Next Article in Journal
Comment on Katsarelias, D., et al. “The Effect of Beta-Adrenergic Blocking Agents in Cutaneous Melanoma—A Nation-Wide Swedish Population-Based Retrospective Register Study” Cancers 2020, 12, 3228
Next Article in Special Issue
Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Histological Types of Thyroid Cancer in the Elderly: Evaluation of 9070 Patients from a Single Referral Centre
Previous Article in Journal
Synergistic Analysis of Protein Corona and Haemoglobin Levels Detects Pancreatic Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sonographic Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules as Rule-Out Tests in Older Adults
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/cancers13010094
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Advanced Age on the Clinical Presentation and Outcome of Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma

by
Antonio Matrone
1,
Carla Gambale
1,
Alessandro Prete
1,
Paolo Piaggi
2,3,
Virginia Cappagli
1,
Valeria Bottici
1,
Cristina Romei
1,
Raffaele Ciampi
1,
Liborio Torregrossa
4,
Luigi De Napoli
5,
Eleonora Molinaro
1,
Gabriele Materazzi
5,
Fulvio Basolo
4 and
Rossella Elisei
1,*
1
Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
2
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Phoenix, AZ 85016, USA
3
Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
4
Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
5
Unit of Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2021, 13(1), 94; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010094
Submission received: 4 December 2020 / Revised: 25 December 2020 / Accepted: 28 December 2020 / Published: 30 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thyroid Cancer in the Elderly)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The clinical behavior of medullary thyroid carcinoma is heterogeneous and can be influenced by several clinical, biochemical and molecular factors. The role of age as a prognostic factor remains controversial. In our cohort of 432 sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma, no differences in histologic features at diagnosis and in number and type of therapies performed during the follow-up were detected when dividing the patients according to age (< and ≥ 65 years). Younger patients had a longer follow-up and survival time, compared to the older patients. However, in dead patients, no differences in the aggressiveness of the disease at presentation and treatments performed during the follow-up were found between the two age groups.

Abstract

Sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare malignancy with a heterogeneous clinical course. Several potential prognostic factors have been investigated, but the impact of some of these is controversial, such as age at diagnosis. We evaluated the data of 432 sporadic MTC patients followed-up for a median of 7.4 years. Patients were divided and compared according to their age at diagnosis in group A (<65 years—n = 338, 78.2%) and group B (≥65 years—n = 94, 21.8%). No differences were detected between the two groups. Median follow-up time was significantly longer in patients <65 than ≥65 years. We observed 41 (9.5%) cancer-related death events. The death rate was similar between the two age groups. However, the Kaplan Meier curve showed a longer survival time for younger patients compared to older patients [HR 2.5 (CI 95%: 1.27–4.94), p < 0.01]. Nevertheless, no differences in the aggressiveness of the disease at presentation and in the number and type of treatments performed were found in the two subgroups of dead patients. In patients with sporadic MTC, age at diagnosis did not correlate with any clinical and pathological features. Cancer-related death events are similar in older and younger patients, but survival time is longer in the younger.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare malignancy [1] occurring in sporadic or hereditary form. The clinical course and outcome are heterogeneous, and several factors can influence the prognosis. Female sex [2] and earlier stages of the disease [2,3] showed better prognosis. Conversely, histologic features, such as extra-thyroidal extension, lymph node involvement and distant metastasis [4,5,6], could negatively influence the clinical course of the disease. Likewise, high calcitonin (CT) values [7] and aggressive REarranged during Transfection (RET) gene mutation (i.e., M918T) [8] have been demonstrated as negative prognostic factors.
Although the impact of age in the prognosis of MTC has been evaluated in several papers [3,9,10], the results remain controversial. In most of the cases, both sporadic and hereditary MTC were included, thus confounding the interpretation of the data.
The aim of our study was to evaluate the presentation and clinical outcome of sporadic MTC in the elderly (≥65 years) [11]. Then, we compared epidemiological, clinical and pathological data obtained with a younger population (<65 years).

2. Results

Epidemiologic, clinical and pathologic data of the study population are summarized in Table 1.
Females were more numerous (56.5%), and the median age at the diagnosis was 54 years. The pre-operative CT value was available in 358/432 (82.9%) patients and in most of them (58.9%) was higher than 100 pg/mL.
In 74 cases, the pre-operative CT value was not available, because of patients who were not surgically treated in Pisa and missed the pre-operative diagnostic work-up, or the diagnosis of MTC was incidental (discovered only after surgery).
More than half of the cases (55.3%) showed tumor diameters between 1.1 and 4 cm; in 36.1% a microcarcinoma was observed, while in the remaining cases (6.6%) tumor diameter was larger than 4 cm. The tumor was unifocal in 84% of cases, and mETE was present in about 20% of the cases.
Central and/or latero-cervical compartment lymph node dissection was performed in 87.5% and 36.6% of cases, respectively. Excluding 33 patients (7.6%) in which lymph nodes were not removed (Nx), most of the remaining had no lymph node metastases (N0 47.2%). Conversely, 66 patients (15.3%) showed central compartment (N1a), 36 (8.3%) latero-cervical compartment (N1b) and 93 (21.5%) had simultaneous central and latero-cervical compartment lymph node metastasis (N1a + N1b).
In 264/432 (61.1%) patients, histological variants of MTC were analyzed. Conventional MTC was the most frequent variant (59.5%), followed by spindle cell (21.6%). Moreover, the presence of somatic mutations was investigated in a subgroup of 160 (37%) patients. RET M918T was the most frequent mutation.
During the follow-up, 48 (11.1%) patients were submitted to a second neck surgery, 44 (10.2%) to local treatments and 59 (13.7%) to systemic treatments.
After a median follow-up of 7.4 years (88.5 months), 229 (53%) patients showed an excellent response, 67 (15.5%) a biochemical incomplete response and 136 (31.5%) had metastatic disease of whom 21.3% (29/136) at local and 78.7% (107/136) at distant sites.

2.1. Differences in Sporadic MTC Patients According to Age < or ≥ 65 Years

As for the aim of the study, patients were divided according to their ages at diagnosis in group A (<65 years—n = 338, 78.2%) and group B (≥65 years—n = 94, 21.8%) (Table 2).
As expected, the median age of the two groups was different (49 vs 70 years, p < 0.01). Conversely, no differences in sex distribution (females 57.1% vs 54.3%, p = 0.62) were shown.
Clinical presentation of the disease was the same in the two groups, in particular median tumor dimension (1.5 vs 1.6 cm, p = 0.70), the prevalence of microcarcinoma (36.4% vs 38.5%, p = 0.81), multifocality (15.7% vs 17%, p = 0.75) and the presence of mETE (19.8% vs 20.2%, p = 0.93) showed no differences between group A and B.
Histological variants of MTC showed the same prevalence in the two groups (p = 0.2).
Regarding TNM, neither T stage (p = 0.92) nor N stage (p = 0.91) and M stage (p = 0.13) differed between the groups.
Moreover, the prevalence of central and latero-cervical compartment lymph node dissection was the same between the two groups (87.6% vs 87.2%, p = 0.93 and 37.3% vs 34%, p = 0.56, respectively), setting to zero the potential interference of the surgical treatment performed on the N result.
No difference in the prevalence (p = 0.22) and type (p = 0.28) of RET somatic mutations was found between group A and B.
Also, additional surgical local and systemic treatments were performed in the same percentage of patients in the two groups.
Although group B had a median follow-up significantly shorter than group A (61 vs 96 months, p < 0.01), clinical outcome did not differ (p = 0.16).

2.2. Cancer-Related Death Events

In our study group, we observed 41 (9.5%) cancer-related death events. All of these patients were included in the distant metastatic group (41/136—30.1%) and death events were related to the progression of the disease. When dividing these patients according to age at surgery, 29/338 (8.6%) were in group A and 12/94 (12.8%) were in group B, and this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.22).
However, the Kaplan-Meier analysis (Figure 1) showed a significant difference in the survival rate between the two groups [HR 2.5 (CI 95%: 1.27–4.94), p < 0.01], with the rate of survival being higher in patients of group A.
Therefore, we assessed the potential impact of the aggressiveness of the presentation of the disease in the two subgroups of patients who died (Table 3).
However, no significant differences were found, suggesting a minimal impact of the presentation of the disease in cancer-related death events when patients were divided according to age.
Moreover, when we evaluated the time elapsed between surgery and death (≤5 yrs, 5.1–10 yrs, 10.1–15 yrs and >15 yrs), again no statistically significant differences were shown (Table 4).
Furthermore, when dividing the age at diagnosis in quartiles (≤43 yrs, 44–54 yrs, 55–63 yrs and ≥64 yrs), the Kaplan-Meier survival curves continued to show a slightly significant difference among the groups (p = 0.049) (Figure 2). Again, patients older than 64 years showed worse survival over time.

3. Discussion

Medullary thyroid carcinoma is a rare malignancy representing 1–2% of thyroid cancers in the USA [1].
In about 15–20% of cases, it can be hereditary due to a germline RET mutation [12]. The remaining 80% of cases are sporadic, and more than half of them can harbor a somatic RET mutation [13]. The ability of MTC to metastasize both by blood and lymphatic vessels makes the prognosis of this tumor intermediate between the quite good prognosis of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and the poor prognosis of anaplastic ones [3,14]. Several epidemiologic and clinic-pathologic factors can contribute to the heterogeneous clinical course of MTC [15,16]. Age is a determinant in the prognosis of DTC [17], indeed also in the AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) staging system [18]; different ages characterize different stages with different prognostic values, even in patients with the same tumor burden. This is not the case for MTC [18]. While in hereditary MTC the role of age is crucial [19], nothing is known about its impact on the clinical presentation and prognosis in sporadic MTC.
In our study, we did not find any differences in the clinical presentation of MTC in the two groups of patients divided by age. Moreover, no differences were found when we looked at the number and types of further local or systemic treatments performed in the two groups.
Several studies analyzed the impact of age on the clinical features and outcome of MTC [4,5,10]. Sahli et al. [10] analyzed the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program) database and evaluated histologic features and disease specific mortality in 1457 hereditary and sporadic MTC patients, according to 3 categories of age: younger adults (18–64 years), older adults (65–79 years) and super-elderly (≥80 years). Although they found significant differences in the extent of surgery (less aggressive in the elderly), in agreement with our results no differences were shown in the prevalence of lymph nodes and distant metastasis among the age groups.
Conversely, other authors found a correlation between older age and structural disease. Kotwal et al. [4] showed that an age of >55 years was significantly associated with the presence of distant metastasis at diagnosis. Hamdy et al. [5], in a cohort of 31 hereditary and sporadic MTC, showed that an age of >40 years increased 12-fold the risk of having distant metastasis, and was associated with shorter disease-free survival. Twito et al. [6] showed that age >45 years at diagnosis was associated with biochemical and/or structural persistent disease in a cohort of 193 MTC (of whom 18.1% were hereditary), at the time of last evaluation (median 7 years). However, when considering sporadic cases, only the presence of distant metastasis at diagnosis was associated with disease persistence.
It is worth noting that all previous studies included both hereditary and sporadic MTC. The different pathogenesis of these two forms should be considered when analyzing age as a prognostic factor, since the development of MTC in hereditary cases is much quicker than in sporadic ones, involving even children [19]. For this reason, we decided to perform this study only in sporadic cases to minimize the possibility of potential bias.
Cancer-related death in the whole cohort (9.5%) was similar to other published data [10] and the death rate did not differ between the two groups (8.6% in group A vs 12.8% in group B, p = 0.22).
However, the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a longer survival time in younger patients who also had a significantly longer follow-up time, both when dividing the patients into two groups of age (<65 and ≥65 years) and when patients were divided into quartiles of age (≤43 yrs, 44–54 yrs, 55–63 yrs and ≥64 yrs). At the time of death, all patients, independently from age, had distant metastatic disease and died from disease progression, regardless of local or systemic treatments performed.
Age was analyzed as a potential prognostic factor of death in several papers including hereditary and sporadic MTC. In a multivariate analysis, both age and stage were predictive factors of survival in a cohort of 899 hereditary and sporadic MTC, included in the French Calcitonin Tumors Study Group (GETC) [3]. The same results were found by Kebebew et al. [9] in 104 patients with MTC or C-cell hyperplasia. Also, more recent papers confirmed this association. Kotwal et al. [4] showed that age >55 years was a significant predictor of worse overall and disease specific survival. In the paper of Sahli et al. [10], older adults and the super-elderly showed a disease specific mortality 2.9 and 6.7 times higher than younger adults, respectively.
At variance with other studies, in two subgroups of our patients, we even analyzed the prevalence of RET somatic mutation and the different histological variants of MTC. It is known that the presence of a RET somatic mutation is a poor prognostic factor for both the initial aggressiveness and survival of sporadic MTC [20]. Similarly, more aggressive behavior could be related to different histological variants [21]. However, neither RET mutations nor histological variants prevalence differed between the groups A and B.
We did not find any difference in the aggressiveness of presentation of the disease in the subgroup of MTC patients who died from the disease. Furthermore, by breaking down the follow-up time into intervals of 5 years, no difference in death rate between the two groups was shown. It is well known that older patients with cancers have a worse outcome per se related to several factors. Cancer more frequently occurs in older age [22], and in several cancers older patients receive less aggressive treatments [23,24]. Moreover, comorbidities increase with age, and, in subjects with the same age, patients with cancer show more comorbidities compared to those without [25,26]. Moreover, cancer patients with comorbidities usually receive less aggressive treatments [27].
In this scenario, although we observed that tumor burden at diagnosis did not differ between the two groups, we can hypothesize that older patients could have a pre-clinical disease for a longer time compared with younger patients, with an uncertain impact of this pre-clinical period of time on the final outcome.
Moreover, since no differences were shown in disease aggressiveness at presentation and number and types of treatments performed in dead patients, we can also hypothesize that the different survival times could be not necessarily related to the disease but to older age per se.

4. Materials and Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the epidemiologic, clinical and pathologic data of 530 consecutive sporadic MTC patients, surgically treated between 2000 and 2018 and followed-up at the Endocrine Unit of the Pisa University Hospital. For the purpose of this study, we excluded patients who were followed for less than 2 years (n = 98), resizing the study population to 432 cases.
The study was approved by the local Ethical Committee (CEAVNO—Comitato Etico Area Vasta Nord-Ovest; protocol number 57877), and, for the policy of the University Hospital, all patients provided a written informed consent to use their data for scientific purposes.
All patients were treated with total thyroidectomy. Central compartment lymph node dissection was routinely performed in most of the MTC patients except those incidentally discovered after surgery. Latero-cervical compartment lymph node dissection was performed only in patients with pre- or intra-operative evidence of latero-cervical lymph node metastasis. Most of the patients (323/432—74.8%) were surgically treated at the Endocrine Surgery Unit of the Pisa University Hospital. In the others, a revision of the histologic specimens was made by our specialized endocrine pathologists.
For each patient, we assessed sex and age at the diagnosis, the value of pre-operative basal serum calcitonin, TNM stage (according to AJCC 8th edition) and other histologic features such as tumor size, presence of minimal extrathyroidal extension (mETE) and multifocality. Moreover, further treatments after primary surgery (second neck surgery, local treatments, systemic treatments) and clinical outcome at the time of the last evaluation were reported.
We defined the clinical outcome as excellent response, when patients showed basal and/or stimulated CT values lower than the upper limit of the normal range, without evidence of structural disease; and biochemical incomplete response when basal and/or stimulated CT values were higher than the upper limit of normal range, without evidence of structural disease. Moreover, we divided the structural incomplete response patients into those who had local disease (cervical lymph node metastasis or local recurrences) and those who had distant metastatic disease, regardless of CT values.

4.1. CT Assays

All patients performed periodic clinical evaluation according to good clinical practice. At each evaluation, patients performed serum CT measurements and neck US as well as thyroid hormones to assess the adequacy of L-T4 substitutive therapy. During the study period (2000–2018), we changed two CT assays. From 2000 to 2013, serum CT was measured using an immunoradiometric assay (ELSA-hCT, CIS, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France) with a functional sensitivity of 10 pg/mL. From 2014 to now, CT was measured using chemiluminescent immunometric assay (Immulite, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostic Products Ltd., Lianberis, Gwynedd LL55 4EL, UK), with an analytical sensitivity of 2 pg/mL and an upper limit of normal range of 11.5 pg/mL in females and 18.2 pg/mL in males.
To define clinical response after surgery, in several cases, in addition to the basal CT, a stimulation test for CT was performed. Until 2013, a CT stimulation test was performed with the injection of pentagastrin (Pg) (Peptavlon, Nova Laboratories, LTD, Leicester UK, 0.5 mg/kg i.v.) and blood was collected before and 2, 5, 15, and 30 min after Pg injection. From 2014, the test was performed with the infusion of calcium (2.3 mg/Kg of calcium element), and blood was collected before and 2, 5 and 10 min after calcium infusion.

4.2. Histological Analysis

MTC can exhibit different histopathological architectures [21]. A tumor showing the typical solid or trabecular growth pattern has been defined as conventional. Alternatively, other less frequent architectural variants have been noted, as the following: (i) spindle cell variant, when the tumor is almost exclusively composed by neoplastic cells with a spindle morphology arranged in interweaving fascicles; (ii) papillary variant, in which true papillae with fibrovascular stalks are lined by neoplastic cells; (iii) follicular variant, in which the neoplastic cells form follicles, resembling those of follicular tumors, containing eosinophilic colloid-like material; (iv) oncocytic variant, showing a prevalence of neoplastic cells with abundant granular eosinophilic cytoplasm; (v) clear cell variant, when the tumor is composed of cells with optically clear cytoplasm; (vi) angiosarcoma-like pattern, in which the neoplastic cells appear along vascular spaces resembling those observed in angiosarcomas.

4.3. Molecular Analysis

The sporadic nature of MTC was defined according to the absence of germline RET mutation, negative familial history of the disease and lack of laboratory test and imaging suggestive of other endocrine neoplasia.
Germline RET mutation investigations were performed in all patients after surgery on blood samples collected in EDTA (2–5 mL) and somatic RET mutations were searched for on fresh tumoral tissue collected at surgery and on paraffin embedded archival slides. DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) or by an automated method (Maxwell 16 Instrument, Promega, Madison, Genes 2019, 10, 698, 3 of 12 WI, USA). RET mutation research was performed in eight exons (5, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 16) by direct sequencing following a previously reported protocol [28] and with an Ion S5 targeted sequencing NGS method using a custom panel as previously described [29].

4.4. Neck US

Neck US was performed with two devices over time, with a multifrequency 7.5 to 12 MHz linear transducer (AU 590 Asynchronous, and MyLab 50; Esaote Biomedica, Firenze, Italy). All neck lymph node compartments were evaluated. Suspected lesions were assessed by US-guided fine needle aspiration cytology with the evaluation of CT in the washing fluid of the needle. In addition to neck US, other imaging procedures (CT scan, MRI) were performed during the follow-up, if necessary.

5. Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables are expressed as counts and percentages, and continuous variables as median (IQR). Chi-square tests were used to evaluate the association between categorical variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous numerical variables. The effect of age on survival was assessed by survival analysis using Cox’s proportional hazards model. Because the proportional hazards assumption was not met across the entire range of follow-up time, the survival analysis was limited to a follow-up time of <15 years when patients were divided into two groups according to age at diagnosis. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analysis was performed with SPSS (version 20.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

6. Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrated that MTC older patients (>65 years) showed a clinical presentation of the disease similar to the younger patients (<65 years). As far as cancer-related death events are concerned, the number of patients was similar in the two groups, but the time of survival was shorter in older patients as demonstrated by the Kaplan-Meyer analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and R.E.; methodology, A.M., C.G., A.P. and R.E.; formal analysis, A.M., C.G. and P.P.; investigation, A.M., C.G., A.P., V.C., V.B., E.M., C.R., R.C., L.T., L.D.N., G.M., F.B., R.E.; data curation, A.M., C.G., P.P., R.E.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M. and C.G.; writing—review and editing, all authors.; supervision, R.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by grants to R.E. from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC, Investigator grant 2018, project code 21790).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the local Ethic Committee of Pisa University Hospital (CEAVNO—Comitato Etico Area Vasta Nord-Ovest; protocol number 57877, approved on December 17, 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to patient privacy and the General Data Protection Regulation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wells, S.A.; Asa, S.L.; Dralle, H.; Elisei, R.; Evans, D.B.; Gagel, R.F.; Lee, N.Y.; Machens, A.; Moley, J.F.; Pacini, F.; et al. Revised American Thyroid Association Guidelines for the Management of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Thyroid 2015, 25, 567–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schröder, S.; Böcker, W.; Baisch, H.; Bürk, C.G.; Arps, H.; Meiners, I.; Kastendieck, H.; Heitz, P.U.; Klöppel, G. Prognostic factors in medullary thyroid carcinomas.Survival in relation to age, sex, stage, histology, immunocytochemistry, and DNA content. Cancer 1988, 61, 806–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Modigliani, E.; Cohen, R.; Campos, J.-M.; Conte-Devolx, B.; Maes, B.; Boneu, A.; Schlumberger, M.; Bigorgne, J.-C.; Dumontier, P.; Leclerc, L.; et al. Prognostic factors for survival and for biochemical cure in medullary thyroid carcinoma: Results in 899 patients. Clin. Endocrinol. 1998, 48, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kotwal, A.; Erickson, D.; Geske, J.; Hay, I.D.; Castro, M.R. Predicting Outcomes in Sporadic and Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma over Two Decades. Thyroid 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hamdy, O.; Awny, S.; Metwally, I.H. Medullary thyroid cancer: Epidemiological pattern and factors contributing to recurrence and metastasis. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2020, 102, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Twito, O.; Grozinsky-Glasberg, S.; Levy, S.; Bachar, G.; Gross, D.J.; Benbassat, C.; Rozental, A.; Hirsch, D. Clinico-pathologic and dynamic prognostic factors in sporadic and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma: An Israeli multi-center study. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2019, 181, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Van Heerden, J.A.; Grant, C.S.; Gharib, H.; Hay, I.D.; Ilstrup, D.M. Long-term Course of Patients with Persistent Hypercalcitoninemia After Apparent Curative Primary Surgery for Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Ann. Surg. 1990, 212, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Prabhu, M.; Shakya, S.; Ballal, S.; Shamim, S.A.; Bal, C. RET gene mutation analysis and long-term clinical outcomes of medullary thyroid cancer patients. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2020, 41, 1136–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kebebew, E.; Ituarte, P.H.; Siperstein, A.E.; Duh, Q.Y.; Clark, O.H. Medullary thyroid carcinoma: Clinical characteristics, treatment, prognostic factors, and a comparison of staging systems. Cancer 2000, 88, 1139–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sahli, Z.T.; Canner, J.K.; Zeiger, M.A.; Mathur, A. Association between age and disease specific mortality in medullary thyroid cancer. Am. J. Surg. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Orimo, H. Reviewing the definition of elderly. Nippon. Ronen Igakkai Zasshi Jpn. J. Geriatr. 2006, 43, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Donis-Keller, H.; Dou, S.; Chi, D.; Carlson, K.M.; Toshima, K.; Lairmore, T.C.; Howe, J.R.; Moley, J.F.; Goodfellow, P.; Wells, J.S.A. Mutations in the RET proto-oncogene are associated with MEN 2A and FMTC. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1993, 2, 851–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Marsh, D.J.; Learoyd, D.L.; Andrew, S.D.; Krishnan, L.; Pojer, R.; Richardson, A.-L.; Delbridge, L.; Eng, C.; Robinson, B.G. Somatic mutations in the RET proto-oncogene in sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma. Clin. Endocrinol. 1996, 44, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ganly, I.; Nixon, I.J.; Wang, L.Y.; Palmer, F.L.; Migliacci, J.C.; Aniss, A.; Sywak, M.S.; Eskander, A.E.; Freeman, J.L.; Campbell, M.J.; et al. Survival from Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: What Has Age Got to Do with It? Thyroid 2015, 25, 1106–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gülben, K.; Berberoğlu, U.; Boyabatlı, M. Prognostic Factors for Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. World J. Surg. 2005, 30, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Massimo, E.D.; Assi, A.; Sironi, M.; Sangalli, G.; Spreafico, G.; Colombo, L. Multivariate analysis of patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma: Prognostic significance and impact on treatment of clinical and pathologic variables. Cancer 1996, 77, 1556–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yan, H.; Winchester, D.J.; Prinz, R.A.; Wang, C.-H.; Nakazato, Y.; Moo-Young, T.A. Differences in the Impact of Age on Mortality in Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 25, 3193–3199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Amin, M.B.; Edge, S.B.; American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; 1024p. [Google Scholar]
  19. Elisei, R.; Romei, C.; Renzini, G.; Bottici, V.; Cosci, B.; Molinaro, E.; Agate, L.; Cappagli, V.; Miccoli, P.; Berti, P.; et al. The Timing of Total Thyroidectomy inRETGene Mutation Carriers Could Be Personalized and Safely Planned on the Basis of Serum Calcitonin: 18 Years Experience at One Single Center. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 426–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Elisei, R.; Cosci, B.; Romei, C.; Bottici, V.; Renzini, G.; Molinaro, E.; Agate, L.; Vivaldi, A.; Faviana, P.; Basolo, F.; et al. Prognostic Significance of SomaticRETOncogene Mutations in Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 93, 682–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. DeLellis, R.A.; Al Ghuzlan, A.; Albores Saavedra, J.; Baloch, Z.W.; Basolo, F.; Elisei, R.; Kaserer, K.; LiVolsi, V.; Matias-Guiu, X.; Mete, O.; et al. Medullary thyroid carcinoma. In WHO Classification of Tumors of Endocrine Organs In Tumors of the Thyroid Gland, 4th ed.; Lloyd, R., Osamura, R., Kloppel, G., Rosai, J., Eds.; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2017; pp. 108–113. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.; Xu, J.; Ward, E. Cancer Statistics, 2010. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2010, 60, 277–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Owonikoko, T.K.; Ragin, C.C.; Belani, C.P.; Oton, A.B.; Gooding, W.E.; Taioli, E.; Ramalingam, S.S. Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007, 25, 5570–5577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Miller, D.C.; Gruber, S.B.; Hollenbeck, B.K.; Montie, J.E.; Wei, J.T. Incidence of Initial Local Therapy Among Men With Lower-Risk Prostate Cancer in the United States. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2006, 98, 1134–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hewitt, M.; Rowland, J.H.; Yancik, R. Cancer Survivors in the United States: Age, Health, and Disability. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Boil. Sci. Med. Sci. 2003, 58, M82–M91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Smith, A.W.; Reeve, B.B.; Bellizzi, K.M.; Harlan, L.C.; Klabunde, C.N.; Amsellem, M.; Bierman, A.S.; Hays, R.D. Cancer, Comorbidities, and Health-Related Quality of Life of Older Adults. Health Care Financ. Rev. 2008, 29, 41–56. [Google Scholar]
  27. Louwman, W.; Janssen-Heijnen, M.; Houterman, S.; Voogd, A.; Van Der Sangen, M.; Nieuwenhuijzen, G.; Coebergh, J.; Van Der Sangen, M.J.C. Less extensive treatment and inferior prognosis for breast cancer patient with comorbidity: A population-based study. Eur. J. Cancer 2005, 41, 779–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Romei, C.; Cosci, B.; Renzini, G.; Bottici, V.; Molinaro, E.; Agate, L.; Passannanti, P.; Viola, D.; Biagini, A.; Basolo, F.; et al. RET genetic screening of sporadic medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) allows the preclinical diagnosis of unsuspected gene carriers and the identification of a relevant percentage of hidden familial MTC (FMTC). Clin. Endocrinol. 2011, 74, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ciampi, R.; Romei, C.; Ramone, T.; Prete, A.; Tacito, A.; Cappagli, V.; Bottici, V.; Viola, D.; Torregrossa, L.; Ugolini, C.; et al. Genetic Landscape of Somatic Mutations in a Large Cohort of Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Carcinomas Studied by Next-Generation Targeted Sequencing. iScience 2019, 20, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 13 00094 g001
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of group A (<65 yrs) and B (≥65 yrs).
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of group A (<65 yrs) and B (≥65 yrs).
Cancers 13 00094 g001
Cancers 13 00094 g002
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of groups, divided into quartiles of age (≤43 yrs, 44–54 yrs, 55–63 yrs and ≥64 yrs).
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of groups, divided into quartiles of age (≤43 yrs, 44–54 yrs, 55–63 yrs and ≥64 yrs).
Cancers 13 00094 g002
Table 1. Epidemiologic, clinical and pathologic features of the 432 sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC).
Table 1. Epidemiologic, clinical and pathologic features of the 432 sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC).
Features n (%)
SexM188 (43.5)
F244 (56.5)
Age
(years)		Median (IQR)54 (43–63)
Min–Max16–83
Pre-operative calcitonin a≤100 pg/mL147 (41.1)
>100 pg/mL211 (58.9)
Tumor size b
(cm)		Median (IQR)1.5 (0.8–2.7)
Min–Max0.1–9
Tumor size category≤1 cm156 (36.1)
1.1–4 cm239 (55.3)
>4 cm28 (6.5)
MultifocalityYes69 (16)
No363 (84)
mETEYes86 (19.9)
No346 (80.1)
Histologic pattern cConventional157 (59.5)
Spindle Cell57 (21.6)
Others d50 (18.9)
T stageT1a147 (34)
T1b94 (21.8)
T289 (20.6)
T377 (17.8)
T421 (4.9)
Tx4 (0.9)
Central compartment lymph node dissectionYes378 (87.5)
No54 (12.5)
Latero-cervical lymph node dissectionYes158 (36.6)
No274 (63.4)
N stageN0204 (47.2)
N1a66 (15.3)
N1b36 (8.3)
N1a + N1b93 (21.5)
Nx33 (7.6)
M stageM022 (5.1)
M148 (11.1)
Mx362 (83.8)
Somatic mutation investigation ePositive94 (58.8)
Negative66 (41.3)
Somatic mutation resultRET M918T63 (67)
Others31 (33)
Follow-up time
(months)		Median (IQR)88.5 (50–138.8)
Min–Max25–247
Second neck surgeryYes48 (11.1)
No384 (88.9)
Local treatments fYes44 (10.2)
No388 (89.8)
Systemic treatmentsYes59 (13.7)
No373 (86.3)
Type of systemic treatmentChemotherapy5 (8.5)
TKI47 (79.7)
Chemotherapy + TKI5 (8.5)
Somatostatin analogs2 (3.4)
Clinical outcomeExcellent Response229 (53)
Biochemical Incomplete Response67 (15.5)
Local Metastatic disease29 (6.7)
Distant Metastatic disease107 (24.8)
Site of surgeryPisa323 (74.8)
No Pisa109 (25.2)
a available in 358/432—82.9%, b available in 423/432—97.9%, c available in 264/432—61.1%, d angiosarcoma, clear cell, follicular, mixed (papillary thyroid cancer/MTC), oncocytic, papillary, small cell, e available in 160/432—37%, f external beam radiotherapy (ERBT), trans-arterial chemioembolization (TACE), trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE).
Table 2. Comparison of analyzed features in group A (<65 yrs) and B (≥65 yrs).
Table 2. Comparison of analyzed features in group A (<65 yrs) and B (≥65 yrs).
Features Group A (<65)
(338—78.2%)		Group B (≥65)
(94—21.8%)		p
SexM145 (42.9)43 (45.7)0.62
F193 (57.1)51 (54.3)
Age
(years)		Median (IQR)49 (40–57)70 (67–76)<0.01
Min–Max(16–64)(65–83)
Pre-operative calcitonin a≤100 pg/mL112 (40.4)35 (43.2)0.66
>100 pg/mL165 (59.6)46 (56.8)
Tumor size b
(cm)		Median (IQR)1.5 (0.8–2.5)1.6 (0.8–2.8)0.7
Min–Max0.1–90.2–8
Tumor size category≤1 cm121 (36.4)35 (38.5)0.81
1.1–4 cm190 (57.2)49 (53.8)
>4 cm21 (6.3)7 (7.7)
MultifocalityYes53 (15.7)16 (17)0.75
No285 (84.378 (83)
mETEYes67 (19.8)19 (20.2)0.93
No271 (80.2)75 (79.8)
Histologic pattern cConventional117 (57.4)40 (66.7)0.2
Spindle Cell49 (24)8 (13.3)
Others d38 (18.6)12 (20)
T stageT1a115 (34)32 (34)0.92
T1b77 (22.8)17 (18.1)
T267 (19.8)22 (23.4)
T359 (17.5)18 (19.1)
T417 (5)4 (4.3)
Tx3 (0.9)1 (1.1)
Central compartment lymph node dissectionYes296 (87.6)82 (87.2)0.93
No42 (12.4)12 (12.8)
Latero-cervical lymph node dissectionYes126 (37.3)32 (34)0.57
No212 (62.7)62 (66)
N stageN0157 (46.4)47 (50)0.91
N1a54 (16)12 (12.8)
N1b28 (8.3)8 (8.5)
N1a + N1b72 (21.3)21 (22.3)
Nx27 (8)6 (6.4)
M stageM021 (6.2)1 (1.1)0.13
M138 (11.2)10 (10.6)
Mx279 (82.5)83 (88.3)
Somatic mutation investigation ePositive81 (60.9)13 (48.1)0.22
Negative52 (39.1)14 (51.9)
Somatic mutation resultRET M918T56 (69.1)7 (53.8)0.28
Others25 (30.9)6 (46.2)
Follow-up time
(months)		Median (IQR)96 (56–144.3)61 (38–106)<0.01
Min–Max25–24725–242
Second neck surgeryYes40 (11.8)8 (85)0.36
No298 (88.2)86 (91.5)
Local treatments fYes38 (11.2)6 (6.4)0.17
No300 (88.8)88 (93.6)
Systemic treatmentsYes47 (13.9)12 (12.8)0.78
No291 (86.1)82 (87.2)
Type of systemic treatmentChemotherapy3 (6.4)2 (16.7)0.46
TKI39 (83)8 (66.7)
Chemotherapy + TKI4 (8.5)1 (8.3)
Somatostatin analogs1 (2.1)1 (8.3)
Clinical outcomeExcellent Response175 (51.8)54 (57.4)0.51
Biochemical Incomplete Response57 (16.9)10 (10.6)
Local Metastatic disease23 (6.8)6 (6.4)
Distant Metastatic disease83 (24.6)24 (25.5)
Site of surgeryPisa250 (74)73 (77.7)0.47
No Pisa88 (26)21 (22.3)
a available in 358/432—82.9%, b available in 423/432—97.9%, c available in 264/432—61.1%, d angiosarcoma, clear cell, follicular, oncocytic, papillary, small cell, e available in 160/432—37%, f external beam radiotherapy (ERBT), trans-arterial chemioembolization (TACE), trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE).
Table 3. Comparison of analyzed features in dead patients of group A and B.
Table 3. Comparison of analyzed features in dead patients of group A and B.
Features Group A
Dead 29/338 (8.6%)		Group B
Dead 12/94 (12.8%)		p
SexMale21 (72.4)10 (83.3)0.46
Female8 (27.6)2 (16.7)
Age
(years)		Median (IQR)47 (41.5–58.5)70.5 (67.3–74.3)<0.01
Min–Max(26–64)(65–79)
Pre-operative calcitonin a≤100 pg/mL2 (10)-0.28
>100 pg/mL18 (90)11 (100)
Tumor size b
(cm)		Median (IQR)2 (1.2–3.8)3 (2.2–4.5)0.17
Min–Max0.2–90.3–8
Tumor size category≤1 cm5 (17.9)1 (9.1)0.69
1.1–4 cm18 (64.3)7 (63.6)
>4 cm5 (17.9)3 (27.3)
MultifocalityYes8 (27.6)5 (41.7)0.38
No21 (72.4)7 (58.3)
mETEYes15 (51.7)6 (50)0.92
No14 (48.3)6 (50)
Histologic pattern cConventional3 (37.5)3 (75)0.07
Spindle Cell5 (62.5)-
Others d-1 (25)
T stageT1a4 (13.8)2 (16.7)0.36
T1b4 (13.8)-
T24 (13.8)3 (25)
T314 (48.3)4 (33.3)
T43 (10.3)2 (16.7)
Tx-1 (8.3)
Central compartment lymph node dissectionYes23 (79.3)10 (83.3)0.68
No6 (20.7)2 (16.7)
Latero-cervical
lymph node dissection		Yes24 (82.8)11(91.7)0.46
No5 (17.2)1 (8.3)
N stageN03 (10.3)1 (8.3)0.92
N1a1 (3.4)1 (8.3)
N1b11 (37.9)5 (41.7)
N1a + N1b13 (44.8)5 (41.7)
Nx1 (3.4)-
M stageM03 (10.3)1 (8.3)0.97
M115 (51.7)6 (50)
Mx11 (37.9)5 (41.7)
Somatic mutation investigation ePositive21 (87.5)5 (71.4)0.31
Negative3 (12.5)2 (28.6)
Somatic mutation resultRET M91816 (76.2)4 (80)0.86
Others5 (23.8)1 (20)
Follow-up time
(months)		Median (IQR)84 (53.5–131.5)61.5 (36–81.8)0.08
Min–Max31–16728–160
Second neck surgeryYes12 (41.4)4 (33.3)0.63
No17 (58.6)8 (66.7)
Local treatments fYes14 (48.3)6 (50)0.92
No15 (51.7)6 (50)
Systemic treatmentsYes21 (72.4)9 (75)0.87
No8 (27.6)3 (25)
Type of systemic treatmentChemotherapy2 (9.5)1 (11.1)0.91
TKI15 (71.4)7 (77.8)
Chemotherapy + TKI3 (14.3)1 (11.1)
Somatostatin analogs1 (4.8)-
Site of surgeryPisa11 (37.9)7 (58.3)0.23
No Pisa18 (62.1)5 (41.7)
a available in 31/41—75.6%, b available in 39/41—95.1%, c available in 12/41—29.3%, d angiosarcoma, clear cell, follicular, mixed (papillary thyroid cancer/MTC), oncocytic, papillary, small cell, e available in 31/41—75.6%, f external beam radiotherapy (ERBT), trans-arterial chemioembolization (TACE), trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE).
Table 4. Death rate in patients of group A and B, divided by 5 years interval of follow-up.
Table 4. Death rate in patients of group A and B, divided by 5 years interval of follow-up.
Follow Up Time Interval
(Years)		 Group A
n° (%)		Group B
n° (%)		p
≤5Alive88 (89.8)41 (87.2)0.65
Dead10 (10.2)6 (12.8)
5.1–10Alive112 (90.3)25 (86.2)0.51
Dead12 (9.7)4 (13.8)
10.1–15Alive78 (91.8)9 (81.8)0.29
Dead7 (8.2)2 (18.2)
>15Alive31 (100)7 (100)-
Dead--
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matrone, A.; Gambale, C.; Prete, A.; Piaggi, P.; Cappagli, V.; Bottici, V.; Romei, C.; Ciampi, R.; Torregrossa, L.; De Napoli, L.; et al. Impact of Advanced Age on the Clinical Presentation and Outcome of Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancers 2021, 13, 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010094

AMA Style

Matrone A, Gambale C, Prete A, Piaggi P, Cappagli V, Bottici V, Romei C, Ciampi R, Torregrossa L, De Napoli L, et al. Impact of Advanced Age on the Clinical Presentation and Outcome of Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancers. 2021; 13(1):94. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matrone, Antonio, Carla Gambale, Alessandro Prete, Paolo Piaggi, Virginia Cappagli, Valeria Bottici, Cristina Romei, Raffaele Ciampi, Liborio Torregrossa, Luigi De Napoli, and et al. 2021. "Impact of Advanced Age on the Clinical Presentation and Outcome of Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma" Cancers 13, no. 1: 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010094

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop