Next Article in Journal
FeCrAlloy Monoliths Coated with Ni/Al2O3 Applied to the Low-Temperature Production of Ethylene
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization and in Silico Analysis of a Cold-Adapted Lipase from an Antarctic Pseudomonas sp. Strain AMS8 Reaction in Triton X-100 Reverse Micelles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enantioselective Bioreduction of Prochiral Pyrimidine Base Derivatives by Boni Protect Fungicide Containing Live Cells of Aureobasidium pullulans

by
Renata Kołodziejska
1,*,
Renata Studzińska
2,
Hanna Pawluk
1,
Aleksandra Karczmarska-Wódzka
3 and
Alina Woźniak
1
1
Department of Medical Biology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Karłowicza 24, 85–092 Bydgoszcz, Poland
2
Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Jurasza 2, 85–089 Bydgoszcz, Poland
3
Department of Pharmacology and Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, M. Curie Skłodowskiej 9, 85–094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2018, 8(7), 290; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8070290
Submission received: 22 June 2018 / Revised: 11 July 2018 / Accepted: 16 July 2018 / Published: 18 July 2018

Abstract

:
The enzymatic enantioselective bioreduction of prochiral 1-substituted-5-methyl-3-(2-oxo-2-phenylethyl)pyrimidine-2,4(1H,3H)-diones to corresponding chiral alcohols by Boni Protect fungicide containing live cells of Aureobasidium pullulans was studied. The microbe-catalyzed reduction of bulky-bulky ketones provides enantiomerically pure products (96–99% ee). In the presence of A. pullulans (Aureobasidium pullulans), one of the enantiotopic hydrides of the dihydropyridine ring coenzyme is selectively transferred to the si sides of the prochiral carbonyl group to give secondary alcohols with R configuration. The reactions were performed under various conditions in order to optimize the procedure with respect to time, solvent, and temperature. The present methodology demonstrates an alternative green way for the synthesis of chiral alcohols in a simple, economical, and eco-friendly biotransformation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Biotransformation, i.e., enzyme-catalyzed reactions, have been used over millions of years in nature to carry out reactions that are complicated from a chemical point of view. Nowadays, biocatalysis has become an important method for the production of organic compounds. Biotransformations catalyzed by isolated enzymes and by whole cells of microorganisms, in terms of microorganisms growing or resting cells, are employed for the synthesis of chemicals such as pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and natural products [1,2,3].
Bioreductions of prochiral carbonyl compounds are mainly carried out using oxidoreductases, the most frequently used of which is the catalytic potential of NADH (Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide)/NADPH (Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate)-dependent dehydrogenases. Dehydrogenases in living organisms catalyze the reaction of the oxidation of alcohols to carbonyl compounds by mediating the transfer of a hydride ion from the cofactor on the substrate. They also have the ability to catalyze a reverse reaction in a reduction reaction. In the reduction reaction, dehydrogenases transfer the hydride ion (pro-S or pro-R) from the cofactor to one of the prochiral sides of the carbonyl group (face re or si) to give pure enantiomeric or diastereomeric products [1,2]. The main limitation to the use of dehydrogenases is the necessity of employing expensive cofactors. In contrast, biocatalysis in the presence of living organisms in the form of tissue cultures or whole microbial cells is a very promising and effective method because the dehydrogenase, cofactor, and its regenerating system are all located within the cell [1,4,5,6].
Baker’s yeast is the most popular whole-cell biocatalyst for the asymmetric reduction of prochiral ketones due to its unlimited availability, ease of growing, and low cost [7]. For asymmetric bioreduction of ketones, in addition to the popular Baker's yeast, most often the cells of bacterial [8], fungal [9,10,11,12,13], and plant tissue [14,15,16,17] are used. The application of bioreagents in enantioselective enzymatic desymmetrization of prochiral ketones leads to a broad spectrum of chiral alcohols used as intermediates in the syntheses of many pharmaceuticals and compounds presenting biological activity [6]. Not without significance is the fact that biocatalytic reactions are conducted under moderate conditions in aqueous solutions without the use of expensive and often toxic reagents. For this reason, they are environmentally friendly, which increases the scope of their applications [1,2].
In this work, we present the microbial biotransformation of the 1-substituted-5-methyl-3-(2-oxo-2-phenylethyl)pyrimidine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione in a reduction catalyzed by Boni Protect fungicide containing live cells of Aureobasidium pullulans. Boni Protect is used in orchards because the microorganism contained in this antifungal preparation has an antagonistic activity against a number of phytopathogenic fungi (Botrytis cinerea, Penicillium expansum, Monilinia laxa, Pezicula malicorticis). It is used most often to combat white mold. The 3-substituted pyrimidine base derivatives exhibit biological activity, for e.g., N-3-substituted arabinofuranosyluracils and 4-thio analogues of N-3-substituted uridines possess hypnotic activity [18,19]. For this reason, the modification of these compounds in order to obtain enantiomerically pure derivatives is important from the point of view of using them as drugs.

2. Results and Discussion

Enantioselectivity and the efficiency of the microbial catalysis are mainly determined by the steric requirements of the substrate. For instance, Baker’s yeast does not tolerate long-chain dialkyl ketones; however, one long alkyl chain is accepted if the methyl group has the other moiety. Highly stereoselective catalysis is achieved for the substrate with substituents of significantly different sizes [20].
The aim of the study was to use A. pullulans (Aureobasidium pullulans) to reduce the phenacyl of pyrimidine base derivatives with a prochiral carbon atom where there are two bulky substituents in the vicinity (Scheme 1). For this reason, they belong to the group of carbonyl compounds that are difficult to reduce by microbiological methods.
A. pullulans was earlier successfully employed as a catalyst in the bioreduction of ethyl 2-oxo-2-(1′,2′,3′,4′-tetrahydro-1′,1′,4′,4′-tetramethyl-6′-naphthalenyl)acetate and its amide [21], ethyl 4-chloro-3-oxobutanoate [22,23] and ethyl 2-methyl-3-oxobutanoate [24]. In our previous work, we also presented the selective biotransformation of unsymmetrical ketones and α,β-ketoesters in the A. pullulans catalyzed reduction. The use of Boni Protect containing A. pullulans live cells resulted in alcohols and hydroxyesters with high stereoselectivity [25,26].
Compounds 13 have previously been reduced by the chiral reagents commonly used in asymmetric organic synthesis. In the presence of borane/oxazaborolidine, which was generated in situ from methoxyborane and (1S, 3S, 4R, 6R)-4-amino-3,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-3-ol, as a catalyst, the corresponding chiral alcohols (1a–3a) were obtained with a low enantiomeric excess (4–21% ee). Whereas the reduction of 1 and 3 with (S)-2-methyl-CBS-oxazaborolidine (CBS = Corey, Bakshi, and Shibata) gives 1a and 3a with 100% yield and higher enantiomeric excess (73–85% ee) [27].
We wanted to find out if the use of A. pullulans will enable the reduction of 13 and whether selectivity of bioreduction can be improved as a result.
The biotransformation a reaction catalyzed by A. pullulans was carried out in aqueous solution (phosphate buffer pH = 7.0) at 30 °C, in the presence of glucose as the energy source and with the addition of ethanol. Under these conditions, regeneration of the cofactor takes place in situ. First, compound 1 as a model substrate was subjected to bioreduction and the reaction was completed after 3, 5, and 6 days (Table 1, entry 1–3). We found that the process of biotransformation of the compound is very slow and in order to achieve an effective performance of greater than 50%, the reaction should be carried out for at least 144 h. The enantiomerically pure product of R configuration ((R)-1′) was obtained, regardless of at which stage the reaction was finished.
In order to improve the reaction yield, it was decided to reduce 1 with the addition of organic solvents: In a two-phase system phosphate buffer (pH = 7.0): Hexane (1:1 v/v), phosphate buffer (pH = 7.0):Hexane (4:1 v/v), and with organic solvents as cosolvents (Table 1, entry 4–12). Surprisingly, regardless of the polarity of organic solvents, the performance of reduction decreased. The highest yield (11.6%) was obtained in a solution of phosphate buffer (pH = 7.0) with the addition of 2% ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([BMIM][BF4]).
Further optimization of the reaction conditions concerned the change in pH of phosphate buffer solution and the introduction of sucrose as a carbon source in the pre-incubation stage. According to the literature, the optimal pH for the microorganism A. pullulans is slightly acidic, therefore, the reduction of 1 in an environment of pH = 6.5 was carried out [20]. The obtained results are given in Table 1 (entry 13,15).
The highest yield was obtained in a solution with pH = 7.0 with sucrose (75.6%; see HPLC analysis of reduction of 1 in this condition—Figure 1).
Bioreduction in aqueous solution with A. pullulans as a catalyst was also carried out for 2 and 3. For compound 2, the highest efficiency and high enantioselectivity (99% ee) were obtained in a phosphate buffer solution with pH = 7.0 in the presence of glucose, which was higher than the efficiency in the solution with pH = 6.5. However, the addition of sucrose to the reaction mixture, independent of the pH of the solution, resulted in a reduction in the reaction yield (Table 2). As in the case of 1, the microorganism A. pullulans ensures excellent selectivity of biotransformation giving chiral R-alcohol with 96–99% ee.
The most difficult object to reduce was compound 3. For this compound, as for 2, the conditions such as phosphate buffer, pH = 7.0, and glucose are the most optimal. After 144 h, the best performance was obtained, which, however, did not exceed 30%. Interestingly, lowering pH to 6.5 resulted in a decrease in performance. Under these conditions, 3a accounted for only 10% of the reaction mixture. As a consequence, (R)-3a was obtained with low yield and high enantiomeric excess (Table 2).
Compounds 13 are structural analogues, differing in substituents in the N-1 position. Despite the similarity in the chemical structure, they are reduced in the same conditions at different rates. Therefore, for each of the prochiral reagents, the conditions of biocatalysis should be individually optimized. Based on the results obtained, the rate of the reaction catalyzed by A. pullulans and thus the efficiency is influenced by the size and chemical nature of the substituent on the first nitrogen in the pyrimidine ring. The presence of the allyl substituent increases the reaction rate.
In the next stage, biotransformation was performed at two additional temperatures to improve the efficiency of the reaction: 33 °C and 36 °C. The reaction rate increases with the increasing temperature, the enzymatic catalysis is also regulated by this dependence, but only within a certain temperature range. The optimal temperature that is characteristic of the enzyme ensures the highest activity of the biocatalyst, which results in the maximum degree of conversion. The inverse relationship applies to the selectivity of the process, in most cases the optical purity of a product decreases along with an increase in temperature [28]. We expected that as the temperature increased, the yield of chiral alcohols would increase without adversely affecting the enantioselectivity of the catalyzed reaction.
For each reagent, the two optimal conditions in which the reductions were performed at elevated temperatures were selected (Table 3). The best results were obtained for 3 at 33 °C. In a phosphate buffer solution with pH = 7.0 with glucose (Figure 2), the yield of the reaction increased 2-fold and even 3-fold under the same conditions with sucrose added as a carbon source.
A slight increase in yield was observed for 2 at 33 °C, and over 60% yield was obtained in the buffer solution with pH = 7.0 with glucose (Figure 3).
In the case of 1, a 3 °C increase in temperature resulted in a decrease in performance. A further increase in temperature to 36 °C adversely affected the conversion rate of each reagent, but did not have any practical effect on the selectivity of the process. Figure 4 shows the comparison of the yield of 1a–3a alcohols at different temperatures.
The advantage of the microbiological method we use is a unique enantioselectivity, which combined with the ecological and economic aspect can be an interesting alternative to organocatalysis. Dehydrogenases contained in the microorganism A. pullulans selectively transfer one of the enantiotopic hydrogen ions of the dihydropyridine ring coenzyme to the si sides of the prochiral carbonyl group and provide secondary alcohols with the R configuration. Therefore, the Boni Protect could be considered as an efficient bioreagent for preparation of optically pure alcohols of derivatives of N-1 substituted thymine.
In the case of previously reduced unsymmetrical ketones (methyl ketones or bromomethyl ketones), in order to improve enantioselectivity, it was necessary to add appropriate inhibitors, i.e., additives which inhibit oxidoreductases with a specific stereopreference. Without the additives, reduction with A. pullulans proceeded with an enantiomeric excess ranging from 0% to 65% ee [26].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Analytical Methods

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were performed with Bruker spectrometers (Billerica, MA, USA, 400/700 MHz). Chemical shifts are reported in δ ppm from tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard.
The enantiomeric excess of the chiral products (1a–3a) was determined by chiral stationary phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). HPLC analyses were performed on a Shimadzu SCL-10A VP, column Lux® 5μ Cellulose-3, LC Column 250 × 4.6 mm, Phenomenex (Warszawa, Poland). The mobile phase was n-hexane and propan-2-ol (60:40 v/v) at the flow rate of 0.5 mL per min. and monitored at 266 nm wavelength.
The samples were incubated in an orbital shaker (VORTEMP 1550 S2050; Equimed, Cracov, Poland).
Ketones 1–3 were obtained in our earlier work [27]. The retention times of 1–3 were 26.1 min, 24.1 min, and 27.4 min, respectively.
The structure of 1a–3a was verified by 1H NMR and spectra date was compared with the literature [27].
The absolute configurations of the chiral molecules were determined by various chiroptical methods (electronic circular dichroism (ECD) and vibrational circular dichroism (VCD)) [27].

3.2. Reagents and Solvents

The chemical substances of analytical grade were commercially available sucrose, glucose, ethyl acetate, ethanol, acetonitrile, tert-butyl methyl ether (TBME), tetrahydrofuran (THF), NaCl, MgSO4, n-hexane for HPLC, propan-2-ol for HPLC from POCH (Polish Chemical Reagents, Gliwice, Poland), butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([BMIM][PF6], Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland), 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([BMIM][BF4], Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and Boni Protect (Koppert Biological Systems, Wien, Austria).

3.3. General Procedure of Asymmetric Reduction by Aureobasidium pullulans

For a typical experiment, to a suspension of Boni Protect (0.5 g) in 7.5 mL of potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) was added 2 × 10−4 mol glucose/sucrose, and the resulting suspension was incubated in an orbital shaker (350 rpm) at specific temperature (30 °C, 33 °C, 36 °C) for 30 min. After pre-incubation, the appropriate ketone (2.5 × 10−5 mol in 0.5 mL EtOH) was added, and stirring was continued at the same temperature. The reaction progress was monitored by Thin Layer Chromatography-TLC (the solvent system used was n-hexane:ethyl acetate 1:3 v/v). After the reaction, hyflo-super cel and ethyl acetate were added and the mixture was filtered. The celit was washed with ethyl acetate, and combined filtrates were extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and the solvent was evaporated under vacuum. After that, each reaction mixture was purified by column chromatography using n-hexane:ethyl acetate 1:3 v/v to afford the product. The enantiomeric ratios were determined on the HPLC system using a chiral column.
NMR and HPLC spectra of 13 and 1a–3a were attached in the Supplementary Materials.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have described an eco-friendly and environmentally benign asymmetric reduction system employing easily available Boni Protect fungicide as a biocatalyst. This reduction method is simple, economical (the need of costly cofactor is eliminated), and does not require the cultivation of the bioreagent. The bioreduction of different phenacyls of pyrimidine base derivatives to corresponding optically chiral alcohols has shown an exclusively (R) configuration. Thus, this study demonstrates an inexpensive approach in the synthesis of optically pure (R)-heterocyclic compounds of biological importance.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/8/7/290/s1. Figure S1: 1H NMR spectra of 1; Figure S2: 1H NMR spectra of 2; Figure S3: 1H NMR spectra of 3; Figure S4: 1H NMR spectra of 1a; Figure S5: 1H NMR spectra of 2a; Figure S6: 1H NMR spectra of 3a; Figure S7: 13C NMR spectra of 1; Figure S8: 13C NMR spectra of 2; Figure S9: 13C NMR spectra of 3; Figure S10: 13C NMR spectra of 1a; Figure S11: 13C NMR spectra of 2a; Figure S12: 13C NMR spectra of 3a; Figure S13: (S)-1a (99% ee); Figure S14: (R)-1a (96% ee); Figure S15: Reduction of 1 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 6.5) with glucose at 30 °C; Figure S16: Reduction of 1 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 6.5) with glucose at 33 °C; Figure S17: Reduction of 1 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) with sucrose at 30 °C; Figure S18: Reduction of 1 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) with sucrose at 33 °C; Figure S19: (S)-2a (99% ee); Figure S20: (R)-2a (97% ee); Figure S21: Reduction of 2 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) with glucose at 30 °C; Figure S22: Reduction of 2 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) with glucose at 33 °C; Figure S23: Reduction of 2 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 6.5) with glucose at 30 °C; Figure S24: Reduction of 2 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 6.5) with glucose at 33 °C; Figure S25: (S)-3a (99% ee); Figure S26: (R)-3a (62% ee); Figure S27: Reduction of 3 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) with glucose at 30 °C; Figure S28: Reduction of 3 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) with glucose at 33 °C; Figure S29: Reduction of 3 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) with sucrose at 30 °C; Figure S30: Reduction of 3 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) with sucrose at 33 °C.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.K.; Investigation, R.K., R.S., and A.K.-W.; Methodology, R.K.; Supervision, R.K.; Writing—original draft, R.K.; Writing—review and editing, R.S., H.P., and A.W.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum as part of the statutory research project in 2018, No. 275. The authors also wish to thank Bio-ferm GmbH and Technical Director PhD Christina Donat for the gift of Boni Protect.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nakamura, K.T.; Yamanaka, R.; Mastuda, T.; Harada, T. Recent developments in asymmetric reduction of ketones with biocatalysts. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2003, 14, 2659–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, Z.-J.; Pan, J.; Ma, B.-D.; Xu, J.-H. Efficient biocatalytic synthesis of chiral chemicals. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2016, 155, 55–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gašo-Sokač, D.; Nujić, M.; Bušić, V.; Habuda-Stanić, M. Biocatalytic reductions by plant tissue-green alternative to alcohol production. Croat. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 6, 51–60. [Google Scholar]
  4. Patel, R.N. Synthesis of chiral pharmaceutical intermediates by biocatalysis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008, 252, 659–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Patel, R.N. Biocatalytic synthesis of chiral alcohols and amino acids for development of pharmaceuticals. Biomolecules 2013, 3, 741–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mastuda, T.; Yamanaka, R.; Nakamura, K. Recent progress in biocatalysis for asymmetric oxidation and reduction. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2009, 20, 513–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Csuk, R.; Glaenzer, B.I. Baker’s yeast mediated transformations in organic chemistry. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 49–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schubert, T.; Hummel, W.; Kula, M.-R.; Müller, M. Enantioselective synthesis of both enantiomers of various propargylic alcohols by use of two oxidoreductases. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 22, 4181–4187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nakamura, K.; Takenaka, K.; Fujii, M.; Ida, Y. Asymmetric synthesis of both enantiomers of secondary alcohols by reduction with a single microbe. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 3629–3631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Patel, R.N.; McNamee, C.G.; Banerjee, A.; Howell, J.M.; Robison, R.S.; Szarka, L. Stereoselective reduction of β-keto esters by Geotrichum candidum. J. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1992, 14, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goswami, A.; Bezbaruah, R.L.; Goswami, J.; Borthakur, N.; Dey, D.; Hazarika, A.K. Microbial reduction of ω-bromoacetophenones in the presence of surfactants. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2000, 11, 3701–3709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Goswami, J.; Bezbaruah, R.L.; Goswami, A.; Borthakur, N. A convenient stereoselective synthesis of (R)-(−)-denopamine and (R)-(−)-salmeterol. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2002, 12, 3343–3348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Roy, S.; Alexandre, V.; Neuwels, M.; Le Texier, L. Asymmetric bioreduction of a bulky ketone: 1-phenyl-1-(2-phenylthiazol-5-yl)-methanone. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 738–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yadav, J.S.; Reddy, G.S.K.K.; Sabitha, G.; Krishna, A.D.; Prasad, A.R.; Rahaman, H.-U.-R.; Rao, K.V.; Rao, A.B. Daucus carota and baker’s yeast mediated bio-reduction of prochiral ketones. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2007, 18, 717–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Omori, A.T.; Lobo, F.G.; Gonçalves do Amaral, A.C.; de Oliveira, C.S. Purple carrots: Better biocatalysts for the enantioselective reduction of acetophenones than common orange carrots (D. carota). J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2016, 127, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lakshmi, C.S.; Reddy, G.R.; Rao, A.B. Asymmetric reduction of heteroaryl methyl ketones using Daucus carota. Green Sustain. Chem. 2011, 1, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yadav, J.S.; Nanda, S.; Reddy, P.T.; Rao, A.B. Efficient enantioselective reduction of ketones with Daucus carota root. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3900–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kozai, S.; Maruyama, T.; Kimura, T.; Yamamoto, I. Synthesis and hypnotic activities of 4-thio analogues of N3-substituted uridines. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2001, 49, 1185–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kimura, T.; Yao, S.; Watanabe, K.; Kondo, S.; Ho, I.K.; Yamamoto, I. Hypnotic action of N3-substituted arabinofuranosyluracils on mice. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2001, 49, 111–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Patel, R.N. Enzymatic synthesis of chiral intermediates for drug development. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 527–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Patel, R.N.; Chu, L.; Chidambaram, R.; Zhu, J.; Kant, J. Enantioselective microbial reduction of 2-oxo-2-(1′,2′,3′,4′-tetrahydro-1′,1′,4′,4′-tetramethyl-6′-naphthalenyl)acetic acid and its ethyl ester. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2002, 13, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, F.; Ni, Y.; Sun, Z.; Zheng, P.; Lin, W.; Zhu, P.; Ju, N. Asymmetric reduction of ethyl 4-chloro-3-oxobutanoate to ethyl (S)-4-chloro-3-hydroxybutanoate catalyzed by Aureobasidium pullulans in an aqueous/ionic liquid biphase system. Chin. J. Catal. 2008, 29, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. He, J.-Y.; Sun, Z.-H.; Ruan, W.-Q.; Xu, Y. Biocatalytic synthesis of ethyl (S)-4-chloro-3hydroxy-butanoate in an aqueous-organic solvent biphasic system using Aureobasidium pullulans CGMCC 1244. Process Biochem. 2006, 41, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ravía, S.P.; Carrera, I.; Seoane, G.A.; Vero, S.; Gamenara, D. Novel fungi-catalyzed reduction of α-alkyl-β-keto esters. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2009, 20, 1393–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kołodziejska, R.; Wróblewski, M.; Studzińska, R.; Karczmarska-Wódzka, A.; Grela, I.; Augustyńska, B.; Modzelewska-Banachiewicz, B. Aureobasidium pullulans as a key for the preparation of optical purity (R)-2-(anthracen-9-yl)-2-methoxyacetic acid—The chiral auxiliary reagent in determination of absolute configuration. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2015, 121, 28–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kołodziejska, R.; Studzińska, R.; Kwit, M.; Jelecki, M.; Tafelska-Kaczmarek, A. Microbiological bio-reduction of prochiral carbonyl compounds by antimycotic agent Boni Protect. Catal. Commun. 2017, 101, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Górecki, M.; Karczmarska-Wódzka, A.; Kołodziejska, R.; Dramiński, M.; Frelek, J. Determination of the stereostructure of pyrimidine nucleoside derivatives with a combination of various chiroptical methods. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 5204–5213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Köhler, J.; Wünsch, B. Lipase catalyzed enantioselective desymmetrization of a prochiral pentane-1,3,5-triol derivative. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2006, 17, 3091–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Bioreduction of the phenacyl of pyrimidine base derivatives (13) by Aureobasidium pullulans.
Scheme 1. Bioreduction of the phenacyl of pyrimidine base derivatives (13) by Aureobasidium pullulans.
Catalysts 08 00290 sch001
Figure 1. Reduction of 1 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) with sucrose.
Figure 1. Reduction of 1 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) with sucrose.
Catalysts 08 00290 g001
Figure 2. Reduction of 3 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) with glucose.
Figure 2. Reduction of 3 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) with glucose.
Catalysts 08 00290 g002
Figure 3. Reduction of 2 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) with glucose.
Figure 3. Reduction of 2 in phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) with glucose.
Catalysts 08 00290 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of 1a–3a performance at 30 °C, 33 °C, and 36 °C in different conditions. System 1: Phosphate buffer pH = 7.0, glucose, System 2: Phosphate buffer pH = 6.5, glucose, System 3: Phosphate buffer pH = 7.0, sucrose. Yields were determined by HPLC.
Figure 4. Comparison of 1a–3a performance at 30 °C, 33 °C, and 36 °C in different conditions. System 1: Phosphate buffer pH = 7.0, glucose, System 2: Phosphate buffer pH = 6.5, glucose, System 3: Phosphate buffer pH = 7.0, sucrose. Yields were determined by HPLC.
Catalysts 08 00290 g004
Table 1. Reduction of 1 by Aureobasidium pullulans.
Table 1. Reduction of 1 by Aureobasidium pullulans.
System: Phosphate BufferT [h]1 [%] a1a [%] aee [%] a
pH = 7.0, glucose7264.635.499
pH = 7.0, glucose12051.848.299
pH = 7.0, glucose14439.660.499
pH = 7.0:hexane 1:1 (v/v), glucose144100--
pH = 7.0:hexane 4:1 (v/v), glucose14495.94.194
pH = 7.0:hexane 88:2 (v/v), glucose14490.010.099
pH = 7.0:TBME 88:2 (v/v), glucose14496.93.199
pH = 7.0:acetonitrile 88:2 (v/v), glucose14498.41.699
pH = 7.0:THF 88:2 (v/v), glucose14498.81.299
pH = 7.0:propan-2-ol 88:2 (v/v), glucose14493.36.799
pH = 7.0:[BMIM][PF6] 88:2 (v/v), glucose14490.39.799
pH = 7.0:[BMIM][BF4] 88:2 (v/v), glucose14488.411.699
pH = 6.5, glucose14433.366.799
pH = 7.0, sucrose14424.475.699
pH = 6.5, sucrose14457.342.799
a The ee (R[%] − S[%]/R[%] + S[%]) and yield were determined by HPLC. TBME = tert-butyl methyl ether; THF = tetrahydrofuran; [BMIM] = butyl-3-methylimidazolium [PF6] = hexafluorophosphate; [BF4] = tetrafluoroborate.
Table 2. Reduction of 2 and 3 by Aureobasidium pullulans in different conditions.
Table 2. Reduction of 2 and 3 by Aureobasidium pullulans in different conditions.
System: Phosphate Buffer2 [%] a,b 2a [%] a,bee [%] a3 [%] a,b3a [%] a,bee [%] a
pH = 7.0, glucosec41.358.79973.526.596
pH = 6.5, glucosec60.439.69991.68.499
pH = 7.0, sucrosec76.823.29986.613.499
pH = 6.5, sucrosec85.314.79694.15.996
a The ee and yield were determined by HPLC; b 144 h; c 30 °C.
Table 3. Reduction of 13 by Aureobasidium pullulans at 33 °C and 36 °C.
Table 3. Reduction of 13 by Aureobasidium pullulans at 33 °C and 36 °C.
SystemT [°C]1a [%] aee [%] a2a [%] aee [%] a3a [%] aee [%] a
Phosphate buffer pH = 7.0, glucose33 °CNd bNd b64.19855.799
36 °CNd bNd b4.4993.799
Phosphate buffer pH = 6.5, glucose33 °C50.09948.999Nd bNd b
36 °C7.0963.699Nd bNd b
Phosphate buffer pH = 7.0, sucrose33 °C37.599Nd bNd b45.299
36 °C5.998Nd bNd b11.199
a The ee and yield were determined by HPLC; Nd b—not determined

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kołodziejska, R.; Studzińska, R.; Pawluk, H.; Karczmarska-Wódzka, A.; Woźniak, A. Enantioselective Bioreduction of Prochiral Pyrimidine Base Derivatives by Boni Protect Fungicide Containing Live Cells of Aureobasidium pullulans. Catalysts 2018, 8, 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8070290

AMA Style

Kołodziejska R, Studzińska R, Pawluk H, Karczmarska-Wódzka A, Woźniak A. Enantioselective Bioreduction of Prochiral Pyrimidine Base Derivatives by Boni Protect Fungicide Containing Live Cells of Aureobasidium pullulans. Catalysts. 2018; 8(7):290. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8070290

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kołodziejska, Renata, Renata Studzińska, Hanna Pawluk, Aleksandra Karczmarska-Wódzka, and Alina Woźniak. 2018. "Enantioselective Bioreduction of Prochiral Pyrimidine Base Derivatives by Boni Protect Fungicide Containing Live Cells of Aureobasidium pullulans" Catalysts 8, no. 7: 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8070290

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop