Next Article in Journal
Zearalenone (ZEN) and Its Metabolite Levels in Tissues of Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) from Southern Italy: A Pilot Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Bacillus thuringiensis Cyt Proteins as Enablers of Activity of Cry and Tpp Toxins against Aedes albopictus
Previous Article in Journal
CDT of Clostridioides difficile Induces MLC-Dependent Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction in HT-29/B6 Epithelial Cell Monolayers
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Crystal Structure of Bacillus thuringiensis Tpp80Aa1 and Its Interaction with Galactose-Containing Glycolipids
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 15
Issue 1
10.3390/toxins15010055
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa Insecticidal Proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) Are Highly Toxic to Anthonomus grandis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Larvae

by
Jéssica A. de Oliveira
1,
Bárbara F. Negri
2,
Patricia Hernández-Martínez
3,
Marcos F. Basso
4 and
Baltasar Escriche
3,*
1
Laboratório de Prospecção de Cepas e Genes, Instituto Mato-Grossense do Algodão (IMAmt), Rondonópolis 78740-970, Mato Grosso, Brazil
2
Laboratório de Biologia Molecular e Transformação de Plantas, Instituto Mato-Grossense do Algodão (IMAmt), Rondonópolis 78740-970, Mato Grosso, Brazil
3
Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biomedicina (BIOTECMED), Universitat de València, 46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain
4
Dipartimento di Biologia e Incubatore Universitario Fiorentino, Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2023, 15(1), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15010055
Submission received: 14 December 2022 / Revised: 2 January 2023 / Accepted: 3 January 2023 / Published: 8 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacillus thuringiensis: A Broader View of Its Biocidal Activity)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The beetle Anthonomus grandis Boheman, 1843, is the main cotton pest, causing enormous losses in cotton. The breeding of genetically modified plants with A. grandis resistance is seen as an important control strategy. However, the identification of molecules with high toxicity to this insect remains a challenge. The susceptibility of A. grandis larvae to proteins (Cry1Ba, Cry7Ab, and Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa) from Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner, 1915, with toxicity reported against Coleopteran, has been evaluated. The ingestion of different protein concentrations (which were incorporated into an artificial diet) by the larvae was tested in the laboratory, and mortality was evaluated after one week. All Cry proteins tested exhibited higher toxicity than that the untreated artificial diet. These Cry proteins showed similar results to the control Cry1Ac, with low toxicity to A. grandis, since it killed less than 50% of larvae, even at the highest concentration applied (100 μg·g−1). Mpp/Xpp proteins provided the highest toxicity with a 0.18 μg·g−1 value for the 50% lethal concentration. Importantly, this parameter is the lowest ever reported for this insect species tested with B. thuringiensis proteins. This result highlights the potential of Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa for the development of a biotechnological tool aiming at the field control of A. grandis.
Keywords:
cotton boll weevil; Cry proteins; Mpp/Xpp proteins; Cry23Aa; Cry37Aa; Coleoptera; Curculionidae
Key Contribution: Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa Bt proteins are promising molecular agents to control the A. grandis cotton pest.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is one of the major crops of the global agricultural economy. During the 2020/2021 growing season, more than 24 million tons of cotton fiber were produced worldwide, with an output of more than 25 million tons in the 2021/2022 growing season. Brazil is the world’s fourth-largest cotton producer after China, India, and the USA, with an expected increase of around 19% for the 2021/2022 growing season [1,2]. One of the greatest challenges for cotton cultivation in Brazil is the high demand for agricultural inputs, particularly insecticides. Data indicate that the investment in insecticides, mainly to control the Anthonomus grandis Boheman, 1843 (cotton boll weevil, CBW) accounts for approximately 21% of the costs of cotton farming in Mato Grosso, Brazil [3].
The cotton boll weevil is a Coleopteran insect, considered the most harmful cotton pest, and its stereotypic behavior makes control difficult [4]. In addition to feeding on the flower buds, after mating, females lay eggs inside the fruiting structures of the cotton plant, where the development of all immature stages of the insect occurs, causing abscission or reduction in fiber quality [5]. In addition, newly emerged or old adults are commonly protected by the flower bud bracts or refugees in plants outside of the cotton crops, decreasing exposure to mortality factors, i.e., insecticides applied by spraying [6].
Once the insect is detected in pheromone traps, insecticide applications are performed, using mainly malathion. These applications can be performed weekly until the insect is no longer detected. Consequently, the field may receive as many as 25 applications in a single growing season, boosting expenses regarding agricultural inputs, and negatively affecting the environment and entomofauna [7,8,9]. However, the low effectiveness of the available synthetic agents has contributed to inefficient control measures, an increase in the insect population, and its genetic diversity. In addition, the non-existence of conventional or transgenic commercial cultivars with some resistance to CBW has stimulated the search for new biotechnological tools for the effective control of this insect pest.
The development of genetically modified crops expressing Cry and Vip toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) has been widely studied due to the toxic effect of these proteins, mainly against Lepidoptera [10]. Interestingly, transgenic plants expressing insecticidal proteins from Bt are effective in controlling stem borers, ear feeders, and rootworms [10]. Therefore, cotton plants expressing Bt proteins (toxic to CBW) may also control this devastating insect pest. Currently, transgenic cotton plants expressing cry and vip genes to control Lepidoptera are already being commercially launched in Brazil, but to date, no variety or cultivar capable of controlling the beetle A. grandis has been released [11,12,13].
The insect order Coleoptera comprises numerous species considered pests for the world’s major crops, few of which have proved susceptible to Bt toxins [14]. Despite causing significant economic losses around the world, the number of studies carried out to identify Bt proteins active against beetles is lower than those performed in Lepidopteran insect species. In the case of CBW, only a few studies have been performed to assess the insecticidal activity of either Bt strains or individual Bt insecticidal proteins. Therefore, more research is needed to determine which Bt proteins are able to effectively control CBW.
The application of Bt toxins to control A. grandis in cotton crops, especially as a transgenic plant, is of considerable agronomic interest, since this biotechnological tool is promising for reducing production and yield losses and containing CBW infestation, which represents a major problem for the cotton farmers in the Americas. Herein, in the present work, four Bt proteins known to be toxic to Coleopterans have been tested for the first time on A. grandis larvae. Two of the proteins tested belong to the 3-domain toxin class (Cry1Ba and Cry7Ab), and the other two mixed proteins (Mpp23Aa and Xpp37Aa, previously known as Cry23Aa and Cry37Aa, respectively) to the Mpp/Xpp class. Specifically, these last two proteins are expressed in a single operon and are mentioned as Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa. Therefore, results from this study could assess the potential of these proteins to effectively control CBW in the field.

2. Results

The survival of newly hatched larvae of A. grandis was affected by the ingestion of an artificial diet containing the different Bt proteins (Figure 1). The decreased survival of Bt-treated individuals increased with the increase in Bt protein concentration. For example, the analysis of the number of dead larvae after treatment at the highest dose (100 μg·g−1) was significantly different from that in the untreated group (one-way ANOVA, n = 269, F = 78, p < 0.0001). At this dose, the Cry1Ac, Cry1Ba, and Cry7Ab proteins had similar effects (Tuckey’s post-test, p > 0.99 for any combination), but the results were statistically different from those regarding the effect of Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa (Tuckey’s post-test, p > 0.0001). Cry proteins showed corrected mortality below 50%, which shows the low susceptibility of these insects to these proteins. In contrast, when the toxicity of the Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa proteins was tested at the same concentrations, 100% mortality was observed.
Moreover, the death of all larvae tested was found in all assayed concentrations, even at the lower level (1.56 μg·g−1). Based on these results, Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa proteins were selected for additional bioassay testing with lower toxin concentrations (ranging from 0.13 to 4 μg·g−1) to obtain dose–response data suitable for analysis. An example of the effect of these proteins can be observed in Figure 2.
The probit analysis was applied to the data obtained, estimating the bioassay parameters (Table 1). In addition, the analysis provided some extrapolated data of lethal concentration (LC) parameters useful for toxicity comparisons. As expected, Cry1Ac protein (described as a Coleopteran non-toxic) was marginally toxic (indicated by a high LC50 value). Based on the LC50 values obtained, Cry1Ba and Cry7Aa were slightly more toxic than Cry1Ac; however, the test of the hypothesis that slopes and intercepts are the same, discarded significant differences (χ2 = 7.04, degrees of freedom, d.f. = 4).
On the other hand, the Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa proteins showed significantly different toxicity dynamics (slope parameter) to A. grandis than to the Cry proteins tested, according to the previous test applied (χ2 = 532, d.f. = 2). The Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa toxicity was higher than that of the Cry proteins tested, since they provided a higher response to the concentration (a slope value higher), and the LC10 and LC50 values were lower. Only the LC parameters ratio (LC Cry1Ac protein/LC Mpp/Xpp proteins) could be provided, since the slopes were not parallel between Mpp/Xpp and the Cry proteins. The ratio of LC10 and LC50 values were 25 and 1761, respectively.
The concentration of Mpp/Xpp proteins required to kill 90% of the treated larvae (LC90), which is significant for pest control, was estimated as 0.4 μg·g−1 (fiducial limits, FL95 = 0.32–0.56), increasing the evidence of its high toxicity.

3. Discussion

Although A. grandis is currently one of the most devastating cotton insect pests in Brazil and other cotton crop-producing countries, there is little information about which Bt insecticidal proteins are effective against this insect pest [12,13,14]. The toxins usually described as active against insects of the order Coleoptera are those of the Cry3, Cry7, Cry8, Cry10, and Gpp34/Tpp35 classes [9,14], although other classes can be toxic as well, including the Cry1 class. Particularly, the Cry1Ba6 [16], Cry8Ka5 [17], Cry1Ia [18,19], Cry1Ia12 [20,21], and Cry10Aa [22] proteins have already been proven as toxic to CBW larvae in bioassays using purified recombinant protein or virus-infected insect extracts, while the Cry1Ia12 [20], Cry1Ia [19], and Cry10Aa [11,13] proteins were also confirmed to show some toxic activity when used in transgenic cotton lines.
It is important to highlight that studies evaluating the toxicity of single insecticidal proteins from Bt are required to show which proteins are effective against A. grandis. Furthermore, additional studies indicating whether it is suitable to combine the selected proteins in the same transgenic crop will be desirable to avoid the occurrence of cross-resistance among these proteins [23].
Results from the selective bioassay showed that although the survival of the larvae was affected after the ingestion of an artificial diet containing Cry1Ac, Cry1Ba, and Cry7Ab proteins, the highest dose used (100 µg·g−1) caused less than 50% mortality. The results obtained indicate that these proteins have low toxicity towards A. grandis larvae. The Cry1Ac is a protein known to be toxic to lepidopteran agricultural pest species such as Helicoverpa zea, Heliothis virescens [24], Helicoverpa armigera [25], Anticarsia gemmatalis, and Chrysodeixis includens [26], among others. For Coleopterans, although toxicity has been reported for some species [27], studies demonstrating high susceptibility to Cry1Ac are rare. Therefore, given the expression levels of Cry1Ac in commercial varieties, with a maximum of 7 and 20 µg·g−1 of fresh and dry leaf tissue, respectively [28,29], our results indicate that these current commercial varieties would not be able to control A. grandis.
Cry1Ba was included in this study because it has been described as a protein that has dual activity (toxicity to both Lepidopteran and Coleopteran insects) [14,30]. A previous study that tested the toxicity of Cry1Ba on A. grandis established an LC50 of 380.8 µg·g−1 [16], which is in line with our results. Interestingly, the authors reported that the toxicity of the original Bt strains that contained the cry1B gene was higher, suggesting that other virulence factors were causing the toxicity of these strains on A. grandis.
The Cry7 group is known to be poisonous to different Coleopteran insect species [10,14]. Here, we showed that the mortality of A. grandis caused by Cry7Ab was not high (40% as a mean in response to 100 µg·g−1), suggesting that this protein is not active against this insect pest. Similarly, Anomala corpulenta and Pyrrhalta aenescens larvae were not affected after ingestion of protein Cry7Ab3, and low susceptibility to Cry7Ab was observed in Acanthoscelides obtectus [30,31]. However, Cry7Ab was highly toxic to Xylotrechus arvicola and Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata larvae, respectively [31,32].
On the other hand, Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa were extremely active against A. grandis larvae, with an estimated LC50 = 0.18 µg·g−1 (Table 1). These two proteins were described as toxic to A. grandis in a previous work [33], although this is the first study that establishes LC50 values. The toxic effect of Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa was also observed on larvae of Tribolium castaneum [34], Cylas spp. [35], and Xylotrechus arvicola [32], suggesting that these proteins are able to control different Coleopteran pests.
The Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa proteins were first described as a binary toxin based on the fact that both genes were located in the same operon. However, recently, it was shown that these proteins were toxic for C. puncticollis larvae when tested individually [36]. In our study, we have tested the toxicity against A. grandis larvae by using a B. thuringiensis strain that expresses both proteins; thus, we cannot determine whether both proteins are required to exert their toxic effect. Further research will be required to test whether both proteins are required for the toxic effect against A. grandis larvae.
Concentrations of some Cry proteins considered viable for introgression in cotton range up to about 20 µg·g−1, since the levels of protein expression in plants differ between flower buds and leaf tissues, ranging from approximately 3.0 to 19.0 µg·g−1 of fresh tissue [10,13]. Thus, according to our results, the potentially possible control of A. grandis by Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa toxins can be satisfactory. More experiments will be conducted to deepen the understanding of the toxicity and mode of action of this protein complex on A. grandis; however, the results presented here may be useful to outline several lines of research.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bt Proteins Preparation

The source and preparation of the Bt proteins (Cry1Ba, Cry7Ab, and Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa) tested in this study were the B. thuringiensis strains described by Rodríguez-González et al. [30]. An exception was Cry1Ac, but it was prepared in the same way. In detail, Cry1Ac and Cry7Ab proteins were obtained from the B. thuringiensis HD-73 and HD867 strains, respectively, provided by the Bacillus Genetic Stock Center, USA. Cry1Ba was obtained from the recombinant B. thuringiensis strain EG11916 (Ecogen, Inc., Langhorne, PA, USA) and Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa were obtained from the EG10327 strain (Ref. No. NRRL B-21365) obtained from the Agricultural Research Culture Collection, Northern Regional Research Laboratory (NRRL), USA, respectively.
The Bacillus thuringiensis strains were grown in CCY medium supplemented with the appropriate antibiotic for 48 h at 29 °C, under constant agitation. Spores and crystals were separated by centrifugation at 16,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C and then washed three times with 1 M NaCl, 10 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and twice with 10 mM KCl. The final pellets were frozen using liquid nitrogen and lyophilized. The presence of the proteins in the lyophilized powder was determined using sodium dodecyl sulfate 12% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (Figure S1).

4.2. Rearing of Anthonomus grandis

Approximately 500 adult boll weevils collected from cotton fields in the region of Rondonópolis City, Mato Grosso, Brazil, were placed in cages at a 1:1 male–female ratio and maintained at 27 °C, under 40% relative humidity, and with a photoperiod of 12:12 h light:dark. In small, cube-shaped cages, the insects were fed an artificial diet [37].
The insect cages were serviced every two days, when the artificial diet was replaced by a fresh one, and insect eggs were collected. The eggs were superficially disinfected with a 20% copper sulfate and 0.2% benzalkonium chloride solution and separated from impurities such as diet leftovers and feces. Then, they were incubated in Petri dishes lined with filter paper and moistened with sterile water until hatching, and the newly hatched larvae (<48 h) were used for the bioassays.

4.3. Bioassays of A. grandis with Bt Proteins

The bioassays were based on the method of incorporating the test substances into an artificial diet [16]. The proteins, supplied as a lyophilized powder, were resuspended in sterile deionized water, and the concentration in this solution was determined by the Bradford method, using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard. The aliquots required to obtain the doses corresponding to concentrations of 100; 50; 25; 12.5; 6.25, 3.13, and 1.56 µg·g−1 were incorporated into the artificial CBW diet in a total volume of 30 mL. After blending, the mixture was poured into Petri dishes (Ø 90 × 15 mm) for solidification, and then 35 newly hatched A. grandis larvae were placed at equal distances on the diet surface. The control for natural mortality consisted of an artificial diet, without the protein addition. The plates were incubated at 27 °C, with 40% relative humidity, and a photoperiod of 12:12 h light:dark for seven days, at which time the number of live and dead larvae on each plate was counted. All assays were performed in triplicate.
Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa proteins that induced very high mortality (100%) at the lowest dose (1.56 µg·g−1) were selected for an additional bioassay at concentrations of 4, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.13 µg·g−1, according to the methodology described above.

4.4. Data Analysis

Mortality results for the figure were corrected based on mortality observed in the control using Abbott’s formula [15], obtaining the mean value and the standard error of the mean. All data analyses were performed with uncorrected mortality data. Differences in dead larvae among different protein treatments at 100 µg·g−1 were tested by one-way ANOVA, followed by a Tukey’s post-test, considering p < 0.05 as a significant difference. GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used.
Bioassay data were analyzed through probit analysis [38] using the POLO-PC software program (LeOra Software, Berkeley, CA, USA, 1987) in order to obtain the toxicological parameters and to compare the obtained results.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxins15010055/s1, Figure S1: SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of insecticidal proteins used in the toxicity tests: Cry1Ac, Cry1Ba, Cry7Ab, and Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa. BlueStar pre-stained protein marker (bands in kDa: 180, 130, 100, 75, 63, 48, 35, 28, 17, 10). Bands were stained with Coomassie blue. The Bt insecticidal protein bands are indicated by an arrow.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.E. and M.F.B.; statistical software, B.E. and J.A.d.O.; formal analysis, B.E., B.F.N., M.F.B. and J.A.d.O.; investigation, M.F.B., B.F.N., P.H.-M. and J.A.d.O.; writing—original draft preparation, B.E. and J.A.d.O.; writing—review and editing, B.E., P.H.-M., B.F.N. and J.A.d.O.; funding acquisition, B.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in part by grants from Generalitat Valenciana (grant number PROMETEO/2020/010), grant PID2021-122914OB-100, funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, and by “ERDF: A way of making Europe,” funded by the European Union.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Guilherme Debiazi Beloni (IMAmt) and Guilherme Gomes Rolim (IMAmt) for the pictures of the adult insect and plant damage in the graphical abstract.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. CONAB. Acompanhamento da Safra Brasileira de Grãos, Safra 2021/22. 2022. Available online: https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/graos/boletim-da-safra-de-graos (accessed on 12 December 2022).
  2. USDA. Cotton: World Markets and Trade. 2022. Available online: https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/cotton-world-markets-and-trade (accessed on 12 December 2022).
  3. IMEA. Custo de Produção do Algodão, Safra 2020/2021. 2022. Available online: https://www.imea.com.br/imea-site/relatorios-mercado (accessed on 12 December 2022).
  4. Arruda, L.S.; Torres, J.B.; Rolim, G.G.; Silva-Torres, C.S.A. Dispersal of boll weevil toward and within the cotton plant and implications for insecticide exposure. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 77, 1339–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Grigolli, J.F.J.; Souza, L.A.; Fernandes, M.G.; Busoli, A.C. Spatial distribution of adult Anthonomus grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and damage to cotton flower buds due to feeding and oviposition. Neotrop. Entomol. 2017, 46, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Neves, R.C.S.; Showler, A.T.; Pinto, E.S.; Bastos, C.S.; Torres, J.B. Reducing boll weevil populations by clipping terminal buds and removing abscised fruiting bodies. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2012, 146, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Perkin, L.C.; Perez, J.L.; Suh, C.P.-C. The identification of boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis grandis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), genes involved in pheromone production and pheromone biosynthesis. Insects 2021, 12, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Oliveira, A.A.S.; Araújo, T.A.; Showler, A.T.; Araújo, A.C.A.; Almeida, I.S.; Aguiar, R.S.A.; Miranda, J.E.; Fernandes, F.L.; Bastos, C.S. Spatio-temporal distribution of Anthonomus grandis Boh. in tropical cotton fields. Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 2492–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Torres, J.B.; Rolim, G.G.; Arruda, L.S.; Dos Santos, M.P.; Leite, S.A.; Neves, R.C.D.S. Insecticides in use and risk of control failure of boll weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the Brazilian Cerrado. Neotrop. Entomol. 2022, 51, 613–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bravo, A.; Gómez, I.; Porta, H.; García-Gómez, B.I.; Rodriguez-Almazan, C.; Pardo, L.; Soberón, M. Evolution of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins insecticidal activity. Microb. Biotechnol. 2012, 6, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ribeiro, T.P.; Arraes, F.B.M.; Lourenço-Tessutti, I.T.; Silva, M.S.; Lisei-de-Sá, M.E.; Lucena, W.A.; Macedo, L.L.P.; Lima, J.N.; Santos Amorim, R.M.; Artico, S.; et al. Transgenic cotton expressing Cry10Aa toxin confers high resistance to the cotton boll weevil. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 997–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. ISAAA. GM Approval Database. 2022. Available online: https://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase (accessed on 12 December 2022).
  13. Ribeiro, T.P.; Basso, M.F.; Carvalho, M.H.d.; Macedo, L.L.P.d.; Silva, D.M.L.d.; Lourenço-Tessutti, I.T.; Oliveira-Neto, O.B.d.; Campos-Pinto, E.R.d.; Lucena, W.A.; Silva, M.C.M.d.; et al. Stability and tissue-specific Cry10Aa overexpression improves cotton resistance to the cotton boll weevil. Biotechnol. Res. Innov. 2019, 3, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Domínguez-Arrizabalaga, M.; Villanueva, M.; Escriche, B.; Ancín-Azpilicueta, C.; Caballero, P. Insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis proteins against Coleopteran Pests. Toxins 2020, 12, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abbott, W.S. A method of computing the effectiveness of on insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 1925, 18, 265–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Martins, E.S.; Monnerat, R.G.; Queiroz, P.R.; Dumas, V.F.; Braz, S.V.; Aguiar, R.W.S.; Gomes, A.C.M.M.; Sánchez, J.; Bravo, A.; Ribeiro, B.M. Midgut GPI-anchored proteins with alkaline phosphatase activity from the cotton boll weevil (A. grandis) are putative receptors for the Cry1B protein of Bacillus thuringiensis. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 40, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Farias, D.F.; Peijnenburg, A.A.; Grossi-de-Sa, M.F.; Carvalho, A.F. Food safety knowledge on the Bt mutant protein Cry8Ka5 employed in the development of coleopteran-resistant transgenic cotton plants. Bioengineered 2015, 6, 323–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Martins, E.S.; Aguiar, R.W.; Martins, N.F.; Melatti, V.M.; Falcao, R.; Gomes, A.C.; Ribeiro, B.M.; Monnerat, R.G. Recombinant Cry1Ia protein is highly toxic to cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis Boheman) and fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda). J. App. Microbiol. 2008, 104, 1363–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Silva, C.R.; Monnerat, R.; Lima, L.M.; Martins, É.S.; Melo Filho, P.A.; Pinheiro, M.P.; Santos, R.C. Stable integration and expression of a cry1Ia gene conferring resistance to fall armyworm and boll weevil in cotton plants. Pest Manag. Sci. 2016, 72, 1549–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. de Oliveira, R.S.; Oliveira-Neto, O.B.; Moura, H.F.; de Macedo, L.L.; Arraes, F.B.; Lucena, W.A.; Lourenco-Tessutti, I.T.; de Deus Barbosa, A.A.; da Silva, M.C.; Grossi-de-Sa, M.F. Transgenic cotton plants expressing Cry1Ia12 toxin confer resistance to fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) and cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis). Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Grossi-de-Sa, M.F.; Quezado de Magalhaes, M.; Silva, M.S.; Silva, S.M.; Dias, S.C.; Nakasu, E.Y.; Brunetta, P.S.; Oliveira, G.R.; Neto, O.B.; Sampaio de Oliveira, R.; et al. Susceptibility of Anthonomus grandis (cotton boll weevil) and Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) to a cry1ia-type toxin from a Brazilian Bacillus thuringiensis strain. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 40, 773–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aguiar, R.W.d.S.; Martins, E.S.; Ribeiro, B.M.; Monnerat, R.G. Cry10Aa protein is highly toxic to Anthonomus grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), an important insect pest in Brazilian cotton crop fields. Bt. Res. 2012, 3, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jakka, S.; Ferré, J.; Jurat-Fuentes, J.L. Cry toxin binding site models and their use in strategies to delay resistance evolution. In Bt Resistance: Characterization and Strategies for GM Crops Producing Bacillus Thuringiensis Toxins; Soberón, M., Gao, Y., Bravo, A., Eds.; Oxfordshire, UK, 2015; pp. 138–149. [Google Scholar]
  24. Abdelgaffar, H.M.; Oppert, C.; Sun, X.; Monserrate, J.; Jurat-Fuentes, J.L. Differential heliothine susceptibility to Cry1Ac associated with gut proteolytic activity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2019, 153, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, P.; Ma, J.; Head, G.P.; Xia, D.; Li, J.; Wang, H.; Yang, M.; Xie, Z.; Zalucki, M.P.; Lu, Z. Susceptibility of Helicoverpa armigera to two Bt toxins, Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab, in northwestern China: Toward developing an IRM strategy. J. Pest. Sci. 2018, 92, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bel, Y.; Sheets, J.J.; Tan, S.Y.; Narva, K.E.; Escriche, B. Toxicity and binding studies of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac, Cry1F, Cry1C, and Cry2A proteins in the soybean pests Anticarsia gemmatalis and Chrysodeixis (Pseudoplusia) includens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e00326-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Qi, G.; Lu, J.; Zhang, P.; Li, J.; Zhu, F.; Chen, J.; Liu, Y.; Yu, Z.; Zhao, X. The cry1Ac gene of Bacillus thuringiensis ZQ-89 encodes a toxin against long-horned beetle adult. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 110, 1224–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Singh, A.K.; Paritosh, K.; Kant, U.P.; Burma, K.; Pental, D. High expression of Cry1Ac protein in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) by combining independent transgenic events that target the protein to cytoplasm and plastids. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Dhanaraj, A.L.; Willse, A.R.; Kamath, S.P. Stability of expression of Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab2 proteins in Bollgard-II hybrids at different stages of crop growth in different genotypes across cropping seasons and multiple geographies. Transgenic Res. 2018, 28, 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Rodríguez-González, A.; Porteous-Álvarez, A.J.; Val, M.; Casquero, P.A.; Escriche, B. Toxicity of five Cry proteins against the insect pest Acanthoscelides obtectus (Coleoptera: Chrisomelidae: Bruchinae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2020, 169, 107295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Song, P.; Wang, Q.; Nangong, Z.; Su, J.; Ge, D. Identification of Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) midgut putative receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal Cry7ab3 toxin. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2012, 109, 318–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rodríguez-González, A.; Porteous-Álvarez, A.J.; Guerra, M.; González-López, O.; Casquero, P.A.; Escriche, B. Effect of Cry toxins on Xylotrechus arvicola (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) larvae. Insects 2021, 13, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guzov, V.M.; Malvar, T.M.; Roberts, J.K.; Sivasupramaniam, S. Insect inhibitory Bacillus thuringiensis proteins, fusions, and methods of use therefor. U.S. Patent 7,655,838, 2 February 2010. [Google Scholar]
  34. Contreras, E.; Rausell, C.; Real, M.D. Proteome response of Tribolium castaneum larvae to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin producing strains. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e0055330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ekobu, M.; Solera, M.; Kyamanywa, S.; Mwanga, R.O.; Odongo, B.; Ghislain, M.; Moar, W.J. Toxicity of seven Bacillus thuringiensis Cry proteins against Cylas puncticollis and Cylas brunneus (Coleoptera: Brentidae) using a novel artificial diet. J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103, 1493–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hernández-Martínez, P.; Khorramnejad, A.; Prentice, K.; Andrés-Garrido, A.; Vera-Velasco, N.M.; Smagghe, G.; Escriche, B. The independent biological activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry23Aa protein against Cylas puncticollis. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Monnerat, R.G.; Dias, S.C.; Oliveira Neto, O.B.; Nobre, S.D.; Silva-Werneck, J.O.; Sá, M.F.G. Criação Massal do Bicudo do Algodoeiro Anthonomus grandis em Laboratório; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia: Brasília, Brazil, 2000; p. 4. [Google Scholar]
  38. Finney, D.J. Probit Analysis, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1971. [Google Scholar]
Toxins 15 00055 g001 550
Figure 1. Corrected mortality [15] of A. grandis larvae after seven days of protein intake in an artificial diet at seven concentrations of different B. thuringiensis Cry proteins. Error bars represent the mean standard error. The error bars for Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa are not shown because of the death of all treated larvae in all replicates.
Figure 1. Corrected mortality [15] of A. grandis larvae after seven days of protein intake in an artificial diet at seven concentrations of different B. thuringiensis Cry proteins. Error bars represent the mean standard error. The error bars for Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa are not shown because of the death of all treated larvae in all replicates.
Toxins 15 00055 g001
Toxins 15 00055 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa on A. grandis larvae with 0.5 μg·g−1 treatment. (A) Neonate larva at the start of the treatment (1 mm size), (B) larva on control untreated media after 7 days of treatment (5 mm size), (C) larva on Mpp/Xpp treated media after 7 days of treatment (1 mm size).
Figure 2. Effect of Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa on A. grandis larvae with 0.5 μg·g−1 treatment. (A) Neonate larva at the start of the treatment (1 mm size), (B) larva on control untreated media after 7 days of treatment (5 mm size), (C) larva on Mpp/Xpp treated media after 7 days of treatment (1 mm size).
Toxins 15 00055 g002
Table
Table 1. Parameters estimated by probit analysis from the bioassays with A. grandis larvae tested with several Bt proteins. Toxin concentrations are given in μg of protein per·g−1 of artificial diet.
Table 1. Parameters estimated by probit analysis from the bioassays with A. grandis larvae tested with several Bt proteins. Toxin concentrations are given in μg of protein per·g−1 of artificial diet.
Bt ProteinnSlope (±SE)LC10 (FL95)LC50 (FL95)χ2 (d.f.)
Cry1Ac8410.58 (0.16)2.01 (0.04–7.70)317 (188–3378) *2.08 (5)
Cry1Ba8400.43 (0.11)0.33 (0.01–1.84)293 (92–4486) *2.05 (5)
Cry7Aa8410.35 (0.12)0.38 (0.01–3.05)1598 (233–ND) *4.60 (5)
Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa7353.80 (0.47)0.08 (0.04–0.12) *0.18 (0.13–0.22)4.43 (4)
n = number of evaluated larvae; slope = dose–response quickness; SE = standard error of the mean; LC10 and LC50 = concentration that killed 10% and 50%, respectively; FL95 = 95% fiducial limits; d.f. = degrees of freedom; ND = not determined; * value interpolated because they were out of the range of assayed concentrations.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Oliveira, J.A.; Negri, B.F.; Hernández-Martínez, P.; Basso, M.F.; Escriche, B. Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa Insecticidal Proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) Are Highly Toxic to Anthonomus grandis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Larvae. Toxins 2023, 15, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15010055

AMA Style

de Oliveira JA, Negri BF, Hernández-Martínez P, Basso MF, Escriche B. Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa Insecticidal Proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) Are Highly Toxic to Anthonomus grandis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Larvae. Toxins. 2023; 15(1):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15010055

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Oliveira, Jéssica A., Bárbara F. Negri, Patricia Hernández-Martínez, Marcos F. Basso, and Baltasar Escriche. 2023. "Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa Insecticidal Proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) Are Highly Toxic to Anthonomus grandis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Larvae" Toxins 15, no. 1: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15010055

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop