Next Article in Journal
Control the System and Environment of Post-Production Wind Turbine Blade Waste Using Life Cycle Models. Part 1. Environmental Transformation Models
Previous Article in Journal
Dyeing of m-Aramid Fibers in Ionic Liquids
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/polym12081826
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Micro/Nanostructured Coating for Cotton Textiles That Repel Oil, Water, and Chemical Warfare Agents

by
Jihyun Kwon
,
Hyunsook Jung
,
Heesoo Jung
and
Juno Lee
*
4th R&D Institute-6th Directorate, Agency for Defense Development, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 34186, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(8), 1826; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081826
Submission received: 25 June 2020 / Revised: 5 August 2020 / Accepted: 11 August 2020 / Published: 14 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Using a lotus leaf as our model, we fabricated an extremely low surface energy micro/nanostructured coating for textiles that repel oil, water, and chemical warfare agents (CWAs) using a simple process that is suitable for large scale production. This coating, called “OmniBlock”, consisted of approximately 200-nm silica nanoparticles, tetraethylorthosilicate, 3-glycidoxypropyl trimethoxysilane, and a perfluorooctanoic acid-free fluoropolymer (Fluorolink S10) that was cross-linked between Si-O-Si groups via a sol-gel process. The perfluorooctanoic acid-free fluoropolymer-coated silica nanoparticles were simply applied to the surface of a cotton fabric by a dip–dry–cure process, forming dense, continuous, and uniform layers of OmniBlock coating. OmniBlock modified the surface of the cotton fibers, creating a rough, high surface area uniform coating with many micro-crevasses. As a result, n-dodecane, water, and CWAs beaded up without wetting the surface, exhibiting large contact angles of 154° for water and 121° for n-dodecane, with a small shedding angle of 5° and contact angle hysteresis of 3.2° for water. The designed coating showed excellent liquid repellence properties against three types of CWAs: 129°, 72°, and 87° for sulfur mustard (HD), soman (GD), and VX nerve agents, respectively. Furthermore, OmniBlock coating shows good mechanical properties under tensile strength and wash tests. This remarkable ability to repel CWAs is likely to have potential military applications in personal protective equipment systems requiring self-cleaning functions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Liquid repellent surfaces with self-cleaning properties are of current research interest, which have been mainly inspired by lotus leaf, known as the Lotus effect [1,2,3]. The effect occurs due to the micro/nanostructures on the leaf that are covered with hydrophobic waxes, providing a low surface free energy [4]. This wax combined with the micro/nanostructures results in a hierarchical double structure in which air pockets form on the surface, repelling water by dramatically increasing the contact angle of water droplets [2]. As a result, water droplets easily capture dust particles by rolling on the leaf, and in doing so, exhibit self-cleaning properties. Replicating these self-cleaning properties can be especially useful for chemical protective clothing, which can require less or no laundering, resulting in an extended wear life, shelf life, and an enhanced protective performance of the clothing. Learning from nature, researchers have made a variety of attempts: plasma etching [5,6], lithography [7,8,9], chemical vapor deposition [10], self-assembly [11,12], layer-by-layer deposition [13,14,15], polymerization reaction [16,17], and sol-gel reaction [18,19] in order to modify a surface’s resistance to wetting by high surface tension liquids like water and low surface tension liquids like an oil (omniphobicity). For instance, researchers have developed self-cleaning textile by combining low surface energy materials such as organic silanes [20,21], fluorinated silanes [22,23], alkyl amines [24], and creating surface roughness [25]. However, these methods typically require expensive, high-vacuum equipment, complicated fabrication processing, and usually the resultant surfaces are easily damaged [26,27,28]. Therefore, these types of approaches are not practical on an industrial scale and other strategies are required to achieve large-area omniphobic surfaces for mass fabrication.
In recent years, sol-gel chemistry, a solution process, is an easy and effective technique that has been adapted to large scale industrial applications because it can coat large-area surfaces at a low cost and with improved durability [29,30,31,32]. Accordingly, the sol-gel chemistry is often investigated for applying hydrophobic coating to fabrics. The main process involves hydrolysis with silica precursor at low temperatures and fast synthesis times. The reactions involve three steps: (1) hydrolysis of the precursor source in the acidic/basic conditions, (2) alcohol condensation, and (3) water condensation [30]. After the condensation process, particles are added to substrate surface. Hydrophobic sol-gel solutions can be deposited onto the surface via spray coating [31], dip coating [32] and thermal curing step [33,34]. Indeed, low-energy surfaces of fabric can be prepared using sol-gel reactions of repellent material such as silica nanoparticles, fluorinated alkylsilane, and perfluoroalkyl compounds [35,36,37]. Fabric coating with silica-based nanosols with perfluoroalkyl compounds was used to get functional properties that are super-hydrophobic and oleophobic. For instance, Ma et al. have successfully demonstrated a ‘non-sticky’ superhydrophobic surface using a sol-gel processed alumina gel film and a fluoroalkyl phosphonic acid treatment [38]. Wei et al. also developed omniphobic self-cleaning surfaces based on a fluorinated hybrid nanocomposite via a nanosilica sol and a fluorine-containing compound [39]. Satoh et al. reported water repellent textile coating with relatively low fluorine contents using inorganic-organic composed perfluroalkylsilane by sol-gel process [40]. Recently, commercialized sol-gel coatings contain micro/nanoparticles in their formulation that can provide an additional layer of surface roughness to repel low surface energy liquids [41].
Repelling oil, water, and chemical warfare agents (CWAs) from the surfaces of textiles is a necessity for safely protecting soldiers in a battlefield. For the past 40 years, textiles used for chemical protective clothing have been coated with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) to minimize surface wetting of the fabric. However, PTFE was phased out in 2015 because its manufacturing requires perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) also known as C8, which has been linked to several health concerns, including cancer, and persists in the environment and living organisms [42,43,44]. Therefore, there have been a growing number of PFOA-free coating technologies [42,45,46,47]. Furthermore, low surface tension liquids such as oils and CWAs can easily wet C8-treated clothing after repeated wearing and washing, gravely concerning the soldiers who use it. The typical low surface tension value for n-dodecane is 25.3 mN/m, for mustard gas (HD) is 42.5 mN/m, for GD is 24.5 mN/m, and for VX is 31.3 mN/m [48,49]. For potential use in CWA’s protective fabric, coating requires materials to effectively remove both non-polar and polar chemicals. In particular, CWAs are polar, so that it is challenging to deal with omniphobic surfaces that repel both non-polar and polar liquids [50].
In this work, we fabricated a material called OmniBlock which displayed excellent liquid repellence properties against oil, water, and CWAs (HD, GD, and VX). We used tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) to prepare approximately 200-nm silica nanoparticles (Si NPs), and then 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GLYMO) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)-free fluoropolymer (Fluorolink S10) were cross-linked between Si-O-Si groups via a simple sol-gel chemistry to obtain PFOA-free fluoropolymer-coated Si NPs (Figure 1). In particular, Fluorolink S10 has two silane end groups and a relatively high fluorocarbon in comparison with common fluoroalkyl compounds, featuring better omniphobic coating and mechanical resistance [51]. By coating cotton fabric in a PFOA-free fluoropolymer-coated Si NPs solution via a dip–dry–cure process, a rough, high surface area oleophobic structure developed on the surface of the cotton fabric. The OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric displayed excellent liquid repellence properties to n-dodecane, water, and CWAs (HD, GD, and VX) with good mechanical properties. This work provides a new route for the large-scale production of liquid-repellent textile surfaces for chemical protective clothing and fabric industries.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Raw cotton fabric (plain weaved, 30 Ne, 126.3 g/m2) was purchased from a local fabric store. Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 98%), isopropyl alcohol (IPA, 99.5%), 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GLYMO, 98%), 1-methyl imidazole (1-MI, 99%) and ammonium hydroxide solution (NH4OH, 28%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without further purification. Fluorolink S10, n-dodecane, and ethanol were purchased from Solvay, Kanto Chemical (Tokyo, Japan), and Samchun Chemical (Seoul, Korea), respectively.
HD (2, 2′-dichloroethyl surfide), GD (3, 3-dimethyl-2-butyl methylphosphonofluoridate), and VX (O-ethyl-S-2(diisopropyl amino)ethyl methylphosphonothioate) (≥99%) were provided by the Chemical Analysis Test and Research Laboratory at the Agency for Defense Development (ADD, Daejeon, Korea). Due to their extreme danger and toxicity, extreme care was taken when handling CWAs. CWAs should only be handled by trained personnel using sufficient protective equipment and relevant safety procedures, as was done in this study.

2.2. Preparation of Si NPs Solution

Si NPs were synthesized according to the Stöber method as reported in the literature [52]. First, 10 mL of TEOS was dissolved in 50 mL of ethanol. Then, 12 mL of NH4OH (28%) in 50 mL of ethanol was added into the TEOS solution. After stirring for 24 h at room temperature, the prepared Si NPs were repeatedly rinsed with ethanol:H2O (1:1 v/v) and with ethanol to remove excess NH4OH. After washing, the resulting Si NPs (~200 nm) solution was dispersed in 100 mL of ethanol by ultrasonication (Power sonic 50, Hwashin Tech, Gwangju, Korea) for 30 min.

2.3. PFOA-Free Fluoropolymer-Coated Si NPs (OmniBlock)

PFOA-free fluoropolymer-coated silica nanoparticles, or OmniBlock, was prepared via the acid catalyst-based co-condensation [53,54,55] of Fluorolink S10, GLYMO, and TEOS with Si NPs (~200 nm). 1 mL of TEOS and 1 mL of GLYMO were dissolved in 5 mL of IPA. The pre-dispersed Si NPs solution (15 mL), 0.1 mL of Fluorolink S10, 0.58 mL of deionized water, and 1 mL of 1M HCl were added to the IPA mixture. The mixture was then stirred for 6 h at room temperature to obtain PFOA-free fluoropolymer-coated Si NPs. Finally, 1 mL of 1-methyl imidazole solution in IPA (10%) was added while stirring for an additional 10 min.

2.4. Dip–Dry–Cure OmniBlock Coating

A dip–dry–cure process was used to fabricate OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric. Cotton fabric (20 × 20 mm) was immersed into the PFOA-free fluoropolymer-coated Si NPs solution for 10 min. The cotton fabric was then dried for 10 min at 80 °C and finally cured for 60 min at 120 °C. Prior to coating, activation of the cotton surface was performed with an Ar plasma generated at 100 W RF power, 20 sccm (standard cubic centimeter) and 200 mTorr for 100 s. The overall fabrication process of OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric is shown in Figure 1.

2.5. Characterization of Surfaces

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using a JSM-IT500HR instrument (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) in high-vacuum mode operated at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV and a probe current of 35 A. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed with an Al Kα X-ray source using a K-Alpha+ spectrometer (ThermoFisher scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) was performed using a Nicolet iS50 FT-IR (ThermoFisher scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with the range from 3800–400 cm−1. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a TGA Q500 apparatus (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) under a nitrogen atmosphere at a flow rate of 100 cm3/min. Additionally, TGA was performed in the air. The temperature range was from 25 to 800 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min.

2.6. Liquid Repellency Measurements

Contact angle measurements were carried out using a drop shape analyzer (DSA 100 instrument from KRŰSS, Hamburg, Germany) at room temperature. A 5-μL droplet for water (deionized) and n-dodecane and 3-μL droplet for CWAs (HD, GD, and VX) were used. We reported the average value of surface contact angles for at least five measurements after resting for 30 s, and the measurements were made on different areas of the coated sample. The Zimmermann method [56] was used to measure the shedding angles, applying a device consisting of a USB microscope (UM12, Vitiny USA) with an angle-adjustable manual stage (G1-80R87, DPIN). The distance between the syringe tip and fabric was fixed at 1 cm. Water and n-dodecane droplets (13 μL, each) were dropped onto the inclined surface, and then the minimum angles were measured at which the droplets of water and n-dodecane rolled off, respectively. For the contact angle hysteresis analysis, the advancing and receding angles were measured using the sessile method [57]. While a water droplet of 5.0 μL was suspended to the needle on the surface of OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric, additional water was spurred out to 7.5 μL and the advancing contact angle was measured. The receding angle was measured with additional suctions to 2.5 μL. The hysteresis was calculated from the difference between the advancing and receding angle.

2.7. Mechanical Properties

Universal testing machine Instron-5967 (Instron, Norwood, MA, USA) was used to examine tensile strength in accordance with the KSK0521 strip method. The sample size was 25 × 170 mm rectangular. The gap between the clamps was 75 mm and tension speed was 50 mm/min. For wash test, the samples (30 × 30 mm) were agitated by a magnetic stirrer at 300 rpm for 30 min in the 1% of Persil® (Henkel, Dusseldorf, Germany) detergent solution, then were rinsed at 300 rpm for 10 min in the water (deionized) and dried at 60 °C for 10 min.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. OmniBlock-Coated Cotton Fabric

The surface morphologies of raw cotton, Ar plasma-treated cotton, and OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric are shown in Figure 2. The raw cotton fabric in Figure 2a exhibits long, narrow surface striations somewhat aligned parallel to the length of the fiber. However, after activation by the Ar plasma treatment in Figure 2b, the surface of the cotton fabric was etched due to the ion bombardment from the Ar plasma [58,59,60], which enhanced the adhesion of the coating by increasing the contact area of the fiber [61]. Images of the OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric in Figure 2c indicate that the PFOA-free fluoropolymer-coated Si NPs appeared to form uniformly packed (Figure S2), continuous layers of coating, making the surface appear rougher and likely with a higher surface area. The size of Si NPs is approximately 200 nm (Figure 2d). The roughness of the OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric was significantly greater than of the raw cotton fabric (Figure S1).
XPS was used to qualitatively characterize the changes in the surface chemical composition of the cotton fabric before and after the OmniBlock layer coating was applied. For the raw cotton fabric, only two peaks corresponding to C and O elements were observed at 290 eV (C 1s) and 536 eV (O 1s), respectively, as shown in Figure 3. After coating with OmniBlock, three new distinctive peaks appeared at 688, 154, and 103 eV, which were attributed to the F 1s, Si 2s, and Si 2p signals, respectively [62,63,64]. This suggests that PFOA-free fluoropolymer-coated Si NPs have covered the surface of the cotton fibers. Additionally, ATR-FTIR spectra of OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric support the covalent attachment of the PFOA-free fluoropolymer to the coated Si NPs (Figure 2b). The peak appearing at 1100 cm−1 is associated with the asymmetric stretching vibration of Si-O-Si bonds [65,66]. Other peaks at 800 and 480 cm−1 are associated with a Si-O-Si bond for the bending and vibration, respectively [67]. The peak at 1145 cm−1 represents a Si-O-C bond [68], confirming the Si NPs attachment to the cotton surface. Reportedly, the degree of condensation of the silsesquioxane networks is high even when precursors bearing long alkyl chains have been used [69,70]. Thus, we believe that the sol-gel reaction between Si NPs and fluorinated alkoxysilane may lead to a high degree of condensation.
TGA was used to evaluate the weight loss of raw and coated cotton fabrics after heating to 800 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min, as shown in Figure 4. TGA and DTG (derivative thermogravimerty) data of 5% (T5%) and 10% (T10%) mass loss temperatures, the maximum-rate degradation temperatures (Tmax1, Tmax2), the residual percentages at Tmax1, Tmax2, and final residual percentages at 800 °C are listed in Table S1. Under air atmosphere, the T5%, T10% of raw cotton were 90 °C, 260 °C, and the final residue at 800 °C was 1.3%. As for OmniBlock-coated cotton, the T5%, T10%, and the final residue at 800 °C increased to 192 °C, 273 °C, and 9.6%. Additionally, under nitrogen atmosphere, the T5% and T10% of raw cotton were 75 °C, 273 °C, and the final residue at 800 °C was 16.3%. As for OmniBlock-coated cotton, the T5%, T10%, and final residue at 800 °C increased to 219 °C, 287 °C, and 23.9%, mainly due to the production of inorganic SiO2 from the degradation of OmniBlock, indicating that thermal stability was also improved by the OmniBlock coating in comparison with the raw cotton [71,72].

3.2. Liquid-Repellence Properties of OmniBlock-Coated Cotton Fabric

Excellent liquid-repellence properties on any surface are characterized by large contact angles (θ > 150°) and small shedding angles (θ < 10°) [73]. In this study, contact angles were measured in a static mode whereas shedding angles were dynamic since the angle was determined by the sliding of the water droplet on a continuously inclined surface [74]. As presented in Figure 5, water and n-dodecane produced spherical and floating droplets on the OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric. The static contact angle of 5 μL of water was measured at 154°. Besides water repellency, the coated cotton surface exhibited excellent repellency for the non-polar liquid (oleophobic), n-dodecane and for CWAs like HD, GD, and VX. It is noted that CWAs are polar but possess relatively low surface tensions [48]. The surface contact angle values with n-dodecane, HD, GD, and VX were 121°, 129°, 72°, and 87°, respectively. It should be noted that the Ar plasma-treated cotton fabric was fully wet with dyed water and n-dodecane, while the droplets of dyed water, n-dodecane and CWAs (HD, GD) floated on the OmniBlock-coated cotton fabrics (Figures S3 and S4). As depicted in Figure 6a, the shedding angle of water (13 μL) was 5° and of n-dodecane (13 μL) was 45° (Figure S5). Additionally, the advancing and receding angles were measured to obtain the contact angle hysteresis (Figure 6b) The contact angle hysteresis was 3.2°, obtained from the difference between the advancing angle and receding angle of water (advancing angle of 151.5° and receding angle of 148.3°), confirming that OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric is superhydrophobic. Robin M. Bär et al. report that robust superhydrophobic surface with various coating methods. The maximum value of 160.2° shows superhydrophocity, but the contact angle hysteresis is measured above 10° [73].
To repel low surface energy liquids, surface chemistry and micro/nanostructure are the two key parameters that must be optimized [75,76]. The surface chemistry of a fabric coating can improve the surface’s ability to resist wetting by low surface tension liquids. Omniphobic materials are characterized by a surface chemistry that is both hydrophobic and oleophobic, with contact angles between 90° and 150° [77]. However, there are limits of omniphobicity. For instance, C8-coated surfaces possess the lowest free energy and the best hydrophobicity of any coatings, but the maximum contact angle only reaches approximately 120° on flat surfaces [78].
On the other hand, the lotus leaf, well-known for the self-cleaning effect described earlier, exhibits a water contact angle of over 160° and a sliding angle as small as 2°. The large contact angle and small sliding angle are attributed to the wax coating on the micro/nanoscale structure on the leaf [4]. The lotus leaf exemplifies the importance of the surface topographic structure and its influence on the liquid repellence, as described by the modified equation [49,79,80]
cosθ′ = fr cos θ − (1 − f),
where θ′ is the apparent contact angle on a rough surface, θ is the intrinsic contact angle on a flat surface, f is the fraction of the solid/liquid interface, and r is roughness factor, while (1 − f) is the fraction of the air/liquid interface. This equation indicates that when a topographically rough surface comes into contact with a liquid, air trapped in the rough area may occur, greatly increasing the omniphobicity [81,82]. That is, an additional layer of surface roughness is necessary to increase the fractional contact of the solid/liquid interface, and this micro/nano surface roughness can be engineered by adding micro/nanoparticles to the coating solution.
As described, the OmniBlock-coated cotton fabrics were created by combining fluoro surface chemistry and micro/nano surface roughness via sol-gel chemistry and showed excellent omni-liquid repellency. Like the lotus leaf, we have shown that the surface chemistry and micro/nanostructure can be tailored to improve the liquid repellence properties. Using our sol-gel derived fluoropolymer-coated Si NPs coating called OmniBlock, we showed that the surface of cotton can be improved significantly. OmniBlock-coated cotton fabrics clearly exhibited a much different surface chemistry and micro/nano surface roughness than raw cotton and achieved excellent omni-liquid repellency.
It should be noted that OmniBlock-coated cotton was fabricated by one-step process using PFOA-free fluoropolymer. For comparison, Yeerken et al. reported two-step process to make the superhydrophobic surface with the static contact angle of 154° and rolling off angle of 4° [83]. They used dip and spray coating of PTFE and silica particles which was followed by PTFE membrane hot pressing. Additionally, Jung et al. have studied chemical warfare agent HD-repellent cotton using UiO-66-NH2 or Zr(OH)4 and hydrophobic aminopropylisooctyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (O-POSS) [84]. Although, the coated fabrics exhibited the static contact angle >150° for a 5-μL water droplet, 107° for a 3-μL HD droplet and roll-off angle of 7 for 50 μL. The process still requires two-step coating.

3.3. Mechanical Properties of OmniBlock-Coated Cotton Fabric

As shown in strength-strain curves in Figure 7, the maximum strength and strain were increased from 27.8 N and 11.4% (raw cotton) to 30.5 N and 12.7% after OmniBlock coating. It is noted that the strength was improved due to the presence of siloxane group between fibers which may increase the binding strength [85]. Additionally, it should be noted that when the OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric was twisted, it shows a great flexibility similar to the untreated raw cotton fabric (Figure S6).
Finally, OmniBlock-coated cotton fabrics were washed as described in Materials and Methods and contact angles of water and n-dodecane were analyzed. As depicted in Figure 8, the contact angles of water and n-dodecane were 150° and 90°, respectively, after washing treatment. The results show that superhydrophobicity and oleophobicity of OmniBlock-coated cotton surfaces were successfully maintained with durability, while cotton fabrics coated with trichlorododecylsilane-treated Si NPs lost its superhydrophobicity after the wash [86]. We believe that the epoxy group of GLYMO used in this study may render the coating more adhesive to cotton textiles [87].

4. Conclusions

We proposed a simple approach for achieving an omniphobic fabric coating that repels oil, water, and CWAs by designing PFOA-free fluoropolymer-coated Si NPs. We named this coating OmniBlock, consisting of TEOS, GLYMO, Si NPs, and a PFOA-free fluoropolymer that was produced via sol-gel chemistry. The PFOA-free fluoropolymer-coated Si NPs were formed via covalent bonds by cross linking between the Si-O-Si groups. The OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric showed outstanding omniphobic properties with a water contact angle of 154°, a shedding angle of 5°, and contact angle hysteresis of 3.2°. The contact angles for n-dodecane, HD, GD, and VX were 121°, 129°, 72°, and 87° each. In particular, coated fabrics provide an adequate omniphobic performance against n-dodecane and HD. Even after the wash, the OmniBlock coating was durable with the contact angles of 150° (water) and 90° (n-dodecane). Additionally, the coating contributed to enhance the thermal stability and mechanical strength of cotton fabric. Furthermore, this coating method can be easily applied to large scale production as demonstrated in this study, and therefore could be effectively applied to a wide range of textile products, including chemical protective clothing, shelters such as tents, as well as other commercial textiles and upholstery products.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/8/1826/s1, Table S1: TGA and DTG data. Figure S1: Surface for height of small structure. Figure S2: SEM image of OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric. Figure S3: The optical images of water and n-dodecane droplets on the cotton fabric. Figure S4: Optical images of HD and GD droplets. Figure S5: Optical images of shedding angle analysis for n-dodecane. Figure S6: The optical images of knotted cotton fabric.

Author Contributions

J.K., H.J. (Hyunsook Jung), H.J. (Heesoo Jung) and J.L. contributed to the design and implementation of the research, to the analysis of the results and to the writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Agency for Defense Development research project (Grant No. 912673101).

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the provision of the chemical agent HD, GD, and VX by the Chemical Analysis Test and Research Lab.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Parhizkar, M.; Zhao, Y.; Wunagi, X.; Lin, T. Photostability and durability properties of photochromic organosilica coating on fabric. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 2014, 9, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Sun, T.; Feng, L.; Gao, X.; Jiang, L. Bioinspired surfaces with special wettability. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Berendjchi, A.; Khajavi, R.; Yazdanshenas, M.E. Fabrication of superhydrophobic and antibacterial surface on cotton fabric by doped silica-based sols with nanoparticles of copper. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 594–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Barthlott, W.; Neinhuis, C. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 1997, 202, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Satyaprasad, A.; Jain, V.; Nema, S.K. Deposition of superhydrophobic nanostructured Teflon-like coating using expanding plasma arc. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 253, 5462–5466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Martines, E.; Seunarine, K.; Morgan, H.; Gadegaard, N.; Wilkinson, C.D.W.; Riehle, M.O. Superhydrophobicity and superhydrophilicity of regular nanopatterns. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 2097–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kravchenko, A.; Shevchenko, A.; Ovchinnikov, V.; Priimagi, A.; Kaivola, M. Optical interference lithography using azobenzene-functionalized polymers for micro- and nanopatterning of silicon. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 4174–4177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, L.; Li, Y.; Gao, S.; Koshizaki, N. Ordered Co3O4 hierarchical nanorod arrays: Tunable superhydrophilicity without UV irradiation and transition to superhydrophobicity. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 8366–8371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Notsu, H.; Kubo, W.; Shitanda, I.; Tatsuma, T. Super-hydrophobic/super-hydrophilic patterning of gold surfaces by photocatalytic lithography. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 1523–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, X.; Tay, B.; Po, W.K.P. Fabrication of three-dimensional ZnO-Carbon nanotube (CNT) hybrids using self-assembled CNT micropatterns as framework. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 17254–17259. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ofir, Y.; Samanta, B.; Arumugam, P.; Rotello, V.M. Controlled fluorination of FePt nanoparticles: Hydrophobic to superhydrophobic surfaces. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 4075–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, T.; Hu, W.; Dong, S. A general route to transform normal hydrophilic cloths into superhydrophobic surfaces. Chem. Commun. 2007, 18, 1849–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, Y.; Liu, F.; Sun, J. A facile layer-by-layer deposition process for the fabrication of highly transparent superhydrophobic coatings. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2730–2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, L.; Chen, H.; Sun, J.; Shen, J. Layer-by-layer deposition of poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) and sodium silicate multilayers on silica-sphere-coated substrate-facile method to prepare a superhydrophobic surface. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 948–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhai, L.; Cebeci, F.C.; Cohen, R.C.; Rubner, M.R. Stable superhydrophobic coatings from polyelectrolyte multilayers. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1349–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. García, N.; Benito, E.; Guzmán, J.; Tiemblo, P. Use of p-toluenesulfonic acid for the controlled grafting of alkoxysilanes onto silanol containing surfaces: Preparation of tunable hydrophilic, hydrophobic, and super-hyerophobic silica. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5052–5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sparks, B.J.; Hoff, E.F.; Xiong, L.; Goetz, J.T.; Patton, D.L. Superhydrophobic hybrid inorganic-organic thiol-ene surfaces fabricated via spray-deposition and photopolymerization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 1811–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Faustini, M.; Nicole, L.; Boissiere, C.; Innocenzi, P.; Sanchez, C.; Grosso, D. Hydrophobic, antireflective, self-cleaning, and antifogging sol-gel coatings: An example of multifunctional nanostructured materials for photovoltaic cells. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 4406–4413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Latthe, S.S.; Terashima, C.; Nakata, K.; Sakai, M.; Fujishima, A. Development of sol–gel processed semi-transparent and self-cleaning superhydrophobic coatings. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 5548–5553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Junaidi, M.U.M.; Azaman, S.H.; Ahmad, N.N.R.; Leo, C.P.; Lim, G.W.; Chan, D.J.C.; Yee, H.M. Superhydrophobic coating of silica with photoluminescence properties synthesized from rice husk ash. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 111, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Meng, J.; Lin, S.; Xiong, X. Preparation of breathable and superhydrophobic coating film via spray coating in combination with vapor-induced phase separation. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 107, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ishizaki, T.; Masuda, Y.; Sakamoto, M. Corrosion resistance and durability of superhydrophobic surface formed on magnesium alloy coated with nanostructured cerium oxide film and fluoroalkylsilane molecules in corrosive NaCl aqueous solution. Langmuir 2011, 27, 4780–4788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, K.; Zhang, M.; Zhai, J.; Wang, J.; Jiang, L. Bioinspired construction of mg-li alloys surfaces with stable superhydrophobicity and improved corrosion resistance. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 183103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bayer, I.S.; Steele, A.; Martorana, P.J.; Loth, E. Fabrication of superhydrophobic polyurethane/organoclay nano-structured composites from cyclomethicone-in-water emulsions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 823–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gupta, D.; Gulrajani, M.L. Self-cleaning finishes for textiles. In Functional Finishes for Textiles: Improving Comfort, Performance and Protection; Paul, R., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  26. Boban, M.; Golovin, K.; Tobelmann, B.; Gupte, O.; Mabry, J.M.; Tuteja, A. Smooth, all-solid, low-hysteresis, omniphobic surfaces with enhanced mechanical durability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 11406–11413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Milionis, A.; Bayer, I.S.; Loth, E. Recent advances in oil-repellent surfaces. Int. Mater. Rev. 2016, 61, 101–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hensel, R.; Neinhuis, C.; Werner, C. The springtail cuticle as a blueprint for omniphobic surfaces. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 323–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Jiang, C.; Liu, W.; Yang, M.; He, S.; Xie, Y.; Wang, Z. Synthesis of superhydrophobic fluoro-containing silica sol coatings for cotton textile by one-step sol-gel process. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2018, 87, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mahltig, B.; Audenaert, F.; Bottcher, H. Hydrophobic silica sol coatings on textiles-the influence of solvent and sol concentration. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2005, 34, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, M.; Liu, W.; Jiang, C.; He, S.; Xie, Y.; Wang, Z. Fabrication of superhydrophobic cotton fabric with fluorinated TiO2 sol by a green and one-step sol-gel process. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 197, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Onar, N.; Mete, G. Development of water-, oil-repellent and flame-retardant cotton fabrics by organic-inorganic hybrid materials. J. Text. Inst. 2016, 107, 1463–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bae, G.B.; Min, B.G.; Jeong, Y.G.; Lee, S.C.; Jang, J.H.; Koo, G.H. Superhydrophobicity of cotton fabrics treated with silica nano particles and water-repellent agent. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 337, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Przybylak, M.; Maciejewski, H.; Dutkiewicz, A.; Dabeck, A.; Nowichi, M. Fabrication of superhydrophobic cotton fabrics by a simple chemical modification. Cellulose 2016, 23, 2185–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Li, Y.; Cai, Z. Effect of acid-catalyzed sol-gel silica coating on the properties of cotton fabric. J. Text. Inst. 2012, 103, 1099–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, G.; Yang, J.; Shi, Q. Preparation of transparent ultrahydrophobic silica film by sol-gel process. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2011, 130, 3862–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tang, X.; Yan, X. Dip-coating for fibrous materials: Mechanism, methods and applications. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2017, 81, 378–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ma, W.; Wu, H.; Higaki, Y.; Otsuka, H.; Takahara, A. A non-sticky superhydrophobic surface prepared by self-assembly of fluoroalkyl phosphonic acid on a hierarchically micro/nanostructured alumina gel film. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 6824–6826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wei, C.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Q.; Zhan, X.; Chen, F. Facile fabrication of highly omniphobic and self-cleaning surfaces based on water mediated fluorinated nanosilica aggregation. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 74340–74348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Satoh, K.; Nakazumi, H.; Morita, M. Novel fluorinated inorganic-organic finishing materials for nylon carpeting. Text. Res. J. 2004, 74, 1079–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Truong, Q.; Koene, B.; Domino, J. Omniphobic coatings for self-cleaning and enhanced chemical/biological (CB) agent protective clothing. NSTI-Nanotechnology 2013, 1, 663–666. [Google Scholar]
  42. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASx) under TSCA; Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0621; United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gao, Y.; He, C.; Huang, Y.; Qing, F. Novel water and oil repellent POSS-based organic/inorganic nanomaterial: Preparation, characterization and application to cotton fabrics. Polymer 2010, 51, 5997–6004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Teaf, C.M.; Garber, M.M.; Covert, D.J.; Tuovila, B.J. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA): Environmental Sources, Chemistry, Toxicology, and Potential Risks. Soil Sediment Contam. Int. J. 2019, 28, 258–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ghahfarokhi, F.S.; Khoddami, A.; Mazrouei-Sebdani, Z.; Rahmatinejad, J.; Mohammadi, H. A new technique to prepare a hydrophobic and thermal insulating polyester woven fabric using electro-spraying of nano-porous silica powder. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 366, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ruan, M.; Zhan, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, W.; Chen, Y.; Wei, M.; Wang, X.; Deng, X. Preparation of PTFE/PDMS superhydrophobic coating and its anti-icing performance. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 41339–41344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Mohsin, M.; Sarwar, N.; Ahmad, S.; Rasheed, A.; Ahmad, F.; Afzal, A.; Zafar, S. Maleic acid crosslinking of C-6 fluorocarbon as oil and water repellent finish on cellulosic fabrics. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 3525–3530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Truong, Q.T.; Pomerantz, N. Military applications: Development of superomniphobic coatings, textiles and surfaces. In Waterproof and Water Repellent Textiles and Clothing; The Textile Institute, Part Three Water Repellent Textiles in Practice: Performance, Testing and Applications 17; Woodhead Publishing, Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  49. Gorzkowska-Sobas, A.A. Chemical Warfare Agents and Their Interactions with Solid Surfaces; FFI-Rapport 2013/00574; Norwegian Defense Research Establishment (FFI): Kjeller, Norway, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  50. Hakonen, A.; Rindzevicius, T.; Schmidt, M.S.; Andersson, P.O.; Juhlin, L.; Svedendahl, M.; Boisen, A.; Käll, M. Detection of nerve gases using surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates with high droplet adhesion. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 1305–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ferrero, F.; Periolatto, M.; Gozzelino, G. Sol-gel process for surface modification of leather. In Recent Applications in Sol-Gel Synthesis; Usha, C., Ed.; InTech: London, UK, 2017; Chapter 14; pp. 283–299. [Google Scholar]
  52. Stöber, W.; Fink, A.; Bohn, E. Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1968, 26, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hench, L.L.; West, J.K. The sol-gel process. Chem. Rev. 1990, 90, 33–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kawaguchi, T.; Ono, K. Spherical silica gels precipitated from acid catalyzed teos solutions. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1990, 232, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, X.; Li, X.; Lei, Q.; Wu, Y.; Li, W. Fabrication of superhydrophobic composite coating based on fluorosilicone resin and silica nanoparticles. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 180598–180612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Zimmermann, J.; Seeger, S.; Reifler, F.A. Water shedding angle: A new technique to evaluate the water-repellent properties of superhydrophobic surface. Text. Res. J. 2009, 80, 1565–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tiab, D.; Donaldson, E.C. Wettability. In Petrophysics, 3rd ed.; Gulf Proffessional Publishing, Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; Chapter 6. [Google Scholar]
  58. Rani, K.V.; Sarma, B.; Sarma, A. Plasma treatment on cotton fabrics to enhance the adhesion of reduced Graphene Oxide for electro-conductive properties. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2018, 84, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bhat, N.V.; Netravali, A.N.; Gore, A.V.; Sathianarayanan, M.P.; Arolkar, G.A.; Deshmukh, R.R. Surface modification of cotton fabrics using plasma technology. Text. Res. J. 2011, 81, 1014–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Castelvetro, V.; Fatarella, E.; Corsi, L.; Giaiacopi, S.; Ciardelli, G. Graft polymerization of functional acrylic monomers onto cotton fibers activated by continuous Ar plasma. Plasma Process. Polym. 2006, 3, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Montarsolo, A.; Periolatto, M.; Zerbola, M.; Mossotti, R.; Ferrero, F. Hydrophobic sol-gel finishing for textiles: Improvement by plasma pre-treatment. Text. Res. J. 2013, 83, 1190–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Xiong, D.; Liu, G.; Duncan, J.S. Diblock-copolymer-coated water- and oil-repellent cotton fabrics. Langmuir 2012, 28, 6911–6918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhou, H.; Wang, H.; Yang, W.; Niu, H.; Wei, X.; Fu, S.; Liu, S.; Shao, H.; Lin, T. Durable superoleophobic-superhydrophilic fabrics with high anti-oil-fouling property. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 26939–26947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Xue, F.; Jia, D.; Li, Y.; Jing, X. Facile preparation of a mechanically robust superhydrophobic acrylic polyurethane coating. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 13856–13863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hozumi, A.; Takai, O. Preparation of ultra water-repellent films by microwave plasma-enhanced CVD. Thin Solid Films 1997, 303, 222–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Latthe, S.S.; Imai, H.; Ganesan, V.; Rao, A.V. Superhydrophobic silica films by sol-gel co-precursor method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 256, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sarkar, D.K.; Brassard, D.; Khakani, M.A.E.; Ouellet, L. Dielectric properties of sol-gel derived high-k titanium silicate thin films. Thin Solid Films 2007, 515, 4788–4793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Brassard, J.-D.; Sarkar, D.K.; Perron, J. Fluorin based superhydrophobic coatings. Appl. Sci. 2012, 2, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Facio, D.S.; Carrascosa, L.A.M.; Mosquera, M.J. Producing lasting amphiphobic building surfaces with self-cleaning properties. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 265601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Dirè, S.; Tagliazucca, V.; Callone, E.; Quaranta, A. Effect of functional groups on condensation and properties of sol-gel silica nanoparticles prepared by direct synthesis from organoalkoxysilanes. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2011, 126, 909–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ceylan, Ö.; Landuyt, L.V.; Rahier, H.; Clerck, K.D. The effect of water immersion on the thermal degradation of cotton fibers. Cellulose 2013, 20, 1603–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Protásio, T.P.; Guimarães, M.G., Jr.; Mirmehdi, S.; Fernando, P.F.; Napoli, A.; Knovack, K.M. Combustion of biomass and charcoal made from babassu nutshell. CERNE 2017, 23, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  73. Bär, R.; Widmaier, S.; Levkin, P. Facile fabrication of robust superhydrophobic surfaces: Comparative investigation. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 98257–98266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Schmidt, D.L.; Bardy, R.F., Jr.; Lam, K.; Schmidt, D.C.; Chaudhury, M.K. Contact angle hysteresis, adhesion, and marine biofouling. Langmuir 2004, 20, 2830–2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Byun, H.-R.; Ha, Y.-G. Non-wetting superhydrophobic surface enabled by one-step spray coating using molecular self-assembled nanoparticles. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2017, 17, 5515–5519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, H.; Wang, R.; Tao, R.; Zhu, Y.; Lv, C.; Zhu, Y. Fabrication of superhydrophobic fiber fabric/epoxy composites coating on aluminum substrate with long-lived wear resistance. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 95556–95563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Woodward, J.T.; Gwin, H.; Schwartz, D.K. Contact angles on surfaces with mesoscopic chemical heterogeneity. Langmuir 2000, 16, 2957–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Nishino, T.; Meguro, M.; Nakamae, K.; Matsushita, M.; Ueda, Y. The lowest surface free energy based on –CF3 alignment. Langmuir 1999, 15, 4321–4323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Celia, E.; Darmanin, T.; de Givenchy, E.T.; Amigoni, S.; Guittard, F. Recent advances in designing superhydrophobic surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 402, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Hoefnagels, H.F.; Wu, D.; de With, G.; Ming, W. Biomimetic superhydrophobic and highly oleophobic cotton textiles. Langmuir 2007, 23, 13158–13163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Shibuichi, S.; Onda, T.; Satoh, N.; Tsujii, K. Super-water-repellent fractal surfaces. Langmuir 1996, 12, 2125–2127. [Google Scholar]
  82. Erbil, H.Y.; Demirel, A.L.; Avci, Y.; Mert, O. Transformation of a simple plastic into a superhydrophobic surface. Science 2003, 299, 1377–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yeerken, T.; Wang, G.; Li, H.; Liu, H.; Yu, W. Chemical stable, superhydrophobic and self-cleaning fabrics prepared by two-step coating of a polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and silica nanoparticles. Text. Res. J. 2019, 89, 4827–4841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jung, H.; Kim, M.; Jang, S. Liquid-repellent textile surfaces using zirconium (Zr)-based porous materials and a polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane coating. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 563, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nabipour, H.; Wang, X.; Song, L.; Hu, Y. Hydrophobic and flame-retardant finishing of cotton fabrics for water-oil separation. Cellulose 2020, 27, 4145–4159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Jeong, S.A.; Kang, T.J. Superhydrophobic and transparent surfaces on cotton fabrics coated with silica nanoparticles for hierarchical roughness. Text. Res. J. 2017, 8, 552–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, H.; Ding, H.; Xue, Y.; Wang, X.; Lin, T. Superhydrophobic fabrics from hybrid silica sol-gel coatings: Structural effect of precursors on wettability and washing durability. J. Mater. Res. 2010, 25, 1336–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Polymers 12 01826 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of OmniBlock coating onto cotton fabric (a) Si NPs from TEOS, (b) PFOA-free fluoropolymer-coated Si NPs (OmniBlock), and (c) dip–dry–cure results.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of OmniBlock coating onto cotton fabric (a) Si NPs from TEOS, (b) PFOA-free fluoropolymer-coated Si NPs (OmniBlock), and (c) dip–dry–cure results.
Polymers 12 01826 g001
Polymers 12 01826 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) raw cotton, (b) Ar plasma-treated cotton, (c) OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric, and (d) Si NPs as prepared.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) raw cotton, (b) Ar plasma-treated cotton, (c) OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric, and (d) Si NPs as prepared.
Polymers 12 01826 g002
Polymers 12 01826 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) XPS spectra of and (b) ATR-FTIR spectra of raw cotton fabric and OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric.
Figure 3. (a) XPS spectra of and (b) ATR-FTIR spectra of raw cotton fabric and OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric.
Polymers 12 01826 g003
Polymers 12 01826 g004 550
Figure 4. TGA and DTG curves of raw and OmniBlock-coated cotton fabrics (a,b) in air and (c,d) nitrogen.
Figure 4. TGA and DTG curves of raw and OmniBlock-coated cotton fabrics (a,b) in air and (c,d) nitrogen.
Polymers 12 01826 g004
Polymers 12 01826 g005 550
Figure 5. The images and contact angles of static droplets on raw cotton fabric (Top) and OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric (Bottom) from the drop shape analyzer. Water (5 μL) at θ = 154°, n-dodecane (5 μL) at θ = 121°, HD (3 μL) at θ = 129°, GD (3 μL) at θ = 72°, and VX (3 μL) at θ = 87°.
Figure 5. The images and contact angles of static droplets on raw cotton fabric (Top) and OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric (Bottom) from the drop shape analyzer. Water (5 μL) at θ = 154°, n-dodecane (5 μL) at θ = 121°, HD (3 μL) at θ = 129°, GD (3 μL) at θ = 72°, and VX (3 μL) at θ = 87°.
Polymers 12 01826 g005
Polymers 12 01826 g006 550
Figure 6. The captured images of (a) shedding angles for water and (b) the advancing angle measurement (top) and the receding angle measurement (bottom) for contact angle hysteresis.
Figure 6. The captured images of (a) shedding angles for water and (b) the advancing angle measurement (top) and the receding angle measurement (bottom) for contact angle hysteresis.
Polymers 12 01826 g006
Polymers 12 01826 g007 550
Figure 7. Strength–strain curves of raw cotton (in black) and OmniBlock-coated cotton (in red).
Figure 7. Strength–strain curves of raw cotton (in black) and OmniBlock-coated cotton (in red).
Polymers 12 01826 g007
Polymers 12 01826 g008 550
Figure 8. The contact angles (a) and captured images (b) of water droplet (top) and n-dodecane droplet (bottom) on OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric after washing treatment.
Figure 8. The contact angles (a) and captured images (b) of water droplet (top) and n-dodecane droplet (bottom) on OmniBlock-coated cotton fabric after washing treatment.
Polymers 12 01826 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kwon, J.; Jung, H.; Jung, H.; Lee, J. Micro/Nanostructured Coating for Cotton Textiles That Repel Oil, Water, and Chemical Warfare Agents. Polymers 2020, 12, 1826. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081826

AMA Style

Kwon J, Jung H, Jung H, Lee J. Micro/Nanostructured Coating for Cotton Textiles That Repel Oil, Water, and Chemical Warfare Agents. Polymers. 2020; 12(8):1826. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081826

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kwon, Jihyun, Hyunsook Jung, Heesoo Jung, and Juno Lee. 2020. "Micro/Nanostructured Coating for Cotton Textiles That Repel Oil, Water, and Chemical Warfare Agents" Polymers 12, no. 8: 1826. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081826

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop