Next Article in Journal
Mn-Ni-Co-O Spinel Oxides towards Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Alkaline Medium: Mn0.5Ni0.5Co2O4/C Synergism and Cooperation
Previous Article in Journal
Process Intensification of the Propane Dehydrogenation Considering Coke Formation, Catalyst Deactivation and Regeneration—Transient Modelling and Analysis of a Heat-Integrated Membrane Reactor
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Oxide and Organic–Inorganic Halide Perovskites with Plasmonics for Optoelectronic and Energy Applications: A Contributive Review

Catalysts 2021, 11(9), 1057; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11091057
by Brahim Aïssa *, Adnan Ali and Fedwa El-Mellouhi
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Catalysts 2021, 11(9), 1057; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11091057
Submission received: 11 August 2021 / Revised: 22 August 2021 / Accepted: 29 August 2021 / Published: 31 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Catalysis for Sustainable Energy)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It is attached in word file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

        Thank you for your nice input and appreciation of our work.

Sincere Regards,
Adnan Ali (behalf of all authors)

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors presented a very interesting and timely review on oxide and organic–inorganic halide perovskites for optoelectronic and energy applications.

The paper is well organized and well written in clear English.

 

A few minor comments must be addressed before publication:

  • 31 must be revised.
  • The abstract mentions metamaterials, which were not discussed in the manuscript. That should be removed from the abstract or expanded along the manuscript.
  • The conclusion mentions hot-electron emission in a confusing sentence: “The physical phenomena regulating plasmon-enhanced solar energy harvesting, including hot-electron injection, light trapping, and energy flow direction modulation in dipole-dipole coupling by the plasmonics effect, were explicitly discussed separately”. It would be wiser to remove the sentence from the present manuscript, unless it is to be discussed in more details.
  • At line 560, authors discuss the large above-bandgap open-circuit voltage observed in ferro-electric PV-materials (fig. 9). However, reference to the literature is incomplete. The effect was actually proposed earlier with organic solar cells (Sicot et al, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 63 (2000) 49-60, org/10.1016/S0927-0248(00)00019-2).

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

       Thank you for the comments. It provided us the opportunity to make the manuscript more sound. We have addressed all the points, mentioned in the review. Please find the changes made according to the review comments in the track change mode in the submitted revised manuscript.

Sincere Regards,
Adnan Ali (on behalf of all authors)

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

In this paper, Brahim et al. report the overall oxide and organic-inorganic halide perovskite application according to unique electrical properties of each perovskite composition and structure, such as superconductivity, catalyst, oxygen separating membrane, SOFCs, solar cell, and so on. Based on the crystallographic study, the perovskite application study was well explained and summarized the plamonics effect on the perovskite solar cell in the table.

However, some references are inconsistent with the content. In the perovskite solar cell application of plasmonic nanostructure, ref 111 does not contain any description of the plasmonic phenomenon. Scientific Reports, 10, 11248 (2020)(doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67741-9) reported that the plasmonic phenomenon was introduced into each layer to maximize the light trapping effect using convex nano-pattering. Furthermore, some word was incorrect in the paper. For example, 775 line "plamonics" word should be fixed to plasmonics.

Therefore, it is thought that additional references check is necessary for the content before it can be published in this journal.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

       We are grateful to the reviewer for the manuscript appreciation. Also this review provided the opportunity to make corrections in the respective references. We have checked all the references one by one and made it sure that all of them are consistent with the contents accordingly.  Please find the revised manuscript in attachment.

Sincere Regards,
Adnan Ali (on behalf of all authors)

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop