Next Article in Journal
Preliminary Study: The Effectiveness of Nutrition Education Intervention Targeting Short-Statured Pregnant Women to Prevent Gestational Stunting
Next Article in Special Issue
Sodium Content in Pre-Packaged Foods in China: A Food Label Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Folic Acid Supplementation during Pregnancy and Its Association with Telomere Length in Children at Four Years: Results from the INMA Birth Cohort Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Initiatives to Reduce the Content of Sodium in Food Products and Meals and Improve the Population’s Health
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes in the Sodium Content in Branded Foods in the Slovenian Food Supply (2011–2020)

1
Nutrition Institute, Koprska Ulica 98, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
VIST–Faculty of Applied Sciences, Gerbičeva Cesta 51A, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
3
Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2023, 15(19), 4304; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15194304
Submission received: 4 August 2023 / Revised: 27 September 2023 / Accepted: 5 October 2023 / Published: 9 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reducing Dietary Sodium and Improving Human Health 2.0)

Abstract

:
High sodium intake is the leading diet-related risk factor for mortality globally. Many countries have introduced policies to support the reformulation of foods and to reduce sodium intake, mainly on a voluntary basis, but there are limited data available about the long-term efficiency of such measures. Slovenia implemented salt reduction policies for the period of 2010–2020; these policies also included the voluntary reformulation of foods with the lowering of sodium content. This study’s aim was to explore the nationally representative branded food datasets collected in the years 2011, 2015, 2017, and 2020 to investigate the changes in the sodium content in prepacked branded foods. The study was conducted with datasets collected from food labels using standard food monitoring studies and included all the major retailers. Differences in market shares were adjusted by sales weighting, which was conducted using the yearly sales data provided by the major retailers. The food categories with a major contribution to the overall sales of sodium in prepacked branded foods were processed meat and derivatives (19.0%), canned vegetables (7.1%), water (6.7%), bread (7.2%), and cheese (6.3%). Considering the available food products, a notable decreasing sodium content trend was observed in biscuits, breakfast cereals, pizza, and spreads. Year-to-year differences were much less expressed after the correction for market share differences, and neutral trends were most frequently highlighted. This indicates that sodium was less frequently reduced in market-leading products. The study results revealed that very limited progress in sodium food reformulation was achieved in the 10-year period, indicating the need for more efficient policy approaches. The study demonstrated the importance of the systematic monitoring of the food supply for the evaluation of food policies.

1. Introduction

The high intake of sodium is a worldwide public health concern. Excess sodium intake is one of the leading risk factors for hypertension, while hypertension-related cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death from non-communicable diseases [1]. Each year, 17.9 million people die due to CVDs, accounting for 32% of all deaths globally [2]. According to the Global Burden of Disease Study, high sodium intake worldwide is the leading diet-related mortality risk factor, and it is responsible for millions of deaths and disability-adjusted life years (DALY) [3].
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that adults should consume less than 5 g of salt/day, which is equivalent to 2 g of sodium per day. However, the typical salt intake is nearly twice (9–12 g salt/day) that of the upper recommended limit [4,5]. Across Europe, the average salt intake ranges between 7 and 13 g per day [6], and approximately 53% of countries in the WHO European Region reported population salt intakes above WHO recommended maximum intakes [7].
Although the primary source of dietary sodium varies from country to country, a significant proportion of sodium intake comes from processed foods—bread and bakery products, cereal and grains, meat products, and dairy products [5]. In many high-income countries, prepared and packaged foods are the source of 75% of dietary sodium intake [8], and this trend is also increasing in low- and middle-income countries [9].
There is a global effort to reduce salt intake. In 2013, the member states of the WHO pledged to reduce sodium intake by 30% by 2025 [10]. Accordingly, the WHO published a technical package, SHAKE (the SHAKE Technical Package for Salt Reduction), for member states in order to assist the sodium reduction strategies in 2016. The WHO encourages governments to establish salt reduction policies and interventions, including surveillance, the promotion of reformulation by industries, the implementation of accurate labelling, the empowerment of individuals through education and communication, and the establishment of environments to promote healthy eating [11].
It is estimated that decreasing the high dietary salt intake from the current level to the recommended level would prevent about 2.5 million deaths from heart attacks and stroke globally [4]. The salt reduction strategies targeting the lowering of the sodium content of commonly consumed foods are effective ways to reduce the sodium intake of the population [12], and salt reduction strategies are considered to be central to the tackling of non-communicable diseases [8]. In principle, salt reduction strategies can target individuals (education, dietary recommendations, and campaigns) and industries (reformulation and salt substitution), or they can make use of economic approaches, such as tax regulations [13,14,15]. Several countries have implemented salt reduction strategies, which include a variety of activities—from individual actions, like consumer education, to structural actions, such as setting sodium content limits and establishing labelling schemes [13]. A review of studies from various countries reporting the changes in sodium content in packaged food products showed that while many countries have implemented salt reduction interventions to reduce the population’s salt intake, very few have published monitoring and evaluation studies [16].
Comprehensive monitoring of the food supply by collecting data from food labels has been proven to be an efficient method for monitoring the content of key nutrients (such as sodium) in branded foods [16,17,18]. Regular cross-sectional food monitoring studies enable tracking market trends on products’ composition over the years [19], providing useful insights into food reformulation activities.
Slovenia is a Central European country in which high dietary salt intake was reported (about 12 g/day) [20]. The National Action Plan to Reduce Salt was accepted in Slovenia in 2010; it aimed to cut the population’s salt intake to the recommended 5 g daily by 2020 [21,22]. The action plan included a wide set of activities, including raising awareness about the risks of excess salt intake and working with the food industry to gradually reduce salt content in processed foods—on a voluntary basis. Reducing salt intake is also a focus of the Slovenian National Program on Nutrition and Health Enhancing Physical Activity 2015–2025 [23], which provided a recommendation for the food industry to gradually lower salt content in critical categories of processed foods by 3.8–5.8% per year. However, Slovenia still has not yet adopted any mandatory measures towards sodium reduction in foods [15]. With respect to these documents, baseline monitoring of the sodium content in processed foods was conducted in 2011 [24] and 2015 [25] as part of the efforts to continuously monitor the food supply; this was conducted within the Slovenian Composition and Labelling Information System (CLAS) program [26]. Further evaluation was supported within the European Food Nutrition Security Cloud (FNS-Cloud) project (https://www.fns-cloud.eu/; accessed on 3 August 2023), funded by the European Commission HORIZON2020 framework program, with a demonstration of the use of branded food datasets in the sodium reformulation case study.
The objective of the study was to investigate the impact of voluntary food reformulation programs to reduce salt content in processed foods in Slovenia. Salt content trends in prepacked branded foods were explored using food supply data collected between the years 2011 and 2020.

2. Datasets and Methods

2.1. Datasets, Data Collection, and Processing

This case study was conducted using branded food datasets for Slovenia for the period 2017/2020; it was compared with a previously reported comparison for the period of 2011/2015 [24,25]. The data collection approach is described in detail elsewhere [26]. Briefly, the datasets were generated by a standard food monitoring study of the major food retailers with the largest nationwide shop networks, covering most of the food supply. All available prepacked products were systematically photographed and entered into the CLAS database (Composition and Labelling Information System (CLAS)) [26], using European Article Number (EAN) barcodes as product identifiers. The collection of the food photographs in the food stores was conducted using the mobile application CLAS, while further data processing was conducted using the CLAS web platform. Barcodes were used to avoid duplicate entries. The labelling of pictures was used for the extraction of various parameters; the declared salt content was used for this study. The dataset was further amended with national yearly sales data obtained from the major retailers. The sales data were given in a universal form, including the barcode number, which was used for food matching. The sales data of different suppliers were totalled for each barcode number, giving overall information about the quantity of sold items per year across the country. To enable the comparison with the previous data, the foods were categorised according to the recommendations of the Global Food Monitoring Group (GFMG) [27], with minor adaptations when considering the specifics of the European market. The case study was focused on the following food (sub)categories of prepacked foods: bread; biscuits; cakes, muffins, and pastries; breakfast cereals; pasta; pizza; soups; ready meals; preprepared salads and sandwiches; cheese; butter and margarine; canned vegetables; processed meat and derivatives; meat alternatives; crisps and snacks; sauces; mayonnaise/dressings; spreads; and water. Examples of food items in these food (sub)categories are provided in Supplementary Table S1.
The 2017 sample contained 11,595 products with available sales data, of which 9474 had available sodium content data. Altogether, 62.9% (N = 5962) of these corresponded to the above-mentioned food categories. Furthermore, the 2020 sample contained 12,302 products with available sales data, of which 9147 had available sodium content data. Of these, 73.9% (N = 6759) corresponded to the above-mentioned food categories. The 2011 and 2015 datasets were previously described in detail and were used to estimate the salt content in the specific food (sub)categories [24,25]; the results of these studies were used for descriptive comparisons.

2.2. Sodium Content in Foods

The labelled salt content was used to calculate the sodium content of each product in the database. In most cases, the sodium content was calculated for a product in the form in which it was sold (in mg per 100 g or mL of food). The exception was soups, where the sodium content was re-calculated for the prepared soup, using the dissolution factor according to the manufacturer’s labelled recommendation for the preparation of the soup.
Sodium content in the investigated food (sub)categories was then presented using descriptive statistics. All calculations were performed with the inclusion of all foods with both sodium and sales data. For each food sub(category), we calculated the median sodium content (in mg of sodium per 100 g or mL), together with P25 and P75 percentiles. To support comparisons with previous studies [24], we also calculated the mean sodium content (MSC).
The sale-weighting approach [25] was used to account for market-share differences; the sale-weighted sodium content (SSC) was calculated for food (sub)categories using the following formula:
S S C f o r   c a t e g o r y = i c i × m i i m i
  • ci … sodium content in specific food (i), included in the food (sub)category;
  • mi … yearly amount of sold specific food (i);
  • i … 1 → n (for all products in selected food (sub)category).
We also calculated the ratio between the MSC and SSC values (SAR values).

2.3. Major Sodium Sources in Branded Foods

To provide insights into the major sodium sources among prepacked branded foods, we further calculated ‘Share in total sodium sales’ (STSS) for each investigated food (sub)category using the following formula:
S T S S f o r   c a t e g o r y = i c i × m i k i c i × m i
  • k … 1 → n (for all included food categories).
STSS, therefore, presents the contribution of each food (sub)category to the total sodium content in all the included sold prepacked foods. It should be noted that the calculated STSS only corresponds to the food categories covered in this study (see Section 2.1), which do not include non-prepacked foods (i.e., non-prepacked bread), which are also considered notable dietary sources of sodium.

2.4. Foods with Excessive Sodium Content

Excessive sodium content in foods was determined using the PAHO criteria [28] for each product in the dataset with labelled sodium and energy content larger than 0 kcal. We calculated the ratio between the amount of sodium (mg) and the energy (kcal) in the product. Products with a ratio equal to or higher than 1 were assigned as high in sodium [28]. The assessment was performed for all categories except for the categories of water and soups. In the next stage, we calculated the crude proportion (High Na; %) and sale-weighted proportion (SW High Na; %) of products with excessive sodium content for each (sub)category.

2.5. Data Analyses

The data were processed and analysed using Stata Statistical Software, Release 17.0, for Windows (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA) and IBM SPSS v.26 and Microsoft Excel 2013 (Redmond, WA, USA), while visualisations were also performed using GraphPad Prism version 10.0.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA). The median, mean, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for the sodium content. On the other hand, the sale-weighted sodium content (SSC) was calculated as an exact value. Data analyses for 2017 and 2020 were performed for all above-mentioned food categories, while long-term comparisons (2011–2022) were performed only for major contributors in sodium intake, using a threshold STSS (2020) > 2%. Statistical analyses were not conducted for (sub)categories with less than 25 products in a single collection year. To determine if the medians originate from the same population of products in the selected categories in different years, we conducted a non-parametric k-sample test for the equality of the medians with a continuity correction. Differences in the MSC between the years were evaluated with an independent sample one-tailed t-test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

The largest contributors to the overall sales of sodium (STSS) in prepacked branded foods were processed meat and derivatives (21.4 and 16.8% for 2017 and 2020, respectively); canned vegetables (9.7 and 7.1%); water (6.7 and 5.7%); bread (9.0 and 8.6%); and cheese and imitates (6.6%) (Table 1).
Among the observed food categories, the highest median content of sodium for the year 2020 was found in processed meat and derivatives (800 mg/100 g), followed by crisps and snacks (720 mg), cheese imitates (720 mg), and sauces (680 mg) (Table 1). Most of these categories were also high in sodium after correction for market share differences using the yearly sales data. The highest SSC values were observed for Cheese imitatates (915 mg); crisps and snacks (805 mg); processed meat and derivatives (797 mg); and sauces (768). In most categories, the sodium content increased when market differences were corrected using sale-weighing, indicating higher sodium content in market-leading products. The most notable exception was meat alternatives.
A comparison of the sodium levels in the selected categories of prepacked foods in the Slovenian food supply in 2020 with those of the 2017 data is presented in Table 1 and Supplementary Table S2. In general, the year-to-year differences were less expressed after the market share differences were addressed using sales weighting. A higher sales-weighted sodium content was observed in water (160%), the noodle subcategory (141%), and cheese and imitates (116%). It should be noted that statistically significant differences in median sodium content between both years were only observed for three main categories of processed meat and derivates (0.005), soups (p = 0.018), crisps and snacks (0.035), and a subcategory of vegetable spreads (<0.001). A higher median sodium content in 2020 was observed in processed meat and derivates, and a lower one was observed in soups, crisps and snacks, and vegetable spreads.
To provide longer-term insights into the sodium reformulation trends in Slovenia, the study results were further compared with the results of previous monitoring conducted in the years 2011 [24] and 2015 [25], focusing on the comparison of food (sub)categories that were included in other monitoring studies and for which sufficient data on sodium levels were available. Comparisons were made for the following major contributors in sodium intake (using a threshold STSS (2020) > 2%): biscuits; bread; cheese; canned vegetables; processed meat and derivatives; crisps and snacks; and sauces. The sodium content trends in the branded foods in the years 2011, 2015, 2017, and 2020 are presented in Figure 1 (for median sodium content) and Figure 2 (for sales-weighted sodium content). As presented in Figure 1, statistically significant changes were only observed in biscuits (between 2015 and 2020), cheese (between 2015 and 2020), processed meat and derivatives (2017 vs. 2020), and in crisps and snacks (2015 vs. 2020; and 2017 vs. 2020). A general observation was that the year-to-year differences are mostly less expressed for the sales-weighted data (SSC). In most of the selected food categories, the results of the year-to-year comparison of sales-weighted sodium levels (Figure 2) show quite neutral trends.
We also investigated food category proportions of products with excess sodium using PAHO criteria [28]. Both crude and sale-weighted proportions of foods high in sodium are presented per (sub)category in Table 1. Above 90% of products with excess sodium in 2020 was observed in pizza (100%), plain bread (99%), pasta sauces (98%), cheese imitates (97%), processed meat and derivatives (95%), spreads and processed cheese (94%), canned vegetables (93%), and sauces (92%). Also, after accounting for market-share differences in all these categories (and additionally in ready meals and vegetable spreads), the sale-weighted proportion of high-sodium foods exceeded 90%. The lowest proportion of high-sodium foods (<10%) were found in biscuits (4%), dry pasta (5%), and breakfast cereals (7%); in the latter case, the proportion increased to 16% after sale-weighing.

4. Discussion

As mentioned above, among all the selected categories of prepacked foods, processed meats and derivatives were identified as the most important contributors to salt intake (17% in 2020); this was similar to the situation in other countries [29,30]. This food group contributes about one fifth of the sodium intake, as it does in other developed countries [31]. Reducing the level of sodium in processed meats is challenging because this not only affects sensory properties but also impacts shelf life and food safety [31] because the addition of salt increases the osmotic pressure, which reduces water activity and thus produces a bacteriostatic effect [32]. This also affected the trends in consumer behaviours, particularly with regard to the clean-label movement and the demand for naturalness in food products [33,34], which involve limiting the use of food additives. Research has also shown that NaCl can be replaced by KCl by up to 50% without changing the taste and texture of some meat products [35,36]. The WHO target values for this category vary from 230 mg/100 g for raw meat products and preparations (such as unprepared meat products and burgers and fresh sausages) to 950 mg for non-heated, preserved whole muscle meat products (air-dried, cured entire meat pieces, e.g., Parma and Serrano ham, and brined meat products, e.g., bacon) [12]. Considering the observed sodium content for this category, the improvement options are obviously not fully exploited. In comparison with other countries, higher sodium contents were reported in China [37], and lower values were reported in the USA [29], Spain [30], Argentina [38], Brazil [39], and South Africa [40]. It should also be noted that the high consumption of processed meat has also been identified as a risk factor for the development of colorectal cancer [41], meaning that consumers should also be educated with regard to how to reduce the overall consumption of such products, independently of the sodium content.
Cheese is another major contributor to salt intake (2020 STSS: 6.6%). As with processed foods, the reduction in sodium content in this food category is challenging due to the multifaceted role of salt in cheese production [42]; it is used as an emulsifier, and it reduces water activity, improves the flavour of the cheese, and protects it from the development of spoilage bacteria and pathogens [43]. Furthermore, various types of cheese contain different amounts of sodium; this also depends on the ripening, which is reflected in the water content. The sodium content benchmarks set by the WHO [12] encompass the following values: 190 mg per 100 g for fresh unripened cheese, 520 mg for soft/medium ripened cheese, 625 mg for semi-hard ripened cheese, and 510 mg for mould-ripened cheese. In light of these benchmarks, it is noteworthy that sodium content in cheese in Slovenia is considerably elevated, with a median value of 560 mg and a sales-weighted sodium content (SSC) of 597 mg. This sodium content in Slovenian cheese surpasses those found in Argentina [38], South Africa [40], the Czech Republic [44], and Brazil [39], while remaining lower than those observed in Spain [30] and China [37]. It is additionally disconcerting to observe that the sodium content in cheese imitates, when weighted by sales, is even more elevated, reaching 915 mg. While this subcategory currently makes a limited contribution to the overall sodium content in sold prepacked foods, we need to consider the European Commission’s Green Deal sustainability goals and the Farm to Fork Strategy [45], which highlight the move towards more plant-based diets. Plant-based imitations of both meats and cheeses are expected to gain popularity and might become a notable source of sodium in the future.
The high prevalence of daily bread consumption in Slovenia, with the accompanying moderately high sodium content in this food category, has made bread a major source of dietary sodium intake [46]. This was also confirmed in our study (STSS in 2020: 8.6%). It should be noted that this value applies only to prepacked bread, while a high proportion of bread in Slovenia is sold as non-prepacked, meaning that the overall contribution of bread to the sodium intake is even larger. Nevertheless, despite bread being a specific category targeted in the National Action Plan to Reduce Salt [21,22], significant improvements have not been evident since 2011, when the inaugural food monitoring study took place in Slovenia. For instance, in 2020, the sales-weighted sodium content in plain bread stood at 504 mg/100 g, only slightly higher than the 492 mg recorded in 2011. Comparable sodium levels were also observed in non-prepacked foods [46], contrasting with the WHO benchmark for bread, which is set at a mere 330 mg [12]. It is worth noting that notably lower sodium levels were reported in bread in the United Kingdom [17]. Furthermore, the sodium content of bread in Spain has nearly halved within an eight-year span [30,47], although it remains higher than the WHO benchmark, a pattern also observed in Argentina [38], Costa Rica [48], the USA [49], Brazil [39], the Czech Republic [44], and South Africa [40]. In Italy, sodium levels were reported to be nearly twice that of the WHO benchmark [50], whereas China has successfully reduced sodium levels below the benchmark [37]. Considering the high daily intake of bread in Slovenia (177 and 118 g in adult males and females, respectively [51]), it would be worth exploiting further activities to support the reduction in sodium levels. In addition to the pledge of the Slovenian Chamber of Commerce to reduce sodium content in bread voluntarily by 5% in the period of 2019–2020, a more efficient option would be to provide a regulatory upper limit to the sodium levels in plain bread, as was also proposed in the Netherlands [52]. Considering that in Slovenia, a lot of food businesses are operating in this sector, many of which are not members of the Slovenian Chamber of Commerce, such an approach would have much higher potential. In addition, one way to reduce salt in the food chain is based on the fact that human receptors can adapt to low salt concentrations over time; this can be used to compensate for the lower salt content in processed foods because small incremental reductions in salt in products are not sensorily detectable [53]. Recent studies showed that a 15–25% reduction, and sometimes a reduction as significant as 33%, in salt in white bread did not affect consumers’ hedonic preference; this was not the case with multigrain bread [54,55,56]. However, to support policymakers in the monitoring of bread reformulation, future studies should also be focused on non-prepacked bread.
As in the 2015 study [25], bottled water was again highlighted as an important contributor to total sodium sales in prepacked foods (STSS: 5.7%). This category is also a most striking example of the importance of the consideration of sales data in the assessment of the food supply. For example, while the median sodium content in 2020 was 0.76 mg/100 mL, the sale-weighted content was much higher (58 mg/100 mL). It should be noted that while most bottled water products in the Slovenian food supply contain less than 1 mg of sodium per 100 mL, a few products with a very high market share (>60%) contain ≥50 mg/L. It is also interesting that the majority of the category was represented by mineral water (87.4% in 2017 and 76.8% in 2020).
Our study highlighted very limited effects of the current national voluntary reformulation strategy on the sodium content in prepacked foods in the Slovenian food supply. Various factors contribute to the effectiveness of food reformulation policies to improve food composition and enhance dietary patterns and overall public health, including robust incentives and a well-structured implementation plan with monitoring and evaluation mechanisms [57,58]. Rosewarne et al. published a global review of national strategies for sodium reduction in branded foods, showing that out of 62 countries with identified sodium reformulation strategies, 43 countries have delineated sodium targets and only 15 are enforcing mandatory regulations at least to some level [59]. It seems that the mandatory approach is much more efficient in comparison with voluntary programmes. For example, South Africa was one of the early adopters of mandatory regulations aimed at reducing salt content in processed foods in 2016, and recent monitoring studies suggested notable effects on both sodium content in foods [60] and sodium intake in the population [61]. On the other hand, monitoring of the voluntary programs produced very diverse results. Rosewarne et al. investigated changes in sodium levels in packaged foods in Australia between 2014 and 2019 when a media advocacy intervention was implemented to stimulate sodium reformulation, but no meaningful reduction in sodium levels was observed in targeted packaged foods [62]. On the other hand, the United Kingdom implemented a comprehensive voluntary salt reduction program in 2003, encompassing a series of progressively lower, product-specific reformulation targets for the food industry, coupled with consumer advice to reduce salt intake, but the effects of activities were also limited. The slight reduction in the salt content of foods and the total volume of salt sold between 2015 and 2020 did not achieve statistical significance, resulting in a recommendation that large food companies should be required to report their salt sales to enhance transparency regarding individual businesses’ progress toward salt reduction targets [63]. Actually, robust and transparent monitoring seems to be a key point for successful sodium reformulation. Our results highlighted the importance of the consideration of sales data to account for huge market-share differences between products in the food supply. To achieve meaningful changes in the sodium content at the population level, these changes need to be reflected particularly in market-leading products. The observed challenges in this area in Slovenia could be partially explained with a hypothesis that particularly newly launched foods might have lower sodium content in comparison with existing market-leading products, which are rarely reformulated. While such a hypothesis should be investigated with future studies, policymakers could improve the sodium reformulation strategy by setting specific sodium content target limits for key food categories, preferably with a mandatory approach and robust monitoring.
The major strengths of this study are that we were able to analyse data collected in different cross-sectional studies in Slovenia in the period of 2011–2020 and that we had access to nationwide yearly sales data. Exploiting the sales data provided very useful insights into the food supply because this enabled the correction of the very different market shares of the different products. This is particularly relevant in the food supply, where some niche products have an almost neglectable market share, while a very small number of bestselling products can dominate the market. Therefore, the median sodium content in foods available in the markets can obscure the real-life situation, as observed in some food categories in our study.
However, the used approach is also related to a limitation. The sales data were unfortunately not available for all the products, but we had access to data for the majority of the products. This limitation is also highly relevant for all such studies in other regions because some retailers are not willing to share sales data, which are usually considered confidential. Actually, most of the food monitoring studies did not explore sales data at all. The limitation of our comparison is that some previous monitoring studies were conducted with a somewhat different monitoring approach and only on selected food categories. This is particularly relevant for the food monitoring study in 2011, which was conducted using direct data collection in food stores without photographing the food labels, and also in a different regulatory situation, when the sodium content was still voluntary and a notable proportion of food labels were missing this information. Another study limitation is that the sodium content data for this study were taken from food labels and not from laboratory analyses. However, considering that the labelling of the nutrition declaration is strictly regulated [64] and can be subject to the official control of the food authorities, this was the most reasonable approach. Chemical analysis of all the marketed foods is simply not feasible, while a randomised analysis approach would result in other limitations. As food labelling data have proven to be a reliable data source in the scientific studies of other nutrients [65], we have no reason to speculate that the labelling data on sodium content would be less reliable.

5. Conclusions

While the voluntary gradual reduction in the sodium levels in processed foods in Slovenia was recommended back in 2010, our study revealed limited progress among prepacked foods, at least in food categories with a major contribution to dietary sodium intake. This is an indication that the implementation of more efficient public health strategies would be beneficial. In addition to consumer education and collaboration with the food industry for reformulation activities, a measurable approach would be to set specific sodium content target limits for specific food categories. To ensure the widest implementation of such target limits, these should be regulated—at least for the key contributors to sodium intake, such as bread. Possible targets of regulatory salt limits are public procurement, food-labelling instruments, and a mandatory salt content limit when substantiated by public health requirements.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu15194304/s1. Table S1: Examples of foods included in the investigated (sub)categories; Table S2: Sodium content in prepacked foods for selected food (sub)categories in 2017 and 2020.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, I.P.; methodology, I.P.; validation, S.K.; formal analysis, S.K., H.H. and I.P.; investigation, M.H., Ž.L., K.Ž. and I.P.; data curation, Ž.L. and H.H.; writing—original draft, S.K.; writing—review and editing, S.K., M.H., Ž.L., K.Ž., H.H. and I.P.; visualisation, S.K. and H.H.; supervision, I.P.; funding acquisition, I.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was conducted within the Food Nutrition Security Cloud (FNS-Cloud) project, which received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme (H2020-EU.3.2.2.3.—A sustainable and competitive agri-food industry) under grant agreement no. 863059. The information and views in this report do not necessarily reflect the official opinion or position of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained herein. Data collection/extraction for this study was supported by the national research programme Nutrition and Public Health (P3-0395, funded by the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency) and research project V3-2105, funded by the Ministry of Health of Republic of Slovenia, and Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency. The funding organisation had no role in the design, analysis, or writing of this article.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the retailers for allowing access to their stores and sales data. We also acknowledge the collaborating students for their help in the data collection. The authors would like to acknowledge that I.P. has led/participated in various other research projects in the area of nutrition/public health/food technology, which were (co)funded by the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency, the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia, and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food of the Republic of Slovenia, and also in the case of specific applied research projects by food businesses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhou, B.; Perel, P.; Mensah, G.A.; Ezzati, M. Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2021, 18, 785–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. WHO. Fact Sheets: Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs). Available online: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  3. Murray, C.J.L.; Aravkin, A.Y.; Zheng, P.; Abbafati, C.; Abbas, K.M.; Abbasi-Kangevari, M.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdelalim, A.; Abdollahi, M.; Abdollahpour, I.; et al. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020, 396, 1223–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. WHO. Fact Sheets: Salt Reduction. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/salt-reduction (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  5. Bhat, S.; Marklund, M.; Henry, M.E.; Appel, L.J.; Croft, K.D.; Neal, B.; Wu, J.H.Y. A Systematic Review of the Sources of Dietary Salt Around the World. Adv. Nutr. 2020, 11, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kloss, L.; Meyer, J.D.; Graeve, L.; Vetter, W. Sodium intake and its reduction by food reformulation in the European Union—A review. NFS J. 2015, 1, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kwong, E.J.L.; Whiting, S.; Bunge, A.C.; Leven, Y.; Breda, J.; Rakovac, I.; Cappuccio, F.P.; Wickramasinghe, K. Population-level salt intake in the WHO European Region in 2022: A systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2022, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brown, I.J.; Tzoulaki, I.; Candeias, V.; Elliott, P. Salt intakes around the world: Implications for public health. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2009, 38, 791–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Stuckler, D.; McKee, M.; Ebrahim, S.; Basu, S. Manufacturing Epidemics: The Role of Global Producers in Increased Consumption of Unhealthy Commodities Including Processed Foods, Alcohol, and Tobacco. PLoS Med. 2012, 9, e1001235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. WHO. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/148114/9789241564854_eng.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  11. WHO. The SHAKE Technical Package for Salt Reduction. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250135/9789241511346-eng.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  12. WHO. WHO Global Sodium Benchmarks for Different Food Categories. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1344511/retrieve (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  13. Trieu, K.; Neal, B.; Hawkes, C.; Dunford, E.; Campbell, N.; Rodriguez-Fernandez, R.; Legetic, B.; McLaren, L.; Barberio, A.; Webster, J. Salt Reduction Initiatives around the World—A Systematic Review of Progress towards the Global Target. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hope, S.F.; Webster, J.; Trieu, K.; Pillay, A.; Ieremia, M.; Bell, C.; Snowdon, W.; Neal, B.; Moodie, M. A systematic review of economic evaluations of population-based sodium reduction interventions. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Global Report on Sodium Intake Reduction; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; p. 99. ISBN 978-92-4-006998-5. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240069985 (accessed on 5 September 2023).
  16. Santos, J.A.; Sparks, E.; Thout, S.R.; McKenzie, B.; Trieu, K.; Hoek, A.; Johnson, C.; McLean, R.; Arcand, J.; Campbell, N.R.C.; et al. The Science of Salt: A global review on changes in sodium levels in foods. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2019, 21, 1043–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mhurchu, C.N.; Capelin, C.; Dunford, E.K.; Webster, J.L.; Neal, B.C.; Jebb, S.A. Sodium content of processed foods in the United Kingdom: Analysis of 44,000 foods purchased by 21,000 households. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 93, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Coyle, D.H.; Wu, J.H.; Di Tanna, G.L.; Shahid, M.; Taylor, F.; Neal, B.; Trevena, H. The Effects of a Supermarket-Based Intervention on the Nutritional Quality of Private-Label Foods: A Prospective Study. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. George Institute for Global Health. Food Composition Database, Version 2014; The George Institute for Global Health Sydney: Newtown, Australia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ribic, C.H.; Zakotnik, J.M.; Vertnik, L.; Vegnuti, M.; Cappuccio, F.P. Salt intake of the Slovene population assessed by 24 h urinary sodium excretion. Public Health Nutr. 2010, 13, 1803–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. MZ. National Action Plan for Reducing the Consumption of Salt in the Diet of the Population of Slovenia for the Period 2010–2020 (In Slovenian: Nacionalni Akcijski Načrt za Zmanjševanje Uživanja Soli v Prehrani Prebivalcev Slovenije za Obdobje 2010–2020). Available online: http://www.mz.gov.si/fileadmin/mz.gov.si/pageuploads/mz_dokumenti/delovna_podrocja/javno_zdravje/petric/Nacio_akcijski_nacrt_za_zmanj_uziv_soli_v_prehrani_preb_Slo_2010-2010.pdf (accessed on 27 June 2017).
  22. WHO. Mapping Salt Reduction Initiatives in the WHO European Region. Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/186462/Mapping-salt-reduction-initiatives-in-the-WHO-European-Region-final.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  23. RS. National Program on Nutrition and Health Enhancing Physical Activity 2015–2025; Uradni list Republike Slovenije: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  24. Korosec, Z.; Pravst, I. Assessing the average sodium content of prepacked foods with nutrition declarations: The importance of sales data. Nutrients 2014, 6, 3501–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pravst, I.; Lavriša, Ž.; Kušar, A.; Miklavec, K.; Žmitek, K. Changes in Average Sodium Content of Prepacked Foods in Slovenia during 2011–2015. Nutrients 2017, 9, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pravst, I.; Hribar, M.; Žmitek, K.; Blažica, B.; Korousic Seljak, B.; Kušar, A. Branded foods databases as a tool to support nutrition research and monitoring of the food supply: Insights from the Slovenian Composition and Labelling Information System (CLAS). Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 798576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dunford, E.; Webster, J.; Metzler, A.B.; Czernichow, S.; Ni Mhurchu, C.; Wolmarans, P.; Snowdon, W.; L’Abbe, M.; Li, N.; Maulik, P.K.; et al. International collaborative project to compare and monitor the nutritional composition of processed foods. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2012, 19, 1326–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Pan American Health Organization Nutrient Profile Model. Available online: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/18621/9789275118733_eng.pdf (accessed on 8 September 2020).
  29. Clapp, J.E.; Niederman, S.A.; Leonard, E.; Curtis, C.J. Changes in Serving Size, Calories, and Sodium Content in Processed Foods From 2009 to 2015. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2018, 15, E33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Beltrá, M.; Borrás, F.; Ropero, A.B. Sodium Content of Foods Sold in the Spanish Market. Results from the BADALI Project. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Inguglia, E.S.; Zhang, Z.; Tiwari, B.K.; Kerry, J.P.; Burgess, C.M. Salt reduction strategies in processed meat products—A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 59, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Duranton, F.; Guillou, S.; Simonin, H.; Chéret, R.; de Lamballerie, M. Combined use of high pressure and salt or sodium nitrite to control the growth of endogenous microflora in raw pork meat. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2012, 16, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Petit, G.; Jury, V.; de Lamballerie, M.; Duranton, F.; Pottier, L.; Martin, J.-L. Salt Intake from Processed Meat Products: Benefits, Risks and Evolving Practices. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 1453–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shan, L.C.; Regan, Á.; Monahan, F.J.; Li, C.; Lalor, F.; Murrin, C.; Wall, P.G.; McConnon, Á. Consumer preferences towards healthier reformulation of a range of processed meat products. Br. Food J. 2017, 119, 2013–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guàrdia, M.D.; Guerrero, L.; Gelabert, J.; Gou, P.; Arnau, J. Consumer attitude towards sodium reduction in meat products and acceptability of fermented sausages with reduced sodium content. Meat Sci. 2006, 73, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lee, Y.S.; Zhekov, Z.G.; Owens, C.M.; Kim, M.; Meullenet, J.F. Effects of Partial and Complete Replacement Of Sodium Chloride With Potassium Chloride On The Texture, Flavor And Water-Holding Capacity of Marinated Broiler Breast Fillets. J. Texture Stud. 2012, 43, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hao, Z.; Liang, L.; Pu, D.; Yuyu, Z. Analysis of Sodium Content in 4082 Kinds of Commercial Foods in China. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Allemandi, L.; Tiscornia, M.V.; Guarnieri, L.; Castronuovo, L.; Martins, E. Monitoring Sodium Content in Processed Foods in Argentina 2017–2018: Compliance with National Legislation and Regional Targets. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Martins, C.A.; de Sousa, A.A.; Veiros, M.B.; González-Chica, D.A.; Proença, R.P.d.C. Sodium content and labelling of processed and ultra-processed food products marketed in Brazil. Public Health Nutr. 2014, 18, 1206–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Peters, S.A.E.; Dunford, E.; Ware, L.J.; Harris, T.; Walker, A.; Wicks, M.; Van Zyl, T.; Swanepoel, B.; Charlton, K.E.; Woodward, M.; et al. The Sodium Content of Processed Foods in South Africa during the Introduction of Mandatory Sodium Limits. Nutrients 2017, 9, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. IARC. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. In Red Meat and Processed Meat; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bansal, V.; Mishra, S.K. Reduced-sodium cheeses: Implications of reducing sodium chloride on cheese quality and safety. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 733–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Luzzi, G.; Brinks, E.; Fritsche, J.; Franz, C. Effect of reduction of sodium content on the microbial ecology of Edam cheese samples. AMB Express 2021, 11, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rýdlová, L.; Hrubá, M.; Škorpilová, T.; Pivoňka, J.; Tobolka, A.; Suchopárová, M.; Rajchl, A. Sodium content of foods sold in the Czech market. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2022, 28, 100526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. EC. Farm to Fork Strategy. Available online: https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-05/f2f_action-plan_2020_strategy-info_en.pdf (accessed on 25 June 2022).
  46. Hlastan Ribič, C.; Zakotnik, J.M.; Seljak, K.B.; Poličnik, R.; Blaznik, U.; Mis, F.N.; Eržen, I.; Ji, C.; Cappucio, F.P. Estimation of sodium availability in food in Slovenia: Results from household food purchase data from 2000 to 2009. Slov. J. Publ. Health 2014, 53, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pérez Farinós, N.; Santos Sanz, S.; Dal Re, M.Á.; Yusta Boyo, J.; Robledo, T.; Castrodeza, J.J.; Campos Amado, J.; Villar, C. Salt content in bread in Spain, 2014. Nutr. Hosp. 2018, 35, 650–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Vega-Solano, J.; Blanco-Metzler, A.; Benavides-Aguilar, K.F.; Arcand, J. An Evaluation of the Sodium Content and Compliance with the National Sodium Reduction Targets among Packaged Foods Sold in Costa Rica in 2015 and 2018. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Coyne, K.J.; Baldridge, A.S.; Huffman, M.D.; Jenner, K.; Xavier, D.; Dunford, E.K. Differences in the sodium content of bread products in the USA and UK: Implications for policy. Public Health Nutr. 2017, 21, 632–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Carcea, M.; Narducci, V.; Turfani, V.; Aguzzi, A. A Survey of Sodium Chloride Content in Italian Artisanal and Industrial Bread. Foods 2018, 7, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gregorič, M.; Hristov, H.; Blaznik, U.; Koroušič Seljak, B.; Delfar, N.; Pravst, I. Dietary Intakes of Slovenian Adults and Elderly: Design and Results of National Dietary Study SI.Menu 2017/18. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. CBL. National Agreement to Improve Product Composition 2014–2020. Available online: http://www.akkoordverbeteringproductsamenstelling.nl/en (accessed on 30 April 2020).
  53. Batenburg, M.; Landrieu, E.; van der Velden, R. Chapter 108—Compensation of Salt Reduction with Aroma Compounds. In Flavour Science; Ferreira, V., Lopez, R., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2014; pp. 589–595. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kuhar, A.; Korosec, M.; Bolha, A.; Pravst, I.; Hristov, H. Is a Consumer Perception of Salt Modification a Sensory or a Behavioural Phenomenon? Insights from a Bread Study. Foods 2020, 9, 1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Riis, N.L.; Bjoernsbo, K.S.; Toft, U.; Trolle, E.; Hyldig, G.; Hartley, I.E.; Keast, R.; Lassen, A.D. Impact of salt reduction interventions on salt taste sensitivity and liking, a cluster randomized controlled trial. Food Qual. Prefer. 2021, 87, 104059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dunteman, A.; Yang, Y.; McKenzie, E.; Lee, Y.; Lee, S.-Y. Sodium reduction technologies applied to bread products and their impact on sensory properties: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 4396–4407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gressier, M.; Sassi, F.; Frost, G. Healthy Foods and Healthy Diets. How Government Policies Can Steer Food Reformulation. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vargas-Meza, J.; Gonzalez-Rocha, A.; Campos-Nonato, I.; Nilson, E.A.F.; Basto-Abreu, A.; Barquera, S.; Denova-Gutiérrez, E. Effective and Scalable Interventions to Reduce Sodium Intake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2023, 12, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Rosewarne, E.; Santos, J.A.; Trieu, K.; Tekle, D.; Mhurchu, C.N.; Jones, A.; Ide, N.; Yamamoto, R.; Nishida, C.; Webster, J. A Global Review of National Strategies to Reduce Sodium Concentrations in Packaged Foods. Adv. Nutr. 2022, 13, 1820–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Van der Westhuizen, B.; Frank, T.; Karim, S.A.; Swart, R.E.C. Determining food industry compliance to mandatory sodium limits: Successes and challenges from the South African experience. Public Health Nutr. 2023, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Strauss-Kruger, M.; Wentzel-Viljoen, E.; Ware, L.J.; Van Zyl, T.; Charlton, K.; Ellis, S.; Schutte, A.E. Early evidence for the effectiveness of South Africa s legislation on salt restriction in foods: The African-PREDICT study. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2023, 37, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Rosewarne, E.; Santos, J.A.; Di Tanna, G.L.; Shahid, M.; Grimes, C.; Bolton, K.A.; Webster, J.; Neal, B.; Woodward, M.; Coyle, D.; et al. Changes in sodium levels in Australian packaged foods between 2014 and 2019: An interrupted time series analysis of the impact of the Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership’s media advocacy strategy. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2023, 20, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bandy, L.K.; Hollowell, S.; Jebb, S.A.; Scarborough, P. Changes in the salt content of packaged foods sold in supermarkets between 2015-2020 in the United Kingdom: A repeated cross-sectional study. PLoS Med. 2022, 19, e1004114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. EC. Regulation (EU) no 1169/2011 on the Provision of Food Information to Consumers. Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2011/1169/2018-01-01 (accessed on 27 September 2021).
  65. Hafner, E.; Lavrisa, A.; Hribar, M.; Krusic, S.; Kusar, A.; Zmitek, K.; Skrt, M.; Ulrih, N.P.; Pravst, I. Verifying the Use of Food Labeling Data for Compiling Branded Food Databases: A Case Study of Sugars in Beverages. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 794468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Median sodium content in selected categories of prepacked branded foods in Slovenia (2011–2020). Significant difference between food categories in different years: (***) = p < 0.001; (**) = p < 0.01; and (*) = p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Median sodium content in selected categories of prepacked branded foods in Slovenia (2011–2020). Significant difference between food categories in different years: (***) = p < 0.001; (**) = p < 0.01; and (*) = p < 0.05.
Nutrients 15 04304 g001
Figure 2. Sales-weighted sodium (SSC) content in selected categories of prepacked branded foods in Slovenia (2011–2020).
Figure 2. Sales-weighted sodium (SSC) content in selected categories of prepacked branded foods in Slovenia (2011–2020).
Nutrients 15 04304 g002
Table 1. Sodium content in prepacked foods for selected food (sub)categories in 2017 and 2020.
Table 1. Sodium content in prepacked foods for selected food (sub)categories in 2017 and 2020.
Food Factory2020 2017 Median
Diff.
2020/2017
p-Value
SSC Ratio
2020/2017
(%)
N% LSCSodium Content
(mg per 100 g/mL)
High Na (%)SW High Na (%)STSS (%)N% LSCSodium Content
(mg per 100 g/mL)
High Na (%)SW High Na (%)STSS (%)
P25Med.P75SSCP25Med.P75SSC
Bread4139344052072050490978.636198440520700517899690.49997
- Plain bread16991440480520486991006.31349744048052048995995.30.855100
Biscuits7709864132240182432.370795801522601635330.091112
Cakes, muffins, and pastries376989218832019117120.9344928018028021413181.40.47790
Breakfast cereals4189916962121937161.0320951610025421813221.40.65489
Pasta74497410.211012318201.8633944128812921222.20.91696
- Noodles6298124040037023400.58792164072026329280.70.866141
- Dry pasta569962.844030520.3445952.85.23231530.40.39396
Pizza251004405205604941001000.1261004805145725231001000.20.92194
Soup (prepared)197100312360400369NANA0.520699338374409380NANA0.90.018 *97
Ready meals2128328840052044288981.4187893204005204419810020.886100
Preprepared salads and sandwiches859435652860051185820.53995360520600530971000.40.40096
Cheese and imitates5239830056076043479626.64759632056080037483565.60.176116
- Cheese3029840060076059781824.72669740060076056888793.40.236105
- Spreads and processed cheese1359832044089057094971.5155963504809055493981.80.905103
- Cheese imitates a33100680720920915971000.1 NANA
Butter and margarine9195440200651410.492914.24220077810.60.88584
- Canned vegetables49710020037260837193967.15159324440078040595969.70.09992
Processed meat and derivatives732926408001320797959416.8703915807481000780949621.40.005 **102
Meat alternatives1229817654476032476530.190936035270035369510.10.08992
Crisps and snacks43210052072096080578874.83409860076898881186835.70.035 *99
Sauces68698440680120076892944.958191440720128084494996.40.48691
- Pasta sauces131100400532800541981000.8149894005209207409410010.80773
Mayonnaise/dressings76994005606004674070.97010044056064046640121.30.874100
Spreads265974020048014243190.4174904833256014347150.50.46999
- Vegetable spreads1049640047252046786990.2609348056060054095990.30.001 **86
Waters95880.280.765.158NANA5.799880.240.764.836NANA6.70.946160
Notes: % LSC: percentage of products with labelled sodium content; Med.: median; SSC: sale-weighted sodium content in prepacked foods; STSS: share in total sodium sales; High Na: proportion of foods (%) with excess sodium content, according to the PAHO criteria [28], that was applied to SSC; SW high Na: sale-weighted sodium proportion of foods (%) with excess sodium content, according to the PAHO criteria; NA: not applicable. a Statistical comparison was not conducted for cheese imitates due to small sample size in 2017. (*) p < 0.05; (**) p < 0.01.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Krušič, S.; Hristov, H.; Hribar, M.; Lavriša, Ž.; Žmitek, K.; Pravst, I. Changes in the Sodium Content in Branded Foods in the Slovenian Food Supply (2011–2020). Nutrients 2023, 15, 4304. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15194304

AMA Style

Krušič S, Hristov H, Hribar M, Lavriša Ž, Žmitek K, Pravst I. Changes in the Sodium Content in Branded Foods in the Slovenian Food Supply (2011–2020). Nutrients. 2023; 15(19):4304. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15194304

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krušič, Sanja, Hristo Hristov, Maša Hribar, Živa Lavriša, Katja Žmitek, and Igor Pravst. 2023. "Changes in the Sodium Content in Branded Foods in the Slovenian Food Supply (2011–2020)" Nutrients 15, no. 19: 4304. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15194304

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop