Next Article in Journal
Modulus of Elasticity and Bending Strength of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Wood from Commercial Thinnings
Previous Article in Journal
Rapid Warming Exacerbates Winter Drought Stress in Trees at High-Altitude Areas in Northeast China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Screening and Expression Characteristics of Plant Type Regulatory Genes in Salix psammophila
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/f15030566
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Terpene Compound Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils from Needles of Pinus densiflora, Pinus koraiensis, Abies holophylla, and Juniperus chinensis by Harvest Period

by
Eunjin Kim
1,
Suyeon Yang
2,
Byeong Bae Jeon
3,
Eugene Song
4 and
Hwayong Lee
5,*
1
Department of Forest Therapy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
3
Suwon R & D Center, Hanbit Flavor and Fragrance, Suwon 16681, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Consumer Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
5
Department of Forest Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(3), 566; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15030566
Submission received: 26 February 2024 / Revised: 14 March 2024 / Accepted: 19 March 2024 / Published: 20 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tree Traits and Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plant resources are used as raw materials in various industries related to humans, such as edible, medicinal, taste, and flavor industries, depending on processes such as drying, processing, and collection period. In this study, we investigated the terpene compound composition and antioxidant activity of essential oils extracted from the needles of Pinus densiflora, Pinus koraiensis, Abies holophylla, and Juniperus chinensis collected in the harvest period (February, April, July, and October) planted on the campus of Chungbuk National University. The essential oil was separated by hydrodistillation. According to the analysis results of gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, the terpene compounds changed depending on the season and tree species. The proportions of monoterpene and sesquiterpene classes in the needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis changed depending on the harvest period. The antioxidant activity by DPPH and ABTS assays varied depending on the species and seasons, and needles harvested from P. koraiensis showed the highest activity in all harvest periods. High antioxidant activity has been confirmed even at low concentrations in pine trees, so it is expected to play a role as a natural antioxidant. Additionally, since the composition of terpene compounds varies depending on the harvesting time and species, it is expected to have various uses in the pharmaceutical, cosmetics, and food industries.

1. Introduction

Essential oils are a mixture of plant secondary metabolites [1] and are volatile aromatic substances composed of bioactive compounds synthesized for self-defense against external environmental threats [2]. Unlike humans and animals, plants have a unique defense mechanism that protects themselves from harmful microorganisms, including herbivores, by secreting low-molecular-weight compounds called secondary metabolites. This compound is concentrated in the essential oil of the plant, and its medicinal properties also treat human diseases [3]. Essential oils are obtained from plant organs such as leaves, bark, roots, flowers, fruit, and seeds [4], and the yield of essential oils is generally known to be less than 1% of the plant [2,5]. Essential oils are mostly composed of terpenes and can be divided into alcohols, esters, aldehydes, ketones, phenols, and ethers, depending on the functional group [6].
Terpenes, the largest group of essential oils, are used for various medicinal purposes, and their uses are not limited to scent, taste, or color [7]. In modern medicine, terpene compounds are used to achieve antiplasmodial [8], antioxidant [9], hypoglycemic and hypolipemic [10], antiviral [11], anticancer [12], and antidepressant [13] activities. Because of these effects, terpenes derived from medicinal plants have been widely used in natural folk remedies as antipyretics, cough suppressants, analgesics, antiemetics, and antidiarrheals [14]. In particular, there are commonly used plants, such as tea, thyme, Spanish sage, citrus fruit, etc., which offer a variety of medicinal values [15]. In addition, tea tree’s volatile essential oil is known for its antibacterial properties and acts as an active ingredient in the treatment of skin infections [16], and terpenes synthesized from cannabis have also been used medicinally for a long time [15]. In addition to their medicinal effects, essential oils are used in the cosmetics industry. Fragrances play a particularly important role in increasing the attractiveness of cosmetics, and a pleasant smell affects the comfort and effectiveness of the product and has a significant impact on the overall evaluation of the cosmetic product [17]. Because the use of aromatic and chemical compounds in natural vegetable oils requires high costs, most industries use synthetic fragrances that imitate them, and these synthetic fragrances may not be safe for application to humans [18]. Essential oils have an attractive scent and no side effects; therefore, they are used to treat skin diseases, and their demand is increasing in the cosmetics industry because they are suitable as skin care products [19]. Consumers are expecting minimal side effects from skin care products and effective prevention and treatment effects [20]. More recently, consumers have demanded a switch to natural cosmetics with natural ingredients compared to conventional cosmetics derived from chemical products [21]. In addition, essential oils have antibacterial [22] and anti-fungal [23] properties against pathogenic fungi and bacteria; therefore, they have the potential to replace synthetic additives [24]. Essential oil is a masking agent that prevents unpleasant odors and is used in folk medicine and aromatherapy as a natural treatment for depression, anxiety, insomnia, and stress caused by changes in the living environment [19]. Famous cosmetic brands use a variety of essential oils in their cosmetics, and the most expensive perfumes contain pure essential oils, giving them a special and unique scent, making them unique as exclusive perfumes [25]. The main markets for essential oils are pharmaceuticals (15%), cosmetics and aromatherapy (29%), and beverages and foods (35%) [17]. In the pharmaceutical industry, medicines in the form of capsules, syrups, ointments, creams, and sprays contain some essential oil ingredients, and their production is continuously increasing [26]. Essential oils are used in the cosmetics industry as antioxidants [27,28] and for care [29], cleansing [30], and protection of skin [31]. In addition, we are attempting to apply it to the food industry as a natural preservative using nanoencapsulation, active packaging, and polymer-based coating [32].
One of the important sources of essential oils is coniferous trees, which have significant economic value in terms of wood production and are important for construction and other uses, such as pulp and paper [33]. Coniferous species such as Pinus densiflora, P. koraiensis, Abies holophylla, and Juniperus chinensis are distributed throughout Northeast Asia, including Korea [34]. P. densiflora is used in medicine [2], food [35], and cosmetics industries [36]. Essential oil extracted from P. densiflora wood has been reported to exhibit anti-inflammatory activity [2]. In P. koraiensis, essential oil extracted from the needles has been reported to have anti-fatigue activity [37], essential oil extracted from wood has anti-inflammatory properties [38], and essential oil extracted from cones has been reported to have anti-tumor activity [39]. Essential oil extracted from A. holophylla needles has been reported to have antibacterial activity against respiratory bacteria [40], while essential oil extracted from J. chinensis needles is known to induce apoptosis [41] and has also been reported to exhibit antibacterial activity [42]. Therefore, essential oils derived from P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis have antibacterial properties and excellent industrial value.
Antioxidation is the action of preventing or removing excessive production of free radicals. Active oxygen is oxygen that is created when oxygen enters the body through breathing and undergoes metabolic processes within the body. When it increases rapidly, it promotes cellular oxidation and attacks human tissues, causing damage to cell structure, loss of cell function, DNA damage, aging, inflammation, and various diseases [43,44]. In a previous study, essential oils were evaluated for their natural antioxidant effects in neutralizing unstable substances called free radicals [45], and Ruberto & Baratta [46] compared the antioxidant activities of 98 essential oil components and reported differences in the activity of each component.
The composition of essential oil compounds varies depending on the growth stage of the plant [47,48]. Additionally, climate changes such as rapid temperature rise and drought also affect the production of secondary metabolites [49]. Therefore, for the use of essential oils, research on the seasonal changes in their compounds is necessary.
In this study, to explore the applicability of essential oils, essential oils were extracted seasonally from the needles of evergreen coniferous species P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis, and changes in seasonal compounds and antioxidant activity of each extracted essential oil were investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Essential Oil Extraction

The sample needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis used in this experiment were collected from the major branches of trees about 12 m tall that were previously planted and managed at the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences of Chungbuk National University (N 36°37′42.42″, E 127°27′13.08″) during 8–11 February (February), 19–22 April (April), 4–7 July (July), 24–27 October (October), and in 2022. Since the production of secondary metabolites in plants is the result of interactions between various factors, in this study, essential oils from needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis planted in the same location were collected at different times. The sample was finely crushed immediately after collection, then 500 g of the crushed sample was mixed with 1.5 L of distilled water, distilled at 100 °C for 2 h using hydrodistillation, and the essential oil was separated through a cooling process.

2.2. Compounds Analysis of Essential Oils

Identification and quantification of essential oil compounds extracted from the needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis were used by modifying the method of Guleria et al. [50], and Mothana et al. [51]. The temperature conditions of the GC (Agilent 8890 GC, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) were from an initial temperature of 50 °C, raised to 230 °C at a rate of 3 °C/min, and maintained at 230 °C for 5 min. The column used was DB-5MS UI (30 m length, 0.25 mm dia., 0.25 μm Film). A GC-MSD (Agilent 5977 B GC/MSD, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to identify the components. The operating conditions of the MSD were ion source temperature of 350 °C, ionization voltage of 70 eV, and mass scan range (mass/charge) of 40~500 m/z. Each component was identified through comparative analysis with the NIST17 library and compared with information reported in the literature [52] (Table 1).
Essential oils were identified by the relative amount (%) of each compound and expressed as a percentage of the peak area relative to the total peak area. The relative peak area (%) of all compounds was greater than 0.1%, and the quality was greater than 90%.

2.3. HaCaT Cell Viability

HaCaT cells (HaCaT-immortalized human keratinocytes) were purchased from AddexBio Technologies (San Diego, CA, USA) and subcultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in DMEM medium containing 10% FBS and 1% P/S. Cell viability was measured using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) colorimetric assay. HaCaT cells were dispensed into a 96-well plate at 1 × 105 cells/mL, and samples of different concentrations were mixed and cultured at 37° C and 5% CO2 incubator for 24 h. When the cells were 80%–90% confluent, the essential oil extracted from P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis needles were diluted and treated at concentrations of 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 µL/mL. After 24 h of incubation, the culture medium was removed, washed twice with PBS, and the washed cells were treated with 100 µL of MTT solution (0.5 mg/mL) and further cultured in a 37 °C and 5% CO2 incubator for 60 min. The MTT solution of cells after additional incubation was removed, treated with 100 µL of DMSO, and incubated for 30 min. Afterward, the absorbance was measured at 595 nm using a microplate reader (Mobi, Microdigital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea).

2.4. Antioxidant Activity

For antioxidant activity, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS) free radical scavenging assay were used. The DPPHand ABTS assay was a modification of the method used by Torres-Martínez et al. [53]. Considering industrial use through HaCaT cell viability, each sample was prepared by diluting it in ethanol at concentrations of 12.5, 25, and 50 µL/mL [54]. For the DPPH assay, 0.2 mM DPPH solution and sample were mixed in the same ratio (1:1), cultured in the dark for 30 min, and absorbance was measured at 517 nm using a microplate reader (Mobi, Microdigital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea). ABTS assay was performed by mixing 7 mM ABTS solution and 2.45 mM Potassium persulfate solution in the same ratio (1:1) and reacting for 16 h at room temperature in dark conditions, and 20 μL of the sample of each concentration and 180 μL of ABTS solution were mixed, cultured in the dark for 30 min, and measured at 734 nm. Each measurement was repeated three times, and each method was calculated using the formulas shown below. The control group was treated with ascorbic acid at the same concentration as the sample.
% of antioxidant activity = [(Ac − As)/Ac] × 100
where Ac: Control reaction absorbance; As: Testing specimen absorbance.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The collected data were analyzed using the SPSS Statistics ver.18 program. ANOVA analysis was performed to compare the antioxidant activity of each coniferous species by concentration, and Tukey HSD was used as a post hoc test to compare the antioxidant activity of each coniferous species.

3. Results

3.1. Research Site and Essential Oil Extraction

The location where the trees used in this experiment were planted (N 36°37’42.42″, E 127°27’13.08″) is a temperate continental climate area with four distinct seasons, with a hot and humid summer and a cold and dry climate in the winter, with an annual average of The temperature is 13.1 °C and the average annual relative humidity is 64%. In 2022, the average temperature was −0.9 °C, and the average relative humidity was 52% in February. The average temperature was 15.2 °C, and the average relative humidity was 48% in April. The average temperature was 27.6 °C, and the average relative humidity was 72% in July, and the average temperature was 15.1 °C, and the average relative humidity was 64% in October [55]. The soil in this area was sandy loam (60.3%), silt (24%), clay (15.4%), pH 6.0, organic matter 17.9 g/kg, and available phosphorus 355.6 mg/kg [56]. The average recovery rate of each essential oil was ca. 0.35%, and the recovery rate of essential oil extracted in October was the highest at ca. 0.48%. The essential oil recovery rate by species was highest in A. holophylla species, with an average essential oil recovery rate of 0.49 ± 0.25. The weather conditions and essential oil recovery rates for each harvest day are as follows (Table 2).

3.2. Terpene Compound by Each Harvest Period of Essential Oils Extracted from Needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis

The chemical compounds that accounted for more than 0.1% of the essential oils extracted from the needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis by harvest period are shown in Table S1 and Figure 1. From essential oil compounds extracted from P. densiflora needles, the proportion of monoterpenes was 71.41% in February, 49.79% in April, 56.48% in July, and 66.86% in October, and the proportion of sesquiterpenes was 28.59% in February, 47.21% in April, 42.06% in July, and 33.14% in October. Among the essential oil compounds extracted from P. koraiensis needles, the proportions of monoterpenes were 56.86% in February, 55.49% in April, 49.13% in July, and 41.81% in October, and the proportions of sesquiterpenes were 38.82% in February, 44.06% in April, 50.18% in July, and 56.77% in October. Among the essential oil compounds extracted from A. holophylla needles, the proportions of monoterpene and sesquiterpene were 45.49% and 54.51 in February, 63.05% and 36.95% in April, 61.17% and 38.83% in July, and 72.15% and 27.85 in October, respectively. Among the essential oil compounds extracted from juniper needles, the proportions of monoterpenes were 56.29% in February, 73.66% in April, 77.29% in July, and 73.33% in October, and the proportions of sesquiterpenes were 43.71% in February, 25.96% in April, 22.71% in July, and 26.67% in October (Figure 1).
Among the essential oils extracted from the needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis, the top 5 compounds were considered to be the main compounds and were compared based on the most abundant amounts for each harvest period. The main terpene compounds in essential oil extracted from P. densiflora needles were 3-Carene, β-Phellanderene, β-Pinene, D-Limonene, and Caryophyllene, and the main terpene compounds in essential oil extracted from P. koraiensis needles were γ-Terpinene, α-Pinene, Germacrene D, γ-Muurolene, and D-Limonene. The main terpene compounds in essential oil extracted from A. holophylla needles were 3-Carene, β-Bisabolene, D-Limonene, α-Pinene, and γ-Muurolene, and the main terpene compounds in essential oil extracted from the needles of the J. chinensis were 3-Carene, Terpineol, γ-Muurolene, α-Pinene, and Caryophyllene (Table 3).
Among the compounds in essential oils extracted from P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis, β-Myrcene, 3-Carene, Terpineol, α-Humulene, and γ-Muurolene were commonly identified in all tree species (Figure 2).

3.3. HaCaT Cell Viability

To confirm the concentration range of the antioxidant activity analysis of essential oil extracted from P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis needles, cell viability was measured by MTT assay using HaCaT cells. The cell viability was high at essential oil concentrations of 12.5 to 50 µL/mL, but when the concentration was higher than 100 µL/mL, essential oil extracted from P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis needles showed a cell viability of 49 to 74%. According to ISO 10993-5, if the cell viability exceeds 80%, it is considered non-cytotoxic, 60%~50% is classified as weak cytotoxicity, 40%~60% as moderate cytotoxicity, and under 40% as strong cytotoxicity [57]. Therefore, toxicity was confirmed at a concentration of 100 µL/mL. As a result, an antioxidant activity test was conducted at the non-toxic range of 12.5, 25, and 50 µL/mL concentrations of essential oil extracted from P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis needles (Figure 3).

3.4. Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils Extracted from Needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis by Each Harvest Period

The antioxidant activity of essential oils extracted seasonally from needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis was analyzed using 1,1-Diphenyl-2-Picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-Azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical scavenging assay and compared with ascorbic acid.
In the DPPH assay, the essential oil from P. densiflora needles harvested in July showed antioxidant activity similar to that of ascorbic acid at a concentration of 25 and 50 µL/mL, and July had the highest concentration at 12.5 µL/mL. In essential oil P. koraiensis needles, antioxidant activity was similar to that of ascorbic acid in July at a concentration of 12.5 µL/mL and in April, July, and October at a concentration of 25 µL/mL. Also, at concentrations of 25 and 50 µL/mL, the antioxidant activity was very high at over 80%, except for February at the 25 µL/mL concentration. Essential oils extracted from A. holophylla and J. chinensis needles had antioxidant activity similar to that of ascorbic acid in oils extracted from October and July at concentrations of 50 µL/mL, respectively (Figure 4).
Antioxidant activity using ABTS, P. koraiensis needles had similar activity to ascorbic acid at concentrations of 25 and 50 μL/mL at all harvest times. Essential oil extracted from P. densiflora needles had similar activity to ascorbic acid at concentrations of 25 and 50 μL/mL only in July. Essential oil harvested from needles of A. holophylla had lower activity than ascorbic acid at all harvest times and concentrations, and essential oil extracted from J. chinensis needles harvested and extracted in July and October had similar activity to ascorbic acid (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

In this study, essential oils were extracted from evergreen coniferous trees such as P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis, and the objective was to investigate changes in the composition and antioxidant activity of the essential oils depending on the collection period.
Essential oil extraction methods include the Soxhlet method, hot-air drying process (HD), and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) [58]. In this study, samples were collected and extracted using hydrodistillation for two hours to extract essential oils. The harvest rate of essential oil from the seeds of Tamarindus indica was higher with Soxhlet extraction than with hydrodistillation, but high-quality essential oil was obtained [59]. In the leaves of Eucalyptus camaldulensis, the yield was high using hydrodistillation, but the proportion of eucalyptol, a major compound, and antioxidant activity was high using supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) [60]. Depending on the condition of the leaves, 40 and 54 compounds were identified in fresh and dried leaves of Citrus sinensis, accounting for 91.5% and 99.6%, respectively, and the main compounds in fresh leaf essential oil were Sabinene (20.4%) and terpinene-4-ol (13.2%), and β-element (16.3%) and Sabinene (10.7%) were confirmed in the dried leaf essential oil [61]. Essential oils are considered to have different extraction cycles and compositions depending on the extraction method and sample conditions. In this study, fresh needles were extracted using hydrodistillation to confirm seasonal changes in essential oil composition and yield. In this study, the essential oil yield rate was highest when P. densiflora and J. chinensis were collected in the summer, P. koraiensis in fall, and A. holophylla in summer and fall. The composition of essential oils varies depending on the plant development stage [47,48], and climate changes such as rapid temperature rise and drought, also affect the production of secondary metabolites [49]. This study also shows changes in the production of essential oil compounds depending on the collection time and weather factors, so continuous monitoring is required.
Terpenes constitute the largest group of essential oils [7]. Terpenes are transparent in color, highly volatile, and have antibacterial, analgesic, and sterilizing effects [62]. Monoterpenes have several properties, including antiplasmodial activity, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anticancer, preservative, astringent, digestive, and diuretic properties [7]. Sesquiterpenes are used in the perfume and cosmetics industry and have antioxidant [63,64], anticancer, and anti-inflammatory properties [65]. In this study, monoterpene and sesquiterpene components were separated from the essential oils of four coniferous tree species, and monoterpenes were found to be more abundant than sesquiterpenes [2]. Differences in essential oil compounds were confirmed to depend on tree species and season [42,66,67,68,69].
When comparing the main compounds of essential oils by tree species and harvest period in this study with other studies, while there were different trends, similar results were also found. Kim et al. [70] and Park & Lee [67], reported that the main compounds of P. densiflora essential oil in summer are α-Humulene and Champhene, respectively, but in this study, Germacrene D was highest in July, the summer season. In this study, the main component of J. chinensis in April, July, and October, corresponding to spring, summer, and fall, was Terpineol, and the main component in winter was 3-Carene. However, in the study by Raina et al. [71], Sabinene was analyzed as the main compound in summer. The above research results showed a different trend from that of this study. In this study, in P. Koraiensis needles collected in spring, the main compounds in October (fall) and February (winter) were confirmed to be Germacrene D and r-Terpinene, respectively. However, in other studies, the main compounds in fall and winter were α-Pinene [72,73,74] and Limonene [75]. In A. holophylla, in this study, D-Limonene was identified as the main substance in needles in April and February, which corresponds to spring and winter, and 3-Carene in fall. In other studies, Limonene was identified as the main compound in summer and winter [40], and 3-Carene was identified as the main compound in fall [76], showing a similar trend to this study.
The major terpene compounds were examined by harvest period in the needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis essential oils analyzed in this study. 3-Carene was also commonly identified in the needles of four coniferous tree species and was identified during all harvest periods. It was identified at a high rate in P. densiflora and J. chinensis needles extracted in February, P. koraiensis needles extracted in July, and A. holophylla needles extracted in October. Pinene is the main compound of coniferous essential oil and is composed of two isoprenes with fresh pine and woody scents [77]. In this study, α-Pinene was analyzed as a major compound in needles of P. koraiensis and A. holophylla except in February and needles of J. chinensis except for July, and β-Pinene was analyzed as a major compound in P. densiflora except in February. In this study, the highest amount of γ-Muurolene was analyzed in P. koraiensis needles in October and A. holophylla needles in February, and the lowest amount was analyzed in J. chinensis needles in February. D-Limonene was very high, accounting for 15.23% of the essential oil in P. densiflora needles harvested in February, and was the main compound in A. holophylla needles, accounting for more than 10% in all four harvest periods. Previous studies have also confirmed the high content of D-Limonene in fir essential oil compounds, so it is believed to be a characteristic of these trees in producing secondary metabolites [69]. Germacrene D was the main compound in the essential oil harvested from needles of P. densiflora in April, July, and October, and in the essential oil of P. koraiensis needles, it was identified as the main compound in all four harvest periods and was highest in October. The main compound identified only in the essential oil of P. densiflora needles is β-Phellanderene. γ-Terpinene was identified as a major compound only in P. koraiensis and was analyzed in the highest amount in February. β-Bisabolene was identified at a high rate in essential oil A. holophylla needles collected in April. Terpineol and Caryophyllene were analyzed as major compounds only in J. chinensis.
In this study, when comparing essential oils extracted from P. densiflora needles by harvest period, it was found that essential oils extracted from needles harvested in July had higher antioxidant activity compared to other periods. The essential oil extracted from P. koraiensis needles showed high antioxidant activity at concentrations above 25 µL/mL, regardless of harvest period. It is considered that the high antioxidant activity, regardless of the season, is a characteristic of the essential oil extracted from P. koraiensis needles [78,79,80]. The antioxidant activity of essential oil extracted from A. holophylla needles did show significant antioxidant activity at 50 µL/mL concentrations essential oil extracted from needles of harvested in October; however, other studies have also shown that the essential oil of A. holophylla has antioxidant activity [81]. Essential oils extracted from the needles of J. chinensis had high antioxidant activity when harvested in summer and fall, and previous studies have shown similar results [82,83].
In this study, changes in the composition of essential oil compounds and differences in antioxidant activity were found in each tree species depending on the harvesting time. There was a significant result in antioxidant activity when the essential oil of P. densiflora needles was harvested in July, and the essential oil of J. chinensis needles was harvested in July and October. The essential oil of P. koraiensis needles showed changes in the composition of compounds depending on the harvest time, and there was a difference in antioxidant activity depending on the harvest time, but high antioxidant activity was confirmed at all harvest times. In a previous study, the antioxidant activity of 423 essential oils was measured, and the results showed that phenolic terpenes (carvacrol, thymol, eugenol, linalool, Pinene) were the main compounds with the best antioxidant activity, followed by 1,8-cineol, borneol, and terpinen-4-ol, several sesquiterpene, D-Limonene [84], and Germacrene D compounds also removed free radicals [45,85]. Since natural essential oils are a mixture of several compounds, they are the result of various types of complex interactions, so it is difficult to regard them as simply the antioxidant properties of a single compound [86]. Therefore, the antioxidant activity of oxygenated monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes has been reported [87]. In other studies on antioxidant activity, high synergy effects are also reported in complex mixtures rather than single compounds and by mixing with non-phenolic oils [88]. The antioxidant activity of pine tree essential oil shown in this study includes the high content of the single compounds Pinene, D-Limonene, and Germacrene confirmed in previous studies, the composition of various and complex essential oil compounds, monoterpenes, monoterpenoids, and sesquiterpenes. It is believed that a synergistic effect occurred through a harmonious mixture of sesquiterpenoids and diterpenes.

5. Conclusions

In this study, essential oil was extracted from evergreen coniferous trees such as P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis, and the extraction yield, terpene content, major compounds, common compounds, and antioxidant activity of the essential oil by harvest period were investigated. The yield of essential oil extraction by collection period of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis needles was confirmed to be high when harvested in July and October. The high content of monoterpene was confirmed in most essential oil compounds, and the high content of sesquiterpene was confirmed in the essential oil of P. koraiensis needles harvested in October and the essential oil of A. holophylla needles harvested in February. Among essential oil compounds, 3-Carene (P. densiflora: 28.55%, J. chinensis: 20.43%) was found to have a high content in pine and juniper essential oils collected in February, and D-Limonene (10.52%–12.7%) was found in all fir trees. It was confirmed to be a major compound at the time of harvest. The main compounds of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis essential oils were identified differently depending on the harvesting period. Therefore, additional research is needed to clearly reveal that the production of terpene compounds is related to the development stage of the plant and weather conditions. When examining the antioxidant activity of essential oils from P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis needles by harvesting time, there were differences in antioxidant activity by harvesting time and concentration for all tree species used in the study. In particular, P. koraiensis needle essential oil has been confirmed to have high antioxidant activity regardless of the collection time, and antioxidant activity has been confirmed even at low concentrations, so it is expected to play a role as a natural antioxidant. In addition, changes in the essential oil compound composition of pine, pine, fir, and juniper needles are observed depending on the harvesting time, suggesting the possibility of being utilized in various industries.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/f15030566/s1, Table S1: Chemical composition of the P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis essential oil (Relative rate (%)); Figure S1: Chromatograms of essential oils extracted from needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis by seasons (spring, summer, and autumn, and winter).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L., B.B.J., E.S. and E.K.; methodology, H.L., B.B.J., S.Y. and E.K.; investigation, H.L., B.B.J., S.Y. and E.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L. and E.K.; writing—review and editing, H.L., B.B.J., E.S. and E.K.; visualization, E.K.; supervision, H.L.; project administration, E.S.; funding acquisition, E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through the Technology Development Project for Safety Management of Household Chemical Products, funded by the Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (No. 2021002970004 and 1485019515).

Data Availability Statement

All data are available within the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ahmad, A.; Elisha, I.L.; van Vuuren, S.; Viljoen, A. Volatile phenolics: A comprehensive review of the anti-infective properties of an important class of essential oil constituents. Phytochemistry 2021, 190, 112864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, J.; Choi, W.-S.; Jeung, E.-B.; Kim, K.-J.; Park, M.-J. Anti-inflammatory effect of essential oil extracted from Pinus densiflora (Sieb. et Zucc.) wood on RBL-2H3 cells. J. Wood Sci. 2021, 67, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ebenezer, K.S.; Manivannan, R.; Punniyamoorthy, A.; Tamilselvan, C. Plant secondary metabolites of antiviral properties a rich medicinal source for drug discovery: A mini review. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2019, 9, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Haro-González, J.N.; Castillo-Herrera, G.A.; Martínez-Velázquez, M.; Espinosa-Andrews, H. Clove essential oil (Syzygium aromaticum L. Myrtaceae): Extraction, chemical composition, food applications, and essential bioactivity for human health. Molecules 2021, 26, 6387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, A.; Jones, S.; Ganapathysubramanian, B.; Sarkar, S.; Mueller, D.; Sandhu, K.; Nagasubramanian, K. Challenges and opportunities in machine-augmented plant stress phenotyping. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Thalappil, M.A.; Butturini, E.; de Prati, A.C.; Bettin, I.; Antonini, L.; Sapienza, F.U.; Garzoli, S.; Ragno, R.; Mariotto, S. Pinus mugo essential oil impairs STAT3 activation through oxidative stress and induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Molecules 2022, 27, 4834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cox-Georgian, D.; Ramadoss, N.; Dona, C.; Basu, C. Therapeutic and medicinal uses of terpenes. In Medicinal Plants: From Farm to Pharmacy; Joshee, N., Dhekney, S.A., Parajuli, P., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 333–359. [Google Scholar]
  8. Boyom, F.F.; Ngouana, V.; Kemgne, E.A.; Zollo, P.H.; Menut, C.; Bessiere, J.M.; Gut, J.; Rosenthal, P.J. Antiplasmodial volatile extracts from Cleistopholis patens Engler & Diels and Uvariastrum pierreanum Engl. (Engl. & Diels) (Annonaceae) growing in Cameroon. Parasitol. Res. 2011, 108, 1211–1217. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lo’ay, A.; Abu-Orabi, S.T.; Hlail, H.M.; Alkhatib, R.Q.; Al-Dalahmeh, Y.; Al-Qudah, M.A. Anthemis cotula L. from Jordan: Essential oil composition, LC-ESI-MS/MS profiling of phenolic acids-flavonoids and in vitro antioxidant activity. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 16, 104470. [Google Scholar]
  10. Santos, E.S.; Abrantes Coelho, G.L.; Saraiva Fontes Loula, Y.K.; Saraiva Landim, B.L.; Fernandes Lima, C.N.; Tavares de Sousa Machado, S.; Pereira Lopes, M.J.; Soares Gomes, A.D.; Martins da Costa, J.G.; Alencar de Menezes, I.R.; et al. Hypoglycemic, hypolipidemic, and anti-inflammatory effects of beta-Pinene in diabetic rats. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2022, 2022, 8173307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, M.; Chen, L.-F.; Li, M.-M.; Li, N.-P.; Cao, J.-Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.-L.; Wnag, L.; Ye, W.-C. Myrtucomvalones A–C, three unusual triketone-sesquiterpene adducts from the leaves of Myrtus communis ‘Variegata’. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 22735–22740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sobral, M.V.; Xavier, A.L.; Lima, T.C.; de Sousa, D.P. Antitumor activity of monoterpenes found in essential oils. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 953451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bahramsoltani, R.; Farzaei, M.H.; Farahani, M.S.; Rahimi, R. Phytochemical constituents as future antidepressants: A comprehensive review. Rev. Neurosci. 2015, 26, 699–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abad, M.J.; Bedoya, L.M.; Apaza, L.; Bermejo, P. The Artemisia L.genus: A review of bioactive essential oils. Molecules 2012, 17, 2542–2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Perry, N.S.; Houghton, P.J.; Theobald, A.; Jenner, P.; Perry, E.K. In-vitro inhibition of human erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase by salvia lavandulaefolia essential oil and constituent terpenes. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2000, 52, 895–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Carson, C.F.; Hammer, K.A.; Riley, T.V. Melaleuca alternifolia (Tea Tree) oil: A review of antimicrobial and other medicinal properties. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 19, 50–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sharmeen, J.B.; Mahomoodally, F.M.; Zengin, G.; Maggi, F. Essential oils as natural sources of fragrance compounds for cosmetics and cosmeceuticals. Molecules 2021, 26, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cavanaugh, J.L. Examining the Differential Effects of Natural and Synthetic Aromas of Lavender and Peppermint on Cognition, Mood, and Subjective Workload. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  19. Irshad, M.; Subhani, M.A.; Ali, S.; Hussain, A. Biological importance of essential oils. In Essential Oils-Oils of Nature; El-Shemy, H.A., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; pp. 37–40. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee, S.H.; Chow, P.S.; Yagnik, C.K. Developing eco-friendly skin care formulations with microemulsions of essential oil. Cosmetics 2022, 9, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guzmán, E.; Lucia, A. Essential oils and their individual components in cosmetic products. Cosmetics 2021, 8, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mouhoub, A.; Guendouz, A.; Belkamel, A.; Talibo, Z.E.A.; Koraochi, S.I.; Modafar, C.E.; Delattre, C. Assessment of the antioxidant, antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of essential oils for potential application of active chitosan films in food preservation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, X.; Liu, M.; Huang, T.; Yang, K.; Zhou, S.; Li, Y.; Tian, J. Antifungal effect of nerol via transcriptome analysis and cell growth repression in sweet potato spoilage fungi Ceratocystis fimbriata. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021, 171, 111343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cardoso-Ugarte, G.A.; Sosa-Morales, M.E. Essential oils from herbs and spices as natural antioxidants: Diversity of promising food applications in the past decade. Food Rev. Int. 2022, 38, 403–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Butnariu, M.; Sarac, I. Essential oils from plants. J. Biotechnol. Biomed. Sci. 2018, 1, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aziz, Z.A.A.; Ahmad, A.; Setapar, S.H.M.; Karakucuk, A.; Azim, M.M.; Lokhat, D.; Rafatullah, M.; Ganash, M.; Kamal, M.A.; Ashraf, G.M. Essential oils: Extraction techniques, pharmaceutical and therapeutic potential-a review. Curr. Drug Metab. 2018, 19, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Michalak, M. Plant-derived antioxidants: Significance in skin health and the ageing process. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yasin, M.; Younis, A.; Ramzan, F.; Javed, T.; Shabbir, R.; Noushahi, H.A.; Skalicky, M.; Ondrisik, P.; Brestic, M.; Hassan, S.; et al. Extraction of essential oil from river tea tree (Melaleuca bracteata F. Muell.): Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Morais, F.P.; Simões, R.M.; Curto, J.M. Biopolymeric delivery systems for cosmetic applications using Chlorella vulgaris algae and tea tree essential oil. Polymers 2020, 12, 2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zeragui, B.; Hachem, K.; Halla, N.; Kahloula, K. Essential oil from Artemisia judaica L. (ssp. sahariensis) flowers as a natural cosmetic preservative: Chemical composition, and antioxidant and antibacterial activities. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2019, 22, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abelan, U.S.; De Oliveira, A.C.; Cacoci, É.S.P.; Martins, T.E.A.; Giacon, V.M.; Velasco, M.V.R.; Lima, C.R.R.C. Potential use of essential oils in cosmetic and dermatological hair products: A review. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2022, 21, 1407–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maurya, A.; Prasad, J.; Das, S.; Dwivedy, A.K. Essential oils and their application in food safety. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 653420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Swor, K.; Satyal, P.; Poudel, A.; Setzer, W.N. Gymnosperms of Idaho: Chemical compositions and enantiomeric distributions of essential oils of Abies lasiocarpa, Picea engelmannii, Pinus contorta, Pseudotsuga menziesii, and Thuja plicata. Molecules 2023, 28, 2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kong, W.-S. Species composition and distribution of native Korean conifers. J. Korean Geogr. Soc. 2004, 39, 528–543. [Google Scholar]
  35. Dziedziński, M.; Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Stachowiak, B. Pinus species as prospective reserves of bioactive compounds with potential use in functional food-Current state of knowledge. Plants 2021, 10, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Silori, G.K.; Kushwaha, N.; Kumar, V. Essential oils from pines: Chemistry and applications. In Essential oil Research: Trends in Biosynthesis, Analytics, Industrial Applications and Biotechnological Production; Malik, S., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 275–297. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee, S.M.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, Y.R.; Lee, B.-R.; Shin, S.; Kim, J.Y.; Jung, I.C.; Lee, M.Y. Anti-fatigue potential of Pinus koraiensis leaf extract in an acute exercise-treated mouse model. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 153, 113501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, J.; Chol, W.-S.; Kim, J.-W.; Lee, S.-S.; Park, M.-J. Anti-inflammatory effect of essential oils extracted from wood of four coniferous tree species. J. Korean Wood Sci. Technol. 2019, 47, 674–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, Y.; Xin, C.; Cheng, C.; Wang, Z. Antitumor activity of nanoemulsion based on essential oil of Pinus koraiensis pinecones in MGC-803 tumor-bearing nude mice. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 8226–8238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, S.-Y.; Kim, S.-H.; Park, M.-J.; Lee, S.-S.; Choi, I.-G. Antibacterial activity of essential oil from Abies holophylla against respiratory tract bacteria. J. Korean Wood Sci. Technol. 2014, 42, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ahn, C.; Yoo, Y.-M.; Park, M.-J.; Ham, Y.; Yang, J.; Jeung, E.-B. Cytotoxic evaluation of the essential oils from Korean native plant on human skin and lung cells. J. Korean Wood Sci. Technol. 2021, 49, 371–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Khamis, A.-D.S.; Chai, L.C. Chemical and antimicrobial analyses of Juniperus chinensis and Juniperus seravschanica essential oils and comparison with their methanolic crude extracts. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2021, 2021, 9937522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Snezhkina, A.V.; Kudryavtseva, A.V.; Kardymon, O.L.; Savvateeva, M.V.; Melnikova, N.V.; Krasnov, G.S.; Dmitriev, A.A. ROS generation and antioxidant defense systems in normal and malignant cells. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 6175804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kumari, S.; Badana, A.K.; Malla, R. Reactive oxygen species: A key constituent in cancer survival. Biomark. Insights 2018, 13, 1177271918755391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Anthony, K.P.; Deolu-Sobogun, S.A.; Saleh, M.A. Comprehensive assessment of antioxidant activity of essential oils. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, 839–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ruberto, G.; Baratta, M.T. Antioxidant activity of selected essential oil components in two lipid model systems. Food Chem. 2000, 69, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Farhadi, N.; Babaei, K.; Farsaraei, S.; Moghaddam, M.; Pirbalouti, A.G. Changes in essential oil compositions, total phenol, flavonoids and antioxidant capacity of Achillea millefolium at different growth stages. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 152, 112570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Esmaeili, H.; Karami, A.; Maggi, F. Essential oil composition, total phenolic and flavonoids contents, and antioxidant activity of Oliveria decumbens Vent. (Apiaceae) at different phenological stages. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 198, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bartwal, A.; Mall, R.; Lohani, P.; Guru, S.K.; Arora, S. Role of secondary metabolites and brassinosteroids in plant defense against environmental stresses. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 32, 216–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guleria, S.; Apurva Koul, A.K.; Gupta, S.; Singh, G.; Razdan, V.K. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of the essential oil and extracts of Zanthoxylum alatum grown in north-western Himalaya. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 790580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mothana, R.A.; Al-Said, M.S.; Al-Yahya, M.A.; Al-Rehaily, A.J.; Khaled, J.M. GC and GC/MS analysis of essential oil composition of the endemic Soqotraen Leucas virgata Balf.f. and its antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 23129–23139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Selli, S.; Gubbuk, H.; Kafkas, E.; Gunes, E. Comparison of aroma compounds in Dwarf Cavendish banana (Musa spp. AAA) grown from open-field and protected cultivation area. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 141, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Torres-Martínez, R.; García-Rodríguez, Y.M.; Ríos-Chávez, P.; Saavedra-Molina, A.; López-Meza, J.E.; Ochoa-Zarzosa, A.; Garciglia, R.S. Antioxidant activity of the essential oil and its major terpenes of Satureja macrostema (Moc. and Sessé ex Benth.) Briq. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2018, 13, s875–s880. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kim, M.J. The Synthesis of Polyphenolic Natural Product and Their Antioxidant Activity Test by ABTS Assay. Ph.D. Dissertation, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  55. Korea Meteorological Administration. Available online: https://www.weather.go.kr/w/index.do (accessed on 3 March 2024).
  56. Korean Soil Information System. Available online: https://soil.rda.go.kr/eng/soils/survey.jsp (accessed on 3 March 2024).
  57. Standard ISO 10993-5:2009; Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices-Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
  58. Yousefi, M.; Rahimi-Nasrabadi, M.; Pourmortazavi, S.M.; Wysokowski, M.; Jesionowski, T.; Ehrlich, H.; Mirsadeghi, S. Supercritical fluid extraction of essential oils. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 118, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fagbemi, K.O.; Aina, D.A.; Olajuyigbe, O.O. Soxhlet extraction versus hydrodistillation using the clevenger apparatus: A comparative study on the extraction of a volatile compound from Tamarindus indica seeds. Sci. World J. 2021, 2021, 5961586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Abbas, A.; Anwar, F.; Alqahtani, S.M.; Ahmad, N.; Al-Mijalli, S.H.; Shahid, M.; Iqba, M. Hydro-distilled and supercritical fluid extraction of Eucalyptus camaldulensis essential oil: Characterization of bioactives along with antioxidant, antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities. Dose-Response 2022, 20, 15593258221125477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Matuka, T.; Oyedeji, P.; Gondwe, M.; Oyedeji, A. Chemical composition and in vivo anti-inflammatory activity of essential oils from Citrus sinensis (L.) osbeck growing in South Africa. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2020, 23, 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lee, H.-Y.; Leem, M.-H.; Kim, C.-S. An analysis on essential oil of Tea tree and Lemon by GC. J. Korea Soc. B & A 2003, 4, 287–301. [Google Scholar]
  63. de Moura, D.F.; Rocha, T.A.; de Melo Barros, D.; da Silva, M.M.; Dos Santos Santana, M.; Neta, B.M.; Cavalcanti, I.M.F.; Martins, R.D.; da Silva, M.V. Evaluation of the antioxidant, antibacterial, and antibiofilm activity of the sesquiterpene nerolidol. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 4303–4311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dahham, S.S.; Tabana, Y.M.; Iqbal, M.A.; Ahamed, M.B.; Ezzat, M.O.; Majid, A.S.; Majid, A.M. The anticancer, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of the sesquiterpene β-Caryophyllene from the essential oil of Aquilaria crassna. Molecules 2015, 20, 11808–11829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Paço, A.; Brás, T.; Santos, J.O.; Sampaio, P.; Gomes, A.C.; Duarte, M.F. Anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory action of sesquiterpene lactones. Molecules 2022, 27, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lee, J.-H.; Lee, B.-K.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, S.H.; Hong, S.-K. Comparison of chemical compositions and antimicrobial activities of essential oils from three conifer trees; Pinus densiflora, Cryptomeria japonica, and Chamaecyparis obtusa. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 19, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Park, J.-S.; Lee, G.-H. Volatile compounds and antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the essential oils of the needles of Pinus densiflora and Pinus thunbergii. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, H.; Dong, A.; Xu, D.; Yang, L.; Ma, Y.; Wang, J. Analysis of the essential oils of pine cones of Pinus koraiensis Steb. Et Zucc. and P. sylvestris L. from China. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2010, 22, 446–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jang, S.-K.; Lee, S.-Y.; Kim, S.-H.; Hong, C.-Y.; Park, M.-J.; Choi, I.-G. Antifungal activities of essential oils from six conifers against Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Korean Wood Sci. Technol. 2012, 40, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kim, H.; Lee, B.; Yun, K.W. Comparison of chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils from three Pinus species. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 44, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Raina, V.; Srivastava, S.; Syamsundar, K. Essential oil composition of Juniperus chinensis from the plains of northern India. Flavour Fragr. J. 2005, 20, 57–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yun, M.S.; Cho, H.M.; Yeon, B.-R.; Choi, J.S.; Kim, S. Herbicidal activities of essential oils from pine, nut pine, larch and khingan fir in Korea. Weed Turfgrass Sci. 2013, 2, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Choi, J.-W.; Kim, R. Antimicrobial activity of essential oil of Pinus koraiensis seed against pathogens related to acne. KSBB J. 2014, 29, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hou, K.; Bao, M.; Wang, L.; Zhang, H.; Yang, L.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Z. Aqueous enzymatic pretreatment ionic liquid–lithium salt based microwave–assisted extraction of essential oil and procyanidins from pinecones of Pinus koraiensis. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lee, J.-H.; Yang, H.-Y.; Lee, H.-S.; Hong, S.-K. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oil from cones of Pinus koraiensis. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 18, 497–502. [Google Scholar]
  76. Lee, J.-H.; Hong, S.-K. Comparative analysis of chemical compositions and antimicrobial activities of essential oils from Abies holophylla and Abies koreana. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 19, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Allenspach, M.; Steuer, C. α-Pinene: A never-ending story. Phytochemistry 2021, 190, 112857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, H.; Zou, P.; Zhao, H.; Qiu, J.; Regenstein, J.M.; Yang, X. Isolation, purification, structure and antioxidant activity of polysaccharide from pinecones of Pinus koraiensis. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 251, 117078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yang, J.; Choi, W.-S.; Kim, K.-J.; Eom, C.-D.; Park, M.-J. Investigation of active anti-Inflammatory constituents of essential oil from Pinus koraiensis (Sieb. et Zucc.) wood in LPS-stimulated RBL-2H3 cells. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, Y.; Xin, C.; Qiu, J.; Wang, Z. Essential oil from Pinus Koraiensis pinecones inhibits gastric cancer cells via the HIPPO/YAP signaling pathway. Molecules 2019, 24, 3851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Seong, E.S.; Kim, S.K.; Lee, J.W.; Choi, S.H.; Yoo, J.H.; Lim, J.D.; Na, J.K.; Yu, C.Y. Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of the byproducts of Abies holophylla extract. Korean J. Med. Crop Sci. 2018, 26, 134–140. [Google Scholar]
  82. Elshafie, H.S.; Caputo, L.; De Martino, L.; Gruľová, D.; Zheljazkov, V.Z.; De Feo, V.; Camele, I. Biological investigations of essential oils extracted from three Juniperus species and evaluation of their antimicrobial, antioxidant and cytotoxic activities. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 129, 1261–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lee, S.-Y.; Lee, D.-S.; Cho, S.-M.; Kim, J.-C.; Park, M.-J.; Choi, I.-G. Antioxidant properties of 7 domestic essential oils and identification of physiologically active components of essential oils against Candida albicans. J. Korean Wood Sci. Technol. 2021, 49, 23–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Anandakumar, P.; Kamaraj, S.; Vanitha, M.K. D-limonene: A multifunctional compound with potent therapeutic effects. J. Food Biochem. 2021, 45, e13566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Casiglia, S.; Bruno, M.; Bramucci, M.; Quassinti, L.; Lupidi, G.; Fiorini, D.; Maggi, F. Kundmannia sicula (L.) DC: A rich source of germacrene D. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2017, 29, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Amorati, R.; Foti, M.C.; Valgimigli, L. Antioxidant activity of essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 10835–10847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kurti, F.; Giorgo, A.; Beretta, G.; Mustafa, B.; Gelmini, F.; Testa, C.; Angioletti, S.; Giupponi, L.; Zilio, E.; Pentimalli, D.; et al. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of essential oils of different Pinus species from Kosovo. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2019, 31, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Tan, J. Comparative analysis of intracellular and in vitro antioxidant activities of essential oil from white and black pepper (Piper nigrum L.). Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 680754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Forests 15 00566 g001
Figure 1. Proportion of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes by harvest period of essential oils extracted from needles of P. densiflora (A), P. koraiensis (B), A. holophylla (C), and J. chinensis (D) (Relative rate (%)).
Figure 1. Proportion of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes by harvest period of essential oils extracted from needles of P. densiflora (A), P. koraiensis (B), A. holophylla (C), and J. chinensis (D) (Relative rate (%)).
Forests 15 00566 g001
Forests 15 00566 g002
Figure 2. Overlapping compounds in essential oils depending on harvest period (Relative rate (%)). (A) P. densiflora, (B) P. koraiensis, (C) A. holophylla, (D) J. chinensis.
Figure 2. Overlapping compounds in essential oils depending on harvest period (Relative rate (%)). (A) P. densiflora, (B) P. koraiensis, (C) A. holophylla, (D) J. chinensis.
Forests 15 00566 g002
Forests 15 00566 g003
Figure 3. HaCaT cell viability treated with essential oils extracted from needles harvested over time from P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with the Tukey HSD test. Values are presented as mean ± S.D. The dotted line represents 80% cell viability.
Figure 3. HaCaT cell viability treated with essential oils extracted from needles harvested over time from P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with the Tukey HSD test. Values are presented as mean ± S.D. The dotted line represents 80% cell viability.
Forests 15 00566 g003
Forests 15 00566 g004
Figure 4. Antioxidant activity of essential oils extracted from leaves harvested over time from P. densiflora (A), P. koraiensis (B), A. holophylla (C), and J. chinensis (D) by DPPH assay. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA with Tukey HSD test. Values are presented as mean ± S.D. Different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Antioxidant activity of essential oils extracted from leaves harvested over time from P. densiflora (A), P. koraiensis (B), A. holophylla (C), and J. chinensis (D) by DPPH assay. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA with Tukey HSD test. Values are presented as mean ± S.D. Different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Forests 15 00566 g004
Forests 15 00566 g005
Figure 5. Antioxidant activity of essential oils extracted from leaves harvested over time from P. densiflora (A), P. koraiensis (B), A. holophylla (C), and J. chinensis (D) by ABTS assay. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA with Tukey HSD test. Values are presented as mean ± S.D. Different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Antioxidant activity of essential oils extracted from leaves harvested over time from P. densiflora (A), P. koraiensis (B), A. holophylla (C), and J. chinensis (D) by ABTS assay. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA with Tukey HSD test. Values are presented as mean ± S.D. Different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Forests 15 00566 g005
Table 1. The analysis conditions of essential oil using GC/MSD.
Table 1. The analysis conditions of essential oil using GC/MSD.
ColumnDB-5MS UI, 30 m length, 0.25 mm dia., 0.25 μm Film
Mass range40~500 m/z
Inlet Temp.250 °C
Ion source Temp.350 °C
Carrier gasHe gas, 1.0 mL/min
Injection volume0.5 mL
Spilt ratio20:1
IonizationEI(electron impact) 70 eV
Temp. program50 °C (4 min) → 3 °C/min → 230 °C (5 min)
Table 2. Yields of essential oils from needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis and weather conditions on each harvest period.
Table 2. Yields of essential oils from needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis and weather conditions on each harvest period.
SpeciesHarvest DayOil Yield (%)Temperature (°C)Relative Humidity (%)
Pinus densiflora8 February 20220.140.245.8
19 April 20220.216.235.3
4 July 20220.328.871
24 October 20220.2810.946.9
Pinus koraiensis9 February 20220.31.443
20 April 20220.416.333.4
5 July 20220.528.574.5
25 October 20220.711.353.8
Abies holophylla10 February 20220.243.344.9
21 April 20220.315.841
6 July 20220.730.368.5
26 October 20220.712.753.9
Juniperus chinensis11 February 20220.14350.5
22 April 20220.1417.559.1
7 July 20220.2630.567.4
27 October 20220.2413.863.5
Oil yield: mL/1000 g wet weight (%).
Table 3. Major compounds in essential oils extracted from needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis (Relative rate (%)).
Table 3. Major compounds in essential oils extracted from needles of P. densiflora, P. koraiensis, A. holophylla, and J. chinensis (Relative rate (%)).
Tree SpeciesNo.CompoundsFebruaryAprilJulyOctober
Pinus densiflora13-Carene28.551.942.101.16
2β-Phellanderene0.5110.6110.4326.57
3β-Pinene06.5610.6925.82
4D-Limonene15.23000
5Germacrene D010.5011.3611.87
Pinus koraiensis1γ-Terpinene16.920.9300.70
2α-Pinene012.739.168.29
3Germacrene D5.509.3312.3313.30
4γ-Muurolene3.472.097.4511.96
53-Carene4.226.4212.634.50
Abies holophylla13-Carene6.0212.248.4414.28
2β-Bisabolene012.784.540
3D-Limonene12.7011.4611.9510.52
4α-Pinene011.3710.1912.23
5γ-Muurolene11.525.605.905.99
Juniperus chinensis13-Carene20.432.728.911.02
2Terpineol2.4616.6116.1619.61
3γ-Muurolene4.1715.1510.8911.53
4α-Pinene13.9410.91011.82
5Caryophyllene13.9401.762.07
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, E.; Yang, S.; Jeon, B.B.; Song, E.; Lee, H. Terpene Compound Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils from Needles of Pinus densiflora, Pinus koraiensis, Abies holophylla, and Juniperus chinensis by Harvest Period. Forests 2024, 15, 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15030566

AMA Style

Kim E, Yang S, Jeon BB, Song E, Lee H. Terpene Compound Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils from Needles of Pinus densiflora, Pinus koraiensis, Abies holophylla, and Juniperus chinensis by Harvest Period. Forests. 2024; 15(3):566. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15030566

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Eunjin, Suyeon Yang, Byeong Bae Jeon, Eugene Song, and Hwayong Lee. 2024. "Terpene Compound Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils from Needles of Pinus densiflora, Pinus koraiensis, Abies holophylla, and Juniperus chinensis by Harvest Period" Forests 15, no. 3: 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15030566

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop