Next Article in Journal
Protein–Polysaccharide Composite Materials: Fabrication and Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Study of POSS on the Properties of Novel Inorganic Dental Composite Resin
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Poly (Lactide Acid) Foams with Thermally Expandable Microspheres
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/polym12020465
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Main Chain–Type Block Copolymers through Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization from Double-Decker–Shaped Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane Hybrids

by
Wei-Cheng Chen
1,
Yu-Hsuan Tsao
1,
Chih-Feng Wang
2,
Chih-Feng Huang
3,
Lizong Dai
4,
Tao Chen
5 and
Shiao-Wei Kuo
1,6,*
1
Department of Materials and Optoelectronic Science, Center of Crystal Research, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
2
Advanced Membrane Materials Research Center, Graduate Institute of Applied Science and Technology, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
3
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, 145 Xingda Road, Taichung 402-27, Taiwan
4
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Fire Retardant Materials, College of Materials, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
5
Ningbo Institute of Material Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Science, Zhongguan West Road 1219, Ningbo 315201, China
6
Department of Medicinal and Applied Chemistry, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(2), 465; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12020465
Submission received: 1 February 2020 / Revised: 12 February 2020 / Accepted: 14 February 2020 / Published: 17 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Silsesquioxane (POSS) Polymers, Copolymers and Nanoparticles)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, we synthesized two main chain–type block copolymers featuring hydrogen bond donor and acceptor segments through atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) using a bifunctionalized polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) nanoparticle as the initiator. Hydrosilylation of vinylbenzyl chloride at the two corners of a double-decker silsesquioxane (DDSQ) provided the bifunctionalized benzyl chloride initiator VBC-DDSQ-VBC, which we applied as a platform to prepare a main chain–type polystyrene homopolymer (PS-DDSQ-PS), the diblock copolymer poly(styrene–b–4-vinylpyridine) (P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP), and the diblock copolymer poly(styrene–b–tert-butoxystyrene) (PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS) through sequential ATRP. Selective hydrolysis of the tert-butoxyl units of PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS yielded the strongly hydrogen bonding diblock copolymer poly (styrene-b-vinylphenol) (PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh). We used Fourier transfer infrared spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, size exclusion chromatography, differential scanning calorimetry, mass-analyzed laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry, and transmission electron microscopy to investigate the chemical structures, thermal behavior, and self-assembled nanostructures formed by these main chain–type block copolymers based on DDSQ.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The self-assembled nanostructures (e.g., cylindrical, lamellar, spherical, and double-gyroid structures) that form from immiscible diblock copolymers (BCPs) have received much attention because of their potential applications in, for example, nano-patterning, drug delivery, and photonic crystals [1,2,3,4,5]. The blending of a homopolymer or a BCP into another BCP matrix, to mediate the volume fraction of the BCP segment, is a relatively facile means of obtaining various self-assembled nanostructures [6,7,8,9]. Positioning hydrogen bond donor or acceptor units into the block segments can alleviate macrophase separation in diblock copolymer mixtures; indeed, many experimental and theoretical studies have been undertaken into the preparation of such block copolymer/homopolymer and block copolymer mixtures [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
The incorporation of inorganic nanoparticles into self-assembled BCPs in the form of block copolymer/nanoparticle (BCP/NP) composites, with the blends stabilized through specific interactions, has potential applications in nanodevices, photonics, and sensors [19,20,21,22,23]. Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSSs) are particularly useful nanoparticles for the preparation of hybrid materials, because they typically have cage-like structures with dimensions of 1–3 nm [24,25,26,27,28,29]. In general, functionalized POSS NPs have been prepared with one, two, or eight functionalized units; we have discussed their effects on the self-assembled structures of BCP hybrid complexes in several previous reports [30,31,32]. For example, the number of phenolic functionalities of a POSS NP strongly affects the self-assembled structures formed when blended with poly (styrene–b–4-vinylpyridine) (PS-b-P4VP) BCPs, stabilized through hydrogen bonding [32]. Furthermore, we have also observed order–order morphological transitions upon increasing the concentrations of functionalized POSS NPs capable of hydrogen bonding [32,33].
In addition to BCP/POSS composites formed through specific physical interactions, covalent chemical bonding of BCPs with POSS NPs has also attracted much interest [34,35,36,37,38,39]. For example, POSS NPs have been positioned at chain ends (e.g., in POSS-b-PS [34,35,36], POSS-b-PMMA [37,38], and POSS-b-PBLG [39,40]) and at junction points (e.g., in PS-b-POSS-b-PDMS [41]) through living polymerization and controlled living radical polymerization to obtain related hybrid block copolymers. Furthermore, star block copolymers prepared through living polymerization and controlled living radical polymerization, using POSS NPs as cores, have also been widely investigated in the forms of PS-b-P4VP [42], PS-b-PVPh [42], PS-b-PMMA [43], and PEO-b-PBLA [44] hybrid block copolymers. To the best of our knowledge, however, main chain–type BCPs based on bifunctionalized POSS NPs have never been reported previously; thus, we became interested in the synthesis of main chain BCPs featuring POSS NPs at their junction points, prepared using nano-sized bifunctional initiators.
In this study, we performed atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of styrene, 4-butoxystryene, and 4-vinylpyridine monomers from a bis (4-vinylbenzyl chloride) double-decker silsesquioxane (VBC-DDSQ-VBC) as the bifunctionalized initiator. We used this approach to synthesize a main chain–type PS homopolymer and the main chain–type diblock copolymers PS-b-PVPh and PS-b-P4VP, featuring hydrogen bond donor and acceptor units, respectively (Scheme 1). Taking into account the fact that the initiators of VBC-DDSQ-VBC for ATRP were located at the junction points of the DDSQ, the propagation through ATRP extension from such a DDSQ cube appears to be a promising and feasible method for the ATRP-based preparation of well-defined structures. We used Fourier transfer infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, size exclusion chromatography (SEC), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), mass-analyzed laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to investigate the chemical structures, thermal behavior, and self-assembled nanostructures of these materials.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Styrene, 4-vinylbenzyl chloride (VBC), 4-tert-butoxystyrene, and 4-vinylpyridine were purchased from Aldrich, dried over CaH2 and distilled prior to use. Phenyltrimethoxysilane [Scheme 1a], methyl dichlorosilane, tetrahydrofuran (THF), 2-propanol, charcoal, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), ethanol (EtOH), methanol (MeOH), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), acetonitrile, cyclohexane, and magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) were also purchased from Aldrich. DDSQ was synthesized as described previously [Scheme 1c] [45,46,47].

2.2. Bis(4-Vinylbenzyl chloride) Double-Decker Silsesquioxane (VBC-DDSQ-VBC)

A mixture of DDSQ (5 g), toluene (5 mL), VBC (1.33 mL) and Pt (dvs) (0.01 mL) were added and then the mixture was heated at 75 °C with stirring for 48 h to complete hydrosilylation. The mixture was filtered through charcoal and then the filtrate was concentrated through vacuum distillation. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and extracted three times with a H2O/MeOH mixture. After drying (MgSO4, stirring for 30 min), the mixture was filtered to give a clear filtrate, which was dried in a vacuum oven for 24 h at 60 °C to give a white solid [Scheme 1d] (yield: 82%).

2.3. PS-DDSQ-PS

A mixture of VBC-DDSQ-VBC (0.380 g), CuBr (0.108 g), and THF (5 mL) was placed into a flask equipped with a reflux condenser and vacuumed by liquid N2 three times to deplete water. Styrene (12.0 mL) and PMDETA (0.162 mL) were added and then the mixture was stirred at 110 °C for 6 h. The solution was evaporated through vacuum filtration where alumina oxide was packed to filter Cu ions. The resulting clear solution was concentrated through vacuum distillation and re-precipitated from MeOH to obtain a white filamentous material. The mixture was evaporated through vacuum filtration to obtain a white powder, which was dried in a vacuum oven for 24 h at 60 °C to provide PS-DDSQ-PS as a white solid [Scheme 1e].

2.4. P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP

The mixture of PS-DDSQ-PS (0.5 g) and CuBr (0.0195 g) was placed in a flask equipped with a reflux condenser and vacuumed by liquid N2 three times to deplete water. 4-Vinylpyridine (8 mL) and PMDETA (0.03 mL) were added and then the mixture was stirred at 110 °C for 8 and 12 h, respectively. The solution was evaporated through vacuum filtration where alumina oxide was packed to filter Cu ions. The resulting clear solution was concentrated through vacuum distillation and re-precipitated in hexane to obtain a filamentous material. The mixture was evaporated through vacuum filtration to obtain a powder, which was dried in a vacuum oven for 24 h at 60 °C to give P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP.

2.5. PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS and PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh

The mixture of PS-DDSQ-PS (0.25 g) and CuBr (0.01 g) was placed in a flask equipped with a reflux condenser and vacuumed by liquid N2 three times to deplete water. 4-tert-Butoxystyrene (6.0 mL) and PMDETA (0.015 mL) were added and the mixture vacuumed by liquid N2 again. After stirring at 110 °C for 24 h, the solution was evaporated through vacuum filtration where alumina oxide was packed to filter Cu ions. The resulting clear solution was evaporated through vacuum distillation and re-precipitated from MeOH to obtain a filamentous material. The mixture was evaporated through vacuum filtration to obtain a powder, which was dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 24 h, providing the block copolymer PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS as a solid. The block copolymer PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh was prepared through the hydrolysis of PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS in 1,4-dioxane under reflux at 85 °C in the presence of HCl (37 wt%) for 24 h. The mixture was neutralized with NaOH solution (5 wt%) to pH 6–7 and then subjected to three dissolve/precipitate cycles [using THF and MeOH/H2O solvent mixtures (1:1, v/v)]. The resulting solid was dried in a vacuum oven overnight at 60 °C.

2.6. Characterization

FTIR spectra were recorded at room temperature at a resolution of 4 cm−1 within the range from 4000 to 400 cm−1 from 32 scans, using a Nicolet 320 FTIR spectrometer and the typical KBr pellet method. NMR spectra were recorded using an INOVA 500 instrument with CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 as the solvent. The molecular weights of the DDSQ-based PS block copolymers were evaluated from their 1H NMR spectra; their polydispersity indices (PDIs) were determined using GPC (Waters 510 apparatus) where the molecular weight calibration was used by PS standard and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonics Autoflex MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer). The thermal properties of the DDSQ-based block copolymers were determined through DSC using a TA Q-20 instrument; the sample was placed in an aluminum pan and heated at a rate of 20 °C min−1 from room temperature to 250 °C under a N2 atmosphere (50 mL/min) after the sample was cooled quickly to −90 °C from the first scan. TEM images were recorded using a JEOL 2100 microscope (Japan) operated at 200 kV; ultrathin films were prepared using a Leica Ultracut microtome featuring a diamond knife and placed on a Cu grid coated with a carbon film. The P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP thin film was imaged after staining with I2 to display its P4VP segments; the PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh thin film was stained with RuO4 to display its PVPh segments.

3. Results

3.1. Synthesis of the Homopolymer PS-DDSQ-PS

Scheme 1a–c displays the synthesis of the PS-DDSQ-PS homopolymer and the corresponding chemical structures of the DDSQ compounds, as confirmed using FTIR, 1H NMR spectroscopy and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Figure 1 provides the FTIR and 1H NMR spectra of each compound obtained during the preparation of the PS-DDSQ-PS homopolymer. The FTIR spectrum of each DDSQ compound featured a strong signal for the Si–O–Si units at 1097 cm−1, with weak signals at 1261 cm−1 for the SiCH3 units of DDSQ [Figure 1A,a] and VBC-DDSQ-VBC [Figure 1A,b]. Furthermore, a signal at 2172 cm−1, representing Si–H stretching, appeared for pure DDSQ [Figure 1A,a], but it disappeared after the hydrosilylation of VBC with DDSQ [Figure 1A,b], indicating the success of the reaction. The 1H NMR spectrum of DDSQ [Figure 1B,a] featured signals for the aromatic protons at 7.50–7.14 ppm, the SiCH3 units at 0.36 ppm, and the SiH groups at 4.98 ppm. The signal for the SiH groups was absent from the spectrum of VBC-DDSQ-VBC [Figure 1B,b] after the vinyl units of VBC had undergone hydrosilylation. Signals for both the α- and β-configurations of the hydrosilylation product were evident; the ratio of β to α linkages in VBC-DDSQ-VBC was 1.22:1, based on integration of the signals e and e’ (or d and d’), again confirming the success of the reaction.
Figure 2 displays the MALDI-TOF mass spectra of DDSQ and VBC-DDSQ-VBC, revealing their monodisperse mass distributions: [DDSQ + Na]+ at 1175 g/mol and [VBC-DDSQ-VBC + Na]+ at 1486 g/mol, consistent with their expected structures. Thus, the FTIR, NMR, and mass spectra confirmed the synthesis of the VBC-DDSQ-VBC initiator for ATRP.
Next, we synthesized PS-DDSQ-PS from the initiator VBC-DDSQ-VBC through ATRP [Scheme 1e]. We performed this ATRP with CuBr as the catalyst and PMEDTA as the ligand at 110 °C for 6 h; the conversion of the styrene monomer was 78% and the degree of polymerization (DP) was 112. Figure 1c presents the FTIR and 1H NMR spectra of the PS56-DDSQ-PS56 hybrid polymer; signals for the aromatic ring in the former appeared at 3030 and 1600 cm−1 [Figure 1A,c] while in the latter the aromatic protons appeared at 6.36–7.10 ppm and the main chain CH and CH2 protons appeared at 1.85 and 1.41 ppm [Figure 1B,c], indicating the successful ATRP yielding the PS-DDSQ-PS hybrid polymer. Figure 3A reveals shifts in the SEC distributions to lower retention times, indicating that the molecular weight increased upon increasing the reaction time, consistent with the FTIR spectra in Figure 3B of PS-DDSQ-PS hybrid polymers having PS segments of different molecular weights. Here, the intensity of the signal for Si–O–Si stretching of DDSQ was maintained, but the intensity of the corresponding absorptions of the PS segments at 3030, 1060, and 696 cm−1 all increased upon increasing the molecular weight of the PS segment [48].
Table 1 summarizes the molecular weights and PDIs of our PS-DDSQ-PS hybrid polymers. The well-defined structure of the PS20-DDSQ-PS20 hybrid polymer was confirmed from its MALDI-TOF mass spectrum (Figure 4), which presented only one apparent mass distribution. The mass difference between each pair of adjacent peaks was 104.15 g mol−1, equal to the expected mass of the repeat unit of a PS segment. Therefore, the NMR spectra, FTIR spectra, GPC traces, and mass spectra all confirmed the successful ATRP of the PS-DDSQ-PS hybrid polymers.

3.2. Synthesis of PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS and PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh

Scheme 1d–f summarizes the preparation of block copolymers based on DDSQ hybrids through ATRP. We used FTIR and 1H NMR spectra (Figure 5) to characterize the structures of the block copolymer hybrids PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b- PtBuOS and PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh. Compared with the FTIR spectrum of the hybrid polymer PS91-DDSQ-PS91 [Figure 5A,a], that of the hybrid block copolymer PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS [Figure 5A,b] exhibited additional signals at 1243, 1163, and 905 cm−1 corresponding to the C–O and C–O–C stretching and C–H bending, respectively. Furthermore, the signal at 1.56 ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum of the hybrid block copolymer PtBuOS78-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-PtBuOS78 [Figure 5B,b], corresponding to the tert-butyl (C4H9) protons of the PtBuOS block segment, confirmed the successful ATRP of the tBuOS groups to give the PS-DDSQ-PS hybrid polymer. This signal at 1.56 ppm for the PtBuOS block segment essentially disappeared after treatment with N2H4, with a new peak appearing at 8.93 ppm representing the OH units of the PVPh block segment [Figure 5B,c],. Furthermore, the hydrolysis of the tert-butyl groups was evidenced by the signals at 1163 and 905 cm−1 decreasing in intensity, with a signal representing the presence of phenolic OH units for the PVPh block segment at 3400 cm−1, [Figure 5A,c],due to the self-association of hydrogen bonding units [42], suggesting the successful hydrolysis and the formation of the hybrid block copolymer PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh.
Figure 6 displays the heating scans of the DSC analyses of the hybrid polymers PS-DDSQ-PS, PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS, and PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh. The glass transition temperature (Tg) of the hybrid polymer PS-DDSQ-PS (110 °C) was higher than that of a PS homopolymer because the inorganic DDSQ nanoparticles enhanced the thermal properties [49]. For the block copolymer hybrid PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS, the value of Tg was also 110 °C, consistent with the value of Tg of a PtBuOS block segment being similar to that of a PS block segment [43]. Two values of Tg appeared, at 110 and 192 °C, for the block copolymer hybrid PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh, implying that microphase separation existed as a result of chemical incompatibility between the PS and PVPh block segments. The value of Tg of the PtBuOS block (110 °C) increased significantly to 192 °C for the PVPh segment in the DDSQ block copolymer because strong OH···OH hydrogen bonding decreases the free volume of the PVPh block segment. Figure 7 displays a TEM image of the block copolymer hybrid PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh; the apparent short-range order of a lamellae structure is similar to that we observed for the pure diblock copolymer PS-b-PVPh in a previous study. Furthermore, the dark regions in the TEM images may have arisen from aggregation of DDSQ nanoparticles having dimensions of approximately 2–3 nm, indicating that the DDSQ units had dispersed well in the block copolymer matrix.

3.3. Synthesis of P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP

Scheme 1h displays the synthetic process toward the hybrid block copolymer P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP through sequential ATRP. Figure 8A presents the FTIR spectrum of the block copolymer P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP, revealing extra signals for pyridine stretching at 1590 and 993 cm−1, corresponding to the P4VP block segment, when compared with the spectrum of PS-DDSQ-PS. The intensities of these two characteristic signals for pyridine rings increased upon increasing the reaction time (8 and 12 h) of the 4-vinylpyridine monomer. Furthermore, Figure 8B displays typical 1H NMR spectra of the hybrid block copolymers PS-DDSQ-PS and P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP; Figure 8B,a,c) summarize the peak assignments. Signals representing the protons of the aromatic and pyridine rings appeared at 7.26–6.25 and 8.3 ppm, respectively; the integrated area for the signal of the extra pyridine units (peak n) at 8.3 ppm also increased upon increasing the reaction time (8 h and 12 h) of the 4-vinylpyridine monomer. We could use these 1H NMR spectra to calculate the molecular weights of the hybrid block copolymers P4VP62-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP62 (8 h) and P4VP98-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP98 (12 h).
Figure 9 presents the second heating scans of the DSC analyses of the hybrid block copolymers PS91-DDSQ-PS91, P4VP62-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP62, and P4VP98-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP98. Both of these P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP hybrid block copolymers displayed two glass transition temperatures, indicating that their two block segments were chemically incompatible, inducing microphase separation. The lower value of Tg represented the PS blocks, while the higher value of Tg represented the P4VP blocks. P4VP62-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP62 displayed values of Tg of 112 and 158 °C; for P4VP98-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP98 these values were 114 and 160 °C. Increasing the molecular weight of the P4VP block segment in the P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP hybrid block copolymer improved the thermal properties because of the greater hard confinement of this hybrid block copolymer.
Figure 10 displays TEM images of the hybrid block copolymers P4VP62-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP62 and P4VP98-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP98 stained with I2. The dark regions correspond to the P4VP block segments; the bright regions, the PS block segments. We observed a cylinder structure for the hybrid block copolymer P4VP62-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP62, as displayed in Figure 10a,b, with a minor phase (dark region) arising from the P4VP block segments, as displayed in Figure 10c, because the volume fraction of P4VP was approximately 31%. Increasing the molecular weight of the P4VP block segment, giving the hybrid block copolymer P4VP98-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP98, resulted in a lamellar structure, as displayed in Figure 10d,e; here, the volume fraction of P4VP block segments was approximately 52%, close to the 50% found in a typical lamellar structure [Figure 10f].
Thus, in this study we could indeed synthesize block copolymers (PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b- PVPh, P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP) featuring strongly hydrogen bonding donor and acceptor block segments. In the near future we will investigate the hydrogen bonding interactions and self-assembly of PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh/P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP block copolymer mixtures.

4. Conclusions

We have synthesized two DDSQ-functionalized hydrogen bond donor and acceptor hybrid block copolymers—PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh and P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP—through sequential ATRP, and characterized them using FTIR spectroscopy, NMR spectroscopy, GPC, DSC, and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Both the hybrid block copolymers PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh and P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP exhibited two glass transition temperatures, indicative of microphase separation with lamellar or cylindrical structures, which we confirmed through TEM image analyses. This facile approach allows the preparation, through controlled living radical polymerizations, of main chain–type block copolymers featuring DDSQ NPs at their junction point.

Author Contributions

W.-C.C. and Y.-H.T. did the experiment, C.-F.W., C.-F.H., T.C. helped to design the ATRP polymerization, L.D. helped to design the POSS composite, and S.-W.K. contributed to the literature review and to the writing of this paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under contracts MOST 106-2221-E-110-067-MY3, MOST 105-2221-E-110-092-MY3, and also supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants U1805253 and 51773214).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guiod, A.R.; Vandermeulen, W.M.; Klok, V.H. Advanced drug delivery devices via self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 270–279. [Google Scholar]
  2. Vu, D.T.; Chiu, H.W.; Nababan, R.; Le, Q.M.; Kuo, S.W.; Chau, L.K.; Ting, C.C.; Kan, H.C.; Hsu, C.C. Enhancing upconversion luminescence emission of rare earth nanophosphors in aqueous solution with thousands fold enhancement factor by low refractive index resonant waveguide grating. ACS Photonics 2018, 5, 3263–3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lin, E.L.; Hsu, W.L.; Chiang, Y.W. Trapping structural coloration by a bioinspired gyroid microstructure in solid state. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jenekhe, S.A.; Chen, X.L. Self-assembly of ordered microporous materials from rod-coil block copolymers. Science 1999, 283, 372–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fuller, E.G.; Sun, H.; Dhavalikar, R.D.; Unni, M.; Scheutz, G.M.; Sumerlin, B.S.; Rinaldi, C. Externally Triggered Heat and Drug Release from Magnetically Controlled Nanocarriers. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2019, 1, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jiang, M.; Xie, H. Miscibility and morphology in block copolymer/homopolymer blends. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1991, 16, 977–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, J.Q.; Pearce, E.M.; Kwei, T.K. Binary and ternary blends of polystyrene-block-poly(p-hydroxystyrene). Macromolecules 1997, 30, 7119–7126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Han, Y.K.; Pearce, E.M.; Kwei, T.K. Poly(styrene-b-vinylphenyldimethylsilanol) and its blends with homopolymers. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 1321–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shih, R.S.; Kuo, S.W.; Chang, F.C. Thermal and mechanical properties of microcellular thermoplastic SBS/PS/SBR blend: Effect of crosslinking. Polymer 2011, 52, 752–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dobrosielska, K.; Wakao, S.; Takano, A.; Matsushita, Y. Nanophase-separated structures of AB block copolymer/C homopolymer blends with complementary hydrogen-bonding interactions. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 7695–7698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dehghan, A.; Shi, A.C. Modeling hydrogen bonding in diblock copolymer/homopolymer blends. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 5796–5805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miyase, H.; Asai, Y.; Takano, A.; Matsushita, Y. Kaleidoscopic tiling patterns with large unit cells from ABC star-shaped terpolymer/diblock copolymer blends with hydrogen bonding interaction. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 979–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tsai, C.C.; Gan, Z.; Chen, T.; Kuo, S.W. Competitive Hydrogen Bonding Interactions Influence the Secondary and Hierarchical Self-Assembled Structures of Polypeptide-Based Triblock Copolymers. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 3017–3029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tseng, T.C.; Kuo, S.W. Hydrogen-Bonding Strength Influences Hierarchical Self-Assembled Structures in Unusual Miscible/Immiscible Diblock Copolymer Blends. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 6451–6459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tsou, C.T.; Kuo, S.W. Competing Hydrogen Bonding Interaction Creates Hierarchically Ordered Self-Assembled Structures of PMMA-b-P4VP/PVPh-b-PS Mixtures. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 8374–8383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tseng, T.C.; Kuo, S.W. Hydrogen bonding induces unusual self-assembled structures from mixtures of two miscible disordered diblock copolymers. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 116, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Su, W.C.; Tsai, F.C.; Huang, C.F.; Dai, L.; Kuo, S.W. Flexible Epoxy Resins Formed by Blending with the Diblock Copolymer PEO-b-PCL and Using a Hydrogen-Bonding Benzoxazine as the Curing Agent. Polymers 2019, 11, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tseng, T.C.; Kuo, S.W. Hierarchical Self-Assembled Structures from Diblock Copolymer Mixtures by Competitive Hydrogen Bonding Strength. Molecules 2018, 23, 2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, H.; Guo, S.; Fu, S.; Zhao, Y. A Near-Infrared Light-Responsive Hybrid Hydrogel Based on UCST Triblock Copolymer and Gold Nanorods. Polymers 2017, 9, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hoheisel, T.N.; Hur, K.; Wiesner, U.B. Block copolymer-nanoparticle hybrid self-assembly. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 40, 3–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sarkar, B.; Alexandridis, P. Block copolymer–nanoparticle composites: Structure, functional properties, and processing. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 40, 33–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, H.S.; Khan, A.; Choe, Y.; Huh, J.; Bang, J.; Stefik, M.; Guldin, S.; Vignolini, S.; Wiesner, U.B.; Steinere, U. Block copolymer self-assembly for nanophotonics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 5076–5091. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mable, C.J.; Gibson, R.R.; Prevost, S.; McKenzie, B.E.; Mykhaylyk, O.O.; Armes, S.P. Loading of Silica Nanoparticles in Block Copolymer Vesicles during Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly: Encapsulation Efficiency and Thermally Triggered Release. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 16098–16108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W. Functional Polyimide/Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane Nanocomposites. Polymers 2019, 11, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, Y.K.; Tsai, F.C.; Ma, C.C.; Wang, M.L.; Kuo, S.W. Using Methacryl-Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane as the Thermal Stabilizer and Plasticizer in Poly (vinyl chloride) Nanocomposites. Polymers 2019, 11, 1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Mohamed, M.G.; Kuo, S.W. Functional Silica and Carbon Nanocomposites Based on Polybenzoxazines. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2019, 220, 1800306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Blanco, I. The Rediscovery of POSS: A Molecule Rather than a Filler. Polymers 2018, 10, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Chen, W.C.; Lin, R.C.; Tseng, S.M.; Kuo, S.W. Minimizing the Strong Screening Effect of Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane Nanoparticles in Hydrogen-Bonded Random Copolymers. Polymers 2018, 10, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ullah, A.; Shah, S.M.; Hussain, H. Amphiphilic tadpole-shaped POSS-poly(glycerol methacrylate) hybrid polymers: Synthesis and self-assembly. J. Polym. Res. 2019, 26, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lu, Y.S.; Kuo, S.W. Functional groups on POSS nanoparticles influence the self-assembled structures of diblock copolymer composites. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 34849–34859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lu, Y.S.; Yu, C.Y.; Lin, Y.C.; Kuo, S.W. Hydrogen Bonding Strength of Diblock Copolymers Affects the Self-Assembled Structures with Octa-Functionalized Phenol POSS Nanoparticles. Soft Matt. 2016, 12, 2288–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, C.Y.; Kuo, S.W. Phenolic Functionality of Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane Nanoparticles Affects Self-Assembly Supramolecular Structures of Block Copolymer Hybrid Complexes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 2546–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, Y.R.; Wu, Y.C.; Kuo, S.W. Transforming the Self-Assembled Structures of Diblock Copolymer/POSS Nanoparticle Composites through Complementary Multiple Hydrogen Bonding Interactions. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2013, 214, 1496–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, W.; Huang, M.; Su, H.; Zhang, S.; Yue, K.; Dong, X.H.; Li, X.; Liu, H.; Zhang, S.; Wesdemiotis, C.; et al. Toward Controlled Hierarchical Heterogeneities in Giant Molecules with Precisely Arranged Nano Building Blocks. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Yu, X.; Zhong, S.; Li, X.; Tu, Y.; Yang, S.; Horn, R.M.; Ni, C.; Pochan, D.J.; Quirk, R.P.; Wesdemiotis, C.; et al. A Giant Surfactant of Polystyrene−(Carboxylic Acid-Functionalized Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane) Amphiphile with Highly Stretched Polystyrene Tails in Micellar Assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16741–16744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yu, X.; Yue, K.; Hsieh, I.F.; Li, Y.; Dong, X.H.; Liu, C.; Xin, Y.; Wang, H.F.; Shi, A.C.; Newkome, G.R.; et al. Giant surfactants provide a versatile platform for sub-10-nm nanostructure engineering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 10078–10083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Huang, C.F.; Kuo, S.W.; Lin, F.J.; Huang, W.J.; Wang, C.F.; Chen, W.Y.; Chang, F.C. Influence of PMMA-Chain-End Tethered Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxanes on the Miscibility and Specific Interaction with Phenolic Blends. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chiou, C.W.; Lin, Y.C.; Wang, L.; Hirano, C.; Suzuki, Y.; Hayakawa, T.; Kuo, S.W. Strong Screening Effect of Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxanes (POSS) Nanoparticles on Hydrogen Bonded Polymer Blends. Polymers 2014, 6, 926–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lin, Y.C.; Kuo, S.W. Hierarchical self-assembly and secondary structures of linear polypeptides graft onto POSS in the side chain through click chemistry. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lin, Y.C.; Kuo, S.W. Self-assembly and secondary structures of linear polypeptides tethered to polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanoparticles through click chemistry. J. Polym. Sci. Part. A Polym. Chem. 2011, 49, 2127–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, W.B.; Sun, B.; Li, H.; Ren, X.; Janoski, J.; Sahoo, S.; Dabney, D.E.; Wesdemiotis, C.; Quirk, R.P.; Cheng, S.Z.D. Synthesis of In-Chain-Functionalized Polystyrene-blockpoly(dimethylsiloxane) Diblock Copolymers by Anionic Polymerization and Hydrosilylation Using Dimethyl-[4-(1-phenylvinyl)phenyl]silane. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 7258–7262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lu, C.H.; Wang, J.H.; Chang, F.C.; Kuo, S.W. Star Block Copolymers through Nitroxide-Mediated Radical Polymerization from Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane (POSS) Core. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2010, 211, 1339–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, F.; Lu, X.; He, C. Some recent developments of polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)-based polymeric materials. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 2775–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, H.; He, B. Synthesis and Drug Release of Star-Shaped Poly(benzyl l-aspartate)-block-poly(ethylene glycol) Copolymers with POSS Cores. Macromol. Biosci. 2014, 14, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chen, W.C.; Ahmed, M.M.M.; Wang, C.F.; Huang, C.F.; Kuo, S.W. Highly thermally stable mesoporous Poly (cyanate ester) featuring double-decker–shaped polyhedral silsesquioxane framework. Polymer 2019, 185, 121940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, W.C.; Kuo, S.W. Ortho-Imide and Allyl Groups Effect on Highly Thermally Stable Polybenzoxazine/Double-Decker-Shaped Polyhedral Silsesquioxane Hybrids. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 9602–9612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liao, Y.T.; Lin, Y.C.; Kuo, S.W. Highly Thermally Stable, Transparent, and Flexible Polybenzoxazine Nanocomposites by Combination of Double-Decker-Shaped Polyhedral Silsesquioxanes and Polydimethylsiloxane. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 5739–5747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kuo, S.W.; Huang, C.F.; Tung, P.H.; Huang, W.J.; Huang, J.M.; Chang, F.C. Synthesis, thermal properties, and specific interactions of high Tg increase in poly (2, 6-dimethyl-1, 4-phenylene oxide)-block-polystyrene copolymers. Polymer 2005, 46, 9348–9361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Blanco, I.; Bottino, F.A.; Cicala, G.; Cozzo, G.; Latteri, A.; Recca, A. Synthesis and thermal characterization of new dumbbell shaped POSS/PS nanocomposites: Influence of the symmetrical structure of the nanoparticles on the dispersion/aggregation in the polymer matrix. Polym. Compos. 2015, 36, 1394–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 12 00465 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of main chain–type block copolymers (e) PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh and (f) P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP from (a) DDSQ, (b) VBC-DDSQ-VBC, (c) PS-DDSQ-PS, and (d) PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS through selective hydrolysis of (e).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of main chain–type block copolymers (e) PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh and (f) P4VP-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-P4VP from (a) DDSQ, (b) VBC-DDSQ-VBC, (c) PS-DDSQ-PS, and (d) PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS through selective hydrolysis of (e).
Polymers 12 00465 sch001
Polymers 12 00465 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) FTIR and (B) 1H NMR spectra of (a) DDSQ, (b) VBC-DDSQ-VBC, and (c) PS-DDSQ-PS.
Figure 1. (A) FTIR and (B) 1H NMR spectra of (a) DDSQ, (b) VBC-DDSQ-VBC, and (c) PS-DDSQ-PS.
Polymers 12 00465 g001
Polymers 12 00465 g002 550
Figure 2. MALDI-TOF mass spectra of DDSQ and VBC-DDSQ-VBC.
Figure 2. MALDI-TOF mass spectra of DDSQ and VBC-DDSQ-VBC.
Polymers 12 00465 g002
Polymers 12 00465 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) SEC and (B) FTIR spectra of PS-DDSQ-PS homopolymers prepared with ATRP reaction times of (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, (d) 4, (e) 5, and (f) 6 h.
Figure 3. (A) SEC and (B) FTIR spectra of PS-DDSQ-PS homopolymers prepared with ATRP reaction times of (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3, (d) 4, (e) 5, and (f) 6 h.
Polymers 12 00465 g003
Polymers 12 00465 g004 550
Figure 4. MALDI-TOF mass spectra of the hybrid polymer PS20-DDSQ-PS20.
Figure 4. MALDI-TOF mass spectra of the hybrid polymer PS20-DDSQ-PS20.
Polymers 12 00465 g004
Polymers 12 00465 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) FTIR and (B) 1H NMR spectra of (a) PS-DDSQ-PS, (b) PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS, and (c) PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh.
Figure 5. (A) FTIR and (B) 1H NMR spectra of (a) PS-DDSQ-PS, (b) PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS, and (c) PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh.
Polymers 12 00465 g005
Polymers 12 00465 g006 550
Figure 6. DSC thermograms of (a) PS-DDSQ-PS, (b) PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS, and (c) PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh.
Figure 6. DSC thermograms of (a) PS-DDSQ-PS, (b) PtBuOS-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PtBuOS, and (c) PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh.
Polymers 12 00465 g006
Polymers 12 00465 g007 550
Figure 7. TEM images (a–d) of the hybrid block copolymer PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh.
Figure 7. TEM images (a–d) of the hybrid block copolymer PVPh-b-PS-DDSQ-PS-b-PVPh.
Polymers 12 00465 g007
Polymers 12 00465 g008 550
Figure 8. (A) FTIR and (B) 1H NMR spectra of (a) PS-DDSQ-PS, (b) P4VP62-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP62, and (c) P4VP98-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP98.
Figure 8. (A) FTIR and (B) 1H NMR spectra of (a) PS-DDSQ-PS, (b) P4VP62-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP62, and (c) P4VP98-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP98.
Polymers 12 00465 g008
Polymers 12 00465 g009 550
Figure 9. DSC thermograms of (a) PS-DDSQ-PS, (b) P4VP62-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP62, and (c) P4VP98-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP98.
Figure 9. DSC thermograms of (a) PS-DDSQ-PS, (b) P4VP62-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP62, and (c) P4VP98-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP98.
Polymers 12 00465 g009
Polymers 12 00465 g010 550
Figure 10. (a,b) TEM images of P4VP62-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP62. (c) Possible scheme for the corresponding cylinder structure. (d,e) TEM images of P4VP98-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP98. (f) Possible scheme for the corresponding lamellar structure.
Figure 10. (a,b) TEM images of P4VP62-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP62. (c) Possible scheme for the corresponding cylinder structure. (d,e) TEM images of P4VP98-b-PS91-DDSQ-PS91-b-P4VP98. (f) Possible scheme for the corresponding lamellar structure.
Polymers 12 00465 g010
Table
Table 1. Molecular weights of PS-b-DDSQ-b-PS polymers used in this study.
Table 1. Molecular weights of PS-b-DDSQ-b-PS polymers used in this study.
SamplePS (Mn) aPDI b
1 h40001.05
2 h43001.16
3 h54001.22
4 h76001.27
5 h11,1001.31
6 h19,0001.42
a: Determined from 1H NMR spectra. b: Determined through GPC analysis.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, W.-C.; Tsao, Y.-H.; Wang, C.-F.; Huang, C.-F.; Dai, L.; Chen, T.; Kuo, S.-W. Main Chain–Type Block Copolymers through Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization from Double-Decker–Shaped Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane Hybrids. Polymers 2020, 12, 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12020465

AMA Style

Chen W-C, Tsao Y-H, Wang C-F, Huang C-F, Dai L, Chen T, Kuo S-W. Main Chain–Type Block Copolymers through Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization from Double-Decker–Shaped Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane Hybrids. Polymers. 2020; 12(2):465. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12020465

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Wei-Cheng, Yu-Hsuan Tsao, Chih-Feng Wang, Chih-Feng Huang, Lizong Dai, Tao Chen, and Shiao-Wei Kuo. 2020. "Main Chain–Type Block Copolymers through Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization from Double-Decker–Shaped Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane Hybrids" Polymers 12, no. 2: 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12020465

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop