Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Thiadiazole Modified UiO-68-CdS Composites for RhB Degradation under Visible Light Irradiation
Next Article in Special Issue
Extractive Metallurgy and Chemistry
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrogen-Terminated Single Crystal Diamond MOSFET with a Bilayer Dielectric of Gd2O3/Al2O3
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reduction Smelting of the Waelz Slag from Electric Arc Furnace Dust Processing: An Experimental Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fusion Extraction of Base Metals (Al, Cr, Fe, Ti and V) Using Ammonium Phosphate Salt as Flux

by
Trevor T. Chiweshe
1,* and
Megan Welman-Purchase
2
1
Institute for Groundwater Studies, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
2
Geology Department, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2023, 13(5), 784; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13050784
Submission received: 15 March 2023 / Revised: 13 April 2023 / Accepted: 18 April 2023 / Published: 8 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extractive Metallurgy and Chemistry)

Abstract

:
The fusion method of using ammonium phosphate salt as flux was assessed for its ability to precipitate metaphosphate compounds containing trivalent ions M3+ = Al, Cr, Fe, Ti, and V as M(PO3)3 in inorganic salts and a certified reference material (CRM) mineral ore sample. Fusion analysis using mixtures of inorganic salts containing AlCl3, CrCl3, FeCl3, and VCl3 showed variable amounts of precipitates isolated as metaphosphate compounds in the order of iron (12%) < vanadium (13%) < chromium (30%) < (44%) aluminum. However, an analysis of the CRM (AMIS 0368) where magnetite (Fe3+/Fe2+) and ilmenite (Ti4+) are the dominant phases, showed that the obtained precipitates were in the order of chromium (less than 0.1%) < vanadium (1%) < aluminum (2%) < titanium (9%) < iron (68%). The metaphosphate compounds isolated via the use of this method were identified using XRD analysis. SEM–EDX analysis showed micro-crystalline particles from the inorganic salts that were irregular and clustered, contrary to the amorphous micro particles which were produced from the CRM. The degree of specificity improved considerably using CRM ore (AMIS 0368) with high iron content (~76%, Fe3+/Fe2+). This method was shown to be highly selective towards metals with a stable trivalent oxidation state. No other elements of a different oxidation state were precipitated.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Recent trends in research have sparked a renewed interest in establishing methods which are efficient in processing ores and concentrates using hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical techniques [1]. Mineral processing is often complicated by the presence of impurities and the inability of the method to achieve clean separation. The efficiency of extraction in hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical techniques is mainly dependent on the degree of selectivity and the amount of impurities in the sample. In the hydrometallurgical extraction of platinum group elements (PGE) from chromite ore, impurities derived from refractive elements and other elements, such as aluminum, ferric iron, magnesium, and chromium, complicate the mineral processing by producing molten sticky products [2], which affect the normal operating conditions. Refractive elements occur in chromite ores in different quantities depending on the spinel structure (Mg2+, Fe2+) O (Cr3+, Al3+, Fe3+)2O3. The removal of base metals is essential to the PGE industry for the removal of interfering base metals, which often limit the normal operating conditions of the blast furnace by forming sticky melts, which cause high operational costs and frequent shutdown of plants.
In different studies, we investigated the isolation of chromium, vanadium, and tungsten from chromite, titanomagnetite (AMIS 0501), and wolframite mineral ore using ammonium phosphate salt as flux. The use of ammonium phosphate as flux was key in isolating these metals as insoluble micro-crystalline c-type metaphosphate M(PO3)3 particles (where M = Cr3+ and V3+), and soluble phosphates compounds such as WO2(PO3)2 [3]. From our previous studies, it was shown that the formation of metaphosphate compounds provided an alternative approach for separating chromium and vanadium [4] from samples with complex matrices, such as mineral ores [5]. However, elemental analysis of the isolated chromium and vanadium metaphosphate products revealed the presence of Al, Fe, or Ti as impurities. Metaphosphate products of chromium revealed the presence of 5% (Fe), 2% (Al), and <1% (Ti), whilst the metaphosphate product of vanadium revealed the presence of 21% (Fe), 3% (Al), and 45% (Ti). Both metaphosphate products revealed impurities with similar chemical compositions, which prompted a revisit of this technique.
A review of this fusion method was prompted by the desire to improve the selectivity of the ammonium phosphate fusion method and to increase the purity of the metaphosphate’s products. The key drive to this investigation was the need to determine the optimum conditions for the selective separation of pure metaphosphate compounds from samples with complex matrices. To achieve this, a review of the reported metaphosphate compounds of the transition elements was considered, as well as the conditions under which they were formed. This background information was critical to decipher the disparity between the unreacted starting material and the possible by-products. Although, due to the trivalent oxidation state of the transition metals, the formation of metaphosphate compounds is considered unusual in solid-state chemistry. These compounds are stabilized by a dense network of polyphosphate (PO4)3 units, which forms an anionic framework that has a high degree of chemical, mechanical, and thermal stability [6].
Numerous metaphosphate compounds have been reported as belonging to a series of polyphosphate compounds [7,8]. These polymorphic compounds can conform into different crystalline forms denoted as A, B, C, D, and E, of which the C-type is the predominant form [9]. The crystalline structure of chromium [10] and vanadium metaphosphate compounds obtained in our previous study belong to the C-type compounds. The C-type polyphosphate compounds (M(PO3)3 M = Cr3+ and V3+) are composed of infinite PO3 chains and a network of individual MO6 octahedral structures connected through an infinite number of repeated PO4 tetrahedral units, as shown in Figure 1 [11]. Studies have shown similarities in the chemical and physical properties of these isostructural compounds V(PO3)3 [12], Cr(PO3)3 [6,13,14], Al(PO3)3 [15], Ti(PO3)3 [16], and Fe(PO3)3 [6]. The formation of mixtures of metaphosphate products was considered highly inevitable in samples such as chromite (Mg2+, Fe2+)O (Cr3+, Al3+, Fe3+)2O3 and titanomagnetite Fe2+(Fe3+, Ti)2O4 mineral ore, which bear different M3+ ions. Studies have shown similarities in the magnetic properties, thermal stability, high melting points, etc., of these metaphosphate compounds, making separation a daunting task [17].
It is evident from the preceding analysis that the current fusion method using ammonium phosphate flux is susceptible to the formation of different metaphosphate products. The possibility of co-precipitation is highly probable in mineral ore samples due to the presence of impurities. Therefore, it was decided that alternative operational conditions were necessary to improve the selectivity of this method. The preliminary stage of this investigation involved a review of this fusion process to determine the optimum conditions necessary for the isolation of pure metaphosphate compounds. The reaction mechanism was also examined in an attempt to optimize the selectivity and purity of the products.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Chemicals and Materials

Ammonium hydrogen phosphate, both (NH4)2HPO4 and (NH4)H2PO4, aluminum nitrate-9-hydrate (Al(NO3)3·9H2O), vanadium (III) chloride (VCl3), iron(III) chloride-6-hydrate (FeCl3·6H2O), chromium(III) chloride hexahydrate (CrCl3·6H2O), mineral acid (HNO3 65%) together with the original multi element ICP standard (1000 mg/L) were purchased from Merck Chemicals, Modderfontein, South Africa. The ceramic crucibles (capacity, 150 mL) were purchased from Terra Nova Ceramics (Johannesburg, South Africa), and all the reagents were used without further purification. Ultra-pure deionized water (0.01 µS/cm, conductivity) was used for wet chemical analysis and all analytical experimental measurements were reported as an average of three replicates.

2.1.1. Description of the Prepared Inorganic Sample

The inorganic sample was prepared by mixing Al(NO3)3·9H2O, (0.701 g), VCl3 (0.155 g), FeCl3·6H2O (0.243 g), and CrCl3·6H2O (0.147 g). The resultant mixture containing 50 mg of each element (Al, V, Fe and Cr) was added to the ammonium phosphate flux (25 g) and thoroughly homogenized. The final mixture was transferred in a ceramic crucible and placed in a preheated oven (800 °C) until a molten melt was formed (20 min). The melt was cooled at room temperature and dissolved in deionized water.

2.1.2. Description of the Certified Reference Material (CRM)

The certified reference material (CRM) used is a titanomagnetite ore, (AMIS 0368) which was purchased from African Mineral Standards (AMIS). According to the analysis certificate, the reference material originated from Rhovan Vanadium Mine in Northwest Province of South Africa. Method of preparation: The CRM was crushed, dry milled, and air classified to less than 54 microns. Confirmation of particle size was conducted using wet sieve particle size analysis, which confirmed the material contained 98.5% of particles less than 54 microns. The certified elemental content of the major elements in the sample were reported as 3.64 ± 0.06% (Al2O3), 0.24 ± 0.02% (Cr2O3), 75.51 ± 0.86% (Fe2O3), 0.68 ± 0.02% (MgO), 2.65 ± 0.06% (SiO2), 13.91 ± 0.18% (TiO2), and 1.52 ± 0.04% (V2O3).

2.2. Experimental Procedures

2.2.1. Sample Preparation and Characterization

Fusion of the control sample together with the CRM (AMIS 0368) was performed using a Barnstead Thermolyne furnace. Eutech pH meter (CyberScan, pH 1500, Thermo Scientific, Shanghai, China) was used for the pH measurements of the filtrate solutions. Characterization of the precipitates obtained was performed using Bruker Fourier-Transform infrared (FT-IR, Billerica, MA, USA) spectrometer in the wavenumber range 400–4000 cm−1. The spectrum was recorded via KBr pellet technique using Thermo Scientific Nicolet 6700, Scanning electron microscope (SEM, Tescan VEGA3, Brno-Kohoutovice, Czech Republic) equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDX, Oxford X-MaxN) from the Centre for Microscopy, using AZtec software (University of the Free State) and an X-ray powder diffraction spectrometer using Highscore software (XRD, Malvern Panalytical, Empyrean, Malvern, United Kingdom) from Geology department (University of the Free State). Wet chemical analysis was performed via a Perkin-Elmer Nexion (model 2000c) inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, Shelton, CT, USA) using the measurement conditions set out in Table 1.

2.2.2. Preparation of Multi-Element Calibration Standards

Multi-element calibration standards with a working range of 0–500 µg/L were prepared in separate volumetric flasks (100.0 mL) using a ‘Transferpette’ micro-pipette. The solutions were acidified using HNO3 acid (5.0 mL; 65%) and filled to the mark using deionized water. The final solutions were homogenized before use.

2.2.3. Sample Preparation Using Ammonium and Sodium Phosphate Flux

Fusion of the inorganic salts and CRM (AMIS 0368) was conducted separately in triplicate analysis using ammonium phosphate flux (NH4)2HPO4/NH4H2PO4). The powdered samples (1.0 g) were thoroughly mixed in separate ceramic crucibles with an excess amount of ammonium phosphate flux (sample: flux ratio, 1:25). The resultant mixtures were heated in a furnace (800 °C) until molten melts were formed (±15 min). The red-hot molten melts were cooled at room temperature and deionized water (50 mL) was added. The solid melts were stirred until the all the melts formed mixtures. The resultant mixtures were filtered, and the solid product was air-dried at room temperature before being characterized using FT-IR, SEM–EDX, and XRD analysis, whilst the filtrate was analyzed using ICP-MS.

2.2.4. Analysis of the Ammonium Phosphate Precipitate

SEM–EDX Analysis

The precipitates from the inorganic sample and CRM (AMIS 0368) were mounted on aluminum pin stubs using double-sided carbon tape and coated with Iridium (±10 nm) using a Leica EM ACE600 sputter coater. Specimens were imaged and analyzed with a JSM-7800F Extreme-resolution Analytical Field Emission SEM (Tokyo, Japan), equipped with an Oxford Instruments X-Max 80 mm EDX detector, using AZtec software. Samples were imaged at 5 kV at a WD of 10 mm and EDX analysis were performed at 20 kV.

XRD Analysis

The XRD analysis was used for the phase identification of the precipitates from the inorganic and CRM (AMIS 0368) samples. The Bruker (Melvern Panalytical Empyrean) X-ray diffractometer, equipped with Cu Kα radiation of wavelength ≈ 0.154 nm, was used to record the XRD patterns. Rietveld refinement was performed using the FullProf software to calculate the structural parameters.

2.2.5. Analysis of the Ammonium Phosphate Filtrate Solutions

ICP-MS Analysis

The filtrate solutions from the inorganic sample and CRM (AMIS 0368) were analyzed using ICP-MS for the elemental content. The acid matrix of these samples was matched by adding HNO3 (5 mL; 65%) to the samples. The ICP-MS operating conditions used for elemental analysis via the KED mode are listed in Table 1. The samples were homogenized and analyzed using the selected isotopic lines.

3. Results and Discussion

The analysis of the selective isolation of metaphosphate compounds from the inorganic and mineral ore sample (CRM) was first performed by probing the effects of temperature. Temperature was determined in our previous studies to be key in the formation of metaphosphate products and in achieving complete sample dissolution. Although various approaches for the synthesis of metaphosphate compounds have been used at different temperatures [19], it was yet to be established if temperature changes had an effect on the dissolution as well as the formation of metaphosphate compounds. The optimum temperature for the fusion extraction of metaphosphate compounds using various mineral ore samples was previously determined to be 800 °C. Preliminary investigations at lower temperatures (<800 °C) showed incomplete dissolution, and at higher temperatures (>800 °C), viscous molten melts were obtained, which solidified the melts so that they were difficult to dissolve. The fusion of pure salts (AlCl3, CrCl3, FeCl3, and VCl3) at 800 °C yielded solid melts which were glassy and crystalline (Figure 2). It is worth noting that all of the solid melts obtained using this method were hygroscopic, which made them easier to dissolve in water or any other polar solvents.
The different products obtained at temperatures above and below 800 °C were consistent with the research findings conducted by Magda et al. [20], which shows the decomposition stages of ammonium phosphate salt. The decomposition of ammonium phosphate salt (Equations (1)–(4)) forms different species depending on temperature. The uncertainty of forming a variety of products increased as the temperature increased beyond 800 °C and more phosphate species formed.
( N H 4 ) 2 H P O 4   <   800   ° C N H 4 H 2 P O 4 + N H 3
2 N H 4 H 2 P O 4   <   800   ° C ( N H 4 ) 2 H 2 P 2 O 7 + H 2 O
( N H 4 ) 2 H 2 P 2 O 7   <   800   ° C 2 N H 4 P O 3 + H 2 O
2 N H 4 P O 3   >   800   ° C P 2 O 5 + 2 N H 4 + H 2 O

3.1. XRD Characterization

Precipitates obtained from the pure salts, CRM mineral ore, and inorganic salts were analysed using the XRD technique to identify their composition as well as the purity of the isolated precipitates. The XRD pattern of the precipitates obtained from pure salts were evaluated and compared with those in the XRD data base. The differences in the XRD pattern confirmed the successful conversion of the starting material to products. It was confirmed that the patterns corresponded to the metaphosphate compounds of Al(PO3)3, Cr(PO3)3, Fe(PO3)3, and V(PO3)3 [12] (Figure 3a). The XRD patterns for the precipitates obtained from the inorganic salts showed that the following mixtures were present in the metaphosphate compounds: Cr(PO3)3 [11] Fe(PO3)3, Al(PO3)3, and Ti(PO3)3 [16]. The XRD pattern of the CRM mineral ore positively identified the presence of two major phases in the ore: magnetite (Fe3O4) and ilmenite (FeO·TiO2). These phases in the mineral ore are the major sources of iron (Fe2+/Fe3+) and Ti3+ in the CRM mineral ore. The XRD pattern for the CRM showed dominant peaks in the region of 20–35° (2θ) corresponding to Fe(PO3)3, Al(PO3)3, and Ti(PO3)3, as shown in Figure 3b.

3.2. IR Characterization

The IR spectra of the precipitates from the inorganic salts and CRM mineral ore exhibit three strong peaks in the region of 1246–1273, 956–964, and 713–767 cm−1, which were characteristic of the stretching vibration of P–Oext and the asymmetric stretching frequencies of (P–Oint)PO2 and P–O–P of the metaphosphates. The spectrum obtained from the CRM precepitate showed an additional sholder peak in the region of 1222 cm−1, which also corresponds to the P–Oext vibration of the metaphosphates. The three stretching bands in the region of 964, 767, and 713 cm−1 were assigned to the stretching mode of the P–O–P bridge bonds. Both spectra of the two products exhibit bands with a poor resolution in the range of 470–615 cm−1, which is mainly predominated by the antiasymetric stretching modes of the isolated tridimensional network of MO6 units, and to a lesser extent, by the antisymmetric bending modes of the chain group (O–P–O). A summary of the stretching frequencies of both products is provided in Table 2. The stretching fequences of both products are compared with those of the isostructural metaphosphate compounds belonging to the C-type. The IR spectra of the precipitates from the inorganic salts showed a number of similar peaks to those of the C-type chromium (III)metaphosphate compound, whilst the precipitate from CRM mineral ore was closely related to the C-type iron (III) metaphosphate. The splitting peaks which can be observed in the region of 665–765 cm−1 of both spectra is attributable to the high crystallinity of the proucts [21]. This was confirmed by the sharp distinguished peaks of both precipitates and the complete lack of background noise compared to the pattern of the CRM mineral ore, which was amorphous.

3.3. SEM–EDX and ICP-MS Analysis

3.3.1. Analysis of Products from a Mixture of Inorganic Salts

The morphology and the surface/interface characterization of the precipitates from the inorganic salts and CRM mineral ore sample (AMIS) was conducted using the SEM–EDX technique at a nanospace range of 0–20 keV. The objective of the analysis was to identify the physical and chemical phases in the precipitates, as well as the elemental composition. SEM images (Figure 4) of the precipitates from the inorganic salts showed micro-crystalline particles that were irregular and clustered. These particles were uniformly distributed throughout the sample and consisted of O (51.3 wt%), P (31.7 wt%), Cr (6.7 wt%), Al (4.6 wt%), Fe (1.8 wt%), and V (2.0 wt%). All the elements added as starting materials (i.e., Al, Cr, Fe, and V) in the form of inorganic salts were retained in the precipitate but in different elemental proportions. A mixture of these elements in the precipitate confirmed the inability of the ammonium phosphate fusion method to selectively precipitate a single product. The order of preference, according to the precipitated inorganic product, was Fe (1.8 wt%) < V (2.0 wt%) < Al (4.6 wt%) < Cr (6.7 wt%), which corresponds to the percentage conversion of 44.37% (Cr), 30.46% (Al), 13.25% (V), and 11.92% (Fe). It is interesting to note that iron was the least preferred amongst the M3+ metals despite its abundance. The results also suggest chromium has the highest likelihood of being precipitated first as chromium(III) metaphosphate. The aforementioned precipitation order, determined by EDX analysis, was attributed to the differences in the rate of reaction between the phosphate (PO3) ions and the M3+ ions (M = Al, Cr, Fe, and V).
The ICP-MS analysis of the filtrate solutions obtained after the removal of solid precipitates aimed to determine the elemental content of the unreacted M3+ ions and other ions in the sample. The percentage conversion of the M3+ ions to metaphosphate compounds was determined by analyzing the corresponding elemental content in the filtrate solutions. Table 3 shows the quantitative results of the filtrate solutions. The matrix effects caused by the presence of polyatomic ions were circumvented using the KED helium mode. The percentage content of unreacted M3+ ions in the filtrate solutions were 91.30% (Fe), 88.82% (V), 71.52% (Al), 54.87% (Cr). The high recoveries of Fe in the filtrate solution was assumed to be the result of a slow interaction between the PO3 and Fe3+, which led to a reduction in product formation in comparison to the other trivalent ions Cr3+, Al3+, and V3+ ions.

3.3.2. EDX Analysis of Precipitates from CRM (AMIS 06038) Mineral Ore Sample

In this part of the study, we investigate whether the elemental content in the ore has any bearing influence in the selective precipitation of Al, Cr, Fe, Ti, and V as metaphosphates. According to the certificate, the percentage content of these elements in the CRM were reported as Fe2O3 (75.51%), TiO2 (13.91%), Al2O3 (3.64%), V2O3 (1.52%), Cr2O3 (0.24%). Magnetite (Fe2+(Fe3+)2O4) and rutile (TiO2) were identified by the XRD pattern as the dominant phases in the mineral ore. The fusion of this CRM sample using ammonium phosphate flux (sample: flux, 1:25) yielded a grey powdered precipitate. SEM–EDX analysis of this product revealed micro-particles that were crystalline and irregular in shape and size. The elemental compositions of these particles, as revealed by EDX analysis (Figure 5), were in the order of Cr (<0.5 wt%) < V (0.5 wt%) < Al (2.6 wt%) < Ti (3.5 wt%) < Fe (17.8 wt%). Interestingly, the elemental contents in the precipitate were ordered according to the quantities in the CRM. Ions in high concentration, e.g., Fe and Ti, were precipitated in higher proportions compared to those with lower concentrations. The proportions of the metal concentrations precipitated from the CRM mineral ore were Fe (68.45%), Ti (9.46%), Al (2.37%), V (0.98%), Cr (<0.1%). These results confirmed the influence of (M3+) ion content (either formed or naturally occurring +3 ions) in the original sample towards the precipitation of metaphosphate compounds. The results obtained in this part of the study also demonstrated the influence of M3+ content on selectivity, i.e., the higher the M3+ ion content in a sample, the higher the metaphosphate product.
Analysis of the CRM filtrate solutions using ICP-MS revealed an average percentage recovery of Fe (7.06%), Ti (4.45%), Al (1.27%), V (0.54%), Cr (0.24%) from the original source. The percentage content of the M3+ ions retained in the filtrate solution differed from those obtained from the inorganic solutions. The higher percentage proportion of iron in the filtrate solution was presumed to be the result of Fe2+ ions from the starting material (Fe2+(Fe3+,Ti)2O4). Since iron (Fe3+/Fe2+) occupied over ~76% of the CRM, it was inevitable that most of the Fe3+ ions in solution reacted with the PO3 ions, thereby limiting the chance (~24%) of the other elements (Ti3+, Al3+, V3+, and Cr3+ ions) interacting with PO3- ions. Other elements identified in the CRM filtrate solution included Na, Mg, K, Ca, Si, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, and Ba, and their respective percentage contents are listed in Table 3. The presence of only Fe, Ti, Al, V, and Cr in the precipitate further confirmed the preference (selectivity) of this method towards the ions with a trivalent oxidation state.

4. Conclusions

The selective precipitation of base metals (M = Al, Cr, Fe, Ti, and V) was achieved using the ammonium phosphate fusion method. This procedure was determined to be ideal for the extraction of base elements as metaphosphate compounds. The chemical composition of the isolated metaphosphate compounds contained metal ions in a trivalent oxidation state. Therefore, it can be concluded that this extraction technique was ideal for metals that can form a stable trivalent oxidation state, as no impurities with different oxidation states were found. The isolated metaphosphate products were insoluble in both polar and organic solvents. The fusion method was characterized by poor selectivity as mixtures of metaphosphate from the M3+ compounds were precipitated. Selectivity was shown to be dependent on the percentage content of M3+ ions in the original sample or formed during the fusion process. It was also observed that selectivity improved in samples, such as the CRM, which contained high iron content (75.51%, presumably Fe3+/Fe2+ ions).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.T.C.; methodology, T.T.C.; software, M.W.-P.; validation, T.T.C. and M.W.-P.; formal analysis, T.T.C.; investigation, T.T.C. and M.W.-P.; resources, M.W.-P.; data curation, M.W.-P. and T.T.C.; writing—original draft preparation, T.T.C.; writing—review and editing, T.T.C.; visualization, M.W.-P. and T.T.C.; supervision, T.T.C.; project administration, T.T.C.; funding acquisition, T.T.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to thank the Research Fund of the University of the Free State, South Africa for their financial support.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sachkov, V.I.; Nefedov, R.A.; Orlov, V.V.; Medvedev, R.O.; Sachkova, A.S. Hydrometallurgical Processing Technology of Titanomagnetite Ores. Minerals 2018, 8, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Barnes, A.R.; Newall, A.F. Spinel removal from PGM smelting furnaces. In Southern African Pyrometallurgy; South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Johannesburg, South Africa, 2006; pp. 77–88. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chiweshe, T.T.; Purchase, M.; Deysel, L. Extraction of tungsten from wolframite sample using ammonium phosphate salt as flux. Miner. Met. Mater. Soc. JOM 2022, 74, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chiweshe, T.T. Fusion–extraction technique of vanadium(III) using ammonium phosphate salt as flux. Crystals 2022, 12, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chiweshe, T.T. Chemical refinement of chromium metaphosphate product isolated from geological mineral ore samples. In Chemistry for a Clean and Healthy Planet; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 317–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, W.; He, W.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Du, Y.; Yan, S.; Tian, X.; Sun, X.; Han, X.; Yue, Y. Simple and rapid synthesis of Fe(PO3)3 by microwave sintering. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2009, 54, 2073–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Haushalter, R.C.; Mundi, L. Reduced molybdenum phosphates: Octahedral -tetrahedral framework solids with tunnels, cages and micropores. Chem. Mater. 1992, 4, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Murashova, E.V.; Chudinova, N.N.; Ilyukhin, A.B. Specific features of the crystal structure of erbium polyphosphate of the structural type C. Crystallogr. Rep. 2007, 52, 230–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Durif, A. Crystal Chemistry of Condensed Phosphates; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995; ISBN 9780306448782/0306448785. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bagieu-Beucher, M.; Guitel, J.C. Structure crystalline de I’hexametaphosphate de chrome: Cr2P6O18. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B 1977, 33, 2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gruss, M.; Glaum, R. Refinement of the superstructure of c-type chromium (III) tris(metaphosphate), Cr(PO3)3. Acta Cystallogr. Sect. C 1996, 52, 2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Middlemiss, N.; Hawthorne, F.; Calvo, C. Crystal structure of vanadium(III) tris(metaphosphate). Can. J. Chem. 1977, 55, 1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Elbouaanani, L.K.; Malaman, B.; Ge´rardin, R. Structure refinement and magnetic properties of C-Fe(PO3)3 studied by neutron diffraction and Mo¨ssbauer techniques. J. Solid State Chem. 1999, 148, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yakubovich, O.V.; Dimitrova, O.V.; Savina, G.V. Synthesis and crystal structure of chromium polyphosphate Cr(PO3)3. Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 1991, 36, 267. [Google Scholar]
  15. van der Meer, H. The crystal structure of a monoclinic form of aluminum metaphosphate, Al(PO3)3. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem. 1976, 32, 2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Harrison, W.T.A.; Gier, T.E.; Stucky, G.D. Titanium(III)tris(metaphosphate). Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 1994, 50, 1643–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. IIiva, D.; Kovacheva, D.; Petkov, C.; Bogachev, G. Vibrational spectra of R(PO3)3 metaphosphates (R = Ga, In, Y, Sm, Gd, Dy). J. Raman Spectrosc. 2001, 32, 893. [Google Scholar]
  18. Momma, K.; Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1272–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Watson, I.M.; Borel, M.M.; Chardon, J.; Leclaire, A. Structure of the Trivalent Molybdenum Metaphosphate Mo(PO3)3. J. Solid State Chem. 1994, 111, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Magda, A.; Pode, R.; Muntean, C.; Medeleanu, M.; Popa, A. Synthesis and characterization of ammonium phosphate fertilizers with boron. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2010, 75, 951–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Surovell, T.A.; Stine, M.C. Standardizing infrared measures of bone mineral crystallinity. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2001, 6, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Rojo, J.M.; Mesa, J.L.; Lezama, L.; Rojo, T. Magnetic Properties of the Fe(PO3)3 Metaphosphate. J. Solid State Chem. 1999, 145, 629–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Crystallographic structure [18] of the C-type vanadium(III) tris(metaphosphate) compound.
Figure 1. Crystallographic structure [18] of the C-type vanadium(III) tris(metaphosphate) compound.
Crystals 13 00784 g001
Figure 2. Fusion melts after the fusion of pure salts VCl3, AlCl3·6H2O, FeCl3·6H2O, and CrCl3·6H2O using ammonium phosphate flux at 800 °C.
Figure 2. Fusion melts after the fusion of pure salts VCl3, AlCl3·6H2O, FeCl3·6H2O, and CrCl3·6H2O using ammonium phosphate flux at 800 °C.
Crystals 13 00784 g002
Figure 3. XRD pattern of the precipates obtained from (a) mixture of inorganic salts and (b) CRM (AMIS 0368). Both patterns, (a) and (b), were compared with the XRD patterns of the metaphosphate compounds prepared using Al3+, Cr3+, Fe3+, and V3+.
Figure 3. XRD pattern of the precipates obtained from (a) mixture of inorganic salts and (b) CRM (AMIS 0368). Both patterns, (a) and (b), were compared with the XRD patterns of the metaphosphate compounds prepared using Al3+, Cr3+, Fe3+, and V3+.
Crystals 13 00784 g003
Figure 4. SEM–EDX images showing the particle size and morphology of the isolated precipitates from the inorganic salts (a). The bar graph (b) shows the elemental content in the metaphosphate’s precipitates compared to the unconverted elements that remain in solution represented by the orange line graph.
Figure 4. SEM–EDX images showing the particle size and morphology of the isolated precipitates from the inorganic salts (a). The bar graph (b) shows the elemental content in the metaphosphate’s precipitates compared to the unconverted elements that remain in solution represented by the orange line graph.
Crystals 13 00784 g004
Figure 5. SEM–EDX images (a) showing the particle size and morphology of the isolated precipitates from the CRM mineral ore (AMIS 06038). The bar graph (b) shows the elemental content in the metaphosphate’s precipitates.
Figure 5. SEM–EDX images (a) showing the particle size and morphology of the isolated precipitates from the CRM mineral ore (AMIS 06038). The bar graph (b) shows the elemental content in the metaphosphate’s precipitates.
Crystals 13 00784 g005aCrystals 13 00784 g005b
Table 1. Selected ICP-MS operating conditions for elemental analysis using the KED mode.
Table 1. Selected ICP-MS operating conditions for elemental analysis using the KED mode.
Parameter/ComponentValue/Type/Mode
Torch positionX (−1.52 mm), Y (−0.33 mm) and Z (0.00 mm)
Auxiliary gas flow1.2 L/min
Nebulizer gas flow0.96 L/min
Plasma gas flow15 L/min
Dwell time50 ms
RF power1100 W
Rinsing time 60 s
Integration time1 ms
Replicates3
NebulizerMeinhard concentric type A3
Scanning modePeak hopping
Spray chamberBaffled quartz cyclonic
Mode of operationKinetic discrimination energy (KED) using Helium gas
Table 2. Comparison between the stretching frequencies of selected bands of the experimentally determined precipitates from the inorganic salts and CRM mineral ore with the reported metaphosphates (M(PO3)3) M = Ti3+, V3+, Cr3+, and Fe3+. Values in bold denote experimental values.
Table 2. Comparison between the stretching frequencies of selected bands of the experimentally determined precipitates from the inorganic salts and CRM mineral ore with the reported metaphosphates (M(PO3)3) M = Ti3+, V3+, Cr3+, and Fe3+. Values in bold denote experimental values.
Stretching BandsExperimentally DeterminedReference [22]
Inorganic SaltsCRM Mineral OreTi3+V3+Cr3+Fe3+
vas(P–Oext)|PO2|1273 vs1246 vs1385 vs1240 vs1240 vs1230 vs
114711491115 s1150 s1160 s
11071118 1130 s1120 s
vs(P–Oext) |PO2|10761080 vs1090 s1095 s1095 vs1075 s
v(P–Oext)|PO3|103310331040 s 1050 s
10101014 1020 s1020 s1020 s
vas(P–Oint) |P–O–P|964 vs956 vs960 s975 s975 s970 s
770 m770 m775 m
763767 vs750 m765 m760 w750 m
vas(P–Oint) |P–O–P|713 vs713 vs715 m715 m
725 m
705 m
675675690 w685 m685 w675 m
vas(M–O)621617 615 w
570 m580 w
560 m560 m560 m
sas(O–P–O) 545 m
520 m
510 m 505 m
490 m
470 m480 m 470 m
vs—very strong; s—strong; m—medium; w—weak.
Table 3. Summary of the elemental content of the precipitates and filtrate solutions obtained from the inorganic salts and CRM mineral ore.
Table 3. Summary of the elemental content of the precipitates and filtrate solutions obtained from the inorganic salts and CRM mineral ore.
ElementInorganic Salts
(Certified/Known conc. %)
Inorganic SaltsAMIS 0368
(Certified/Known conc. (%))
AMIS 0368
SEM–EDX
(Precipitate, %)
ICP-MS
(Filtrate, %)
SEM–EDX
(Precipitate, %)
ICP-MS
(Filtrate, %)
Al257.6217.383.642.371.27
Cr2511.0913.910.24<0.10.24
Fe252.9822.0275.5168.457.06
V253.3121.691.520.980.54
Ti--<0.0113.919.464.45
Na--<0.01--<0.01
Mg--<0.01--<0.01
K--<0.01--<0.01
Si--<0.012.65-1.75
Ca--<0.01--<0.01
Mn--<0.01--<0.01
Co--<0.01--<0.01
Ni--<0.01--<0.01
Cu--<0.01--<0.01
Ba--<0.01--<0.01
-—Element not present/no certified or known conc. Emboldened elements reflect the theme of the manuscript.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chiweshe, T.T.; Welman-Purchase, M. Fusion Extraction of Base Metals (Al, Cr, Fe, Ti and V) Using Ammonium Phosphate Salt as Flux. Crystals 2023, 13, 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13050784

AMA Style

Chiweshe TT, Welman-Purchase M. Fusion Extraction of Base Metals (Al, Cr, Fe, Ti and V) Using Ammonium Phosphate Salt as Flux. Crystals. 2023; 13(5):784. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13050784

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chiweshe, Trevor T., and Megan Welman-Purchase. 2023. "Fusion Extraction of Base Metals (Al, Cr, Fe, Ti and V) Using Ammonium Phosphate Salt as Flux" Crystals 13, no. 5: 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13050784

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop