Next Article in Journal
Solving the Bonding Problem of the Ni Thin Coating with the Ultrasonic Assisted Electrochemical Potential Activation Method
Next Article in Special Issue
A D-Band Direct-Conversion IQ Receiver with 28 dB CG and 7.3 dB NF in 130 nm SiGe Process
Previous Article in Journal
A Delay-Cell-Controlled VCO Design for Unipolar Single-Gate Enhancement-Mode TFT Technologies
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Inductorless Gain-Controllable Wideband LNA Based on CCCIIs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis and Design of a Non-Magnetic Bulk CMOS Passive Circulator Using 25% Duty-Cycle Clock

1
School of Integrated Circuits and Electronics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2
School of Information and Electronics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2023, 14(1), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14010033
Submission received: 12 November 2022 / Revised: 18 December 2022 / Accepted: 20 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art CMOS and MEMS Devices)

Abstract

:
A circulator, which is a non-reciprocal device, is widely used in full-duplex systems, future communication and sensing networks, and quantum computing, and it is difficult to implement a passive topology on a chip. Based on switch-based spatio-temporal conductivity modulation, in this study, we design and implement a non-magnetic on-chip passive circulator operating at the Ku band in a 90-nm bulk CMOS technology using a 25% duty-cycle I/Q clock signal. With the virtue of the four-phase non-overlapping clock signal, the proposed circulator achieves a 3.9 dB transmitter (TX)-to-antenna (ANT) and a 4.0 dB ANT-to-receiver (RX) insertion loss with a 1-dB bandwidth of 2.7 GHz (21.4%). The TX-to-RX isolation is better than 17.2 dB, and the TX-to-ANT IIP3 and ANT-to-RX IIP3 are 19.7 dBm and 20.0 dBm, respectively, while occupying a die area of 1.55 mm × 1.15 mm. Although low-cost bulk CMOS technology is used, competitive isolation, linearity performance, and isolation bandwidth are achieved in the proposed design.

1. Introduction

Full-duplex (FD) communication, considered as one of the most important technologies in 5G as well as future communication and sensing systems, has been widely studied in recent years [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], as it allows simultaneous transmission and reception at the same time. Compared to Frequency Division Duplexing (FDD) and Time Division Duplexing (TDD) systems that use different frequency channels or time slots for transmission and reception, FD may increase the transmission speed by up to two times and save the frequency bands. However, the most significant obstacle for FD to be commercially used is the large self-interference (SI) from transmitter to receiver [3]. Therefore, a number of self-interference cancellation (SIC) technologies have been proposed in terms of the antenna interface, radio frequency (RF), and analog and digital domains [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] in order to mitigate this challenge.
At the antenna interface, SIC can be performed by separated antennas [7], which occupy a large area and are not suitable for phased-array or multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) systems. In order to reduce the area, a shared antenna is suggested. Typically, an electrical-balance duplexer (EBD) [19,20] is utilized to suppress SI. However, the EBD, which is a reciprocal three-port device, exhibits an inherent 3-dB loss, which is not acceptable in low-loss systems nowadays. Moreover, another candidate is a circulator, which is a non-reciprocal three-port device. Traditionally, a circulator is implemented using ferrite materials, which are bulky, expensive, and incompatible with the integrated circuit (IC) fabrication process. On-chip active circulators [21,22,23,24,25] using transistors suffer from poor noise and linearity performance and a limited dynamic range [26]. Therefore, a non-magnetic non-reciprocal passive on-chip circulator is expected. Nevertheless, the implementation of non-magnetic non-reciprocity is a great challenge, which has been widely studied in the past few years [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35].
An on-chip CMOS non-magnetic passive circulator was first demonstrated by Prof. Krishnaswamy’s group using an N-path filter [32,36]. Later, the first on-chip non-magnetic passive circulator based on switch-based spatio-temporal conductivity modulation [33] was proposed [37], which consumes more area. Compared to the circulator using the N-path filter, a higher operating frequency and lower clock frequency were achieved. It is also utilized in quantum computing applications [38,39] at cryogenic temperatures. A summary of the previous literature is shown in Table 1.
Nowadays, the circulator based on the N-path filter is attempted to be used in complete full-duplex transceivers [36] due to its small form factor and lower insertion loss. However, the circulator based on the N-path filter limits the transceivers to operate at lower frequencies, which is not suitable for millimeter-wave wireless systems. Traditionally, a 50% duty-cycle clock signal is applied on the circulator based on switch-based spatio-temporal conductivity modulation. However, using a 25% duty-cycle clock signal can potentially provide a higher conversion gain and lower crosstalk compared with using a 50% duty-cycle clock signal. Moreover, the design of two local oscillator (LO) signals at millimeter-wave frequencies with different duty cycles is a great challenge.
According to the previous discussion, a passive circulator operating at 10–20 GHz remains to be studied. In this frequency band, Ku-band satellite communication is located. Traditionally, the simultaneous transmission and reception of a satellite communication system is implemented by utilizing different frequency channels. However, with the increasing data volume and the emerging future communication methods, full-duplex satellite communication becomes a promising means to potentially double the throughput and save the frequency bands. Therefore, an on-chip passive circulator for full-duplex satellite communication is an emerging research topic in the near future.
To address the research gap and potentially use the 25%-duty-cycle clock signal to implement higher conversion gains, this paper describes the analysis, design, and implementation of a non-magnetic passive circulator operating at the Ku band based on switch-based spatio-temporal conductivity modulation in a 90-nm bulk CMOS technology. Section 2 begins with an illustration of the working state of the proposed circulator based on time-domain and frequency-domain analysis. A novel system-level analysis method is also presented in this section. Then, the implementation details of the proposed circulator are provided in Section 3. Section 4 and Section 5 presents the measurement results and the limitation of the study and recommendations, and the paper concludes in Section 6.

2. Analysis

A gyrator [46], considered as a passive, non-reciprocal, and two-port device, was proposed in 1948, which exhibits a phase difference of 180° between the forward and reverse directions and is a good candidate for passive non-reciprocal element design, e.g., circulators. The gyrator using a 25% duty-cycle clock signal embedded in the proposed circulator is shown in Figure 1. In order to clarify the working state of the gyrator, time-domain analysis, frequency-domain analysis, and the novel system-level analysis are presented in this section.

2.1. Time-Domain Analysis

In order to verify the working state of the gyrator using a 25% duty-cycle clock signal, the phase shift of different modulation periods both in forward and reverse directions is illustrated, as shown in Table 2 and Table 3.
From Table 2 and Table 3, it is found that the gyrator using the 25% duty-cycle clock signal exhibits a 90° phase shift in the forward direction and −90° in the reverse direction, which implements a phase difference of 180°.

2.2. Frequency-Domain Analysis

In this section, the frequency-domain analysis of the gyrator embedded in the proposed circulator is explained. Due to the double-balanced differential implementation of the switches, the final derivation can be multiplied by 2 directly. The Fourier series of the 25% duty-cycle clock signal is as follows:
L O ( t ) = 2 π n = 1 sin ( 2 n 1 ) π 4 2 n 1 ( e j ( 2 n 1 ) ω m t + e j ( 2 n 1 ) ω m t )
For an input signal v 1 + ( t ) = e j ω t , the output signal of the gyrator at the right-hand side can be derived as
v 2 ( t ) = v 1 + ( t T m 4 ) × L O ( t T m 4 ) × L O ( t T m 4 )           = 8 π 2 e j ω T m 4 e j ω t n = 1 sin 2 ( 2 n 1 4 ) ( 2 n 1 ) 2           = 1 2 8 π 2 e j ω T m 4 e j ω t n = 1 1 ( 2 n 1 ) 2           = 1 2 e j ω T m 4 e j ω t
Therefore, the total output signal mixed by the four-phase clock signal can be calculated as
v 2 ( t ) t o t a l = e j ω T m 4 e j ω t                       = e j ω T m 4 v 1 + ( t )
Similar derivation can be performed for the reverse direction and the final result is as follows:
v 1 ( t ) t o t a l = e j ω T m 4 e j ω t                       = e j ω T m 4 v 2 + ( t )
Equations (3) and (4) show that the ideal gyrator using a 25% duty-cycle clock signal is lossless and appears externally as linear time invariant (LTI), which has the same results compared with the gyrator using a 50% duty-cycle clock signal [34].

2.3. System-Level Analysis

In order to provide a more straightforward and accurate analysis of the gyrator’s performance, a system-level analysis method is proposed in this section.
Starting from Equation (1), when the LO signal is mixed with an input signal expressed as v 1 + ( t ) = e j ω t , the output signal h(t) is shown as follows:
h ( t ) = L O ( t ) × v 1 + ( t )       = 2 π n = 1 sin ( 2 n 1 ) π 4 2 n 1 ( e j ( ω + ( 2 n 1 ) ω m ) t + e j ( ω ( 2 n 1 ) ω m ) t )
Now, if the output signal in Equation (5) is directly mixed again with the square wave in Equation (1), the output signal can be derived as
v 2 ( t ) = L O ( t ) × v 1 + ( t ) × L O ( t )             = 2 π n = 1 sin ( 2 n 1 ) π 4 2 n 1 ( e j ( ω + ( 2 n 1 ) ω m ) t + e j ( ω ( 2 n 1 ) ω m ) t )             × 2 π n = 1 sin ( 2 n 1 ) π 4 2 n 1 ( e j ( 2 n 1 ) ω m t + e j ( 2 n 1 ) ω m t )             = 1 2 e j ω t
Then, the total output signal mixed by the four-phase clock signal can be calculated as
v 2 ( t ) t o t a l = v 1 + ( t )
From Equations (5)–(7), it is found that the system illustrated above is independent with mixing products and is externally LTI and reciprocal as
v 2 ( t τ ) = L O ( t τ ) × v 1 + ( t τ ) × L O ( t τ )
and
a v 2 , a ( t τ ) + b v 2 , b ( t τ ) = L O ( t τ ) × ( a v 1 , a + ( t τ ) + b v 1 , b + ( t τ ) ) × L O ( t τ )
The system derived in Equations (5)–(9) can be illustrated as in Figure 2a,b. From another point of view, the system with time delay τ in Figure 2b can be separated into two sub-systems in the forward and reverse direction if the time delay is performed by the time delay module internally, as shown in Figure 3a,b. Note that the time delay module should be non-reciprocal and the system implements a time delay of ±τ in the forward and reverse direction.
If the time delay module is implemented by a transmission line, it must be reciprocal in both directions. Therefore, in order to implement the system shown in Figure 3a,b using a transmission line, the relationship shown below is required:
h ( t + τ ) = h ( t τ )
Considering the frequency components in the internal node after mixing expressed as
ω ± ( 2 n 1 ) ω m
when τ = Tm/n and the frequency of the input signal is the harmonics of ωm, the ratio n that satisfies Equation (10) is analyzed. Under such a circumstance, the frequency components in the internal node are the harmonics of ωm, and if the minimum frequency component meets the requirement of Equation (10), all the higher-order harmonics will be satisfied. Thus, the minimum frequency component is analyzed here.
When the frequency of the input signal is the even harmonics of ωm, the minimum frequency component in the internal node is ωm, i.e.,
2 τ = T m n = 2
In this case, a reciprocal phase shift of Tm/2 in the forward and reverse direction is implemented.
When the frequency of the input signal is the odd harmonics of ωm, the minimum frequency component is 2ωm, i.e.,
2 τ = T m 2 n = 4
In this case, a non-reciprocal phase shift of ±Tm/4 in the forward and reverse direction is implemented and the function of a gyrator is realized, which is used in the designed circulator.

3. Implementation

A comprehensive research framework is shown in Figure 4. The implementation details are illustrated in this section and the design procedure of the artificial transmission line is followed according to [37].

3.1. Generation of 25% Duty-Cycle Clock Signal

Conventionally, a 25% duty-cycle clock signal is generated using a divide-by-2 frequency divider and AND gates, as shown in Figure 5, which results in high power consumption and poor phase-noise performance. In order not to deteriorate the performance of the whole full-duplex communication transceiver and implement a high-frequency, high-performance 25% duty-cycle clock signal, the generator that outputs the 25% duty-cycle clock signal directly after the divide-by-2 divider is used in this design, as shown in Figure 6.
The sinusoidal input signal with a frequency of 2fLO is injected using the ground-signal-ground (GSG) pad and the single-to-differential conversion is performed on the chip. A four-stage inverter buffer with resistor feedback in the second and fourth stages is applied directly after the 25% duty-cycle quadrature output. In order to mitigate the influence of the long-distance layout routing of the clock signal to the switches, another two-stage inverter buffer with resistor feedback in the second stage is placed near to the switches in the layout design.
A 2fLO (i.e., 8.4 GHz) sinusoidal signal is used as the input of the generator. The clock signal generator consumes power of 47.3 mW, which includes 3.9 mW from the generator core and 43.4 mW from all the buffers. After the inverter buffer chain, a four-phase 25% duty-cycle square-wave clock signal, of which the rising time is approximately 1/12 of the modulation period, is generated.

3.2. Proposed Circulator

The passive on-chip non-reciprocal CMOS circulator is proposed in this section, as shown in Figure 7, embedded with the gyrator using a 25% duty-cycle clock signal. The operating frequency is designed to be 12.6 GHz with a 4.2 GHz modulation clock. In order to absorb the parasitic capacitance of the switches to the λ/8 transmission line at 12.6 GHz, a symmetric structure is utilized in this design.
Considering the fabrication technology limitations, bulk CMOS transistors without a thick gate are used as the mixer switches, of which the parasitic capacitance is absorbed in the gyrator symmetrically.
The λ/8 transmission line at 12.6 GHz between the TX/RX port and gyrator is implemented by the LC lumped element, and the λ/4 transmission line at 12.6 GHz between the TX/RX port and ANT port is implemented by a grounded coplanar waveguide (GCPW). Taking the size, insertion loss, and bandwidth into consideration, the λ/4 transmission line at 4.2 GHz in the gyrator is realized by a 5-stage LC π-type lumped element transmission line. The simulated Bragg frequency is approximately 42 GHz, which can tolerate up to seven-times mixing products and is limited by the operating frequency and process used. Recently, the LC π-type lumped element transmission line has been modified to obtain a lower insertion loss, such as a hybrid π-lattice structure [42], band-pass filter structure [43], all-pass filter structure [39], etc., which are also suitable in the proposed circulator. In addition, in order to enable single-ended measurements, baluns are attached to the proposed design.

4. Measurements

The proposed on-chip passive circulator is fabricated in a 90-nm bulk CMOS technology. The die micro-photograph of the chip is shown in Figure 8, and the total chip area is 1.55 mm × 1.15 mm with the TX and RX baluns and bonding pads excluded (ANT balun is difficult to de-embed, as shown in Figure 7). The measurement is performed by an RF probe with the die mounted on a PCB board. The power supply and ground are wire bonded to the board.
Four GSG pads are included on the chip for the probing test. Three of them are TX, ANT, and RX terminals and the other one is for clock signal input. The 8.4 GHz sinusoidal input clock signal is generated using a millimeter-wave signal generator and the single-to-differential conversion is implemented on the chip, as illustrated above. S-parameters are measured using a vector network analyzer with two ports probed at a time and the third port terminated with 50 Ω. On-chip calibration of the vector network analyzer is performed ahead of S-parameter measurement. The measured S-parameters of TX-to-ANT (port 1 and port 2), ANT-to-RX (port 2 and port 3) and TX-to-RX (port 1 and port 3) are shown in Figure 9a–c. The insertion loss (IL) is 3.9 dB from TX to ANT (S21) and 4.0 dB from ANT to RX (S32). The TX-to-RX isolation (S31) is >17.2 dB. The S-parameter results are concluded without any on-chip reconfiguration and ANT port impedance tuning, which leads to the reflection at the ANT port and influences the isolation performance. The bandwidth of 1-dB IL degradation is 2.7 GHz (21.4%), corresponding to an isolation of 17.2 to 21.7 dB.
The linearity of the proposed circulator is measured with a two-tone (12.6 GHz and 12.7 GHz) third-order intercept point (IP3) test. The fundamental output amplitude is extrapolated along a line of unity slope and the third-order intermodulation product (IM3) is extrapolated along a line with a slope of three, with the results exhibited in Figure 10a,b. It shows that an input third-order intercept point (IIP3) of 19.7 dBm from TX to ANT and 20.0 dBm from ANT to RX are achieved.
A performance summary and comparison is shown in Table 4. Compared to the prior work, this paper has implemented an on-chip non-reciprocal passive circulator using bulk CMOS technology operating at the Ku band. Thanks to the high-speed 25% duty-cycle clock signal generation circuit, the proposed circulator realizes competitive performance in isolation and linearity compared with the designs using SOI technology, which makes the cost lower. Although process limitations exist, the insertion loss from TX to ANT and from ANT to RX only deteriorates slightly compared to the design in CMOS SOI, which is significantly influenced by the process and operating frequency.

5. Limitations of the Study and Recommendations

Due to the lack of a qualified pre-amplifier, the followings are absent: noise figure, P1dB, and spurious tone measurement. However, P1dB and spurious tones can be reflected by IIP3 to some extent, and the noise figure should be slightly larger than the insertion loss in this passive circulator due to the phase noise of the clock signal.
From the current measurement results, it is recommended to use this circulator in a full-duplex system operating at around 10–20 GHz and requiring a low cost. Although the insertion loss is slightly larger than designs using CMOS SOI technology, other measurement results are competitive, and, moreover, the isolation bandwidth is slightly larger without any tuning method. The proposed design is a promising candidate for Ku-band full-duplex satellite communication.

6. Conclusions

This paper presents an on-chip non-reciprocal passive circulator using bulk CMOS technology with spatio-temporal conductivity modulation operating at the Ku band. Fabricated in a 90-nm bulk CMOS technology, the proposed 12.6-GHz circulator implements an insertion loss of 3.9 dB from TX to ANT and of 4.0 dB from ANT to RX, and with 1-dB degradation over 2.7 GHz, which corresponds to a bandwidth of 21.4%. A > 17.2 dB isolation is achieved, which ranges from 17.2 dB to 21.7 dB in the 1-dB degradation insertion loss bandwidth. Linearity performance is also competitive compared to the prior work using SOI technology without antenna impedance tuning. The proposed circulator consumes an area of 1.55 mm × 1.15 mm and is suitable for low-cost RFIC design.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.G. and J.W.; methodology, X.W. and F.H.; software, J.G.; validation, J.G., W.G. and F.H.; formal analysis, W.G.; investigation, X.W. and J.W.; resources, J.G. and X.W.; data curation, F.H.; writing—original draft preparation, J.G.; writing—review and editing, X.W. and W.G.; visualization, W.G.; supervision, J.W.; project administration, J.W.; funding acquisition, X.W. and J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 62101038, in part by the Beijing Nova Program of Science and Technology under Grant Z191100001119078, and in part by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant 2021M700406.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Debaillie, B.; van Liempd, B.; Hershberg, B.; Craninckx, J.; Rikkinen, K.; van den Broek, D.J.; Klumperink, E.A.M.; Nauta, B. In-band Full-Duplex Transceiver Technology for 5G Mobile Networks. In Proceedings of the ESSCIRC Conference 2015—41st European Solid-State Circuits Conference (ESSCIRC), Graz, Austria, 14–18 September 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Giordani, M.; Polese, M.; Mezzavilla, M.; Rangan, S.; Zorzi, M. Toward 6G Networks: Use Cases and Technologies. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2020, 58, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Reiskarimian, N.; Dinc, T.; Zhou, J.; Chen, T.; Dastjerdi, M.B.; Diakonikolas, J.; Zussman, G.; Krishnaswamy, H. One-way ramp to a two-way highway: Integrated magnetic-free nonreciprocal antenna interfaces for full-duplex wireless. IEEE Microw. Mag. 2019, 20, 56–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhou, J.; Reiskarimian, N.; Diakonikolas, J.; Dinc, T.; Chen, T.; Zussman, G.; Krishnaswamy, H. Integrated full duplex radios. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barneto, C.B.; Riihonen, T.; Turunen, M.; Anttila, L.; Fleischer, M.; Stadius, K.; Ryynanen, J.; Valkama, M. Full-Duplex OFDM Radar With LTE and 5G NR Waveforms: Challenges, Solutions, and Measurements. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2019, 67, 4042–4054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Biedka, M.; Wang, Y.E.; Xu, Q.M.; Li, Y. Full-Duplex RF Front Ends: From Antennas and Circulators to Leakage Cancellation. IEEE Microw. Mag. 2019, 20, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dinc, T.; Chakrabarti, A.; Krishnaswamy, H. A 60 GHz CMOS Full-Duplex Transceiver and Link with Polarization-Based Antenna and RF Cancellation. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2016, 51, 1125–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chi, T.; Park, J.S.; Li, S.; Wang, H. A 64GHz Full-Duplex Transceiver Front-End with an On-Chip Multifeed Self-Interference-Canceling Antenna and an All-Passive Canceler Supporting 4Gb/s Modulation in One Antenna Footprint. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Solid—State Circuits Conference—(ISSCC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 11–15 February 2018. [Google Scholar]
  9. Le, A.T.; Tran, L.C.; Huang, X.; Guo, Y.J. Analog Least Mean Square Loop With I/Q Imbalance for Self-Interference Cancellation in Full-Duplex Radios. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019, 68, 9848–9860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Le, A.T.; Tran, L.C.; Huang, X.; Guo, Y.J. Beam-Based Analog Self-Interference Cancellation in Full-Duplex MIMO Systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2020, 19, 2460–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zhou, J.; Chuang, T.-H.; Dinc, T.; Krishnaswamy, H. Integrated Wideband Self-Interference Cancellation in the RF Domain for FDD and Full-Duplex Wireless. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2015, 50, 3015–3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Roberts, I.P.; Jain, H.B.; Vishwanath, S. Equipping Millimeter-Wave Full-Duplex with Analog Self-Interference Cancellation. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), Dublin, Ireland, 7–11 June 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Erdem, M.; Gurbuz, O.; Ozkan, H. A Residual Scheme for Digital Self-Interference Cancellation in Full Duplex Communication. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), Dublin, Ireland, 7–11 June 2020. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ershadi, A.; Entesari, K. A 0.5-to-3.5-GHz Full-Duplex Mixer-First Receiver With Cartesian Synthesized Self-Interference Suppression Interface in 65-nm CMOS. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2020, 68, 1995–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, T.; Su, C.; Najafi, A.; Rudell, J.C. Wideband Dual-Injection Path Self-Interference Cancellation Architecture for Full-Duplex Transceivers. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2018, 53, 1563–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hamza, A.; Hill, C.; AlShammary, H.; Buckwalter, J. High-Rejection RF Code Domain Receivers for Simultaneous Transmit and Receive Applications. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2020, 55, 1909–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Waheed, M.Z.; Korpi, D.; Anttila, L.; Kiayani, A.; Kosunen, M.; Stadius, K.; Campo, P.P.; Turunen, M.; Allen, M.; Ryynanen, J.; et al. Passive Intermodulation in Simultaneous Transmit–Receive Systems: Modeling and Digital Cancellation Methods. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2020, 68, 3633–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Haq, F.U.; Englund, M.; Antonov, Y.; Stadius, K.; Kosunen, M.; Ryynänen, J.; Östman, K.B.; Koli, K. Full-Duplex Wireless Transceiver Self-Interference Cancellation Through FD-SOI Buried-Gate Signaling. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Florence, Italy, 27–30 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mikhemar, M.; Darabi, H.; Abidi, A. A tunable integrated duplexer with 50dB isolation in 40nm CMOS. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference—Digest of Technical Papers, San Francisco, CA, USA, 8–12 February 2009. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mikhemar, M.; Darabi, H.; Abidi, A.A. A Multiband RF Antenna Duplexer on CMOS: Design and Performance. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2013, 48, 2067–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tanaka, S.; Shimomura, N.; Ohtake, K. Active circulators—The realization of circulators using transistors. Proc. IEEE 1965, 53, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mung, S.W.Y.; Chan, W.S. The Challenge of Active Circulators: Design and Optimization in Future Wireless Communication. IEEE Microw. Mag. 2019, 20, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tang, B.; Gui, X.; Xu, J.; Xia, Q.; Geng, L. A Dual Interference-Canceling Active Quasi-Circulator Achieving 36-dB Isolation Over 6-GHz Bandwidth. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2019, 29, 409–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, S.; Lee, C.-H.; Wu, Y.-B. Fully Integrated 10-GHz Active Circulator and Quasi-Circulator Using Bridged-T Networks in Standard CMOS. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst. 2016, 24, 3184–3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fang, K.; Buckwalter, J.F. A Tunable 5–7 GHz Distributed Active Quasi-Circulator With 18-dBm Output Power in CMOS SOI. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2017, 27, 998–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nagulu, A.; Reiskarimian, N.; Krishnaswamy, H. Non-reciprocal electronics based on temporal modulation. Nat. Electron. 2020, 3, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kodera, T.; Sounas, D.L.; Caloz, C. Magnetless Nonreciprocal Metamaterial (MNM) Technology: Application to Microwave Components. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2013, 61, 1030–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fleury, R.; Sounas, D.L.; Sieck, C.F.; Haberman, M.R.; Alù, A. Sound isolation and giant linear nonreciprocity in a compact acoustic circulator. Science 2014, 343, 516–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Estep, N.A.; Sounas, D.L.; Soric, J.; Alù, A. Magnetic-free non-reciprocity and isolation based on parametrically modulated coupled-resonator loops. Nat. Phys. 2014, 10, 923–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qin, S.; Xu, Q.; Wang, Y.E. Nonreciprocal Components With Distributedly Modulated Capacitors. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2014, 62, 2260–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mahmoud, A.M.; Davoyan, A.R.; Engheta, N. All-passive nonreciprocal metastructure. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Reiskarimian, N.; Krishnaswamy, H. Magnetic-free non-reciprocity based on staggered commutation. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Dinc, T.; Tymchenko, M.; Nagulu, A.; Sounas, D.; Alù, A.; Krishnaswamy, H. Synchronized conductivity modulation to realize broadband lossless magnetic-free non-reciprocity. Nat. Commun 2017, 8, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Nagulu, A.; Dinc, T.; Xiao, Z.; Tymchenko, M.; Sounas, D.L.; Alù, A.; Krishnaswamy, H. Nonreciprocal Components Based on Switched Transmission Lines. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2018, 66, 4706–4725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kord, A.; Sounas, D.L.; Alu, A. Microwave Nonreciprocity. Proc. IEEE 2020, 108, 1728–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Reiskarimian, N.; Zhou, J.; Krishnaswamy, H. A CMOS Passive LPTV Nonmagnetic Circulator and Its Application in a Full-Duplex Receiver. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2017, 52, 1358–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dinc, T.; Nagulu, A.; Krishnaswamy, H. A Millimeter-Wave Non-Magnetic Passive SOI CMOS Circulator Based on Spatio-Temporal Conductivity Modulation. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2017, 52, 3276–3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ruffino, A.; Peng, Y.; Sebastiano, F.; Babaie, M.; Charbon, E. A 6.5-GHz Cryogenic All-Pass Filter Circulator in 40-nm CMOS for Quantum Computing Applications. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium (RFIC), Boston, MA, USA, 2–4 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ruffino, A.; Peng, Y.; Sebastiano, F.; Babaie, M.; Charbon, E. A Wideband Low-Power Cryogenic CMOS Circulator for Quantum Applications. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2020, 55, 1224–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Reiskarimian, N.; Khorshidian, M.; Krishnaswamy, H. Inductorless, Widely Tunable N-Path Shekel Circulators Based on Harmonic Engineering. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2021, 56, 1425–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nagulu, A.; Mekkawy, A.; Tymchenko, M.; Sounas, D.; Alù, A.; Krishnaswamy, H. Ultra-Wideband Switched-Capacitor Delays and Circulators—Theory and Implementation. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2021, 56, 1412–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nagulu, A.; Krishnaswamy, H. Non-Magnetic CMOS Switched-Transmission-Line Circulators With High Power Handling and Antenna Balancing: Theory and Implementation. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2019, 54, 1288–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nagulu, A.; Krishnaswamy, H. 28.5 Non-Magnetic 60GHz SOI CMOS Circulator Based on Loss/Dispersion-Engineered Switched Bandpass Filters. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference—(ISSCC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 17–21 February 2019. [Google Scholar]
  44. Nagulu, A.; Chen, T.; Zussman, G.; Krishnaswamy, H. Multi-Watt, 1-GHz CMOS Circulator Based on Switched-Capacitor Clock Boosting. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2020, 55, 3308–3321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Min, B.; Hwang, J. Fully Integrated Ultra-Wideband Differential Circulator Based on Sequentially Switched Delay Line in 28-nm FDSOI CMOS. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium—(RFIC), Denver, CO, USA, 19–21 June 2022. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tellegen, B.D.H. The gyrator, a new electric network element. Philips Res. Rep. 1948, 3, 81–101. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kord, A.; Tymchenko, M.; Sounas, D.L.; Krishnaswamy, H.; Alu, A. CMOS Integrated Magnetless Circulators Based on Spatiotemporal Modulation Angular-Momentum Biasing. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2019, 67, 2649–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Gyrator using 25% duty-cycle clock signal.
Figure 1. Gyrator using 25% duty-cycle clock signal.
Micromachines 14 00033 g001
Figure 2. Doubly square-wave mixing system with LTI and reciprocal property: (a) original case; (b) with time delay τ.
Figure 2. Doubly square-wave mixing system with LTI and reciprocal property: (a) original case; (b) with time delay τ.
Micromachines 14 00033 g002
Figure 3. Doubly square-wave mixing system with time delay in the internal node: (a) forward direction; (b) reverse direction.
Figure 3. Doubly square-wave mixing system with time delay in the internal node: (a) forward direction; (b) reverse direction.
Micromachines 14 00033 g003
Figure 4. Comprehensive research framework of proposed circulator.
Figure 4. Comprehensive research framework of proposed circulator.
Micromachines 14 00033 g004
Figure 5. The 25% duty-cycle clock generation using a frequency divider and AND gates.
Figure 5. The 25% duty-cycle clock generation using a frequency divider and AND gates.
Micromachines 14 00033 g005
Figure 6. The 25% duty-cycle clock generation directly after the divide-by-2 frequency divider.
Figure 6. The 25% duty-cycle clock generation directly after the divide-by-2 frequency divider.
Micromachines 14 00033 g006
Figure 7. Proposed circulator using 25% duty-cycle clock signal.
Figure 7. Proposed circulator using 25% duty-cycle clock signal.
Micromachines 14 00033 g007
Figure 8. Die photo.
Figure 8. Die photo.
Micromachines 14 00033 g008
Figure 9. S-parameter measurements: (a) S21 and S12; (b) S31 and S13; (c) S32 and S23.
Figure 9. S-parameter measurements: (a) S21 and S12; (b) S31 and S13; (c) S32 and S23.
Micromachines 14 00033 g009
Figure 10. IIP3 measurements (a) TX to ANT; (b) ANT to RX.
Figure 10. IIP3 measurements (a) TX to ANT; (b) ANT to RX.
Micromachines 14 00033 g010
Table 1. Summary of prior literature and proposed work.
Table 1. Summary of prior literature and proposed work.
ReferenceTopologyTechnologyFrequency (GHz)Clock Duty CycleUsage
[36]N-path65 nm0.6–0.88Sub-GHz
[40]65 nm0.11–1.1/
0.28–1.15
4/8Sub-GHz
[41]65 nmDC-18Sub-GHz
[37]
[42]
Switched TL45 nm SOI *
180 nm SOI
22.7–27.3
0.86–1.08
2
2
5G
Sub-GHz
[43]45 nm SOI50–56.82WiFi
[44]180 nm SOI0.914–1.0862Sub-GHz
[45]28 nm FDSOI **0.05–72Sub-GHz
* SOI: Silicon-on-insulator; ** FDSOI: Fully depleted silicon-on-insulator.
Table 2. Phase shift in forward direction.
Table 2. Phase shift in forward direction.
Modulation PeriodLeftTL *RightPhase Shift
0A1 (0°)90°A2 (0°)90°
Tm/4C1 (0°)90°C2 (0°)90°
Tm/2B1 (180°)90°B2 (180°)450° (90°)
3Tm/4D1 (180°)90°D2 (180°)450° (90°)
* TL = The λ/4 transmission line in the gyrator.
Table 3. Phase shift in reverse direction.
Table 3. Phase shift in reverse direction.
Modulation PeriodRightTL *LeftPhase Shift
0D2 (180°)90°C1 (0°)270° (−90°)
Tm/4A2 (0°)90°B1 (180°)270° (−90°)
Tm/2C2 (0°)90°D1 (180°)270° (−90°)
3Tm/4B2 (180°)90°A1 (0°)270° (−90°)
* TL = The λ/4 transmission line in the gyrator.
Table 4. Comparison table with the state-of-the-art.
Table 4. Comparison table with the state-of-the-art.
This Work[37][42][43][47][23]
TypePassive
Circulator
Passive
Circulator
Passive
Circulator
Passive
Circulator
Passive
Circulator
Active Quasi-Circulator
Technology90-nm CMOS45-nm CMOS SOI180-nm CMOS SOI45-nm CMOS SOI180-nm CMOS180-nm CMOS
Frequency (GHz) *11.6–14.322.7–27.30.86–1.0850–56.80.89–0.921–7 ****
Designed Center Frequency (GHz)12.6250.95540.91N/A
Reconfiguration /TuningNoClock Phase TuningAntenna TuningClock Phase TuningExternal Reconfigurable Impedance TuningNo
TX-ANT
Transmission (dB)
−3.9
@12.6 GHz
−3.3
@25 GHz
−2.1
@0.95 GHz
−3.6(1.2V VDD)/−3.9(1V VDD)
@54 GHz
−4.8
@0.91 GHz
>−10
ANT-RX
Transmission (dB)
−4.0
@12.6 GHz
−3.2
@24.7 GHz
−2.9
@0.95 GHz
−3.1
@54 GHz
−4.8
@0.91 GHz
>−9
TX-RX
Isolation (dB) **
> 17.2> 18.3> 25> 20> 20>36
Isolation
Bandwidth ***
21.4%18.4%17%14.6%3.4%N/A
TX-ANT IIP3
(dBm)
19.720.150.02519.436.19.7
ANT-RX IIP3
(dBm)
2019.936.919.0363.5
Area (mm2)1.55 × 1.151.8 × 1.24.6 × 3.61.57 × 1.1361.03 × 0.55
* Frequency range of 1-dB IL degradation; ** Isolation in the frequency range; *** Frequency range divided by designed center frequency; **** Secured isolation bandwidth.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, J.; Wang, X.; Han, F.; Wan, J.; Gu, W. Analysis and Design of a Non-Magnetic Bulk CMOS Passive Circulator Using 25% Duty-Cycle Clock. Micromachines 2023, 14, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14010033

AMA Style

Gao J, Wang X, Han F, Wan J, Gu W. Analysis and Design of a Non-Magnetic Bulk CMOS Passive Circulator Using 25% Duty-Cycle Clock. Micromachines. 2023; 14(1):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14010033

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Jian, Xinghua Wang, Fang Han, Jiayue Wan, and Wei Gu. 2023. "Analysis and Design of a Non-Magnetic Bulk CMOS Passive Circulator Using 25% Duty-Cycle Clock" Micromachines 14, no. 1: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14010033

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop