Next Article in Journal
Food Consumption and Dietary Patterns of Local Adults Living on the Tibetan Plateau: Results from 14 Countries along the Yarlung Tsangpo River
Next Article in Special Issue
Phytosterols, Cholesterol Control, and Cardiovascular Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Consumption of Monounsaturated Fatty Acids Is Associated with Improved Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Four African-Origin Populations Spanning the Epidemiologic Transition
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reduction of Cardio-Metabolic Risk and Body Weight through a Multiphasic Very-Low Calorie Ketogenic Diet Program in Women with Overweight/Obesity: A Study in a Real-World Setting
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Systematic Review of Carotenoids in the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy

by
Drake W. Lem
1,†,
Dennis L. Gierhart
2 and
Pinakin Gunvant Davey
1,*,†
1
College of Optometry, Western University of Health Sciences, 309 E Second St, Pomona, CA 91766, USA
2
ZeaVision, LLC, Chesterfield, MO 63005, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2021, 13(7), 2441; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13072441
Submission received: 30 May 2021 / Revised: 8 July 2021 / Accepted: 12 July 2021 / Published: 16 July 2021

Abstract

:
Diabetic retinopathy, which was primarily regarded as a microvascular disease, is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. With obesity at epidemic proportions, diabetes-related ocular problems are exponentially increasing in the developed world. Oxidative stress due to hyperglycemic states and its associated inflammation is one of the pathological mechanisms which leads to depletion of endogenous antioxidants in retina in a diabetic patient. This contributes to a cascade of events that finally leads to retinal neurodegeneration and irreversible vision loss. The xanthophylls lutein and zeaxanthin are known to promote retinal health, improve visual function in retinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration that has oxidative damage central in its etiopathogenesis. Thus, it can be hypothesized that dietary supplements with xanthophylls that are potent antioxidants may regenerate the compromised antioxidant capacity as a consequence of the diabetic state, therefore ultimately promoting retinal health and visual improvement. We performed a comprehensive literature review of the National Library of Medicine and Web of Science databases, resulting in 341 publications meeting search criteria, of which, 18 were found eligible for inclusion in this review. Lutein and zeaxanthin demonstrated significant protection against capillary cell degeneration and hyperglycemia-induced changes in retinal vasculature. Observational studies indicate that depletion of xanthophyll carotenoids in the macula may represent a novel feature of DR, specifically in patients with type 2 or poorly managed type 1 diabetes. Meanwhile, early interventional trials with dietary carotenoid supplementation show promise in improving their levels in serum and macular pigments concomitant with benefits in visual performance. These findings provide a strong molecular basis and a line of evidence that suggests carotenoid vitamin therapy may offer enhanced neuroprotective effects with therapeutic potential to function as an adjunct nutraceutical strategy for management of diabetic retinopathy.

1. Introduction

Although half a billion individuals are estimated to be living with this condition globally, diabetes remains severely underdiagnosed, with one in every two individuals living with the disease unaware [1,2,3]. It is further projected that the prevalence of diabetes is likely to increase to 700 million by the year 2045 [2,3,4]. The systemic disease of endocrine origin leads to progressive damage throughout the body with all end-organs suffering damage [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Chronic hyperglycemia causes irreversible damage to all parts of the eye. Both the anterior segment structures, cornea, conjunctiva, and lens as well as the posterior segment become damaged [6,11,12]. In the posterior segment, particularly the retina in an individual shows pathognomonic damage, leading to diabetic retinopathy (DR) [6,7,11,12]. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) has reached epidemic proportions [4,12]. Increased life expectancy and the chronic nature of diabetes with no “true” cure has led to and will continue being a massive health care and socio-economic burden [2,3,5,13,14]. Consequently, it is expected that annual global expenditures will exceed USD 825 billion by the year 2030 [15].
The natural history of DR features retinal capillary degeneration and subsequent significant visual impairment [16], when poorly managed, causes vasoproliferative disease in retina and/or edema in the central macular region; these complications may arise consecutively or simultaneously [11,12]. Approximately one in three individuals with diabetes is affected by retinopathy [4,5,6,7]. The severity of DR is associated with both with the duration of diabetes and glycemic control [17,18]. An estimated 4.1 million individuals in the US are afflicted with DR, of which approximately 899,000 have vision-threatening retinopathy [1]. It is estimated globally that 146 million adults have DR with a projected increase to 191 million by 2030 [2,3,14]. The vision loss due to hyperglycemia-induced retinopathy is irreversible as the retinal tissue does not regenerate. However, the damage due to diabetes and DR is preventable, and thus allows for a potential of improvement in the quality of life, decrease in susceptibility to further complications, and reducing health care expenditures [4,7].
Hyperglycemia-induced damage to other parts of the body has been shown to correlate with the severity of DR, including peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy and cardiovascular complications [5,6,7,8,9,10]. It is well known that chronic hyperglycemic states promote oxidative damage particularly in highly susceptible regions with corresponding high metabolic demands. The extremely metabolically active retinal tissue is particularly susceptible to oxidative damage due to constant exposure to light [19,20]. Recent work strongly implicate that neurodegeneration in retina is proliferated by pro-oxidative and pro-inflammatory mechanisms prior to indications of clinical retinopathy [5,7,10,18,20,21,22,23,24]. Inherent defense mechanisms against oxidative damage in the retina involve constant neutralization of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Congruously, both endogenous and exogenous antioxidants are essential in maintaining cellular redox homeostasis [20,25,26]. Quite appropriately, it is postulated that the interdependence between prolonged hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, and changes in redox homeostasis is a key factor contributing to the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy [19,25].
More than 750 naturally occurring phytochemical carotenoids have been identified and characterized, of which, approximately 20 types are present in serum and tissue [27,28,29,30]. Among them, the only dietary carotenoids which accumulate in the human eye are lutein and zeaxanthin [27,30]. They belong to the xanthophyll class of carotenoids which contain oxygen in their polyene chain structure and are more lipophilic in comparison with the other subgroup of carotenoids known as carotenes, which do not contain oxygen and are purely hydrocarbons [27,31]. Three isomeric xanthophyll carotenoids—lutein, zeaxanthin, and meso-zeaxanthin (Figure 1)—are believed to possess significant antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties in the retina and have been shown to benefit in prevention of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [25,27,32,33,34,35]. Oxidative insult contributing to retinal neurodegeneration is common to the pathogenesis of both DR and AMD. Hence, it is hypothesized that xanthophyll carotenoids may be clinically beneficial in management of DR.
To the best of our knowledge, the neuroprotective potential afforded by these xanthophylls in clinical management of DR has not been thoroughly reviewed. The primary objective of this systematic review focuses on summarizing the evidence from animal models, clinical observational studies, and randomized controlled trials that have reported on the putative relationship between DR and carotenoids lutein, zeaxanthin, and/or meso-zeaxanthin. Thus, the goal of this systematic review is to determine the degree of clinical benefits of carotenoids as an adjunct therapy for the management of DR.

Retinal Changes in Diabetics

Retinal changes in diabetes are graded by fundoscopic lesions as outlined by the International Clinical Disease Severity Scale [12,13,16,36,37,38]. Large-scale clinical trials established the severity classification system (Table 1) that is currently used: The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) and the Wisconsin Epidemiological Study of DR (WESDR) [16,37,38,39]. Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) is seen as microvascular abnormalities limited to the retinal surface. Additionally, some other features visible are intraretinal hemorrhages (“dot and blot” shaped), microaneurysms, hard exudates, and intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (i.e., tortuous sinus shunt vessels) [37,38,39]. The degeneration of capillaries and apoptosis in the endothelium are an outcome of progressive oxidative damage in this stage that leads to capillary nonperfusion and vascular occlusion leading to retinal ischemia/hypoxia. This compromises oxygenation and further aggravates oxidative and pro-inflammatory processes in the extremely metabolically-active retina [17,18,36]. These events promote angiogenesis due to the release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [17,18,36,40]. The manifestation of cotton wool spots represents hypoxic retina that leads to neurodegeneration [18]. Subsequent retinal neovascularization with aberrant angiogenesis marks disease progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). The new blood vessel formation is an ineffectual attempt to re-establish vascular perfusion and restore homeostasis. However, the response mechanism itself paradoxically further threatens function and viability of the retina ensuing leakage or hemorrhaging into the vitreous cavity, which can lead to retinal detachment and irreversible vision loss [12,13,16,36].
Structural and cellular changes to the retinal architecture enhance permeability, con-tributing to the break in the blood–retinal barrier that leads to diabetic macular edema (DME); the primary cause of significant vision loss in DR [17,36]. Signs of overt edema are seen during fundoscopic exam. However, subtle edema, evidenced by thickening of basement membrane and presence of exudates, is best visible using optical coherence tomography (OCT) [41,42]. It is extremely important to note, the onset of DME can occur at any stage of DR [5,36].

2. Diabetic Retinopathy and Macular Pigment

2.1. Basics of Macular Pigment

The yellow spot that is visible during ophthalmoscopy is due to macular pigment, which contains three carotenoids—(1) lutein, (2) zeaxanthin, and (3) a stereo isomer of zeaxanthin called meso-zeaxanthin [43,44]—which are known as macular xanthophylls. They are uniquely concentrated in the fovea centralis. A recent study that used confocal resonance Raman microscopy showed that although both lutein and zeaxanthin are concentrated in the fovea, zeaxanthin mainly accumulates in the inner plexiform, outer plexiform and outer nuclear layers of the retina [43,44,45,46,47]. Lutein is more diffusely distributed throughout the macula and is present at lower concentrations in comparison to zeaxanthin at the fovea [47]. Humans have lost the ability to synthesize lutein and zeaxanthin in vivo and thus lutein and zeaxanthin can only be acquired through dietary intake [27]. Common food sources that can provide these xanthophylls are green leafy cruciferous vegetables and egg yolks [44,48,49,50]. Unless artificially supplemented, meso-zeaxanthin found in the retina is an outcome of biochemical conversion of lutein via RPE65 isomerase in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) [44,47,48,51,52,53,54]. The biological processes involving the uptake, metabolism, and transport of xanthophyll carotenoids to the retina have been explored in greater depth in these review articles [27,28,44,48,51,53,54,55,56]. Supplementation of macular xanthophylls improves their levels in the serum [44,48,52,57] and is well known to accumulate in the human retina [27,43,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68].
Clinical measurement of the macular pigment optical density (MPOD) is as close as we can get to quantification of macular carotenoids. The level of MPOD is indeed a biomarker and is strongly associated with maintenance of retinal health and optimal visual function in both health and disease [44,46,50,59]. Prior reports have demonstrated that carotenoids afford enhanced protection in the retina, specifically in the central region, via two proposed mechanisms: (1) acting as a naturally occurring blue light filter or blocker, and (2) a potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory substance in the retina [44,50,59,69,70,71,72]. The short-wavelength (blue) light triggers production of ROS due to photo-oxidation that leads to damage of the lipid bilayer in cell membranes, proteins, and DNA, in addition to mitochondrial dysfunction which leads to cellular necrosis [44,70,71,72,73,74]. Absorption of the blue light by macular pigment prevents formation of ROS and the consequent oxidative injury triggered by photo-oxidation [43,72,73]. These properties of carotenoids in macular pigment may in part explain how MPOD levels provide neuroprotective capabilities in the retina.

2.2. Measuring MPOD

There are several techniques available to effectively quantify MPOD in vivo [27,46,50,75,76,77,78,79,80]. The techniques can be broadly divided into two types: (1) subjective—that is, requiring patient response or participation and (2) objective—that is, requiring minimal to no participant involvement to collect measurements [46,50,75,77,81,82,83,84].
Heterochromatic flicker photometry (HFP) is the most widely used technique to measure MPOD [46,50,75,76,78,79]. The precise mechanism used to measure macular pigment levels by HFP devices may vary based on the manufacturer, which has been described in prior literature [27,45,46,50,69,77,78,85,86,87]. Briefly, current HFP devices adjust the intensity of the blue to green ratio in the target stimuli, which is perceived as a flicker. Steady light is observed when the blue component is fully absorbed by the macula, and only green is visible. This is the lowest point in the absorption curve that is measured and converted to MPOD density units [46,50,77,79,80,88,89].
Fundus reflectometry [61,83,90,91,92,93], fundus autofluorescence [81,82,94] and resonance Raman spectroscopy [47,95,96] are all non-invasive, objective imaging modalities that can measure MPOD [50,75]. Details regarding both subjective and objective techniques to measure MPOD can be found in these review articles [27,45,46,50,75,82,94,97,98].

3. Materials and Methods

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines [99].

3.1. Literature Search and Selection Strategy

Two authors (PGD and DWL) performed a wide-ranging search of the scientific databases National Library of Medicine and Web of Science to identify all relevant publications reporting on the association between macular carotenoids and DR until 21 December 2020. Under the guidance of the university librarian, the two authors conducted the full search strategy and data collection together using the following keywords and the combination of their variants during the search query: carotenoids, lutein, zeaxanthin, meso-zeaxanthin, macular pigment, macular pigment optical density, MPOD, diabetes, diabetic eye disease, and diabetic retinopathy. The database selection strategy was limited to records pertaining to macular carotenoids (i.e., lutein and/or zeaxanthin and/or meso-zeaxanthin) and diabetic retinopathy only. Primary search results were identified for initial screening according to titles and abstracts available in English by PGD and DWL. Among the eligible records, full-text publications were retrieved and evaluated for study inclusion or exclusion criteria. To ensure all relevant studies were included in this review, we individually conducted backward and forward searches of the eligible publications by reviewing reference lists and cited references, respectively. All records retrieved in full text were individually screened and evaluated by two authors (PGD and DWL) for inclusion/exclusion and any discrepancies were resolved through discussion involving the third author (DLG). Selected publications were quantitative research articles evaluating the association between MPOD/carotenoids (including lutein and/or zeaxanthin and/or meso-zeaxanthin) and diabetic retinopathy. Additional records involving other forms of diabetes-associated ocular disease were not considered in this review (such as diabetic cataract, diabetic anterior segment or corneal changes associated with hyperglycemia). The full inclusion criteria for eligible publications from experimental and clinical studies are outlined below.

3.2. Study Selection

Experimental animal studies included in this review met the following criteria: (1) evaluating the effects of treatment with carotenoids (including lutein, L and/or zeaxanthin, Z) on outcomes of retinal neurodegeneration, such as markers of oxidative stress, cell viability and visual performance in murine models of DR; (2) carotenoid interventions include powder diet supplemented with L and/or Z only, nutraceutical diet containing L/Z, and powder diet supplemented with micronutrient formula containing L/Z; (3) presentation of DR pathology induced using standard induction methods (i.e., administration of the drug alloxan/streptozotocin, high-sugar diet, and surgical or chemically-induced damage) or genetic models (namely the Leprdb model) in rodents only; and (4) experimental models of type 1 or type 2 diabetes in rodents were included.
Inclusion criteria for this systematic review were: (1) observational studies evaluating the association among macular xanthophylls and DR; (2) prospective randomized clinical trials assessing the benefits of carotenoid vitamin therapy in diabetic patients; (3) interventions include dietary carotenoid supplementation (containing L and/or Z) or in a multivitamin formula containing micronutrients and antioxidants; (4) assessment of macular carotenoid levels reported by serum/plasma concentrations of L/Z, or by validated MPOD measurement techniques; (5) cohorts of diabetic patients (type 1 diabetes mellitus, T1DM; and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus, T2DM); and (6) study cohorts of both T1DM and T2DM with either no retinopathy present or mild/moderate NPDR.
Exclusion criteria were based on the following: (1) carotenoid treatment did not include either lutein and/or zeaxanthin in formulation/design; (2) carotenoid treatment included other types of carotenoids; (3) experimental diabetes pathology (as listed previously) were not standard methods of induction; (4) inclusion of adults with other forms of diabetes associated eye disease; and (5) publications were not available in English.

3.3. Data Extraction, Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment

The PRISMA reporting guidelines were carefully followed as closely as possible, as discussed previously [99]. The risk of bias was assessed using standard metrics established to evaluate the intervention studies and randomized controlled trials. The SYRCLE’s RoB tool which is an adaptation of Cochrane RoB tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias for the animal studies [100]. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias for the randomized controlled trials [101].

4. Results

4.1. Search and Selection of Studies

In total, 397 studies were identified during the primary search from scientific databases (Figure 2). After removing duplicate records and including additional records retrieved from reference list searches, 281 studies remained for titles and abstract screening. Consequently, 103 records were excluded based on article type, with an additional 148 records excluded due to the aforementioned inclusion criteria for clinical and preclinical studies. Finally, 30 records were identified to be eligible for full-text assessment, of which, 18 studies were included in the final review: seven preclinical studies [102,103,104,105,106,107,108], nine observational clinical studies [19,25,109,110,111,112,113,114,115] and two interventional clinical trials [34,116].

4.2. Carotenoids in the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy—Animal Studies

Figure 3 provides a summary of the assessment of risk of bias using the SYRCLE’s RoB tool [100]. The studies were unclear on performance bias blinding and outcome assessment blinding was not performed (see Figure 3). However, given that studies have utilized laboratory analysis and histology and not psychophysical response measured in animals or subjective interpretations we can overall safely conclude that the overall risk of bias in these studies were low.
There is an increasing amount of research and animal trials that substantiate the neuroprotective effects of carotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin in rodent models of DR using either chemical induction or genetic modes to engender diabetic state (Table 2) [102,103,104,105,106,107,108]. Pharmacological injection of alloxan or streptozotocin (STZ) are often used to recapitulate T1DM pathology in both mice and rats through death of pancreatic beta cells and subsequent insulin deficiency [102,103,104,105,106,117,118,119,120]. Genetic modes offer unique models to examine pathophysiological mechanisms of metabolic perturbations that may contribute to incident retinopathy; in particular, leptin receptor deficient (db/db) mice develop morbid obesity and hypoinsulinemia, making them a desirable model for replicating conditions found in T2DM [107,108,118,119,120]. Importantly, these murine models mimic the characteristic pathological changes induced by hyperglycemia, including oxidative stress driven by free radicals, chronic low-grade inflammation, morphological abnormalities from capillary cell death, and visual dysfunction. Results from these studies are congruous, indicating that lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation has significant potential to protect the retina from the onset of DR.
The importance of macular carotenoid’s antioxidant properties is evident by their enhanced capacity to ameliorate the extent of oxidative injury caused by hyperglycemia in diabetic retina. Supplementation with lutein and/or zeaxanthin was shown to protect against measures of oxidative and nitrosative stress, marked by significant reductions in malondialdehyde, 8-OHdG (oxidatively-modified DNA), and nitrotyrosine, respectively [102,103,105,117,121,122,123]. Additionally, one study found that micronutrients containing carotenoids prevented a significant rise in retinal ROS levels in T1DM rats following treatment with the EyePromise Diabetes and Visual Function Study (DVS) formula (ZeaVision LLC, Chesterfield, MO, USA) [104,124]. These findings suggest that the mechanism of protection against oxidative damage to the retina may involve improving mitochondrial dysfunction, the primary source of aberrant free radical production as a consequence of hyperglycemia [26,125,126,127,128,129]. In fact, lutein and zeaxanthin were shown to protect against mitochondrial stress induced by T1DM pathology, and improved retinal expression of mtDNA-encoded proteins involved in oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial biogenesis [26,102,103,108,117]. Thus, dietary treatment using lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation may prevent early lesions of retinopathy by alleviating pro-oxidant stressors and redox imbalance propagated by hyperglycemic state.
Dietary augmentation of the compromised endogenous antioxidant defenses has been considered the key modulator in the pathogenesis of DR. Multiple studies found that lutein and zeaxanthin recovered enzymatic activity and expression levels of glutathione, glutathione peroxidase and manganese superoxide dismutase [102,103,105,107,117]; indicating a reversal of hyperglycemic-induced impairment in free radical detoxification and clearance mechanisms [26,121,130,131]. Similarly, one animal model demonstrated that an AREDS-based micronutrient formulation improved total antioxidant capacity in the retina, as well as metabolic abnormalities associated with early stages of retinopathy progression [104]. By regenerating endogenous antioxidant capacity, dietary supplementation with lutein and zeaxanthin may serve to reduce the proliferation of consequent damage brought on by oxidative stress and inflammation in diabetic retina [104,121,130,131,132,133,134,135,136].
Macular carotenoids may further protect against retinal neurodegeneration by limiting activation of low-grade inflammatory pathways triggered by metabolic and oxidative insults concomitant with hyperglycemic conditions [17,18,21,22,132,133,137,138]. Consistent with this, carotenoid supplementation was shown to mitigate T1DM-induced increase in retinal pro-inflammatory mediators, such as nuclear transcriptional factor-B (NF-kB), interleukin-1β and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 [103,104,105,137,139,140,141,142,143,144,145]. In addition, several studies found that carotenoids demonstrated significant potential to offset pathogenic factor associated with pivotal changes observed in early and advanced stages of retinopathy [17,21,22,104,108,117]; namely, increased cell permeability and neovascularization, respectively [133,135,136,142,146,147]. This neuroprotection following lutein and zeaxanthin administration was evidenced by attenuating the upregulation of pro-angiogenic factor VEGF in diabetic retina of mice and rats [104,108,117]. Preliminary reports suggest carotenoids may protect the local retinal tissue by reducing pro-inflammatory signaling, thereby limiting exacerbation of the inflammatory response to surrounding tissues [138,143,144,148].
The neuroprotective potential of lutein and zeaxanthin positively influencing the pathogenesis of DR was most substantial preventing changes in retinal morphology as a consequence of accelerated capillary cell loss induced by hyperglycemia; regarded as hallmark features of early-stage retinopathy [17,18,148,149,150,151,152,153]. Lutein and zeaxanthin improved cell viability and markedly enhanced cell survival of the retinal vasculature, which was marked by significant reduction in apoptotic nuclei and formation of degenerative (acellular) capillaries [102,103,104,106,154,155]. Similarly, carotenoid treatment completely reversed significant loss of ganglion cells caused by hyperglycemic state in murine model [102,106,107]. Studies found lutein and zeaxanthin effectively protected against DM-induced alterations in retinal histology, such as accelerated thinning of the ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), inner nuclear layer (INL), outer nuclear layer (ONL), and the photoreceptor layer (inner and outer segment) [102,106,107]. It is important to note, improvement in the photoreceptor layer indicate that the extent of augmentation in cell survival following lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation can be seen maintaining both vascular and non-vascular cells throughout the retina.
Experimental studies strongly suggest that carotenoids may sufficiently protect against the cumulative effect of hyperglycemic-induced retinopathy, or rather progressive neurodegeneration in retinal function made evident by abnormal or delayed response on electroretinogram (ERG). Studies found that lutein and zeaxanthin preserved measures of inner retinal function at the post-receptor level, attenuating DM-induced reduction in oscillatory potentials and the amplitudes of both a- and b-waves on ERG [102,104,105,106,156,157,158,159]. Increased retinal expression of synaptophysin and brain-derived nuclear factor (BDNF) seem to corroborate these findings, wherein greater synaptic activity and cell survival in the inner retina were observed following supplementation with lutein and zeaxanthin [106,160,161,162,163]. Thus, preliminary findings offer substantial evidence demonstrating neuroprotective effects of macular carotenoids preventing vision loss in models of both type 1 and type 2 diabetic retina.
Although results from these animal models are promising, interpretation of the immediate translative potential for clinical application must be performed with prudence. Briefly, accumulation of carotenoids in the macula is unique to primate retinas, and therefore macular pigments cannot be fully studied using only rodent models of DR [27,164,165]. It is important to note the potential limitations depending on the method of DM-induction utilized in rodents; namely, pathophysiological differences in T1DM (via pharmacological injection with STZ/Alloxan) compared to T2DM (using genetic modes) [118]. For instance, while models of T1DM using STZ are more common since it results in the fastest rate of disease progression, evidence from these reports is not directly comparable between animal models of DR, and therefore each induction method contains its own set of advantages and limitations [118]. In light of this, when accounting for average body weight and daily food consumption in these rodent models, the concentrations of carotenoids and antioxidants used in some reports [104,117] are largely equivalent to the dosage of lutein and zeaxanthin used in clinical intervention trials [34,116,166]. Thus, findings from these preclinical studies are encouraging since the observed protective effects are not due primarily as a consequence of inflated carotenoid concentrations that are beyond clinical relevance for humans. Nonetheless, we can conclude there is a significant and growing body of evidence in agreement with the neuroprotective benefits of lutein and zeaxanthin in ameliorating the onset and progression of hyperglycemia-induced retinopathy.

4.3. Clinical Studies Using Carotenoids in the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy

Clinical studies implicate MPOD depletion, as well as low serum levels of lutein and zeaxanthin, may represent a novel clinical feature of DR; one that is likely contingent upon several metabolic perturbations associated with chronic hyperglycemia in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Reports from observational studies are consistent in demonstrating carotenoid levels (measured both in serum and the macular pigment) are further reduced among diabetic patients with clinically evident retinopathy (Table 3) [19,25,34,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116]. In fact, one study found that lower plasma concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin were significantly associated with greater risk of incident maculopathy as well as disease progression in patients with T2DM [109]. Macular pigment data seem to mirror these findings, providing a strong line of evidence that MPOD levels are substantially lower in diabetic retina [34,110,111,112,113,114,115] and in particular, individuals with T2DM with retinopathy [19,25,112]. Several studies have also shown the severity of diabetic maculopathy was significantly associated with lower MPOD levels [110,111,112,113]. Moreover, preliminary findings are largely comparable and suggest that the relationship between compromised macular pigment and incident retinopathy may vary between diabetes types [19,25,112].
There is limited evidence of RCTs evaluating the benefits of carotenoids in management of diabetic retinopathy. We used the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias, which covers the following domains—selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias, and other bias [101]. Figure 4 provides a summary of the risk assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool.
It is well known that both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients with mild NPDR or no retinopathy exhibit a notable range of visual function impairment, even in the absence of clinically relevant lesions of neurodegeneration in the retina [167,168,169,170,171,172,173]. Following active oral supplementation containing lutein and/or zeaxanthin micronutrients, two interventional studies (Table 4) observed marked improvements in serum carotenoids and MPOD levels. Additionally, clinically meaningful improvements in visual performance were also observed in these short-term supplementation trials between three and six months, respectively [34,116]. Most notably, the randomized, placebo-controlled Diabetes Visual Function Supplement Study (DiVFuSS) demonstrated an average increase of 27% in MPOD levels (measured by HFP) after six months of active supplementation [34]. This study revealed that daily supplementation of 4 mg lutein and 8 mg zeaxanthin plus antioxidants offered significant improvement in contrast sensitivity, color discrimination error score and mean visual field sensitivity in diabetic patients presenting with or without mild-to-moderate NPDR [34]. Thus, these results suggest that carotenoid vitamin therapy formulation may offer protection against diabetes-induced retinal neurodegenerative pathology with concomitant effects on visual performance measures in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In fact, the enhanced neuroprotective capacity of a similar carotenoid formula has been shown in experimental model of DR using chemical induction to recapitulate pathology observed in T1DM, discussed previously [34,104,166]. The risk of bias was low for this trial as assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool.
Various reports seem to suggest these improvements in visual performance following increases in serum carotenoid levels and MPOD concentrations may be attributed, at least in part, to the enhanced functional capacity of the macular pigments to preferentially absorb short-wavelength blue light [27,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183]. Greater MPOD levels may provide neuroprotective, pre-receptoral filtration against harmful blue light thereby attenuating the deleterious effects of chromatic aberration [27,178,180,181,182,183]. One school of thought argues that MPOD status may represent a sine qua non for improvements in visual function; namely, that significant benefit in visual performance will occur only after MPOD density has been maintained at greater concentrations for a period of time [62,178,184]. Alternatively, carotenoid vitamin therapy is also believed to augment total antioxidant capacity which may ameliorate intracellular redox homeostasis in the surrounding tissue including the photoreceptor cells of the neurosensory retina [26,127,185,186]. Further implications of greater carotenoid levels in the macula are also thought to improve metabolic efficiency of the visual cycle thereby promoting enhancement of the post-receptoral circuitry [187]. Indeed, the neuroprotective benefits in ganglion cells and photoreceptors observed in experimental models [102,106,107] are also implicated in humans marked by restoring clinical measures of both inner and outer retinal function, respectively [34,116,169,188]. By augmenting their levels in the diet through oral supplementation, the potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of xanthophyll carotenoids likely counteract the compounding insult from oxidative stress and chronic inflammation in the diabetic retina, as discussed previously [10,55,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204]. However, future studies are required in order to elucidate the precise mechanisms responsible for the visual improvements in diabetic retina using carotenoid vitamin therapy.
In view of these findings, available reports among diabetic patients with and without non-proliferative retinopathy are encouraging in demonstrating the potential for carotenoid supplementation as an adjunct nutraceutical approach to offer enhanced protection against further hyperglycemia-induced injury to the retina. Figure 5 illustrates major causative mechanisms which have been postulated in diabetic retinopathy onset, of which, several interconnected processes are believed to represent key drivers among those with type 2 diabetes or poorly-managed type 1 diabetes [34,205]. One mechanism of action involves systemic, atherogenic metabolic imbalance which is believed to play a significant role in macular pigment depletion [49,189,190,192,195,202,205,206,207,208]. Prior to exerting their nutraceutical effects, lutein and zeaxanthin acquired from the diet must first be released and then absorbed from food matrices before being transported into circulation [56,206,209]. The bioavailability of these dietary xanthophylls in the blood has been shown to fluctuate greatly as a consequence of high-glycemic-index foods [205,206,210,211,212,213]. It is known that dietary behaviors such as those in the Western diet contribute significantly to the onset of metabolic syndrome and may also contribute to MPOD depletion in DR. Thus, metabolic perturbations typically present in patients with T2DM or poorly controlled T1DM, such as obesity, dyslipidemia, insulin deficiency and hyperglycemia are believed to substantially compromise the bioavailability and assimilation of dietary lutein and zeaxanthin to the retina [55,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,206]. The bioavailability of dietary carotenoids is also strongly influenced by age, gender, and racial/ethnic origin, in addition to these anthropometric measures [55,112,175,176,189,190,192,193,194,195,206].
While there are no established recommendations currently regarding daily intake levels of lutein and zeaxanthin consumption, oral supplementation with these carotenoids has a relatively high safety profile, with low risk for adverse effects and are appropriately considered by the US Food and Drug Administration to be Generally Regarded as Safe (GRAS) [214]. Large-scale epidemiological studies are needed to elucidate the putative role of dietary carotenoid intake and risk of DR along with disease progression among cohorts of both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. To this point, population data in healthy individuals on dietary intake levels of lutein and zeaxanthin is fairly limited and likely varies significantly among populations based on their dietary behaviors, as mentioned previously [28]. However, one may speculate that individuals whose diet primarily consist of foods rich in refined carbohydrates and artificially sweetened beverages containing high-fructose corn syrup, such as those with T2DM or poorly controlled T1DM for instance, are likely to have significantly lower levels of daily carotenoid intake when compared to those following a Mediterranean-style diet [28,205,215,216,217]. This may be explained, at least in part, by the disparities in regular consumption of various functional food groups (i.e., fresh fruit, nuts, leafy vegetables, and unrefined cereals), of which, several possess relatively high concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin content per serving (Table 5) [27,28,44,215,218,219]. Based on the available evidence, it remains unclear whether relying solely upon dietary consumption of these carotenoid-rich food is sufficient to achieve the neuroprotective benefits with greater MPOD levels observed in patients with type 1 and type 2 DM following the use of carotenoid vitamin therapy.
It is important to note that these clinically meaningful benefits in diabetic patients with or without DR were independent of any changes in hyperglycemic status or in relation to blood glucose control. Moreover, based on these results, there is a considerable body of preliminary evidence to substantiate the neuroprotective capacity of macular carotenoids to inhibit or reverse disease progression by ameliorating the metabolic correlates and comorbidities often seen in patients with type 2 or poorly controlled type 1 diabetes. Encouraging results from early interventional studies offer scientific justification for renewed clinical trials thereby corroborating the potential use of carotenoid vitamin therapy as an adjunctive therapeutic approach in the management of diabetic retinopathy for patients with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
However, there are several limitations currently that must be addressed in future clinical studies should carotenoid supplementation be used for this purpose. First, there is a growing need for further studies to investigate the potential implications associated with long-term use of adjunctive carotenoid vitamin therapy in larger cohorts of individuals with T1DM and T2DM. Second, additional randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to determine the optimal dosage of lutein and zeaxanthin necessary to achieve clinically meaningful benefits, in addition to whether all three xanthophyll carotenoids found in the retina should be included in formulation. A recent systematic review in healthy adult eyes, found that lutein and zeaxanthin intake of less than 5 mg per day (by oral supplement or food sources) was insufficient dosage to significantly raise MPOD levels during trials up to six months [220]. Additionally, there have been no clinical trials investigating the effects of oral supplementation with meso-zeaxanthin in diabetic patients with or without DR to date. Further investigations are required to better understand if the addition of meso-zeaxanthin in combination with lutein and zeaxanthin may offer greater benefit or ascertain whether formulations with the two dietary xanthophylls are sufficient to elicit protective effect in diabetic retina. One of the limitations of this systematic review is that the number of databases searched was limited to National Library of Medicine and Web of Science. Additionally, the articles evaluated were limited to those published in the English language.
Lastly, given the systemic etiopathogenesis of diabetes which can manifest in the eye as vascular endotheliopathy, future strategies may focus on ameliorating early microvasculature complications such as retinal vascular occlusion as a consequence of capillary nonperfusion. While experimental models have shown that lutein and zeaxanthin offer protection against retinal capillary degeneration triggered by ischemic-reperfusion injury, it is unclear whether these xanthophylls can prevent microvasculature alterations which ultimately lead to vascular dysregulation. However, oral supplementation with a similar xanthophyll carotenoid known as astaxanthin has been shown in healthy adults has shown to exert benefits on retinal hemodynamic measures including capillary blood flow and velocity of choroidal circulation [221,222,223,224]. Given that astaxanthins retinal uptake has not been clearly demonstrated, its similar neuroprotective properties comparable to those of lutein and zeaxanthin provide scientific rationale for including astaxanthin into carotenoid vitamin therapy formulations in future nutraceutical trials of diabetic retinopathy [221,222,223,224].

5. Conclusions

Substantial efforts are necessary in developing early prophylactic measures that offer synergistic protection against several pathogenic mechanisms contributing to retinal neurodegeneration and subsequently preventing irreversible vision loss. To this accord, there is robust preclinical evidence and at least early clinical trials supporting the potential use of carotenoid vitamin supplementation in diabetics with and without retinopathy. Chronic hyperglycemia significantly compromises the endogenous defense systems in a diabetic individual. The metabolic changes due to diabetes possibly lead to depletion of macular carotenoids lutein, zeaxanthin, and meso-zeaxanthin, in addition to other potent antioxidants that are pertinent for maintaining retinal health as seen in various observational studies. MPOD measurements may also have a role to play in screening high-risk individuals prior to overt changes in retina due to DR pathology. Further randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to support and solidify its use more universally as a first line of defense in combination with routine systemic management of diabetes and in susceptible individuals that are at risk of diabetes or pre-diabetics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.W.L. and P.G.D.; methodology, D.W.L. and P.G.D.; data curation, D.W.L.; writing—original draft preparation, D.W.L. and P.G.D.; writing—review and editing, D.W.L., D.L.G. and P.G.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Assessment and Public Relations Librarian.

Conflicts of Interest

Drake W. Lem, none. Pinakin Davey is a consultant and has received research grants from ZeaVision and Guardion Health Sciences for his prior research not related to current manuscript. Dennis L. Gierhart is an Employee, Chief Scientific Officer for ZeaVision manufacturer of various nutritional supplements including the DVS.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report 2020; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2020; pp. 12–15.
  2. Saeedi, P.; Petersohn, I.; Salpea, P.; Malanda, B.; Karuranga, S.; Unwin, N.; Colagiuri, S.; Guariguata, L.; Motala, A.A.; Ogurtsova, K.; et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019, 157, 107843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lin, X.; Xu, Y.; Pan, X.; Xu, J.; Ding, Y.; Sun, X.; Song, X.; Ren, Y.; Shan, P.F. Global, regional, and national burden and trend of diabetes in 195 countries and territories: An analysis from 1990 to 2025. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wong, T.Y.; Sabanayagam, C. Strategies to Tackle the Global Burden of Diabetic Retinopathy: From Epidemiology to Artificial Intelligence. Ophthalmologica 2020, 243, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, R.; Wong, T.Y.; Sabanayagam, C. Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema and related vision loss. Eye Vis. 2015, 2, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Pearce, I.; Simo, R.; Lovestam-Adrian, M.; Wong, D.T.; Evans, M. Association between diabetic eye disease and other complications of diabetes: Implications for care. A systematic review. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2019, 21, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Simo-Servat, O.; Hernandez, C.; Simo, R. Diabetic Retinopathy in the Context of Patients with Diabetes. Ophthalmic Res. 2019, 62, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. He, F.; Xia, X.; Wu, X.F.; Yu, X.Q.; Huang, F.X. Diabetic retinopathy in predicting diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes and renal disease: A meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2013, 56, 457–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kawasaki, R.; Tanaka, S.; Tanaka, S.; Abe, S.; Sone, H.; Yokote, K.; Ishibashi, S.; Katayama, S.; Ohashi, Y.; Akanuma, Y.; et al. Risk of cardiovascular diseases is increased even with mild diabetic retinopathy: The Japan Diabetes Complications Study. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tong, L.; Vernon, S.A.; Kiel, W.; Sung, V.; Orr, G.M. Association of macular involvement with proliferative retinopathy in Type 2 diabetes. Diabet. Med. 2001, 18, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Antonetti, D.A.; Klein, R.; Gardner, T.W. Diabetic retinopathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 1227–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Cheloni, R.; Gandolfi, S.A.; Signorelli, C.; Odone, A. Global prevalence of diabetic retinopathy: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e022188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Solomon, S.D.; Chew, E.; Duh, E.J.; Sobrin, L.; Sun, J.K.; VanderBeek, B.L.; Wykoff, C.C.; Gardner, T.W. Diabetic Retinopathy: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2017, 40, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. World Health Organization. World Report on Vision 2019. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/world-report-on-vision (accessed on 15 December 2020).
  15. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 9th Edition 2019. Available online: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/en/ (accessed on 12 December 2020).
  16. Wu, L.; Fernandez-Loaiza, P.; Sauma, J.; Hernandez-Bogantes, E.; Masis, M. Classification of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. World J. Diabetes 2013, 4, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cheung, N.; Mitchell, P.; Wong, T.Y. Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet 2010, 376, 124–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Duh, E.J.; Sun, J.K.; Stitt, A.W. Diabetic retinopathy: Current understanding, mechanisms, and treatment strategies. JCI Insight 2017, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Scanlon, G.; Connell, P.; Ratzlaff, M.; Foerg, B.; McCartney, D.; Murphy, A.; O’Connor, K.; Loughman, J. Macular Pigment Optical Density Is Lower in Type 2 Diabetes, Compared with Type 1 Diabetes and Normal Controls. Retina 2015, 35, 1808–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Kowluru, R.A.; Chan, P.S. Oxidative stress and diabetic retinopathy. Exp. Diabetes Res. 2007, 2007, 43603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Simo, R.; Stitt, A.W.; Gardner, T.W. Neurodegeneration in diabetic retinopathy: Does it really matter? Diabetologia 2018, 61, 1902–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Simo, R.; Hernandez, C.; European Consortium for the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy. Neurodegeneration in the diabetic eye: New insights and therapeutic perspectives. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 25, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bek, T. Diameter Changes of Retinal Vessels in Diabetic Retinopathy. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2017, 17, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gardner, T.W.; Davila, J.R. The neurovascular unit and the pathophysiologic basis of diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2017, 255, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Scanlon, G.; McCartney, D.; Butler, J.S.; Loskutova, E.; Loughman, J. Identification of Surrogate Biomarkers for the Prediction of Patients at Risk of Low Macular Pigment in Type 2 Diabetes. Curr. Eye Res. 2019, 44, 1369–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Georgieva, E.; Ivanova, D.; Zhelev, Z.; Bakalova, R.; Gulubova, M.; Aoki, I. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Redox Imbalance as a Diagnostic Marker of “Free Radical Diseases”. Anticancer Res. 2017, 37, 5373–5381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bernstein, P.S.; Li, B.; Vachali, P.P.; Gorusupudi, A.; Shyam, R.; Henriksen, B.S.; Nolan, J.M. Lutein, zeaxanthin, and meso-zeaxanthin: The basic and clinical science underlying carotenoid-based nutritional interventions against ocular disease. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2016, 50, 34–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Eisenhauer, B.; Natoli, S.; Liew, G.; Flood, V.M. Lutein and Zeaxanthin-Food Sources, Bioavailability and Dietary Variety in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Protection. Nutrients 2017, 9, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maoka, T. Carotenoids as natural functional pigments. J. Nat. Med. 2020, 74, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rao, A.V.; Rao, L.G. Carotenoids and human health. Pharmacol. Res. 2007, 55, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Arunkumar, R.; Gorusupudi, A.; Bernstein, P.S. The macular carotenoids: A biochemical overview. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2020, 1865, 158617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 Research Group. Lutein + zeaxanthin and omega-3 fatty acids for age-related macular degeneration: The Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013, 309, 2005–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. SanGiovanni, J.P.; Chew, E.Y.; Clemons, T.E.; Ferris, F.L., 3rd; Gensler, G.; Lindblad, A.S.; Milton, R.C.; Seddon, J.M.; Sperduto, R.D. The relationship of dietary carotenoid and vitamin A, E, and C intake with age-related macular degeneration in a case-control study: AREDS Report No. 22. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2007, 125, 1225–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chous, A.P.; Richer, S.P.; Gerson, J.D.; Kowluru, R.A. The Diabetes Visual Function Supplement Study (DiVFuSS). Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 100, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Davey, P.G.; Henderson, T.; Lem, D.W.; Weis, R.; Amonoo-Monney, S.; Evans, D.W. Visual Function and Macular Carotenoid Changes in Eyes with Retinal Drusen-An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare a Micronized Lipid-Based Carotenoid Liquid Supplementation and AREDS-2 Formula. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Berco, E.; Rappoport, D.; Pollack, A.; Kleinmann, G.; Greenwald, Y. Management of Diabetic Retinopathy and Other Ocular Complications in Type 1 Diabetes. In Major Topics in Type 1 Diabetes; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wilkinson, C.P.; Ferris, F.L., 3rd; Klein, R.E.; Lee, P.P.; Agardh, C.D.; Davis, M.; Dills, D.; Kampik, A.; Pararajasegaram, R.; Verdaguer, J.T.; et al. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology 2003, 110, 1677–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yonekawa, Y.; Modi, Y.S.; Kim, L.A.; Skondra, D.; Kim, J.E.; Wykoff, C.C. American Society of Retina Specialists Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of Nonproliferative and Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Without Diabetic Macular Edema. J. Vitr. Dis. 2020, 4, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs--an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991, 98, 786–806. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ishibazawa, A.; De Pretto, L.R.; Alibhai, A.Y.; Moult, E.M.; Arya, M.; Sorour, O.; Mehta, N.; Baumal, C.R.; Witkin, A.J.; Yoshida, A.; et al. Retinal Nonperfusion Relationship to Arteries or Veins Observed on Widefield Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, 4310–4318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Acon, D.; Wu, L. Multimodal Imaging in Diabetic Macular Edema. Asia Pac. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 7, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. You, Q.S.; Bartsch, D.U.; Espina, M.; Alam, M.; Camacho, N.; Mendoza, N.; Freeman, W.R. Reproducibility of Macular Pigment Optical Density Measurement by Two-Wavelength Autofluorescence in a Clinical Setting. Retina 2016, 36, 1381–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Bernstein, P.S.; Delori, F.C.; Richer, S.; van Kuijk, F.J.; Wenzel, A.J. The value of measurement of macular carotenoid pigment optical densities and distributions in age-related macular degeneration and other retinal disorders. Vis. Res. 2010, 50, 716–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Gruszecki, W.I.; Sielewiesiuk, J. Orientation of xanthophylls in phosphatidylcholine multibilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1990, 1023, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. de Kinkelder, R.; van der Veen, R.L.; Verbaak, F.D.; Faber, D.J.; van Leeuwen, T.G.; Berendschot, T.T. Macular pigment optical density measurements: Evaluation of a device using heterochromatic flicker photometry. Eye 2011, 25, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Leung, I.Y. Macular pigment: New clinical methods of detection and the role of carotenoids in age-related macular degeneration. Optometry 2008, 79, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Li, B.; George, E.W.; Rognon, G.T.; Gorusupudi, A.; Ranganathan, A.; Chang, F.Y.; Shi, L.; Frederick, J.M.; Bernstein, P.S. Imaging lutein and zeaxanthin in the human retina with confocal resonance Raman microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 12352–12358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bone, R.A.; Landrum, J.T.; Hime, G.W.; Cains, A.; Zamor, J. Stereochemistry of the human macular carotenoids. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1993, 34, 2033–2040. [Google Scholar]
  49. Scripsema, N.K.; Hu, D.N.; Rosen, R.B. Lutein, Zeaxanthin, and meso-Zeaxanthin in the Clinical Management of Eye Disease. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 2015, 865179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Howells, O.; Eperjesi, F.; Bartlett, H. Measuring macular pigment optical density in vivo: A review of techniques. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2011, 249, 315–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Shyam, R.; Gorusupudi, A.; Nelson, K.; Horvath, M.P.; Bernstein, P.S. RPE65 has an additional function as the lutein to meso-zeaxanthin isomerase in the vertebrate eye. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 10882–10887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Bone, R.A.; Landrum, J.T.; Mayne, S.T.; Gomez, C.M.; Tibor, S.E.; Twaroska, E.E. Macular pigment in donor eyes with and without AMD: A case-control study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2001, 42, 235–240. [Google Scholar]
  53. Gorusupudi, A.; Shyam, R.; Li, B.; Vachali, P.; Subhani, Y.K.; Nelson, K.; Bernstein, P.S. Developmentally Regulated Production of meso-Zeaxanthin in Chicken Retinal Pigment Epithelium/Choroid and Retina. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, 1853–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Khachik, F.; de Moura, F.F.; Zhao, D.Y.; Aebischer, C.P.; Bernstein, P.S. Transformations of selected carotenoids in plasma, liver, and ocular tissues of humans and in nonprimate animal models. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 3383–3392. [Google Scholar]
  55. Connor, W.E.; Duell, P.B.; Kean, R.; Wang, Y. The prime role of HDL to transport lutein into the retina: Evidence from HDL-deficient WHAM chicks having a mutant ABCA1 transporter. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 4226–4231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Nagao, A. Absorption and metabolism of dietary carotenoids. BioFactors 2011, 37, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bone, R.A.; Davey, P.G.; Roman, B.O.; Evans, D.W. Efficacy of Commercially Available Nutritional Supplements: Analysis of Serum Uptake, Macular Pigment Optical Density and Visual Functional Response. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Landrum, J.T.; Bone, R.A.; Joa, H.; Kilburn, M.D.; Moore, L.L.; Sprague, K.E. A one year study of the macular pigment: The effect of 140 days of a lutein supplement. Exp. Eye Res. 1997, 65, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bone, R.A.; Landrum, J.T.; Cao, Y.; Howard, A.N.; Alvarez-Calderon, F. Macular pigment response to a supplement containing meso-zeaxanthin, lutein and zeaxanthin. Nutr. Metab. 2007, 4, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Akuffo, K.O.; Beatty, S.; Stack, J.; Dennison, J.; O’Regan, S.; Meagher, K.A.; Peto, T.; Nolan, J. Central Retinal Enrichment Supplementation Trials (CREST): Design and methodology of the CREST randomized controlled trials. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2014, 21, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Berendschot, T.T.; Goldbohm, R.A.; Klopping, W.A.; van de Kraats, J.; van Norel, J.; van Norren, D. Influence of lutein supplementation on macular pigment, assessed with two objective techniques. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 3322–3326. [Google Scholar]
  62. Huang, Y.M.; Dou, H.L.; Huang, F.F.; Xu, X.R.; Zou, Z.Y.; Lin, X.M. Effect of supplemental lutein and zeaxanthin on serum, macular pigmentation, and visual performance in patients with early age-related macular degeneration. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 564738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Khachik, F.; de Moura, F.F.; Chew, E.Y.; Douglass, L.W.; Ferris, F.L., 3rd; Kim, J.; Thompson, D.J. The effect of lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation on metabolites of these carotenoids in the serum of persons aged 60 or older. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006, 47, 5234–5242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Koh, H.H.; Murray, I.J.; Nolan, D.; Carden, D.; Feather, J.; Beatty, S. Plasma and macular responses to lutein supplement in subjects with and without age-related maculopathy: A pilot study. Exp. Eye Res. 2004, 79, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ma, L.; Yan, S.F.; Huang, Y.M.; Lu, X.R.; Qian, F.; Pang, H.L.; Xu, X.R.; Zou, Z.Y.; Dong, P.C.; Xiao, X.; et al. Effect of lutein and zeaxanthin on macular pigment and visual function in patients with early age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 2290–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Richer, S.; Devenport, J.; Lang, J.C. LAST II: Differential temporal responses of macular pigment optical density in patients with atrophic age-related macular degeneration to dietary supplementation with xanthophylls. Optometry 2007, 78, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Trieschmann, M.; Beatty, S.; Nolan, J.M.; Hense, H.W.; Heimes, B.; Austermann, U.; Fobker, M.; Pauleikhoff, D. Changes in macular pigment optical density and serum concentrations of its constituent carotenoids following supplemental lutein and zeaxanthin: The LUNA study. Exp. Eye Res. 2007, 84, 718–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Weigert, G.; Kaya, S.; Pemp, B.; Sacu, S.; Lasta, M.; Werkmeister, R.M.; Dragostinoff, N.; Simader, C.; Garhofer, G.; Schmidt-Erfurth, U.; et al. Effects of lutein supplementation on macular pigment optical density and visual acuity in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 8174–8178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Howells, O.; Eperjesi, F.; Bartlett, H. Improving the repeatability of heterochromatic flicker photometry for measurement of macular pigment optical density. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2013, 251, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Krinsky, N.I.; Johnson, E.J. Carotenoid actions and their relation to health and disease. Mol. Asp. Med. 2005, 26, 459–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Junghans, A.; Sies, H.; Stahl, W. Macular pigments lutein and zeaxanthin as blue light filters studied in liposomes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2001, 391, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kijlstra, A.; Tian, Y.; Kelly, E.R.; Berendschot, T.T. Lutein: More than just a filter for blue light. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2012, 31, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Landrum, J.T.; Bone, R.A. Mechanistic Evidence for Eye Disease and Carotenoids; Krinsky, N.I., Mayne, S.T., Sies, H., Eds.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  74. Li, S.Y.; Fu, Z.J.; Lo, A.C. Hypoxia-induced oxidative stress in ischemic retinopathy. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2012, 2012, 426769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Suarez-Berumen, K.; Davey, P.G. Macular Pigments Optical Density: A Review of Techniques of Measurements and Factors Influencing their Levels. JSM Ophthalmol. 2014, 3, 4. [Google Scholar]
  76. Bartlett, H.; Eperjesi, F. Apparent motion photometry: Evaluation and reliability of a novel method for the measurement of macular pigment. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2011, 95, 662–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Bartlett, H.; Howells, O.; Eperjesi, F. The role of macular pigment assessment in clinical practice: A review. Clin. Exp. Optom. 2010, 93, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Davey, P.G.; Alvarez, S.D.; Lee, J.Y. Macular pigment optical density: Repeatability, intereye correlation, and effect of ocular dominance. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2016, 10, 1671–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Moreland, J.D. Macular pigment assessment by motion photometry. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 430, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lee, B.B.; Martin, P.R.; Valberg, A. The physiological basis of heterochromatic flicker photometry demonstrated in the ganglion cells of the macaque retina. J. Physiol. 1988, 404, 323–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Delori, F.C. Autofluorescence method to measure macular pigment optical densities fluorometry and autofluorescence imaging. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 430, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Delori, F.C.; Goger, D.G.; Hammond, B.R.; Snodderly, D.M.; Burns, S.A. Macular pigment density measured by autofluorescence spectrometry: Comparison with reflectometry and heterochromatic flicker photometry. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 2001, 18, 1212–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Berendschot, T.T.; van Norren, D. Objective determination of the macular pigment optical density using fundus reflectance spectroscopy. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 430, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bernstein, P.S.; Yoshida, M.D.; Katz, N.B.; McClane, R.W.; Gellermann, W. Raman detection of macular carotenoid pigments in intact human retina. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1998, 39, 2003–2011. [Google Scholar]
  85. Bartlett, H.; Stainer, L.; Singh, S.; Eperjesi, F.; Howells, O. Clinical evaluation of the MPS 9000 Macular Pigment Screener. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2010, 94, 753–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Loughman, J.; Scanlon, G.; Nolan, J.M.; O’Dwyer, V.; Beatty, S. An evaluation of a novel instrument for measuring macular pigment optical density: The MPS 9000. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012, 90, e90–e97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. van der Veen, R.L.; Berendschot, T.T.; Hendrikse, F.; Carden, D.; Makridaki, M.; Murray, I.J. A new desktop instrument for measuring macular pigment optical density based on a novel technique for setting flicker thresholds. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 2009, 29, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Bone, R.A.; Mukherjee, A. Innovative Troxler-free Measurement of Macular Pigment and Lens Density with Correction of the Former for the Aging Lens. J. Biomed. Opt. 2013, 18, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Obana, A.; Gohto, Y.; Moriyama, T.; Seto, T.; Sasano, H.; Okazaki, S. Reliability of a commercially available heterochromatic flicker photometer, the MPS2, for measuring the macular pigment optical density of a Japanese population. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 62, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Davey, P.G.; Ngo, A.; Cross, J.; Gierhart, D.L. Macular Pigment Reflectometry: Development and evaluation of a novel clinical device for rapid objective assessment of the macular carotenoids. In Ophthalmic Technologies Xxix; Manns, F., Soderberg, P.G., Ho, A., Eds.; Spie-Int Soc Optical Engineering: Bellingham, DC, USA, 2019; Volume 10858. [Google Scholar]
  91. Huang, H.; Guan, C.; Ng, D.S.; Liu, X.; Chen, H. Macular Pigment Optical Density Measured by a Single Wavelength Reflection Photometry with and without Mydriasis. Curr. Eye Res. 2019, 44, 324–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kilbride, P.E.; Alexander, K.R.; Fishman, M.; Fishman, G.A. Human macular pigment assessed by imaging fundus reflectometry. Vis. Res. 1989, 29, 663–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sanabria, J.C.; Bass, J.; Spors, F.; Gierhart, D.L.; Davey, P.G. Measurement of Carotenoids in Perifovea using the Macular Pigment Reflectometer. J. Vis. Exp. 2020, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Dennison, J.L.; Stack, J.; Beatty, S.; Nolan, J.M. Concordance of macular pigment measurements obtained using customized heterochromatic flicker photometry, dual-wavelength autofluorescence, and single-wavelength reflectance. Exp. Eye Res. 2013, 116, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Bernstein, P.S.; Zhao, D.Y.; Sharifzadeh, M.; Ermakov, I.V.; Gellermann, W. Resonance Raman measurement of macular carotenoids in the living human eye. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 430, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Gellermann, W.; Ermakov, I.V.; Ermakova, M.R.; McClane, R.W.; Zhao, D.Y.; Bernstein, P.S. In vivo resonant Raman measurement of macular carotenoid pigments in the young and the aging human retina. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 2002, 19, 1172–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lapierre-Landry, M.; Carroll, J.; Skala, M.C. Imaging retinal melanin: A review of current technologies. J. Biol. Eng. 2018, 12, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yung, M.; Klufas, M.A.; Sarraf, D. Clinical applications of fundus autofluorescence in retinal disease. Int. J. Retin. Vitr. 2016, 2, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; Group, P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2009, 62, 1006–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Hooijmans, C.R.; Rovers, M.M.; de Vries, R.B.; Leenaars, M.; Ritskes-Hoitinga, M.; Langendam, M.W. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2014, 14, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Higgins, J.P.; Altman, D.G.; Gotzsche, P.C.; Juni, P.; Moher, D.; Oxman, A.D.; Savovic, J.; Schulz, K.F.; Weeks, L.; Sterne, J.A.; et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011, 343, d5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Arnal, E.; Miranda, M.; Johnsen-Soriano, S.; Alvarez-Nolting, R.; Diaz-Llopis, M.; Araiz, J.; Cervera, E.; Bosch-Morell, F.; Romero, F.J. Beneficial effect of docosahexanoic acid and lutein on retinal structural, metabolic, and functional abnormalities in diabetic rats. Curr. Eye Res. 2009, 34, 928–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kowluru, R.A.; Menon, B.; Gierhart, D.L. Beneficial effect of zeaxanthin on retinal metabolic abnormalities in diabetic rats. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 1645–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kowluru, R.A.; Zhong, Q.; Santos, J.M.; Thandampallayam, M.; Putt, D.; Gierhart, D.L. Beneficial effects of the nutritional supplements on the development of diabetic retinopathy. Nutr. Metab. 2014, 11, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Muriach, M.; Bosch-Morell, F.; Alexander, G.; Blomhoff, R.; Barcia, J.; Arnal, E.; Almansa, I.; Romero, F.J.; Miranda, M. Lutein effect on retina and hippocampus of diabetic mice. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2006, 41, 979–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sasaki, M.; Ozawa, Y.; Kurihara, T.; Kubota, S.; Yuki, K.; Noda, K.; Kobayashi, S.; Ishida, S.; Tsubota, K. Neurodegenerative influence of oxidative stress in the retina of a murine model of diabetes. Diabetologia 2010, 53, 971–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Tang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Willard, L.; Ortiz, E.; Wark, L.; Medeiros, D.; Lin, D. Dietary wolfberry ameliorates retinal structure abnormalities in db/db mice at the early stage of diabetes. Exp. Biol. Med. 2011, 236, 1051–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Yu, H.; Wark, L.; Ji, H.; Willard, L.; Jaing, Y.; Han, J.; He, H.; Ortiz, E.; Zhang, Y.; Medeiros, D.M.; et al. Dietary wolfberry upregulates carotenoid metabolic genes and enhances mitochondrial biogenesis in the retina of db/db diabetic mice. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 1158–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Brazionis, L.; Rowley, K.; Itsiopoulos, C.; O’Dea, K. Plasma carotenoids and diabetic retinopathy. Br. J. Nutr. 2009, 101, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Cennamo, G.; Lanni, V.; Abbate, R.; Velotti, N.; Fossataro, F.; Sparnelli, F.; Romano, M.R.; de Crecchio, G.; Cennamo, G. The Relationship between Macular Pigment and Vessel Density in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Ophthalmic Res. 2019, 61, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Davies, N.P.; Morland, A.B. Color matching in diabetes: Optical density of the crystalline lens and macular pigments. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 281–289. [Google Scholar]
  112. Lima, V.C.; Rosen, R.B.; Maia, M.; Prata, T.S.; Dorairaj, S.; Farah, M.E.; Sallum, J. Macular pigment optical density measured by dual-wavelength autofluorescence imaging in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: A comparative study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 5840–5845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Mares, J.A.; LaRowe, T.L.; Snodderly, D.M.; Moeller, S.M.; Gruber, M.J.; Klein, M.L.; Wooten, B.R.; Johnson, E.J.; Chappell, R.J.; Group, C.M.P.S.; et al. Predictors of optical density of lutein and zeaxanthin in retinas of older women in the Carotenoids in Age-Related Eye Disease Study, an ancillary study of the Women’s Health Initiative. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 84, 1107–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. She, C.Y.; Gu, H.; Xu, J.; Yang, X.F.; Ren, X.T.; Liu, N.P. Association of macular pigment optical density with early stage of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 9, 1433–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Zagers, N.P.; Pot, M.C.; van Norren, D. Spectral and directional reflectance of the fovea in diabetes mellitus: Photoreceptor integrity, macular pigment and lens. Vis. Res. 2005, 45, 1745–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Hu, B.J.; Hu, Y.N.; Lin, S.; Ma, W.J.; Li, X.R. Application of Lutein and Zeaxanthin in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2011, 4, 303–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Kowluru, R.A.; Kanwar, M.; Chan, P.S.; Zhang, J.P. Inhibition of retinopathy and retinal metabolic abnormalities in diabetic rats with AREDS-based micronutrients. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2008, 126, 1266–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Olivares, A.M.; Althoff, K.; Chen, G.F.; Wu, S.; Morrisson, M.A.; DeAngelis, M.M.; Haider, N. Animal Models of Diabetic Retinopathy. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2017, 17, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Rakieten, N.; Rakieten, M.L.; Nadkarni, M.R. Studies on the diabetogenic action of streptozotocin (NSC-37917). Cancer Chemother. Rep. 1963, 29, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  120. Robinson, R.; Barathi, V.A.; Chaurasia, S.S.; Wong, T.Y.; Kern, T.S. Update on animal models of diabetic retinopathy: From molecular approaches to mice and higher mammals. Dis. Model. Mech. 2012, 5, 444–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Cobb, C.A.; Cole, M.P. Oxidative and nitrative stress in neurodegeneration. Neurobiol. Dis. 2015, 84, 4–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Aslan, M.; Yucel, I.; Akar, Y.; Yucel, G.; Ciftcioglu, M.A.; Sanlioglu, S. Nitrotyrosine formation and apoptosis in rat models of ocular injury. Free Radic. Res. 2006, 40, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Toda, N.; Nakanishi-Toda, M. Nitric oxide: Ocular blood flow, glaucoma, and diabetic retinopathy. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2007, 26, 205–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. ZeaVision LLC. EyePromise DVS. Available online: http://www.eyepromise.com/doctors/products/eyepromise-dvs/?utm_source=Website&utm_medium=Blog-Post&utm_campaign=Doctor-Blog&utm_content=Diabetes-Awareness-Series-3-Sept2018 (accessed on 10 December 2020).
  125. Kanwar, M.; Chan, P.S.; Kern, T.S.; Kowluru, R.A. Oxidative damage in the retinal mitochondria of diabetic mice: Possible protection by superoxide dismutase. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 3805–3811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Kowluru, R.A.; Kowluru, A.; Mishra, M.; Kumar, B. Oxidative stress and epigenetic modifications in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2015, 48, 40–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Droge, W. Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function. Physiol. Rev. 2002, 82, 47–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Halliwell, B. Biochemistry of oxidative stress. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2007, 35, 1147–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Sena, L.A.; Chandel, N.S. Physiological roles of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Mol. Cell 2012, 48, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Kowluru, R.; Kern, T.S.; Engerman, R.L. Abnormalities of retinal metabolism in diabetes or galactosemia. II. Comparison of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase in retina and cerebral cortex, and effects of antioxidant therapy. Curr. Eye Res. 1994, 13, 891–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Kowluru, R.A.; Kern, T.S.; Engerman, R.L. Abnormalities of retinal metabolism in diabetes or experimental galactosemia. IV. Antioxidant defense system. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1997, 22, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Neelam, K.; Goenadi, C.J.; Lun, K.; Yip, C.C.; Au Eong, K.G. Putative protective role of lutein and zeaxanthin in diabetic retinopathy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 101, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Izumi-Nagai, K.; Nagai, N.; Ohgami, K.; Satofuka, S.; Ozawa, Y.; Tsubota, K.; Umezawa, K.; Ohno, S.; Oike, Y.; Ishida, S. Macular pigment lutein is antiinflammatory in preventing choroidal neovascularization. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007, 27, 2555–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Sarıkaya, E.; Doğan, S. Glutathione Peroxidase in Health and Diseases. In Glutathione System and Oxidative Stress in Health and Disease; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  135. Bian, Q.; Gao, S.; Zhou, J.; Qin, J.; Taylor, A.; Johnson, E.J.; Tang, G.; Sparrow, J.R.; Gierhart, D.; Shang, F. Lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation reduces photooxidative damage and modulates the expression of inflammation-related genes in retinal pigment epithelial cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 53, 1298–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Li, S.Y.; Fung, F.K.; Fu, Z.J.; Wong, D.; Chan, H.H.; Lo, A.C. Anti-inflammatory effects of lutein in retinal ischemic/hypoxic injury: In vivo and in vitro studies. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 5976–5984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Tarr, J.M.; Kaul, K.; Chopra, M.; Kohner, E.M.; Chibber, R. Pathophysiology of diabetic retinopathy. ISRN Ophthalmol. 2013, 2013, 343560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Joussen, A.M.; Poulaki, V.; Le, M.L.; Koizumi, K.; Esser, C.; Janicki, H.; Schraermeyer, U.; Kociok, N.; Fauser, S.; Kirchhof, B.; et al. A central role for inflammation in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. FASEB J. 2004, 18, 1450–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Chan, P.S.; Kanwar, M.; Kowluru, R.A. Resistance of retinal inflammatory mediators to suppress after reinstitution of good glycemic control: Novel mechanism for metabolic memory. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2010, 24, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Kowluru, R.A.; Odenbach, S. Role of interleukin-1beta in the development of retinopathy in rats: Effect of antioxidants. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45, 4161–4166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Kowluru, R.A.; Koppolu, P.; Chakrabarti, S.; Chen, S. Diabetes-induced activation of nuclear transcriptional factor in the retina, and its inhibition by antioxidants. Free Radic. Res. 2003, 37, 1169–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Abcouwer, S.F. Angiogenic Factors and Cytokines in Diabetic Retinopathy. J. Clin. Cell Immunol. 2013, 7 (Suppl. 1). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Klein, B.E.; Knudtson, M.D.; Tsai, M.Y.; Klein, R. The relation of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction to the prevalence and progression of diabetic retinopathy: Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2009, 127, 1175–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Schroder, S.; Palinski, W.; Schmid-Schonbein, G.W. Activated monocytes and granulocytes, capillary nonperfusion, and neovascularization in diabetic retinopathy. Am. J. Pathol. 1991, 139, 81–100. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  145. Kowluru, R.A.; Mohammad, G.; Santos, J.M.; Tewari, S.; Zhong, Q. Interleukin-1beta and mitochondria damage, and the development of diabetic retinopathy. J. Ocul. Biol. Dis. Inform. 2011, 4, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Feit-Leichman, R.A.; Kinouchi, R.; Takeda, M.; Fan, Z.; Mohr, S.; Kern, T.S.; Chen, D.F. Vascular damage in a mouse model of diabetic retinopathy: Relation to neuronal and glial changes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005, 46, 4281–4287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Kern, T.S. Interrelationships between the Retinal Neuroglia and Vasculature in Diabetes. Diabetes Metab. J. 2014, 38, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Aiello, L.P.; Wong, J.S. Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in diabetic vascular complications. Kidney Int. Suppl. 2000, 77, S113–S119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Kern, T.S.; Engerman, R.L. Pharmacological inhibition of diabetic retinopathy: Aminoguanidine and aspirin. Diabetes 2001, 50, 1636–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Kern, T.S.; Tang, J.; Mizutani, M.; Kowluru, R.A.; Nagaraj, R.H.; Romeo, G.; Podesta, F.; Lorenzi, M. Response of capillary cell death to aminoguanidine predicts the development of retinopathy: Comparison of diabetes and galactosemia. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 3972–3978. [Google Scholar]
  151. Mizutani, M.; Kern, T.S.; Lorenzi, M. Accelerated death of retinal microvascular cells in human and experimental diabetic retinopathy. J. Clin. Investig. 1996, 97, 2883–2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Curtis, T.M.; Gardiner, T.A.; Stitt, A.W. Microvascular lesions of diabetic retinopathy: Clues towards understanding pathogenesis? Eye 2009, 23, 1496–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Kohzaki, K.; Vingrys, A.J.; Bui, B.V. Early inner retinal dysfunction in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 3595–3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Fung, F.K.; Law, B.Y.; Lo, A.C. Lutein Attenuates Both Apoptosis and Autophagy upon Cobalt (II) Chloride-Induced Hypoxia in Rat Muller Cells. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0167828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Li, S.Y.; Fu, Z.J.; Ma, H.; Jang, W.C.; So, K.F.; Wong, D.; Lo, A.C. Effect of lutein on retinal neurons and oxidative stress in a model of acute retinal ischemia/reperfusion. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Dong, C.J.; Agey, P.; Hare, W.A. Origins of the electroretinogram oscillatory potentials in the rabbit retina. Vis. Neurosci. 2004, 21, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Hancock, H.A.; Kraft, T.W. Oscillatory potential analysis and ERGs of normal and diabetic rats. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45, 1002–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Kizawa, J.; Machida, S.; Kobayashi, T.; Gotoh, Y.; Kurosaka, D. Changes of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with early diabetic retinopathy. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2006, 50, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Yonemura, D.; Tsuzuki, K.; Aoki, T. Clinical importance of the oscillatory potential in the human ERG. Acta Ophthalmol. Suppl. 1962, 40 (Suppl. 70), 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Binder, D.K.; Scharfman, H.E. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Growth Factors 2004, 22, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Martin, P.M.; Roon, P.; Van Ells, T.K.; Ganapathy, V.; Smith, S.B. Death of retinal neurons in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45, 3330–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Kern, T.S.; Barber, A.J. Retinal ganglion cells in diabetes. J. Physiol. 2008, 586, 4401–4408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Seki, M.; Tanaka, T.; Nawa, H.; Usui, T.; Fukuchi, T.; Ikeda, K.; Abe, H.; Takei, N. Involvement of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in early retinal neuropathy of streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats: Therapeutic potential of brain-derived neurotrophic factor for dopaminergic amacrine cells. Diabetes 2004, 53, 2412–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Xue, C.; Rosen, R.; Jordan, A.; Hu, D.N. Management of Ocular Diseases Using Lutein and Zeaxanthin: What Have We Learned from Experimental Animal Studies? J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 2015, 523027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Li, B.; Vachali, P.P.; Gorusupudi, A.; Shen, Z.; Sharifzadeh, H.; Besch, B.M.; Nelson, K.; Horvath, M.M.; Frederick, J.M.; Baehr, W.; et al. Inactivity of human beta,beta-carotene-9′,10′-dioxygenase (BCO2) underlies retinal accumulation of the human macular carotenoid pigment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 10173–10178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Kowluru, R.A.; Zhong, Q. Beyond AREDS: Is there a place for antioxidant therapy in the prevention/treatment of eye disease? Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 8665–8671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Daley, M.L.; Watzke, R.C.; Riddle, M.C. Early loss of blue-sensitive color vision in patients with type I diabetes. Diabetes Care 1987, 10, 777–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Han, Y.; Adams, A.J.; Bearse, M.A., Jr.; Schneck, M.E. Multifocal electroretinogram and short-wavelength automated perimetry measures in diabetic eyes with little or no retinopathy. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2004, 122, 1809–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Jackson, G.R.; Barber, A.J. Visual dysfunction associated with diabetic retinopathy. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2010, 10, 380–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Takahashi, H.; Chihara, E. Impact of diabetic retinopathy on quantitative retinal nerve fiber layer measurement and glaucoma screening. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 687–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  171. van Dijk, H.W.; Kok, P.H.; Garvin, M.; Sonka, M.; Devries, J.H.; Michels, R.P.; van Velthoven, M.E.; Schlingemann, R.O.; Verbraak, F.D.; Abramoff, M.D. Selective loss of inner retinal layer thickness in type 1 diabetic patients with minimal diabetic retinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 3404–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. van Dijk, H.W.; Verbraak, F.D.; Kok, P.H.; Garvin, M.K.; Sonka, M.; Lee, K.; Devries, J.H.; Michels, R.P.; van Velthoven, M.E.; Schlingemann, R.O.; et al. Decreased retinal ganglion cell layer thickness in patients with type 1 diabetes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 3660–3665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Greenstein, V.C.; Hood, D.C.; Ritch, R.; Steinberger, D.; Carr, R.E. S (blue) cone pathway vulnerability in retinitis pigmentosa, diabetes and glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1989, 30, 1732–1737. [Google Scholar]
  174. Johnson, E.J.; Avendano, E.E.; Mohn, E.S.; Raman, G. The association between macular pigment optical density and visual function outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eye 2020, 35, 1620–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Lem, D.W.; Gierhart, D.L.; Davey, P.G. Carotenoids in the Management of Glaucoma: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Lem, D.W.; Gierhart, D.L.; Gunvant Davey, P. Management of Diabetic Eye Disease using Carotenoids and Nutrients. In Antioxidants-Benefits, Sources, and Mechanisms of Action; Waisundara, V.Y., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  177. Liu, R.; Wang, T.; Zhang, B.; Qin, L.; Wu, C.; Li, Q.; Ma, L. Lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation and association with visual function in age-related macular degeneration. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 56, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Loughman, J.; Akkali, M.C.; Beatty, S.; Scanlon, G.; Davison, P.A.; O’Dwyer, V.; Cantwell, T.; Major, P.; Stack, J.; Nolan, J.M. The relationship between macular pigment and visual performance. Vis. Res. 2010, 50, 1249–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Loughman, J.; Nolan, J.M.; Beatty, S. Impact of dietary carotenoid deprivation on macular pigment and serum concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 108, 2102–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  180. Loughman, J.; Nolan, J.M.; Howard, A.N.; Connolly, E.; Meagher, K.; Beatty, S. The impact of macular pigment augmentation on visual performance using different carotenoid formulations. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 7871–7880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  181. Hammond, B.R., Jr.; Fletcher, L.M.; Elliott, J.G. Glare disability, photostress recovery, and chromatic contrast: Relation to macular pigment and serum lutein and zeaxanthin. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 476–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  182. Hammond, B.R.; Fletcher, L.M.; Roos, F.; Wittwer, J.; Schalch, W. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the effects of lutein and zeaxanthin on photostress recovery, glare disability, and chromatic contrast. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 8583–8589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  183. Kleiner, R.C.; Enger, C.; Alexander, M.F.; Fine, S.L. Contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1988, 106, 55–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Nolan, J.M.; Loughman, J.; Akkali, M.C.; Stack, J.; Scanlon, G.; Davison, P.; Beatty, S. The impact of macular pigment augmentation on visual performance in normal subjects: COMPASS. Vis. Res. 2011, 51, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  185. Almasieh, M.; Wilson, A.M.; Morquette, B.; Cueva Vargas, J.L.; Di Polo, A. The molecular basis of retinal ganglion cell death in glaucoma. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2012, 31, 152–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Pinazo-Durán, M.D.; Zanón-Moreno, V.; Gallego-Pinazo, R.; García-Medina, J.J. Chapter 6-Oxidative stress and mitochondrial failure in the pathogenesis of glaucoma neurodegeneration. In Progress in Brain Research; Bagetta, G., Nucci, C., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 220, pp. 127–153. [Google Scholar]
  187. Stringham, J.M.; O’Brien, K.J.; Stringham, N.T. Contrast Sensitivity and Lateral Inhibition Are Enhanced With Macular Carotenoid Supplementation. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017, 58, 2291–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Jackson, G.R.; Scott, I.U.; Quillen, D.A.; Walter, L.E.; Gardner, T.W. Inner retinal visual dysfunction is a sensitive marker of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 96, 699–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Johnson, E.J.; Hammond, B.R.; Yeum, K.J.; Qin, J.; Wang, X.D.; Castaneda, C.; Snodderly, D.M.; Russell, R.M. Relation among serum and tissue concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin and macular pigment density. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 71, 1555–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  190. Hammond, B.R., Jr.; Ciulla, T.A.; Snodderly, D.M. Macular pigment density is reduced in obese subjects. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 47–50. [Google Scholar]
  191. Thomson, L.R.; Toyoda, Y.; Langner, A.; Delori, F.C.; Garnett, K.M.; Craft, N.; Nichols, C.R.; Cheng, K.M.; Dorey, C.K. Elevated retinal zeaxanthin and prevention of light-induced photoreceptor cell death in quail. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 3538–3549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Nolan, J.; O’Donovan, O.; Kavanagh, H.; Stack, J.; Harrison, M.; Muldoon, A.; Mellerio, J.; Beatty, S. Macular pigment and percentage of body fat. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45, 3940–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Wang, W.; Connor, S.L.; Johnson, E.J.; Klein, M.L.; Hughes, S.; Connor, W.E. Effect of dietary lutein and zeaxanthin on plasma carotenoids and their transport in lipoproteins in age-related macular degeneration. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 85, 762–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Lim, C.; Kim, D.-w.; Sim, T.; Hoang, N.H.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, E.S.; Youn, Y.S.; Oh, K.T. Preparation and characterization of a lutein loading nanoemulsion system for ophthalmic eye drops. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2016, 36, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Broekmans, W.M.; Berendschot, T.T.; Klopping-Ketelaars, I.A.; de Vries, A.J.; Goldbohm, R.A.; Tijburg, L.B.; Kardinaal, A.F.; van Poppel, G. Macular pigment density in relation to serum and adipose tissue concentrations of lutein and serum concentrations of zeaxanthin. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 76, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Loane, E.; Nolan, J.M.; Beatty, S. The respective relationships between lipoprotein profile, macular pigment optical density, and serum concentrations of lutein and zeaxanthin. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 5897–5905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Goldberg, I.J. Clinical review 124: Diabetic dyslipidemia: Causes and consequences. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 86, 965–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Al-Aubaidy, H.A.; Jelinek, H.F. Oxidative DNA damage and obesity in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2011, 164, 899–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Castro, A.M.; Macedo-de la Concha, L.E.; Pantoja-Meléndez, C.A. Low-grade inflammation and its relation to obesity and chronic degenerative diseases. Rev. Médica Hosp. Gen. México 2017, 80, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Fernandez-Sanchez, A.; Madrigal-Santillan, E.; Bautista, M.; Esquivel-Soto, J.; Morales-Gonzalez, A.; Esquivel-Chirino, C.; Durante-Montiel, I.; Sanchez-Rivera, G.; Valadez-Vega, C.; Morales-Gonzalez, J.A. Inflammation, oxidative stress, and obesity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 3117–3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  201. Kwon, H.; Pessin, J.E. Adipokines mediate inflammation and insulin resistance. Front. Endocrinol. 2013, 4, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Nieves, D.J.; Cnop, M.; Retzlaff, B.; Walden, C.E.; Brunzell, J.D.; Knopp, R.H.; Kahn, S.E. The atherogenic lipoprotein profile associated with obesity and insulin resistance is largely attributable to intra-abdominal fat. Diabetes 2003, 52, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  203. Savini, I.; Catani, M.V.; Evangelista, D.; Gasperi, V.; Avigliano, L. Obesity-associated oxidative stress: Strategies finalized to improve redox state. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 10497–10538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  204. Tilg, H.; Moschen, A.R. Adipocytokines: Mediators linking adipose tissue, inflammation and immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 772–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Scanlon, G.; Loughman, J.; Farrell, D.; McCartney, D. A review of the putative causal mechanisms associated with lower macular pigment in diabetes mellitus. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2019, 32, 247–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  206. van Het Hof, K.H.; West, C.E.; Weststrate, J.A.; Hautvast, J.G. Dietary factors that affect the bioavailability of carotenoids. J. Nutr. 2000, 130, 503–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Nolan, J.M.; Feeney, J.; Kenny, R.A.; Cronin, H.; O’Regan, C.; Savva, G.M.; Loughman, J.; Finucane, C.; Connolly, E.; Meagher, K.; et al. Education is positively associated with macular pigment: The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 7855–7861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Bovier, E.R.; Lewis, R.D.; Hammond, B.R., Jr. The relationship between lutein and zeaxanthin status and body fat. Nutrients 2013, 5, 750–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Bohn, T. Bioavailability of non-provitamin A carotenoids. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2008, 240–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Bray, G.A.; Nielsen, S.J.; Popkin, B.M. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Gross, L.S.; Li, L.; Ford, E.S.; Liu, S. Increased consumption of refined carbohydrates and the epidemic of type 2 diabetes in the United States: An ecologic assessment. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 774–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Ludwig, D.S.; Majzoub, J.A.; Al-Zahrani, A.; Dallal, G.E.; Blanco, I.; Roberts, S.B. High glycemic index foods, overeating, and obesity. Pediatrics 1999, 103, E26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  213. Marshall, J.A.; Hamman, R.F.; Baxter, J. High-fat, low-carbohydrate diet and the etiology of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: The San Luis Valley Diabetes Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1991, 134, 590–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Ranard, K.M.; Jeon, S.; Mohn, E.S.; Griffiths, J.C.; Johnson, E.J.; Erdman, J.W., Jr. Dietary guidance for lutein: Consideration for intake recommendations is scientifically supported. Eur. J. Nutr. 2017, 56, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  215. Abdel-Aal, E.S.; Akhtar, H.; Zaheer, K.; Ali, R. Dietary sources of lutein and zeaxanthin carotenoids and their role in eye health. Nutrients 2013, 5, 1169–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  216. Djuric, Z.; Ren, J.; Blythe, J.; VanLoon, G.; Sen, A. A Mediterranean dietary intervention in healthy American women changes plasma carotenoids and fatty acids in distinct clusters. Nutr. Res. 2009, 29, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Marhuenda-Munoz, M.; Hurtado-Barroso, S.; Tresserra-Rimbau, A.; Lamuela-Raventos, R.M. A review of factors that affect carotenoid concentrations in human plasma: Differences between Mediterranean and Northern diets. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 72, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Stringham, J.M.; Johnson, E.J.; Hammond, B.R. Lutein across the Lifespan: From Childhood Cognitive Performance to the Aging Eye and Brain. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2019, 3, nzz066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. US Department of Agriculture; Agricultural Research Service; Library, N.D. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. Available online: https://www.ars.usda.gov/northeast-area/beltsville-md-bhnrc/beltsville-human-nutrition-research-center/methods-and-application-of-food-composition-laboratory (accessed on 10 April 2021).
  220. Wilson, L.M.; Tharmarajah, S.; Jia, Y.; Semba, R.D.; Schaumberg, D.A.; Robinson, K.A. The Effect of Lutein/Zeaxanthin Intake on Human Macular Pigment Optical Density: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv. Nutr. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Donoso, A.; Gonzalez-Duran, J.; Munoz, A.A.; Gonzalez, P.A.; Agurto-Munoz, C. Therapeutic uses of natural astaxanthin: An evidence-based review focused on human clinical trials. Pharmacol. Res. 2021, 166, 105479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Fakhri, S.; Abbaszadeh, F.; Dargahi, L.; Jorjani, M. Astaxanthin: A mechanistic review on its biological activities and health benefits. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 136, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Giannaccare, G.; Pellegrini, M.; Senni, C.; Bernabei, F.; Scorcia, V.; Cicero, A.F.G. Clinical Applications of Astaxanthin in the Treatment of Ocular Diseases: Emerging Insights. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Saito, M.; Yoshida, K.; Saito, W.; Fujiya, A.; Ohgami, K.; Kitaichi, N.; Tsukahara, H.; Ishida, S.; Ohno, S. Astaxanthin increases choroidal blood flow velocity. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2012, 250, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of isomeric xanthophyll carotenoids lutein, zeaxanthin, and meso-zeaxanthin.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of isomeric xanthophyll carotenoids lutein, zeaxanthin, and meso-zeaxanthin.
Nutrients 13 02441 g001
Figure 2. Flow diagram of literature search and selection criteria.
Figure 2. Flow diagram of literature search and selection criteria.
Nutrients 13 02441 g002
Figure 3. SYRCLE’s risk of bias assessment for animal studies [100].
Figure 3. SYRCLE’s risk of bias assessment for animal studies [100].
Nutrients 13 02441 g003
Figure 4. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized controlled trials [101].
Figure 4. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized controlled trials [101].
Nutrients 13 02441 g004
Figure 5. Schematic overview of proposed causative mechanisms and metabolic perturbations implicated in diabetic retinopathy. MPOD, macular pigment optical density; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Figure 5. Schematic overview of proposed causative mechanisms and metabolic perturbations implicated in diabetic retinopathy. MPOD, macular pigment optical density; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Nutrients 13 02441 g005
Table 1. International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale [37].
Table 1. International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale [37].
Disease Severity ScaleClinical Features
No apparent retinopathyNo fundus abnormalities present
Mild NPDRMicroaneurysms only
Moderate NPDRMore than just MAs, but less than severe NPDR
Severe NPDRAny of the following: (with no signs of PDR) extensive DBH in each of 4 quadrants (≥20/quadrants), venous beading in at least 2 quadrants, and/or IRMA in at least 1 quadrant
PDROne or more of the following: neovascularization, tractional retinal detachment, or vitreous/preretinal hemorrhage
Abbreviations: NPDR, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; MA, microaneurysms; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; DBH, dot blot hemorrhages; IRMA, intraretinal microvascular abnormalities.
Table 2. Animal studies of carotenoid treatment in diabetic retinopathy.
Table 2. Animal studies of carotenoid treatment in diabetic retinopathy.
Author (Year)DM Study DesignDurationTreatmentResults
Arnal (2009) [102]T1DM, via STZ-injection in Wistar rats12 wksL (0.5 mg/kg)Significantly improved GSH and GPx activity
Kowluru (2008) [103]T1DM, via STZ-injection in Lewis rats2 monthsZ (8.4 ± 1.6 mg/d);
Z (44 ± 8 mg/d)
Enhanced MnSOD and complex III expression
Kowluru (2014) [104]T1DM, via STZ-injection in Wistar rats11 monthsL (1 mg/d) and Z (2 mg/d) *Augmented retinal cell viability and survival
Muriach (2006) [105]T1DM, via A-injection in Albino mice2 wksL (0.2 mg/kg)Re-established levels of MDA, GSH and GPx
Sasaki (2010) [106]T1DM, via STZ-injection in C57BL/6 mice4 monthsL (0.1% diet)Protected visual function of inner retina
Tang (2011) [107]T2DM, via genetic db/db mice (Leprdb)8 wksL (0.05 mg/g fruits) and Z (1.76 mg/g fruits) Attenuated ER stress and ganglion cell loss
Yu (2013) [108]T2DM, via genetic db/db mice (Leprdb)8 wksL and Z (values not available) Ameliorated hypoxia and mitochondrial stress
Abbreviations: DM, diabetes mellitus; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; L, lutein; Z, zeaxanthin; STZ, streptozotocin; A, alloxan; db/db, leptin receptor deficient (Leprdb); GSH, glutathione; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; MnSOD, manganese superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; ER, endoplasmic reticulum * Multivitamin supplement formula; Wolfberry nutraceutical.
Table 3. A summary of the observational trials.
Table 3. A summary of the observational trials.
Author (Year)ParticipantsDR PresentResults
Brazionis (2009) [109]111 patients with T2DM, aged 44–77 years in USA78 No DR,
33 DR
Lower risk of DR with greater serum levels of non-pro-vitamin A (including L/Z) carotenoids (p = 0.039)
Cennamo (2019) [110]59 patients with T1DM, aged (38.2 ± 13.4) years; 40 healthy controls, aged (31.6 ± 7.4) years in Italy59 DRSignificantly reduced MPOD (p < 0.001) measured by fundus reflectometry
Davies (2002) [111]34 patients with DM (24 T2DM, 10 T1DM), aged (48.1 ± 11.6) years; 34 healthy controls, aged (36.7 ± 15.1) in United KingdomNot specifiedSignificant lower MPOD among patients with grade 2 maculopathy (p = 0.016)
Lima (2010) [112]29 patients with T2DM, aged (60.7 ± 10.7) years; 14 healthy controls, aged (56.2 ± 11.7) years in USA17 No DR,
12 NPDR
T2DM patients with or without retinopathy showed reduced MPOD (p < 0.001) measured by autofluorescence
Mares (2006) [113]1698 women from CAREDS, aged 53–86 years (108 patients with diabetes) in USANot specifiedMPOD measured by HFP (p < 0.01) significantly inversely related to diabetes and waist circumference
Scanlon (2015) [19]102 patients with DM (34 T1DM, 68 T2DM), aged (53.2 ± 12.2) years; 48 healthy controls, aged (52.5 ± 16) years in Ireland55 No DR,
47 NPDR
MPOD measured by cHFP significantly lower among T2DM (p = 0.04) compared to T1DM and controls
Scanlon (2019) [25]188 patients with T2DM, aged (64.7 ± 8.3) years; 2594 healthy controls, aged (61.4 ± 7.6) years in Ireland152 No DR,
10 NPDR
T2DM patients saw lower MPOD (p = 0.047) measured by cHFP compared to non-diabetic controls
She (2016) [114]182 patients with DM, aged (62.5 ± 7.2) years; 219 healthy controls, aged (63.6 ± 7.4) years in China134 No DR,
48 NPDR
MPOD level measured by HFP was significantly associated with central foveal thickness (p = 0.001)
Zagers (2005) [115]14 patients with DM, aged (46 ± 11) years; 14 healthy controls, aged (47 ± 11) years in NetherlandsNot specifiedDiabetic eyes showed significant reduction in fundus reflectance MPOD measurement (p < 0.001) compared to controls
Abbreviations: NPDR, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; DM, diabetes mellitus; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; L, lutein; Z, zeaxanthin; HFP, heterochromatic flicker photometry; cHFP, customized heterochromatic flicker photometry.
Table 4. Characteristics of the eligible randomized clinical trials.
Table 4. Characteristics of the eligible randomized clinical trials.
Author (Year)ParticipantsDM SubtypeDurationInterventionsResults
Chous (2016) [34]67 patients with no retinopathy or mild/moderate NPDR, aged (56.1 ± 13.2) years in USA27 T1DM,
40 T2DM
6 monthsDaily: 4 mg L and 8 mg Z (n = 39, multivitamin oral supplementation) ; placebo (n = 28)Significant increase in MPOD (p < 0.001), contrast sensitivity (p < 0.01, for all) and color error score (p < 0.001)
Hu (2011) [116]60 patients with NPDR, aged (59.5 ± 14.5) years; 30 healthy controls aged (55 ± 9.0) years in China10 T1DM,
50 T2DM
3 monthsDaily: 6 mg L and 0.5 mg Z (n = 30 NPDR); placebo oral supplementation (n = 30 NPDR, 30 controls)Significant increase in serum L/Z (p < 0.001), visual acuity (p < 0.001) and contrast sensitivity (p < 0.05, for all)
Abbreviations: NPDR, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; L, lutein; Z, zeaxanthin; EyePromise DVS multivitamin supplement.
Table 5. Common dietary sources of xanthophylls lutein and zeaxanthin [218,219].
Table 5. Common dietary sources of xanthophylls lutein and zeaxanthin [218,219].
FoodsServing SizeLutein + Zeaxanthin Content (mg)
Spinach, frozen (cooked)1 cup29.8
Kale, frozen (cooked)1 cup25.6
Swiss chard (cooked)1 cup11.0
Collard greens, frozen (cooked)1 cup8.9
Summer squash (cooked)1 cup4.0
Peas, frozen (cooked)1 cup3.8
Brussel sprouts, frozen (cooked)1 cup2.4
Broccoli, frozen (cooked)1 cup2.0
Edamame, frozen1 cup1.6
Sweet yellow corn (boiled)1 cup1.5
Asparagus (boiled)0.5 cup0.7
Avocado, raw1 medium-size0.4
Egg yolk, raw1 large0.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lem, D.W.; Gierhart, D.L.; Davey, P.G. A Systematic Review of Carotenoids in the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13072441

AMA Style

Lem DW, Gierhart DL, Davey PG. A Systematic Review of Carotenoids in the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy. Nutrients. 2021; 13(7):2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13072441

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lem, Drake W., Dennis L. Gierhart, and Pinakin Gunvant Davey. 2021. "A Systematic Review of Carotenoids in the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy" Nutrients 13, no. 7: 2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13072441

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop