Next Article in Journal
The Microstructure of Yellow River Ice in the Freezing Period
Next Article in Special Issue
Thermal Cyclic Properties of Ti-Pd-Pt-Zr High-Temperature Shape Memory Alloys
Previous Article in Journal
Aperiodic Photonics of Elliptic Curves
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-Physics Bi-Functional Intelligent Meta-Device Based on the Shape Memory Alloys
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Microalloying Effect of Ce on the Mechanical Properties of Medium Entropy Bulk Metallic Glass Composites

1
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Non-ferrous Metals, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2019, 9(9), 483; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst9090483
Submission received: 3 September 2019 / Revised: 10 September 2019 / Accepted: 12 September 2019 / Published: 15 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced High Temperature Shape Memory Alloys)

Abstract

:
Novel ultra-strong medium entropy bulk metallic glasses composites (BMGCs) Fe65.4−xCexMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 and Ti40−xCexNi40Cu20 (x = 0, 1.0), through the martensite transformation induced plasticity (TRIP effect) to enhance both the ductility and work-hardening capability, were fabricated using magnetic levitation melting and copper mold suction via high frequency induction heating. Furthermore, the Ce microalloying effects on microstructure and mechanical behaviors were studied. The Fe-based BMGCs consisted of face-centered cubic (fcc) γ-Fe and body-centered cubic (bcc) α-Fe phase, as well as Ti-based BMGCs containing supercooled B2-Ti (Ni, Cu) and a thermally induced martensite phase B19’-Ti (Ni, Cu). As loading, the TRIP BMGCs exhibited work-hardening behavior, a high fracture strength, and large plasticity, which was attributed to the stress-induced transformation of ε-Fe martensite and B19’-Ti (Ni, Cu) martensite. Ce addition further improved the strengthening and toughening effects of TRIP BMGCs. Adding elemental Ce enhanced the mixing entropy ΔSmix and atomic size difference δ, while reducing the mixing enthalpy ΔHmix, thus improving the glass forming ability and delaying the phase transition process, and hence prolonging the work-hardening period before fracturing. The fracture strength σf and plastic stress εp of Ti39CeNi40Cu20 and Fe64.4CeMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 alloys were up to 2635 MPa and 13.8%, and 2905 MPa and 30.1%, respectively.

1. Introduction

Due to their special structural properties of short-range order and long-range disorder, bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) exhibit excellent mechanical and functional properties, such as a high strength and elastic limit, low elastic modulus, and excellent wear-corrosion resistance [1,2]. However, a fatal drawback of BMGs, the limited ductility and strain softening as loading, restricts its application as an advanced structural material [3,4,5]. Recently, some alloy systems have offered the possibility to produce in situ composites consisting of shape memory crystals and a glassy matrix [6,7,8,9]. Bulk metallic glass composites (BMGCs) can overcome the problems with BMGs using a transformation induced plasticity (TRIP) effect as loading [10,11,12,13]. Besides, in recent years, it has been found that the addition of rare earth elements can not only effectively improve the ability of amorphous formation, but also play an important role toward deoxidation, metamorphism, and strengthening alloys [14,15]. As Ce is the most abundant rare earth element, being easy to extract and of low cost, it has become the preferred choice for research and industrial application [16]. In the current work, we developed Fe-based and Ti-based TRIP BMGCs, which both contain duel crystalline phases besides an amorphous matrix. Furthermore, we discuss the effect of Ce microalloying on the microstructure and work-hardening behaviors of the different alloy systems.

2. Materials and Methods

The ingots of the Fe65.4−xCexMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 and Ti40−xCexNi40Cu20 (x = 0, 1.0) (atomic percent, at. %) alloys, where x = 0 and 1.0, were prepared by mixing the constituent elements (Trillion Metals Co., Beijing, China) in a vacuum high-frequency induction furnace with a water-cooled Cu crucible under an argon atmosphere. Each ingot was re-melted at least six times to ensure homogeneity. Cylinder samples with a diameter of 2 mm for Fe-based and 3 mm for Ti-based alloys were prepared using suction casting into copper mold. The microstructure of the alloys was studied using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, D/max-2400, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu-Kα radiation (40 kV, 30 mA), thermal field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Quanta FEG 450, FEI Co., Hillsboro, Oregon, USA) operated at an acceleration voltage of 10 kV and a working distance of 8 mm, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2010,JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) coupled with fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the selected area under a 200 kV accelerating voltage. For compression tests, the electronic universal testing machine (Model 3382, Instron Co., Canton, MA, USA) was employed with a strain rate of 5 × 10−4 s−1. The cylinder samples with a height: diameter ratio of 2:1 were fabricated, and both ends of the samples were polished.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure of the Fe-Based and Ti-Based TRIP BMGCs

Figure 1 shows the high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image and fast Fourier transform (FFT) patterns of selected area for the as-cast Fe65.4Mn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 and Ti40Ni40Cu20 BMGCs, respectively. The disordered atomic arrangement of the amorphous phase, the ordered face-centered cubic γ-austenite, and the body-centered cubic α-ferrite in Fe-based BMGC; and the B2-Ti (Ni, Cu) austenite and B19’-Ti (Ni, Cu) martensite in Ti-based BMGC can be observed.
Figure 2 gives the X-ray diffraction patterns of as-cast and loading-fracture samples of Fe65.4−xCexMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 and Ti40−xCexNi40Cu20 (x = 0, 1.0) alloys. Amorphous diffuse scattering peaks can be observed in the XRD patterns of four alloys from 2θ = 40–50°, as well as the crystalline phases that were precipitated and superimposed on the diffuse scattering peaks, verifying that the composites consisted of duel crystal phases and an amorphous matrix. The diffuse scattering peak widths of the as-cast XRD images of Fe64.4Ce1.0Mn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 and Ti39Ce1.0Ni40Cu20 alloys with rare earth element Ce were higher than those without a rare earth element alloy, indicating that the addition of rare earth elements increased the volume fraction of the amorphous phase and enhanced the amorphous forming ability. Meanwhile, the precipitated crystal phases of the two Fe-based as-cast alloys were a supercooled shape memory austenite phase face-centered cubic (fcc) γ-Fe and ferrite phase body-centered cubic (bcc) α-Fe, indicating that both microstructures of the alloys were composed of an amorphous matrix and duel crystalline phases (Figure 2a). The precipitated crystals of the two Ti-based as-cast alloys were confirmed to be supercooled shape memory austenite phase B2-Ti (Ni, Cu) and thermally induced martensite phase B19’-Ti (Ni, Cu) (Figure 2b). As the addition of Ce elements can reduce the temperature of martensitic transformation, the austenite phase was stabilized during solidification. As can be seen from the as-cast XRD patterns, the volume fractions of the γ-Fe and B2-Ti (Ni, Cu) supercooled austenite were more than those of the alloys without the Ce addition. Furthermore, from the XRD patterns of loading fracture samples, the stress-induced hexagonal closed-packed (hcp) ε-Fe martensite and the B19’-Ti (Ni, Cu) martensite diffraction peaks can be clearly identified from the as-cast amorphous hump and crystalline peaks. Regarding loading, the local stress increased with the increase of dislocation density in the local region, and ultimately induced the martensite transformation.
The inherent thermodynamic properties dominated the state and properties of the amorphous and crystalline phases. According to Boltzmann’s equations [17,18], it is assumed that there are N atoms mixed in an alloy, where n0, ni, …, nr are the numbers of different elements and k is the Boltzmann constant; then, the mixing entropy ΔSmix of an alloy is:
Δ S m i x = k   l n ( N ! n 0 ! n 1 ! n r ! )
When the atomic ratios are non-equal:
Δ S m i x = R i = 1 i x i l n x i
where xi is the atomic percentage of components, and R is the gas constant.
The mixing enthalpy ΔHmix can be calculated by using the mixture enthalpy Δ H A B m i x of a binary system, which is shown in Table 1 [19]:
Δ H m i x = i = 1 , i j N 4 Δ H A B m i x x i x j
Thus, ΔSmix and ΔHmix of the four alloys could be calculated using Table 2. All the four TRIP BMGCs were confirmed to be medium entropy materials. Furthermore, the addition of the rare earth element Ce increased ΔSmix, improving the chaos degree of the alloy system, as well as promoting the formation of the denser disordered stacking arrangements. In addition, the reduction of ΔHmix reduced the driving force of crystallization, that is, it improved the amorphous forming ability of the two alloy systems.
Moreover, the parameter Ω, which can combine the effects of ΔSmix and ΔHmix on the stability of multicomponent solid solution, is defined as [21,22,23]:
Ω = T m Δ S m i x / | Δ H m i x |
T m = i = 1 n x i T i
Δ H m i x = i = 1 , i j n Ω i j c i c j
where n is the number of elements, xi is the mole fraction of each element, Ti is the melting temperature of each element, and Tm is the average melting temperature of the n-element alloy. Furthermore, a lower Ω and smaller n improve the glass-forming ability (GFA) of the BMGC [24].
Table 3 shows the atomic radius ratio ψ between the Ce element and the other components of the alloys. The atomic size differences were much larger than 12%, which promoted the formation of a denser and more uniform disordered stacking structure, as well as enhancing the solid–liquid interface energy. As the viscosity of the supercooled liquid increased and made the long-range diffusion of atoms more difficult, the GFA of the alloy was improved [25]
Figure 3 gives the relationships between phase selection, atomic size difference δ, and ΔHmix. δ is defined as [26]:
δ = i = 1 n x i ( 1 d i / j = 1 n x j d j ) 2
where di and dj are the atomic diameters of the components i and j, respectively. From Figure 3, the TRIP BMGCs were located in the BMG formation zone, that is, −40 < ΔHmix < −5 kJ/mol, and 6% < δ <18%.
Moreover, elemental Ce, which can be used as an oxygen adsorbent, preferentially reacts with residual O in the atmosphere to form a stable compound, thereby purifying the melts and suppressing the heterogeneous nucleation and crystal growth, thus improving their glass forming ability [3,14].

3.2. Mechanical Behaviors of the Fe-Based and Ti-Based TRIP BMGCs

Figure 4 shows the compressive engineering stress–strain curves of Fe-based and Ti-based TRIP BMGCs. All the four alloys exhibited excellent comprehensive mechanical properties, such as the high fracture strength σf, large plastic strain εp, and excellent work-hardening abilities. From Figure 4a, the fracture strength and plastic strain of Fe65.4Mn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 BMGC were 2321 MPa and 20.7%, respectively. After adding elemental Ce, the σf and εp went up to 2905 MPa and 30.1%. Furthermore, the energy stored up to the fracture of the Fe-based BMGCs, found via the integration of the stress versus strain curves, were 511.85 and 725.64 J/m3, respectively. From Figure 4b, the σf and εp of the Ti-based BMGC significantly improved from the 2006 MPa and 11.3% of Ti40Ni40Cu20 to 2635 MPa and 13.8% by adding 1% elemental Ce. Meanwhile, the energy stored up to the fracture of the Ti-based BMGCs improved from 193.22 to 404.49 J/m3.
Figure 5 gives the work-hardening rate θ versus the true strain curves for the four BMGCs. The θ can be obtained from dσT/dεT. In the initial stage of deformation, the alloys with no added Ce exhibited a larger θ and smaller yield strength σy. Since the elemental Ce contributed to the stabilization of the amorphous matrix, it was difficult to form dislocations when loading. The higher the dislocation density was, the greater the work-hardening rate.
From Figure 5a, the θ of Fe-based BMGCs was obviously smaller than that of the Ti-based BMGCs, which was attributed to the different mixed crystal structure. The existence of ferrite reduced the θ of Fe-based BMGCs. As austenite exhibits a higher work-hardening ability than ferrite [27], the TRIP effect dominated the work-hardening behavior of the composites. The alloys with added Ce showed a longer subsequent strengthening and toughening deformation stage. The enhanced GFA significantly delayed the proliferation of dislocations. In the last stage, the two curves nearly coincided. The austenite was almost exhausted by the phase transition, while ferrite played a dominant role.
From Figure 5b, as the GFA improved, Ti-based BMGCs showed a higher work-hardening rate, larger σy and smaller εp compared with Fe-based alloys. Furthermore, Ce addition decreased the dislocation density and delayed the phase transition process. When the strain was greater than 6%, the work-hardening rate was higher than Ti40Ni40Cu20. Ti39CeNi40Cu20 and Fe64.4CeMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 showed a longer work-hardening period before fracture than the alloys without added Ce. That is, Ce addition further improved the strengthening and toughening effects of TRIP BMGCs.

3.3. Fracture Morphology of the Fe-Based and Ti-Based TRIP BMGCs

Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the fracture morphology of the Fe-based and Ti-based TRIP BMGCs, respectively. The edge regions maintained the disordered structure from the frozen liquid metal due to the high cooling rate. Furthermore, as mentioned, adding elemental Ce can improve the GFA, as well as further develop the densely disordered clusters. As the final fracture occurred, the sudden rise of temperature in the locally softened shear bands led to local melting and thus formed numerous amorphous vein patterns. The densely continuous vein patterns can be seen in Figure 6a,c, and the distribution is more uniform in Figure 6c. From Figure 6b,d, a large quantity of dimples can be seen in the center zone of the Fe-based BMGCs, while the dimple distribution of Fe64.4CeMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 is more uniform. Compared with the Fe-based alloys, the veins in the edge region of the Ti-based BMGCs were sparse and developed in a river-like pattern, as well as the dimples in the center zone being relatively shallow. Furthermore, the dimples of the Ti39CeNi40Cu20 alloy were also more evenly distributed than without Ce addition.

4. Conclusions

In the present work, we designed the medium-entropy Fe-based and Ti-based BMGCs via shape memory crystalline phase transitions induced plasticity to enhance both their strength and ductility. Adding elemental Ce could stabilize the amorphous phase and enhance the GFA, as well as improve the TRIP effects. The Ce microalloyed BMGCs with larger ΔSmix and δ, and a smaller ΔHmix, exhibited a better GFA, as well as excellent comprehensive mechanical properties. The thermodynamic parameters of the Fe64.4CeMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 alloy—ΔSmix, δ, and ΔHmix—changed from 1.05R to 1.08R J·mol−1·K−1, 3.69% to 5.62%, and −14.34 to −14.43 kJ·mol−1, respectively. The σf and εp went up to 2905 MPa and 30.1%, respectively. For the Ti39CeNi40Cu20 alloy, ΔSmix and δ increased from 1.06R to 1.10R and 7.01 to 7.85, respectively. Furthermore, ΔHmix decreased from −23.72 to −24.12, and the σf and εp improved to 2635 MPa and 13.8% and 2905 MPa and 30.1%, respectively. The novel TRIP BMGCs can serve as an important guidance for future metastable metals with superior mechanical properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. and W.L.; methodology, Y.Z. and W.L.; validation, Y.Z. and W.L.; formal analysis, Y.Z., P.Z., and J.J.; investigation, Y.Z., P.Z., X.M., and J.J.; resources, Y.Z. and S.K.; data curation, Y.Z., P.Z., X.M., and Z.Y.; writing–original draft preparation, Y.Z. and J.J.; writing–review and editing, W.L.; supervision, W.L.; project administration, Y.Z. and W.L.; funding acquisition, Y.Z. and W.L.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51661017; Outstanding Youth Funds of Gansu Province of China, grant number 17JR5RA108; and Hongliu Outstanding Talents Program of Lanzhou University of Technology, grant number 2018.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Xiaopeng Yuan for insightful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

All the authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, nor in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Qiao, J.C.; Wang, Q.; Pelletier, J.M.; Kato, H.; Casalini, R.; Crespo, D.; Pineda, E.; Yao, Y.; Yang, Y. Structural heterogeneities and mechanical behavior of amorphous alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 104, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, W.H. Bulk metallic glasses with functional physical properties. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 4524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qiao, J.W.; Jia, H.L.; Liaw, P.K. Metallic glass matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2016, 100, 1–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Schuh, C.A.; Hufnagel, T.C.; Ramamurty, U. Mechanical behavior of amorphous alloys. Acta Mater. 2007, 55, 4067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schroers, J. Processing of bulk metallic glass. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lazzara, G.; Cavallaro, G.; Panchal, A.; Fakhrullin, R.; Stavitskaya, A.; Vinokurov, V.; Lvov, Y. An assembly of organic-inorganic composites using halloysite clay nanotubes. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface 2018, 35, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, Y.; Ma, D.; Li, Q.K.; Stoica, A.D.; Song, W.L.; Wang, H.; Liu, X.J.; Stoica, G.M.; Wang, G.Y.; An, K. Transformation-induced plasticity in bulk metallic glass composites evidenced by in-situ neutron diffraction. Acta Mater. 2017, 124, 478–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pauly, S.; Das, J.; Bednarcik, J.; Mattern, N.; Kim, K.B.; Kim, D.H.; Eckert, J. Deformation-induced martensitic transformation in Cu-Zr-(Al,Ti) bulk metallic glass composites. Scr. Mater. 2009, 60, 431–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, Y.; Xiao, Y.H.; Chen, G.L.; Liu, C.T.; Lu, Z.P. Bulk metallic glass composite with transformation-mediated work-hardening and ductility. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tian, X.; Zhang, K.; Tan, C.; Guo, E. Influence of doping tb on the mechanical properties and martensitic transformation of Ni-Mn-Sn magnetic shape memory alloys. Crystals 2018, 8, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, H.B.; Hu, J.; Xia, X.X.; Sun, B.A.; Li, X.X.; Wang, W.H.; Bai, H.Y. Stress-induced structural inhomogeneity and plasticity of bulk metallic glasses. Scr. Mater. 2009, 61, 640–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, Y.; Wang, H.; Wu, H.H.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Hui, X.D.; Chen, G.L.; Ma, D.; Wang, X.L.; Lu, Z.P. Formation of Cu-Zr-Al bulk metallic glass composites with improved tensile properties. Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 2928–2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, W.; Zhao, C. Microstructure and phase transformation analysis of Ni50−xTi50Lax shape memory alloys. Crystals 2018, 8, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Park, J.M.; Park, J.S.; Na, J.H.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, D.H. Effect of Y addition on thermal stability and the glass forming ability in Fe-Nb-B-Si bulk glassy alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 435, 425–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, J.; Tan, H.; Feng, Y.P. The effect of Y on glass forming ability. Scr. Mater. 2005, 53, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kariper, İ.A. The production of UV absorber amorphous Cerium sulfide thin film. Mater. Res. 2017, 20, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gaskell, D.R. Introduction to the Thermodynamics of Materials, 3rd ed.; Taylor & Francis Ltd.: Washington, DC, USA, 2008; pp. 80–84. [Google Scholar]
  18. Swalin, R.A. Thermodynamics of Solids, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1972; pp. 35–41. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gao, M.C.; Yeh, J.W.; Liaw, P.K.; Zhang, Y. High-Entropy Alloys: Fundamentals and Applications, 1st ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  20. Takeuchi, A.; Inoue, A. Classification of bulk metallic glasses by atomic size difference, heat of mixing and period of constituent elements and its application to characterization of the main alloying element. Mater. Trans. 2005, 46, 2817–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, X.; Zhang, Y. Prediction of high-entropy stabilized solid-solution in multicomponent alloys. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 132, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Liaw, P.K. Alloy design and properties optimization of high-entropy alloys. JOM 2012, 64, 830–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, X.; Chen, S.Y.; Cotton, J.D.; Zhang, Y. Phase stability of low-density, multiprincipal component alloys containing aluminum, magnesium, and lithium. JOM 2014, 10, 2009–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.; Lu, Z.P.; Ma, S.G.; Liaw, P.K.; Tang, Z.; Cheng, Y.Q.; Gao, M.C. Guidelines in predicting phase formation of high-entropy alloys. MRS Commun. 2014, 4, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, W.H.; Dong, C.; Shek, C.H. Bulk metallic glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2004, 44, 45–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Y.J.; Lin, J.P.; Chen, G.L.; Liaw, P.K. Solid-solution phase formation rules for multi-component alloys. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2008, 10, 534–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hwang, S.W.; Ji, J.H.; Lee, E.G.; Park, K.T. Tensile deformation of a duplex Fe-20Mn-9Al-0.6C steel having the reduced specific weight. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2011, 528, 5196–5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and fast Fourier transform (FFT) of (a) the as-cast Fe65.4Mn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 and (b) Ti40Ni40Cu20 alloys.
Figure 1. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and fast Fourier transform (FFT) of (a) the as-cast Fe65.4Mn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 and (b) Ti40Ni40Cu20 alloys.
Crystals 09 00483 g001
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) Fe65.4−xCexMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 and (b) Ti40−xCexNi40Cu20 (x = 0, 1.0) alloys.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) Fe65.4−xCexMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 and (b) Ti40−xCexNi40Cu20 (x = 0, 1.0) alloys.
Crystals 09 00483 g002
Figure 3. Relationships of phase selection, atomic size difference δ, and mixing enthalpy ΔHmix [26].
Figure 3. Relationships of phase selection, atomic size difference δ, and mixing enthalpy ΔHmix [26].
Crystals 09 00483 g003
Figure 4. Compressive engineering stress–strain curves of: (a) Fe65.4−xCexMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 and (b) Ti40−xCexNi40Cu20 (x = 0, 1.0) alloys.
Figure 4. Compressive engineering stress–strain curves of: (a) Fe65.4−xCexMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 and (b) Ti40−xCexNi40Cu20 (x = 0, 1.0) alloys.
Crystals 09 00483 g004
Figure 5. Work-hardening rate and true stress versus true strain curves of: (a) Fe65.4−xCexMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 and (b) Ti40−xCexNi40Cu20 (x = 0, 1.0) alloys.
Figure 5. Work-hardening rate and true stress versus true strain curves of: (a) Fe65.4−xCexMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 and (b) Ti40−xCexNi40Cu20 (x = 0, 1.0) alloys.
Crystals 09 00483 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of the compressive fractured surface of the (a) edge and (b) center of the Fe65.4Mn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 alloy, and the (c) edge and (d) center of the Fe64.4CeMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 alloy.
Figure 6. SEM images of the compressive fractured surface of the (a) edge and (b) center of the Fe65.4Mn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 alloy, and the (c) edge and (d) center of the Fe64.4CeMn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.9 alloy.
Crystals 09 00483 g006
Figure 7. SEM images of the compressive fractured surface of the (a) edge and (b) center of the Ti40Ni40Cu20 alloy, and the (c) surface and (d) center of the Ti39CeNi40Cu20 alloy.
Figure 7. SEM images of the compressive fractured surface of the (a) edge and (b) center of the Ti40Ni40Cu20 alloy, and the (c) surface and (d) center of the Ti39CeNi40Cu20 alloy.
Crystals 09 00483 g007
Table 1. Δ H A B m i x of the binary elements [20].
Table 1. Δ H A B m i x of the binary elements [20].
ElementFeMn SiCr CTiNiCuCe
Fe 0−35−1−50 3
Mn0 −452−66 1
Si−35−45 −37−39 −73
Cr−12−37 −61 15
C−50−66−39−61 −116
Ti −35−918
Ni −35 4−28
Cu −94 −21
Ce31−7315−11618−28−21
Table 2. ΔSmix and ΔHmix of TRIP BMGCs.
Table 2. ΔSmix and ΔHmix of TRIP BMGCs.
AlloyΔSmix (J·mol−1·K−1)ΔHmix (kJ·mol−1)δ (%)
Fe65.4Mn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.91.05R−14.343.69
Fe64.4Ce1.0Mn14.3Si9.4Cr10C0.91.08R−14.435.62
Ti40Ni40Cu201.06R−23.727.01
Ti39Ce1.0Ni40Cu201.10R−24.127.85
Table 3. Atomic radius ratio ψ between Ce and alloy elements.
Table 3. Atomic radius ratio ψ between Ce and alloy elements.
ElementFeMnSiCrCTiNiCu
ψ1.431.381.361.432.121.261.471.42

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Y.; Zhao, P.; Li, W.; Kou, S.; Jiang, J.; Mao, X.; Yang, Z. The Microalloying Effect of Ce on the Mechanical Properties of Medium Entropy Bulk Metallic Glass Composites. Crystals 2019, 9, 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst9090483

AMA Style

Zhao Y, Zhao P, Li W, Kou S, Jiang J, Mao X, Yang Z. The Microalloying Effect of Ce on the Mechanical Properties of Medium Entropy Bulk Metallic Glass Composites. Crystals. 2019; 9(9):483. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst9090483

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Yanchun, Pengbiao Zhao, Wensheng Li, Shengzhong Kou, Jianlong Jiang, Xuejing Mao, and Zhuang Yang. 2019. "The Microalloying Effect of Ce on the Mechanical Properties of Medium Entropy Bulk Metallic Glass Composites" Crystals 9, no. 9: 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst9090483

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop