test the cells growth in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 7). For all Se-starch80 concentrations in the media (10–1000 g/mL), the HepG2 cell viability was marginally greater than 100%, suggesting the facilitation of cell proliferation by Se-starch80. This result might be attributed to the antioxidative activity of Se-starch80 as a GPx mimic. Overall, the Se-starch80, without any cytotoxicity, promoted the cell growth, suggesting that the biodegradable selenium-functionalized corn starch may be a good candidate for antioxidant enzyme mimic [23,47].

4. Conclusions

In this paper, a new strategy for producing the Se-functionalized starch with GPx-like catalytic activity was developed by the nucleophilic addition between NaSeH and OSA waxy corn starch. The covalently linked −SeH on the starch surface provided it with catalytic centers, while the OSA chains supplied the hydrophobic microenvironments for gathering substrates. The optimal technological conditions for preparing Se-functionalized starch were that reaction time 6 h, temperature 30 °C, molar ratio of NaSeH to −HC=CH− 1.5 and volume ratio of ethanol 80%. Such Se-functionalized starch with a Se content of 0.033 mg/kg revealed a high capacity for catalyzing the reaction between CUOOH and NBT (v0 = 3.64 μM/min). The high catalytic activity of Se-functionalized starch was attributed to the intensive distribution of catalytic center on the surface of starch and the hydrophobic microenvironments. The Se-functionalized starch did not require any bioconversion to perform the GPx-like function and showed a typical saturated kinetic catalytic behavior. In addition, the biodegradable starch skeleton did not change significantly during the modification and such Se-functionalized starch had no toxicity to cells. Therefore, a non-toxic Se-starch was prepared by a chemical modified method, which is expected to become a novel supplement with GPx-like activity for solving the nutrient deficiency of selenium. This work may provide a potential for the preparation of Se-functionalized starch.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.J. and Y.Y.; methodology, Z.L.; software, S.J. and F.W.; validation, Y.Y. and M.L.; formal analysis, Y.Y. and M.L.; investigation, Y.Y. and Y.L.; resources, Y.Y.; data curation, Y.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Y.; writing—review and editing, F.W. and S.Z.; visualization, Y.Y.; supervision, Y.Y. and Y.L.; project administration, Y.Y.; funding acquisition, Y.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51663020; Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Guangxi Province, grant number 2017GXNSFFA198007; and Project of Guangxi Colleges and Universities for the Promotion of Foundation Ability of Young Teachers, grant number2021KY0436.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Qinzhou Key Laboratory of Biowaste Resources for Selenium-enriched Functional Utilization, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Materials and Safety Technology and GuangxiEngineeringResearchCenterforNew ChemicalMaterialsandSafetyTechnology. The authors acknowledge Guangxi Colleges and Universities Innovation Research Team.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ighodaro, O.M.; Akinloye, O.A. First line defence antioxidants-superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX): Their fundamental role in the entire antioxidant defence grid. Alex. J. Med. 2018, 54, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Li, C.; Deng, X.; Xie, X.; Liu, Y.; Friedmann Angeli, J.P.; Lai, L. Activation of Glutathione Peroxidase 4 as a Novel Anti-inflammatory Strategy. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chang, C.; Worley, B.L.; Phaëton, R.; Hempel, N. Extracellular Glutathione Peroxidase GPx3 and Its Role in Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xia, Y.; Hill, K.E.; Burk, R.F. Biochemical Studies of a Selenium-Deficient Population in China: Measurement of Selenium, Glutathione Peroxidase and Other Oxidant Defense Indices in Blood. J. Nutr. 1989, 119, 1318–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Loscalzo, J. Keshan disease, selenium deficiency, and the selenoproteome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 1756–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Toulis, K.A.; Anastasilakis, A.D.; Tzellos, T.G.; Goulis, D.G.; Kouvelas, D. Selenium Supplementation in the Treatment of Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis: A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis. Thyroid 2010, 20, 1163–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ibrahim, S.A.Z.; Kerkadi, A.; Agouni, A. Selenium and Health: An Update on the Situation in the Middle East and North Africa. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Méplan, C.; Hughes, D.J. The Role of Selenium in Health and Disease: Emerging and Recurring Trends. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cubadda, F.; Aureli, F.; Ciardullo, S.; D Amato, M.; Raggi, A.; Acharya, R.; Reddy, R.A.V.; Prakash, N.T. Changes in Selenium Speciation Associated with Increasing Tissue Concentrations of Selenium in Wheat Grain. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 2295–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lara, T.S.; Lessa, J.H.D.L.; de Souza, K.R.D.; Corguinha, A.P.B.; Martins, F.A.D.; Lopes, G.; Guilherme, L.R.G. Selenium biofortification of wheat grain via foliar application and its effect on plant metabolism. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2019, 81, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, M.; Ali, F.; Wang, M.; Dinh, Q.T.; Zhou, F.; Bañuelos, G.S.; Liang, D. Understanding boosting selenium accumulation in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) following foliar selenium application at different stages, forms, and doses. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 717–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Deng, X.; Liu, K.; Li, M.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, X. Difference of selenium uptake and distribution in the plant and selenium form in the grains of rice with foliar spray of selenite or selenate at different stages. Field Crop. Res. 2017, 211, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gong, R.; Ai, C.; Zhang, B.; Cheng, X. Effect of selenite on organic selenium speciation and selenium bioaccessibility in rice grains of two Se-enriched rice cultivars. Food Chem. 2018, 264, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hu, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Suzuki, N.; Guo, X.; Xiong, H.; Ogra, Y. Speciation of Selenium in Brown Rice Fertilized with Selenite and Effects of Selenium Fertilization on Rice Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Zhang, H.; Zhao, Z.; Nie, B.; Lyu, C.; Liu, X. Selenium loss and changes in product quality during cooking of selenium enriched potato tubers. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2021, 96, 103728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, H.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Huang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Yuan, L.; Liu, X. Effects of foliar application of selenate and selenite at different growth stages on Selenium accumulation and speciation in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Food Chem. 2019, 286, 550–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chuai, H.; Zhang, S.; Bai, H.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Sun, J.; Wen, E.; Zhang, J.; Xin, M. Small molecule selenium-containing compounds: Recent development and therapeutic applications. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 223, 113621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Köhrle, J. Selenium in Endocrinology—Selenoprotein-Related Diseases, Population Studies, and Epidemiological Evidence. Endocrinology 2021, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yin, Y.; Wang, L.; Jin, H.; Lv, C.; Yu, S.; Huang, X.; Luo, Q.; Xu, J.; Liu, J. Construction of a smart glutathione peroxidase mimic with temperature responsive activity based on block copolymer. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, S.; Li, T.; Guo, Y.; Sun, C.; Xianyu, B.; Xu, H. Selenium-Containing Nanoparticles Combine the NK Cells Mediated Immunotherapy with Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1907568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Dong, Z.; Luo, Q.; Liu, J. Artificial enzymes based on supramolecular scaffolds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7890–7908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Huang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liu, C.; Ju, E.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. Self-Assembly of Multi-nanozymes to Mimic an Intracellular Antioxidant Defense System. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 6646–6650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sun, T.; Zhu, C.; Xu, J. Multiple stimuli-responsive selenium-functionalized biodegradable starch-based hydrogels. Soft Matter 2018, 14, 921–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kazemi, M.; Akbari, A.; Sabouri, Z.; Soleimanpour, S.; Zarrinfar, H.; Khatami, M.; Darroudi, M. Green synthesis of colloidal selenium nanoparticles in starch solutions and investigation of their photocatalytic, antimicrobial, and cytotoxicity effects. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 44, 1215–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Perfileva, A.I.; Nozhkina, O.A.; Tretyakova, M.S.; Graskova, I.A.; Klimenkov, I.V.; Sudakov, N.P.; Alexandrova, G.P.; Sukhov, B.G. Biological Activity and Environmental Safety of Selenium Nanoparticles Encapsulated in Starch Macromolecules. Nanotechnol. Russ. 2020, 15, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, W.; Cheng, B.; Li, J.; Shu, Z.; Wang, P.; Zeng, X. Structure and Properties of Octenyl Succinic Anhydride-Modified High-Amylose Japonica Rice Starches. Polymers 2021, 13, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Altuna, L.; Herrera, M.L.; Foresti, M.L. Synthesis and characterization of octenyl succinic anhydride modified starches for food applications. A review of recent literature. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 80, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mansourian, M.; Sadeghi, H.; Doustimotlagh, A.H. Activation of the Glutathione Peroxidase by Metformin in the Bile-duct Ligation induced Liver Injury: In vivo Combined with Molecular Docking Studies. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 3256–3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dong, Z.; Liu, J.; Mao, S.; Huang, X.; Yang, B.; Ren, X.; Luo, G.; Shen, J. Aryl Thiol Substrate 3-Carboxy-4-Nitrobenzenethiol Strongly Stimulating Thiol Peroxidase Activity of Glutathione Peroxidase Mimic 2, 2’-Ditellurobis(2-Deoxy-β-Cyclodextrin). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16395–16404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, Z.P.; Hilvert, D. Selenosubtilisin as a glutathione peroxidase mimic. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5647–5648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pan, T.; Liu, Y.; Sun, H.; Xu, J.; Liu, J. Reversible Switch of a Selenium-Containing Antioxidant System Regulated by Protein Assembly. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 9735–9740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Song, R.; Cai, J.; Xu, J.; Tang, X.; Li, N. Ginger polysaccharides induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 123, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bai, Y.; Shi, Y.; Herrera, A.; Prakash, O. Study of octenyl succinic anhydride-modified waxy maize starch by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 83, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lopachin, R.M.; Gavin, T.; Geohagen, B.C.; Das, S. Neurotoxic Mechanisms of Electrophilic Type-2 Alkenes: Soft Soft Interactions Described by Quantum Mechanical Parameters. Toxicol. Sci. 2007, 98, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Prasanth, S.; Sudarsanakumar, C. Elucidating the interaction of L-cysteine-capped selenium nanoparticles and human serum albumin: Spectroscopic and thermodynamic analysis. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 9521–9530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khandsuren, B.; Prokisch, J. Preparation of red and grey elemental selenium for food fortification. Acta Aliment. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yan, H.; Zhengbiao, G.U. Morphology of modified starches prepared by different methods. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 767–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, Q.; Gao, Q. Synthesis, characterization and hydrophobicity of esterified waxy potato starch nanocrystals. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 130, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Song, X.; Zhu, W.; Li, Z.; Zhu, J. Characteristics and application of octenyl succinic anhydride modified waxy corn starch in sausage. Starch-Stärke 2010, 62, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Velásquez-Barreto, F.F.; Bello-Pérez, L.A.; Yee-Madeira, H.; Velezmoro Sánchez, C.E. Esterification and Characterization of Starch from Andean Tubers. Starch-Stärke 2019, 71, 1800101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Charles, A.L.; Kao, H.; Huang, T. Physical investigations of surface membrane–water relationship of intact and gelatinized wheat–starch systems. Carbohydr. Res. 2003, 338, 2403–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Luo, G.M.; Ren, X.J.; Liu, J.Q.; Mu, Y.; Shen, J.C. Towards more efficient glutathione peroxidase mimics: Substrate recognition and catalytic group assembly. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 1151–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Dong, Z.; Liang, K.; Wang, C.; Huang, X.; Mao, S.; Li, X.; Xu, J.; Liu, J.; Luo, G.; Shen, J. A study of biomimetic system: Exploration of factors modulating the catalytic capacity of glutathione peroxidase mimics. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2007, 277, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Damas, C.; Adibnejad, M.; Benjelloun, A.; Brembilla, A.; Carré, M.C.; Viriot, M.L.; Lochon, P. Fluorescent probes for detection of amphiphilic polymer hydrophobic microdomains: A comparative study between pyrene and molecular rotors. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1997, 275, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Matsui, J.; Mitsuishi, M.; Miyashita, T. Characterization of the Molecular Environment of Polymer Langmuir−Blodgett Films Using a Pyrene Fluorescent Probe. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Huang, X.; Dong, Z.; Liu, J.; Mao, S.; Xu, J.; Luo, G.; Shen, J. Selenium-Mediated Micellar Catalyst:  An Efficient Enzyme Model for Glutathione Peroxidase-like Catalysis. Langmuir 2007, 23, 1518–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Krystyjan, M.; Khachatryan, G.; Grabacka, M.; Krzan, M.; Witczak, M.; Grzyb, J.; Woszczak, L. Physicochemical, Bacteriostatic, and Biological Properties of Starch/Chitosan Polymer Composites Modified by Graphene Oxide, Designed as New Bionanomaterials. Polymers 2021, 13, 2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 13 04309 sch001 550
Scheme 1. The schematic illustration for preparing selenium-functionalized waxy corn starch.
Scheme 1. The schematic illustration for preparing selenium-functionalized waxy corn starch.
Polymers 13 04309 sch001
Polymers 13 04309 g001 550
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectra of OSA starch and Se-starch80 in D2O.
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectra of OSA starch and Se-starch80 in D2O.
Polymers 13 04309 g001
Polymers 13 04309 g002 550
Figure 2. XPS spectrum (A), EDS spectrum and Se map of Se-starch80 (B); SEM images of OSA starch (C) and Se-starch80 (D).
Figure 2. XPS spectrum (A), EDS spectrum and Se map of Se-starch80 (B); SEM images of OSA starch (C) and Se-starch80 (D).
Polymers 13 04309 g002
Polymers 13 04309 g003 550
Figure 3. FT-IR spectra (A) and XRD patterns (B) of OSA starch and Se-starch80.
Figure 3. FT-IR spectra (A) and XRD patterns (B) of OSA starch and Se-starch80.
Polymers 13 04309 g003
Polymers 13 04309 g004 550
Figure 4. The υ0 and the selenium content as the function of reaction time (A), reaction temperature (B), the mole ratio of NaSeH and −HC=CH− (C), and volume ratio of ethanol (D); the digital photographs of the reaction system with different volume ratio of ethanol (E).
Figure 4. The υ0 and the selenium content as the function of reaction time (A), reaction temperature (B), the mole ratio of NaSeH and −HC=CH− (C), and volume ratio of ethanol (D); the digital photographs of the reaction system with different volume ratio of ethanol (E).
Polymers 13 04309 g004
Polymers 13 04309 sch002 550
Scheme 2. The reaction between thiophenol substrates and hydroperoxide substrates under catalysis of Se-starch80.
Scheme 2. The reaction between thiophenol substrates and hydroperoxide substrates under catalysis of Se-starch80.
Polymers 13 04309 sch002
Polymers 13 04309 g005 550
Figure 5. Fluorescence spectra of pyrene solution and the pyrene/Se-starch80 solution, where the concentration of pyrene was 1.0 × 10−6 M.
Figure 5. Fluorescence spectra of pyrene solution and the pyrene/Se-starch80 solution, where the concentration of pyrene was 1.0 × 10−6 M.
Polymers 13 04309 g005
Polymers 13 04309 g006 550
Figure 6. The initial rates as the function of concentration of hydroperoxide substrates at various reaction systems, H2O2 + TNB (A), CUOOH + TNB (B), H2O2 + NBT (C), and CUOOH + NBT (D).
Figure 6. The initial rates as the function of concentration of hydroperoxide substrates at various reaction systems, H2O2 + TNB (A), CUOOH + TNB (B), H2O2 + NBT (C), and CUOOH + NBT (D).
Polymers 13 04309 g006
Polymers 13 04309 g007 550
Figure 7. The cell viability as the function of the concentration of Se-starch80.
Figure 7. The cell viability as the function of the concentration of Se-starch80.
Polymers 13 04309 g007
Table
Table 1. The initial rates (v0) for the reduction of ROOH (250 µM) by ArSH (150 µM) in the presence of Se-starch80 at 25 °C and pH 7.0 (50 mM PBS).
Table 1. The initial rates (v0) for the reduction of ROOH (250 µM) by ArSH (150 µM) in the presence of Se-starch80 at 25 °C and pH 7.0 (50 mM PBS).
CatalystArSHROOHυ0 (μM/min) a
PhSeSePhNBTCUOOH2.38 × 10−5
Micellar CatalystTNBCUOOH2.25 ± 0.24 [41]
OSA starchNBTCUOOHND b
Se-starch80TNBCUOOH2.11 ± 0.17
Se-starch80TNBH2O21.58 ± 0.09
Se-starch80NBTCUOOH3.64 ± 0.19
Se-starch80NBTH2O22.69 ± 0.18
a Main±SD, each sample was measured for three times, and the v0 was calculated on the basis of 1.0 μM selenium monomer; b ND, not detected.
Table
Table 2. The catalytic saturation kinetic constants of Se-starch80 in different reaction systems.
Table 2. The catalytic saturation kinetic constants of Se-starch80 in different reaction systems.
SubstratesvmaxKcatKmKcat/ Km
(µM/min)(1/min)µM(×105 1/M∙min)
CUOOH + NBT7.9415.88750.792.11
H2O2 + NBT5.5511.10558.891.99
CUOOH + TNB3.757.50281.652.66
H2O2 + TNB3.246.48373.461.73
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiao, S.; Liu, Z.; Liu, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhong, S.; Wang, F.; Yin, Y. Selenium-Functionalized Corn Starch as a Biodegradable GPx Mimic with High Catalytic Performance. Polymers 2021, 13, 4309. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244309

AMA Style

Jiao S, Liu Z, Liu M, Liu Y, Zhong S, Wang F, Yin Y. Selenium-Functionalized Corn Starch as a Biodegradable GPx Mimic with High Catalytic Performance. Polymers. 2021; 13(24):4309. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiao, Shufei, Zijie Liu, Min Liu, Yongxian Liu, Shuming Zhong, Feng Wang, and Yanzhen Yin. 2021. "Selenium-Functionalized Corn Starch as a Biodegradable GPx Mimic with High Catalytic Performance" Polymers 13, no. 24: 4309. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop