Next Article in Journal
HIV-1 Infection Transcriptomics: Meta-Analysis of CD4+ T Cells Gene Expression Profiles
Next Article in Special Issue
Association between Genetic Variants in NOS2 and TNF Genes with Congenital Zika Syndrome and Severe Microcephaly
Previous Article in Journal
Mucosal-Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cells Are Highly Activated and Functionally Impaired in COVID-19 Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Expression of CCR5 and CX3CR1 Receptors and Correlation with the Functionality of T Cells in Women infected with ZIKV during Pregnancy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Knowledge of Zika Virus Transmission and Its Prevention among High-Risk Pregnant Women in Brazil

by
Lucas C. Pires
1,*,
Luiza R. Dantas
1,
Steven S. Witkin
2,3,
Ana Paula A. P. Bertozzi
4,
Rita de Cássia A. B. Dezena
4,
Maria M. D. Rodrigues
4,
Rosa Estela Gazeta
4 and
Saulo D. Passos
4,5
1
Faculty of Medicine, Jundiaí School of Medicine, Jundiaí, São Paulo 13202-550, Brazil
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
3
Laboratory of Virology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil
4
Department of Pediatrics, Jundiaí School of Medicine, Jundiaí, São Paulo 13207-450, Brazil
5
Laboratory of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Jundiaí School of Medicine, Jundiaí, São Paulo 13202-550, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2021, 13(2), 242; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13020242
Submission received: 28 December 2020 / Revised: 21 January 2021 / Accepted: 29 January 2021 / Published: 4 February 2021

Abstract

:
Recent outbreaks of Zika virus (ZIKV) infection highlight the urgent need to evaluate the efficacy of current public health measures to educate susceptible groups about how to prevent infection, modes of viral transmission, and consequences of infection. We performed a cross-sectional study in the city of Jundiaí, São-Paulo, from March 2016 to August 2017. In 315 high-risk pregnant women we evaluated the rate of ZIKV infection, knowledge of pathways of ZIKV transmission, and the use of protective measures. Data were analyzed and correlated with sociodemographic variables. The rate of ZIKV infection was 10.8%. ZIKV transmission by mosquitoes was the best-known means of virus acquisition, while transmission of ZIKV by sexual intercourse as well as mother–fetus transmission was known by less than half of the women. The use of insect repellent, reported by 53% of participants, was correlated with higher education and personal directives from health professionals. Condom use was reported by 19.5% of subjects. Improved strategies to increase awareness of ZIKV infection and its consequences, designed to appeal to specific, targeted populations, are clearly necessary to more accurately prevent the spread of this infection and diminish adverse consequences in the pregnant population.

1. Introduction

Vector-borne diseases account for more than 17% of all infections worldwide, killing more than 700,000 people per year. The vast majority of deaths can be prevented through protective measures and community mobilization [1]. The arboviruses (arthropod-borne viruses) are responsible for many devastating diseases in humans with public health importance, such as Zika virus (ZIKV), Yellow Fever, and West Nile viruses [2]. ZIKV, a member of the Flaviviridae family, was declared in 2016 by the World Health Organization as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern [3]. Despite the fact Brazil is not currently facing ZIKV epidemic, during the period of December 2019 to October 2020, there were 7000 suspected cases, with a total of 201 confirmed cases during pregnancy in Brazil [4].
A unique characteristic of ZIKV is its diversity in terms of transmission. Infection is primarily from mosquito bites but can also occur by sexual intercourse [5], blood transfusion, accidental blood exposure, transplacentally [6,7], and possibly via breast milk [8]. ZIKV has been isolated from amniotic fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, saliva, vaginal secretions, semen, and breast milk [9].
The symptoms of ZIKV infection are nonspecific, and the majority of patients are asymptomatic [2]. This makes accurate diagnosis and patient follow-up difficult [10]. During pregnancy, ZIKV infection may induce Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS) in fetuses and newborns, and ZIKV is now a member of the TORCH group (Toxoplasmosis, Other, Rubella, Cytomegalovirus, Herpes Simplex Virus) [11]. CZS can present with a large spectrum of neurological and ortho-muscular changes, such as brain calcification, ventriculomegaly, joint and ocular abnormalities, and microcephaly [12]. Some infected newborns may present developmental delay and neurosensory alterations during the first years of life, showing that even when CZS is not diagnosed at birth, exposed babies may, nevertheless, experience long-term consequences of intrauterine exposition to ZIKV [13]. These findings affect the quality of life of the entire family in terms of psychological, medical, and social consequences [14]. In addition, there are severe economic consequences.
Identification of effective strategies to prevent ZIKV transmission, especially to pregnant women, is an obvious priority [15]. Since there is no vaccine or specific treatment for ZIKV, prevention and education are key factors in controlling and combating this infection [2,16,17,18]. Surveying a population’s level of knowledge about ZIKV, its outcomes, and ways of prevention are essential for the design and adoption of successful intervention strategies [19]. However, studies assessing information and attitudes toward ZIKV infection are limited and identification of knowledge gaps can lead to decreased susceptibility to infection [20], especially in pregnant women. This group has the highest incidence of comorbidities that justifies an enhanced concern about ZIKV exposure during prenatal care and the subsequent increased risk of complications in both mother and newborn [12,21].
Utilizing a pregnant population at the time of a recent ZIKV epidemic, the present study, carried out between March 2016 and August 2017, evaluated the frequency of ZIKV infection and subjects’ knowledge of methods to limit virus exposure and the routes of ZIKV transmission. Findings were correlated with socio-demographic variables.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study was performed at the University Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine of Jundiaí, a regional center specializing in gynecology, obstetrics, and pediatrics. The municipality of Jundiaí has 423,000 inhabitants [22].

2.2. Study Design

We conducted a cross-sectional study, part of the Thematic Project: “Vertical infection by the ZIKA virus and its impact on the mother-child area”, a Cohort Study that recruited women with high-risk pregnancies between March 2016 and August 2017 [23,24]. The inclusion criteria were (1) high-risk pregnant women, defined as pregnancies more likely to have an adverse outcome due to previous pregnancy loss or preterm delivery, preexisting autoimmune, hormonal or hypertensive conditions, the presence of hormonal, infectious, or hypertensive disorders in the current pregnancy, or maternal age <16 or >35 [25], (2) participation in the Thematic Project, and (3) residents of Jundiaí. The exclusion criteria were women with life-threatening conditions and those unable to provide written, informed consent.

2.3. Study Instrument and Variables

A pilot study was conducted starting in January 2017 with the objectives of training the team of researchers, evaluating subjects’ understanding of the questions, and estimating the duration of the interviews. This training lasted two months and each interview lasted an average of 25 min. After the pilot test, we finalized a semi-structured questionnaire, based on recommendations indicated by the World Health Organization (WHO) [26], with the conceptual framework adapted for the study [19,27] (Figure 1). The questionnaire evaluated the following aspects: (1) socio-demographic characteristics: age, race, marital status, educational level, paid work, and people per room in the household, (2) epidemiological and organizational variables: contact with other arboviruses, travel to possible risk areas, and receiving calls from the Cohort (for internal control and active search for complications), (3) prevention: use of condoms and insect repellent, (4) knowledge about ZIKV transmission routes (sexual, vertical, insect vector), and (5) guidelines on how to acquire the knowledge and means to prevent ZIKV acquisition (health professionals, television, internet, newspaper, radio, family, or friends).
The final questionnaire was given to 315 subjects from April 2017 to February 2018 by previously trained researchers during a scheduled prenatal visit of women in the Cohort. After application of the questionnaire, all subjects received ZIKV prevention guidelines and other pertinent recommendations about the disease, as well as free distribution of insect repellents and condoms.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Collected data were entered into an Excel spreadsheet and analyzed through Statistical Package of Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics 23, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Cases with missing data were automatically dropped from each analysis by SPSS. The dependent variables in the study were: orientation about ZIKV prevention, use of insect repellent, use of condoms, and presence of ZIKV infection. ZIKV infection was defined as detection of ZIKV RNA by RT-PCR or identification of specific IgM antibodies by ELISA, as described in the cohort profile [23]. After a descriptive analysis, the covariates were categorized and/or dichotomized for statistical analysis [28]. To compare dependent and covariates, data were analyzed by the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of each dependent variable: ZIKV positivity, orientation of preventive measures, and repellent and condom use. We used univariate logistic regression, and variables with a p value <0.20 were entered into the multivariate analysis. The confidence interval adopted was 95%. The Hosmer and Lemeshow Test was used to verify adherence of the models, considered a poor fit if the p value was <0.05.

2.5. Ethical Approval

This study was approved in the domain of the Jundiaí Zika Cohort by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of Jundiaí (CAAE 53248616200005412, protocol number 1446577, 10 March 2016); Ethics and Research Review Committee (WHO ERC), World Health Organization (ZIKV100/2018). All research was conducted within ethical standards and the confidentiality of all information was ensured to maintain the privacy of the participants.

3. Results

3.1. Study Population Characteristics

Characteristics of study participants are shown in Table 1. Median age was 27.9 years (range: 13–46 years). Most of the subjects were White (52.1%) or mixed race (34.8%). Most (78.6%) were either married or in stable relationships and 41.5% had a high school education. Crowded housing conditions (≥1 person per room) were reported by 55.4% of subjects, 46.2% worked outside of the home, and 32.4% were having their first pregnancy.

3.2. Guidance about ZIKV Prevention

Information about ZIKV prevention and transmission and the sources of knowledge are displayed in Table 2. Knowledge about modes of ZIKV transmission was acknowledged by 85.9% of the subjects. Most (83.8%) knew that the virus was transmitted by mosquitoes, 42.8% were aware that ZIKV could be sexually transmitted, and 42.1% knew that a pregnant woman could transmit the virus to her unborn baby. The majority of the women obtained information about ZIKV either from a health professional (66.4%) or from television (59.4%).
The use of insect repellent was reported by 53% of participants. We identified an increased likelihood to use insect repellent if the participants had higher than an eighth-grade education (p = 0.014, adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 2.114, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.162, 3.844) and had been personally instructed to do so by health professionals (p = 0.001, aOR 2.855, 95% CI 1.515, 5.380). The complete analysis is shown in Table S1. The Hosmer and Lemeshow Test yielded a p value of 0.875. Condom use during pregnancy was reported by 19.5% of the subjects, and absence of this use was associated with receiving ZIKV information via television (p = 0.049, aOR 0.493, 95% CI 0.244, 0.997). The complete analysis is shown in Table S2. The Hosmer and Lemeshow Test p value was 0.473.

3.3. ZIKV Infection

Thirty-four (10.8%) of the women were positive for ZIKV, 97.1% detected by RT-PCR and 2.9% by identification of specific IgM antibodies. The prevalence of ZIKV infection was similar among women regardless of differences in socioeconomic variables, their use of prophylactic measures, or knowledge about ZIKV transmission (Table 3). The complete analysis is shown in Table S3.

4. Discussion

The results of our study indicate that, even in the middle of a viral epidemic, the group most susceptible to adverse consequences, high-risk pregnant women, were seriously under-informed about the consequences of ZIKV infection and means of prevention. Use of insect repellent or condoms, receiving guidance on prevention, and knowledge about routes of transmission were reported by only a limited number of subjects, 10.8% of whom were ZIKV-positive. This highlights the inadequacy of current public health measures and the need for improved means of communication to the general public. Paralleling findings from other studies [29,30,31], the transmission of ZIKV by an insect vector was known to a greater number of subjects than were the perinatal and sexual transmission pathways. The use of repellents by approximately half of the participants was similar to previous studies of pregnant women conducted in Martinique (49.5%) [32] and Brazil (56%) [33] and different from what was found in the US Virgin Islands, where 74% of the pregnant women reported using repellent [34]. The use of repellents was associated with higher levels of education and receiving direct guidance from health professionals. This was also consistent with findings from prior studies [33,35,36]. This reinforces the need for comprehensive educational campaigns and widely available information [37], appropriate to the social cultural condition of target population [20,38].
While an enhanced access to information translates to a higher level of prevention [32,39], socioeconomic and cultural conditions are additional highly relevant variables that can directly reflect individuals’ attitudes and prevention practices [40]. The cost of insect repellent may be one of the obstacles to its use [33,35]. Programs that include free distribution of preventative items is an effective method in the control of infections, especially in populations with few resources, as has already been observed in a study from Puerto Rico [41]. However, in our study, repellents were freely available at no cost. Additional factors must, therefore, be involved in low adherence, such as the absence of frequent reinforcement of its importance and a low level of understanding of the consequences of infection [42].
The use of condoms to prevent transmission of ZIKV during sexual intercourse was infrequently used in our population. Consistent with prior studies [32,34,37,39], condom usage for a reason other than contraception is understandably unpopular. Being a participant in a stable union was associated with the absence of condom usage, repeating findings from another Brazilian study [43]. We also observed a weak association between non-use of condoms and receiving knowledge about ZIKV from television. Again, this is likely related to an aversion to recommending condoms to couples in which the woman is already pregnant.
Dissemination of information by television has a recognized role in reducing the risk of arbovirus infections in Brazil [44] and, in the present study, this was the second most common method of receiving prevention guidance. Wakefield et al. [45] recommended strategies that could improve the success of information transmission by television: a more frequent and more widespread exposure to information and messages based on an understanding of the types of presentation most likely to appeal to the target audience. An improved understanding of ZIKV-related knowledge and the means of acquisition in a specific population can assist in development and restructuring of public health policies to improve strategies for the prevention, combat, and surveillance of ZIKV infection [10,46].
Findings from this study should be viewed in light of several limitations. The study sample represented a specific population of high-risk pregnant women who were users of the public health system. Therefore, the results may not be generalizable to other populations. The data that we obtained were cross sectional, which did not allow for causal inference, and were based on self-report. This may have introduced measurement error from recall bias or social desirability.

5. Conclusions

Current public health measures to educate our high-risk pregnant population about the modes of ZIKV transmission and how to prevent exposure were clearly inadequate. The frequency of ZIKV infection was 10.8% and knowledge was very limited. This lack of understanding about ZIKV and insufficient practice of disease prevention indicates the need for continuous reassessment to improve educational strategies in public health. Novel and improved strategies to increase awareness of ZIKV infection and its consequences, designed to appeal to specific, targeted populations, are clearly necessary to more accurately educate and lower the incidence of ZIKV infection and its consequences in vulnerable groups.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/2/242/s1, Table S1: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis showing associations between variables and use of insect repellent; Table S2: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis showing associations between variables and use of condom; Table S3: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of associations between variables and ZIKV infection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.D.P. and L.C.P.; methodology, S.D.P., L.C.P., S.S.W., and L.R.D.; formal analysis, S.D.P. and L.C.P.; investigation, L.R.D., M.M.D.R., R.d.C.A.B.D., and R.E.G.; resources, R.d.C.A.B.D., M.M.D.R., and A.P.A.P.B.; data curation, S.D.P. and L.C.P.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C.P., L.R.D., R.d.C.A.B.D., and M.M.D.R.; writing—review and editing, S.D.P., S.S.W., A.P.A.P.B., and R.E.G.; visualization, L.C.P., A.P.A.P.B., and R.E.G.; supervision, S.D.P. and A.P.A.P.B.; project administration, S.D.P.; funding acquisition, S.D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), grant number 2016/08578-0.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved in the domain of the Jundiaí Zika Cohort by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of Jundiaí (CAAE 53248616200005412, protocol number 1446577, 10 March 2016); Ethics and Research Review Committee (WHO ERC), World Health Organization (ZIKV100/2018). All research was conducted within ethical standards and the confidentiality of all information was ensured to maintain the privacy of the participants.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the patients and patient advisers involved in the Jundiaí Zika Cohort: Alexandra Siqueira Melo, Alify Silva, Antônio Fernandes Moron, Antoni Soriano-Arandes, Bruna P. Alves, Carmen Figueiredo, Clóvis Antônio L. Pinto, Danila Soares Tambalo, Diego Lima, Dirce Takako Fujiwara, Dora Fix Ventura, Eduardo Roberto Bagni, Emmanuel M. Oliveira, Fernanda Guerra Velasco, Fernando N. Arita, Gabriel Zanquetta, Geovanne R. dos Santos, Julia R. Galdeano, Juliana Paula G. de Almeida, Karen R. Camandulli, Leonardo Ideal, Lourival Oliveira, Luiz Baran, Márcia Borges Machado, Maria de Fatima Rizzo, Matheus Sene, Mayara Zatz, Maria Amélia Farrão, Melina Di Trani, Mirella B. Leite, Natalia Vieira, Nemésio Florence Filho, Nuria Sanchez Clemente, Paloma Rocillo, Patricia C. Loiola, Raianny de Oliveira, Raquel Prestes, Raphael Prudente, Renata Jordão, Sandra Helena A. Bonon, Sergio Rosemberg, Sergio Vranjec, Tania M. Quintella, Tathiana Ghisi de Souza, Thamirys Gillo Fajardo, Viviam Paiva, and Viviane Cristina M. Pandini.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Vector-Borne Diseases. 2016. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs387/en/ (accessed on 2 April 2017).
  2. Chang, C.; Ortiz, K.; Ansari, A.; Gershwin, M.E. The Zika outbreak of the 21st century. J. Autoimmun. 2016, 68, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. World Health Organization. WHO Director-General Summarizes the Outcome of the Emergency Committee Regarding Clusters of Microcephaly and Guillain-Barré Syndrome. 2016. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/01-02-2016-who-director-general-summarizes-the-outcome-of-the-emergency-committee-regarding-clusters-of-microcephaly-and-guillain-barr%C3%A9-syndrome (accessed on 3 April 2017).
  4. Brazil. Ministry of Health. Boletim Epidemiológico 48: Monitoramento dos Casos de Arboviroses Urbanas Transmitidas Pelo Aedes Aegypti (Dengue, Chikungunya e Zika), Semanas Epidemiológicas 1 a 46, Volume 51. 2020. Available online: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/media/pdf/2020/dezembro/11/boletim_epidemiologico_svs_48.pdf (accessed on 18 January 2021).
  5. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinical Guidance for Healthcare Providers for Prevention of Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus. 2019. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/zika/hc-providers/clinical-guidance/sexualtransmission.html (accessed on 19 May 2019).
  6. MacDonald, P.D.M.; Holden, E.W. Zika and public health: Understanding the epidemiology and information environment. Pediatrics 2018, 141, S137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Schwartz, D.A. Viral infection, proliferation, and hyperplasia of Hofbauer cells and absence of inflammation characterize the placental pathology of fetuses with congenital Zika virus infection. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2017, 295, 1361–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Siqueira Mello, A.; Pascalicchio Bertozzi, A.; Rodrigues, M.; Gazeta, R.E.; Moron, A.F.; Soriano-Arandes, A.; Sarmento, S.; Vedovello, D.; Silva, A.; Grillo Fajardo, T.C.; et al. Development of secondary microcephaly after delivery: Possible consequence of mother-baby transmission of Zika virus in breast milk. Am. J. Case Rep. 2019, 20, 723–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Paz-Bailey, G.; Rosenberg, E.S.; Doyle, K.; Munoz-Jordan, J.; Santiago, G.A.; Klein, L.; Perez-Padilla, J.; Medina, F.A.; Waterman, S.H.; Gubern, C.G.; et al. Persistence of Zika virus in body fluids—Final report. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 379, 1234–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rather, I.A.; Kumar, S.; Bajpai, V.K.; Lim, J.; Park, Y.H. Prevention and control strategies to counter ZIKA epidemic. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schwartz, D.A. The origins and emergence of Zika Virus, the newest torch infection: What’s old is new again. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2017, 141, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Nithiyanantham, S.F.; Badawi, A. Maternal infection with Zika virus and prevalence of congenital disorders in infants: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Can. J. Public Health 2019, 110, 638–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nielsen-Saines, K.; Brasil, P.; Kerin, T.; Vasconcelos, Z.; Gabaglia, C.R.; Damasceno, L.; Pone, M.; Abreu de Carvalho, L.M.; Pone, S.M.; Zin, A.A.; et al. Delayed childhood neurodevelopment and neurosensory alterations in the second year of life in a prospective cohort of ZIKV-exposed children. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1213–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bailey, D.B., Jr.; Ventura, L.O. The likely impact of congenital Zika syndrome on families: Considerations for family supports and services. Pediatrics 2018, 141, S180–S187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Alfaro-Murillo, J.A.; Parpia, A.S.; Fitzpatrick, M.C.; Tamagnan, J.A.; Medlock, J.; Ndeffo-Mbah, M.L.; Fish, D.; Ávila-Agüero, M.L.; Marín, R.; Ko, A.I.; et al. A cost-effectiveness tool for informing policies on Zika virus control. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Noor, R.; Ahmed, T. Zika virus: Epidemiological study and its association with public health risk. J. Infect. Public Health 2018, 11, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Piltch-Loeb, R.; Merdjanoff, A.A.; Bhanja, A.; Abramson, D.M. Support for vector control strategies in the United States during the Zika outbreak in 2016: The role of risk perception, knowledge, and confidence in government. Prev. Med. 2019, 119, 52–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. World Health Organization. Zika Strategic Response Framework and Joint Operations Plan. January–June 2016. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/204420 (accessed on 2 April 2017).
  19. Kumar, S.; Preetha, G. Health promotion: An effective tool for global health. Indian J. Community Med. 2012, 37, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Garcia Serpa Osorio-de-Castro, C.; Silva Miranda, E.; Machado de Freitas, C.; Rochel de Camargo, K.; Cranmer, H.H. The Zika virus outbreak in Brazil: Knowledge gaps and challenges for risk reduction. Am. J. Public Health 2017, 107, 960–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alvarado, M.G.; Schwartz, D.A. Zika virus infection in pregnancy, microcephaly, and maternal and fetal health: What we think, what we know, and what we think we know. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2017, 141, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). Cidades. Jundiaí Panorama. 2020. Available online: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/sp/jundiai/panorama (accessed on 5 September 2020).
  23. Clemente, N.S.; Rodrigues, M.; Pascalicchio, A.P.; Gazeta, R.E.; Vedovello, D.; Brickley, E.B.; De Almeida, M.F.; Passos, S.D. Cohort profile: The Jundiaí Zika cohort (JZC), a pregnancy and birth cohort in São Paulo state, Brazil. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e027947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Clemente, N.S.; Brickley, E.B.; Paixão, E.S.; De Almeida, M.F.; Gazeta, R.E.; Vedovello, D.; Rodrigues, L.C.; Witkin, S.S.; Passos, S.D. Zika virus infection in pregnancy and adverse fetal outcomes in São Paulo State, Brazil: A prospective cohort study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Brazil. Ministry of Health. Gestação de Alto Risco—Manual Técnico 5. ed., 2012. (In Brazilian). Available online: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/manual_tecnico_gestacao_alto_risco.pdf (accessed on 1 November 2017).
  26. World Health Organization. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice Surveys: Zika Virus Disease and Potential Complications: Resource Pack. 2016. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/204689/WHO_ZIKV_RCCE_16.2_eng.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2017).
  27. Solar, O.; Irwin, A. A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health; WHO Document Production Services: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  28. Blake, K.; Kellerson, R.; Simic, A. Measuring Overcrowding in Housing; Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  29. Argüelles-Nava, V.G.; Alvarez-Bañuelos, M.T.; Córdoba-Suárez, D.; Sampieri, C.L.; Ortiz-León, M.C.; Riande-Juárez, G.; Montero, H. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices about Zika among a university community located in an endemic zone In Mexico. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Cheema, S.; Maisonneuve, P.; Weber, I.; Fernandez-Luque, L.; Abraham, A.; Alrouh, H.; Sheikh, J.; Lowenfels, A.B.; Mamtani, R. Knowledge and perceptions about Zika virus in a Middle East country. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Borges, A.L.V.; Moreau, C.; Burke, A.; Dos Santos, O.A.; Chofakian, C.B. Women’s reproductive health knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to the Zika virus outbreak in northeast Brazil. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0190024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Delet, J.; Cabié, A.; Merle, S.; Voluménie, J.L.; Monthieux, A. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of pregnant women in Martinique in the immediate aftermath of the Zika virus outbreak. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2018, 222, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dantas Melo, V.A.; Santos Silva, J.R.; La Corte, R. Use of mosquito repellents to protect against Zika virus infection among pregnant women in Brazil. Public Health 2019, 171, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Prue, C.E.; Roth, J.N., Jr.; Garcia-Williams, A.; Yoos, A.; Camperlengo, L.; DeWilde, L.; Lamtahri, M.; Prosper, A.; Harrison, C.; Witbart, L.; et al. Awareness, beliefs, and actions concerning Zika virus among pregnant women and community members—U.S. Virgin Islands, November–December 2016. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2017, 66, 909–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Melo, V.A.D.; Silva, J.R.S.; Corte, R.L. Personal protective measures of pregnant women against Zika virus infection. Rev. Saúde Publ. 2019, 53, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Pooransingh, S.; Parasram, R.; Nandram, N.; Bhagwandeen, B.; Dialsingh, I. Zika virus disease-knowledge, attitudes and practices among pregnant women-implications for public health practice. Public Health 2018, 165, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nelson, E.J.; Luetke, M.C.; Kianersi, S.; Willis, E.; Rosenberg, M. Knowledge and perceptions of Zika virus transmission in the community of Puerto Plata, Dominican Republic. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Causa, R.; Ochoa-Díaz-López, H.; Dor, A.; Rodríguez-León, F.; Solís-Hernández, R.; Pacheco-Soriano, A.L. Emerging arboviruses (dengue, chikungunya, and Zika) in Southeastern Mexico: Influence of socio-environmental determinants on knowledge and practices. Cad. Saúde Publ. 2020, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Samuel, G.; DiBartolo-Cordovano, R.; Taj, I.; Merriam, A.; Lopez, J.M.; Torres, C.; Lantigua, R.A.; Morse, S.S.; Chang, B.; Gyamfi, C.; et al. A survey of the knowledge, attitudes and practices on Zika virus in New York City. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Whiteman, A.; Mejia, A.; Hernandez, I.; Loaiza, J.R. Socioeconomic and demographic predictors of resident knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding arthropod-borne viruses in Panama. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Earle-Richardson, G.; Prue, C.; Turay, K.; Thomas, D. Influences of community interventions on Zika prevention behaviors of pregnant women, Puerto Rico, July 2016–June 2017. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 2251–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Hasler, T.; Fehr, J.; Held, U.; Schlagenhauf, P. Use of repellents by travellers: A randomized, quantitative analysis of applied dosage and an evaluation of knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP). Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2019, 28, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tsuyuki, K.; Gipson, J.D.; Barbosa, R.M.; Urada, L.A.; Morisky, D.E. Preventing syndemic Zika virus, HIV/STIs and unintended pregnancy: Dual method use and consistent condom use among Brazilian women in marital and civil unions. Cult. Health Sex. 2018, 20, 1006–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Alves, A.C.; Fabbro, A.L.; Passos, A.D.; Carneiro, A.F.; Jorge, T.M.; Martinez, E.Z. Knowledge and practices related to dengue and its vector: A community-based study from Southeast Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2016, 49, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wakefield, M.A.; Loken, B.; Hornik, R.C. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet 2010, 376, 1261–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Silva, N.M.; Santos, N.C.; Martins, I.C. Dengue and Zika viruses: Epidemiological history, potential therapies, and promising vaccines. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2020, 5, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Conceptual Framework.
Figure 1. Conceptual Framework.
Viruses 13 00242 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of total study population.
Table 1. Characteristics of total study population.
Characteristics of Pregnant Women
Median age (range)27.9 (13–46) years
Marital status
Stable partnership40.1%
Married38.5%
Single18.8%
Divorced1.6%
Widowed1.0%
Race
White52.1%
Mixed race34.8%
Black11.5%
Asian1.0%
Indian0.6%
Education
Elementary school4.1%
Middle school18.9%
Some high school18.8%
Completed high school41.5%
Attended college16.6%
Employed outside the home46.2%
≥1 persons per room55.4%
First pregnancy32.4%
Table 2. Knowledge about ZIKV transmission.
Table 2. Knowledge about ZIKV transmission.
VariableParametersValues
Transmission
Insect vector83.8%
Perinatal42.1%
Sexual intercourse42.8%
Source of knowledge
Health professional66.4%
Television59.4%
Internet30.6%
Newspapers13.5%
Friends or family7.9%
Radio6.1%
Table 3. Association between variables and ZIKV infection.
Table 3. Association between variables and ZIKV infection.
VariableParametersZIKV Detection
PositiveNegative
Marital status
Stable union82.4%78.2%
No stable partner17.6%21.8%
Age
<3585.3%79.7%
≥3514.7%20.3%
Education
≤8 years44.1%41.6%
>8 years55.9%58.4%
Race
White55.9%51.6%
Other44.1%48.4%
Work outside the home
Yes47.1%46.0%
Persons per room
<139.4%45.3%
≥160.6%54.7%
Primigravid 41.2%31.3%
Insect repellent usage 64.7%51.6%
Condom usage 17.6%19.7%
Knowledge of ZIKV transmission *
Insect vector93.1%82.8%
Perinatal48.3%41.4%
Sexual intercourse58.6%41.0%
Source of knowledge *
Health professional70.8%65.9%
Television70.8%58.0%
Internet41.7%29.3%
* Column percentages do not total 100% because categories are not mutually exclusive.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pires, L.C.; Dantas, L.R.; Witkin, S.S.; Bertozzi, A.P.A.P.; Dezena, R.d.C.A.B.; Rodrigues, M.M.D.; Gazeta, R.E.; Passos, S.D. Knowledge of Zika Virus Transmission and Its Prevention among High-Risk Pregnant Women in Brazil. Viruses 2021, 13, 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13020242

AMA Style

Pires LC, Dantas LR, Witkin SS, Bertozzi APAP, Dezena RdCAB, Rodrigues MMD, Gazeta RE, Passos SD. Knowledge of Zika Virus Transmission and Its Prevention among High-Risk Pregnant Women in Brazil. Viruses. 2021; 13(2):242. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13020242

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pires, Lucas C., Luiza R. Dantas, Steven S. Witkin, Ana Paula A. P. Bertozzi, Rita de Cássia A. B. Dezena, Maria M. D. Rodrigues, Rosa Estela Gazeta, and Saulo D. Passos. 2021. "Knowledge of Zika Virus Transmission and Its Prevention among High-Risk Pregnant Women in Brazil" Viruses 13, no. 2: 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13020242

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop