Next Article in Journal
Titanium Dioxide–Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites for Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes in Water
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Basic Promoters on Porous Supported Alumina Catalysts for Acetins Production
Previous Article in Journal
Chalcogenides and Chalcogenide-Based Heterostructures as Photocatalysts for Water Splitting
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ordered Mesoporous nZVI/Zr-Ce-SBA-15 Catalysts Used for Nitrate Reduction: Synthesis, Optimization and Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ni and Ce Grafted Ordered Mesoporous Silica KIT-6 for CO2 Adsorption

1
“Coriolan Drăgulescu” Institute of Chemistry, Bl. Mihai Viteazul, No. 24, 300223 Timisoara, Romania
2
Faculty of Physics, West University of Timisoara, Vasile Parvan, No. 4, 300223 Timisoara, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2022, 12(11), 1339; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12111339
Submission received: 29 September 2022 / Revised: 28 October 2022 / Accepted: 30 October 2022 / Published: 1 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microporous and Mesoporous Materials for Catalytic Applications)

Abstract

:
In this study, the Ni/KIT-6 and Ce/KIT-6 materials were prepared through the impregnation method and then amino-functionalized materials were obtained by the grafting of an amino-silane coupling agent 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES). The samples were characterized by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA-DTA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and nitrogen adsorption at 77 K. The study of CO2 adsorption–desorption on prepared materials was investigated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA-DTA) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS). The influence of metal oxides on the performance of CO2 adsorption on functionalized mesoporous silica was presented. The results showed that doping the molecular sieve with cerium oxide can significantly increase the adsorption capacity of the amino-functionalized KIT-6. As the CO2 adsorbents were prepared by functionalization through grafting with APTES, the amount of amine loading is one of the important factors which improves CO2 adsorption capacity. Additionally, CO2 adsorption performance depends on the textural properties and the temperature used for the adsorption process. The maximum adsorption capacity of Ce/KIT-6 Sil is 3.66 mmol/g, which is 2.4 times higher than Ni/KIT-6 Sil. After the nine cycles of cyclic CO2 adsorption/desorption, the Ce/KIT-6 Sil still had higher adsorption capacities, indicating their good cyclical stability.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Today, global warming as a result of the unprecedented increase of carbon dioxide emissions, which are caused mainly through the combustion of fossil fuels, is a severe environmental issue. Considerable research efforts have been carried out to capture CO2, so in the short term it can be considered a promising way to reduce CO2 emissions. Thus, the research directions have been aimed at obtaining materials with improved features for the CO2 adsorption–desorption process [1,2,3]. Since the capture of carbon dioxide on a global scale can result in large quantities of gas, its prevention has been attempted, and one of the more effective methods is synthetic CO2 hydrogenation in order to obtain combusted hydrocarbons and the CO2 reforming of methane [4,5].
In addition to the mesoporous materials MCM-41, MCM-48 and SBA-15, considerable attention has been given to the mesoporous KIT-6 sieve by researchers in the fields of catalysis, adsorption–desorption or ion exchange. The mesoporous KIT-6 sieve is characterized by an easy synthesis method, its symmetric three-dimensional cubic structures Ia3d, an average pore diameter of 4–12 nm and wall thickness of 4–6 nm [6,7].
The functionalization of the mesoporous sieves MCM-41, MCM-48, SBA-15 and KIT-6 with amines for CO2 capture has been studied for a long time due to the high structural stability of the pore volume and adjustable pore dimensions [8,9,10].
The structure of KIT-6 is clearly superior to the other mesoporous supports due to the gyroid two-dimensional networks with pores that provide direct access to active sites, which facilitates insertion or diffusion inside the pores, thus allowing more reactants and precursor solutions through pore channels [11,12].
To improve the efficiency of the adsorption properties but also, implicitly, the catalytic properties of metal oxide materials that have applications in many industrial processes, researchers have attempted to immobilize metal oxide nanoparticles on porous supports with a large surface area and pore volume, such as zeolites or mesoporous sieves [13,14,15,16,17,18].
Sun et al. studied the method of increasing the adsorption capacity of CO2 and cyclic stability for CaO by impregnating CaO into a mesoporous silica structure, namely KIT-6 [19]. The prepared CaO supported KIT-6 has a good cycling stability of over 10 cycles of carbonation/calcination. The performance increase for CO2 capture is due to the interaction between the structure of KIT-6 and active CaO, through the formation of interfacial mixed oxides, which enhanced the sintering-resistant properties of CaO.
Puertolas et al. studied the cerium oxide supported on mesoporous KIT-6 prepared by the impregnation of Ce(NO3)3 on siliceous KIT-6. These cerium oxide doped materials Ce-KIT-6 have been tested as catalysts for the total oxidation of naphthalene and display excellent activity, remarkably higher than commercial CeO2 [20].
The advantages of mesoporous CeO2 materials for glycerol conversion were demonstrated by Ruiz et al. [21], showing that the acidic properties of CeO2 proved to be a determining factor for the selectivity towards acetol and acrolein. Mahfouz et al. [22] investigated the effect of the promotion of cerium on Ni and/or Ru KIT-6 mesoporous catalysts for the CO2 reformation of methane, with the catalysts being synthesized using the wet impregnation technique.
The low cost and wide range of applications have led to detailed studies of nickel-based catalysts [23,24]. In order to obtain a high catalytic activity, studies were conducted on the production of nickel nanoparticles, controlling the dimensions at the nanometer scale using various synthesis methods [25,26,27,28,29]. These catalysts have high catalytic activity and are prepared by simple methods, making them appropriate for different applications, such as the gas cleaning of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from gas exhaust. Additionally, they could be used as supports for different metals and oxides which are catalytically active and in other applications for the protection of the environment from harmful emissions.
In the present study, materials containing Ni and Ce were prepared by impregnating the hydrothermally prepared mesoporous KIT-6 support with 30 wt% total metal oxide content. Then amino-functionalized materials were obtained by the grafting of an amino-silane coupling agent 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES) on previously prepared samples.
The three-dimensional mesoporous structure of the KIT-6 support and Me/KIT-6 (Me= Ni and Ce) was confirmed by small angle X-ray diffraction (SAXRD) patterns. N2 adsorption–desorption analysis results confirmed that the mesoporous structure of KIT-6 and Me/KIT-6 was preserved after metal oxide loading. The structural bonds of KIT-6 support and prepared amino-functionalized materials were determined by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. As far as we know, there are no reports available in the literature regarding Ni/KIT-6 and Ce/KIT-6 composites modified with APTES used for CO2 adsorption–desorption studies. Compared with other mesoporous silica composites, the CO2 adsorption–desorption experiments clearly reveal that Ce/KIT-6 composites modified with APTES in particular are very efficient adsorbents.
The CO2 adsorption capacity and amine efficiency for all prepared amino-functionalized materials were measured by CO2 adsorption/desorption experiments at adsorption temperatures of 40, 50, 60 and 70 °C, using thermogravimetric analysis. Some representative samples from studied amino-functionalized materials were also tested for stability and recyclability during prolonged operation to justify their consistency for practical applications.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Physical–Chemical Characterization

The low angle XRD patterns of KIT-6, Ni/KIT-6 and Ce/KIT-6 are shown in Figure 1 and to large angle in Figure 2. It can be seen that KIT-6, Ni-/KIT-6 and Ce/KIT-6 exhibit similar characteristic peaks, which suggest and confirm that the cubic structure Ia3d specific to the mesoporous sieves of KIT-6 type was still maintained after the addition of Ni- and Ce-active metals. Anyway, in the case of Ni/KIT-6 and Ce/KIT-6, the peaks were also retained but the intensities decreased.
Figure 2 shows the large-angle XRD patterns of Ni/KIT-6 and Ce/ KIT-6 materials. The characteristic diffraction peaks observed at 2θ = 44.3° and 52.5° were indexed as the plane (111) and (220) of the face-centered cubic NiO (JCPDS No.04-0850) [22] and CeO2 [21] at 2θ = 28.8 °, 33.1°, 47.5° and 56.4° peaks, corresponding to the (111), (220), (311) and (200) planes of cerium oxide spacegroup Fm3m (225), with cubic fluorite structure (JCPDS No. 34–0394).
The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of KIT-6 support and metal oxide-impregnated materials are the type IV hysteresis loop, which, according to the IUPAC classification, is the indication of a mesoporous structure (Figure 3). It could be observed a sharp increase in volume adsorbed at p/p0 = 0.5–0.8 is characteristic of the highly ordered pores of composites. Even after metal oxide loading, the preservation of mesoporous structure was confirmed by XRD and N2 adsorption–desorption analyses.
As can be seen from Table 1, the largest surface area (SBET = 813 m2/g) and pore volume (Vp = 0.99 cm3/g) were recorded for the KIT-6 support. The specific surface areas and pore volumes decreased, respectively, to 649 m2/g and 0.49 cm3/g for Ce/KIT-6 and 551 m2/g and 0.65 cm3/g for Ni/KIT-6. This is an anticipated consequence of pore filling during the impregnation process.
The pore parameters of amino-functionalized molecular sieves reveal that the surface areas of KIT-6 Sil, Ni/KIT-6 Sil and Ce/KIT-6 Sil decreased after modification with amino-silane coupling agent 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane. The reduction in surface areas can be attributed to the increase in the agglomeration of silica particles and/or the occupation of pores after modification with APTES.
As can be seen in Figure 4, the FT-IR spectra of all the samples display three bands at 461, 803, and 1075 cm−s, which are typical for Si-O-Si bands and are related to the presence of a condensed silica network. The adsorption peaks at 461 cm−m, 803 cm−m8and 1075 cm−mdare the bending vibration peak and the symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibration peaks of Si-O-Si bonds in the KIT-6 network [28].
In order to confirm the presence of the APTES in the amino-functionalized molecular sieves, the FT-IR spectra were recorded in the range 500–4000 cm−a (Figure 4). In the APTES-grafted materials, the peaks at 1383 cm−( and 1547 cm−a, representing the –NH2 and –NH groups associated with the materials surface [16]. The broad peak at around 3734 represents the -OH stretching vibrations, and its intensity is lower for amino-functionalized materials than for the parent KIT-6. The other peaks at 2941 cm−o and 1635 cm−a represent the asymmetric deformation of CH2 groups present in APTES and the physically adsorbed water [14].
The Si-O-Si symmetric stretching vibrations of Ni/KIT-6 and Ce/KIT-6 materials presented a slight shift toward lower wavenumbers in comparison with KIT-6, which was probably because Ni and Ce species were introduced into the 3D-mesopores of KIT-6.
Scanning electron micrographs images were used to analyze the morphology of the KIT-6, KIT-6 Sil and Ni/KIT-6 Sil particles (Figure 5). The picture of KIT-6 shows that the particles appear to be spherical due to the aggregation of the fine threads of KIT-6. It can be seen that the spherical morphology is modified by the introduction of APTES after amine functionalization, as the threads are dispersed and thus destroy the spherical morphology [14,30]. From the EDX spectrum it was confirmed that Ni and Ce elements have 30% loading.

2.2. The Adsorption-Desorption Process CO2

The adsorption–desorption process of CO2 was studied for amine-grafted KIT-6 Sil, Ni/KIT-6 Sil and Ce/KIT-6 Sil adsorbents. It should be mentioned that non-functionalized materials were not active for CO2 capture. The CO2 adsorption capacity of the adsorbent in mmol of CO2 per gram of the adsorbent was determined from the mass gain of the sample in the adsorption process step (Figure 6a and Figure 7). The steps of pre-treated samples during adsorption–desorption processes are: first, each sample was pre-treated in flowing N2 at 150 °C (1/2 h) and temperature is then decreased to the desired adsorption temperature (40, 50, 60, 70 °C) and held there for 30 min under N2 flow. Following this, the sample was exposed to the adsorption gas mixture 30% CO2/ N2 (70 mL/min) and held for 90 min. After the adsorption process is ended, the samples are maintained for another 30 min in N2 flow in order to remove the physisorbed CO2 from the sample.
The desorption step of the chemisorbed CO2 from the amine-grafted materials was carried out from the adsorption temperature until 180 °C, with an increasing temperature rate of 10 °C/min and with an isotherm at 180 °C for 30 min. From the MS spectra (Figure 6b) the evolution of CO2 (at a specific mass-to-charge ratio m/z = 46, 45, 44, 43, 23, 22, 16, 12 and 11) during all steps of the adsorption–desorption process was observed. During adsorption process, the MS signal of CO2 increased and then remained relatively constant for 90 min when the sample was exposed to the adsorption gas mixture. After the CO2/ N2 mixture flow was stopped, the MS signal of CO2 decreased when the samples were maintained for another 30 min in the N2 atmosphere only (when the physisorbed CO2 is removed from the sample). The CO2 signal increased again during the desorption step of the chemisorbed CO2 from the adsorption temperature until 180 °C (selected area in the Origin graphs of Figure 6b).
In Table 2, the amounts of the captured CO2 on KIT-6 Sil adsorbent in the temperatures: 40, 50, 60 and 70 °C are shown. By increasing the temperature, the adsorption capacity and efficiently of amino groups decrease from 2.23 to 0.95 mmol CO2/g SiO2 and from 0.51 to 0.22 mmol CO2/mmol NH2, respectively. The best result was obtained for KIT-6 Sil at 40 °C, which means an adsorption capacity of 2.23 mmol CO2/g SiO2 and an efficiency of amino groups of 0.51 mmol CO2/mmol NH2. The levels of the capture CO2 using KIT-6 Sil at different temperatures were calculated from mass gain during the adsorption step. The same calculation method was applied to KIT-6 Sil, Ni/KIT-6 Sil and Ce/KIT-6 Sil at 40 °C by using the following calculation formulas:
m K I T 6   S i l i n i m H 2 O m a s s   l o s s   t o t a l = m K I T 6   S i l d r y
n S i O 2 = m K I T 6   S i l d r y 60
n C O 2 = m C O 2 a d s 44
n C O 2   n S i O 2 60 = x   m m o l e C O 2 / g S i O 2
n C O 2   n N H 2 = x   m m o l e   C O 2 / m m o l e   N H 2
where m K I T 6   S i l i n i is the initial mass of KIT-6; m H 2 O m a s s   l o s s   t o t a l is water loss until 150 °C; m K I T 6   S i l d r y is the dried mass of KIT-6; and n C O 2 , n S i O 2 and n N H 2 are the number of mmole.
The results are promising and showed that both the adsorption capacity (mmol CO2/g adsorbent) and the efficiency of amino groups (mmol CO2/mmol NH2) depend on the temperature at which the experiment is performed. The rate of CO2 adsorption reaches maximum values at 40 °C and then decreases at higher temperatures. One of the external energy sources that can activate the CO2 molecule is temperature, among others such as light or electricity. So, the CO2 adsorption capacity is influenced by the temperature as a result of the activation of the CO2 molecule by facilitating charge transfer (mainly electron injection) processes to the molecule from, for instance, a catalytic surface. It is probably a question of equilibrium between the processes of CO2 adsorption and desorption processes, respectively. Until 40 °C, the adsorption process in favorably influenced by the temperature; however, with increasing temperature, desorption is the process favored by the temperature.
The evolution of the CO2 uptake with time and also its time derivative—which is taken as a measure of adsorption rate—is shown in Figure 8a,b for KIT-6 Sil, Ni/KIT-6 Sil and Ce/KIT-6 Sil adsorbents at 40 °C. The rate of CO2 adsorption has reached the maximum values for Ce/KIT-6 Sil and then decreases for the other adsorbents.
The efficiency of the adsorbent (measured in mmol CO2/mmol NH2), was calculated from the mass loss during the desorption step of CO2 (Table 3). CO2 adsorption isotherms of functionalized samples at 40 °C showed that the adsorption capacity (mmol CO2/g ads) is higher for KIT-6 Sil, while the efficiency of the amino group is higher for Ce/KIT-6 Sil (Figure 9). The higher adsorption capacity of Ce/KIT-6 Sil compared to Ni/KIT-6 Sil can be explained by the fact that the anchoring of nickel oxide on the inner surface of the 3D mesopores was more uniform and in depth, owing to its lower volume (rNi-O = 2.112 Å, Ni2+ =0.69 Å, O2- = 1.40 Å and VNiO = 74.97 Å3,) in comparation with that of cerium oxide (rCe-O = 2.37 Å, Ce3+ = 0.97 Å, O2- = 1.40 Å and VCeO2 = 163.44 Å3). Additionally, a higher decrease in specific surface area and pore volume can be observed in the case of Ni/KIT-6 Sil with APTES grafting, which suggests that a part of the pores was blocked, hindering CO2 access to the active sites.
As we mentioned before, the modifications to the surface chemistry of the silica porous materials by incorporating basic organic group (various amines) and inorganic metal oxides increase CO2 adsorption capacity. The interaction of CO2 with amine groups in a water-free environment gives rise to carbamates, via the formation of the CO2-amine zwitterion, such as R-NH2 +COO. Overall, this reaction requires two amine groups per CO2 molecule, i.e., adsorption efficiency, defined as the CO2/N molar ratio, equal to 0.5. The chemical interaction between CO2 and amine (APTES) can be expressed as follows:
R-NH2 + CO2 → R-NH2+COO
R-NH2+COO− + R-NH2→ R-NHCOO− + RNH3+
While the desorption of CO2 and regeneration of grafted mesoporous silica is expressed as follows:
R-NH-COO + R-NH3+ + Heat→ CO2 + 2R-NH2
The formation of the carbamate involves equilibrium and is, therefore, reversible. It is also important to point out that, while this mechanism corresponds to chemisorption, physisorption also takes place at higher partial pressures [31,32].
Kishor and Ghoshal [7] investigated KIT-6 performance as absorbent, for CO2 adsorption using APTES as silanization agent. At different amine loadings quantities of 1.43, 1.50 and 1.72 mmol/g, they obtained CO2 adsorption capacities of 0.79, 0.90 and 0.83 mmol CO2/g, respectively, and a stable performance after 10 cycles of adsorption–desorption. Muchan et al. [33] concluded that high surface area does not represent the only important factor that influences the adsorption capacity, as pore-size diameter and the level of amine loading must also be taken into account. The presence of mesopores channels in the KIT-6 structure provides a better mass transfer of CO2 throughout the adsorbent, and APTES addition increases the CO2 adsorbed quantity to 1.30 mmol CO2/g. Analyzing the adsorption–desorption cycle it was found that the regeneration efficiency at 100 °C for unmodified KIT-6 and modified KIT-6/APTES adsorbent reaches 95%, representing good regenerability and stability. Yilmaz S.M. [34] studied KIT-6 mesoporous silica via partitioned cooperative self-assembly method. CO2 adsorption–desorption experiments were performed at the different temperatures of 25, 75, and 100 °C, and the maximum adsorption capacity, 0.65 mmol/g, was achieved at the 25 °C adsorption temperature. J.A.A. Gibson et al. [35] investigated how the different amine loadings influenced the CO2 uptake at 0.1 bar partial pressure on two different carbon porous materials. In the case of micro-AC, the results show that for optimum amine loading, the absorbed amount of CO2 is 1.05 mmol g−i. After four cycles of the adsorption–desorption experiment, the CO2 efficiency proved to be relatively constant in case of both micro-AC and meso-AC studied materials.
The cycles of CO2 adsorption–desorption of the functionalized sample Ce/KIT-6 Sil are shown in Figure 10. Nine cycles of CO2 adsorption/desorption measurements were performed on grafted samples with the highest CO2 absorption at 40 °C, which means that Ce/KIT-6 Sil can be used to assess their potential for recycling. Every test was pretreated in N2 flowing at 120 °C for 10 min, then cooled to a 40 °C adsorption temperature and exposed to 30% CO2 in N2 for 40 min. CO2 desorption was performed by heating the sample to 120 °C with 10 °C/min. An examination of the adsorption/desorption cycle data shows that the performance of the Ce/KIT-6 Sil adsorbent is relatively stable, with a low decrease in the adsorption capacity after nine adsorption–desorption cycles.

3. Experimental

3.1. Preparation of sample

Mesoporous silica KIT-6 type was prepared according to the method described by Kleitz et al. [36]. First, 3.69 g triblock copolymer Pluronic P123 (EO20PO70EO20) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was dissolved in 132 g distilled water and 6.75 g 37% HCl under vigorous stirring at 35 °C for 8 h. After total dissolution, 3.63 g n-butanol (≥95.0% Reactivul, București, Romania) was added to initial solution. The mixture remained under stirring at 35 °C for 1 h. Then, 7.92 g tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, ≥99% Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was added to the homogeneous solution and stirred for 24 h at 35 °C. This mixture was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and heated at 100 °C for 24 h under static hydrothermal conditions. After hydrothermal treatment, the obtained solid material was separated by vacuum filtration and washed with a 2% HCl-ethanol solution. At the end, the samples were calcined in air atmosphere at 550 °C for 6 h to remove the organic template. The resulting sample was denoted as KIT-6.
The Ni/KIT-6 and Ce/KIT-6 materials with 30% Ni and Ce loading were prepared by the impregnation method. An adequate amount of Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and Ce(NO3)3·6H2O (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), respectively, was dissolved in 0.6 mL deionized water. Then the support KIT-6 was added in the solution and the mixture was stirred for 2.0 h. Next, the formed slurry was further filtered to obtain dried powder samples, and the obtained powder samples were dried at 80 °C overnight. Finally, the powder samples were calcined at 250 °C for 4.0 h.
Modified KIT-6 and Me/KIT-6 denoted as KIT-6 Sil and Me / KIT-6 Sil (Me= Ni and Ce) were prepared as follows: 0.5 g of KIT-6 was dispersed in 50 mL toluene and 0.79 mL of 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES, ≥98.0% Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was later added to the solution. The grafting reaction was carried out at 110 °C for 5 h. After filtration and drying, the absorbents were obtained as white solids.

3.2. Characterization of the Samples

The thermal analysis was carried out using a thermoanalyzer system Mettler TGA/SDTA 851/LF/1100 (Columbus, OH, USA) coupled with mass-spectrometry (MS). The measurements were conducted in dynamic atmosphere of air (50 mL/min), using the alumina plates crucibles of 150 μL.
The FTIR absorption spectra were recorded with a Jasco 430 spectrometer (Tokio, Japan) in the spectral range 4000–400 cm−1 range, 256 scans and resolution 2 cm−1, using KBr pellets.
Powder X-ray diffraction data were obtained with a XD 8 Advanced Bruker diffractometer (Karlsruhe, Germany) using the CuKα radiation in the range 2θ = 0.5 ÷ 50 and 2θ = 5 ÷ 600. The specific surface areas of samples were calculated from the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms using a Quantachrome instrument, Nova 2000 series (Boynton Beach, FL, USA).
Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) were recorded using Jeol JMS 6460 LV instrument (Tokio, Japan) equipped with an Oxford Instruments EDS (energy dispersive spectroscopy) analyzer.
The tests of CO2 adsorption–desorption were obtained using the same thermogravimetric analyzer coupled with MS used for thermal analysis. High-purity CO2 and 30% CO2 in N2 at 1 atm was used for the adsorption experiments, and N2 was used as purge gas for CO2 desorption. Each sample was pretreated in N2 atmosphere at 150 °C, then was cooled to the desired adsorption temperature (40–70 °C) and finally exposed to 30% CO2/N2 (70 mL/min) for 90 min. The CO2 adsorption capacity of the adsorbent in milligrams of CO2 per gram of adsorbent was calculated from the weight gain of the sample in the adsorption process.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the Ni/KIT-6 and Ce/KIT-6 materials with 30% Ni and Ce loading were prepared by the impregnation method. Then amino-functionalized materials were prepared by grafting of a silane coupling agent 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES) on previous prepared samples.
The small angles of XRD showed that KIT-6 has a cubic structure, which indicates that the synthesis was successfully carried out. For the KIT-6-Sil sample a decrease in peak intensity appears because the APTES was successfully grafted onto KIT-6. The FT-IR indicated that the KIT-6-Sil is present all the characteristic bands of amino-functional groups, confirming the grafting of amines onto KIT-6.
The CO2 adsorption/desorption of KIT-6-Sil showed that both the adsorption capacity (mmolCO2/g adsorbent) and the efficiency of amino groups (molCO2/mol NH2) depend on the temperature. The best results were obtained for KIT-6-Sil at 40 °C. Good CO2 adsorption capacities were obtained for all prepared adsorbents, especially for the Ce/KIT-6 Sil sample. After nine adsorption–desorption cycles, the performance of the Ce/KIT-6 Sil adsorbent is relatively stable, with a low decrease in the adsorption capacity. In the case of the Ni/KIT-6 Sil adsorbent, a lower adsorption capacity was displayed. These studies show the potential of mesoporous silica for carbon dioxide capture. The ability of KIT-6 mesoporous sieves to change their structure with metal ions and organic functional groups opens the door for CO2 adsorption.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P. and M.S.; methodology, S.B., O.V. and A.P; formal analysis, M.S., S.B. and P.B.; investigation, S.B., M.S. and O.V.; resources, P.B. and A.P.; data curation, S.B. and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.P., S.B. and M.S.; writing—review and editing, A.P., S.B. and M.S.; visualization, P.B. and O.V.; supervision, A.P. and S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Romanian Academy Project No. 4.3.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Liu, Y.; Yu, X. Carbon dioxide adsorption properties and adsorption/desorption kinetics of amine-functionalized KIT-6. Appl. Energy. 2018, 211, 1080–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Belmabkhout, Y.; Serna-Guerrero, R.; Sayari, A. Adsorption of CO2-Containing Gas Mixtures over Amine-Bearing Pore-Expanded MCM-41 Silica. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ma, B.; Zhuang, L.; Chen, S. Rapid synthesis of tunable-structured short-pore SBA-15 and its application on CO2 capture. J. Porous Mater. 2016, 23, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alreshaidan, S.B.; Ibrahim, A.A.; Fakeeha, A.H.; Almutlaq, A.M.; Ali, F.A.A.; Al-Fatesh, A.S. Effect of Modified Alumina Support on the Performance of Ni-Based Catalysts for CO2 Reforming of Methane. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ye, R.-P.; Ding, J.; Gong, W.; Argyle, M.D.; Zhong, Q.; Wang, Y.; Russell, C.K.; Xu, Z.; Russell, A.G.; Li, Q.; et al. CO2 hydrogenation to high-value products via heterogeneous catalysis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Fernandes, F.; Pinto, F.; Lima, E.; Souza, L.; Caldeira, V.; Santos, A. Influence of Synthesis Parameters in Obtaining KIT-6. Mesoporous Material. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kishor, R.; Ghoshal, A.K. APTES grafted ordered mesoporous silica KIT-6 for CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 262, 882–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Popa, A.; Sasca, V.; Verdes, O.; Suba, M.; Barvinschi, P. Effect of the amine type on thermal stability of modified mesoporous silica used for CO2 adsorption. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2018, 134, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Heydari-Gorji, A.; Yang, Y.; Sayari, A. Effect of the Pore Length on CO2 Adsorption over Amine-Modified Mesoporous Silicas. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 4206–4210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Q.; Shi, J.; Zheng, S.; Tao, M.; He, Y.; Shi, Y. Kinetics Studies of CO2 Adsorption/Desorption on Amine-Functionalized Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 11677–11683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oveisi, H.; Anand, C.; Mano, A.; Al-Deyab, S.S.; Kalita, P.; Beitollahi, A.; Vinu, A. Inclusion of size controlled gallium oxide nanoparticles into highly ordered 3D mesoporous silica with tunable pore diameters and their unusual catalytic performance. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2010, 20, 10120–10129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Karthikeyan, G.; Pandurangan, A. Post synthesis alumination of KIT-6 materials with Ia3d symmetry and their catalytic efficiency towards multicomponent synthesis of 1H-pyrazolo[1,2-]phthalazine-5,10-dione carbonitriles and carboxylates. J. Mol Catal A Chem. 2012, 361–362, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, J.; Kan, Q.; Li, Z.; Yu, G.; Liu, H.; Yang, X.; Guan, J. Different transition metal (Fe2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+ or VO2+) Schiff complexes immobilized onto three-dimensional mesoporous silica KIT-6 for the epoxidation of styrene. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 2310–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Visuvamithiran, P.; Palanichamy, M.; Shanthi, K.; Murugesan, V. Selective epoxidation of olefins over Co(II)-Schiff immobilised on KIT-6. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 462–463, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Taghizadeh, M.; Akhoundzadeh, H.; Rezayan, A.; Sadeghian, M. Excellent catalytic performance of 3D-mesoporous KIT-6 supported Cu and Ce nanoparticles in methanol steam reforming. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2018, 43, 10926–11093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kishor, R.; Singh, S.B.; Ghoshal, A.K. Role of metal type on mesoporous KIT-6 for hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2018, 43, 10376–10385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Z.; Miao, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, J.; Si, W.; Zhuo, S. One-pot synthesis of ZrMo-KIT-6 solid acid catalyst for solvent-free conversion of glycerol to solketal. Fuel 2018, 233, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Prabhu, A.; Kumaresan, L.; Palanichamy, M.; Murugesan, V. Synthesis and characterization of aluminium incorporated mesoporous KIT-6: Efficient catalyst for acylation of phenol. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2009, 360, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, H.; Parlett, C.M.A.; Isaacs, M.A.; Liu, X.; Adwek, G.; Wang, J.; Wu, C. Development of Ca/KIT-6 adsorbents for high temperature CO2 capture. Fuel 2019, 235, 1070–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Puertolas, B.; Solsona, B.; Agouram, S.; Murillo, R.; Mastral, A.M.; Aranda, A.; Garcia, T. The catalytic performance of mesoporous cerium oxides prepared through a nanocasting route for the total oxidation of naphthalene. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2010, 93, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ruiz, M.G.; Pliego, J.A.; Noreña Franco, L.E.; Álvarez, C.M.; Pariente, J.P.; Martin Guaregua, N.C. Synthesis and characterization of a mesoporous cerium oxide catalyst for the conversion of glycerol. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 2018, 16, 511–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mahfouz, R.; Estephane, J.; Gennequin, C.; Tidahy, L.; Aouad, S.; Abi-Aad, E. CO2 reforming of methane over Ni and/or Ru catalysts supported on mesoporous KIT-6: Effect of promotion with Ce. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 104662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, X.; Zhao, H.; Liu, S.; Ye, D.; Qu, R.; Zheng, C.; Gao, X. Engineering nano-ordered of Ni nanoparticles on KIT-6 for enhanced catalytic hydrogenation of nitrobenzene. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 525, 146382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Świrk, K.; Gálvez, M.E.; Motak, M.; Grzybek, T.; Rønning, M.; Da Costa, P. Syngas production from dry methane reforming over yttrium-promoted nickel-KIT-6 catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019, 44, 274–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Koltypin, Y.; Fernandez, A.; Rojas, T.C.; Campora, J.; Palma, P.; Prozorov, R.; Gedanken, A. Encapsulation of Nickel Nanoparticles in Carbon Obtained by the Sonochemical Decomposition of Ni(C8H12)2. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 1331–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moreau, L.M.; Ha, D.H.; Bealing, C.R.; Zhang, H.; Hennig, R.G.; Robinson, R.D. Unintended Phosphorus Doping of Nickel Nanoparticles during Synthesis with TOP: A Discovery through Structural Analysis. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 4530–4539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pan, Y.; Jia, R.; Zhao, J.; Liang, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, C. Size-controlled synthesis of monodisperse nickel nanoparticles and investigation of their magnetic and catalytic properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 316, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jia, F.L.; Zhang, L.Z.; Shang, X.Y.; Yang, Y. Non-Aqueous Sol–Gel Approach towards the Controllable Synthesis of Nickel Nanospheres, Nanowires, and Nanoflowers. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 1050–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, Z.C.; Zhou, J.; Cao, K.; Yang, W.M.; Gao, H.X.; Wang, Y.D.; Li, H.X. Highly dispersed nickel loaded on mesoporous silica: One-spot synthesis strategy and high performance as catalysts for methane reforming with carbon dioxide. Appl. Catal. B 2012, 125, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cao, H.-X.; Zhang, J.; Guo, C.L.; Chen, J.G.; Ren, X.K. Highly dispersed Ni nanoparticles on 3D-mesoporous KIT-6 for CO methanation: Effect of promoter species on catalytic performance. Chin. J. Catal. 2017, 38, 1127–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sreenivasulu, B.; Gayatri, D.V.; Sreedhar, I.; Raghavan, K.V. A journey into the process and engineering aspects of carbon capture technologies. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2015, 41, 1324–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sanz-Perez, E.S.; Dantas, T.C.M.; Arencibia, A.; Calleja, G.; Guedes, A.P.M.A.; Araujo, A.S.; Sanz, R. Reuse and recycling of amine-functionalized silica materials for CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 308, 1021–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Muchan, P.; Saiwan., C.C.; Nithitanakul, M. Investigation of adsorption/desorption performance by aminopropyltriethoxysilane grafted onto different mesoporous silica for post-combustion CO2 capture. Clean Energy 2020, 4, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yılmaz, S.M. A study of CO2 adsorption behaviour and kinetics on KIT-6. EJOSAT 2020, 19, 48–55. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gibson, J.A.A.; Gromov, A.V.; Brandani, S.; Campbell, E.E.B. The effect of pore structure on the CO2 adsorption efficiency of polyamine impregnated porous carbons. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015, 208, 129–139. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kleitz, F.; Choi, S.H.; Ryoo, R. Cubic Ia3d large mesoupouros silica: Synthesis and replication to palatinum nanowires, carbon nanorods and carbon nanotube. Chem. Commun. 2003, 7, 2136–2137. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Small-angle XRD patterns of (a) KIT-6, (b) KIT-6 Sil and (c) Me/KIT-6.
Figure 1. Small-angle XRD patterns of (a) KIT-6, (b) KIT-6 Sil and (c) Me/KIT-6.
Catalysts 12 01339 g001
Figure 2. Large-angle XRD patterns of Ni/KIT-6 and Ce/KIT-6.
Figure 2. Large-angle XRD patterns of Ni/KIT-6 and Ce/KIT-6.
Catalysts 12 01339 g002
Figure 3. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and the pore size distribution of KIT-6 and KIT-6 Sil (A), Ni/KIT-6 and Ni/KIT-6 Sil (B) and Ce/KIT-6 and Ce/KIT-6 Sil (C).
Figure 3. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and the pore size distribution of KIT-6 and KIT-6 Sil (A), Ni/KIT-6 and Ni/KIT-6 Sil (B) and Ce/KIT-6 and Ce/KIT-6 Sil (C).
Catalysts 12 01339 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of parent KIT-6, KIT-6 Sil, Ce/KIT-6 Sil and Ni/KIT-6 Sil (a) and detailed spectra in the intervals of interest (b,c).
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of parent KIT-6, KIT-6 Sil, Ce/KIT-6 Sil and Ni/KIT-6 Sil (a) and detailed spectra in the intervals of interest (b,c).
Catalysts 12 01339 g004
Figure 5. SEM micrographs images of the KIT-6 and KIT-6 Sil particles.
Figure 5. SEM micrographs images of the KIT-6 and KIT-6 Sil particles.
Catalysts 12 01339 g005
Figure 6. CO2 adsorption–desorption steps of functionalized samples KIT-6 Sil with an adsorption isotherm at 40–70 °C (A) and MS for KIT-6 Sil composites at 40 °C (B).
Figure 6. CO2 adsorption–desorption steps of functionalized samples KIT-6 Sil with an adsorption isotherm at 40–70 °C (A) and MS for KIT-6 Sil composites at 40 °C (B).
Catalysts 12 01339 g006
Figure 7. CO2 adsorption–desorption steps of functionalized samples KIT-6 Sil (a), Ni/KIT-6 Sil (b) and Ce/KIT-6 Sil (c) with an adsorption isotherm at 40 °C.
Figure 7. CO2 adsorption–desorption steps of functionalized samples KIT-6 Sil (a), Ni/KIT-6 Sil (b) and Ce/KIT-6 Sil (c) with an adsorption isotherm at 40 °C.
Catalysts 12 01339 g007
Figure 8. Carbon dioxide adsorption and (A) carbon dioxide adsorption rate of KIT-6 Sil, Ni/KIT-6 Sil and Ce/KIT-6 Sil at temperatures between 40 °C (B).
Figure 8. Carbon dioxide adsorption and (A) carbon dioxide adsorption rate of KIT-6 Sil, Ni/KIT-6 Sil and Ce/KIT-6 Sil at temperatures between 40 °C (B).
Catalysts 12 01339 g008
Figure 9. The adsorbed amounts of CO2 by KIT-6 Sil, Ni/KIT-6 Sil and Ce/KIT-6 at 40 °C.
Figure 9. The adsorbed amounts of CO2 by KIT-6 Sil, Ni/KIT-6 Sil and Ce/KIT-6 at 40 °C.
Catalysts 12 01339 g009
Figure 10. Cycles of CO2 adsorption–desorption of functionalized samples Ce/KIT-6 Sil with adsorption at 40 °C.
Figure 10. Cycles of CO2 adsorption–desorption of functionalized samples Ce/KIT-6 Sil with adsorption at 40 °C.
Catalysts 12 01339 g010
Table 1. Textural properties of KIT-6, Me/KIT-6 and amine-grafted samples.
Table 1. Textural properties of KIT-6, Me/KIT-6 and amine-grafted samples.
No.SampleSpecific Surface Area (m2/g)Pore Volume BJHDes (cc/g)Average Pore Diameter BJHDes (nm)
1KIT-68130.9917.867
2KIT-6 Sil5610.9505.462
3Ni/KIT-65510.6504.723
4Ni/KIT-6 Sil2600.3955.666
5Ce/KIT-66490.4904.896
Table 2. The amounts of the capture CO2 using KIT-6 Sil at different temperatures.
Table 2. The amounts of the capture CO2 using KIT-6 Sil at different temperatures.
No.SampleTemp (°C)nCO2/gSiO2 (mmol/gSiO2)nCO2/nNH2
(mmol/mmol)
1KIT-6-Sil402.230.51
2KIT-6-Sil501.760.40
3KIT-6-Sil601.310.29
4KIT-6-Sil700.950.22
Table 3. The amount of the captured CO2 at 40 °C using KIT-6 Sil, Ni/KIT-6 Sil and Ce/KIT-6 Sil.
Table 3. The amount of the captured CO2 at 40 °C using KIT-6 Sil, Ni/KIT-6 Sil and Ce/KIT-6 Sil.
No.SampleTemperature
(°C)
nCO2/g SiO2
(mmol/g SiO2)
nCO2/nNH2
(mmol/mmol)
1KIT-6 Sil402.230.512
2Ni/KIT-6 Sil401.630.188
3Ce/KIT-6 Sil403.660.256
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suba, M.; Popa, A.; Verdeș, O.; Borcănescu, S.; Barvinschi, P. Ni and Ce Grafted Ordered Mesoporous Silica KIT-6 for CO2 Adsorption. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12111339

AMA Style

Suba M, Popa A, Verdeș O, Borcănescu S, Barvinschi P. Ni and Ce Grafted Ordered Mesoporous Silica KIT-6 for CO2 Adsorption. Catalysts. 2022; 12(11):1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12111339

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suba, Mariana, Alexandru Popa, Orsina Verdeș, Silvana Borcănescu, and Paul Barvinschi. 2022. "Ni and Ce Grafted Ordered Mesoporous Silica KIT-6 for CO2 Adsorption" Catalysts 12, no. 11: 1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12111339

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop