Next Article in Journal
Electrical Characterization of Thin PEDOT:PSS Films on Alumina and Thiol–Ene Substrates
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical Properties of PolyJet 3D-Printed Composites Inspired by Space-Filling Peano Curves
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

First-Principle Study on p-n Control of PEDOT-Based Thermoelectric Materials by PTSA Doping

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tokyo City University, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(20), 3518; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13203518
Submission received: 22 September 2021 / Revised: 8 October 2021 / Accepted: 11 October 2021 / Published: 13 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Physics and Theory)

Abstract

:
PEDOT:Tos, a PSS-free PEDOT-based material, is a promising possible organic thermoelectric material for a practical conversion module because the material reportedly has a large power factor. However, since PEDOT:Tos is mainly reported to be a p-type thermoelectric material, the development of PSS-free PEDOT with n-type thermoelectric properties is desirable. Thus, in order to search for PSS-free PEDOT with n-type thermoelectric properties, we investigated the doping concentration of PTSA dependence of the thermoelectric property using the first-principle calculation. The band structure and the density of state indicated that the n-type thermal electromotive force was attributed to the electrons’ large effective mass. Such electrons were produced thanks to the binding of the dopant PTSA to the benzene ring. The contribution of the electron to the Seebeck coefficient increased with increasing PTSA doping concentrations.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The demands for energy harvesting technologies are increasing with the expanding use of Internet of Things (IoT) devices [1]. Additionally, thermoelectric conversion is expected as the power source for wearable devices [2,3] and self-powered wireless devices [4] because thermoelectric conversion can generate electricity from waste heat and body heat. The thermoelectric materials used as the main parts in thermoelectric conversion modules are evaluated by the dimensionless figure of merit ZT = S2σT/κ, where S, σ, T, and κ are the Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity, temperature, and thermal conductivity [5]. ZT indicates that high-performance thermoelectric materials have a high power factor PF = S2σ and a small κ. A typical thermoelectric module is composed of p- and n-type thermoelectric conversion materials. In inorganic thermoelectric conversion materials, for thermal stress relief at each junction point in the module, the creation of p- and n-type in the same material system has been investigated [6,7].
Organic thermoelectric materials are better suited for energy harvesting devices than inorganic ones because of their smaller thermal conductivity [8,9,10], lower production cost, and higher bendability. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) doped with polystyrene sulphonic acid (PEDOT:PSS), one of the conductive polymers, is considered for practical use due to its high electrical conductivity and chemical stability. PEDOT without doping has only the π-conjugated conduction path and no conduction carriers; however, through doping with PSS, PEDOT can gain electrical conductivity and film formability [11]. PEDOT:PSS has been reported to have ZT = 0.42 [12], which is the highest value among organic thermoelectric materials. However, in order to be used as a stand-alone power source, an energy conversion efficiency of more than 10%, namely ZT ≥ 1, which is equivalent to other cogeneration systems, is required [13].
PEDOT:PSS has been reported to have a low thermal conductivity of 0.2 W/mK [9]. Subsequently, the reduction in thermal conductivity by orientation control has been studied [14], but a value below 0.2 W/mK has not been reported. Thus, the improvement of ZT by increasing the Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity is the main subject of investigation. To improve the Seebeck coefficient, the creation of a PEDOT:PSS composite with Cu2Se, an inorganic thermoelectric material, has been investigated, and PF = 389.7 μV/mK2 has been reported [15].
On the other hand, to improve electrical conductivity, the microstructure formed by PEDOT and PSS has been widely improved. It is reported that PEDOT doped with PSS forms a core-shell structure, in which a PEDOT core is covered by a PSS shell [16]. The formation of the core-shell structure is one factor that hinders the improvement of electrical conductivity [17] due to the insulator, PSS, interfering with the band conduction of PEDOT. An improvement in electrical conductivity has been reported for PEDOT:PSS, in which the addition of ethylene glycol removes excess PSS [18,19,20]. This measure has also been used to study the thermoelectric properties of PEDOT:PSS [21]. Since the formation of the core-shell structure is caused by PSS, PSS-free PEDOT-based conductive films have also been reported [22,23]. Furthermore, deposition on surface-modified substrates such as hierarchical nanoporous layered glasses [24] and polyelectrolyte brushes [25] has also been studied.
PEDOT doped with Tosylate (PEDOT:Tos) of PSS-free PEDOT has been reported to have PF = 453 μV/mK2, which is as large as PEDOT:PSS [26], and semi-metallic properties [27]. Thus, it is suggested that doping with small molecules improves the performance of PEDOT-based thermoelectric conversion materials. However, most of the thermoelectric properties of PSS-free PEDOT reported so far are p-type [26,27]; hence, the development of n-type materials is required. In this study, we focused on the doping of p-toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA) into PSS-free PEDOT. PTSA is used as an oxidizing agent for the polymerization of PEDOT:Tos, and it is known to exist in PEDOT as an anion, Tos. Therefore, the causal relationship between thermoelectric properties and doping concentration has only been investigated in models with the introduction of Tos [28,29], and the causal relationship with PTSA doping has not been investigated. Therefore, for the exploration of PSS-free PEDOT with n-type thermoelectric properties, we investigate the causal relationship between thermoelectric properties and the PTSA doping of PSS-free PEDOT using the first-principle band calculation.

2. Methods

To calculate the band structure and the density of state (DOS), a first-principle band calculation based on the full potential augmented plane wave + local orbitals (APW + lo) method with a generalized gradient approximation with Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof parametrization (GGA-PBE) was performed by using a WIEN2k package [30]. We calculated, using the models of PEDOT:Tos, highly doped PEDOT doped with PTSA (PEDOT:PTSA) and poorly doped PEDOT:PTSA shown in Figure 1a–c. Figure 1, based on the X-ray diffraction of PEDOT:Tos, was reported by K. E. Aasmundtveit et al. [31] and was drawn using VESTA [32]. In a self-consistent cycle, k-mesh was 7 × 2 × 8, and the cut-off energy was 290 eV.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Band Structure

Figure 2a–c show the band structures of PEDOT:Tos, highly doped PEDOT:PTSA, and poorly doped PEDOT:PTSA. The Fermi level EF was set to 0 eV, and the high symmetry k-points in the first Brillouin zone are Γ = (0, 0, 0), Y = (0, 0.5, 0), Q = (0, 0.5, 0.5), Z = (0, 0, 0.5), and X = (0.5, 0, 0).
In all models, the ΓY direction consisted only of the flat bands. The curvature of the k-vector dependence of the energy level is proportionate to the electron effective mass’ reciprocal [33]; thus, the larger the band’s curvature, the higher the electrical conductivity. The flat band, such as the ΓY direction in Figure 2, indicated infinite effective mass, namely a localized electron state. Since the ΓY direction showed electrical conduction between PEDOT through dopant molecules in real space, electrons are bound and localized in PEDOT or dopants. The localized electrons may exhibit insulator-like behavior or hopping conduction depending on the constraint’s strength.
In the ΓX and ΓZ directions corresponding to the a- and c-axis directions in Figure 1, the bands around the EF that contribute to electrical conduction in PEDOT:Tos and poorly doped PEDOT:PTSA consisted only of curved bands. In contrast, the ΓX and ΓZ structure of the highly doped PEDOT:PTSA consisted of flat bands located slightly higher than the EF in addition to the curved bands as the poorly doped PEDOT:PTSA. In all the models, the band’s curvature in the ΓX direction—the PEDOT chains’ bonding direction—was more significant than that in the ΓZ direction, which indicates the direction between the PEDOT. The band conduction in the ΓY direction was blocked, suggesting that the PEDOT chain’s electrical conduction is dominant regardless of the dopant.

3.2. DOS

The total density of state (TDOS) and the projected density of state (PDOS) of PEDOT:Tos, highly doped PEDOT:PTSA, and poorly doped PEDOT:PTSA are shown in Figure 3a–c, with a Fermi level EF of 0 eV. The dopant forms the discrete density of states (DOS) in all models, whereas PEDOT forms the continuous DOS. The PDOS for PEDOT does not have a similar shape to the discrete DOS due to the dopant, suggesting weak orbital hybridization between PEDOT and the dopant. Thus, the covalent bonding between PEDOT and the dopant should be weak.
The Seebeck coefficient depends on the difference in carriers’ contribution to electrical conduction at energies of 1.5 kBT and −1.5 kBT [34], where kB is the Boltzmann’s constant. In discussions of the Seebeck coefficient of PEDOT-based thermoelectric conversion materials, approximations based on Mott’s theory are often used [27,28]. This paper also discusses this using Equation (1), one of the approximations based on Mott’s theory [35]:
S ( T ) = π 2 k B 2 T 3 e D ( E F ) [ D ( ε ) ε ] ε = E F
where ε, D(ε), and e represent the energy, the DOS at ε, and the charge of the carrier, respectively.
[ D ( ε ) / ε ] ε = E F calculated from Figure 3 for each model is shown in Table 1. The negative gradient of TDOS at the Fermi level for PEDOT:Tos and poorly doped PEDOT:PTSA indicated their positive Seebeck coefficients, whereas highly doped PEDOT:PTSA did the opposite, indicating a negative Seebeck coefficient. Thus, the thermoelectric properties changed from p-type to n-type with increasing PTSA doping concentrations. The highly doped PEDOT:PTSA had a ten-fold larger gradient than the other two models. The doping of PTSA possibly enhances the Seebeck coefficient because the PTSA-doped PEDOT exhibited a larger TDOS gradient than the Tos-doped one.
The positive TDOS gradient for the highly doped PEDOT:PTSA is supposed to come from the significant impurity level just above the valence-band edge caused by the PTSA’s benzene ring, as Figure 3b shows. The impurity level corresponds to the flat bands around the EF in Figure 2b, and the states’ high density was attributed to the large effective mass’ localized electrons.
The electrons with large effective mass are considered to hardly contribute to the electrical conduction. The carriers should contribute to the conduction by their large mobility to develop the thermoelectric force. However, Equation (1) is approximated by the assumption that the carriers have sufficient mobility, and the Seebeck coefficient’s magnitude is discussed only by [ D ( ε ) / ε ] ε = E F . To obtain high n-type thermoelectric properties, the carriers in this impurity level must contribute to the electrical conduction by hopping conduction or the phonon drag.
Contrastingly, Figure 2a and Figure 3a showed that PEDOT:Tos’ impurity levels differ from highly doped PEDOT:PTSA but several sharp peaks appear in the valence band from −3 to 0 eV, which are caused by a flat band. The peak at −0.4 eV was attributed to the sulfo group, while the other peaks were attributed to the benzene ring and sulfo group, similar to the highly doped PEDOT:PTSA’s impurity level. Tos’ structure has a hydrogen atom missing from the tip of the sulfo group of PTSA, suggesting that the band is formed only by the sulfo group due to this atomic defect.
Conversely, Figure 2c and Figure 3c showed that the impurity level in the highly doped PEDOT:PTSA is also in the poorly doped PEDOT:PTSA. This impurity level was located at 0.17 eV in the bandgap for the poorly doped PEDOT:PTSA. Therefore, it should not contribute to the Seebeck coefficient and the electrical conductivity in the temperature range below 350 K, a practical usage temperature of organic thermoelectric materials.
The impurity level was located within the bandgap and at the valence band edge for the poorly doped and highly doped PEDOT:PTSA. A lower impurity level indicates that the carriers are more easily excited from the valence band. As the valence band is attributed to the PEDOT molecule and the impurity level to the benzene ring and sulfo group of PTSA, the conductive carriers in PEDOT:PTSA are considered to be generated by PTSA pulling out electrons from PEDOT. The increase in the number of PTSA near the PEDOT by doping at higher concentrations is thought to attract more electrons in the PEDOT and weaken the electron binding in the PEDOT. This suggests that the impurity level shifts from within the bandgap to the valence band edge as the PTSA doping concentration increases.
To obtain n-type thermoelectric properties, the PTSA must attract electrons from the PEDOT; hence, more PTSA are required to be close to the PEDOT. As shown in the calculation model in this paper, if PTSA can be inserted between the oriented PEDOT chains, n-type PEDOT can be developed more efficiently. The orientation of PEDOT molecular chains can also contribute to the improvement of electrical conductivity. Therefore, by doping PTSA into the orientation-controlled PEDOT, it is possible to fabricate n-type PEDOT with higher thermoelectric properties.

4. Conclusions

We investigated the doping effect of PTSA on the thermoelectric properties of PSS-free PEDOT by first-principle calculation in order to search for n-type PSS-free PEDOT. The calculated band structure and the density of state revealed that the PTSA doped in PEDOT formed an energy band with a large effective mass in the bandgap. Furthermore, the impurity level originating from this band was shown to degenerate and overlap with the valence band edge with a high doping of PTSA. As the impurity band is sharp and intense, the p-n control of PEDOT:PTSA by its doping concentration is indicated to be possible.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.A. and T.F.; Data curation, H.A.; Funding acquisition, T.F.; Investigation, H.A.; Methodology, H.A.; Project administration, H.A. and T.F.; Resources, H.A. and T.F.; Software, H.A.; Supervision, T.F.; Validation, H.A., Y.O., R.T. and T.F.; Visualization, H.A.; Writing—original draft, H.A.; Writing—review and editing, H.A. and T.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Tateisi Science and Technology Foundation, grant number 2191902.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kamalinejad, P.; Mahapatra, C.; Sheng, Z.; Mirabbasi, S.; Leung, V.C.M.; Guan, Y.L. Wireless energy harvesting for the Internet of Things. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2015, 53, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Vostrikov, S.; Somov, A.; Gotovtsev, P. Low temperature gradient thermoelectric generator: Modelling and experimental verification. Appl. Energy 2019, 255, 113786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Im, J.-P.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, J.W.; Woo, J.Y.; Im, S.Y.; Kim, Y.; Eom, Y.-S.; Choi, W.C.; Kim, J.S.; Moon, S.E. Self-powered autonomous wireless sensor node by using silicon-based 3D thermoelectric energy generator for environmental monitoring application. Energies 2020, 13, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Wang, W.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z. Thermo-electric energy harvesting powered IoT system design and energy model analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Anti-Counterfeiting, Security, and Identification, Xiamen, China, 25–27 October 2019; pp. 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rowe, D.M. CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  6. Fujima, T.; Shimizu, N.; Arimatsu, H. p-n control of AlMgB14-based thermoelectric materials by metal site occupancy. Materials 2020, 12, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Maruyama, S.; Miyazaki, Y.; Hayashi, K.; Kajitani, T.; Mori, T. Excellent p-n control in a high temperature thermoelectric boride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 152101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yan, H.; Sada, N.; Toshima, N. Thermal transporting properties of electrically conductive polyaniline films as organic thermoelectric materials. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2002, 69, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Feng-Xing, J.; Jing-Kun, X.; Bao-Yang, L.; Yu, X.; Rong-Jin, H.; Lai-Feng, L. Thermoelectric performance of Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): Poly(styrenesulfonate). Chin. Phys. Lett. 2008, 6, 2202–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Moses, D.; Denenstein, A. Experimental determination of the thermal conductivity of a conducting polymer: Pure and heavily doped polyacetylene. Phys. Rev. B 1984, 30, 2090–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kirchmeyer, S.; Reuter, K. Scientific importance, properties and growing applications of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 2077–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, G.-H.; Shao, L.; Zhang, K.; Pipe, K.P. Engineered doping of organic semiconductors for enhanced thermoelectric efficiency. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 719–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Riffat, S.B.; Ma, X. Thermoelectrics: A review of present and potential applications. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2003, 23, 913–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cigarini, L.; Ruini, A.; Catellani, A.; Calzolari, A. Conflicting effect of chemical doping on the thermoelectric response of ordered PEDOT aggregates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 5021–5027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Cai, K.; Yao, Q.; Song, H.; Tong, L.; He, J.; Chen, L. Good performance and flexible PEDOT:PSS/Cu2Se nanowire thermoelectric composite films. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 12819–12829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Takano, T.; Masunaga, H.; Fujiwara, A.; Okuzaki, H.; Sasaki, T. PEDOT nanocrystal in highly conductive PEDOT:PSS polymer films. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 3859–3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jönsson, S.K.M.; Birgerson, J.; Crispin, X.; Greczynski, G.; Osikowicz, W.; van der Gon, A.W.D.; Salaneck, W.R.; Fahlman, M. The effects of solvents on the morphology and sheet resistance in poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-polystyrenesulfonic acid (PEDOT-PSS) films. Synth. Met. 2003, 139, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Crispin, X.; Jakobsson, F.L.E.; Crispin, A.; Grim, P.C.M.; Andersson, P.; Volodin, A.; Van Haesendonck, C.; Van Der Auweraer, M.; Salaneck, W.R.; Berggren, M. The origin of the high conductivity of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)- poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT-PSS) plastic electrodes. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 4354–4360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thomas, J.P.; Zhao, L.; McGillivray, D.; Leung, K.T. High-efficiency hybrid solar cells by nanostructural modification in PEDOT:PSS with co-solvent addition. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 2383–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lee, I.; Kim, G.W.; Yang, M.; Kim, T.S. Simultaneously Enhancing the Cohesion and Electrical Conductivity of PEDOT:PSS Conductive Polymer Films using DMSO Additives. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Paulraj, I.; Liang, T.-F.; Yang, T.-S.; Wang, C.-H.; Chen, J.-L.; Wang, Y.W.; Liu, C.-J. High performance of post-treated PEDOT:PSS thin films for thermoelectric power generation applications. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 42977–42990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, J.; Kim, E.; Won, Y.; Lee, H.; Suh, K. The preparation and characteristics of conductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) thin film by vapor-phase polymerization. Synth. Met. 2003, 139, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mueller, M.; Fabretto, M.; Evans, D.; Hojati-Talemi, P.; Gruber, C.; Murphy, P. Vacuum vapour phase polymerization of high conductivity PEDOT: Role of PEG-PPG-PEG, the origin of water, and choice of oxidant. Polymer 2012, 53, 2146–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fujima, T.; Uchiyama, K.; Yasumoro, K.; Ito, T.; Tabata, E. A PSS-free PEDOT conductive film supported by a hierarchical Nanoporous Layer Glass. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2018, 303, 1800183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yasumoro, K.; Fujita, Y.; Arimatsu, H.; Fujima, T. A new composite structure of PEDOT/PSS: Macro-separated layers by a Polyelectrolyte Brush. Polymers 2020, 12, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Bubnova, O.; Khan, Z.U.; Malti, A.; Braun, S.; Fahlman, M.; Berggren, M.; Crispin, X. Optimization of the thermoelectric figure of merit in the conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 429–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bobnova, O.; Khan, Z.U.; Malti, A.; Braun, S.; Fahlman, M.; Berggren, M.; Crispin, X. Semi-metallic polymers. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, B.; Wang, K.; Li, D.; Cui, X. Doping effects on the thermoelectric properties of pristine poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 33885–33891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shi, W.; Zhao, T.; Xi, J.; Wang, D.; Shuai, Z. Unravelling doping effects on PEDOT at the molecular level: From geometry to thermoelectric transport properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 12929–12938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Blaha, P.; Schwarz, K.; Madsen, G.K.H.; Kvasnicka, D.; Luitz, J.; Laskowski, R.; Tran, F.; Marks, L.D. WIEN2k, an Augmented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties; Schwarz, K., Ed.; Technische Universität Wien: Vienna, Austria, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  31. Aasmundtveit, K.E.; Samuelsen, E.J.; Pettersson, L.A.A.; Inganäs, O.; Johansson, T.; Feidenhans’I, R. Structure of thin films of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Synth. Met. 1999, 101, 561–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Momma, K.; Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1272–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cox, P.A. The Electronic Structure and Chemistry of Solids; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  34. Takeuchi, T. Conditions of electronic structure to obtain large dimensionless figure of merit for developing practical thermoelectric materials. Mater. Trans. 2009, 50, 2359–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Mott, N.F.; Jones, H. The Theory of the Properties of Metals and Alloys; Oxford University Press: London, UK, 1936. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Calculation models of (a) PEDOT:Tos, (b) highly doped PEDOT:PTSA, and (c) poorly doped PEDOT: PTSA. The red, yellow, dark brown, and gray spheres indicate the atoms of oxygen, sulfur, carbon, and hydrogen. The red and green areas indicate PEDOT and dopant layer.
Figure 1. Calculation models of (a) PEDOT:Tos, (b) highly doped PEDOT:PTSA, and (c) poorly doped PEDOT: PTSA. The red, yellow, dark brown, and gray spheres indicate the atoms of oxygen, sulfur, carbon, and hydrogen. The red and green areas indicate PEDOT and dopant layer.
Polymers 13 03518 g001
Figure 2. Band structure of (a) PEDOT:Tos, (b) highly doped PEDOT:PTSA, and (c) poorly doped PEDOT:PTSA. The Fermi energy is at 0 eV. The high-symmetry k-points in the first Brillouin zone are Γ = (0, 0, 0), Y = (0, 0.5, 0), Q = (0, 0.5, 0.5), Z = (0, 0, 0.5), and X = (0.5, 0, 0).
Figure 2. Band structure of (a) PEDOT:Tos, (b) highly doped PEDOT:PTSA, and (c) poorly doped PEDOT:PTSA. The Fermi energy is at 0 eV. The high-symmetry k-points in the first Brillouin zone are Γ = (0, 0, 0), Y = (0, 0.5, 0), Q = (0, 0.5, 0.5), Z = (0, 0, 0.5), and X = (0.5, 0, 0).
Polymers 13 03518 g002
Figure 3. TDOS and PDOS projected for PEDOT and sulfo group, benzene ring, and methyl groups in the dopant of (a) PEDOT:Tos, (b) highly doped PEDOT:PTSA, and (c) poorly doped PEDOT:PTSA. The Fermi energy is at 0 eV.
Figure 3. TDOS and PDOS projected for PEDOT and sulfo group, benzene ring, and methyl groups in the dopant of (a) PEDOT:Tos, (b) highly doped PEDOT:PTSA, and (c) poorly doped PEDOT:PTSA. The Fermi energy is at 0 eV.
Polymers 13 03518 g003
Table 1. [ D ( ε ) / ε ] ε = E F calculated from TDOS shown in Figure 3.
Table 1. [ D ( ε ) / ε ] ε = E F calculated from TDOS shown in Figure 3.
Model [ D ( ε ) / ε ] ε = E F
PEDOT:Tos−10.50
Highly doped PEDOT:PTSA285.22
Poorly doped PEDOT:PTSA−19.63
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arimatsu, H.; Osada, Y.; Takagi, R.; Fujima, T. First-Principle Study on p-n Control of PEDOT-Based Thermoelectric Materials by PTSA Doping. Polymers 2021, 13, 3518. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13203518

AMA Style

Arimatsu H, Osada Y, Takagi R, Fujima T. First-Principle Study on p-n Control of PEDOT-Based Thermoelectric Materials by PTSA Doping. Polymers. 2021; 13(20):3518. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13203518

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arimatsu, Hideki, Yuki Osada, Ryo Takagi, and Takuya Fujima. 2021. "First-Principle Study on p-n Control of PEDOT-Based Thermoelectric Materials by PTSA Doping" Polymers 13, no. 20: 3518. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13203518

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop