Next Article in Journal
Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Variably Protease-Sensitive Prionopathy: A Report of Three Cases Carrying Different Genotypes at PRNP Codon 129
Next Article in Special Issue
Small RNA Sequencing and Multiplex RT-PCR for Diagnostics of Grapevine Viruses and Virus-like Organisms
Previous Article in Journal
Conserved Residues Adjacent to ß-Barrel and Loop Intersection among Enterovirus VP1 Affect Viral Replication: Potential Target for Anti-Enteroviral Development
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrating High throughput Sequencing into Survey Design Reveals Turnip Yellows Virus and Soybean Dwarf Virus in Pea (Pisum Sativum) in the United Kingdom
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/v14020365
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Viruses Infecting Greenhood Orchids (Pterostylidinae) in Eastern Australia

by
Hsu-Yao Chao
1,*,
Mark A. Clements
2,
Anne M. Mackenzie
3,
Ralf G. Dietzgen
1,
John E. Thomas
1 and
Andrew D. W. Geering
1,*
1
Centre for Horticultural Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
2
Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, National Facilities and Collections, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
3
Independent Researcher, Hawker, ACT 2614, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2022, 14(2), 365; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14020365
Submission received: 17 January 2022 / Revised: 1 February 2022 / Accepted: 3 February 2022 / Published: 10 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Virus Surveillance and Metagenomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Australasian biogeographic realm is a major centre of diversity for orchids, with every subfamily of the Orchidaceae represented and high levels of endemism at the species rank. It is hypothesised that there is a commensurate diversity of viruses infecting this group of plants. In this study, we have utilised high-throughput sequencing to survey for viruses infecting greenhood orchids (Pterostylidinae) in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. The main aim of this study was to characterise Pterostylis blotch virus (PtBV), a previously reported but uncharacterised virus that had been tentatively classified in the genus Orthotospovirus. This classification was confirmed by genome sequencing, and phylogenetic analyses suggested that PtBV is representative of a new species that is possibly indigenous to Australia as it does not belong to either the American or Eurasian clades of orthotospoviruses. Apart from PtBV, putative new viruses in the genera Alphaendornavirus, Amalgavirus, Polerovirus and Totivirus were discovered, and complete genome sequences were obtained for each virus. It is concluded that the polerovirus is likely an example of an introduced virus infecting a native plant species in its natural habitat, as this virus is probably vectored by an aphid, and Australia has a depauperate native aphid fauna that does not include any species that are host-adapted to orchids.

1. Introduction

Research on plant viruses has mainly focused on the ones that cause diseases in food and fibre crops, while those that infect plants within natural ecosystems are generally poorly understood unless located at the interface with agriculture [1,2]. Plant viruses likely play significant ecological roles, as plant pathogens in general are important determinants of plant community structure, as well as individual plant species diversity [3]. Even a slight change in the fitness of a plant species could affect the abundance of its genotype over longer timeframes. While plant viruses are conventionally regarded as pathogens and therefore detrimental to the host plant, some viruses may actually confer fitness benefits such as drought tolerance [4].
The Orchidaceae is the second largest family of plants in the world and constitutes about 8% of all currently accepted plant species [5]. Biogeographical studies suggest that orchids originated on the Australian part of Gondwana about 112 million years ago, after the split of Africa and India/Madagascar, then migrated to South America via the Antarctic land bridge by about 90 million years ago [6]. More recent migrations are thought to have occurred following the collision of tectonic plates, such as that of the Australian and Sunda plates, and by infrequent long-distance dispersal of the dust-sized seed in jet streams across oceans. The Orchidaceae is divided into five subfamilies, and then into tribes and subtribes [7]. Representatives of all subfamilies naturally occur in the Australasian biogeographic realm, encompassing Australia, New Guinea and the eastern part of the Indonesian archipelago [6].
Tribe Cranichideae (subfamily Orchidoideae) is a cosmopolitan group of mainly terrestrial species comprising nine subtribes in two main areas of distribution. There are six subtribes represented in South America while members of four subtribes inhabit the Australasian region: the Pterostylidinae, 12 genera from the Goodyerinae, a few species from the Spiranthinae and the endemic Achlydosinae from New Caledonia [8]. There is also one endemic subtribe in West Africa. Subtribe Pterostylidinae is predominantly found in Australia and is disproportionately species-rich, containing 312 named species, which amounts to 14% of all taxa in the Cranichidieae [9,10]. The Pterostylidinae is further divided into 10 genera (Speculantha, Diplodium, Pterostylis, Bunochilus, Hymenochilus, Oligochaetochilus, Pharochilum, Plumatichilos, Stamnorchis and Urochilus), the majority of which occur in southern Australia, where their main growing season is during winter and early spring [8,10]. During the hot dry summer, these orchids die back to underground tubers, from which plants regenerate when the rains return in late autumn. The Pterostylidinae have special symbiotic relationships with mycorrhizal fungi such as Ceratobasidium spp., which are vital for successful seed germination [11,12]. The flowers of these orchids emit sex pheromones that attract male fungus gnats, which attempt to copulate with the flower and in so doing, inadvertently transfer pollen between plants [13].
Thus far, surveys from Australia suggest that the types of viruses infecting orchids in cultivation are very different to those growing in the wild. Odontoglossum ringspot virus (genus Tobamovirus) and Cymbidium mosaic virus (genus Potexvirus) are the most common viruses of cultivated orchids, and these are mechanically transmissible, highly infectious and occur in most countries where orchids are grown [14,15,16]. Orchid fleck virus (genus Dichorhavirus), another cosmopolitan pathogen with a false spider mite (Brevipalpus spp.) vector [17], is also frequently detected in cultivated orchids in Australia [16]. In contrast, the viruses infecting orchids in natural environments appear to be mostly indigenous, although there are instances of infections of terrestrial orchids in temperate south-west Western Australia by introduced viruses such as bean yellow mosaic virus (genus Potyvirus), Ornithogalum mosaic virus (genus Potyvirus) and turnip yellows virus (genus Polerovirus) [18]. Examples of orchid-infecting viruses that are likely indigenous to Australia include Diuris virus Y (DiVY), blue squill virus A, donkey orchid virus A, Diuris virus A, Diuris virus B, Diuris pendunculata cryptic virus, donkey orchid symptomless virus and Caladenia virus A [18,19,20]. Mycoviruses have also been found in the mycorrhizal fungi associated with orchids [21].
One interesting discovery of a virus in a natural population of orchids in Australia has been Pterostylis blotch virus (PtBV) [15]. PtBV was tentatively classified in the genus Orthotospovirus (family Tospoviridae, order Bunyavirales) based on virion morphology and amplification of cDNA using a universal tospovirus reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay targeting the RNA polymerase gene on genome segment L. Unfortunately, no sequence information for this virus was deposited in the international nucleotide sequence databases. PtBV was found at five different locations in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), inland New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria, and in six orchid species, Pterostylis curta R.Br., Pterostylis hispidula Fitzg., Plumatichilos plumosa Szlach., Diplodium reflexum (R.Br.) D.L.Jones & M.A.Clem., Diplodium revolutum (R.Br.) D.L.Jones & M.A.Clem., and Speculantha parviflora (R.Br.) D.L.Jones & M.A.Clem. Orthotospoviruses are renowned for having extremely wide host ranges, numbering over 1000 species in 15 monocotyledenous plant families, 69 dicotyledenous plant families and one family of pteridophytes in the case of the tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) [22]. Hence, PtBV may represent an extension in the host range of an uncharacterised orthotospovirus in ornamental or crop plant species. Three orthotospoviruses are already widely distributed in Australia, namely TSWV, capsicum chlorosis virus (CaCV) and iris yellow spot virus (IYSV), and all are regarded as introduced pathogens [23]. The two centres of diversity of orthotospoviruses are the Americas and Eurasia [24].
In this work, we have undertaken surveys of Pterostylis nutans R.Br., P. curta and Oligochaetochilus hamatus (Blackmore & Clemesha) Szlach. in eastern Australia to identify and characterise the viruses infecting these native plant species using high-throughput sequencing methods. Priority was given to characterise PtBV and therefore localities where this virus had been historically recorded were revisited. However, during these surveys, alphaendorna-, amalga-, polero-, totiviruses were serendipitously discovered, and many of these were records of novel viruses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Surveys and Plant Samples

Entire plants of P. nutans, P. curta and O. hamatus were collected from four sites within the ACT and seven sites within NSW (Table 1). Leaf samples were either processed immediately upon delivery of the plants to the laboratory at the Ecosciences Precinct, Dutton Park, Queensland or the plants were transplanted into pots containing a sand-peat mix and grown in an insect-free glasshouse at the same location for later sampling. Permission to collect the plants was provided by NSW Scientific Licence SL100750 and ACT Licence No. PL2017136.
Total RNA was extracted from fresh or lyophilised leaves using either a TRIzol™ Plus RNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) or an ISOLATE II RNA Plant Kit (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH, USA) using the RLY buffer as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.2. High-Throughput Sequencing and Sequence Assembly

Total RNA extracts from each orchid plant were submitted to the Australian Genome Research Facility (Melbourne, Australia) and RNA quality checks, library preparation and high-throughput sequencing (HTS) were carried out there. Paired-end cDNA libraries were prepared from the RNA samples using a TruSeq® Stranded Total RNA Library Preparation Kit with Ribo-Zero™ Plant (Illumina, San Diego CA, USA). Sample 13365 was sequenced using a NovaSeq 6000 System with NovaSeq 6000 SP Reagent Kit v1 (200 cycles, Illumina) to generate 100 bp pair-end reads, and data from this sample were obtained from three lanes of the flow cell. The samples GF and HR were sequenced using the MiSeq System with a MiSeq Reagent Kits v2 (300 cycles, Illumina) to generate 150 bp pair-end reads. The other samples were sequenced using the NovaSeq 6000 System with NovaSeq 6000 SP Reagent Kit v1.5 (300 cycles, Illumina) to generate 150 bp pair-end reads.
The raw reads generated from HTS were trimmed with Trimmomatic (version 0.39) [25]. The sequence file used for adapter clipping was TruSeq3-PE-2.fa. The maximum number of seed mismatches for adapter clipping was set to 2, palindrome clip threshold to 30, simple clip threshold to 7 and minimum length of detected adapters to 1. Quality trimming was carried out by setting the quality thresholds for trimming leading bases, trimming trailing bases and sliding window (window size = 4) to 20. For de novo assembly, the minimum read length was set to 100 bp or 130 bp; for read mapping, the minimum read length was set to 30 bp.
De novo sequence assembly was executed with SPAdes v3.11.1 [26] using the parameters listed in Table S1, with “read error correction” and “mismatch correction” enabled. Assembled contigs were queried against a local protein database built from NCBI complete RefSeq release (Release 201) of viral sequences using BLASTX (version 2.3.0+) [27]. Plant-associated virus sequence contigs were then manually identified based on significant alignment results.
Paired reads at least 30 bp in length after trimming were mapped against the near complete virus genome sequences using BWA (version 0.7.13) with backtrack algorithm [28] and default settings. Variants were called on the mapping output using SAMtools (version 1.10) [29] and BCFtools (version 1.3) [29] to obtain consensus sequences and the coverage of each position in the reference sequences. The variant caller was consensus caller (bcftools call -c option), and the p-value threshold for accepting a variant (bcftools call -p option) was set to 0.05. Domains of viral polyproteins were predicted by querying the open reading frame against the NCBI Conserved Domain Database (version 3.19) using the search function with default settings [30,31]. Putative ribosomal frameshift sites were manually identified by searching for previously identified slippery sequences at feasible positions in the newly discovered virus genomes. The annotations and organisations of verified virus genomes were then visualised in Geneious Prime version 2020.2.3 (https://www.geneious.com, last accessed on 16 January 2022).
To confirm the presence of each virus discovered by HTS, RT-PCR assays were done using a OneTaq® One-Step RT-PCR Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich MA, USA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions and with the following thermocycling parameters: 15 min at 48 °C, 1 min at 94 °C followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 60 °C and 1 min at 68 °C, ending with 5 min of final extension at 68 °C. The primers used for RT-PCR and amplicon sequencing are described in Table S2. The amplicons were gel-purified and directly sequenced by Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea).

2.3. Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (RACE)

For the single-stranded RNA viruses, 5′ and 3′ RACE were carried out using c. 1 μg of a DNase I-treated total plant RNA extract as the starting material. All gene-specific primers used in the PCR and sequencing are listed in the Supplementary Materials (Table S2). The RNA was polyadenylated using E. coli poly(A) polymerase (New England Biolabs) and cleaned up with a Monarch® RNA Cleanup Kit (10 µg, New England Biolabs). cDNA was synthesised from the polyadenylated RNA using Maxima H Minus Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as per the manufacturer’s instructions, except that the custom primer 5′-CCACGCGTATCGATGTCGAC(dT)40VN-3′ was used instead of the recommended oligo(dT)18 primer. The synthesised cDNA was purified using a Monarch® PCR & DNA Clean-up Kit (5 μg, New England Biolabs) following the protocol for ssDNA clean up. The cDNA was then polyadenylated using Terminal Transferase (New England Biolabs), assuming the ratio of 3′ cDNA ends to dATP was 1: >5000. For 3′ RACE, the first round of PCR was done with a gene-specific forward primer and the reverse primer 5′-CCACGCGTATCGATGTCGAC-3′. The PCR amplicon was diluted and used as the template for nested PCR using a new gene-specific forward primer and the same reverse primer. The target amplicon was gel-purified and sequenced with another nested gene-specific forward primer. For 5′ RACE, the first round of PCR was completed using the forward primer 5′-GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTAC(dT)40VN-3′ and a gene-specific reverse primer. The PCR amplicon was diluted and used as the template for nested PCR, using 5′-GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTAC-3′ as the forward primer and a nested gene-specific reverse primer. The target amplicon was gel-purified and sequenced with another nested gene-specific reverse primer. Platinum™ SuperFi II Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for all PCRs and thermocycling conditions were 30 s at 98 °C followed by 35 cycles of 10 s at 98 °C, 10 s at 60 °C and 30 s at 72 °C, ending with 5 min of final extension at 72 °C.
For samples containing dsRNA viruses or viruses with a stable replicative dsRNA form, the ends of the virus genomes were determined using 5′ RACE in a similar manner as described above, except that cDNA was synthesised from about 150 ng of total plant RNA using gene-specific primers (Table S2), and all subsequent PCRs were carried out using Q5® High-Fidelity 2× Master Mix (New England Biolabs) with the following thermocycling conditions: 30 s at 98 °C followed by 40 cycles of 5 s at 98 °C, 10 s at 55 °C or 60 °C and 10 s at 72 °C, ending with 2 min of final extension at 72 °C. The gel purification and direct sequencing of target amplicons were mostly outsourced to Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea), with some samples gel-purified in-house using Monarch® DNA Gel Extraction Kit (New England Biolabs) and sequenced by the Australian Genome Research Facility (Melbourne, Australia).

2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses and Pairwise Sequence Comparisons

Predicted amino acid sequences were aligned using COBALT [32], as provided by NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/cobalt/, last accessed on 16 January 2022). The gap opening penalty, gap extension penalty, end-gap opening penalty and end-gap extension penalty were set to −6, −6, −1 and −1, respectively. The accession numbers of the sequences included in the phylogenetic analyses are listed in the Supplementary Materials (Tables S3–S7). After manually excluding non-conserved or poorly aligned regions at the N- and C-termini, the aligned protein sequences were back-translated to codon sequence alignments for the phylogenetic analyses. FASconCAT-G [33] was used to concatenate the sequence alignments, and maximum likelihood (ML) trees were reconstructed using IQ-TREE (version 1.6.12 or 2.1.3) [34]. The nucleotide substitution models were selected based on corrected Akaike information criterion or Bayesian information criterion according to the model test results obtained using ModelFinder [35]. The option of more thorough and slower nearest neighbour interchange search (-allnni), was enabled for tree search. If the chosen substitution model included + I + G (invariable site plus discrete gamma model), the option -opt-gamma-inv, was enabled for more thorough estimation of + I + G model parameters. Branch support was assessed by non-parametric bootstrapping, using 1000 samples from the original alignment. The starting seed number for all analyses was arbitrarily specified as 109,843. All other parameters used by IQ-TREE remained by default. For phylogenetic analyses performed with a concatenated sequence alignment, gene trees were inferred, and gene concordance factors (gCF) were calculated as per the IQ-TREE manual. The gCF were then manually converted to the number of decisive gene trees that support the species tree. The nodes with a bootstrap value of less than 50 in the ML trees were collapsed using TreeGraph (version 2.15.0-887 beta) [36] and visualised with FigTree (version 1.4.4, http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/, last accessed on 16 January 2022).
For calculating pairwise sequence identities, nucleotide (nt) sequences were aligned with Clustal Omega 1.2.2 [37] using Geneious Prime version 2020.2.3 with automatic parameter adjustment enabled, while amino acid (aa) sequences were aligned using COBALT [32] as described in the previous paragraph.

3. Results

Virus-like sequence contigs were identified in 12 of the 15 orchid plants that were analysed by HTS: samples 13402, PI-1 and PI-2 were apparently uninfected (Table 1). All tested plants grew in undisturbed natural habitats, except for the two plants from Pine Island (PI-1 and PI-2), which were found at a popular recreational reserve on the banks of the Murrumbidgee River (Table 1). The numbers of raw reads generated from HTS for each sample and the numbers of reads left after trimming are shown in Table S8. The viruses identified in the greenhood orchids in this study had single-stranded, positive-sense (+) or negative-sense/ambisense (−) RNA, or double-stranded (ds) RNA genomes. They could be taxonomically classified into five genera in five different families: (+) RNA: Alphaendornavirus (family Endornaviridae), Polerovirus (family Solemoviridae); (−) RNA: Orthotospovirus (family Tospoviridae); dsRNA: Amalgavirus (family Amalgaviridae), Totivirus (family Totiviridae), as detailed below.
The presence of the virus identified by HTS in each of the plant samples was confirmed by RT-PCR. The sequences of each of the amplicons matched the corresponding sequences obtained by HTS with 100% nt sequence identity.

3.1. Molecular Characterisation of PtBV

PtBV was first reported in 2000, infecting a colony of P. nutans growing in dry sclerophyll forest on the slopes of Black Mountain in the ACT (MA Clements and AJ Gibbs, pers. comm.). This colony of orchids has persisted and when inspected in 2020, chlorotic blotch symptoms were observed on some but not all of the orchids (Figure 1). A symptomatic plant was collected from this location (sample 13365) and chosen for the first round of HTS.
After assembling the HTS data, three contigs were obtained that contained complete coding sequences for proteins that are homologous to those of orthotospoviruses based on BLASTX searches of the NCBI RefSeq protein database. These virus sequences were assumed to be representative of PtBV, hence the name was retained but since the sequence of the PCR product obtained by Gibbs and colleagues [15] was not deposited in one of the international nucleotide sequence databases, sequence comparisons were not possible to link these virus discoveries. Following 5′ and 3′ RACE, the complete genome segment sequences are 8636 nt for the L segment, 4697 nt for the M segment and 3159 nt for the S segment and these have been deposited in GenBank with accession numbers OL471332 to OL471334, respectively. The genome organisation resembled by the complete sequences of the assumed PtBV from the orchid sample 13365 (PtBV-13365) is typical of an orthotospovirus (Figure 2): one negative-sense long open reading frame (ORF) in the L RNA segment encoding the putative RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp); one positive-sense ORF encoding the putative non-structural movement protein (NSm) and one negative-sense ORF encoding the putative glycoprotein precursor (GP) at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the M RNA segment, respectively, and one positive-sense ORF encoding the putative non-structural RNA silencing suppressor (NSs) and one negative-sense ORF encoding the putative nucleocapsid protein (N) at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the S RNA segment, respectively.
The RdRp and N protein coding regions, at 8529 and 735 nt, respectively, are shorter than those of any other known orthotospoviruses. Conserved and complementary sequence motifs were present at the termini of the three genome segments: 5′-AGAGC-3′ at the 5′ end and 5′-GCUCU-3′ at the 3′ end. PtBV was also detected in P. nutans and P. curta at two other sites in the ACT (samples GF and HR, Table 1), and in P. curta from Warrumbungle National Park (sample 13399, Table 1), which is located approximately 550 km north of the ACT. These additional three infected plants also showed symptoms similar to those shown in Figure 1, but such symptoms were not observed in other samples where PtBV was not detected.
Pairwise sequence comparisons showed that all the recovered genomes of PtBV have less than 40% aa sequence identity in the N protein to any other recognised or tentative orthotospovirus species (Table S10) but greater than 99% aa sequence identity to each other (Table S11), suggesting that PtBV should be classified in a novel species according to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) species demarcation threshold of 90% aa sequence identity [38]. PtBV-13399 was the most distantly related to the designated exemplar of PtBV from Black Mountain (PtBV-13365, Table S11), likely reflecting the fact that it was the most geographically separated among the PtBV that were detected. The genome architectures of all PtBV were identical, except that the lengths of the intergenic regions (IGR) in the M and S RNA segments varied. The lengths of the IGR in the M segments of PtBV-13365, -GF, -HR and -13399 are, respectively, 242, 240, 194 and 253 nt, while those in the S segments are, respectively, 969, 1093, 1100 and 841 nt. The genome segments of PtBV-13399, -GF and -HR, excluding the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs), were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers OL471335 to OL471343.
In a phylogenetic reconstruction based on the RdRp codon sequence alignment, PtBV fell within a monophyletic clade containing all recognised orthotospoviruses, within which groundnut chlorotic fan-spot virus (GCFSV) was the basal taxon (Figure S1). To provide a genome-wide estimation of phylogeny, a second analysis was carried out using a concatenated codon sequence alignment from five of the orthotospovirus genes (RdRp, NSm, GP, NSs and N). PtBV and Barleria chlorosis-associated virus (BCaV) were shown to be sister taxa with 100% bootstrap support for the branch node and genealogical concordance with all but the NSs gene (Figure 3 and Figure S2). Considering that the currently recognised clades of orthotospoviruses described in the literature, i.e., the American and the Eurasian clades, are well supported by the species tree with 100% bootstrap support and 100% genealogical concordance (all five genes, Figure 3), BCaV and PtBV should probably be treated as distinct lineages given that they do not have the same level of genealogical concordance and that they share low sequence similarities.

3.2. Pterostylis Alphaendornavirus

A long sequence contig from P. nutans sample HR had a significant match to winged bean endornavirus 1 (WBEV1, genus Alphaendornavirus, family Endornaviridae) following a BLASTX search of the NCBI RefSeq protein database. This virus, which was provisionally named Pterostylis alphaendornavirus (PtAEV), was not found in any other orchid sample. Members of Endornaviridae are known to have a stable dsRNA replicative form. Utilising this feature and following 5′ RACE, a complete genome sequence was obtained (GenBank accession number OL471320), which consists of 14,889 nt and has a single, long ORF of 14,835 nt that is flanked by a 5′ UTR of 22 nt and a 3′ UTR of 32 nt (Figure 2). As is typical of members of the family Endornaviridae, there is a 10-base stretch of cytosines at the 3′ end of the PtAEV genome. Following conceptual translation of the ORF, a 560 kDa protein was predicted that contains four conserved domains, which in order from the N- to the C-terminus, are cysteine proteinase (CD accession number pfam05412), helicase (CD accession number COG1112), glycotransferase (CD accession number cd03784) and RdRp (CD accession number pfam00978). A BLASTP search of the NCBI non-redundant protein sequence database revealed WBEV1 (GenBank accession number YP_009305414.1) as the closest match, with 72% query coverage and 30.8% pairwise sequence identity.
In a phylogenetic reconstruction using the codon sequence alignment from the RdRp, PtAEV was sister to a clade of plant-infecting alphaendornaviruses containing WBEV1, Phaseolus vulgaris endornavirus 2 (PvEV2), bell pepper endornavirus (BPEV) and hot pepper endornavirus (HPEV, Figure 4). Over the entire length of the genome, PtAEV has less than 40% nt sequence identity to these viruses, which is well below the 75% nt sequence identity demarcation threshold for distinguishing different species in this genus [39].

3.3. Pterostylis Amalgaviruses

Amalgaviruses (genus Amalgavirus, family Amalgaviridae) have linear dsRNA genomes of about 3.5 kb with two overlapping ORFs. Amalgavirus sequence contigs were detected in nine Pterostylis plants (Table 1) and two sequence clusters were identified based on an 85% nt sequence identity cut-off (Table S12). One cluster was represented by a single sequence, PtAV-13438-2, and the other contained the remaining 10 sequences. PtAV-13365 and PtAV-13438-2 were selected as exemplars for two tentative new amalgaviruses that were, respectively, named Pterostylis amalgavirus 1 (PtAV1) and Pterostylis amalgavirus 2 (PtAV2). After 5′ RACE was carried out, complete genome sequences of these viruses were obtained, which comprised 3428 nt for PtAV-13365 and 3426 nt for PtAV-13438-2 (GenBank accession numbers OL471321 and OL471331, respectively). Both amalgavirus genomes contain two overlapping ORFs that are predicted to produce a fusion protein through a + 1 ribosomal frameshift (Figure 2). The same slippery sequence motif, UUUCGU, where the predicted ribosomal frameshift occurs at the C, was identified at the 3′ end of ORF1 in both amalgavirus genomes. The ORF2 gene product, likely expressed through the + 1 ribosomal frameshift in both genomes, has an RdRp domain, suggesting it functions as a polymerase. The ORF1 gene product is predicted to be the capsid protein [40], although no actual virions of amalgaviruses have been observed to date.
In a phylogenetic reconstruction using the RdRp sequence alignment, both PtAV1 and PtAV2 clustered within the genus Amalgavirus but in different positions of the tree (Figure 5). PtAV1 formed its own distinctive clade, while PtAV2 clustered with southern tomato virus (STV), Allium cepa amalgavirus 1 (AcAV1), Allium cepa amalgavirus 2 (AcAV2), rhododendron virus A (RhVA), spinach amalgavirus 1 (SpAV1) and Vicia cryptic virus M (VCVM, Figure 5). Species demarcation criteria have yet to be set for the genus Amalgavirus. However, members of the family Partitiviridae have a homologous RdRp [40], and the species demarcation criterion for species in this family is ≤90% aa sequence identity in the RdRp [41]. As PtAV1 and PtAV2 have not more than 60% aa identity to each other and to any other known amalgavirus species in the RdRp (Tables S12 and S13), we suggest that they each should be classified in a new species in the genus. The genomes of the other nine PtAV1, each 3175 nt in length excluding the 5′ and 3′ UTRs, were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers OL471322 to OL471330.

3.4. Pterostylis Totiviruses

Five totivirus sequence contigs, hereafter referred to as Pterostylis totivirus (PtTV), were detected in three P. nutans (samples HR, 13365, 13421) and one P. curta (sample GF) plants (Table 1). All PtTV genomes contain two non-overlapping ORFs that are predicted to produce a fusion protein through a − 1 ribosomal frameshift, enabled by a slippery sequence motif (GGAUUUU) at the 3′ end of ORF 1, where the rightmost U is the predicted ribosomal frameshift site (Figure 2). The ORF1 gene product is predicted to be the coat protein, while the fusion protein is predicted to be the RdRp (Figure 2). PtTV-13421-2 has less than 65% nt sequence identity to the other totivirus sequence contigs in the coding region, while the other sequences were more than 80% identical to each other (Table S14). Following 5′ RACE, the complete genome sequences of PtTV-13365 and PtTV-13421-2 were 5003 and 4972 nt, respectively, and these have been deposited in GenBank with accession numbers OL471345 and OL471347, respectively. The remaining three sequence contigs for PtTV-HR, PtTV-13421-1 and PtTV-GF, each 4847 nt long after removing the unverified 5′ and 3′ UTRs, represented near-complete genomes (GenBank accession numbers OL471349, OL471346 and OL471348, respectively). Although the 5′ and 3′ UTRs of PtTV-13365 and PtTV-13421-2 are different in length, the arrangement of the coding regions are identical (Figure 2).
Different totiviruses are defined as having less than 50% aa sequence identity in the fusion protein, although this is not a canonical rule [42]. All five Pterostylis-associated totivirus ORF2 sequences have nearly 70% aa sequence identity to a totivirus-like sequence identified in Pterostylis from Western Australia, named Pterostylis sanguinea totivirus A (PtSTVA, Table S15), suggesting that they could be classified as the same virus species even though the current sequence data of PtSTVA are incomplete. Based on a phylogenetic analysis using the RdRp codon sequence, PtSTVA and PtTV formed a distinct clade within the genus Totivirus, which is most closely related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae virus L-A (ScVLA) and Tuber aestivum virus 1 (TaV1, Figure 6).

3.5. Pterostylis Polerovirus

A 5757-nt sequence (GenBank accession number OL471344) of a polerovirus, tentatively named Pterostylis polerovirus (PtPV), was discovered in sample 13365 (Table 1). The genome organization of PtPV is typical of poleroviruses in general (Figure 2), with seven predicted ORFs altogether translated into seven protein products, whose putative functions are as follows: RNA silencing suppressor (P0); serine peptidase (P1); RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (P1–P2 fusion protein); major capsid protein (P3); movement protein (P4); minor capsid protein (P3–P5 read-through protein); and accessory movement protein (P3a) [43]. P0 and P1 are encoded by ORF0 and ORF1, respectively. A slippery sequence motif, GGGAAAC, is present in ORF1, where C is the predicted ribosomal frameshift site; by utilization of this motif, a − 1 ribosomal frameshift would occur, resulting in the co-translation of ORF2 into the P1–P2 RdRp fusion protein. ORF3a encoding P3a starts with a non-canonical codon, AUU. ORF4 encoding P4 is nested within ORF3, which encodes P3. ORF5 is co-translated with ORF3 through stop-codon readthrough into P3–P5 read-through protein.
A reconstruction of phylogeny based on the concatenated alignments of four conserved regions (genes) in the protein coding sequences, one in ORF1, one in ORF2, one in ORF3 and the other encoding the protein sequence at the C-terminus of P3 as part of the P3–P5 read-through protein, grouped PtPV with potato leafroll virus (PLRV), cereal yellow dwarf virus-RPS (CYDV-RPS) and cereal yellow dwarf virus-RPV (CYDV-RPV) but this relationship was only supported by three out of the four gene trees (Figure 7). Contrary to PtPV and the CYDVs, PLRV appears to have a different origin in the fourth conserved region (Figure S3D). On the other hand, the node accommodating PtPV and the CYDVs in the species tree was not supported by any gene tree (Figure 7), reflecting that there is no node in any of the four gene trees containing “only” PtPV and the CYDVs (Figure S3).
The predicted protein products of PtPV all have less than 70% aa sequence identity to their respective closest relatives (Table S16), suggesting that PtPV should be classified in a new species in the genus Polerovirus given the species demarcation criterion of more than 10% difference in the aa sequence identity of any gene product [44].

4. Discussion

Viruses belonging to five different genera were identified during this survey of greenhood orchids, although only PtBV and PtPV, as members of the genera Orthotospovirus and Polerovirus, respectively, are likely to be pathogenic. Furthermore, PtBV is probably the main cause of the yellow blotch symptoms, as it was the only virus consistently associated with these distinctive symptoms (Figure 1). The majority of alphaendornaviruses cause latent infections, although some may produce mild symptoms, such as balloon flower endornavirus, whose presence correlates with leaf shrinkage in Platycodon grandiflorus [45]. Amalgaviruses are cryptic in nature, occur at low titres and are only thought to be able to propagate within their host plant by cell division as they lack a movement protein gene [46].
Orchids have well-known symbiotic relationships with both mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal fungi, which assist with nutrient uptake, modulate plant hormone levels and confer defence against fungal pathogens [47]. Using our HTS strategy, it is not possible to definitively conclude whether some of the viruses that were discovered were infecting the plant or a fungal species that might be associated with the plant. Similar to the totivirus detected in this study, Ong, et al. [48] detected Pterostylis sanguinea totivirus A in leaf tissues of Pterostylis plants but given that all well-characterised totiviruses have fungal hosts (Virus Taxonomy: 2020 Release, https://talk.ictvonline.org/taxonomy/, last accessed on 16 January 2022), it would seem most likely this totivirus was infecting an endophytic fungus within the plant. The various known alphaendornaviruses may have plant, fungal or oomycete hosts but given that PtAEV was most closely related to the plant-infecting species, it is likely that this virus also shares the same ecological niche.
The recognition of PtBV as belonging to a distinct species within the genus Orthotospovirus is strongly supported by results of genome organization, phylogenetic relationships and N protein sequence comparisons. PtBV is only the fifth virus from this taxon to have been found in Australia after TSWV, CaCV, IYSV and impatiens necrotic spot virus [23,49]. These four orthotospoviruses are broadly distributed around the world and are almost certainly recent arrivals [23], whereas PtBV may represent the first indigenous orthotospovirus from Australia. Supporting this conclusion, PtBV represents a separate distinct lineage in the orthotospovirus phylogenetic tree. Secondly, the virus was found in undisturbed habitats that were protected within national parks, far removed from any agricultural areas. Furthermore, Pterostylis species are known to be mainly distributed in Australia [50].
If PtBV does in fact have an Australian origin, then a corollary would be the existence of a native thrips vector. Candidate vectors are Dichromothrips spp., a genus of thrips that is widespread on the Orchidaceae in the Old World tropics from Africa to New Zealand [51]. D. australiae Mound has been collected from Pterostylis cycnocephala Fitzg., P. nutans and P. pedunculata in the ACT and NSW and D. spiranthidis Bagnall has a wider host range within the Orchidaceae including Microtis unifolia (G.Forst.) Rchb.f., Prasophyllum wilkinsoniorum D.L.Jones, Spiranthes sinensis (Pers.) Ames and a Thelymitra sp. [52] (L. A. Mound, pers. comm. 18 October 2021). D. corbetti Priesner also occurs in Australia as a pest species of cultivated orchids but it is considered non-native, originating in South-East Asia [52]. If in fact a Dichromothrips sp. is acting as a vector, it would not facilitate rapid spread, as most adults are flightless (L. A. Mound, pers. comm. 18 October 2021).
PtBV shares a most recent common ancestor with BCaV, another recently described orthotospovirus that was discovered in South Africa [53]. As with PtBV, BCaV does not readily fit into either the Eurasian or American clades of orthotospoviruses, raising the possibility that it might be indigenous to the African continent and has spread from a native plant species into the weedy and introduced plant species, Barleria cristata L. Africa and Australia were once connected as parts of the Gondwanan supercontinent. Perhaps PtBV and its closest known relative, BCaV, had a common Gondwanan origin and the current distribution may be explained by continental drift.
PtPV is less likely to be an indigenous virus than PtBV as all poleroviruses except pepper whitefly-borne vein yellows virus are obligatorily transmitted by aphids [54,55], and Australia has a very depauperate native aphid fauna [56]. Furthermore, those aphid species that are native to Australia are very host-specific and none are specialised for feeding on orchids. The polerovirus, turnip yellows virus, which is more typically associated with brassica crops, has been detected in another ground orchid from Victoria, Diuris pedunculata R.Br. [18]. However, its known aphid vectors (Myzus persicae (Sulzer), Brevicoryne brassicae L., Aphis gossypii Glover and Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas)) are all introduced species [57]. Combining the fact that PtPV has a close evolutionary relationship with PLRV, CYDV-RPV and CYDV-RPS, which are exotic to Australia, it is likely that PtPV is also exotic and transmitted by introduced vectors. Thus, it is predicted that alternative, introduced plant hosts will eventually be identified for PtPV.
As with many previous studies, the research described in this paper has demonstrated the power of high-throughput sequencing technologies to discover new viruses, and to provide comprehensive sequence data to allow their accurate classification into species. PtBV and PtPV may pose threats to economically important plant crops in Australia and it will be important to investigate the possible existence of alternative hosts and to determine whether PtBV can be transmitted by some of the polyphagous pest thrips species such as Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) or Thrips tabaci Lindeman. If an exotic thrips species does turn out to be a more efficient vector of the virus than its proposed original native vector, then new hosts of PtBV may arise and the infection pressure on the orchids could reach a level that poses an existential threat.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v14020365/s1, Table S1: Assembly parameters for SPAdes, Table S2: Gene-specific primers used in rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) and reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, Table S3: Sources of orthotospovirus and Dugbe virus sequences, Table S4: Sources of endornavirus and grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1 sequences, Table S5: Sources of amalgavirus, Zygosaccharomyces bailii virus Z and Amasya cherry disease associated chrysovirus sequences, Table S6: Sources of totivirus and Amasya cherry disease associated chrysovirus sequences, Table S7: Sources of polerovirus and enamovirus sequences, Table S8: Numbers of paired reads before and after trimming, Table S9: Substitution models used in reconstructing maximum likelihood trees in Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7, Table S10: Closest matches of each Pterostylis blotch virus protein from BLASTP searches of the NCBI non-redundant protein sequence database, Table S11: Pairwise sequence identities (%) of the orthotospoviruses identified in this study, Table S12: Pairwise sequence identities (%) of the amalgaviruses identified in this study, Table S13: Closest matches of the predicted Pterostylis amalgavirus fusion protein and ORF2 product from BLASTP searches of the NCBI non-redundant protein sequence database, Table S14: Pairwise sequence identities (%) of the totiviruses identified in this study, Table S15: Closest matches of the predicted Pterostylis totivirus fusion protein and ORF2 product from BLASTP searches of the NCBI non-redundant protein sequence database, Table S16: Closest matches of the predicted Pterostylis polerovirus proteins from BLASTP searches of the NCBI non-redundant protein sequence database, Figure S1: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene rooted to Dugbe virus (DUGV), Figure S2: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic gene trees of orthotospoviruses, Figure S3: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic gene trees of poleroviruses and enamoviruses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-Y.C.; Formal analysis, H.-Y.C.; Funding acquisition, R.G.D., J.E.T. and A.D.W.G.; Investigation, H.-Y.C.; Methodology, H.-Y.C.; Resources, M.A.C., A.M.M. and A.D.W.G.; Supervision, R.G.D., J.E.T. and A.D.W.G.; Visualization, H.-Y.C.; Writing—original draft, H.-Y.C.; Writing—review & editing, M.A.C., R.G.D., J.E.T. and A.D.W.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Hort Innovation (Grant NY19007), using the Greenlife Industry research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not-for-profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All sequence data generated in this study have been lodged in GenBank.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge Adrian J. Gibbs for first alerting us to the discovery of Pterostylis blotch virus, and to Alistair R. McTaggart for providing instruction on the use of IQ-TREE. The authors acknowledge the Jagera and Turrbal people as the Traditional Custodians of the land on which the experimental work was completed in Brisbane.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Webster, C.G.; Coutts, B.A.; Jones, R.A.C.; Jones, M.G.K.; Wylie, S.J. Virus impact at the interface of an ancient ecosystem and a recent agroecosystem: Studies on three legume-infecting potyviruses in the Southwest Australian floristic region. Plant Pathol. 2007, 56, 729–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. García-Arenal, F.; Zerbini, F.M. Life on the edge: Geminiviruses at the Interface between Crops and Wild Plant Hosts. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2019, 6, 411–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Burdon, J.J.; Thrall, P.H.; Ericson, L. The Current and Future Dynamics of Disease in Plant Communities. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2006, 44, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Dastogeer, K.M.G.; Li, H.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Jones, M.G.K.; Wylie, S.J. Fungal endophytes and a virus confer drought tolerance to Nicotiana benthamiana plants through modulating osmolytes, antioxidant enzymes and expression of host drought responsive genes. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 149, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. WFO: World Flora Online. 2021. Available online: http://www.worldfloraonline.org (accessed on 16 November 2021).
  6. Givnish, T.J.; Spalink, D.; Ames, M.; Lyon, S.P.; Hunter, S.J.; Zuluaga, A.; Doucette, A.; Caro, G.G.; McDaniel, J.; Clements, M.A. Orchid historical biogeography, diversification, Antarctica and the paradox of orchid dispersal. J. Biogeogr. 2016, 43, 1905–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, Y.-X.; Li, Z.-H.; Schuiteman, A.; Chase, M.W.; Li, J.-W.; Huang, W.-C.; Hidayat, A.; Wu, S.-S.; Jin, X.-H. Phylogenomics of Orchidaceae based on plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2019, 139, 106540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Clements, M.A.; Otero, J.T.; Miller, J.T. Phylogenetic relationships in Pterostylidinae (Cranichideae: Orchidaceae): Combined evidence from nuclear ribomsomal and plastid DNA sequences. Aust. J. Bot. 2011, 59, 99–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pridgeon, A.M.; Cribb, J.P.; Chase, W.M.; Rasmussen, F. Genera Orchidacearum; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999–2014. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jones, D.L. A Complete Guide to Native Orchids of Australia, 3rd ed.; New Holland Publishers Frenchs Forest: Sydney, Australia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. Warcup, J.H. Symbiotic germination of some Australian terrestrial orchids. New Phytol. 1973, 72, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Otero, J.T.; Thrall, P.H.; Clements, M.; Burdon, J.J.; Miller, J.T. Codiversification of orchids (Pterostylidinae) and their associated mycorrhizal fungi. Aust. J. Bot. 2011, 59, 480–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hayashi, T.; Bohman, B.; Scaffidi, A.; Peakall, R.; Flematti, G.R. An unusual tricosatriene is crucial for male fungus gnat attraction and exploitation by sexually deceptive Pterostylis orchids. Curr. Biol. 2021, 31, 1954–1961.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zettler, F.W.; Ko, N.J.; Wisler, G.C.; Elliott, M.S.; Wong, S.M. Viruses of orchids and their control. Plant Dis. 1990, 74, 621–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gibbs, A.; Mackenzie, A.; Blanchfield, A.; Cross, P.; Wilson, C.; Elliot, K.; Nightingale, M.; Clements, M. Viruses of orchids in Australia: Their identification, biology and control. Aust. Orchid Rev. 2000, 65, 10–21. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ali, R.N.; Dann, A.L.; Cross, P.A.; Wilson, C.R. Multiplex RT-PCR detection of three common viruses infecting orchids. Arch. Virol. 2014, 159, 3095–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dietzgen, R.G.; Freitas-Astúa, J.; Chabi-Jesus, C.; Ramos-González, P.L.; Goodin, M.M.; Kondo, H.; Tassi, A.D.; Kitajima, E.W. Chapter Five - Dichorhaviruses in their Host Plants and Mite Vectors. In Advances in Virus Research; Palukaitis, P., Roossinck, M.J., Eds.; Academic Press: Maryland Heights, MO, USA, 2018; Volume 102, Chapter 5; pp. 119–148. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wylie, S.J.; Li, H.; Dixon, K.W.; Richards, H.; Jones, M.G.K. Exotic and indigenous viruses infect wild populations and captive collections of temperate terrestrial orchids (Diuris Species) in Australia. Virus Res. 2013, 171, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Wylie, S.J.; Tan, A.J.Y.; Li, H.; Dixon, K.W.; Jones, M.G.K. Caladenia virus A, an unusual new member of the family Potyviridae from terrestrial orchids in Western Australia. Arch. Virol. 2012, 157, 2447–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wylie, S.J.; Li, H.; Jones, M.G.K. Donkey Orchid Symptomless Virus: A Viral ‘Platypus’ from Australian Terrestrial Orchids. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79587. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ong, J.W.L.; Li, H.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Dixon, K.W.; Jones, M.G.K.; Wylie, S.J. Novel Endorna-like viruses, including three with two open reading frames, challenge the membership criteria and taxonomy of the Endornaviridae. Virology 2016, 499, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Parrella, G.; Gognalons, P.; Gebre-Selassiè, K.; Vovlas, C.; Marchoux, G. An update of the host range of tomato spotted wilt virus. J. Plant Pathol. 2003, 85, 227–264. [Google Scholar]
  23. Persley, D.M.; Thomas, J.E.; Sharman, M. Tospoviruses—An Australian perspective. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2006, 35, 161–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Oliver, J.E.; Whitfield, A.E. The Genus Tospovirus: Emerging Bunyaviruses that Threaten Food Security. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2016, 3, 101–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schäffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Danecek, P.; Bonfield, J.K.; Liddle, J.; Marshall, J.; Ohan, V.; Pollard, M.O.; Whitwham, A.; Keane, T.; McCarthy, S.A.; Davies, R.M.; et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 2021, 10, giab008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Bryant, S.H. CD-Search: Protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, W327–W331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lu, S.; Wang, J.; Chitsaz, F.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Geer, R.C.; Gonzales, N.R.; Gwadz, M.; Hurwitz, D.I.; Marchler, G.H.; Song, J.S.; et al. CDD/SPARCLE: The conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D265–D268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Papadopoulos, J.S.; Agarwala, R. COBALT: Constraint-based alignment tool for multiple protein sequences. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 1073–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Kück, P.; Longo, G.C. FASconCAT-G: Extensive functions for multiple sequence alignment preparations concerning phylogenetic studies. Front. Zool. 2014, 11, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Nguyen, L.-T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Stöver, B.C.; Müller, K.F. TreeGraph 2: Combining and visualizing evidence from different phylogenetic analyses. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Sievers, F.; Wilm, A.; Dineen, D.; Gibson, T.J.; Karplus, K.; Li, W.; Lopez, R.; McWilliam, H.; Remmert, M.; Söding, J.; et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. King, A.M.Q.; Adams, M.J.; Carstens, E.B.; Lefkowitz, E.J. (Eds.) Family—Bunyaviridae. In Virus Taxonomy; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 725–741. [Google Scholar]
  39. Valverde, R.A.; Khalifa, M.E.; Okada, R.; Fukuhara, T.; Sabanadzovic, S. ICTV Report Consortium ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Endornaviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2019, 100, 1204–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Krupovic, M.; Dolja, V.V.; Koonin, E.V. Plant viruses of the Amalgaviridae family evolved via recombination between viruses with double-stranded and negative-strand RNA genomes. Biol. Direct 2015, 10, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Vainio, E.J.; Chiba, S.; Ghabrial, S.A.; Maiss, E.; Roossinck, M.; Sabanadzovic, S.; Suzuki, N.; Xie, J.; Nibert, M. ICTV Report Consortium ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Partitiviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2018, 99, 17–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. King, A.M.Q.; Adams, M.J.; Carstens, E.B.; Lefkowitz, E.J. (Eds.) Family—Totiviridae. In Virus Taxonomy; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 639–650. [Google Scholar]
  43. Morozov, S.Y.; Solovyev, A.G. Small hydrophobic viral proteins involved in intercellular movement of diverse plant virus genomes. AIMS Microbiol. 2020, 6, 305–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sõmera, M.; Fargette, D.; Hébrard, E.; Sarmiento, C. ICTV Report Consortium ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Solemoviridae 2021. J. Gen. Virol. 2021, 102, 001707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, F.; Dong, Q.; Gao, Z.; Zhou, B.; Bao, X. Characterisation of a novel alphaendornavirus isolated from balloon flower (Platycodon grandiflorus). Arch. Virol. 2020, 165, 1023–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tzanetakis, I.E.; Sabanadzovic, S.; Valverde, R.A. Amalgaviruses (Amalgaviridae). In Encyclopedia of Virology, 4th ed.; Bamford, D.H., Zuckerman, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2021; pp. 154–157. [Google Scholar]
  47. Favre-Godal, Q.; Gourguillon, L.; Lordel-Madeleine, S.; Gindro, K.; Choisy, P. Orchids and their mycorrhizal fungi: An insufficiently explored relationship. Mycorrhiza 2020, 30, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ong, J.W.L.; Li, H.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Dixon, K.W.; Jones, M.G.K.; Wylie, S.J. Novel and divergent viruses associated with Australian orchid-fungus symbioses. Virus Res. 2018, 244, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Impatiens Necrotic Spot Virus (INSV) in New South Wales (NSW). Available online: https://www.ippc.int/en/countries/australia/pestreports/2018/09/impatiens-necrotic-spot-virus-insv-in-new-south-wales-nsw/ (accessed on 3 November 2021).
  50. Janes, J.K.; Duretto, M.F. A new classification for subtribe Pterostylidinae (Orchidaceae), reaffirming Pterostylis in the broad sense. Aust. Syst. Bot. 2010, 23, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mound, L.A. Thysanoptera of the genus Dichromothrips on Old World Orchidaceae. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1976, 8, 245–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mound, L.A.; Tree, D.J. Thysanoptera Australiensis—Thrips of Australia. 2020. Available online: https://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/thrips_australia/ (accessed on 18 October 2021).
  53. Read, D.A.; Roberts, R.; Thompson, G. Genomic characterization of two novel viruses infecting Barleria cristata L. from the genera Orthotospovirus and Polerovirus. Arch. Virol. 2021, 166, 2615–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ghosh, S.; Kanakala, S.; Lebedev, G.; Kontsedalov, S.; Silverman, D.; Alon, T.; Mor, N.; Sela, N.; Luria, N.; Dombrovsky, A.; et al. Transmission of a New Polerovirus Infecting Pepper by the Whitefly Bemisia tabaci. J. Virol. 2019, 93, e00488-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Garcia-Ruiz, H.; Holste, N.M.; LaTourrette, K. Poleroviruses (Luteoviridae). In Encyclopedia of Virology, 4th ed.; Bamford, D.H., Zuckerman, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2021; pp. 594–602. [Google Scholar]
  56. Austin, A.D.; Yeates, D.K.; Cassis, G.; Fletcher, M.J.; La Salle, J.; Lawrence, J.F.; McQuillan, P.B.; Mound, L.A.; J Bickel, D.; Gullan, P.J. Insects ‘Down under’– Diversity, endemism and evolution of the Australian insect fauna: Examples from select orders. Aust. J. Entomol. 2004, 43, 216–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Schliephake, E.; Graichen, K.; Rabenstein, F. Investigations on the vector transmission of the Beet mild yellowing virus (BMYV) and the Turnip yellows virus (TuYV). Untersuchungen zur Vektorübertragung des Milden Rübenvergilbungsvirus (Beet mild yellowing virus) und des Wasserrübenvergilbungsvirus (Turnip yellows virus). Zeitschrift Pflanzenkrankheiten Pflanzenschutz J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2000, 107, 81–87. [Google Scholar]
Viruses 14 00365 g001 550
Figure 1. Pterostylis nutans infected with Pterostylis blotch virus (yellow frame) and healthy P. nutans (red frame), on Black Mountain, the Australian Capital Territory, in 2020.
Figure 1. Pterostylis nutans infected with Pterostylis blotch virus (yellow frame) and healthy P. nutans (red frame), on Black Mountain, the Australian Capital Territory, in 2020.
Viruses 14 00365 g001
Viruses 14 00365 g002 550
Figure 2. Genome architectures of the viruses identified in this study. Abbreviations are as follows: PtAEV, Pterostylis alphaendornavirus; PtAV1, Pterostylis amalgavirus 1; PtAV2, Pterostylis amalgavirus 2; PtTV, Pterostylis totivirus; PtPV, Pterostylis polerovirus; RdRp, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; NSm, non-structural protein, M segment; NSs, non-structural protein, S segment; N, nucleocapsid protein; CP, capsid protein; nt, nucleotide; aa, amino acid.
Figure 2. Genome architectures of the viruses identified in this study. Abbreviations are as follows: PtAEV, Pterostylis alphaendornavirus; PtAV1, Pterostylis amalgavirus 1; PtAV2, Pterostylis amalgavirus 2; PtTV, Pterostylis totivirus; PtPV, Pterostylis polerovirus; RdRp, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; NSm, non-structural protein, M segment; NSs, non-structural protein, S segment; N, nucleocapsid protein; CP, capsid protein; nt, nucleotide; aa, amino acid.
Viruses 14 00365 g002
Viruses 14 00365 g003 550
Figure 3. Maximum likelihood reconstruction of the phylogeny of orthotospoviruses based on concatenated sequence alignments of five genes (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, non-structural protein M segment, glycoprotein precursor, non-structural protein S segment and nucleocapsid protein). The acronyms in red font correspond to the viruses discovered in this study (Table 1) and the other virus acronyms are defined in Table S3. The numbers to the left of the slash next to the branches are non-parametric bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates; the numbers to the right of the slash are the number of decisive gene trees (5 at maximum) supporting the branch. The nucleotide substitution models used are listed in Table S9.
Figure 3. Maximum likelihood reconstruction of the phylogeny of orthotospoviruses based on concatenated sequence alignments of five genes (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, non-structural protein M segment, glycoprotein precursor, non-structural protein S segment and nucleocapsid protein). The acronyms in red font correspond to the viruses discovered in this study (Table 1) and the other virus acronyms are defined in Table S3. The numbers to the left of the slash next to the branches are non-parametric bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates; the numbers to the right of the slash are the number of decisive gene trees (5 at maximum) supporting the branch. The nucleotide substitution models used are listed in Table S9.
Viruses 14 00365 g003
Viruses 14 00365 g004 550
Figure 4. Maximum likelihood reconstruction of the phylogeny of alphaendornaviruses based on the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene. The acronym in red font corresponds to the virus discovered in this study (Table 1) and the other virus acronyms are defined in Table S4. The numbers next to the branches are non-parametric bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates. The nucleotide substitution model used for the phylogenetic tree is listed in Table S9.
Figure 4. Maximum likelihood reconstruction of the phylogeny of alphaendornaviruses based on the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene. The acronym in red font corresponds to the virus discovered in this study (Table 1) and the other virus acronyms are defined in Table S4. The numbers next to the branches are non-parametric bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates. The nucleotide substitution model used for the phylogenetic tree is listed in Table S9.
Viruses 14 00365 g004
Viruses 14 00365 g005 550
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood reconstruction of the phylogeny of amalgaviruses based on the RNA dependent RNA polymerase gene. The acronyms in red font correspond to the viruses discovered in this study (Table 1) and the other virus acronyms are defined in Table S5. The numbers next to the branches are non-parametric bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates. The nucleotide substitution model used for the phylogenetic tree is listed in Table S9.
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood reconstruction of the phylogeny of amalgaviruses based on the RNA dependent RNA polymerase gene. The acronyms in red font correspond to the viruses discovered in this study (Table 1) and the other virus acronyms are defined in Table S5. The numbers next to the branches are non-parametric bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates. The nucleotide substitution model used for the phylogenetic tree is listed in Table S9.
Viruses 14 00365 g005
Viruses 14 00365 g006 550
Figure 6. Maximum likelihood reconstruction of the phylogeny of totiviruses based on the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene. The acronyms in red font correspond to the viruses s discovered in this study (Table 1) and the other virus acronyms are defined in Table S6. The numbers next to the branches are non-parametric bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates. The nucleotide substitution model used for the phylogenetic tree is listed in Table S9.
Figure 6. Maximum likelihood reconstruction of the phylogeny of totiviruses based on the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene. The acronyms in red font correspond to the viruses s discovered in this study (Table 1) and the other virus acronyms are defined in Table S6. The numbers next to the branches are non-parametric bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates. The nucleotide substitution model used for the phylogenetic tree is listed in Table S9.
Viruses 14 00365 g006
Viruses 14 00365 g007 550
Figure 7. Maximum likelihood reconstruction of the phylogeny of poleroviruses based on concatenated codon sequence alignments of the conserved regions of four genes (serine proteinase, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, capsid protein (P3) and the domain at the C-terminus of P3 in P3–P5 readthrough protein). The acronym in red font corresponds to the virus isolate discovered in this study (Table 1) and the other virus acronyms are defined in Table S7. The numbers to the left of the slash next to the branches are non-parametric bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates; the numbers to the right of the slash are the number of decisive gene trees (4 at maximum) supporting the branch. The nucleotide substitution models are listed in Table S9.
Figure 7. Maximum likelihood reconstruction of the phylogeny of poleroviruses based on concatenated codon sequence alignments of the conserved regions of four genes (serine proteinase, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, capsid protein (P3) and the domain at the C-terminus of P3 in P3–P5 readthrough protein). The acronym in red font corresponds to the virus isolate discovered in this study (Table 1) and the other virus acronyms are defined in Table S7. The numbers to the left of the slash next to the branches are non-parametric bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates; the numbers to the right of the slash are the number of decisive gene trees (4 at maximum) supporting the branch. The nucleotide substitution models are listed in Table S9.
Viruses 14 00365 g007
Table
Table 1. Orchid Samples Analysed and Types of Viruses Found.
Table 1. Orchid Samples Analysed and Types of Viruses Found.
SampleLocationHost SpeciesVirus GenusSequence
Notation		Sequence Depth *
13365Black Mountain Lookout, ACTPterostylis nutansAmalgavirusPtAV-1336577
OrthotospovirusPtBV-13365L: 80,318; M: 54,274; S: 47,192
PolerovirusPtPV1,790,464
TotivirusPtTV-13365528
13392Camp Pincham track,
Warrumbungle National Park, NSW		Pterostylis curtaAmalgavirusPtAV-13392262
13394Camp Pincham track,
Warrumbungle National Park, NSW		Pterostylis curtaAmalgavirusPtAV-13394198
13395Camp Pincham track,
Warrumbungle National Park, NSW		Pterostylis curtaAmalgavirusPtAV-13395-195
AmalgavirusPtAV-13395-224
13396Camp Pincham track,
Warrumbungle National Park, NSW		Pterostylis curtaAmalgavirusPtAV-1339653
13399Burbie Camp track,
Warrumbungle National Park, NSW		Pterostylis curtaOrthotospovirusPtBV-13399L:56,527; M: 87,708; S: 41,563
13402Timor Rock,
Warrumbungle National Park, NSW		Pterostylis curta---
13421Governor Track,
Mt Kaputar National Park, NSW		Pterostylis nutansAmalgavirusPtAV-1342115
TotivirusPtTV-13421-1665
TotivirusPtTV-13421-235
13430Wellington, Mt Arthur
Reserve, NSW		Pterostylis curtaAmalgavirusPtAV-13430112
13438Grill Cave, Bungonia
National Park, NSW		Pterostylis nutansAmalgavirusPtAV-13438-140
AmalgavirusPtAV-13438-215
13442Green track, Bungonia
National Park, NSW		Pterostylis curtaAmalgavirusPtAV-1344297
GFGibraltar Falls, Namadgi National Park, ACTPterostylis curtaOrthotospovirusPtBV-GFL: 12,876; M: 10,559; S: 3453
TotivirusPtTV-GF63
HRHanging Rock,
Tidbinbilla Nature
Reserve, ACT		Pterostylis nutansAlphaendornavirusPtAEV68
OrthotospovirusPtBV-HRL: 4026; M: 7010; S: 1195
TotivirusPtTV-HR36
PI-1Pine Island Reserve, ACTOligochaetochilus hamatus---
PI-2Pine Island Reserve, ACTPterostylis nutans---
* Average sequence depth excluding 5’ and 3’ untranslated regions.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chao, H.-Y.; Clements, M.A.; Mackenzie, A.M.; Dietzgen, R.G.; Thomas, J.E.; Geering, A.D.W. Viruses Infecting Greenhood Orchids (Pterostylidinae) in Eastern Australia. Viruses 2022, 14, 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14020365

AMA Style

Chao H-Y, Clements MA, Mackenzie AM, Dietzgen RG, Thomas JE, Geering ADW. Viruses Infecting Greenhood Orchids (Pterostylidinae) in Eastern Australia. Viruses. 2022; 14(2):365. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14020365

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chao, Hsu-Yao, Mark A. Clements, Anne M. Mackenzie, Ralf G. Dietzgen, John E. Thomas, and Andrew D. W. Geering. 2022. "Viruses Infecting Greenhood Orchids (Pterostylidinae) in Eastern Australia" Viruses 14, no. 2: 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14020365

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop