Next Article in Journal
Wine Resveratrol: From the Ground Up
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Postprandial Blood Pressure on Gait Parameters in Older People
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 8
Issue 4
10.3390/nu8040221
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Body Position Modulates Gastric Emptying and Affects the Post-Prandial Rise in Plasma Amino Acid Concentrations Following Protein Ingestion in Humans

by
Andrew M. Holwerda
1,
Kaatje Lenaerts
2,
Jörgen Bierau
3 and
Luc J. C. Van Loon
1,*
1
Department of Human Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands
2
Department of Surgery, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands
3
Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2016, 8(4), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8040221
Submission received: 14 March 2016 / Revised: 5 April 2016 / Accepted: 8 April 2016 / Published: 13 April 2016
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Dietary protein digestion and amino acid absorption kinetics determine the post-prandial muscle protein synthetic response. Body position may affect gastrointestinal function and modulate the post-prandial rise in plasma amino acid availability. We aimed to assess the impact of body position on gastric emptying rate and the post-prandial rise in plasma amino acid concentrations following ingestion of a single, meal-like amount of protein. In a randomized, cross-over design, eight healthy males (25 ± 2 years, 23.9 ± 0.8 kg·m−2) ingested 22 g protein and 1.5 g paracetamol (acetaminophen) in an upright seated position (control) and in a −20° head-down tilted position (inversion). Blood samples were collected during a 240-min post-prandial period and analyzed for paracetamol and plasma amino acid concentrations to assess gastric emptying rate and post-prandial amino acid availability, respectively. Peak plasma leucine concentrations were lower in the inversion compared with the control treatment (177 ± 15 vs. 236 ± 15 mmol·L−1, p < 0.05), which was accompanied by a lower plasma essential amino acid (EAA) response over 240 min (31,956 ± 6441 vs. 50,351 ± 4015 AU; p < 0.05). Peak plasma paracetamol concentrations were lower in the inversion vs. control treatment (5.8 ± 1.1 vs. 10.0 ± 0.6 mg·L−1, p < 0.05). Gastric emptying rate and post-prandial plasma amino acid availability are significantly decreased after protein ingestion in a head-down tilted position. Therefore, upright body positioning should be considered when aiming to augment post-prandial muscle protein accretion in both health and disease.

1. Introduction

Ingestion of dietary protein increases muscle protein synthesis rates [1,2,3,4,5]. This increase in muscle protein synthesis has been attributed to the post-prandial rise in circulating (essential) amino acid concentrations, with leucine being of particular relevance [6,7,8,9]. The post-prandial muscle protein synthetic response is regulated on multiple levels, ranging from protein digestion and amino acid absorption [10,11], post-prandial insulin release, and the subsequent increase in muscle perfusion [12], amino acid uptake in muscle [13], activation of anabolic signaling pathways [9,14,15], and subsequent myofibrillar protein synthesis [1,2,3,4,5].
The post-prandial muscle protein synthetic response can be modulated by changing the type [10,16], amount [3,4,17,18], and timing [19,20] of protein ingestion. Differences in the anabolic properties of various proteins have been attributed to their specific protein digestion and amino acid absorption kinetics [21], as well as their amino acid composition [22]. Previous work from our group [16] as well as others [3,23,24,25,26,27,28,29] has shown that the ingestion of more rapidly digestible protein, such as whey, results in a greater post-prandial rise in circulating amino acid concentrations, thereby further increasing whole body and/or muscle protein synthesis rates when compared with the ingestion of a more slowly digestible protein, such as intact casein. However, whey and casein do not only differ in their protein digestion and absorption kinetics, but also in their amino acid composition, with whey containing more leucine [11,24,27].
To define the impact of dietary protein digestion and absorption kinetics per se on post-prandial protein handling, we assessed protein digestion and amino acid absorption together with post-prandial muscle protein synthesis rates following the ingestion of intact micellar casein in comparison with its hydrolyzed form [10,16]. Ingestion of the more rapidly digestible casein hydrolysate resulted in a more rapid post-prandial rise in circulating amino acids, greater post-prandial dietary protein-derived amino acid availability, and ~30% higher post-prandial muscle protein synthesis rates when compared to ingestion of intact casein [10]. These findings confirmed the importance of the rate of digestion and amino acid absorption in stimulating post-prandial muscle protein synthesis rates. These findings sparked research investigating various factors that may modulate post-prandial protein handling, which include the type of protein [16,26,27], the matrix in which the protein is consumed [30,31,32], the macronutrient composition of a protein-rich meal [33,34], as well as food preparation [35,36,37] and mastication [38]. We speculated that protein digestion and absorption might also be modulated by a factor as simple as body position (i.e., sitting upright or lying down). Digestive modulation through changes in body position may be of particular interest since a blunted muscle protein synthesis response to feeding is typically observed in settings where patients are subjected to prolonged supine rest or in the absence of gravity [39].
In the present study, we tested our hypothesis that changes in body position strongly modulate gastric emptying rate and affect the post-prandial rise in amino acid concentrations in vivo in humans. To test this hypothesis, eight young males were selected to participate in this randomized, cross-over study with two treatments. We assessed gastric emptying rate and the post-prandial rise in circulating amino acids following ingestion of a single, meal-like amount of protein while maintaining a conventional, upright seated body position and while laying supine at a −20° head-down tilted position. This study is the first proof-of-principle study to show that gastric emptying rate is reduced and post-prandial plasma amino acid responses are attenuated when food is ingested in a partly inverted versus upright body position.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

A total of 8 healthy young males (25 ± 2 years, 23.9 ± 0.8 kg·m−2) were recruited to participate in the study. All subjects were instructed to refrain from any exhaustive physical activity and alcohol consumption for two days prior to each trial. Subjects remained fasted from 2200 h in the evening before each test. This study is part of a larger project (Netherlands Trial Register, NTR5027) that was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Maastricht University Medical Centre+, The Netherlands (METC143052) and conformed to standards for the use of human subjects in research as outlined in the seventh revision of the Declaration of Helsinki (Brazil, 2013).

2.2. Experimental Protocol

This randomized, cross-over study compared the effect of body position on gastric emptying rate and plasma amino acid availability after protein ingestion. In a proof-of-principle approach, we chose to assess potential differences in body position by comparing an upright seated body position with a moderately inverted body position. Therefore, subjects consumed the protein bolus in an upright seated position (control) and in a −20° head-down tilted position (inversion). On the test days, participants reported to the lab in a fasted state and had one Teflon catheter inserted into the antecubital vein of the right arm. A background blood sample was collected, and blood pressure and heart rate were measured before subjects were positioned in either the control or inversion position, completed in a randomized order. For the control treatment, subjects sat in a standardized, stationary chair and were instructed to hold their lower back against the back support of the chair. Subjects were supervised throughout the test day and were constantly reminded to maintain the upright posture. For the inversion treatment, subjects were secured with shoulder and waist straps onto a rotatable bed (Confidence Inversion Table, Confidence Fitness, UK) for the duration of the test. Once secured, the table was tilted to an angle of −20° head-down from a horizontal position, confirmed using an electronic level. Subjects acclimatized to each body position for 30 min after which a baseline blood sample was drawn, and blood pressure and heart rate were measured. Following the baseline blood draw, subjects ingested 60 g of skim milk powder (Campina, The Netherlands—Energy (En): 890 kJ, Protein: 22 g, Carbohydrate: 29 g; Fat: 0.4 g) plus 1.5 g paracetamol (acetaminophen, Kruidvat, Leiden, The Netherlands) dissolved in water up to a volume of 500 mL. Paracetamol was added to the beverage to assess gastric emptying rate. The protein bolus was ingested within a 5-min time period for both treatments. Following ingestion of the drink (t = 0 min), blood samples were collected at t = 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 min. After the last blood sample was collected, subjects were slowly returned to an upright body position and re-acclimatized throughout a 10-min time period.

2.3. Gastric Emptying

Gastric emptying rate was assessed by measuring the post-prandial rise in plasma paracetamol (acetaminophen) concentrations after ingestion of protein with 1.5 g of paracetamol added [40,41]. With paracetamol being rapidly absorbed in the small intestine, gastric emptying forms the rate-limiting step determining the appearance rate of paracetamol in the circulation. Peak plasma paracetamol concentrations are typically reached after 30–60 min following ingestion with a t1/2 of ~2 h [42]. We used plasma paracetamol appearance in the circulation as a marker of gastric emptying rate as applied previously in our laboratory [42] as well as others [43,44,45].

2.4. Plasma Analysis

Blood samples were collected in tubes containing EDTA and centrifuged at 1000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. Aliquots of plasma were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until further analyses. Plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were analyzed using commercially available kits (Glucose HK CP, Horiba ABX Diagnostics, France, Ref: AA11A01667, and Human Insulin-specific (RIA), Merck Millipore, Germany, Cat #: HI-14K, respectively). Plasma (100 µL) for amino acid analyses was deproteinized on ice with 5-sulphosalicylic acid and mixed, and the clear supernatant was collected after centrifugation. Amino acid profiles were determined using ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) as described previously [46]. Plasma paracetamol concentrations were analyzed with an acetaminophen assay kit (K991598, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with the COBAS-Integra 800 immuno-assay analyzer. Briefly, acetaminophen is hydrolyzed to p-aminophenol and acetate. The p-aminophenol is then converted to an indophenol by enzymatic reaction. The production of indophenol is colorimetrically analyzed and is directly proportional to acetaminophen concentration in plasma.

2.5. Statistics

All data are displayed as means + standard error of means (SEM). Time-dependent variables such as plasma glucose, insulin, amino acid, and paracetamol concentrations were analyzed using a two-way repeated measure ANOVA (time × treatment). Upon identification of a significant time × treatment interaction, Bonferroni post hoc testing was used to identify time points at which the treatments differed. Differences in treatment-dependent variables, such as area under the curve (AUC), were analyzed using a Student’s paired t-test. Pearson’s r product moment correlation was used to examine the linear relationship between plasma essential amino acids (EAAs) and paracetamol AUC for each test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All calculations were performed using SPSS 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Plasma Glucose and Insulin Concentrations

Plasma glucose (Figure 1A) and insulin (Figure 1B) concentrations increased following protein ingestion in both treatments (p < 0.05). After reaching peak concentrations, plasma glucose concentrations decreased in both treatments and were significantly lower in the control vs. inversion treatment between t = 60–240 min (time × treatment interaction, p < 0.05). The increase in insulin was significantly different between the inversion and control treatments (time × treatment interaction, p < 0.05). Peak post-prandial insulin concentrations were reached at t = 15 min and were significantly lower in the inversion vs. control treatment (27 ± 8 vs. 52 ± 13 mU·L−1, p < 0.05).

3.2. Plasma Amino Acid Responses

Plasma leucine (Figure 2A) and EAA (Figure 2B) concentrations increased following protein ingestion in both treatments (p < 0.01). Plasma leucine and total EAA concentrations showed an attenuated rise in the inversion compared with the control treatment, with concentrations being significantly lower in the inversion treatment between t = 15–120 min (p < 0.05). Overall leucine and EAA availability, expressed as AUC calculated over 240 min, were lower in the inversion compared with control treatment (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in post-prandial non-essential amino acid (NEAA) availability (Figure 2C) between treatments (main effect for time, p < 0.05; time × treatment interaction, p > 0.05).

3.3. Gastric Emptying

Plasma paracetamol (Figure 3) concentrations increased following protein ingestion in both treatments (p < 0.05). An attenuated post-prandial rise in paracetamol concentrations was observed in the inversion compared with control treatment (time × treatment, p < 0.05). Peak paracetamol concentrations reached 10.0 ± 0.6 mg·L−1 at t = 90 min in the control treatment and 5.8 ± 1.1 mg·L−1 at t = 120 min (p < 0.05) in the inversion treatment. Gastric emptying rate during the early post-prandial phase, assessed by paracetamol AUC from t = 0–60 min was 54% ± 13% lower in the inversion compared with control treatment (132 ± 37 vs. 344 ± 47 AU (arbitrary units); p < 0.05). When assessed over the entire 240-min post-prandial period, paracetamol AUC was 38% ± 13% lower in the inversion compared with control treatment (1054 ± 196 vs. 1693 ± 101 AU; p < 0.05).
Pearson’s r product moment correlation was performed between plasma EAAs and paracetamol AUCs over the 240-min post-prandial period (Figure 4). A significant positive (r = 0.68; p < 0.01) correlation was detected between plasma EAAs and paracetamol AUCs.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we observed that gastric emptying rates were reduced when protein was ingested in an inverted versus upright seated position. The post-prandial rise in circulating amino acid concentrations was attenuated following protein ingestion in the head-down tilted position along with substantially lower post-prandial amino acid availability when compared to feeding in the upright seated position.
It has been well established that the post-prandial rise in plasma EAA concentrations following food ingestion increases muscle protein synthesis rates [6,7,8,47]. In the present study, we observed a rapid rise in plasma glucose and insulin (Figure 1) and EAA (Figure 2) concentrations following ingestion of a single, meal-like amount of protein when sitting in a normal, upright position. Total EAA concentrations increased rapidly, reaching peak levels of 1408 ± 80 umol·L−1 within 30 min after ingesting 22 g of milk protein. In line, plasma leucine concentrations rapidly reached peak levels of 236 ± 15 umol·L−1 within the same post-prandial time frame (Figure 2A). The level of increase in plasma EAA concentrations, and leucine in particular, observed in the control treatment have been previously shown to result in post-prandial muscle protein synthesis rates that were 30%–100% higher when compared to basal, post-absorptive muscle protein synthesis rates [3,4,5,30,33,48].
When the same bolus of protein was ingested in an inverted body position, the post-prandial rises in plasma insulin (Figure 1B), EAA (Figure 2B), and leucine (Figure 2A) concentrations were substantially reduced. Peak plasma EAAs, and leucine in particular, reached levels of 1112 ± 70 and 177 ± 15 umol·L−1, respectively, which were substantially lower when compared to levels observed after ingesting protein in an upright seated position (p < 0.05). The extent of the difference in the post-prandial rise in amino acid concentrations following ingestion of a meal-like amount of protein in an inverted versus a normal, upright seated position was beyond our expectations. The blunted post-prandial rise in plasma EAA concentrations, and leucine concentrations in particular, observed in the inversion treatment would unlikely suffice to induce a measurable increase in post-prandial muscle protein synthesis rates as shown in previous work [4,18].
Besides the blunted post-prandial rise in amino acid concentrations following feeding in the inverted versus upright seated position, we also observed lower plasma EAA and leucine availability over the 4-h post-prandial period (Figure 2). These findings are in line with Koopman et al., who showed that ingestion of a single 35 g bolus of intact, micellar casein resulted in less protein-derived amino acids being released into the circulation when compared with the ingestion of the same amount of hydrolyzed casein [10]. The reduction in protein-derived amino acid release could be attributed to reduced gastric emptying rates and/or greater splanchnic amino acid retention following ingestion of a more slowly digested protein. In the present study, we assessed gastric emptying rates by measuring the increase in plasma paracetamol concentrations following the co-ingestion of 1.5 g paracetamol [40,41,42,49]. Peak plasma paracetamol concentration was substantially lower (5.8 vs. 10.0 mg·L−1) and was reached 30 min later when protein was ingested in the inverted compared with the upright seated position (Figure 3). The attenuated rise in plasma paracetamol concentrations following protein ingestion implies that gastric emptying rates were substantially reduced in the inverted versus upright seated position. Furthermore, we found that the overall appearance of plasma paracetamol was positively correlated with the overall plasma EAA availability (Figure 4). The reduction in gastric emptying rate demonstrated in the inverted position may be partly explained by recently published work using computer modeling techniques to demonstrate that the movement of stomach content is slowed in a supine position due to a lower amount of stomach content gathering near the pylorus [50]. Therefore, we conclude that the attenuated post-prandial rise in plasma amino acid concentrations following ingestion of protein in an inverted compared with an upright seated position can, at least partly, be attributed to a reduction in gastric emptying rate.
The present findings may be of relevance in various settings of disuse atrophy. Disuse atrophy has been partly attributed to a reduced sensitivity of the muscle protein synthetic response to the post-prandial rise in plasma amino acid concentrations, and leucine concentrations in particular [51,52]. Feeding hospitalized patients in a supine as opposed to a normal upright sitting position may attenuate the post-prandial rise in plasma amino acid concentrations, contributing to anabolic resistance in these patients. Proper upright body positioning may be an important pre-requisite to increase the post-prandial rise in plasma amino acid availability, thereby increasing the post-prandial muscle protein synthetic response to meal ingestion. In other words, our mothers may have been right in more than one way by telling us to sit up straight at the dinner table. Lastly, the present findings imply that part of the muscle lost by astronauts due to microgravity [53,54] may also be explained by reduced protein digestion and amino acid absorption, thereby attenuating the post-prandial rise in plasma amino acid concentrations and lowering the post-prandial muscle protein synthetic response to food intake.

5. Conclusions

Changes in body position substantially modulate gastric emptying rate and the subsequent post-prandial rise in plasma amino acid availability. Therefore, an upright body position during and after feeding is important for adequate nutrient absorption and should be considered when aiming to optimize post-prandial muscle protein accretion in both health and disease.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the enthusiastic support of the subjects who volunteered to participate in this experiment.

Author Contributions

A.M.H., K.L., and L.J.C.L. designed the research; A.M.H. conducted the research; A.M.H., K.L., J.B., and L.J.C.L. analyzed the data; A.M.H. performed the statistical analysis; and A.M.H. and L.J.C.L. wrote the paper and hold primary responsibility for the final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AUArbitrary unit
AUCArea under the curve
EAAEssential amino acid
NEAANon-essential amino acid
SEMStandard error of the mean

References

  1. Symons, T.B.; Sheffield-Moore, M.; Wolfe, R.R.; Paddon-Jones, D. A moderate serving of high-quality protein maximally stimulates skeletal muscle protein synthesis in young and elderly subjects. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009, 109, 1582–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Paddon-Jones, D.; Sheffield-Moore, M.; Katsanos, C.S.; Zhang, X.-J.; Wolfe, R.R. Differential stimulation of muscle protein synthesis in elderly humans following isocaloric ingestion of amino acids or whey protein. Exp. Gerontol. 2006, 41, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, Y.; Churchward-Venne, T.A.; Burd, N.A.; Breen, L.; Tarnopolsky, M.A.; Phillips, S.M. Myofibrillar protein synthesis following ingestion of soy protein isolate at rest and after resistance exercise in elderly men. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 9, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yang, Y.; Breen, L.; Burd, N.A.; Hector, A.J.; Churchward-Venne, T.A.; Josse, A.R.; Tarnopolsky, M.A.; Phillips, S.M. Resistance exercise enhances myofibrillar protein synthesis with graded intakes of whey protein in older men. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 108, 1780–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Burd, N.A.; Gorissen, S.H.; van Vliet, S.; Snijders, T.; van Loon, L.J. Differences in postprandial protein handling after beef compared with milk ingestion during postexercise recovery: A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 102, 828–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wall, B.T.; Hamer, H.M.; de Lange, A.; Kiskini, A.; Groen, B.B.L.; Senden, J.M.G.; Gijsen, A.P.; Verdijk, L.B.; van Loon, L.J.C. Leucine co-ingestion improves post-prandial muscle protein accretion in elderly men. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 32, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dreyer, H.C.; Drummond, M.J.; Pennings, B.; Fujita, S.; Glynn, E.L.; Chinkes, D.L.; Dhanani, S.; Volpi, E.; Rasmussen, B.B. Leucine-enriched essential amino acid and carbohydrate ingestion following resistance exercise enhances mTOR signaling and protein synthesis in human muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 294, E392–E400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Drummond, M.J.; Rasmussen, B.B. Leucine-enriched nutrients and the regulation of mammalian target of rapamycin signalling and human skeletal muscle protein synthesis. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2008, 11, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cuthbertson, D.; Smith, K.; Babraj, J.; Leese, G.; Waddell, T.; Atherton, P.; Wackerhage, H.; Taylor, P.M.; Rennie, M.J. Anabolic signaling deficits underlie amino acid resistance of wasting, aging muscle. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 422–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Koopman, R.; Crombach, N.; Gijsen, A.P.; Walrand, S.; Fauquant, J.; Kies, A.K.; Lemosquet, S.; Saris, W.H.M.; Boirie, Y.; van Loon, L.J.C. Ingestion of a protein hydrolysate is accompanied by an accelerated in vivo digestion and absorption rate when compared with its intact protein. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 90, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Boirie, Y.; Dangin, M.; Gachon, P.; Vasson, M.P.; Maubois, J.L.; Beaufrere, B. Slow and fast dietary proteins differently modulate postprandial protein accretion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 14930–14935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rasmussen, B.B.; Fujita, S.; Wolfe, R.R.; Mittendorfer, B.; Roy, M.; Rowe, V.L.; Volpi, E. Insulin resistance of muscle protein metabolism in aging. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 768–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dickinson, J.M.; Drummond, M.J.; Coben, J.R.; Volpi, E.; Rasmussen, B.B. Aging differentially affects human skeletal muscle amino acid transporter expression when essential amino acids are ingested after exercise. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 32, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fry, C.S.; Drummond, M.J.; Glynn, E.L.; Dickinson, J.M.; Gundermann, D.M.; Timmerman, K.L.; Walker, D.K.; Dhanani, S.; Volpi, E.; Rasmussen, B.B. Aging impairs contraction-induced human skeletal muscle mTORC1 signaling and protein synthesis. Skelet. Muscle 2011, 1, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kumar, V.; Selby, A.; Rankin, D.; Patel, R.; Atherton, P.; Hildebrandt, W.; Williams, J.; Smith, K.; Seynnes, O.; Hiscock, N.; et al. Age-related differences in the dose-response relationship of muscle protein synthesis to resistance exercise in young and old men. J. Physiol. 2009, 587, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pennings, B.; Boirie, Y.; Senden, J.M.G.; Gijsen, A.P.; Kuipers, H.; van Loon, L.J.C. Whey protein stimulates postprandial muscle protein accretion more effectively than do casein and casein hydrolysate in older men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 93, 997–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pennings, B.; Groen, B.; de Lange, A.; Gijsen, A.P.; Zorenc, A.H.; Senden, J.M.G.; van Loon, L.J.C. Amino acid absorption and subsequent muscle protein accretion following graded intakes of whey protein in elderly men. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 302, E992–E999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Robinson, M.J.; Burd, N.A.; Breen, L.; Rerecich, T.; Yang, Y.; Hector, A.J.; Baker, S.K.; Phillips, S.M. Dose-dependent responses of myofibrillar protein synthesis with beef ingestion are enhanced with resistance exercise in middle-aged men. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2013, 38, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mamerow, M.M.; Mettler, J.A.; English, K.L.; Casperson, S.L.; Arentson-Lantz, E.; Sheffield-Moore, M.; Layman, D.K.; Paddon-Jones, D. Dietary protein distribution positively influences 24-h muscle protein synthesis in healthy adults. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 876–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Murphy, C.H.; Churchward-Venne, T.A.; Mitchell, C.J.; Kolar, N.M.; Kassis, A.; Karagounis, L.G.; Burke, L.M.; Hawley, J.A.; Phillips, S.M. Hypoenergetic diet-induced reductions in myofibrillar protein synthesis are restored with resistance training and balanced daily protein ingestion in older men. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 308, E734–E743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Calbet, J.A.L.; Holst, J.J. Gastric emptying, gastric secretion and enterogastrone response after administration of milk proteins or their peptide hydrolysates in humans. Eur. J. Nutr. 2004, 43, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Churchward-Venne, T.A.; Burd, N.A.; Mitchell, C.J.; West, D.W.D.; Philp, A.; Marcotte, G.R.; Baker, S.K.; Baar, K.; Phillips, S.M. Supplementation of a suboptimal protein dose with leucine or essential amino acids: Effects on myofibrillar protein synthesis at rest and following resistance exercise in men. J. Physiol. 2012, 590, 2751–2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hector, A.J.; Marcotte, G.R.; Churchward-Venne, T.A.; Murphy, C.H.; Breen, L.; Von Allmen, M.; Baker, S.K.; Phillips, S.M. Whey protein supplementation preserves postprandial myofibrillar protein synthesis during short-term energy restriction in overweight and obese adults. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tang, J.E.; Moore, D.R.; Kujbida, G.W.; Tarnopolsky, M.A.; Phillips, S.M. Ingestion of whey hydrolysate, casein, or soy protein isolate: Effects on mixed muscle protein synthesis at rest and following resistance exercise in young men. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 107, 987–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Boirie, Y.; Gachon, P.; Corny, S.; Fauquant, J.; Maubois, J.L.; Beaufrere, B. Acute postprandial changes in leucine metabolism as assessed with an intrinsically labeled milk protein. Am. J. Physiol. 1996, 271, E1083–E1091. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Dangin, M.; Boirie, Y.; Guillet, C.; Beaufrère, B. Influence of the protein digestion rate on protein turnover in young and elderly subjects. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 3228S–3233S. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Dangin, M.; Boirie, Y.; Garcia-Rodenas, C.; Gachon, P.; Fauquant, J.; Callier, P.; Ballèvre, O.; Beaufrere, B. The digestion rate of protein is an independent regulating factor of postprandial protein retention. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 280, E340–E348. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Reitelseder, S.; Agergaard, J.; Doessing, S.; Helmark, I.C.; Lund, P.; Kristensen, N.B.; Frystyk, J.; Flyvbjerg, A.; Schjerling, P.; van Hall, G.; et al. Whey and casein labeled with l-[1-13C]leucine and muscle protein synthesis: Effect of resistance exercise and protein ingestion. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 300, E231–E242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dideriksen, K.J.; Reitelseder, S.; Petersen, S.G.; Hjort, M.; Helmark, I.C.; Kjaer, M.; Holm, L. Stimulation of muscle protein synthesis by whey and caseinate ingestion after resistance exercise in elderly individuals. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2011, 21, e372–e383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Churchward-Venne, T.A.; Snijders, T.; Linkens, A.M.A.; Hamer, H.M.; van Kranenburg, J.; van Loon, L.J.C. Ingestion of Casein in a Milk Matrix Modulates Dietary Protein Digestion and Absorption Kinetics but Does Not Modulate Postprandial Muscle Protein Synthesis in Older Men. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 1438–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mahé, S.; Roos, N.; Benamouzig, R.; Davin, L.; Luengo, C.; Gagnon, L.; Gaussergès, N.; Rautureau, J.; Tomé, D. Gastrojejunal kinetics and the digestion of [15N]beta-lactoglobulin and casein in humans: The influence of the nature and quantity of the protein. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996, 63, 546–552. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Soop, M.; Nehra, V.; Henderson, G.C.; Boirie, Y.; Ford, G.C.; Nair, K.S. Coingestion of whey protein and casein in a mixed meal: Demonstration of a more sustained anabolic effect of casein. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 303, E152–E162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gorissen, S.H.M.; Burd, N.A.; Hamer, H.M.; Gijsen, A.P.; Groen, B.B.; van Loon, L.J.C. Carbohydrate coingestion delays dietary protein digestion and absorption but does not modulate postprandial muscle protein accretion. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 99, 2250–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Staples, A.W.; Burd, N.A.; West, D.W.D.; Currie, K.D.; Atherton, P.J.; Moore, D.R.; Rennie, M.J.; MacDonald, M.J.; Baker, S.K.; Phillips, S.M. Carbohydrate does not augment exercise-induced protein accretion versus protein alone. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2011, 43, 1154–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pennings, B.; Groen, B.B.L.; van Dijk, J.-W.; de Lange, A.; Kiskini, A.; Kuklinski, M.; Senden, J.M.G.; van Loon, L.J.C. Minced beef is more rapidly digested and absorbed than beef steak, resulting in greater postprandial protein retention in older men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 98, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bax, M.-L.; Aubry, L.; Ferreira, C.; Daudin, J.-D.; Gatellier, P.; Rémond, D.; Santé-Lhoutellier, V. Cooking temperature is a key determinant of in vitro meat protein digestion rate: Investigation of underlying mechanisms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 2569–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Evenepoel, P.; Geypens, B.; Luypaerts, A.; Hiele, M.; Ghoos, Y.; Rutgeerts, P. Digestibility of cooked and raw egg protein in humans as assessed by stable isotope techniques. J. Nutr. 1998, 128, 1716–1722. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Dreyer, H.C.; Volpi, E. Role of protein and amino acids in the pathophysiology and treatment of sarcopenia. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2005, 24, 140S–145S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Drummond, M.J.; Dickinson, J.M.; Fry, C.S.; Walker, D.K.; Gundermann, D.M.; Reidy, P.T.; Timmerman, K.L.; Markofski, M.M.; Paddon-Jones, D.; Rasmussen, B.B.; et al. Bed rest impairs skeletal muscle amino acid transporter expression, mTORC1 signaling, and protein synthesis in response to essential amino acids in older adults. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 302, E1113–E1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Willems, M.; Quartero, A.O.; Numans, M.E. How useful is paracetamol absorption as a marker of gastric emptying? A systematic literature study. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2001, 46, 2256–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Glerup, H.; Bluhme, H.; Villadsen, G.E.; Rasmussen, K.; Ejskjaer, N.; Dahlerup, J.F. Gastric emptying: A comparison of three methods. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 42, 1182–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Van Can, J.; Sloth, B.; Jensen, C.B.; Flint, A.; Blaak, E.E.; Saris, W.H.M. Effects of the once-daily GLP-1 analog liraglutide on gastric emptying, glycemic parameters, appetite and energy metabolism in obese, non-diabetic adults. Int. J. Obes. 2014, 38, 784–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Harmuth, S.; Wewalka, M.; Holst, J.J.; Nemecek, R.; Thalhammer, S.; Schmid, R.; Sahora, K.; Gnant, M.; Miholić, J. Distal gastrectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with accelerated gastric emptying, enhanced postprandial release of GLP-1, and improved insulin sensitivity. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2014, 18, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Horowitz, M.; Flint, A.; Jones, K.L.; Hindsberger, C.; Rasmussen, M.F.; Kapitza, C.; Doran, S.; Jax, T.; Zdravkovic, M.; Chapman, I.M. Effect of the once-daily human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide on appetite, energy intake, energy expenditure and gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2012, 97, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Panahi, S.; Khoury, E.D.; Kubant, R.; Akhavan, T.; Luhovyy, B.L.; Goff, H.D.; Anderson, G.H. Mechanism of action of whole milk and its components on glycemic control in healthy young men. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2014, 25, 1124–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Waterval, W.A.H.; Scheijen, J.L.J.M.; Ortmans-Ploemen, M.M.J.C.; Habets-van der Poel, C.D.; Bierau, J. Quantitative UPLC-MS/MS analysis of underivatised amino acids in body fluids is a reliable tool for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with inborn errors of metabolism. Clin. Chim. Acta 2009, 407, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dickinson, J.M.; Gundermann, D.M.; Walker, D.K.; Reidy, P.T.; Borack, M.S.; Drummond, M.J.; Arora, M.; Volpi, E.; Rasmussen, B.B. Leucine-enriched amino acid ingestion after resistance exercise prolongs myofibrillar protein synthesis and amino acid transporter expression in older men. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 1694–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kouw, I.W.K.; Gorissen, S.H.M.; Burd, N.A.; Cermak, N.M.; Gijsen, A.P.; van Kranenburg, J.; van Loon, L.J.C. Postprandial protein handling is not impaired in type 2 diabetes patients when compared with normoglycemic controls. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, 3103–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Heading, R.C.; Nimmo, J.; Prescott, L.F. The dependence of paracetamol absorption on the rate of gastric emptying. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1973, 47, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Imai, Y.; Kobayashi, I.; Ishida, S.; Ishikawa, T.; Buist, M.; Yamaguchi, T. Antral recirculation in the stomach during gastric mixing. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2013, 304, G536–G542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Glover, E.I.; Phillips, S.M.; Oates, B.R.; Tang, J.E.; Tarnopolsky, M.A.; Selby, A.; Smith, K.; Rennie, M.J. Immobilization induces anabolic resistance in human myofibrillar protein synthesis with low and high dose amino acid infusion. J. Physiol. 2008, 586, 6049–6061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wall, B.T.; Dirks, M.L.; Snijders, T.; van Dijk, J.-W.; Fritsch, M.; Verdijk, L.B.; van Loon, L.J.C. Short-term muscle disuse lowers myofibrillar protein synthesis rates and induces anabolic resistance to protein ingestion. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 310, E137–E147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Akima, H.; Kawakami, Y.; Kubo, K.; Sekiguchi, C.; Ohshima, H.; Miyamoto, A.; Fukunaga, T. Effect of short-duration spaceflight on thigh and leg muscle volume. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2000, 32, 1743–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Trappe, S.; Costill, D.; Gallagher, P.; Creer, A.; Peters, J.R.; Evans, H.; Riley, D.A.; Fitts, R.H. Exercise in space: Human skeletal muscle after 6 months aboard the International Space Station. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 106, 1159–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 08 00221 g001 1024
Figure 1. Mean (+SEM) plasma glucose (mmol·L−1) (A) and insulin (mU·L−1) (B) concentrations after protein ingestion while seated (Control; n = 8) and in a −20° head-down tilted position (Inversion; n = 8). The data were analyzed with a two-way repeated-measures (treatment × time) ANOVA. Glucose: time effect: p < 0.05; time × treatment interaction: p < 0.05. Insulin: time effect: p < 0.05; time × treatment interaction: p < 0.05. * Significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments within each time point.
Figure 1. Mean (+SEM) plasma glucose (mmol·L−1) (A) and insulin (mU·L−1) (B) concentrations after protein ingestion while seated (Control; n = 8) and in a −20° head-down tilted position (Inversion; n = 8). The data were analyzed with a two-way repeated-measures (treatment × time) ANOVA. Glucose: time effect: p < 0.05; time × treatment interaction: p < 0.05. Insulin: time effect: p < 0.05; time × treatment interaction: p < 0.05. * Significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments within each time point.
Nutrients 08 00221 g001
Nutrients 08 00221 g002 1024
Figure 2. Mean (+SEM) plasma leucine (A), essential (EAA) (B), and non-essential (NEAAs) (C) amino acid concentrations (umol·L−1) after protein ingestion in a seated (Control; n = 8) and in a −20° head-down tilted position (Inversion; n = 8). The data were analyzed with a two-way repeated-measures (treatment × time) ANOVA. Leucine: time effect: p < 0.01; time × treatment interaction: p < 0.05. EAAs: time effect: p < 0.01; time × treatment interaction: p < 0.05. NEAAs: time effect: p < 0.01; time × treatment interaction: p > 0.05. Area under the curve over 240 min (arbitrary units, AU) inset and analyzed with a Student’s paired t-test. * Significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments within each time point.
Figure 2. Mean (+SEM) plasma leucine (A), essential (EAA) (B), and non-essential (NEAAs) (C) amino acid concentrations (umol·L−1) after protein ingestion in a seated (Control; n = 8) and in a −20° head-down tilted position (Inversion; n = 8). The data were analyzed with a two-way repeated-measures (treatment × time) ANOVA. Leucine: time effect: p < 0.01; time × treatment interaction: p < 0.05. EAAs: time effect: p < 0.01; time × treatment interaction: p < 0.05. NEAAs: time effect: p < 0.01; time × treatment interaction: p > 0.05. Area under the curve over 240 min (arbitrary units, AU) inset and analyzed with a Student’s paired t-test. * Significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments within each time point.
Nutrients 08 00221 g002
Nutrients 08 00221 g003 1024
Figure 3. Mean (+SEM) plasma paracetamol concentrations (mg·L−1) after protein ingestion in a seated (Control; n = 7) and a −20° head-down tilted position (Inversion; n = 7). The data were analyzed with a two-way repeated-measures (treatment × time) ANOVA. Time effect: p < 0.05; time × treatment interaction: p < 0.05. Area under the curve over 240 min (arbitrary units, AU) inset and analyzed with a Student’s paired t-test. * Significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments within each time point.
Figure 3. Mean (+SEM) plasma paracetamol concentrations (mg·L−1) after protein ingestion in a seated (Control; n = 7) and a −20° head-down tilted position (Inversion; n = 7). The data were analyzed with a two-way repeated-measures (treatment × time) ANOVA. Time effect: p < 0.05; time × treatment interaction: p < 0.05. Area under the curve over 240 min (arbitrary units, AU) inset and analyzed with a Student’s paired t-test. * Significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments within each time point.
Nutrients 08 00221 g003
Nutrients 08 00221 g004 1024
Figure 4. Correlation between post-prandial plasma EAA and paracetamol availability. Values represent area under the curve (AUC) calculations based on plasma EAA and paracetamol concentrations measured over 240 min in each trial (n = 14, one subject on both trials did not ingest paracetamol). The solid line indicates the linear regression line of best fit, and the dashed lines represent the 95% confidence interval. A significant positive correlation was observed (r = 0.68; p < 0.01).
Figure 4. Correlation between post-prandial plasma EAA and paracetamol availability. Values represent area under the curve (AUC) calculations based on plasma EAA and paracetamol concentrations measured over 240 min in each trial (n = 14, one subject on both trials did not ingest paracetamol). The solid line indicates the linear regression line of best fit, and the dashed lines represent the 95% confidence interval. A significant positive correlation was observed (r = 0.68; p < 0.01).
Nutrients 08 00221 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Holwerda, A.M.; Lenaerts, K.; Bierau, J.; Van Loon, L.J.C. Body Position Modulates Gastric Emptying and Affects the Post-Prandial Rise in Plasma Amino Acid Concentrations Following Protein Ingestion in Humans. Nutrients 2016, 8, 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8040221

AMA Style

Holwerda AM, Lenaerts K, Bierau J, Van Loon LJC. Body Position Modulates Gastric Emptying and Affects the Post-Prandial Rise in Plasma Amino Acid Concentrations Following Protein Ingestion in Humans. Nutrients. 2016; 8(4):221. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8040221

Chicago/Turabian Style

Holwerda, Andrew M., Kaatje Lenaerts, Jörgen Bierau, and Luc J. C. Van Loon. 2016. "Body Position Modulates Gastric Emptying and Affects the Post-Prandial Rise in Plasma Amino Acid Concentrations Following Protein Ingestion in Humans" Nutrients 8, no. 4: 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8040221

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop