Next Article in Journal
Theoretical Investigation of Magneto-Electro-Elastic Piezoelectric Phononic Crystal
Next Article in Special Issue
Solution-Mediated Polymorphic Transformation of L-Carnosine from Form II to Form I
Previous Article in Journal
Powder Extrusion Printing and Sintering Densification Behaviors of Ultrafine 98W-1Ni-1Fe Alloy Powder
Previous Article in Special Issue
Polytypes of sp2-Bonded Boron Nitride
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermodynamic Properties of 1,5-Pentanediamine Adipate Dihydrate in Three Binary Solvent Systems from 278.15 K to 313.15 K

1
National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Crystallization Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin 300072, China
3
Hebei Meibang Engineering & Technology Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Crystals 2022, 12(6), 877; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12060877
Submission received: 23 May 2022 / Revised: 17 June 2022 / Accepted: 18 June 2022 / Published: 20 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymorphism in Crystals)

Abstract

:
In this work, solubility data of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in binary solvent systems of water + methanol, water + ethanol and water + N,N-dimethylformamide were experimentally measured via a static gravimetric method in the temperature range from 278.15 K to 313.15 K under atmospheric pressure. The results indicated that the solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate increased with the rising of temperature in all the selected binary solvent systems. For water + N,N-dimethylformamide, solubility increased as the mole fraction of water increased. However, the rising tendency changed when the temperature was higher than 303.15 K for water + methanol, and it would show a cosolvency phenomenon for water + ethanol. Furthermore, the solubility data were fitted with modified an Apelblat equation, NRTL model, combined nearly ideal binary solvent/Redlich Kister (CNIBS/R-K) model and Jouban–Acree model. The calculation results agreed well with the experimental data. Finally, the mixing thermodynamic properties of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in all tested solvents were calculated based on the experimental data and NRTL model.

1. Introduction

1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate (C11H24O4N2∙2H2O, CAS registry No. 2156592-12-8, Figure 1), is major monomer for the synthesis of bio-based polyamide 56 fiber [1]. Due to its excellent mechanical properties, heat resistance, abrasion resistance and self-lubricity, polyamide 56 is not only a renewable substitute for traditional materials, but also a unique and novel polymer applied in the textile and industrial plastics [2].
The performance of the polymer material is directly related to the purity of the polymerized monomer since it is greatly sensitive to impurities [3]. Therefore, the purification stage of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate plays a critical role during the manufacturing process [4,5]. Crystallization, as a vital separation and purification process, is widely used in the pharmaceutical and food industries. As such, it is essential to know the physicochemical and thermodynamic properties of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate to design and optimize the crystallization process [6]. Considering the high solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in water, anti-solvent crystallization is a reasonable and efficient crystallization method for purifying it [7,8]. Besides, the temperature range from 278.15 K to 313.15 K is commonly used in industrial manufacturing and the product contains two molecules of water. However, no reports about the solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in this temperature range have been published.
In this work, the solubility data of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in water + methanol, water + ethanol and water + N,N-dimethylformamide were determined in the range of 278.15 K to 313.15 K under 0.1 MPa. Besides, the modified Apelblat equation model, NRTL model, combined nearly ideal binary solvent/Redlich Kister (CNIBS/R-K) model, and Jouyban–Acree model were applied to the fitting of the experimental solubility data, respectively. Finally, the mixing thermodynamic properties, including the mixing enthalpy, the mixing entropy and the Gibbs free energy of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in different binary solvents were calculated and discussed.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate (≥0.99 mass fraction) was offered by Hebei Meibang Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. (Hebei, China). Deionized water was prepared by an ultrapure water system (YPYD Co., Nanjing, China) in the laboratory. Methanol and ethanol were purchased from Guangda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China), and N,N-dimethylformamide was purchased from Benchmark Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). More details about the materials are listed in Table 1. All chemicals were used without further purification.

2.2. Apparatus and Methods

The gravimetric method was used to determine the solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in different binary solvent mixtures [9]. Known mass of solvent and excess 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate were added to a 100 mL crystallizer. A constant temperature water bath (Nanjing Xianou Instrument Manufacturing Co., Ltd., China) was used to control the solution at specified temperature. The solution was agitated for 12 h to ensure that the solution reaches solid-liquid equilibrium. Then, the stirring was stopped and the solution was kept static for 3 h until the suspended particles settled down. After that, the samples were drawn with a 5 mL syringe and filtered through a 0.45 µm nylon membrane into 50 mL pre-weighed beakers and the total weight was measured immediately. Besides, KF analyzer (C20s, Mettler Toledo, Switzerland) was used to determine the amount of water in the saturated solution after equilibration. Finally, the beakers were put into a vacuum oven and dried at temperature of 323.15 K. The quality of the beaker with the samples was recorded periodically until the total weight did not change any more, to ensure that there were no solvents in the solid after the drying treatment. The solubility data of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate were calculated from the mass of the remaining solid. The crystal form of the dried solid was determined using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). All the samples were weighed by an analytic balance (AL204, Mettler Toledo, Switzerland) with an accuracy of ±0.0001 g. The procedure was repeated three times to determine the error of the experiments.
The solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate described in the mole percentage xp was calculated by Equation (1):
x p = m p M p m p M p + m w M w + m i M i
where x, m and M represent the mole fraction solubility, mass and molar mass, respectively. The subscript p, w, and i represent 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate, water and the other organic solvents, respectively. The mass of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate (mp) was calculated by using experimental results. Besides, the masses of water and organic solvents were determined by the pre-designed mixed solvents of different compositions.
The samples were dried to completely convert into anhydrous 1,5-pentanediamine adipate and the mass of dissolved 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate was calculated by Equation (2):
m p = M p M a m a
where ma and Ma represent the mass and molar mass of anhydrous 1,5-pentanediamine adipate, respectively. The mole fraction solubility of anhydrous 1,5-pentanediamine adipate was calculated as follows:
x a = m p M p m w M w + m i M i + 3 m p M p
The initial mole fraction of water xw in the mixed solution was calculated as follows:
x w = m w M w m w M w + m i M i
where mw and mi were determined by an analytic balance during the process of preparing mixing solvent. The final mole fraction of water x w 0 in three binary solvent mixtures was calculated as follows:
x w 0 = m w M w + 2 m p M p m w M w + m i M i + 2 m p M p

2.3. Characterization of 1,5-Pentanediamine Adipate Dihydrate

The crystal form of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate, before and after solubility measurement, was determined using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), which was carried out on Rigaku D/max-2500 (Rigaku, Japan). The diffraction angle (2θ) ranged from 2° to 40° with a scanning rate of 8°/min and step size of 0.02°.
In order to characterize the melting temperature and melting enthalpy of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate, the thermal behaviors of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate were measured using TGA/DSC (Mettler Toledo, Zurich, Switzerland) under the protection of nitrogen. Besides, the thermal behaviors of dehydrated raw materials were also detected to eliminate the influence of dehydration peaks. The measurements were conducted within the temperature ranging from 298.15 K to 473.15 K at a heating rate of 3 K/min. The DSC instrument was calibrated by indium and zinc, of which the melting temperature was measured three times. The standard uncertainties of melting points and solid-to-solid transition temperature were estimated to be 1 K while the relative standard uncertainties of melting enthalpy and solid-to-solid transition enthalpy were estimated to be 5%.

3. Thermodynamic Models

3.1. The Modified Apelblat Equation

Combined with the Clausius–Clapeyron relationship, Apelblat et al. proposed a semi-empirical model in 1999 as Equation (6) [10,11].
ln x = A + B T + C ln T
where x is the mole fraction solubility of solute at absolute temperature T. A, B and C are model constants.

3.2. NRTL Equation

The solubility of solute can be expressed by a general thermodynamic model, which is written as follows [12].
ln x = ln γ i + Δ f H R ( 1 T m 1 T ) 1 R T T m T Δ C p d T + 1 R T m T Δ C p T d T
where γi stands for the activity coefficient, ΔfH is the enthalpy of fusion, R is the gas constant; T and Tm refer to the solution temperature and the melting point of solute, respectively, ΔCp refers to the difference of the molar heat capacity between melting state and solid state of the solute. When a solid undergoes a phase transition, the solubility equation should include a term for the contribution of the transition as following [13].
ln x = ln γ i + Δ f H R ( 1 T m 1 T ) + Δ t r H R ( 1 T t r 1 T ) 1 R T T m T Δ C p d T + 1 R T m T Δ C p T d T
where ΔtrH and Ttr stand for the enthalpy of the transition and the transition temperature of the solute, respectively.
Considering the last two parts of the Equation (8) are less important than the first three parts due to the negligible value of ΔCp, the solubility of the solute can be expressed by a simplified thermodynamic model, which is written as follows [14].
ln x = Δ f H R ( 1 T m 1 T ) + Δ t r H R ( 1 T tr 1 T ) ln γ i
The nonrandom two-liquid (NRTL) model, which is based on the theory of solid–liquid phase equilibrium can be used to calculate the activity coefficients. It can be shown as Equations (10)–(13) [15,16].
ln γ i = ( G j i x j + G k i x k ) ( τ j i G j i x j + τ k i G k i x k ) ( x i + G j i x j + G k i x k ) 2 + τ i j G i j x j 2 + G i j G k j x j x k ( τ i j τ k j ) ( x j + G i j x i + G k j x k ) 2 + τ i k G i k x k 2 + G i k G j k x j x k ( τ i k τ j k ) ( x k + G i k x i + G j k x j ) 2
where i, j, k are the three components of the solution system. Model parameters τij and Gij can be calculated as follows:
G i j = exp ( α i j τ i j )
τ i j = Δ g i j R T
α i j = α j i
where αij represents the non-randomness between i and j components and Δgij stands for the cross-interaction energy.

3.3. The CNIBS/R-K Model

The combined nearly ideal binary solvent/Redlich–Kister (CNIBS/R–K) model, which describes the relationship between solubility and solvent composition, is suitable for binary solvent systems [17]. It describes the relationship between solubility and solvent composition as Equation (14).
ln x = x a ln X a + x b ln X b + x a x b i = 0 N S i ( x a x b ) i
where xa, xb stand for the initial mole fraction of water and organic solvents in binary solvent mixtures, respectively. Xa, Xb are the mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in pure water and organic solvents, respectively. Si is the model constant and N refers to the number of the solvents.
For binary solvent systems, substituting N = 2 and xa = 1 − xb into Equation (14) can result in a new simplified equation as following.
ln x = B 0 + B 1 x a + B 2 x a 2 + B 3 x a 3 + B 4 x a 4
where B0 to B4 are empirical model parameters.

3.4. The Jouyban–Acree Model

The Jouyban–Acree model is widely used to describe the solubility by considering both the composition of the solution and the temperature [18]. The model is expressed as Equation (16):
ln x = x a ln X a + x b ln X b + x a x b i = 0 N J i ( x a x b ) i T
Subsequently, Jouyban et al. proposed to combine the Jouyban–Acree model with the van’t Hoff model to obtain a seven-parameters mixed model [19] as Equation (17).
ln x = A 0 + A 1 x a + A 2 + A 3 x a + A 4 x a 2 + A 5 x a 3 + A 6 x a 4 T
where A0 to A6 are empirical model parameters.
To evaluate the fitting accuracy, the average relative deviation (ARD) and root mean-square deviations (RMSD) were calculated [20,21].
A R D = 1 N i = 1 N | x i cal x i exp x i exp |
R M S D = i = 1 N ( x i cal x i exp ) 2 N
where N stands for the total number of experiments. x i exp and x i cal refer to the experimental mole fraction solubility and calculated mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate, respectively.

3.5. Solution Mixing Thermodynamics

For the ideal solution, its mixing properties, including Gibbs energy, enthalpy, and entropy, can be expressed as follows [22].
Δ m G i d = R T i = 1 n x i ln x i
Δ m H i d = 0
Δ m S i d = R i = 1 n x i ln x i
where xi represent the mole fraction of each component. The mixing thermodynamic properties of the real solution system can be calculated by using Equation (23).
Δ m M = M E + Δ m M i d
where M refers to the Gibbs free energy (G), enthalpy (H) or entropy (S); ΔmMid and ME represent the mixing properties of the ideal solution and excess properties, respectively. Excess mixing properties (ME) can be calculated using the Equations (24)–(26).
G E = R T i = 1 n x i ln γ i
H E = R T 2 i = 1 n x i ( ln γ i T ) P , x
S E = H E G E T
where γi refer to the activity coefficient, which will be calculated by the NRTL model in this work.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Identification and Characterization of Materials

The powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate are shown in Figure 2. It can be found that the 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate crystals obtained in this work remained unchanged in each experiment, indicating no phase transformation occurred during solid–liquid equilibrium. Furthermore, the results of random KF titration experiments for the cases with a large organic solvent content at the highest studied temperatures are shown in Table 2. It can be found that the amount of water x w 0 , K F agrees with the calculated data in Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5, indicating no additional release of water from the hydrated solid phase upon equilibration.
As shown in Figure 3, the dried solid was proved to completely convert into anhydrous 1,5-pentanediamine adipate by PXRD. The mass of dissolved 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate was calculated from the measured value of anhydrous 1,5-pentanediamine adipate.
The TG/DSC results for the 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate crystal are shown in Figure 4. It was found that there was 12.49% weight loss between room temperature and 428.15 K, which is consistent with the theoretical water content of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate (12.66 wt%). Meanwhile, there are two sharp endothermic peaks in the DSC curve, representing the dehydration process of two crystal waters in crystal. The loss of water from the lattice was divided into two stages, occurring at 341.71 K and 347.47 K, and the total dehydration enthalpy is 40.13 kJ·mol−1, respectively. The broad endothermic peak at about 380 K indicated that the dehydration of polyamide 56 salt dihydrate was a slow process, accompanied by the endothermic phenomena related to the melting and dissolution in water. The endothermic peak at 456.10 K represents the decomposition process.
Furthermore, the DSC results for anhydrous 1,5-pentanediamine adipate (Figure 5) show a sharp endothermic peak at 397.32 K, which should be the melting process, and the melting enthalpy is 22.13 kJ·mol−1. As shown in Figure 6, the melting process of anhydrous 1,5-pentanediamine adipate at 397.32 K was proved through polarized optical microscopy.

4.2. Solubility of 1,5-Pentanediamine Adipate Dihydrate in Binary Mixed Solvents

The experimental solubility data of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate are listed in Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5 and are plotted in 3D mode in Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9. The results show that the solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate is positively correlated with temperature in all the tested three solvent systems. At a fixed temperature and solvent composition, the solubility order of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in the tested solvent systems follows the trend: (water + methanol) > (water + ethanol) > (water + DMF), which is consistent with the solvent polarity of methanol, ethanol and DMF. Taking into account the intense polarity of the molecule, the solvent effect on solubility could be explained by the “like dissolves like” rule, in which polar solute and polar solvent can result in strong interactions [23].
Solvent composition is the most important factor, which could affect the solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in the solvent mixtures. Interestingly, the solubility values show different characteristics in the three binary mixture solvent systems. For water + methanol, a progressive rise of initial content of water result in ever-increasing solubility at lower temperature, while the trend changes when the temperature is higher than 303.15 K. Besides, cosolvency phenomenon can be observed in water + ethanol mixture, which means that there is a peak in solubility curve versus solvent composition [24]. The peak position slightly shifts with temperature and it gives the highest solubility at xw in between 0.8 and 0.9 for water + ethanol. While, the solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate increases with the rising mole fraction of water for the binary mixed solvents water + DMF. From the above results, ethanol and DMF can be chosen as antisolvent since 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate is almost insoluble in them.
Furthermore, the experimental solubility data of this work were fitted by using the modified Apelblat Equation, NRTL model, the CNIBS/R–K model, and the Jouyban–Acree model. The values of model parameters and the calculated ARD and RMSD are shown in Table 6, Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9. It can be observed the ARD% values of the four models used in this work and are generally lower than 5%, and the RMSD values are all lower than 0.006. It implies that the results fitted by these models show satisfactory consistency with the experimental values. Among them, the ARD% values of CNIBS/R-K model are lower than 1%, and the RMSD values are generally lower than 0.001. The CNIBS/R-K model shows best consistency among the four models, and as such, it was chosen to calculate the solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in the above-mentioned solvents.

4.3. The Mixing Thermodynamic Properties

The mixing properties, including mixing Gibbs free energy (ΔmG), mixing enthalpy (ΔmH), and mixing entropy (ΔmS), are essential for non-ideal binary solution mixtures and NRTL model can be adopted to calculate these data. The results are shown in Table 10, Table 11 and Table 12. It can be found that the values of ΔmG are negative, indicating that the mixing processes in the investigated solution systems are spontaneous. Besides, the values of ΔmH are mostly negative, which means the mixing processes are mainly exothermic. Generally, the thermodynamic properties of mixing are affected by the properties of solvents.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, the solubility data of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in binary solvent mixtures (water + methanol, water + ethanol, water + DMF) were measured under atmospheric pressure at temperatures ranging from 278.15 K to 313.15 K by gravimetric method. The solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate increased with the rising of temperature. At fixed temperature and solvent composition, the solubility order of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate is (water + methanol) > (water + ethanol) > (water + DMF), which is consistent with the solvent polarity of methanol, ethanol and DMF. In water + methanol binary mixtures, the trend of solubility with components changes as the temperature rises, and the cut-off point is 303.15 K. Meanwhile, the cosolvency phenomenon was observed in water + ethanol system and maximum solubility values were observed when molar content of the water is about 0.8–0.9. As for water + DMF mixed solvent, a progressive increase in the initial content of organic solvent results in a decrease in its solubility. Furthermore, the solubility data were fitted by the Apelblat model, the NRTL model, the CNIBS/R–K model, and the Jouyban–Acree model. The results show satisfied fitting consistency. Finally, the mixing thermodynamic data indicate that the mixing process is spontaneous.

Author Contributions

Data curation, H.F. and Y.M.; Methodology, D.L.; Writing—original draft, L.L. and Y.Z.; Writing—review & editing, B.H., N.W., T.W. and H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by [Tianjin Natural Science Foundation] grant number [18JCZDJC38100].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful for the financial support of the Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (grant number 18JCZDJC38100). And Liang Li and Yihan Zhao are co-first authors of the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, P.; Peng, X.; Wang, S.; Li, D.; Li, M.; Jiao, P.; Zhuang, W.; Wu, J.; Wen, Q.; Ying, H. Crystal structure, thermodynamics, and crystallization of bio-based polyamide 56 salt. CrystEngComm 2020, 22, 3234–3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, Y.; Kang, H.; Guo, Y.; Liu, R.; Hao, X.; Qiao, R.; Yan, J. The structures and properties of bio-based polyamide 56 fibers prepared by high-speed spinning. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 49344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kricheldorf, H.R.; Zolotukhin, M.G.; Cárdenas, J. Non-Stoichiometric Polycondensations and the Synthesis of High Molar Mass Polycondensates. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2012, 33, 1814–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gao, Y.Y.; Xie, C.; Wang, J.K. Effects of low magnetic field on batch crystallisation of glycine. Mater. Res. Innov. 2009, 13, 112–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hao, H.; Yin, Q.; Zhong, J.; Wang, X. Crystallization for Pharmaceutical and Food Science. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 2327–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, C.; Wang, A.J.; Wang, Y. Solubility of Ceftriaxone Disodium in Acetone, Methanol, Ethanol, N,N-Dimethylformamide, and Formamide between 278 and 318 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2005, 50, 1757–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mao, Y.; Li, F.; Wang, T.; Cheng, X.; Li, G.; Li, D.; Zhang, X.; Hao, H. Enhancement of lysozyme crystallization under ultrasound field. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020, 63, 104975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J.; Gong, J. Investigation on the Spherical Crystallization Process of Cefotaxime Sodium. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 1402–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, J.; Hou, B.; Huang, J.; Li, X.; Tian, B.; Wang, N.; Bi, J.; Hao, H. Solution thermodynamics of tris-(2,4-ditert-butylphenyl)-phosphite in a series of pure solvents. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 283, 713–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Apelblat, A.; Manzurola, E. Solubilities of L-aspartic, DL-aspartic, DL-glutamic, p-hydroxybenzoic, o-anisic, p-anisic, and itaconic acids in water from T = 278 K to T = 345 K. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 1997, 29, 1527–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Apelblat, A.; Manzurola, E. Solubilities of l-glutamic acid, 3-nitrobenzoic acid, p-toluic acid, calcium-l-lactate, calcium gluconate, magnesium-dl-aspartate, and magnesium-l-lactate in water. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2002, 34, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yan, H.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J. Correlation of Solubility and Prediction of the Mixing Properties of Capsaicin in Different Pure Solvents. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 2808–2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Choi, P.B.; Mclaughlin, E. Effect of a phase transition on the solubility of a solid. AIChE J. 1983, 29, 150–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zong, S.; Wang, J.; Xiao, Y.; Wu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Guo, Y.; Huang, X.; Hao, H. Solubility and dissolution thermodynamic properties of lansoprazole in pure solvents. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 241, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Renon, H.; Prausnitz, J.M. Local compositions in thermodynamic excess functions for liquid mixtures. AIChE J. 1968, 14, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. You, Y.; Gao, T.; Qiu, F.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Jia, W.; Li, R. Solubility Measurement and Modeling for 2-Benzoyl-3-chlorobenzoic Acid and 1-Chloroanthraquinone in Organic Solvents. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2013, 58, 1845–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Acree, W.E. Mathematical representation of thermodynamic properties: Part 2. Derivation of the combined nearly ideal binary solvent (NIBS)/Redlich-Kister mathematical representation from a two-body and three-body interactional mixing model. Thermochim. Acta 1992, 198, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jouyban, A.; Soltani, S.; Chan, H.-K.; Acree, W.E. Modeling acid dissociation constant of analytes in binary solvents at various temperatures using Jouyban–Acree model. Thermochim. Acta 2005, 428, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jouyban, A.; Fakhree, M.A.A.; Acree, J.W.E. Comment on “Measurement and Correlation of Solubilities of (Z)-2-(2-Aminothiazol-4-yl)-2-methoxyiminoacetic Acid in Different Pure Solvents and Binary Mixtures of Water + (Ethanol, Methanol, or Glycol)”. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2012, 57, 1344–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, Q.; Li, Y.; Yuan, F.; Xiao, L.; Hao, H.; Wang, Y. Thermodynamic properties of enantiotropic polymorphs of glycolide. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2017, 111, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, G.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Hao, H.; Luan, Q.; Wang, H. Determination and correlation of cefuroxime acid solubility in (acetonitrile + water) mixtures. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2014, 77, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ruidiaz, M.A.; Delgado, D.R.; Martinez, M.A.R.; Marcus, Y. Solubility and preferential solvation of indomethacin in 1,4-dioxane+water solvent mixtures. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2010, 299, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zou, F.; Zhuang, W.; Wu, J.; Zhou, J.; Liu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Xie, J.; Zhu, C.; Guo, T.; Ying, H. Experimental measurement and modelling of solubility of inosine-5′-monophosphate disodium in pure and mixed solvents. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2014, 77, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jouyban, A. Review of the cosolvency models for predicting solubility of drugs in water-cosolvent mixtures. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 11, 32–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Molecular structure of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate.
Figure 1. Molecular structure of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate.
Crystals 12 00877 g001
Figure 2. Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of raw material and residual solid in mixed systems: water + DMF (xw = 0.648), water + ethanol (xw = 0.447) and water + methanol (xw = 0.360) at T = 298.15 K.
Figure 2. Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of raw material and residual solid in mixed systems: water + DMF (xw = 0.648), water + ethanol (xw = 0.447) and water + methanol (xw = 0.360) at T = 298.15 K.
Crystals 12 00877 g002
Figure 3. Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of dried solid in mixed systems: water + DMF (xw = 0.648), water + ethanol (xw = 0.447) and water + methanol (xw = 0.360) at T = 298.15 K.
Figure 3. Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of dried solid in mixed systems: water + DMF (xw = 0.648), water + ethanol (xw = 0.447) and water + methanol (xw = 0.360) at T = 298.15 K.
Crystals 12 00877 g003
Figure 4. Thermal analysis (TG-DSC) of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate.
Figure 4. Thermal analysis (TG-DSC) of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate.
Crystals 12 00877 g004
Figure 5. DSC of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate after dehydration.
Figure 5. DSC of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate after dehydration.
Crystals 12 00877 g005
Figure 6. Polarized optical microscopy of anhydrous 1,5-pentanediamine adipate (left: 120.6 °C, right: 140.6 °C).
Figure 6. Polarized optical microscopy of anhydrous 1,5-pentanediamine adipate (left: 120.6 °C, right: 140.6 °C).
Crystals 12 00877 g006
Figure 7. Mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in (water + methanol) mixed solvents with different mole fractions at various temperatures.
Figure 7. Mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in (water + methanol) mixed solvents with different mole fractions at various temperatures.
Crystals 12 00877 g007
Figure 8. Mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in (water + ethanol) mixed solvents with different mole fractions at various temperatures.
Figure 8. Mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in (water + ethanol) mixed solvents with different mole fractions at various temperatures.
Crystals 12 00877 g008
Figure 9. Mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in (water + DMF) mixed solvents with different mole fractions at various temperatures.
Figure 9. Mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in (water + DMF) mixed solvents with different mole fractions at various temperatures.
Crystals 12 00877 g009
Table 1. Sources and mass fraction purity of chemicals.
Table 1. Sources and mass fraction purity of chemicals.
Chemical NameCAS Reg. No.Mass Fraction PuritySourceAnalysis Method
1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate2156592-12-8≥0.99Hebei Meibang Engineering Technology Co., Ltd., of ChinaHPLC a
1,5-pentanediamine adipate13534-23-1≥0.99Hebei Meibang Engineering Technology Co., Ltd., of ChinaHPLC a
methanol67-56-1≥0.995Tianjin Guangda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., ChinaGC b
ethanol64-17-5≥0.997Tianjin Guangda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., ChinaGC b
DMF68-12-2≥0.995Tianjin Benchmark Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., ChinaGC c
a High performance liquid chromatography, determined by Hebei Meibang Engineering Technology Co., Ltd., of China. b Gas chromatography, determined by Tianjin Guangda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China. c Gas chromatography, determined by Tianjin Benchmark Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., China.
Table 2. The amount of water x w 0 upon equilibration.
Table 2. The amount of water x w 0 upon equilibration.
Sample x w 0 , K F
water + methanol (xw = 0.360, T = 313.15 K)0.562
water + ethanol (xw = 0.447, T = 313.15 K)0.553
water + DMF (xw = 0.648, T = 313.15 K)0.656
Table 3. Mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in water + methanol from 278.15 K to 313.15 K (p = 0.1 MPa) a,b.
Table 3. Mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in water + methanol from 278.15 K to 313.15 K (p = 0.1 MPa) a,b.
T/K x w 0 10 2 x a 10 2 x p exp 10 2 x p Apel 10 2 x p NRTL 10 2 x p RK 10 2 x p JA
xw = 0.360
278.150.4325.4126.0295.738 5.9346.036 5.795
283.150.4405.8966.6416.837 7.0276.641 6.944
288.150.4556.9768.0558.132 8.1178.062 8.270
293.150.4748.2339.7939.654 9.4399.793 9.789
298.150.4889.15811.1411.43 11.2711.1411.52
303.150.52011.1714.2913.53 13.0513.74 13.49
308.150.53511.7415.8515.97 15.9315.87 15.71
313.150.56913.8619.0118.82 18.9818.89 18.21
xw = 0.491
278.150.5545.8276.552 6.308 6.6086.503 6.270
283.150.5626.5447.480 7.340 7.3837.483 7.365
288.150.5707.2658.446 8.529 8.3998.407 8.603
293.150.5838.3039.893 9.897 9.6029.891 9.996
298.150.5918.99510.89 11.46 11.2610.90 11.55
303.150.61010.5313.26 13.27 13.0913.26 13.29
308.150.62911.9715.70 15.33 15.4715.58 15.22
313.150.64413.1017.65 17.70 18.6617.65 17.36
xw = 0.600
278.150.6516.0446.830 6.730 7.1616.956 6.703
283.150.6586.7977.816 7.692 7.7777.794 7.744
288.150.6647.4558.704 8.786 8.6528.772 8.901
293.150.6738.43410.0810.02 9.70810.09 10.18
298.150.6799.04310.9711.44 11.1810.94 11.59
303.150.69310.4813.19 13.04 12.8613.19 13.14
308.150.70411.6115.04 14.85 15.1215.22 14.84
313.150.71512.6616.85 16.90 18.0516.83 16.70
xw = 0.692
278.150.7356.5717.517 7.241 7.4967.371 7.086
283.150.7386.9007.952 8.123 8.1368.004 8.071
288.150.7447.7619.127 9.117 8.8239.108 9.151
293.150.7508.59010.30 10.23 9.78410.26 10.33
298.150.7549.09911.05 11.50 11.1111.08 11.61
303.150.76310.3913.04 12.92 12.6713.06 13.01
308.150.77111.4314.72 14.52 14.7614.71 14.52
313.150.77912.3316.28 16.33 17.4516.30 16.15
xw = 0.771
278.150.8046.6877.670 7.513 7.8877.730 7.418
283.150.8067.1368.270 8.360 8.3828.225 8.348
288.150.8117.9719.422 9.304 8.9779.380 9.356
293.150.8148.60410.32 10.35 9.87410.36 10.44
298.150.8189.22111.23 11.52 11.0511.22 11.61
303.150.82410.2812.86 12.82 12.5112.84 12.87
308.150.82911.1914.32 14.27 14.4414.19 14.22
313.150.83412.1416.15 15.88 16.0015.93 15.66
xw = 0.900
278.150.9157.1198.247 8.028 8.4158.250 7.947
283.150.9167.4068.638 8.760 8.7978.654 8.771
288.150.9188.1179.628 9.567 9.2599.664 9.647
293.150.9198.71010.48 10.45 9.99110.46 10.57
298.150.9209.29311.34 11.43 10.9811.34 11.55
303.150.9229.97712.38 12.51 12.2612.39 12.59
308.150.92410.5913.36 13.69 13.9113.45 13.68
313.150.92711.4815.36 14.99 16.0915.37 14.83
xw = 1.000
278.151.0007.3138.512 8.263 8.8438.509 8.334
283.151.0007.5068.869 8.945 9.1078.865 9.060
288.151.0008.1069.613 9.691 9.4909.603 9.821
293.151.0008.77410.57 10.5010.0710.57 10.61
298.151.0009.15211.1811.3910.9411.18 11.44
303.151.0009.86912.27 12.37 12.0612.27 12.31
308.151.00010.6213.40 13.43 13.5313.37 13.21
313.151.00011.5014.7814.59 15.4614.78 14.14
a  x p exp is the experimental mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate; x p Apel , x p NRTL , x p RK and x p JA refer to the calculated mole fraction solubility according to the modified Apelblat equation, NRTL model, CNIBS/R-K model and Jouyban–Acree model, respectively. x w is the initial mole fraction of water in three binary solvent mixtures; x w 0 is the final mole fraction of water in three binary solvent mixtures; x a is the mole fraction solubility of anhydrous 1,5-pentanediamine adipate. b Standard uncertainty is u(T) = 0.03 K, u(p) = 0.3 kPa. The relative standard uncertainty is ur(xw) = 0.03, ur(xp) = 0.05, ur( x w 0 ) = 0.03.
Table 4. Mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in water + ethanol from 278.15 K to 313.15 K (p = 0.1 MPa) a,b.
Table 4. Mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in water + ethanol from 278.15 K to 313.15 K (p = 0.1 MPa) a,b.
T/K x w 0 10 2 x a 10 2 x p exp 10 2 x p Apel 10 2 x p NRTL 10 2 x p RK 10 2 x p JA
xw = 0.447
278.150.4691.9752.042 1.885 2.1942.039 2.120
283.150.4752.4692.580 2.421 2.6412.575 2.673
288.150.4823.1103.293 3.106 3.2363.291 3.345
293.150.4883.6203.877 3.978 3.9763.872 4.153
298.150.4974.3824.771 5.087 4.8394.766 5.120
303.150.5145.7516.455 6.495 6.2246.451 6.268
308.150.5307.0758.188 8.280 7.9878.193 7.623
313.150.5558.86310.70 10.54 10.6610.69 9.213
xw = 0.581
278.150.6133.7904.074 4.175 4.3644.114 4.041
283.150.6214.6785.126 4.951 4.9125.198 4.874
288.150.6265.1895.751 5.852 5.6365.783 5.840
293.150.6346.0556.844 6.892 6.5736.899 6.954
298.150.6447.1108.235 8.090 7.7618.297 8.233
303.150.6548.0699.561 9.466 9.3289.605 9.693
308.150.6628.94010.81 11.04 11.2910.77 11.35
313.150.67710.3312.94 12.84 13.9412.99 13.22
xw = 0.683
278.150.7195.3926.004 6.092 6.1365.879 5.564
283.150.7256.2787.132 6.899 6.6276.904 6.504
288.150.7286.7437.743 7.810 7.3827.620 7.562
293.150.7357.6508.974 8.837 8.2808.807 8.747
298.150.7408.3279.928 9.995 9.5079.804 10.069
303.150.7479.22211.23 11.29 11.0411.12 11.53
308.150.7529.96312.36 12.76 13.0212.46 13.16
313.150.76511.5314.74 14.41 15.5714.60 14.94
xw = 0.764
278.150.7946.1316.943 6.824 7.3987.011 6.600
283.150.7976.6747.652 7.620 7.8617.840 7.539
288.150.8017.3448.553 8.516 8.4878.724 8.572
293.150.8058.0749.567 9.522 9.3379.705 9.703
298.150.8088.69910.46 10.65 10.4810.42 10.93
303.150.8139.55811.74 11.92 11.9311.80 12.28
308.150.81910.5413.27 13.34 13.8113.24 13.74
313.150.82611.9115.15 14.94 16.2315.28 15.31
xw = 0.829
278.150.8536.6077.564 7.454 8.1437.645 7.292
283.150.8557.1678.313 8.228 8.4948.345 8.180
288.150.8597.9489.390 9.089 9.0049.305 9.140
293.150.8608.40510.04 10.04 9.85210.06 10.17
298.150.8628.75510.54 11.10 10.9610.75 11.28
303.150.8669.75912.05 12.28 12.2812.10 12.47
308.150.87010.7213.57 13.59 14.0413.47 13.74
313.150.87512.0315.38 15.04 16.3315.37 15.09
xw = 0.928
278.150.9397.1638.307 8.151 8.5588.205 8.152
283.150.9407.5888.889 8.855 8.8338.781 8.904
288.150.9418.1409.662 9.628 9.2749.660 9.696
293.150.9428.63210.36 10.47 9.95610.29 10.52
298.150.9439.25511.28 11.40 10.8611.12 11.39
303.150.9449.95912.35 12.42 12.0612.29 12.30
308.150.94510.5613.31 13.53 13.6213.39 13.25
313.150.94712.1315.05 14.76 15.6515.01 14.24
a  x p exp is the experimental mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate; x p Apel , x p NRTL , x p RK and x p JA refer to the calculated mole fraction solubility according to the modified Apelblat equation, NRTL model, CNIBS/R-K model and Jouyban–Acree model, respectively. x w is the initial mole fraction of water in three binary solvent mixtures; x w 0 is the final mole fraction of water in three binary solvent mixtures; x a is the mole fraction solubility of anhydrous 1,5-pentanediamine adipate. b Standard uncertainty is u(T) = 0.03 K, u(p) = 0.3 kPa. The relative standard uncertainty is ur(xw) = 0.03, ur(xp) = 0.05, ur( x w 0 ) = 0.03.
Table 5. Mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in water + DMF from 278.15 K to 313.15 K (p = 0.1 MPa) a,b.
Table 5. Mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in water + DMF from 278.15 K to 313.15 K (p = 0.1 MPa) a,b.
T/K x w 0 10 2 x a 10 2 x p exp 10 2 x p Apel 10 2 x p NRTL 10 2 x p RK 10 2 x p JA
xw = 0.648
278.150.6480.10820.1084 0.1350 0.10950.1075 0.1237
283.150.6490.21640.2173 0.1930 0.16300.2158 0.1806
288.150.6490.26240.2637 0.27400.24020.2619 0.2602
293.150.6500.37920.3820 0.3860 0.35710.3640 0.3701
298.150.6510.46280.4671 0.5420 0.51900.4649 0.5204
303.150.6520.65230.6609 0.7550 0.74100.6558 0.7234
308.150.6551.0591.0811.046 1.1161.073 0.9948
313.150.6581.4831.5281.441 1.6321.509 1.354
xw = 0.741
278.150.7450.85930.8940 1.030 1.0030.89441.018
283.150.7471.2141.241 1.347 1.3051.217 1.340
288.150.7491.7031.756 1.754 1.6931.758 1.748
293.150.7522.1592.239 2.274 2.1772.226 2.259
298.150.7573.1343.265 2.937 2.8353.244 2.895
303.150.7593.4853.729 3.779 3.6133.749 3.679
308.150.7644.3694.777 4.843 4.6074.809 4.640
313.150.7715.5266.197 6.184 5.8486.240 5.808
xw = 0.811
278.150.8233.0873.291 2.997 3.0793.108 2.677
283.150.8233.2923.465 3.535 3.6253.553 3.298
288.150.8263.8354.090 4.167 4.2424.107 4.034
293.150.8284.4984.918 4.911 4.9554.950 4.900
298.150.8304.9495.711 5.785 5.8395.665 5.914
303.150.8356.0236.762 6.810 6.7246.726 7.093
308.150.8397.0308.026 8.013 7.7877.980 8.457
313.150.8438.0139.374 9.422 9.0789.295 10.02
xw = 0.866
278.150.8774.4114.8374.949 5.1934.965 4.431
283.150.8805.2265.858 5.566 5.5515.746 5.204
288.150.8815.5046.196 6.252 6.3536.162 6.079
293.150.8836.6307.152 7.012 6.9547.125 7.063
298.150.8846.7677.429 7.855 7.9037.567 8.165
303.150.8877.4248.715 8.788 8.9598.739 9.393
308.150.8898.32810.05 9.818 9.99310.07 10.75
313.150.8929.02911.07 10.95 11.4211.13 12.26
xw = 0.9453
278.150.9526.4327.071 7.404 7.5267.262 7.157
283.150.9537.1608.265 8.021 7.7548.327 7.884
288.150.9537.4358.645 8.698 8.5498.670 8.654
293.150.9548.0699.568 9.442 9.1489.579 9.470
298.150.9558.45110.07 10.25 10.409.962 10.33
303.150.9569.03310.92 11.15 11.4810.92 11.24
308.150.9579.93712.25 12.13 12.1512.25 12.19
313.150.95810.5513.22 13.20 13.6913.21 13.19
a  x p exp is the experimental mole fraction solubility of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate; x p Apel , x p NRTL , x p RK and x p JA refer to the calculated mole fraction solubility according to the modified Apelblat equation, NRTL model, CNIBS/R-K model and Jouyban–Acree model, respectively. x w is the initial mole fraction of water in three binary solvent mixtures; x w 0 is the final mole fraction of water in three binary solvent mixtures; x a is the mole fraction solubility of anhydrous 1,5-pentanediamine adipate. b Standard uncertainty is u(T) = 0.03 K, u(p) = 0.3 kPa. The relative standard uncertainty is ur(xw) = 0.03, ur(xp) = 0.05, ur( x w 0 ) = 0.03.
Table 6. Model parameters of modified Apelblat model for 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in the investigated binary solvent mixtures a,b,c.
Table 6. Model parameters of modified Apelblat model for 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in the investigated binary solvent mixtures a,b,c.
xwABCARD%103RMSD
water + methanol
0.360−82.83401038.9913.54621.9411.947
0.491−77.87191151.4012.60961.8112.613
0.600−82.41021586.5513.14951.4351.987
0.692−95.14112376.7814.91971.6522.144
0.771−80.25151856.4712.61311.0321.322
0.900−81.01162152.5412.57081.4592.062
1.000−75.77572039.9911.71751.1871.464
water + ethanol
0.447−147.5622728.0323.77034.009 1.704
0.581−44.1974−544.3437.636301.744 1.340
0.683−81.26291656.5312.88331.729 2.126
0.764−94.65522414.2714.79891.037 1.308
0.829−85.25482175.2113.29701.915 2.722
0.928−78.05442088.1412.08921.113 1.571
water + DMF
0.648−103.155−706.68717.605310.73 0.553
0.741−98.5924393.33216.45355.559 1.575
0.811−111.0742345.0317.61422.312 1.586
0.866−55.1677636.2368.861591.817 1.342
0.945−81.63572273.4112.59011.723 2.044
a A, B and C are the parameters of the modified Apelblat equation. b ARD is the average relative deviation. c RMSD is the root mean-square deviation.
Table 7. Model parameters of NRTL model for 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in the investigated binary solvent mixtures a,b,c.
Table 7. Model parameters of NRTL model for 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in the investigated binary solvent mixtures a,b,c.
ParametersWater + MethanolWater + EthanolWater + DMF
Δgij−345,527−347,351360,083
Δgik−12,636.6−8875.18−3418.04
Δgji392,075394,734−319,133
Δgjk854.4834455.60−55,130.0
Δgki13,260.814,444.68333.05
Δgkj4300.474725.4914,778.7
ARD%2.6783.6525.387
103RMSD4.2264.0352.430
a Δgij, Δgik, Δgji, Δgjk, Δgki and Δgkj are the parameters of NRTL model. b ARD is the average relative deviation. c RMSD is the root mean-square deviation.
Table 8. Model parameters of CNIBS/R-K model for 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in the investigated binary solvent mixtures a,b,c.
Table 8. Model parameters of CNIBS/R-K model for 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in the investigated binary solvent mixtures a,b,c.
T/KB0B1B2B3B4ARD%103RMSD
water + methanol
278.15−2.986560.535550−0.4203001.13613−0.7289100.785 0.848
283.15−4.5389110.7029−22.123920.5480−7.0110.252 0.303
288.15−2.607320.359600−0.8533701.93184−1.173880.349 0.397
293.15−1.91604−2.846626.86270−6.666562.320150.166 0.255
298.15−1.97239−0.8880800.4508601.18540−0.9666300.101 0.167
303.15−0.914890−6.9030515.9257−15.96725.761520.060 0.116
308.15−1.38438−3.35065−9.15557−10.99734.565260.571 1.103
313.15−1.574440.361170−2.866113.78493−1.617090.052 0.125
water + ethanol
278.15−6.859833.8650515.6193−25.924810.84070.990 0.805
283.15−12.053935.5145−50.495232.8953−8.278721.334 1.328
288.15−7.1488111.4357−6.18013−2.537522.089150.740 0.935
293.15−7.3273511.6185−1.76807−11.64456.877370.770 0.965
298.15−13.566450.5021−86.045966.1292−19.20530.909 1.230
303.15−8.0395923.0644−34.168322.9691−5.921560.455 0.644
308.15−1.81365−9.8332031.2860−34.028512.36660.431 0.690
313.15−0.181820−16.314042.2165−42.381914.75090.376 0.809
water + DMF
278.15219.485−1234.932423.09−2035.12625.0284.045 2.264
283.1592.4160−562.5811120.79−934.259281.2090.510 0.327
288.15−88.0758293.604−381.254223.373−49.98860.423 0.294
293.15−83.1875272.112−340.998188.063−38.23640.095 0.077
298.15−330.8811465.47−2470.411859.26−525.6362.276 1.976
303.15−166.220669.528−1035.38716.822−186.8390.295 0.296
308.15−143.599580.109−902.644630.033−165.9070.621 0.723
313.15−180.185758.701−1219.05873.296−234.6650.568 0.742
a B0, B1, B2, B3 and B4 are the parameters of CNIBS/R-K model. b ARD is the average relative deviation. c RMSD is the root mean-square deviation.
Table 9. Model parameters of Jouyban–Acree equation for 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in the investigated binary solvent mixtures a,b,c.
Table 9. Model parameters of Jouyban–Acree equation for 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in the investigated binary solvent mixtures a,b,c.
ParametersWater + MethanolWater + EthanolWater + DMF
A010.296315.617340.6254
A1−8.04828−14.1420−39.9894
A2−3704.93−6730.11−35,615.2
A32326.558302.0887,378.6
A4167.587−3422.17−90,712.4
A5−127.038285.81446,058.6
A620.3783475.704−7948.44
ARD%2.0223.2706.128
103RMSD2.4593.7074.389
a A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5 and A6 are the parameters of Jouyban-Acree equation. b ARD is the average relative deviation. c RMSD is the root mean-square deviation.
Table 10. Mixing thermodynamic properties of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in water + methanol mixtures a,b.
Table 10. Mixing thermodynamic properties of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in water + methanol mixtures a,b.
xwΔmH/kJ·mol−1ΔmG/kJ·mol−1ΔmS/J·mol−1·K−1
T = 278.15 K
0.360−3.767−1.873−6.813
0.491−4.283−1.997−8.223
0.600−4.480−2.017−8.858
0.692−4.879−2.050−10.17
0.771−4.992−1.983−10.82
0.900−5.399−1.814−12.89
1.000−5.435−1.450−14.33
T = 283.15 K
0.360−4.036−1.953−7.360
0.491−4.676−2.100−9.102
0.600−4.882−2.119−9.763
0.692−4.961−2.072−10.20
0.771−5.152−2.019−11.06
0.900−5.435−1.810−12.80
1.000−5.464−1.434−14.24
T = 288.15 K
0.360−4.656−2.114−8.825
0.491−5.038−2.195−9.872
0.600−5.184−2.197−10.37
0.692−5.388−2.176−11.15
0.771−5.555−2.113−11.95
0.900−5.758−1.876−13.48
1.000−5.692−1.464−14.68
T = 293.15 K
0.360−5.315−2.290−10.32
0.491−5.563−2.330−11.03
0.600−5.658−2.315−11.41
0.692−5.754−2.265−11.90
0.771−5.789−2.165−12.36
0.900−5.976−1.911−13.87
1.000−5.999−1.495−15.37
T = 298.15 K
0.360−5.714−2.408−11.09
0.491−5.828−2.404−11.48
0.600−5.862−2.370−11.71
0.692−5.888−2.297−12.04
0.771−5.988−2.207−12.68
0.900−6.167−1.936−14.19
1.000−6.105−1.483−15.50
T = 303.15 K
0.360−6.579−2.667−12.91
0.491−6.507−2.589−12.92
0.600−6.490−2.533−13.05
0.692−6.439−2.434−13.21
0.771−6.413−2.305−13.55
0.900−6.400−1.970−14.62
1.000−6.415−1.499−16.22
T = 308.15 K
0.360−6.809−2.764−13.13
0.491−7.018−2.748−13.86
0.600−6.859−2.638−13.70
0.692−6.775−2.520−13.81
0.771−6.705−2.368−14.08
0.900−6.572−1.986−14.88
1.000−6.710−1.532−16.81
T = 313.15 K
0.360−7.245−2.957−13.69
0.491−7.265−2.847−14.11
0.600−7.115−2.721−14.03
0.692−6.993−2.578−14.10
0.771−7.378−2.063−16.98
0.900−7.056−2.077−15.90
1.000−7.068−1.579−17.53
a The values of ΔmG, ΔmH and ΔmS were calculated by Equation (23). b The standard uncertainty are u(T) = 0.03 K, u(p) = 0.3 kPa. The combined expanded uncertainties are ucmH) = 0.060ΔmH, ucmS) = 0.065ΔmS, ucmG) = 0.070ΔmG (0.95 level of confidence).
Table 11. Mixing thermodynamic properties of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in water + ethanol mixtures a,b.
Table 11. Mixing thermodynamic properties of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in water + ethanol mixtures a,b.
xwΔmH/kJ·mol−1ΔmG/kJ·mol−1ΔmS/J·mol−1·K−1
T = 278.15 K
0.447−0.3891−0.1108−1.000
0.581−1.808−0.4737−4.801
0.683−3.093−0.8665−8.010
0.764−3.769−1.114−9.550
0.829−4.291−1.295−10.77
0.928−5.100−1.499−12.95
T = 283.15 K
0.447−0.7009−0.1980−1.776
0.581−2.368−0.6156−6.194
0.683−3.602−0.9993−9.197
0.764−4.012−1.177−10.01
0.829−4.530−1.352−11.22
0.928−5.242−1.517−13.16
T = 288.15 K
0.447−1.096−0.3010−2.762
0.581−2.626−0.6872−6.734
0.683−3.782−1.050−9.488
0.764−4.318−1.255−10.63
0.829−4.900−1.440−12.01
0.928−5.458−1.552−13.56
T = 293.15 K
0.447−1.382−0.3795−3.423
0.581−3.102−0.8079−7.830
0.683−4.231−1.165−10.46
0.764−4.634−1.334−11.26
0.829−5.026−1.466−12.15
0.928−5.611−1.570−13.79
T = 298.15 K
0.447−1.807−0.4852−4.436
0.581−3.654−0.9458−9.090
0.683−4.496−1.236−10.93
0.764−4.854−1.389−11.62
0.829−5.069−1.469−12.08
0.928−5.835−1.603−14.20
T = 303.15 K
0.447−2.575−0.6620−6.314
0.581−4.098−1.061−10.02
0.683−4.858−1.332−11.63
0.764−5.186−1.471−12.25
0.829−5.493−1.566−12.96
0.928−6.092−1.639−14.69
T = 308.15 K
0.447−3.240−0.8211−7.854
0.581−4.444−1.155−10.67
0.683−5.092−1.397−11.99
0.764−5.543−1.561−12.96
0.829−5.848−1.646−13.64
0.928−6.264−1.654−14.96
T = 313.15 K
0.447−4.078−1.029−9.741
0.581−5.004−1.310−11.80
0.683−5.648−1.353−13.08
0.764−5.932−1.664−13.63
0.829−6.356−1.764−14.67
0.928−6.692−1.722−15.88
a The values of ΔmG, ΔmH and ΔmS were calculated by Equation (23). b The standard uncertainty are u(T) = 0.03 K, u(p) = 0.3 kPa. The combined expanded uncertainties are ucmH) = 0.060ΔmH, ucmS) = 0.065ΔmS, ucmG) = 0.070ΔmG (0.95 level of confidence).
Table 12. Mixing thermodynamic properties of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in water +DMF mixtures a,b.
Table 12. Mixing thermodynamic properties of 1,5-pentanediamine adipate dihydrate in water +DMF mixtures a,b.
xwΔmH/kJ·mol−1ΔmG/kJ·mol−1ΔmS/J·mol−1·K−1
T = 278.15 K
0.648−23.05−2.277−1.024
0.741−17.50−1.8031.927
0.811−11.39−1.3979.279
0.866−7.392−1.06411.70
0.945−3.686−5.5516.710
T = 283.15 K
0.648−22.87−2.271−0.567
0.741−17.12−1.7972.989
0.811−11.34−1.3959.239
0.866−7.374−1.06411.56
0.945−4.046−5.5475.304
T = 288.15 K
0.648−22.73−2.263−0.359
0.741−16.68−1.7894.219
0.811−11.11−1.3899.652
0.866−7.371−1.05811.16
0.945−4.172−5.5604.818
T = 293.15 K
0.648−22.52−2.2530.0403
0.741−16.32−1.7825.112
0.811−10.89−1.3819.958
0.866−7.454−1.05510.58
0.945−4.501−5.5703.647
T = 298.15 K
0.648−22.35−2.2440.308
0.741−15.67−1.7676.708
0.811−10.82−1.3779.888
0.866−7.546−1.05210.00
0.945−4.552−5.4993.178
T = 303.15 K
0.648−22.14−2.2390.819
0.741−15.47−1.7576.946
0.811−10.66−1.3649.832
0.866−7.644−1.0439.199
0.945−4.822−5.1451.065
T = 308.15 K
0.648−21.69−2.2231.733
0.741−15.06−1.7427.638
0.811−10.65−1.3519.300
0.866−7.894−1.0368.023
0.945−5.467−5.5380.2324
T = 313.15 K
0.648−21.30−2.2092.528
0.741−14.67−1.7198.059
0.811−10.71−1.3358.432
0.866−8.115−1.0296.952
0.945−5.760−5.469−0.9297
a The values of ΔmG, ΔmH and ΔmS were calculated by Equation (23). b The standard uncertainty are u(T) = 0.03 K, u(p) = 0.3 kPa. The combined expanded uncertainties are ucmH) = 0.060ΔmH, ucmS) = 0.065ΔmS, ucmG) = 0.070ΔmG (0.95 level of confidence).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, L.; Zhao, Y.; Hou, B.; Feng, H.; Wang, N.; Liu, D.; Ma, Y.; Wang, T.; Hao, H. Thermodynamic Properties of 1,5-Pentanediamine Adipate Dihydrate in Three Binary Solvent Systems from 278.15 K to 313.15 K. Crystals 2022, 12, 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12060877

AMA Style

Li L, Zhao Y, Hou B, Feng H, Wang N, Liu D, Ma Y, Wang T, Hao H. Thermodynamic Properties of 1,5-Pentanediamine Adipate Dihydrate in Three Binary Solvent Systems from 278.15 K to 313.15 K. Crystals. 2022; 12(6):877. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12060877

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Liang, Yihan Zhao, Baohong Hou, Han Feng, Na Wang, Dong Liu, Yingjie Ma, Ting Wang, and Hongxun Hao. 2022. "Thermodynamic Properties of 1,5-Pentanediamine Adipate Dihydrate in Three Binary Solvent Systems from 278.15 K to 313.15 K" Crystals 12, no. 6: 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12060877

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop