Next Article in Journal
Rare Earth Ion-Doped Y2.95R0.05MgAl3SiO12 (R = Yb, Y, Dy, Eu, Sm) Garnet-Type Microwave Ceramics for 5G Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Temperature and Flow Ratio on the Morphology and Uniformity of 4H-SiC Epitaxial Layers Growth on 150 mm 4° Off-Axis Substrates
Previous Article in Journal
Structural, Electrical and Optical Properties of TM (Mn and Cr) Doped BiFeO3 Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis, Crystal and Electronic Structure of the New Ternary Compound Ca3InAs3
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Concept Paper

Operation Mechanisms of Flexible RF Silicon Thin Film Transistor under Bending Conditions

1
School of Microelectronics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Imaging and Sensing Microelectronic Technology, Tianjin 300072, China
3
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2022, 12(11), 1609; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12111609
Submission received: 22 October 2022 / Revised: 4 November 2022 / Accepted: 4 November 2022 / Published: 11 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Semiconductor Material Growth, Characterization, and Simulation)

Abstract

:
We fabricate a flexible silicon thin-film transistor (TFT) on a plastic substrate as a key component and representative example to analyze the major influencing factors of flexible devices under bending conditions. Experimental and two-dimensional device modeling results reveal that bending radius and device dimensions have a significant influence on the radio-frequency (RF) performance of the flexible silicon nanomembrane (SiNM) TFT under bending conditions. Carrier mobility and electric field extracted from the model, together with theoretical analysis, were employed to study the performance dependence and the operation mechanisms of the bended TFTs. The carrier mobility and electric field are increased monotonically with larger bending strains, which lead to better RF performance. They also showed a consistent change trend with different device parameters (e.g., gate length, oxide thickness). Flexible SiNM TFTs with a smaller gate length and a larger gate dielectric thickness are shown to have better RF performance robustness with bending strains. The analysis provides a guideline for the study of flexible electronics under bending conditions.

1. Introduction

Flexible electronics have received extensive attention in recent years because of their outstanding characteristics of bendability, foldability, and lightweight. Flexible electronics are now widely used in many new-rising areas [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. In particular, the concept of the Metaverse makes wearable devices, flexible smart sensors, and electronic skins attract great interest [11]. With the development of transferable single-crystal SiNMs, flexible TFTs have become an essential and fundamental element for most of the flexible applications [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].
These flexible applications often need to operate under bending conditions, and thus the performance variations of flexible devices with bending strains are of great concern. While the flexible TFTs are the most essential components, the influencing factors and operation mechanisms of the TFTs under mechanical bending conditions are yet to be investigated. Researchers have been trying to study the performance of different types of flexible devices with bending strains [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. However, these studies were most focused on the direct current regime and applied experimental characterizations or equivalent circuit modeling to analyze the performance variations of bended devices [33,34,35,36,37]. In addition, these studies were mainly about the monotonicity between the flexible device and bending radius.
Equivalent circuit modeling was usually used in traditional work, while two-dimensional device modeling was used in our proposed work. A small signal strain equivalent circuit model was employed for calculations and analysis of the TFT device in traditional work, where the source resistance can be obtained by model parameter extraction [24,28,37]. Then the relationship between source resistance and device performance was analyzed. Other device parameters, such as carrier mobility or electric field distribution, cannot be directly calculated or analyzed by this method. During this work, carrier mobility and electric field can be extracted from the model through Silvaco’s process simulators Athena and Atlas. It was clearer to show the carrier mobility and electric field variations under bending conditions and with different device structure parameters. Additionally, a standard fabrication process for the TFTs was applied to the model in our work, which was identical to the device fabrication processes, including the same device structure, ion implantations, annealing, etc. This helped to better investigate the device’s underlying mechanism.
In this work, it was found that the flexible SiNM TFTs have good RF performance robustness under bending conditions, and performance variations of flexible SiNM TFTs with bending strains were also related to the device dimension. Firstly, the flexible SiNM TFTs were fabricated on plastic substrates, and the RF characteristics of the flexible SiNM TFTs under different bending conditions were measured. Then Silvaco’s process simulators Athena and Atlas were used to analyze the dominant influencing factors of the flexible SiNM TFTs with different device dimensions under different bending conditions with model calculations of the carrier mobility and electric field. The SiNM TFTs with smaller gate lengths and larger gate dielectric thickness indicated better RF performance robustness with bending strains. The analysis was helpful for the design and application of flexible electronics under bending conditions.

2. Device Fabrication and Simulation

The main fabrication processes of the flexible silicon thin film transistor on plastic substrate were as follows [37]. First, high-dosage and high-energy ion implantations and high-temperature furnace annealing (950 °C) were conducted to form the source/drain (S/D) regions. Next, the top silicon template layer was patterned into 45 μm wide strips and then immersed in 49% aqueous hydrofluoric acid to remove the buried oxide (BOX) layer. The silicon nanostrips were then transferred onto a 225 μm thick polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate. Finally, the stack layers of SiO and Ti/Au were formed for the gate dielectric and gate metal. Figure 1a shows the finished gigahertz flexible SiNM TFTs on a PET substrate. Figure 1b shows the cross-section schematic of the flexible double-gate TFT (effective channel length is 1.5 μm, width is 40 μm).
For mechanical bending tests, the small-signal RF performance was measured for the SiNM TFTs mounted on the curvature mold with an Agilent E8364A performance network analyzer using Cascade GSG probes. Figure 1c shows an example photo of the bending test setup. The flexible SiNM TFT was mounted on bending test fixtures with different radii of 77.5 mm, 38.5 mm, and 21 mm. With Figure 1d and Equation (1), the tensile strains were calculated to be 0.16%, 0.33%, and 0.6%, respectively:
S t r a i n ( % ) = Δ L L + Δ L = 1 2 R Δ R + 1
where R is the radius of the curvature mold, Δ R is the thickness of the bended SiNM TFT, L is the reference length, and Δ L is the elongation under tensile strain condition. To analyze the operation mechanism of SiNM TFTs under bending strains, Silvaco’s process simulators Athena and Atlas were used to model the RF performance of the flexible SiNM TFTs with different device structures under various bending conditions [26]. The same fabrication processes and parameters of SiNM TFT were applied to the model, including the same device structure, ion implantations, annealing condition, etc. [38].
Mechanical parameters of the flexible SiNM TFT have been assigned to silicon (Young’s modulus 169 GPa, Poisson ratio 0.28), silicon oxide (Young’s modulus 75 GPa, Poisson ratio 0.2), and metal electrodes (Young’s modulus 70 GPa, Poisson ratio 0.33), respectively. Doping has little effect on the mechanical parameters of silicon. Therefore, the same stress parameters were applied to the entire silicon region. The metal stress parameter and the gate oxide stress parameter were assigned to the electrodes and gate oxide, respectively. Figure 1e shows the schematic cross-section structure and doping concentration of the flat and bended TFTs.

3. Results and Discussion

Bending tests were carried out for the flexible SiNM TFTs, and the applied tensile strains were ~0.16%, ~0.33%, and ~0.6%, respectively. Figure 2a–d showed the current gain (H21) and power gain (Gmax) of the flexible SiNM TFT with no strain and 0.6% strain, respectively. The results indicate good agreement between the model and experimental results, indicating the accuracy of the model for the bended TFTs.
More importantly, Figure 2e,f showed that H21 and Gmax of the flexible SiNM TFTs increased monotonically with larger bending strains. Some studies attribute the RF performance changes of flexible devices with strains to the variation of carrier mobility [39,40]. Therefore, the carrier mobility of n+ doped regions in the model was extracted by Silvaco’s process simulator Atlas to investigate the underlying mechanism.
Figure 3a showed that the carrier mobility of the n+ doped regions increased by 5.83% with strains up to ~0.60%. When the carrier mobility of the n+ doped regions increased, the resistivity of the sources (n+ doped) decreased, leading to smaller source resistance and thus better RF performance. In addition, Figure 3a–c showed the change percentage of carrier mobility, H21, and Gmax of the flexible SiNM TFTs with larger bending strains, indicating a nonlinear increase in the change with larger strain.
To better understand this phenomenon, the electric field of the channel of the flexible TFTs was investigated, since the electric field also had an influence on the effective carrier mobility. The electric field contained a lateral and vertical electric field. The bending tests had little effect on the vertical electric field. Therefore, the lateral electric field was the main influencing factor. When the flexible SiNM TFTs were bended, the distance between drain and source became smaller, leading to a larger lateral electric field in the channel (Figure 3d). Additionally, the increase of electric field became less with larger strain, which was consistent with the change trend of mobility, H21, and Gmax. In addition, a large electric field at a larger bending strain may result in the saturation of carrier drift velocity and thus a smaller increase in carrier mobility with a larger strain. Consequently, the RF performance of the flexible TFTs increased monotonically with larger bending strains, while the change in the increase percentage became smaller as the strain was larger.
Furthermore, the dimensions of the gate and the dielectric layer could also have an impact on the bending robustness of the flexible TFTs. First, the operation mechanism of the bended TFTs with different gate lengths (1.3, 1.5, and 1.7 μm) was investigated. From Figure 4a, it was observed that with the same gate length, H21 increased with larger bending strains. More importantly, with the same bending strain, H21 increased more with a larger gate length. The change rate of H21 of the SiNM TFTs, with gate lengths up to 1.7 μm, was nearly 12%. The result indicated that the RF performance of the SiNM TFTs under bending conditions was not only affected by bending strains but also related to the gate length. One reason was explained as follows. The cutoff frequency of the TFTs can be expressed as:
f T = 1 2 π 1 C g s + C g d g m + C g d ( R s + R d )
where Rs was the source resistance, Rd was the drain resistance, and Cgd was the gate drain capacitance, respectively. Source resistance and gate drain capacitance were the two main influencing factors for H21 of the SiNM TFTs. With a larger gate length, gate drain capacitance was larger. Therefore, when the bending tests were carried out for the flexible SiNM TFTs, a larger gate drain capacitance will increase the change of the source resistance according to Equation (2). Therefore, with a similar decrease of Rs and Rd with larger bending strains, the fT (or H21) had more change. The other reason was related to the electric field of the bended TFTs (Figure 4b). Figure 4b clearly showed that the electric field near the channel of SiNM TFTs with a short gate length (1.3 μm) changes less than it does with a long gate length (1.7 μm). The electric field in the channel of the bended TFT with a smaller gate length changed less than that with a larger gate length. The small change rate of the electric field meant the carrier mobility changed less, and thus the SiNM TFTs would have good RF performance robustness. Overall, the flexible SiNM TFTs with smaller gate lengths showed better RF performance robustness under bending conditions than those with larger gate lengths.
The influence of gate dielectric thickness on the RF performance of the bended SiNM TFTs was also investigated (Figure 4c). From Figure 4c, it was observed that, with the same gate dielectric thickness, H21 increased with larger bending strains. More importantly, with the same bending strain, H21 increased more with a thinner gate dielectric layer. The change rate of H21 in the SiNM TFTs with gate dielectric thickness up to 23 nm was nearly 18%. The results showed that H21 had a smaller change with a thicker gate dielectric layer. This can also be explained by Equation (2), where a thinner gate dielectric leads to a larger gate drain capacitance. This will increase the change in the source resistance and thus more change for H21. In addition, Figure 4d showed that the carrier mobility of the SiNM TFTs with a thicker gate dielectric layer changed less. A small change rate of carrier mobility means that the SiNM TFTs have good RF performance robustness. Consequently, the flexible SiNM TFTs with larger gate dielectric thickness had better RF performance robustness under bending conditions. The results in Figure 4 also verified that there was no convergence or singularity problem with the model. Compared to the equivalent circuit modeling or physical device model, two-dimensional device modeling can better show the underlying mechanism. By two-dimensional device modeling, the device structure parameters (e.g., channel length, oxide material, and thickness) can be directly modified to show the device’s performance. Furthermore, the two-dimensional device modeling can exhibit the performance prediction on different bending conditions or device structures, which cannot be realized by traditional modeling.
The performance of flexible SiNM TFTs has been continuously improved. However, there are still limitations to further improving the repeatability and reliability of the flexible devices. For the modeling and analysis of flexible electronics, investigations on the device’s performance with different environmental parameters, such as humidity and high- and low-temperatures, are yet to be conducted. Based on the individual device modeling, accurate modeling for flexible integrated circuits is also a future research direction.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, flexible single-crystalline silicon nanomembrane (SiNM) thin film transistors were fabricated on plastic substrates. The RF performance of the SiNM TFTs with various dimensions was investigated under different bending conditions. Experimental and two-dimensional device modeling results revealed that the bending strain and the device dimensions had a significant influence on the RF performance of the bended SiNM TFTs under bending conditions. The RF performance of the flexible TFTs increased monotonically with larger bending strains, while the change in the increase percentage became smaller as the strain was larger. Carrier mobility and electric field extracted from the model, together with theoretical analysis, were employed to study these performance dependences and the operation mechanisms of the bended TFTs. The carrier mobility and electric field were increased monotonically with larger bending strains, which led to better RF performance. They also showed a consistent change trend with different device parameters (e.g., gate length, oxide thickness). The flexible SiNM TFTs with smaller gate lengths or larger gate dielectric thickness had better RF performance robustness under bending conditions. The results provided a useful guideline for the design and application of flexible TFTs under bending conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Y. and G.Q.; methodology, H.Y. and Z.M.; software, H.Y.; validation, H.Y. and G.Q.; formal analysis, H.Y.; investigation, H.Y. and G.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Y.; writing—review and editing, H.Y. and G.Q.; visualization, H.Y.; supervision, G.Q. and K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61871285).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Song, E.; Guo, Z.; Li, G.; Liao, F.; Li, G.; Du, H.; Schmidt, O.G.; Kim, M.J.; Yi, Y.J.; Bao, W.; et al. Thickness-dependent electronic transport in ultrathin, single crystalline silicon nanomembranes. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2019, 5, 1900232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, S.; Xu, J.; Wang, W.; Wang, G.-J.N.; Rastak, R.; Molina-Lopez, F.; Chung, J.W.; Niu, S.; Feig, V.R.; Lopez, J.; et al. Skin electronics from scalable fabrication of an intrinsically stretchable transistor array. Nature 2018, 555, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hua, Q.; Sun, J.; Liu, H.; Bao, R.; Yu, R.; Zhai, J.; Pan, C.; Wang, Z.L. Skin-inspired highly stretchable and conformable matrix networks for multifunctional sensing. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Zhang, R.R.; Lubin, J.A.; Kuo, J.S. Bioresorbable silicon electronic sensors for the brain. Nature 2016, 530, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ko, H.C.; Stoykovich, M.P.; Song, J.; Malyarchak, V.; Coi, W.M.; Yu, C.-J.; Geddes, J.B., III; Xiao, J.; Wang, S.; Huang, Y.; et al. A hemispherical electronic eye camera based on compressible silicon optoelectronics. Nature 2008, 454, 748–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xie, Y.; Xu, H.; He, X.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, E.; Gao, Y.; Liu, D.; Shi, Z.; Li, J.; Yang, Q.; et al. Flexible electronic skin sensor based on regenerated cellulose/carbon nanotube composite films. Cellulose 2020, 27, 10199–10211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rogers, J.A.; Someya, T.; Huang, Y. Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science 2010, 327, 1603–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ebnalwaled, A.A.; Thabet, A. Controlling the optical constants of PVC nanocomposite films for optoelectronic applications. Synth. Met. J. 2016, 220, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, H.; Luo, D.; Li, M.; Xu, M.; Zou, J.; Tao, H.; Lan, L.; Wang, L.; Peng, J.; Cao, Y. A flexible AMOLED display on the PEN substrate driven by oxide thin-film transistors using anodized aluminium oxide as dielectric. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 1255–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shin, S.-R.; Lee, H.B.; Jin, W.-Y.; Ko, K.-J.; Park, S.; Yoo, S.; Kang, J.-W. Improving light extraction of flexible OLEDs using a mechanically robust Ag mesh/ITO composite electrode and microlens array. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 5444–5452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gupta, S.; Yogeswaran, N.; Giacomozzi, F.; Lorenzelli, L.; Dahiya, R. Touch sensor based on flexible AlN piezocapacitor coupled with MOSFET. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 6810–6817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cantarella, G.; Costa, J.; Meister, T.; Ishida, K.; Carta, C.; Ellinger, F.; Lugli, P.; Münzenrieder, N.; Petti, L. Review of recent trends in flexible metal oxide thin-film transistors for analog applications. Flex. Print. Electron. 2020, 5, 033001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Petti, L.; Münzenrieder, N.; Vogt, C.; Faber, H.; Büthe, L.; Cantarella, G.; Bottacchi, F.; Anthopoulos, T.D.; Tröster, G. Metal oxide semiconductor thin-film transistors for flexible electronics. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2016, 3, 021303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Fan, Y.; Tu, H.; Zhao, H.; Wei, F.; Yang, Y.; Ren, T. A wearable contact lens sensor for noninvasive in-situ monitoring of intraocular pressure. Nanotechnology 2020, 32, 095106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chiang, C.-H.; Won, S.M.; Orsborn, A.L.; Yu, K.J.; Trumpis, M.; Bent, B.; Wang, C.; Xue, Y.; Min, S.; Woods, V.; et al. Development of a neural interface for high-definition, long-term recording in rodents and nonhuman primates. Sci. Trans. Med. 2020, 12, eaay4682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Menard, E.; Lee, K.J.; Khang, D.Y.; Nuzzo, R.G.; Rogers, J.A. A printable form of silicon for high performance thin film transistors on plastic substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84, 5398–5400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Huang, G.S.; Mei, Y.F. Assembly and self-assembly of nanomembrane materials-from 2D to 3D. Small 2018, 14, 1703665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Menard, E.; Nuzzo, R.G.; Rogers, J.A. Bendable single crystal silicon thin film transistors formed by printing on plastic substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 093507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yuan, H.C.; Ma, Z.Q. Microwave thin-film transistors using Si nanomembranes on flexible polymer substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 212105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, L.R.; Xiao, W.P.; Wu, W.J.; Liu, B.Q. Research progress on flexible oxide-based thin film transistors. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, L.; Yu, H.; Xiao, W.; Liu, C.; Chen, J.; Guo, M.; Gao, H.; Liu, B.; Wu, W. Strategies for applications of oxide-based thin film transistors. Electronics 2022, 11, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jeon, Y.; Lee, D.; Yoo, H. Recent advances in metal-oxide thin-film transistors: Flexible/stretchable devices, integrated circuits, biosensors, and neuromorphic applications. Coatings 2022, 12, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bahubalindruni, P.G.; Martins, J.; Santa, A.; Tavares, V.; Martins, R.; Fortunato, E.; Barquinha, P. High-gain transimpedance amplifier for flexible radiation dosimetry using InGaZnO TFTs. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2018, 6, 760–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qin, G.; Zuo, K.; Seo, J.-H.; Xu, Y.; Yuan, H.-C.; Liu, H.; Huang, Z.; Ma, J.; Ma, Z. On the bending characterization of flexible radio-frequency single-crystalline germanium diodes on a plastic substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 043504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, W.P.N.; Su, P.; Goto, K.I. Investigation of coulomb mobility in nanoscale strained PMOSFETs. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2008, 7, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, J.L.; Yang, X.D.; Ma, Z.Q.; Qin, G.X. On the operation mechanism of the flexible diodes under mechanical bending conditions. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 45LT01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, T.I.; Jo, W.; Kim, W.; Kim, J.H.; Paik, K.W.; Kim, T.S. Direct visualization of cross-sectional strain distribution in flexible devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 13416–13422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qin, G.; Yang, L.; Seo, J.-H.; Yuan, H.-C.; Celler, G.K.; Ma, J.; Ma, Z. Experimental characterization and modeling of the bending strain effect on flexible microwave diodes and switches on plastic substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 243104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, K.-M.; Huang, G.-W.; Chen, B.-Y.; Chiu, C.-S.; Hsiao, C.-H.; Liao, W.-S.; Chen, M.-Y.; Yang, Y.-C.; Wang, K.-L.; Liu, C.W. LDMOS transistor high-frequency performance enhancements by strain. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2012, 33, 471–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, S.-Y.; Bong, J.H.; Kim, D.J.; Kim, C.S.; Choi, H.; Hwang, W.S.; Cho, B.J. Performance degradation of flexible Si nanomembrane transistors with Al2O3 and SiO2 dielectrics under mechanical stress. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65, 3069–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liang, Y.-H.; Huang, W.-C.; Wang, H.-H.; Cheng, C.-C.; Liu, C.-Y.; Chiang, M.-F. P-10: A study on bending tolerance of hybrid IGZO TFTs fabricated on PEN Films. Sid Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2018, 1, 1219–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Munzenrieder, N.; Ishida, K.; Meister, T.; Cantarella, G.; Petti, L.; Carta, C.; Ellinger, F.; Troster, G. Flexible InGaZnO TFTs with fmax above 300 MHz. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2018, 39, 1310–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Qin, G.X.; Yuan, H.C.; Celler, G.K.; Ma, J.G.; Ma, Z.Q. Influence of bending strains on radio frequency characteristics of flexible microwave switches using single-crystal silicon nanomembranes on plastic substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 153106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, H.; Guo, L.; Loh, W.; Bera, L.; Zhang, Q.; Hwang, N.; Liao, E.; Teoh, K.; Chua, H.; Shen, Z.; et al. Bendability of single-crystal Si MOSFETs investigated on flexible substrate. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2006, 27, 538–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cho, M.; Seo, J.H.; Park, D.W.; Zhou, W.D.; Ma, Z.Q. Capacitance-voltage characteristics of Si and Ge nanomembrane based flexible metal-oxide-semiconductor devices under bending conditions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108, 233505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kao, H.L.; Yeh, C.S.; Chen, M.T.; Chiu, H.C.; Chang, L.C. Characterization and reliability of nMOSFETs on flexible substrates under mechanical strain. Microelectron. Rel. 2012, 52, 999–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Qin, G.X.; Seo, J.H.; Zhang, Y. RF Characterization of gigahertz flexible silicon thin-film transistor on plastic substrates under bending conditions. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013, 34, 262–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Asadirad, M.; Pouladi, S.; Shervin, S.; Oh, S.K.; Lee, K.H.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.-N.; Gao, Y.; Dutta, P.; Selvamanickam, V.; et al. Numerical simulation for operation of flexible thin-film transistors with bending. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2017, 38, 217–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bennett, N.S.; Cowern, N.E.B.; Sealy, B.J. Model for electron mobility as a function of carrier concentration and strain in heavily doped strained silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 252109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhao, W.; He, J.L.; Belford, R.E.; Wernersson, L.E.; Seabaugh, A. Partially depleted SOI MOSFETs under uniaxial tensile strain. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2004, 51, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Optical image of the gigahertz flexible silicon nanomembrane (SiNM) thin-film transistors (TFTs) on a bended plastic substrate. (b) Cross-sectional schematic of the flexible double-gate TFTs (drawn not to scale). (c) Measurement setup for the bending tests of the SiNM TFT. (d) Schematic of bending strain calculations for flexible SiNM TFT (drawn not to scale). (e) Schematic cross-section structure and doping concentration of the modelled flat and bended TFT (drawn not to scale).
Figure 1. (a) Optical image of the gigahertz flexible silicon nanomembrane (SiNM) thin-film transistors (TFTs) on a bended plastic substrate. (b) Cross-sectional schematic of the flexible double-gate TFTs (drawn not to scale). (c) Measurement setup for the bending tests of the SiNM TFT. (d) Schematic of bending strain calculations for flexible SiNM TFT (drawn not to scale). (e) Schematic cross-section structure and doping concentration of the modelled flat and bended TFT (drawn not to scale).
Crystals 12 01609 g001aCrystals 12 01609 g001b
Figure 2. Comparison of the measured and the simulated (a) H21 and (b) Gmax of the flat TFT. Comparison of the measured and the simulated (c) H21 and (d) Gmax of the TFTs with 0.6% bending strains (1–3 GHz). Measured (e) H21 and (f) Gmax of the TFTs with different bending strains (1.0, 1.4, and 2.1 GHz).
Figure 2. Comparison of the measured and the simulated (a) H21 and (b) Gmax of the flat TFT. Comparison of the measured and the simulated (c) H21 and (d) Gmax of the TFTs with 0.6% bending strains (1–3 GHz). Measured (e) H21 and (f) Gmax of the TFTs with different bending strains (1.0, 1.4, and 2.1 GHz).
Crystals 12 01609 g002
Figure 3. (a) n+ carrier mobility enhancement (in percentage) with different bending strains. Change of (b) measured H21 and (c) Gmax of the TFTs (in percentage) at 1.0, 1.4, and 2.1 GHz with different bending strains. (d) An electric field with different bending strains.
Figure 3. (a) n+ carrier mobility enhancement (in percentage) with different bending strains. Change of (b) measured H21 and (c) Gmax of the TFTs (in percentage) at 1.0, 1.4, and 2.1 GHz with different bending strains. (d) An electric field with different bending strains.
Crystals 12 01609 g003
Figure 4. Change of the simulated (a) H21 (in percentage) and (b) electric field of the TFTs (gate length = 1.3, 1.5, and 1.7 μm) with different bending strains. Change of the simulated (c) H21 (in percentage) and (d) carrier mobility of the TFTs (gate dielectric thickness = 23, 25, and 28 nm) with different bending strains. (Red circle: gate length for (a,b), gate dielectric thickness for (c,d). Black rectangle: gate length changed by −1% for (a,b), gate dielectric thickness changed by −1% for (c,d). Blue triangle: gate length changed by +1% for (a,b), gate dielectric thickness changed by +1% for (c,d).)
Figure 4. Change of the simulated (a) H21 (in percentage) and (b) electric field of the TFTs (gate length = 1.3, 1.5, and 1.7 μm) with different bending strains. Change of the simulated (c) H21 (in percentage) and (d) carrier mobility of the TFTs (gate dielectric thickness = 23, 25, and 28 nm) with different bending strains. (Red circle: gate length for (a,b), gate dielectric thickness for (c,d). Black rectangle: gate length changed by −1% for (a,b), gate dielectric thickness changed by −1% for (c,d). Blue triangle: gate length changed by +1% for (a,b), gate dielectric thickness changed by +1% for (c,d).)
Crystals 12 01609 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ye, H.; Lan, K.; Ma, Z.; Qin, G. Operation Mechanisms of Flexible RF Silicon Thin Film Transistor under Bending Conditions. Crystals 2022, 12, 1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12111609

AMA Style

Ye H, Lan K, Ma Z, Qin G. Operation Mechanisms of Flexible RF Silicon Thin Film Transistor under Bending Conditions. Crystals. 2022; 12(11):1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12111609

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ye, Haotian, Kuibo Lan, Zhenqiang Ma, and Guoxuan Qin. 2022. "Operation Mechanisms of Flexible RF Silicon Thin Film Transistor under Bending Conditions" Crystals 12, no. 11: 1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12111609

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop