Next Article in Journal
Association of Vitamin D Status with Lower Limb Muscle Strength in Professional Basketball Players: A Cross-Sectional Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Daily Protein and Energy Intake Are Not Associated with Muscle Mass and Physical Function in Healthy Older Individuals—A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Low Content of Cyclosporine A and Its Metabolites in the Colostrum of Post-Transplant Mothers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hip Fracture Patients in Geriatric Rehabilitation Show Poor Nutritional Status, Dietary Intake and Muscle Health
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms in Sex-Frailty Paradox

1
Geriatric Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
3
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 20148 Milan, Italy
4
Laboratorio Sperimentale di Ricerche di Neuroendocrinologia Geriatrica ed Oncologica, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, 20095 Cusano Milanino, Italy
5
Laboratorio Analisi Cliniche Centro di Ricerche e Tecnologie Biomediche, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, 20095 Cusano Milanino, Italy
6
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Contributed equally.
Nutrients 2020, 12(9), 2714; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092714
Submission received: 29 July 2020 / Revised: 2 September 2020 / Accepted: 3 September 2020 / Published: 5 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrients Requirements and Muscle Mass in Older Persons)

Abstract

:
The “male-female health-survival paradox” evidences that the survival advantage observed in women is linked to higher rates of disability and poor health status compared to men, a phenomenon also called the “sex-frailty paradox”. The depletion of vitamin D seems to play a role in the fragilization of old persons, and genetic polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene seem to be involved in regulating the vitamin D pathway. This study correlated the VDR gene polymorphisms (FokI, ApaI, BsmiI, and TaqI) with frailty, computed by frailty index (FI), in 202 persons (127 women and 75 men, aged from 60 to 116 years), aiming to capture the involvement of vitamin D in the sex-frailty paradox. The results showed slightly higher FI (p = 0.05), lower levels of 25(OH)D (p = 0.04), and higher levels of parathyroid hormone PTH (p = 0.002) and phosphorus (p < 0.001) in women than in men. Interestingly, the ApaI minor allele (Aa + aa) showed a significant positive association with FI (p = 0.03) and a negative association with inorganic phosphorus values (p = 0.04) compared to AA genotype only in women, regardless of age. The exact mechanism and the causal role that, in old women, links ApaI polymorphism with frailty are still unclear. However, we could speculate that a specific genetic profiling, other than 25(OH)D levels, play a role in the sex-frailty paradox.

1. Introduction

The worldwide increase of human life expectancy and the concomitant rapid aging of the population represent major demographic phenomena of the last century.
It has been known that aging has different effects in women and men: a phenomenon described as the “male-female health-survival paradox”, also known as the “sex-frailty paradox” [1], in which women experience greater longevity than men [2]. However, this survival advantage in women is linked to higher rates of disability and poor health during their lives, and characterized by more chronic diseases compared to men [1].
The higher clinical complexity is well represented by the concept of frailty that is a typical condition in older persons. It is characterized by increased vulnerability to stressors and reduced homeostatic reserves [3].
Such risk conditions seem to differently impact on women and men. Indeed, the sex-frailty paradox has recently been explained with the proposal that women may experience a different kind of frailty: though they manifest a poorer health status compared to men, such higher vulnerability does not translate into a higher risk of death [4,5,6].
Moreover, epigenetic changes, environmental factors, and anthropological culture that differently affect men and women’s lives may play a crucial role and, together with the genetic profile, concur at the definition of the sex-frailty paradox [7].
Recent studies have identified the depletion of vitamin D as a key factor contributing to the development of frailty in very old persons [8]. Strategies to prevent hypovitaminosis D have been proposed as useful to slow down the processes of “fragilization” naturally occurring during aging [9,10].
The action of this vitamin is mediated by the vitamin D receptor (VDR), a nuclear transcription-regulating factor that drives the synthesis of proteins involved in bone mineral homeostasis and cell cycle regulation. The (1,25(OH)2D)-VDR complex is transferred to the nucleus where it generates heterodimers with the retinoid X receptor (RXR), which binds a specific DNA sequence called vitamin D response element (VDRE). This results in the activation of a plethora of genes.
The VDR gene is located on the chromosome 12.13.11. It encompasses different single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), including ApaI (rs7975232) [11] and BsmI (rs1544410) [12], located in intron 8, TaqI (rs731236) in exon 9, and [13] the missense FokI (rs2228570) in exon 2.
Interestingly, in a cohort study of centenarians we have previously identified an association between these SNPs with functional, physical, and cognitive performances [14]. Consistently, in this cohort, certain genetic profiles were related to different prevalence of age-related diseases, such as hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, angina, venous insufficiency, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and arthrosis [14].
Starting from these premises, we analyzed possible associations between frailty and the vitamin D pathway as well as VDR gene profiling in a cohort of very old women and men. In this study, we used the frailty index (FI) as measure of frailty because it is designed to estimate the biological aging of the individual through a quantitative (i.e., the age-related accumulation of health deficits) [15] and multidimensional [16] approach.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

Data are from a cohort study conducted in Northern Italy between 2007 and 2014 and funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research.
A trained multidisciplinary team administered a standardized and structured questionnaire to all subjects to record information about their health, functions, medications use, clinical history, and lifestyle. In particular, the research personnel went to each centenarian’s house or nursing home to administer the evaluation.
A total of 202 persons (127 women and 75 men) aged between 60 and 116 years old were enrolled. These participants did not take any medications affecting vitamin D pathway.
The study protocol received approval from the local ethical committee. All subjects who gave written informed consent to participate in the study and filled out the questionnaire, were included in the study.

2.2. Frailty Index

A FI was computed following the criteria described by Searle et al. [17] and taking into account a wide range of age-related signs, symptoms, disabilities, and diseases.
Briefly, the constituting variables were scored as 0 (absence of the deficit) or 1 (presence of the deficit). The FI was then calculated as the ratio between the number of health deficits presented by the individual and the total number of health deficits considered for its computation (in our case, n = 30), as previously described [16].

2.3. Biochemical Analyses

Serum parathyroid hormone PTH and 25(OH) vitamin D concentrations were measured through Cobas electrochemiluminescence immunoassays (ECLIA) on the Modular E170 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Serum calcium and phosphate (inorganic) were measured with Cobas® CA2 and Cobas®PHOS2 on COBAS C702 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), employing as test principle 5-nitro-5′-methyl-BAPTA (NM-BAPTA) and molybdate UV reactions, respectively. All assays were performed according to the recommendations of the respective manufacturers.
The range of vitamin D are: >30 μg/L normal, 21–29 μg/L insufficient, and <20 μg/L lacking levels. The coefficient of variation ranges from 4.8% to 10.8% (mean values from 15.0 to 27.7). For the other parameters, the normal range values are: PTH 13–64 ng/L, calcium 8.1–10.4 mg/dL and inorganic phosphorus 2.5–4.5 mg/dL.

2.4. VDR Genotyping

For the genetic analyses, 85 out of 202 subjects were analyzed (117 subjects did not provide informed consent for these analyses). The following VDR polymorphisms were analyzed: rs731236 A/G(T/t) (TaqI), rs10735810 C/T(F/f) (FokI), rs1544410 C/T(B/b) (BsmI), and rs7975232 A/C(A/a) (ApaI). DNA was isolated from peripheral blood through the phenol/chloroform method.
SNPs were evaluated by Allelic Discrimination Real-time PCR using pre-designed TaqMan probes (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). PCR consisted of a hot start at 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 15 sec and 60 °C for 1 min. Fluorescence detection took place at 60 °C. Assays were performed in 10 μL reactions, using TaqMan Genotyping Master Mix on 96-well plates using an ABI 7000 instrument (Applied Biosystems). Control samples, representing all possible genotypes and a negative control, were included in each reaction.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Chi-square analysis was used to verify that populations were in Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) and to evaluate the sex association. Linear regression analysis was adopted to evaluate the FI association with the VDR genotype distribution in men and women, adjusting by age. Multivariate stepwise binary logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between VDR genotype and biochemical parameters. Evaluation was conducted separately in men and women and adjusted by age and FI. Analyses were carried out using SPSS 26.0 for Windows.
Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype gender association were calculated by SHEsis [18] and haplotype correlation with FI as well as with biochemical parameters was calculated by regression analysis, adjusting by age, using PLINK software [19].

3. Results

3.1. FI and Vitamin D Pathway in Women and Men

Table 1 reports the main characteristics of the study sample according to sex. No difference was observed in the mean age of women and men. The FI was slightly higher in women than in men (p = 0.05). Conversely, significantly lower levels of 25(OH)D (p = 0.04) and higher levels of PTH and phosphorus were evidenced in women compared to men (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). No significant difference was found for calcium levels.
As expected, due to the advanced age of the participants, all subjects were 25(OH)D-deficient and the women showed higher PTH levels than normal ranges.

3.2. VDR Association with FI and Vitamin D Pathway

The VDR rs73236 (ApaI), rs7975232 (TaqI), rs10735810 (FokI), and rs1544410 (BsmI) analyses were performed. Genotype distributions evidenced a low skewing of ApaI frequency from HWE equilibrium in women (p = 0.02). In particular, a higher frequency of ApaI Aa genotype was present in women than expected. No different distributions of the VDR gene polymorphisms were observed between women and men (Table S1).
In a subsequent analysis, we clustered the subjects into carriers of the minor allele (i.e., heterozygous + homozygous for minor): TaqI (Tt + tt), BsmI (Bb + bb), ApaI (Aa + aa), and FokI (Ff + ff) and carriers of the homozygote major allele: TaqI (TT), BsmI (BB), ApaI (AA), and FokI (FF).
Women carrying the minor ApaI allele (Aa + aa) showed significantly higher FI values (p = 0.03) (Table 2). No association was observed in men.
The multivariate stepwise binary logistic analysis evidenced in women a significant association between ApaI (Aa + aa) genotype with low levels of inorganic phosphorus (p = 0.04 OR = 0.18 95% IC: 0.03–0.9). No association was observed between ApaI polymorphism and 25(OH)D (p = 0.10) nor with PTH (p = 0.42). Independently of the genetic profile, phosphorus correlated with FI only in women (R = 0.21 p = 0.03), but not in men.
Linkage haplotype study was conducted separately in women and men to evaluate the linkage score between VDR variants as well as to verify the presence of association between the different haplotypes and sex. Haplotype analysis evidenced, as expected, the presence of a linkage disequilibrium (LD) between ApaI, BsmI, and TaqI (r2 > 0.3); in contrast, no linkage was detected between FokI and any of the other VDR polymorphisms (r2 < 0.10). Haplotype distributions were not significantly different between men and women.

4. Discussion

The main finding of this study was the association between VDR ApaI gene polymorphism and FI values in very old women. Interestingly, we have previously described the impact of VDR SNPs on different age-related diseases comparing the subjects by age and not by sex [14]. To our knowledge, this is the first study that correlates VDR ApaI SNP with frailty by the means of the FI computation.
How to characterize a person’s health status is not clear. Multidimensional approaches that aggregate the individual effects of multiple biological and physiological markers into an aging score have already been studied. The FI, based on the assumption that health deficits tend to accumulate with aging, represents a quantitative measure of extreme interest which is able to capture the complexity of the aging phenomenon [20].
It has been known that aging has different effects in women and men. The sex-frailty paradox is a well-described phenomenon, in which women have experienced greater longevity than men since the 18th century. However, this survival advantage in females is linked to higher rates of disability and poor health status during their lives, as demonstrated by the higher FI shown by women compared men in this cohort.
The remodeling of the endocrine system could play a key role in the different aging trajectories [21,22] and may explain the different rate of survival between the sexes [23]. In particular, this remodeling involves the parathyroid glands altering the production of PTH and, consequently, the entire vitamin D pathway [24]. In general, the consequences of these pathway changes are manifold and include the reduction of bone and skeletal muscle mass, the reduction in muscle strength, and the increase in adipose tissue. Interestingly, significant correlation was found between serum levels of vitamin D and muscle strength/physical performance mainly in women [25].
All these modifications can influence and drive the “fragilization” of the older person [8,26], particularly in women. In addition, vitamin D appears to have a role in the development of several age-related diseases (cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer, etc.) [27].
Due to the older age of our subjects, the levels of vitamin D were lower than normal ranges in both women and men. Interestingly, we observed significantly different levels not only of 25(OH)D, but also of PTH and inorganic phosphorus in women compared to men. This result may be a consequence of the 25(OH)D and PTH hormonal axis imbalance in regulating phosphorus levels, especially in women [28,29,30,31]. Conversely, no differences were shown for calcium. In women, low levels of 25(OH)D seem to be related to frailty differently than men, in accordance with the literature [32].
Most of the biological activities of 25(OH)D are mediated by VDR, a high-affinity receptor acting as a ligand-activated transcription factor. Generally, the age-related reduction of the VDR expression seems to be more evident in women than in men [33]. Alterations of the VDR gene have been hypothesized to cause important defects in gene activation, affecting calcium metabolism, cell proliferation, immune function, PTH synthesis, and intestinal absorption of calcium and phosphate [34]. As a matter of fact, VDR polymorphisms have been largely associated with different diseases as well as with successful aging [14].
Interestingly, in women carrying the minor allele of the ApaI polymorphism, we found higher FI values and lower phosphorus levels compared to women homozygous for the major allele, independently of age.
It is of note that the metabolism of phosphorus is regulated by PTH, 25(OH)D and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and, in turn, VDR regulates the gene expression of FGF23 as well as Klotho [35]. Klotho is a bona fide longevity gene that, if inactivated, generates a phenotype identical to that of FGF23-null mice [36], characterized by premature aging, decreased lifespan, elevated 25(OH)D, hyperphosphatemia, ectopic calcification, skin and muscle atrophy, osteoporosis, and hearing loss.
Although the functional role of the VDR polymorphisms is not well defined, it has been reported that ApaI together with BsmI and TaqI cause silent codon changes influencing the different stability and translation of the VDR mRNA [33] and, probably, the VDR levels.
Interestingly, in patients with chronic renal failure, the VDR genetic profile seems to perturb the FGF23 expression and consequently the physiological action of FGF23 mediated by FGF receptor and co-receptor Klotho [37].
Since ApaI minor allele per se or in linkage with BsmI is associated with different diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease [38], osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis [39], and osteopenia [40], we could speculate that ApaI minor allele is related to the “fragilization” of old women, playing a role in the low 25(OH)D levels in the sex-frailty paradox. The exact mechanism involved and whether there is a causal role is still unclear. We can postulate that a specific VDR genetic profile may impact on phosphorus levels in old women, modulating genes involved in aging [41].
This is the first study that underlines an association between a specific genetic profile of the VDR gene and frailty.
The limitations of our study may be the low number of men compared to the women, potentially affecting the statistical power of some analyses. A replication analysis in a larger group is warranted. Moreover, the ApaI distribution significantly differs from the HWE, but this is consistent with an age-related positive selective pressure of the AA genotype as already described [14].
In conclusion, these results shed light on the complex relationship between VDR SNPs and aging, suggesting a role of ApaI on the “fragilization” of very old persons.
Although these are preliminary findings, our observations could be useful in designing ad hoc clinical studies on lifestyle, vitamin D supplementation, and rehabilitation treatments in aging.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/9/2714/s1, Table S1: Genotype and allele distributions of polymorphisms of vitamin D receptor.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: B.A. and F.R.G.; methodology, A.S.C., A.D., E.F. and E.T.; formal analysis, B.A. and F.R.G.; investigation, B.A. and F.R.G.; writing—original draft preparation, B.A. and F.R.G.; writing—review and editing, M.C. (Mario Clerici), M.C. (Matteo Cesari) and G.V.; funding acquisition, D.M., G.V., B.A., M.C., M.C. and F.R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the “PSR LINEA 2 2016 and 2019”—University of Milan and Ricerca Corrente—IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (code: 05C621_2016), Ricerca Corrente 2019 [Italian Ministry of Health].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oksuzyan, A.; Juel, K.; Vaupel, J.W.; Christensen, K. Men: Good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2008, 20, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Thorslund, M.; Wastesson, J.W.; Agahi, N.; Lagergren, M.; Parker, M.G. The rise and fall of women’s advantage: A comparison of national trends in life expectancy at age 65 years. Eur. J. Ageing 2013, 10, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Fried, L.P.; Ferrucci, L.; Darer, J.; Williamson, J.D.; Anderson, G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: Implications for improved targeting and care. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2004, 59, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Gordon, E.H.; Hubbard, R.E. The Pathophysiology of Frailty: Why Sex Is So Important. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2018, 19, 4–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gordon, E.H.; Peel, N.M.; Hubbard, R.E. The male-female health-survival paradox in hospitalised older adults. Maturitas 2018, 107, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gordon, E.H.; Peel, N.M.; Samanta, M.; Theou, O.; Howlett, S.E.; Hubbard, R.E. Sex differences in frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp. Gerontol. 2017, 89, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ostan, R.; Monti, D.; Gueresi, P.; Bussolotto, M.; Franceschi, C.; Baggio, G. Gender, aging and longevity in humans: An update of an intriguing/neglected scenario paving the way to a gender-specific medicine. Clin. Sci. 2016, 130, 1711–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Buchebner, D.; Bartosch, P.; Malmgren, L.; McGuigan, F.E.; Gerdhem, P.; Akesson, K.E. Association Between Vitamin D, Frailty, and Progression of Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 104, 6139–6147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ferri, E.; Casati, M.; Cesari, M.; Vitale, G.; Arosio, B. Vitamin D in physiological and pathological aging: Lesson from centenarians. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2019, 20, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Loh, H.H.; Lim, L.L.; Yee, A.; Loh, H.S.; Vethakkan, S.R. Effect of vitamin D replacement in primary hyperparathyroidism with concurrent vitamin D deficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva. Endocrinol. 2019, 44, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Faraco, J.H.; Morrison, N.A.; Baker, A.; Shine, J.; Frossard, P.M. ApaI dimorphism at the human vitamin D receptor gene locus. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17, 2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Morrison, N.A.; Yeoman, R.; Kelly, P.J.; Eisman, J.A. Contribution of trans-acting factor alleles to normal physiological variability: Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and circulating osteocalcin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 6665–6669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Morrison, N.A.; Qi, J.C.; Tokita, A.; Kelly, P.J.; Crofts, L.; Nguyen, T.V.; Sambrook, P.N.; Eisman, J.A. Prediction of bone density from vitamin D receptor alleles. Nature 1994, 367, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gussago, C.; Arosio, B.; Guerini, F.R.; Ferri, E.; Costa, A.S.; Casati, M.; Bollini, E.M.; Ronchetti, F.; Colombo, E.; Bernardelli, G.; et al. Impact of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms in centenarians. Endocrine 2016, 53, 558–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rockwood, K.; Mitnitski, A. Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2007, 62, 722–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Arosio, B.; Ferri, E.; Casati, M.; Mari, D.; Vitale, G.; Cesari, M. The Frailty Index in centenarians and their offspring. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2019, 31, 1685–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Searle, S.D.; Mitnitski, A.; Gahbauer, E.A.; Gill, T.M.; Rockwood, K. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr. 2008, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Shi, Y.Y.; He, L. SHEsis, a powerful software platform for analyses of linkage disequilibrium, haplotype construction, and genetic association at polymorphism loci. Cell Res. 2005, 5, 97–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Purcell, S.; Neale, B.; Todd-Brown, K.; Thomas, L.; Ferreira, M.A.; Bender, D.; Maller, J.; Sklar, P.; de Bakker, P.I.; Daly, M.J.; et al. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mitnitski, A.B.; Mogilner, A.J.; Rockwood, K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. Sci. World J. 2001, 1, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Arosio, B.; Monti, D.; Mari, D.; Passarino, G.; Ostan, R.; Ferri, E.; De Rango, F.; Franceschi, C.; Cesari, M.; Vitale, G. Thyroid hormones and frailty in persons experiencing extreme longevity. Exp. Gerontol. 2020, 138, 111000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Vitale, G.; Pellegrino, G.; Vollery, M.; Hofland, L.J. ROLE of IGF-1 System in the Modulation of Longevity: Controversies and New Insights from a Centenarians’ Perspective. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Austad, S.N.; Bartke, A. Sex Differences in Longevity and in Responses to Anti-Aging Interventions: A Mini-Review. Gerontology 2015, 62, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lanske, B.; Razzaque, M.S. Vitamin D and aging: Old concepts and new insights. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2007, 18, 771–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Vitale, G.; Cesari, M.; Mari, D. Aging of the endocrine system and its potential impact on sarcopenia. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2016, 35, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Spira, D.; Buchmann, N.; Konig, M.; Rosada, A.; Steinhagen-Thiessen, E.; Demuth, I.; Norman, K. Sex-specific differences in the association of vitamin D with low lean mass and frailty: Results from the Berlin Aging Study II. Nutrition 2019, 62, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Berridge, M.J. Vitamin D deficiency accelerates ageing and age-related diseases: A novel hypothesis. J. Physiol. 2017, 595, 6825–6836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Benhamou, C.L.; Tourliere, D.; Gauvain, J.B.; Picaper, G.; Audran, M.; Jallet, P. Calciotropic hormones in elderly people with and without hip fracture. Osteoporos. Int. 1995, 5, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chapuy, M.C.; Preziosi, P.; Maamer, M.; Arnaud, S.; Galan, P.; Hercberg, S.; Meunier, P.J. Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in an adult normal population. Osteoporos. Int. 1997, 7, 439–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Freaney, R.; McBrinn, Y.; McKenna, M.J. Secondary hyperparathyroidism in elderly people: Combined effect of renal insufficiency and vitamin D deficiency. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1993, 58, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Peacock, M. Phosphate Metabolism in Health and Disease. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhou, J.; Huang, P.; Liu, P.; Hao, Q.; Chen, S.; Dong, B.; Wang, J. Association of vitamin D deficiency and frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas 2016, 94, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sato, M.; Morishita, T.; Katayama, T.; Satomura, S.; Okuno, H.; Sumida, N.; Sakuma, M.; Arai, H.; Katoh, S.; Sairyo, K.; et al. Relationship between age-related decreases in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and skeletal muscle mass in Japanese women. J. Med. Investig. 2020, 67, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Valdivielso, J.M.; Fernandez, E. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and diseases. Clin. Chim. Acta 2006, 371, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Haussler, M.R.; Haussler, C.A.; Whitfield, G.K.; Hsieh, J.C.; Thompson, P.D.; Barthel, T.K.; Bartik, L.; Egan, J.B.; Wu, Y.; Kubicek, J.L.; et al. The nuclear vitamin D receptor controls the expression of genes encoding factors which feed the “Fountain of Youth” to mediate healthful aging. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 121, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Kuro-o, M.; Matsumura, Y.; Aizawa, H.; Kawaguchi, H.; Suga, T.; Utsugi, T.; Ohyama, Y.; Kurabayashi, M.; Kaname, T.; Kume, E.; et al. Mutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing. Nature 1997, 390, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bouksila, M.; Kaabachi, W.; Mrad, M.; Smaoui, W.; El Kateb, E.C.; Zouaghi, M.K.; Hamzaoui, K.; Bahlous, A. FGF 23, PTH and vitamin D status in end stage renal disease patients affected by VDR FokI and BsmI variants. Clin. Biochem. 2018, 54, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, Y.H.; Kim, J.H.; Song, G.G. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and susceptibility to Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease: A meta-analysis. Neurol. Sci. 2014, 35, 1947–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mukhtar, M.; Sheikh, N.; Suqaina, S.K.; Batool, A.; Fatima, N.; Mehmood, R.; Nazir, S. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism: An Important Predictor of Arthritis Development. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 8326246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Sassi, R.; Sahli, H.; Souissi, C.; Sellami, S.; Ben Ammar El Gaaied, A. Polymorphisms in VDR gene in Tunisian postmenopausal women are associated with osteopenia phenotype. Climacteric 2015, 18, 624–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheikhi, A.; Barchowsky, A.; Sahu, A.; Shinde, S.N.; Pius, A.; Clemens, Z.J.; Li, H.; Kennedy, C.A.; Hoeck, J.D.; Franti, M.; et al. Klotho: An Elephant in Aging Research. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2019, 74, 1031–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants.
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants.
Women (n = 127)Men (n = 75)p
Age 80.5 ± 15.4 79.7 ± 14.20.91
FI 0.27 (0.1–0.5)0.23 (0.1–0.3)0.05
25(OH)D μg/L 17.5 ± 15.120.9 ± 14.20.04
PTH ng/L 86.8 ± 68.761.5 ± 44.20.002
Calcium mg/dL 10.1 ± 0.910.2 ± 0.50.79
Posphorus mg/dL3.7 ± 0.83.2 ± 0.5<0.001
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and/or median and interquartile range (IQR). FI: frailty index, PTH: parathyroid hormone. Statistically significant p values are in bold.
Table 2. Association between FI and VDR polymorphisms.
Table 2. Association between FI and VDR polymorphisms.
FIWomen (n = 50)Men (n = 35)
Bp95%CIBp95%CI
TaqI−0.020.56−0.10 to 0.050.030.48−0.06 to 0.12
BsmI0.060.10−0.01 to 0.14−0.050.27−0.15 to 0.04
ApaI0.080.030.01 to 0.16−0.050.37−0.15 to 0.06
FokI0.040.24−0.03 to 0.120.060.13−0.02 to 1.14
Multiple linear regression analyses between frailty index (FI) as dependent variable and each VDR polymorphism adjusted by age. TaqI (Tt + tt) vs. (TT), BsmI (Bb + bb) vs. (BB), ApaI (Aa + aa) vs. (AA), and FokI (Ff + ff) vs. FF. Statistically significant p values are in bold.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arosio, B.; Guerini, F.R.; Costa, A.S.; Dicitore, A.; Ferri, E.; Mari, D.; Torresani, E.; Clerici, M.; Cesari, M.; Vitale, G. Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms in Sex-Frailty Paradox. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2714. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092714

AMA Style

Arosio B, Guerini FR, Costa AS, Dicitore A, Ferri E, Mari D, Torresani E, Clerici M, Cesari M, Vitale G. Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms in Sex-Frailty Paradox. Nutrients. 2020; 12(9):2714. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092714

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arosio, Beatrice, Franca Rosa Guerini, Andrea Saul Costa, Alessandra Dicitore, Evelyn Ferri, Daniela Mari, Erminio Torresani, Mario Clerici, Matteo Cesari, and Giovanni Vitale. 2020. "Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms in Sex-Frailty Paradox" Nutrients 12, no. 9: 2714. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092714

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop