Next Article in Journal
New Possibilities for Testing the Service Life of Magnetic Contacts
Next Article in Special Issue
A Novel Approach for a Chip-Sized Scanning Optical Microscope
Previous Article in Journal
Binary Pectin-Chitosan Composites for the Uptake of Lanthanum and Yttrium Species in Aqueous Media 
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phase-Modulated Standing Wave Interferometer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bottom-Up (Cu, Ag, Au)/Al2O3/Bi2Te3 Assembled Thermoelectric Heterostructures

1
National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Micro-Nano Fabrication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2
Department of Micro/Nano-Electronics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
3
Institute of Nano-Micro Energy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2021, 12(5), 480; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12050480
Submission received: 29 March 2021 / Revised: 12 April 2021 / Accepted: 19 April 2021 / Published: 22 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue nano FIS 2020—Integrated Functional nano Systems)

Abstract

:
The interface affects the transmission behavior of electrons and phonons, which in turn determines the performance of thermoelectric materials. In this paper, metals (Cu, Ag, Au)/Al2O3/Bi2Te3 heterostructures have been fabricated from bottom to up to optimize the thermoelectric power factor. The introducing metals can be alloyed with Bi2Te3 or form interstitials or dopants to adjust the carrier concentration and mobility. In addition, the metal-semiconductor interface as well as the metal-insulator-semiconductor interface constructed by the introduced metal and Al2O3 would further participate in the regulation of the carrier transport process. By adjusting the metal and oxide layer, it is possible to realize the simultaneous optimization of electric conductivity and Seebeck coefficient. This work will enable the optimal and novel design of heterostructures for thermoelectric materials with further improved performance.

1. Introduction

Thermoelectric technology can convert heat to electricity freely. The thermoelectric (TE) efficiency is normally evaluated by the dimensionless figure of merit ZT = S2σT/κ (κ = κe + κL), where S, σ, κ, κe, κL, and T are the Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, electronic thermal conductivity, lattice thermal conductivity, and absolute temperature, respectively [1]. One strategy to improve the thermoelectric performance is fabricating nanostructures such as pores [2,3] or nanograins [4,5], which could strongly scatter phonons and thereby reducing the lattice thermal conductivity. However, little room remains for further reducing κ. On the one hand, the contribution of electrons to thermal conductivity is unavoidable due to Wiedemann-Franz law. On the other hand, the lattice thermal conductivity cannot be lower than the amorphous state. For Bi2Te3 system with excellent thermoelectric properties near room temperature, the lattice thermal conductivity has been approached to lower as ~0.3 W·m−1·K−1, which is the limit value predicted by Cahill model [6,7]. Further improvements in the ZT could be relied on decoupling S and σ to improve the power factor (PF = S2σ).
Compared with its bulk counterparts, nanostructured Bi2Te3 film provides promising possibilities for enhanced TE properties and potential applications in micro/nano-electromechanical systems (MEMS/NEMS) TE device [8]. The thermoelectric performance of Bi2Te3 can be optimized by adjusting the (00l) orientation [9,10], pores [9,11], nanosheet boundary [12,13], and the intrinsic defects [14,15]. In addition, constructing a heterogeneous interface is also one of the effective methods to optimize the thermoelectric performance. The heterogeneous interface can filter low-energy carriers that contribute negative to the Seebeck coefficient through the interface barrier and thus the thermoelectric power factor will be enhanced [16]. Meanwhile, the interface could also scatter phonons to reduce the lattice thermal conductivity, and finally the ZT value of the material will be further improved [1]. Experimentally, metal/semi-metal or carbon had been introduced in Bi2Te3 to build heterostructures (such as Bi2Te3/Ag [12,17], Bi2Te3/Cu [12,18] Bi2Te3/Cd [19], Bi2Te3/Te [20], Bi2Te3/carbon nanotube [10,21]) especially by solution or sintering method to further enhanced the TE properties. Oxide layer was also introduced into the Ag/Sb2Te3 system by atomic layer deposition, and the filtering effect of the corresponding interface on low-energy carriers was discussed [6]. In this paper, group IB metals (M = Cu, Ag, Au) and Al2O3 interfaces were systematically introduced into Bi2Te3 film to modulate the carrier behavior and thus enhance the thermoelectric power factor. Incidentally, the introduced interface can also scatter phonons to reduce the thermal conductivity of the lattice, which is beneficial to improve the ZT value.

2. Materials and Methods

Group IB metal M (M = Cu, Ag, Au) with a thickness of 6~10 nm was pre-deposited on SiO2/Si substrates by an e-beam evaporation system. Using Al2O3 targets, Al2O3 layer with a thickness of ~3 nm was first selectively sputtered on the pre-deposited metal. Then, Bi2Te3 films with a thickness of about 300 nm were sputtered. The base vacuum of the sputtering chamber was 5E−3 Pa and the working pressure was 0.26 Pa. The substrate was rotated at a speed of 20 rpm to ensure the uniformity of the sputtered film. The Al2O3 sputtered at 100 W and Bi2Te3 sputtered at 50 W were both in a radio frequency (RF) mode. The purity of all source materials is 99.99%. The sample preparation is illustrated in Figure 1a. For the convenience of description in the following part, pure Bi2Te3 is marked as B. Cu/Bi2Te3, Ag/Bi2Te3, and Au/Bi2Te3 samples are marked as CB, SB, and GB, respectively. Cu/Al2O3/ Bi2Te3, Ag/Al2O3/Bi2Te3, and Au/Al2O3/ Bi2Te3 are marked as CAB, SAB, and GAB, respectively.
The surface morphology, cross section, composition, and thickness of films were characterized by atomic force microscope (AFM, Multimode Nanoscope IIIa), scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS, Zeiss Ultra Plus) and surface profiler (KLA-Tencor P7). The structures of the films were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 Advance) with a Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406Å) in conventional θ–2θ mode from 10–80° at a sweep rate of 4°/min. Electrical transport of film was obtained by Hall measurement (model: MMR) with a Van der Pauw pattern and averaged by three measurements. The contact effect and other additional effect including heating effect of current and asymmetric effect of probing electrodes can be exclude in this current reversal method with four-probe configuration. The Seebeck coefficient was evaluated by a home-built system as reported in detail in our previous study [22].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Heterostructure Characterization

The pre-deposited metal presents as discontinuous particles as shown in Figure 1b–d. The height of Ag is about 10 nm, while the height of Cu and Au is about 6–7 nm as shown in Figure 1 and Figure S1. After sputtering Al2O3, the total height of the metal particles increased by ~3 nm. Interestingly, Al2O3 appeared as smaller particles on the surface of the pre-deposited metal particles, resulting in increased particle fluctuations, as shown in Figure 1e–g.
The Te/Bi atomic ratio of all Bi2Te3 films that sputtered with the same target and sputtering power was about ~1.5. The surface and cross section of Bi2Te3 and M/Al2O3/Bi2Te3 are given in Figure S2. Take Ag/Al2O3/Bi2Te3 as an example, the surface of each layer is given in Figure 2a–c. Regardless of whether metal/oxide was previously deposited, there was no obvious difference in the surface morphology of the Bi2Te3 film, the surface of which is selected as shown in Figure 2c. The bottom-up Ag/Al2O3/Bi2Te3 structure could be clearly seen from the cross section as shown in Figure 2d. The thickness of the Bi2Te3 film was about 300 nm, and the XRD pattern of Bi2Te3 indicated that the obtained Bi2Te3 is with good crystallinity as shown in Figure 2e.

3.2. Carrier Transport Characteristics

All Bi2Te3-based films exhibit n-type conductivity, and the majority of carriers in the films are electrons as characterized by Hall measurements and shown in Figure 3a–c. Compared with the pure Bi2Te3 film, the introduction of M (M = Cu, Ag, Au) in the film leads to a decrease in total electron concentration of the film as shown in Figure 3a.
The role of introducing group IB metals in Bi2Te3 can be summarized as follows: (i) In one way, one M atom should produce one electron compensating a hole. This process can be achieved by forming [MBiTe2 +Bi3Te4] through the alloying of Bi2Te3 and M as shown in Figure 3g [23]. Generally, the diffusion, solid solution and alloying process of group IB metal in Bi2Te3 can be modulated by heat treatment [23,24,25,26]. Because the films in this study have not been annealed, the above effects, especially the alloying process (generate new phases), are weak. (ii) Another way is that the introduction of M atom could form interstitial Mi+ compensated by electrons. While the electronegativity (Pauling scale) of Cu, Ag, and Au atoms increases in turn (from 1.90, 1.93 to 2.54), the ability to form Mi+ decreases in turn [14]. Generally, since the space in the lattice is limited, atoms or cations with a smaller radius are more likely to form interstitial phases. The radius of Cu, Ag, and Au are 1.28 Å, 1.44 Å, and 1.44 Å, respectively. The radius of Cu+, Ag+, and Au+ are 0.98 Å, 1.10 Å, and 1.10 Å, respectively [27]. In terms of the ability to form interstitial, the electron concentration of the Cu-introduced film should be less than that in the Ag-introduced film, which is confirmed in Figure 3a. (iii) Since M (M = Cu, Ag, and Au) have fewer electrons in their outermost orbitals than Bi, doping them at the Sb-sites greatly increases the hole concentration and consequently reduces the electron concentration [19].
The coexistence of the above alloying, interstitial and doping process together determines the reduction of the electron concentration in the Bi2Te3 film after the introduction of metal. Eventually, the electron concentration of the Bi2Te3, Au/Bi2Te3, Ag/Bi2Te3, and Cu/Bi2Te3 film decreases sequentially. After the Al2O3 layer was deposited to build a metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) interface, the electrons in the metal were blocked from entering Bi2Te3 and some carriers may tunnel through the thin oxide layer from the metal into Bi2Te3 as shown in Figure 3g,h. Because there were unavoidable narrow holes in such thin Al2O3 layer deposited by magnetron sputtering, there would still be some interfaces where the metal was in direct contact with Bi2Te3. The above-mentioned combined effect made the carrier concentration of the film further decrease after the Al2O3 layer was introduced.
As the electron concentration decreased after metal or oxide was introduced, the scattering between electrons was weakened and the mobility of the film increased. On the other hand, the introduction of a metal-semiconductor (MS) interface or an MIS interface would lead to the reduction of the mobility which was closely related to the size and distribution of the metal particles and the surface Al2O3 that covers them. The interfaces and the corresponding electronic transport processes are illustrated in Figure 3d–f. The above combined effect makes the total electrical mobility and conductivity of the films other than Ag/Bi2Te3 increase while compared to the pure Bi2Te3, which may be related to the Ohmic contact of the Ag-Bi2Te3 interface and Ag particle with relatively high height (thickness). In addition to filtering out low-energy electrons based on the interface barrier, an additional oxide layer was deposited to control the tunneling electron concentration. Through the above dual effects, the concentration and average energy of electrons can be adjusted.

3.3. Thermoelectric Properties

The Seebeck coefficient is closely related to the carrier concentration and its energy distribution, and the contribution of low-energy carriers to the Seebeck coefficient is negative [28]. The measured Seebeck coefficient of Bi2Te3-based film is presented in Figure 4a. It can be seen from Figure 4a that the Seebeck coefficients of the film with Cu and Au are lower than the pure Bi2Te3, which may be related to the relatively high interface barrier that filters out some high-energy electrons. The deposited Al2O3 layer allowed tunneling electrons to pass through, which would reduce the concentration of high-energy electrons in the film, and ultimately reduce the Seebeck coefficient.
For a material with a single parabolic band, the Seebeck coefficient, DOS effective mass of carriers (m*) and Lorenz number (L) can be written as [22,29]
S = K B e ( ( 5 / 2 + λ ) F 3 / 2 + λ ( η ) ( 3 / 2 + λ ) F 1 / 2 + λ ( η ) η )
m = h 2 2 K b T ( n 4 π F 1 / 2 ( η ) ) 2 / 3
F i ( η ) = 0 x i d x 1 + exp ( x η )
L = k B e 2 ( λ + 7 / 2 ) F λ + 5 / 2 ( η ) ( λ + 7 / 2 ) F λ + 1 / 2 ( η ) ( λ + 5 / 2 ) F λ + 3 / 2 ( η ) ( λ + 3 / 2 ) F λ + 1 / 2 ( η ) 2
κe = LTσ
where e, m*, h, kB, L, and T are the electronic charge, effective mass, Planck’s constant, Boltzmann constant, Lorenz number, and absolute temperature, respectively. η is the reduced Fermi energy (EF/kBT), Fi is the fermi integral of the order of x. Acoustic phonon scattering (γ = −1/2) has been assumed as the main carrier scattering mechanism at room temperature. The corresponding calculation results at 300 K are listed in Table 1. In order to compare the effect of interface on the Seebeck coefficient of Bi2Te3 at room temperature, Pisarenko plot is applied as shown in Figure 4b.
After the metal was introduced into Bi2Te3 film, the m* of the film was reduced, and it was further reduced after the oxide layer was introduced as shown in Table 1. However, when compared with Cu-introduced and Ag-introduced films, the effective mass change in the Au-introduced film was small, which was closely related to the carrier behavior as analyzed before. The power factor of Bi2Te3-based film at 300 K is given in Figure 4c. Compared with pure Bi2Te3, the power factor of the film introduced with metal and oxide is increased, which benefits from the effect of metals and the MIS interface. As a result, the power factor of the Cu/Al2O3/Bi2Te3 film is 6.5 μW·cm−1·K−2, which is 1.75 times that of a single Bi2Te3 film. In addition, the corresponding electronic thermal conductivity calculated according to Equation (5) is given in Table 1.
Although the introduction of Cu/Al2O3 leads to an increase in the electronic thermal conductivity of the film, the smaller Cu particles result in a higher interface density (Figure 1b), which could scatter phonons more strongly and make the lattice thermal conductivity lower [30]. In addition to scattering phonons at the interface to reduce the thermal conductivity, it is particularly important to use the interface to optimize the thermoelectric power factor to improve the overall performance of the film.

4. Conclusions

In summary, metal (Cu, Ag, Au)/Al2O3/Bi2Te3 heterostructures have been fabricated to improve the thermoelectric properties. By constructing the metal-semiconductor and metal-insulator-semiconductor interface, using the filter carrier effect or controlling the tunneling electrons, it is possible to coordinately control the carrier concentration and mobility, and finally optimize the thermoelectric power factor. The power factor of the Cu/Al2O3/Bi2Te3 heterostructure film is 6.5 μW·cm−1·K−2, which is 1.75 times that of a single Bi2Te3 film. Future work will focus on optimizing the metal particle size, oxide layer thickness, and annealing process to further optimize the thermoelectric performance. Related works are still ongoing.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/mi12050480/s1, Figure S1: AFM step profiler of (a) Cu and (d) Au. Figure S2: Surface of (a) Bi2Te3, (b) Cu/Al2O3/Bi2Te3, (c) Ag/Al2O3/Bi2Te3, (d) Au/Al2O3/Bi2Te3. Cross section of (e) Bi2Te3, (f) Cu/Al2O3/Bi2Te3, (g) Ag/Al2O3/Bi2Te3, (h) Au/Al2O3/Bi2Te3.

Author Contributions

Methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation, Z.W.; investigation, data curation, S.Z., Z.L. and C.L.; Supervision and funding acquisition, Z.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51776126.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Center of Advanced Electronic Materials and Devices (AEMD) and the Instrumental Analysis Center of Shanghai Jiao Tong University for providing experimental support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shi, X.L.; Zou, J.; Chen, Z.G. Advanced thermoelectric design: From materials and structures to devices. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 7399–7515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xu, B.; Feng, T.; Agne, M.T.; Zhou, L.; Ruan, X.; Snyder, G.J.; Wu, Y. Highly porous thermoelectric nanocomposites with low thermal conductivity and high figure of merit from large-scale solution-synthesized Bi2Te2.5Se0.5 hollow nanostructures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3546–3551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Giulia, P. Thermoelectric materials: The power of pores. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lee, S.; Lee, K.H.; Kim, Y.M.; Kim, H.S.; Snyder, G.J.; Baik, S.; Kim, S.W. Simple and efficient synthesis of nanograin structured single phase filled skutterudite for high thermoelectric performance. Acta Mater. 2018, 142, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xie, K.; Gupta, M.C. Thermoelectric properties of SiGe thin films prepared by laser sintering of nanograin powders. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 820, 153182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Y.; Bahk, J.H.; Lee, J.; Birkel, C.S.; Snedaker, M.L.; Liu, D.; Zeng, H.; Moskovits, M.; Shakouri, A.; Stucky, G.D. Hot carrier filtering in solution processed heterostructures: A paradigm for improving thermoelectric efficiency. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2755–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Mao, J.; Chen, G.; Ren, Z. Thermoelectric cooling materials. Nat. Mater. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mu, E.; Wu, Z.; Wu, Z.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Fu, X.; Hu, Z. A novel self-powering ultrathin TEG device based on micro/nano emitter for radiative cooling. Nano Energy 2019, 55, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, Z.; Mu, E.; Che, Z.; Liu, Y.; Sun, F.; Wang, X.; Hu, Z. Nanoporous (00l)-oriented Bi2Te3 nanoplate film for improved thermoelectric performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 828, 154239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jin, Q.; Jiang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, D.; Qiu, J.; Tang, D.M.; Tan, J.; Sun, D.M.; Hou, P.X.; Chen, X.Q. Flexible layer-structured Bi2Te3 thermoelectric on a carbon nanotube scaffold. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, X.; Hu, J.; Feng, B.; Pan, Z.; Liu, P.; Zhang, Y.; Li, R.; He, Z.; Li, G.; Li, Y. Artificial porous structure: An effective method to improve thermoelectric performance of Bi2Te3 based alloys. J. Solid State Chem. 2020, 282, 121060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dun, C.; Hewitt, C.A.; Li, Q.; Guo, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Xu, J.; Marcus, G.; Schall, D.C.; Carroll, D.L. Self-assembled heterostructures: Selective growth of metallic nanoparticles on V2–VI3 nanoplates. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1702968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, Z.; Mu, E.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Wu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Hu, Z. Bi2Te3 nanoplates’ selective growth morphology on different interfaces for enhancing thermoelectric properties. Cryst. Growth Des. 2019, 19, 3639–3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, T.; Hu, L.; Zhao, X.; He, J. New insights into intrinsic point defects in V2VI3 thermoelectric materials. Adv. Sci. 2016, 3, 1600004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, M.; Liu, W.; Zhang, C.; Xie, S.; Li, Z.; Hua, F.; Luo, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, W.; Yan, F. Identifying the manipulation of individual atomic-scale defects for boosting thermoelectric performances in artificially controlled Bi2Te3 Films. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 5706–5714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gayner, C.; Amouyal, Y. Energy filtering of charge carriers: Current trends, challenges, and prospects for thermoelectric materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1901789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Q.; Ai, X.; Wang, L.; Chang, Y.; Luo, W.; Jiang, W.; Chen, L. Improved thermoelectric performance of silver nanoparticles-dispersed Bi2Te3 composites deriving from hierarchical two-phased heterostructure. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 966–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, H.J.; Yen, W.T. High thermoelectric performance in Cu-doped Bi2Te3 with carrier-type transition. Acta Mater. 2018, 157, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hao, F.; Qiu, P.; Tang, Y.; Bai, S.; Xing, T.; Chu, H.-S.; Zhang, Q.; Lu, P.; Zhang, T.; Ren, D. High efficiency Bi2Te3-based materials and devices for thermoelectric power generation between 100 and 300 °C. Energ. Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 3120–3127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Choi, H.; Jeong, K.; Chae, J.; Park, H.; Baeck, J.; Kim, T.H.; Song, J.Y.; Park, J.; Jeong, K.H.; Cho, M.-H. Enhancement in thermoelectric properties of Te-embedded Bi2Te3 by preferential phonon scattering in heterostructure interface. Nano Energy 2018, 47, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; Qiao, J.; Jiang, S.; Mao, P.; Qiu, J.; Kang, S.; Tan, J.; Tai, K.; Liu, C. Decoupling phonon and carrier scattering at carbon nanotube/Bi2Te3 interfaces for improved thermoelectric performance. Carbon 2020, 170, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, Z.; Chen, X.; Mu, E.; Liu, Y.; Che, Z.; Dun, C.; Sun, F.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, Z. Lattice strain enhances thermoelectric properties in Sb2Te3/Te heterostructure. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2020, 6, 1900735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bludska, J.; Jakubec, I.; Drašar, Č.; Lošťák, P.; Horak, J. Structural defects in Cu-doped Bi2Te3 single crystals. Philos. Mag. 2007, 87, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Keys, J.D.; Dutton, H.M. Diffusion and solid solubility of gold in single-crystal bismuth telluride. J. Appl. Phys. 1963, 34, 1830–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Keys, J.D.; Dutton, H.M. Diffusion and solid solubility of silver in single-crystal bismuth telluride. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1963, 24, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, S.; Hutabalian, Y.; Hu, Z.; Chen, H.; Shih, H.; Wang, W. Liquation phenomena in Sn/Bi2Te3, In/Bi2Te3 and Cu/Bi2Te3 couples. Acta Mater. 2020, 196, 418–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Heyrovska, R. The Golden ratio, ionic and atomic radii and bond lengths. Mol. Phys. 2005, 103, 877–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Minnich, A.; Dresselhaus, M.S.; Ren, Z.; Chen, G. Bulk nanostructured thermoelectric materials: Current research and future prospects. Energ. Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 466–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ioffe, I.F. Semiconductor Thermoelements and Thermoelectric Cooling; Infosearch Ltd.: London, UK, 1957. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yang, J.; Xi, L.; Qiu, W.; Wu, L.; Shi, X.; Chen, L.; Yang, J.; Zhang, W.; Uher, C.; Singh, D.J. On the tuning of electrical and thermal transport in thermoelectrics: An integrated theory–experiment perspective. NPJ Comput. Mater. 2016, 2, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) Film preparation process. SEM image of (b) Cu, (c) Ag and (d) Au surface. AFM image of (e) Ag and (f) Ag/ Al2O3. (g) AFM step profiler of Ag and Ag/Al2O3.
Figure 1. (a) Film preparation process. SEM image of (b) Cu, (c) Ag and (d) Au surface. AFM image of (e) Ag and (f) Ag/ Al2O3. (g) AFM step profiler of Ag and Ag/Al2O3.
Micromachines 12 00480 g001
Figure 2. SEM image of (a) Ag/Al2O3, (b) Ag/Al2O3/Bi2Te3, and (c) Bi2Te3. (d) Cross section of Ag/Al2O3/Bi2Te3. (e) XRD pattern of Bi2Te3.
Figure 2. SEM image of (a) Ag/Al2O3, (b) Ag/Al2O3/Bi2Te3, and (c) Bi2Te3. (d) Cross section of Ag/Al2O3/Bi2Te3. (e) XRD pattern of Bi2Te3.
Micromachines 12 00480 g002
Figure 3. Electrical properties of Bi2Te3-based films at 300 K. (a) Carrier concentration (n). (b) Carrier mobility (μ). (c) Electrical conductivity (σ). Equilibrium band gap alignment of (d) Ag, Al2O3 and Bi2Te3, (e) Cu, Al2O3, and Bi2Te3, (f) Au, Al2O3, and Bi2Te3. Behavior of electrons at the interface of (g) Metal/Bi2Te3 and (h) Metal/Al2O3/Bi2Te3.
Figure 3. Electrical properties of Bi2Te3-based films at 300 K. (a) Carrier concentration (n). (b) Carrier mobility (μ). (c) Electrical conductivity (σ). Equilibrium band gap alignment of (d) Ag, Al2O3 and Bi2Te3, (e) Cu, Al2O3, and Bi2Te3, (f) Au, Al2O3, and Bi2Te3. Behavior of electrons at the interface of (g) Metal/Bi2Te3 and (h) Metal/Al2O3/Bi2Te3.
Micromachines 12 00480 g003
Figure 4. Thermoelectric properties of Bi2Te3-based films at 300 K. (a) Seebeck coefficient (S). (b) Seebeck coefficient as a function of carrier concentration (Pisarenko plot). Dashed lines represent theoretical fits for m* = 0.3 m0, 2.5 m0, 3 m0, 4 m0 and 7 m0 based on Equations (1)–(3). m0 is mass of free electron. (c) Power factor (S2σ).
Figure 4. Thermoelectric properties of Bi2Te3-based films at 300 K. (a) Seebeck coefficient (S). (b) Seebeck coefficient as a function of carrier concentration (Pisarenko plot). Dashed lines represent theoretical fits for m* = 0.3 m0, 2.5 m0, 3 m0, 4 m0 and 7 m0 based on Equations (1)–(3). m0 is mass of free electron. (c) Power factor (S2σ).
Micromachines 12 00480 g004
Table 1. Thermoelectric parameters of Bi2Te3-based films at 300 K.
Table 1. Thermoelectric parameters of Bi2Te3-based films at 300 K.
SampleBCBCABSBSABGBGAB
m*/m06.382.560.263.800.303.923.12
L (V2·K−2)2.04 × 10−82.08 × 10−82.12 × 10−82.01 × 10−82.05 × 10−82.09 × 10−82.14 × 10−8
κe (W·m−1·K−1)0.370.401.000.180.560.470.72
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Z.; Lu, C.; Hu, Z. Bottom-Up (Cu, Ag, Au)/Al2O3/Bi2Te3 Assembled Thermoelectric Heterostructures. Micromachines 2021, 12, 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12050480

AMA Style

Wu Z, Zhang S, Liu Z, Lu C, Hu Z. Bottom-Up (Cu, Ag, Au)/Al2O3/Bi2Te3 Assembled Thermoelectric Heterostructures. Micromachines. 2021; 12(5):480. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12050480

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Zhenhua, Shuai Zhang, Zekun Liu, Cheng Lu, and Zhiyu Hu. 2021. "Bottom-Up (Cu, Ag, Au)/Al2O3/Bi2Te3 Assembled Thermoelectric Heterostructures" Micromachines 12, no. 5: 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12050480

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop