Next Article in Journal
Selecting Disaster Waste Transportation Routes to Reduce Overlapping of Transportation Routes after Floods
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation on the Potential of Various Biomass Waste for the Synthesis of Carbon Material for Energy Storage Application
Previous Article in Journal
So Close, Yet So Far: The Benefits and Limits of Rural–Urban Industry Linkages
Previous Article in Special Issue
Solvent-Free Synthesis of MIL-101(Cr) for CO2 Gas Adsorption: The Effect of Metal Precursor and Molar Ratio
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermal-Energy Performance of Bulk Insulation Coupled with High-Albedo Roof Tiles in Urban Pitched Residential Roof Assemblies in the Hot, Humid Climate

1
Vice Presidency for Project Management, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
2
Institute of Self-Sustainable Building for Smart Living, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia
3
Department of Civil Engineering, Yarmouk University, Irbid 21163, Jordan
4
Department of Civil Engineering, Jadara University, Irbid 21110, Jordan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(5), 2867; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052867
Submission received: 14 January 2022 / Revised: 25 February 2022 / Accepted: 26 February 2022 / Published: 1 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Development for Sustainability)

Abstract

:
The high rate of heat transfer through the residential roof assembly aggravates the condition of indoor thermal discomfort. Bulk insulation can be installed in the assembly to improve thermal performance. However, although it can efficiently reduce diurnal heat transfer from the outdoor environment into the indoor space through the roof assembly, it can also suppress nocturnal heat transfer in the opposite direction. Alternatively, high-albedo roof tiles employ cool colors to reflect heat at the roof surface, whereas bulk insulation hinders the conduction of heat through the roof assembly. In light of the potential of high-albedo roof tiles and bulk insulation in reducing heat transfer, thermal-energy performance of an urban pitched residential roof assembly, which adopted varying configurations of high-albedo roof tiles and bulk insulation under a hot, humid climate, was evaluated. Energy savings were generated, which were 15.13% when the change from a conventional to a high-albedo roof surface was performed, and 17.00% when the installation of bulk insulation was performed on the high-albedo roof assembly.

1. Introduction

Buildings in countries that have hot, humid climates are exposed to intense solar radiation during the day, owing to the high altitude of the sun path [1,2]. In particular, the roof receives the highest amount of solar radiation in comparison to other components of the building envelope by virtue of the horizontal orientation and higher elevation of the roof [3,4].
Malaysia, which is located in Southeast Asia from 1° to 7° north of the equator [1], has a hot, humid climate throughout the year [1,5]. Its climate can be classified as a tropical rainforest climate, as per the Köppen–Geiger climate classification [6]. According to the annual moving averages reported in Tang [5] for selected urban areas, namely Kota Kinabalu, Kuantan, Kuching, Malacca and Subang Jaya, mean daily temperatures of Malaysia, from 1956 to 2016, ranged between 25.0 °C and 28.7 °C. Recently, the Malaysian Meteorological Department revealed that 38.6 °C was the highest peak daily temperature in Malaysia in 2020, which was recorded in Alor Setar [7]. Previously in 1998, a higher peak daily temperature of 40.1 °C was recorded in Chuping [7]. The average duration of exposure to sunshine throughout Malaysia ranged from six to eight hours per day [8,9].
Typical urban residential buildings in Malaysia are predominantly low-rise with pitched roof assemblies, where the heat transfer through the roof accounts for between 50% and 70% of the total heat gain in the indoor space beneath the roof [10]. The high rate of heat transfer through the residential roof assembly aggravates the condition of indoor thermal discomfort experienced by the occupants. Accordingly, dependence toward air conditioners increases, which is a huge concern, as air conditioners heavily consume energy [8,9].
Bulk insulation restricts the transfer of heat via conduction and convection by trapping air in millions of pockets within bulky materials that possess low density. Common bulk insulation materials employed for various applications, include, among others, cellulose, glass wool, mineral wool, polyester, polyisocyanurate, polystyrene and polyurethane. Bulk insulation products can be manufactured in various forms, which are, but not limited to, batts, loose-fills, rigid boards and rolls. Bulk insulation can be installed in the residential roof assembly to improve thermal performance owing to the presence of miniature air spaces that hinder heat conduction [11], which can potentially reduce the intensity and duration of the operation of air conditioners by the occupants [12]. Innovations pertaining to bulk insulation materials have been proposed by, among others, Husna et al. [13] and Ismail et al. [14], who adopted nano-materials that possess ultra-low thermal conductivity, as well as Nuruddin et al. [15], Farhan et al. [16] and Omar et al. [17], who adopted natural fibers, which are greener than synthetic fibers. Although bulk insulation has great potential in improving the thermal-energy performance of the roof assembly, its rate of adoption in Malaysia is still low [18]. Increases in cost related to the purchase, installation and maintenance of the insulation material, as well as lack of awareness and understanding of the long-term benefits of employing insulation, influence the decisions opted by homeowners [18]. Consequently, the omission of bulk insulation from the roof assembly may result in an increase in the rate of heat transfer through the roof assembly and into the indoor space. Hence, thermal-energy performance of the building during hours of high exposure to intense solar radiation will be negatively impacted.
Residential roof assemblies in Malaysia are typically lightweight and pitched. They comprise roof tiles, attic spaces and ceiling boards. For lightweight roofs, Malaysian Standard: Energy Efficiency and Use of Renewable Energy for Residential Buildings (MS 2680:2017) [19] recommends the installation of insulation within the roof assembly. Furthermore, a minimum thermal resistance (R-value) of 2.50 m2K/W has been set as a mandatory compliance criterion for lightweight roofs as stated in MS 2680:2017 [19], Green Building Index Assessment Criteria for Residential New Construction [20], and Selangor Uniform Building By-Laws [21].
Previous studies on building insulation paid more attention to wall insulation in cold climates [22], and less emphasis was given to roof insulation in hot climates. In Malaysia, previous research pertaining to thermal performance evaluation of insulation materials installed in residential roof assemblies is limited to the studies of Farhan et al. [16], Halim et al. [23], Irwan et al. [24,25], Ismail et al. [14], Morris et al. [26], Nuruddin et al. [15,27], Puad et al. [28] and Zakaria et al. [29]. Findings indicated that installing roof insulation efficiently reduced diurnal heat transfer from the outdoor environment into the indoor space through the roof assembly. Conversely, findings also revealed that the presence of insulation suppressed nocturnal heat transfer through the roof assembly, which is in the opposite direction to that of the diurnal heat transfer. Consequently, the nocturnal energy consumption owing to the use of air conditioners will increase in view of the fact that indoor thermal comfort has to be sustained throughout the night in order to facilitate adequate rest and sleep among the occupants.
Alternatively, Al-Obaidi et al. [4], Al Yacouby et al. [30] and Farhan et al. [31] studied the effect of high-albedo roofs without insulation under the climate of Malaysia. High-albedo roof tiles reflect heat at the roof surface, whereas bulk insulation hinders the conduction of heat through the roof assembly. Adoption of high-albedo roofs has been reported in Synnefa et al. [32] to be effective at increasing thermal-energy performance for widely differing climate classes. Prevalently, previous studies have attempted to increase the albedo of roof tiles by applying high-albedo coatings. The coatings can be classified according to their binders, such as cementitious or elastomeric coatings. Alternatively, the coatings can also be categorized according to their carriers, such as solvent- or water-based coatings [33]. Essentially, for application on high-albedo roofs, the coatings are required to possess superficial thermal-optical properties that are appropriate for maintaining, under exposure to solar radiation, surface temperatures that are appreciably lower than those of conventional roofs. In general, high-albedo coatings that possess pre-eminent thermal-optical properties are those that are white in color. However, as aesthetics of buildings cannot be disregarded, studies have been conducted to develop innovative coatings, such as those that possess solar-reflective surfaces with non-white colors, those that are thermochromic, or those that are doped with phase-change materials [33].
Despite the potential for improving the thermal-energy performance, adoption of high-albedo roofs in countries that are exposed to the tropical rainforest climate is still low [9,30]. In particular, within the region of Southeast Asia, research on the effect of high-albedo roofs is currently deficient. Exclusive of the studies that were conducted in Malaysia, which are Al-Obaidi et al. [4], Al Yacouby et al. [30] and Farhan et al. [31], the research is limited to the studies of Syuhada and Maulana [34] in Indonesia, Zingre et al. [35] in Singapore and Thongkanluang et al. [36] in Thailand.
Although Al-Obaidi et al. [4] and Al Yacouby et al. [30] studied the effect of high-albedo roofs by varying the color of the roof surface, their methodologies employed test cells that did not comply with the clauses in Uniform Building By-Laws 1984 (UBBL 1984) [37] for habitable rooms of residential buildings in Malaysia. The methodology adopted in Farhan et al. [31] later addressed the shortcomings of the test cells employed in Al-Obaidi et al. [4] and Al Yacouby et al. [30] but focused solely on the effect of high-albedo roofs without considering its coupling with insulation. The scope of Syuhada and Maulana [34] zoomed in on zinc roofs and excluded the adoption of roof tiles. Zingre et al. [35] adopted a methodology that concentrated on flat roofs and did not consider pitched roof assemblies that have attic spaces and ceiling boards. Thongkanluang et al. [36] focused on synthesizing a coating material for potential application on the surface of high-albedo roofs, without performing any study on heat transfer through the roof assembly that endures exposure to solar radiation.
Hence, new studies are required to address the shortcomings of previous research on the effect of high-albedo roofs, in particular, those that zoom in on pitched roof assemblies that have roof tiles, attic spaces and ceiling boards, together with the adoption of insulation, under a hot, humid climate. In light of the potential of high-albedo roof tiles and bulk insulation in reducing heat transfer, thermal-energy performance of an urban pitched residential roof assembly, which adopted varying configurations of high-albedo roof tiles and bulk insulation under a hot, humid climate, was evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

The thermal-energy performance of an urban pitched residential roof assembly was evaluated by developing a building information model using Integrated Environmental Solutions <Virtual Environment> (IESVE), which is a building information modeling (BIM) tool. Thermal-energy and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses were performed on the model. Varying configurations of high-albedo roof tiles and bulk insulation within the roof assembly were adopted. The roof was exposed to the hot, humid climate of Shah Alam in Malaysia, which is an urban area.
The second law of thermodynamics states that the total entropy, which is a measure of the disorder of a system and its environment, will never decrease. Therefore, heat transfer through the residential roof assembly will occur from the hotter to the colder bodies, as the building and its environment attempt to gain entropy over time and reach its maximum, which is when thermal equilibrium is achieved [38]. Accordingly, as outdoor and sky conditions change over time throughout the day, magnitude and direction of heat transfer through the roof assembly will continually change in conformity with the second law of thermodynamics.
In the present study, evaluation of thermal-energy performance considered the conduction, convection and radiation modes of heat transfer through the roof assembly. Thermal properties of materials that constitute the assembly were also taken into account. The rate of heat transfer by conduction (Qconduction), convection (Qconvection) and radiation (Qradiation) can be expressed by Fourier’s Law as per Equation (1) [39], Newton’s Law of Cooling as per Equation (2) [40] and Stefan–Boltzmann’s Law as per Equations (3) and (4) [41].
Q c o n d u c t i o n = k A d T d x
where k is the thermal conductivity of the material expressed in W/mK, A is the cross-sectional area perpendicular to heat flow expressed in m2, and d T d x is the temperature gradient expressed in K/m.
Q c o n v e c t i o n = h c A ( T s T f )
where hc is the surface heat transfer coefficient, A is the surface area, Ts is the surface temperature, and Tf is the fluid temperature.
Q r a d i a t i o n = σ A 1 ε 1 ( T 1 4 T 2 4 )
Q r a d i a t i o n = h r A 1 ( T 1 T 2 )
where σ is the Stefan–Boltzmann constant, hr is the coefficient of heat transfer, A1 is the area of the first surface, ɛ1 is the emissivity of the first surface, T1 is the absolute temperature of the first surface, and T2 is the absolute temperature of the second surface.
The ability of the roof surface to reject solar heat, as indicated by the solar reflectance index (SRI), was also taken into consideration. SRI refers to the relative steady-state temperature of a surface with respect to a standard white, which is given the SRI value of 100, and a standard black, which is given the SRI value of 0, under standard solar and ambient conditions. It is calculated as per Equation (5) [42]. As its definition and method of calculation are based on the steady-state temperatures of a standard black, which has a reflectance of 0.05 and an emittance of 0.90, and a standard white, which has a reflectance of 0.80 and an emittance of 0.90, it is possible for SRI values to be slightly negative or exceed 100.
S R I = ( T b l a c k T s u r f a c e ) ( T b l a c k T w h i t e ) × 100
where Tblack, Twhite and Tsurface are steady-state temperatures of the standard black, standard white and material surface, respectively, which are derived from measured values of solar reflectance and infrared emittance of the material surface according to the calculations in the Standard Practice for Calculating Solar Reflectance Index of Horizontal and Low-Sloped Opaque Surfaces (ASTM E1980-11) [43].
Adoption of high-albedo roof tiles and bulk insulation within the roof assembly were aimed toward developing an energy-efficient roof assembly. Monitoring of the energy-efficiency considered the cooling load and energy savings, which signify the level of indoor thermal comfort. A conceptual framework of the present study is outlined in Figure 1.
BIM was selected as the methodology, as it is capable of assisting the decision-making process when it comes to sustainable design of buildings. BIM has been employed in previous studies to perform sustainable design of residential buildings that are exposed to the hot, humid climate of Malaysia. Amir et al. [44], Gardezi et al. [45] and Jamaludin et al. [46] developed building information models of pre-determined types of residential buildings. Alternatively, building information models developed in Farhan et al. [31], Halim et al. [23], Irwan et al. [24,25] and Morris et al. [26] were those of test cells that represent the conditions of a habitable space in typical urban residential buildings in Malaysia. BIM simulation data that were collected from the building information models can be validated by conducting field measurements and comparing the measured data with their counterparts from the BIM simulation based on Equation (6) as in Vangimalla et al. [47].
P D S D - F M = S D F M F M × 100 %
where SD and FM are the simulation and field measurement data, respectively, and PDSD−FM is the percentage difference between the simulation and field measurement data.
Acceptable PDSD−FM values adopted in Vangimalla et al. [47] and Leng et al. [48] are 15% and 20%, respectively, which were determined based on the 10% to 20% acceptable range recommended in Maamari et al. [49].
In the present study, two test cells, as shown in Figure 2, were constructed at the site location of 3.07° N, 101.50° E in Shah Alam, as shown in Figure 3. The test cells are identical, barring the roof tile color, where red and white roof tile colors were adopted, as shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5, to represent conventional and high-albedo roofs, respectively. Thermocouples and data loggers were installed in the test cells to collect air and surface temperature data throughout the whole year of 2021.
Inspections were conducted prior to commencement of data collection, as well as once per week after the commencement, to ascertain the accuracy of data throughout the data collection. The inspections were conducted by comparing air and surface temperature data that were recorded using primary data loggers, which were mounted to the test cells, with those that were recorded using secondary data loggers of the same model that were minimally used. For the surface temperature data, their accuracy was further ascertained by performing supplementary comparisons between the temperatures that were measured using thermocouples, which were then recorded by the data loggers, with those that were manually measured using a thermal imaging camera.
The test cells were 4 m long, 4 m wide and 3 m high. The dimensions were selected as such to fulfil minimum size requirements as specified in UBBL 1984 [37], while minimizing the size of the test cells for feasibility of the experiment. The minimum base area, height and width of a habitable room in residential buildings were 11 m2, 2.5 m and 2 m, respectively.
Conventional materials were employed to construct the test cells, as itemized in Table 1, inclusive of the density, thermal conductivity (k-value), specific heat and thickness of each material, with the aim of creating the conditions of a habitable space in typical urban residential buildings in Malaysia.
The test cell was modeled in IESVE as a building information model. An axonometric projection of the model is shown in Figure 6. Two-dimensional plan, front and rear, and left and right views of the model are shown in Figure 7.
Thermal-energy performance of the roof assembly of the building information model was evaluated by performing thermal-energy and CFD analyses using Apache and MicroFlo, respectively, in IESVE. SRI values of the roof surfaces were calculated from solar reflectance and infrared emittance values of roof surfaces of roof tile samples, which were obtained from laboratory measurements. Thermal-energy analysis was performed for a whole typical meteorological year (TMY) for the site location of the test cells at 3.07° N, 101.50° E in Shah Alam, Malaysia. Meteorological data, inclusive of solar irradiance, were generated by Meteonorm, based on data obtained from weather stations, geostationary satellites and globally calibrated aerosol climatology, as well as sophisticated interpolation models [50]. Roof-surface and attic-air temperature data generated from the thermal-energy analysis throughout the TMY were averaged to obtain annual-averaged 24-h profiles. The CFD analysis generated indoor temperature contours at peak diurnal outdoor temperature and the trough of nocturnal outdoor temperature. Configuration of the roof assembly was varied according to the roof tile color and presence of insulation to create three building information models as presented in Table 2. Then, 100-mm thick mineral wool was employed within the roof assembly as bulk insulation, as it is commonly used for building insulation in Malaysia.
The evaluation of thermal-energy performance considered the operation of a unit of a 950-W air conditioner for cooling of the indoor space with a set-point temperature of 24 °C as recommended in Malaysian Standard: Energy Efficiency and Use of Renewable Energy for Non-Residential Buildings (MS 1525:2019) [51] and also adopted in Halim et al. [23] and Irwan et al. [24,25]. Daily, weekly and monthly indoor cooling profiles were configured based on the profiles adopted in Halim et al. [23], Irwan et al. [24,25], Tang and Chin [52] and Zakaria et al. [29], which also focused on residential buildings in Malaysia. Simulation settings were configured with the assumption that no occupants and furniture are present in the indoor space, and the door and windows are closed throughout the year.
The methodology of the study is elucidated in Figure 8 and Figure 9.

3. Results and Discussion

The site location of the test cells at 3.07° N, 101.50° E in Shah Alam, Malaysia is within the tropical rainforest region as per the Köppen–Geiger climate classification [6]. Consequently, the test cells are exposed to a hot, humid climate throughout the year [1,5]. Minimum, mean and maximum annual-averaged profiles of solar irradiance and outdoor air temperature throughout the TMY of the location are presented in Figure 10. For the most part, solar irradiance throughout diurnal periods is relatively high, particularly in the afternoon, owing to the high altitude of the sun path as mentioned in Alam et al. [1] and Al-Obaidi et al. [2]. Minimum, mean and maximum solar irradiance profiles peaked at 73.36, 587.52 and 1070.25 W/m2, respectively. The solar irradiance culminated at 13:30, which is about halfway through the diurnal period. Inversely, there is zero solar irradiance throughout the nocturnal period from 20:30 to 5:30. Accordingly, as outdoor air temperature is directly impacted by solar irradiance, the trend of the outdoor air temperature profiles trailed those of solar irradiance. Minimum, mean and maximum profiles of the outdoor air temperatures peaked at 26.9, 31.23 and 36.00 °C, respectively, with the temperatures culminating from 15:30 to 16:30.
Solar reflectance and infrared emittance of the roof surfaces are, as measured in the laboratory, presented in Figure 11. SRI values, as shown in Figure 12, were calculated from the solar reflectance and infrared emittance values, as per Santamouris et al. [42] and ASTM E1980-11 [43]. The change from a conventional to a high-albedo roof surface has led to an increase in the solar reflectance from 0.20 to 0.73, no change in the infrared emittance at 0.90, and an increase in the SRI from 19 to 90. Application of white paint that brought about the high-albedo roof surface can significantly reduce heat transfer through the roof assembly, as, according to Raeissi and Taheri [53], the wavelength of light is reflected by the white pigment at the roof surface and, as a consequence, less solar radiation is absorbed.
Roof surface temperature (TRS) profiles of the non-insulated conventional and high-albedo roof assemblies are compared in Figure 13. As TRS is heavily influenced by solar irradiance, waveform of the TRS profiles in Figure 13 bears resemblances to that of the solar irradiance profiles in Figure 10. The change from a conventional to a high-albedo roof surface has led to the reduction in TRS throughout the diurnal segment, where TRS culminated at 50.50 and 35.84 °C for the conventional and high-albedo roof surfaces, respectively. The strong peak reduction of −14.79 °C in TRS, as illustrated in Figure 14, which presents the change in TRS (∆TRS), transpired owing to the relatively higher SRI of the high-albedo roof surface of 90, in comparison to that of the conventional roof surface of 19. The higher SRI resulted in a higher rate of reflection and accordingly a lower rate of absorption of solar radiation that is incident on the roof surface. As opposed to that of the diurnal segment, the increase in SRI did not influence TRS throughout the nocturnal segment due to the absence of solar radiation throughout the nocturnal period.
Plot of TRS versus solar irradiance for the non-insulated conventional and high-albedo roof assemblies are presented in Figure 15. Correlations between TRS and solar irradiance are positive, with coefficient of determination (R2) values of 0.9662 and 0.8233, and gradients of 0.0446 and 0.0197, for the conventional (SRI = 19) and high-albedo (SRI = 90) roof assemblies, respectively. The lower R2 and gradient for the high-albedo roof assembly signify that the change from the conventional to the high-albedo roof surface has led to the reduction in the influence of solar irradiance on TRS by virtue of the higher rate of reflection and lower rate of absorption of solar radiation on the high-albedo roof surface in comparison to that on the conventional roof surface.
TRS profiles of the non-insulated and insulated high-albedo roof assemblies are compared in Figure 16. The installation of bulk insulation within the high-albedo roof assembly has led to the reduction in TRS throughout the diurnal segment, where the peak TRS further declined from 35.84 to 32.63 °C. The presence of insulation has led to a further peak reduction in TRS of −4.06 °C as illustrated in Figure 17, as the insulation material hinders heat conduction through the roof assembly [11].
Throughout the nocturnal segment, the absence of solar radiation has caused the heat conduction transfer to invert. The transposition occurred due to the reduction in the average effective sky temperature, which resulted in the radiation of heat from the roof surface to the sky during the nocturnal period. Accordingly, heat within the indoor space and roof assembly flows toward the roof tiles and attempts to escape the building to achieve thermal equilibrium as mentioned in Farhan et al. [31] and Tang and Chin [52]. Under the circumstances, the presence of insulation within the roof assembly contributed toward hampering the heat transfer out of the building. As a consequence, TRS increased throughout the nocturnal period by up to 2.64 °C, as shown in Figure 17.
Indoor temperature (Ti) contours were generated at peak diurnal outdoor temperature (To) as shown in Figure 18, which was on 17 March at 16:00, and the trough of nocturnal To as shown in Figure 19, which was on 22 September at 6:00. The contours were generated for all of the configurations of the roof assembly, which were conventional, high-albedo, and high-albedo with bulk insulation. Ti contour for the conventional roof assembly discloses that, during peak diurnal To, the high TRS, which culminated at 45.00 °C, caused the attic air temperature (TAA) to elevate to within the range from 39.55 to 43.18 °C. Then, heat transfer into the indoor space resulted in the increase in room air temperature (TRA) to within the range from 34.09 to 37.73 °C. Ti contour for the high-albedo roof assembly exhibits that, resulting from the change from a conventional to a high-albedo roof surface, at peak diurnal To, the range of TRS greatly reduced to within the range from 25.00 to 39.55 °C. The decline in TRS transpired due to the adoption of the high-albedo roof surface, which reduced heat transfer into the attic space. Accordingly, TAA and TRA reduced to within the range from 32.27 to 34.09 °C. Ti contour for the high-albedo roof assembly with bulk insulation reveals that the presence of bulk insulation caused TAA and TRA to further reduce to within the range from 30.45 to 32.27 °C by hampering the heat transfer from the roof surface to the attic space.
At the trough of nocturnal To, increase in the SRI of the roof surface did not influence TRS, TAA and TRA by virtue of the absence of solar radiation, which induced heat radiation from the roof surface to the sky during the nocturnal period and is in agreement with Farhan et al. [31] and Tang and Chin [52]. TRS ranged from 20.00 to 21.36 °C while TAA and TRA ranged from 21.82 to 22.27 °C. Ti contour for the high-albedo roof assembly with bulk insulation shows that, due to the presence of bulk insulation, TRS, TAA and TRA increased owing to the obstruction of heat from escaping the building from the roof surface toward the sky during the nocturnal period. Consequently, heat transfer from the indoor space to the roof surface was hindered.
The change from a conventional to a high-albedo roof surface, followed by the installation of bulk insulation, has resulted in reduction of indoor annual cooling load of the building information model as presented in Figure 20. The indoor annual cooling load reduced from 2.67 MWh for the conventional roof assembly to 2.32 MWh for the high-albedo roof assembly. Installation of bulk insulation within the high-albedo roof assembly has led to further reduction of the indoor annual cooling load from 2.32 to 2.28 MWh. Energy savings of 15.13% have been generated when the change from a conventional to a high-albedo roof surface was performed, while 17.00% have been generated when the installation of bulk insulation was performed on the high-albedo roof assembly.

4. Conclusions

Thermal-energy performance of an urban pitched residential roof assembly, which adopted varying configurations of high-albedo roof tiles and bulk insulation under the hot, humid climate, was evaluated. Thermal-energy and CFD analyses were performed on a building information model.
Change from the conventional to the high-albedo roof surface has led to the reduction in the influence of solar irradiance on roof surface temperature due to the higher rate of reflection of solar radiation on the roof surface. However, the change did not influence the roof surface temperature throughout the nocturnal segment due to the absence of solar radiation. Installation of bulk insulation within the high-albedo roof assembly has led to further reduction in roof surface temperature throughout the diurnal segment. However, the reduction coincided with the increase in the roof surface temperature throughout the nocturnal period as heat transfers out of the building, owing to the absence of solar radiation that has caused the direction of heat conduction transfer to invert, which is hampered by the insulation material. Despite the negative impact of installing bulk insulation throughout the nocturnal period, on the whole, energy savings have been achieved, which are 15.13%, which is from 2.67 to 2.32 MWh when the change from a conventional to a high-albedo roof surface was performed, and 17.00%, which is from 2.32 to 2.28 MWh when the installation of bulk insulation was performed on the high-albedo roof assembly.
For future research, studies that consider the variation in height of the building and surrounding buildings and degree of the placement of high-albedo materials can be considered. Development of a solar-reflective coating that can further increase the solar reflectance of the roof surface and potentially eliminate dependence toward insulation is also recommended. Alternatively, engineering of novel materials that possess extremely low thermal conductivity, which can potentially be applied within the roof assembly with minuscule thicknesses, is proposed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D.; methodology, S.A.F.; software, N.S.; validation, H.A.-M.; formal analysis, R.I.; investigation, M.D.; resources, N.S.; data curation, H.A.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A.F.; writing—review and editing, M.D. and S.A.F.; visualization, R.I.; supervision, N.S.; project administration, H.A.-M.; funding acquisition, R.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Article Processing Charge was self-funded by the authors. The research also received financial support from Yayasan Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Malaysia, via grant number 015LC0–155, which was administered by Research Management Center of UTP.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author, S.A.F.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Institute of Science of Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam, Malaysia, as well as Yarmouk University and Jadara University, Jordan, for the support and collaboration.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

Abbreviations
BIMBuilding Information Modeling
CFDComputational Fluid Dynamics
IESVEIntegrated Environmental Solutions <Virtual Environment>
k-valueThermal conductivity
R-valueThermal resistance
SRISolar Reflectance Index
TMYTypical Meteorological Year
Notations
ACross-sectional area perpendicular to heat flow (for calculation of Qconduction), or surface area (for calculation of Qconvection)
A1Area of the first surface
d T d x Temperature gradient
FMField measurement data
hcSurface heat transfer coefficient
hrCoefficient of heat transfer
kThermal conductivity
PDSD-FMPercentage difference between the simulation and field measurement data
QconductionHeat transfer by conduction
QconvectionHeat transfer by convection
QradiationHeat transfer by radiation
SDSimulation data
TAAAttic air temperature
TblackSteady-state temperature of the standard black
TfFluid temperature
TiIndoor temperature
ToOutdoor temperature
TRSRoof-top surface temperature
TsSurface temperature
TsurfaceSteady-state temperature of the material surface
TwhiteSteady-state temperature of the standard white
T1Absolute temperature of the first surface
T2Absolute temperature of the second surface
TRSChange in roof-top surface temperature
ɛ1Emissivity of the first surface
σStefan–Boltzmann constant

References

  1. Alam, S.S.; Omar, N.A.; Ahmad, M.S.; Siddiquei, H.R.; Nor, S.M. Renewable energy in Malaysia: Strategies and development. Environ. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 2, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Al-Obaidi, K.M.; Ismail, M.; Abdul Rahman, A.M. Passive cooling techniques through reflective and radiative roofs in tropical houses in Southeast Asia: A literature review. Front. Archit. Res. 2014, 3, 283–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Miranville, F.; Boyer, H.; Mara, T.; Garde, F. On the thermal behaviour of roof-mounted radiant barriers under tropical and humid climatic conditions: Modelling and empirical validation. Energy Build. 2003, 35, 997–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Al-Obaidi, K.M.; Ismail, M.; Abdul Rahman, A.M. Investigation of passive design techniques for pitched roof systems in the tropical region. Mod. Appl. Sci. 2014, 8, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Tang, K.H.D. Climate change in Malaysia: Trends, contributors, impacts, mitigation and adaptations. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 650, 1858–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Beck, H.E.; Zimmermann, N.E.; McVicar, T.R.; Vergopolan, N.; Berg, A.; Wood, E.F. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci. Data 2018, 5, 180214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. MetMalaysia: Maklumat Iklim. Available online: https://www.met.gov.my/iklim/laporanringkasan/maklumatiklim (accessed on 11 January 2022).
  8. MetMalaysia: Iklim Malaysia. Available online: https://www.met.gov.my/pendidikan/iklim/iklimmalaysia (accessed on 11 January 2022).
  9. Mekhilef, S.; Safari, A.; Mustaffa, W.E.S.; Saidur, R.; Omar, R.; Younis, M.A.A. Solar energy in Malaysia: Current state and prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vijaykumar, K.C.K.; Srinivasan, P.S.S.; Dhandapani, S. A performance of hollow clay tile (HCT) laid reinforced cement concrete (RCC) roof for tropical summer climates. Energy Build. 2007, 39, 886–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tuck, N.W.; Zaki, S.A.; Hagishima, A.; Rijal, H.B.; Yakub, F. Affordable retrofitting methods to achieve thermal comfort for a terrace house in Malaysia with a hot–humid climate. Energy Build. 2020, 223, 110072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Papadopoulos, A.M.; Giama, E. Environmental performance evaluation of thermal insulation materials and its impact on the building. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 2178–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Husna, N.; Farhan, S.A.; Abdul Wahab, M.M.; Shafiq, N.; Sharif, M.T.; Abd Razak, S.N.; Ismail, F.I. Effect of granular silica aerogel as filler on tensile and flexural strengths and moduli of stone-wool-fibre-reinforced composite as rigid board roof insulation material. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 945, 012061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ismail, F.I.; Farhan, S.A.; Shafiq, N.; Husna, N.; Sharif, M.T.; Affan, S.U.; Veerasenan, A.K. Nano-porous silica-aerogel-incorporated composite materials for thermal-energy-efficient pitched roof in the tropical region. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nuruddin, M.F.; Husna, N.; Azizli, K.A.M.; Farhan, S.A.; Wan Zainal Abidin, W.A.A. Prospect of adopting kapok fibre as roof insulation. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 567, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Farhan, S.A.; Khamidi, M.F.; Husna, N. Thickness optimization of kapok fibre insulation below roof pitch of residential buildings in hot-humid climate with mathematical formulation. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 699, 864–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Omar, M.F.; Abdullah, M.A.H.; Rashid, N.A.; Abdul Rani, A.L.; Illias, N.A. The application of coconut fiber as insulation ceiling board in building construction. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 864, 012196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Al Yacouby, A.M.; Khamidi, M.F.; Teo, Y.W.; Nuruddin, M.F.; Farhan, S.A.; Sulaiman, S.A.; Razali, A.E. Housing developers and home owners awareness on implementation of building insulation in Malaysia. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2011, 148, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. MS 2680:2017; Energy Efficiency and Use of Renewable Energy for Residential Buildings—Code of Practice. Malaysian Standard: Cyberjaya, Malaysia, 2017.
  20. Green Building Index Assessment Criteria for Residential New Construction Version 3.0. Available online: https://www.greenbuildingindex.org/Files/Resources/GBI%20Tools/GBI%20RNC%20Residential%20Tool%20V3.0.pdf (accessed on 11 January 2022).
  21. Sel. P.U. 142/2012; Selangor Uniform Building (Amendment) (No. 2) By-Laws 2012. State of Selangor: Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2012.
  22. Farhan, S.A.; Khamidi, M.F.; Al Yacouby, A.M.; Idrus, A.; Nuruddin, M.F. Critical Review of Published Research on Building Insulation: Focus on Building Components and Climate. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Business, Engineering & Industrial Applications Colloquium (BEIAC 2012), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 7–8 April 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Halim, N.H.A.; Zain-Ahmed, A.; Zakaria, N.Z. Thermal and Energy Analysis of Ceiling and Pitch Insulation for Buildings in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium & Exhibition in Sustainable Energy & Environment (ISESEE 2011), Malacca, Malaysia, 1–3 June 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Irwan, S.S.; Zain-Ahmed, A.; Zakaria, N.Z.; Ibrahim, N. Thermal and energy performance of conditioned building due to insulated sloped roof. AIP Conf. Proc. 2010, 1250, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Irwan, S.S.; Zain-Ahmed, A.; Ibrahim, N.; Zakaria, N.Z. Roof Angle for Optimum Thermal and Energy Performance of Insulated Roof. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Energy and Environment (ICEE 2009), Malacca, Malaysia, 7–8 December 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Morris, F.; Zain-Ahmed, A.; Zakaria, N.Z. Thermal Performance of Naturally Ventilated Test Building with Pitch and Ceiling Insulation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium & Exhibition in Sustainable Energy & Environment (ISESEE 2011), Malacca, Malaysia, 1–3 June 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nuruddin, M.F.; Puad, N.H.A.; Zaidi, N.H.A. Effectiveness of aerogel roofing system on temperature reduction in Malaysian residential buildings. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2017, 12, 4057–4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Puad, N.H.A.; Nuruddin, M.F.; Lian, J.J.; Othman, I. Roof Insulation Material from Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE), Kapok Fibre and Silica Aerogel. In Engineering Challenges for Sustainable Future, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Civil, Offshore and Environmental Engineering (ICCOEE 2016), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 15–17 August 2016; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zakaria, N.Z.; Zain-Ahmed, A.; Ariffin, N.N.; Abdul Halim, N.H.; Morris, F. Thermal Energy Evaluation of Building with Ceiling Insulation in Warm-Humid Tropical Climate. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering (CHUSER 2011), Penang, Malaysia, 5–6 December 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Al Yacouby, A.M.; Khamidi, M.F.; Nuruddin, M.F.; Farhan, S.A.; Razali, A.E. Study on Roof Tile’s Colors in Malaysia for Development of New Anti-Warming Roof Tiles with Higher Solar Reflectance Index (SRI). In Energy and Sustainability: Exploring the Innovative Minds, Proceedings of the National Postgraduate Conference (NPC 2011), Perak, Malaysia, 19–20 September 2011; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  31. Farhan, S.A.; Ismail, F.I.; Kiwan, O.; Shafiq, N.; Zain-Ahmed, A.; Husna, N.; Hamid, A.I.A. Effect of roof tile colour on heat conduction transfer, roof-top surface temperature and cooling load in modern residential buildings under the tropical climate of Malaysia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Synnefa, A.; Santamouris, M.; Akbari, H. Estimating the effect of using cool coatings on energy loads and thermal comfort in residential buildings in various climatic conditions. Energy Build. 2007, 39, 1167–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pisello, A.L. High-albedo roof coatings for reducing building cooling needs. In Eco-Efficient Materials for Mitigating Building Cooling Needs—Design, Properties and Applications; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2015; pp. 243–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Syuhada, A.; Maulana, M.I. Heat transfer capability of solar radiation in colored roof and influence on room thermal comfort. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 1931, 030054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zingre, K.T.; Wan, M.P.; Wong, S.K.; Toh, W.B.T.; Lee, I.Y.L. Modelling of cool roof performance for double-skin roofs in tropical climate. Energy 2015, 82, 813–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Thongkanluang, T.; Chirakanphaisarn, N.; Limsuwan, P. Preparation of NIR reflective brown pigment. Procedia Eng. 2012, 32, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. G.N. 5178/85; UBBL 1984. Uniform Building By-Laws 1984. International Law Book Services: Petaling Jaya, Malaysia, 2013.
  38. Sekerka, R.F. Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jayamaha, L. Energy Efficient Building Systems: Green Strategies for Operation and Maintenance; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ghiaasiaan, S.M. Convective Heat and Mass Transfer; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  41. Howell, J.R.; Siegel, R.; Mengüç, M.P. Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer, 5th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  42. Santamouris, M.; Synnefa, A.; Karlessi, T. Using advanced cool materials in the urban built environment to mitigate heat islands and improve thermal comfort conditions. Sol. Energy 2011, 85, 3085–3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. ASTM E1980-11; Standard Practice for Calculating Solar Reflectance Index of Horizontal and Low-Sloped Opaque Surfaces. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019.
  44. Amir, A.; Mohamed, M.F.; Sulaiman, M.K.A.; Yusoff, W.F.M. Assessment of indoor thermal condition of a low-cost single story detached house: A case study in Malaysia. Alam Cipta 2019, 12, 80–88. [Google Scholar]
  45. Gardezi, S.S.S.; Shafiq, N.; Wan Abdullah Zawawi, N.A.; Khamidi, M.F.; Farhan, S.A. Minimization of embodied carbon footprint from housing sector of Malaysia. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2015, 45, 1927–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jamaludin, N.; Mohammed, N.I.; Farhan, S.A. Indoor Thermal Environment in Residential Buildings at Different Micro-Climates in Malaysia. In Recent Advances in Environmental and Biological Engineering, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Cities, Urban Sustainability and Transportation (SCUST ‘14), Istanbul, Turkey, 15–17 December 2014; WSEAS Press: Athens, Greece, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  47. Vangimalla, P.R.; Olbina, S.J.; Issa, R.R.; Hinze, J. Validation of Autodesk EcotectTM Accuracy for Thermal and Daylighting Simulations. In Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 11–14 December 2011. [Google Scholar]
  48. Leng, P.C.; Ahmad, M.H.; Ossen, D.R.; Hamid, M. Investigation of Integrated Environmental Solutions-Virtual Environment Software Accuracy for Air Temperature and Relative Humidity of the Test Room Simulations. In Proceedings of the Universiti Malaysia Terengganu 11th International Annual Symposium on Sustainability Science and Management, Terengganu, Malaysia, 9–11 July 2012. [Google Scholar]
  49. Maamari, F.; Andersen, M.; de Boer, J.; Carroll, W.L.; Dumortier, D.; Greenup, P. Experimental validation of simulation methods for bi-directional transmission properties at the daylighting performance level. Energy Build. 2006, 38, 878–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Meteonorm: Global Climate Database. Available online: https://meteonorm.com (accessed on 11 January 2022).
  51. MS 1525:2019; Energy Efficiency and Use of Renewable Energy for Non-Residential Buildings—Code of Practice (Third Revision). Malaysian Standard: Cyberjaya, Malaysia, 2019.
  52. Tang, C.K.; Chin, N. Building Energy Efficiency Technical Guideline for Passive Design; Building Sector Energy Efficiency Project (BSEEP): Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  53. Raeissi, S.; Taheri, M. Cooling load reduction of buildings using passive roof options. Renew. Energy 1996, 7, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of the present study.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of the present study.
Sustainability 14 02867 g001
Figure 2. Two test cells.
Figure 2. Two test cells.
Sustainability 14 02867 g002
Figure 3. Plan view of the site location of the test cells.
Figure 3. Plan view of the site location of the test cells.
Sustainability 14 02867 g003
Figure 4. Red (conventional) roof of one of the test cells.
Figure 4. Red (conventional) roof of one of the test cells.
Sustainability 14 02867 g004
Figure 5. White (high-albedo) roof of one of the test cells.
Figure 5. White (high-albedo) roof of one of the test cells.
Sustainability 14 02867 g005
Figure 6. Axonometric projection of the building information model of the test cell.
Figure 6. Axonometric projection of the building information model of the test cell.
Sustainability 14 02867 g006
Figure 7. Two-dimensional views of the building information model of the test cell: (a) plan; (b) front and rear; (c) left and right.
Figure 7. Two-dimensional views of the building information model of the test cell: (a) plan; (b) front and rear; (c) left and right.
Sustainability 14 02867 g007
Figure 8. Methodology of the present study.
Figure 8. Methodology of the present study.
Sustainability 14 02867 g008
Figure 9. Methodology of the present study (continued).
Figure 9. Methodology of the present study (continued).
Sustainability 14 02867 g009
Figure 10. Annual-averaged profiles of (a) solar irradiance and (b) outdoor air temperature throughout the typical meteorological year of the site location.
Figure 10. Annual-averaged profiles of (a) solar irradiance and (b) outdoor air temperature throughout the typical meteorological year of the site location.
Sustainability 14 02867 g010
Figure 11. Solar reflectance and infrared emittance of the conventional and high-albedo roof surfaces.
Figure 11. Solar reflectance and infrared emittance of the conventional and high-albedo roof surfaces.
Sustainability 14 02867 g011
Figure 12. Solar reflectance index (SRI) of the conventional and high-albedo roof surfaces.
Figure 12. Solar reflectance index (SRI) of the conventional and high-albedo roof surfaces.
Sustainability 14 02867 g012
Figure 13. Roof surface temperature (TRS) profiles of non-insulated roof assemblies.
Figure 13. Roof surface temperature (TRS) profiles of non-insulated roof assemblies.
Sustainability 14 02867 g013
Figure 14. Change in TRS (∆TRS) when SRI was increased from that of the conventional roof assembly (SRI = 19) to that of the non-insulated high-albedo roof assembly (SRI = 90).
Figure 14. Change in TRS (∆TRS) when SRI was increased from that of the conventional roof assembly (SRI = 19) to that of the non-insulated high-albedo roof assembly (SRI = 90).
Sustainability 14 02867 g014
Figure 15. Plot of TRS versus solar irradiance for the non-insulated roof assemblies.
Figure 15. Plot of TRS versus solar irradiance for the non-insulated roof assemblies.
Sustainability 14 02867 g015
Figure 16. TRS profiles of high-albedo roof assemblies.
Figure 16. TRS profiles of high-albedo roof assemblies.
Sustainability 14 02867 g016
Figure 17.TRS when bulk insulation was added to the non-insulated high-albedo roof.
Figure 17.TRS when bulk insulation was added to the non-insulated high-albedo roof.
Sustainability 14 02867 g017
Figure 18. Indoor temperature (Ti) contours at peak diurnal outdoor temperature (To): (a) conventional, (b) high-albedo and (c) high-albedo with bulk insulation.
Figure 18. Indoor temperature (Ti) contours at peak diurnal outdoor temperature (To): (a) conventional, (b) high-albedo and (c) high-albedo with bulk insulation.
Sustainability 14 02867 g018
Figure 19. Ti contours at the trough of nocturnal To: (a) conventional, (b) high-albedo and (c) high-albedo with bulk insulation.
Figure 19. Ti contours at the trough of nocturnal To: (a) conventional, (b) high-albedo and (c) high-albedo with bulk insulation.
Sustainability 14 02867 g019
Figure 20. Annual cooling load and energy savings of the roof assembly at various configurations.
Figure 20. Annual cooling load and energy savings of the roof assembly at various configurations.
Sustainability 14 02867 g020
Table 1. Materials employed to construct the test cells.
Table 1. Materials employed to construct the test cells.
ComponentMaterialDensity
(kg/m3)
Specific Heat
(J/kgK)
k-Value
(W/mK)
Thickness
(mm)
RoofCement Tile189010000.83610.0
CeilingCement Board72010000.2504.5
WindowClear Float Glass28008000.8106.0
DoorSolid Timber70227200.13838.0
WallCement Plaster16908400.53318.0
Clay Brick18008001.154114.0
Cement Plaster16908400.53318.0
FloorReinforced Concrete240010001.44250.0
Table 2. Roof assembly configurations of building information models.
Table 2. Roof assembly configurations of building information models.
Building Information ModelRoof Tile ColorBulk Insulation
ConventionalRedNil
High-AlbedoWhiteNil
High-Albedo + Bulk InsulationWhiteMineral Wool
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dahim, M.; Farhan, S.A.; Shafiq, N.; Al-Mattarneh, H.; Ismail, R. Thermal-Energy Performance of Bulk Insulation Coupled with High-Albedo Roof Tiles in Urban Pitched Residential Roof Assemblies in the Hot, Humid Climate. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2867. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052867

AMA Style

Dahim M, Farhan SA, Shafiq N, Al-Mattarneh H, Ismail R. Thermal-Energy Performance of Bulk Insulation Coupled with High-Albedo Roof Tiles in Urban Pitched Residential Roof Assemblies in the Hot, Humid Climate. Sustainability. 2022; 14(5):2867. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052867

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dahim, Mohammed, Syed Ahmad Farhan, Nasir Shafiq, Hashem Al-Mattarneh, and Rabah Ismail. 2022. "Thermal-Energy Performance of Bulk Insulation Coupled with High-Albedo Roof Tiles in Urban Pitched Residential Roof Assemblies in the Hot, Humid Climate" Sustainability 14, no. 5: 2867. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052867

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop