Next Article in Journal
A Model for an Order-Picking Problem with a One-Directional Conveyor and Buffer
Next Article in Special Issue
Research on the Spatiotemporal Distribution and Cultural Tourism Strategy of Modern Educational Architectural Heritage in Nanjing
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Rainfall in Urban Metropolitan Cities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Complex Nexus between Sustainable Development and Green Tourism through Advanced GMM Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Cultural Landscape of Rural Cemeteries on the Polish–Czech Borderlands: Multi-Faceted Visual Analysis as an Element of Tourism Potential Assessment

1
Institute of Security Engineering, Faculty of Security Studies, General Tadeusz Kościuszko Military University of Land Forces, 51-147 Wrocław, Poland
2
Institute of Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Wroclaw, 50-137 Wrocław, Poland
3
Voivodeship Office for the Protection of Monuments in Wrocław, 50-243 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(18), 13730; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813730
Submission received: 31 July 2023 / Revised: 29 August 2023 / Accepted: 9 September 2023 / Published: 14 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tourism, Sustainable Development, and Cultural Heritage)

Abstract

:
This article presents the tourism potential of the Polish–Czech borderlands (Klodzko Land, Lower Silesia, Poland), in which historical sacred sites, namely cemeteries and churches, play a significant role. An analysis of the most important features of sacred sites was carried out to present the diversity of the architectural richness of the region. At the same time, attention was paid to additional elements, such as their visual aspects and their impact on shaping space. The research is based on the sacred sites located on the Polish–Czech borderland. As part of the work, an analysis of historical, natural, and landscape conditions was performed along with the spatial layout of 106 cemeteries. During the field research, inventories of landscape and natural values were carried out. The assessment of landscape value was carried out using an original concept to enable an indication of site’s tourism potential on the basis of visual aspects of its space. The article and the research methods contained within concern interdisciplinary research combining architecture, landscape architecture, socio-economic geography, and tourism.

1. Introduction

Elements of cultural heritage and sacred sites have been an stimulus for the development of tourism for many generations [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. According to the World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), 330 million people a year undertake religious tourism [12,13]. Sanctuaries and places commemorating important events become important centers for the development of tourism. This contributes to the growth of the popularity of a place, the expansion of the service sector, as well as a seasonal or constant influx of people. Visitors to places of worship have various motives that become reasons for choosing their travel interests [14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. These can be religious needs, the desire to see famous places, the need to become familiar with works of architecture and others that often exist or are created next to important sacred sites. This analysis takes into consideration that well-known and important places in terms of religion or tourism are often “overcrowded” [21,22,23,24,25,26,27].
The intensification of tourism (regardless of the motives of visitors) in certain periods (tourist seasonality, holiday periods, celebrations of important events, etc.) may cause “discomfort”, a sense of “overloading”, and could even intensify negative feelings during sightseeing [28,29,30]. Therefore, it may be worth discovering and popularizing sites that can potentially be a tourist attractor, especially in the context of shaping the development of religious tourism. When creating a new “tourist product” or promoting facilities that are to become the reason for the development of pioneering travel, the diverse needs of stakeholders should be taken into account, as well as the opportunity to propose interesting and inspiring stimuli [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41].
The aim of the article is to present the tourist potential of the Polish–Czech borderlands (Klodzko Land, Lower Silesia, Poland). Particular attention is paid to the sacred sites of cemeteries and churches. An analysis of the most important features of sacred sites was carried out in order to present the diversity of the architectural richness of the region. At the same time, attention was paid to additional elements such as the visual aspects of sacred sites and their impact on shaping space.

2. Materials and Methods

The article presents the results of research carried out under a grant on Wiejskie przykościelne cmentarze pogranicza polsko-czeskiego w krajobrazie woj. dolnośląskiego (“Rural churchyards of the Polish–Czech borderlands in the landscape of the Lower Silesian Voivodeship”). Comparative research on this area has been conducted since September 2022 and has been financed under the MEiN (Polish Ministry of Education and Science) Nauka dla Społeczeństwa (“Science for Society”). (Publication co-financed from the state budget under the program of the Polish Ministry of Education and Science under the name “Science for Society”, project no. NdS/552172/2022/2022, amount of co-financing PLN 487 978, total project value PLN 487 978). The research includes sacred sites located on the Polish–Czech borderlands, primarily including an analysis of historical, natural, and landscape conditions, as well as the spatial layout of 106 cemeteries. During the field research, inventories of landscape and natural values were carried out. As part of desk research, information related to the history and origin of sites, their transformation over time, as well as issues related to the shaping of the surrounding space were collected. Attention was also paid to important aspects connected to the historical and contemporary development of areas directly related to the analyzed sites.
This article presents a selected part of the research. Attention was focused on the area of Kłodzko Land (Lower Silesia, Poland), due to the richness and diversity of historic sacred sites found there. At the same time, these areas are characterized by natural and landscape diversity. Due to their physiographic conditions, they are important areas stimulating the development of tourism. A skillful combination of values may provide a stimulus for the future development of a new tourism trend in these areas: religious tourism. The results of field inventories and desk surveys are presented in two tables synthesized in a manner to show the potential and advantages of the analyzed sacred sites, and the cemeteries and churches located within them. The first table contains data related to the location, the history of origin, and important elements of cultural heritage. These elements were:
  • Location of sites in administrative terms;
  • Location of sites against the village background;
  • Religious affiliation of current and past facilities;
  • The dominant architectural style of churches;
  • The history of cemeteries and their origins;
  • Spatial features of cemeteries: the degree of preservation of the spatial layout and the nature of the burial field;
  • Historical elements of cemeteries: boundaries, gates, tombstones, epitaphs, chapels, monuments to the fallen, etc.;
  • Other important elements affecting the diversity and richness of facilities.
An assessment of landscape value was also carried out using existing approaches [42,43,44,45,46,47,48] and an original idea enabling an indication of the potential of a place on the basis of visual aspects of its space. The aspects included:
  • Architectural elements: the visual value of the church, state of preservation (technical condition), significance and technical condition of architectural elements.
  • Landscape value: location against the background of a village, position of a church with the cemetery (site as a landscape dominant), attractiveness and diversity of panoramas and views from the cemetery, the natural value of the space surrounding the sites, the state of preservation of greenery in the cemetery, the importance of archetypes in shaping the image of space.
While inventorying the architectural elements, attention was paid to the most valuable, increasing its tourist attractiveness. During the assessment of landscape and visual values, a five-point scale was used, where a score of 5 indicated the greatest impact on the positive perception of space and the shaping of the potential of the place, while a score of 1 was assigned to criteria that have a negligible impact on the image of the space. Detailed assessment criteria are presented in Table 1.

3. Results

3.1. An Analysis of Geographical, Historical, Location Conditions

For detailed analysis sites (cemeteries and churches) located in Kłodzko Land (Terra Glacensis), in the counties of Kłodzko and Kamienna Góra, Lower Silesia, Poland were selected. In each of the villages there is a cemetery, and within it a church. The research area is located in the southern part of Poland and since 1945 it has belonged to the Polish state. As a border area, its history was shaped by Polish and Czech influences [49,50,51].
This area is attractive for tourists in terms of natural values, especially due to its physical and geographical features—there are diverse mountain ranges in terms of form and structure: Sowie, Orlickie, Bystrzyckie and Stołowe. In addition, an area of about 50,000 ha is protected due to the richness of nature and landscape. These are the Stołowe Mountains National Park, Śnieżnicki Landscape Park, Sowie Mountains Landscape Park, several nature reserves, protected landscape areas, and NATURA 2000 sites [52,53,54,55].
An extraordinary advantage of Kłodzko Land is the existing network of hiking and cycling trails. Due to the fact that both countries—Poland and Czechia—belong to the European Union, these routes are an element of integrating communities. At the same time, undiscovered, forgotten, or unusual sacred sites may contribute to strengthening the tourist potential of the region in the future [56,57,58].
Ten sites located in Kłodzko Land were selected for detailed analyses. Nine of them are located within Kłodzko County and one within Kamienna Góra County. During field research, attention was paid to the location of sites and their role in the landscape. An inventory of the most historically significant architectural elements affecting attractiveness was also made. The information collected in the field was supplemented by desk research, during which the focus was on the analysis of data related to the history of the origin of sites (cemeteries and churches), tracing changes In the formation of the architectural style of churches, as well as identifying the special features of sites affecting the richness and diversity of sites. A detailed summary of the collected data is provided in the tables (Figure 1 and Table 2).
Most of the analyzed sites are located in the historical center of a village or on a hill. This is related to historical conditions. Formerly, churches were places for local residents to gather together, a center of worship and testified to the rank of the town. A location on a hill indicated an emphasis on the religious context: a combination of the earthly and the divine. In Gorzanów, a church with a cemetery is located near the sites of the former palace and park complex. In Goworów, the church and the former cemetery were connected by an avenue of trees with a new cemetery. The avenue is a peculiar element in the landscape; it can be seen as a metaphor, an avenue as a way of transition from the old to the new, or to mark the road leading to eternal life [59,60,61,62,63] (Table 2, Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Six of the analyzed churches originally belonged to the Protestant denomination, but were handed to the Roman Catholic church in the 16th century. This was related to the religious changes in Europe in the 15th and 16th centuries. The oldest of the sites is the church in Rędziny, erected in the second half of the 12th century, which displays visible features of the Romanesque style. However, the church constructed in Lasówka, completed in the first half of the 20th century, bears neo-Romanesque features. Other churches built from the 16th to the 18th centuries present different faces of the Baroque form, from early to late. Their forms also show the features of earlier styles, most often Gothic (Table 2, Figure 2 and Figure 3) [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74].
Table 2. Characteristics of the analyzed sites [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84].
Table 2. Characteristics of the analyzed sites [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84].
Site CharacteristicsBoboszówGorzanówGoworów
LocationDolnośląskie Voivodeship, Kłodzko County, Międzylesie Commune—rural areaLower Silesian Voivodeship, Kłodzko County, Bystrzyca Kłodzka Commune—rural areaDolnośląskie Voivodeship, Kłodzko County, Międzylesie Commune—rural area
Location against the village backgroundLocated on a main road, in the central part of the villageLocated in the center of a village on a hill near the palaceLocated in the center of a village, connected by an avenue with the new cemetery
Church
Religious affiliationNowRoman CatholicRoman CatholicRoman Catholic
In the pastCatholicProtestantProtestant
DedicationSt AnnSt Mary MagdaleneSs Peter and Paul
Architectural styleLate BaroqueBaroqueGothic–Baroque
Age of creationwooden, brick since the 18th century14th century, rebuilt in the 17th century16th/17th centuries
Historical protectionYesYesYes
Cemetery
Age of creation18/19th centuries15th century17th century
Historical protectionYesYesYes
Preserved original spatial layout of the cemeteryLegible layoutLegible layoutLegible layout
Existing burial fieldYesYesNo
Contemporary use of the cemetery—contemporary burialsYesNoNo
Historical elements of the cemetery (boundaries, gate, tombstones, epitaphs, chapel, monuments to the fallen, etc.)Tombstones from the first half of the 20th century, graves from the second half of the 19th centuryThree baroque chapels, wall, two gates, tombstones and slabs, Baroque sculpture of the crucified Christ, 19th century tombstones, tombstones from the first half of the 20th centuryWall, gate with morgue, plaque commemorating soldiers killed in World War I placed in the wall, 18th century tombstones, epitaph
Site CharacteristicsJodłówKamieńczykLasówka
LocationDolnośląskie Voivodeship, Kłodzko County, Międzylesie Commune—rural areaDolnośląskie Voivodeship, Kłodzko County, Międzylesie Commune—rural areaLower Silesian Voivodeship, Kłodzko County, Bystrzyca Kłodzka Commune—rural area
Location against the village backgroundOriginally in the center of the village, now on the edge of the southern partLocated on a hill, above the village, exposedIn the center of the village on the main road
Church
Religious affiliationNowRoman CatholicRoman CatholicRoman Catholic
In the pastProtestantRoman CatholicRoman Catholic
DedicationSt John the BaptistSt Michael the ArchangelSt Anthony
Architectural styleBaroqueBaroqueNeo-Romanesque
Age of creation17th century18th century1st half of 20th century (1912)
Historic protectionYesYesYes
Cemetery
Age of creation16th century16th century1911–1912
Historical protectionYesYesYes
Preserved original spatial layout of the cemeteryIrregular layoutRegular layoutClear layout, crosses and tombstones were placed next to the wall of the chapel
Existing burial fieldYesYesYes, lapidarium
Contemporary use of the cemetery—contemporary burialsYesYesNo
Historical elements of the cemetery (boundary, gate, tombstones, epitaphs, chapel, monuments of the fallen, etc.)Wall, pre-burial chapel, tombstones from 1901–1931, 19th century pillar gate with openwork doors, tombstone in the form of a “Crucifixion” chapel18th century gate, tombstones from the first half of the 20th century, sculpture of the crucifixion of ChristA cross commemorating the victims of wars—former residents of Kaiserswalde (since 1945, Lasówki), a monument commemorating the fallen in World War I, the grave of the priest Gustav Pangratz 1881–1945, tombstones from the first half of the 20th century
Site CharacteristicsNowa BystrzycaPasterkaRędzinyStara Łomnica
LocationLower Silesian Voivodeship, Kłodzko County, Bystrzyca Kłodzka Commune—rural areaDolnośląskie Voivodeship, Kłodzko County, Radków Commune—rural areaDolnośląskie Voivodeship, Kamienna Góra County, Kamienna Góra CommuneLower Silesian Voivodeship, Kłodzko County, Bystrzyca Kłodzka Commune—rural area
Location against the village backgroundOn a slope, above the villageOn a slope, on the main roadOn a hill, on the south-western edge of the villageIn the central part of the village
Church
Religious affiliationNowRoman CatholicRoman CatholicRoman CatholicRoman Catholic
In the pastProtestantProtestantProtestantProtestant
DedicationSt Mary the VirginSt John the BaptistNativity of the Virgin MarySt Margaret
Architectural styleWooden BaroqueBaroqueRomanesqueGothic, early Baroque
Age of building18th century18th century2nd half of 12th century14th century, rebuilt at the end of the 16th century
Historic preservationYesYesYesYes
Cemetery
Age of creation17th century17th century16th century15th century
Historical preservationYesYesYesYes
Preserved original layout of the cemeteryLegible layoutLegible layoutLegible layoutIllegible layout
Existing burial fieldYesYesYesYes
Contemporary use of the cemetery—contemporary burialsYesNoYesNo
Historical elements of the cemetery (boundary, gate, tombstones, epitaphs, chapel, monuments of the fallen, etc.)Wall and chapel from the 18th century, gate from the second half of the 19th century, tombstones from the second half of the 19th century, tombstones from the first half of the 20th centuryFuneral chapelEpitaph on the wall from the 19th century, stone wall from the 18th century, gate from the 19th century, tombstones from the second half of the 19th century, tombstones from the first half of the 20th century, epitaphs from the 19th centuryWall, gate, chapel with pieta, crosses in the cemetery field, slabs in the church wall, tombstones from the first and second halves of the 19th century
Cemeteries were most often set out at the same time as the church and most of them have retained their original, legible spatial arrangement. In Jodłowo, as the site was expanded, the original spatial layout was lost, and it is impossible to read the form of the original complex. In Lasówka, on the other hand, due to the small number of preserved historical graves, the layout is legible, but contemporary burials are beginning to shape a new image of space (Table 2, Figure 2 and Figure 3) [75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84].

3.2. An Analysis of Architectural Conditions

In the research—presence of architectural features such as: cemetery chapels, boundaries, gates, tombstones, crosses, epitaphs, plaques commemorating important events or the dead, as well as sculptures were taken into account. Their state of preservation is diverse, related to the age of the sites, as well as the financial aspects of conservation work. The site in Gorzanów is distinguished by the extraordinary Baroque richness of accompanying features. The church and the cemetery are surrounded by a wall in which three chapels are blended. In addition to the plaques on the wall of the church, a sculpture of the crucified Christ can be found. In Goworów, the most valuable element, due to connections with the local community, is the plaque commemorating soldiers killed in World War I. Rędziny is distinguished by the richness of epitaphs located in the wall surrounding the cemetery. In Lasówka, in contrast, a lapidarium was created (Table 2, Figure 2 and Figure 3) [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84].
When analyzing each of the sites, attention was paid to their diversity, as well as the uniqueness of the preserved historical architectural elements. In Boboszów, there is a hall church with chapel niches and galleries. Inside, there is rich polychrome in an historicist style with both artistic and scientific value. The building itself is genetically related to Czech architecture. In Goworów, the church is one of the most valuable examples of early Baroque sacred architecture from Bohemia, Moravia, and the Kłodzko region, containing early Baroque stucco of outstanding artistic value. Together with the cemetery, it is surrounded by a high wall with two gates. The building in Kamieńczyk is one of four wooden churches in Kłodzko county, it has a unique 18th century decorative polychrome in the church interior. Inside Lasówka, original, pre-war details from the early 20th century are found, including the main and two side altars with paintings of its patrons, the Mother of God and St. Joseph, as well as a sandstone baptismal font. It should be emphasized that this is an extremely attractive place in terms of tourism, rich in diverse landforms, characteristic mountain ranges, rivers, streams, and cultural values, located very close to Polish-Czech border, where several very popular hiking and cycling trails run. The church in Rędziny is an example of a well-preserved building from the 12th century with wooden walls in a very good state of repair. In Stara Łomnica, the historical spatial layout of several sites has been preserved: a church surrounded by walls with the remains of a cemetery, presbytery, and farm sites (Table 2, Figure 2 and Figure 3) [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84].

4. Discussion

The analysis of the landscape potential of the place was made on the basis of the authors’ assessment of landscape and visual values. During field research, each site was evaluated according to separate criteria. The perception of the landscape is multi-faceted. The main element influencing the assessment of the landscape is the visual image of space. When staying in an attractive landscape, we pay special attention and assess the openness and multi-facetedness of views, viewpoints, and viewing axes, with wide and varied panoramas. Architectural elements and structures also have an undeniable influence. Their dominance in the landscape or the rhythm introduced through repetition potentially organizes and calms the space while giving it an individual character. At the same time, the landscape is evaluated and felt through other senses, as well as instilled patterns and traditions. Therefore, among the evaluation criteria, the category “the importance of archetypes in shaping the image-perception of the landscape” was distinguished (Table 3).
Taking into account the assessment of the importance of architectural elements, the highest score was obtained by Stara Łomnica (5.00), followed by Boboszów (4.75) and Gorzanów (4.75). Churches located in these villages are characterized not only by attractive architecture, but are also maintained in a good state of repair. This directly affects assessment. The churches in Jodłowo and Pasterka had the lowest average criteria. Their assessment underestimates the technical condition of churches and other architectural elements; however, this is not as important for their special visual value (Table 3).
In the assessment criteria assigned to the category of landscape elements, a much greater numerical differentiation can be seen. This is mainly due to the terrain, the position of the analyzed sites, natural value, and the state of maintenance of greenery. The influence of archetypes in shaping the image of the area was also taken into account—location on a hill, the occurrence of streams, or the existence of elements affecting the connections of the community with the place. The highest average in the assessment of landscape elements was obtained by the sites in Kamieńczyk (4.43), Jodłowo (4.14), and Lasówka (4.14). The space surrounding them has natural value, and their location and the state of greenery (in and around cemeteries) affects attractiveness, as well as the variety of views and panoramas. The lowest average scores were in Pasterka (2.29) and Gorzanów (2.71) This is due to the poor position of the sites, the lack of viewpoints, and the low importance of archetypes in shaping the image of the place (Table 3).

5. Conclusions

Landscape perception has a multi-faceted character. The main element influencing its assessment is the visual image of the space, with the help of which the openness and multi-facetedness of views, viewpoints, and viewing axes, as well as diverse panoramas, are assessed. The landscapes of rural church cemeteries on the Polish–Czech borderlands are unique. They have a diverse physiognomy and landscape affecting the overall landscape and cultural heritage. Preserving church cemeteries in the village landscape and emphasizing their importance in tourism is an important element for recreating the history and stories of the former inhabitants. In the analyzed area, many sites of great architectural importance have accumulated. These are places valuable for historical, religious, cultural, and social reasons, which must be saved from oblivion. Their importance for tourism is still unrecognized. Future research should focus on a holistic assessment of the landscape value of rural areas and model solutions for local and regional tourism, including religious cultural heritage.
Cemeteries are an important element of the landscape, where the symbolism associated with the sacred is identified in relation to a set of signs, elements, and symbols. Cemetery zones are diverse; their layout depends on many factors, including religious traditions, local community, geographical location, building conditions, or spatial development plans. In the villages of the Polish–Czech borderland, there are many small church cemeteries, which have become an important element of the cultural landscape of the Polish countryside. An important aspect is the exceptional value of landscape features that are characteristic of these cemeteries, which must be identified, grouped, and evaluated, and then qualified for protection or additional care. Such research will also have an impact on the promotion of culture in this area, and strengthening the awareness of residents about the cultural values of Polish-Czech borderland. This is related to the use of these places in education and tourism and results from the strengthening of tourism also into the development of tourist services in this area, which can have a positive impact on the economy of municipalities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D., A.K., A.Z. and K.P.; methodology, A.D., A.K. and A.Z.; software, A.K., A.Z. and A.D.; validation, A.D., A.K. and A.Z. formal analysis, A.D., A.K. and A.Z.; investigation, A.D., A.K., K.P. and A.Z.; resources, A.D., A.K. and A.Z.; data curation: A.D., A.K. and A.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D., A.K. and A.Z.; writing—review and editing, A.D., A.K. and A.Z., visualization, A.D., A.K. and A.Z.; supervision, A.D., A.K. and A.Z.; project administration, A.D., A.K. and A.Z. funding acquisition, A.D., A.K. and A.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Publication co-financed from the state budget under the program of the Polish Ministry of Education and Science under the name “Science for Society”, project no. NdS/552172/2022/2022 amount of co-financing PLN 487 978, total project value PLN 487 978.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yoon, Y.; Gursoy, D.; Chen, J.S. Validating a tourism development theory with structural equation modeling. Tour. Manag. 2001, 22, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Streimikiene, D.; Bilan, Y. Review of rural tourism development theories. Transform. Bus. Econ. 2015, 14, 21–34. [Google Scholar]
  3. Awang, K.W.; Hassan Wan, M.W.; Zahari Mohd, S.M. Tourism development: A geographical perspective. Asian Soc. Sci. 2009, 5, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Byrd, E.T. Stakeholders in sustainable tourism development and their roles: Applying stakeholder theory to sustainable tourism development. Tour. Rev. 2007, 62, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Berno, T.; Bricker, K. Sustainable tourism development: The long road from theory to practice. Int. J. Econ. Dev. 2001, 3, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  6. Goral, A. Research on cultural tourism development in sacral and spiritual sites from the UNESCO World Heritage List. Int. J. Herit. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 1, 49–59. [Google Scholar]
  7. Duda, T. Sacral landscape and its influence on the tourism space development in the region (based on the example of Western Pomerania region NW Poland). Int. J. Relig. Tour. Pilgr. 2014, 2, 4. [Google Scholar]
  8. Xoliqov, R.Y.; Dexkanbayeva, M.N. Sacral landscapes as objects of religious tourism and recreation. Econ. Soc. 2019, 10, 467–470. [Google Scholar]
  9. Krool, V.P.; Vdovichen, A.A.; Hyshchuk, R.M.; Dobynda, I.P. Sacral Heritage of the Carpathian Region and Management of its Resource Component in Tourism Activity. J. Geol. Geogr. Geoecol. 2021, 30, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aulet, S.; Duda, T. Tourism accessibility and its impact on the spiritual sustainability of sacred sites. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Uaisova, A. The historical and cultural potential of the Otyrar district and the development of sacral tourism in the region. Mod. Sci. 2018, 4, 142–144. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jackowski, A. Pielgrzymki i Turystyka Religijna w Polsce, 1st ed.; Instytut Turystyki: Warszawa, Poland, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jackowski, A. Święta Przestrzeń Świata. Podstawy Geografii Religii, 1st ed.; Wyd. Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego: Kraków, Poland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hronček, P.; Gregorová, B.; Weis, K. Medieval religious landscape and its use in religious tourism (case study of the early gothic church koscelisko surroundings in Kysuce, Slovakia). Geo. J. Tour. Geosites 2022, 41, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kalmić, L. The sacral places and centers in tourism as a secular pilgrimage. Quaestus Multidiscip. Res. J. 2014, 23, 83–98. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hvizdova, E. Religious tourism and its socio-economic dimensions. Eur. J. Sci. Theol. 2018, 14, 89–98. [Google Scholar]
  17. Poria, Y.; Biran, A.; Reichel, A. Visitors’ preferences for interpretation at heritage sites. J. Travel Res. 2009, 48, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Irimiás, A.; Michalkó, G. Religious tourism in Hungary-an integrative framework. Hung. Geogr. Bull. 2013, 62, 175–196. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nilsson, M.; Tesfahuney, M. The post-secular tourist: Re-thinking pilgrimage tourism. Tour. Stud. 2018, 18, 159–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Olsen, D.H. Pilgrimage, religious tourism, biodiversity, and natural sacred sites. In Religious Tourism and the Environment, 1st ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  21. Alaverdov, E.; Bari, M.W. Global Development of Religious Tourism; Business Science Reference: Hershey, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  22. Poulaki, P. Pilgrimage and Religious Tourism-Case study: North Aegean of Greece. J. Hosp. Tour. 2023, 1, 31–48. [Google Scholar]
  23. Trono, A.; Castronuovo, V. Pilgrimage Tourism, Accessibility and Local Communities in Western Countries. The Camino de Santiago de Compostela and the via Francigena for All. In Host Communities and Pilgrimage Tourism: Asia and Beyond, 1st ed.; Progano, R.N., Cheer, J.M., Santos, X.M., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mróz, F. The Network of the Way of St. James in Poland–Genesis, Development as Well as Religious, Cultural and Socio-Economic Impact. In Host Communities and Pilgrimage Tourism: Asia and Beyond, 1st ed.; Progano, R.N., Cheer, J.M., Santos, X.M., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 179–193. [Google Scholar]
  25. Blom, T.; Nilsson, M. Tactile Tourism: Tourist Attractions to Touch. Tour. Int. Interdiscip. J. 2023, 71, 553–567. [Google Scholar]
  26. El Archi, Y.; Benbba, B.; Nizamatdinova, Z.; Issakov, Y.; Vargáné, G.I.; Dávid, L.D. Systematic Literature Review Analysing Smart Tourism Destinations in Context of Sustainable Development: Current Applications and Future Directions. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Bao, J. Scale theory and tourism destination development: Towards a new theoretical tool. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2023, 55, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Boager, E.; Castro, P. Lisbon’s unsustainable tourism intensification: Contributions from social representations to understanding a depoliticised press discourse and its consequences. J. Sustain. Tour. 2022, 30, 1956–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sthapit, E.; Björk, P.; Coudounaris, D.N. Memorable nature-based tourism experience, place attachment and tourists’ environmentally responsible behaviour. J. Ecotourism 2022, 21, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sołjan, I.; Liro, J. The changing roman catholic pilgrimage centres in Europe in the context of contemporary socio-cultural changes. Soc. Cult. Geogr. 2022, 23, 376–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Duda, T. Between the sacrum and profanum. geographical determinants of development of the sacral landscape and religious tourism space in areas of high cultural and transformations (Western Pomerania, NW Poland). Almatourism-J. Tour. Cult. Territ. Dev. 2018, 9, 32–54. [Google Scholar]
  32. Łach, J.; Krzemińska, A.; Widawski, K.; Zaręba, A. The role of the Protestant legacy in shaping Lower Silesian cultural heritage as exemplified by the refuge church in Borek Strzeliński (Großburg). Museol. Cult. Herit. 2022, 10, 53–78. [Google Scholar]
  33. Halajová, D.; Halaj, P. Tourism potential of small sacral architecture in Spiš Region in Slovakia. Public Recreat. Landsc. Prot. 2019, 22, 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  34. Duda, T.; Doburzyński, D. Religious tourism vs. sacred space experience: Conflict or complementary interaction? Int. J. Relig. Tour. Pilgr. 2019, 7, 2. [Google Scholar]
  35. Olsen, D.H. A scalar comparison of motivations and expectations of experience within the religious tourism market. Int. J. Relig. Tour. Pilgr. 2014, 1, 5. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim, B.; Kim, S.; King, B. Religious tourism studies: Evolution, progress, and future prospects. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2020, 45, 185–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Korstanje, M.E. The impact of coronavirus on religious tourism: Is this the end of pilgrimage? Int. J. Relig. Tour. Pilgr. 2020, 8, 4. [Google Scholar]
  38. Huang, K.; Pearce, P. Visitors’ perceptions of religious tourism destinations. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2019, 14, 100371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shinde, K.A. Managing the environment in religious tourism destinations: A conceptual model. In Religious Tourism and the Environment, 1st ed.; Shinde, K.A., Olsen, D.H., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  40. Susetyo, B.; Purwaningsih, E.; Sutriani, W.; Caesario, D.; Bagus, M.I.; Ramadani, F. Utilization of Geographic Information Systems for Development of Effective Routes for Object Areas of Religious Tourism Destinations Nagari Batuhampar, Limapuluh Kota Regency. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Geography, ICGEO 2022, Padang, Indonesia, 19–20 November 2022; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  41. Choe, J.; Mahyuni, L.P. Sustainable and Inclusive Spiritual Tourism Development in Bali as a Long-term Post-Pandemic Strategy. Int. J. Relig. Tour. Pilgr. 2023, 11, 11. [Google Scholar]
  42. Knight, R.; Therivel, R. Landscape and visual. In Methods of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, 4th ed.; Morris, P., Therivel, R., Therivel, R., Wood, G., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 399–431. [Google Scholar]
  43. Chisholm, A.; Jesus, J. Cultural heritage. In Methods of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, 4th ed.; Morris, P., Therivel, R., Therivel, R., Wood, G., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 432–474. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wilson, S. Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, 2nd ed.; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  45. Krause, C.L. Our visual landscape: Managing the landscape under special consideration of visual aspects. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 54, 239–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. De la Torre, M. Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage, 1st ed.; The J. Paul Getty Trust: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kalivoda, O.; Vojar, J.; Skřivanová, Z.; Zahradník, D. Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents’ characteristics. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 137, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kang, N.; Liu, C. Towards landscape visual quality evaluation: Methodologies, technologies, and recommendations. Ecol. Indic. 2002, 142, 109174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Herzig, A.; Ruchniewicz, M. Dzieje Ziemi Kłodzkiej, 1st ed.; Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT: Wrocław, Poland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  50. Laska, J. Ziemia kłodzka. In Popularna Encyklopedia Ziemi Kłodzkiej. T. 1 (A–J). Kłodzko-Nowa Ruda, 1st ed.; Laska, J., Kowalcze, M., Eds.; Kłodzkie Towarzystwo Oświatowe: Kłodzko, Poland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  51. Herzig, A.; Ruchniewicz, K.; Ruchniewicz, M. Śląsk i Jego Dzieje, 1st ed.; Via Nova: Wrocław, Poland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  52. Winkiel, M. Ziemia Kłodzka, 1st ed.; Helion: Gliwice, Poland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  53. Staffa, M. Słownik Geografii Turystycznej Sudetów, Tom 15 Kotlina Kłodzka i Rów Górnej Nysy, 1st ed.; I-BiS: Wrocław, Poland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  54. Staffa, M. Słownik Geografii Turystycznej Sudetów, Tom 13 Góry Stołowe, 1st ed.; PTTK „Kraj”: Warszawa, Poland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  55. Łangowska-Marcinowska, K. Euroregions, Their Influence on the Development of Polish and Czech Borderlands. Kult. I Eduk. 2022, 4, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Więckowski, M. Kształtowanie się transgranicznych regionów turystycznych na granicach Polski. Pr. Kom. Geogr. Komun. PTG 2011, 18, 171–190. [Google Scholar]
  57. Rogowska-Sawicz, M. Factors activating the development of towns with a spa and touristic character in Lower Silesia during 2015–2019. Bibl. Reg. 2021, 21, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sikorski, D. Rozwój turystyki na ziemi kłodzkiej ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem turystyki na terenach przemysłowych i poprzemysłowych na tle aktualnych przemian społeczno-gospodarczych regionu. Pr. Kom. Geogr. Przemysłu Pol. Tow. Geogr. 2021, 35, 220–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ronnberg, A.; Martin, K. The Book of Symbols: Reflections on Archetypal Images, 1st ed.; Taschen: Cologne, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  60. Eliade, M. The Sacred and the Profane. The Nature of Religion, 2nd ed.; Harcourt Brace & Company: San Diego, CA, USA, 1957. [Google Scholar]
  61. Dee, C. Form and Fabric in Landscape Architecture: A Visual Introduction, 1st ed.; Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sonntag, K.E. The Role of the Transcendent in Landscapes. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations; Utah State University: Logan, UT, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  63. Krinke, R. Contemporary Landscapes of Contemplation, 1st ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kościół filialny p.w. św. Anny, Boboszów, Karta Ewidencyjna Zabytków Architektury i Budownictwa nr 5086, Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków w Warszawie, 1–29. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/boboszow-kosciol-parafialny-pw-sw-anny (accessed on 10 April 2023).
  65. Kościół filialny p.w. św. Marii Magdaleny, Gorzanów, Karta Ewidencyjna Zabytków Architektury i Budownictwa nr 1150, Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków w Warszawie, 1–16. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/cmentarz-rzymskokatolick-676760 (accessed on 17 April 2023).
  66. Kościół filialny p.w. śś. Piotra i Pawła, Goworów, Karta Ewidencyjna Zabytków Architektury i Budownictwa nr 5106, Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków w Warszawie, 1–29. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/goworow-kosciol-filialny-pw-sw-piotra-i-pawla (accessed on 15 May 2023).
  67. Kościół filialny p.w. św. Jana Chrzciciela, Jodłów, Karta Ewidencyjna Zabytków Architektury i Budownictwa nr 5110, Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków w Warszawie, 1–29. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/jodlow-kosciol-parafialny-pw-sw-jana-chrzciciela (accessed on 13 May 2023).
  68. Kościół filialny p.w. św. Michała Archanioła, Kamieńczyk, Karta Ewidencyjna Zabytków Architektury i Budownictwa nr 5130, Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków w Warszawie, 1–20. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/kamienczyk-kosciol-fil-pw-sw-michala-archaniola (accessed on 21 February 2023).
  69. Kościół filialny p.w. św. Antoniego, Lasówka, Karta Ewidencyjna Zabytków Architektury i Budownictwa nr 5112, Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków w Warszawie, 1–29. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/lasowka-kosciol-fil-pw-sw-antoniego (accessed on 4 February 2023).
  70. Kościół filialny p.w. Wniebowzięcia NMP, Nowa Bystrzyca, Karta Ewidencyjna Zabytków Architektury i Budownictwa nr 1230, Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków w Warszawie, 1–29. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/nowa-bystrzyca-kosciol-filialny-pw-wniebowziecia-nmp (accessed on 4 April 2023).
  71. Kościół filialny p.w. św. Jana Chrzciciela, Pasterka, Karta Ewidencyjna Zabytku Nieruchomego nr 12458, Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków w Warszawie, 1–9. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/g-258970 (accessed on 7 December 2023).
  72. Kościół filialny p.w. Św. Jana Chrzciciela, Rędziny, Karta Ewidencyjna Zabytków Architektury i Budownictwa nr 3143, Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków w Warszawie, ss. 1–14. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/redziny-kosciol-fil-pw-narodzenia-nmp (accessed on 16 January 2023).
  73. Kościół filialny p.w. Św. Małgorzaty, Stara Łomnica, Karta Ewidencyjna Zabytków Architektury i Budownictwa nr 1249, Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków w Warszawie, ss. 1–14. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/stara-lomnica-kosciol-par-pw-sw-malgorzaty (accessed on 12 May 2023).
  74. Zespół kościelny wraz z kościołem parafialnym pw. Św. Małgorzaty, Stara Łomnica, Karta Ewidencyjna Zabytków Architektury i Budownictwa nr 1248, Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków w Warszawie, ss. 1–19. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/zespol-kosciola-par.-pw.-789863 (accessed on 12 May 2023).
  75. Karta Cmentarza nr 506, Boboszów, Regionalny Ośrodek Studiów i Ochrony Środowiska Kulturowego we Wrocławiu, 1997, Archiwum SOZ/OZ, Wałbrzych, 1–6. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/cmentarz-rzymskokatolick-677957 (accessed on 10 April 2023).
  76. Karta Cmentarza nr 453, Gorzanów, Regionalny Ośrodek Studiów i Ochrony Środowiska Kulturowego we Wrocławiu, 1997, Archiwum SOZ/OZ, Wałbrzych, 1–6. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/cmentarz-rzymskokatolick-676760 (accessed on 17 April 2023).
  77. Karta Cmentarza nr 511, Goworów, Regionalny Ośrodek Studiów i Ochrony Środowiska Kulturowego we Wrocławiu, 1997, Archiwum SOZ/OZ, Wałbrzych, 1–6. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/cmentarz-rzymskokatolick-681203 (accessed on 7 May 2023).
  78. Karta Cmentarza nr 514, Jodłów, Regionalny Ośrodek Studiów i Ochrony Środowiska Kulturowego we Wrocławiu, 1997, Archiwum SOZ/OZ, Wałbrzych, 1–6. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/cmentarz-ewangelicki,-ob-678019 (accessed on 15 March 2023).
  79. Karta Cmentarza nr 515, Kamieńczyk, Regionalny Ośrodek Studiów i Ochrony Środowiska Kulturowego we Wrocławiu, 1997, Archiwum SOZ/OZ, Wałbrzych, 1–6. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/cmentarz-ewangelicki,-ob-678080 (accessed on 12 February 2023).
  80. Karta Cmentarza nr 457, Lasówka, Regionalny Ośrodek Studiów i Ochrony Środowiska Kulturowego we Wrocławiu, 1995, Archiwum SOZ/OZ, Wałbrzych, 1–6. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/cmentarz-rzymskokatolick-676767 (accessed on 4 March 2023).
  81. Karta Cmentarza nr 461, Nowa Bystrzyca, Regionalny Ośrodek Studiów i Ochrony Środowiska Kulturowego we Wrocławiu, 1995, Archiwum SOZ/OZ, Wałbrzych, 1–7. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/cmentarz-rzymskokatolick-681045 (accessed on 6 April 2023).
  82. Karta Cmentarza nr 468, Pasterka, Regionalny Ośrodek Studiów i Ochrony Środowiska Kulturowego we Wrocławiu, 1995, Archiwum SOZ/OZ, Wałbrzych, 1–7. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/g-258970 (accessed on 7 December 2022).
  83. Karta Cmentarza nr 424, Rędziny, Regionalny Ośrodek Studiów i Ochrony Środowiska Kulturowego we Wrocławiu, 1997 r., w archiwum SOZ/OZ, Wałbrzych, 1–6. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/cmentarz-rzymskokatolick-677508 (accessed on 15 January 2023).
  84. Karta Cmentarza nr 467, Stara Łomnica, Regionalny Ośrodek Studiów i Ochrony Środowiska Kulturowego we Wrocławiu, 1997 r., w archiwum SOZ/OZ, Wałbrzych, 1–6. Available online: https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/cmentarz-ewangelicki,-ob-677872 (accessed on 12 May 2023).
Figure 1. Location of sites selected for detailed analysis.
Figure 1. Location of sites selected for detailed analysis.
Sustainability 15 13730 g001
Figure 2. Distinctive landscape elements of the analyzed sites: (A) Baroque chapel in the cemetery in Gorzanów; (B) the church in Gorzanów; (C) historic tombstones in the cemetery in Jodłowo; (D) neo-Romanesque church in Lasówka; (E) wooden Baroque church in Kamieńczyk; (F) view of historic tombstones and the viewpoint from the cemetery in Kamieńczyk.
Figure 2. Distinctive landscape elements of the analyzed sites: (A) Baroque chapel in the cemetery in Gorzanów; (B) the church in Gorzanów; (C) historic tombstones in the cemetery in Jodłowo; (D) neo-Romanesque church in Lasówka; (E) wooden Baroque church in Kamieńczyk; (F) view of historic tombstones and the viewpoint from the cemetery in Kamieńczyk.
Sustainability 15 13730 g002
Figure 3. Distinctive landscape elements of the analyzed sites: (A) view of the Baroque wooden church and residential sites in Nowa Bystrzyca; (B) view of the Baroque church and historic tombstones; (C) entrance to the church complex in Stará Lomnica; (D) Baroque interior of the church in Goworów.
Figure 3. Distinctive landscape elements of the analyzed sites: (A) view of the Baroque wooden church and residential sites in Nowa Bystrzyca; (B) view of the Baroque church and historic tombstones; (C) entrance to the church complex in Stará Lomnica; (D) Baroque interior of the church in Goworów.
Sustainability 15 13730 g003
Table 1. Criteria for the assessment of landscape and visual value.
Table 1. Criteria for the assessment of landscape and visual value.
Evaluation Criteria54321
Architectural elements
Visual value of the churchexceptionalabove averagestandardaveragenegligible
Technical state of preservation of the churchvery goodgoodaveragesatisfactorypoor
The importance of historical architectural elementsvery goodgoodaveragesmallnegligible
Technical condition of architectural elementsvery goodgoodaveragesatisfactorypoor
average rating
Landscape elements
Location against the village backgroundhaving an exceptional impact on the ranking of the placehaving an above-average impact on the importance of the placehaving a standard impact emphasizing the rank of the placehaving an average impact on the importance of the placehaving a negative impact on the rank of the place
Position—church with cemetery as a dominantexceptionalabove averagestandardaveragenegligible
Panoramas, sightseeing viewpointsexceptionalabove averagestandardaveragenegligible
Attractiveness, diversity of views/panoramas from the cemeteryexceptionalabove averagestandardaveragenegligible
Natural valueexceptionalabove averagestandardaveragenegligible
The state of preservation of greeneryvery goodgoodaveragesatisfactorypoor
The importance of archetypes in shaping the view of landscapeexceptionalabove averagestandardaveragenegligible
Average evaluation
Table 3. Assessment of landscape and visual value.
Table 3. Assessment of landscape and visual value.
Evaluation CriterionBoboszówGorzanówGoworówJodłówKamieńczykLasówkaNowa BystrzycaPasterkaStara Łomnica
Architectural elements
Visual value of the Church554455545
Preservation of technical state of the Church544345435
Importance of historical/architectural elements453243445
Technical condition of architectural elements553333325
Average4.754.753.503.004.004.004.003.255.00
Landscape elements
Location against the village background442354434
Position of the church with cemetery as a dominant341453324
Panoramas, viewpoints323555314
Attractiveness, variety of views, panoramas from the cemetery312545213
Natural preservation325555453
State of preservation/maintenance of greenery344334225
The importance of archetypes in shaping the image/feeling of the landscape223443424
Average3.002.712.864.144.434.143.142.293.86
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dzikowska, A.; Zaręba, A.; Krzemińska, A.; Pawłowski, K. The Cultural Landscape of Rural Cemeteries on the Polish–Czech Borderlands: Multi-Faceted Visual Analysis as an Element of Tourism Potential Assessment. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813730

AMA Style

Dzikowska A, Zaręba A, Krzemińska A, Pawłowski K. The Cultural Landscape of Rural Cemeteries on the Polish–Czech Borderlands: Multi-Faceted Visual Analysis as an Element of Tourism Potential Assessment. Sustainability. 2023; 15(18):13730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813730

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dzikowska, Anna, Anna Zaręba, Alicja Krzemińska, and Kamil Pawłowski. 2023. "The Cultural Landscape of Rural Cemeteries on the Polish–Czech Borderlands: Multi-Faceted Visual Analysis as an Element of Tourism Potential Assessment" Sustainability 15, no. 18: 13730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813730

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop