Next Article in Journal
Nanobiocatalysts for Biodiesel Synthesis through Transesterification—A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Au or Pt@Perovskite Nanocrystals via Interfacial Photoreduction
Previous Article in Journal
A “Superaerophobic” Se-Doped CoS2 Porous Nanowires Array for Cost-Saving Hydrogen Evolution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analyses of the Effect of Peptidoglycan on Photocatalytic Bactericidal Activity Using Different Growth Phases Cells of Gram-Positive Bacterium and Spheroplast Cells of Gram-Negative Bacterium
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/catal11020172
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of Adsorption in the Photocatalytic Decomposition of Dyes on APTES-Modified TiO2 Nanomaterials

by
Ewelina Kusiak-Nejman
*,
Agnieszka Sienkiewicz
,
Agnieszka Wanag
,
Paulina Rokicka-Konieczna
and
Antoni W. Morawski
Department of Inorganic Chemical Technology and Environment Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Technology and Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Pułaskiego 10, 70-322 Szczecin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2021, 11(2), 172; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11020172
Submission received: 15 December 2020 / Revised: 16 January 2021 / Accepted: 21 January 2021 / Published: 27 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Commemorative Issue in Honor of Professor Akira Fujishima)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This work investigated for the first time the role of adsorption in the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue and Orange II dyes in the presence of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES)-modified TiO2 nanomaterials. It has been demonstrated that the decrease in adsorption has a detrimental effect on photocatalytic activity. APTES/TiO2 photocatalysts were successfully prepared by solvothermal modification of TiO2 in a pressure autoclave, followed by heat treatment in an inert gas atmosphere at the temperature range from 300 °C to 900 °C. It was observed that functionalization of TiO2 via APTES effectively suppressed the anatase-to-rutile phase transformation, as well as the growth of crystallites size during calcination, and reduction of specific surface area (APTES modification inhibits sintering of crystallites). The noted alterations in the adsorption properties, observed after the calcination, were generally related to changes in the surface characteristics, mainly surface charges expressed by the zeta potential. Positively charged surface enhances adsorption of anionic dye (Orange II), while negatively charged surface was better for adsorption of cationic dye (methylene blue). The adsorption process substantially affects the efficiency of the photocatalytic oxidation of both dyes. The methylene blue decomposition proceeded according to the pseudo-first and pseudo-second-order kinetic models, while the degradation of Orange II followed the zero, pseudo-first, and pseudo-second order kinetic models.

1. Introduction

In addition to consuming large amounts of water, the textile industry also uses a wide range of synthetic dyes, as a result of which it contributes to the discharge of a large quantity of wastewater. In the states of Gujarat and Maharashtra, India, the annual production of synthetic dyes for textiles and other industries is about 130,000 tons, and due to the high toxicity, solubility, mutagenicity and lack of biodegradability, these colourants are one of the most problematic and hazardous water pollutants [1]. Therefore, many researchers are trying to develop the best method to remove different types of dye from water.
Currently, the elimination of this organic contaminant is carried out using various techniques such as flocculation and coagulation [2,3], biological oxidation [4,5], adsorption [6,7], and membrane filtration [5,8]. Recent studies also focus on using advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) to decompose synthetic dyes present in water. Among AOPs, for example, H2O2/ultraviolet (UV) processes [9] or Fenton and photo-Fenton catalytic reactions [10,11], heterogeneous photocatalysis using titanium dioxide as a photocatalyst appear to be one of the most influential technologies [12,13]. The main advantages are that photocatalysis could be carried out under ambient conditions, does not involve mass transfer, and can also lead to total transformation of organic carbon to CO2 [14]. Additionally, TiO2 is widely used due to its low cost, chemical and biological stability, low toxicity, and high photoactivity [15].
It is commonly known that photocatalytic reactions occur primarily on the surface of the semiconductor. Therefore, the adsorption of contaminants on the surface of the material plays a crucial role in affecting the photodegradation efficiency [16]. Many experiments measured the adsorption and the kinetics of photodecomposition of various dyes on TiO2, for instance, Reactive Black [17], Rhodamine B [18,19], Orange II [20], methylene blue [17,21], Direct Green 99 [22] and thionine [19]. In all presented research, organic compounds are adsorbed on the surface of the semiconductor, until the adsorption-desorption equilibrium between the dye molecules and the TiO2 surface is reached. After that, the lamps are turned on, and the photooxidation is carried out [22]. Moreover, Zhu et al. [23] noted that the high adsorption capacity of polythiophene/TiO2 photocatalyst could potentially increase the rate of photocatalytic decomposition of methyl orange. Wang et al. [24] also reported that the enhancement of the degradation kinetics of dyes after fluorination of TiO2 was due to increased adsorption and decreased flat band potential.
Additionally, TiO2 surface properties are also crucial for the effectiveness of photooxidation. Therefore, photocatalytic studies’ significant field concentrates on modifying TiO2 to improve its physicochemical properties and photocatalytic activity [21]. In recent years, organosilanes such as 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES), as surface modifiers, have received increasing research interest, since most applications of modified nanomaterials require them to be chemically and thermally stable, well dispersed in the media and characterized by a large specific surface area [25,26]. For example, APTES-modified TiO2 nanoparticles have been used to induce the self-cleaning capability of ceramic tiles [27] or-enhance the decomposition degree of Reactive Brilliant Red X-3B [28]. Moreover, the adsorption properties of organic dyes (Acid Orange 7 and Reactive Blue 19) on the APTES-functionalized TiO2 pigment surface was also investigated [29]. In this case, the modified rutile titanium oxide was used as an adsorbent, and due to the weak photoactivity of this polymorphous form of TiO2 no photocatalytic degradation of tested dyes was performed.
In the present study, the APTES-modified TiO2 nanomaterials were obtained by a solvothermal process, and then calcination in an inert gas atmosphere. This combined method has been proposed for the first time by our research group [30]. Other preparation methods described in the literature, where APTES-modified TiO2 were utilized in the removal process of dyes by adsorption or photooxidation, involve the sol-gel method [28] and simple mixing of TiO2 slurry with aminosilane coupling agents [29]. Here, two commercial textile dyes: cationic methylene blue and anionic Orange II, were removed from aqueous solution. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper presenting the results of research on the role of adsorption in the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue and Orange II in the presence of APTES-modified TiO2 photocatalysts. The novelty of the presented studies was also to establish the impact of modifying the efficiency and potential reuse of the prepared photocatalysts during subsequent dye decomposition cycles.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Materials

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of APTES/TiO2 nanomaterials are presented in Figure 1. The structural characteristics of the starting-TiO2 and calcined reference samples were discussed in detail in our previously published work [30]. Except for the sample calcined at 900 °C, all tested nanomaterials showed reflections characteristic of the anatase phase located at 25.3, 37.8, 48.1, 53.9, 55.1, 62.7, 68.9, 70.3 and 75.1°, which correspond to (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), (204), (116), (220), (215) indexed by JCPDS 01-070-7348, and certain reflections characteristic of the rutile phase located in 27.4, 36.0 and 41.2°, corresponding to (110), (101) and (111) indexed by JCPDS 01-076-0318. While the TiO2-Ar-900°C sample demonstrated only reflections characteristic for the rutile phase located at 27.4, 36.0, 39.1, 41.2, 44.0, 54.3, 56.6, 62.7, 64.0, 69.0 and 69.7°, which correspond to (110), (101), (200), (111), (210), (211), (220), (002), (310), (301) and (112), respectively. The presence of rutile in the starting-TiO2 resulted from the addition of rutile nuclei during the production process of TiO2 pulp via sulphate technology. For starting-TiO2, the anatase-to-rutile phase transformation typically occurs between 600 °C and 700 °C [31,32]. In our case, the phase transformation started above 500 °C, and starting TiO2 was fully transformed into rutile at 900 °C [30]. According to the XRD phase composition and the crystallites size data shown in Table 1, the amount of anatase in APTES-modified TiO2 samples was constant, and its content was about 96%. Moreover, it is important to note that after calcination at 900 °C, the TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–900°C sample still contained 95% of anatase phase. Silicon present in the APTES contributed to the effective suppression of anatase-to-rutile phase transformation during thermal modification [33,34,35]. For all tested photocatalysts, the crystallites size enhanced with the increase of the modification temperature. For starting-TiO2 and calcined reference samples, the crystallites size of anatase was in the range of 14–52 nm [30], and 14–30 nm for APTES/TiO2 nanomaterials. Whereas, the crystallites size of rutile for starting-TiO2 and reference samples was from 21 nm to >100 nm, and from 46 nm to 79 nm for APTES/TiO2 nanomaterials. Nevertheless, comparing the crystallites size of photocatalysts calcined at the same temperature with and without APTES, the crystallites size of both polymorphous forms of TiO2 was significantly smaller for APTES-modified samples than for the reference materials. For example, the anatase crystallite size for TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–700°C sample equalled only 17 nm, while for TiO2-Ar–700°C it was 52 nm [30]. According to Dalod et al. [33], the use of such stabilizers as APTES can lead to the formation of an amorphous SiO2 layer on the surface, derived from the organosilane coupling agent, and leading to TiO2-SiO2 core-shell nanostructures, so that, during the thermal modification both the growth of the crystallites size and phase transformation can be successfully inhibited. Furthermore, the results presented by Lu et al. [35] and Xu et al. [36] also showed that silicon could effectively suppress the growth of titania grains over the calcination process.
In Figure 2 the adsorption-desorption isotherms of the obtained photocatalysts were shown. Most of them presented a type IV isotherm in IUPAC classification, characteristic for mesoporous materials [37]. Other nanomaterials presented the H3 type of the hysteresis loops. The H3 loops have characteristic desorption shoulders, lower closure points, and no plateau in the high p/p0 value [38,39]. The pore size distribution was presented in Figure S1 (in the Supplementary Materials section).
Furthermore, according to the data exhibited in Table 1, most of the tested semiconductors were mesoporous materials with a small number of micropores (except for the TiO2-Ar–900°C sample that was a non-porous material, as presented in our previous paper [30]). In starting TiO2, after modification with 500 mM of APTES, a significant decrease of the specific surface area and total pore volume was noted. Compared to the starting-TiO2, the SBET of TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM reduced by 67 m2/g and Vtotal by 0.098 cm3/g. Dalod et al. [33] observed that TiO2 surface functionalization using different silane coupling agents such as 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, 3-(2-aminoethylamino)propyl- dimethoxy-methylsilane and n-decyltriethoxysilane decreased the specific surface area, from 195 m2/g for unmodified TiO2 to 178 m2/g, 149 m2/g and 114 m2/g, respectively. Siwińska-Stefańska et al. [40] also noted that modification via different alkoxysilanes compounds such as vinyltrimethoxysilane, n-2-(aminoethyl)-3-aminopropyltrimethoxy- silane and 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane, caused a decrease of the SBET and Vtotal of obtained nanomaterials. This was most likely because the modifier particles blocked the active centers on the TiO2-SiO2 surface. Zhuang et al. [41] also found that the specific surface area and the pore volume were smaller for the nanocomposites than for the unmodified TiO2 because APTES also penetrated inside the pores, rather than only dispersing on the external surface.
After calcination, the SBET of APTES-modified TiO2 increased from 140 m2/g for TiO2–4 h–120 °C–500mM through 158 m2/g for the sample calcined at 300 °C to 170 m2/g for heated at 500 °C. Diminishing and eventually disappearing APTES-characteristic peaks with the increase of the modification temperature, observed on diffuse reflectance Fourier-transform infrared spectra (DRIFTS), presented in Figure 3, as well as the observed significant decrease in carbon and nitrogen content (see Table 2) indicated the unblocking of the surface of the nanomaterials. Therefore, the increase in the specific surface area was related to the decomposition of APTES molecules during the calcination process. The increase of Vtotal value from 0.242 cm3/g (for sample calcined at 300 °C) to 0.272 cm3/g after thermal modification at 500 °C, also pointed out that the modifier molecules unblocked both the external surface of TiO2 and the pores. As shown in Table 1, a further increase in the modification temperature above 500 °C caused a decrease in the specific surface area and pore volume of the tested photocatalysts, which resulted in the increase of the anatase and rutile crystallites size and sintering of photocatalysts particles [42].
The DRIFTS measurements were utilized to determine the surface characteristics of the prepared photocatalysts. All spectra presented in Figure 3 showed a narrow band at 1620 cm−1, as well as a wide band from 3700 cm−1 to 2500 cm−1, associated with the molecular water and stretching vibrations of surface hydroxyl groups [28,43,44]. An increase of the modification temperature of APTES/TiO2 samples resulted in a decrease of the intensity of these bands, due to the changes in the amount of surface −OH groups [45,46]. All materials exhibited the intensive band at around 950 cm−1 assigned to the self-absorption of titania [46,47]. Some new characteristic bands of APTES were observed in the spectra, shown in Figure 3, which indicates that the modified photocatalysts were prepared successfully. The bands detected at 2900 cm−1 and 2885 cm−1, which belongs to the bending and stretching contributions of the alkyl groups [(CHn)] [48,49,50]. The asymmetric −NH3+ deformation modes were observed near 1600 cm−1 [49,51,52]. Another low-intensity band at 1360 cm−1, indicating the existence of C−N bonds [51,53]. Bands noted 960–910 cm−1 ascribe the stretching vibrations of Ti–O–Si chemical interactions [54,55]. Additionally, the band localized at 920 cm−1 indicated the condensation reaction between silanol and −OH groups on the surface of the semiconductor [54]. Above 300 °C, bands characteristic for APTES assigned to alkyl groups, −NH3+, C−N and Ti–O–Si bonds were no longer observed. Furthermore, the band at around 1165 cm−1 corresponds to the Si−O−Si stretching vibrations, created by the condensation reaction between silanol groups [43,51]. The presence of Si−O−C stretching mode was noted at around 1085 cm−1 [51,53].
From the ultraviolet–visible diffuse reflectance spectra (UV–Vis/DRS) of all APTES- modified TiO2, shown in Figure 4, it was noted that TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM exhibited the characteristic absorption in the UV region due to the intrinsic band gap absorption of Ti [56,57]. Moreover, for all APTES/TiO2 photocatalysts calcined in an inert gas conditions, the f reflectance in the visible range decreased as the heating temperature increased, due to the change of colour from white for TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM through greyish for TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–500°C, to dark grey for TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–900°C material [58,59]. Interestingly, the bang gap energy values determined for all calcined APTES-modified TiO2 samples did not change in comparison to starting titania sample, including nanomaterials calcined at 700 and 900 °C. These results also provide the evidence of the inhibition of phase transition.
Following the data presented in Table 2, the occurrence of carbon (3.34 wt.%) and nitrogen (1.24 wt.%) in TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM sample, confirmed the presence of APTES in the material obtained after TiO2 modification. Additionally, it was found that the content of the analyzed elements decreased with the increase of calcination temperature, most probably as a result of nitrogen and carbon decomposition from the solid phase [46,60]. The data obtained from DRIFT spectra (see Figure 3) agreed with the analysis of carbon and nitrogen content, which showed a continued decrease of carbon and nitrogen in APTES-modified TiO2 samples as the calcination temperature increases. The preparation procedure can explain the presence of nitrogen in the starting-TiO2 (preliminary rinsing with NH4OH), used to eliminate the residual sulfuric acid from the raw slurry of TiO2 obtained by sulphate technology [61].
Based on the data shown in Table 2, the zeta potential values of APTES/TiO2 photocatalysts changed from +4.43 mV for TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM to −36.13 mV for TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–900°C. Goscianska et al. [62], Ukaji et al. [54] and Talavera-Pech et al. [63] found that the amine groups of APTES tend to gain protons, and thus, NH3+ species can be formed. The NH3+ can easily be attached to the TiO2 surface, which results in a positive surface charge of the semiconductor. The FT-IR/DR spectra presented in Figure 3, as well as the noted significant decrease of the nitrogen content (see Table 2), showed that the positively charged amino groups were not observed on the TiO2 surface when the calcination temperature exceeded 300 °C. Above this temperature, mostly silicon groups were found on the TiO2 surface. Wilhelm et al. [64] and Ferreira-Neto et al. [65] noted that silica-modified TiO2 exhibited negative zeta potential values. The zeta potential of APTES/TiO2 nanomaterials prepared via calcination at temperature above 300 °C, changed from positive to negative.

2.2. Adsorption Experiments

Before the photocatalytic activity test, studies on determination of the adsorption-desorption equilibrium were performed. The adsorption degree of methylene blue was shown in Figure 5 while the adsorption degree of Orange II was presented in Figure 6A,B. For methylene blue the adsorption-desorption equilibrium was established after 60 min for starting TiO2 and TiO2–4 h–120 °C–500mM samples, whereas after 180 min for calcined reference materials and APTES-modified TiO2 nanomaterials received after the calcination. Different adsorption-desorption equilibrium time is associated with the surface characteristics of semiconductors (see Table 2). For starting TiO2, all calcined reference materials [30], TiO2–4 h–120 °C–500mM and TiO2–4 h–120 °C–500mM-Ar-300°C, the adsorption degree of methylene blue reached c.a. 5%. For other APTES/TiO2 nanomaterials, an increase of the calcination temperature above 300 °C resulted in the notable improvement of adsorption properties. Based on zeta potential values (shown in Table 2), for materials with positively charged surface, the low adsorption of a cationic dye was observed. While, photocatalysts with the negatively charged surface exhibited a good adsorption efficiency, due to the higher potential of contact with the positively charged methylene blue molecules. The highest adsorption degree of methylene blue equalled 30%, was found for the TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–900°C sample with the most negative zeta potential value of −36.13 mV and the lowest value for specific surface area. Therefore, the change in TiO2 surface charge after calcination from positive to negative was found to be the main factor that enhances the adsorption properties of the APTES-modified TiO2 [66,67,68]. It can be additionally noted that both photocatalysts calcined at 900 °C exhibited a different dye adsorption degree, although almost the same zeta potential value characterized them (for TiO2-Ar-900°C was only 5%). For this reason, the noted enhancement of the adsorption properties at the highest temperature of modification was mainly associated with the values of specific surface area (50 m2/g for TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar-900°C and 3 m2/g for TiO2-Ar-900°C [30]). It was confirmed that APTES modification successfully prevents the anatase-to-rutile transformation and sintering of the crystallites at a higher temperature of calcination process.
For Orange II, the adsorption-desorption equilibrium was established after 90 min for all calcined reference materials, whereas after 60 min for starting and calcined APTES-modified TiO2 photocatalysts. In case of TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM sample, significant Orange II desorption (approximately 23%) was observed prior to the adsorption-desorption equilibrium established after 240 min. For APTES/TiO2 photocatalysts, the increase of the calcination temperature resulted in a decrease of adsorption properties related to the change of the TiO2 surface charge from positive to negative (see Table 2). The positively charged surface of the semiconductor has a higher potential of contact with the negatively charged dye molecules like Orange II. Therefore, for nanomaterials with a negatively charged surface, the low adsorption efficiency of anionic dye was noted [20,66,67,68,69].

Adsorption Capacity

To better understand the adsorption process, additional tests were conducted to determine the adsorption capacity of examined materials. The values of constants and correlation coefficients for Freundlich, Langmuir, Langmuir–Freundlich, and Temkin isotherm models are listed in Table S1 for methylene blue and in Table S2 for Orange II dye.
Based on the correlation coefficients obtained for methylene blue adsorption, it was revealed that the Langmuir and Langmuir–Freundlich isotherm models gave similar and the best simulation of the experimental data with the highest R2 for all APTES-modified TiO2 samples. The Langmuir–Freundlich isotherm model describes most accurately the adsorption properties of starting-TiO2 and all calcined reference photocatalysts, while for TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM the best simulation of the experimental data provided the Temkin isotherm. For photocatalysts that have shown the best fit to the Langmuir–Freundlich isotherm model, it can be assumed that the surface of the semiconductors is heterogeneous [70]. The increase of the adsorption capacity for methylene blue can be explained as the effects of modification, including an increase of the specific surface area (see Table 1), a change in surface charge (see Table 2), and mesoporous structure of APTES/TiO2 nanomaterials [20,71].
Following the calculated correlation coefficients, the experimental equilibrium data for the adsorption of Orange II for starting TiO2 and reference samples calcined at 300–700 °C were most closely fitted to the Freundlich isotherm. TiO2-Ar–900°C and TiO2–4 h–120°C–500mM-Ar-900°C samples were found to be the weakest adsorbents of Orange II dye due to the negative character of the surface (see Table 2), and characterized by negligible adsorption of anionic dye (see Figure 6A,B), which effectively made it very difficult to match the appropriate model of adsorption isotherm. For TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM and APTES-modified TiO2 calcined at 300–700 °C, the best simulation of the experimental data was provided by the Freundlich or Langmuir–Freundlich isotherm model. It can be concluded that the surfaces of APTES-modified semiconductors are heterogeneous [20,71]. The noted increase of the n and qm values was related to the change of surface charge from negative to positive due to TiO2 modification (see Table 2) [20,71,72].

2.3. Photocatalytic Activity Test

The photocatalytic activity of the examined nanomaterials was calculated based on the degradation of methylene blue and Orange II dyes under UV light irradiation. Tests performed in the absence of the photocatalyst (see Figure 7A and Figure 8A) revealed that, for both methylene blue and Orange II, the decomposition due to the photolysis process was insignificant compared to the photocatalysis process. After 360 min of exposure under the same conditions as in the photocatalytic activity tests, about 2.5% decomposition of dyes was recorded.
For methylene blue, a significant improvement of the photoactivity from 39% to 95% for starting TiO2 was noted only for the nanomaterial calcined at 700 °C, consisting of 88% of anatase and 12% of rutile phase, and the band gap energy value of 3.07 eV [30]. Ohno et al. [73] observed that TiO2, being an optimal mixture of anatase and rutile phases, exhibited higher photocatalytic activity than TiO2 composed of only one phase. Moreover, the co-existence of various-forms of TiO2 is essential for determining the TiO2 photoactivity, and the most effective performance during methylene blue degradation was achieved for photocatalysts with slightly reduced Eg (3.04 eV) and a mixture of both phases. Additionally, these samples did not have the largest SBET among all examined materials. After 240 min of exposure to UV light, the methylene blue removal degree determined in the presence of TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM sample compared to starting TiO2, enhanced from 39% to 82% (see Figure 9). After modification of TiO2 via APTES, the increase of the efficiency was essentially associated with the presence of nitrogen and carbon in the materials obtained (see Table 2) [74]. After thermal modification, almost all APTES/TiO2 photocatalysts showed an improved methylene blue decomposition degree in comparison to reference materials heat treated at the same temperature. Only TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–700°C sample showed a slight 7% decrease in efficiency compared to TiO2-Ar-700°C. The reported increase in the activity was related to the fact that the modification with APTES, which is a good source of silicon, effectively suppressed the anatase-to-rutile phase transformation, as well as the growth of crystallites size (see Table 1). The growth of the anatase phase crystallinity and the decrease of the bulk defects after thermal modification resulted in an increase of the electron diffusion rate to the surface of the semiconductor by inhibiting electron-hole recombination.
Furthermore, the high porosity facilitated the mass transfer of reagents such as reaction by-products or oxygen, contributing to enhancing the photoactivity of the tested calcined APTES-functionalized TiO2 photocatalysts [75,76]. Moreover, it was found that APTES-modified TiO2 samples calcined at 500–900 °C were characterized not only by a high dye decomposition degree (see Figure 9), but also by excellent adsorption properties (see Figure 5). These observations were consistent with the reports indicating that the adsorption process strongly influences the photocatalytic degradation reaction [20,24,77]. Furthermore, it was noted that APTES/TiO2 nanomaterial calcined at 900 °C showed the highest efficiency enhancement concerning the reference material. Methylene blue decomposition degree of TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–900°C increased by 58% compared to TiO2-Ar-900°C. Since both photocatalysts showed similar zeta potential values (see Table 2), the noticed gain of activity was mostly related to the suppression of anatase-to-rutile phase transformation, thus the higher value of the SBET of the modified samples (see Table 1).
In the case of Orange II, after calcination at 300 °C and 500 °C, a slight decrease (approximately 10% and 5%, respectively) in the photocatalytic activity was noted in comparison to starting TiO2. Significant reduction of the decomposition degree (approximately 95%) was observed for TiO2-Ar–900°C, which was associated with the complete formation of the rutile phase and an increase in the aggregation of molecules, which reduced the specific surface area [30]. After TiO2 modification with APTES, the photocatalytic activity of TiO2-4h–120°C-500mM decreased by 90% after 240 min of irradiation compared to the starting TiO2. For TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM sample, after 60 min of UV light irradiation, significant desorption of dye molecules from the surface of the photocatalyst was noted (see Figure 8B), which may be related to the increase of the temperature of the reaction suspension, caused by the heat generated by the 6 lamps used in the experiments. The significant amount of the Orange II molecules released effectively disrupted the photocatalytic decomposition, causing a decrease in the activity. It was noted that APTES-modified TiO2 calcined at 300 °C and 500 °C exhibited a significantly lower decomposition degree of Orange II than the reference materials prepared at the same temperature. The TiO2-Ar–300 °C and TiO2-Ar–500 °C samples (see Figure 6A) exhibited a higher adsorption degree of Orange II than TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–300°C and TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–500°C materials (see Figure 6B). The reference samples calcined at 300 °C and 500 °C showed almost identical phase composition and were characterized by a smaller specific surface area than the corresponding APTES-modified TiO2 nanomaterials (see Table 1), the obtained results imply that the adsorption process had a strong influence on the Orange II degradation. Our observations were consistent with the reports indicating that the adsorption process has a substantial impact on the photocatalytic oxidation process and may improve the efficiency of the studied materials [20,24,77]. As the modification temperature increased, the difference between the dye decomposition degree achieved by the reference materials and those modified with APTES decreased. For photocatalysts calcined at 300 °C, the difference in yield was 58%, and at 500 °C it equaled 34%, while at 700 °C the difference in efficiency was only 4%. Only for TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–900°C did the sample show a 92% increase in photoactivity after 240 min of exposure to UV light compared to the TiO2-Ar–900 °C (see Figure 10). Similar to the methylene blue decomposition, because both materials exhibited almost the same zeta potential values, the noted increase in the photoactivity was connected with the effective suppression of anatase-to-rutile phase transformation (see Table 1) and still the relatively high specific surface area of TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–900°C sample (50 m2/g) in comparison to TiO2-Ar–900°C (3 m2/g) [30,75].
The apparent reaction rate constants were established to better understand the photocatalytic decomposition process of both methylene blue and Orange II. The zero- order, pseudo-first order, and pseudo-second order linear transformations are presented for methylene blue in Figure S2A,B, and for Orange II in Figure S3A–C, respectively. The reaction rate constants were determined after 240 min of exposure to UV light, due to the fact that when the irradiation time was extended to 360 min, after 240 min the points in the graph start to deviate from the typical linear course of the curve (see Figures S2B and S3C). The reported reduction in the reaction rate was related to the formation of intermediates during the decomposition of dyes and the adsorption of these carbon deposits on the surface of the semiconductor. To avoid impairing the visibility of all graphs, the kinetics of the decomposition after 360 min of irradiation were presented only for the pseudo-second order reactions.
It was found that the degradation of methylene blue in the case of starting-TiO2, the reference materials calcined at 300–700 °C [30] and TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM followed the Langmuir–Hinshelwood pseudo-first order model. According to the pseudo-second- order model for TiO2-Ar–900°C and all APTES/TiO2 nanomaterials after calcination proceeds. It was noted that after TiO2 functionalization via APTES combined with thermal modification, the kinetics of the methylene blue decomposition changed from pseudo-first to the pseudo-second order. The calculated reaction rate constants were listed in Table S3.
The degradation of Orange II in the case of TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM, TiO2-Ar-500°C and TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–300°C followed the zero-order model, while for TiO2-Ar–900°C proceeds according to the pseudo-second-order model. For all other photocatalysts, the decomposition was in accordance with the pseudo-first order model. Based on the data shown in Table S4, the obtained values of k0 were 0.0171 mg/(L·min) for TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM sample, 0.0337 mg/(L·min) for the reference material and 0.0175 mg/(L·min) for TiO2-modified APTES calcined at 300 °C. The noted values of k1 were between 0.0019 L/min and 0.0143 L/min. For TiO2-Ar–900°C sample, k2 equalled 0.0001 L/(min·mg).

The Reusability Tests

Determining the stability of photocatalysts in subsequent cycles of pollutants decomposition plays a crucial role in assessing the possibility of their industrial use. The performance of the studied nanomaterials was tested for four subsequent photocatalytic cycles. For methylene blue decomposition, the results obtained were shown in Figure 11A–E, and for Orange II in Figure 12A–E. In the case of methylene blue, the modification in the Ar atmosphere at 500 °C (TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–500°C) and 700 °C (TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–700°C) contributed to an improvement in the stability compared to TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM sample. After the first cycle, the decomposition degree of TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM reduced by about 31%, whereas after calcination the photocatalytic activity decreased by about 21% and 26%, respectively. The increase in SBET and Vtotal after calcination (see Table 1) improved the performance of subsequent dye decomposition cycles. Moreover, DRIFT spectra presented in Figure 3, as well as the results of the C and N content shown in Table 2, confirmed the absence of carbon and nitrogen in the materials obtained after the calcination process, the leaching of which reduced the effectiveness of TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM sample [74].
Additionally, to explain the decrease in the efficiency of calcined materials, after the last fourth cycle of methylene blue decomposition, DRIFT spectra of selected photocatalysts were measured and shown in Figure 13A in combination with the spectra of samples before the exposure process. The observed change in the shape of the spectra after four cycles indicates that the structure of the semiconductor has changed during the photocatalytic reaction. An apparent increase in the intensity of the band located from 1200 cm−1 to 1600 cm−1 suggested that in subsequent cycles carbon deposits originating from methylene blue appeared, which caused a decrease in the photocatalytic activity [78].
For TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM and TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–300°C samples, a significant enhancement in yield was noted in the subsequent cycles of Orange II decomposition (see Figure 12A,B). Compared to the first cycle, the decomposition degree of TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM increased from 38% to 100% after the second cycle and remained at this level even after the last cycle. For TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–300°C there was a gradual increase in activity from 49% after the first cycle, through 82% after the second to 96% after the fourth cycle. The materials calcined at 500 °C and 900 °C had relatively high stability, because after four cycles only a slight decrease in the activity of 9% and 5%, respectively, was recorded. Only a TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–700°C sample exhibited a slight reduction in the activity during the reusability test, for which the decomposition degree decreased from 100% after the first cycle to 80% after the fourth cycle. The increase in the activity and high stability of photocatalysts in the subsequent cycles of Orange II decomposition resulted from the appearance of −SiO3− groups on the TiO2 surface, which were observed on DRIFT spectra at 1175 cm−1 (see Figure 13B) [78]. According to the literature [17], the presence of the −SO3− group could be assumed to improve the removal efficiency. An increase in the intensity of the band located from 1200 cm−1 to 1600 cm−1 indicated that in subsequent cycles semiproducts originating from Orange II decomposition appeared, which contributed to a slight decrease in the efficiency of the sample calcined at 700 °C. Apart from the confirmed significant influence of the phase composition on the photocatalytic efficiency, the obtained FT-IR/DR spectra demonstrated that the reduction of the dye decomposition degree was strongly influenced by the adsorption of methylene blue on the surface of the tested nanomaterials. A negatively charged surface of APTES-modified photocatalysts impacts the sorption of degradation co-products of methylene blue in each next cycle, thus decreasing the photoactivity. On the other hand, the presence of the negative-loaded groups on the surface of tested materials (i.e. SiO3− groups) inhibits sorption of Orange II degradation semiproducts. Therefore, the adsorption process also plays an essential role in the photocatalytic decomposition of pollutants [17,79,80].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Reagents

Crude TiO2 pulp, purchased from the chemical plant Grupa Azoty Zakłady Chemiczne “Police” S.A. (Police, Poland), was used as a TiO2 source. Before modification, the raw pulp was pre-prepared to reach pH equal to 6.8 due to the presence of post-production sulphuric acid remains. This stage was described in detail in our previous article [61]. The received material was named as starting TiO2. 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES, C9H23NO3Si, ≥98%) from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) was used as a modifier of the TiO2. Ethyl alcohol (purity 96%, pure p.a.) purchased from P.P.H. “STANLAB” Sp.J. (Lublin, Poland) was used as a solvent of APTES. During photocatalytic decomposition tests, Orange II (C16H11N2NaO4S, ≥85%, Firma Chempur®, Piekary Śląskie, Poland) and methylene blue (C16H18ClN3S, ≥82%, Firma Chempur®, Piekary Śląskie, Poland) were used as model organic water pollution.

3.2. Synthesis of 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES)-Modified TiO2

The APTES/TiO2 nanomaterials were obtained by the solvothermal process and calcination. In the beginning, 5 g of starting TiO2 was dispersed in 25 mL of APTES solution. The concentration of the modifier in ethanol was 500 mM. Next, the prepared mixture was modified in a pressure autoclave for 4 h at 120 °C, ensuring continuous stirring at 500 rpm. Then, the suspension obtained was rinsed with ethanol and distilled water to eliminate all residual chemicals. The sample was dried at 105 °C for 24 h in a lab dryer. The material obtained was denoted as TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM. Finally, the prepared material was heated in argon atmosphere (purity 5.0, Messer Polska Sp. z o.o., Chorzów, Poland). The quartz crucible containing the obtained photocatalyst was placed inside a quartz tube in the middle of the GHC 12/900 horizontal furnace (Carbolite Gero, Ltd., Sheffield, UK). Calcination was conducted in the range of 300–900 °C (Δt = 200 °C). Prior to the heating step, the argon was passed through the quartz tube for 30 min to remove the air present in the quartz pipe. After that, the furnace was heated up to the set temperature in the argon flow of 180 mL/min. The calcination time was 4 h. After the set time, the furnace was slowly cooled down to room temperature. Nanomaterials received after the thermal modification of starting TiO2 in the Ar atmosphere were named as reference samples denoted as TiO2-Ar-t, while APTES/TiO2 materials obtained after heat treatment were marked as TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar-t, where t is the calcination temperature.

3.3. Characterization Methods

The low-temperature nitrogen adsorption-desorption measurements (conducted at 77 K) carried out on the QUADRASORB evoTM Gas Sorption analyzer (Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria) were used to calculate the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific surface area and pore volume. Before the measurements, all samples were degassed for 12 h at 100 °C under high vacuum to remove any residual contaminants present on the surface of tested materials. The single-point value determined the total pore volume from the nitrogen adsorption isotherms at relative pressure p/p0 = 0.99. Micropore volume was estimated using the Dubinin–Radushkevich method, while mesopore volume was determined as the difference between Vtotal and Vmicro. The zeta potential values were determined with the ZetaSizer NanoSeries ZS (Malvern PANalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK). The crystalline structure of the tested photocatalysts was identified by the X-ray powder diffraction analysis (Malvern PANalytical B.V., Almelo, Netherlands) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å). Scherrer’s equation was used to calculate the mean crystallites size. To identify the phase composition, the PDF-4+ 2014 International Centre for Diffraction Data database (for anatase: 04-002-8296 PDF4+ card, and for rutile: 04-005-5923 PDF4+ card) was applied. The FT-IR-4200 spectrometer (number of scans 100, resolution 4.0 cm−1, JASCO International Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with DiffuseIR accessory (PIKE Technologies, Fitchburg, WI, USA) was utilized to determine the surface functional groups and to notice the surface changes during the reusability test. The V-650 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (JASCO International Co., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a PIV-756 integrating sphere accessory for measuring DR spectra (JASCO International Co., Tokyo, Japan) was used to examine the light reflectance abilities of the new APTES/TiO2 samples. Spectralon® Diffuse Reflectance Material (Labsphere, New Hampshire, NE, USA) was applied as the reference material. The optical bandgap energy (Eg) of the samples was calculated by plotting [F(R)hυ]1/2 as a function of photon energy and next extrapolating the linear parts to [F(R)hυ]1/2 = 0 [81]. The CN 628 elemental analyzer (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, USA) was used to determine the total carbon and nitrogen content in the studied nanomaterials. The certified ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) standard (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, USA) containing 9.56 ± 0.03 wt.% of nitrogen and 41.06 ± 0.09 wt.% of carbon was utilized to prepare the calibration curve for preparing calibration curves. The error range for measurements was maximally ±0.1%.

3.4. Adsorption Capacity

To determine the adsorption capacity, the adsorption experiments were carried out in Erlenmeyer flask with starting-TiO2, reference samples and APTES-modified TiO2 nanomaterials, by stirring at 150 rpm 0.125 g of the photocatalyst in 0.25 L of methylene blue and Orange II aqueous solutions with concentrations of 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 15 mg/L, under light-free conditions in a thermostatic chamber at 20 °C (Pol-Eko-Aparatura sp.j., Włodzisław Śląski, Poland). This process continued for 240 min to establish the adsorption-desorption equilibrium between the dye and photocatalysts surface. Ultrapure water (Merck Millipore Sp. z o.o., Warszawa, Poland) was used to prepare all solutions. After 240 min, 10 mL of the withdrawn suspension was centrifuged to separate all suspended nanoparticles. The concentration of methylene blue and Orange II was analyzed by the V-630 UV-Vis spectrometer (JASCO International Co., Tokyo, Japan). The experimental equilibrium adsorption data were analyzed using Freundlich [82], Langmuir [72], Langmuir–Freundlich [70], and Temkin [71] isotherm models. The Statistica software (version 13.1) was used to plot the adsorption isotherms.

3.5. Photocatalytic Activity Test

Methylene blue and Orange II were selected for the photocatalytic activity and reusability tests. Photocatalytic decomposition was carried out under UV-Vis light with the radiation intensity of 65 W/m2 for 300–2800 nm and 36 W/m2 for the 280–400 nm region, supplied by a series of 6 lamps of 20 W each (Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Because of the low intensity of visible (Vis) irradiation used, this type of light was named as UV light. The experiments were performed in a 0.6 L glass beaker using 0.5 L of dye solution, with an initial concentration of 15 mg/L and the concentration of photocatalyst equalled 0.5 g/L. The experimental procedure consisted of two steps. Firstly, before the irradiation stage, the prepared suspension was magnetically stirred under dark conditions to establish the adsorption-desorption equilibrium between the TiO2 surface and dye molecules. The time necessary to achieve the adsorption-desorption equilibrium was determined based on research on the sorption properties of the photocatalysts. Secondly, the suspension was exposed to UV light irradiation. The total exposure time was 360 min. The dye concentration was measured every 60 min with the V-630 UV-Vis spectrometer (JASCO International Co., Tokyo, Japan). Prior to each measurement, 10 mL of the withdrawn suspension was centrifuged to remove all suspended photocatalyst nanoparticles. Additionally, the reusability test was determined based on the decomposition of dyes under UV light after 360 min of irradiation. After each cycle, the material was separated by filtration and dried for 12 h at 105 °C and then added to a new dose of the dye solution with appropriate initial concentration. Based on the results obtained, the reaction rates of model organic pollutants decomposition were determined by adjusting the appropriate order of the reaction. The zero reaction rate constant was established according to the zero-order model [47].
The pseudo-first reaction rate constant was calculated using the Langmuir– Hinshelwood pseudo-first order model and the pseudo-second reaction rate constant was determined following the pseudo-second order model [83].

4. Conclusions

The APTES/TiO2 nanomaterials were obtained by a solvothermal process at 120 °C, and subsequent calcination in Ar atmosphere in the range of 300 °C–900 °C. In the present article, for the first time, the role of adsorption in the photocatalytic decomposition of dyes on APTES-modified TiO2 nanomaterials, as well as the influence of calcination in the inert gas atmosphere on the adsorption capacity and stability of APTES/TiO2 samples were determined. The presence of the modifier on the TiO2 surface was confirmed by DRIFTS measurements and carbon and nitrogen content analysis. It was found that the Langmuir and Langmuir–Freundlich isotherm models, due to their highest fit, best describe the adsorption of methylene blue on the surface of the examined APTES-modified photocatalysts, while for the Orange II adsorption process, the best fit was found for Freundlich and Langmuir–Freundlich isotherm models. The recorded alterations in the adsorption capacity were related to the changes in the surface charge and the SBET of the APTES-modified TiO2. It was also observed that the adsorption process had a significant impact on the photooxidation of dyes. The APTES/TiO2 photocatalysts calcined at 900 °C, showed a markedly higher methylene blue and Orange II degradation degree in comparison to calcined reference materials, which was related to the fact that functionalization via APTES, which is a good source of silicon, effectively suppressed anatase-to-rutile phase transition, as well as the growth of crystallites size. Furthermore, in the case of methylene blue, thermal modification at 500 °C and 700 °C contributed to an improvement in the stability compared to TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM sample for Orange II, all photocatalysts showed high efficiency during the reusability test.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/11/2/172/s1, Figure S1: Pore size distribution plots of starting-TiO2, calcined reference samples (A), and APTES-modified TiO2 photocatalysts (B), Figure S2: The pseudo-first-order plot (A), and the pseudo-second-order plot (B) of methylene blue decomposition., Figure S3: The zero-order plot (A), the pseudo-first-order plot (B), and the pseudo-second-order plot (C) of Orange II decomposition. Table S1: Isotherm constants for the adsorption process of methylene blue on starting TiO2, calcined reference samples and APTES-modified photocatalysts. Table S2: Isotherm constants for the adsorption process of Orange II on starting TiO2, calcined reference samples and APTES-modified photocatalysts. Table S3: The fitting parameters, the pseudo-first and pseudo-second reaction rate constants for methylene blue photoremoval (after 240 min of UV radiation). Table S4: The fitting parameters, zero, pseudo-first, and pseudo-second reaction rate constants for Orange II photoremoval (after 240 min of UV radiation).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S., A.W. and A.W.M.; Formal analysis, E.K.-N.; Funding acquisition, A.W.M.; Investigation, A.S., A.W. and P.R.-K.; Methodology, A.S. and A.W.; Software, A.S. and E.K.-N.; Supervision, E.K.-N., A.W. and A.W.M.; Writing—original draft, A.S. and E.K.-N.; Writing—review and editing, E.K.-N., A.W., A.S., A.W.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Centre, Poland, grant no. 2017/27/B/ST8/02007.

Conflicts of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rathour, R.; Patel, D.; Shaikh, S.; Desai, C. Eco-electrogenic treatment of dyestuff wastewater using constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell system with an evaluation of electrode-enriched microbial community structures. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 285, 121349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lau, Y.-Y.; Wong, Y.-S.; Teng, T.-T.; Morad, N.; Rafatullah, M.; Ong, S.-A. Coagulation—Flocculation of azo dye Acid Orange 7 with green refined laterite soil. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 246, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Karthik, V.; Saravanan, K.; Bharathi, P.; Dharanya, V.; Meiaraj, C. An overview of treatments for the removal of textile dyes. J. Chem. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 7, 301–307. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kuppusamy, S.; Sethurajan, M.; Kadarkarai, M.; Aruliah, R. Biodecolourization of textile dyes by novel, indigenous Pseudomonas stutzeri MN1 and Acinetobacter baumannii MN3. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 716–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mokif, L.A. Removal methods of synthetic dyes from industrial wastewater: A review. Mesop. Environ. J. 2019, 5, 23–40. [Google Scholar]
  6. Venkata Mohan, S.; Karthikeyan, J. Adsorptive removal of reactive azo dye from an aqueous phase onto charfines and activated carbon. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2004, 6, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Forgacs, E.; Cserháti, T.; Oros, G. Removal of synthetic dyes from wastewaters: A review. Environ. Inter. 2004, 30, 953–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, T.-H.; Park, C.; Kim, S. Water recycling from desalination and purification process of reactive dye manufacturing industry by combined membrane filtration. J. Clean. Prod. 2005, 13, 779–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arslan, I.; Akmehmet Balcioglu, I.; Tuhkanen, T. Advanced Oxidation of Synthetic Dyehouse Effluent by O3, H2O2/O3 and H2O2/UV Processes. Environ. Technol. 1999, 20, 921–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Balanosky, E.; Fernandez, J.; Kiwi, J.; Lopez, A. Degradation of membrane concentrates of the textile industry by Fenton like reactions in iron-free solutions at biocompatible pH values (pH ≈ 7–8). Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 40, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kang, S.-F.; Liao, C.-H.; Po, S.-T. Decolorization of textile wastewater by photo-fenton oxidation technology. Chemosphere 2000, 41, 1287–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Piaskowski, K.; Świderska-Dąbrowska, R.; Zarzycki, P.K. Dye Removal from Water and Wastewater Using Various Physical, Chemical, and Biological Processes. J. AOAC Int. 2018, 101, 1371–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Da Silva, C.G.; Faria, J.L.S. Photochemical and photocatalytic degradation of an azodye in aqueous solution by UV irradiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2003, 155, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Konstantinou, I.K.; Albanis, T.A. TiO2-assisted photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in aqueous solution: Kinetic and mechanistic investigations: A review. Appl. Catal. B 2004, 49, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ratova, M.; Sawtell, D.; Kelly, P.J. Micro-Patterning of Magnetron Sputtered Titanium Dioxide Coatings and Their Efficiency for Photocatalytic Applications. Coatings 2020, 10, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Xue, G.; Liu, H.; Chen, Q.; Hills, C.; Tyrer, M.; Innocent, F. Synergy between surface adsorption and photocatalysis during degradation of humic acid on TiO2/activated carbon composites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tryba, B.; Morawski, A.W.; Tsumura, T.; Toyoda, M.; Inagaki, M. Hybridization of adsorptivity with photocatalytic activity-carbon-coated anatase. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2004, 167, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ariyanti, D.; Maillot, M.; Gao, W. TiO2 used as photocatalyst for rhodamine B degradation under solar radiation. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2017, 31, 1744095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chatterjee, D.; Ruj, B.; Mahata, A. Adsorption and photocatalysis of colour removal from wastewater using flash and sunlight. Catal. Commun. 2001, 2, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jafari, S.; Tryba, B.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Kapica-Kozar, J.; Morawski, A.W.; Sillanpää, M. The role of adsorption in the photocatalytic decomposition of Orange II on carbon-modified TiO2. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 220, 504–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Wanag, A.; Kapica-Kozar, J.; Kowalczyk, Ł.; Zgrzebnicki, M.; Tryba, B.; Przepiórski, J.; Morawski, A.W. Methylene blue decomposition on TiO2/reduced graphene oxide hybrid photocatalysts obtained by a two-step hydrothermal and calcination synthesis. Catal. Today 2020, 357, 630–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Janus, M.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Morawski, A.W. Determination of the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 with high adsorption capacity. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2011, 103, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhu, Y.; Xu, S.; Yi, D. Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange using polythiophene/titanium dioxide composites. React. Funct. Polym. 2010, 70, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Q.; Chen, C.; Zhao, D.; Ma, W.; Zhao, J. Change of adsorption modes of dyes on fluorinated TiO2 and its effect on photocatalytic degradation of dyes under visible irradiation. Langmuir 2008, 24, 7338–7345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, Q.; Yakovlev, N.L. Adsorption and interaction of organosilanes on TiO2 nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 1395–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, J.; Cho, J.; Seidler, P.; Kurland, N.; Yadavalli, V. Investigations of Chemical Modifications of Amino-Terminated Organic Films on Silicon Substrates and Controlled Protein Immobilization. Langmuir 2010, 26, 2599–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shakeri, A.; Yip, D.; Badv, M.; Imani, S.M.; Sanjari, M.; Didar, T.F. Self-cleaning ceramic tiles produced via stable coating of TiO2 nanoparticles. Materials 2018, 11, 1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bao, N.; Wu, G.; Niu, J.; Zhang, Q.; He, S.; Wang, J. Wide spectral response and enhanced photocatalytic activity of TiO2 continuous fibers modified with aminosilane coupling agents. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 599, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Andrzejewska, A.; Krysztafkiewicz, A.; Jesionowski, T. Adsorption of organic dyes on the aminosilane modified TiO2 surface. Dyes Pigm. 2004, 62, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sienkiewicz, A.; Wanag, A.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Ekiert, E.; Rokicka-Konieczna, P.; Morawski, A.W. Effect of calcination on the photocatalytic activity and stability of TiO2 photocatalysts modified with APTES. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 104794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wetchakun, N.; Incessungvorn, B.; Wetchakun, K.; Phanichphant, S. Influence of calcination temperature on anatase to rutile phase transformation in TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized by the modified sol-gel method. Mater. Lett. 2012, 82, 195–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Byrne, C.; Fagan, R.; Hinder, S.; McCormack, D.E.; Pillai, S.C. New approach of modifying the anatase to rutile transition temperature in TiO2 photocatalysts. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 95232–95238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dalod, A.R.M.; Henriksen, L.; Grande, T.; Einarsrud, M.-A. Functionalized TiO2 nanoparticles by single-step hydrothermal synthesis: The role of the silane coupling agents. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Tobaldi, D.M.; Tucci, A.; Škapin, A.S.; Esposito, L. Effects of SiO2 addition on TiO2 crystal structure and photocatalytic activity. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 30, 2481–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lu, Z.; Jiang, X.; Zhou, B.; Wu, X.; Lu, L. Study of effect annealing temperature on the structure, morphology and photocatalytic activity of Si doped TiO2 thin films deposited by electron beam evaporation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 10715–10720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, G.; Zheng, Z.; Wu, Y.; Feng, N. Effect of silica on the microstructure and photocatalytic properties of titania. Ceram. Int. 2009, 35, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schneider, P. Adsorption isotherms of microporous-mesoporous solids revisited. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1995, 129, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sing, K.S.W.; William, R.T. Physisorption hysteresis loops and the characterization of nanoporous materials. Adsorp. Sci. Technol. 2004, 22, 773–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, Q.; Hu, X.; Zheng, S.; Sun, Z.; Liu, S.; Li, H. Influence of calcination temperature on the structural, adsorption and photocatalytic properties of TiO2 nanoparticles supported on natural zeolite. Powder Technol. 2015, 274, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Siwińska-Stefańska, K.; Ciesielczyk, F.; Nowacka, M.; Jesionowski, T. Influence of selected alkoxysilanes on dispersive properties and surface chemistry of titanium dioxide and TiO2-SiO2 composite material. J. Nanomater. 2012, 2012, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhuang, W.; Zhang, Y.; He, L.; An, R.; Li, B.; Ying, H.; Wu, J.; Chen, Y.J.; Zhou, J.; Lu, X. Facile synthesis of amino-functionalized mesoporous TiO2 microparticles for adenosine deaminase immobilization. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2017, 239, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Górska, P.; Zaleska, A.; Kowalska, E.; Klimczuk, T.; Sobczak, J.W.; Skwarek, E.; Janusz, W.; Hupka, J. TiO2 photoactivity in vis and UV light: The influence of calcination temperature and surface properties. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 84, 440–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cheng, F.; Sajedin, S.M.; Kelly, S.M.; Lee, A.F.; Kornherr, A. UV-stable paper coated with APTES-modified P25 TiO2 nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 114, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rokicka-Konieczna, P.; Markowska-Szczupak, A.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Morawski, A.W. Photocatalytic water disinfection under the artificial solar light by fructose modified TiO2. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 372, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kuroda, Y.; Mori, T.; Yagi, K.; Makihata, N.; Kawahara, Y.; Nagao, M.; Kittaka, S. Preparation of visible-light-responsive TiO2-xNx photocatalyst by a sol-gel method: Analysis of the active center on TiO2 that reacts with NH3. Langmuir 2005, 21, 8026–8034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Wanag, A.; Kapica-Kozar, J.; Morawski, A.W. Preparation and characterisation of TiO2 thermally modified with cyclohexane vapours. Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol. 2016, 52, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Abdullah, S.M.A.; Chong, F.K. Dual-effects of adsorption and photodegradation of methylene blue by tungsten-loaded titanium dioxide. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 158, 418–425. [Google Scholar]
  48. Saliba, P.A.; Mansur, A.A.P.; Mansur, H.S. Advanced Nanocomposite Coatings of Fusion Bonded Epoxy Reinforced with Amino-Functionalized Nanoparticles for Applications in Underwater Oil Pipelines. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Razmjou, A.; Resosudarmo, A.; Holmes, R.L.; Li, H.; Mansouri, J.; Chen, V. The effect of modified TiO2 nanoparticles on the polyethersulfone ultrafiltration hollow fiber membranes. Desalination 2012, 287, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. De Melo Pinheiro, A.F.; Nijmeijer, A.; Prasad Sripathi, V.G.; Winnubst, L. Chemical modification/grafting of mesoporous alumina with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Eur. J. Chem. 2015, 6, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Meroni, D.; Lo Presti, L.; Di Liberto, G.; Ceotto, M.; Acres, R.G.; Prince, K.C.; Bellani, R.; Soliveri, G.; Ardizzone, S. A Close Look at the Structure of the TiO2-APTES Interface in Hybrid Nanomaterials and Its Degradation Pathway: An Experimental and Theoretical Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 430–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Vandenberg, E.T.; Bertilsson, L.; Liedberg, B.; Uvdal, K.; Erlandsson, R.; Elwing, H.; Lundström, I. Structure of 3-aminopropyl triethoxy silane on silicon oxide. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1991, 147, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Milanesi, F.; Cappelletti, G.; Annunziata, R.; Bianchi, C.L.; Meroni, D.; Ardizzone, S. Siloxane-TiO2 Hybrid Nanocomposites. The Structure of the Hydrophobic Layer. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 8287–8293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ukaji, E.; Furusawa, T.; Sato, M.; Suzuki, M. The effect of surface modification with silane coupling agent on suppressing the photocatalytic activity of fine TiO2 particles as inorganic UV filter. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 254, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Razmjou, A.; Mansouri, J.; Chen, V. The effects of mechanical and chemical modification of TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface chemistry, structure and fouling performance of PES ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 378, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, W.; Guo, H.; Sun, H.; Zeng, R.-C. Hydrothermal synthesis and photoelectrochemical performance enhancement of TiO2 graphene composite in photo-generated cathodic protection. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 382, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, W.; Yang, Q.; Hou, Q.; Wei, L.; Liu, L.; Huang, F.; Ju, M. Enhancement of photocatalytic performance with the use of noble-metal-decorated TiO2 nanocrystals as highly active catalysts for aerobic oxidation under visible-light irradiation. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 210, 352–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yuan, L.; Weng, X.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, Q.; Deng, L. Structural and Visible-Near Infrared Optical Properties of Cr-Doped TiO2 for Colored Cool Pigments. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Janus, M.; Grzmil, B.; Morawski, A.W. Methylene blue decomposition under visible light irradiation in the presence of carbon-modified TiO2 photocatalysts. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2011, 226, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Suwannaruang, T.; Kamonsuangkasem, K.; Kidkhunthod, P.; Chirawatkul, P.; Saiyasombat, C.; Chanlek, N.; Wantala, K. Influence of nitrogen content levels on structural properties and photocatalytic activities of nanorice-like N-doped TiO2 with various calcination temperatures. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018, 105, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Janus, M.; Bubacz, K.; Zatorska, J.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Czyżewski, A.; Morawski, A.W. Preliminary studies of photocatalytic activity of gypsum plasters containing TiO2 co-modified with nitrogen and carbon. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 2015, 17, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Goscianska, J.; Olejnik, A.; Nowak, I. APTES-functionalized mesoporous silica as a vehicle for antipyrine-adsorption and release studies. Colloids Surf. A 2017, 533, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Talavera-Pech, W.A.; Esparza-Ruiz, A.; Quintana-Owen, P.; Vilchis-Nestor, A.F.; Carrera-Figueiras, C.; Ávila-Ortega, A. Effects of different amounts of APTES on physicochemical and structural properties of amino-functionalized MCM-41-MSNs. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2016, 80, 697–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wilhelm, P.; Stephan, D. Photodegradation of rhodamine B in aqueous solution via SiO2@TiO2 nano-spheres. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2007, 185, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ferreira-Neto, E.P.; Ullah, S.; Simões, M.B.; Perissinotto, A.P.; Vicente, F.S.; Noeske, P.-L.M.; Ribeiro, S.J.L.; Rodrigues-Filho, U.P. Solvent-controlled deposition of titania on silica spheres for the preparation of SiO2@TiO2 core@shell nanoparticles with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Colloids Surf. A 2019, 570, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Medeiros Borsagli, F.G.L. A green 3D scaffolds based on chitosan with thiol group as a model for adsorption of hazardous organic dye pollutants. Desalination Water Treat. 2019, 169, 395–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, S.; Zhu, Z.H.; Coomes, A.; Haghseresht, F.; Lu, G.Q. The physical and surface chemical characteristics of activated carbons and the adsorption of methylene blue from wastewater. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 284, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Beegam, M.S.; Ullattil, S.G.; Periyat, P. Selective Solar Photocatalysis by High Temperature Stable Anatase TiO2. Sol. Energy 2018, 160, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bubacz, K.; Tryba, B.; Morawski, A.W. The role of adsorption in decomposition of dyes on TiO2 and N-modified TiO2 photocatalysts under UV and visible light irradiations. Mater. Res. Bull. 2012, 47, 3697–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ayawei, N.; Ebelegi, A.N.; Wankasi, D. Modelling and Interpretation of Adsorption Isotherms. J. Chem. 2017, 2017, 3039817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Konicki, W.; Aleksandrzak, M.; Moszyński, D.; Mijowska, E. Adsorption of anionic azo-dyes from aqueous solutions onto graphene oxide: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 496, 188–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Jafari, S.; Yahyaei, B.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Sillanpää, M. The influence of carbonization temperature on the modification of TiO2 in the removal of methyl orange from aqueous solution by adsorption. Desalination Water Treat. 2016, 57, 18825–18835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Ohno, T.; Tokieda, K.; Higashida, S.; Matsumura, M. Synergism between rutile and anatase TiO2 particles in photocatalytic oxidation of naphthalene. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2003, 244, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wanag, A.; Sienkiewicz, A.; Rokicka-Konieczna, P.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Morawski, A.W. Influence of modification of titanium dioxide by silane coupling agents on the photocatalytic activity and stability. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, R.-B. Photodegradation of toluene using silica-embedded titania. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2005, 351, 2129–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Su, Y.; Wu, J.; Quan, X.; Chen, S. Electrochemically assisted photocatalytic degradation of phenol using silicon-doped TiO2 nanofilm electrode. Desalination 2010, 252, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cheng, Y.; Luo, F.; Jiang, Y.; Li, F.; Wei, C. The effect of calcination temperature on the structure and activity of TiO2/SiO2 composite catalysts derived from titanium sulfate and fly ash acid sludge. Colloids Surf. A 2018, 554, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bartošová, A.; Blinová, L.; Sirotiak, M.; Michalíková, M. Usage of FTIR-ATR as Non-Destructive Analysis of Selected Toxic Dyes. Res. Pap. Fac. Mater. Sci. Technol. Slovak Univ. Technol. 2017, 25, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Wang, H.; Huang, Y. Prussian-blue-modified iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles as effective peroxidase-like catalysts to degrade methylene blue with H2O2. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 191, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Abbas, M.; Parvatheeswara, R.B.; Reddy, V.; Kim, C. Fe3O4/TiO2 core/shell nanocubes: Single-batch surfactant less synthesis, characterization and efficient catalysts for methylene blue degradation. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 11177–11186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, D.; Zou, L.; Li, S.; Zheng, F. Nanospherical like reduced graphene oxide decorated TiO2 nanoparticles: An advanced catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Inyinbor, A.A.; Adekola, F.A.; Olatunji, G.A. Kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic modeling of liquid phase adsorption of Rhodamine B dye onto Raphia hookerie fruit epicarp. Water Resour. Ind. 2016, 15, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Wu, F.; Liu, W.; Qiu, J.; Li, J.; Zhou, W.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, X. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation and adsorption of methylene blue via TiO2 nanocrystals supported on graphene-like bamboo charcoal. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 358, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Catalysts 11 00172 g001 550
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES)-modified TiO2 before and after the calcination process.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES)-modified TiO2 before and after the calcination process.
Catalysts 11 00172 g001
Catalysts 11 00172 g002 550
Figure 2. Adsorption/desorption isotherms of APTES-modified TiO2 prior and after calcination process.
Figure 2. Adsorption/desorption isotherms of APTES-modified TiO2 prior and after calcination process.
Catalysts 11 00172 g002
Catalysts 11 00172 g003 550
Figure 3. Diffuse refletrance Fourier transform infrared spectra (DRIFTS) of and APTES-modified TiO2 before and after calcination process.
Figure 3. Diffuse refletrance Fourier transform infrared spectra (DRIFTS) of and APTES-modified TiO2 before and after calcination process.
Catalysts 11 00172 g003
Catalysts 11 00172 g004 550
Figure 4. Ultraviolet–visible diffuse reflectance spectra (UV–Vis/DRS) of and APTES-modified TiO2 prior and after calcination process.
Figure 4. Ultraviolet–visible diffuse reflectance spectra (UV–Vis/DRS) of and APTES-modified TiO2 prior and after calcination process.
Catalysts 11 00172 g004
Catalysts 11 00172 g005 550
Figure 5. Adsorption degree of methylene blue dye on the surface of APTES-modified TiO2 before and after calcination.
Figure 5. Adsorption degree of methylene blue dye on the surface of APTES-modified TiO2 before and after calcination.
Catalysts 11 00172 g005
Catalysts 11 00172 g006 550
Figure 6. Adsorption degree of Orange II dye on the surface of starting TiO2 and calcined reference samples (A), and APTES-modified TiO2 before and after calcination process (B).
Figure 6. Adsorption degree of Orange II dye on the surface of starting TiO2 and calcined reference samples (A), and APTES-modified TiO2 before and after calcination process (B).
Catalysts 11 00172 g006
Catalysts 11 00172 g007 550
Figure 7. Methylene blue decomposition under UV irradiation for starting TiO2 and calcined reference samples (A), and APTES-modified TiO2 before and after calcination (B).
Figure 7. Methylene blue decomposition under UV irradiation for starting TiO2 and calcined reference samples (A), and APTES-modified TiO2 before and after calcination (B).
Catalysts 11 00172 g007
Catalysts 11 00172 g008 550
Figure 8. Orange II decomposition under UV irradiation for starting TiO2 and calcined reference samples (A), and APTES-modified TiO2 before and after calcination (B).
Figure 8. Orange II decomposition under UV irradiation for starting TiO2 and calcined reference samples (A), and APTES-modified TiO2 before and after calcination (B).
Catalysts 11 00172 g008
Catalysts 11 00172 g009 550
Figure 9. Methylene blue decomposition degree after 240 min of UV light irradiation for starting TiO2, calcined reference samples, and APTES-modified TiO2 prior to and after process.
Figure 9. Methylene blue decomposition degree after 240 min of UV light irradiation for starting TiO2, calcined reference samples, and APTES-modified TiO2 prior to and after process.
Catalysts 11 00172 g009
Catalysts 11 00172 g010 550
Figure 10. Orange II decomposition degree after 240 min of UV light irradiation for starting TiO2, calcined reference samples, and APTES-modified TiO2 before and after calcination.
Figure 10. Orange II decomposition degree after 240 min of UV light irradiation for starting TiO2, calcined reference samples, and APTES-modified TiO2 before and after calcination.
Catalysts 11 00172 g010
Catalysts 11 00172 g011 550
Figure 11. Photocatalytic activity in subsequent cycles of methylene blue degradation of TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM (A), TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar-300°C (B), TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar-500°C (C), TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–700°C (D), and TiO2–4h–120°C-500mM-Ar-900°C (E) materials.
Figure 11. Photocatalytic activity in subsequent cycles of methylene blue degradation of TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM (A), TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar-300°C (B), TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar-500°C (C), TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–700°C (D), and TiO2–4h–120°C-500mM-Ar-900°C (E) materials.
Catalysts 11 00172 g011
Catalysts 11 00172 g012 550
Figure 12. Photocatalytic activity in subsequent cycles of Orange II degradation of TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM (A), TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar-300°C (B), TiO2–4h-120°C–500mM-Ar-500°C (C), TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–700°C (D), and TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar-900°C (E) nanomaterials.
Figure 12. Photocatalytic activity in subsequent cycles of Orange II degradation of TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM (A), TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar-300°C (B), TiO2–4h-120°C–500mM-Ar-500°C (C), TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–700°C (D), and TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar-900°C (E) nanomaterials.
Catalysts 11 00172 g012
Catalysts 11 00172 g013a 550Catalysts 11 00172 g013b 550
Figure 13. DRIFT spectra of TiO2–4h–120°C–50 mM and TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–700°C photocatalysts before the first cycle and after the fourth cycle for methylene blue (A), and Orange II (B) decomposition.
Figure 13. DRIFT spectra of TiO2–4h–120°C–50 mM and TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–700°C photocatalysts before the first cycle and after the fourth cycle for methylene blue (A), and Orange II (B) decomposition.
Catalysts 11 00172 g013aCatalysts 11 00172 g013b
Table
Table 1. Structural parameters of starting TiO2 and APTES-modified photocatalysts prior and after the calcination process.
Table 1. Structural parameters of starting TiO2 and APTES-modified photocatalysts prior and after the calcination process.
Sample NameAnatase in Crystallite Phase (%)Anatase Crystallite Size (nm)Rutile in Crystallite Phase (%)Rutile Crystallite Size (nm)SBET (m2/g)Vtotal (cm3/g)Vmicro (cm3/g)Vmeso (cm3/g)
starting TiO295145212070.3700.0700.300
TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM96144461400.2720.0530.219
TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar-300°C95145361580.2420.0580.184
TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar-500 °C96154511700.2720.0620.210
TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–700°C96174451400.2670.0530.214
TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar-900°C9530579500.1500.0190.131
Table
Table 2. The carbon and nitrogen content, and zeta potential values of starting TiO2, reference samples and APTES-modified photocatalysts prior to and after the calcination process.
Table 2. The carbon and nitrogen content, and zeta potential values of starting TiO2, reference samples and APTES-modified photocatalysts prior to and after the calcination process.
Sample NameZeta Potential
δ (mV)		Carbon
Content
(wt.%)		Nitrogen
Content
(wt.%)
starting TiO2+11.00-0.18
TiO2-Ar–300°C+12.34--
TiO2-Ar–500°C+12.43--
TiO2-Ar–700°C+24.77--
TiO2-Ar–900°C−29.67--
TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM+4.433.341.24
TiO2-4h–120°C-500mM-Ar-300°C+19.432.330.66
TiO2-4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–500°C−25.630.500.14
TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar–700°C−25.570.300.11
TiO2–4h–120°C–500mM-Ar-900°C−36.130.160.07
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Sienkiewicz, A.; Wanag, A.; Rokicka-Konieczna, P.; Morawski, A.W. The Role of Adsorption in the Photocatalytic Decomposition of Dyes on APTES-Modified TiO2 Nanomaterials. Catalysts 2021, 11, 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11020172

AMA Style

Kusiak-Nejman E, Sienkiewicz A, Wanag A, Rokicka-Konieczna P, Morawski AW. The Role of Adsorption in the Photocatalytic Decomposition of Dyes on APTES-Modified TiO2 Nanomaterials. Catalysts. 2021; 11(2):172. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11020172

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kusiak-Nejman, Ewelina, Agnieszka Sienkiewicz, Agnieszka Wanag, Paulina Rokicka-Konieczna, and Antoni W. Morawski. 2021. "The Role of Adsorption in the Photocatalytic Decomposition of Dyes on APTES-Modified TiO2 Nanomaterials" Catalysts 11, no. 2: 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11020172

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop