Next Article in Journal
An Automatic Immunoaffinity Pretreatment of Deoxynivalenol Coupled with UPLC-UV Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Two Toxin-Producing Harmful Algae, Alexandrium catenella and Dinophysis acuminata (Dinophyceae), on Activity and Mortality of Larval Shellfish
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry Reveals a Novel Binding Region of a Neutralizing Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody to Anthrax Protective Antigen
Previous Article in Special Issue
Yeast Cell as a Bio-Model for Measuring the Toxicity of Fish-Killing Flagellates
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/toxins14020095
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection and Quantification of the Harmful Dinoflagellate Margalefidinium polykrikoides (East Asian Ribotype) in the Coastal Waters of China

by
Jiarong Hu
1,2,3,
Ruoyu Guo
1,2,3,
Douding Lu
1,2,3,
Xinfeng Dai
1,2,3,
Yuanli Zhu
1,
Bum Soo Park
4 and
Pengbin Wang
1,2,3,*
1
Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China
2
Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Ecosystem and Bioresource, Fourth Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beihai 536000, China
3
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Beibu Gulf Marine Resources, Environment and Sustainable Development, Fourth Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beihai 536000, China
4
Marine Ecosystem Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Busan 49111, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2022, 14(2), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14020095
Submission received: 15 December 2021 / Revised: 15 January 2022 / Accepted: 17 January 2022 / Published: 25 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Harmful Algal Blooms on Aquatic Organisms)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
As a marine ichthyotoxic dinoflagellate, Margalefidinium polykrikoides, previously named Cochlodinium polykrikoides, have caused mass mortalities of fish worldwide during blooms. Rapid detection of target species is a prerequisite for the timely monitoring and early warning of harmful algal blooms (HABs). However, it is difficult to achieve rapid identification with traditional methods. The technology of using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) to detect and quantify microalgae is relatively mature. Based on the accuracy, rapidity, and sensitivity of qPCR technology, it can be used in the monitoring and development of early warning systems for HABs. From 2017 to 2020, samples were collected from 15 locations off the Chinese coast or from local sea areas. Based on the qPCR detection and analysis, the target species, M. polykrikoides (East Asian ribotype, EAr), was found in samples from Tianjin, Yangtze River estuary, and offshore Fujian (East China Sea). This is the first time that M. polykrikoides (EAr) was detected in the coastal waters of Tianjin. The results reveal a distributive pattern of M. polykrikoides (EAr) along Chinese coastal waters. It is helpful to predict the future diffusion trend of M. polykrikoides (EAr) in the China Sea and provides a practical case for the future construction of monitoring and warning systems for M. polykrikoides and HABs.
Keywords:
Margalefidinium polykrikoides (East Asian ribotype); quantitative real-time PCR; field application; China coastal waters
Key Contribution: Research results reveal a distributive pattern of M. polykrikoides (EAr) in Chinese coastal waters. This research is helpful for predicting the future diffusion trend of M. polykrikoides (EAr) in the China Sea.

1. Introduction

Margalefidinium polykrikoides [1], formerly known as Cochlodinium polykrikoides [2], is an ichthyotoxic unarmored dinoflagellate that has caused mass mortalities of fish worldwide during blooms, with catastrophic impacts to aquaculture and local economies [1,3,4,5,6,7]. M. polykrikoides blooms are usually characterized by large spatial scale (10 to 100 km) and high-density aggregation (>106 cells·L−1) [8]. These blooms are often accompanied by the production of strongly ichthyotoxic compounds, resulting in the death of a large number of marine organisms [9]. The ichthyotoxicity produced by M. polykrikoides can cause high mortality to marine organisms in a short period of time [9]. M. polykrikoides has been reported in tropical, subtropical, and temperate waters [10], such as the Gulf of California, United States of America [11], Korea [12], Japan [13], Middle East [5,14], Canada [7], and China [15]. Over the past three decades, harmful algal blooms (HABs) caused by M. polykrikoides have been spreading in Asian, Europe, and North American waters. In Korea alone, fishery losses associated with the blooms exceed $100M annually [16,17]. Compared with other countries, such as Japan and Korea, there are few reports regarding M. polykrikoides in Chinese coastal waters, and there is still a lack of reports on the detailed distribution of M. polykrikoides in the China Sea.
The rapid identification of the target species is imperative for timely monitoring and early warning of HABs [18,19,20]. Using conventional light microscopy (LM) and electron microscopy (EM) [21] to observe and identify microalgae is not only time-consuming and labor-intensive, but also requires high levels of taxonomic skill. Although these classical methods are still used today, it is difficult to achieve rapid detection and timely warning. In fact, for M. polykrikoides sharing similar morphological characteristics with other Margalefidinium species, it is difficult to distinguish and identify them from field samples [22,23,24]. Furthermore, after fixation with Lugol’s solution, glutaraldehyde, or other fixatives, some dinoflagellates may deform and even break. As unarmored dinoflagellate, the preservation time of M. polykrikoides is short in the fixative. This is not conducive to qualitative and quantitative analysis. However, researchers have never stopped exploring the development of rapid methods for microalgae detection. Using molecular methods to detect some HABs causative species can not only reduce the detection limit and improve the sensitivity and accuracy but it can also reduce the cost and processing time of each sample. Some molecular techniques, such as microarrays with molecular probes, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), high throughput sequencing, and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH-probes), have been developed for the detection and quantification of microalgae in the last three decades [25,26]. However, compared with the above detection methods, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) has higher sensitivity, specificity, and a more accurate quantitative effect [27,28].
In the past 20 years, qPCR has been used to detect and quantify microalgae. Park et al. resolved the intra-specific succession within M. polykrikoides populations in southern Korean coastal waters via the use of qPCR assays [10]. Park et al. developed a real-time PCR technique for detecting viable M. polykrikoides cysts in sediment [29]. Based on previous studies, Eckford-Soper and Daugbjerg developed a multiplex real-time qPCR assay that can simultaneously detect four marine toxic bloom-forming microalgal species [30]. Many scholars have conducted the qPCR quantitative analysis on major HABs causative dinoflagellates, such as M. polykrikoides [10], Heterosigma akashiwo [31], Karenia mikimotoi [32], Prorocentrum donghaiense [33], and Alexandrium [34]. Based on previous studies, effective primers have been developed and can be used to achieve the real-time quantitative amplification of target genes in S. Korea. In this study, qPCR was used to study the distribution of M. polykrikoides (East Asian ribotype, EAr) in the coastal areas of China.

2. Results

2.1. LM and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

M. polykrikoides (EAr), used to take LM micrographs, was obtained from the Department of Biotechnology at Sangmyung University (Seoul, Korea). M. polykrikoides used to take SEM micrographs was obtained from the East China Sea (ECS). The size of a single-cell of M. polykrikoides is 25–36 µm long and 16–25 µm wide (Figure 1). Under the LM, the cells form an eight-celled chain (Figure 1A). The single-cell of M. polykrikoides is conical at the tip and hemispherical at the bottom (Figure 1B–D).

2.2. Melting Curve and Standard Curve

Each qPCR product had one informative melting curve. Analyzing the melting curve is useful for the detection of false positives due to primer-dimers or unexpected products. In this study, the melting temperatures were 88 °C and the melting curve showed narrow peaks, indicating that only the target sequence was successfully amplified (Figure 2).
The number of cells corresponding to serial 10 fold dilutions of the DNA extracts was 7.09 × 10−3, 7.09 × 10−2, 7.09 × 10−1, 7.09, and 70.9 cells·µL−1 (cell concentration dissolved in TEbuffer), respectively. There was a strong linear relationship between the CT value and the log10 of the cells number. The regression equation was:
y = −3.2417x + 25.52 (R2 = 0.998)
The R2 values of all the standard curves were over 0.99 (Figure 3).

2.3. Application of qPCR to Field Samples

The applicability of the developed qPCR was tested on the field samples. Three repetitions were set for each sample. M. polykrikoides (EAr) was detected at four sampling sites, including Tianjin (S1), the Yangtze River estuary (S6, September), the Yangtze River estuary (S7, July), and Fujian coastal (S11, May) (Table 1). The site S11 showed the lowest abundance (1.5×103 cells·L−1), while S7 displayed the highest concentration with 1.0 × 105 cells·L−1. Overall, 3.6 × 103 and 1.9 × 104 cells·L−1 were detected at S1 and S6, respectively (Figure 4). The water temperatures at the stations where M. polykrikoides (EAr) was detected were 27.5 °C (S1), 25.4 °C (S6), 26.2 °C (S7), and 24.7 °C (S11), respectively. The average temperature was 25.9 ± 1.2 °C. The study results showed that M. polykrikoides (EAr) was detected in the Bohai Sea and the East China Sea, while no M. polykrikoides (EAr) was detected in the Yellow Sea and the South China Sea. The sampling time of the stations where M. polykrikoides (EAr) was detected was concentrated from May to September. Station S11, located in Fujian coastal, was sampled in May. Station S7, located in the Yangtze River estuary, was sampled in July. Station S1, located in Tianjin, was sampled in August. As time went on, M. polykrikoides (EAr) was detected from south to north.

2.4. Phylogenetic Tree

The qPCR amplification products of field samples with positive results were sequenced, and all sequencing results were an identical sequence. In the clade of M. polykrikoides, specimens were clearly separated into four monophyletic sub-clades. One clade of M. polykrikoides (EAr) was composed of sequences collected from this study and other Asian seas, and all sequences in this clade were completely identical, which was well supported by bootstrap support (BS) values (neighbor-joining (NJ)/maximum likelihood (ML) = 90%/99%). The phylogenetic tree clearly shows the relationships of M. polykrikoides (EAr) and other ribotypes, including the Philippines ribotype, American/Malaysian ribotype, and the Mediterranean Sea ribotype (Figure 5).

3. Discussion

Although many molecular methods, such as microarrays with molecular probes [35], RFLP [36], high throughput sequencing [37], and FISH-probes [38], have been developed to detect microalgae, qPCR is more widely used to detect and quantify microalgae because of the high accuracy and good sensitivity [27,28,39]. Currently, qPCR has been applied in the field to detect and quantify harmful algae [40,41,42,43]. It may be difficult to detect and quantify microalgae by direct counting with LM at low densities of the target species, but based on the high sensitivity of qPCR, it is possible to detect and quantify the target species even at low densities (<10 cells·L−1) [10,44]. The copy numbers of the rRNA gene of dinoflagellates can be up to the order of 10000 [45]. Therefore, even if the extracted DNA contains less than one cell due to dilution, the rRNA gene can be amplified [10]. On the other hand, a high copy number can effectively eliminate PCR inhibitor interference in the qPCR process by diluting the extracted DNA. PCR inhibitors, such as mucopolysaccharides, phenolic compounds, humic acids, and heavy metals in field samples, may cause the qPCR results to be inaccurate or even false negative [46,47]. Based on Park et al. research foundation, the results of this study indicate that the qPCR primer (CPSF2-CPSR3) for the M. polykrikoides (EAr) has a strong specificity and is appropriate for the specific detection and quantification of M. polykrikoides (EAr) [10].
M. polykrikoides is present in tropical, subtropical and temperate waters [10]. Kim et al. [48] research results showed that M. polykrikoides examined in the laboratory exhibited its maximum specific growth rate of 0.41 day−1 at a combination of 25 °C and salinity of 34 psu, and optimum growth rates of >0.3 day−1 were observed at temperatures ranging from 21 to 26 °C and at salinities from 30 to 36 psu. It can be seen that most sea areas in China are suitable for the growth of M. polykrikoides. In 1993, Qi et al. reported the occurrence of red tide of Margalefidinium sp. in Quanzhou Bay, Fujian Province, which caused the death of a large number of marine organisms, but the cause species were not confirmed [15]. In 2009, M. polykrikoides was found in the Pearl River Estuary, South China Sea [49]. In 2014, morphological characterization and phylogenetic analysis of M. polykrikoides isolated from the ECS were carried out by Wang et al. [50]. In 2019, M. polykrikoides was detected in Jiaozhou Bay, Qingdao and demonstrated strong temporal preference with a sharp peak of abundance in early autumn (September), but failed to detect M. polykrikoides from January to May [51]. In this study, we also collected samples in coastal Qingdao on 10 May 2019. It is consistent with the research results of Liu et al. [51], we also failed to detect M. polykrikoides. This may be related to the low water temperature (16.9 °C). However, compared with countries such as Japan and Korea, there are still fewer reports on geographical distribution of M. polykrikoides in China’s coastal areas. In 1978, the first outbreak of red tide of M. polykrikoides occurred in the Yatsushiro Sea of Japan, and thereafter, the red tide caused by this species rapidly spread to the extensive waters along the coast of Japan and Korea [22,48,52]. Marine ecosystems are experiencing warming due to global climate change [53]. Seawater warming change the basal metabolic function and species distribution in microalgae [54]. In addition, ballast water is also an important reason for the spread of microalgae species [55]. In a time of global warming and increasingly advanced shipping, the rate of spread of harmful algal bloom species is increasing. Therefore, there is a possibility that M. polykrikoides could cause a massive outbreak in the China Sea. Timely warning is the key to face the outbreak of HABs. qPCR can achieve rapid detection and timely warning.
The results of this study show that M. polykrikoides (EAr) existed in the ECS and Tianjin coastal area, and their concentration can reach 1.0 × 105 cells·L−1 at least in the ECS. In this study, field samples were collected from 15 locations, 3 of them were offshore sampling. M. polykrikoides (EAr) was detected in all three samples sampled offshore. However, M. polykrikoides (EAr) was detected in only 1 of the 12 samplings conducted near shore. One of the possible reasons why M. polykrikoides (EAr) were rarely found near shore may be due to the high turbidity of nearshore waters, which can affect the growth and distribution of M. polykrikoides (EAr). Blooms of M. polykrikoides are influenced by prevailing ocean currents [56]. Lee et al. research results showed that the outbreak of M. polykrikoides in coastal areas of Korea was influenced by the Tsushima Warm Current [52]. Large-scale transport of M. polykrikoides blooms by the Tsushima Warm Current also happened in the southwest Sea of Japan [57]. As a branch of the main stem of the Kuroshio in the northeastern waters of Taiwan Island, Taiwan Warm Current (TWC) is a high-temperature, high-salt current that exists year-round in the waters of Fujian and Zhejiang, China [58]. TWC carries high nutritive (phosphate) seawater to the Yangtze River estuary and plays an important role in the hydrology and climate of the ECS [59]. There is no report on the effect of TWC on M. polykrikoides, but there are many studies on the effect of TWC on Prorocentrum donghaiense. The research results of Dai et al. support the hypothesis that P. donghaiense blooms develop from the population at the TWC front in the ECS [60], suggesting the role of the ocean current front as a seed bank to dinoflagellate blooms. Zeng et al.’s research results showed that P. donghaiense blooms first occurred at the northern end of the Taiwan Strait and then moved northward and nearshore with the TWC [61]. Whether TWC will affect M. polykrikoides remains to be investigated. Although the effect of TWC on M. polykrikoides was not addressed in this study, it may be an important direction for future research on the distribution of M. polykrikoides in the coastal waters of China.
In this study, M. polykrikoides (EAr) was detected in the coastal waters of Tianjin for the first time. Since the first reported outbreak of Cochlodinium sp. in Quanzhou Bay in 1993 [15], this study confirmed the presence of M. polykrikoides (EAr) in the offshore of Fujian. M. polykrikoides has a maximum specific growth rate at 25 °C [48]. The water temperature at the time of the M. polykrikoides blooms mostly between 20 to 30 °C [62,63]. In this study, the water temperatures at the stations where M. polykrikoides (EAr) was detected were 27.5 °C (S1), 25.4 °C (S6), 26.2 °C (S7), and 24.7 °C (S11), respectively. The average temperature was 25.9 ± 1.2 °C. Some stations where M. polykrikoides (EAr) was not detected, such as S4, S5, S9, and S10, had water temperatures below 20 °C. Therefore, under suitable environmental conditions, those stations where M. polykrikoides (EAr) was not detected in this study may also exist M. polykrikoides (EAr). The sampling time of the stations where M. polykrikoides (EAr) was detected was mainlyfrom May to September. Following the time and season passing and changing, M. polykrikoides (EAr) was detected from south to north. It suggests that M. polykrikoides (EAr) is likely to keep moving northward as the water temperature rises. In March 2005, massive fish mortalities and water discoloration was reported off the western coast of Puerto Princesa, Palawan, Philippines; phytoplankton analysis revealed a near monospecific bloom of the dinoflagellate, M. polykrikoides [64]. There is a possibility that M. polykrikoides is expanding with seasonal changes from the low to latitude the high latitude sea area, though there still need for further study to clarify this issue.

4. Conclusions

In this study, qPCR was successfully applied to detect and quantify field samples along the Chinese coast. The target species, M. polykrikoides (EAr), was found in samples from Tianjin, the Yangtze River estuary, and offshore Fujian (East China Sea). This is the first time that M. polykrikoides (EAr) was detected in the coastal waters of Tianjin. Based on the accuracy, rapidity, and sensitivity of qPCR technology, it can be used in the monitoring and early warning system of HABs. It provides a practical case for the future construction of monitoring and warning systems for M. polykrikoides (EAr) and HABs.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Algal Cultures

The algal culture of M. polykrikoides (EAr) was obtained from the Department of Biotechnology at Sangmyung University (Seoul, Korea). The cultures were maintained in f/2 medium at 20 °C ± 1 °C under a light intensity of 65 µmol·Em−2·s−1 on a 12:12 h light-dark cycle. The f/2 medium was prepared as described in [65,66]. All seawater at a salinity of 31–33 psu was filtered through GF/F membranes (Whatman, Little Chalfont, UK) and then autoclaved at 121 °C for 30 min. Strains were subcultured with fresh f/2 medium at 20 day intervals to maintain healthy cultures.

5.2. LM and SEM

LM images of M. polykrikoides (EAr) in the exponential growth phase were recorded using an inverted microscope (BX53, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed using CellSens Standard 2.3 software (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) [67]. SEM images were obtained in the following steps. M. polykrikoides obtained from ECS in the exponential growth phase was fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde at 4 °C for 4 h. Following the fixed samples were filtered and collected through a 3 μm polycarbonate membrane (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), washed with distilled water, thoroughly removed all fixed reagents and sea salt, dehydrated with a graded ethanol series treatment (30, 50, 70, 90, 100, and 100%; 30 min per concentration), dried with a critical point drier (Joel Hi-Tech Co., Dalian, China), and gold-coated in a sputter coater. Lastly, the M. polykrikoides cells were observed and photographed under an SEM (TM-1000 Tabletop Microscope, Hitachi High-Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan) [67,68].

5.3. Study Area and Field Sampling

From April 2017 to November 2020, samples were collected from 15 locations of the Chinese coast or sea areas, including Tianjin, Beidaihe, Zhangzi Island, Rongcheng, Qingdao, Yangtze River estuary (July), Yangtze River estuary (September), Nanji islands, Fujian coastal (April), Fujian coastal (May), Ningde, Xiamen, Beihai, Weizhou island, and Sanya (Figure 6). The sampling time and location of each station are listed in Table 1. Seawater ranging from 100 mL to 1200 mL was filtered and collected via filtering with 0.2 μm Millipore filter membrane (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Seawater filtration volume (100–500 mL) were decided according to cell abundance and turbidity of seawater. The filters were placed in a 2 mL microtube containing 800 μL of 2% cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) extraction buffer and then stored at −80 °C until DNA extraction.

5.4. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and DNA Sequencing

DNA extraction of samples was carried out with the CTAB method [69]. Based on the study of Park et al. [10], the East Asian ribotype of M. polykrikoides was confirmed by conventional PCR. The primers sequences for different ribotypes of M. polykrikoides were as follows: CPSF2: 5′-AACGCAAGTGTGAGTGTGAGTT, CPSR3: 5′-GGACCCACGATCAACCCA (EAr), PhiCPSF: 5′-TGCAAGTTTCAACCATCTCTCGC, PhiCPSR: 5′-GAAAGCAAGTTCAATCGACGGTTT (Philippines ribotype) and AMCPSF: 5′-CTCAATCGCCTTTCGCCTGAT, AMCPSR: 5′-ACCGGACACCTCGGATATGAT (American/Malaysian ribotype) [10]. The conventional PCR was carried out in a final volume of 20 µL containing 2 µL of 10× PCR buffer, 2 µL of dNTP (2.5 mM), 1 µL of each primer (0.1 mM), 12.8 µL of double-distilled water, 0.2 µL Takara Ex Taq polymerase (5U; TaKaRa, Osaka, Japan), and 1 µL of genomic DNA. Using T100TM Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), the PCR procedure was as follows: 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 61.5 °C (EAr), 62 °C (Philippines ribotype), or 64 °C (American/Malaysian ribotype) for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s followed by 72 °C for 10 min. PCR amplification products were analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis according to standard methods [70]. DNA sequencing was performed by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).

5.5. qPCR and Standard Curve Construction

The species-specific qPCR primer used in this study for M. polykrikoides was developed by Park et al. [10]. DNA melting curve analysis was conducted using a CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Quantitative Real-time PCR assays were performed in a total reaction volume of 20 µL, which contained 10 µL of 1 × SsoFastTM EvaGreen® Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), 1 µL of each primer (0.1 mM), 1 µL of genomic DNA, and 7 µL double-distilled water. qPCR reactions were run using a CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) at 98 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles at 98 °C for 5 s, then 55 °C for 20 s. The melting curve was increased from 65 °C to 95 °C in 0.5 °C increments, and each step was held for 5 s.
The specificity of a qPCR assay is determined by the primers and reaction conditions used. However, even with well-designed primers, it is always possible to produce primer-dimers or unexpected products. The specificity of the qPCR assay can be confirmed using melting curve analysis. The establishment of the standard curve was based on the linear relationship between the CT value and the number of cells. Standard curves were constructed from DNA isolated from 150mL of culture harvested by filtration during the exponential growth phase. M. polykrikoides was counted using a Sedgewick Rafter counting chamber with an LM at 200 × magnification (CKX53, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and then filtered to collect the cells. The collected cells were extracted DNA according to the above method. DNA extracts were serially diluted 10-fold and used to construct standard curves.

5.6. Phylogenetic Tree

The sequences obtained by qPCR assay in this study and deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 31 August 2021) were aligned with the sequences obtained from GenBank using BioEdit (North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA) (Version.7.0.5.3) [71]. The sequences obtained in this study were used together with those in Genbank to construct a phylogenetic tree and using Akashiwo sanguinea, Karenia mikimotoi, and Gymnodinium catenatum sequences as outgroup (Table 2) [72]. This analysis involved 34 nucleotide sequences. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated (complete deletion option). There was a total of 146 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X (Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA) (Version.10.2.4) [73]. The sequence obtained in this study is located in the D1-D2 region of the large subunit ribosomal RNA gene (LSU rDNA). ML and NJ phylogenetic tree based on partial LSU rDNA sequences showing the relationships of M. polykrikoides (EAr) and other ribotypes, including the Philippines ribotype, American/Malaysian ribotype, and the Mediterranean Sea ribotype.

5.7. Data Analysis

Amplification data were handled in a Bio-Rad CFX Maestro v 3.0 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), with Ct determination mode set to a single threshold and the baseline decided by baseline subtracted curve fit. Unknown cell concentrations were derived directly from the standard calibration curve by a Bio-Rad CFX Maestro v 3.0 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Raw data were extracted to Microsoft Excel Professional Plus 2010 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and OriginPro 2019b (Originlab Co., Northampton, MA, USA), where they were inspected manually.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.H., P.W., R.G., D.L. and B.S.P.; methodology, J.H., R.G., P.W. and B.S.P.; software, J.H., P.W. and R.G.; validation, P.W., R.G., B.S.P., D.L. and J.H.; formal analysis, P.W., R.G., J.H., D.L. and X.D.; investigation, J.H., P.W., Y.Z., R.G., D.L. and X.D.; resources, P.W., R.G., J.H., D.L., Y.Z. and X.D.; data curation, P.W., R.G. and J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, J.H.; writing—review and editing, J.H., P.W. and R.G.; visualization, J.H., P.W. and R.G.; supervision, P.W. and R.G.; project administration, P.W.; funding acquisition, P.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the following Projects: National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41961144013, 41706191); Scientific Research Fund of Second Institute of Oceanography, MNR (Grant No. JT1803); Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LY20D060004, LY19D060007), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 41876139, 41676111, 41906140, 41376168); Zhejiang Provincial Public Welfare Technology Application Research Program of China under Grant No. LGF21D060001; Long-Term Observation and Research Plan in the Changjiang Estuary and the Adjacent East China Sea Project I and II (LORCE I&II).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Gómez, F.; Richlen, M.L.; Anderson, D.M. Molecular characterization and morphology of Cochlodinium strangulatum, the type species of Cochlodinium, and Margalefidinium gen. nov. for C. polykrikoides and allied species (Gymnodiniales, Dinophyceae). Harmful Algae 2017, 63, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Margalef, R. Hidrografía y Fitoplancton de un Area Marina de la Costa Meridional de Puerto Rico; Spanish National Research Council: Madrid, Spain, 1961. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yan, T.; Zhou, M.-J.; Zou, J.-Z. A National Report on Harmful Algal Blooms in China. In Harmful Algal Blooms in the PICES Region of the North Pacific; PICES: Sydney, BR, Canada, 2002; Volume 21. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fukuyo, Y.; Imai, I.; Kodama, M.; Tamai, K. Red tides and other harmful algal blooms in Japan. Harmful algal blooms in the PICES region of the North. Pacific. PICES Sci. Rep. 2002, 23, 7–20. [Google Scholar]
  5. Richlen, M.L.; Morton, S.L.; Jamali, E.A.; Rajan, A.; Anderson, D.M. The catastrophic 2008–2009 red tide in the Arabian gulf region, with observations on the identification and phylogeny of the fish-killing dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides. Harmful Algae 2010, 9, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Park, T.G.; Lim, W.A.; Park, Y.T.; Lee, C.K.; Jeong, H.J. Economic impact, management and mitigation of red tides in Korea. Harmful Algae 2013, 30, S131–S143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Whyte, J.N.C.; Haigh, N.; Ginther, N.G.; Keddy, L.J. First record of blooms of Cochlodinium sp. (Gymnodiniales, Dinophyceae) causing mortality to aquacultured salmon on the west coast of Canada. Phycologia 2001, 40, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kudela, R.M.; Gobler, C.J. Harmful dinoflagellate blooms caused by Cochlodinium sp.: Global expansion and ecological strategies facilitating bloom formation. Harmful Algae 2012, 14, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, D.; Oda, T.; Muramatsu, T.; Kim, D.; Matsuyama, Y.; Honjo, T. Possible factors responsible for the toxicity of Cochlodinium polykrikoides, a red tide phytoplankton. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C: Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2002, 132, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Park, B.S.; Wang, P.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.-H.; Gobler, C.J.; Han, M.-S. Resolving the intra-specific succession within Cochlodinium polykrikoides populations in southern Korean coastal waters via use of quantitative PCR assays. Harmful Algae 2014, 37, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gárate-Lizárraga, I. Bloom of Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Dinophyceae: Gymnodiniales) in Bahía de La Paz, Gulf of California. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 67, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Park, B.S.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, J.H.; Gobler, C.J.; Baek, S.H.; Han, M.-S. Dynamics of bacterial community structure during blooms of Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Gymnodiniales, Dinophyceae) in Korean coastal waters. Harmful Algae 2015, 48, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shimada, H.; Sakamoto, S.; Yamaguchi, M.; Imai, I. First record of two warm-water HAB species Chattonella marina (Raphidophyceae) and Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Dinophyceae) on the west coast of Hokkaido, northern Japan in summer. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2016, 7, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Al-Azri, A.R.; Piontkovski, S.A.; Al-Hashmi, K.A.; Goes, J.I.; Gomes, H.d.R.; Glibert, P.M. Mesoscale and Nutrient Conditions Associated with the Massive 2008 Cochlodinium polykrikoides Bloom in the Sea of Oman/Arabian Gulf. Estuaries Coasts 2013, 37, 325–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Qi, D.; Huang, Y.; Wang, X. Toxic dinoflagellate red tide by a Cochlodinium sp. along the coast of Fujian, China. Dev. Mar. Biol. 1993, 3, 235–238. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, H.G. Recent harmful algal blooms and mitigation strategies in Korea. Ocean. Polar Res. 1997, 19, 185–192. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, H. Cochlodinium polykrikoides blooms in Korean coastal waters and their mitigation. In Harmful Algae; Reguera, B., Blanco, J., Fernandez, M.L., Wyatt, T., Eds.; Xunta de Galicia and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO: Paris, 1998; pp. 227–228. [Google Scholar]
  18. Anderson, D.M. Approaches to monitoring, control and management of harmful algal blooms (HABs). Ocean Coast. Manag. 2009, 52, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Anderson, D.M.; Cembella, A.D.; Hallegraeff, G.M. Progress in Understanding Harmful Algal Blooms: Paradigm Shifts and New Technologies for Research, Monitoring, and Management. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2012, 4, 143–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, P. Harmful Algal Blooms. In Encyclopedia of Ocean Engineering; Cui, W., Fu, S., Hu, Z., Eds.; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2021; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  21. Booth, B.C. Estimating Cell Concentration and Biomass of Autotrophic Plankton Using Microscopy. In Handbook of Methods in Aquatic Microbial Ecology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; pp. 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Matsuoka, K.; Iwataki, M.; Kawami, H. Morphology and taxonomy of chain-forming species of the genus Cochlodinium (Dinophyceae). Harmful Algae 2008, 7, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Marcoval, M.A.; Pan, J.; Tang, Y.; Gobler, C.J. The ability of the branchiopod, Artemia salina, to graze upon harmful algal blooms caused by Alexandrium fundyense, Aureococcus anophagefferens, and Cochlodinium polykrikoides. Estuarine, Coast. Shelf Sci. 2013, 131, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cho, E.S.; Kim, G.Y.; Choi, B.D.; Rhodes, L.L.; Kim, T.J.; Kim, G.H.; Lee, J.D. A Comparative Study of the Harmful Dinoflagellates Cochlodinium polykrikoides and Gyrodinium impudicum Using Transmission Electron Microscopy, Fatty Acid Composition, Carotenoid Content, DNA Quantification and Gene Sequences. Bot. Mar. 2001, 44, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Koehne, B.; Elli, G.; Jennings, R.; Wilhelm, C.; Trissl, H.-W. Spectroscopic and molecular characterization of a long wavelength absorbing antenna of Ostreobium sp. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Bioenerg. 1999, 1412, 94–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Peng, Y.; Zhigang, Y.; Chunmei, D. Pigment signatures of some diatoms isolated from China seas. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 2006, 1, 108–118. [Google Scholar]
  27. Walker, N.J. A Technique Whose Time Has Come. Science 2002, 296, 557–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Coyne, K.J.; Handy, S.M.; Demir, E.; Whereat, E.B.; Hutchins, D.A.; Portune, K.J.; Doblin, M.A.; Cary, S.C. Improved quantitative real-time PCR assays for enumeration of harmful algal species in field samples using an exogenous DNA reference standard. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 2005, 3, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Park, T.G.; Kim, J.J.; Kim, W.J.; Won, K.M. Development of real-time RT-PCR for detecting viable Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Dinophyceae) cysts in sediment. Harmful Algae 2016, 60, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Eckford-Soper, L.K.; Daugbjerg, N. Development of a multiplex real-time qPCR assay for simultaneous enumeration of up to four marine toxic bloom-forming microalgal species. Harmful Algae 2015, 48, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kim, J.-H.; Kim, J.H.; Wang, P.; Park, B.S.; Han, M.-S. An Improved Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay for the Enumeration of Heterosigma akashiwo (Raphidophyceae) Cysts Using a DNA Debris Removal Method and a Cyst-Based Standard Curve. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0145712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Yuan, J.; Mi, T.; Zhen, Y.; Yu, Z. Development of a rapid detection and quantification method of Karenia mikimotoi by real-time quantitative PCR. Harmful Algae 2012, 17, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, C.Y.; Chen, G.F.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Y.Y.; Lu, D.D. Development of a quantitative PCR for detection and quantification of Prorocentrum donghaiense. Environ. Boil. Fishes 2015, 28, 1683–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gao, Y.; Yu, R.-C.; Chen, J.-H.; Zhang, Q.-C.; Kong, F.-Z.; Zhou, M.-J. Distribution of Alexandrium fundyense and A. pacificum (Dinophyceae) in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 96, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Edvardsen, B.; Dittami, S.M.; Groben, R.; Brubak, S.; Escalera, L.; Rodríguez, F.; Reguera, B.; Chen, J.; Medlin, L.K. Molecular probes and microarrays for the detection of toxic algae in the genera Dinophysis and Phalacroma (Dinophyta). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 20, 6733–6750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Yoshinaga, I.; Kim, M.; Katanozaka, N.; Imai, I.; Uchida, A.; Ishida, Y. Population structure of algicidal marine bacteria targeting the red tide forming alga Heterosigma akashiwo (Raphidophyceae), determined by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA genes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1998, 170, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Oliveira, M.C.; Repetti, S.I.; Iha, C.; Jackson, C.J.; Díaz-Tapia, P.; Lubiana, K.M.F.; Cassano, V.; Costa, J.F.; Cremen, M.C.M.; Marcelino, V.R.; et al. High-throughput sequencing for algal systematics. Eur. J. Phycol. 2018, 53, 256–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Eckford-Soper, L.K.; Davidson, K.; Bresnan, E. Identification and quantification of toxic and nontoxic strains of the harmful dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarenseusing fluorescence in situ hybridization and flow cytometry. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 2013, 11, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Medlin, L.K.; Orozco, J. Molecular Techniques for the Detection of Organisms in Aquatic Environments, with Emphasis on Harmful Algal Bloom Species. Sensors 2017, 17, 1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Perini, F.; Bastianini, M.; Capellacci, S.; Pugliese, L.; DiPoi, E.; Cabrini, M.; Buratti, S.; Marini, M.; Penna, A. Molecular methods for cost-efficient monitoring of HAB (harmful algal bloom) dinoflagellate resting cysts. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 147, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zamor, R.M.; Glenn, K.L.; Hambright, K.D. Incorporating molecular tools into routine HAB monitoring programs: Using qPCR to track invasive Prymnesium. Harmful Algae 2011, 15, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Elleuch, J.; Barkallah, M.; Smith, K.F.; Ben Neila, I.; Fendri, I.; Abdelkafi, S. Quantitative PCR assay for the simultaneous identification and enumeration of multiple Karenia species. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 36889–36899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Park, T.-G.; de Salas, M.F.; Bolch, C.J.S.; Hallegraeff, G.M. Development of a Real-Time PCR Probe for Quantification of the Heterotrophic Dinoflagellate Cryptoperidiniopsis brodyi (Dinophyceae) in Environmental Samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 2552–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Park, B.S.; Baek, S.H.; Ki, J.-S.; Cattolico, R.A.; Han, M.-S. Assessment of EvaGreen-based quantitative real-time PCR assay for enumeration of the microalgae Heterosigma and Chattonella (Raphidophyceae). J. Appl. Phycol. 2012, 24, 1555–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Schlötterer, C. Ribosomal DNA Probes and Primers. In Molecular Tools for Screening Biodiversity; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998; pp. 267–276. [Google Scholar]
  46. Wilson, I.G. Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 3741–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Anderson, D.M.; Keafer, B.A.; McGillicuddy, D.J.; Mickelson, M.J.; Keay, K.E.; Libby, P.S.; Manning, J.P.; Mayo, C.A.; Whittaker, D.K.; Hickey, J.M.; et al. Initial observations of the 2005 Alexandrium fundyense bloom in southern New England: General patterns and mechanisms. Deep. Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2005, 52, 2856–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, D.-I.; Matsuyama, Y.; Nagasoe, S.; Yamaguchi, M.; Yoon, Y.-H.; Oshima, Y.; Imada, N.; Honjo, T. Effects of temperature, salinity and irradiance on the growth of the harmful red tide dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides Margalef (Dinophyceae). J. Plankton Res. 2004, 26, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shen, P.-P.; Li, Y.-N.; Qi, Y.-Z.; Zhang, L.-P.; Tan, Y.-H.; Huang, L.-M. Morphology and bloom dynamics of Cochlodinium geminatum (Schütt) Schütt in the Pearl River Estuary, South China Sea. Harmful Algae 2012, 13, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, H.; Lu, D.; He, P. Morphology and phylogeny of dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides from the East China Sea. Oceanol. Limnol. Sin. 2014, 45, 757–763. [Google Scholar]
  51. Liu, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, N. Biodiversity and Spatial-Temporal Dynamics of Margalefidinium Species in Jiaozhou Bay, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lee, D.-K. Cochlodinium polykrikoides blooms and eco-physical conditions in the South Sea of Korea. Harmful Algae 2008, 7, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Karl, T.R.; Trenberth, K.E. Modern Global Climate Change. Science 2003, 302, 1719–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Gobler, C.J.; Doherty, O.M.; Hattenrath-Lehmann, T.K.; Griffith, A.W.; Kang, Y.; Litaker, R.W. Ocean warming since 1982 has expanded the niche of toxic algal blooms in the North Atlantic and North Pacific oceans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 4975–4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Smayda, T.J. Reflections on the ballast water dispersal—harmful algal bloom paradigm. Harmful Algae 2007, 6, 601–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Azanza, R.V.; Baula, I.U. Fish kills associated with Cochlodinium blooms in Palawan, the’last frontier’of the Philippines. Harmful Algae News 2005, 29, 13–14. [Google Scholar]
  57. Onitsuka, G.; Miyahara, K.; Hirose, N.; Watanabe, S.; Semura, H.; Hori, R.; Nishikawa, T.; Miyaji, K.; Yamaguchi, M. Large-scale transport of Cochlodinium polykrikoides blooms by the Tsushima Warm Current in the southwest Sea of Japan. Harmful Algae 2010, 9, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jilan, S.; Yuqiu, P.; Xiangsan, L. Kuroshio Intrusion and Taiwan Warm Current. In Oceanology of China Seas; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1994; pp. 59–70. [Google Scholar]
  59. Qi, J.; Yin, B.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, D.; Xu, Z. Seasonal variation of the Taiwan Warm Current Water and its underlying mechanism. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2016, 35, 1045–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dai, X.; Lu, D.; Guan, W.; Xia, P.; Wang, H.; He, P.; Zhang, D. The Correlation between Prorocentrum donghaiense Blooms and the Taiwan Warm Current in the East China Sea—Evidence for the “Pelagic Seed Bank” Hypothesis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zeng, Y.; Lu, D.; Wang, P.; Guo, R.; Guan, W.; Dai, X. Advanced researches on the relationship between Prorocentrum donghaiense Lu blooms and the Taiwan Warm Current. J. Mar. Sci. 2020, 38, 38. [Google Scholar]
  62. Mulholland, M.R.; Morse, R.E.; Boneillo, G.E.; Bernhardt, P.W.; Filippino, K.C.; Procise, L.A.; Blanco-Garcia, J.L.; Marshall, H.G.; Egerton, T.A.; Hunley, W.S.; et al. Understanding Causes and Impacts of the Dinoflagellate, Cochlodinium polykrikoides, Blooms in the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries Coasts 2009, 32, 734–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gobler, C.J.; Berry, D.L.; Anderson, O.R.; Burson, A.; Koch, F.; Rodgers, B.S.; Moore, L.K.; Goleski, J.A.; Allam, B.; Bowser, P.; et al. Characterization, dynamics, and ecological impacts of harmful Cochlodinium polykrikoides blooms on eastern Long Island, NY, USA. Harmful Algae 2008, 7, 293–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Azanza, R.V.; David, L.T.; Borja, R.T.; Baula, I.U.; Fukuyo, Y. An extensive Cochlodinium bloom along the western coast of Palawan, Philippines. Harmful Algae 2008, 7, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Guillard, R.R.; Ryther, J.H. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms: I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt, and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. Can. J. Microbiol. 1962, 8, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Guillard, R.R. Culture of Phytoplankton for Feeding Marine Invertebrates. In Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1975; pp. 29–60. [Google Scholar]
  67. Han, M.-S.; Wang, P.; Kim, J.H.; Cho, S.-Y.; Park, B.S.; Kim, J.-H.; Katano, T.; Kim, B.-H. Morphological and Molecular Phylogenetic Position of Prorocentrum micans sensu stricto and Description of Prorocentrum koreanum sp. nov. from Southern Coastal Waters in Korea and Japan. Protist 2016, 167, 32–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wang, P.; Park, B.S.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, H.-O.; Han, M.-S. Phylogenetic position of eight Amphora sensu lato (Bacillariophyceae) species and comparative analysis of morphological characteristics. ALGAE 2014, 29, 57–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Murray, M.G.; Thompson, W.F. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 8, 4321–4326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Green, M.R.; Hughes, H.; Sambrook, J.; MacCallum, P. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. In Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual; CSH Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2012; p. 1890. [Google Scholar]
  71. Hall, T. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  72. Iwataki, M.; Kawami, H.; Mizushima, K.; Mikulski, C.M.; Doucette, G.J.; Relox, J.R.; Anton, A.; Fukuyo, Y.; Matsuoka, K. Phylogenetic relationships in the harmful dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Gymnodiniales, Dinophyceae) inferred from LSU rDNA sequences. Harmful Algae 2008, 7, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Toxins 14 00095 g001 550
Figure 1. LM (A,B) and SEM (C–E) micrographs of M. polykrikoides.
Figure 1. LM (A,B) and SEM (C–E) micrographs of M. polykrikoides.
Toxins 14 00095 g001
Toxins 14 00095 g002 550
Figure 2. Melting curves obtained using the qPCR assay with DNA extracts from M. polykrikoides (EAr). (A1,A2): Standard sample and field samples. (B1,B2): Standard sample. (C1,C2): Field samples from Tianjin (S1). (D1,D2): Field samples from the Yangtze River estuary (S6, September). (E1,E2): Field samples from the Yangtze River estuary (S7, July). (F1,F2): Field samples from Fujian coastal (S11, May).
Figure 2. Melting curves obtained using the qPCR assay with DNA extracts from M. polykrikoides (EAr). (A1,A2): Standard sample and field samples. (B1,B2): Standard sample. (C1,C2): Field samples from Tianjin (S1). (D1,D2): Field samples from the Yangtze River estuary (S6, September). (E1,E2): Field samples from the Yangtze River estuary (S7, July). (F1,F2): Field samples from Fujian coastal (S11, May).
Toxins 14 00095 g002
Toxins 14 00095 g003 550
Figure 3. Standard curves of the qPCR assay using 10 fold dilutions of M. polykrikoides (EAr) DNA extracts.
Figure 3. Standard curves of the qPCR assay using 10 fold dilutions of M. polykrikoides (EAr) DNA extracts.
Toxins 14 00095 g003
Toxins 14 00095 g004 550
Figure 4. Distribution of M. polykrikoides (EAr) in coastal China based on qPCR assay. The Yellow triangle indicates the absence of M. polykrikoides (EAr), the red circles indicate the presence of M. polykrikoides (EAr), and the size of the circles indicates the concentration. Name of each station: (S1: Tianjin, S2: Beidaihe, S3: Zhangzi Island, S4: Rongcheng, S5: Qingdao, S6: Yangtze River estuary (September), S7: Yangtze River estuary (July), S8: Nanji Island, S9: Ningde, S10: Fujian coastal (April), S11: Fujian coastal (May), S12: Xiamen, S13: Beihai, S14: Weizhou Island, S15: Sanya.).
Figure 4. Distribution of M. polykrikoides (EAr) in coastal China based on qPCR assay. The Yellow triangle indicates the absence of M. polykrikoides (EAr), the red circles indicate the presence of M. polykrikoides (EAr), and the size of the circles indicates the concentration. Name of each station: (S1: Tianjin, S2: Beidaihe, S3: Zhangzi Island, S4: Rongcheng, S5: Qingdao, S6: Yangtze River estuary (September), S7: Yangtze River estuary (July), S8: Nanji Island, S9: Ningde, S10: Fujian coastal (April), S11: Fujian coastal (May), S12: Xiamen, S13: Beihai, S14: Weizhou Island, S15: Sanya.).
Toxins 14 00095 g004
Toxins 14 00095 g005 550
Figure 5. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. Bootstrap support (BS) values of the Maximum likelihood (ML) and neighbor-joining (NJ) analysis are given left and right, respectively. Accession numbers are indicated after species names. SAMITES: Succussed Amplified M. polykrikoides (EAr) In Tested Environment Sample.
Figure 5. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. Bootstrap support (BS) values of the Maximum likelihood (ML) and neighbor-joining (NJ) analysis are given left and right, respectively. Accession numbers are indicated after species names. SAMITES: Succussed Amplified M. polykrikoides (EAr) In Tested Environment Sample.
Toxins 14 00095 g005
Toxins 14 00095 g006 550
Figure 6. Map of sampling area. Name of each station: (S1: Tianjin, S2: Beidaihe, S3: Zhangzi Island, S4: Rongcheng, S5: Qingdao, S6: Yangtze River estuary (September), S7: Yangtze River estuary (July), S8: Nanji Island, S9: Ningde, S10: Fujian coastal (April), S11: Fujian coastal (May), S12: Xiamen, S13: Beihai, S14: Weizhou Island, S15: Sanya).
Figure 6. Map of sampling area. Name of each station: (S1: Tianjin, S2: Beidaihe, S3: Zhangzi Island, S4: Rongcheng, S5: Qingdao, S6: Yangtze River estuary (September), S7: Yangtze River estuary (July), S8: Nanji Island, S9: Ningde, S10: Fujian coastal (April), S11: Fujian coastal (May), S12: Xiamen, S13: Beihai, S14: Weizhou Island, S15: Sanya).
Toxins 14 00095 g006
Table
Table 1. Sampling site information (sampling date, latitude and longitude, and cell density of M. polykrikoides (EAr)).
Table 1. Sampling site information (sampling date, latitude and longitude, and cell density of M. polykrikoides (EAr)).
Sea AreaStationLocationCollection DateLatitude (N)Longitude (E)Temperature (°C)M. polykrikoides (EAr) (Cells·L−1)
Bohai SeaS1Dongjiang, Tianjin29 August 201739.0070°117.8204°27.53.6 × 103
S2Beidaihe, Hebei30 August 201739.8241°119.5336°23.0N/D
Yellow SeaS3Zhangzidao, Liaoning17 September 201939.1188°122.8238°22.4N/D
S4Rongcheng, Shandong1 June 201937.9075°122.4100°17.5N/D
S5Qingdao, Shandong10 May 201936.0500°120.3444°16.9N/D
East China SeaS6Yangtze River estuary21 September 202032.0190°122.4900°25.41.9 × 104
S7Yangtze River estuary15 July 202030.0010°123.3920°26.21.0 × 105
S8Nanji island, Zhejiang28 July 201927.4650°121.0605°31.5N/D
S9Ningde, Fujian8 January 201926.7528°119.7772°15.3N/D
S10Fujian coastal29 April 201827.3037°120.9138°19.0N/D
S11Fujian coastal21 May 201826.4046°120.3876°24.71.5 × 103
S12Xiamen, Fujian12 April 201824.4563°118.1713°23.8N/D
South China SeaS13Beihai, Guangxi18 November 201821.4888°109.1252°25.7N/D
S14Weizhou island, Guangxi9 November 202021.0138°109.0986°22.4N/D
S15Sanya, Hainan9 October 201918.2233°109.6222°29.9N/D
N/D: Not detected.
Table
Table 2. List of strains examined in the present study and accession numbers for their LSU rDNA sequences.
Table 2. List of strains examined in the present study and accession numbers for their LSU rDNA sequences.
SpeciesRibotypeAccession No.LSU RegionStrainLocationDateIsolator
Margalefidinium polykrikoides MargalefEAAB288383D1–D6IN1-ND104Inokushi Bay, JapanJanuary 2005H. Kawami
M. polykrikoidesEAAB288384D1–D6OB7-ND3Tachibana Bay, JapanJuly 2002M. Iwataki
M. polykrikoidesEAAB288385D1–D6KG8-ND14Kamigoto Is., JapanAugust 2002M. Iwataki
M. polykrikoidesEAAB288386D1–D6USUKAUsuka Bay, JapanOctober 2003T. Yamatogi
M. polykrikoidesEAAY725423D1–D3-Korea--
M. polykrikoidesEAAB295042D1–D3-Off Mishima Is., JapanAugust 2003T. Baba
M. polykrikoidesEAAB295043D1–D3IS8-ND70Isahaya Bay, JapanAugust 2003M. Iwataki
M. polykrikoidesEAAB295044D1–D6IN5-ND81Inokushi Bay, JapanMay 2004M. Iwataki
M. polykrikoidesEAAB295045D1–D6KT8-ND109Katagami Bay, JapanAugust 2005H. Kawami
M. polykrikoidesEAEF506614D1–D3C.polyNamhae, KoreaSeptember 2000C.K. Lee
M. polykrikoidesEAEF506616D1–D3PP-3Tongyong, KoreaSeptember 2001C.K. Lee
M. polykrikoidesEAEF506618D1–D3PP-6Busan, KoreaSeptember 2001C.K. Lee
M. polykrikoidesEAEF506620D1–D3CP2002Busan, KoreaAugust 2002C.K. Lee
M. polykrikoidesEAEF506622D1–D3CP2002-1Namhae, KoreaAugust 2002C.K. Lee
M. polykrikoidesEAEF506623D1–D3HKHong Kong--
M. polykrikoidesMSKC577591D1–D2SC5Tarragona Harbour, CataloniaSeptember 2012A. Rene
M. polykrikoidesMSKC577592D1–D2SC6Tarragona Harbour, CataloniaSeptember 2012A. Rene
M. polykrikoidesMSKC577593D1–D2SC7Tarragona Harbour, CataloniaSeptember 2012A. Rene
M. polykrikoidesPhAB295046D1–D3MBCpManila Bay, PhilippinesOctober 2004J.R. Relox Jr.
M. polykrikoidesPhAB295047D1–D6OM7-ND59Omura Bay, JapanJuly 2003M. Iwataki
M. polykrikoidesA/MAB295048D1–D8cp1Sabah, MalaysiaJanuary 2004A. Anton
M. polykrikoidesA/MAB295049D1–D7cp2Sabah, MalaysiaJanuary 2004A. Anton
M. polykrikoidesA/MEF110556D1–D3CpFB-06-1Long Island, NY, USAAugust 2006Y. Tang
M. polykrikoidesA/MEF506625D1–D3CPCB10Cotuit Bay, MA, USASeptember 2001D. Kulis
M. polykrikoidesA/MEF506627D1–D3CPPV-1Bahı’adeLaPaz, Mexico-L. Morquecho
M. polykrikoidesA/MAB295050D1–D8PR107Phosphorescence Bay, Puerto Rico2005C. Tomas
M. polykrikoidesA/MGQ500117D1–D2CPDBC4United Arab Emirates--
Akashiwo sanguinea AF260396D1–D3JL36--S. Morton
Karenia mikimotoi AY355460D1–D3NOAA-2Sarasota, FL, USA--
Gymnodinium catenatum AF200672D1–D3-Spain--
EA: East Asian; MS: Mediterranean Sea; Ph: Philippines; A/M: American/Malaysian.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, J.; Guo, R.; Lu, D.; Dai, X.; Zhu, Y.; Park, B.S.; Wang, P. Detection and Quantification of the Harmful Dinoflagellate Margalefidinium polykrikoides (East Asian Ribotype) in the Coastal Waters of China. Toxins 2022, 14, 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14020095

AMA Style

Hu J, Guo R, Lu D, Dai X, Zhu Y, Park BS, Wang P. Detection and Quantification of the Harmful Dinoflagellate Margalefidinium polykrikoides (East Asian Ribotype) in the Coastal Waters of China. Toxins. 2022; 14(2):95. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14020095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Jiarong, Ruoyu Guo, Douding Lu, Xinfeng Dai, Yuanli Zhu, Bum Soo Park, and Pengbin Wang. 2022. "Detection and Quantification of the Harmful Dinoflagellate Margalefidinium polykrikoides (East Asian Ribotype) in the Coastal Waters of China" Toxins 14, no. 2: 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14020095

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop