Next Article in Journal
Catalytic Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide over Magnetic Nanoparticles: Modification in Fixed-Bed Reactor
Next Article in Special Issue
Ex-LDH-Based Catalysts for CO2 Conversion to Methanol and Dimethyl Ether
Previous Article in Journal
Methane to Methanol through Heterogeneous Catalysis and Plasma Catalysis
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Recovery/Reuse of Heterogeneous Supported Spent Catalysts

Department of Civil, Energy, Environmental and Materials Engineering, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Via Graziella, Loc. Feo di Vito, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy
Environmental Engineering Department, University of Calabria, 87036 Cosenza, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2021, 11(5), 591;
Submission received: 13 April 2021 / Revised: 27 April 2021 / Accepted: 29 April 2021 / Published: 1 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Catalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide)


The rapid separation and efficient recycling of catalysts after a catalytic reaction are considered important requirements along with the high catalytic performances. In this view, although heterogeneous catalysis is generally less efficient if compared to the homogeneous type, it is generally preferred since it benefits from the easy recovery of the catalyst. Recycling of heterogeneous catalysts using traditional methods of separation such as extraction, filtration, vacuum distillation, or centrifugation is tedious and time-consuming. They are uneconomic processes and, hence, they cannot be carried out in the industrial scale. For these limitations, today, the research is devoted to the development of new methods that allow a good separation and recycling of catalysts. The separation process should follow a procedure economically and technically feasible with a minimal loss of the solid catalyst. The aim of this work is to provide an overview about the current trends in the methods of separation/recycling used in the heterogeneous catalysis.

1. Introduction

Catalysts represent a key component in a broad range of reactions, being generally characterized by high activity and selectivity. Their widespread use in a variety of processes is of great interest in both academia and industry. Indeed, the fields of applications of catalysis include photocatalysis [1,2], environmental catalysis [3], metal-catalysis [4], electrocatalysis [5], organocatalysis [6], and green catalysis [7,8], most of all devoted to the sustainability requirements. As an example, in the last few years, due to the exploitation of renewable energy and the concomitant need to both reduce carbon emissions and replace fossil fuels to preserve natural resources, the development of the so-called green fuel has been highly promoted, through the methanation process [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
Many different types of catalysts and catalysis mechanisms are possible. Most solid catalysts are metals, disseminated within a solid or liquid matrix, the catalyst support. The immobilization of a catalyst is a very important aspect that can in principle facilitate its recovery and reuse and therefore is of considerable interest. In fact, besides the high catalytic performance, a rapid separation and efficient recycling of the catalyst after a catalytic reaction are important requirements to reduce the production costs as well as to minimize waste generation, especially in industrial applications. As an example, carbon based materials (e.g., graphene, activated carbon, biochar) are generally used as support materials for the dispersion of active components in many catalytic processes [17,18,19,20,21] because of their high specific surface, good physical and thermal stability, reusability, and regeneration capacity. Their easiness of recycling offers the opportunity to increase the use of expensive catalysts based on noble metals since the organic content of the spent catalyst can be destroyed by a simple combustion process under mild conditions. As a consequence, this leads to highly concentrated ashes from which an easy and economical recovery of precious metals is possible [22].
Conventionally, catalysts have been categorized as homogeneous and heterogeneous. Homogenous catalysts exhibit advantages in terms of activity and stability due to their good solubility in reaction media. However, homogeneous catalysts are difficult to separate and recover from the reaction mixture, resulting in increasing economic cost, environmental pollution, and corrosion [23]. This problem limits their applications in industry, especially in the drug and pharmaceutical industry owing to the issue of metal contamination in the case of metal-catalyzed synthesis [24]. Although heterogeneous catalysis is generally less efficient compared to the homogeneous counterpart, it benefits from easy recovery. In gas/solid systems, the catalyst is easily separated and cleaned, and, in liquid/solid systems, it can be simply filtered [25]. The bridge between heterogeneous and homogeneous catalytic processes can be achieved through the use of magnetic nanoparticles. Magnetic nanoparticles can operate as catalytic supports enabling immobilization and magnetic recovery of homogenous catalysts [26]. Today, magnetic separation is considered a more competitive technology for the recovery of heterogeneous supported catalysts than traditional methods since it is fast, efficient, consumes low energy, and minimizes the use of solvents and the generation of secondary wastes [27].
Spent catalysts, once they have completed their useful life, represent a threat to the environment due to the leachable metals from their surface; a way to make their overall process of disposal less toxic to the environment is considering them a secondary source of metals.
Therefore, nowadays, the development of eco-friendly and highly efficient recovery techniques has become a focus of interest for both academia and industry. Tetronics’ DC Plasma Arc technology seems to be the option that best meets these needs.

2. The Catalyst’s Life Cycle

The recovery of a catalyst is important from both the economic and the environmental point of view. Typically, once separated from the reaction mixture, a catalyst is recycled a number of times. However, the catalytic deactivation is inevitable for most catalytic processes. Poisoning, fouling, carbon deposition, thermal degradation, sintering, and leaching of active metal species into liquid phases [28] are just some of causes that lead to the deactivation of catalysts [29]. When the activity of a catalyst goes below a certain threshold, it is usually regenerated and reused. According to numerous scientific studies, the most common regeneration mechanism for removal of deposits or poisons present on the surface is the thermal calcination treatment [29]. At this stage, if structural changes or poisoning effects are irreversible, catalyst recycling is no longer possible, and its life cycle is completed. Catalysts which can no longer perform their original duty are considered “spent” and the possible presence of heavy metals, coke, and other poisonous elements makes them hazardous toxic wastes. However, before being disposed in landfills as solid wastes, spent catalysts can be reused once again in other processes that require a less degree of catalytic activity or addressed to be treated for the recovery of metals so as to minimize discarded materials in refining industry [30]. A schematization of the catalysts’ life cycle is reported in Figure 1.

3. Methods for Recycling Heterogenous Catalysts

3.1. Traditional Methods of Recovery: Filtration and Centrifugation

In accordance with the need of green and sustainable development, a long lifetime and an easily recycling are important requirements for practical application of a catalyst in industry [31]. In gas/solid systems, the catalyst is easily recovered from the reaction medium mechanically. Instead, in liquid media reaction, a rapid and efficient method of separation is required to remove the catalyst from products in order to recycle it as many times as possible. Therefore, the appropriate separation process should be chosen based on the nature of the catalytic material, the time required, and the energy consumed. Filtration and Centrifugation are two of the methods traditionally employed in laboratory scale to allow handling, separation, recovery, and recycling of heterogeneous catalysts. Like all the other techniques of separation, these techniques are based on the different chemical or physical properties between the components of the reaction mixture.
Filtration exploits the different size of the components of the mixture to separate an undissolved solid from a liquid or a gas. The technique involves the use of a porous structure (filter/membrane) called septum that allows the fluid phase of mixture to pass through but keeps larger solid particles back. As the liquid/solid material passes through the filter, the solid material is collected and removed. In this process, the collected solid material is called “residue” while the fluid material more or less thoroughly separated from the solids is called “filtrate”, “effluent”, or “permeate”.
The permeation of the fluid phase through the filter medium is influenced by the gradient of pressure across the septum [32]. Filtration processes can be classified in accordance with driving forces that produce such difference of pressure. In most cases, the liquid is allowed to flow through the filter medium only by gravity, and the process is known as “gravity filtration”. Generally, gravity filtration is used to remove solid impurities such as drying agent, an undesired side product, or leftover reactant from a liquid media. Since this driving force is relatively weak, the liquid phase must be of low viscosity and the mixture sufficient dilute.
The difference of pressure for the “centrifugal filtration” is due to the centrifugal force acting on the fluid that, at high rotation speeds, can be many orders of magnitude higher than the gravitational force. The process requires more technical equipment, but, as a general rule, it is much faster and more efficient than the gravitational one. “Vacuum filtration” and “pressured filtration” usually are used in the laboratory in preference to gravity filtration.
A vacuum filter operates by creating a partial vacuum on the opposite side of the filter. Therefore, the vacuum filtration technique requires a vacuum pump able to aspire the liquid through the septum. In pressure filtration, the liquid phase is driven through the filter by mechanical pressure on the feed side of the filter. Since the driving force (pressurized fluid or vacuum) is much greater than gravity, the pressure difference generated is sufficient to filter a filtrate too viscus, thus permitting higher filtration rates and a lower consumption of solvents. Processes of filtration are schematized in Figure 2.
As in other separation processes, the separation of phases by filtration is never complete: liquid adheres to the separated solids, and the filtrate often contains some solids. Therefore, the recovery of solid catalysts after separation from reaction mixture by filtration methods very often requires further treatments such as washing, deliquoring (elimination of liquid from the filter by mechanical forces), and thermal drying [32].
Recently, Mina Amirsoleimani and her collaborators synthetized a highly effective heterogeneous and environmentally benign catalyst for the conversion of a variety of amines to their corresponding formamides and acetamides, which was recovered by filtering the reaction mixture and recycled seven times without any loss in activity [33].
Centrifugation is a technique frequently used to separate mixtures of two or more phases on the basis of their different density. Separation of heterogeneous mixtures through sedimentation happens spontaneously due to earth gravity, but it would take a long time. If separation is carried out by the application of a centrifugal force, this natural process is accelerated (Figure 3).
According to Newton’s first law, a body tends to remain in a state on rest or linear uniform motion in the absence of forces acting upon it. When the body moves with uniform speed along a circular, a force directed towards the center of the circle acts upon it. This force is called centripetal force. Changing the frame of reference, the body moving in the curve path feels an apparent force called centrifugal force that has the same magnitude and dimensions as the centripetal force but points in the opposite direction. Such force is dependent on the speed of rotation in RPM and the distance of the body from the center of rotation.
The centrifugal force provided by a centrifuge in combination with gravitational force cause particles to move radially away from the axis of rotation. More-dense particles of the mixture tend to move at the bottom of the tube, while less-dense particles of the mixture migrate towards the axis of the centrifuge. The solid deposited on the bottom of the tube is called “pellet”, while the remaining solution is called the “supernate” or “supernatant liquid”. The supernatant liquid can be quickly decanted from the tube without disturbing the precipitate, or aspirated with a Pasteur pipette [34].
Nasresfahani et al., in their recent study, prepared an efficient heterogeneous Nickel−Copper bimetallic catalyst for the synthesis of substituted amines that was successfully recovered through centrifugation and reused four times without notable decrease in its activity [35].
However, recycling of heterogeneous catalysts using traditional methods of separation such as filtration and centrifugation is tedious and time-consuming. In addition, these separation techniques are not usually able to collect the nano-sized catalysts without weight loss. Recovery by filtration is not advisable because smaller sized nanoparticles could pass through the filter paper. On the other hand, centrifugation is uneconomic processes and, consequently, it cannot be carried out on an industrial scale. Recently, magnetic separation for catalyst recycling provided an interesting alternative to the separation methods mentioned above in terms of time, energy, and efficiency of catalysis [36,37,38].

3.2. Magnetic Separation

By using an external magnet, the separation of magnetic solid catalysts has been demonstrated to be fast, simple, convenient, and efficient; this new type of approach makes the work-up procedure economically and technically feasible with a minimal loss of solid catalyst (Figure 4) [39]. In accordance with the principles of green chemistry, magnetic separation reduces secondary waste generation and energy consumption, and also offers the opportunity to expand the use of expensive catalysts based on noble metals and rare-earth elements [40].

3.2.1. Magnetic Nanoparticles (MNPs)

In recent years, magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have received considerable attention among researchers due to their wide use in the preparation of recyclable catalysts. These nanoparticles can be directly used as catalysts or as magnetic carriers for the catalytic species immobilized on their surface. Utilizing magnetic nanoparticles as catalysts or supports helps to combine the advantages of both nano-sized particles and magnetic materials. The large surface-to-volume ratio of these types of materials allows excellent loading of the homogeneous catalyst and then obtaining a magnetic catalyst with high catalytic activity.
Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) usually exhibit a phenomenon known as superparamagnetism. Superparamagnetism is a form of magnetism that takes place when the size of ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic nanoparticles is as low as 10–20 nm [41]. As a consequence of an externally applied magnetic field, superparamagnetic and paramagnetic materials become magnetized up to their saturation magnetization. As soon as the field goes to zero, any residual magnetic interaction disappears. In comparison with paramagnetic materials, superparamagnetic nanoparticles have a higher magnetic susceptibility, rendering them highly sensitive to externally applied magnetic fields [42].
If nanoparticles are sufficiently small, each of them can be considered as characterized by a single magnetic domain able to act as a “single super spin”. Unlike ferromagnetic materials, in the absence of the magnetic field, these nanoparticles randomly change the orientation of their spins even at room temperature. Instead, the ordered magnetic moments of ferromagnetic materials become disordered in response to thermal fluctuations only above the Curie Temperature (CT), or Curie point, losing their permanent magnetism.
The magnetic component of MNPs provides a fast separation from the liquid phase by application of an external magnetic field and an easy redispersion in the absence of an applied magnetic field, avoiding in this way the conventional filtration, centrifugation, or other tedious workup processes. Most magnetic-supported catalysts can be reused to several runs almost keeping their initial activity [43].
When a permanent magnet is placed in contact with a beaker containing a suspension of magnetic nanomaterial, magnetic dipoles of nanoparticles point in the same direction of the field lines. As shown in Figure 5, the applied magnetic field induces nanoparticles to migrate towards the magnet. After a few minutes, all particles end up concentrated at the wall in correspondence with the magnet; in this way, the supernatant can be easily aspirated with a syringe. When the magnet is removed, the random orientation of nanoparticle is so fast that the measured magnetic moment gets down to zero quickly and nanoparticles behave as no-magnetic materials.
Properties such as large surface area, relatively low preparation cost and toxicity, good stability, coercivity (the field required to bring the magnetism to zero), low Curie temperature [44], and rapid recovery make them ideal supports in the field of catalysis. Thanks to these particular properties, these materials are also applied in a variety of fields such as biotechnology/biomedicine [45], magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [46], controlled drug delivery [46], biosensors [44], hyperthermia [47], gene therapy [48], gas sensor [49], data storage [50], adsorbent materials [51], batteries [52], pigments [53], water purification [54], tissue repair [55], detoxification of biological fluids [56], and labeling and separation of cells [57].
The most common MNPs are pure metal nanoparticles (Fe, Co, Ni), metal alloys (FePt, CoPt), iron oxides (FeO, Fe2O3, Fe3O4), or ferrites MFe2O4 (M = Co, Mn, Cu, Zn) [24]. These materials can be easily modified and functionalized without altering their magnetic properties. Appropriate surface changes are required to improve the dispersion, the catalytic activity, and the physicochemical and mechanical properties of MNPs, and make them biocompatible [58].
For example, cobalt (0) nanoparticles supported on ceria were used as catalyst in the hydrolysis of ammonia borane for hydrogen production. The presence of cerium(III) defects improved the catalytic activity of metal nanoparticles through a more favorable substrate–metal interaction [59]. After completion of reaction, the catalyst was isolated by a permanent magnet and then redispersed for a subsequent run of hydrolysis retaining its initial catalytic activity even after the fifth use [60].
Among the magnetic nanoparticles, iron oxides are widespread used in the field of MNPs catalysis owing to their optical, electrical, magnetic, and catalytic properties [61]. Up to now, 16 pure phases of iron oxides, in the form of oxides, hydroxides, and oxyhydroxides have been found [62]. Particularly, magnetite (Fe3O4), an important type of ferrite, is highly regarded and applied due to their low cost, availability, nontoxicity, and easy functionalization with other metallic species or organocatalysts [38]. Fe3O4 is characterized by strong superparamagnetic and electron properties due to the presence of iron cations in both capacities (Fe2+, Fe3+) [62]. Their superparamagnetic behavior makes magnetite NPs possible to use such as the magnetic core to an eventual core–shell structure. Adding Fe3O4 into catalysts endows the catalysts with excellent magnetic properties and improves even further the catalytic performances [38].

3.2.2. Magnetically Recoverable Transition Metal Ferrite Nanoparticles

In the last few years, magnetic spinel ferrite nanoparticles with a general molecular formula MFe2O4 (M is transition metal, such as Fe, Cu, Zn, and Mn) have attracted significant interest on the field of heterogeneous catalysis. They offer several advantages such as chemical and thermal stability [63], and high surface area and mechanical hardness. Ferrite nanocatalysts not only are environmentally benign and compatible with green chemistry aspects but also can be simply recovered from reaction mixture and recycled up to several times almost without significant loss of their catalytic activity [64].
Ali et al. studied catalytic performance of cuprospinel CuFe2O4 nanoparticles in the biodiesel production via the waste frying oil (WFO) transesterification process. This catalyst, synthesized by a combination of co-precipitation and hydrothermal methods, showed high activity and reactivity, simplicity, easy reusability, and excellent stability under different reaction conditions. After the reaction time, the catalyst was recovered by an external magnetic field, washed with acetone to remove the adhered oil and glycerol, and dried and reused again without any leaching or any catalytic efficiency reduction even for five reaction cycles [65].

3.2.3. Magnetically Recoverable Orthoferrites of Rare-Earth Nanoparticles

The rare earths (REEs) are a class of seventeen transition metal elements, including 15 lanthanides, scandium (Sc), and yttrium (Y), widely applied in various fields such as metallurgy, electronic devices, high-performance alloys, glass, ceramics, and the phosphorous industries. They are also used to make permanent magnets (PMs) [66,67]. The variable valence states and electronic structures of rare earth ions allow their use for several catalytic applications. For example, same rare earth elements are applied in catalysis as dopants or components to modulate the specific physical and chemical properties of different materials [68], cerium-based materials act as catalysts in various reactions such as CO2 hydrogenation [10], Fischer–Tropsch synthesis [69], and CO2 methanation [9,11,13,70] due to redox properties and excellent oxygen mobility.
Orthoferrites of rare-earth elements (REE) with the formula RFeO3 (R = Sc, Y, La-Lu) are a novel class of acid-base catalysts of great interest for researchers due to their high activity and the possibility of magnetic recovery. They are applied mainly in redox and photoinduced processes [40]. For example, K.D Martinson and his research group successfully synthetized a phase-pure porous magnetic nanopowder based on holmium orthoferrites by glycine-nitrate combustion approach for the first time. The porous holmium orthoferrite has been tested for n-hexane conversion at 500 °C and 1 atm. The observed catalytic activity can be attributed to high concentration of acid-base sites on its surface. After reaction, the spent sample was separated by an external magnetic field of a permanent magnet from the reaction followed by heat treatment at 600 °C for 1 h, with an efficiency of 97% [40].

3.2.4. Surface Modification of Magnetic Nanoparticles

Unfortunately, it has been found that MNPs commonly tend to agglomerate into a large cluster due to their small interparticle distances, high surface energy, and the existence of van der Waals forces. As a result, all of this involves a non-uniform dispersion of the magnetic catalyst in the reaction mixture and then a rapid loss of catalytic activity and magnetism [71]. This problem is solved by coating their surface with suitable protecting agents to prevent direct contact between the nanoparticles and accordingly improve their chemical stability. Generally, magnetic nanoparticles (NPs) are coated with carbon (graphene) or silica so that they form magnetic core–shell structures. Carbon or silica coating provides the possibility to prevent metal oxidation and/or to facilitate the introduction of functional groups via sp2 carbon of graphene or silanol groups of silica [72], which allow, in turn, the attachment of various catalytic species on the magnetic NPs surface including ionic liquids through covalent bonds or electrostatic interactions. Recently, much attention has been paid to other metal oxides, such as ceria and titania, for coating of the magnetic core in order to obtain magnetically recoverable catalyst supports. Vono et al. have found that the pre-coating of magnetic supports containing ceria or titania with a uniform layer of silica provides thermal resistant magnetic materials without modifying the magnetic properties of the iron oxide core [27].
The process of synthesis of functionalized magnetic nanoparticles usually consists of three steps: the formation of the magnetic core, the coating of the nanoparticles with an outer shell and the modification of the resultant core–shell structure.

3.2.5. Ionic Liquid Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles

Recently, Ionic liquids (ILs)-coated MNPs have attracted growing interest as catalysts for a wide range of new industrial applications. Ionic liquids (ILs) are commonly defined as salts composed of organic cations and organic or inorganic anions with melting point below the boiling point of water. According to the nature of the cation and/or the counter anion moiety, the ionic liquid may behave as an acidic, basic, or organ catalyst [73]. Many of these ILs have been investigated in a variety of organic transformations in which ILs can act as solvents and/or catalysts [74]. They have a number of advantages such as wide liquid range and potential window, extremely low vapor pressure, high ionic conductivity, and extraordinary ability to functionalization [75]. However, their industrial applications are hampered by their high viscosity [71], high cost, large consumption, and homogeneousness (difficulty to separate) [76]. To overcome these drawbacks, supported ionic liquid catalysts (SIL) could be a valid alternative to homogeneous analogues since they maintain the excellent catalytic properties of ionic liquids, but also manifest the advantages of easy separation and recovery typical of the heterogeneous catalyst. On the basis of this awareness, different support materials, such as amorphous or ordered mesoporous silica, zeolites, polystyrene, magnetic nanoparticles, and many others have been used as carrier for loading ionic liquids [77]. Particularly, ionic liquids immobilized on the magnetic nanoparticles surface, have emerged as good catalysts because of their facile separation by an external magnet.
Cano et al. synthesised a new, highly active, and efficiently recoverable catalytic system modifying nano-magnetite materials with a paramagnetic halometallate-based ionic liquid (MILs), Fe3O4@SiO2@(mim)[FeCl4] (mim: methylimidazolium). This system was applied in the glycolysis of PET into BHET under conventional heating. The catalyst exhibited an excellent recycling behaviour, achieving nearly 100% yield and selectivity over twelve consecutive reaction cycles at 180 °C and was easily recovered with an external magnetic field avoiding tedious work-up or purification processes. Further analyses by ICP revealed that the amount of catalyst lost after each cycle was minimal and the amount of Fe in the purified product was negligible [76].
Ren et al. synthesized an alkaline ionic liquid immobilized on protective copolymers coated magnetic nanoparticles ([Im][OH]/P(VBC-DVB) @MNPs). The catalyst consisted of three layers: a magnetic core, an intermediate protective shell, and an outer catalytic layer. The magnetic core, mainly composed of CoFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles (CFNPs), makes easier separation of the catalyst from reaction medium. The protective layer, formed by the copolymer of divinylbenzene (DVB) and vinyl benzyl chloride (VBC), incorporated into the catalyst, on the other hand, prevents the corrosion of magnetic nanoparticle when the catalyst is used in polar solvents, thus preserving recyclability and improving its stability. The catalytic layer, which consisted of 1-propyl-3-alkylimidazole hydroxide ionic liquid, is where the reaction takes part. This catalyst showed an excellent catalytic activity for Knoevenagel condensation between benzaldehyde and ethyl cyanoacetate due to the large amount of OH ions loading on the surface and a lower activation energy than of homogeneous catalyst NaOH. The catalyst was conveniently recovered upon applying an external magnetic field, and it was recycled at least six times without significant changes [23]. However, since the loading of ILs on the surface cannot be too high, catalytic activity turns out to be limited owing to the relatively low number of catalytic units compared to the large surface area of magnetic nanoparticles [71]. To improve the catalytic activity, it is necessary to increase the amount of catalyst used for the catalytic process, and this could require a greater use of solvents as well as expensive recovery cost and possible toxicological concern [23]. This problem could be solved by the surface modification of the magnetic nanoparticles with different polymer grafting methods [78]. The introduction of polymer onto the MNPs increases the loading content of grafted homogenous material since more catalytic units can be attached onto magnetic support [78]. On the other hand, the polymer layer could prevent the formation of clusters in high temperature processes [79]. Arghan et al. developed a novel poly (ionic liquid) (PIL) coated magnetic nanoparticles catalyst, noted as n-Fe3O4/PVAm-SO3H, and used it as a magnetic heterogeneous acid catalyst for the one-pot synthesis of tri and tetrasubstituted imidazole derivatives under optimized condition in excellent yields. The catalyst was synthesized by directly grafting polyvinyl amine layer onto surface of Fe3O4 without using any bridged organosilane compounds. In the following, the sulfonation treatment was carried out by covalent grafting of chlorosulfonic acid on amine groups to convert n-Fe3O4/PVAm into an efficient acid catalyst. In addition, the resulted catalyst was readily separated in a green way by using a magnetic force and reused eight times without any significant deterioration in catalytic activity. The study results show that this new acid magnetic catalyst exhibits more advantages than soluble acids [78].
Nowadays, dicationic ionic liquids (DILs), a new subclass of ILs, have attracted significant attention. Typically, these molecules contain two cationic head groups connected together with a rigid or flexible spacer, associated with two counter anions, respectively [75]. Modifying the length of the chain and the type of spacer or the cation, their physicochemical properties can be tuned [71]. In comparison to various reported monocationic ionic liquid in the literature, dicationic ionic liquids exhibit several interesting advantages such as higher thermal stability, surface activity, more extensive liquid range, and higher selectivity [75]. These ILs can be used in many applications from the “classical” use as solvents, catalysts, or catalytic supports in organic reactions, to more specific uses as high temperature lubricants/heat transfer fluids, including a variety of roles in analytical sciences [71].
Fahimeh Rezaei and co-workers designed Brønsted acidic dicationic ionic liquid immobilized on silica-coated iron oxide support with core–shell structure and applied it as a recyclable nanocatalyst under solvent-free conditions in the synthesis of pyrazole derivatives [80]. The catalyst has maintained his catalytic activity at least five times. In addition, Reyhaneh Karimi-Chayjani demonstrated that magnetic γFe2O3@SiO2 NPs-supported Bis[(3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane] dichloride bis-dicationic ionic liquid (DIL) catalyst can catalyse the Knoevenagel condensation achieving high reaction rates and yields. The synthesized nanomagnetic catalyst possesses a high superparamagnetic characteristic and can be simply recovered and reused applying an external magnetic field at least six times without loss of catalytic activity [44].
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), also known as porous coordination polymers (PCPs), are a class of porous crystalline materials, highly investigated in the last twenty years. Several features of MOFs such as controllable composition, large surface areas, regular and accessible pores, and crystalline open structures allows them to encapsulate within their frameworks magnetic nanoparticles, making them promising heterogeneous catalysts or catalytic carriers of various species including ionic liquids [81].
For example, very recently, Xie et al. developed an efficient and magnetically recyclable acidic catalyst based on the amino-functionalized metal-organic framework structures, for the biodisel production via simultaneous transesterification-esterifications of low-quality oil feedstock. To prepare the acidic catalyst with Brönsted–Lewis acid sites, the POM-ILs with sulfonated organic cations and Keggin POM counter anions were immobilized on the CoFe2O4/MIL-88B(Fe)-NH2 support combining in this way the advantages of ILs and heterogeneous character of MOFs. The catalyst showed a good stability, probably, due to the charge interaction of acidic groups of POM-based sulfonated ILs with amino groups of the magnetic support. On the other hand, the encapsulation of magnetic nanoparticles (CoFe2O4) into cavities of the metal organic framework nanocomposites gives magnetic properties to catalysts, improving its separation performances. In order to investigate the reusability of the solid catalyst, its recovery was conveniently carried out by using a permanent magnet. The catalyst was reused for five transesterification runs under the optimized reaction conditions without significant decay of the catalytic activity [82].

4. Methods for Recovering Metals from Spent Catalysts

4.1. Traditional Methods of Recovery: Hydrometallurgy and Pirometallurgy

Since spent catalysts are considered valuable sources [83] of metals and hazardous residues [84] at the same time, their recovery offers both economic and environmental benefits. Hence, after reaching their useful life, spent catalysts are further treated before final disposal for the recovery of metal content and/or separation of various components. Hydrometallurgy and pyrometallurgy are two traditional technologies widely applied for these purposes (Figure 6).
Hydrometallurgy, known as the leaching method, consists of metals dissolution by acid or base solutions and their selective separation in a pure form by solvent extraction. In this last operation, the leach liquors are brought into contact with an organic phase in order to transfer, selectively, the metallic ions from solutions to organic phase [85]. Precipitation, distillation, and ion exchange are other separation procedures used as an alternative to solvent extraction [86,87]. Mishra et al. used a combination of acid leaching followed by solvent extraction to recovery selectively Mo and V from spent petroleum catalyst [86]. Wu et al. used an ion exchange method for the recovery of tungsten (W) from the leach liquor after leaching of the SCR catalyst [88]. Hydrometallurgical processing is effective and easy to operate but produces a large amount of acidic waste liquid [89].
Pyrometallurgical processing requires chemical treatments at high temperatures such as incineration, pyrolysis, and melting. However, treatments involve production of toxic gases such as dioxins and furans, which energy consuming and expensive [89,90].
Today, bioleaching seems instead to be a more promising approach to value such resources due to its environmental friendliness, and low cost and low energy requirements [91] (Figure 6). This sustainable method consists of the use of microorganisms such as bacteria or fungi which can secrete organic or inorganic acids able to solubilize and extract selectively metals from solid compounds [92]. The use of microorganisms makes this process require a longer time in comparison to the conventional chemical leaching [91].

4.2. Tetronics’ DC Plasma Arc Technology

In recent years, the application of thermal plasma technology for wastes treatment has increased enormously. In particular, Tetronics’ DC Plasma Arc technology represents today an ecofriendly pyrometallurgical solution for the recovery of metals from secondary sources [92]. This technology, for example, has been applied for many years to recover platinum group metals (PGM) from automotive and industrial catalysts [85], Figure 7.
Plasma processing uses a plasma arc created by either a single or multiple electrodes/torch as a heat source to smelt metals [89]. The high energy content of the plasma converts the organic components into small molecules, whereas the inorganic and metal components are melted to form slag and metal slag. Therefore, compared to incineration, plasma melting can destroy harmful organic compounds such as dioxin and furans [89]. The exhaust gases, before being vented to the atmosphere, are continuously analysed by a continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS). In addition, incineration and other conventional technologies generally produce ash, which contains leachable levels of heavy metals as well as char and tars. Instead, the non-valuable solid residue recovered from the Tetronics’ DC Plasma Arc process, called Plasmarok ®, having been subjected to extreme heat, presents itself as an inert, non- hazardous molten vitreous material, that, if cooled slowly, can be harder and more stable than granite and, hence, can be reused in a range of building applications [85].

5. Conclusions

The pivotal role of heterogeneous catalysts in a variety of catalytic processes is undoubtedly well assessed. The need to further improve their efficiency, especially in terms of activity and recyclability, led to the advancement of reuse/recycle techniques. Traditional methods alongside more innovative approaches were analysed and reviewed.
It was highlighted that filtration and centrifugation, very much exploited in the past, have been supported and/or replaced in the last few years by the handier magnetic separation. Indeed, considered all its possible configurations, this method is characterized by high efficiency, low energy and time consumption, with minimal loss of solid catalysts.
However, when recycling is no longer possible and catalysts reach their useful life, the recovery of metals and/or separation of various components of spent catalysts are also possible before the final disposal. In particular, pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy, and biometallurgy were reported together with the Tetronics’ DC Plasma Arc technology, the most innovative technique in this field.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M., P.F. and A.M. (Angela Malara); methodology, M.M., P.F. and A.M.(Angela Malara); formal analysis, M.M., P.F., A.M. (Anastasia Macario) and A.M. (Angela Malara), investigation, M.M. and A.M.(Angela Malara); data curation, M.M. and A.M.(Angela Malara); writing—original draft preparation, M.M. and A.M.(Angela Malara); writing—review and editing, M.M., P.F. A.M. (Anastasia Macario) and A.M. (Angela Malara); supervision, P.F. and A.M.(Angela Malara). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This publication was supported by the project PRIN 2017 “DIRECTBIOPOWER”, for the development of innovative components for IT-SOFC, (Code 2017FCFYHK).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Parrino, F.; Bellardita, M.; Garcia-Lopez, E.I.; Marci, G.; Loddo, V.; Palmisano, L. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis for Selective Formation of High-Value-Added Molecules: Some Chemical and Engineering Aspects. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 11191–11225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dosa, M.; Piumetti, M.; Bensaid, S.; Andana, T.; Galletti, C.; Fino, D.; Russo, N. Photocatalytic Abatement of Volatile Organic Compounds by TiO2 Nanoparticles Doped with Either Phosphorous or Zirconium. Materials 2019, 12, 2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Rodríguez-Padrón, D.; Puente-Santiago, A.R.; Balu, A.M.; Muñoz-Batista, M.J.; Luque, R. Environmental Catalysis: Present and Future. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 18–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, L.; Corma, A. Metal Catalysts for Heterogeneous Catalysis: From Single Atoms to Nanoclusters and Nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 4981–5079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Frontera, P.; Malara, A.; Stelitano, S.; Leonardi, S.G.; Bonavita, A.; Fazio, E.; Antonucci, P.; Neri, G.; Neri, F.; Santangelo, S. Characterisation and H2O2 sensing properties of TiO2-CNTs/Pt electro-catalysts. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 170, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kisszékelyi, P.; Nagy, S.; Fehér, Z.; Huszthy, P.; Kupai, J. Membrane-Supported Recovery of Homogeneous Organocatalysts: A Review. Chemistry 2020, 2, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, C.; Paone, E.; Rodríguez-Padrón, D.; Luque, R.; Mauriello, F. Reductive catalytic routes towards sustainable production of hydrogen, fuels and chemicals from biomass derived polyols. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 127, 109852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Malara, A.; Paone, E.; Bonaccorsi, L.; Mauriello, F.; Macario, A.; Frontera, P. Pd/Fe3O4 Nanofibers for the Catalytic Conversion of Lignin-Derived Benzyl Phenyl Ether under Transfer Hydrogenolysis Conditions. Catalysts 2019, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Frontera, P.; Macario, A.; Malara, A.; Santangelo, S.; Triolo, C.; Crea, F.; Antonucci, P. Trimetallic Ni-Based Catalysts over Gadolinia-Doped Ceria for Green Fuel Production. Catalysts 2018, 8, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Frontera, P.; Macario, A.; Malara, A.; Modafferi, V.; Mascolo, M.C.; Candamano, S.; Crea, F.; Antonucci, P. CO2 and CO hydrogenation over Ni-supported materials. Funct. Mater. Lett. 2018, 11, 1850061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Frontera, P.; Malara, A.; Modafferi, V.; Antonucci, V.; Antonucci, P.; Macario, A. Catalytic activity of Ni-Co supported metals in carbon dioxides methanation. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 98, 1924–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Malara, A.; Frontera, P.; Antonucci, P.; Macario, A. Smart recycling of carbon oxides: Current status of methanation reaction. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2020, 26, 100376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Frontera, P.; Macario, A.; Malara, A.; Antonucci, V.; Modafferi, V.; Antonucci, P.L. Simultaneous methanation of carbon oxides on nickel-iron catalysts supported on ceria-doped gadolinia. Catal. Today 2020, 357, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Frontera, P.; Macario, A.; Ferraro, M.; Antonucci, P. Supported Catalysts for CO2 Methanation: A Review. Catalysts 2017, 7, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Boaro, M.; Colussi, S.; Trovarelli, A. Ceria-Based Materials in Hydrogenation and Reforming Reactions for CO2 Valorization. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kesavan, J.K.; Luisetto, I.; Tuti, S.; Meneghini, C.; Iucci, G.; Battocchio, C.; Mobilio, S.; Casciardi, S.; Sisto, R. Nickel supported on YSZ: The effect of Ni particle size on the catalytic activity for CO2 methanation. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 23, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Santos, J.L.; Megías-Sayago, C.; Ivanova, S.; Centeno, M.Á.; Odriozola, J.A. Functionalized biochars as supports for Pd/C catalysts for efficient hydrogen production from formic acid. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 282, 119615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Palliyarayil, A.; Prakash, P.S.; Nandakumar, S.; Kumar, N.S.; Sil, S. Palladium nanoparticles impregnated activated carbon material for catalytic oxidation of carbon monoxide. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2020, 107, 107884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yam, K.M.; Guo, N.; Jiang, Z.; Li, S.; Zhang, C. Graphene-Based Heterogeneous Catalysis: Role of Graphene. Catalysts 2020, 10, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Paone, E.; Beneduci, A.; Corrente, G.; Malara, A.; Mauriello, F. Hydrogenolysis of aromatic ethers under lignin-first conditions. Mol. Catal. 2020, 497, 111228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gumina, B.; Mauriello, F.; Pietropaolo, R.; Galvagno, S.; Espro, C. Hydrogenolysis of sorbitol into valuable C3-C2 alcohols at low H2 pressure promoted by the heterogeneous Pd/Fe3O4 catalyst. Mol. Catal. 2018, 446, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Santos, J.L.; Mäki-Arvela, P.; Monzón, A.; Murzin, D.Y.; Centeno, M. Ángel Metal catalysts supported on biochars: Part I synthesis and characterization. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 268, 118423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ren, Y.; Li, H.; Yang, W.; Shi, D.; Wu, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Feng, C.; Liu, H.; Jiao, Q. Alkaline Ionic Liquids Immobilized on Protective Copolymers Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles: An Efficient and Magnetically Recyclable Catalyst for Knoevenagel Condensation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 2824–2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, D.; Astruc, D. Fast-Growing Field of Magnetically Recyclable Nanocatalysts. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 6949–6985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rothenberg, G. Catalysis: Concepts and Green Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  26. Baig, R.B.N.; Varma, R.S. Magnetically retrievable catalysts for organic synthesis. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 752–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Vono, L.L.R.; Damasceno, C.C.; Matos, J.R.; Jardim, R.F.; Landers, R.; Masunaga, S.H.; Rossi, L.M. Separation technology meets green chemistry: Development of magnetically recoverable catalyst supports containing silica, ceria, and titania. Pure Appl. Chem. 2018, 90, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sádaba, I.; Granados, M.L.; Riisager, A.; Taarning, E. Deactivation of solid catalysts in liquid media: The case of leaching of active sites in biomass conversion reactions. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 4133–4145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Argyle, M.D.; Bartholomew, C.H. Heterogeneous Catalyst Deactivation and Regeneration: A Review. Catalysts 2015, 5, 145–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chiranjeevi, T.; Pragya, R.; Gupta, S.; Gokak, D.; Bhargava, S. Minimization of Waste Spent Catalyst in Refineries. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2016, 35, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Molnár, Á.; Papp, A. Catalyst recycling—A survey of recent progress and current status. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 349, 1–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ripperger, S.; Gösele, W.; Alt, C.; Loewe, T. Filtration, 1. Fundamentals. Ullmann’s Encycl. Ind. Chem. 2013, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Amirsoleimani, M.; Khalilzadeh, M.A.; Zareyee, D. Preparation and catalytic evaluation of a palladium catalyst deposited over modified clinoptilolite (Pd@MCP) for chemoselective N-formylation and N-acylation of amines. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1225, 129076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Majekodunmi, S.O. A review on centrifugation in the pharmaceutical industry. Am. J. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 5, 67–78. [Google Scholar]
  35. Nasresfahani, Z.; Kassaee, M.Z. Nickel−Copper bimetallic mesoporous nanoparticles: As an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for N -alkylation of amines with alcohols. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 35, e6032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, H.; Ma, Y. Magnetically separable Fe3O4-supported Ru–Ni bimetallic catalysts for diformyltricyclodecanes hydrogenation to value-added fine chemicals. Prog. React. Kinet. Mech. 2020, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, A.; Sudarsanam, P.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, H.; Yang, S. Functionalized magnetic nanosized materials for efficient biodiesel synthesis via acid–base/enzyme catalysis. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 2977–3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, F.; Zhu, W.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Y.; Song, H.; Li, C. Catalytic transfer hydrogenation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol over Fe3O4 modified Ru/Carbon nanotubes catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2020, 45, 1981–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alaei, S.; Haghighi, M.; Toghiani, J.; Vahid, B.R. Magnetic and reusable MgO/MgFe2O4 nanocatalyst for biodiesel production from sunflower oil: Influence of fuel ratio in combustion synthesis on catalytic properties and performance. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 117, 322–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Martinson, K.; Kondrashkova, I.; Omarov, S.; Sladkovskiy, D.; Kiselev, A.; Kiseleva, T.; Popkov, V. Magnetically recoverable catalyst based on porous nanocrystalline HoFeO3 for processes of n-hexane conversion. Adv. Powder Technol. 2020, 31, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wahajuddin, A.S. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Magnetic nanoplatforms as drug carriers. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 3445–3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kneller, E.F.; Luborsky, F.E. Particle Size Dependence of Coercivity and Remanence of Single-Domain Particles. J. Appl. Phys. 1963, 34, 656–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kooti, M.; Nasiri, E. Synthesis of a novel magnetic nanocatalyst based on rhodium complex for transfer hydrogenation of ketone. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 33, e4886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Karimi-Chayjani, R.; Daneshvar, N.; Shirini, F.; Tajik, H. New magnetic nanocatalyst containing a bis-dicationic ionic liquid framework for Knoevenagel condensation reaction. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2019, 45, 2471–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gupta, A.K.; Gupta, M. Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 3995–4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Colombo, M.; Carregal-Romero, S.; Casula, M.F.; Gutiérrez, L.; Morales, M.P.; Böhm, I.B.; Heverhagen, J.T.; Prosperi, D.; Parak, W.J. Biological applications of magnetic nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 4306–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sasikala, A.R.K.; GhavamiNejad, A.; Unnithan, A.R.; Thomas, R.G.; Moon, M.; Jeong, Y.Y.; Park, C.H.; Kim, C.S. A smart magnetic nanoplatform for synergistic anticancer therapy: Manoeuvring mussel-inspired functional magnetic nanoparticles for pH responsive anticancer drug delivery and hyperthermia. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 18119–18128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. SJiang, S.; Eltoukhy, A.A.; Love, K.T.; Langer, R.; Anderson, D.G. Lipidoid-Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Efficient DNA and siRNA delivery. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1059–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhai, Q.; Du, B.; Feng, R.; Xu, W.; Wei, Q. A highly sensitive gas sensor based on Pd-doped Fe3O4nanoparticles for volatile organic compounds detection. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 886–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, F.; Zhang, T.; Yang, X.; Zhang, L.; Leng, K.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Y. A high-performance supercapacitor-battery hybrid energy storage device based on graphene-enhanced electrode materials with ultrahigh energy density. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1623–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, S.; Bai, B.; He, Y.; Hu, N.; Wang, H.; Suo, Y. Controllable conversion of Prussian blue@yeast bio-template into 3D cage-like magnetic Fe3O4@N-doped carbon absorbent and its cohesive regeneration by persulfate activation. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 1151–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Malara, A.; Pantò, F.; Santangelo, S.; Antonucci, P.L.; Fiore, M.; Longoni, G.; Ruffo, R.; Frontera, P. Comparative life cycle assessment of Fe2O3-based fibers as anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2020, 23, 6786–6799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, Z.; Zhai, S.; Lv, J.; Qi, H.; Zheng, W.; Zhai, B.; An, Q. Versatile hierarchical Cu/Fe3O4 nanocatalysts for efficient degradation of organic dyes prepared by a facile, controllable hydrothermal method. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 74575–74584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Abdullah, N.H.; Shameli, K.; Abdullah, E.C.; Abdullah, L.C. Solid matrices for fabrication of magnetic iron oxide nanocomposites: Synthesis, properties, and application for the adsorption of heavy metal ions and dyes. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 162, 538–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Silva, V.A.J.; Andrade, P.L.; Silva, M.P.C.; Valladares, L.D.L.S.; Aguiar, J.A. Synthesis and characterization of Fe3O4 nanoparticles coated with fucan polysaccharides. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2013, 343, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Lian, S.; Kang, Z.; Wang, E.; Jiang, M.; Hu, C.; Xu, L. Convenient synthesis of single crystalline magnetic Fe3O4 nanorods. Solid State Commun. 2003, 127, 605–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Neoh, K.G.; Kang, E.T. Surface modification of magnetic nanoparticles for stem celllabeling. Soft Matter 2011, 8, 2057–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhu, N.; Ji, H.; Yu, P.; Niu, J.; Farooq, M.U.; Akram, M.W.; Udego, I.O.; Li, H.; Niu, X. Surface Modification of Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. He, L.; Liang, B.; Li, L.; Yang, X.; Huang, Y.; Wang, A.; Wang, X.; Zhang, T. Cerium-Oxide-Modified Nickel as a Non-Noble Metal Catalyst for Selective Decomposition of Hydrous Hydrazine to Hydrogen. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1623–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Akbayrak, S.; Taneroğlu, O.; Özkar, S. Nanoceria supported cobalt(0) nanoparticles: A magnetically separable and reusable catalyst in hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of ammonia borane. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 6546–6552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ali, A.; Hira Zafar, M.Z.; ul Haq, I.; Phull, A.R.; Ali, J.S.; Hussain, A. Synthesis, characterization, applications, and challenges of iron oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2016, 9, 49–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Vahidian, M.; Elhamifar, D.; Shaker, M. Protected, Email Core–shell structured magnetic mesoporous silica-titania: A novel, powerful and recoverable nanocatalyst. Polyhedron 2020, 178, 114326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hamad, H.A.; El-Latif, M.M.A.; Kashyout, A.B.; Sadik, W.A.; Feteha, M.Y. Study on synthesis of superparamagnetic spinel cobalt ferrite nanoparticles as layered double hydroxides by co-precipitation method. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2014, 84, 2205–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Amiri, M.; Eskandari, K.; Salavati-Niasari, M. Magnetically retrievable ferrite nanoparticles in the catalysis application. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 271, 101982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ali, R.M.; Elkatory, M.R.; Hamad, H.A. Highly active and stable magnetically recyclable CuFe2O4 as a heterogenous catalyst for efficient conversion of waste frying oil to biodiesel. Fuel 2020, 268, 117297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sun, X.; Yuan, K.; Zhang, Y. Advances and prospects of rare earth metal-organic frameworks in catalytic applications. J. Rare Earths 2020, 38, 801–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jyothi, R.K.; Thenepalli, T.; Ahn, J.W.; Parhi, P.K.; Chung, K.W.; Lee, J.-Y. Review of rare earth elements recovery from secondary resources for clean energy technologies: Grand opportunities to create wealth from waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 267, 122048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zeng, Z.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, Z.; Luo, M.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, C.; Xu, J.; Huang, B.; Luo, F.; et al. Rare-earth-containing perovskite nanomaterials: Design, synthesis, properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 1109–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Spadaro, L.; Arena, F.; Granados, M.L.; Ojeda, M.; Fierro, J.; Frusteri, F. Metal–support interactions and reactivity of Co/CeO2 catalysts in the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis reaction. J. Catal. 2005, 234, 451–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Frontera, P.; Macario, A.; Monforte, G.; Bonura, G.; Ferraro, M.; Dispenza, G.; Antonucci, V.; Aricò, A.; Antonucci, P. The role of Gadolinia Doped Ceria support on the promotion of CO2 methanation over Ni and Ni Fe catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 26828–26842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xie, W.; Wang, H. Immobilized polymeric sulfonated ionic liquid on core-shell structured Fe3O4/SiO2 composites: A magnetically recyclable catalyst for simultaneous transesterification and esterifications of low-cost oils to biodiesel. Renew. Energy 2020, 145, 1709–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shifrina, Z.B.; Bronstein, L.M. Magnetically Recoverable Catalysts: Beyond Magnetic Separation. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ratti, R. Ionic Liquids: Synthesis and Applications in Catalysis. Adv. Chem. 2014, 2014, 729842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, S.-Y.; Zhuang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Wang, H.; Gao, Z.; Sun, J.-K.; Yuan, J. Poly(ionic liquid) composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 1726–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Sorkhi, S.E.S.; Hashemi, M.M.; Ezabadi, A. Introduction of a novel dicationic Brönsted acidic ionic liquid based on pyrazine and its application in the synthesis of xanthenediones and 3, 4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones under solvent-free conditions. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2020, 46, 2229–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cano, I.; Martin, C.; Fernandes, J.A.; Lodge, R.W.; Dupont, J.; Casado-Carmona, F.A.; Lucena, R.; Cardenas, S.; Sans, V.; de Pedro, I. Paramagnetic ionic liquid-coated SiO2@Fe3O4 nanoparticles—The next generation of magnetically recoverable nanocatalysts applied in the glycolysis of PET. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 260, 118110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Campisciano, V.; Giacalone, F.; Gruttadauria, M. Supported Ionic Liquids: A Versatile and Useful Class of Materials. Chem. Rec. 2017, 17, 918–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Arghan, M.; Koukabi, N.; Kolvari, E. Sulfonated-polyvinyl amine coated on Fe3O4 nanoparticles: A high-loaded and magnetically separable acid catalyst for multicomponent reactions. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2019, 16, 2333–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pourjavadi, A.; Hosseini, S.H.; Aghayeemeibody, S.A.; Hosseini, S.T. Poly(basic ionic liquid) coated magnetic nanoparticles: High-loaded supported basic ionic liquid catalyst. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2013, 16, 906–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rezaei, F.; Amrollahi, M.A.; Khalifeh, R. Brønsted Acidic Dicationic Ionic Liquid Immobilized on Fe3O4/SiO2 Nanoparticles as an Efficient and Magnetically Separable Catalyst for the Synthesis of Bispyrazoles. ChemistrySelect 2020, 5, 1760–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wu, Z.; Chen, C.; Wan, H.; Wang, L.; Li, Z.; Li, B.; Guo, Q.; Guan, G. Fabrication of Magnetic NH2-MIL-88B (Fe) Confined Brønsted Ionic Liquid as an Efficient Catalyst in Biodiesel Synthesis. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 10739–10746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Xie, W.; Wang, H. Synthesis of heterogenized polyoxometalate-based ionic liquids with Brönsted-Lewis acid sites: A magnetically recyclable catalyst for biodiesel production from low-quality oils. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020, 87, 162–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Fornalczyk, A. Industrial catalysts as a source of valuable metals. JAMME 2012, 55, 864–868. [Google Scholar]
  84. Eijsbouts, S.; Battiston, A.A.; Van Leerdam, G.C. Life cycle of hydroprocessing catalysts and total catalyst management. Catal. Today 2008, 130, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Innocenzi, V.; Ippolito, N.M.; De Michelis, I.; Prisciandaro, M.; Medici, F.; Vegliò, F. A review of the processes and lab-scale techniques for the treatment of spent rechargeable NiMH batteries. J. Power Sources 2017, 362, 202–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hu, J.; Wang, X.; Xiao, L.; Song, S.; Zhang, B. Removal of vanadium from molybdate solution by ion exchange. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 95, 203–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Cai, Y.; Ma, L.; Xi, X.; Nie, Z.; Nie, Z. Separation of tungsten and molybdenum using selective precipitation with manganese sulfate assisted by cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB). Hydrometallurgy 2020, 198, 105494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wu, W.-C.; Tsai, T.-Y.; Shen, Y.-H. Tungsten Recovery from Spent SCR Catalyst Using Alkaline Leaching and Ion Exchange. Minerals 2016, 6, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Changming, D.; Chao, S.; Gong, X.; Ting, W.; Xiange, W. Plasma methods for metals recovery from metal–containing waste. Waste Manag. 2018, 77, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Marafi, M.; Rana, M.S. Refinery waste: The spent hydroprocessing catalyst and its recycling options. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2016, 202, 219–230. [Google Scholar]
  91. Wiecka, Z.; Rzelewska-Piekut, M.; Cierpiszewski, R.; Staszak, K.; Regel-Rosocka, M. Hydrometallurgical Recovery of Cobalt(II) from Spent Industrial Catalysts. Catalyst 2020, 10, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Amiri, F.; Yaghmaei, S.; Mousavi, S.; Sheibani, S. Recovery of metals from spent refinery hydrocracking catalyst using adapted Aspergillus niger. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 109, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The catalyst’s life cycle.
Figure 1. The catalyst’s life cycle.
Catalysts 11 00591 g001
Figure 2. Schematization of filtration processes: gravity, centrifugal, pressure, and vacuum.
Figure 2. Schematization of filtration processes: gravity, centrifugal, pressure, and vacuum.
Catalysts 11 00591 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the sedimentation and the centrifugation processes.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the sedimentation and the centrifugation processes.
Catalysts 11 00591 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of recovery methods: filtration, centrifugation, and magnetic separation.
Figure 4. Comparison of recovery methods: filtration, centrifugation, and magnetic separation.
Catalysts 11 00591 g004
Figure 5. Schematic representation of the magnetic separation.
Figure 5. Schematic representation of the magnetic separation.
Catalysts 11 00591 g005
Figure 6. Methods of recovery of metals from spent catalysts: pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy, and biometallurgy.
Figure 6. Methods of recovery of metals from spent catalysts: pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy, and biometallurgy.
Catalysts 11 00591 g006
Figure 7. Main advantages of tetronic’s DC plasma arc technology.
Figure 7. Main advantages of tetronic’s DC plasma arc technology.
Catalysts 11 00591 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miceli, M.; Frontera, P.; Macario, A.; Malara, A. Recovery/Reuse of Heterogeneous Supported Spent Catalysts. Catalysts 2021, 11, 591.

AMA Style

Miceli M, Frontera P, Macario A, Malara A. Recovery/Reuse of Heterogeneous Supported Spent Catalysts. Catalysts. 2021; 11(5):591.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miceli, Mariachiara, Patrizia Frontera, Anastasia Macario, and Angela Malara. 2021. "Recovery/Reuse of Heterogeneous Supported Spent Catalysts" Catalysts 11, no. 5: 591.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop