Next Article in Journal
Addressing the Phenomenon of Overtourism in Budapest from Multiple Angles Using Unconventional Methodologies and Data
Previous Article in Journal
Farm-Level Technical Efficiency and Its Determinants of Rice Production in Indo-Gangetic Plains: A Stochastic Frontier Model Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards a More-than-Human Approach to Smart and Sustainable Urban Development: Designing for Multispecies Justice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Towards Smart and Sustainable Urban Electromobility: An Editorial Commentary

School of Architecture and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
Sustainability 2022, 14(4), 2264; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042264
Submission received: 11 February 2022 / Accepted: 12 February 2022 / Published: 16 February 2022
In the age of anthropogenic climate change, developing smart and sustainable transport systems is among the most popular urban policy debates. Given that the future of urban mobility must be based on renewable energy resources, planning on how to move towards smart and sustainable urban electromobility is critical, and forms the rationale of this paper. In this editorial commentary: (a) The important role of smart and sustainable transport systems in addressing urban and environmental challenges is discussed; (b) The need for and the drivers of smart and sustainable urban electromobility are presented, and; (c) The key issues for establishing a new research agenda for smart and sustainable urban electromobility are listed. The editorial commentary also highlights the overall contributions of the papers of the Special Issue on the state-of-the-art and future perspectives in smart and sustainable urban development.
Today, we are living in a rapidly urbanizing world that accommodates human populations beyond the carrying capacity of our planet [1]. In many developed countries, at present, urbanization levels have reached as high as 80–90%. While generally urban densification is the desired form of growth, only a fraction of urban development is happening in the form of infill development [2]. Most of the growth is expansion towards greenfield—i.e., urban fringes and peri-urban areas—that is ending up forming a large metropolitan conurbation [3]. The result is an unsustainable sprawl and a serious threat to highly sensitive urban ecosystem services [4].
The perils of globally common expansionist urban development patterns are not limited to pollution and urban ecosystem loss only [5,6]. Anthropogenetic climate change, deforestation, biodiversity loss, socioeconomic inequalities, increased natural disasters and health hazards are among some of the consequential negative externalities of such development types [7]. There is, hence, an urgent need for rethinking the sustainability of urban systems and finding ways to reshape, if not rectify, our urban spaces to minimize the undesired consequences of unsustainable anthropogenic activities [8].
For instance, the combination of private motor vehicle dependency, sprawling urban form, and vehicle combustion engine technology makes urban transport one of the major contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [9,10]. Addressing urban transport externalities, whether it is environmental or societal, is a highly challenging task [11,12] It requires sound government policy, commitment, and determination, along with automotive industry transformation and community behavioral change and support [13].
Advanced technological innovations also offer invaluable opportunities to help urban administrators tackle the challenges in establishing smart and sustainable urban transport systems [14]. For example, developments in transport technologies have brought intelligent transport systems a long way from automated traffic signalization to autonomous and connected vehicles [15]. Today, these smart mobility systems are in service in a growing number of cities across the globe—especially in the form of autonomous public shuttle buses [16].
Nonetheless, technological innovations alone are not adequate to turn our transport systems into truly smart and sustainable ones. A critical component of smart and sustainable urban transport is from which source energy of the vehicle is obtained. Electrification in this sense is a good example, as electricity produced from fossil fuels is not sustainable at all [17]. Thus, an electric vehicle is only as sustainable as the source of its power—whether it comes from fossil fuels or renewables, such as solar, wind, tidal and so on [18].
The mode of transport will have to invariably be powered by renewable energies due to serious environmental and societal pressures we are facing today [19]. Electric vehicles, also including hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles, are an important step towards achieving the smart and sustainable urban transport goal. However, the current global market share of electric vehicles is only about 1%. Besides in many countries, even including developing nations, this figure is very low, such as 0.4% for Australia [20]. Similarly, renewable energy is only responsible for about 29% of global electricity generation, where in many countries this figure is much lower than 20% [21].
Nevertheless, increasing global pressures, especially during the 26th UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26), have pushed many climate action passive countries, including Australia, for a pro-climate policy change. For example, most recently, the Australian Government adopted a ‘technology-led approach’ to emissions reduction as one of the most prominent national climate change strategies—others include emissions reduction incentives, regulating emissions, and reporting on emissions [22]. Subsequently, government subsidies for technocentric solutions to sustainability issues, including electric mobility or electromobility uptake, will soon start to become commonplace [23].
In recent years, exponential technological advancements, under the pressure of climate crises, have given birth to many innovative solutions not only in the automotive and energy sectors, but also in urban infrastructure and construction sectors [24,25]. Examples include autonomous and connected vehicles, smart roads and highways, Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS), photovoltaic solar energy conversion, battery storage of photovoltaic systems, smart grids, smart buildings, and smart homes, and so on [26,27,28,29].
Bringing sustainability to urban transport systems via electrification that is sourced from renewables is widely seen as a novel approach [30]. Nonetheless, vehicle electrification is only the tip of the iceberg. In other words, an electric vehicle is not the only required component of electromobility. Achieving electromobility, in the context of sustainable urban transport, also requires system thinking. This includes, but is not limited to, road infrastructure, power transfer systems, renewable energy generators, urban form, user behavior and so on [31,32,33,34]. Figure 1 illustrates the main drivers of smart and sustainable urban electromobility.
So far, numerous studies highlighted the challenges of electric vehicle uptake ranging from the cost of the vehicle, distance travelled with a single charge, availability of superfast charging stations, government incentives, battery life, second-hand market, source of electric energy, and so on [35,36,37]. Besides the vehicle cost issue, the second obstacle concerns vehicle charging matters [38].
The most recent attempts to address the limitations of smart and sustainable urban electromobility see it as an ecosystem that goes behind the vehicle alone, incorporate state-of-the-art technological solutions to the charging problems [39]. To be precise, the installation of a flexible dynamic wireless power transfer system on the main roads facilitates efficient, safe, on-demand, reliable and bi-directional power transfer to electric vehicles [40,41]. In such an ecosystem, another requirement is to develop incentive-based demand management for electric vehicles, including V2G and G2V transfer of power while maintaining stability of the electricity grid, V2G and G2V [42,43].
Along with the innovative vehicle and power technologies, sustainable electromobility also requires the development of an efficient transportation network with multi objective optimization framework incorporating electrical demand incentives, electric vehicle communication and charging and/or discharging, and urban infrastructure constraints [44,45,46,47].
Additionally, redevelopment or restructuring the urban form and main land use destinations, as well as understanding the underlining factors and changing traveler behaviors, accordingly, are important elements of a smart and sustainable urban electromobility ecosystem [48,49,50].
Given the urgency of establishing smart and sustainable transport systems in cities across the globe, there is a need for thoroughly exploring efficient methodologies towards a smart and sustainable urban electromobility transformation without burdening transportation and electrical grids. Besides, the need for developing technologies, infrastructures, and systems to support the mobile energy needs of urban mobility networks is becoming evident [51]—e.g., Mobile-Energy-as-a-Service (MEaaS).
In this regard, the following questions will be helpful in forming a much clearer view of how to plan for smart and sustainable electromobility in our cities. These questions also contribute to establishing a new research agenda for moving towards smart and sustainable urban electromobility.
  • Why is smart and sustainable urban electromobility needed, and how can it help in addressing some colossal urban and environmental problems?
  • Which technologies, infrastructures and systems are needed for developing smart and sustainable urban electromobility networks?
  • When can smart and sustainable urban electromobility become relatively affordable for wider adoption in cities?
  • Where are the most suitable locations to trial and operationalize smart and sustainable urban electromobility systems?
  • Who are the key stakeholders of smart and sustainable urban electromobility to support the development and uptake?
  • What do experts, authorities, service providers, electric vehicle users, and community at large think on smart and sustainable urban electromobility?
  • How can the development and adoption of smart and sustainable urban electromobility systems be incentivized and regulated?
Against the above editorial commentary, the Special Issue on the state-of-the-art and future perspectives in smart and sustainable urban development supports the efforts in improving research and practice in smart and sustainable urbanism. The Special Issue contributes to the conceptual and practical knowledge pools to improve the research and practice on smart and sustainable urban development by bringing an informed understanding of the subject to scholars, policymakers, and practitioners. It offers insights into smart and sustainable urban development by conducting in-depth conceptual debates, detailed case study descriptions, thorough empirical investigations, systematic literature reviews, or forecasting analyses. The Special Issue, hence, forms a repository of relevant information, material, and knowledge to support research, policymaking, practice, and transferability of experiences to address the urbanization and other planetary challenges.
The Special Issue includes the following 20 commentaries, viewpoints, case reports, reviews, and research papers with the input of 76 urban scholars from across the globe:
  • Yigitcanlar, T. Towards Smart and Sustainable Urban Electromobility: An Editorial Commentary.
  • Ullah, I.; Shah, M.; Khan, A.; Maple, C.; Waheed, A.; Jeon, G. A Distributed Mix-Context-Based Method for Location Privacy in Road Networks.
  • Gulati, B.; Weiler, S. Risk, Recessions, and Resilience: Towards Sustainable Local Labor Markets through Employment Portfolio Analysis.
  • Cai, C.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, B.; Wang, X.; Li, B.; Tang, P. Urban Morphological Feature Extraction and Multi-Dimensional Similarity Analysis Based on Deep Learning Approaches.
  • Niemann, L.; Hoppe, T. How to Sustain Sustainability Monitoring in Cities: Lessons from 49 Community Indicator Initiatives across 10 Latin American Countries.
  • Taylor, J.; Jokela, S.; Laine, M.; Rajaniemi, J.; Jokinen, P.; Häikiö, L.; Lönnqvist, A. Learning and Teaching Interdisciplinary Skills in Sustainable Urban Development—The Case of Tampere University, Finland.
  • Guo, N.; Chan, E.; Yung, E. Alternative Governance Model for Historical Building Conservation in China: From Property Rights Perspective.
  • Boguniewicz-Zabłocka, J.; Capodaglio, A. Analysis of Alternatives for Sustainable Stormwater Management in Small Developments of Polish Urban Catchments.
  • Gurieff, N.; Green, D.; Koskinen, I.; Lipson, M.; Baldry, M.; Maddocks, A.; Menictas, C.; Noack, J.; Moghtaderi, B.; Doroodchi, E. Healthy Power: Reimagining Hospitals as Sustainable Energy Hubs.
  • Slater, K.; Robinson, J. Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Co-Production: A Social Practice Approach.
  • Salvia, R.; Egidi, G.; Salvati, L.; Rodrigo-Comino, J.; Quaranta, G. In-Between ‘Smart’ Urban Growth and ‘Sluggish’ Rural Development? Reframing Population Dynamics in Greece, 1940–2019.
  • Serrano, I.; Calvet-Mir, L.; Ribera-Fumaz, R.; Díaz, I.; March, H. A Social Network Analysis of the Spanish Network of Smart Cities.
  • Song, Y.; Stead, D.; de Jong, M. New Town Development and Sustainable Transition under Urban Entrepreneurialism in China.
  • Fieuw, W.; Foth, M.; Caldwell, G. Towards a More-than-Human Approach to Smart and Sustainable Urban Development: Designing for Multispecies Justice.
  • Malek, J.; Lim, S.; Yigitcanlar, T. Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review.
  • Wijesiri, B.; Bandala, E.; Liu, A.; Goonetilleke, A. A Framework for Stormwater Quality Modelling under the Effects of Climate Change to Enhance Reuse.
  • E, J.; Xia, B.; Buys, L.; Yigitcanlar, T. Sustainable Urban Development for Older Australians: Understanding the Formation of Naturally Occurring Retirement Communities in the Greater Brisbane Region.
  • Lim, S.; Malek, J.; Yussoff, M.; Yigitcanlar, T. Understanding and Acceptance of Smart City Policies: Practitioners’ Perspectives on the Malaysian Smart City Framework.
  • Sabatini-Marques, J.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Schreiner, T.; Wittmann, T.; Sotto, D.; Inkinen, T. Strategizing Smart, Sustainable, and Knowledge-Based Development of Cities: Insights from Florianópolis, Brazil.
  • Yigitcanlar, T.; Cugurullo, F. The Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence: An Urbanistic Viewpoint from the Lens of Smart and Sustainable Cities.
This collection of these 20 papers focused on answering the following overall questions of this Special Issue: (a) What are the critical theoretical and conceptual underpinnings and analytical and policy frameworks of smart and sustainable urban development? (b) What are the critical methodological and technical approaches for the evaluation and forecasting of smart and sustainable urban development? (c) What are the critical technological progresses, developments, and trials concerning the quadruple bottom-line development of smart and sustainable cities? (d) What are the critical global best and good practice smart and sustainable urban development case investigations, demonstrations, and reports? (e) What are the critical smart and sustainable urban development planning, design, applications, and governance models to deliver desired urban outcomes? (f) What are the critical premises, pitfalls, implications, and impacts concerning the future of urbanization and smart and sustainable urban development?

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gao, Q.; Fang, C.; Cui, X. Carrying capacity for SDGs: A review of connotation evolution and practice. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2021, 91, 106676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yigitcanlar, T. Rethinking Sustainable Development: Urban Management, Engineering, and Design, 1st ed.; IGI Global: Hersey, PA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mortoja, M.; Yigitcanlar, T. How does peri-urbanization trigger climate change vulnerabilities? An investigation of the Dhaka megacity in Bangladesh. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bueno-Suárez, C.; Coq-Huelva, D. Sustaining what is unsustainable: A review of urban sprawl and urban socio-environmental policies in North America and Western Europe. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mahbub, P.; Goonetilleke, A.; Ayoko, G.; Egodawatta, P.; Yigitcanlar, T. Analysis of build-up of heavy metals and volatile organics on urban roads in Gold Coast, Australia. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63, 2077–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Csete, M.; Horváth, L. Sustainability and green development in urban policies and strategies. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2012, 10, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sotto, D.; Philippi, A.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Kamruzzaman, M. Aligning urban policy with climate action in the global south: Are Brazilian cities considering climate emergency in local planning practice? Energies 2019, 12, 3418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mortoja, M.; Yigitcanlar, T. Local drivers of anthropogenic climate change: Quantifying the impact through a remote sensing approach in Brisbane. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yigitcanlar, T.; Dodson, J.; Gleeson, B.; Sipe, N. Travel self-containment in master planned estates: Analysis of recent Australian trends. Urban Policy Res. 2007, 25, 129–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Perveen, S.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Kamruzzaman, M.; Hayes, J. Evaluating transport externalities of urban growth: A critical review of scenario-based planning methods. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 14, 663–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wangsness, P.; Proost, S.; Rødseth, K. Vehicle choices and urban transport externalities: Are Norwegian policy makers getting it right? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 86, 102384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Butler, L.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Paz, A. How can smart mobility innovations alleviate transportation disadvantage? Assembling a conceptual framework through a systematic review. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dur, F.; Yigitcanlar, T. Assessing land-use and transport integration via a spatial composite indexing model. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 803–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Novizayanti, D.; Prasetio, E. Orchestrating innovation network: Case of sustainable transportation technology. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2021, 4, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Golbabaei, F.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Bunker, J. The role of shared autonomous vehicle systems in delivering smart urban mobility: A systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2021, 15, 731–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dennis, S.; Paz, A.; Yigitcanlar, T. Perceptions and attitudes towards the deployment of autonomous and connected vehicles: Insights from Las Vegas, Nevada. J. Urban Technol. 2021, 28, 75–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Monteiro, V.; Afonso, J.; Ferreira, J.; Afonso, J. Vehicle electrification: New challenges and opportunities for smart grids. Energies 2019, 12, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Domínguez-Navarro, J.; Dufo-López, R.; Yusta-Loyo, J.; Artal-Sevil, J.; Bernal-Agustín, J. Design of an electric vehicle fast-charging station with integration of renewable energy and storage systems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2019, 105, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Letnik, T.; Marksel, M.; Luppino, G.; Bardi, A.; Božičnik, S. Review of policies and measures for sustainable and energy efficient urban transport. Energy 2018, 163, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Foley, B.; Degirmenci, K.; Yigitcanlar, T. Factors affecting electric vehicle uptake: Insights from a descriptive analysis in Australia. Urban Sci. 2020, 4, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, H.; Edwards, D.; Hosseini, M.; Costin, G. A review on renewable energy transition in Australia: An updated depiction. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 242, 118475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Australia’s Climate Change Strategies. Available online: https://www.industry.gov.au/policies-and-initiatives/australias-climate-change-strategies (accessed on 5 February 2022).
  23. Wang, N.; Tang, L.; Pan, H. A global comparison and assessment of incentive policy on electric vehicle promotion. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 44, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Leydesdorff, L.; Alkemade, F.; Heimeriks, G.; Hoekstra, R. Patents as instruments for exploring innovation dynamics: Geographic and technological perspectives on “photovoltaic cells”. Scientometrics 2015, 102, 629–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Faisal, A.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Kamruzzaman, M.; Paz, A. Mapping two decades of autonomous vehicle research: A systematic scientometric analysis. J. Urban Technol. 2021, 28, 45–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fahrenbruch, A.; Bube, R. Fundamentals of Solar Cells: Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conversion; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mahmud, K.; Hossain, M.; Town, G. Peak-load reduction by coordinated response of photovoltaics, battery storage, and electric vehicles. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 29353–29365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Butler, L.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Paz, A. Smart urban mobility innovations: A comprehensive review and evaluation. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 196034–196049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, W.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Erol, I.; Liu, A. Motivations, barriers and risks of smart home adoption: From systematic literature review to conceptual framework. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 80, 102211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cao, J.; Chen, X.; Qiu, R.; Hou, S. Electric vehicle industry sustainable development with a stakeholder engagement system. Technol. Soc. 2021, 67, 101771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schipper, L. Sustainable urban transport in the 21st century: A new agenda. Transp. Res. Rec. 2002, 1792, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Goldman, T.; Gorham, R. Sustainable urban transport: Four innovative directions. Technol. Soc. 2006, 28, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pojani, D.; Stead, D. Policy design for sustainable urban transport in the global south. Policy Des. Pract. 2018, 1, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mukherjee, S.; Ryan, L. Factors influencing early battery electric vehicle adoption in Ireland. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 118, 109504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abotalebi, E.; Scott, D.; Ferguson, M. Why is electric vehicle uptake low in Atlantic Canada? A comparison to leading adoption provinces. J. Transp. Geogr. 2019, 74, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. O’Neill, E.; Moore, D.; Kelleher, L.; Brereton, F. Barriers to electric vehicle uptake in Ireland: Perspectives of car-dealers and policy-makers. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2019, 7, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yao, J.; Xiong, S.; Ma, X. Comparative analysis of national policies for electric vehicle uptake using econometric models. Energies 2020, 13, 3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gong, D.; Tang, M.; Buchmeister, B.; Zhang, H. Solving location problem for electric vehicle charging stations: A sharing charging model. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 138391–138402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Panchal, C.; Stegen, S.; Lu, J. Review of static and dynamic wireless electric vehicle charging system. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2018, 21, 922–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mou, X.; Gladwin, D.; Zhao, R.; Sun, H. Survey on magnetic resonant coupling wireless power transfer technology for electric vehicle charging. IET Power Electron. 2019, 12, 3005–3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhang, B.; Carlson, R.; Smart, J.; Dufek, E.; Liaw, B. Challenges of future high power wireless power transfer for light-duty electric vehicles: Technology and risk management. eTransportation 2019, 2, 100012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mozafar, M.; Amini, M.; Moradi, M. Innovative appraisement of smart grid operation considering large-scale integration of electric vehicles enabling V2G and G2V systems. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2018, 154, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Madawala, U.; Thrimawithana, D.; Ma, H. A new controller for bidirectional wireless power transfer systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2017, 33, 9076–9087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Siskova, M.; Van den Bergh, J. Optimal urban form for global and local emissions under electric vehicle and renewable energy scenarios. Urban Clim. 2019, 29, 100472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Das, R.; Wang, Y.; Putrus, G.; Kotter, R.; Marzband, M.; Herteleer, B.; Warmerdam, J. Multi-objective techno-economic-environmental optimisation of electric vehicle for energy services. Appl. Energy 2020, 257, 113965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Perera, P.; Hewage, K.; Sadiq, R. Electric vehicle recharging infrastructure planning and management in urban communities. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 250, 119559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Solanke, T.; Ramachandaramurthy, V.; Yong, J.; Pasupuleti, J.; Kasinathan, P.; Rajagopalan, A. A review of strategic charging–discharging control of grid-connected electric vehicles. J. Energy Storage 2020, 28, 101193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Donada, C. Leadership in the electromobility ecosystem: Integrators and coordinators. Int. J. Automot. Technol. Manag. 2018, 18, 229–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Narassimhan, E.; Johnson, C. The role of demand-side incentives and charging infrastructure on plug-in electric vehicle adoption: Analysis of US States. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 074032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Curiel-Ramirez, L.; Ramirez-Mendoza, R.; Bustamante-Bello, M.; Morales-Menendez, R.; Galvan, J.; Lozoya-Santos, J. Smart electromobility: Interactive ecosystem of research, innovation, engineering, and entrepreneurship. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2020, 14, 1443–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wu, M.; Bao, Y.; Chen, G.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Qian, W. Hierarchical distributed control strategy for electric vehicle mobile energy storage clusters. Energies 2019, 12, 1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Drivers of smart and sustainable urban electromobility.
Figure 1. Drivers of smart and sustainable urban electromobility.
Sustainability 14 02264 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yigitcanlar, T. Towards Smart and Sustainable Urban Electromobility: An Editorial Commentary. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042264

AMA Style

Yigitcanlar T. Towards Smart and Sustainable Urban Electromobility: An Editorial Commentary. Sustainability. 2022; 14(4):2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042264

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yigitcanlar, Tan. 2022. "Towards Smart and Sustainable Urban Electromobility: An Editorial Commentary" Sustainability 14, no. 4: 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042264

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop