Next Article in Journal
The Positive Effects of Growth Mindset on Students’ Intention toward Self-Regulated Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A PLS-SEM Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Examining the Promotional Effect and Mechanism of Innovative City Pilot Policy on City Brand Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phytoremediation Potential of Sorghum as a Bioenergy Crop in Pb-Amendment Soil

by
Hanan E. Osman
1,2,*,
Ruwaydah S. Fadhlallah
1,
Wael M. Alamoudi
1,
Ebrahem M. Eid
3,4 and
Ahmed A. Abdelhafez
5,6
1
Department of Biology, Faculty of Applied Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca 24382, Saudi Arabia
2
Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11435, Egypt
3
Biology Department, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi Arabia
4
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, Egypt
5
Department of Soils and Water, Faculty of Agriculture, New Valley University, Kharga Oasis 72511, Egypt
6
National Committee of Soil Science, Academy of Scientific Research and Technology, Cairo 11694, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(3), 2178; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032178
Submission received: 25 December 2022 / Revised: 14 January 2023 / Accepted: 17 January 2023 / Published: 24 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Agriculture)

Abstract

:
Lead contamination is among the most significant threats to the environment. The phytoextraction approach uses plants that can tolerate and accumulate metals in their tissues. Lately, biofuel plants have been recommended to be suitable for remediation and implementation of potentially toxic elements (PTEs)-polluted soil. This research assessed the Pb phytoremediation potential of three Sorghum bicolor [red cultivar (S1), white cultivar (S2) and shahla cultivar (S3)]. A pot experiment with five treatments (0, 100, 200, 400 and 800 mg Pb/kg soil) was carried out to assess the potential possibility of using these cultivars to remediate the soil of Pb. The potential possibility of using these plants to phytoremediate the soil of Pb was also assessed. The results emphasized that all the examined cultivars could attain growth to maturity in high Pb spiked soil. However, Pb influenced morphological and chlorophyll contents, especially in plants grown in soil amended with 800 mg/kg. The S1 cultivar had the most significant reduction in total chlorophyll with an average of 72%, followed by the S2 and S3 cultivars (65% and 58% reduction, respectively). The highest Pb content in root (110.0, 177.6 and 198.9 mg/kg, respectively) and in-plant shoot (83.9, 103.6 and 99.0 mg/kg, respectively) were detected by sorghum (S1, S2 and S3, respectively) grown in soil enriched by 800 mg/kg of Pb. From the calculated results of the contamination indices, contamination factor (CF), translocation factor (TF), plant uptake (UT) and tolerance index (TI), none of the investigated cultivars were considered Pb hyperaccumulators, but all were identified as particularly ideal for phytostabilization.

1. Introduction

Soil is a valuable ecosystem that provides water, energy, nutrients and organic matter, all of which are necessary for the continued existence of a wide variety of organisms [1,2]. Due to unmanaged development, excessive amounts of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) are released into the environment [3]. Metal lead (Pb) is extremely toxic to humans. Inhaling or ingesting even trace amounts of lead is extremely harmful to human health [4,5,6,7]. Anthropogenic activities, such as battery recycling, mining, coal burning, pesticides, Pb-based paints, automobile exhaust and leather tanning, contribute to remarkable levels of Pb in the environment [8,9]. Alloway [10] observed a Pb concentration ranging from 2–300 g/kg in unpolluted soil, with a level of 100 g/kg being a concern to both the environment and humans. Reclamation of Pb-polluted soil is difficult due to its limited mobility, high toxicity, non-biodegradability and persistent nature [11,12,13]. As a result, scientists, policymakers and the general public throughout the world are increasingly concerned about Pb negative impacts on the environment. For the remediation of PTEs-polluted soil, several procedures, such as oxidation, physical separation, isolation and stabilization, are applied [14]. Although these approaches provide effective soil treatment, they are typically time-consuming, expensive, deplete soil fertility and ineffective for treating extremely PTEs-polluted soils [15]. The capability of plants to absorb contaminates, like Pb, could be exploited for substrate phytoremediation [16,17]. These methods include using plants that can absorb PTEs through their roots and then transport and accumulate them into harvestable parts [18,19]. In phytoextraction, plants absorb PTEs and store them in aboveground tissues. In phytostabilization, plants reduce the mobility of PTEs in the soil through root exudates. Few plants have been discovered as Pb hyperaccumulators, the majority of which are Brassicaceae [20,21]. Nonetheless, various studies have been conducted to identify remediation potential, compensating for a reduced Pb level in their tissues by growing fast, producing large biomass and being easily managed and harvested [22]. Through the application of phytoremediation technology, the Robinia pseudoacacia has been utilized successfully for the remediation of PTEs-contained soils and could be used successfully to extract 92.31% Cu and 46.64% Pb [23]. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) is a C4 crop, considered the fifth most important cereal globally. Crops of sorghum can be used for various purposes, and the resulting goods range from syrup and brushes to paper and even building materials. Livestock and people both eat sorghum [24]. This crop can be tolerant and produce high biomass when grown in harsh conditions like drought, heat and pollution [25,26]. Because of its rapid growth and high biomass yield, sorghum crop is regarded as a promising energy plant. Sorghum crop is implanted in a variety of provinces in Saudi Arabia. It is the main cereal crop in the southern area of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [27].
Multiple studies demonstrated sorghum’s capacity to tolerate PTEs from a polluted substrate [28,29,30,31,32]. To reduce the potentially disastrous effects of PTEs and their transfer to crops, it is critical to evaluate the impact of soil characteristics on metal availability and crop uptake [33]. Predicting PTEs’ content by crop plants using variables in the soil, such as pH, organic matter (OM) and soil contents, is a useful application of regression equations [34]. According to the authors, no prediction equation is excited for the uptake of Pb metal ions by sorghum crops planted in soil enrichment with Pb. In this regard, only a few studies have been conducted to predict Pb uptake by sorghum plants based on soil characteristics, such as pH and OM. Furthermore, this study is regarded as one of the most recent studies dealing with the application of sorghum crop varieties for the remediation of Pb-contaminated soils in Saudi Arabia.
Consequently, the main objectives of the current study are: (i) to formulate novel prediction equations for predicting the efficiency of three tested cultivars of sorghum crops for uptake of Pb grown in soil amendment with Pb under greenhouse conditions; (ii) to assess and compare the phytoremediation efficiency of three tested cultivars of S. bicolor for removal Pb from contaminated soil; and (iii) to determine the Pb levels in various plant organs and how they affect the tested cultivars’ growth parameters. We hypothesize that using a prediction model to predict Pb levels in contaminated soils based on soil conditions, such as pH and OM, will be beneficial. Furthermore, sorghum crops can be used to remediate Pb-contaminated soils effectively.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Seeds of different cultivars of Sorghum bicolor [red cultivar (S1), white cultivar (S2) and shahla cultivar (S3)] were identified and obtained from the Ministry of Environment Water and Agriculture, KSA.

2.2. Experimental Design

At Umm Al-Qura University in Saudi Arabia (21°18′56.3″ N, 39°56′47.8″ E), a pot experiment was conducted between October and December 2020. The temperatures and humidity levels in the greenhouse were controlled to maintain a range from 20 °C to 28 °C and 50 ± 4%, respectively. Several types of sorghum, grown for their bioenergy potential on Pb-contaminated soil, were put through an experiment to measure the amount the PTEs could absorb. The soil was collected from nearby farmland and sands at a ratio of 2:1; then it was air-dried, sieved and blended until it was uniform in texture (loamy sand). The electrical conductivity of this soil was 0.44 dS/cm (EC), and the pH was 7.56. The total background level of Pb was 8.18 ± 2.1 mg/kg, while the DTPA-Pb (available) background level was 2.10 ± 0.05 mg/kg. Lead was added to the soil as lead nitrate [Pb (NO3)2] at five different concentrations: 0, 100, 200, 400 and 800 mg Pb/kg dry soil. Based on the ALINORM [35] phytotoxicity threshold, the Pb levels of 400 and 800 mg/kg were chosen. After letting the treated soil equilibrate for around 30 days, a total of 90 individual pots were employed in a completely randomized design (3 cultivars, 5 treatments and 6 replicate). Five seeds of each cultivar were put into 4 kg of soil in pots measuring 21 cm in diameter and 23 cm in height, and the plants were then grown in a greenhouse for 80 days under natural day/light conditions. After 15 days of seeding, we manually weeded the pots and irrigated them twice a week with a drip system, reducing the number of plants per pot from 5 to 3 to remove weak plants and maintain healthy ones.

2.3. Growth Measurements

The crop plants under study were harvested 80 days after planting and dissected into roots and shoots. Each plant’s root and shoot lengths were recorded. Additionally, the fresh and dry weights (g/plant) were calculated by weighing the various components of each plant before and after oven-drying at 65 °C till constant weight.

2.4. Plant and Soil Analysis

For each treatment, we took three samples of the collected plant material, dried them in the oven (at 65 °C), ground them in a metal-free plastic mill until they were uniform in texture and sieved them through a 2-mm mesh sieve. The photosynthetic pigments were extracted from the fresh leaves, and their concentrations were determined colorimetrically. The content of chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids was calculated as described by Arnon [36].
Chlorophyll a (g/L) = 9.784(O.D.at 662) − 9.90(O.D.644)
Chlorophyll b (g/L) = 21.426(O.D.at 644) − 4.65(O.D.662)
Carotenoids (g/L) = 4.695(O.D.at 440.5) − 0.268(chlorophyll a + b)
Pb content was measured using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Shimadzu AA-6300; Shimadzu Co. Ltd., Japan) after a 1 g ground sample was digested with 20 mL of a tri-acid mixture consisting of HNO3:H2SO4:HClO4 (5:1:1, v/v/v) [37].
Three samples of soil were collected before planting crops, allowed to air dry and then sieved through a 2-mm mesh. Soil water extracts of 1/5 (w/v) were made and tested for pH and EC using a pH meter (Model 9107 BN, ORION type), and a conductivity meter (60 Sensor Operating Instruction Corning), respectively. Plant analytical methods were also used to assess the total Pb content of soil samples taken before cultivation. DTPA (diethylene triamine pentaacetate) extract was used to quantify the accessible Pb content in the soil before and after harvesting for each sorghum cultivar across treatments, as described by Lindsay and Norvell [38]. Ten gm of air-dried soil was extracted with 20 mL of DTPA extraction solution. After 2 h of shaking, suspensions were gravity filtered with Whatman 42 filter paper. Filtrates were analyzed for Pb content and measured using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer.

2.5. Data Analysis

Based on growth data, we used the method to determine the tolerance index (TI) of the three sorghum cultivars evaluated for Pb removal [39]. To predict PTEs’ absorption by plant roots from soil, the bioaccumulation factor (BAFroot) is a useful tool. In contrast, PTEs’ translocation from roots to shoots is measured by the translocation factor (TF). They were determined to find out which of the sorghum cultivars used in the study had the best capacity to take up Pb from the soil and move it along to their leaves [40]. Galal et al. [41] provided the following method for measurements:
BAFroot = Croot/Csoil
TF = Cshoot/Croot
where, Csoil, Croot and Cshoot are the Pb concentrations (mg/kg) in the soil, root and shoot, respectively.
Also, Pb uptake (μg/pot) was calculated according to Utmazian et al. [42].
TU (µg/pot) = concentration of Pb in roots or shoots dwt × dwt of roots or shoots g/pot
The simple linear correlation coefficient was used to analyze the association between plant-PTEs and soil factors (r). To validate the data, we chose eighteen shoot and root observations from the entire dataset. To estimate the concentration of Pb in three tested cultivars of sorghum tissues, based on soil pH, OM content and soil Pb as independent variables, we ran a regression approach utilizing 18 additional data for the same tissues. The quality of the models was determined by calculating the following metrics [43]: coefficient of determination (R2), model efficiency (ME), its strength (mean normalized average error, MNAE) and mean normalized bias (MNB).
ME = 1− {∑ (Cmodel − Cmeasured)2/(∑ (Cmeasured − Cmean)2}
MNAE = {∑ (|Cmodel − Cmeasured|/Cmeasured)}/n
MNB = ∑ (Cmodel − Cmeasured)/∑ Cmeasured
In this equation, Cmodel represents the projected PTEs concentration; Cmeasured represents the measured PTEs concentration; Cmean represents the mean of the measured PTEs concentration; and n represents the number of observations. PTEs concentrations in the validation dataset (n = 18 for each root and shoot) were estimated using the derived regression equations. Student’s t-test was used to analyze significant discrepancies between predicted and actual Pb levels in the same tissue [44].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data on plant characteristics and Pb-treatment parameters were log-transformed as necessary to ensure normality of distribution and homogeneity of variance before analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. Using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), we compared the significance of differences in Pb-concentration between the various tissues of the three sorghum cultivars used in this study. The simple linear correlation coefficient (r) was computed to evaluate the connection between the Pb-tolerance index of the plant growth data and the bioaccumulation criterion, which included the Pb concentration and the bioaccumulation factor. All statistical tests were performed with SPSS [44].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Lead Levels in Soil

The soil in the experiment was enhanced with various amounts of Pb (0, 100, 200, 400 and 800 mg/kg), resulting in soil DTPA-Pb values of 2.10, 43.22, 87.55, 108.19 and 135.78 mg/kg (Table 1). It was found that the content of the soluble fraction of Pb in the soil after 80 days of plantation was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower compared to the initial values in the soil before cultivation, as compared to the initial values in the soil before plantation. This was true across all study conditions and all three sorghum cultivars. Such reduction varied from one cultivar to another; for example, the Pb reduction value in soil cultivated with S1, S2 and S3 plants grown in soil amendment with 800 mg/kg reached 45.63, 44.17 and 43.65%, respectively, as compared to soil before cultivation (Table 1).
PTEs are found in soils in various chemical forms. They typically display a range of physical and chemical behaviors regarding their potential toxicity, mobility, biological availability and chemical interactions. Lead, which may form stable complexes with organic material, iron and manganese oxides and clays, is a major ecotoxic element that pollutes both terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Soil carbonates, hydroxides and phosphates are also possible precipitates [45,46]. Smith et al. [47] reported a range of 10–40 mg/kg dry soil for the soil Pb content they utilized in their studies, with a median value of about 20 mg/kg dry soil for the soil Pb content used in the present study. Thus, before additions, the soil utilized in the research was Pb-free, but afterward, it became Pb-polluted. To add extra complexity, the overall Pb content, pH, concentrations of other PTEs and macro-nutrients all impact the amount of Pb that is available to plants [48]. Prior to the experiment, the slightly alkaline (pH = 7.56) soil in the present investigation had an available Pb concentration of between 2.10 and 135.78 mg/kg at the control and 800 mg/kg Pb-treatment, respectively. Soil with a slightly alkaline pH may have reduced metal availability and solubility, as stated by Al-Sodany et al. [49].

3.2. Effect of Pb-Treatments on the Growth Criteria

The high biomass yield of the tested plant for the phytoremediation approach was selected to ensure a high removal rate of different PTEs from a substrate. Sorghum cultivars were chosen in this work based on their capability to uptake metals from a contaminated substrate, high biomass and fast growth rate. In this work, there were significant variations of different tested growth criteria of different cultivars grown on soil enriched with varying levels of Pb (Table 2). The reduction in the plant length and biomass of both roots and shoots of the tested cultivars was progressive and gradual with the increase of Pb concentration in soil. This is due to the cumulative effect of the bioaccumulated amount of Pb in the different tissues. For example, such reduction may reach 75, 89, 78, 65, 71 and 60%, respectively, in the dry weight of root and shoot in different cultivars (S1, S2 and S3) treated with 800 Pb compared with control treatment (Table 2).
It was found that different cultivars of sorghum (S1, S2 and S3) had their maximum root and shoot length and biomass production (13.5, 115.5 cm, 1.29, 0.38, 12.78, and 2.17 g/plant, respectively) at control, while the lowest (4.2, 44.0 cm, 0.18, 0.06, 0.98 and 0.10 g/plant), respectively was recorded at 800 mg/kg Pb-treatment (Table 2). The significant decline in biomass production in both roots and shoots as the impact of PTEs was outlined in a cultivar of species [50,51,52,53].
High concentrations of PTEs in plants cause significant damage to many physiological activities, ultimately leading to plant death. When plants are exposed to excessive levels of metals, physiologically active enzymes are inhibited [54] and destroy mineral metabolism [55].
The root system is in direct contact with Pb and acts as the main entrance for metal ions [56]. According to Sharma and Dubey [57], plant roots quickly respond to absorbed Pb by changing the branching pattern and reducing root growth. According to several works, root growth is inhibited under Pb stress due to Pb-induced inhibition of cell division in root tips [57,58].
As previously described, a high removal rate of hazardous PTEs requires a high biomass of plants specifically chosen for phytoextraction technology. Three sorghum cultivars were selected for their high biomass, fast growth rate and potential to uptake Pb from polluted soils [59]. Three different cultivars of sorghum showed altered growth and metabolic rates when subjected to PTEs stress, such as Pb. Effects on growth and biomass production were noticeable at high Pb concentrations, and they were similar to those reported by previous researchers in other plant species [53,60,61,62,63]. The cumulative effect of damaged or inhibited physiological function under Pb stress conditions is responsible for the considerable suppression of morphological features in Pb-treated plants compared to control, a finding consistent with the work of Ramana et al. [64] and Ryser and Sauder [65]. Tolerance index (TI) is considered an important parameter that affects selecting the plant with phytoremediation potential. TI was calculated in the root and shoot of three tested sorghum cultivars at various Pb concentrations (Table 2). TI was measured at various Pb concentrations by dividing the dry weight of the plant exposed to different metal concentrations by the dry weight estimated during control growth [66]. Generally, sorghum plants displayed a good TI to Pb (on average, 68%). According to mean TI values at different Pb concentrations, the tested sorghum cultivars can be arranged in the following descending order: S3 (78%), followed by S2 (74%), then 51% for S1. In this regard, Hira et al. [67] found that both tested plants, guar and sesame, had different tolerance indexes (TIs) under Pb stress, and their value decreased by increasing Pb doses. Also, Srinivasan et al. [68] reported that growth inhibition is a common response to PTEs stress and is also one of the most important agricultural indices of PTEs tolerance.

3.3. Effect of Pb-Treatment on Pigment Contents

Pigment contents are a significant reflection of plant response to different stress; it could be due to total chlorophyll, chl. a, and b contents under these conditions were declined. Increasing the level of Pb in the soil led to a decline in the growth of three tested cultivars of sorghum, which led to significant (p ≤ 0.05) gradual inhibition of total chlorophyll, chl. a and b contents (Table 3). This is due to the threatening impact of excessive Pb contents, which cause plants’ weakness and vital metabolic activities. Chlorophyll a and b, total chl. and carotenoids were lowered by (mean from three tested cultivars) 64.5, 67.3, 65.8 and 73.1%, respectively, with 800 mg/kg Pb contents as compared to untreated plants (Table 3). Several authors detected the same results in different plants [51,69,70,71].
The plant subject to PTEs’ stress, especially Pb, leads to inhibition of chlorophyll contents. This may be associated with the high ability of these plants to accumulate metals that destroy the chloroplasts and/or inhibit chlorophyll synthesis [72,73] or directly destroy the photosynthetic apparatus and decrease the photosynthetic production due to enhanced Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) [74].

3.4. Lead Content in Plant Tissue and Phytoremediation Efficiency

A close positive correlation was observed between the concentrations of Pb in the soil and its concentrations in the root and shoot of the tested sorghum cultivars (Table 4). From the tabulated data, it is clear that increasing Pb contents in the soil led to a significant (p ≤ 0.05) increase in Pb content in different parts of the tested cultivars of sorghum (Table 4 and Table 5). As expected, the highest concentration of Pb was found in plants grown in soil amended with 800 mg/kg of Pb for all tested cultivars of sorghum. In contrast, the minimum Pb contents were detected in sorghum cultivars grown in untreated soil. The highest Pb content in root (110.0, 177.6 and 198.9 mg/kg, respectively) and in-plant shoot (83.9, 103.6 and 99.0 mg/kg, respectively) was detected by sorghum (S1, S2 and S3, respectively) grown in soil enriched by 800 mg/kg of Pb.
Regarding the distribution of Pb among the different parts of all tested cultivars of sorghum under the different levels of soil enrichment with Pb, the data revealed a tendency to accumulate Pb ions in roots rather than in shoots (Table 4). This could be attributed to PTEs being absorbed by roots from soil solution and then translocated to leaves (via xylem tissues), where they are stored in vacuoles [76]. Since it prevents metal translocation to shoots, Pb accumulation in roots is thought to increase plant tolerance to Pb toxicity [77].
Consistent with our findings, different works detected that the underground portions were the principal depot for accumulating Pb in sorghum, followed by the aerial portions [30,31,32,78,79]. In this regard, Blanco et al. [31] performed a study that collected sorghum plants grown in a former battery recycling plant in Córdoba city (Argentina), indicating that sorghum accumulated Pb principally in roots and only a small amount was detected in the aerial portion. Furthermore, Memoli et al. [32] noticed that Pb accumulated primarily in the sorghum’s roots, the leaves and stems and the fruits.Also, the roots accumulate Pb twenty folds than leaves.
Estimates of Pb ion uptake by roots were obtained using the BAFroot. In most cases, elevated soil Pb levels were associated with a rise in BAFroot values (Table 4). Potential accumulation of Pb from the soil to the roots of the three sorghum cultivars was shown by a BAFroot higher than 1 at each Pb-treatment, with the exception of the control and 100 mg/kg treatments for tested cultivars. Treatment with 800 mg/kg Pb produced the greatest BAFroot (2.60) in S3. Furthermore, TF values ranged from 0.35 to 0.81 for the tested cultivars of sorghum, which means that tested cultivars did not transfer Pb from root to shoot with TF less than 1. The maximum values of TF were detected in the case of S3 plants, while the lowest ones were found in the case of S1 plants (Table 4). The tested cultivars exhibited significant variation in the TF values at different Pb contents (Table 4 and Table 5). Goni et al. [80] investigated the uptake and translocation of Fe, Zn, Cr, Pb, Cu, Ni and Cd in various parts of rice plants irrigated with contaminated water and detected that the TF for tested metals was below 1, which indicates that the majority of the metals were stored in the roots. In our case, TF of Pb ranged between 0.35 and 0.81. Similar results were reported by Baldi et al. [81] and Yoon et al. [82] on sorghum and Alaboudi et al. [53] on sunflower.
Concentration of the Pb in the plant and dry matter yield affect the absorption of tested metal (PT). Therefore, a plant species that can tolerate and accumulate moderate levels of Pb would be suitable for remediating a contaminated site by producing high biomass yielding crop. There is higher uptake in the shoot (238.05 g/pot) over the root (65.7 g/pot), and the uptake of the overall plant is (299.81 g/pot) at Pb 800 mg/kg, indicating that the plant’s uptake pattern of Pb does not reflect the trend of its concentration in the tissue (Table 4). It may be because shoots generate more biomass than roots do. The uptake levels varied from cultivar to cultivar based on each plant’s ability to absorb Pb from the soil and its total biomass. Despite ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and sunflower (H. annus) having plant Pb concentrations more than two times the values for redtop (Agrostis alba L.) and corn (Zea mays), Cooper et al. [83] reported that the greatest plant Pb uptake occurred in redtop and corn, which generated the greatest biomass.

3.5. Determining Cause and Effect through a Correlation Analysis

The Pb-tolerance index was negatively connected with root Pb contents (r = −0.384, −0.383, −0.555 and −0.366) and shoot Pb contents (r = −0.483, −0.666, −0.362 and −0.787), as shown by the simple linear correlation coefficient (Table 6). Root bioaccumulation factor (BAFroot), translocation factor (TF) and plant uptake (UT) were all inversely connected with root and shoot length tolerance index (Table 6).
Three features must be met for a plant to be considered a Pb hyperaccumulator: (a) TF > 1, (b) a concentration of 1000/g dry wt in the shoot and (c) BAF > 1, as stated by (Baker and Walker [84]). The current investigation failed to find evidence that the plant fulfilled all three of the criteria for a Pb hyperaccumulator. That is why it is considered an excludable item. Even in the presence of high concentrations of PTEs, excluders have been observed to tolerate severely polluted soils and to take up low amounts of PTEs [85].

3.6. Regression Models

As shown in Table 7, regression models were used to predict the levels of Pb in sorghum shoots and roots related to soil Pb contents, pH and OM contents. Correlations were clearly observed between the measured and predicted Pb levels in shoots and roots with a high ME and R2 and low mean MNAE. In addition, p-values indicated no significant differences between the actual and estimated Pb levels in either shoots or roots of tested sorghum cultivars. The obtained results demonstrated that the used model fit well for estimating Pb levels in shoots and roots based on their Pb concentrations in soils and pH and OM levels of the tested soils. As shown in (Table 7), a high R2 value was associated with a high ME value. Sorghum cultivar S1 had the highest R2 and ME values recorded, with averages of 0.94 and 0.98 in shoots and 0.97 and 0.99 in roots. Sorghum cultivar S3 had lower R2 and ME values, with averages of 0.90 and 0.92 in shoots for R2 and ME, respectively, and 0.86 and 0.87 in roots. It is worth noting that soil pH and OM contents both play major roles in Pb absorption by the growing sorghum cultivars. The previous studies conducted by Eid et al. [86] showed that soil pH has negative correlations with tested PTEs, i.e., Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb and Zn. In addition, they have observed that OM contents ultimate PTEs uptake by the growing plants. In this study, we went almost to similar findings; soil pH and OM contents significantly affected Pb uptake by sorghum cultivars. In this regard, the utilized model is effective for calculating Pb absorption based on soil Pb content, pH and OM content of the tested soil. T-tests for Pb in tissues of tested cultivars found no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the measured and estimated Pb in plant tissues.
The Pearson correlation analysis is shown in Figure 1 and Supplementary Material S1. The solubility of PTEs is controlled by the adsorption and desorption phenomena in soil, which are primarily influenced by soil characteristics, i.e., pH, OM, CEC, Eh and the concentration of specific PTEs ion [33]. The obtained results showed that Pb concentrations in the growing sorghum cultivars were strongly linked to the Pb concentrations in soils where they were grown. These findings imply that Pb can be easily transferred from soils to plants. The previous studies went almost to similar findings [87]. They have mentioned that, as the concentration of PTEs increased in soil, the growing plants’ uptake increased. Sorghum cultivar S1 showed a negative correlation between soil pH and plant Pb absorption. The average pH value of the examined soil was 7.59, and raising soil pH resulted in less Pb ion uptake by the sorghum plant. PTEs solubility and absorption by growing plants are influenced by soil pH, as demonstrated by Abdelhafez et al. [6] and Abdelhafez and Li [3]. Raising soil pH is well-known to limit Pb absorption by forming less soluble forms of Pb metal ions [6,88,89]. S2 and S3 cultivars, on the other hand, showed a different pattern, with average pH values of investigated soils of 7.42 and 7.55, respectively. These were lower than those of the S1 cultivar; as a result, Pb solubility increased under low pH, resulting in elevated Pb absorption by the growing plants.
Organic matter plays an essential role for metal ions speciation in soil [90]. Most studies demonstrated that increasing soil organic matter contents led to increased PTE solubility of PTEs and their uptake by the growing plants [33,91]. However, in this study, OM contents in soils negatively but not significantly affected the absorption of Pb by the tested sorghum cultivars, except for S2 sorghum cultivar.
Figure 2 displays the scatter plot of Pb bioaccumulation factor (BAF) values. The results revealed that the BAF of the investigated cultivars had high BAF values above 1 at soil Pb concentrations > 50 mg/kg. This finding suggests that metal content is the primary factor influencing Pb absorption by growing plants.

4. Conclusions

This study tested the Pb phytoremediation potential of three S. bicolor cultivars grown on different Pb-contaminated soils. Our research showed that sorghum cultivars might be used to clean up Pb-contaminated soil. Some soil properties, including pH, EC, OM, CEC, Eh and Pb ion concentration, may affect the availability of Pb ions in the tested soils. Therefore, it contributes considerably to the efficiency with which sorghum cultivars may extract Pb. Compared to the S1 and S2 cultivars, the Pb removal efficiency of S3 was clearly the highest. Soil Pb levels may be accurately predicted using the evaluated regression model, which showed excellent performance and efficiency.
These plants were also evaluated for their potential to be used in Pb phytoremediation. It was shown that all tested cultivars were capable of growing in soil heavily spiked with Pb. However, Pb affected plant morphology and chlorophyll content, especially in soil treated with 800 mg/kg. Sorghum cultivars (S1, S2 and S3) planted in soil enriched by 800 mg/kg of Pb had the greatest Pb concentration in root (110.0, 177.6 and 198.9 mg/kg, respectively) and in plant shoot (83.9, 103.6 and 99.0 mg/kg, respectively). Despite not being Pb hyperaccumulators, the contamination indices (CT, TF, UT and TI), contamination factor (CF), translocation factor (TF), plant uptake (UT) and tolerance index (TI) revealed that evaluated cultivars were ideal candidates for phytostabilization. Overall, the regression model results and Pb uptake by sorghum cultivars confirmed our hypothesis. More research is needed to study the potential combinations of plant growth promoters and phytoremediation technologies to obtain high Pb removal effeminacy from polluted soils.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su15032178/s1.

Author Contributions

Methodology: H.E.O. and R.S.F.; Analysis: H.E.O., R.S.F., E.M.E. and A.A.A.; Data curation: H.E.O., A.A.A. and E.M.E.; Writing—original draft preparation: H.E.O., E.M.E., W.M.A. and A.A.A.; Writing—review and editing H.E.O., R.S.F., E.M.E., W.M.A. and A.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The author would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University for supporting this work by Grant Code: (22UQU4320730DSR07) Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Alihan, C.; Hatice, C. Effects of lead (PbCl2) stress on germination of lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.) lines. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 8608–8612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nawab, J.; Shah, M.T.; Khan, S.; Qing, H.; Khan, K.; Ali, R. Quantification of heavy metals in mining affected soil and their bioaccumulation in native plant species. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2015, 17, 801–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Abdelhafez, A.A.; Li, J. Feasibility of biochar manufactured from organic wastes on the stabilization of heavy metals in a metal smelter contaminated soil. Chemosphere 2014, 117, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Duruibe, J.O.; Ogwuegbu, M.O.C.; Egwurugwu, J.N. Heavy metal pollution and human biotoxic effects. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2007, 2, 112–118. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gul, I.; Manzoor, M.; Kallerhoff, J.; Arshad, M. Enhanced phytoremediation of lead by soil applied organic and inorganic amendments: Pb phytoavailability, accumulation, and metal recovery. Chemosphere 2020, 258, 127405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abdelhafez, A.A.; Abbas, H.H.; Abd-El-Aal, R.S.; Kandil, N.F.; Li, j.; Mahmoud, W. Environmental and health impacts of successive mineral fertilization in Egypt. Clean Soil Air Water 2012, 40, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Osman, H.E.M.; Abdel-Hamed, E.M.W.; Al-Juhani, W.S.M.; Al-Maroai, Y.A.O.; El-Morsy, M.H.E. Bioaccumulation and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in food crops irrigated with freshwater and treated wastewater: A case study in Southern Cairo, Egypt. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 50217–50229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gul, I.; Manzoor, M.; Hashim, N.; Yaqoob, K.; Kallerhoff, J.; Arshad, M. Comparative effectiveness of organic and inorganic amendments on cadmium bioavailability and uptake by Pelargonium hortorum. J. Soils Sediments 2019, 19, 2346–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Rehman, M.Z.; Javed, M.R.; Bashir, A. Lead toxicity in cereals and its management strategies: A critical review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2018, 229, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alloway, B.J. Soil processes and the behavior of heavy metals. In Heavy Metals in Soils; Blackie Academic and Professional; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1995; pp. 11–37. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gul, I.; Manzoor, M.; Rizwan, M.; Silvestre, J.; Hina, K.; Kallerhoff, J.; Arshad, M. EDTA-assisted phytoextraction of lead and cadmium by Pelargonium cultivars grown on spiked soil. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2019, 21, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Ali, B.; Adrees, M.; Arshad, M.; Hussain, A.; Rehman, M.Z.; Waris, A.A. Zinc and iron oxide nanoparticles improved the plant growth and reduced the oxidative stress and cadmium concentration in wheat. Chemosphere 2019, 214, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Arshad, M.; Merlina, G.; Uzu, G.; Sobanska, S.; Sarret, G.; Dumat, C.; Silvestre, J.; Pinelli, E.; Kallerhoff, J. Phytoavailability of lead altered by two Pelargonium cultivars grown on contrasting lead-spiked soils. J. Soils Sediments 2016, 16, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mahmood-ul-Hassan, M.; Suthar, V.; Ahmad, R.; Yousra, M. Heavy metal phytoextraction—Natural and EDTA-assisted remediation of contaminated calcareous soils by sorghum and oat. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2017, 189, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Eid, E.M.; Galal, T.M.; Sewelam, N.A.; Talha, N.I.; Abdallah, S.M. Phytoremediation of heavy metals by four aquatic macro-phytes and their potential use as contamination indicators: A comparative assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 12138–12151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, P.B.A.N.; Dushenkov, V.; Motto, H.; Raskin, I. Phytoextraction: The use of plants to remove heavy metals from soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 1232–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Padmavathiamma, P.K.; Li, L.Y. Phytoremediation technology: Hyper-accumulation metals in plants. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2007, 184, 105–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, X.; Xiao, J.; Salam, M.M.A.; Chen, G. Evaluation of dendroremediation potential of ten Quercus spp. for heavy metals contaminated soil: A three-year field trial. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 851, 158232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Suman, J.; Uhlik, O.; Viktorova, J.; Macek, T. Phytoextraction of heavy metals: A promising tool for clean-up of polluted environment. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Drozdova, I.; Alekseeva-Popova, N.; Dorofeyev, V.; Bech, J.; Belyaeva, A.; Roca, N.A. Comparative study of the accumulation of trace elements in Brassicaceae plant species with phytoremediation potential. Appl. Geochem. 2019, 108, 104377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tangahu, B.V.; Sheikh Abdullah, S.R.; Basri, H.; Idris, M.; Anuar, N.; Mukhlisin, M.A. review on heavy metals (As, Pb, and Hg) uptake by plants through phytoremediation. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 36, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kiran, B.R.; Prasad, M.N.V. Ricinus communis L. (castor bean), a potential multi-purpose environmental crop for improved and integrated phytoremediation. EuroBiotech J. 2017, 1, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chirilă Băbău, A.M.; Micle, V.; Damian, G.E.; Sur, I.M. Sustainable ecological restoration of sterile dumps using Robinia pseudoacacia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 14021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Meki, M.N.; Snider, J.L.; Kiniry, J.R.; Raper, R.L.; Rocateli, A.C. Energy sorghum biomass harvest thresholds and tillage effects on soil organic carbon and bulk density. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 43, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Epelde, L.; Mijangos, I.; Becerril, J.M.; Garbisu, C. Soil microbial community as bioindicator of the recovery of soil functioning derived from metal phytoextraction with sorghum. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41, 1788–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhuang, P.; Shu, W.S.; Li, Z.; Liao, B.; Li, J.L.; Shao, J.S. Removal of metals by sorghum plants from contaminated land. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21, 1432–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chaudhary, S.A. Grasses of Saudi Arabia; National Herbarium National Agriculture and Water Research Center Ministry of Agriculture and Water: Riyadh, Sudi Arabia, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kumawat, D.M.; Dubey, P.S. Sorghum straw as an efficient remover of metal from wastewater. Curr. Sci. 1991, 61, 47–49. [Google Scholar]
  29. An, Y.J. Soil ecotoxicity assessment using cadmium-sensitive plants. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 127, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Marchiol, L.; Fellet, G.; Perosa, D.; Zerbi, G. Removal of trace metals by Sorghum bicolor and Helianthus annuus in a site polluted by industrial wastes: A field experience. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2007, 45, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Blanco, A.; Salazar, M.J.; Vergara, C.C.; Pereyra, C.; Cavaglieri, L.R.; Becerra, A.G.; Pignata, M.L.; Rodriguez, J.H. Multidisciplinary study of chemical and biological factors related to Pb accumulation in sorghum crops grown in contaminated soils and their toxicological implications. J. Geochem. Explor. 2016, 166, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Memoli, V.; Esposito, F.; De Marco, A.; Arena, C.; Vitale, L.; Tedeschi, A.; Magliulo, V.; Maisto, G. Metal compartmentalization in different biomass portions of Helianthus annuus L. and Sorghum bicolor L. grown in an agricultural field inside an urban fabric. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 121, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zeng, F.; Ali, S.; Zhang, H.; Ouyang, Y.; Qiu, B.; Wu, F.; Zhang, G. The influence of pH and organic matter content in paddy soil on heavy metal availability and their uptake by rice plant. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Waegeneers, N.; Ruttens, A.; Temmerman, L.D.A. dynamic model to calculate cadmium concentrations in bovine tissues from basic soil characteristics. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 2815–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. ALINORM, 07/30/13; Food Standard Programme Codex Alimentarius Commission, 13th Session, Report of the Thirty-Eight Session of the Codex Committee on Food Hygiene. FAO/WHO, Joint WHO (World Health Organization)/FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization): Houston, TX, USA, 2007.
  36. Arnon, D.J. Chlorophyll absorption spectrum and quantitative determination. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1956, 20, 449–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Allen, S.E. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials; Blackwell Scientific Publications: London, UK, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lindsay, W.L.; Norvell, W.A. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc iron manganese and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1978, 42, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, M.; Luo, Q.; Liu, S.; Zhao, Y.; Long, Y.; Pan, Y. Screening ornamental plants to identify potential Cd hyperaccumulators for bioremediation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 162, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ghosh, M.; Singh, S.P. A comparative study of cadmium phytoextraction by accumulator and weed species. Environ. Pollut. 2005, 133, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Galal, T.M.; Hassan, L.M.; Ahmed, D.A.; Alamri, S.A.M.; Alrumman, S.A.; Eid, E.M. Heavy metals uptake by the global economic crop (Pisum sativum L.) grown in contaminated soils and its associated health risks. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0252229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Utmazian, M.N.D.S.; Wieshammer, G.; Vega, R.; Wenzel, W.W. Hydroponic screening for metal resistance and accumulation of cadmium and zinc in twenty clones of willows and poplars. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 148, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Novotná, M.; Mikeš, O.; Komprdová, K. Development and comparison of regression models for the uptake of metals into various field crops. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 207, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. SPSS. SPSS Version 20.0; SPSS Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  45. Gandhin, N.; Sirishan, D.; Asthana, D. Phytoremediation of lead contaminated soil by using Sorghum bicolor. Res. Rev. Biosci. 2015, 10, 333–342. [Google Scholar]
  46. McBride, M. Environmental chemistry of soils. Environ. Chem. Soils 1994, 7, 406. [Google Scholar]
  47. Smith, D.B.; Cannon, W.F.; Woodruff, L.G.; Solano, F.; Kilburn, J.E.; Fey, D.L. Geochemical and Mineralogical Data for Soils of the Conterminous United States; US Geological Survey Data Series 801; US Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  48. Alloway, B.J. Zinc in Soils and Crop Nutrition, 2nd ed.; IZA/IFA: Brussels, Belgium; Paris, France, 2008; p. 139. [Google Scholar]
  49. Al-Sodany, Y.M.; Saleh, M.A.; Arshad, M.; Abdel Khalik, K.N.; Al-Bakre, D.A.; Eid, E.M. Regression models to estimate accumulation capability of six metals by two macrophytes, Typha domingensis and Typha elephantina, grown in an arid climate in the mountainous region of Taif, Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Toler, H.D.; Morton, J.B.; Cumming, J.R. Growth and metal accumulation of mycorrhizal sorghum exposed to elevated copper and zinc. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2005, 164, 155–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gomes, M.P.; Marques, T.C.L.L.S.M.; Nogueira, M.O.G.; Castro, E.M.; Soares, A.M. Ecophysiological and anatomical changes due to uptake and accumulation of heavy metal in Brachiaria decumbens. Sci. Agric. 2011, 68, 566–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Mirshekali, H.; Hadi, H.; Amirnia, R.; Hodaverdiloo, H. Effect of zinc toxicity on plant productivity, chlorophyll and Zn contents of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and common lambsquarter (Chenopodium album). Int. J. Agric. Res. Rev. 2012, 2, 247–254. [Google Scholar]
  53. Alaboudi, K.A.; Ahmed, B.; Brodie, G. Phytoremediation of Pb and Cd contaminated soils by using sunflower (Helianthus annuus) plant. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2018, 63, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gadd, G.M. Geomycology: Biogeochemical transformations of rocks, minerals, metals and radionuclides by fungi, bioweathering and bioremediation. Mycol. Res. 2007, 111, 3–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Janas, K.M.; Zieli, A.; Ska-Tomaszewska, J.; Rybaczek, D.; Maszewski, J.; Posmyk, M.M.; Amarowicz, R.; Kosińska, A. The impact of copper ions on growth, lipid peroxidation, and phenolic compound accumulation and localization in lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.) seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 167, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Piechalak, A.; Tomaszewska, B.; Baralkiewicz, D.; Malecka, A. Accumulation and detoxification of lead ions in legumes. Phytochemistry 2002, 60, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sharma, P.; Dubey, R.S. Lead toxicity in plants. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 17, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Eun, S.O.; Shik Youn, H.; Lee, Y. Lead disturbs microtubule organization in the root meristem of Zea mays. Physiol. Plant 2000, 110, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Forte, J.; Mutiti, S. Phytoremediation potential of Helianthus annuus and Hydrangea paniculata in copper and lead-contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017, 228, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hamadouche, N.A.; Aoumeur, H.; Djediai, S.; Slimani, M.; Aoues, A. Phytoremediation potential of Raphanus sativus L. for lead contaminated soil. Acta Biol. Szeged. 2012, 56, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  61. Gupta, D.K.; Huang, H.G.; Corpas, F.J. Lead tolerance in plants: Strategies for phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 2150–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hamvumba, R.; Mataa, M.; Mweetwa, A.M. Evaluation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and chinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis) for phytoremediation of lead-contaminated soils. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 3, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Alves, J.C.; de Souza, A.P.; Pôrto, M.L.A.; Fontes, R.L.F.; Arruda, J.; Marques, L.F. Potential of sunflower, castor bean, common buckwheat and vetiver as lead phytoaccumulators. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. E Ambient. 2016, 20, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Ramana, S.; Tripathi, A.K.; Bharati, K.; Singh, A.B.; Kumar, A.; Sahu, A.; Rajput, P.S.; Dey, P.; Saha, J.K.; Patra, K.P. Toler ance of cotton to elevated levels of Pb and its potential for phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 32299–32309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ryser, P.; Sauder, W.R. Effects of heavy-metal-contaminated soil on growth, phenology and biomass turnover of Hieracium piloselloides. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 140, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chang, A.C.; Granato, T.C.; Page, A.L. A methodology for establishing phytotoxicity criteria for chromium, copper, nickel and zinc in agricultural land application of municipal sewage sludges. J. Environ. Qual. 1992, 1, 521–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hira, A.; Arain, B.A.; Abbasi, J.T.M.; Sadi, M.; Farah, A. Accumulation and distribution of lead (Pb) in plant tissues of guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) and sesame (Sesamum indicum L.): Profitable phytoremediation with biofuel crops. Geol. Ecol. Landsc. 2018, 2, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Srinivasan, M.; Sahi, S.V.; Paulo, J.C.F.; Venkatachalam, P. Lead heavy metal toxicity induced changes on growth and antioxidative enzymes level in water hyacinths [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.)]. Bot. Stud. 2014, 55, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Soudek, P.; Katrušáková, A.; Sedláček, L.; Petrová, Š.; Kočí, V.; Maršík, P.; Griga, M.; Vaněk, T. Effect of heavy metals on inhibition of root elongation in 23 cultivars of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2010, 59, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Galal, T.M. Health hazards and heavy metals accumulation by summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) cultivated in contaminated soils. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Rahbari, A.; Fatemi, H.; Esmaiel Pour, B.; Rizwan, M.; Soltani, A.A. Lead (Pb)-resistant bacteria inhibit Pb accumulation in dill (Anethum graveolens L.) by improving biochemical, physiological, and antioxidant enzyme response of plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 5704–5713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Gangwar, S.; Singh, V.P.; Srivastava, P.K. Modification of chromium (VI) phytotoxicity by exogenous gibberellic acid application in Pisum sativum (L.) seedlings. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2011, 33, 1385–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Huang, H.; Wang, K.; Zhu, Z.; Li, Y.; He, Z.; Yang, X.E. Moderate phosphorus application enhances Zn mobility and uptake in hyperaccumulator Sedum Alfredii. Environ. Sci. Pollut. 2013, 20, 2844–2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yan, K.; Chen, P.; Shao, H.B.; Zhang, L.; Xu, G. Effects of short term high temperature on photosynthesis and photosystem II performance in sorghum. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2011, 197, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kabata-Pendias, A. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  76. De Abreu, C.B.; do Sacramento, B.L.; Alves, A.T.; Moura, S.C.; Pinelli, M.S.; Neto, A.D.d.-Z. Nutritional and biochemical changes induced by lead in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Semin. Ciênc. Agrár. Londrina 2017, 37, 1229–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Azad, H.N.; Shiva, A.H.; Malekpour, R. Toxic effects of lead on growth and some biochemical and ionic parameters of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seedlings. Curr. Res. Biol. Sci. Taiwan 2011, 3, 398–403. [Google Scholar]
  78. Al Chami, Z.; Amer, N.; Al Bitar, L.; Cavoski, I. Potential use of Sorghum bicolor and Carthamus tinctorius in phytoremediation of nickel, lead and zinc. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 3957–3970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Angelova, V.R.; Ivanova, R.V.; Delibaltova, V.A.; Ivanov, K.I. Use of sorghum crops for in situ phytoremediation of polluted soils. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2011, 1, 693–702. [Google Scholar]
  80. Goni, M.A.; Ahmad, J.U.; Halim, M.A.; Mottalib, M.A.; Chowdhury, D.A. Uptake and translocation of metals in different parts of crop plants irrigated with contaminated water from DEPZ area of Bangladesh. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2014, 92, 726–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Baldi, A.; Cecchi, S.; Grassi, C.; Zanchi, C.A.; Orlandini, S.; Napoli, M. Lead bioaccumulation and translocation in herbaceous plants grown in urban and peri-urban soil and the potential human health risk. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yoon, J.; Cao, X.; Hou, Q.; Ma, L.Q. Accumulation of Pb, Cu and Zn in native plants growing on contaminated Florida site. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 368, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Cooper, E.M.; Sims, J.T.; Cunningham, S.D.; Huang, J.W.; Berti, W.R. Chelate-assisted phytoextraction of lead from contaminated soils. J. Environ. Qual. 1999, 28, 1709–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Baker, A.J.; Walker, P.L. Ecophysiology of metal uptake by tolerant plants: Heavy metal tolerance in plants. In Evolutionary Aspects; Shaw, A.J., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1990; pp. 155–177. [Google Scholar]
  85. Wenzel, W.W.; Bunkowski, M.; Puschenreiter, M.; Horak, O. Rhizosphere characteristics of indigenously growing nickel hyperaccumulator and excluder plants on serpentine soil. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 123, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Eid, E.M.; Khedher, K.M.; Ayed, H.; Arshad, M.; Mouldi, A.; Shaltout, K.H.; Sewelam, N.A.; Galal, T.M.; El-Bebany, A.F.; Alshehri, A.M.A. Prediction models based on soil properties for evaluating the heavy metal uptake into Hordeum vulgare L. grown in agricultural soils amended with different rates of sewage sludge. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2022, 32, 106–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Intawongse, M.; Dean, J.R. Uptake of heavy metals by vegetable plants grown on contaminated soil and their bioavailability in the human gastrointestinal tract. Food Addit. Contam. 2022, 23, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Bravo, S.; Amorós, J.A.; Pérez, G.F.J.; Moreno, M.M.; Sánchez-Ormeno, M.; Higueras, P. Influence of the soil pH in the uptake and bioaccumulation of heavy metals (Fe, Zn, Cu, Pb, and Mn) and other elements (Ca, K, Al, Sr and Ba) in vine leaves, Castilla-La Mancha (Spain). J. Geochem. Explor. 2017, 174, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kiciska, A.; Pomykała, R.; Izquierdo-Diaz, M. Changes in soil pH and mobility of heavy metals in contaminated soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2022, 73, e13203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, Z.; Liang, D.; Peng, Q.; Cui, Z.; Huang, J.; Lin, A. Interaction between selenium and soil organic matter and its impact on soil selenium bioavailability: A review. Geoderma 2017, 295, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Liang, H.M.; Lin, T.H.; Chiou, J.M.; Yeh, K.C. Model evaluation of the phytoextraction potential of heavy metal hyperaccumulators and non-hyperaccumulators. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 1945–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Pearson correlation coefficient (r-values, n = 30) between Pb concentrations in three sorghum cultivars tissues and the chemical characteristics of the soil. OM: organic matter content.
Figure 1. Pearson correlation coefficient (r-values, n = 30) between Pb concentrations in three sorghum cultivars tissues and the chemical characteristics of the soil. OM: organic matter content.
Sustainability 15 02178 g001
Figure 2. Scatter plot of Pb’s bioaccumulation factor (BAF) values in three sorghum cultivars roots concerning their soil concentrations: (A) cultivar 1; (B) cultivar 2; (C) cultivar 3.
Figure 2. Scatter plot of Pb’s bioaccumulation factor (BAF) values in three sorghum cultivars roots concerning their soil concentrations: (A) cultivar 1; (B) cultivar 2; (C) cultivar 3.
Sustainability 15 02178 g002
Table 1. Available Pb content (mean ± SD) of the soil before and after cultivation of the different cultivars of Sorghum bicolor crop plants for 80 days.
Table 1. Available Pb content (mean ± SD) of the soil before and after cultivation of the different cultivars of Sorghum bicolor crop plants for 80 days.
Treatments
(mg/kg)
Before HarvestAfter Harvest
S. bicolor
S1
S. bicolor
S2
S. bicolor
S3
Control2.10 ± 0.051.79 ± 0.13 *1.66 ± 0.15 *1.49 ± 0.06 *
10043.22 ± 5.8432.40 ± 4.28 *31.73 ± 3.51 *37.01 ± 5.83 *
20087.55 ± 7.1255.70 ± 6.97 *54.00 ± 5.06 *54.77 ± 6.59 *
400108.19 ± 8.5669.32 ± 5.56 *65.26 ± 6.05 *69.84 ± 8.81 *
800135.78 ± 7.1273.82 ± 8.94 *75.80 ± 6.60 *76.51 ± 9.93 *
*: The mean soil value after harvesting was significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) from its corresponding value before cultivation.
Table 2. Morphological measurements and tolerance index (TI%) of the different cultivars of Sorghum bicolor crop plants grown under different Pb treatments for 80 days.
Table 2. Morphological measurements and tolerance index (TI%) of the different cultivars of Sorghum bicolor crop plants grown under different Pb treatments for 80 days.
Treatments
(mg/kg)
Root Length
(cm)
Shoot Length
(cm)
Root FW
(g/plant)
Root DW
(g/plant)
Shoot FW
(g/plant)
Shoot DW
(g/plant)
TI Root (%)TI Shoot (%)
Sorghum S1
Control13.50 ± 2.50 a106.83 ± 5.01 a0.82 ± 0.09 a0.24 ± 0.06 a6.17 ± 0.99 a0.97 ± 0.20 a
1009.50 ± 1.45 b91.67 ± 7.88 b0.58 ± 0.06 b0.20 ± 0.04 a4.21 ± 0.82 b0.73 ± 0.06 b83 ± 5.5 a75 ± 7.8 b
2007.13 ± 2.32 c66.00 ± 8.11 c0.54 ± 0.06 b0.12 ± 0.01 b3.24 ± 0.93 b0.62 ± 0.05 c60 ± 4.1 b85 ± 9.4 a
4005.00 ± 1.05 d54.67 ± 9.43 d0.38 ± 0.02 c0.06 ± 0.01 b1.85 ± 0.31 c0.16 ± 0.04 d50 ± 4.7 c16 ± 2.7 c
8004.23 ± 0.76 d44.00 ±6.18 e0.18 ± 0.01 d0.06 ± 0.01 b0.98 ± 0.12 e0.10 ± 0.02 c25 ± 3.9 d10 ± 1.9 d
Sorghum S2
Control12.00 ± 2.00 a85.67 ± 8.21 a1.11 ± 0.16 a0.32 ± 0.07 a12.78 ± 2.80 a2.17 ± 0.88 a
1009.00 ± 1.52 b69.33 ± 6.21 b0.81 ± 0.16 b0.26 ± 0.04 b9.31 ± 3.07 b1.85 ± 0.31 b81 ± 7.2 b83 ± 6.8 a
2007.50 ± 1.45 c62.00 ± 6.50 bc0.70 ± 0.09 b0.25 ± 0.06 b8.74 ± 0.06 b1.39 ± 0.29 c96 ± 8.1 a77 ± 7.2 b
4005.67 ± 0.76 d56.07 ± 5.79 cd0.43 ± 0.06 c0.16 ± 0.02 c7.50 ± 0.62 bc1.10 ± 0.24 d64 ± 6.5 c79 ± 5.8 b
8004.80 ± 0.98 d49.00 ± 5.09 d0.26 ± 0.08 d0.07 ± 0.02 d5.05 ± 0.51 c0.76 ± 0.19 e44 ± 4.2 d69 ± 5.1 c
Sorghum S3
Control13.33 ± 3.04 a115.50 ± 8.91 a1.29 ± 0.22 a0.38 ± 0.04 a9.96 ± 1.01 a1.96 ± 0.27 a
10010.17 ± 1.76 b94.33 ± 7.86 b1.14 ± 0.11 ab0.32 ± 0.01 b8.53 ± 1.63 b1.77 ± 0.32 a84 ± 5.5 a90 ± 7.8 a
2008.50 ± 1.20 c80.67 ± 8.21 c0.96 ± 0.21 b0.27 ± 0.07 c8.33 ± 1.45 b1.35 ± 0.19 b84 ± 4.9 a76 ± 6.9 b
4006.75 ± 0.95 d68.75 ± 6.25 d0.68 ± 0.12 c0.22 ± 0.06 c6.78 ± 1.10 c1.27 ± 0.16 b81 ± 5.7 b74 ± 5.6 b
8005.15 ± 0.65 e47.50 ± 7.50 e0.51 ± 0.09 c0.11 ± 0.02 d5.33 ± 0.69 d0.79 ± 0.18 c50 ± 4.8 c62 ± 6.2 c
Means with different letters are significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 3. Chlorophyll contents of the different cultivars of Sorghum bicolor crop plants grown under different Pb treatments for 80 days.
Table 3. Chlorophyll contents of the different cultivars of Sorghum bicolor crop plants grown under different Pb treatments for 80 days.
Treatments
(mg/kg)
Chl. aChl. bTotal Chl.A/B ratioCarotenoids
Sorghum S1
Control1.75 ± 0.20 a1.12 ± 0.12 a2.87 ± 0.20 a1.56 ± 0.18 b2.51 ± 0.48 a
1001.33 ± 0.17 b1.15 ± 0.14 a2.48 ± 0.29 b1.16 ± 0.28 c2.38 ± 0.46 ab
2001.10 ± 0.14 c0.93 ± 0.12 b2.03 ± 0.26 c1.19 ± 0.13 c1.90 ± 0.22 bc
4000.91 ± 0.12 d0.62 ± 0.09 c1.53 ± 0.21 d1.47 ± 0.18 b1.52 ± 0.15 c
8000.53 ± 0.08 e0.27 ± 0.05 d0.79 ± 0.09 e1.97 ± 0.27 a0.69 ± 0.06 d
Sorghum S2
Control1.98 ± 0.39 a1.37 ± 0.11 a3.35 ± 0.54 a1.47 ± 0.51 ab2.86 ± 0.24 a
1001.33 ± 0.21 b1.00 ± 0.08 b2.33 ± 0.26 b1.33 ± 0.32 b2.35 ± 0.28 b
2000.99 ± 0.14 bc0.87 ± 0.09 c1.86 ± 0.36 c1.14 ± 0.22 b1.84 ± 0.25 c
4000.89 ± 0.13 bc0.58 ± 0.07 d1.47 ± 0.35 cd1.55 ± 0.27 ab1.18 ± 0.24 c
8000.76 ± 0.12 c0.41 ± 0.08 e1.17 ± 0.32 d1.84 ± 0.34 a0.82 ± 0.15 d
Sorghum S3
Control2.05 ± 0.31 a1.52 ± 0.24 a3.57 ± 0.24 a1.37 ± 0.22 a2.88 ± 0.29 a
1001.58 ± 0.26 b1.09 ± 0.17 b2.67 ± 0.30 b1.44 ± 0.21 a2.28 ± 0.24 b
2001.12 ± 0.21 b0.94 ± 0.14 b2.06 ± 0.04 c1.20 ± 0.16 ab1.85 ± 0.10 c
4001.07 ± 0.11 c0.86 ± 0.18 bc1.94 ± 0.39 c1.25 ± 0.10 ab1.34 ± 0.21 d
8000.82 ± 0.13 d0.67 ± 0.07 c1.49 ± 0.20 d1.21 ± 0.09 ab0.72 ± 0.11 e
Means with different letters are significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 4. Pb-concentration (mean ± SE, n = 3) in the roots and shoots, translocation factor (TF), bioaccumulation factor (BAFroot), root, shoot and total plant uptake of different cultivars of Sorghum bicolor crop plants grown under different Pb-treatments for 80 days.
Table 4. Pb-concentration (mean ± SE, n = 3) in the roots and shoots, translocation factor (TF), bioaccumulation factor (BAFroot), root, shoot and total plant uptake of different cultivars of Sorghum bicolor crop plants grown under different Pb-treatments for 80 days.
Treatments
(mg/kg)
Pb Concentration in Plant Tissues µg/gTFBAFrootPb Uptake (µg/pot)
RootShootRootShootTotal
Sorghum S1
Control0.16 ± 0.01 e0.11 ± 0.03 e0.69 ± 0.08 ab0.09 ± 0.01 e0.06 ± 0.02 c0.33 ± 0.06 d0.39 ± 0.05 d
10015.39 ± 3.35 d5.28 ± 0.95 d0.35 ± 0.07 c0.48 ± 0.07 d4.71 ± 0.83 b11.46 ± 2.44 c16.17 ± 2.51 c
20062.36 ± 6.32 c39.46 ± 1.73 c0.64 ± 0.04 b1.12 ± 0.17 c11.01 ± 1.74 a73.44 ± 5.18 a84.42 ± 8.58 a
40088.12 ± 5.24 b60.63 ± 5.97 b0.69 ± 0.06 ab1.28 ± 0.13 b8.37 ± 1.26 ab28.47 ± 3.08 b36.84 ± 4.05 b
800110.00 ± 8.47 a83.93 ± 6.81 a0.76 ± 0.05 a1.49 ± 0.14 a10.95 ± 2.56 a25.62 ± 2.09 b36.99 ± 3.74 b
Sorghum S2
Control0.18 ± 0.02 e0.13 ± 0.01 e0.71 ± 0.10 ab0.11 ± 0.01 e0.18 ± 0.05 d0.81 ± 0.09 d0.99 ± 0.08 d
10016.50 ± 2.88 d8.03 ± 1.08 d0.49 ± 0.06 c0.52 ± 0.03 d12.99 ± 2.83 c44.43 ± 5.27 c57.42 ± 6.67 c
20066.70 ± 5.90 c45.56 ± 4.63 c0.69 ± 0.07 ab1.24 ± 0.13 c50.88 ± 7.65 a189.54 ± 7.01 b240.42 ± 9.67 b
400100.52 ± 8.38 b74.16 ± 6.12 b0.74 ± 0.10 a1.55 ± 0.15 b39.20 ± 4.54 b234.77 ± 10.42 a273.97 ± 10.91 ab
800177.64 ± 13.37 a103.56 ± 10.15 a0.59 ± 0.08 bc2.35 ± 0.23 a39.33 ± 7.42 b238.05 ± 13.70 a277.38 ± 10.28 a
Sorghum S3
Control0.15 ± 0.01 e0.11 ± 0.01 e0.74 ± 0.11 b0.10 ± 0.01 d0.18 ± 0.04 d0.63 ± 0.08 c0.81 ± 0.09 d
10021.62 ± 2.61 d8.54 ± 1.66 d0.40 ± 0.05 d0.59 ± 0.10 c20.67 ± 3.76 c45.60 ± 4.73 b66.30 ± 5.24 c
20061.83 ± 5.21 c50.17 ± 4.14 c0.81 ± 0.13 a1.13 ± 0.21 b50.34 ± 6.74 b203.37 ± 9.55 a253.71 ± 10.81 b
40079.30 ± 7.45 b58.70 ± 6.70 b0.74 ± 0.11 b1.14 ± 0.14 b52.95 ± 4.05 b222.90 ± 14.54 a275.82 ± 11.60 ab
800198.91 ± 12.58 a99.03 ± 8.31 a0.50 ± 0.09 c2.60 ± 0.30 a65.7 ± 5.82 a233.73 ± 9.84 a299.81 ± 13.53 a
Safe limit *Up to 10
Excessive or toxic limit **30–300
* ALINORM [35]; ** Kabata-Pendias [75]. Means with different letters are significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 5. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates the variations in the Pb contents in root and shoots, translocation factor (TF), bioaccumulation factor (BAF), root, shoot and plant uptake of the three tested cultivars of Sorghum bicolor plants grown under different Pb treatments.
Table 5. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates the variations in the Pb contents in root and shoots, translocation factor (TF), bioaccumulation factor (BAF), root, shoot and plant uptake of the three tested cultivars of Sorghum bicolor plants grown under different Pb treatments.
VariableF-Value
TreatmentPlantIntercept
Root Pb1609.10 ***63.77 ***8682.65 ***
Shoot Pb2477.50 ***47.33 ***14,119.01 ***
TF51.08 ***0.4165880.73 ***
BAF572.10 ***29.95 ***5128.61 ***
Root Uptake140.51 ***195.83 ***1426.41 ***
Shoot Uptake234.01 ***263.96 ***1966.09 ***
Plant Uptake293.65 ***342.072561.82 ***
***: p < 0.001.
Table 6. Correlation matrix of the Pb tolerance index (TI) and accumulation characteristics for all tested cultivars of Sorghum biolocor.
Table 6. Correlation matrix of the Pb tolerance index (TI) and accumulation characteristics for all tested cultivars of Sorghum biolocor.
VariableTolerance Index
Root Length
(cm)
Shoot Length
(cm)
No. of LeavesRoot Weight
(g/plant)
Shoot Weight
(g/plant)
Pb content in root (mg/kg)−0.384 **−0.383 **−0.688 **−0.555 **−0.366 **
Pb content in shoot (mg/kg)−0.753 **−0.736 **−0.713 **−0.571 **−0.696 **
BAFroot−0.550 **−0.542 **−0.588 **−0.631 **−0.440 **
TF−0.621 **−0.619 **−0.625 **−0.691 **−0.591 **
Plant Uptake−0.279 *−0.278 *−0.092−0.320 **−0.141
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01.
Table 7. Regression models between Pb concentrations in three sorghum cultivars tissues (mg/kg) and soil Pb (mg/kg), pH and organic matter content (OM%).
Table 7. Regression models between Pb concentrations in three sorghum cultivars tissues (mg/kg) and soil Pb (mg/kg), pH and organic matter content (OM%).
EquationR2MEMNAEMNBStudent’s t-test
t-Valuep
Sorghum S1
Pbshoot = 691.621 + (1.223 × Pbsoil) − (94.162 × pH) + (1.331 × OM)0.9410.9790.1850.0290.2460.811
Pbroot = 694.125 + (1.632 × Pbsoil) − (95.143 × pH) + (2.576 × OM)0.9650.9880.1490.0110.1420.891
Sorghum S2
Pbshoot = −617.666 + (1.335 × Pbsoil) + (81.480 × pH) − (0.659 × OM)0.9090.9260.2130.0460.5750.579
Pbroot = −1556.612 + (2.139 × Pbsoil) + (206.009 × pH) + (0.532 × OM)0.9230.9500.2070.0360.5740.580
Sorghum S3
Pbshoot = −633.742 + (1.231 × Pbsoil) + (81.468 × pH) + (1.260 × OM)0.8990.9220.2840.0461.3930.197
Pbroot = −1717.556 + (2.197 × Pbsoil) + (221.489 × pH) + (4.900 × OM)0.8580.8650.3010.0521.9790.079
R2: coefficient of determination; ME: model efficiency; MNAE: mean normalized average error; MNB: mean normalized bias.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Osman, H.E.; Fadhlallah, R.S.; Alamoudi, W.M.; Eid, E.M.; Abdelhafez, A.A. Phytoremediation Potential of Sorghum as a Bioenergy Crop in Pb-Amendment Soil. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2178. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032178

AMA Style

Osman HE, Fadhlallah RS, Alamoudi WM, Eid EM, Abdelhafez AA. Phytoremediation Potential of Sorghum as a Bioenergy Crop in Pb-Amendment Soil. Sustainability. 2023; 15(3):2178. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032178

Chicago/Turabian Style

Osman, Hanan E., Ruwaydah S. Fadhlallah, Wael M. Alamoudi, Ebrahem M. Eid, and Ahmed A. Abdelhafez. 2023. "Phytoremediation Potential of Sorghum as a Bioenergy Crop in Pb-Amendment Soil" Sustainability 15, no. 3: 2178. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032178

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop