Next Article in Journal
Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet Is Associated with Lower Depressive Symptoms among U.S. Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Dietary Intake Patterns and Weight Status during the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Cross-Sectional Study Focusing on Young Adults in Malaysia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/nu14020281
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dietary Sodium and Potassium Intake: Data from the Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2016

by
Jorge Vargas-Meza
,
Manuel A. Cervantes-Armenta
,
Ismael Campos-Nonato
*,
Claudia Nieto
,
Joaquín Alejandro Marrón-Ponce
,
Simón Barquera
,
Mario Flores-Aldana
and
Sonia Rodríguez-Ramírez
Center for Nutrition and Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655 Col Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca C.P. 62100, Morelos, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(2), 281; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14020281
Submission received: 25 November 2021 / Revised: 1 January 2022 / Accepted: 4 January 2022 / Published: 11 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nutritional Epidemiology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Population studies have demonstrated an association between sodium and potassium intake and blood pressure levels and lipids. The aim of this study was to describe the dietary intake and contribution of sodium and potassium to the Mexican diet, and to describe its association with nutrition status and clinical characteristics. We analyzed a national survey with 4219 participants. Dietary information was obtained with a 24-h recall. Foods and beverages were classified according to level of processing. The mean intake (mg/d) of Na was 1512 in preschool children, 2844 in school-age children, 3743 in adolescents, and 3132 in adults. The mean intake (mg/d) of K was 1616 in preschool children, 2256 in school-age children, 2967 in adolescents, and 3401 in adults. Processed and ultra-processed foods (UPF) contribute 49% of Na intake in preschool children, 50% in school-age children, 47% in adolescents, and 39% in adults. Adults with high Na intake had lower serum concentrations of cholesterol, HDL-c, and LDL-c. A significant proportion of the Mexican population has a high intake of Na (64–82%) and low K (58–73%). Strategies to reduce Na and increase K intake need to reduce the possibility of having high BP and serum lipid disturbances.

1. Introduction

Sodium (Na) and Potassium (K) are essential minerals for human homeostasis because they help maintain osmotic balance [1]. In the plasma membrane of cells, Na and K move against concentration gradients through constant pumping of Na-K ATPase, regulating cell volume and maintaining homeostasis of tissues and organs [2].
Population studies have demonstrated an association between high dietary Na intake and high blood pressure (BP) [3] and metabolic disorders [4]. Conversely, a low Na intake can lower BP in people who are sensitive to salt, increase the vascular insulin resistance, and improve blood levels of cholesterol and triglycerides [5].
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) established a maximum tolerable intake level (UL) of Na of 2.3 g/day [6], while the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends not exceeding 2 g/day [7]. Both organizations recommend limiting Na intake because higher consumption is associated with adverse health effects [8]. In a cohort study conducted in Mexico, the mean Na intake was 3.5 g/day [9].
In Latin America, sodium intake has been identified as coming from different food sources. Argentina has shown that the highest sodium intake comes from ultra-processed foods (UPF) (65–70%), while in Brazil and Costa Rica the main source is common salt (74 and 60%, respectively) [10].
In Mexico, the purchase of UPF products increased during the last decades [11]; however, their dietary contribution to daily sodium intake is unknown. In a study that examined sodium levels of UPF for 14 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, including Mexico, the foods with the highest sodium content were unprocessed and processed meats, ready-to-eat cereals, yogurt and milk-based drinks, seasonings, and salty snacks [12].
On the other hand, adult K intake was low (1.9 g/day) in a Mexico City cohort [9], compared to international recommendations (at least 3.5 g/day) [6,13]. Adequate K intake has been shown to have beneficial effects, such as lowering blood pressure and risk of kidney disease [5,14]. However, K is among the four most common deficient nutrients in the world diet [9,15].
The WHO highlights the importance of implementing a surveillance system to measure and evaluate the patterns of salt intake, as well as identify the main sources of Na intake in the population, since this can inform the development of programs aimed at reducing Na intake [16]. Furthermore, the effects of high sodium and low potassium intake on high BP [3], reduced renal function, and metabolic disorders are synergic, so the Na-K ratio may be a strong indicator for cardiovascular health outcomes [17,18]. The current evidence indicates that a ratio greater than 1.0 between Na and K results in an increase in BP [19].
There have been efforts in Mexico to measure Na and K intake [9,20]; however, these studies are not nationally representative and do not include all age groups. To date, there are no data about the national intake of Na and K or their food sources. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe the dietary intake and main food sources of Na and K in participants of the Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2016 (ENSANUT-2016), and to describe the association between Na and K intake with cardiovascular health outcomes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Study Population

This cross-sectional study used data from the ENSANUT-2016, which is a probabilistic survey at the national, regional, and state level with urban and rural strata. The data collection was between May and October of 2016. Details of the design, sampling size calculation, and methodology of the survey have been previously described elsewhere [21].

2.2. Estimating Total Na and K Intake

Dietary information was obtained from a subsample of participants of ENSANUT-2016: 535 pre-school children (1 to <5 years), 1101 school-age children (5 to <12 years), 1284 adolescents (12 to <20 years), and 1421 adults (>20 years). Those participants with extreme energy intake (outside three standard deviations of the log of energy intake-to-energy requirement ratio) were excluded from the study, as well as pregnant, lactating females, and all individuals ≤1 year old (n = 122).
Trained interviewers obtained a 24-h recall from the participants [22]. The recall was collected between Monday and Sunday to capture the intake variability between weekdays and weekends. Participants younger than 15 years old were assisted by the person who cooked and prepared their meals in the household [23]. Energy and nutrient intakes were estimated using the Mexican Food Database (BAM version 18.1.1, by its Spanish acronym) [24].
Participants reported their dietary intake from the previous days as individual foods, custom recipes (individual ingredients that make up the recipe), and standard recipes (sets of default ingredients that make up a recipe when the informer was not able to provide one). For the present analysis, food recipes were disaggregated into their ingredients. The ENSANUT-2016 dataset does not include Na from salt added at the table but does include Na from salt used in preparations.
We classified all foods and beverages that were reported into 36 groups according to their nutritional profile; if they were frequently consumed by the population, they were considered in a single group (for example, tortilla). The groups are shown in supplementary Table S1. We calculated the total Na and K intake and the contribution (percentage of total Na/K intake) of each food group and ratio of Na to K intake (Na-K).

2.3. Food Classification Based on NOVA Processing Level

Based on the NOVA food framework, foods and beverages reported in the 24-h recall were classified as: (1) unprocessed or minimally processed foods (those obtained directly from nature or altered in ways that do not introduce any additional substances but may involve removal of inedible parts); (2) processed culinary ingredients (substances derived from foods or nature through methods such as pressing, refining, grinding, milling, and drying and which are used in culinary preparations); (3) processed foods (those manufactured products made by adding sugar, fat, oil, salt, and/or other culinary ingredients to minimally processed foods); and (4) UPF (manufactured formulations made from substances derived from foods or synthesized from other organic sources, preservatives, and additives) [25,26]. Details of the food and beverage subcategory of each NOVA group are described elsewhere [27].

2.4. Sociodemographic Characteristics and Socio-Economic Status

Trained personnel applied questionnaires to participants. The questionnaires were previously validated to collect sociodemographic characteristics. Sociodemographic characteristics such as household characteristics, goods, and available services were used to create a socioeconomic status index (SES) using principal component analysis. The SES was classified into three categories using the 33% and 67% percentiles of the index as cutoff points to create the low, medium, and high strata for SES [28].

2.5. Anthropometry

Trained personnel measured participants’ weight, height, and waist circumference using international protocols [21]. Weight in kilograms (kg) and height in meters were used to calculate body mass index (BMI, kg/m2). The result was categorized according to the WHO criteria [29]. For participants <19 years, we used STATA macro to analyze survey anthropometric data. For adult participants (>19 years), we used the following classification: normal BMI (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2), obesity (≥30.0 kg/m2). Abdominal obesity was defined as a waist circumference of ≥80 cm and ≥90 cm for women and men, respectively [30].

2.6. Adult Sample

BP was measured using a digital sphygmomanometer Omron HEM-907 XL following the protocol recommended by the American Heart Association [31]. Adults were classified with hypertension when they had a systolic BP ≥ 130 mmHg and/or a diastolic BP ≥ 80 mmHg and/or when they were under pharmacologic treatment for high BP.
Serum and urine biomarkers: The collection protocols for serum biomarker samples and urine samples were reported elsewhere [32]. Impaired fasting glucose was defined according to the American Diabetes Association classification [33]: prediabetes (fasting glucose ≥ 100 and < 126 mg/dL or HbA1c ≥ 5.7 and <6.5%) or diagnosis made during the survey (fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%). Altered serum lipid levels were considered if cholesterol was >200 mg/dL, triglycerides was >150 mg/dL, c-LDL > 100 mg/dL, and c-HDL < 60 mg/dL [34]. Serum creatinine level was calculated through the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation [35] based on the glomerular filtration rate (GFR, mL/min/1.73 m2) and categorized as follows: normal (≥90); mildly reduced (60–89); moderately reduced (30–59); and severely reduced (15–29) [35].
Smoking, previously diagnosed hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and/or acute myocardial infarction/angina pectoris were self-reported within ENSANUT-2016 using the following questions: “have you smoked?” and “do you currently smoke?”, or “has your doctor ever said you had diabetes or high blood sugar?” Each question was asked for each chronic disease. Those who responded “yes” were defined as self-reported current smoker; ex-smoker; or to have a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease and cerebro-vascular disease).

2.7. Ethical Considerations

All participants signed the informed consent approved by the Institutional Review Board of the MNIPH. The Ethics and Research Commissions of the MNIPH with the Commission number 1401 approved the original protocol. Bioethics registration 17 CEI00120130424 and COFEPRIS registration CEI 17 007 36.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Means, standard deviations, and confidence intervals (95%CI) of total Na and K intakes were estimated considering age group categories. We also estimated Na and K intakes according to sociodemographic characteristics and BMI. The food groups were ranked according to their contribution to Na and K intake by age group. We classified foods by processing level and eating occasions, stratified by age group, and estimated means and percentage contribution of food groups. The quartiles of Na and K intake were categorized by BMI, waist circumference, BP, lipids, glucose, previous medical diagnosis, and smoking.
We obtained the percentage and 95%CI of the population with a high Na intake, a low K intake, as well as an Na-K ratio > 1.0 according to sociodemographic characteristics. A high level of Na was considered when Na intake was above 800 mg for children 1–3 years; 1000 mg for children 4–8 years; 1200 mg for children 9–13 years, 1500 mg for adolescents 14–18 years; and 2000 mg for adults 19 years and older. K deficiency was considered when the intake of K was less than 2000 mg for children 1–3 years; 2300 mg for children 4–8 years; 2500 mg for male children 9–13 years; 2300 mg for adolescent women ages 9–18; 3000 mg for male adolescent ages 14–18; and 3510 mg for adults ages 19 and older.
To explore differences across categories, we used linear regression models and design-based Wald statistics for quantitative variables. We employed the design-based F-statistic Pearson Chi-square and logistic regression for categorical data. A general p < 0.05 value was considered to set the statistical significance. All the analyses were performed using the SVY command to consider the survey sample weights and the sample design of the ENSANUT-2016. All the analyses were carried out in STATA version 15 (College Station, TX, USA). Stata Corp. Release 14, vol. 1–4. College Station (TX): Stata Press.

3. Results

Data from 4219 participants were analyzed, representing more than 136 million Mexicans. Table 1 shows Na and K intake according to age group and sociodemographic characteristics. The mean intake of Na in pre-school children was 1512 mg (95%CI: 1377, 1647); in school-age children it was 2844 mg (95%CI: 2379, 3309); in adolescents (the age group with the highest intake), 3743 mg (95%CI: 3144, 4341); and in adults it was 3132 mg (95%CI: 2794, 3470). The mean intake of K in pre-schoolchildren was 1616 mg (95%CI: 1481, 1751); in school-age children, 2256 (95%CI: 1987, 2525); in adolescents, 2967 mg (95%CI: 2612, 3322); and in adults, 3401 mg (95%CI: 2862, 3939). The Na-K ratio was higher in school-age children (1.4, 95%CI: 1.1, 1.7) and adolescents (1.3, 95%CI: 1.3, 1.4).

3.1. Food Groups That Contribute to Sodium and Potassium Intake

Table 2 shows the 10 food groups that contribute the most Na and K to Mexicans’ dietary intake, categorized by age groups. The food groups that had the highest contribution to daily Na intake in preschool children were: dairy (197 mg), processed meats (148 mg), and condiments (77 mg); in school-age children: dairy (229 mg), processed meats (237 mg), and salty snacks (117 mg); in adolescents: dairy (287 mg), processed meats (269 mg), and salty snacks (172 mg); and in adults: red meat (197 mg), dairy (184 mg), and processed meat (179 mg). Also, by age group, the food categories that contributed the most to K intake in pre-school children were: dairy (397 mg), fruits (261 mg), and vegetables (169 mg); in school-age children they were: vegetables (350 mg), dairy (324 mg), fruits (279 mg), and corn tortillas (216 mg); in adolescents they were: fruits (415 mg), vegetables (386 mg), and corn tortillas (363 mg); and in adults they were: vegetables (702 mg), fruits (467 mg), and corn tortillas (401 mg).

3.2. Contribution of Na and K According to the NOVA Classification

Figure 1 shows the contribution of Na intake according to the NOVA classification in the Mexican population. Processed and UPF contributed 49% of Na intake in preschool children and school-age children; 50% for adolescents; and 39% for adults. Figure 2 shows the contribution of K intake according to the NOVA classification in the Mexican population. Potassium intake was lower for processed and UPF, contributing 31% of K intake for preschool children; 23% for school-age children; 22% for adolescents; and 14% for adults (Figure 2). The mean intake and contribution of Na and K according to the NOVA classification in the Mexican population is displayed in supplementary Table S2.

3.3. Na and K Intake: Health Risk

Table 3 shows the proportion of participants with high Na and K intake, as well as a Na-K ratio greater than 1.0. Among preschool children, 65% (95%CI: 51.7–76.9) had high SES, while 98% (95%CI: 90.3–99.6) of those who were overweight showed insufficient K. In addition, the lowest proportion with Na-K ratio > 1.0 was present in the southern region of Mexico (35.2%, 95%CI: 26.1–45.6). Among school-age children, a higher proportion of children with high Na intake was observed in urban areas (84.8%, 95%CI: 79.5–89.0), high SES (87.2%, 95%CI: 79.9–92.1), as well as among those children with obesity (88.0%, 95%CI: 80.0–93.1). The lowest proportion with insufficient K and a Na-K ratio > 1.0 was present in schoolchildren with obesity (60.3%, 95%CI: 48.7–70.8) and in those located in the southern region of Mexico (49.3%, 95%CI: 40.8–57.7), respectively. Among adolescents, a higher proportion of high Na intake was observed in those participants with overweight (82.4%, 95%CI: 75.8–87.5) and obesity (86.8%, 95%CI: 72.7–94.2). The lowest proportion with insufficient K was found in those located in the central region of Mexico (47.9%, 95%CI: 36.4–59.5). Among adults, a higher proportion of people with high SES consumed high amounts of Na (70.6%, 95%CI: 60.7–78.9).

3.4. Na and K Intake: Nutrition Status and Clinical Characteristics

Table 4 shows the quartiles of Na and K intake in adults according to the participants’ nutrition status and clinical characteristics. Adults in the fourth quartile of sodium intake (5049.6 mg/day) had lower cholesterol serum concentrations (181.4 mg/dL) and HDL-c (35.5 mg/dL) than adults in the first quartile (cholesterol 202.5 mg/dL and HDL-c 40.8 mg/dL) (p < 0.005). Adults who were in the fourth quartile showed lower levels of HDL-c (34.3 mg/dL) compared to those in the first quartile (41.6 mg/dL) (p < 0.005). Participants in the third quartile of K intake (2166.5 mg/day) had higher serum concentrations of LDL-c (123.5 mg/dL) compared to those in the first quartile (104.9 mg/dL) (p < 0.005).

4. Discussion

This study shows that the Na dietary intake in Mexicans exceeds the WHO recommendation (2 g/day) for preschool children, school-age children, adolescents, and adults. The main food sources of dietary Na were salt, cereals, dairy, and processed and red meats. For dietary K, all age groups consumed insufficient amounts of K according to the WHO and IOM recommendations. The main food sources of K were vegetables, dairy, fruits, tortillas, and legumes. In addition, processed and UPF and beverages contributed the most to dietary Na, while minimally processed or unprocessed foods contributed the most K in the diet. In addition, adults who consumed higher amounts of Na and K have a lower serum concentration of cholesterol, HDL-c, and LDL-c levels.
The Na intake found in this study was similar to that found in Latin American and the Caribbean countries, where the average Na intake is close to 3.4 g/day [36], observing higher intake in Brazil, Chile, and Colombia (>4.7 g/day). It is even similar to worldwide Na intake (about 3.9 g/day) [37]. Potassium intake is low in this population according to recommendations from international organizations [6,7]. Globally, it has been shown that the intake of this nutrient has increased in recent years, slightly exceeding the expectations (3.7 g/day) [38]. However, in countries such as Brazil, slightly low potassium intake has been identified, similar to the adult population in this study [39].
The intake of both nutrients may be due, in a large extent, to modified nutritional behavior [40,41,42]. Most countries have experienced a change in their traditional diets, shifting towards a western diet, which is characterized by increased intake of processed foods [43] and decreased intake of fruits and vegetables [44]. If this nutrient intake is maintained, it will continue to contribute to the main cause of mortality in Mexico and the years of life lost, also worsening years of life lost due to disability [45].
Our study showed that processed and UPF and beverages contribute the most to dietary Na, while minimally processed or unprocessed contribute the most K. This is expected since the higher the degree of processing, the greater the amount of critical nutrients that are added (such as sodium), while the lower the processing, the greater the amount of fiber due to the natural state of the product [25].
A study carried out in Canada found that the population that consumed a proportion of processed foods in their diet had a higher Na content and a lower K content; the opposite was observed in a diet that consisted of either minimally processed or unprocessed foods [46]. Similarly, a study in Australia found that individuals with higher intake of processed foods had more Na and less K in their diet, compared to those who have a low intake, which contributes more K and less Na in their diet [47]. Furthermore, this study showed that foods that are minimally processed contribute more than 50% of dietary K. If this trend continues, it might decrease K intake in our population and increase the Na-K ratio, posing a higher cardiovascular risk [48]. However, the studies that link NOVA classified foods with health events or diet quality do not use added salt, since this would contribute greatly to the group of culinary ingredients and would be the first source of sodium in the diet [49,50]. In this study, we include this source of Na (salt in preparations) within the culinary ingredients in the NOVA classification; however, processed and UPF provide between 40–50% of Na among the different age groups.
Our results showed an Na intake of 1512 mg/day and a K intake of 1616 mg/day for pre-schoolchildren. In Mexicans, the amount of Na is high for the age, however, the Japanese population (2300 mg) [51], Polish (1220 mg) [52], and Australian (3400 mg) [53] consume more Na. For K intake, it is higher in Japan (1700 mg) [51] and lower in Poland (947 mg) [52] and Australia (1119 mg) [53]. This may be due to eating patterns between countries. Also, the intake of processed foods may be greater in developing countries. Mexico exceeds amounts recommended by the WHO and the IOM, probably due to poor diet quality [54].
In school-age children, Na intake exceeded the WHO recommendation, while K intake was below the recommended level; the Na-K ratio was 1.4 (95%CI: 1.1, 1.7). These results coincide with those obtained in Indonesian children between 9 and 12 years, who had a high Na intake (>2300 mg/day) and a low K intake (<2500 mg/day) [55]. On the other hand, in Spanish children between 9 and 13 years old, Na intake was close to 2500 mg/day, while K intake was 2800 mg/day [56]. Guatemalan children (6–11 years) reported a low intake of Na (831 mg/day), as well as a low intake of K (1364 mg/day) [57]. These similarities may occur because in these countries the consumption of fruits and vegetables containing K is low, while the consumption of processed foods and UPF that contain Na is high. The main food groups that contribute to Na intake in this population group are salt, cereals, dairy products, processed meats, salty snacks, red meats, and seasonings. Food groups such as dairy, vegetables, fruits, as well as corn tortillas and root vegetables contribute the most K to the diet. These results are consistent with those obtained by Grimes et al., since they showed that in Australian children between 4 and 12 years, the main food groups that contributed to a high Na intake in the diet were cereals, as well as meat, poultry, condiments or seasonings, and flavored sauces. Regarding K intake, this population showed that milk products and dishes, as well as vegetables, fruits, meats, and cereals contribute most of the intake of this nutrient [58]. On the other hand, Cuadrado et al., showed that the main food sources that contributed Na to the diet in Spanish children between 7 and 11 years old were meats and meat products, cereals, grains and legumes, as well as pre-cooked and ready-to-eat meals [49]. This may also be due to the fact that non-basic foods that are high in fat and sugar, animal products, and milk and dairy derivatives were found to contribute 22% to total dietary energy in schoolchildren [43].
In adolescents, the mean dietary Na intake was higher, and the mean dietary K intake was below the levels recommended by international agencies. These results were consistent with international studies; for example, Portuguese adolescents showed a high mean dietary Na intake (3500 mg/day), while the mean dietary K intake was low (2150 mg/day) [59]. Furthermore, adolescents in Morocco reported consuming more than 2134 mg/day [57], while adolescents in China reported consuming a median intake of dietary Na of 4300 mg/day while consuming 1600 mg/day of dietary K [60]. In this population group, the main sources of foods that contributed Na were salt, cereals, dairy products, processed meats, salty snacks, and red meat. The main food sources that contributed a high K intake were fruits, vegetables, corn tortillas, dairy, legumes, and red meat [61]. These results were consistent with that of American adolescents since the main food sources that contributed to high Na intake were mixed dishes—pizza, mixed-Mexican dishes, as well as mixed avocado sandwiches, breads, rolls, and tortillas [61]. On the other hand, the main food sources that contributed to K intake were milk, white potatoes, fruits, 100% juices, poultry, and mixed-Mexican dishes [62]. This may be because this population group is the one that consumes the least fruits and vegetables compared to adults and those under 12 years of age. In addition, adolescents have been identified to have a Western diet pattern, which is characterized by high processed food and salt intake [43].
Mexican adults have a high Na intake (3132 mg/day), as well as a low K intake (3400 mg/day). The previous results were consistent with previous studies obtained from the SALMEX cohort in Mexico City [9]. This study showed that the estimated Na intake was high (2600 mg/day), while the (urinary) K intake was low (1982 mg/day) [9]. A study carried out in China showed that Na intake in the adult population was above 4100 mg/day, while K intake was between 1500 and 1600 mg/day [63]. Another study carried out with American adults showed that the mean population of Na intake was close to 3500 mg/day, while the mean K intake was close to 2800 mg/day [64]. Our results did not show a high proportion between Na-K ratio; however, other countries have shown that these proportions are above two [63,65], which was related to diastolic and systolic pressure. Mexican adults do not have enough K intake to comply with the WHO recommendations. K intake is higher than in other countries like China [63], probably because intake of non-basic foods in the adult diet is lower than that of minors [43].
Our results showed that the food groups that most contribute to Na intake are salt, cereals, red meat, dairy, processed meats, as well as seasonings, while the food groups that contribute the most to K intake are vegetables, fruits, corn tortillas, legumes, dairy, as well as root vegetables. These results are not very consistent with those obtained in a subsample of the SALMEX cohort, a local study that only includes a region of the country [20]. This may be due to the fact that our results have national coverage and there is a greater variety of food intake in different regions. A study conducted with Chinese adults showed that the main source of Na distribution was salt (69%), as well as soy sauce (8%) and processed food (6%) [66]. However, the Mexican diet is different from the Chinese; also, China has higher mortality rates attributed to high Na intake compared to Mexico [45]. In addition to the above, our results are consistent with a study conducted with Australian adults, in which the main sources of K intake were vegetables, meat, poultry, fruits, and milk products [65].
This study showed a relationship between higher sodium intake (fourth quartile) and cholesterol and LDL-c levels, compared to people who consumed less sodium (first quartile). These results are consistent with a review of randomized studies by Graudal et al. who showed an inverse relationship between sodium intake and serum cholesterol concentrations compared to those with high Na intake [67]; in addition, this review shows that decreasing sodium intake increases serum concentrations of undesirable lipids (Cholesterol, HDL-c, and LDL-c) [67]. In Denmark, it was found that salt intake is negatively associated with HDL-c but positively associated with triglycerides [68]. These associations should be viewed and interpreted with caution, since multiple biases influence the measure that comes from indirect methods that estimate sodium intake [69].
Finally, it is important to highlight that about 49% of Mexican adults have hypertension [70] and that the main cause of death is cardiovascular disease [71]. Our studies indicate that a large proportion of adults have a high intake of Na (64%) and an insufficient intake of K (65%). These findings indicate that the risk of suffering from hypertension or suffering from some complication is greater. Simulation studies carried out in Latin America have estimated that reducing sodium consumption as recommended by the WHO could reduce about 47,000 deaths from cardiovascular diseases, mainly from coronary, hypertensive, and cardiovascular disease, the equivalent of 85 million dollars in health care [72,73].
The main strengths of this study are that it is based on a representative sample, it includes all age groups nationwide, and is the first to identify Na and K intake as well as the main dietary sources of Na and K (among them the nova classification). The detailed dietary intake data were collected at the brand level for each food consumed, and Na values were updated with analytical data on Mexican foods. In addition, we utilized nutrition status and clinical characteristics biomarkers with a high precision in adults.
The main limitation of this study is that we estimate intake with a 24-h food recall, and this information does not come from a direct biomarker such as 24-h urine (reference method). The 24-h food recall tends to underestimate the intake of nutrients such as Na and K due to the lack of precision and memory of the participant, since this method is complex, requires a lot of work for both participants and field workers, and participants tend to change the consumption report in the dietary recall interview [69]. Furthermore, this study did not consider Na added at the table, but did measure Na used in food preparation, allowing for an even greater underestimation.
Furthermore, Na intake has been found to be highly correlated with total energy intake, due to the wide variety of foods and meals [69]. Likewise, it has been identified that Na consumption is higher in those with high BMI. In Mexico, 30% of children under 12 years of age, 36% of adolescents [74], and 70% of adults [75] are overweight or obese. Therefore, Na consumption is likely to be underreported.
Despite the above, the population information generated in this research is essential to have an approach in the consumption of Na and K in Mexico, which could be used for the design and evaluation of strategies to reduce the intake of Na and increase K intake in this country.

5. Conclusions

Our results show that all age groups have high Na and low K intakes, as well as an inadequate Na-K ratio according to international recommendations.
Also, there is a relationship between higher sodium intake and low cholesterol, HDL-c, and LDL-c levels, compared to people who consume less sodium.
In Mexico, it is important to promote a diet from an early age with foods rich in K, such as: fruits, vegetables, legumes, and milk. Although these foods are the main sources of K intake in this population; their current intake seems insufficient to provide enough K in the diet. The results of this article highlight the importance of implementing reformulation strategies in processed and UPF and beverages because they contribute the most to dietary Na. If this trend continues, the probability of having an unhealthy Na-K ratio will increase, along with cardiovascular risk.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu14020281/s1, Table S1: Description of the food groups used in the analysis of the food and beverage groups contributing to sodium and potassium intake. Table S2: Mean and contribution of sodium and potassium intake by Nova classification in Mexican population: ENSANUT 2016. Table S3: Mean intake and percentage contribution of sodium and potassium according to the Nova classification in the Mexican population: ENSANUT 2016.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.V.-M., M.A.C.-A. and I.C.-N.; methodology, J.V.-M. and I.C.-N.; formal analysis, M.A.C.-A., J.V.-M. and J.A.M.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, J.V.-M. and I.C.-N.; writing—review and editing, J.V.-M., C.N. and I.C.-N.; funding acquisition, I.C.-N.; Critical revision of the drafted manuscript, C.N., S.B., M.F.-A. and S.R.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies: Id #2019-71206.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All participants signed the informed consent approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Institute of Public Health in Mexico. This study was a secondary data analysis; Ethics and Research Commissions of the MNIPH with the Commission number 1401, Bioethics registration 17 CEI00120130424, and COFEPRIS registration CEI 17 007 36 approved the original protocol.

Informed Consent Statement

Participants signed the informed consent approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Institute of Public Health in Mexico.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the correspondence author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mariel White for the revision of the English language and the edition to the journal format.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride and Sulfate; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; ISBN 0309091586. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pirahanchi, Y.; Jessu, R.; Aeddula, N.R. Physiology, Sodium Potassium Pump; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  3. Grillo, A.; Salvi, L.; Coruzzi, P.; Salvi, P.; Parati, G. Sodium intake and hypertension. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Jr, R.C.M.; Schmidlin, O.; Frassetto, L.A.; Sebastian, A.; Morris, R.C.; Schmidlin, O.; Frassetto, L.A.; Sebastian, A. Relationship and Interaction between Sodium and Potassium Relationship and Interaction between Sodium and. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2013, 25 (Suppl. 3), 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Newberry, S.J.; Chung, M.; Anderson, C.A.M.; Chen, C.; Fu, Z.; Tang, A.; Zhao, N.; Booth, M.; Marks, J.; Hollands, S.; et al. Sodium and Potassium Intake: Effects on Chronic Disease Outcomes and Risks [Internet]; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US): Rockville, MD, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Sodium and Potassium; The National AcademiesThe National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-0-309-48834-1. [Google Scholar]
  7. OMS (Organización Mundial de la Salud). Ingesta de Sodio en Adultos y Niños; Organización Mundial de la Salud: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mozaffarian, D.; Fahimi, S.; Singh, G.M.; Micha, R.; Khatibzadeh, S.; Engell, R.E.; Lim, S.; Danaei, G.; Ezzati, M.; Powles, J. Global Sodium Consumption and Death from Cardiovascular Causes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 624–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Vega-Vega, O.; Fonseca-Correa, J.I.; Mendoza-De la Garza, A.; Rincón-Pedrero, R.; Espinosa-Cuevas, A.; Baeza-Arias, Y.; Dary, O.; Herrero-Bervera, B.; Nieves-Anaya, I.; Correa-Rotter, R. Contemporary dietary intake: Too much sodium, not enough potassium, yet sufficient iodine: The SALMEX cohort results. Nutrients 2018, 10, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Madriz, K.; Ramos, E.; Blanco-Metzler, A.; Saavedra, L.; Nilson, E.; Tiscornia, V. Policy Brief: El Desafío de Reducir el Consumo de sal/Sodio en la Dieta de la Población Latinoamericana; Tres Ríos, Costa Rica, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. Marrón-Ponce, J.A.; Tolentino-Mayo, L.; Hernández-F, M.; Batis, C. Trends in ultra-processed food purchases from 1984 to 2016 in Mexican households. Nutrients 2019, 11, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Arcand, J.; Blanco-Metzler, A.; Aguilar, K.B.; L’abbe, M.R.; Legetic, B. Sodium levels in packaged foods sold in 14 latin american and Caribbean countries: A food label analysis. Nutrients 2018, 11, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. OMS (Organización Mundial de la Salud). Ingesta de Potasio en Adultos y Niños; Organización Mundial de la Salud: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  14. He, F.J.; MacGregor, G.A. Beneficial effects of potassium on human health. Physiol. Plant 2008, 133, 725–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vallejo, M.; Colín-Ramírez, E.; Mancía, S.R.; Rosado, R.C.; Madero, M.; Vázquez, O.I.; Vargas-Barrón, J. Assessment of Sodium and Potassium Intake by 24 h Urinary Excretion in a Healthy Mexican Cohort. Arch. Med. Res. 2017, 48, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Organización Panamerica de la Salud. SHAKE Menos sal, más Salud. Guía Técnica Para Reducir el Consumo de sal; Organización Panamerica de la Salud: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cook, N.R.; Obarzanek, E.; Cutler, J.A.; Buring, J.E.; Rexrode, K.M.; Kumanyika, S.K.; Appel, L.J.; Whelton, P.K. Joint effects of sodium and potassium intake on subsequent cardiovascular disease: The Trials of Hypertension Prevention follow-up study. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. O’Donnell, M.; Mente, A.; Rangarajan, S.; McQueen, M.J.; O’Leary, N.; Yin, L.; Liu, X.; Swaminathan, S.; Khatib, R.; Rosengren, A.; et al. Joint association of urinary sodium and potassium excretion with cardiovascular events and mortality: Prospective cohort study. BMJ 2019, 364, l772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. O’Donnell, M.; Mente, A.; Rangarajan, S.; McQueen, M.J.; Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Yan, H.; Lee, S.F.; Mony, P.; Devanath, A.; et al. Urinary sodium and potassium excretion, mortality, and cardiovascular events. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 612–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Colin-Ramirez, E.; Espinosa-Cuevas, Á.; Miranda-Alatriste, P.V.; Tovar-Villegas, V.I.; Arcand, J.; Correa-Rotter, R. Food sources of sodium intake in an adult mexican population: A sub-analysis of the SALMEX study. Nutrients 2017, 9, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Romero-Martínez, M.; Shamah-Levy, T.; Cuevas-Nasu, L.; Méndez Gómez-Humarán, I.; Gaona-Pineda, E.; Gómez-Acosta, L.; Rivera-Dommarco, J. Diseño metodológico de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición de Medio Camino 2016. Salud Publica Mex 2017, 59, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Blanton, C.A.; Moshfegh, A.J.; Baer, D.J.; Kretsch, M.J. The USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method accurately estimates group total energy and nutrient intake. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 2594–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ramírez-Silva, I.; Rodríguez-Ramírez, S.; Barragán-Vázquez, S.; Castellanos-Gutiérrez, A.; Reyes-García, A.; Martínez-Piña, A.; Pedroza-Tobías, A. Prevalence of inadequate intake of vitamins and minerals in the Mexican population correcting by nutrient retention factors, Ensanut 2016. Salud Publica Mex. 2020, 62, 521–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ramírez Silva, I.; Barragán-Vázquez, S.; Rodríguez-Ramírez, S.; Rivera-Dommarco, J.A.; Mejía-Rodríguez, F.; Barquera-Cervera, S.; Tolentino, L.; Al, E. Base de Alimentos de México (BAM): Compilación de la Composición de los Alimentos Frecuentemente Consumidos en el País; Versión 18.1.1; Morelos, México, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Alimentos y Bebidas Ultraprocesados en América Latina: Tendencias, Efecto Sobre la Obesidad e Implicaciones para las Políticas Públicas; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015; ISBN 9789275718643. [Google Scholar]
  26. Monteiro, C.A.; Cannon, G.; Levy, R.; Moubarac, J.-C.; Jaime, P.; Martins, A.P.; Canella, D.; Louzada, M.; Parra, D. NOVA. The Star Shines Bright (Food Classification. Public Health). World Nutr. 2016, 7, 28–38. [Google Scholar]
  27. Marrón-Ponce, J.A.; Flores, M.; Cediel, G.; Monteiro, C.A.; Batis, C. Associations between Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods and Intake of Nutrients Related to Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases in Mexico. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2019, 119, 1852–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Vyas, S.; Kumaranayake, L. Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan. 2006, 21, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. World Health Organization (WHO). Chap 6. Construction of Body Mass Index- for-Age Standards; World Health Organization: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  30. World Health Organization (WHO). Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switerland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  31. Muntner, P.; Shimbo, D.; Carey, R.M.; Charleston, J.B.; Gaillard, T.; Misra, S.; Myers, M.G.; Ogedegbe, G.; Schwartz, J.E.; Townsend, R.R.; et al. Measurement of Blood Pressure in Humans: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension 2019, 3, e35–e66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hernández-Alcaraz, C.; Shamah-Levy, T.; Romero-Martínez, M.; Sepúlveda-Amor, J.; Aguilar-Salinas, C.A.; Rivera-Dommarco, J.; Kershenobich-Stalnikowitz, D.; Hernández-Ávila, M.; Barquera, S. Submuestra para el análisis de enfermedades crónicas con biomarcadores, Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2016. Salud Publica Mex. 2020, 62, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. American Diabetes Association. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 14–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cholesterol. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/cholesterol/cholesterol_screening.htm (accessed on 26 December 2021).
  35. Levey, A.S.; Stevens, L.A.; Schmid, C.H.; Zhang, Y.L.; Castro, A.F., 3rd; Feldman, H.I.; Kusek, J.W.; Eggers, P.; Van Lente, F.; Greene, T.; et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 150, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Carrillo-Larco, R.M.; Bernabe-Ortiz, A. Sodium and Salt Consumption in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Systematic-Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies and Surveys. Nutrients 2020, 12, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Powles, J.; Fahimi, S.; Micha, R.; Khatibzadeh, S.; Shi, P.; Ezzati, M.; Engell, R.E.; Lim, S.S.; Danaei, G.; Mozaffarian, D. Global, regional and national sodium intakes in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis of 24 h urinary sodium excretion and dietary surveys worldwide. BMJ Open 2013, 3, e003733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kumssa, D.B.; Joy, E.J.M.; Broadley, M.R. Global Trends (1961–2017) in Human Dietary Potassium Supplies. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pereira, T.S.S.; Cade, N.V.; Mill, J.G.; Sichieri, R.; Molina, M.D.C.B. Use of the Method of Triads in the Validation of Sodium and Potassium Intake in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0169085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Popkin, B.M.; Lu, B.; Zhai, F. Understanding the nutrition transition: Measuring rapid dietary changes in transitional countries. Public Health Nutr. 2002, 5, 947–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Popkin, B.M. The Nutrition Transition: An Overview of World Patterns of Change. Nutr. Rev. 2004, 62, S140–S143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Popkin, B.M.; Adair, L.S.; Ng, S.W. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr. Rev. 2012, 70, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. García-chávez, C.G.; Monterrubio-flores, E.; Ramírez-silva, I.; Aburto, T.C.; Pedraza, L.S.; Rivera-dommarco, J. Contribución de los alimentos a la ingesta total de energía en la dieta de los mexicanos mayores de cinco años. Salud Publica Mex. 2020, 62, 166–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Micha, R.; Khatibzadeh, S.; Shi, P.; Andrews, K.G.; Engell, R.E.; Mozaffarian, D. Global, regional and national consumption of major food groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis including 266 country-specific nutrition surveys worldwide. BMJ Open 2015, 5, e008705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Insitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Global Burden Disease Compare Data Visualization; IHME: Seattle, WA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  46. Moubarac, J.-C.; Batal, M.; Louzada, M.L.; Martinez Steele, E.; Monteiro, C.A. Consumption of ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada. Appetite 2017, 108, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Machado, P.P.; Steele, E.M.; Levy, R.B.; Sui, Z.; Rangan, A.; Woods, J.; Gill, T.; Scrinis, G.; Monteiro, C.A. Ultra-processed foods and recommended intake levels of nutrients linked to non-communicable diseases in Australia: Evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e029544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Schnabel, L.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Allès, B.; Touvier, M.; Srour, B.; Hercberg, S.; Buscail, C.; Julia, C. Association Between Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Mortality Among Middle-aged Adults in France. JAMA Intern. Med. 2019, 179, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Cuadrado-Soto, E.; Peral-Suarez, Á.; Aparicio, A.; Perea, J.M.; Ortega, R.M.; López-Sobaler, A.M. Sources of Dietary Sodium in Food and Beverages Consumed by Spanish Schoolchildren between 7 and 11 Years Old by the Degree of Processing and the Nutritional Profile. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Rauber, F.; da Costa Louzada, M.L.; Steele, E.M.; Millett, C.; Monteiro, C.A.; Levy, R.B. Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases-Related Dietary Nutrient Profile in the UK (2008–2014). Nutrients 2018, 10, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Koyama, T.; Yoshiike, N. Association between Parent and Child Dietary Sodium and Potassium Intakes: Aomori Prefectural Health and Nutrition Survey, 2016. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Merkiel, S.; Chalcarz, W. Preschool diets in children from Piła, Poland, require urgent intervention as implied by high risk of nutrient inadequacies. J. Health. Popul. Nutr. 2016, 35, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. O’Halloran, S.A.; Grimes, C.A.; Lacy, K.E.; Campbell, K.J.; Nowson, C.A. Dietary intake and sources of potassium and the relationship to dietary sodium in a sample of Australian pre-school children. Nutrients 2016, 8, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Rodríguez-Ramírez, S.; Muñoz-Espinosa, A.; Rivera, J.A.; González-Castell, D.; González de Cosío, T. Mexican Children under 2 Years of Age Consume Food Groups High in Energy and Low in Micronutrients. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 1916S–1923S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Farapti, F.; Sulistyowati, M.; Artanti, K.D.; Setyaningtyas, S.W.; Sumarmi, S.; Mulyana, B. Highlighting of Urinary Sodium and Potassium among Indonesian Schoolchildren Aged 9–12 Years: The Contribution of School Food. J. Nutr. Metab. 2019, 2019, 1028672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. López-Sobaler, A.M.; Aparicio, A.; González-Rodríguez, L.G.; Cuadrado-Soto, E.; Rubio, J.; Marcos, V.; Sanchidrián, R.; Santos, S.; Pérez-Farinós, N.; Dal Re, M.Á.; et al. Adequacy of Usual Vitamin and Mineral Intake in Spanish Children and Adolescents: ENALIA Study. Nutrients 2017, 9, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Saeid, N.; Elmzibri, M.; Hamrani, A.; Latifa, Q.; Belghiti, H.; El Berri, H.; Benjeddou, K.; Bouziani, A.; Benkirane, H.; Taboz, Y.; et al. Assessment of Sodium and Potassium Intakes in Children Aged 6 to 18 Years by 24 h Urinary Excretion in City of Rabat, Morocco. J. Nutr. Metab. 2018, 2018, 8687192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Grimes, C.A.; Riddell, L.J.; Campbell, K.J.; Beckford, K.; Baxter, J.R.; He, F.J.; Nowson, C.A. Dietary intake and sources of sodium and potassium among Australian schoolchildren: Results from the cross-sectional Salt and Other Nutrients in Children (SONIC) study. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e016639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Gonçalves, C.; Abreu, S.; Padrão, P.; Pinho, O.; Graça, P.; Breda, J.; Santos, R.; Moreira, P. Sodium and potassium urinary excretion and dietary intake: A cross-sectional analysis in adolescents. Food Nutr. Res. 2016, 60, 29442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Yu, A.Y.L.; López-Olmedo, N.; Popkin, B.M. Analysis of dietary trends in Chinese adolescents from 1991 to 2011. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 27, 1106–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. O’Neil, C.E.; Nicklas, T.A.; Fulgoni, V.L. 3rd Food Sources of Energy and Nutrients of Public Health Concern and Nutrients to Limit with a Focus on Milk and other Dairy Foods in Children 2 to 18 Years of Age: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011–2014. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Zárate-Ortiz, A.G.; Melse-Boonstra, A.; Rodríguez-Ramírez, S.; Hernández-Cordero, S.; Feskens, E.J.M. Dietary Patterns and the Double Burden of Malnutrition in Mexican Adolescents: Results from ENSANUT-2006. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Huang, L.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Ding, G. Associations of dietary sodium, potassium, and sodium to potassium ratio with blood pressure— regional disparities in China. Nutrients 2020, 12, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Sharma, S.; McFann, K.; Chonchol, M.; Kendrick, J. Dietary sodium and potassium intake is not associated with elevated blood pressure in US adults with no prior history of hypertension. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2014, 16, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Bolton, K.A.; Trieu, K.; Woodward, M.; Nowson, C.; Webster, J.; Dunford, E.K.; Bolam, B.; Grimes, C. Dietary Intake and Sources of Potassium in a Cross-Sectional Study of Australian Adults. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Fang, K.; He, Y.; Fang, Y.; Lian, Y. Dietary Sodium Intake and Food Sources Among Chinese Adults: Data from the CNNHS 2010-2012. Nutrients 2020, 12, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Graudal, N.A.; Hubeck-Graudal, T.; Jurgens, G. Effects of low sodium diet versus high sodium diet on blood pressure, renin, aldosterone, catecholamines, cholesterol, and triglyceride. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 2017, CD004022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Thuesen, B.H.; Toft, U.; Buhelt, L.P.; Linneberg, A.; Friedrich, N.; Nauck, M.; Wallaschofski, H.; Jørgensen, T. Estimated daily salt intake in relation to blood pressure and blood lipids: The role of obesity. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2015, 22, 1567–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. McLean, R.M. Measuring population sodium intake: A review of methods. Nutrients 2014, 6, 4651–4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Campos-Nonato, I.; Hernández-Barrera, L.; Oviedo-Solís, C.; Ramírez-Villalobos, D.; Hernández, B.; Barquera, S. Epidemiología de la hipertensión arterial en adultos mexicanos: Diagnóstico, control y tendencias. Ensanut 2020. Salud Publica Mex 2021, 63, 692–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). GBD Compare Data Visualization; IHME: University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2019; Available online: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ (accessed on 21 December 2021).
  72. Vega-Solano, J.; Blanco-Metzler, A.; Madriz-Morales, K.; Fernandes-Nilson, E.A.; Labonté, M.E. Impact of salt intake reduction on CVD mortality in Costa Rica: A scenario modelling study. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0245388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nilson, E.A.F.; Metlzer, A.B.; Labonté, M.-E.; Jaime, P.C. Modelling the effect of compliance with WHO salt recommendations on cardiovascular disease mortality and costs in Brazil. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0235514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shamah-Levy, T.; Cuevas-Nasu, L.; Gaona-Pineda, E.; Gómez-Acosta, L.M.; Morales-Rúan, M.D.C.; Hernández-Ávila, M.; Rivera-Dommarco, J.Á. Sobrepeso y obesidad en niños y adolescentes en México, actualización de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición de Medio Camino 2016. Salud Publica Mex. 2018, 60, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Barquera, S.; Hernández-Barrera, L.; Trejo-Valdivia, B. Obesidad en México, prevalencia y tendencias en adultos. Ensanut 2018-19. Salud Publica Mex. 2020, 62, 682–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 14 00281 g001 550
Figure 1. Percentage contribution of sodium intake by NOVA classification in the Mexican population: ENSANUT-2016.
Figure 1. Percentage contribution of sodium intake by NOVA classification in the Mexican population: ENSANUT-2016.
Nutrients 14 00281 g001
Nutrients 14 00281 g002 550
Figure 2. Percentage contribution of potassium intake by Nova classification in the Mexican population: ENSANUT-2016.
Figure 2. Percentage contribution of potassium intake by Nova classification in the Mexican population: ENSANUT-2016.
Nutrients 14 00281 g002
Table
Table 1. Sodium and potassium mean intake by age group according to sociodemographic characteristics and Body Mass Index in Mexican population. ENSANUT 2016.
Table 1. Sodium and potassium mean intake by age group according to sociodemographic characteristics and Body Mass Index in Mexican population. ENSANUT 2016.
Preschool ChildrenSchool-Age ChildrenAdolescentsAdults
n = 528N = 8,584,831n = 1095N = 16,144,480n = 1240N = 23,988,992n = 1356N = 87,921,191
Mean (SE)95%CIMean (SE)95%CIMean (SE)95%CIMean (SE)95%CI
Total (n = 4219; N = 136,639,494)
Sodium intake (mg/day)1512.2 ± 68.6(1377.1, 1647.2)2843.8 ± 236.1(2379.0, 3308.6)3743.2 ± 304.2(3144.4, 4341.9)3132.3 ± 171.9(2794.0, 3470.7)
Potassium intake (mg/day)1615.7 ± 68.6(1480.6, 1750.7)2255.7 ± 136.5(1986.9, 2524.5)2966.6 ± 180.3(2611.7, 3321.5)3400.6 ± 273.5(2862.1, 3939.0)
Na-K ratio1.1 ± 0.1(0.9, 1.2)1.4 ± 0.1(1.1, 1.7)1.3 ± 0.0(1.3, 1.4)1.1 ± 0.0(1.0, 1.2)
Sex
Women (n = 2312; N = 72,673,426)
Sodium intake (mg/day)1494.8 ± 95.6(1306.7, 1682.9)2817.2 ± 425.6(1979.5, 3655.0)3286.6 ± 240.2(2813.8, 3759.5)2927.9 ± 217.2(2500.3, 3355.5)
Potassium intake (mg/day)1594.4 ± 93.0(1411.3, 1777.6)2052.2 ± 77.6(1899.4, 2205.1)2560.6 ± 138.5(2288.0, 2833.1)3250.5 ± 427.4(2409.1, 4091.9)
Na-K ratio1.0 ± 0.1(0.9, 1.1)1.6 ± 0.3(1.0, 2.2)1.4 ± 0.1(1.2, 1.5)1.1 ± 0.1(1.0, 1.2)
Men (n = 1907; N = 63,966,069)
Sodium intake (mg/day)1528.6 ± 109.7(1312.5, 1744.6)2867.2 ± 253.4(2368.3, 3366.1)4236.6 ± 567.5(3119.5, 5353.7)3383.7 ± 257.2(2877.3, 3890.1)
Potassium intake (mg/day)1635.8 ± 96.6(1445.6, 1826.0)2434.6 ± 236.4(1969.2, 2900.0)3405.5 ± 329.3(2757.1, 4053.9)3585.0 ± 325.7(2943.7, 4226.3)
Na-K ratio1.1 ± 0.1(0.9, 1.4)1.3 ± 0.1(1.2, 1.4)1.3 ± 0.1(1.2, 1.5)1.1 ± 0.1(1.0, 1.2)
Area of residence
Rural (n = 2227; N = 37,106,754)
Sodium intake (mg/day)1439.1 ± 107.6(1225.8, 1652.3)2515.5 ± 243.5(2032.9, 2998.1)3498.7 ± 202.9(3096.6, 3900.8)3133.7 ± 375.8(2389.0, 3878.5)
Potassium intake (mg/day)1552.4 ± 100.4(1353.5, 1751.3)2193.2 ± 125.1(1945.2, 2441.1)2817.7 ± 135.3(2549.5, 3085.9)3626.9 ± 452.4(2730.3, 4523.5)
Na/-K ratio1.0 ± 0.1(0.9, 1.1)1.3 ± 0.1(1.1, 1.5)1.3 ± 0.1(1.2, 1.4)1.0 ± 0.1(0.9, 1.2)
Urban (n = 1992; N = 99,532,740)
Sodium intake (mg/day)1538.7 ± 84.6(1371.7, 1705.7)2978.9 ± 317.6(2352.0, 3605.9)3824.4 ± 398.5(3037.9, 4610.9)3131.8 ± 189.5(2757.7, 3505.9)
Potassium intake (mg/day)1638.7 ± 85.9(1469.0, 1808.3)2281.4 ± 185.6(1915.1, 2647.7)3016.1 ± 233.3(2555.6, 3476.6)3314.9 ± 337.7(2648.4, 3981.5)
Na-K ratio1.1 ± 0.1(0.9, 1.3)1.5 ± 0.2(1.1, 1.9)1.4 ± 0.1(1.2, 1.5)1.1 ± 0.1(1.0, 1.2)
Socioeconomic tertile
Low (n = 1464; N = 31,441,350)
Sodium intake (mg/day)1388.4 ± 112.4(1166.7, 1610.2)2368.8 ± 201.1(1972.1, 2765.5)2896.1 ± 144.7(2610.7, 3181.6)2854.5 ± 278.6(2304.9, 3404.2)
Potassium intake (mg/day)1483.7 ± 101.0(1284.4, 1683.0)2163.3 ± 250.4(1669.3, 2657.3)2701.7 ± 134.7(2436.1, 2967.4)3283.7 ± 261.1(2768.6, 3798.8)
Na-K ratio1.0 ± 0.1(0.9, 1.2)1.3 ± 0.1(1.1, 1.4)1.2 ± 0.0(1.1, 1.3)1.0 ± 0.1(0.8, 1.1)
Medium (n = 1516; N = 40,785,812)
Sodium intake (mg/day)1448.3 ± 108.6(1234.3, 1662.2)2958.1 ± 574.0(1827.6, 4088.7)4324.4 ± 772.5(2802.8, 5846.0)3264.8 ± 379.6(2517.0, 4012.6)
Potassium intake (mg/day)1637.2 ± 118.2(1404.3, 1870.1)1982.8 ± 116.5(1753.3, 2212.4)3423.6 ± 445.3(2546.4, 4300.8)3450.6 ± 486.4(2492.6, 4408.7)
Na-K ratio1.1 ± 0.2(0.8, 1.4)1.7 ± 0.4(0.9, 2.5)1.3 ± 0.1(1.1, 1.5)1.2 ± 0.1(1.0, 1.3)
High (n = 1239; N = 64,412,333)
Sodium intake (mg/day)1684.5 ± 126.3(1435.7, 1933.3)3053.3 ± 313.5(2435.7, 3670.9)3707.6 ± 271.0(3173.6, 4241.5)3186.0 ± 216.4(2759.6, 3612.4)
Potassium intake (mg/day)1692.7 ± 123.8(1448.7, 1936.6)2546.4 ± 264.9(2024.6, 3068.3)2745.9 ± 132.0(2485.8, 3005.9)3426.1 ± 463.0(2513.8, 4338.4)
Na-K ratio1.1 ± 0.1(1.0, 1.3)1.3 ± 0.1(1.1, 1.4)1.5 ± 0.1(1.3, 1.6)1.1 ± 0.1(1.0, 1.3)
Body Mass Index a
Normal (n = 2277; N = 49,562,419)
Sodium intake (mg/day)1477.9 ± 70.7(1338.6, 1617.1)2533.5 ± 327.7(1888.3, 3178.7)2894.7 ± 121.6(2655.2, 3134.1)2898.6 ± 234.6(2436.6, 3360.5)
Potassium intake (mg/day)1576.3 ± 73.3(1431.9, 1720.6)1878.3 ± 77.0(1726.8, 2029.9)2380.0 ± 93.7(2195.5, 2564.5)3072.9 ± 285.5(2510.8, 3635.0)
Na-K ratio1.1 ± 0.1(0.9, 1.2)1.5 ± 0.2(1.1, 1.9)1.4 ± 0.1(1.2, 1.5)1.1 ± 0.1(0.9, 1.3)
Overweight (n = 949; N = 35,937,427)
Sodium intake (mg/day)1097.8 ± 128.3(845.2, 1350.4)2376.3 ± 139.2(2102.2, 2650.4)2856.8 ± 138.7(2583.6, 3129.9)3110.9 ± 318.0(2484.5, 3737.3)
Potassium intake (mg/day)1064.5 ± 153.1(762.9, 1366.1)2103.3 ± 106.4(1893.7, 2312.9)2188.1 ± 108.7(1973.9, 2402.2)3163.4 ± 400.8(2374.1, 3952.7)
Na-K ratio1.1 ± 0.1(0.8, 1.3)1.2 ± 0.1(1.1, 1.4)1.4 ± 0.1(1.3, 1.5)1.1 ± 0.1(1.0, 1.3)
Obesity (n = 840 N = 42,639,888)
Sodium intake (mg/day)2194.8 ± 254.5(1693.5, 2696.2)2720.2 ± 224.5(2277.9, 3162.5)3359.6 ± 375.0(2620.7, 4098.4)3287.1 ± 257.1(2780.5, 3793.6)
Potassium intake (mg/day)2102.1 ± 131.4(1843.1, 2361.0)2095.6 ± 168.8(1763.1, 2428.1)2653.8 ± 252.6(2156.2, 3151.5)3786.6 ± 511.3(2779.3, 4793.9)
Na-K ratio1.1 ± 0.2(0.8, 1.5)1.5 ± 0.1(1.2, 1.7)1.3 ± 0.2(1.0, 1.6)1.0 ± 0.1(0.9, 1.2)
n, sample size; N, expanded sample. Bold numbers mean statistically significant difference vs reference category (p < 0.05). The reference category is the first row of each variable, except for the first variable where it is the first column. a Body mass index (BMI): <25 kg/m2 (normal); 25–29.9 kg/m2 (overweight); ≥30 kg/m2 (obesity). For those under 19 years of age, the BMI for age was used according to the WHO child growth patterns.
Table
Table 2. Dietary top 10 food and beverage groups contributing to sodium and potassium intake in Mexican population: ENSANUT 2016.
Table 2. Dietary top 10 food and beverage groups contributing to sodium and potassium intake in Mexican population: ENSANUT 2016.
Preschool ChildrenSchool-Age ChildrenAdolescentsAdults
Sodium
RankingFood Groupsmg/day% ContributionFood Groupsmg/day% ContributionFood Groupsmg/day% ContributionFood Groupsmg/day% Contribution
1Salt399.3 ± 41.326.8 ± 1.5Salt1016.9 ± 216.228.1 ± 1.2Salt1186.2 ± 133.732.2 ± 2.3Salt1153.5 ± 104.736.5 ± 1.5
2Cereals253.6 ± 38.713.4 ± 1.6Cereals458.1 ± 43.316.0 ± 1.2Cereals641.7 ± 117.013.6 ± 1.4Cereals448.5 ± 60.512.5 ± 1.1
3Dairy196.8 ± 12.316.1 ± 1.3Dairy228.8 ± 20.010.2 ± 0.6Dairy287.1 ± 44.38.4 ± 1.0Red meat197.3 ± 40.65.9 ± 0.9
4Processed meats148.1 ± 28.17.6 ± 1.2Processed meats237.1 ± 34.77.9 ± 0.8Processed meats268.7 ± 43.56.6 ± 0.9Dairy184.0 ± 16.96.7 ± 0.5
5Seasonings76.6 ± 20.14.4 ± 1.0Salty snacks116.9 ± 19.34.1 ± 0.4Salty snacks172.3 ± 34.44.0 ± 0.6Processed meats178.6 ± 31.64.5 ± 0.6
6Eggs42.7 ± 3.73.3 ± 0.3Red meat105.4 ± 17.03.6 ± 0.5Red meat159.0 ± 31.84.7 ± 1.2Seasonings125.0 ± 44.23.5 ± 1.0
7Salty snacks45.5 ± 15.42.3 ± 0.6Seasonings104.1 ± 30.22.7 ± 0.5Seasonings89.02 ± 19.12.5 ± 0.4Corn tortilla95.5 ± 8.64.4 ± 0.4
8Red meat27.8 ± 8.41.7 ± 0.4Corn tortilla52.2 ± 4.82.9 ± 0.2Corn tortilla87.6 ± 9.43.5 ± 0.3Eggs68.0 ± 8.92.9 ± 0.4
9Cereal-based sweets26.1 ± 6.11.8 ± 0.4Eggs51.6 ± 4.22.9 ± 0.3Sweet bakery bread80.3 ± 14.63.2 ± 0.6Sweet bakery bread63.4 ± 8.42.9 ± 0.4
10Non-cereal-based sweets26.5 ± 4.61.8 ± 0.2R-to-E Cereals51.1 ± 11.02.7 ± 0.4Eggs77.7 ± 9.12.7 ± 0.3Cereals based sweets60.3 ± 18.11.9 ± 0.6
Potassium
RankingFood groupsmg/day% ContributionFood groupsmg/day% ContributionFood groupsmg/day% ContributionFood groupsmg/day% Contribution
1Dairy396.7 ± 32.323.7 ± 1.7Vegetables350.3 ± 42.513.5 ± 0.9Fruits414.5 ± 67.711.7 ± 1.2Vegetables701.6 ± 124.817.7 ± 1.2
2Fruits260.7 ± 28.514.7 ± 1.2Dairy324.2 ± 29.115.6 ± 0.9Vegetables385.7 ± 46.713.2 ± 1.1Fruits467.0 ± 74.212.3 ± 0.8
3Vegetables168.7 ± 19.19.8 ± 0.8Fruits278.5 ± 22.312.1 ± 0.8Corn tortilla363.3 ± 38.913.8 ± 0.9Corn tortilla401.4 ± 35.713.9 ± 1.0
4Yogurt and milk-based drinks101.4 ± 14.55.9 ± 0.8Corn tortilla215.9 ± 19.910.8 ± 0.6Dairy360.4 ± 48.411.5 ± 0.9Legumes302.6 ± 38.19.3 ± 0.9
5Corn tortilla89.3 ± 9.16.4 ± 0.6Legumes149.8 ± 18.06.7 ± 0.5Legumes273.6 40.68.2 ± 0.8Dairy233.2 ± 26.67.9 ± 0.6
6Legumes81.4 ± 10.95.3 ± 0.6Root vegetables134.2 ± 34.14.2 ± 0.6Red meat161.4 ± 20.85.7 ± 0.4Root vegetables198.6 ± 47.84.5 ± 0.6
7SSBs carbonated75.6 ± 11.54.8 ± 0.8Red meat101.6 ± 11.74.8 ± 0.6Cereals100.2 ± 11.34.0 ± 0.4Red meat172.0 ± 24.35.9 ± 0.5
8Root vegetables59.4 ± 13.73.0 ± 0.5Cereals88.2 ± 6.74.5 ± 0.2Salty snacks98.2 ± 19.03.1 ± 0.5Cereals138.9 ± 27.74.2 ± 0.4
9Cereals55.8 ± 7.34.3 ± 0.5Yogurt and milk-based drinks82.1 ± 14.93.0 ± 0.4Poultry95.4 ± 23.73.4 ± 0.7Coffee and tea134.0 ± 36.93.5 ± 0.4
10Poultry45.2 ± 6.23.0 ± 0.4Poultry79.7 ± 11.43.3 ± 0.3Root vegetables88.7 ± 16.012.9 ± 0.4Poultry120.8 ± 21.14.2 ± 0.5
Salt refers to that reported in the preparations. SSBs, sugar-sweetened beverages. R-to-E Cereals, ready-to-eat cereals.
Table
Table 3. Proportions of high sodium, insufficient potassium intake, and sodium–potassium ratio by age group in Mexican population. ENSANUT-2016 1,2,3.
Table 3. Proportions of high sodium, insufficient potassium intake, and sodium–potassium ratio by age group in Mexican population. ENSANUT-2016 1,2,3.
Preschool ChildrenSchool-Age ChildrenAdolescentsAdults
High NaInsufficient KNa-KHigh NaInsufficient KNa-KHigh NaInsufficient KNa-KHigh NaInsufficient KNa-K
Total (n = 4219; N = 136,639,494)
Age73.6 (66.9, 79.4)73.3 (66.2, 79.4)41.5 (34.6, 48.8)82.1 (78.1, 85.6)67.1 (61.5, 72.3)61.1 (56.3, 65.8)81.6 (76.3, 85.9)58.0 (49.1, 66.3)62.5 (52.6, 71.5)64.1 (57.1, 70.5)65.6 (56.7, 73.5)45.7 (38.6, 53.0)
Sex
Women74.8 (67.0, 81.2)71.9 (61.6, 80.2)44.8 (35.3, 54.7)80.9 (75.4, 85.4)66.8 (59.8, 73.2)59.5 (53.3, 65.5)79.4 (70.5, 86.2)62.1 (49.5, 73.3)60.5 (44.2, 74.7)60.9 (51.0, 70.0)69.7 (55.0, 81.3)45.1 (35.0, 55.6)
Men72.5 (61.9, 81.1)74.7 (64.5, 82.8)38.4 (28.6, 49.2)83.2 (77.0, 88.0)67.4 (59.0, 74.9)62.6 (54.8, 69.7)84.0 (76.8, 89.3)53.5 (42.0, 64.7)64.8 (52.6, 75.3)68.0 (58.6, 76.1)60.4 (49.5, 70.4)46.4 (37.3, 55.8)
Area of residence
Rural71.8 (63.3, 79.0)80.5 (72.8, 86.5)40.3 (31.4, 49.9)75.6 (69.9, 80.5)67.1 (59.7, 73.8)52.5 (46.0, 58.9)79.3 (73.5, 84.1)54.0 (45.6, 62.2)60.2 (53.7, 66.4)65.6 (56.1, 74.0)61.5 (47.9, 73.6)37.8 (27.7, 49.1)
Urban74.3 (65.49,81.5)70.7 (61.4, 78.6)41.9 (33.1, 51.3)84.8 (79.5, 89.0)67.1 (59.7, 73.8)64.7 (58.5, 70.4)82.4 (75.5, 87.7)59.3 (47.8, 69.8)63.3 (50.0, 74.8)63.5 (54.5, 71.6)67.1 (55.8, 76.7)48.7 (39.6, 57.8)
Region
North73.2 (58.7, 84.1)70.8 (50.9, 85.1)55.4 (38.6, 71.0)81.4 (71.0, 88.6)75.4 (59.3, 86.6)67.1 (56.8, 76.0)89.5 (78.1, 95.3)76.9 (52.2, 91.0)58.2 (26.5, 84.3)70.8 (53.5, 83.6)52.4 (30.3, 73.6)45.8 (26.7, 66.2)
Center70.4 (55.9, 81.7)69.2 (55.7, 80.0)39.1 (26.9, 53.0)85.0 (79.2,89.4)64.7 (55.3, 73.0)65.8 (57.1, 73.6)81.2 (72.2, 87.7)47.9 (36.4, 59.5)67.0 (55.2, 77.0)71.3 (62.2, 78.9)68.4 (55.4, 79.0)47.2 (37.0, 57.7)
Mexico City and State of Mexico78.3 (63.1, 88.4)70.2 (49.5, 85.0)43.2 (26.0, 62.1)88.5 (76.1, 94.9)70.5 (56.9, 81.3)70.5 (59.0, 79.8)72.3 (56.8, 83.9)67.9 (55.4, 78.2)75.3 (57.6, 87.3)58.8 (44.7, 71.7)77.0 (64.5, 86.1)60.3 (46.5, 72.6)
South75.4 (65.6, 83.1)81.1 (71.5, 88.0)35.2 (26.1, 45.6)77.2 (68.9, 83.8)63.3 (53.4, 72.2)49.3 (40.8, 57.7)80.9 (73.5, 86.5)53.2 (41.1, 64.9)54.5 (42.7, 65.7)55.3 (42.0, 67.8)66.8 (52.3, 78.6)38.4 (27.3, 50.8)
Socioeconomic status
Low70.5 (60.5, 78.9)82.0 (71.2, 89.4)38.0 (28.2, 49.0)75.7 (68.8, 81.5)71.2 (61.7, 79.2)58.8 (50.7, 66.5)75.2 (67.1, 81.9)61.7 (51.3, 71.2)58.1 (49.2, 66.6)49.5 (35.6, 63.5)64.4 (50.8,76.0)37.3 (26.3, 49.9)
Medium71.4 (59.0, 81.3)74.3 (62.4, 83.5)39.2 (27.3, 52.5)81.0 (73.9, 86.6)72.0 (64.4, 78.5)59.2 (51.1, 66.9)83.7 (75.7, 89.5)52.2 (38.6, 65.5)63.2 (48.3, 76.0)64.1 (53.0, 73.8)63.4 (48.0, 76.5)48.5 (35.8, 61.4)
High78.7 (66.1, 87.5)65.4 (51.7, 76.9)47.0 (34.2, 60.1)87.2 (79.9, 92.1)60.4 (49.9, 70.0)64.2 (55.6, 72.0)83.1 (73.0, 89.9)60.6 (45.2, 74.1)64.1 (44.4, 80.0)70.6 (60.7, 78.9)67.2 (52.0, 79.5)47.9 (36.8, 59.2)
Body mass indexa (kg/m2)
Normal72.3 (65.1, 78.5)74.9 (67.0, 81.4)41.8 (34.3, 49.7)78.5 (72.8, 83.3)76.5 (70.8, 81.4)59.1 (53.2, 64.8)68.1 (61.0, 74.5)69.0 (62.8, 74.5)60.3 (52.3, 67.8)60.8 (47.6, 72.6)70.8 (57.1,81.6)45.4 (33.7, 57.8)
Overweight71.2 (29.6, 93.6)97.9 (90.3, 99.6)41.6 (14.0, 75.7)84.7 (75.4, 90.9)60.3 (48.7, 70.8)60.2 (48.4, 70.9)82.4 (75.8, 87.5)75.7 (65.5, 83.6)70.1 (60.6, 78.1)61.7 (51.5, 71.0)73.0 (59.7, 83.1)47.9 (37.9, 58.1)
Obesity10040.3 (11.0, 78.8)68.4 (28.8, 92.1)88.0 (80.0, 93.1)66.6 (49.4, 80.2)61.5 (48.1, 73.3)86.8 (72.7, 94.2)81.5 (58.1, 93.3)50.6 (19.4, 81.3)68.0 (56.7, 77.4)56.4 (41.7, 70.0)44.0 (32.0, 56.8)
n, sample size; N, expanded sample. Bold numbers mean statistically significant difference vs reference category (p < 0.05), using logistic regression models. The reference category is the first row of each variable; except for the first variable (age), which is the in first column (preschool children). Data present percentages and confidence intervals (95%) and were adjusted by the survey design. a Body mass index (BMI): <25 kg/m2 (normal); 25–29.9 kg/m2 (overweight); and ≥30 kg/m2 (obesity). For those under 19 years of age, BMI for age was used according to the WHO growth standards. 1 We used the references for adequate intake (AI) by age and sex for sodium and potassium for those ≤18 years from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019. Dietary Reference Intakes for Sodium and Potassium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. For those >18 years, the references for sodium and potassium intake used came from WHO. Guideline: Potassium intake for adults and children. Geneva, World Health Organization (WHO), 2012 and WHO. Guideline: Sodium intake for adults and children. Geneva, World Health Organization (WHO), 2012. 2 High sodium was determined when sodium intake was above 800 mg (1–3 years old), 1000 mg (4–8 years old), 1200 mg (9–13 years old), 1500 mg (14–18 years old), and 2000 mg (19 years old or older). Insufficient potassium was considered when potassium intake was under 2000 mg (1–3 years old), 2300 mg (4–8 years old), 2500 mg (males 9–13 years old), 2300 mg (females 9–13 years old), 3000 mg (males 14–18 years old), and 3510 mg (19 years old or older). 3 Na-K: Those that exceed the ratio of >1.0 were considered.
Table
Table 4. Nutrition status and clinical characteristics according to quartiles of sodium and potassium intake in adults: ENSANUT-2016.
Table 4. Nutrition status and clinical characteristics according to quartiles of sodium and potassium intake in adults: ENSANUT-2016.
Sodium Intake Quartiles (mg/day)nFirstSecondThirdFourthp
Mean95%CIMean95%CIMean95%CIMean95%CI
1356801.8(761.9, 841.7)1578.93(1517.6, 1649.2)2438.4(2381.6, 2494.9)5049.6(4579.4, 5519.8)-
BMI (kg/m2) a129428.7(27.2, 30.2)28.5(27.2, 29.8)28.7(27.0, 30.3)28.2(27.1, 29.4)0.966
Waist circumference (cm). Women55496.4(91.4, 101.3)93.5(88.9, 98.2)94.2(90.2, 98.2)94.1(90.8, 97.4)0.853
Men35698.562(89.8, 107.3)95.0(90.9, 99.1)98.1(93.8, 102.5)97.3753(92.0, 102.8)0.749
SBP (mm Hg)901123.2(119.7, 126.8)128.3(119.6, 136.9)120.5(117.1, 123.9)122.1(117.2, 127.0)0.373
DBP (mm Hg)90173.7(71.3, 76.2)76.4(73.1, 79.7)73.4(70.9, 75.8)72.1(69.6, 74.6)0.259
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)922116.6(110.6, 122.5)113.7(107.4, 120.1)123.3(108.2, 138.4)112.4(108.3, 116.5)0.486
Glucose (mg/dL)922107.4(101.4, 113.4)115.8(96.0, 135.5)109.9(98.0, 121.7)101.0(95.9, 106.0)0.185
Cholesterol (mg/dL) b922202.5(189.0, 216.0)193.5(178.4, 208.6)184.4(172.8, 196.1)181.4(173.6, 189.1)0.058
HDL-c (mg/dL) c92240.8(38.1, 43.6)35.7(31.6 39.8)38.9(35.2, 42.6)35.5(33.2, 37.8)0.026
LDL-c (mg/dL) d865123.6(110.1, 137)115.3(108.3, 122.3)111.9(102.3, 121.4)106.6(98.8, 114.3)0.156
TG (mg/dL), mean (95%CI) e922197.8(176.3, 219.3)361.5(79.9, 643.1)218.8(153.4, 284.3)220.5(170.3, 270.6)0.547
Diabetes f (%)
Prediabetes92624.6(17.4, 33.6)27.79(15.0, 45.6)32.92(21.7, 46.6)28.46(16.5, 44.6)0.548
Previous diagnosis 12.31(7.9, 18.8)8.107(4.6, 13.8)7.305(4.2, 12.4)6.175(3.3, 11.2)
Survey finding 9.9(3.7, 24.2)15.3(3.7, 46.4)9.1(2.4, 28.6)3.7(1.3, 9.9)
High blood pressure g (%)
Normal90143.6(31.3, 56.8)32.0(20.3, 46.5)42.3(29.7, 56.0)46.8(33.2, 60.9)0.213
Elevated 11.5(6.7, 19.2)11.8(4.9, 25.7)18.3(8.6, 34.9)15.3(8.4, 26.4)
Stage 1 23.7(13.3, 38.6)20.8(9.6, 39.4)21.7(11.1, 38.0)9.8(5.5, 17.0)
Stage 2 7.9(4.5, 13.5)25.6(10.4, 50.6)8.4(4.6, 15.0)11.4(4.4, 26.5)
Previous diagnosis 13.2(8.7, 19.6)9.7(5.6, 16.3)9.3(4.5, 18.3)16.7(8.0, 31.6)
Coronary heart disease (%)9260.7(0.1, 3.4)1.5(0.6, 4.2)1.9(0.6, 5.7)4.1(0.7, 21.7)0.385
Cerebro-vascular disease (%)9160.0 0.5(0.1, 3.3)0.1(0.0, 1.1)0.9(0.1, 6.0)0.580
Smoking (%)
Never92643.2(32.0, 55.1)65.8(51.5, 77.8)54.9(40.8, 68.2)31.8(21.3, 44.5)0.002
Current smoker 20.1(11.4, 33.1)6.4(3.6, 11.1)13.7(7.0, 25.2)30.9(18.4, 46.9)
Ex-smoker 36.7(26.2, 48.7)27.8(17.4, 41.3)31.4(20.2, 45.3)37.3(24.8, 51.8)
Potassium intake quartiles (mg/day)nFirstSecondThirdFourthp
Mean95%CIMean95%CIMean95%CIMean95%CI
1356965.4(921.1, 1009.7)1552.2(1510.6, 1593.7)2210.9(2166.5, 2255.5)5039.5(4338.9, 5740.1)-
BMI (kg/m2) a129428.3(27.1, 29.5)27.4(26.4, 28.5)29.4(28.2, 30.6)28.6(27.3, 29.9)0.096
Waist circumference (cm). Women55498.2(93.5, 102.9)93.6(89.4, 97.7)96.6(93.0, 100.3)92.1(88.9, 95.4)0.143
Men35691.4(87.5, 95.3)95.7(91.3, 100.0)98.4(94.8, 102.1)98.2(93.4, 103.1)0.056
SBP (mm Hg)901122.0(117.8, 126.2)122.4(116.8, 127.9)122.3(119.6, 125.0)123.7(118.6, 128.8)0.959
DBP (mm Hg)90173.9(70.6, 77.2)74.5(71.7, 77.2)74.4(72.1, 76.7)72.8(70.5, 75.2)0.758
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)922115.2(112.0, 118.4)117.6(110.4, 124.7)118.0(113.1, 122.8)115.3(107.2, 123.4)0.819
Glucose (mg/dL)922118.0(98.0, 138.0)102.0(97.1, 106.9)105.9(99.2, 112.6)106.7(97.5, 115.9)0.289
Cholesterol (mg/dL) b922181.8(172.1, 191.6)187.9(176.9, 198.8)198.7(187.8, 209.5)184.1(174.7, 193.6)0.112
HDL-c (mg/dL), c92241.6(39.3, 43.9)39.9(33.3, 46.5)40.1(37.7, 42.4)34.3(32.4, 36.1)0.000
LDL-c (mg/dL) d865104.9(95.7, 114.1)112.7(104.2, 121.2)123.5(113.5, 133.5)108.7(101.4, 115.9)0.036
TG (mg/dL), mean (95%CI) e922225.6(145.9, 305.2)224.9(113.0, 336.9)235.3(160.9, 309.8)258.7(145.3, 372.1)0.969
Diabetes f (%)
Prediabetes92624.7(14.8, 38.3)29.3(16.8, 46.0)24.8(14.9, 38.4)31.5(20.4, 45.2)0.505
Previous diagnosis 9.2(5.3, 15.5)9.8(5.8, 16.0)12.3(7.5, 19.5)5.0(2.8, 8.9)
Survey finding 17.8(4.5, 50.0)5.4(2.5, 11.4)5.2(1.5, 16.9)8.0(2.6, 22.2)
High blood pressure g (%)
Normal90147.4(31.5, 63.9)41.3(28.0, 56.2)36.1(25.8, 47.9)43.4(31.2, 56.4)0.754
Elevated 10.1(4.9, 19.6)9.4(5.0, 16.8)20.3(10.4, 35.8)15.9(8.7, 27.5)
Stage 1 24.5(9.3, 50.6)22.9(11.8, 39.8)19.3(10.6, 32.4)12.7(7.6, 20.6)
Stage 2 8.9(4.2, 18.1)12.7(5.1, 28.2)11.0(5.9, 19.5)14.8(6.5, 30.1)
Previous diagnosis 9.1(5.1, 15.6)13.7(8.1, 22.3)13.3(7.9, 21.6)13.2(6.3, 25.6)
Coronary heart disease (%)9261.0(0.3, 3.5)0.7(0.1, 4.6)3.2(1.2, 7.9)3.2(0.6, 16.8)0.496
Cerebro-vascular disease (%)9160.7(0.1, 5.3)0.000.2(0.0, 1.6)0.7(0.1, 4.6)0.699
Smoking (%)926
Never 58.2(42.3, 72.5)50.8(36.7, 64.7)45.4(33.7, 57.7)42.5(30.7, 55.2)0.691
Current smoker 17.8(8.9, 32.2)20.2(10.8, 34.5)22.4(12.9, 36.0)19.6(10.3, 34.0)
Ex-smoker 24.1(15.5, 35.4)29.1(19.6, 40.8)32.2(22.1, 44.2)37.9(26.7, 50.7)
Data adjusted by survey design. Bold numbers indicate a statistically significant difference between first quartile and other quartiles using Wald test for continuous variables (p < 0.05). a Body mass index (BMI): <25 kg/m2 (normal); 25–29.9 kg/m2 (overweight); ≥30 kg/m2 (obesity). b High total cholesterol levels: ≥200 mg/dL. c Low HDL-c levels (hypoalphalipoproteinemia): <40 mg/dL. d High LDL-c levels: ≥100 mg/dL. e High triglycerides levels: ≥150 mg/dL. f Diabetes classification: prediabetes (fasting glucose ≥ 100 y < 126 mg/dL or HbA1c ≥ 5.7 and < 6.5%); survey finding (fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%). g Blood pressure (mm Hg): normal (<120/80); elevated (systolic between 120–129 and diastolic < 80); stage 1 (systolic between 130–139 or diastolic between 80–89); stage 2 (systolic at least 140 or diastolic at least 90.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vargas-Meza, J.; Cervantes-Armenta, M.A.; Campos-Nonato, I.; Nieto, C.; Marrón-Ponce, J.A.; Barquera, S.; Flores-Aldana, M.; Rodríguez-Ramírez, S. Dietary Sodium and Potassium Intake: Data from the Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2016. Nutrients 2022, 14, 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14020281

AMA Style

Vargas-Meza J, Cervantes-Armenta MA, Campos-Nonato I, Nieto C, Marrón-Ponce JA, Barquera S, Flores-Aldana M, Rodríguez-Ramírez S. Dietary Sodium and Potassium Intake: Data from the Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2016. Nutrients. 2022; 14(2):281. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14020281

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vargas-Meza, Jorge, Manuel A. Cervantes-Armenta, Ismael Campos-Nonato, Claudia Nieto, Joaquín Alejandro Marrón-Ponce, Simón Barquera, Mario Flores-Aldana, and Sonia Rodríguez-Ramírez. 2022. "Dietary Sodium and Potassium Intake: Data from the Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2016" Nutrients 14, no. 2: 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14020281

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop