Next Article in Journal
Systematic Analysis of Aberrant Biochemical Networks and Potential Drug Vulnerabilities Induced by Tumor Suppressor Loss in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Next Article in Special Issue
Survival in Cytologically Proven Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients with Nodal Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution of the Experimental Models of Cholangiocarcinoma
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

No Difference in Overall Survival and Non-Breast Cancer Deaths after Partial Breast Radiotherapy Compared to Whole Breast Radiotherapy—A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Cancers 2020, 12(8), 2309; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082309
by Jan Haussmann 1, Wilfried Budach 1, Stefanie Corradini 2, David Krug 3, Balint Tamaskovics 1, Edwin Bölke 1,*, Freddy-Joel Djiepmo-Njanang 1, Ioannis Simiantonakis 1, Kai Kammers 4 and Christiane Matuschek 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Cancers 2020, 12(8), 2309; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082309
Submission received: 1 July 2020 / Revised: 4 August 2020 / Accepted: 10 August 2020 / Published: 17 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Early Breast Cancer)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a well-written article.. The aim of the study was clearly defined. The statistical methods and the structure of the study have been planned correctly. The results were described in a proper manner. The discussion was presented very well .The cited publications are well adjusted.

it is useful to write conclusions in a separate section. It is acceptable after minor revision

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 

thank you very much for your constructive and helpful review. We wrote the conclusion now in a separate section.

Kind regards

Edwin Bölke on behalf of all authors

Reviewer 2 Report

The argument of the work is really interesting  and the method is theoretically rigorous. Unfortunately in practice there are many mistakes in the citations. Before considering the publication of this paper you should revise accurately the citation of the references that appears uncorrect in many parts of the article. some examples: table 1 vicini 31. meattini 37, vaidya 9, veronesi 10, struad 12,...

line 76 cit 26, line 221 cit 23

 

 

line 12 insert trials

line 34 regimen

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

thank you very much for your constructive review. We checked our references and revised them accurately.

Kind regards

Edwin Bölke on behalf of all authors

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

now, the work appears adequate. next time, please revise accurately the paper before the submission

Back to TopTop