Next Article in Journal
Development and Use of a Residence Time Distribution (RTD) Model Control Strategy for a Continuous Manufacturing Drug Product Pharmaceutical Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of GSTA1 Variants on Busulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen Prior to Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Asians
Previous Article in Journal
Therapeutic Options for Recurrent Glioblastoma—Efficacy of Talaporfin Sodium Mediated Photodynamic Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association of P450 Oxidoreductase Gene Polymorphism with Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pharmacogene Variants Associated with Liver Transplant in a Twelve-Year Clinical Follow-Up

by
Luis Sendra
1,2,
Gladys G. Olivera
1,2,
Rafael López-Andújar
3,
Cristina Serrano
4,
Luis E. Rojas
5,6,
Eva María Montalvá
3,
María José Herrero
1,2,* and
Salvador F. Aliño
1,2,7
1
Pharmacogenetics and Gene Therapy Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
2
Gene Therapy and Pharmacogenomics Group, Pharmacology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat de València, Av. Blasco Ibáñez 15, Lab. 03, 46010 Valencia, Spain
3
Unit of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Transplant, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
4
Spanish Clinical Research Network, SCReN, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
5
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 3542000, Chile
6
Program of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 3543151, Chile
7
Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, Drugs Area, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2022, 14(2), 354; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020354
Submission received: 26 October 2021 / Revised: 28 January 2022 / Accepted: 31 January 2022 / Published: 3 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Association Studies in Clinical Pharmacogenetics)

Abstract

:
Some gene polymorphisms have been previously associated individually with tacrolimus efficacy and toxicity, but no long-term study to determine the role of pharmacogene variants in the clinical evolution of liver-transplanted patients has been addressed so far. In the present work, we analyzed the relation between highly-evidenced genetic polymorphisms located in relevant pharmacogenes and the risk of suffering premature death and other comorbidities such as cancer, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, graft rejection, infections and nephrotoxicities in a cohort of 87 patients (8 were excluded due to early loss of follow-up) transplanted at Hospital La Fe in Valencia (Spain) during a 12-year follow-up. Employing a logistic regression model with false discovery rate penalization and Kaplan–Meier analyses, we observed significant association between survival rates and metabolizer genes. In this sense, our results show an association between MTHFR gene variants in donor rs1801133 (HR: 7.90; p-value: 0.032) and recipient rs1801131 (HR: 7.34; p-value: 0.036) and the group of patients who died during the follow-up period, supporting the interest of confirming these results with larger patient cohorts. In addition, donor polymorphisms in UGT1A9 metabolizer gene rs6714486 (OR: 0.13; p-value: 0.032) were associated with a lower risk of suffering from de novo cancer. Genetic variants in CYP2B6 metabolizer gene rs2279343 demonstrated an association with a risk of infection. Other variants in different locations of SLCO1A2, ABCC2 and ABCB1 transporter genes were associated with a lower risk of suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic and acute nephrotoxicities and arterial hypertension. Results suggest that pharmacogenetics-derived information may be an important support for personalized drug prescription, clinical follow-up and the evolution of liver-transplanted patients.

1. Introduction

In 2019, over 39,000 liver transplantations were performed worldwide [1]. Post-transplantation survival rate has continuously increased during the past decade to achieve 83% at 1 year, 71% at 5 years, 61% at 10 years, 51% at 15 years and 41% at 20 years [2] thanks to improved therapeutic follow-up of patients. However, transplanted patients have a 30% higher overall risk of exitus than healthy patients do. Furthermore, these patients frequently present comorbidities [3], such as tumors, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, organ rejection, infections and acute and chronic nephrotoxicities, which worsen their prognosis and welfare and generate a huge increase in healthcare spending. These clinical variables widely differ among patients, and whereas some of them have high survival rates over 10 years without clinical problems, others present several comorbidities, with frequent hospitalizations and reduced survival probability. The reasons underlying the different clinical evolution after liver transplantation are not completely elucidated, although it is thought that the distinct patients response to the transport and metabolism of the immunosuppressant drugs employed plays an important role [4]. Many different proteins are involved in drug processing, and these are encoded by pharmacogenes [5,6,7,8], which, as other genes, present natural variability among the population. Some of these genetic variants affect the normal function of some drugs and can result in deleterious effects on patients, and this is especially relevant in the liver transplant setting due to its pivotal role in drug metabolism and detoxification [9]. To date, only variants of CYP3A5 gene have achieved the top level of scientific evidence quality (1A) regarding tacrolimus [10,11,12], the most widely employed immunosuppressant, whereas genetic variants of CYP3A4 gene reached high [13,14], not top, quality (level 1B). In this regard, FDA includes CYP3A pharmacogenetics information in tacrolimus drug label. To date, most previous studies have focused on these genes and short follow-up periods. However, patients receive multiple drugs during their entire life, and some information, such as interactions or metabolism pathway saturation, could be overlooked. In the present work, we have developed a highly evidenced [15] SNPs panel that includes variants affecting transport, metabolism and signaling pathway genes involved in immunosuppressants and other prescribed drugs. Liver transplantation is a special setting given its pivotal role in drug metabolism and detoxification, as well as the fact that two genotypes (from the recipient and the donor) are participating [16]. Some drug transporters are encoded by the recipient genome, but key proteins in liver metabolism are encoded by the donor genotype, and these two DNA sequences could be different. For these reasons, genotyping both the donor and the recipient is required.
In the present work, DNA samples from donors and recipients of 87 liver transplantations (8 were excluded later due to early, less than 1 year, loss of follow-up) performed at Hospital La Fe (Valencia, Spain) during 2008 and 2009 were genotyped for the selected SNPs. The association of gene variants with clinical results during the 12-year clinical follow-up was evaluated. The goal of the present work was to evaluate the association between genetic variants of pharmacogenes and clinical long-term evolution of liver-transplanted patients. We studied both complex multi-factorial clinical events with diverse etiology, such as cancer and survival, and other events that could be more directly associated with a cause. Accordingly, the data analysis was addressed in two ways: (a) an analysis based on the hypothesis of a possible association of a subgroup of genes with a higher risk of cancer or lower survival. It has been reported that MTHFR variants with reduced gene function (rs1801131 and rs1801133) affect the folate cycle (Figure 1), which has a pivotal role in cell metabolism, and provoke important oncologic [17] and non-oncologic [18] clinical manifestations; (b) in the absence of hypothesis, the association of specific clinical parameters with all the variants of the pharmacogenes used in our panel was evaluated.

2. Methods

2.1. Patients

According to the Declaration of Helsinki, the study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Board of the Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain. A written informed consent was obtained from all the subjects included in this study. All liver-transplanted adult patients (>18 years) operated on in 2008 and 2009 and treated with tacrolimus were assessed for potential study inclusion. The demographic, clinical and laboratory data were obtained from electronic health medical records (Table 1) under the approval of the Hospital Ethics Committee (references: 2021-370-1).

2.2. Immunosuppressive Therapy

Tacrolimus (Prograf®, Astellas Pharma Inc., Valencia, Spain) was first administered orally within 24 h after surgery, unless there were any clinical complications, at an initial dose of 0.1 mg/kg/day, twice daily. The dosage was adjusted to achieve the target trough level, set between 10 and 15 ng/mL during the first 3 months, 5 and 15 ng/mL until 12 months and 5 and 10 ng/mL thereafter. Methylprednisolone (10 mg/kg) was intravenously administered during surgery. Then, the dosage was gradually reduced and was changed to orally administered prednisolone 1 week after surgery. The prednisolone dosage was gradually diminished and discontinued when clinically possible after the transplant.
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was also administered to diabetic patients who received low doses of steroids, patients with hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) and those with early kidney failure during calcineurin inhibitor therapy. MMF was administered orally at a fixed dose of 1–1.5 g/day. Azathioprine (1.2 mg/kg/day) was used in patients with autoimmune hepatitis or primary biliary cirrhosis. Recipients with acute kidney failure received two 20 mg doses of IV basiliximab (Novartis, East Hanover, NJ, USA) within 6 h post transplantation and on day 4 after transplantation.

2.3. Clinical Outcomes

For tumor incidence, only those patients without hepatocellular carcinoma at surgery who had a de novo tumor during the follow-up period were considered. Acute rejection was determined by liver biopsy, and the histologic diagnosis was performed according to Banff criteria. Diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension were diagnosed as usually done in clinical setting. As infections, we considered de novo infections suffered by a transplanted patient. Acute nephrotoxicity was defined as increased serum creatinine level greater than 0.5 mg/dl or 20–25% above the pre-transplant baseline coinciding with high tacrolimus blood levels that decrease with tacrolimus reduction, and excluding other conditions that cause renal impairment such as fever, infection, graft swelling or tenderness, oliguria, bleeding, dehydration, increased resistive index on Doppler ultrasonography or ureteral obstruction. Chronic nephrotoxicity was diagnosed based on clinical criteria: creatinine clearance <60 mL/min for at least 3 months, not coincidental with other above-mentioned clinical parameters causing renal impairment or use of other nephrotoxic drugs. Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Equation (4) [19].

2.4. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Identification

The genotyping of the SNPs was performed using the MassARRAY platform by SEQUENOM (currently Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) at the SCSIE (Central Service of Experimental Research Support) at the Faculty of Medicine, Universitat de Valencia, Spain. In brief, genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood of transplanted recipients and donors, collected in EDTA tubes. The DNA was purified from 200 μL of blood using a commercially available kit (Ultra Clean Blood Spin DNA Isolation Kit; MoBio Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. After quantification using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA) to determine the concentration and purity, DNA was preserved at −20 °C until further use. All the samples were then genotyped in triplicates to assess quality of the technique. Genotype and allele frequencies, MAF and chi-square for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium determination of all gene variants evaluated are described at Table S1 of Supplementary Materials.

2.5. SNPs Panel

SNPs evaluated (Table 2) were selected based on previous studies associating genes with clinical outcomes in liver-transplanted patients, with the addition of other polymorphisms located in genes encoding drug transporters and other signaling pathways with potential interest.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 26; IBM; New York, NY, USA) and RStudio (version 1.4.1106; Boston, MA, USA) software. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to evaluate the association of genetic variants with the risk of exitus and tumor incidence during the follow-up period. All gene variants were included as variates; age, gender, hepatitis, hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis were included as co-variates. We calculated hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for clinical outcomes in subjects with all variants to evaluate associations. Survival and tumor logistic regression was performed in a step-wise fashion with SPSS software with false discovery rate penalty, employing those p-values obtained for gene variants associated with logistic and Cox regression tests obtained in both exitus and tumor. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The time evolution of exitus and cancer prevalence during the follow-up with the significant gene variants selected by logistic regression and FDR was represented by Kaplan–Meier curves, designed by ggplot package in RStudio software. Significance was determined by log-rank analysis. The association of pharmacogene variants with the other clinical variables was evaluated with RStudio software by logistic regression and elastic net fitting (alpha: 0.5; lambda: min; 500 iterations). Elastic net in the fitting of linear or logistic regression models is a regularized regression method that linearly combines the L1 and L2 penalties of the lasso and ridge methods. It is a variable selection method that builds predictive models including only variables with statistical predictive power. It is especially suited for sets of data with many more variables than observations, and it does not produce p-values. Variables selected in the model are statistically relevant. Those variables that are not selected are excluded. Elastic net does not calculate either confidence intervals or p-values; it only generates predictive models, not inferential ones [20,21]. For those pharmacogenes variants associated with clinical events, Fisher and chi-square contingency analyses were performed depending on the presence of two or three possible genotypes, respectively. This permitted reconfirming the strongest associations.

3. Results

3.1. Patients’ Genotypes

The genotypic and allelic frequencies of all SNPs evaluated from donors and recipients are shown in Table S1 (Supplementary Materials). MAF and chi-square to determine their Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium were also included.

3.2. Survival

The relation between pharmacogene variants and survival was evaluated. We determined the role of genetics in survival at the end of the 12-year study by multivariate logistic regression (Table 3). All SNP variants were included as variables, and age, gender, hepatitis and hepatocarcinoma were used as co-variables. In this study, false discovery rate was applied considering all p-values of the variants selected in order to penalize p-values and determine the association. Logistic regression with FDR penalty showed that only the CC variant in MTHFR rs1801131 for the recipient and the TT variant in MTHFR rs1801133 for the donor were significantly (p = 0.036 and p = 0.032, respectively) related to higher mortality, with 7.34 and 7.90 odds ratios, respectively.
The individual role of these variants on patients’ survival was graphed as a Kaplan–Meier curve (Figure 2), and significance was measured by log-rank. Only rs1801131 SNP demonstrated significant (p = 0.013) differences in survival rate.

3.3. Tumor

The relation between genotype and post-transplantation tumor incidence risk was also evaluated. As with survival, we studied this relation at the follow-up endpoint by multivariate logistic regression. Statistical analysis included all SNP variants from the donor and recipient as variables and gender, age, hepatitis and hepatocarcinoma as co-variables. After FDR p-value correction employing p-values of the different gene variants selected, only the TA variant in UGT1A9 rs6714486 of the recipient (Table 4) was significantly (p = 0.032) related to lower tumor probability (HR: 0.13).
The incidence of tumors over time was represented as a Kaplan–Meier curve (Figure 3). This variant also proved statistically significant (p-value = 0.00062) when analyzed individually by log-rank.

3.4. Other Clinical Variables

Other clinical variables commonly associated with liver-transplanted patients and their pharmacological treatment, including arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, organ rejection, infections and acute and chronic nephrotoxicity, were also evaluated by logistic regression. Since these pathologies are also present in the general population of similar age, we employed a more restrictive statistical analysis, logistic regression with elastic net penalty fitting, to exclude potential bias and ensure the assessment of pharmacogene variant association. All SNP genotypes were included as variates, and gender and age as co-variates. For selected variables, contingency tests (Fisher or chi-square) were performed to calculate their p-values and determine the differences between groups. When including all SNPs as variables, we did not find significant association of pharmacogene variants with organ rejection, arterial hypertension or acute nephrotoxicity. However, the results (Table 5) reported that the CA variant in gene SLCO1A2 rs11568563 of the recipient was statistically associated with a lower risk (OR: 0.705; p-value = 0.002) of suffering from diabetes mellitus. Regarding chronic nephrotoxicity, which affected 30% of our cohort, statistical analysis determined that two variants in ABCC2 were significantly associated with a reduced risk of suffering from this pathology. These variants were CT in rs374066 and TC in rs717620, both in the recipient, which presented ORs of 0.920 (p-value = 0.017) and 0.878 (p-value = 0.012), respectively. On the other hand, the GA genotype in rs2279343 of CYP2B6 gene in the recipient was selected as a predictive variable by elastic net and associated with a higher risk of infection (OR: 1.116; p-value = 0.086).
In order to determine the role of the gene variants depending on their function, the SNPs located in genes encoding transporter proteins (ABC and SLCO) and in metabolizer and signaling pathway proteins (CYP, UGT, TPMT, MTHFR, NOD2) were separately re-evaluated. With this analysis, fewer variates were included, and thus the penalty applied was lower. These results permitted observing more associations.

3.5. Other Clinical Variables: Transporter Genes

In diabetes mellitus (Table 6), the association of CA variant in rs11568563 (SLCO1A2) of the recipient was confirmed, and OR was even lower (0.550; p-value = 0.002). In this sense, whereas patients with the AA variant (n: 64) in this SNP were nearly distributed normally in the presence (n: 27) or absence (n: 37) of disease, none of the patients with the CA variant (n: 15) presented diabetes mellitus during the 12-year post-transplantation period. Besides this SNP, the CA variant in rs2231142 of gene ABCG2 of the recipient was associated with a slightly higher (OR: 1.008; p-value = 0.082) risk of DM2. Two variants in two SNPs of ABCB1 gene in the donor were related with DM2; the CT variant in rs1128503 had a lower risk (OR: 0.922; p-value = 0.122), and the TT variant in rs2032582 presented a slightly higher risk (OR: 1.062; p-value = 0.133), none of them being significant after contingency analysis.
In arterial hypertension, we found associations of variants in ABCB1 and ABCC2 genes of the recipient with lower risk. In ABCB1 gene, the TT variant in rs1045642 (p-value = 0.017) and rs1128503 (p-value = 0.054) and the GG variant in rs229109 (p-value = 0.053) reported odds ratios of 0.976, 0.859 and 0.857, respectively. In ABCC2, the GA variant in rs2273697 (p-value = 0.103) showed an OR of 0.942. Only the TT variant in ABCB1 rs1045642 of the donor presented association (p-value = 0.040) with a decreased risk of suffering from acute nephrotoxicity, with an odds ratio of 0.916. In chronic nephrotoxicity, the same ABCC2 gene variants observed with the whole panel proved significant but with even lower risk (OR 0.831; p-value = 0.017) for rs374066 in the recipient, as well as 0.784 OR (p-value = 0.012) in the TC variant in rs717620 of the recipient.

3.6. Other Clinical Variables: Metabolizer and Signaling Pathway Genes

Only the GA variant in rs2279343 of recipient CYP2B6 gene demonstrated an association with higher risk of infections (Table 7), as observed in the whole panel study, though the OR was 1.240. When a contingency test was performed, the p-value did not prove significant (p-value = 0.086). No other variant had an association with any clinical variable studied.

4. Discussion

We have evaluated possible associations between genetic variants on a panel designed to include the SNPs with significant scientific evidence and liver-transplanted patients’ clinical evolution during follow-up 12 years following the intervention. The panel included 37 SNPs from 14 genes: five transporters (18 SNPs), seven metabolizers (14 SNPs) and two signaling-pathway-related (5 SNPs). Differing from other studies, the aim of this work was not to determine direct drug–SNP associations but to analyze the role of pharmacogene variants in patients’ clinical evolution, considering that, besides the immunosuppressant treatment, patients are submitted to other medicines and environmental factors, such as xenobiotics. In our cohort, we found that survival rate was associated with gene variants in MTHFR, and cancer incidence risk was associated with genotype in UGT1A9 metabolizer gene. Other clinical parameters, except for infections, were associated mainly with transporter genes. The associations appeared both in pharmacogenes previously associated with drugs prescribed in transplantation settings and in other locations not previously reported. No variant in CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genes (associated by other authors with tacrolimus) demonstrated significant association with clinical events in our study. In our results, genetic variants affecting transporter genes showed more significant associations with the clinical events studied.
Associations between survival outcome and genotype in pharmacogenes were found. Variants in MTHFR (methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase) metabolizer gene, rs1801131 and rs1801133, demonstrated association with a significantly lower survival rate. Although both MTHFR rs1801131 and rs1801133 variants showed significant association with exitus altogether when analyzed by multivariate logistic regression with the other genetic variants, rs1801133 did not show significant association with survival rate by the Kaplan–Meier method since this test analyzes the individual role of a variant with the clinical event probability over time. MTHFR plays a key role in folate metabolism and DNA synthesis and participates in the pharmacodynamics of several drugs. The one-carbon metabolic pathway (Figure 1) is mainly involved in supplying the metabolites required for DNA synthesis (folate cycle), as well as cell methylation (cysteine cycle) required for the epigenetic regulation of DNA and histones, homocysteine metabolism and serine catabolism, which contribute to the re-methylation of homocysteine to methionine. The activity of MTHFR enzyme must determine the magnitude of folate product supply to the different cycles of the one-carbon metabolic pathway. Thus, the increase of blood homocysteine associated with functional deficiency of MTHFR affects the joints and cognitive capacity and increases the risk of heart disease [22], stroke, hypertension, embolism and other neurological signs. On the other hand, the deficient activity of MTHFR reduces the amount of required precursors for DNA synthesis, exerting a synergistic effect with methotrexate in rheumatic diseases [23]. This has been associated with unfavorable evolution in patients with neuroblastoma [24]. It has been suggested that a dietary supply of the precursors of these cycles could be beneficial in patients with deficient MTHFR [18,25], but this remains to be clarified.
In our study, the TA variant in UGT1A9 was associated with a lower incidence (HR: 0.13) of de novo cancer. When the time of tumors’ appearance was analyzed individually by Kaplan–Meier for this SNP, it also proved significant. The association of UGT1A9 rs6714486 with lower cancer incidence in our study coincides with the data of other authors that recently correlated this variant with mycophenolate mofetil efficacy [26].
Regarding our results in diabetes mellitus, hypertension, nephrotoxicities and infections, large limitations were found with regard to proposing a biological mechanism that explains the associations. For this reason, we first relate the associations found with those previously described by other authors. In this sense, variants in up to four different SNPs in ABCB1 gene have been associated with diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and acute nephrotoxicity. The same SNPs observed in this study have been associated by other authors [27,28] with different responses to a wide range of medicines, among which cyclosporine, tacrolimus, everolimus, glucocorticoids, sirolimus and many other habitual drugs used in organ transplantation settings are included. We also found significant associations between variants present in ABCC2 gene (rs2273697 GA, rs717610 CT and rs3740066 TT) and clinical events, but protective ones in this case, such as a reduced risk of arterial hypertension and a significantly lower incidence of chronic nephrotoxicity. Variants in this gene have already been related by other authors to metabolism and pharmacokinetic issues of immunosuppressant drugs such as mycophenolic acid and tacrolimus [29,30,31]. All the SNPs in ABC genes described in the present work had already been associated with tacrolimus toxicity and efficacy issues in organ transplantation settings except for ABCG2 gene and rs717620 of ABCC2 gene. Variants in ABCB1 and ABCC2 genes, encoding transporters located in the apical side of tubular kidney cells, have been associated with nephrotoxicity caused by intracellular drug accumulation [32] due to an imbalanced efflux. Despite all of them presenting low levels of evidence, the data reported by other authors and the present work shed light on the importance of genetic variability in ABC superfamily genes. The importance of transporter genes and their variants in drug management and patients’ health becomes manifest, as other genetic variants present in SLCO superfamily genes are associated with DM2 incidence (SLCO1A2). In our cohort, the presence of CA variant in SLCO1A2 rs11568563 has been strongly associated with a lower risk of DM2 incidence. These results reinforce the observations supporting the idea that gene variants in SLCO1A2 could be involved in the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome, characterized by an increased incidence of DM2 [33].
Regarding CYP2B6, a higher risk of infection was observed in patients with a CYP2B6 metabolizer gene variant (rs2279343 GA). Although the G variant in rs2279343 has been previously correlated with efavirenz [34], methadone, bupropion, nicotine and others [35], no previous studies reported an association with immunosuppressant drugs. We do not know the reasons that could justify its association with infections. However, some publications relate variants in this gene to the activity of the immune system, albeit with little evidence at this moment [36].

5. Conclusions

A panel of pharmacogene variants, including high-evidenced SNPs, permitted us to observe their associations with clinical events in liver-transplanted patients during 12-year follow-up. We observed associations between exitus and genetic variants in MTHFR metabolizer gene, as well as between a decreased risk of de novo cancer and variants in UGT1A9 metabolizer gene. In addition, genetic variants in CYP2B6 metabolizer gene proved association with higher risk of infections. On the contrary, gene variants in SLCO1A2, ABCB1 and ABCC2 transporter genes were associated with a lower risk of suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and acute and chronic nephrotoxicities. Our results suggest that early pharmacogenetics analyses could help clinicians to personalize their pharmacological strategies during patient follow-ups, aiming to improve patients’ survival and quality of life. Further studies will be required to confirm the interest in deepening the exploration of these variants to achieve more robust evidence.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020354/s1, Table S1: Patients’ genotype and allele frequencies. Chi-square calculation for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium comparing the observed vs. the expected genotype frequencies was also calculated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.F.A. and M.J.H.; methodology, C.S. and G.G.O.; software, L.S.; validation, S.F.A., M.J.H. and L.S.; formal analysis, L.E.R.; investigation, C.S., L.E.R. and G.G.O.; resources, R.L.-A. and E.M.M.; data curation, L.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.S.; writing—review and editing, S.F.A. and M.J.H.; visualization, R.L.-A. and E.M.M.; supervision, S.F.A.; project ad-ministration, M.J.H.; funding acquisition, S.F.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by funds from the Generalitat Valenciana (Spain), projects AP-149/08 and GE-007/10. L. Sendra’s contract with CIBERer is financed by the “Infraestructura de Medicina de Precisión asociada a la Ciencia y Tecnología (IMPaCT, IMP/00009)”, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII).

Institutional Review Board Statement

According to the Declaration of Helsinki, the study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Board of the Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. The demographic, clinical and laboratory data were obtained from electronic health medical records under the approval of the Hospital Ethics Committee (reference: 2021-370-1).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical reasons.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Data Science, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics platform from Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AAdenine
ABC ATP-binding cassette
CCytosine
CIConfidence Interval
CYPCytochrome P450
DHFDihydrofolate
DHFRDihydrofolate reductase
DMDiabetes mellitus
DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
dTMPDeoxythymidine monophosphate
dUMPDeoxyuridine monophosphate
EDTAEthylenediaminetetraacetic acid
FDAFood and Drug Administration
FDR False Discovery Rate
GGuanine
HCVHepatitis C virus
MAF Minor Allele Frequency
MTHFR Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase
NODNucleotide-binding oligomerization domain
OROdds Ratio
SAMS-Adenosyl methionine
SLCO Solute Carrier
SNPSingle nucleotide polymorphism
TThymine
THFTetrahydrofolate
TPMTThiopurine methyltransferase
UGTUridine diphosphate glucuronyltransferase

References

  1. Home—GODT. Available online: http://www.transplant-observatory.org/ (accessed on 15 July 2021).
  2. Adam, R.; Karam, V.; Cailliez, V.; Grady, J.G.O.; Mirza, D.; Cherqui, D.; Klempnauer, J.; Salizzoni, M.; Pratschke, J.; Jamieson, N.; et al. 2018 Annual Report of the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR)-50-year evolution of liver transplantation. Transpl. Int. 2018, 31, 1293–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Rub, A.; Anchez-Montes, C.S.; Aguilera, V.; Juan, F.S.; Ferrer, I.; Moya, A.; Montalva, E.; Pareja, E.; López-Andujar, R.; Prieto, M.; et al. Long-term outcome of “long-term liver transplant survivors”. Transpl. Int. 2013, 26, 740–750. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kisor, D.F.; Bodzin, A.S. Pharmacogenomics in liver transplantation: Testing the recipient and the ex-vivo donor liver. Pharmacogenomics 2018, 19, 753–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Caputo, V.; Strafella, C.; Cosio, T.; Lanna, C.; Campione, E.; Novelli, G.; Giardina, E.; Cascella, R. Pharmacogenomics: An Update on Biologics and Small-Molecule Drugs in the Treatment of Psoriasis. Genes 2021, 12, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Membrive Jiménez, C.; Pérez Ramírez, C.; Sánchez Martín, A.; Vieira Maroun, S.; Arias Santiago, S.; Ramírez Tortosa, M.C.; Jiménez Morales, A. Clinical Application of Pharmacogenetic Markers in the Treatment of Dermatologic Pathologies. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cargnin, S.; Sances, G.; Shin, J.I.; Tassorelli, C.; Terrazzino, S. Gene polymorphism association studies in cluster headache: A field synopsis and systematic meta-analyses. Headache J. Head Face Pain 2021, 61, 1060–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Katara, P.; Yadav, A. Pharmacogenes (PGx-genes): Current understanding and future directions. Gene 2019, 718, 144050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wang, J.; Li, K.; Zhang, X.; Teng, D.; Ju, M.; Jing, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Li, G. The correlation between the expression of genes involved in drug metabolism and the blood level of tacrolimus in liver transplant receipts. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hendijani, F.; Azarpira, N.; Kaviani, M. Effect of CYP3A5*1 expression on tacrolimus required dose after liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Transplant. 2018, 32, e13306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Birdwell, K.; Decker, B.; Barbarino, J.M.; Peterson, J.F.; Stein, C.M.; Sadee, W.; Wang, D.; Vinks, A.; He, Y.; Swen, J.; et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines forCYP3A5Genotype and Tacrolimus Dosing. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015, 98, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Calvo, P.L.; Serpe, L.; Brunati, A.; Nonnato, A.; Bongioanni, D.; Olio, D.D.; Pinon, M.; Ferretti, C.; Tandoi, F.; Carbonaro, G.; et al. Donor CYP3A5 genotype influences tacrolimus disposition on the first day after paediatric liver transplantation. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017, 83, 1252–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lloberas, N.; Hesselink, D.A.; Van Schaik, R.H.; Grinyó, J.M.; Colom, H.; Van Gelder, T.; Elens, L. Detection of a rare CYP3A4 variant in a transplant patient characterized by a tacrolimus poor metabolizer phenotype. Pharmacogenomics 2018, 19, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Berger, F.A.; Mulder, M.B.; ten Bosch-Dijksman, W.; van Schaik, R.H.N.; Coenen, S.; de Winter, B.C.M. Differences in CYP3A genotypes of a liver transplant recipient and the donor liver graft and adjustment of tacrolimus dose. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2019, 85, 1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. PharmGKB. Stanford University. 2020. Available online: https://www.pharmgkb.org (accessed on 25 October 2021).
  16. Tron, C.; Woillard, J.-B.; Houssel-Debry, P.; David, V.; Jezequel, C.; Rayar, M.; Balakirouchenane, D.; Blanchet, B.; Debord, J.; Petitcollin, A.; et al. Pharmacogenetic—Whole blood and intracellular pharmacokinetic—Pharmacodynamic (PG-PK2-PD) relationship of tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gong, J.-M.; Shen, Y.; Shan, W.-W.; He, Y.-X. The association between MTHFR polymorphism and cervical cancer. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liew, S.-C.; Das Gupta, E. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism: Epidemiology, metabolism and the associated diseases. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2015, 58, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Levey, A.S.; Coresh, J.; Greene, T.; Marsh, J.; Stevens, L.A.; Kusek, J.W.; Van Lente, F.; Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. Expressing the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Equation for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate with Standardized Serum Creatinine Values. Clin. Chem. 2007, 53, 766–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Huang, A.; Xu, S.; Cai, X. Empirical Bayesian elastic net for multiple quantitative trait locus mapping. Heredity 2014, 114, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zou, H.; Hastie, T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 2005, 67, 301–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kang, S.S.; Wong, P.W.; Susmano, A.; Sora, J.; Norusis, M.; Ruggie, N. Thermolabile methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase: An inherited risk factor for coronary artery disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1991, 48, 536–545. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ghodke-Puranik, Y.; Puranik, A.S.; Shintre, P.; Joshi, K.; Patwardhan, B.; Lamba, J.; Niewold, T.B.; Chopra, A. Folate metabolic pathway single nucleotide polymorphisms: A predictive pharmacogenetic marker of methotrexate response in Indian (Asian) patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacogenomics 2015, 16, 2019–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Olivera, G.G.; Yáñez, Y.; Gargallo, P.; Sendra, L.; Aliño, S.F.; Segura, V.; Sanz, M.Á.; Cañete, A.; Castel, V.; De Mora, J.F.; et al. MTHFR and VDR Polymorphisms Improve the Prognostic Value of MYCN Status on Overall Survival in Neuroblastoma Patients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gao, X.; Sanderson, S.M.; Dai, Z.; Reid, M.A.; Cooper, D.E.; Lu, M.; Richie, J.P., Jr.; Ciccarella, A.; Calcagnotto, A.; Mikhael, P.G.; et al. Dietary methionine influences therapy in mouse cancer models and alters human metabolism. Nature 2019, 572, 397–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jiang, Z.; Hu, N. Effect of UGT polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics and adverse reactions of mycophenolic acid in kidney transplant patients. Pharmacogenomics 2021, 22, 1019–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Vanhove, T.; Annaert, P.; Lambrechts, D.; Kuypers, D.R.J. Effect of ABCB1 diplotype on tacrolimus disposition in renal recipients depends on CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 genotype. Pharm. J. 2016, 17, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tron, C.; Lemaitre, F.; Verstuyft, C.; Petitcollin, A.; Verdier, M.-C.; Bellissant, E. Pharmacogenetics of Membrane Transporters of Tacrolimus in Solid Organ Transplantation. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2018, 58, 593–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Genvigir, F.D.V.; Nishikawa, A.M.; Felipe, C.R.; Helio, T.-S., Jr.; Oliveira, N.; Salazar, A.B.C.; Pestana, J.M.; Doi, S.Q.; Hirata, M.H.; Hirata, R.D.C. Influence ofABCC2, CYP2C8, andCYP2J2Polymorphisms on Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Sodium-Based Treatment in Brazilian Kidney Transplant Recipients. Pharmacother. J. Hum. Pharmacol. Drug Ther. 2017, 37, 535–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Božina, N.; Lalić, Z.; Nađ-Škegro, S.; Borić-Bilušić, A.; Kaštelan, Ž.; Trkulja, V. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in renal transplant patients: Exploratory analysis of the effects of cyclosporine, recipients’ and donors’ ABCC2 gene variants, and their interactions. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017, 73, 1129–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Thishya, K.; Sreenu, B.; Raju, S.B.; Kutala, V.K. Impact of Pharmacogenetic Determinants of Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate on Adverse Events in Renal Transplant Patients. Curr. Drug Metab. 2021, 22, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ivanyuk, A.; Livio, F.; Biollaz, J.; Buclin, T. Renal Drug Transporters and Drug Interactions. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2017, 56, 825–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lu, X.; Chan, T.; Cheng, Z.; Shams, T.; Zhu, L.; Murray, M.; Zhou, F. The 5′-AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Regulates the Function and Expression of Human Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 1A2. Mol. Pharmacol. 2018, 94, 1412–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nwogu, J.N.; Gandhi, M.; Owen, A.; Khoo, S.H.; Taiwo, B.; Olagunju, A.; Berzins, B.; Okochi, H.; Tallerico, R.; Robertson, K.; et al. Associations between efavirenz concentrations, pharmacogenetics and neurocognitive performance in people living with HIV in Nigeria. AIDS 2021, 35, 1919–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Langmia, I.M.; Just, K.S.; Yamoune, S.; Brockmöller, J.; Masimirembwa, C.; Stingl, J.C. CYP2B6 Functional Variability in Drug Metabolism and Exposure Across Populations—Implication for Drug Safety, Dosing, and Individualized Therapy. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 692234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lv, C.; Huang, L. Xenobiotic receptors in mediating the effect of sepsis on drug metabolism. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2019, 10, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. One-carbon metabolism pathway. DHF, dihydrofolate; DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase; dTMP, deoxythymidine monophosphate; dUMP, deoxyuridine monophosphate; MTHFR, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; SAM, S-Adenosyl methionine; THF, tetrahydrofolate.
Figure 1. One-carbon metabolism pathway. DHF, dihydrofolate; DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase; dTMP, deoxythymidine monophosphate; dUMP, deoxyuridine monophosphate; MTHFR, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; SAM, S-Adenosyl methionine; THF, tetrahydrofolate.
Pharmaceutics 14 00354 g001
Figure 2. Survival rate. Kaplan–Meier representation of patients’ survival rates depending on genetic variants in recipient MTHFR rs1801133 SNP. Significance was obtained by log-rank analysis.
Figure 2. Survival rate. Kaplan–Meier representation of patients’ survival rates depending on genetic variants in recipient MTHFR rs1801133 SNP. Significance was obtained by log-rank analysis.
Pharmaceutics 14 00354 g002
Figure 3. De novo cancer risk. Kaplan–Meier representation of patients’ risk of cancer de novo appearance depending on genetic variants in recipient UGT1A9 rs6714486 SNP. Significance was obtained by log-rank analysis.
Figure 3. De novo cancer risk. Kaplan–Meier representation of patients’ risk of cancer de novo appearance depending on genetic variants in recipient UGT1A9 rs6714486 SNP. Significance was obtained by log-rank analysis.
Pharmaceutics 14 00354 g003
Table 1. Patients’ demographics.
Table 1. Patients’ demographics.
Gender (n)Average ± SD%
Male (m)5569.62
Female (f)2430.38
Weight (kg)74.90 ± 13.10
Age at Tx (years)54.65 ± 10.24
Diagnosis at Tx (n)
Cirrhosis7088.61
Hepatitis C virus (HCV)3746.84
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)3139.24
Tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day)0.09 ± 0.02
Hospital stay (days)24.14 ± 43.07
Retransplantation required (n)56.33
Exitus during follow-up
n2632.91
Time (years)9.22 ± 3.97
De novo cancer during follow-up
n1518.99
Time (years)6.21 ± 2.40
Clinical events during follow-up (n)
De novo DM22734.18
De novo arterial hypertension2936.71
Graft rejection3645.57
Infections4658.23
Acute nephrotoxicity2835.44
Chronic nephrotoxicity2430.38
Patients with emergencies5873.42
Average emergencies7.17 ± 9.49
Patients requiring hospitalizations6886.08
Average hospitalizations4.81 ± 4.15
Pharmacological treatment
Tacrolimus79100.00
Micophenolic acid3645.57
Corticosteroids7594.94
Time (months)11.00 ± 9.30
Azatioprin1215.19
Induction therapy45.06
Nephrotoxic drugs1113.92
CYP3A5 modifier drugs56.33
Table 2. SNPs included within the pharmacogenetics panel.
Table 2. SNPs included within the pharmacogenetics panel.
GeneFunctionSNP
ABCB1Transporterrs1045642rs2235013
rs1128503rs2235033
rs2032582rs3213619
rs229109rs9282564
ABCC2Transporterrs3740066rs717620
rs2273697
ABCG2Transporterrs2231137rs2231142
CYP2B6Metabolizerrs2279343rs3745274
CYP2C19Metabolizerrs4244285
CYP2C9Metabolizerrs1799853rs1057910
CYP3A4Metabolizerrs2740574
CYP3A5Metabolizerrs41303343rs776746
rs10264272
MTHFRMetabolizerrs1801131rs1801133
NOD2Signaling pathwayrs2066844rs2066845
SLCO1A2Transporterrs11568564rs72559749
rs11568563
SLCO1B1Transporterrs2306283rs4149056
TPMTSignaling pathwayrs1142345rs1800462
rs1800460
UGT1A9Metabolizerrs17868320rs72551330
rs6714486
Table 3. Pharmacogene variants significantly associated with survival rates after FDR calculation employing the p-values of selected variables in exitus and cancer risk studies by logistic and Cox regression.
Table 3. Pharmacogene variants significantly associated with survival rates after FDR calculation employing the p-values of selected variables in exitus and cancer risk studies by logistic and Cox regression.
Model Data
Logistic Regression CI (95%)
GeneSNPD/RGenotypeR2 Cox SnellR2 Nagelkerkep-ValueORLowerUpper
MTHFRrs1801131RCC0.2940.4090.0367.341.3938.70
MTHFRrs1801133DTT0.0327.901.6737.43
SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism; D: donor; R: recipient; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.
Table 4. Pharmacogene variants significantly associated with tumor incidence after FDR calculation employing the p-values of selected variables in cancer risk and exitus studies by logistic and Cox regression.
Table 4. Pharmacogene variants significantly associated with tumor incidence after FDR calculation employing the p-values of selected variables in cancer risk and exitus studies by logistic and Cox regression.
Model Data
Logistic Regression CI (95%)
GeneSNPD/RGenotypeR2 Cox SnellR2 Nagelkerkep-ValueORLowerUpper
UGT1A9rs6714486RTA0.2480.3990.0320.130.0300.583
SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism; D: donor; R: recipient; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.
Table 5. Pharmacogene variants associated with other clinical variables selected by multivariate logistic regression and regularized by elastic net statistical analysis. Full panel with all SNPs.
Table 5. Pharmacogene variants associated with other clinical variables selected by multivariate logistic regression and regularized by elastic net statistical analysis. Full panel with all SNPs.
All SNPs
Clinical VariablesGeneSNPD/RGenotypen%OR
Diabetes mellitusSLCO1A2rs11568563RCA 1518.990.705
InfectionsCYP2B6rs2279343RGA3544.301.116
Chronic nephrotoxicityABCC2rs3740066RCT 3949.370.920
rs717620RTC 2936.710.878
SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism; D: donor; R: recipient; OR: odds ratio; n: number of patients with the indicated genotype; % proportion of patients with the indicated genotype within the population. † significant p-value (<0.05) after contingency test analysis.
Table 6. Transporter pharmacogene variants associated with clinical variables selected by multivariate logistic regression and regularized by elastic net statistical analysis.
Table 6. Transporter pharmacogene variants associated with clinical variables selected by multivariate logistic regression and regularized by elastic net statistical analysis.
Transporter Genes SNPs De Novo Disease (n)
Clinical VariablesGeneSNPD/RGenotypeAbsencePresenceOR
Diabetes mellitusSLCO1A2rs11568563RA3727-
CA 1500.550
ABCG2rs2231142RC4821-
CA461.008
ABCB1rs1128503DC1512-
CT2880.922
TT97-
rs2032582DGT2810-
G2011-
TT461.063
Arterial hypertensionABCB1rs1045642RTC2715-
CC711-
TT 1630.976
rs1128503RCT2920-
CC98-
TT 1210.859
rs229109RGA14-
AA23-
GG 47220.857
ABCC2rs2273697RGG2923-
AA32-
GA1840.942
Acute nephrotoxicityABCB1rs1045642DCC1110-
TC2717-
TT 1310.916
Chronic nephrotoxicityABCC2rs3740066RCC1512-
CT 3360.831
TT76-
rs717620RCC2720-
TC 2630.784
TT21-
SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism; D: donor; R: recipient; OR: odds ratio; † significant p-value (<0.05) after contingency test analysis.
Table 7. Pharmacogene variants associated with other clinical variables selected by multivariate logistic regression and regularized by elastic net statistical analysis. Metabolizer and target pharmacogenes.
Table 7. Pharmacogene variants associated with other clinical variables selected by multivariate logistic regression and regularized by elastic net statistical analysis. Metabolizer and target pharmacogenes.
Metabolizer and Target Genes SNPs De Novo Disease (n)
Clinical VariablesGeneSNPD/RGenotypeAbsencePresenceOR
InfectionsCYP2B6rs2279343RAA1818-
GA8271.240
GG62-
SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism; D: donor; R: recipient; OR: odds ratio.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sendra, L.; Olivera, G.G.; López-Andújar, R.; Serrano, C.; Rojas, L.E.; Montalvá, E.M.; Herrero, M.J.; Aliño, S.F. Pharmacogene Variants Associated with Liver Transplant in a Twelve-Year Clinical Follow-Up. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020354

AMA Style

Sendra L, Olivera GG, López-Andújar R, Serrano C, Rojas LE, Montalvá EM, Herrero MJ, Aliño SF. Pharmacogene Variants Associated with Liver Transplant in a Twelve-Year Clinical Follow-Up. Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(2):354. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020354

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sendra, Luis, Gladys G. Olivera, Rafael López-Andújar, Cristina Serrano, Luis E. Rojas, Eva María Montalvá, María José Herrero, and Salvador F. Aliño. 2022. "Pharmacogene Variants Associated with Liver Transplant in a Twelve-Year Clinical Follow-Up" Pharmaceutics 14, no. 2: 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020354

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop